HomeMy WebLinkAboutHaws Run Mitigation Site1998 Preliminary Report
Haws Run Mitigation Site
Pender / Onslow County
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Planning and Environmental Branch
Raleigh, North Carolina
July 1998
Introduction
Project Background
The Haws Run Mitigation Site was purchased in 1995 by the North Carolina Department of
Transportation (NCDOT) to provide compensatory mitigation for unavoidable impacts to
wetlands resulting from highway construction in the region. The site is located approximately 28
miles northeast of Wilmington, North Carolina, straddling the Pender-Onslow County line. The
site consists of riverine swamp forests at the northern and southern ends and a cutover interior of
former wet flats and savannas with an extensive ditch and canal system. A mitigation plan for
the Haws Run Site was prepared for NCDOT by Land Management Group, Inc. (LMG) in April
1997.
Purpose
To address agency questions about the savanna restoration area of the Haws Run Site, the central
canal and lateral ditches north of the electrical transmission line were plugged in December 1997.
Five RDS groundwater wells and three vegetation test plots were established by NCDOT in the
area circumscribed by the ditch plugs. Nine RDS groundwater wells, installed in 1995 by LMG,
were included in the data analysis. Groundwater elevations were automatically recorded daily.
Locations of groundwater wells, vegetation plots, and ditch plugs are shown in Figure 1. The
purpose of this report is to document the response of the hydrology and vegetation in the area of
influence of the ditch plugs.
Hydrologic Monitoring
Success Criteria
Because the'Pender/ Onslow County line divides the mitigation site, the project's growing
season must represent both counties. The Soil Conservation Service defined growing season for
Pender County lasts 237 days, from March 19 to November 11. The growing season for Onslow
County lasts 212 days, from April 8 to November 5. Using the U.S. Weather Bureau
publication, Low Temperature Probabilities in North Carolina, anestimated growing season for
the area was calculated as 252 days, lasting from March 12 to November 19.
Using all three data sets, the average growing season for the Haws Run site was calculated to be
237 days in length, lasting from March 23 to November 15. In order to be classified as a wetland,
the water table must be within 12 inches of the soil surface, ponded, or flooded for 5% to 12.5%
of the growing season under normal precipitation. Normal is defined as total monthly
precipitation falling within the 30th and 70th percentiles of a 30 year period. Therefore, for Haws
Run, the water table must not fall below the 12-inch line for at least 30 consecutive days during
the growing season under normal precipitation to meet the 12.5% criteria.
Monitoring Description and Results
The proposed pine savanna restoration area is located in the northern portion of the Haws Run
site. It contains eight groundwater monitoring wells within the area of influence of the ditch
plugs, hereafter referred to as the study area (Figure 1). Three were installed in 1995 by LMG
while the remaining five were installed in 1998 by NCDOT. The wells are denoted by the
following symbols: D, E, G, W1, W2, W4, W5, and W6. Appendix A contains a plot of the
daily groundwater depth for these eight wells.
Appendix A also contains plots of the daily groundwater depth for six other wells installed in
1995 in the northern section of Haws Run. These are Wells C, H, H-50, H-250, and I, located in
jurisdictional wetlands, and Well F, located in a proposed savanna restoration area outside the
study area.
Table 1 reports the number of consecutive days, starting on the first day of the growing season,
that the groundwater was within 12 inches of the soil surface for each well, hereafter referred to
as the wet season. The wells in bold print are located in the study area.
Table 1 Hydrologic Monitoring Results
Monitoring Well Number of Days
above 12" (consecutive)
1997 / 1998 Well Location
C 14 / 61 Jurisdictional wetland
D 6/53 Savanna restoration
E 9/53 Savanna restoration; near Well W6
F 2/4 Savanna restoration
G 5/6 Savanna restoration; near Well W5
H 25 / 72 Jurisdictional wetland
H-50 27 / 72 Jurisdictional wetland
H-250 28 / 74 Jurisdictional wetland
1 99 / 74 Jurisdictional wetland
Monitoring Well Number of Days
1998
W1 . 59 Savanna restoration
W2 60 Savanna restoration
W4* 54 Savanna restoration
W5 62 Savanna restoration; near Well G
W6 60 Savanna restoration; near Well E
* -- Well 4: 2 days in the 54 day period had readings of -12.4 and -12.6
Seven of the eight wells in the study area met or nearly met* the hydrologic criteria for a
jurisdictional wetland at the 12.5% level in 1998.
The groundwater elevation graphs for Wells D and E show a marked decline in the water table in
early 1997 during periods of low rainfall. However, during periods of low rain fall in early 1998,
the water table did not decline until several weeks into the growing season. The wet season in
1998 was 8.8 times longer for Well D and 5.9 times longer for Well E than in 1997.
The 1998 wet season for wells located in the study area was similar to the 1998 wet season for
Well F, located outside the study area, did not show a substantial change in the wet season from
1997 to 1998.
Well G was the one well within the study area which did not meet the hydrologic criteria for a
jurisdictional wetland in 1998. The reason for this is not known; it is possibly due to elevation,
root channels, or some other local condition. However, the average water table elevation during
the first 30 days of the growing season for Well G was substantially higher in 1998, at -7.5
inches, than in 1997, at -24.2 inches for the comparable period. Water table elevations in 1998
at Well 5, located nearby Well G, were consistent with those of Wells D and E.
Wells C and I also showed some effect from the ditch plugs as water backed up behind the ditch
plug in the central canal.
Daily rainfall data, collected at Marine Corps Air Station New River (located approximately 12
miles east of Haws Run site), is plotted with each groundwater elevation graph in Appendix A
and by year in Appendix B. Appendix B also contains graphs of monthly rainfall totals with the
30 year averages. Monthly rainfall totals from January 1997 through June 1997 were within or
below the 30/70 percentile normal range. In 1998, precipitation during January, February, and
May was above normal, during March was below normal, and during April and June was within
the normal range.
Plant Community Monitoring
Success Criteria
Vegetation success criteria are the survival of planted trees in the test plots under altered
hydrologic conditions created by the central canal and lateral ditch plugs.
Monitoring Description and Results
Three 70' x 70' vegetation test plots, consisting of a mixture of pond and long leaf pines, were
established within the study area in December 1997. Table 2 outlines the number and type of
trees planted and the May 1998 testing results.
T.1,1P')• Plant Cnmmiinity Monitoring Results
Vegetation Sample Plot Number Planted
(Dec. 1997) Number Counted
(May 1998) % Survival
Plot 1
Longleaf Pine 21 18 85
Pond Pine 28 26 93
Plot 2
Longleaf Pine 10 10 100
Pond Pine 18 14 78
Plot 3
Longleaf Pine 19 17 89
Pond Pine 18 12 67
Total 114 97 85
The average percent survival for both species after six months was 90% for Plot 1, 88% for Plot
2, and 78% for Plot 3.
Conclusions
• The groundwater in the study area was within twelve inches of the soil surface for 12.5% of
the 1998 growing season for all wells except Well G. However, data from a nearby well
indicates that Well G may reflect unusual conditions.
• After installing the ditch plugs, the wet season in the study area was similar to the wet season
in the jurisdictional wetland area. In previous years, the wet season in the study area had been
substantially shorter than that of the wetland area.
• Rainfall during the 1997 dormant season and early growing season fell within or below the
30/70 percentiles for the 30 year rainfall averages.
• Rainfall during the 1998 dormant season was higher than normal, the majority of which
occurred by mid-February. However, the majority of the excess rainfall left the site as
shallow subsurface flow and overland flow. This is evidenced by the steady state of the
water table during these periods of high rainfall.
• Rainfall during the month immediately prior to the 1998 growing season was drier than
normal and rainfall during the 1998 early growing season was within the normal range. The
water table elevation in the study area remained at the pre-growing season level throughout
this period of low rainfall. In contrast, the groundwater elevation at Well F, outside the study
area, dropped below the 12 inch depth within 4 days of the beginning of the growing season,
as it had done in past years.
• The survival of planted trees was approximately 85% averaged over the three test plots.
• The ditch plugs created a positive hydrologic response by raising the water table elevation
while supporting the planted vegetation.
Discussion
These data are supported by the requirement for two activities. Approximately 70% of the
interior portion of the mitigation site was, upon recommendation of the North Carolina Division
of Forest Services, drum-chopped to remove unwanted trees in preparation for a prescribed burn
planned for this summer. Also, NCDOT construction personnel will soon remove the six
temporary plugs so that the site will not become too wet for equipment to carry out planned
grading activities.
These results, in conjunction with the soils data collected in August 1997, indicate that the areas
of Haws Run Mitigation Site proposed for restoration to wet pine savanna will be successful.
Trends toward hydrologic restoration and high percentages of tree survivability appear to have
been met in this limited study.
1
C
/ g//ice%i
'?•' i ice' ? :• ??.?? ?? / / / / / / i
? O
?m
Co
l0 y j 4
g O
0
Z
f
T
U)
n
t
?a
?o
Q
?o
O
_O
Haws Run Well 1
Groundwater Elevation
Mfirrh _ _luna 1998
10
9
8
7
6
V
w 5
E
m
IX
4
3
2
1
0
1998 Growing Season Begins
L L L L L L L L L
2 a a a Q ?o
2 7
r 00 to N N 0) (fl M O v
0') LO N N r N r N C7
5
0
-5
-10
i
f
-15 a
c.
c
-20
i
-25
c
-30
-35
-40
-4,
Day of the year 1998
Haves Run Well 2
Groundwater Elevation
Minrrh _ -lima 1GAR
10
9
8
7
6
0
S
5
c
4
3
2
1
0
;? - 1998 Growing Season Begins
?
cu ? ? Q" Q- n. a m co :3
Q Q Q Q 2 2
~ r
r ? N M r N M 11
r 00 L6 N N N 6 ' ? ' '
r
Day of the year 1998
5
0
-5
-10
-15
-20
-25
-30
-35
-4C
-4`
Haws Run Well 4
Groundwater Elevation
March - June 1998
10
9
8
7
6
c
V
g 5
cc
IX
4
3
2
1
0
1998 Growing Season Begins
„
„
L L L L L L L L L
i
r 00 In N Ch i i i V i ~
r N N r- - N M r N M r
5
0
-5
-10
-15
-20
-2:
-30
-3f
-40
-45
Day of the year 1998
10
9
8
7
6
c
a 5
c
4
3
2
1
Haws Run Well 5
Groundwater Elevation
March _ _hinp 199R
5
;, 1998 Growing Season Begins
-J14"
3
-5
-10
-15
-20
-25
-30
-35
-40
-45
cu u c`a m Q Q Q Q u
r 00 L6 N N e- N M O N M
Day of the year 1998
Haws Run Well 6
Groundwater Elevation
Marr_h ..June 1998
10
9
8
7
6
c
w 5
4
3
2
1
0
1998 Growing Season Begins
a
C6 L6 N o? L6
N N
Q m m N CO m
Q Q Q r` ?t
0) (D 4
T" N r r N M
D
c
L
5'
3
v
c
0
c
5S
c
a0
5
to
t5
Day of the year 1998
Rainfall (in)
O -? N W .0.1 Ch CA -1 Cp CO O
23-Jan
30-Jan
6-Feb
13-Feb
20-Feb
27-Feb
6-Mar
13-Mar
20-Mar
27-Mar
3-Apr
10-Apr
17-Apr
24-Apr
1-May
8-May
15-May
22-May
29-May
5-Jun
12-Jun
19-Jun
26-Jun
3-Jul
10-Jul
17-Jul
24-Jul
31-Jul
7-Aug
14-Aug
21-Aug
28-Aug
4-Sep
d 11-Sep
0 18-Sep
c 25-Sep
`' 2-Oct
9-Oct
16-Oct
23-Oct
CO
30-Oct
6-Nov
13-Nov
20-Nov
27-Nov
4-Dec
11-Dec
18-Dec
25-Dec
1-Jan
8-Jan
15-Jan
22-Jan
29-Jan
5-Feb
12-Feb
19-Feb
26-Feb
5-Mar
12-Mar
19-Mar
26-Mar
2-Apr
9-Apr
16-Apr
23-Apr
30-Apr
7-May
14-May
21-May
28-May
4-Jun
11-Jun
.& . W W N N L L & O Cn
Cn O cn O Cn O cn O
Depth to groundwater (in)
G)
0
c =
N
c
m
n
' O
i
Rainfall (in)
O N W -A. Cn CA -l CO CC)
23-Jan
30-Jan
6-Feb
13-Feb
20-Feb
27-Feb
6-Mar
13-Mar
20-Mar
27-Mar
3-Apr
10-Apr
17-Apr
24-Apr
1-May
8-May
15-May
22-May
29-May
5-Jun
12-Jun
19-Jun
26-Jun
3-Jul
10-Jul
17-Jul
24-Jul
31-Jul
7-Aug
14-Aug
21-Aug
28-Aug
4-Sep
11-Sep
18-Sep
25-Sep
`4 - 2-Oct
9-Oct
16-Oct
W 23-Oct
30-Oct
O0 6-Nov
13-Nov
20-Nov
27-Nov
4-Dec
11-Dec
18-Dec
25-Dec
1-Jan
8-Jan
15-Jan
22-Jan
29-Jan
5-Feb
12-Feb
19-Feb
26-Feb
5-Mar
12-Mar
19-Mar
26-Mar
2-Apr
9-Apr
16-Apr
23-Apr
30-Apr
7-May
14-May
21-May
28-May
4-Jun
11-Jun
O
- - co
G)
0
5
(0
cn
Cn
0
m
(?
ca
.
Z3
0
'
_ 5
U)
CD
v
- U)
o
m
Z)
C1
0
(D
CO
- G)
t _ qtr-, ?„
'Cn
Cn
cD
v
0
c?
`
cn
W
L
c ?
? CL N
CO
c
c- M
CD
rot
O
co 0
cc ?
.? .4 W W N N '. ?a Cn O Cn
Cn O Cn O Cn O Cn O
Depth to groundwater
Rainfall (in)
O N CJ .P Cn CA -I 00 CO O
23-Jan
30-Jan
6-Feb
13-Feb
20-Feb
27-Feb
6-Mar
13-Mar
20-Mar
27-Mar
3-Apr
10-Apr
17-Apr
24-Apr
1-May
8-May
15-May
22-May
29-May
5-Jun
12-Jun
19-Jun
26-Jun
3-Jul
10-Jul
17-Jul
24-Jul
31-Jul
7-Aug
14-Aug
21-Aug
28-Aug
4-Sep
11-Sep
18-Sep
cc 25-Sep
2-Oct
L 9-Oct
16-Oct
23-Oct
30-Oct
6-Nov
13-Nov
20-Nov
27-Nov
4-Dec
11-Dec
18-Dec
25-Dec
1-Jan
8-Jan
15-Jan
22-Jan
29-Jan
5-Feb
12-Feb
19-Feb
26-Feb
5-Mar
12-Mar
19-Mar
26-Mar
2-Apr
9-Apr
16-Apr
23-Apr
30-Apr
7-May
14-May
21-May
28-May
4-Jun
11-Jun
7-
I?
0
cn
cn
m
v
0
co
cn.
L
G) ?
cn
o
v
o
,
t
m
o
c
o
•
,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,.,,, ..,.
, C9
a
3
4, ? W W N N 11 1. (In O Cn
Cn O Cn O Cn O Cn O
Depth to groundwater (in)
o =
H
c
m
< M
a m
i0
i3
Rainfall (in)
O N W ? CA O v O (0 O
23-Jan
6-Feb
20-Feb
5-Mar
19-Mar
2-Apr
16-Apr
30-Apr
14-May
28-May
11-Jun
25-Jun
9-Jul
23-Jul
6-Aug
20-Aug
3-Sep
v 17-Sep
eo •c
4 0 1-Oct
c
CD
.? 15-Oct
29-Oct
12-Nov
26-Nov
10-Dec
24-Dec
7-Jan
21-Jan
4-Feb
18-Feb
4-Mar
18-Mar
1-Apr
15-Apr
29-Apr
13-May
27-May
10-Jun
L.
D
? CL N
cc
V
?M
<D
(D A) n
O
to
to
00
$. .4 W W N N ?? Cn O Cn
U1 O Cn O CT O U1 O
Depth to groundwater (in)
Rainfall (in)
O -? N w N C31 0) ?I 00 CO O
23-Jan
30-Jan
6-Feb
13-Feb
20-Feb
27-Feb
6-Mar
13-Mar
20-Mar
27-Mar
3-Apr
10-Apr
17-Apr
24-Apr
1-May
8-May
15-May
22-May
29-May
5-Jun
12-Jun
19-Jun
26-Jun
3-Jul
10-Jul
17-Jul
24-Jul
31-Jul
7-Aug
14-Aug
21-Aug
28-Aug
4-Sep
11-Sep
v 18-Sep
25-Sep
o? 2-Oct
L 5 9-Oct
16-Oct
23-Oct
30-Oct
6-Nov
13-Nov
20-Nov
27-Nov
4-Dec
11-Dec
18-Dec
25-Dec
1-Jan
8-Jan
15-Jan
22-Jan
29-Jan
5-Feb
12-Feb
19-Feb
26-Feb
5-Mar
12-Mar
19-Mar
26-Mar
2-Apr
9-Apr
16-Apr
23-Apr
30-Apr
7-May
14-May
21-May
28-May
4-Jun
11-Jun
L
G)
C c =
C
?4 CD
L M g
CD CD
3
C)
CO O
co
CO
I
I. ., W 6 N N 1. L O Cn
Cn O un O M O Cn O
Depth to groundwat r (in)
Rainfall (in)
o N w .tom Cn rn v 00 Co o
23-Jan
30-Jan
6-Feb
13-Feb
20-Feb
27-Feb
6-Mar
13-Mar
20-Mar
27-Mar
3-Apr
10-Apr
17-Apr
24-Apr
1-May
8-May
15-May
22-May
29-May
5-Jun
12-Jun
19-Jun
26-Jun
3-Jul
10-Jul
17-Jul
24-Jul
31-Jul
7-Aug
14-Aug
21-Aug
28-Aug
C_ 4-Sep
11-Sep
18-Sep
25-Sep
`4 - 2-Oct
L 9-Oct
16-Oct
23-Oct
' 30-Oct
00 6-Nov
13-Nov
20-Nov
27-Nov
4-Dec
11-Dec
18-Dec
25-Dec
1-Jan
8-Jan
15-Jan
22-Jan
29-Jan
5-Feb
12-Feb
19-Feb
26-Feb
5-Mar
12-Mar
19-Mar
26-Mar
2-Apr
9-Apr
16-Apr
23-Apr
30-Apr
7-May
14-May
21-May
28-May
4-Jun
11-Jun
4, $? W W N N 11 -1 , Cn O (n
Cn O Cn O Cn O (n O
Depth to groundwater (in)
P
o =
c ?
? N
c
mg
?D <D
0
Rainfall (in)
O - N W Cn (A -4 00 <0 O
23-Jan
30-Jan
6-Feb
13-Feb
20-Feb
27-Feb
6-Mar
13-Mar
20-Mar
27-Mar
3-Apr
10-Apr
17-Apr
24-Apr
1-May
8-May
15-May
22-May
29-May
5-Jun
12-Jun
19-Jun
26-Jun
3-Jul
10-Jul
17-Jul
24-Jul
31-Jul
7-Aug
14-Aug
21-Aug
28-Aug
4-Sep
11-Sep
d 18-Sep
25-Sep
`4 °? 2-Oct
c 9-Oct
3 .? 16-Oct
23-Oct
' 30-Oct
Co 6-Nov
13-Nov
20-Nov
27-Nov
4-Dec
11-Dec
18-Dec
25-Dec
1-Jan
8-Jan
15-Jan
22-Jan
29-Jan
5-Feb
12-Feb
19-Feb
26-Feb
5-Mar
12-Mar
19-Mar
26-Mar
2-Apr
9-Apr
16-Apr
23-Apr
30-Apr
7-May
14-May
21-May
28-May
4-Jun
11-Jun
- - G)
0
- cn
- cn
m
0
m
Cn
A
- G7
0 t_
5
(D C
Cn
0
v
W
0 to
to
m 4
°- t_
--------------
- to
to
00
O
Co
- o
cn
F
U)
0
cD
1 ! W 6 N N a L & O CA
Cn O Ul 01 M O Cn C]
Depth to groundwater (in)
o =
c ?
? y
fl.
W
D ?
M
0 0
. Rainfall (in)
O N W .P Cr CD -4 OD (0
23-Jan
30-Jan
6-Feb
13-Feb
20-Feb
27-Feb
6-Mar
13-Mar
20-Mar
27-Mar
3-Apr
10-Apr
17-Apr
24-Apr
1-May
8-May
15-May
22-May
29-May
5-Jun
12-Jun
19-Jun
26-Jun
3-Jul
10-Jul
17-Jul
24-Jul
31-Jul
7-Aug
14-Aug
21-Aug
28-Aug
4-Sep
3 11-Sep
18-Sep
co `4 25-Sep
4 2-Oct
L ? 9-Oct
16-Oct
23-Oct
' 30-Oct
Coo 6-Nov
13-Nov
20-Nov
27-Nov
4-Dec
11-Dec
18-Dec
25-Dec
1-Jan
8-Jan
15-Jan
22-Jan
29-Jan
5-Feb
12-Feb
19-Feb
26-Feb
5-Mar
12-Mar
19-Mar
26-Mar
2-Apr
9-Apr
16-Apr
23-Apr
30-Apr
7-May
14-May
21-May
28-May
4-Jun
11-Jun
O
-
co
G)
0
(D
n?
U)
0
(D
cn
U)
J
G)
C,
_ 0
(D
v ,
a
° c
t
m
f ?
c
cc
cc
a
o
c
? c
< 2
Q;. N
. o
? o
11 ? GJ W N N L L & O CA
Cn O M O Cn O M O
Depth to groundwater (in)
.
O
23-Jan
30-Jan
6-Feb
13-Feb
20-Feb
27-Feb
6-Mar
13-Mar
20-Mar
27-Mar
3-Apr
10-Apr
17-Apr
24-Apr
1-May
8-May
15-May
22-May
29-May
5-Jun
12-Jun
19-Jun
26-Jun
3-Jul
10-Jul
17-Jul
24-Jul
31-Jul
7-Aug
14-Aug
21-Aug
28-Aug
C 4-Sep
11-Sep
18-Sep
25-Sep
2-Oct
C 9-Oct
? 16-Oct
ID 23-Oct
' 30-Oct
ao 6-Nov
13-Nov
20-Nov
27-Nov
4-Dec
11-Dec
18-Dec
25-Dec
1-Jan
8-Jan
15-Jan
22-Jan
29-Jan
5-Feb
12-Feb
19-Feb
26-Feb
5-Mar
12-Mar
19-Mar
26-Mar
2-Apr
9-Apr
16-Apr
23-Apr
30-Apr
7-May
14-May
21-May
28-May
4-Jun
11-Jun
Rainfall (in)
-? N W (n Cn ?I co m O
= 2
a?
N
? c
m?
CD
1 -
O
P GJ W N N O Cn
CA O Cn O Cn O Cn O
Depth to groundwater (in)
a
3
z
C
O
a
0
U
C
A
z
W
a o
C
e?
a
C
0
C
A
Monthly Rainfall 1997
MCAS New River
I?nb-ar%m.illa KIP
12
10
8
'c
w 6
c
tY
4
2
0
70th percentile of 30 year average
30th percentile of
30 year average , •
\ 10
i \
r
r
r
i
L
Cu ,` ? ? ? ? L L
Q p? a o L
n L
o
Q n p (D (D
LL a)
U)
U) O
z u
Month of the year 1997
Monthly Rainfall 1998
MCAS New River
12
10
8
C
g 6
c
4
2
0
Jacksonville, NC
70th percentile of 30 year average
30th percentile of 30 year average;
-- -------------
L L 'tom ? N ?+ r'' L L L L
f0 f0 d N O 3 7 Q )
C ` O Q O
Q O U ; V
(D O Z
Month of the year 1998
1-Jar
8-Jar
15-Jar
22-Jar
29-Jar
5-Fek
12-Fek
19-Fek
26-Fek
4-Mai
11-Mai
18-Mai
25-Mai
1-Api
8-Apr
15-Apr
22-Apr
29-Apr
6-May
13-May
20-May
27-May
3-Jun
10-Jun
v
17-Jun
°• 24-Jun
0 1-Jul
1<
CD 8-Jul
15-Jul
4 22-Jul
29-Jul
5-Aug
12-Aug
19-Aug
26-Aug
2-Sep
9-Sep
16-Sep
23-Sep
30-Sep
7-Oct
14-Oct
21-Oct
28-Oct
4-Nov
11-Nov
18-Nov
25-Nov
2-Dec
9-Dec
16-Dec
23-Dec
30-Dec
Rainfall (in)
U1 -? CJ1 N CTS W Vt .p CT
G)
0
cn
0
(D
v
U)
" o
D
W
0
" cn
.L
cD
V
0 C_ K --------------------- ------ _------ .ti.... ?l
v
v nv
N
o
< N
= :E
n N Co
Rainfall (in)
O -? N w 1s
O 6 -? cn N <J? Co
to ?i U1
1-Jan
8-Jan
15-Jan
22-Jan
29-Jan
5-Feb
12-Feb
19-Feb
26-Feb
5-Mar
12-Mar
19-Mar
26-Mar
2-Apr
9-Apr
16-Apr
23-Apr
30-Apr
7-May
14-May
21-May
28-May
4-Jun
11-Jun
v
19-Jun
o26-Jun
3-Jul
10-Jul
17-Jul
m
24-Jul
31-Jul
7-Aug
14-Aug
21-Aug
28-Aug
4-Sep
11-Sep
18-Sep
25-Sep
2-Oct
9-Oct
16-Oct
23-Oct
30-Oct
6-Nov
13-Nov
20-Nov
27-Nov
4-Dec
11-Dec
18-Dec
25-Dec
cn
0
cn
CI)
cD
U)
0
- o0
c?
v
v n ?.
0 y
CD ;o
o Z °?.
<m
D v
z
0 N co
, OD
,A 5rATE
yw
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR.
GOVERNOR
P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201
DAVID MCCOY
SECRETARY
January 24, 2000
Mr. David Timpy
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
PO Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
Dear Mr. Timpy:
Subject: 1999 Annual Monitoring Report for the Haws Run Mitigation Site, Pender
and Onslow Counties
Please find enclosed the 1999 Annual Monitoring Report for the Haws Run Mitigation Site.
This report details the hydrologic and vegetation monitoring activities over the past year at
the site, which is in its first year of monitoring following construction.
A meeting to discuss this and other sites evaluated by the Wilmington and Washington
Regulatory Offices has been scheduled for Friday, February 18, 2000 at 9:00am in Room
470 of the Transportation Building. Representatives from NCDOT and other agencies will
be in attendance.
If you should have any questions prior to this meeting, please contact Beth Smyre, Natural
Systems Engineer, at (919) 733-1175. Thank you for your continued support and
cooperation.
Sincerely,
c kL
5 'U
V. Charles Bruton, Ph.D.,
Assistant Branch Manager
Project Development and Environmental
Analysis Branch
Cc: w/ attachment
David Franklin, USACE (1)
Kelly Williams, NCDCM (2)
John Hennessy, NCDWQ (1)
David Cox, NCWRC (1)
w/o attachment
Bruce Ellis, NCDOT