20191512 Ver 1_More Info Received_20200428

Strickland, Bev
From: paul headwaterenvironmental.com <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 12:17 PM
To: Johnson, Alan; Roden Reynolds, Bryan K CIV (US)
Subject: [External] Village at Rocky River
Attachments: Site Plans.April-2020.Wetlands Exhibit Maps.pdf, PCN Submission_4-28-20.pdf
• External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
OFo?[e-mail]
Welp, it took the client months and months to revise the site plans. We finally received the updated drawings
today. One of the key revisions was a depiction of a lateral culvert, providing drainage under the road for Wetland Area
A. Also, the plan view provides more details, such BMP locations.
A pdf copy is attached for your records.
Paul Pascarosa, President
Headwater Environmental, Inc. [headwaterenvironmental.coml — Linkedln [linkedin.coml
1844 Sir Tyler Drive, Wilmington, NC 28405
Ph: 910-777-3908 Fax: [phone]

MIDMsion of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 11, 2020 Ver 3.1
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all
mandatory questions are answered.
Also, if at any point you wish to print a copy of the E-PCN, all you need to do is right -click on the document and you
can print a copy of the form.
Below is a link to the online help file.
https:Hedocs.deq.nc.gov/WaterResources/O/edoc/624704/PCN%2OHelp%2OFile%202018-1-30.pdf
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located: *
Union
Is this a NCDMS Project*
Yes 4 No
Click Yes, only if NCDMS is the applicant or co -applicant.
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
This is any publicly funded by municipal,state or federal funds road, rail, airport transportation project.

1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: *
Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?*
Nationwide Permit (NWP)
Regional General Permit (RGP)
Standard (IP)
This form may be used to initiate the standard/individual permit process with the Corps. Please contact your Corps
representative concerning submittals for standard permits. All required items that are not provided in the E-PCN can
be added to the miscellaneous upload area located at the bottom of this form.
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?*
Yes No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 14 - Linear transportation
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
List all NW numbers you are applying for not on the drop down list.
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR: *
check all that apply
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
Individual Permit
401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
*
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification: Yes No
For the record only for Corps Permit: Yes No
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
Yes No

1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program.
Yes U No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
FILE TYPE MUST BE PDF
1 h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?*
Yes No
1 j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?*
Yes No
Link to trout information: http://www.saw.usace.army.miI/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Agency-
Coordination/Trout.aspx
B. Applicant Information
1 a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Nicholas Parker
1 b. Primary Contact Email: *
[e-mail]
1 d. Who is applying for the permit?*
Owner
(Check all that apply)
1 e. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project? *
Yes No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed: *
Harris Teeter Properties, LLC a North Carolina LLC
1 c. Primary Contact Phone:*
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
[phone]
Applicant (other than owner)

2b. Deed book and page no.:
3830/784
2c. Responsible party:
(for Corporations)
Harris Teeter Properties, LLC
2d. Address*
Street Address
701 Crestdale Road
Address Line 2
City
Matthews
Postal / Zip Code
28105
2e. Telephone Number:*
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
[phone]
2f. Fax Number:
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:*
Nicholas Parker
3b. Business Name:
(if applicable)
Green Street Land Co., LLC

3c. Address*
Street Address
5615 Potter Road
Address Line 2
City State / Province / Region
Mathews NC
Postal / Zip Code Country
28104 USA
3d. Telephone Number:*
[phone] 3e. Fax Number:
(xxx)xxx-xxxx (xxx)xxx-xxxx
3f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:*
Nick Creidler
4b. Business Name:
(if applicable)
Headwater Environmental, Inc.
4c. Address*
Street Address
1844 Sir Tyler Drive
Address Line 2
City State / Province / Region
Wilmington NC
Postal / Zip Code Country
28405 New Hanover
4d. Telephone Number:*
[phone] 4e. Fax Number:
(xxx)xxx-xxxx (xxx)xxx-xxxx

4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Agent Authorization Letter*
Please provide the Agent Authorization Letter if you are submitting this document.
134f.Agent Authorization Letter.pdf
FILE TYPE MUST BE PDF
73.4KB
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1 a. Name of project:*
Village at Rocky River
1 b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
Village at Rocky River
1c. Nearest municipality / town:*
Monroe
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number: 2b. Property size:
(tax PIN or parcel ID) (in acres)
09348013A; 09348013B 55.07
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Rocky River Road
Address Line 2
City State / Province / Region
Monroe NC
Postal / Zip Code Country
28110 Union

2d. Site coordinates in decimal degrees
Please collect site coordinates in decimal degrees. Use between 4-6 digits (unless you are using a survey -grade GPS
device) after the decimal place as appropriate, based on how the location was determined. (For example, most
mobile phones with GPS provide locational precision in decimal degrees to map coordinates to 5 or 6 digits after the
decimal place.)
Latitude: * Longitude: *
34.990132-80.610546
ex: 34.208504-77.796371
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project: *
Bearskin Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:
C
Surface Water Lookup
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Yadkin-PeeDee
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located. *
IIi�11�[IjiY11ii1�J
River Basin Lookup
4. Project Description and History

4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the
time of this application: *
The site is currently wooded. Three wetland areas and one stream are located on site. Wetland A is located
on the northern portion of the site. Wetland B is located on the southern portion of the site, abutting Stream
A. Stream A has intermittent flow and drains off -site to the northwest. According to Monroe Code of
Ordinances, Code §158.06, a 50-foot vegetative buffer is required along Stream A. Wetland C is located on
the central portion of the site. Several mounds of dirt and vegetative debris are located throughout Wetland
C. A relic logging access road severes connection between Wetland A and C. The wetland and stream
locations were verified by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers on November 27, 2018 (SAW-2006-40743).
The site is situated in a developing area of Union County. An elementary school is located north of the site.
Wooded land, agricultural land, and dwellings are located east of the site. Weddington Road bounds the site
to the south followed by a church. North Rocky River Road bounds the site to the west. Wooded and
agricultural land are located further west.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the
past? *
Yes No Unknown
4c. If yes, please give the DWR Certification number or the Corps Action ID (exp. SAW-0000-00000).
SAW-2006-40743
Project History Upload
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
SAW-2006-40743 (signed PJD)-signed.pdf 614.67KB
File type must be PDF
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the
location of the project site. (for DWR)
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
C4d.Topo Map.pdf
File type must be pdf
878.56KB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map
depicting the project site. (for DWR)
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
C4e.Printed Soil Map.pdf
File type must be pdf
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
1.67 acres

4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
(intermittent and perennial)
950 feet
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: *
The proposed project involves construction of a residential subdivision consisting of single-family homes. As
the population of Union County continues to grow, new affordable housing accommodations are needed to
keep up with an increasing population. The proposed subdivision is designed to accommodate and attract
middle income families. Access to the proposed subdivision shall be located on the north site of Weddington
Road and on the east side of North Rocky River Road.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used: *
The proposed project includes development of a 184-lot residential subdivision consisting of single-family
homes. A community center and pool shall be located on the central portion of the site. Minor impacts are
proposed at Wetland Area A. The proposed residential development will avoid Wetland Areas B, C, and
Stream A. There will be two access points to the proposed subdivision. The access roads will extend north
from Weddington Road and east from North Rocky River Road, respectively.
Proposed development of an improved road on the northern portion of site will result in 0.084 acre of
wetland impacts. The proposed road crossing shall provide neighborhood continuity and access to
residential units. A stormwater BMP is designed on the west side of Wetland Area A. 24" reinforced concrete
pipe (RFP) shall be used to convey stormwater from the proposed development to the BMP. The RFP piping
will discharge directly to the BMP. The BMP shall discharge to an 18" RCP that will be tied in to existing
stormwater infrastructure associated with the adjacent school to the north.
Timbering of the site will utilize heavy machinery and chainsaws to clear the project areas for development.
Bulldozers, backhoes, and excavators will be used in the grading of the site, building of the BMPs, and other
aspects associated with the development of a residential subdivision. Additionally, pick-up trucks will be
utilized on site by contractors and construction workers.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Survey and Former Site Plans.pdf
663.82KB
Site Plans.01-22-2020.Wetlands Exhibit Maps.pdf 691.93KB
Site Plans.April-2020.Wetland s Exhibit Maps.pdf 734.66KB
File type must be pdf
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
Yes No Unknown

Comments:
Wetland delineation completed by Headwater
Environmental in September 2018.
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
Preliminary Approved
Corps AID Number:
Example: SAW-2017-99999
SAW-2006-40743
Not Verified Unknown N/A
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant
Company:
Other:
Paul Pascarosa; Nick Creidler
Headwater Environmental, Inc.
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made
by the Corps or DWR.
PJD (SAW-2006-40743) issued by Bryan Roden Reynolds of the USACE on November 27, 2018.
Site visit with Alan Johnson, November 26, 2018.
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
SAW-2006-40743 (signed PJD)-signed.pdf 614.67KB
File type must be PDF
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
Yes
No
7b. If yes, explain.
Development of the residential subdivision will consist of three (3) phases. By building in phases, the
developer is managing their budget by ensuring completed houses sell before they invest in building new
houses within the proposed subdivision.

Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to
authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity? This includes other separate and distant
crossing for linear projects that require Department of the Army authorization but don't require pre -
construction notification.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
Wetlands Streams -tributaries Buffers
Open Waters Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland
area impacted.
"W." will be used in the table below to represent the word "wetland".
2a. Site
#* ('>
2a1 Reason*
M
2b. Impact
type* M
2c. Type of W. *
2d. W. name*
2e.
Forested
2f. Type of
Jurisdicition*
M
2g.
Impact
area
F
Street
P
Pine Flat
Wetland A
Yes
Corps
0.084
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.084
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.084

2h. Comments:
Permanent wetland impacts are associated with fill needed to build a road on the
northern portion of the site. The road shall provide neighbor continuity for the eastern
and western portions of the subdivision. The proposed road will ease vehicle traffic on
other streets within the development.
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization

1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the
project: *
The current site plans were designed to specifically to avoid and minimize impacts to
Waters of the U.S.
In 2006, the USACE determined there were no Waters of the U.S. within the site
boundary (same action ID as current JD). In August 2018, site plans were designed
based around the 2006 JD. Therefore, the original site plans for this project were
designed without regard to wetland resources.
After a preliminary site reconnaissance by the permittee, potential Waters of the U.S.
were observed. Headwater was retained to perform a wetland delineation in September
2018. We identified and mapped 1.69 acres of wetland and 950 feet of stream. The
wetland delineation was approved by the Army Corps of Engineers on November 27,
2018.
Therefore, in retrospect, the original site plans included over 1.5 acres of wetland
impacts, and approximately 100 feet of stream impacts. Streets and residential lots were
located through Wetland Areas A, B and C, plus a road crossing was designed through
Stream A and its associated 50-foot buffer. A third access point to the subdivision was
located on the east side of Rocky River Road.
In August 2019, the site plans eliminated the stream crossing, altered the road design,
and minimized lot size. These site plans depicted a residential lot and a stormwater
BMP throughout Wetland Areas A. The stormwater BMP was added to the northern
portion of the site, within the footprint of Wetland A. This area was originally selected
due to its lower topographic position (i.e. water flows downhill). Permanent impacts to
Wetland Area A were minimized to 0.44-acre. In addition to payment into a mitigation
bank, a proposition was made to restore Wetland C which included removing relic fill
material, restoring the disturbed area to grade, and planting native species. After review
of mitigation options and potential restoration efforts, further avoidance and minimization
efforts were implemented.
The current site plans relocated the proposed BMP to the west of Wetland Area A, and
open green space acreage was reduced to accommodate for residential lots. Wetland
impacts have been limited to a single road crossing. The proposed project has
minimized wetland impacts to a total of 0.084-acre. The permanent wetland impacts are
to allow for a road that connects lots on the northern portion of the site. A mitigation plan
has been eliminated from this proposed action since total impacts are less than 0.10-
acre.

1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction
techniques: *
Silt fencing will be installed prior to construction along the perimeter of the wetlands and
stream to minimize sedimentation into these resources.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of
the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the
State?
Yes No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Permanent wetland impacts are less than 0.10-acre. Therefore, compensatory mitigation is not required.
NC Stream Temperature Classification Maps can be found under the Mitigation Concepts tab on the Wilmington
District's RIBITS website.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan
(required by DWR)
*** Recent changes to the stormwater rules have required updates to this section .***
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC
Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes No
For a list of options to meet the diffuse flow requirements, click here.
If no, explain why:
City of Monroe buffers apply to the intermittent stream. Monroe Code of Ordinances, Code §158.06
2. Stormwater Management Plan

2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
Yes No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)? *
Yes No
To look up low density requirement click here 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2).
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state
stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater program? *
Yes
am
N/A - project disturbs < 1 acre
Hint: projects that have vested rights, exemptions, or grandfathering from state or locally implemented stormwater programs or projects that satisfy
state or locally -implemented stormwater programs through use of community in -lieu programs should answer no to this question.
2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply (check all that apply): *
Local Government State
If you have a local government approval please include the SMP on their overall impact map.
Local Government Stormwater Programs*
Phase II NSW
USMP Water Supply
Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using. *
City of Monroe
Comments:
Stormwater management plan will be submitted to City of Monroe for review.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?*
Yes No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)

2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland
Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A
NCAC 2B .0200)? *
Yes No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? *
Yes No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The site surrounded by a school to the north, private land to the east, a church and gas
station to the south, and a road followed by agricultural land to the west. Additional
development is not anticipated.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project? *
Yes No N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater
generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a treatment plant, list the capacity
available at that plant.
City sewer services
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps
Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat? *
Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
Yes No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville

5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?*
Yes No
Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?*
Yes No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?*
Yes No
Link to the NLEB SLOPES document: http://saw-reg.usace.army.mil/NLEB/1-30-17-signed_NLEB-SLOPES&apps.pdf
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?**
Yes No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by
machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?*
Yes No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or
Designated Critical Habitat?*
Headwater performed a Biological Assessment of the site, refer to attachment.
Consultation Documentation Upload
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
File type must be PDF
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat? *
NOAA Essential Fish Habitat Mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)

Link to the State Historic Preservation Office Historic Properties Map (does not include archaeological data:
http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as
having historic or cultural preservation status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties
significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)?*
Yes No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological
resources?*
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS Service
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
G7c.SHPO Map.pdf
File must be PDF
599.8KB
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
Link to the FEMA Floodplain Maps: https:Hmsc.fema.gov/portal/search
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? *
Yes No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FEMA Online Flood Service Center: Map Panel # 3710541500J dated October 16,
2008.
Miscellaneous
Comments
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
File must be PDF or KMZ

Signature
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
■ 1 have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
■ 1 agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General
Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
■ I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General
Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
■ I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a
written signature; AND
■ I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:*
Nicholas Creidler
Signature*
Date
4/28/2020

PCN Sections
Village at Rocky River
Section C4a.
The site is currently wooded. Three wetland areas and one stream are located on site. Wetland
A is located on the northern portion of the site. Wetland B is located on the southern portion of
the site, abutting Stream A. Stream A has intermittent flow and drains off -site to the northwest.
According to Monroe Code of Ordinances, Code §158.06, a 50-foot vegetative buffer is required
along Stream A. Wetland C is located on the central portion of the site. Several mounds of dirt
and vegetative debris are located throughout Wetland C. A relic logging access road severes
connection between Wetland A and C. The wetland and stream locations were verified by the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers on November 27, 2018 (SAW-2006-40743).
The site is situated in a developing area of Union County. An elementary school is located north
of the site. Wooded land, agricultural land, and dwellings are located east of the site. Weddington
Road bounds the site to the south followed by a church. North Rocky River Road bounds the site
to the west. Wooded and agricultural land are located further west.
Section C4h.
The proposed project involves construction of a residential subdivision consisting of single-family
homes. As the population of Union County continues to grow, new affordable housing
accommodations are needed to keep up with an increasing population. The proposed subdivision
is designed to accommodate and attract middle income families. Access to the proposed
subdivision shall be located on the north site of Weddington Road and on the east side of North
Rocky River Road.
Section C4i.
The proposed project includes development of a 184-lot residential subdivision consisting of
single-family homes. A community center and pool shall be located on the central portion of the
site. Minor impacts are proposed at Wetland Area A. The proposed residential development will
avoid Wetland Areas B, C, and Stream A. There will be two access points to the proposed
subdivision. The access roads will extend north from Weddington Road and east from North
Rocky River Road, respectively.
Proposed development of an improved road on the northern portion of site will result in 0.084 acre
of wetland impacts. The proposed road crossing shall provide neighborhood continuity and
access to residential units. A stormwater BMP is designed on the west side of Wetland Area A.
24" reinforced concrete pipe (RFP) shall be used to convey stormwater from the proposed
development to the BMP. The RFP piping will discharge directly to the BMP. The BMP shall
discharge to an 18" RCP that will be tied in to existing stormwater infrastructure associated with
the adjacent school to the north.
Timbering of the site will utilize heavy machinery and chainsaws to clear the project areas for
development. Bulldozers, backhoes, and excavators will be used in the grading of the site,
building of the BMPs, and other aspects associated with the development of a residential
subdivision. Additionally, pick-up trucks will be utilized on site by contractors and construction
workers.

Section C61b.
Development of the residential subdivision will consist of three (3) phases. By building in
phases, the developer is managing their budget by ensuring completed houses sell before they
invest in building new houses within the proposed subdivision.
Section D21h.
Permanent wetland impacts are associated with fill needed to build a road on the northern portion
of the site. The road shall provide neighbor continuity for the eastern and western portions of the
subdivision. The proposed road will ease vehicle traffic on other streets within the development.
Section Eta.
The current site plans were designed to specifically to avoid and minimize impacts to Waters of
the U.S.
In 2006, the USACE determined there were no Waters of the U.S. within the site boundary (same
action ID as current JD). In August 2018, site plans were designed based around the 2006 JD.
Therefore, the original site plans for this project were designed without regard to wetland
resources.
After a preliminary site reconnaissance by the permittee, potential Waters of the U.S. were
observed. Headwater was retained to perform a wetland delineation in September 2018. We
identified and mapped 1.69 acres of wetland and 950 feet of stream. The wetland delineation
was approved by the Army Corps of Engineers on November 27, 2018.
Therefore, in retrospect, the original site plans included over 1.5 acres of wetland impacts, and
approximately 100 feet of stream impacts. Streets and residential lots were located through
Wetland Areas A, B and C, plus a road crossing was designed through Stream A and its
associated 50-foot buffer. A third access point to the subdivision was located on the east side of
Rocky River Road.
In August 2019, the site plans eliminated the stream crossing, altered the road design, and
minimized lot size. These site plans depicted a residential lot and a stormwater BMP throughout
Wetland Areas A. The stormwater BMP was added to the northern portion of the site, within the
footprint of Wetland A. This area was originally selected due to its lower topographic position (i.e.
water flows downhill). Permanent impacts to Wetland Area A were minimized to 0.44-acre. In
addition to payment into a mitigation bank, a proposition was made to restore Wetland C which
included removing relic fill material, restoring the disturbed area to grade, and planting native
species. After review of mitigation options and potential restoration efforts, further avoidance and
minimization efforts were implemented.
The current site plans relocated the proposed BMP to the west of Wetland Area A, and open
green space acreage was reduced to accommodate for residential lots. Wetland impacts have
been limited to a single road crossing. The proposed project has minimized wetland impacts to
a total of 0.084-acre. The permanent wetland impacts are to allow for a road that connects lots
on the northern portion of the site. A mitigation plan has been eliminated from this proposed action
since total impacts are less than 0.10-acre.
Section E1 b.
Silt fencing will be installed prior to construction along the perimeter of the wetlands and stream
to minimize sedimentation into these resources.

Section G3b.
Additional development is not anticipated. The site is bounded on three sides by roadways and/or
a school. Additional surrounding areas are occupied by a church, gas station, or in an agricultural
or rural residential setting.

Jurisdictional Determination Request
UNNOMMMMEN
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION','
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. 13 the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Print Name Additionally, by signing this document, I
Capacity: ❑✓ Owner ❑Authorized Agents authorize Headwater Environmental, Inc. to
c7 �1e %Z serve as my agent regarding the wetland
Date
Si
assessment.
E. REASON FOR Jll REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
Q
'gned to avoid all aquatic resources.
1 intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
❑ A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels oNNned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
s Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Q I - 0 f.
s p / O
C!
64
0.. ,_• •f fV I H H
fl w• �A
.a
�•�'u
a • ul •.
• i '� -� n J
a� Tr 6" ms
z 655 •
k H • 1 -640
r. •{ t
Legend 1 a ¢`- p IJ I (f ��' AQ
Site boundary
Feet
0 1,000 2,000 4,000
FIGURE 1
Headwater SOURCE: LOCATION MAP
ENVIRONMENTAL INC. USGS
7.5-Minute Topographic Quadrangle Harris Teeter Site
Monroe, North Carolina (1989) North Rocky River Road
Date: 9/14/2018 Controur Interval = 10 feet Monroe, North Carolina
/\ HEnv Project # 2018106A
Prepared by: NJC " 1 inch = 2,000 feet

Groee
dng
CmB Ch
te8 ram?
CmB TuB
•f-
Cm8 � -
b32 M B
Ry ,
Ming G.AJ
M2
1 '
A
�� .�y i r 11VVff
Cm8 -� = . Lid
- �.. 607 .
ibB2 •-
s
Ff7 CmB
Legend 1692 -
Site boundary
SOURCE: FIGURE 2
Headwater ARCHIVED SOIL SURVEY MAP
ENVIRONMENTAL i N C. Natural Resources Conservation
Service (NRCS) Harris Teeter Site
Archived Soil Survey North Rocky River Road
Date: 9/27/2018 Union County, North Carolina (1996) Monroe, North Carolina
/\ HEnv Project # 2018106A
Prepared by: NJC "

25
WETLANDS "A" -
25,980 SF/0.596 AC
3,659 SF/0.084 AC. PERMANENT IMPACT
WETLAND "A" IMPACT DUE TO
FILL ASSOCIATED WITH ROAD CROSSING
COPYRIGHT © 2020. AMICUS PARTNERS, PLLC.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THE CONTENTS
OF THIS DOCUMENT, OR ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO THIS
DOCUMENT, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT
OF AMICUS PARTNERS, IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. ONLY
COPIES FROM THE ORIGINAL OF THIS DOCUMENT, AS APPROVED BY
THE ENGINEER SHALL BE CONSIDERED TO BE VALID, TRUE COPIES.
JI 19 LLa §r- II 16 116 I P.
J?00&y RfVR _
(SR IOOy1'104D
WETLANDS "B"
35,326 SF/0.811 AC.
NO IMPACT
175 / / / %\—�—
INT. STREAM I
GRAPHIC SCALE
m
k2
WETLANDS "C"
11,602 SF/0.266 AC.
NO IMPACT
250 0 125 250 500
AMICUS PARTNERS,
PLLC P-1191
30 South Union Street
Concord, NC 28025
P-1191 704.573.1621
Wetlands "A" Disturbance
Overall Exhibit Map
Village at Rocky River
Project Number: 1 7- 1 7-230
l Date: 01.22.2020
Drawn By: JLM
Checked By: NRP
o Revisions:
Seal:
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
OR
RECORDATION
EXHIBIT
MAP ONLY
C-000

AMICUS PARTNERS,
_20 PLLC P-1191
30 South Union Street
C 2 4 RC \ Concord, NC 28025
126 II
P-1191 704.573.1621
e I
Wetlands "A" Disturbance
Exhibit Map
WETLANDS "A" 650 O \ Village at Rocky River
3,659 SF/0.084 AC. PERMANENT IMPACT I 125
I
.. . m
WETLAND "A" IMPACT DUE TO � Project Number:er:17-17-230
FILL ASSOCIATED WITH ROAD CROSSING
\ Date: 01.22.2020
\ cow
Drawn By: AM
\ IU J 4
Checked By, NRP
\ — — -6— 5 — —
\ 30" RCP Revisions:
WETLANDS "A" - 25,980 SF \ \
J5--27- NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
OR
RECORDATION
EXHIBIT
MAP ONLY
GRAPHIC SCALE
COPYRIGHT © 2020, AMICUS PARTNERS, PLLC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THE CONTENTS 40 0 20 40 80
OF THIS DOCUMENT, OR ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO THIS -00
DOCUMENT, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT
OF AMICUS PARTNERS, IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. ONLY
COPIES FROM THE ORIGINAL OF THIS DOCUMENT, AS APPROVED BY
THE ENGINEER SHALL BE CONSIDERED TO BE VALID, TRUE COPIES.

EXISTING GRADE (WETLAND "A")
HEADWALL
665
655
645
DATUM ELEV 1
635 0+00
COPYRIGHT © 2020, AMICUS PARTNERS, PLLC.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THE CONTENTS
OF THIS DOCUMENT, OR ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO THIS
DOCUMENT, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT
OF AMICUS PARTNERS, IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. ONLY
COPIES FROM THE ORIGINAL OF THIS DOCUMENT, AS APPROVED BY
THE ENGINEER SHALL BE CONSIDERED TO BE VALID, TRUE COPIES.
CATCH BASIN CB-18
RIM ELEV. = 652.58 FT
INLET INVERT ELEV. = 648.49 FT
OUTLET INVERT ELEV. = 648.49 FT
WETLANDS "A" DISTURBANCE — CROSS SECTION
HORIZONTAL GRAPHIC SCALE
1 INCH = 10 FEET
10 0 5 10 20
665
30" RCP
INLET INVERT ELEV. = 648.58 FT
OUTLET INVERT ELEV. = 648.49 FT
LENGTH = 16.55 FT
655 SLOPE = 0.54%
645
HEADWALL
1 DATUM ELEV
0+50 635
VERTICAL GRAPHIC SCALE
1 INCH = 10 FEET
10 0 5 10 20
AMICUS PARTNERS,
PLLC P-1191
30 South Union Street
Concord, NC 28025
P-1191 704.573.1621
Wetlands "A" Disturbance
Cross Section
Village at Rocky River
Project Number:
Date:
Drawn By:
Checked By:
Kev5ion5:
1 7- 1 7-230
01 .22.2020
JLM
N RP
Seal:
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
OR
RECORDATION
EXHIBIT
MAP ONLY
C-0021

+'•' �� J.1/\� 7�'"J'lllTp�r-1 �i 11 � ��.o ��,� � :.'•.'o,� LECSND
4J
77
------------
------------------
\ UNION COUNTY !
I (PARENT PARCEL) \ !
\ 09348013 \\ \ `Ji
� •ate+ \ II \ OB. 4215 PG 389 \ \ 'or�
`�—� \ NARAIS TEETER PROPERTIES. ilr LyC �•�'•+-r �,� \ srf �..� 093,8013 / \ j I `^ • \ ���
S` 0B. 3830 PC. 784 •+'� a
\ y LOT 2 /
``�I--
J.
RARRIS T-E PROPERTIES. LLC r
'••� �� y� y — �����` _—�__ —_�— 1\ ` \ k t \ DB.'1R30 PC- 794
`, 213 ACRES \
all
I � �- - - ..�� a �„ r ��• � :,,may'^:,..
4611 Em11&CRM
%%ft" TaLl"'waAeRnm LLC

.w.
T; a.
w aar
�r
rn
u n
1 /+G
'DWN faaar
eery
rmr
' G
ae' fraw
Z
Y11
ee
lxI saw I
m I1.�
n
am 1aar Iw
ar'
!.
V r
m I
iV
u
oa
an'
u
sar nip
as
aua•
ss>r mw
a
I W w
CI
ur Y
da
r3Y
c.
d
ur v
me
ever
ar
arr ewer
ur
MOE
�l•..w � ...«.....,ra.. � ..��.���. ^r...._.�_. r.e roam
.r-------; ---------
HI�.Tvrs�_' �isrr r. wlw i�a � .r. r�wTw v frr�l
.O>+ayy b1P • 1 vP e� '• �' 'rFoo to 1M � A ; o { W� +t""o!
A� ++y• �1.�I..�1_
....
rT i � � � 1�.7FS-'!t'!T'_�!'-"R'77�Yf17'7fk'�JO� • • -•�
'` � ��.��__-� � 9 4 e 1 TiMlrio�„ �.'yA,�ya'��'A. r'A r-r • w-
1 �L�`�L� �r � rA + -�� 1l ��--� � w n •" �f"�� .._ _ .._ _ -- ��� � .L �.i_� is ryf 7
�1'` {yA�y4'.+My - y 1 �µ. O•Te Y`YS`wl 0*1 r. ^4 A• nJ-1
PLiVAZ32 9AL�." ..�3nc-[-a -re".• .YlGi.il:i
1�
V r• i1
__T.4'.iZYS�C=9fS�>CL7lTAY-�1'7YlLLTa`1�1=_'_'_"�_
WOaA
A
:av-•r—sw�WJ ..� ... --
raWr _
ow
a l a a eat
Vl' mm +�• v � y,,.,�".��M4+� ��.-F� �` +' �, ! �a� rM� A�1 r_�S-"� M �,�ifF� � _� �r� jlAi ��1� �� }
ar r6w+
aw sear•
aer rrew ,� �,�,p,�7� _ —;`r �A'r,+q' � oyi � � 1� n �r.. • e� � / r - - - - - - - ,
ur J
� iy:: _^ __ _ `� +N mar•-+•e. - Arm l _.- - _ _ _ -
f�19D
- ' , ewo.,a
Lop)
wpse.r. aw
LLB;
oor r i slopear. x K sK-0ru
I'S 7H LAW.
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
�y
Overall
�
Site
Plan
CS
I�
C-2.0;
Q

PROPOSED BMP
SAND FILTER SF-1
IWETLANDS "A" - 25.980 SF I
PROPOSED BMP
SAND FILTER SF-2
J L l L� II I ©I I�I1011©IIOII
WETLANDS "A"
3,659 SF/0.084 AC. PERMANENT IMPACT
WETLAND "A" IMPACT DUE TO
FILL ASSOCIATED WITH ROAD CROSSING
COPYRIGHT © 2020, AMICUS PARTNERS, PLLC.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THE CONTENTS
OF THIS DOCUMENT, OR ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO THIS
DOCUMENT, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT
OF AMICUS PARTNERS, IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. ONLY
ICOPIES FROM THE ORIGINAL OF THIS DOCUMENT, AS APPROVED BY
THE ENGINEER SHALL BE CONSIDERED TO BE VALID, TRUE COPIES.
WETLANDS "B"
35,326 SF/0.811 AC.
NO IMPACT
PROPOSED BMP
WET DETENTION BASIN WDB-3
EXISTING DITCH L— WETLANDS "C"
NO IMPACT 11,602 SF/0.266 AC.
INOIMPACT
GRAPHIC SCALE
250 0 125 250 500
AMICUS PARTNERS,
PLLC P-1191
30 South Union Street
Concord, NC 28025
P-1191 704.573.1621
Wetlands "A" Disturbance
Overall Exhibit Map
Village at Rocky River
Project Number: 1 7-1 7-230
Date: 04. 14.2020
Drawn By: JLM
Checked By: NRP
Revisions:
Seal:
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
OR
RECORDATION
EXHIBIT
MAP ONLY
C-0001

AMICUS PARTNERS,
PLLC P-1191
30 South Union Street
Concord, NC 28025
P-1191 704.573.1621
Wetlands "A" Disturbance
Exhibit Map
Village at Rocky River
Project Number: 1 7-1 7-230
Date: 04. 14.2020
Drawn By: JLM
Checked By: NRP
Revisions:
Seal:
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
OR
RECORDATION
EXHIBIT
MAP ONLY
C-00 I

EXISTING GRADE (WETU
HEADWALL -
PROPOSED GRADE -\
,ND "A")
655
I
i 30" RCP
INLET IN)
OUTLET I
LENGTH
655 SLOPE _
645
645
DATUM ELEV
DATUM ELEV
635 0+00
COPYRIGHT © 2020, AMICUS PARTNERS, PLLC.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THE CONTENTS
OF THIS DOCUMENT, OR ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO THIS
DOCUMENT, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT
OF AMICUS PARTNERS, IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. ONLY
COPIES FROM THE ORIGINAL OF THIS DOCUMENT, AS APPROVED BY
THE ENGINEER SHALL BE CONSIDERED TO BE VALID, TRUE COPIES.
WETLANDS "A" DISTURBANCE — CROSS SECTION
HORIZONTAL GRAPHIC SCALE
1 INCH = 10 FEET
10 0 5 10 20
0+50 635
'ERT ELEV. = 648.58 FT
WERT ELEV. = 648.26 FT
= 60.20 FT
0.53%
H EADWALL
VERTICAL GRAPHIC SCALE
1 INCH = 10 FEET
10 0 5 10 20
AMICUS PARTNERS,
PLLC P-1191
30 South Union Street
Concord, NC 28025
P-1191 704.573.1621
Wetlands "A" Disturbance
Cross Section
Village at Rocky River
Project Number: 1 7- 1 7-230
Date: 04. 1 4.2020
Drawn By: AM
Checked By: NKP
KeV15lon5:
Seal:
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
OR
RECORDATION
EXHIBIT
MAP ONLY
C-0021

SAW-2006-40743
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2006-40743 County: Union U.S.G.S. Quad: NC- Monroe
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner: Amicus Partners, PLLC
Nick Parker
Address: 7140 Weddington Road, Suite 140
Concord, NC 28027
Telephone Number: 704-902-5771
E-mail: nyarker(&amicuseng.com
Size (acres) 57.24 Nearest Town Monroe
Nearest Waterway Bearskin Creek River Basin Upper Yadkin
USGS HUC 03040105 Coordinates Latitude: 34.990132
Longitude:-80.610546
Location description: The review area is located on the east side of N. Rocky River Road; approximately 0.2 mile north of the
intersection of N. Rocky River Road and Weddington Road. PINS: 09348013A and 09348013B. Reference review area
description shown in Jurisdictional Determination Reauest package entitled "Figure 1. Location Mad' and Printed Date of
09/14/2018.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
® There appear to be waters including wetlands, on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The
waters including wetlands, have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate
and reliable. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated 1/16/2019. Therefore
this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process, including determining compensatory
mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation requirements, and other resource protection
measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all waters and wetlands that would be affected in any
way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an
appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may
request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
❑ There appear to be waters including wetlands, on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403).
However, since the waters including wetlands, have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination
may not be used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is
merely an effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the waters including wetlands, at the project area, which
is not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the waters
including wetlands, on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland
delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area/property subject to the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are waters including wetlands, on the above described project area/property subject to the permit requirements of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.

SAW-2006-40743
❑ We recommend you have the waters including wetlands, on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be
able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that
can be verified by the Corps.
❑ The waters including wetlands, on your project area/property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by
the Corps. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated DATE. We strongly
suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once
verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided
there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
❑ The waters including wetlands, have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the
Corps Regulatory Official identified below on DATE. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area/property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA).
You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to determine their
requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material, construction or
placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If you have any questions
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Bryan Roden -Reynolds at 704-510-1440 or
bryan.roden-rynolds(& usace. army.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: Basis For Determination: See the preliminary jurisdictional determination
form dated 11/27/2018.
D. Remarks: None.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by Not applicable.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**

SAW-2006-40743
RO D E N Digitally signed by RODEN REYNOLDS.BRYAN.KENNETH.1263385574
DN: c=US, o=U.S. Government, ou=DoD, ou=PKI, ou=USA, cn=RODEN
Corps Regulatory Official: REYNOLDS.BRYAN.KENNETH.1263385574 Date:O20119.01.1809:30:54- 5'00'3385574
Date of JD: 11/27/2018 Expiration Date of JD: Not applicable
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p= l 36:4:0
Copy furnished:
Agent:
Headwater Environmental
Nick Creidler
Address: 1844 Sir Tyler Driver
Wilmington, NC 28405
Telephone Number: 910-777-8386
E-mail: nick(&headwaterenvironmental.com

SAW-2006-40743
NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: Amicus Partners, PLLC, Nick Parker File Number: SAW-2006-40743 Date: 11/27/2018
Attached
is:
See Section below
PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter of ermission
A
RED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter of ermission
B
DENIAL
LAPPROVED
C
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
INARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at or hLtp://www.usace.gM.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoEyProgramandPerinits.asox
or the Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section I1 of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.

SAW-2006-40743
SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact:
also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Attn: Bryan Roden -Reynolds
CESAD-PDO
Charlotte Regulatory Office
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15
8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 615
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunit to participate in all site investigations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: Bryan Roden -Reynolds, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North
Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal
Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 11/27/2018
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Amicus Partners, PLLC, Nick Parker, 7140
Weddington Road, Suite 140,Concord, NC 28027
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, Harris Teeter Properties, SAW-
2006-40743
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The review area is located on the east side
of N. Rocky River Road; approximately 0.2 mile north of the intersection of N. Rocky River Road and Weddington
Road. PINs: 09348013A and 09348013B. Reference review area description shown in Jurisdictional Determination
Request package entitled "Figure 1, Location Map" and Printed Date of 09/14/2018.
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County: Union City: Monroe
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Latitude: 34.990132 Longitude:-80.610546
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Bearskin Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
® Field Determination. Date(s): 01/15/2019
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Estimated amount of
Geographic authority to
Type of aquatic
aquatic resources in
which the aquatic resource
Latitude (decimal
Longitude (decimal
resources (i.e.,
Site Number
review area (acreage
"may be" subject (i.e.,
degrees)
degrees)
wetland vs. non-
and linear feet, if
Section 404 or Section
wetland waters)
applicable
10/404)
Wetland A
34.992659
-80.611011
0.78 acre
Wetland
404
Wetland B
34.987544
-80.611515
0.27 acre
Wetland
404
Wetland C
34.991036
-80.610527
0.64 acre
Wetland
404
Stream A
34.988252
-80.611921
950 linear feet
Non -wetland
404
1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review
area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an
approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed the
various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General
Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction notification" (PCN), or
requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has

not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit
applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official
determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD
before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit
authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or
different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than
accepting the terms and conditions of the NVWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant
can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5)
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an AJD
constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g.,
signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area
affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such
jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any
administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD
or a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual
permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be
administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over
aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic
resources in the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the
review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: Figures 1-6
❑ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Figure 1, Location Map (7.5-Minute Topographic
Quadrangle Monroe, NC Dated 1989)
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Figure 2, Archived Soil Survey Map (Soil Survey of
Union County Dated 1996) and Figure 3, Web Soil Survey Map (Soil Survey of Union County)
® National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: Figure 5, National Wetland (USFWS NWI Mapper)
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
® FEMA/FIRM maps: Figure 4, FEMA Map (FEMA FIRM Panel No. 3710541500J Dated 10/16/2008)
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ®Aerial (Name & Date): Figure 6, Wetland Delineation Map (ESRI Imagery Dated 2017)
or ®Other (Name & Date): Photographs 1-6 Dated 09/26/2018
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
® Other information (please specify): NCDWQ Stream Identification Form (Version 4.11) Dated 09/26/2018
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
RO D E N Digitally signed by RODEN
REYNOLDS.BRYAN.KEN N ETH.1263385574
REYNOLDS.BRYAN.K DN: c=US, o=U.S. Government, ou=DoD,
ou=PKI, ou=USA, cn=RODEN
H.
ENNETH.1263385574 Date:O20119.0.180930:23T05100'3385574
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing PJD
11/27/2018
Signature and date of person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is
impracticable)1
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an
action.

F
a survey. All locations depicted on this figure are approximate. This Wetland Delineation was conducted by Headwater
l, Inc. (Headwater) on September 26, 2018, and January 15, 2019. This wetland delineation was verified in the field with Mr.
-Reynolds of the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) on January 15, 2019 (Action Id. SAW-2006-40743). If impacts
treams occur from development, additional coordination with the USACE and North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR)
nted. Wetland and stream locations were recorded with the Trimble Geo 7x GPS device.
1. The site drains to Bearskin Creek.
Bearskin Creek is located within the Yadkin
Pee Dee River Basin. Bearskin Creek is it i•••
classified as Class C Waters. Riparian Y
buffers are not implemented by the DWR
along streams in this river basin. Of -
'�' z f.
2. According to Monroe Code of Ordinances,
Code §158.06, the width of the buffer zone
begins and is measured landward from the A
nearest edge of the disturbed area and/or _ - DP-1
five feet from the edge of the top of the bank
of streams or rivers to the nearest edge of
the disturbed area. D
Stream A
2' x 950'
Wetland AAcres
0.78
Wetland B Acres
0.27
Wetland C Acres
0.64
Wetland Acres
1.69
Upland Acres
53.00
Site Acres
54.69
r
F
0 200 400
Weddington Rd
m Feet
800
Headwater
ENVIRONMENTAL INC.
Date: 9/28/2018
Revised 1 /16/2019
Prepared by: I NJC
C
N
DP-4 ,
Cs
t,
SOURCE:
ESRI
World Basemap Imagery (2017)
Site Reconnaissance
September 26, 2018
1 inch = 400 feet
Legend
Site boundary
Wetland
— — - Intermittent stream
r 50ft buffer
• Data point
FIGURE 6
WETLAND DELINEATION MAP
Harris Teeter Site
North Rocky River Road
Monroe, North Carolina
HEnv Project # 2018106A

h FYSJi lcVJ)urr.
-" United States Department of the Interior ,�x"
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
%$ Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
'aRCH 3,e 160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
hap://www.fws.2ov/nc-es/es/couniyft.html
In Reply Refer To: September 10, 2019
Consultation Code: 04EN1000-2019-SLI-0733
Event Code: 04EN1000-2019-E-01879
Project Name: Village at Rocky River
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The attached species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. Although not required by
section 7, many agencies request species lists to start the informal consultation process and begin
their fulfillment of the requirements under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of
1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 etseq.).
This list, along with other helpful resources, is also available on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) Asheville Field Office's (AFO) website: https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/
cntylist/nc_counties.html. The AFO website list includes "species of concern" species that could
potentially be placed on the federal list of threatened and endangered species in the future. Also
available are:
Design and Construction Recommendations
htlps://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmls/Troject review/Recommendations.html
Optimal Survey Times for Federally Listed Plants
htlps://www.fws.gov/nc-es/Tlggt/plant survey.html
Northern long-eared bat Guidance
https://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmis/project_review/NLEB_in WNC.html
Predictive Habitat Model for Aquatic Species
htlps://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmls/Maxent/Maxent.html

09/10/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2019-E-01879 2
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could require modifications of these lists.
Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act,
the accuracy of the species lists should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website or the AFO website (the AFO website dates each
county list with the day of the most recent update/change) at regular intervals during project
planning and implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be
requested through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the
enclosed list or by going to the AFO website.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having
similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a Biological
Evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may
affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended
contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12 and on our office's website
at https://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmis/project_review/assessment guidance.html.
If a Federal agency (or their non-federal representative) determines, based on the Biological
Assessment or Biological Evaluation, that listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be
affected by the proposed project, the agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to
50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service recommends that candidate species, proposed species, and
proposed critical habitat be addressed within the consultation. More information on the
regulations and procedures for section 7 consultation, including the role of permit or license
applicants, can be found in the "Endangered Species Consultation Handbook" at: http://
www. fws. gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLO S . PDF.
Though the bald eagle is no longer protected under the Endangered Species Act, please be aware
that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16
U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require additional consultation (see
hns://www.fws.gov/southeast/our-services/permits/eagles. Wind energy projects should follow
the wind energy guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to
migratory birds (including bald and golden eagles) and bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http://

09/10/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2019-E-01879
www.fws. og v/mi rg atorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm;
http://www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws. og v/mi rg atorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/
towers/comtow.html.
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office.
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List
■ Migratory Birds
• Wetlands

09/10/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2019-E-01879
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
[phone]

09/10/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2019-E-01879
Project Summary
Consultation Code: 04EN1000-2019-SLI-0733
Event Code: 04EN1000-2019-E-01879
Project Name: Village at Rocky River
Project Type: DEVELOPMENT
Project Description: The site is located northeast and adjacent to the intersection of
Weddington Road and North Rocky River Road in Monroe, Union
County. The site consists of two parcels. According to the Union County
GIS service, the parcels are identified as Parcel Identification Numbers
(PIN) 09348013A (21.346 acres) and 09348013B (35.89 acres), and are
owned by Harris Teeter Properties, LLC.
Headwater completed a Wetland Delineation report on January 18, 2019.
The Army Corps of Engineers agreed with out wetland delineation and
issued a Jurisdictional Determination (JD). The signed JD
(SAW-2006-40743) was received on January 18, 2019. The proposed use
of the site is for a residential subdivision.
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:
www.2oo2le.com/maps/place/34.989836637764036N80.61077489429942W
a
Counties: Union, NC
2

e AWK110140
Event Code: 04EN1000-2019-E-01879
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 3 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesl, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Clams
NAME STATUS
Carolina Heelsplitter Lasmigona decorata Endangered
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.2_ov/ecp/species/3534
Flowering Plants
NAME STATUS
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: htips:Hecos.fws. og v/ecp/species/5217
Schweinitz's Sunflower Helianthus schweinitzii Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: htips:Hecos.fws. og v/ecp/species/3849
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

09/10/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2019-E-01879
Migratory Birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act! and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Acts.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS
Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location.
To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see
the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that
every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders
and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data
mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For
projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative
occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to additional
information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your migratory
bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found
below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
BREEDING
NAME SEASON
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention Jul 31
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types
of development or activities.
hUs://ecos.fws. o,� v/ecp/species/1626
Kentucky Warbler Oporornis formosus Breeds Apr 20
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Aug 20
and Alaska.

09/10/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2019-E-01879 2
NAME
BREEDING
SEASON
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor Breeds May 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA Jul 31
and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Probability Of Presence Summary
Breeds May 10
to Sep 10
Breeds
elsewhere
Breeds May 10
to Aug 31
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the
FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting
to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 1 Okm grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week
months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see
below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher
confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for
that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee
was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is
0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence
in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12
(0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on
week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.

09/10/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2019-E-01879 3
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across
its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project
area.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the IOkm grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on
all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Bald Eagle +—,� i , 1 1 1 1111111111111111 1111 ---_ —111 11PI
Non -BCC Vulnerable
Kentucky
BCC Rang wide Warb(Cler
+-+ ­ 4 �� _+�� +—II Jill Jill Jill Ilp— +1-- — — — — — — — —
Prairie Warbler —+�� +��' Jill
"" "" ---—� +--- ---- --e (CON) --
BCC RangewidRed_headedIII Jill Jill Jill Jill v
Woodpecker +—+— —++' _4 ­ +--+ + -- —��— -- —
BCC Rangewide (CON)
Rusty Blackbird '—+— ­++— —'�� +--+ +—+— — A —1
BCC Rangewide (CON) —��— ---- --� —�—� —��— --�—
Wood Thrush +—+— —++— —+-- +--+ 'll Jill Jill Jill rt—� +--- — — — — — — — —
BCC Rangewide (CON)
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/
birds-of-conservation-concern.php
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds http://www.fws.aovibirds/
mana eg ment/project-assessment-tools-and-guidance/
conservation-measures.php

09/10/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2019-E-01879 4
Nationwide conservation measures for birds http://www.fws.gov/mi rg atorybirds/pdf/
management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures.pdf
Migratory Birds FAQ
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts
to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize
impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly
important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in
the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very
helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding
in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures and/or
permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of
infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified
location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCQ and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding,
and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 1 Okm grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as
warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act
requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your
project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list
of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data
provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing
collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information
becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and
how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my
project area?

09/10/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2019-E-01879 5
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding,
wintering, migrating or year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab
of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of
interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your
migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your
project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds
elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern
throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands,
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on
your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles)
potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities
(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made,
in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC
species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles,
please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species
and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the
Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides
birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird
model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical
Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use
throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this
information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study
and the nanota studies tudies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Lorin.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid
violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report

09/10/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2019-E-01879 6
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of
birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for
identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC
use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be
aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that
overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no
data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey
effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of
certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might
be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you
know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement
conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell
me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.

09/10/2019 Event Code: 04EN1000-2019-E-01879
Wetlands
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section
404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District.
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to
update our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine
the actual extent of wetlands on site.
RIVERINE
• R4SBC

PCN Application Attachment
Village at Rocky River
Headwater Project 2018106A2
Section G5: Review of endangered species and designated critical habitat
Headwater conducted a multiple site visits in September and November 2018, January 2019, and
October 2019. The site was clearcut in the early 1990s, and subsequently planted with short leaf
pine. The site has been managed as timberland during the past 27 to 28 years. The understory
is routinely bushogged and maintained. Currently, the understory is comprised of 3 to 4-year
growth and consists of assorted herbaceous and shrub/sapling species.
As previously discussed in Section Ci, three wetland systems and stream are located within the
site boundary.
In general, the site can be divided into three separate habitat areas:
Managed pineland
The majority of the site is managed pineland. The shortleaf pine trees (Pinus enchinata)
are approximately 30 years old. There is no mid -canopy. The understory is somewhat
dense and is comprised of assorted shrubs, saplings, and herbaceous species. Species
observed include, but are not limited to, Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), black cherry
(Prunus serotina), black ash (Fraxinus nigra), pokeweed (Phytolacca Americana), stinking
chamomile (Anthemis cotula), tall beggarticks (Bidens vulgate), and blackberry (Rubus
argutus).
PFO Wetland
Forested wetlands are located on the central and northern portions of the site. The
shrubs/sapling layers are light within the forested wetland area. Herbaceous species are
fairly dense within the Wetland Area A. Species observed within the forested wetland
areas include shortleaf pine, red maple (Acer rubrum), sweet gum (Liquidambar
styraciflua), groundsel tree (Baccharis halimifolia), soft rush (Juncus effuses), common
thresquare (Schoenoplectus pungens), slender woodoats (Chasmanthium laxum), and
various sedges (Carex spp.). Wetland Area C is a sparsely vegetated concave surface
with a peripheral of water oak (Quercus nigra), sweetgum and mockernut hickory (Carya
tomentosa). The upper reach of Wetland A is seasonally saturated. The remainder of
Wetland A and all of Wetland C are seasonally inundated with several inches of water,
This seasonal inundation is primarily due to poor surface water management by the
timbering activity and adjoining property to the north.
Narrow Riparian Corridor and PSS Wetland
An intermittent stream is located on the southern portion of the site. The stream flows off -
site to the southeast and is a tributary of Bearskin Creek. The narrow riparian corridor is
comprised of assorted trees and scrub/shrub vegetation extending approximately 15 feet
horizontally along the stream bank. Species observed include red maple, short leaf pine,
water oak, wax myrtle (Morella cerifera), sweet gum, box elder (Acer negundo), Chinese
privet (Ligustrum sinense), greenbriar (Smilax rontundifolia), and muscadine grape (Vitus
rontundifolia). In the fall and winter, the perennial stream has a steady flow and is tannin
rich. The stream receives sediment from the adjacent agricultural fields. Habitat for
assorted macrobenthic organisms, minnows, and amphibians is minimal.

PCN Application Attachment
Village at Rocky River
Headwater Project 2018106A2
FEDERALLY LISTED SPECIES
There are seven species listed by the USFWS in Union County, North Carolina:
Name
Scientific Name
Taxonomic Group
Federal Status
Carolina heelsplitter
Lasmi ona decorata
Clam
E
Atlantic pigtoe
Fusconaia masoni
Clam
PT
Schweinitz's sunflower
Helianthus schweinitzii
Flowering Plant
E
Michaux's sumac
Rhus michauxii
Flowering Plant
E
Ravine sedge
Carex im ressinervia
Flowering Plant
UR
Tricolored bat
Perim otis subflavus
Mammal
UR
E: Endangered; UR: Potential Threatened; UR: Under Review
Species Description
Carolina heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata)
The Carolina heelsplitter is a freshwater mussel with an ovate, trapezoid -shaped shell, growing
up to 4.6 inches in length. The outer surface of the shell varies from greenish brown to dark brown
in color, and shells from younger specimens have faint greenish brown or black rays. The nacre
(inside surface) is often pearly white to bluish white, grading to orange in the deepest part of the
shell. Historically, the Carolina heelspliter was found throughout the Catawba and Pee Dee River
systems.
The Carolina heelsplitter habitat requires cool, clean, well -oxygenated water with stable, silt -free
stream bottoms. Typically, stable areas occur where the stream banks are well -vegetated with a
mature forested canopy and shrubs. It is not known to inhabit narrow stream less than 5 feet in
width. The Carolina heelsplitter inhabits larger order low gradient creeks with available sections
of pooling.
Atlantic pigtoe (Fusconaia masons)
The shell of the Atlantic pigtoe is a chunky, rhombus shape, like that of a pig's hoof/toe. There is
a distinct posterior ridge. The outer surface of the shell is yellow to dark brown and parchment -
like, while the inner layer is iridescent blue to salmon, white, or orange. Although larger specimens
exist, the Atlantic pigtoe rarely exceeds two inches in length. Young individuals may have
greenish rays across the entire shell surface. When collected fresh, the interior surface (nacre) in
the shell tends to be salmon colored and sometimes iridescent. Atlantic pigtoe has interlocking
hinge "teeth" on the inside of the shell to help keep the two valves in proper alignment.
The preferred habitat of the Atlantic pigtoe is coarse sand and gravel, and rarely in silt and detritus.
Historically, the best populations existed in small creeks to larger rivers with excellent water
quality, where flows were sufficient to maintain clean, silt -free substrates. The Atlantic pigtoe rely
on host fish for successful reproduction. Each mussel species has specific fish species (host fish)
that are needed by the glochidia to keep growing to ultimately transform into juveniles. After a few
weeks of living as parasites, they drop off and land on the river bottom where they grow into
adults. Atlantic pigtoe are tachytictic (short term breeders) that usually release their larvae by July
or August.
2

PCN Application Attachment
Village at Rocky River
Headwater Project 2018106A2
Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzit)
This plant is a perennial herb that produces solitary stem, five to six feet tall, and bears yellow
flower heads in late summer and early autumn. It occurs within clearings in upland oak -pine -
hickory woods and piedmont longleaf pine forests in moist to mostly dry sandy loams. This species
requires full to partial sun of an open habitat. This habitat is historically associated with areas that
experience wildfires and grazing by herds of bison and elk. Now, most occurrences are confined
to roadsides and powerline clearings.
Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii)
This plant is a low -growing, densely hairy, dioecious scrub. It is usually between one and three
feet in height. The leaves are pinnately compound with seven to 13 leaflets that are coarsely
toothed. The female plants produce erect clusters of greenish -yellow to white flowers with four to
five parts, and conspicuous red drupes. It generally flowers from April to June and fruits persist
from August through September or October. Many populations do not contain plants of both
sexes. Michaux's sumac occurs in sandy or rocky open woods, sometimes in association with
circumneutral soils. In the eastern Piedmont, it occurs on sand soils derived from granite. In the
central Piedmont, it occurs on clayey soils derived from mafic rocks. In all of its habitats, Rhus
michauxii is dependent upon some form of disturbance to maintain the open quality of its habitat.
Ravine sedge (Carex impressinervia)
The ravine sedge is a perennial, grass -like herb forming dense clumps connected by underground
stems or rhizomes. Flowering stems are 10 - 34 inches tall and yellow -brown. Leaf sheaths are
hairless and greenish -white or light tan. Leaf blades are about % inch wide and smooth, except
for a hairy mid -vein; the lower part of the leaf is a hairless, pale green or tan sheath encircling the
base of the stem. Old, fibrous leaf bases persist at the base of the plant. The topmost flower spike
is up to 1'/2 inches long, solitary at the top of the flowering stem, and contains male flowers only.
Lateral flower spikes are up to 13/4 inches long, with both female and male flowers, 2 - 4 spikes
per stem, and are held below the male -flowered spike on the same stem; each spike with 5 - 11
fruits. The fruit body is about % inch long with a short, bent stalk and sharply bent tip, tightly
enclosed in a 3-sided, heavily veined sac.
Ravine sedge occurs in vegetatively diverse moist to wet deciduous forests. It is usually found on
gentle slopes above and in the floodplains of small streams, usually in areas with mafic (rich in
magnesium and iron) or slate bedrock
Tricolored bat (Perimyotis subflavus)
The tricolored bat, formerly known as the eastern pipistrelle, is a small bat weighing 5 to 8 grams
and has a wingspan of 8 to 10 inches. The term "tricolored" refers to the bat's yellowish -brown
coat that is dark at the base, yellowish -brown in the middle, and dark at the tips. The wing
membranes are blackish, but the face and ears have a pinkish color. An obvious identifying
characteristic of this species is the pink color of the skin on the radius bone.
Tricolored bats are associated with forested landscapes, along waterways. They can also be
found over water and adjacent to water edges. In South Carolina, sparse vegetation and early
successional stands were found to be the best predictor of foraging habitat use by tricolored bats.
These bat primarily feeds over water and forest edges. Mature stands of deciduous trees, along
perennial streams, are preferred by this species. They can also rely on farm ponds and other
water sources provide some trees are available in the vicinity, They are not often found in deep
woods, seeming to prefer edge habitats near areas of mixed agricultural use. These bats have
3

PCN Application Attachment
Village at Rocky River
Headwater Project 2018106A2
been found to feed on large hatches of grain moths emerging from corn cribs, indicating that they
may be of important agricultural benefit. Hibernation sites are found deep within caves or mines
in areas of relatively warm, stable temperatures. White nose syndrome and habitat loss are the
biggest threats to tricolored bats.
Additional State listed species of concern
Name
Scientific Name
Taxonomic Group
State Status
Smooth sunflower
Helianthus laevigatus
Flowering plant
SC
Eastern creekshell
Villosa delumbis
Clam
SR
SC: Special Concern; SR: Significantly Rare
Correspondence from the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission dated December 5,
2019, indicated there are known records of federally listed Scheinitz's sunflower and state special
concern smooth sunflower (Helianthus laevigatus) near the site, and state significantly rare
eastern creekshell mussel (Villosa delumbis) in the watershed.
Smooth sunflower (Helianthus laevigatus)
This flower is a North American species of sunflower known by the common name smooth
sunflower. It is native to the east -central and southeastern United States
from Georgia to Maryland.
It is a perennial herb up to 220 cm (over 7 feet) tall, spreading by means of underground rhizomes.
Most of the leaves are on the stem rather than crowded around the base, each leaf up to 15 cm
(6 inches) long. Leaves and stems generally have no hairs, and the undersides of the leaves
sometimes appear pale because of a layer of wax on the surface. One plant usually produces 1-
6 flower heads. Each head has 5-10 yellow ray florets surrounding 40 or more yellow disc florets.
Helianthus laevigatus requires high light availability and generally occurs in open areas with shale,
dolomite, limestone, or ultra-mafic, igneous substrates. In Virginia, West Virginia and Maryland,
its habitats include glades and barrens, woodland borders, dry roadsides, and powerline corridors.
In North Carolina and South Carolina, all occurrences are in disturbed areas on slate derived
soils.
Eastern creekshell (Villosa delumbis)
The eastern creekshell is very similar to the Carolina creekshell. The periostracum is yellow to
dark golden brown with green rays. However, the rays of the eastern creekshell are usually broken
instead of continuous. These rays may cover the entire shell or be restricted to the posterior slope.
A dark layer of diatoms and algae may be obscure the true colors of the shell. There are
two pseudocardinal teeth in each valve; however, the posterior tooth in the left valve and the
anterior tooth in the right valve may be vestigial. The lateral teeth are straight and well developed;
two in the left valve and one in the right. Finally, the outer margins of the marsupium in the eastern
creekshell are black; while, the outer margins of the marsupium in the Carolina creekshell are
ivory colored. Preferred habitat for the eastern creekshell consists of small rivers and creeks with
mud or soft sand bottoms, particularly where rich in plant detritus.
HABITAT REVIEW
The on -site stream has intermittent flow, poor riffle -pool systems, and poorly sorted bottom.
Habitat for the Carolina heelsplitter, Atlantic pigtoe, and eastern creekshell is not present on site.
12

PCN Application Attachment
Village at Rocky River
Headwater Project 2018106A2
Habitat with an open understory and well drained sandy soils preferred by the Schweinitz's
sunflower and Micheaux's sunflower is not present on site.
The site is relatively flat. The forest is dominated by pine, and bedrock was not observed on site.
Therefore, habitat for the ravine sedge is not present.
Open areas with exposed rock (such as slate, shale, dolomite, etc.) and full sun are not present
on site. Therefore, habitat for the smooth coneflower is not present.
There is no hibernacula feature present at the site. A relatively open forest habitat is present on
site. However, the site lacks a mature hardwood tree forest (i.e. tree cavities and deciduous leaf
foliage), perennial stream, and open water. Therefore, foraging habitat for the tri-colored bat is
not present.
5

SITE PHOTOS
Headwater Project #2018106A2
Y'.
t � i � • �. - tr, h�. ,
.vvi�`aa �° • w,,. ,ninY
Photograph 1. Managed pineland throughout the site. Photo: October 14, 2019.
Photograph 2. Lower reach of Wetland A (PFO Wetland) on the northern portion of the site,
Photo: September 26, 2018

SITE PHOTOS
Headwater Project #201816A2
Photograph 3. Wetland Area C (PFO) on the central portion of the site. Photo: November 26, 2018
Photograph 4. Wetland Area C (PFO) on the central portion of the site. Photo: October 14, 2019

September 10, 2019
1:28,890
❑ 0.28 0,55 11 mi
NR Paints
SLHD Center Point
r NR Individual Listing
0 0.42 0.85 1.7 km
SLDOE HD Center Point
NR Listing, Gone
5L boundaries
* N R H D Center Point
Study List Boundary
NR Boundaries
Both 5L and Determined Eligible Boundary
❑National Register Boundary
DOE Points
❑Boundary of DestroyedARemoved N R Listing
A Determined E ligibie
SL Points
A DOE, Gone
SL Individual Entry
-" 5L and DOE
1 SL and DOE entry
SL and DOE, Gone
NC Cenler for G eographic Ininrmation &Analysis
� Study List Entry, Gone
DOE HD Center Paint
SL and DOE, Gone
SLD0EHD Center Point

PROPOSED BMP
SAND FILTER SF-1
IWETLANDS "A" - 25.980 SF I
PROPOSED BMP
SAND FILTER SF-2
J L l L� II I ©I I�I1011©IIOII
WETLANDS "A"
3,659 SF/0.084 AC. PERMANENT IMPACT
WETLAND "A" IMPACT DUE TO
FILL ASSOCIATED WITH ROAD CROSSING
COPYRIGHT © 2020, AMICUS PARTNERS, PLLC.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THE CONTENTS
OF THIS DOCUMENT, OR ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO THIS
DOCUMENT, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT
OF AMICUS PARTNERS, IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. ONLY
ICOPIES FROM THE ORIGINAL OF THIS DOCUMENT, AS APPROVED BY
THE ENGINEER SHALL BE CONSIDERED TO BE VALID, TRUE COPIES.
WETLANDS "B"
35,326 SF/0.811 AC.
NO IMPACT
PROPOSED BMP
WET DETENTION BASIN WDB-3
EXISTING DITCH L— WETLANDS "C"
NO IMPACT 11,602 SF/0.266 AC.
INOIMPACT
GRAPHIC SCALE
250 0 125 250 500
AMICUS PARTNERS,
PLLC P-1191
30 South Union Street
Concord, NC 28025
P-1191 704.573.1621
Wetlands "A" Disturbance
Overall Exhibit Map
Village at Rocky River
Project Number: 1 7-1 7-230
Date: 04. 14.2020
Drawn By: JLM
Checked By: NRP
Revisions:
Seal:
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
OR
RECORDATION
EXHIBIT
MAP ONLY
C-0001

AMICUS PARTNERS,
PLLC P-1191
30 South Union Street
Concord, NC 28025
P-1191 704.573.1621
Wetlands "A" Disturbance
Exhibit Map
Village at Rocky River
Project Number: 1 7-1 7-230
Date: 04. 14.2020
Drawn By: JLM
Checked By: NRP
Revisions:
Seal:
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
OR
RECORDATION
EXHIBIT
MAP ONLY
C-00 I

EXISTING GRADE (WETU
HEADWALL -
PROPOSED GRADE -\
,ND "A")
655
I
i 30" RCP
INLET IN)
OUTLET I
LENGTH
655 SLOPE _
645
645
DATUM ELEV
DATUM ELEV
635 0+00
COPYRIGHT © 2020, AMICUS PARTNERS, PLLC.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THE CONTENTS
OF THIS DOCUMENT, OR ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO THIS
DOCUMENT, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT
OF AMICUS PARTNERS, IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. ONLY
COPIES FROM THE ORIGINAL OF THIS DOCUMENT, AS APPROVED BY
THE ENGINEER SHALL BE CONSIDERED TO BE VALID, TRUE COPIES.
WETLANDS "A" DISTURBANCE — CROSS SECTION
HORIZONTAL GRAPHIC SCALE
1 INCH = 10 FEET
10 0 5 10 20
0+50 635
'ERT ELEV. = 648.58 FT
WERT ELEV. = 648.26 FT
= 60.20 FT
0.53%
H EADWALL
VERTICAL GRAPHIC SCALE
1 INCH = 10 FEET
10 0 5 10 20
AMICUS PARTNERS,
PLLC P-1191
30 South Union Street
Concord, NC 28025
P-1191 704.573.1621
Wetlands "A" Disturbance
Cross Section
Village at Rocky River
Project Number: 1 7- 1 7-230
Date: 04. 1 4.2020
Drawn By: AM
Checked By: NKP
KeV15lon5:
Seal:
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
OR
RECORDATION
EXHIBIT
MAP ONLY
C-0021