Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20200579 Ver 1_Sand Filter Calculations_20200511ID#* 20200579 Version* 1 Select Reviewer:* Katie Merritt Initial Review Completed Date 05/12/2020 Mitigation Project Submittal - 5/11/2020 Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* O Yes a No Type of Mitigation Project:* r Stream r Wetlands G Buffer q Nutrient Offset (Select all that apply) Project Contact Information Contact Name:* Rebecca Stubbs, PE Project Information ................................................................................... ID#:* 20200579 Existing IW Project Type: Project Name: County: F DMS r Mitigation Bank Whirligig Station Wilson Document Information Email Address:* rstubbs@mcadamsco.com Version: * 1 Existing Version Mitigation Document Type:* Mitigation Information File Upload: Sand Filter Calculations. pdf 9.02MB Rease upload only one R7F of the cor plete file that needs to be subrritted... Signature Print Name:* Heather Dew, PE Signature:* WHIRLIGIG STATION - PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS WILSON, NC STORMWATER CALCULATIONS NUTRIENT CREDIT GENERATION PROJECT NUMBER: DESIGNED BY: CW I-19000 H. DEW, PE R. STUBBS, PE DATE: APRIL2020 2905 MERIDIAN PARKWAY DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA27713 NC LIC. # C-0293 ", .�` H C '�. S r 49073 CCA SI \ o\�-\ NARRATIVE > CWI-19000 2905 Meridian Parkway, Durham, NC 27713 / 919. 361. 5000creatingexperiences through experience WHIRLIGIG STATION Sand Filter Nutrient Credit Calculations GENERAL DESCRIPTION The proposed design for the Whirligig Station – Parking Lots Improvements underground storage and sand filter SCM was previously approved by the City of Wilson. The original design, signed February 28, 2020, can be found in the Appendix of this report. The project is located on a lot between Tarboro Street SW and Goldsboro Street SW in the downtown area of Wilson, North Carolina and is owned by the City of Wilson. The project is within the Neuse River Basin. The existing site consists of a parking lot area with limited stormwater drainage piping. The proposed design will include increased stormwater routing of onsite and offsite surface runoff to the SCM which is capturing approximately 8.61 acres of total and impervious area. The associated amount of impervious does not change from the pre- development to the post-development condition. CALCULATION METHODOLOGY These calculations provide the determination of nutrient credits, specifically nitrogen, generated by the sand filter once constructed. The sand filter design computations per the current NC DEQ MDCs include a correction to the ‘hmax’, ponding depth value, from the previously provided calculations in the original Stormwater Design Calculations (See Appendix). The original sand filter nutrient calculations were completed using the North Carolina Stormwater Nitrogen and Phosphorus Tool (SNAP Tool). However, the design storm size input has been updated in the current report to reflect the water quality design storm for which the facility is sized. The original calculations were referenced for all other inputs. DISCUSSION OF RESULTS NUTRIENT CREDITS GENERATED The onsite underground storage and sand filter SCM is capturing approximately 8.61 acres of surface runoff. The sand filter is designed per MDC standards. Nutrient treatment was not required by the development in the original design, however, as the sand filter is providing nitrogen treatment in the downtown area, the credits generated have been calculated to be utilized in the associated MBI. The total generated nitrogen credits were calculated to be 431.23 lbs. CONCLUSION If the development on this tract is built as proposed within the original report (see Appendix), then no additional stormwater control measures are needed to generate the calculated nitrogen credits associated with this project. However, modifications to the proposed development may require that this analysis be revised. Some modifications that would require this analysis to be revised include: 1.The proposed site impervious surface differs from the amount accounted for in this report. 2.The post-development watershed breaks change significantly from those used to prepare this report. The above modifications may result in the assumptions within this report becoming invalid. The computations within this report will need to be revisited if any of the above conditions become apparent as development of the proposed site moves forward. Whirligig Station – Parking Lot Improvements CWI-19000 Modified Sand Filter Calculations WHIRLIGIG STATION CWI-19000 MODIFIED SAND FILTER DESIGN H. DEW, PE 3/17/2020 Determination of Water Quality Volume (WQV) Note: The following design calculations are based upon requirements from the NCDEQ Minimum Design Critieria. where, WQV= water quality volume (CF) RV = 0.05+0.009(I) where I is percent impervious cover A = area in acres P = rainfall (in inches) Input data: Total area, A =8.61 acres Impervious area =8.61 acres Percent impervious cover, I =100.0 % Rainfall, P =1.0 inches Calculated values: RV = 0.95 WQV = 0.68 acre-ft =29693 cf. Sizing is based upon the discounted water quality volume, WQV dis (75% of the total WQV). WQVdis = 22270 cf. Size Sand Filter and Sedimentation Chamber Determine the required Sand Filter Surface Area The minimum required sand filter surface area is the discounted WQ volume divided by the ponding depth: Ponding Depth (D) =2.50 ft ASF = 8,908 sf. (minimum sand filter surface area required) The minimum sand chamber area must accommodate 50% of the treatment volume. Design Summary ASF ≥8,908 sf (minimum total sand and sedimentation chamber surface area) ASF ≥9,230 sf (total sand and sedimentation chamber surface area provided) ASand ≥4,454 sf (minimum sand chamber area required) ASand ≥6,602 sf (minimum sand chamber area provided) ASed ≥2,628 sf (minimum sedimentation chamber area provided) D =2.50 ft (maximum WQV dis ponding depth in facility) A SF = WQV dis / D WQV = (P)(R V )(A)/12 x 43,560 WHIRLIGIG STATION CWI-19000 MODIFIED SAND FILTER DESIGN H. DEW, PE 3/17/2020 Determination of Underdrain Sizing The following design calculations are based upon requirements from the 2009 NC BMP Design Manual. Compute drawdown through filter bed where, A = provided surface area of filter bed (sf) k = coefficient of permeability of filter media (ft/day) hF = height of water above filter bed (feet) dF = filter bed depth (feet) Input data: A =6602 sf k =3.50 ft/day hF =2.50 ft dF =2.00 ft Calculated values: Q =51993 cf/day =0.602 cfs Compute minimum drawdown discharge WQV =22270 cf t = 1.667 days Minimum drawdown, Q = 0.155 cfs Compute underdrain pipe capacity Number of rows, n =8 Diameter of underdrains, d =6 inches Area, A =0.1963 sf Wetted perimeter, P =1.5708 ft Slope, S =0.0050 ft/ft Capacity of one pipe = 0.395 cfs Total capacity = 3.161 cfs Assume 50% clogging =1.580 cfs DESIGN ACCEPTABLE Compute underdrain perforation capacity 3/8-inch perforations spaced 3 inches on center, along 4 longitudinal rows spaced 90 o apart Number of rows, n =8 Diameter of underdrains, d =6 inches Length of underdrains, L =40 ft Number of perforations = 5120 holes Capacity of one hole = 0.008 cfs Total capacity = 42.280 cfs Assume 50% clogging =21.140 cfs DESIGN ACCEPTABLE Q = A(k)(h F +d F )/(d F ) Project Information Project Name:Merrimont Park Submission Date: Project Area (ft2):377,194 ft2 Disturbed Area (ft2):85,836 ft2 Development Land Use Type:Commercial Development Activity Type:Existing Dev. Retrofit Designated Downtown Area?yes Project Location/Address:211 Tarboro St. SW County:Wilson Local Jurisdiction:Wilson Project Latitude Coordinates:35.724181 N Project Longitude Coordinates:-77.912967 W Precipitation Station:Wilson Physiographic Region:Coastal Nutrient Management Watershed:Neuse Subwatershed:Neuse - 03020203 Phosphorus Delivery Zone:Neuse - Contentnea Nitrogen Delivery Zone:Neuse - Contentnea Project Designer and Contact Phone Number / Email:Rebecca Stubbs, PE, rstubbs@mcadamsco.com Part of Common Development Plan?yes Project Owner Type:Local Government Project Description: Roof 1.18 0.11 101,282 101,282 Roadway 1.64 0.34 75,318 75,318 Parking/Driveway/Sidewalk 1.42 0.18 200,594 200,594 Protected Forest 0.97 0.03 Other Pervious/Landscaping 2.48 1.07 CUSTOM LAND COVER 1 CUSTOM LAND COVER 2 CUSTOM LAND COVER 3 LAND TAKEN UP BY SCM 1.18 0.11 SIMPLE METHOD Stormwater Runoff Volume Generated, V Runoff Coefficient, R v V = Pj * Rv * (P/12) * A Rv = 0.05 + (0.009 *I) where A = drainage area (ft2) where I = percent impervious (%) Pj = Average Annual Pollutant Load, L P = L = where C = Pre-Project: Post-Project: A =8.6592 ac A =8.6592 ac P =47.40 in.P =47.40 in. V =1273878 ft3 V =1273878 ft3 I =100%I =100% Rv =0.95 Rv =0.95 Pj =0.9 Pj =0.9 CTN =1.40 mg/L CTN =1.40 mg/L CTP =0.19 mg/L CTP =0.19 mg/L LTN =111.32 lb/yr LTN =111.32 lb/yr LTP =15.36 lb/yr LTP =15.36 lb/yr event mean concentration (mg/L) Equations Used and Project Area Calculations fraction of rain events with runoff average annual rainfall depth (in) (Pj * Rv * (P/12 )) * (C * A * 2.72) PROJECT AREA LAND COVERS TN EMC (mg/L) TP EMC (mg/L) Post- Project Area (ft2) Pre- Project Area (ft2) Net Change of Land Covers (ft2):0 Total Pre-Project Calculated Area (ft 2): Total Post-Project Calculated Area (ft 2): Total Project Area Entered (ft 2):377,194 377,194 377,194 LAND COVER AREA CHECK 3. SCM Characteristics Catchment ID 1 1 1 SCM ID 101 102 103 Type of SCM Sand Filter per MDC - Closed Predominant hydrologic soil group at SCM location D SCM Description Sand Filter per MDC - Closed Design Storm Size (inches/24hrs)1.00 Percent of Full Size 100% Hydrologic Value - Percent Annual Effluent 90% Hydrologic Value - Percent Annual Overflow 10% Hydrologic Value - Percent Annual ET/Infiltrated 0% SCM Effluent TP EMC (mg/L)0.12 SCM Effluent TN EMC (mg/L)1.20 SCM Land Cover TP EMC (mg/L)0.11 SCM Land Cover TN EMC (mg/L)1.18 Drains to SCM ID 0 Catchment Routing (Source Catchment)Catchments Draining to SCM 101 Catchments Draining to SCM 102 Catchments Draining to SCM 103 Catchment 1 Catchment 2 Catchment 3 Catchment 4 Catchment 5 Catchment 6 SCM ID:101 102 103 SCM Drainage Area Land Covers Area Draining Directly to SCM 101 (ft2) Area Draining Directly to SCM 102 (ft2) Area Draining Directly to SCM 103 (ft2) Total Land Use Area Treated By All SCMs (ft2) Allowable Total Land Use Area to be Treated Based on Post-Project Areas (ft2) Roof 101,282 101,282 101,282 Roadway 75,318 75,318 75,318 Parking/Driveway/Sidewalk 198,466 198,466 200,594 Protected Forest 0 0 Other Pervious/Landscaping 0 0 CUSTOM LAND COVER 1 0 0 CUSTOM LAND COVER 2 0 0 CUSTOM LAND COVER 3 0 0 LAND TAKEN UP BY SCM 0 0 TOTAL AREA DRAINING TO SCM (ft2):375,066 0 0 375,066 377,194 CATCHMENT AREA (ft2):375,066 Project Summary 377,194 ft2 8.6592 acres 85,836 ft2 1.9705 acres 100%100% 1.77 12.86 15.36 111.32 10.15 96.98 N/A N/A 0.00 0.00 -5.21 -14.35 -5.21 -14.35 Nutrient Export Summary Pre-Project Whole Site Conditions Post-Project Whole Site without SCMs Post-Project Whole Site with SCMs Post-Project SCM-Treated Area Post-Project Untreated Area 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 1,273,878 1,273,878 1,273,878 1,266,692 7,187 0%0%0% 1.40 1.40 1.22 1.22 1.42 111.32 111.32 96.98 96.34 0.64 12.86 12.86 11.20 11.19 13.04 0%0%-13% 0.19 0.19 0.13 0.13 0.18 15.36 15.36 10.15 10.07 0.08 1.77 1.77 1.17 1.17 1.65 0%0%-34% SCM/Catchment Summary Volume Reduction (%)TN Out (mg/L) TP Out (mg/L) TN Out (lbs/ac/yr) TP Out (lbs/ac/yr) TN Reduction (%) TP Reduction (%) 0.00%1.22 0.13 11.19 1.17 12.94%34.07% 0.00%1.22 0.13 11.19 1.17 12.94%34.07% 0.00%0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00%0.00% 0.00%0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00%0.00% 0.00%0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00%0.00% 0.00%0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00%0.00% 0.00%0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00%0.00% 0.00%0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00%0.00% 0.00%0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00%0.00% 0.00%0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00%0.00% 0.00%0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00%0.00% 0.00%0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00%0.00% 0.00%0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00%0.00% 0.00%0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00%0.00% 0.00%0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00%0.00% 0.00%0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00%0.00% 0.00%0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00%0.00% 0.00%0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00%0.00% 0.00%0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00%0.00% 0.00%0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00%0.00% 0.00%0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00%0.00% 0.00%0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00%0.00% 0.00%0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00%0.00% 0.00%0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00%0.00% P Load Treatment Balance at Site (lb/yr): Nitrogen Delivery Factor (%): Owner Type: Designated Downtown Area? Subwatershed: Nitrogen Delivery Zone: Commercial yes Neuse - 03020203 Neuse - Contentnea Neuse Neuse - Contentnea Existing Dev. Retrofit Merrimont Park Total Nitrogen Loading Rate (lb/ac/yr) Total Nitrogen % Change (relative to pre-D) Project Name: Project Area (ft2): Disturbed Area (ft2): County: Development Land Use Type: P Load Treatment Balance at Lake (lb/yr):N Load Treatment Balance at Lake (lb/yr): Nutrient Management Watershed: Phosphorus Delivery Zone: N Load Treatment Balance at Site (lb/yr): Phosphorus Delivery Factor (%): Submission Date: Total Phosphorus Load Leaving Site (lb/yr) Total Phosphorus Loading Rate (lb/ac/yr) Percent Built-Upon Area (BUA) (%) Annual Runoff Volume (ft3/yr) Annual Runoff % Change (relative to pre-D) Total Nitrogen EMC (mg/L) Total Nitrogen Load Leaving Site (lb/yr) Development Activity Type: Percent Impervious (for runoff calculation) (%) Total Phosphorus EMC (mg/L) Phosphorus Loading Rate Target (lb/ac/yr): Phosphorus Load Target at Site (lb/yr): Phosphorus Load Leaving Site w/SCMs (lb/yr): P Offsite Buy-Down Threshold Loading Rate (lb/ac/yr): SCM rows in red have a data entry error for the SCM that makes an error in the calculation. Wilson Local Jurisdiction:Wilson Total Phosphorus % Change (relative to pre-D) Total P Load Reduction Needed (lb/yr): Nitrogen Loading Rate Target (lb/ac/yr): Nitrogen Load Target at Site (lb/yr): Nitrogen Load Leaving Site w/SCMs (lb/yr): N Offsite Buy-Down Threshold Loading Rate Total N Load Reduction Needed (lb/yr): Local Government 102: NA 101: Sand Filter per MDC - Closed SCM ID and Type 103: NA 201: NA Catchment 1 Catchment 2 Catchment 3 Catchment 4 Catchment 5 202: NA 203: NA 301: NA 302: NA 303: NA 401: NA 402: NA 403: NA 602: NA 603: NA 501: NA 502: NA Catchment 6 503: NA 601: NA Type of SCM:Sand Filter per MDC - Closed Area Treated by SCM (ft2):375,066 Percent Impervious of Contributing Watershed (%): 100% Runoff Coefficient, Rv: 0.95 Inflow Volume (ft3):1,266,692 Incoming Total Nitrogen Concentration (mg/L): 1.40 Annual Incoming Total Nitrogen Load (lbs): 110.66 Incoming Total Phosphorus Concentration (mg/L): 0.19 Annual Incoming Total Phosphorus Load (lbs): 15.28 Total Volume Leaving SCM (ft3):1,266,692 Outgoing Total Nitrogen Concentration (mg/L): 1.22 Annual Outgoing Total Nitrogen Load (lbs): 96.34 Outgoing Total Phosphorus Concentration (mg/L): 0.13 Annual Outgoing Total Phosphorus Load (lbs): 10.07 Annual Volume Reduction by SCM (ft3):0 Annual Volume Reduction by SCM (%): 0% Annual Total Nitrogen Reduction by SCM (%): 12.94% Annual Total Nitrogen Reduction by SCM (lb): 14.32 Annual Total Phosphorus Reduction by SCM (%): 34.07% Annual Total Phosphorus Reduction by SCM (lb): 5.21 L = ((P * Pj * Rv) ÷ (12 )) * (C * A * 2.72) where L = annual pollutant loading (lbs) Pj = fraction of rain events that produce runoff (dec) C = event mean concentration of pollutant (mg/L) Lout = Vout * EMCout * 6.243ᴇ-5 where Vout = outflow volume (ft3), EMCout = effluent median concentration (mg/L) Vout = Vin * (1 - Red) where Vin = inflow volume (ft3) Red = volume reduction by SCM (%) Rv = 0.05 + (0.009 *I), where I = percent impervious (%) Supporting Calculations V = Pj * Rv * A * (P/12), where A = area of catchment (ft2) P = average annual rainfall depth (in) CATCHMENT 1, SCM 101 L = ((P * Pj * Rv) ÷ (12 )) * (C * A * 2.72) where L = annual pollutant loading (lbs) Pj = fraction of rain events that produce runoff (dec) C = event mean concentration of pollutant (mg/L) Lout = Vout * EMCout * 6.243ᴇ-5 where Vout = outflow volume (ft3), EMCout = effluent median concentration (mg/L) Vout = Vin * (1 - Red) where Vin = inflow volume (ft3) Red = volume reduction by SCM (%) Rv = 0.05 + (0.009 *I), where I = percent impervious (%) Supporting Calculations V = Pj * Rv * A * (P/12), where A = area of catchment (ft2) P = average annual rainfall depth (in) Cumulative Catchment Area (ft2):375,066 Composite Catchment Impervious Surface (%): Composite Runoff Coefficient, Rv: Cumulative Runoff Volume (ft3):1,266,692 Composite Total Nitrogen Runoff Concentration (mg/L): 1.40 Annual Total Nitrogen Runoff Load (lbs): 110.66 Composite Total Phosphorus Runoff Concentration (mg/L): 0.19 Annual Total Phosphorus Runoff Load (lbs): 15.28 Total Volume Leaving Catchment (ft3):1,266,692 Outgoing Total Nitrogen Concentration (mg/L): 1.22 Annual Outgoing Total Nitrogen Load (lbs): 96.34 Outgoing Total Phosphorus Concentration (mg/L): 0.13 Annual Outgoing Total Phosphorus Load (lbs): 10.07 Annual Volume Reduction by Catchment (ft3):0 Annual Volume Reduction by Catchment (%): 0% Annual Total Nitrogen Reduction by Catchment (%): 12.94% Annual Total Nitrogen Reduction by Catchment (lb): 14.32 Annual Total Phosphorus Reduction by Catchment (%): 34.07% Annual Total Phosphorus Reduction by Catchment (lb): 5.21 CATCHMENT 1 4/6/2020 Wilson N/A N/A 100% 100% (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (L) (Where Applicable) Untreated Loading Rate (lbs/ac/yr) Treated Loading Rate (lbs/ac/yr) Loading Rate Target (lbs/ac/yr) Reduction Need (lbs/ac/yr) Project Size (ac) Offset Duration (yrs) Delivery Factor (%) State Buy Down Amount (lbs) Local Gov’t Buy Down Amount (lbs) B - C D * E * F * G 12.86 11.20 12.86 -1.66 8.6592 30 100%0.00 (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (L) (Where Applicable) Untreated Load Rate (lbs/ac/yr) Treated Load Rate (lbs/ac/yr) Loading Rate Target (lbs/ac/yr) Reduction Need (lbs/ac/yr) Project Size (ac) Offset Duration (yrs) Delivery Factor (%) State Buy Down Amount (lbs) Local Gov’t Buy Down Amount (lbs) B - C D * E * F * G 1.77 1.17 1.77 -0.60 8.6592 30 100%0.00 Phone: Date: Date:(mm/dd/yyyy) County: Wilson 35.724181 -77.912967 100.00% 100.00% WATERSHED INFORMATION P Offsite Threshold Rate (lb/ac/yr): NUTRIENT OFFSET REQUEST Phosphorus Load Offset Needs Nitrogen Load Offset Needs Local Government Authorizing Signature: Staff Email: Development Land Use Type: Development Activity Type: Commercial Nitrogen Delivery Factor: Phosphorus Delivery Factor: Neuse Neuse - 03020203 Neuse - Contentnea Neuse - Contentnea Staff Name: Existing Dev. Retrofit Project Latitude: Project Longitude: LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORIZATION Local Government Name: N Offsite Threshold Rate (lb/ac/yr): Pre-Project Built-Upon Area %: Post-Project Built-Upon Area %: Nutrient Management Watershed: Subwatershed: Nitrogen Delivery Zone: Phosphorus Delivery Zone: http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/planning/nonpoint-source-management/nutrient-offset- information Nutrient Management Strategy Watershed - Nutrient Offset Credit Reporting Form Project Address: Project Name: Applicant Name:McAdams Whirligig Station Parking Lot Improvements 211 Tarboro St. SW Please complete and submit the following information to the local government permitting your development project to characterize it and assess the need to purchase nutrient offset credits. Contact and rule implementation information can be found online at: PROJECT INFORMATION Whirligig Station – Parking Lot Improvements CWI-19000 Appendix – Original Stormwater Design Calculations WHIRLIGIG STATION Parking Lot Improvements Wilson County, NC STGRMWA.TER DESIGN CALCULATIONS February 28, 2020 101 � Mm SIG PG 1906 Nash Street North Wilson, NC 27893-1726 Phone: (252) 399-0704 Fax: (252) 399-0804 Robert,, bartlett . 0I II///I/ N CARQ/// o� S S !�'< 4 < LNGtNE WHIRLIGIG STATION – Parking Lot Improvements STORMWATER UNDERGROUND STORAGE WITH SAND FILTER DESIGN CALCULATIONS GENERAL SITE DESCRIPTION The proposed project is located between Tarboro Street SW and Goldsboro St SW, City of Wilson in Wilson County. (Latitude: 35.724181°; Longitude: -77.912967 °). The site is an existing parking area that is mostly impervious with limited drainage pipe sizes to accommodate all site surface runoff. The proposed project is will route all site and offsite surface runoff to an underground stormwater treatment system nutrients and peak flow reduction. Site Data: Site Area 1.84+/- acres Total onsite + offsite drainage area 375,066 sf (8.61+/-) acres Total Built Upon Area 375,066 sf (8.61+/-) acres Percent Impervious 100% Proposed SCM Underground Storage with Sand Filter UNDERGROUND STORAGESYSTEMPRELIMINARY PLANSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Underground Storage with Sand Filter Design Calculations  Stormwater Nitrogen & Phosphorus Tool (SNAP)  Sand Filter Preliminary Design  Stormwater Events Equivalent CN value  Equivalent Impervious Area Calculations  Underground Storage Pond Design Calculations Project Information Project Name:Whirligig Station Parking Lot Improvements Submission Date: Project Area (ft2):377,194 ft2 Disturbed Area (ft2):85,836 ft2 Development Land Use Type:Commercial Development Activity Type:Existing Dev. Retrofit Designated Downtown Area?yes Project Location/Address:211 Tarboro St. SW County:Wilson Local Jurisdiction:Wilson Project Latitude Coordinates:35.724181 N Project Longitude Coordinates:77.912967 W Precipitation Station:Wilson Physiographic Region:Coastal Nutrient Management Watershed:Neuse Subwatershed:Neuse - 03020203 Phosphorus Delivery Zone:Neuse - Contentnea Nitrogen Delivery Zone:Neuse - Contentnea Project Designer and Contact Phone Number / Email:Ronald Fuentes (252) 399-0704 Part of Common Development Plan?yes Project Owner Type:Local Government Project Description: Project Area Land Cover Characteristics Roof 1.18 0.11 101,282 101,282 Roadway 1.64 0.34 75,318 75,318 Parking/Driveway/Sidewalk 1.42 0.18 200,594 200,594 Protected Forest 0.97 0.03 Other Pervious/Landscaping 2.48 1.07 CUSTOM LAND COVER 1 CUSTOM LAND COVER 2 CUSTOM LAND COVER 3 LAND TAKEN UP BY SCM 1.18 0.11 SIMPLE METHOD Stormwater Runoff Volume Generated, V Runoff Coefficient, R v V = Pj * Rv * (P/12) * A Rv = 0.05 + (0.009 *I) where A = drainage area (ft2) where I = percent impervious (%) Pj = Average Annual Pollutant Load, L P = L = where C = Pre-Project: Post-Project: A = 8.6592 ac A =8.6592 ac P = 47.40 in.P =47.40 in. V = 1273878 ft3 V =1273878 ft3 I = 100%I = 100% Rv = 0.95 Rv = 0.95 Pj = 0.9 Pj = 0.9 CTN = 1.40 mg/L CTN = 1.40 mg/L CTP = 0.19 mg/L CTP = 0.19 mg/L LTN = 111.32 lb/yr LTN = 111.32 lb/yr LTP = 15.36 lb/yr LTP = 15.36 lb/yr Net Change of Land Covers (ft2):0 Total Pre-Project Calculated Area (ft2): Total Post-Project Calculated Area (ft2): Total Project Area Entered (ft2):377,194 377,194 377,194 LAND COVER AREA CHECK PROJECT AREA LAND COVERS TN EMC (mg/L) TP EMC (mg/L) Post- Project Area (ft2) Pre- Project Area (ft2) event mean concentration (mg/L) Equations Used and Project Area Calculations fraction of rain events with runoff average annual rainfall depth (in) (Pj * Rv * (P/12 )) * (C * A * 2.72) 3. SCM Characteristics Catchment ID 1 1 1 SCM ID 101 102 103 Type of SCM Sand Filter per MDC - Closed Predominant hydrologic soil group at SCM location D SCM Description Sand Filter per MDC - Closed Design Storm Size (inches/24hrs)2.91 Percent of Full Size 100% Hydrologic Value - Percent Annual Effluent 90% Hydrologic Value - Percent Annual Overflow 10% Hydrologic Value - Percent Annual ET/Infiltrated 0% SCM Effluent TP EMC (mg/L)0.12 SCM Effluent TN EMC (mg/L)1.20 SCM Land Cover TP EMC (mg/L)0.11 SCM Land Cover TN EMC (mg/L)1.18 Drains to SCM ID 0 Catchment Routing (Source Catchment)Catchments Draining to SCM 101 Catchments Draining to SCM 102 Catchments Draining to SCM 103 Catchment 1 no Catchment 2 no Catchment 3 no Catchment 4 no Catchment 5 no Catchment 6 no SCM ID:101 102 103 SCM Drainage Area Land Covers Area Draining Directly to SCM 101 (ft2) Area Draining Directly to SCM 102 (ft2) Area Draining Directly to SCM 103 (ft2) Total Land Use Area Treated By All SCMs (ft2) Roof 101,282 101,282 Roadway 75,318 75,318 Parking/Driveway/Sidewalk 198,466 198,466 Protected Forest 0 Other Pervious/Landscaping 0 CUSTOM LAND COVER 1 0 CUSTOM LAND COVER 2 0 CUSTOM LAND COVER 3 0 LAND TAKEN UP BY SCM 0 TOTAL AREA DRAINING TO SCM (ft2):375,066 0 0 375,066 CATCHMENT AREA (ft2):375,066 SCM Characteristics 3. SCM Characteristics Catchment ID SCM ID Type of SCM Predominant hydrologic soil group at SCM location SCM Description Design Storm Size (inches/24hrs) Percent of Full Size Hydrologic Value - Percent Annual Effluent Hydrologic Value - Percent Annual Overflow Hydrologic Value - Percent Annual ET/Infiltrated SCM Effluent TP EMC (mg/L) SCM Effluent TN EMC (mg/L) SCM Land Cover TP EMC (mg/L) SCM Land Cover TN EMC (mg/L) Drains to SCM ID Catchment Routing (Source Catchment) Catchment 1 Catchment 2 Catchment 3 Catchment 4 Catchment 5 Catchment 6 SCM ID: SCM Drainage Area Land Covers Roof Roadway Parking/Driveway/Sidewalk Protected Forest Other Pervious/Landscaping CUSTOM LAND COVER 1 CUSTOM LAND COVER 2 CUSTOM LAND COVER 3 LAND TAKEN UP BY SCM TOTAL AREA DRAINING TO SCM (ft2): CATCHMENT AREA (ft2): SCM Characteristics Allowable Total Land Use Area to be Treated Based on Post-Project Areas (ft2) Post-Project Untreated Land Area (ft2) 101,282 0 75,318 0 200,594 2,128 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 377,194 2,128 Project Summary 377,194 ft2 8.6592 acres 85,836 ft2 1.9705 acres 100% 100% 1.77 12.86 15.36 111.32 10.15 96.98 N/A N/A 0.00 0.00 -5.21 -14.35 -5.21 -14.35 Nutrient Export Summary Pre-Project Whole Site Conditions Post-Project Whole Site without SCMs Post-Project Whole Site with SCMs Post-Project SCM-Treated Area Post-Project Untreated Area 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 1,273,878 1,273,878 1,273,878 1,266,692 7,187 0% 0% 0% 1.40 1.40 1.22 1.22 1.42 111.32 111.32 96.98 96.34 0.64 12.86 12.86 11.20 11.19 13.04 0% 0% -13% 0.19 0.19 0.13 0.13 0.18 15.36 15.36 10.15 10.07 0.08 1.77 1.77 1.17 1.17 1.65 0% 0% -34% Wilson Local Jurisdiction:Wilson Total Phosphorus % Change (relative to pre-D) Total P Load Reduction Needed (lb/yr): Nitrogen Loading Rate Target (lb/ac/yr): Nitrogen Load Target at Site (lb/yr): Nitrogen Load Leaving Site w/SCMs (lb/yr): N Offsite Buy-Down Threshold Loading Rate Total N Load Reduction Needed (lb/yr): Local Government Submission Date: Total Phosphorus Load Leaving Site (lb/yr) Total Phosphorus Loading Rate (lb/ac/yr) Percent Built-Upon Area (BUA) (%) Annual Runoff Volume (ft3/yr) Annual Runoff % Change (relative to pre-D) Total Nitrogen EMC (mg/L) Total Nitrogen Load Leaving Site (lb/yr) Development Activity Type: Percent Impervious (for runoff calculation) (%) Total Phosphorus EMC (mg/L) Phosphorus Loading Rate Target (lb/ac/yr): Phosphorus Load Target at Site (lb/yr): Phosphorus Load Leaving Site w/SCMs (lb/yr): P Offsite Buy-Down Threshold Loading Rate (lb/ac/yr): Whirligig Station Parking Lot Improvements Total Nitrogen Loading Rate (lb/ac/yr) Total Nitrogen % Change (relative to pre-D) Project Name: Project Area (ft2): Disturbed Area (ft2): County: Development Land Use Type: P Load Treatment Balance at Lake (lb/yr): N Load Treatment Balance at Lake (lb/yr): Nutrient Management Watershed: Phosphorus Delivery Zone: N Load Treatment Balance at Site (lb/yr): Phosphorus Delivery Factor (%): P Load Treatment Balance at Site (lb/yr): Nitrogen Delivery Factor (%): Owner Type: Designated Downtown Area? Subwatershed: Nitrogen Delivery Zone: Commercial yes Neuse - 03020203 Neuse - Contentnea Neuse Neuse - Contentnea Existing Dev. Retrofit SCM/Catchment Summary Volume Reduction (%)TN Out (mg/L) TP Out (mg/L) TN Out (lbs/ac/yr) TP Out (lbs/ac/yr)TN Reduction (%) TP Reduction (%) 0.00%1.22 0.13 11.19 1.17 12.94%34.07% 0.00% 1.22 0.13 11.19 1.17 12.94% 34.07% 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00% 602: NA 603: NA 501: NA 502: NA Catchment 6 503: NA 601: NA Catchment 3 Catchment 4 Catchment 5 202: NA 203: NA 301: NA 302: NA 303: NA 401: NA 402: NA 403: NA 102: NA 101: Sand Filter per MDC - Closed SCM ID and Type 103: NA 201: NA Catchment 1 Catchment 2 SCM rows in red have a data entry error for the SCM that makes an error in the calculation. Type of SCM:Sand Filter per MDC - Closed Area Treated by SCM (ft2):375,066 Percent Impervious of Contributing Watershed (%): 100% Runoff Coefficient, Rv: 0.95 Inflow Volume (ft3):1,266,692 Incoming Total Nitrogen Concentration (mg/L): 1.40 Annual Incoming Total Nitrogen Load (lbs): 110.66 Incoming Total Phosphorus Concentration (mg/L): 0.19 Annual Incoming Total Phosphorus Load (lbs): 15.28 Total Volume Leaving SCM (ft3):1,266,692 Outgoing Total Nitrogen Concentration (mg/L): 1.22 Annual Outgoing Total Nitrogen Load (lbs): 96.34 Outgoing Total Phosphorus Concentration (mg/L): 0.13 Annual Outgoing Total Phosphorus Load (lbs): 10.07 Annual Volume Reduction by SCM (ft3):0 Annual Volume Reduction by SCM (%): 0% Annual Total Nitrogen Reduction by SCM (%): 12.94% Annual Total Nitrogen Reduction by SCM (lb): 14.32 Annual Total Phosphorus Reduction by SCM (%): 34.07% Annual Total Phosphorus Reduction by SCM (lb): 5.21 Rv = 0.05 + (0.009 *I), where I = percent impervious (%) Supporting Calculations V = Pj * Rv * A * (P/12), where A = area of catchment (ft2) P = average annual rainfall depth (in) CATCHMENT 1, SCM 101 L = ((P * Pj * Rv) ÷ (12 )) * (C * A * 2.72) where L = annual pollutant loading (lbs) Pj = fraction of rain events that produce runoff (dec) C = event mean concentration of pollutant (mg/L) Lout = Vout * EMCout * 6.243ᴇ-5 where Vout = outflow volume (ft3), EMCout = effluent median concentration (mg/L) Vout = Vin * (1 - Red) where Vin = inflow volume (ft3) Red = volume reduction by SCM (%) Wilson N/A N/A 100% 100% (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (L) (Where Applicable) Untreated Loading Rate (lbs/ac/yr) Treated Loading Rate (lbs/ac/yr) Loading Rate Target (lbs/ac/yr) Reduction Need (lbs/ac/yr) Project Size (ac) Offset Duration (yrs) Delivery Factor (%) State Buy Down Amount (lbs) Local Gov’t Buy Down Amount (lbs) B - C D * E * F * G 12.86 11.20 12.86 -1.66 8.6592 30 100%0.00 (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (L) (Where Applicable) Untreated Load Rate (lbs/ac/yr) Treated Load Rate (lbs/ac/yr) Loading Rate Target (lbs/ac/yr) Reduction Need (lbs/ac/yr) Project Size (ac) Offset Duration (yrs) Delivery Factor (%) State Buy Down Amount (lbs) Local Gov’t Buy Down Amount (lbs) B - C D * E * F * G 1.77 1.17 1.77 -0.60 8.6592 30 100%0.00 Phone: Date: http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/planning/nonpoint-source-management/nutrient-offset- information Nutrient Management Strategy Watershed - Nutrient Offset Credit Reporting Form Project Address: Project Name: Applicant Name: Whirligig Station Parking Lot Improvements 211 Tarboro St. SW Please complete and submit the following information to the local government permitting your development project to characterize it and assess the need to purchase nutrient offset credits. Contact and rule implementation information can be found online at: PROJECT INFORMATION Staff Name: Existing Dev. Retrofit Project Latitude: Project Longitude: LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORIZATION Local Government Name: N Offsite Threshold Rate (lb/ac/yr): Pre-Project Built-Upon Area %: Post-Project Built-Upon Area %: Nutrient Management Watershed: Subwatershed: Nitrogen Delivery Zone: Phosphorus Delivery Zone: Development Land Use Type: Development Activity Type: Commercial Nitrogen Delivery Factor: Phosphorus Delivery Factor: Neuse Neuse - 03020203 Neuse - Contentnea Neuse - Contentnea Local Government Authorizing Signature: Staff Email: Date: (mm/dd/yyyy) County: Wilson 35.724181 77.912967 100.00% 100.00% WATERSHED INFORMATION P Offsite Threshold Rate (lb/ac/yr): NUTRIENT OFFSET REQUEST Phosphorus Load Offset Needs Nitrogen Load Offset Needs SAND FILTER PRELIMINARY DESIGN Water Quality Volume (WQv) Drainage Area (DA) 375,066.00 sf Built Upon Area (BUA)375,066.00 sf BUA/DA 1.00 Runoff Coefficient (Rv) 0.95 Storm Rainfall Depth (Rd)1 in Water Quality Volume (WQv)29,692.73 cf Sediment Chamber Surface Area Required, Asmin.=240*Rv*(DA/43560)*Rd 1,963.16 sf Surface Area of Sediment Chamber Provided (As)2,459.50 sf Depth of Sediment Chamber 2.00 ft Volume of Sediment Chamber 4,919.00 cf Sand Filter WQv adj. = 0.75 x WQv 22,270 cf Ponding depth, (h = 0.5' to 6')6.00 ft Surface Area Required, Afmin = WQv adj. / h 3,711.59 sf Surface Area Provided (Af)6,450.50 sf Sand Filter Depth (D)2.00 ft WQv adj. surface area (SA = As + Af) 8,910.00 sf % WQv adj above sand Filter (must be greater than 50%) 72.40 % Min. required Weir Height above sand filter (WQv adj./SA) 2.50 ft Provided overflow weir height above sand filter 2.50 ft Porosity (N)0.40 Equivalent Surface Area for caclulating Volume of voids 2,580.20 sf Underdrain Pipe Material PVC Manning's roughness coefficient (n)0.010 Slope (s)0.005 ft/ft Pipe size 6.000 in. Flow capcity 0.516 cfs Number of pipes 9.00 Total flow (Qdrain)4.64 cfs Outlet Pipe size (Theoretical) 13.66 in. USE ====> 12.00 in. Outlet Pipe Capacity (Qfull)3.27 cfs Drawdown Rate Sand Filter Depth provided (D) 24.00 in Dept of sand above pipe/s 18.00 in Sand Filter Exfiltration Rate (ER= Qdrain/Af) 21.93 in/hr Min. Exfiltration Rate (ERmin)2.00 in/hr Min. Qdrain = ERmin * Af 0.30 cfs Time to drain sand chamber (T) = D/ER 1.09 hrs Max. time to drain sand chamber (Tmax) = D/Ermin 12.00 hrs * Max. drawdown is controlled by the drain pipe outlet capacity Chamber Areas Total Storage Volume (from Storm Trap) 130,175.98 cf Total interior depth of structure 8.33 ft Equivalent Surface Area (Volume / Depth) 15,621.12 sf Sediment Chamber surface area 2,459.50 sf Sand Filter surface area 6,450.50 sf Overflow Chamber surface area 30.67 sf Temporary Storage surface area 6,680.45 sf Stage-Storage Table Sand Filter Treatment Chamber Temporary Storage Total Elevation Area (sf) Incremental Area (sf) Incremental Area (sf) Incremental Incremental Storage Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume 127.00 2580.0 0.0 6,680.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 128.00 2580.0 2580.0 6,680.0 6,680.0 9,260.0 9,260.0 129.00 2580.0 2580.0 8910.0 0.0 6,680.0 6,680.0 9,260.0 18,520.0 130.00 8910.0 8,910.0 6,680.0 6,680.0 15,590.0 34,110.0 131.00 8910.0 8,910.0 6,680.0 6,680.0 15,590.0 49,700.0 131.50 8910.0 4,455.0 6,680.0 3,340.0 7,795.0 57,495.0 132.00 8910.0 4,455.0 6,680.0 3,340.0 7,795.0 65,290.0 133.00 8910.0 8,910.0 6,680.0 6,680.0 15,590.0 80,880.0 134.00 8910.0 8,910.0 6,680.0 6,680.0 15,590.0 96,470.0 135.00 8910.0 8,910.0 6,680.0 6,680.0 15,590.0 112,060.0 135.33 8910.0 2,940.3 6,680.0 2,204.4 5,144.7 117,204.7 Total 5,160.0 Total 56,400.3 Total 55,644.4 Total Storage 117,204.7 Note: Sand Filter area equivalent to 40% of total surface area to account for volume of voids. STORM EXISTING POST DEV'T POST DEV'T REDUCTION SCM WS EL SCM OUTLET POST DEV'T EVENT CONDITIONS W/O SCM WITH SCM %FLOW EQUIV. CN 1-YR 29.82 CFS 29.82 CFS 8.15 CFS 73%129.82 8.13 CFS 71.0 10-YR 56.48 CFS 56.48 CFS 11.19 CFS 80%131.82 11.15 CFS 52.6 25-YR 70.70 CFS 70.70 CFS 12.38 CFS 82%132.95 12.33 CFS 45.8 100-YR 97.22 CFS 97.22 CFS 18.66 CFS 81%134.91 18.59 CFS 39.0 DRAINAGE BASIN SUMMARY Post SCM - 1 yr Storm Description Area (sf)CN Area x CN Impervious surface 212,932.1 98.0 20,867,345.80 Lawn/Grassed area 164,261.9 36.0 5,913,428.40 Total Area 377,194.0 71.0 26,780,774.20 Post SCM - 10 yr Storm Description Area (sf)CN Area x CN Impervious surface 100,990.7 98.0 9,897,088.60 Lawn/Grassed area 276,203.3 36.0 9,943,318.80 Total Area 377,194.0 52.6 19,840,407.40 Post SCM - 25 yr Storm Description Area (sf)CN Area x CN Impervious surface 59,621.0 98.0 5,842,858.00 Lawn/Grassed area 317,573.0 36.0 11,432,628.00 Total Area 377,194.0 45.8 17,275,486.00 Post SCM - 100 yr Storm Description Area (sf)CN Area x CN Impervious surface 18,251.3 98.0 1,788,627.40 Lawn/Grassed area 358,942.7 36.0 12,921,937.20 Total Area 377,194.0 39.0 14,710,564.60 EQUIVALENT IMPERVIOUS AREA CALCULATION Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Thursday, 02 / 27 / 2020 Hyd. No. 8 Equivalent Impervious Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 8.154 cfs Storm frequency = 1 yrs Time to peak = 12.03 hrs Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 22,990 cuft Drainage area = 8.660 ac Curve number = 71 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 10.00 min Total precip. = 2.91 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 4.00 4.00 6.00 6.00 8.00 8.00 10.00 10.00 Q (cfs) Time (hrs) Equivalent Impervious Hyd. No. 8 -- 1 Year Hyd No. 8 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Thursday, 02 / 27 / 2020 Hyd. No. 8 Equivalent Impervious Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 11.17 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak = 12.03 hrs Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 34,071 cuft Drainage area = 8.660 ac Curve number = 52.6 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 10.00 min Total precip. = 5.45 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 4.00 4.00 6.00 6.00 8.00 8.00 10.00 10.00 12.00 12.00 Q (cfs) Time (hrs) Equivalent Impervious Hyd. No. 8 -- 10 Year Hyd No. 8 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Thursday, 02 / 27 / 2020 Hyd. No. 8 Equivalent Impervious Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 12.43 cfs Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time to peak = 12.03 hrs Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 39,313 cuft Drainage area = 8.660 ac Curve number = 45.8 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 10.00 min Total precip. = 6.81 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 4.00 4.00 6.00 6.00 8.00 8.00 10.00 10.00 12.00 12.00 14.00 14.00 Q (cfs) Time (hrs) Equivalent Impervious Hyd. No. 8 -- 25 Year Hyd No. 8 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Thursday, 02 / 27 / 2020 Hyd. No. 8 Equivalent Impervious Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 18.68 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 12.03 hrs Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 57,400 cuft Drainage area = 8.660 ac Curve number = 39 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 10.00 min Total precip. = 9.35 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 3.00 3.00 6.00 6.00 9.00 9.00 12.00 12.00 15.00 15.00 18.00 18.00 21.00 21.00 Q (cfs) Time (hrs) Equivalent Impervious Hyd. No. 8 -- 100 Year Hyd No. 8 Hydraflow Table of Contents 18-501 Whirligig Parking Lot.gpw Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Thursday, 02 / 27 / 2020 Watershed Model Schematic...................................................................................... 1 Hydrograph Return Period Recap............................................................................. 2 1 - Year Summary Report......................................................................................................................... 3 Hydrograph Reports................................................................................................................... 4 Hydrograph No. 1, SCS Runoff, Existing to UGS..................................................................... 4 Hydrograph No. 2, SCS Runoff, Existing Offsite...................................................................... 5 Hydrograph No. 3, Combine, Existing...................................................................................... 6 Hydrograph No. 4, SCS Runoff, Proposed to UGS.................................................................. 7 Hydrograph No. 5, SCS Runoff, Proposed to Offsite............................................................... 8 Hydrograph No. 6, Reservoir, UGS.......................................................................................... 9 Pond Report - UGS............................................................................................................10 Hydrograph No. 7, Combine, Proposed.................................................................................11 10 - Year Summary Report.......................................................................................................................12 Hydrograph Reports.................................................................................................................13 Hydrograph No. 1, SCS Runoff, Existing to UGS...................................................................13 Hydrograph No. 2, SCS Runoff, Existing Offsite....................................................................14 Hydrograph No. 3, Combine, Existing....................................................................................15 Hydrograph No. 4, SCS Runoff, Proposed to UGS................................................................16 Hydrograph No. 5, SCS Runoff, Proposed to Offsite.............................................................17 Hydrograph No. 6, Reservoir, UGS........................................................................................18 Hydrograph No. 7, Combine, Proposed.................................................................................19 25 - Year Summary Report.......................................................................................................................20 Hydrograph Reports.................................................................................................................21 Hydrograph No. 1, SCS Runoff, Existing to UGS...................................................................21 Hydrograph No. 2, SCS Runoff, Existing Offsite....................................................................22 Hydrograph No. 3, Combine, Existing....................................................................................23 Hydrograph No. 4, SCS Runoff, Proposed to UGS................................................................24 Hydrograph No. 5, SCS Runoff, Proposed to Offsite.............................................................25 Hydrograph No. 6, Reservoir, UGS........................................................................................26 Hydrograph No. 7, Combine, Proposed.................................................................................27 100 - Year Summary Report.......................................................................................................................28 Hydrograph Reports.................................................................................................................29 Hydrograph No. 1, SCS Runoff, Existing to UGS...................................................................29 Hydrograph No. 2, SCS Runoff, Existing Offsite....................................................................30 Hydrograph No. 3, Combine, Existing....................................................................................31 Hydrograph No. 4, SCS Runoff, Proposed to UGS................................................................32 Hydrograph No. 5, SCS Runoff, Proposed to Offsite.............................................................33 Hydrograph No. 6, Reservoir, UGS........................................................................................34 Hydrograph No. 7, Combine, Proposed.................................................................................35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 Watershed Model Schematic Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Project: 18-501 Whirligig Parking Lot.gpw Thursday, 02 / 27 / 2020 Hyd.Origin Description Legend 1 SCS Runoff Existing to UGS 2 SCS Runoff Existing Offsite 3 Combine Existing 4 SCS Runoff Proposed to UGS 5 SCS Runoff Proposed to Offsite 6 Reservoir UGS 7 Combine Proposed Hydrograph Return Period Recap 2 Hyd. Hydrograph Inflow Peak Outflow (cfs) Hydrograph No. type hyd(s) Description (origin) 1-yr 2-yr 3-yr 5-yr 10-yr 25-yr 50-yr 100-yr 1 SCS Runoff ------ 29.68 ------- ------- ------- 56.21 70.36 ------- 96.75 Existing to UGS 2 SCS Runoff ------ 0.196 ------- ------- ------- 0.371 0.464 ------- 0.638 Existing Offsite 3 Combine 1, 2 29.82 ------- ------- ------- 56.48 70.70 ------- 97.22 Existing 4 SCS Runoff ------ 29.68 ------- ------- ------- 56.21 70.36 ------- 96.75 Proposed to UGS 5 SCS Runoff ------ 0.196 ------- ------- ------- 0.371 0.464 ------- 0.638 Proposed to Offsite 6 Reservoir 4 8.125 ------- ------- ------- 11.15 12.33 ------- 18.59 UGS 7 Combine 5, 6 8.147 ------- ------- ------- 11.19 12.38 ------- 18.66 Proposed Proj. file: 18-501 Whirligig Parking Lot.gpw Thursday, 02 / 27 / 2020 Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Hydrograph Summary Report 3 Hyd. Hydrograph Peak Time Time to Hyd. Inflow Maximum Total Hydrograph No. type flow interval Peak volume hyd(s) elevation strge used Description (origin) (cfs) (min) (min) (cuft) (ft) (cuft) 1 SCS Runoff 29.68 2 720 86,336 ------ ------ ------ Existing to UGS 2 SCS Runoff 0.196 2 716 456 ------ ------ ------ Existing Offsite 3 Combine 29.82 2 720 86,791 1, 2 ------ ------ Existing 4 SCS Runoff 29.68 2 720 86,336 ------ ------ ------ Proposed to UGS 5 SCS Runoff 0.196 2 716 456 ------ ------ ------ Proposed to Offsite 6 Reservoir 8.125 2 734 86,315 4 129.82 31,217 UGS 7 Combine 8.147 2 734 86,771 5, 6 ------ ------ Proposed 18-501 Whirligig Parking Lot.gpw Return Period: 1 Year Thursday, 02 / 27 / 2020 Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Thursday, 02 / 27 / 2020 Hyd. No. 1 Existing to UGS Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 29.68 cfs Storm frequency = 1 yrs Time to peak = 12.00 hrs Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 86,336 cuft Drainage area = 8.610 ac Curve number = 98 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 10.00 min Total precip. = 2.91 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 4 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 5.00 5.00 10.00 10.00 15.00 15.00 20.00 20.00 25.00 25.00 30.00 30.00 Q (cfs) Time (hrs) Existing to UGS Hyd. No. 1 -- 1 Year Hyd No. 1 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Thursday, 02 / 27 / 2020 Hyd. No. 2 Existing Offsite Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.196 cfs Storm frequency = 1 yrs Time to peak = 11.93 hrs Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 456 cuft Drainage area = 0.050 ac Curve number = 98 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 5.00 min Total precip. = 2.91 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 5 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.10 0.10 0.15 0.15 0.20 0.20 0.25 0.25 0.30 0.30 0.35 0.35 0.40 0.40 0.45 0.45 0.50 0.50 Q (cfs) Time (hrs) Existing Offsite Hyd. No. 2 -- 1 Year Hyd No. 2 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Thursday, 02 / 27 / 2020 Hyd. No. 3 Existing Hydrograph type = Combine Peak discharge = 29.82 cfs Storm frequency = 1 yrs Time to peak = 12.00 hrs Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 86,791 cuft Inflow hyds. = 1, 2 Contrib. drain. area = 8.660 ac 6 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 5.00 5.00 10.00 10.00 15.00 15.00 20.00 20.00 25.00 25.00 30.00 30.00 Q (cfs) Time (hrs) Existing Hyd. No. 3 -- 1 Year Hyd No. 3 Hyd No. 1 Hyd No. 2 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Thursday, 02 / 27 / 2020 Hyd. No. 4 Proposed to UGS Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 29.68 cfs Storm frequency = 1 yrs Time to peak = 12.00 hrs Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 86,336 cuft Drainage area = 8.610 ac Curve number = 98 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 10.00 min Total precip. = 2.91 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 7 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 5.00 5.00 10.00 10.00 15.00 15.00 20.00 20.00 25.00 25.00 30.00 30.00 Q (cfs) Time (hrs) Proposed to UGS Hyd. No. 4 -- 1 Year Hyd No. 4 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Thursday, 02 / 27 / 2020 Hyd. No. 5 Proposed to Offsite Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.196 cfs Storm frequency = 1 yrs Time to peak = 11.93 hrs Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 456 cuft Drainage area = 0.050 ac Curve number = 98 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 5.00 min Total precip. = 2.91 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 8 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.10 0.10 0.15 0.15 0.20 0.20 0.25 0.25 0.30 0.30 0.35 0.35 0.40 0.40 0.45 0.45 0.50 0.50 Q (cfs) Time (hrs) Proposed to Offsite Hyd. No. 5 -- 1 Year Hyd No. 5 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Thursday, 02 / 27 / 2020 Hyd. No. 6 UGS Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 8.125 cfs Storm frequency = 1 yrs Time to peak = 12.23 hrs Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 86,315 cuft Inflow hyd. No. = 4 - Proposed to UGS Max. Elevation = 129.82 ft Reservoir name = UGS Max. Storage = 31,217 cuft Storage Indication method used. 9 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 5.00 5.00 10.00 10.00 15.00 15.00 20.00 20.00 25.00 25.00 30.00 30.00 Q (cfs) Time (hrs) UGS Hyd. No. 6 -- 1 Year Hyd No. 6 Hyd No. 4 Total storage used = 31,217 cuft Pond Report 10 Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Thursday, 02 / 27 / 2020 Pond No. 1 - UGS Pond Data Contours -User-defined contour areas. Conic method used for volume calculation. Begining Elevation = 127.00 ft Stage / Storage Table Stage (ft) Elevation (ft) Contour area (sqft) Incr. Storage (cuft) Total storage (cuft) 0.00 127.00 9,260 0 0 1.00 128.00 9,260 9,259 9,259 2.00 129.00 9,260 9,259 18,518 2.01 129.01 15,590 123 18,641 3.00 130.00 15,590 15,433 34,074 4.00 131.00 15,590 15,588 49,662 5.00 132.00 15,590 15,588 65,250 6.00 133.00 15,590 15,588 80,839 7.00 134.00 15,590 15,588 96,427 8.00 135.00 15,590 15,588 112,016 8.33 135.33 15,590 5,144 117,160 Culvert / Orifice Structures Weir Structures [A] [B] [C] [PrfRsr] [A] [B] [C] [D] Rise (in)= 18.00 12.00 12.00 0.00 Span (in)= 18.00 12.00 12.00 0.00 No. Barrels = 1 1 1 0 Invert El. (ft)= 127.00 127.00 127.00 0.00 Length (ft)= 181.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Slope (%)= 1.00 0.00 0.00 n/a N-Value = .013 .013 .013 n/a Orifice Coeff.= 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 Multi-Stage = n/a Yes Yes No Crest Len (ft)= 11.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 Crest El. (ft)= 133.00 134.00 0.00 0.00 Weir Coeff.= 3.33 3.33 3.33 3.33 Weir Type = 1 Rect Rect --- Multi-Stage = Yes Yes No No Exfil.(in/hr)= 0.000 (by Contour) TW Elev. (ft)= 0.00 Note: Culvert/Orifice outflows are analyzed under inlet (ic) and outlet (oc) control. Weir risers checked for orifice conditions (ic) and submergence (s). 0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 18.00 20.00 Stage (ft) 0.00 127.00 2.00 129.00 4.00 131.00 6.00 133.00 8.00 135.00 10.00 137.00 Elev (ft) Discharge (cfs) Stage / Discharge Total Q Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Thursday, 02 / 27 / 2020 Hyd. No. 7 Proposed Hydrograph type = Combine Peak discharge = 8.147 cfs Storm frequency = 1 yrs Time to peak = 12.23 hrs Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 86,771 cuft Inflow hyds. = 5, 6 Contrib. drain. area = 0.050 ac 11 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 4.00 4.00 6.00 6.00 8.00 8.00 10.00 10.00 Q (cfs) Time (hrs) Proposed Hyd. No. 7 -- 1 Year Hyd No. 7 Hyd No. 5 Hyd No. 6 Hydrograph Summary Report 12 Hyd. Hydrograph Peak Time Time to Hyd. Inflow Maximum Total Hydrograph No. type flow interval Peak volume hyd(s) elevation strge used Description (origin) (cfs) (min) (min) (cuft) (ft) (cuft) 1 SCS Runoff 56.21 2 720 168,005 ------ ------ ------ Existing to UGS 2 SCS Runoff 0.371 2 716 887 ------ ------ ------ Existing Offsite 3 Combine 56.48 2 720 168,892 1, 2 ------ ------ Existing 4 SCS Runoff 56.21 2 720 168,005 ------ ------ ------ Proposed to UGS 5 SCS Runoff 0.371 2 716 887 ------ ------ ------ Proposed to Offsite 6 Reservoir 11.15 2 736 167,984 4 131.82 62,410 UGS 7 Combine 11.19 2 736 168,871 5, 6 ------ ------ Proposed 18-501 Whirligig Parking Lot.gpw Return Period: 10 Year Thursday, 02 / 27 / 2020 Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Thursday, 02 / 27 / 2020 Hyd. No. 1 Existing to UGS Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 56.21 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak = 12.00 hrs Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 168,005 cuft Drainage area = 8.610 ac Curve number = 98 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 10.00 min Total precip. = 5.45 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 13 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 10.00 10.00 20.00 20.00 30.00 30.00 40.00 40.00 50.00 50.00 60.00 60.00 Q (cfs) Time (hrs) Existing to UGS Hyd. No. 1 -- 10 Year Hyd No. 1 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Thursday, 02 / 27 / 2020 Hyd. No. 2 Existing Offsite Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.371 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak = 11.93 hrs Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 887 cuft Drainage area = 0.050 ac Curve number = 98 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 5.00 min Total precip. = 5.45 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 14 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.10 0.10 0.15 0.15 0.20 0.20 0.25 0.25 0.30 0.30 0.35 0.35 0.40 0.40 0.45 0.45 0.50 0.50 Q (cfs) Time (hrs) Existing Offsite Hyd. No. 2 -- 10 Year Hyd No. 2 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Thursday, 02 / 27 / 2020 Hyd. No. 3 Existing Hydrograph type = Combine Peak discharge = 56.48 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak = 12.00 hrs Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 168,892 cuft Inflow hyds. = 1, 2 Contrib. drain. area = 8.660 ac 15 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 10.00 10.00 20.00 20.00 30.00 30.00 40.00 40.00 50.00 50.00 60.00 60.00 Q (cfs) Time (hrs) Existing Hyd. No. 3 -- 10 Year Hyd No. 3 Hyd No. 1 Hyd No. 2 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Thursday, 02 / 27 / 2020 Hyd. No. 4 Proposed to UGS Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 56.21 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak = 12.00 hrs Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 168,005 cuft Drainage area = 8.610 ac Curve number = 98 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 10.00 min Total precip. = 5.45 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 16 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 10.00 10.00 20.00 20.00 30.00 30.00 40.00 40.00 50.00 50.00 60.00 60.00 Q (cfs) Time (hrs) Proposed to UGS Hyd. No. 4 -- 10 Year Hyd No. 4 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Thursday, 02 / 27 / 2020 Hyd. No. 5 Proposed to Offsite Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.371 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak = 11.93 hrs Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 887 cuft Drainage area = 0.050 ac Curve number = 98 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 5.00 min Total precip. = 5.45 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 17 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.10 0.10 0.15 0.15 0.20 0.20 0.25 0.25 0.30 0.30 0.35 0.35 0.40 0.40 0.45 0.45 0.50 0.50 Q (cfs) Time (hrs) Proposed to Offsite Hyd. No. 5 -- 10 Year Hyd No. 5 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Thursday, 02 / 27 / 2020 Hyd. No. 6 UGS Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 11.15 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak = 12.27 hrs Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 167,984 cuft Inflow hyd. No. = 4 - Proposed to UGS Max. Elevation = 131.82 ft Reservoir name = UGS Max. Storage = 62,410 cuft Storage Indication method used. 18 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 10.00 10.00 20.00 20.00 30.00 30.00 40.00 40.00 50.00 50.00 60.00 60.00 Q (cfs) Time (hrs) UGS Hyd. No. 6 -- 10 Year Hyd No. 6 Hyd No. 4 Total storage used = 62,410 cuft Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Thursday, 02 / 27 / 2020 Hyd. No. 7 Proposed Hydrograph type = Combine Peak discharge = 11.19 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak = 12.27 hrs Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 168,871 cuft Inflow hyds. = 5, 6 Contrib. drain. area = 0.050 ac 19 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 4.00 4.00 6.00 6.00 8.00 8.00 10.00 10.00 12.00 12.00 Q (cfs) Time (hrs) Proposed Hyd. No. 7 -- 10 Year Hyd No. 7 Hyd No. 5 Hyd No. 6 Hydrograph Summary Report 20 Hyd. Hydrograph Peak Time Time to Hyd. Inflow Maximum Total Hydrograph No. type flow interval Peak volume hyd(s) elevation strge used Description (origin) (cfs) (min) (min) (cuft) (ft) (cuft) 1 SCS Runoff 70.36 2 720 211,792 ------ ------ ------ Existing to UGS 2 SCS Runoff 0.464 2 716 1,118 ------ ------ ------ Existing Offsite 3 Combine 70.70 2 720 212,910 1, 2 ------ ------ Existing 4 SCS Runoff 70.36 2 720 211,792 ------ ------ ------ Proposed to UGS 5 SCS Runoff 0.464 2 716 1,118 ------ ------ ------ Proposed to Offsite 6 Reservoir 12.33 2 736 211,771 4 132.95 80,081 UGS 7 Combine 12.38 2 736 212,889 5, 6 ------ ------ Proposed 18-501 Whirligig Parking Lot.gpw Return Period: 25 Year Thursday, 02 / 27 / 2020 Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Thursday, 02 / 27 / 2020 Hyd. No. 1 Existing to UGS Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 70.36 cfs Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time to peak = 12.00 hrs Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 211,792 cuft Drainage area = 8.610 ac Curve number = 98 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 10.00 min Total precip. = 6.81 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 21 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 10.00 10.00 20.00 20.00 30.00 30.00 40.00 40.00 50.00 50.00 60.00 60.00 70.00 70.00 80.00 80.00 Q (cfs) Time (hrs) Existing to UGS Hyd. No. 1 -- 25 Year Hyd No. 1 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Thursday, 02 / 27 / 2020 Hyd. No. 2 Existing Offsite Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.464 cfs Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time to peak = 11.93 hrs Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 1,118 cuft Drainage area = 0.050 ac Curve number = 98 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 5.00 min Total precip. = 6.81 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 22 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.10 0.10 0.15 0.15 0.20 0.20 0.25 0.25 0.30 0.30 0.35 0.35 0.40 0.40 0.45 0.45 0.50 0.50 Q (cfs) Time (hrs) Existing Offsite Hyd. No. 2 -- 25 Year Hyd No. 2 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Thursday, 02 / 27 / 2020 Hyd. No. 3 Existing Hydrograph type = Combine Peak discharge = 70.70 cfs Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time to peak = 12.00 hrs Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 212,910 cuft Inflow hyds. = 1, 2 Contrib. drain. area = 8.660 ac 23 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 10.00 10.00 20.00 20.00 30.00 30.00 40.00 40.00 50.00 50.00 60.00 60.00 70.00 70.00 80.00 80.00 Q (cfs) Time (hrs) Existing Hyd. No. 3 -- 25 Year Hyd No. 3 Hyd No. 1 Hyd No. 2 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Thursday, 02 / 27 / 2020 Hyd. No. 4 Proposed to UGS Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 70.36 cfs Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time to peak = 12.00 hrs Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 211,792 cuft Drainage area = 8.610 ac Curve number = 98 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 10.00 min Total precip. = 6.81 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 24 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 10.00 10.00 20.00 20.00 30.00 30.00 40.00 40.00 50.00 50.00 60.00 60.00 70.00 70.00 80.00 80.00 Q (cfs) Time (hrs) Proposed to UGS Hyd. No. 4 -- 25 Year Hyd No. 4 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Thursday, 02 / 27 / 2020 Hyd. No. 5 Proposed to Offsite Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.464 cfs Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time to peak = 11.93 hrs Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 1,118 cuft Drainage area = 0.050 ac Curve number = 98 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 5.00 min Total precip. = 6.81 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 25 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.10 0.10 0.15 0.15 0.20 0.20 0.25 0.25 0.30 0.30 0.35 0.35 0.40 0.40 0.45 0.45 0.50 0.50 Q (cfs) Time (hrs) Proposed to Offsite Hyd. No. 5 -- 25 Year Hyd No. 5 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Thursday, 02 / 27 / 2020 Hyd. No. 6 UGS Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 12.33 cfs Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time to peak = 12.27 hrs Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 211,771 cuft Inflow hyd. No. = 4 - Proposed to UGS Max. Elevation = 132.95 ft Reservoir name = UGS Max. Storage = 80,081 cuft Storage Indication method used. 26 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 10.00 10.00 20.00 20.00 30.00 30.00 40.00 40.00 50.00 50.00 60.00 60.00 70.00 70.00 80.00 80.00 Q (cfs) Time (hrs) UGS Hyd. No. 6 -- 25 Year Hyd No. 6 Hyd No. 4 Total storage used = 80,081 cuft Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Thursday, 02 / 27 / 2020 Hyd. No. 7 Proposed Hydrograph type = Combine Peak discharge = 12.38 cfs Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time to peak = 12.27 hrs Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 212,889 cuft Inflow hyds. = 5, 6 Contrib. drain. area = 0.050 ac 27 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 4.00 4.00 6.00 6.00 8.00 8.00 10.00 10.00 12.00 12.00 14.00 14.00 Q (cfs) Time (hrs) Proposed Hyd. No. 7 -- 25 Year Hyd No. 7 Hyd No. 5 Hyd No. 6 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Thursday, 02 / 27 / 2020 Hyd. No. 1 Existing to UGS Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 96.75 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 12.00 hrs Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 293,608 cuft Drainage area = 8.610 ac Curve number = 98 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 10.00 min Total precip. = 9.35 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 29 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 10.00 10.00 20.00 20.00 30.00 30.00 40.00 40.00 50.00 50.00 60.00 60.00 70.00 70.00 80.00 80.00 90.00 90.00 100.00 100.00 Q (cfs) Time (hrs) Existing to UGS Hyd. No. 1 -- 100 Year Hyd No. 1 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Thursday, 02 / 27 / 2020 Hyd. No. 2 Existing Offsite Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.638 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 11.93 hrs Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 1,550 cuft Drainage area = 0.050 ac Curve number = 98 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 5.00 min Total precip. = 9.35 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 30 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.30 0.30 0.40 0.40 0.50 0.50 0.60 0.60 0.70 0.70 0.80 0.80 0.90 0.90 1.00 1.00 Q (cfs) Time (hrs) Existing Offsite Hyd. No. 2 -- 100 Year Hyd No. 2 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Thursday, 02 / 27 / 2020 Hyd. No. 3 Existing Hydrograph type = Combine Peak discharge = 97.22 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 12.00 hrs Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 295,157 cuft Inflow hyds. = 1, 2 Contrib. drain. area = 8.660 ac 31 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 10.00 10.00 20.00 20.00 30.00 30.00 40.00 40.00 50.00 50.00 60.00 60.00 70.00 70.00 80.00 80.00 90.00 90.00 100.00 100.00 Q (cfs) Time (hrs) Existing Hyd. No. 3 -- 100 Year Hyd No. 3 Hyd No. 1 Hyd No. 2 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Thursday, 02 / 27 / 2020 Hyd. No. 4 Proposed to UGS Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 96.75 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 12.00 hrs Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 293,608 cuft Drainage area = 8.610 ac Curve number = 98 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 10.00 min Total precip. = 9.35 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 32 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 10.00 10.00 20.00 20.00 30.00 30.00 40.00 40.00 50.00 50.00 60.00 60.00 70.00 70.00 80.00 80.00 90.00 90.00 100.00 100.00 Q (cfs) Time (hrs) Proposed to UGS Hyd. No. 4 -- 100 Year Hyd No. 4 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Thursday, 02 / 27 / 2020 Hyd. No. 5 Proposed to Offsite Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.638 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 11.93 hrs Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 1,550 cuft Drainage area = 0.050 ac Curve number = 98 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 5.00 min Total precip. = 9.35 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 33 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.30 0.30 0.40 0.40 0.50 0.50 0.60 0.60 0.70 0.70 0.80 0.80 0.90 0.90 1.00 1.00 Q (cfs) Time (hrs) Proposed to Offsite Hyd. No. 5 -- 100 Year Hyd No. 5 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Thursday, 02 / 27 / 2020 Hyd. No. 6 UGS Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 18.59 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 12.27 hrs Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 293,587 cuft Inflow hyd. No. = 4 - Proposed to UGS Max. Elevation = 134.91 ft Reservoir name = UGS Max. Storage = 110,662 cuft Storage Indication method used. 34 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 10.00 10.00 20.00 20.00 30.00 30.00 40.00 40.00 50.00 50.00 60.00 60.00 70.00 70.00 80.00 80.00 90.00 90.00 100.00 100.00 Q (cfs) Time (hrs) UGS Hyd. No. 6 -- 100 Year Hyd No. 6 Hyd No. 4 Total storage used = 110,662 cuft Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Thursday, 02 / 27 / 2020 Hyd. No. 7 Proposed Hydrograph type = Combine Peak discharge = 18.66 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 12.27 hrs Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 295,137 cuft Inflow hyds. = 5, 6 Contrib. drain. area = 0.050 ac 35 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 3.00 3.00 6.00 6.00 9.00 9.00 12.00 12.00 15.00 15.00 18.00 18.00 21.00 21.00 Q (cfs) Time (hrs) Proposed Hyd. No. 7 -- 100 Year Hyd No. 7 Hyd No. 5 Hyd No. 6 Hydraflow Rainfall Report 36 Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Thursday, 02 / 27 / 2020 Return Intensity-Duration-Frequency Equation Coefficients (FHA) Period (Yrs)B D E (N/A) 1 61.3089 12.1000 0.8801 -------- 2 73.0076 12.6000 0.8788 -------- 3 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -------- 5 72.3690 12.4000 0.8323 -------- 10 71.3089 12.0000 0.7930 -------- 25 67.3330 11.1000 0.7441 -------- 50 59.3755 9.9000 0.6892 -------- 100 56.4628 9.2000 0.6543 -------- File name: Wilson NC NOAA ATLAS 14.IDF Intensity = B / (Tc + D)^E Return Intensity Values (in/hr) Period (Yrs) 5 min 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 1 5.04 4.02 3.36 2.89 2.55 2.28 2.07 1.89 1.74 1.62 1.51 1.42 2 5.87 4.71 3.95 3.42 3.01 2.70 2.45 2.24 2.07 1.93 1.80 1.69 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5 6.72 5.44 4.60 4.00 3.55 3.20 2.92 2.68 2.49 2.32 2.18 2.05 10 7.54 6.15 5.22 4.57 4.07 3.68 3.37 3.11 2.89 2.70 2.54 2.40 25 8.52 6.96 5.94 5.22 4.67 4.24 3.89 3.61 3.36 3.16 2.98 2.82 50 9.23 7.56 6.48 5.71 5.13 4.68 4.31 4.01 3.76 3.54 3.35 3.18 100 9.95 8.17 7.02 6.21 5.60 5.12 4.73 4.41 4.14 3.91 3.71 3.53 Tc = time in minutes. Values may exceed 60. Rainfall Precipitation Table (in) Precip. file name: P:\_CADD\Hydraflow Precipitaion & Rainfall Intensity Data\Wilson NC NOAA ATLAS 14.pcp Storm Distribution 1-yr 2-yr 3-yr 5-yr 10-yr 25-yr 50-yr 100-yr SCS 24-hour 2.91 3.53 0.00 4.56 5.45 6.81 8.00 9.35 SCS 6-Hr 2.10 2.51 0.00 3.12 3.75 4.60 5.39 6.23 Huff-1st 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Huff-2nd 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Huff-3rd 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Huff-4th 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Huff-Indy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Custom 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Contents continued...18-501 Whirligig Parking Lot.gpw IDF Report..................................................................................................................36 \\o S S AP ROXIM \ `\\r• S pAnolV W \\ \ \ 8" TC fX wA�R UN f O LY S \ \ • so. BpR \ \ \ .., 4 , 0 STOP \ \ \ s \ \ \ P(�B�/C SIGN EX. MH f ■ # D O TOP 140.67 — t a, i D INV. 135.57 � + 13 spaces 16 row "WIN D STOPS _ f D R NAPE REA =8.6 AC SIGN .4f D ° paces :D ijilj me `+ I SPILL CURB — f GUTTER (TYP.) do k 1 I +• 1 o I aces �► a # �. a UNDERGR UN STORMWATER STORAGE SYSTEM 1 I No 36spac # �� 30" CURB & I ° • , j ! ..r0 GUTTER (TYP.) CONCRETE WHEEL solo- STOPS (TYP.) r♦ ' `L 0 OF FUTURE TRASH-�._.3.+, •.� , ! •� � � _ i{ RECYCLE AND Y f COMPACTOR 0 BY QTHERS. - 7 ; • COMPACTOR CONC. PAD �r � Lo u) (36'x15') (26'x15') t _ w a All 10' ACCESS ES s% t ■ S i INGRESS/EGRESS l f • EASE � ♦ l •. j �. e STOP STOP' -a.. 'y' rwr Ow SIGN SIGN N49'31'08"E 66.53' O 1 0 {CHISLED ---------�/ ----- JJ �`--- ± -- `— CURB X. MH GUTTER 1 JV. 124" 7 IN — JV. 124.82 OUT % T UGE UGE �— S ------ -- -- — -- --- — — --- -- — - GOLD 4I a ► • t ♦ _ _ _ �.� 60't PU R/W (S. RM 184)FS , b! ff� I I � • .. � � - T } � I Ir t •_ S ! r