20200544 Ver 2_More Information Received_20200513

Staff Review
Does this application have all the attachments needed to accept it into the review process?*
r Yes r No
ID#* Version* 2
20200544
Is this project a public transportation project?* r Yes
r No
Is this a DOT r Yes r No
project?*
Reviewer List:* Rob Ridings:eads\rgridings
Select Reviewing Office:* Central Office - [phone]
Does this project require a request for payment to be sent?*
r
Yes
r
No

Project Submittal Form
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all
mandatory questions are answered.
Project Type: r
New Project
r
New Project w Existing ID
r
Pre -Application Submittal
r
More Information Response
r
Other Agency Comments
r
For the Record Only (Courtesy Copy)
r
Stream or Buffer Appeal
New Project - Please check the new project type if you are trying to submit a new project that needs an official approval
decision.
Pre -Application Submittal - Please check the pre -application submittal if you just want feedback on your submittal and
do not have the expectation that your submittal will be considered a complete application requiring a formal decision.
More Information Response - Please check this type if you are responding to a request for information from staff and
you have and ID# and version for this response.
Other Agency Comments - Please check this if you are submitting comments on an existing project.
Is this supplemental information that needs to be sent to the Corps?*
r Yes r No
Project Contact Information
Name: Chris Rivenbark
VUio is subrritting the inforrration?
Email Address: [e-mail]
Project Information
Existing ID #: Existing Version:
20200544 1
20170001(no dashes)
Project Name: Bridge No. 93 on NC561 over Conoconnara Swamp (B-5662 Central)
Is this a public transportation project?
r Yes
r No
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
r Yes r No r Unknown
TIP#: WBS#:
B-5662 45617.1.1
(Applies to DOT projects only)
County (ies)
Halifax
Please upload all files that need to be submited.

click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
20200513 B-5662 Environmental Permit Plans
8.11 MB
cr_ed its. pdf
Only pdf or krm files are accepted.
Describe the attachments:
Division 4 requested this modification to the permit authorization because, in their experience, and
considering typical equipment utilized, they will need to allow the contractor access to the interior bents to
enable driving the piles. This will add temporary surface water impacts to the foreseeable project footprint.
The additional pad downstream is shown because an area may be needed to set the girders for the bridge.
The temporary impacts for the detour bridge are shown as they are because it is up to the contractor to
propose the detour bridge layout and in the Division's best guess this could range from 1-3 interior bents
which means temporary access could possibly be needed from both sides.
Division 4 prefers to allow the contractors the option of causeway or work bridge on projects where either
might work. This doesn't restrict some contractors from bidding if they don't have work bridge resources.
Minimization will take place during construction. Contractors typically do things that are most economical and
time efficient within the confines of the permit and causeways are not very efficient at either. So, they will be
utilized only if needed and at the smallest footprint needed.
If needed, for installation and removal, the limits of causeway riprap in the water will be delineated and
quantified and that same footprint and quantity will be removed to the max extent possible. Turbidity curtains
will be utilized to the maximum extent possible during both of these operations.
Sign and Submit
W By checking the box and signing box below, I certify that:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the
"Uniform Electronic Transactions Act")
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes
(the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written
signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the online form."
Signature:
h�re4C 4LYwag ///
Submittal Date: 05/13/2020
Is filled in autorratically.

(Version 2.07; Released October 2016)
45617.1.1 TIP No.:B-5662 County(ies):Halifax Page 1 of 1
TIP Number:Date:
Phone:Phone:
Email:Email:
County(ies):
CAMA County?
Yes
Design/Future:Year:2040 Existing:Year:
Aquatic T&E Species?No Comments:
Yes N/A
No
N/A
Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body?(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative)(If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
General Project Narrative)(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative)
ac.
APPROXIMATE 11' TRAVEL LANES WITH 2' PAVED SHOULDER
1400
[e-mail]
Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body?Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer?Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer?
NRTR Stream ID:
Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day):
Existing Site
Project Length (lin. miles or feet):
ac.
Surface Water Body (1):
Class CNCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body
N/ABuffer Rules in Effect:N/A
None
1150
12' TRAVEL LANES WITH 4' PAVED SHOULDER AT BRIDGE; 35.25' OUT TO OUT
Waterbody Information
2020
NCDWR Stream Index No.:
45617.1.1
Impairments:
Other Stream Classification:
Primary Classification:
Project Built-Upon Area (ac.)
This project will replace Halifax County Bridge #0093 and its approaches. The proposed replacement is 110' long with a clear roadway width of 32'. This structure provides 2'-12'
travel lanes with a 4' paved shoulder. The proposed bridge will have 1.5:1 sloping riprap abutments and 4' caps at the end bents. Placement and construction of the proposed
bridge, end bents, caps, and associated roadway fill will not result in any jurisdictional stream or similar environmental impacts. There will be no permanent channel changes.
There are wetlands present over the extent of the project. The removal of the existing structure, excavation under the bridge, placement of riprap for bank stabilization, and
roadway fill results in 0.73 acres of permanent fill, <0.01 acres in excavation in wetlands, 0.17 acres of mechanized clearing, 0.02 acres and 92 linear feet of permanent surface
water impacts, and 0.21 acres and 59 linear feet of temporary surface water impacts. Mechanized clearing will be limited to 5' off roadway fill. Additionally, there will be 0.07
acres of temporary fill and 0.20 acres of hand clearing in wetlands due to the construction of the detour bridge. STORMWATER CONTROLS: The proposed bridge does not
require deck drains. The runoff from the bridge discharges through a pipe/inlet system in the northwest quadrant of the project outside of the jurisdictional stream at non-erosive
velocities. In all bridge quadrants, roadway runoff is treated via vegetated roadway shoulder and existing vegetated swales prior to entering the stream.
4505 Falls of Neuse Road
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Highway Stormwater Program
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
Project Type:
1000 Birch Ridge Dr Address:
General Project Information
B-5662
WBS Element:
Bridge ReplacementWBS Element:
Leah Young, PENCDOT Contact:
[phone]
Suite 400
Raleigh, NC 27609
Contractor / Designer:
[phone]
[e-mail]
27610
Address:
5/11/2020
HalifaxNone
Tierre Peterson
Raleigh, NC
River Basin(s):
City/Town:
0.7
Typical Cross Section Description:
Surrounding Land Use:
General Project Narrative:
(Description of Minimization of Water
Quality Impacts)
No
Wetlands/Rural Residential/Agricultural
CONOCONNARA SWAMP 23-33
0.6
0.20
Project Description
Proposed Project
Roanoke
None
Supplemental Classification: None
Wetlands within Project Limits?
Revised 5/13/2020
Revised 5/13/2020
f {l
�
� �
� .... "' iz 0 in � 1l"' 8.
,?
f-..
�
� I
� "' l
§ I
� f-..
�
Lu it
j
�
��
err-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------..... ---------------� PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
" B-5662 PRM-2 ' ro
C rn cl N Q
L " 9-t 9-N
(D w '? O'.l
cl C 0 � "3 " rn '; 0 C D < 0
C " E C D C > C '"
f-cc Q'. w
Q_ / " u " �
5, :r: / N w
(D LD m i'1 LD ,.,. CJ' 0 m m N 0/ Nm o-NO ,N �/ , .."':,:
SAG 10+90.00 -.3000% I; 0.5097%
LLOYD C�MANLEY DB 1561 PG 178 INSET B MARTHA CAPEL MERRITT �
-ELi±. STA. 19+79.22 BEGIN APPROACH -L-STA. 14+91.83
BEGI BRIDGE -L-A. 15+06.00
INSET A
/
CREST 13 + 90.00 + .5097% 1-0.3000%
NO MORE THAN 50% OF THE CHANNEL
:,1 L;_.!� ��iKED � t6ITE SITE 1 SITE 1 b:z --NAD 8�A 2011
PONDING STILL t:JfSE
('I + °'
� \ \
SHEET 2
�· \ \ INS&-T D '\
��
"'
lLLDYD C. MA�EY CLASS II RIPRAP T<)<-ELEV. 43.3' STA +41 (STRUCTURES PAY ITEM)
STD. RIPRAP PTu CL. B
EST 1 TON
u!. O. DB 1561 PC: 178 ,.�
EST 5 SY GT Wi ELBOWS HC
IMPACTS LEGEND
DENOTES EXCAVATION IN WETLAND
DENOTES HAND CLEARING
DENOTES FILL IN WETLAND
DENOTES MECHANIZED CLEARING
� DENOTES TEMPORARY � FILL IN WETLAND
� DENOTES TEMPORARY � IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
� DENOTES IMPACTS IN � SURFACE WATER
.00
DETAIL 1 TOE PROTECTION [Notto Scale)
� d= l ft. '\__ Geotextile Type of Liner-CLASS B RIPRAP EST 610 TONS EST 1350 SY GT
FROM -L-STA 10+04.25 TO STA 14+80.00 RT FROM -L-STA. 16+45.00 TO STA. 19+66.50 RT FROM -L-STA.10+16.00 TO STA. 14+78.00 LT FROM -L-STA. 16+52.00 TO STA. 19+70.00 LT
RN( SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
CULTIVATED END UTILITY CONST.
-L-STA. 21 + 79.00
VERGIE F. JOHNSON DB 1793 PG ◄41 PB 6 PG 40-0
WALTER JAMES TILLERY DB 02-E PG 52 PB 6 PG 40-0
� BRIDGE APPROACH SLAB
� STRUCTURE EXCAVATION
FOR -L PROFLE SEE SHEET 5
FOR -DET-SEE SHEET 4A
FOR STRUCTURE PLANS.SEE SHEETS S-1 THRU S-?
Revised 5/13/2020
Revised 5/13/2020
Revised 5/13/2020
Revised 5/13/2020
Revised 5/13/2020
Revised 5/13/2020
Revised 5/13/2020
Revised 5/13/2020
Revised 5/13/2020
Revised 5/13/2020
Revised 5/13/2020
Revised 5/13/2020
Revised 5/13/2020
Revised 5/13/2020
Hand Existing Existing
Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural
Site Station Structure Fill In Fill In in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream
No.(From/To)Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp.Design
(ac)(ac)(ac)(ac)(ac)(ac)(ac)(ft)(ft)(ft)
1 -L- STA 10+25 TO FILL FOR ROADWAY 0.53 0.02 0.06 85 25
-L- STA 15+61 CL AND ACCESS
1 -L- STA 15+99 TO FILL FOR ROADWAY 0.21
-L- STA 18+77 CL AND ACCESS
1 -L- STA 15+19 TO EXCAVATION UNDER < 0.01
-L- STA 15+32 CL PROPOSED BRIDGE
1 -L- STA 15+93 TO EXCAVATION UNDER < 0.01 < 0.01 7
1 -L- STA 13+50 TO TEMPORARY ACCESS FOR 0.03 0.09 17
-L- STA 14+72 LT DETOUR BRIDGE
1 -L- STA 16+14 TO TEMPORARY ACCESS FOR 0.04 0.05 17
-L- STA 17+57 LT DETOUR BRIDGE
1 -L- STA 10+19 TO MECHANIZED CLEARING 0.11
-L- STA 15+19 CL FOR FILL IN WETLANDS
1 -L- STA 16+08 TO MECHANIZED CLEARING 0.06
-L- STA 18+77 CL FOR FILL IN WETLANDS
1 -L- STA 10+09 TO HAND CLEARING FOR 0.12
-L- STA 15+23 CL TEMPORARY FILL
1 -L- STA 16+09 TO HAND CLEARING FOR 0.08
-L- STA 18+77 CL TEMPORARY FILL
TOTALS*:0.73 0.07 < 0.01 0.17 0.20 0.02 0.21 92 59 0
*Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts
NOTES:
Revised 2018 Feb SHEET 16 OF 16
WETLAND AND SURACE WATER IMPACTS SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
HALIFAX
B-5662
45617.1.1
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
5/11/2020
Revised 5/13/2020