20200572 Ver 1_USACE More Info Received_20200508

Strickland, Bev
From: Preston Butler <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2020 3:40 PM
To: Phillips, George L CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
Cc: Goss, Stephanie; Phil May
Subject: [External] RE: Grove Avenue Subdivision / SAW-2019-00636 / NWP 29 / Request for
Additional Information
Attachments: IMG-5413jpg; IMG-5415jpg; IMG-5416jpg; Final PJD.pdf
External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
[e-mail]
Hey Lyle,
Thanks again for your review. I have provided our responses in blue below.
1) Are the proposed 0.01 permanent impacts a result of above grade fill (permanent wetland with loss) or
permanent wetland conversion from forested to herbaceous wetlands (permanent wetland impact with no
loss)?
The proposed 0.01 acre of permanent impact is wetland conversion from forested to herbaceous wetland and
will result in no loss.
2) Can you provide a quick description of the habitat for USFWS within the permit area, so that we can determine
the potential for suitable habitat for Michaux's sumac? Sumac survives best in areas where some form of
disturbance has provided an open area. Several populations in North Carolina are on the edges of artificially
maintained clearings. For example, was the easement maintained to not allow for woody vegetation growth?
Were the edges of the easement too competitive to allow for colonization? Is the canopy dense not allowing for
sufficient sunlight for sumac growth? Do you recall surveying for sumac species during the delineation?
The site is entirely forested except for the roadside on the eastern side of the site and the maintained utility
corridor bisecting the site. This roadside has heavy canopy cover over the maintained right of way that inhibits
ample sunlight for sumac growth. English Ivy (Hedera helix) was also present along the maintained roadside and
was the predominant groundcover species. The utility corridor was maintained, contained only herbaceous
vegetation with no evident sumac stems, and had canopy cover from the surrounding trees that allowed for only
moderate sunlight into the corridor. The species within the corridor were also highly competitive/invasive
species, including Microstegium viminium and Solidago canandensis, and would likely outcompete Michaux's
sumac for the limited sunlight. Therefore, we did not consider these areas to be suitable habitat for Michaux's
sumac.
While we did not perform a formal survey for Michaux's sumac, none were observed during delineation on May
18, 2018 which was within the survey window. The nearest known population of Michaux's sumac is 2.5 miles
away.
3) Can you please provide me a copy of the PJD Request that was submitted for this project?
Our PJD submittal is attached.

In addition to our PJD submittal, I have attached some site photos of the roadside and utility corridor that I took last
week. Let me know if you have any more questions or concerns.
Best,
Preston Butler
AROLINA ECOSYSTEMS
3040 NC 42 W
Clayton, NC 27520
919-523-5821
www.carolinaeco.com fcarolinaeco.coml
From: Phil May <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2020 9:24 AM
To: Phillips, George L CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Cc: 'Goss, Stephanie' <[e-mail]>; Preston Butler <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Grove Avenue Subdivision / SAW-2019-00636 / NWP 29 / Request for Additional Information
Lyle,
Thanks for these comments. Preston was able to run by the site yesterday to grab some photos and we will provide
those with the responses this week.
Thanks
Phil
Phil May
CAROLINA ECOSYSTEMS INC.
[phone]
From: Phillips, George L CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, May 4, 2020 12:16 PM
To: Phil May <[e-mail]>
Cc: 'Goss, Stephanie' <[e-mail]>
Subject: Grove Avenue Subdivision / SAW-2019-00636 / NWP 29 / Request for Additional Information
Hey Phil,
I have reviewed the PCN for the above referenced project, and I have a few comments/questions that need to be
addressed prior to proceeding with review and issuance of the permit verification. Please let me know if you have any
questions.
1) Are the proposed 0.01 permanent impacts a result of above grade fill (permanent wetland with loss) or
permanent wetland conversion from forested to herbaceous wetlands (permanent wetland impact with no
loss)?
2) Can you provide a quick description of the habitat for USFWS within the permit area, so that we can determine
the potential for suitable habitat for Michaux's sumac? Sumac survives best in areas where some form of
disturbance has provided an open area. Several populations in North Carolina are on the edges of artificially
maintained clearings. For example, was the easement maintained to not allow for woody vegetation growth?
Were the edges of the easement too competitive to allow for colonization? Is the canopy dense not allowing for
sufficient sunlight for sumac growth? Do you recall surveying for sumac species during the delineation?
3) Can you please provide me a copy of the PJD Request that was submitted for this project?

G. Lyle Phillips
Regulatory Specialist
US Army Corps of Engineers
CE-SAW-RG-R
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Phone: [phone], Ext. 25.
Fax: [phone]
Email: George. L.Phil [e-mail]
We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated Customer Service Survey is
located at: http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm apex/f?p=136:4:0 fcorpsmapu.usace.army.mill. Thank you for taking
the time to visit this site and complete the survey.

I ati. ,. ell
e..v . ;�,� ... ' . i 7 f. ,�. , 1i r,l ,� „�. i .Y�, , w = �.�,` ` ''� • i,,w`1` !�}` . L.�.-p y, �'1 M _
IV • %w
,,r ''` �-• "I,W - Y"`r. >' r;. ( f w C ,'F, -:"„C' ^ �•k'. .\t / ; -�•S r 'W .x� ; �"r!h �j'� /J� • ♦ «►�
o
> ` , F,�'`� r r �,• ,, •y.�p f'i. .- Y I '�- > ? t a .yJ� i . Y
! • Ill r il' lowtlo. �- a�� :�': T+' Xb1r y f looll! � � t '
'b. ..I ..- .IJfiow L�ell, to fiiM" t p 'F ;Y.�. - .;p : R o >\+s~ kill
..
�- v .
+- i
1 ... toot,,a• >'-V r.►,,'�' yy 4 r -.a. <b gpyY' o V \/ F =r `:t �, C +� r+-ate
'lle
po . , i vr°1I .10
1A' �I. %,.� *:. ' Si' S� aRfv ` ' ` '` M. i'' 1 1 •?i %'f!�/ -
4 eoll n
i •�: l a jyi o.
i �. r •p y y, �r �i�.{ _ ,'
.. •'1• \,ftlVol
«�. i. 1 ,�r 1 \- •-*: r " :y"''� 1 \: •^ t t\V "�'1 `,. / h 3.i:.��lol lir{"{''..y� r r
f
01 All Vol lo,
J
w yy
Ilk. Vo—
:r r k' M1 ill t •� r� .�% V � A Ill
Ill I
s
It It
y M p
4, IN
, ; .. .Lly
F}a ti ' ) •/ ♦ VY , V - � /i r {j' �w.sr i rf' I' , `�, FY; N'
il. `� J� ! 1goopor "I « i ''� t V,.�r '! ,Iy - -
or
' F <�}""• •` I�'i� t� �T ..y.0 ' 1f�1r 1� .: -' ^ P •x� :t'11�'.. >� - a# - • +'� re
4•
r
a
y�>~ i 1 tij'`j-• s 'q�..} ,U `...\ A \T. \ .., a tt
Ar.
loll
�~ 1/ •" f' t *. I r, � ';,.r ' t4` f'%I
', 1 ( 1 F, - n d i = , "-. ♦ a^ 4 ,eA,i, .e'.'rr�• �a ii
Y
r
r
`i. 'II w•
rA
•� -.n+�7 �
lop
;,ytin `
J�,.
r—_-
_-
r
e
yc yrk
p Illf� III
'IlL'n a `� ! I rl r7 1 / f ,yam r - g I� - "olI I .. - _ w - '.:4.'
toll
s�G .'4"% ! I 1 ' � `z�w ` �y Pl ♦ i,t �•,',r 1' s..» 'Y t
/" - '°�' /,,, :++••!�+ ;'+f'..Ji ,r r ~,� r 1 • \vl ;Vol♦ a ""rejyb ;;-^; Yea A i •"ira' " S k +.w,6v S� n :r.4. 7 `� v.y+.. 1 •, ,\ _
r ` �� ' ,e r toI'dtit
- y dt • F1 u;.T »
\ I M�
ooll
_ 1 ry1F
,
ol.
r
.
PI—
IWI - � f :
.. ... • lrlip
k'�r
I `'d'/. 'M> M J > li.• ° + I''p .vim -.1 y-�„�r �- -w.- »_ !1
� r ftill
tP sJ`
♦� J' Opt AW
tie'llit
r
A'
..... . Volr Via' ' r `I < v - y y 1 `• h , 1
jfJ
ll
ok
-.I.$r!/ r, y ,d 'II•Ir. \I. '� rN„ 'E 1'.r.•,.s' i.Y
` \ 4AIL
,ol kL —
♦ [[jtt , c
oloorII
'Fw } al,.r�'4' : wy,x \T`` '•s 1 _
Al _-- 1.
lor
ft loll
Ill, lolll
Vol
/r+,/ -t ♦i . °=Jls:y,F`+ 'tGi, ��.r F3, 7,;\. .�, _ .a - '�':, A'*S�. • ,�yKxy. ` ,s
Iwo
ooI
JF
p J las
}
k
Nil
Alp 11P I., lot
loll
VAV
yy T
I
loot
oll
r lot
-'. I .. / _ M1 i —yam �'• 1,�Y..r _.y .,.yy+
/> / �� ♦ �.
/ I J' - t I- 1 i r,TtraS a, `/~ r - r r ~ - Y _
`III I,Y. ••' pry M �..�.,'-
4 4 At lop
Iol
. 64 `v h 1 • '� .. -,Itf' r ,�a,1tt�• 'l .

ML
1,14AWW. W
.r���"-'��y► � - - a1� I, i. ,-4� � ► 1.�<��S�P ,�\,� A, , )�'. a.r a.+t jTi?,�> 4✓�-•a S/w�i`�V �a (,
a If
�'' -+�. '�' r _ ��.„ 'I�i 1'%I�� • .lL.> ^ l'> ''�g�'\'ate♦.1`erL r�r'
'p ��r.. ,.. +r�.d�. ��r�• _.� �Yn I,-a��14, 1� 'f�r�'��� Cl+�rt�' -.. �rCi G7 . df'
-49N ��►� . ., 'e."r` `ir��+' — Y � ., = y _ �y./a ; 6,.: �i 'i ` , � N, r'?`"v . t \ �'rE' , . ;� h°arI r �.. q*' � '"
ma's' r"c� tt s> •i!' 4 2e 'JIf+ - x:a E'.�'7 n ,r.. ad
�
aat
_5t►y{. r+ \ r74.ILI
. r.. -W.IAM
r I Jl •' i . s _ _ A r C��' e'er •�.A
r a r
!-�rl - >' 3' Gli i' / �1 _ w,' •t• 4` Y 'r• `Y,Y fir. ..p i'. •. _ ram
n= 3
AL
Ia, ILL
�r+y'c.-S�W `�,"�. +' ..e a;; �'�♦dP_a� �/j r �,'c.� 3 =I��� - -
:�,. -"a r �"i.-..:� �'��.• l' �� . ��:��� .$ ` ` • -ae w �+� iQ ye.�_ !y► 1 � :d `Isy �� �`tt"ti-t7�i �
ILL
Lain-+__ 1�`1_L •mary'�I. SL.� ' ors
r�'r�sr
I '4f+�lff _' t'•♦F1.—'...� ., wA4�.I.—f,'�� J' �+C"•f ��._ c�� rF }��
'g
la r
-Iq
"VIFVffICi.
op
'eILL_ i
1
VIPAwl
hyp
awk- if
J`p 06)L1
• �+ , 1 -siF, LNG
ffi�� � �, �^ i'.�'- '� *� f' YP Wa ` 44
ALL
ILI
I ILL.
.,._�;, ' 4 ,1., dlit�S <. 4... N !��['py�^[�� i f ,� 1
aa
WC I
++ y' i
If 0
�~�.c —•
/W I
IF
.. � s , (_p' � ,/ids. , `/, ` �• �'� � , SI j ► �'-', —'"� , , i; � - � '�•, �nr,��. gj��- . '!7
{. ljt� _�!�y�,-j tl�`O • f , 4_ J 1 p ♦ rf✓ llll"@y.,,'IZ
d.
sflow
J
Ze
APP
Ow
IQ4FIL
10
Sit
ate; yr
. ar
r i 40
Or_rr�"X,
uw
pp
+��',� Oak
ArPOMW we ' P ' I
A AA
Lof
• t
CIL
Id
, eA
4�_
_ ._ .•,�$eiL�' v e�G,.s > ? `+i {.a..i ft.' 4Yl -, r. • _ �♦
` f��•
IL
aIlia

�., ..
�.
r , ,.00� °1 Vl" ` f'%e i° .t. ��;.t 'y`V4 r II 4
I ell
CL
.�Id
r
-�. ♦ .. a .tea+�.•'i f . - F.
a •. fa Y -.`%• .r ` ^-',f^-...i,, ^w..a '. �. � .` J �.rt e•�1✓ .'!' w,. -_ `i"` _CJ•.��
Ji� •• yam' ~ 'IY, .� _ ._.>` •% Y•a
"S ,
n
• ." � •uwa 1 �+. ^• ty�J . ... fit' - � a R I� �•.y'� lf- */lY. 'y r •,`% \o < � S�! pt, y • < .l i �� � .� _ . r a -.... +"��`� 15 , - ' , s .�. X� �. M1�. ��{ 1',9r ,.. a •► �... -
.y � , S !k �o��� '�. t�.o- � ., .4€' a .�:Z ; Mr, •.. �' 1. f �`� w �+ .. , ... icy jS',..1Xyj�'1t1'!�„�SP,. ,/y��/�� a,/ r '., Y y
�.ol
_. , �.;, �t R.._ lt< flq 'y ' rim 5 `'i` .. ."�! 1GY.:
�. M.a 4 ,, } K �y
• it . _ _ 3 L. p Jr
\} , ._ i .. , .{! • ' '!'}� ,4, y "55 .,",r a Y-cc,' ¢ '4� i ! a i': �S F, ' v ��t
qq tq.. ~-. jj., .,`� a a !t KN I• ,t �33J5~:, - ✓ ,,,r! l �•I �•��, �,{{•
J1 <lT - i :i E,.` ,.� R. .'tf �' Z i'•.. '� -� fi/ty 1 .J«•i. �f �. .7 ,%i�_'.�'° J�
r
to
J
4 I w
�� GiIlr
140
.. - r. k t v a, . . r,: S . t- r 'r'1�.J -+ w, •f / Q - , e ,ir Ij
�. we
• - .. `.. a,.••. --. ;. ^! i�Y•, p n i•v •' P 7i w I 'J � J er ` \� , .i R .:• 7s `\' S >" ` � ` irl� T,,, f♦ 1 w ✓ .t, r _ e. ,.'ll / t
. F Iij
0+ / .
.
• °�a��- �i:. . • o- tC', 1"'.• a,�n� . • ff .. J F a• Y MT'y?.^_ '.. n. ie, t.. 4 �� ,•t. a �� ! . 'i III,5 ••?• _ ,-
: i . ' 'yT-!.. ` 4 ii Y' ��` htr w'iR't° 1 ... i 4Fr, y �. 4 • '^ " p •
, , ; J y` ? A O 1R-'i. �. .•v"7! _ , rL•� - - Y: i w f � ��•%r ` �s 3.Fi 'ey -
',!r\%a'f. G -r" *1''+.y..�..< •7' :'. M„' .t .i .� ,. r , ':t.• +� :i'�� 3r .,.�. _ .'J��yT Y - S . i":'
`..®R_r€R•w'yw5 ,a ry' S, 4.. +,'� MCII
�). - < ✓5 L ,•'i p...•l �a•�y.• - yi'"i'j� .. P+ �E�
T' !
,
04
e: yip ..!-
z- '. - -.. i' � icL! :. $i f ..• .e c IV,ts '!,"� 'qr M' .e.•:•� J' �s!�,/ � - _ � -
.� ..'vi<: 9I,, .. ,!)% b • �- c ti. f: l�_ a
WI I
IT I
IP
,.._. .:a. " .' ,.. f_` a: xi ,t ,:�;..,:+Or.Y •'., .'t `.� 'i Jar 'Y�,-. !<: _ •' i _ i .r:
we
IIM
•` a')P a' ,tea. ..:- - t Ri H _ - `JI{! / ~' ' �S'.
I y ..- '" _ �. '- v l' i:'• 4\Io,�K!' aSYN^: ,`�R♦ ;,' rxPr .. .. irk• Jar •'r'
T
y.., i.# „L . i ✓r' - r {� ° 10
w•w*' 1t _
-__ - c ,c �'• L �'_{ �5 '� • Imo' - f� oo� � _'� �' ~✓f� � -
Ir
_ �' .:' i 4 , - �� vir•._ 3 y-i /y`�-z1_/^t, v.
\_ ♦
1 _. -
Y
lee
Iffil
lAI
rr s G9 F
ll
All
404% l"
i
2

3040 NC 42 West, Clayton NC 27520
P:919-359-1102 – F:919-585-5570

February 11, 2019

Mr. James Lastinger
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587

RE: Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
Grove Ave Site
Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina

Dear Mr. Lastinger,

Carolina Ecosystems, Inc. (CEI) has completed a delineation of streams and wetlands for a 8.35-
acre site off Grove Ave in Wake County, NC. The attached information, including required
forms, tables, and figures, is submitted for your review and determination of jurisdiction under
the Clean Water Act (CWA).

Project Description & Methodology

As shown in Figure 1, the proposed project is located in Raleigh, NC within the Neuse River
Basin (USGS Hydrologic Unit 03020201) and comprises approximately 8.35 acres.

Delineations were performed on May 24, 2018, in compliance with methodology set forth in the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Wetland Delineation Manual (USACE 1987) and
subsequent guidance including the Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement.
Surface waters were assessed for jurisdiction under the CWA using field indications of ordinary
high water mark and the NC Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) Stream Identification Form
Version 4.11.

Delineation Results

Figure 2 is presented using the Raleigh West (2013) US Geological Survey 1:24,000 Quadrangle
Map. Figure 3 presents the results of the delineation, including one stream and three wetlands.

Table 1 presents detailed information on each aquatic resource within the study area, including
latitude/longitude, estimated amount and type of aquatic resource in the review area, and
geographic authority to which the resource may be subject. Based on field data, there are
approximately 487 linear feet of perennial stream, and approximately 1.6 acres of wetland.

Mr. James Lastinger Parkers Gate
February 11, 2019 Page 2 of 2

We respectfully request your review of this information so that a preliminary jurisdictional
determination under the CWA may be obtained. If you have any questions, need additional
information, or would like to schedule a site visit, please contact me at your earliest convenience
at [phone] or [e-mail].

Sincerely,

Chris Hopper
Environmental Scientist
Carolina Ecosystems, Inc.

Attachments:
- Jurisdictional Determination (JD) Request Form
- Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form
- Table 1: Preliminary Jurisdictional Table
- Figure 1: Vicinity map
- Figure 2: USGS map
- Figure 3: Features map
- Stream and Wetland Data Forms
- Agent Authorization Forms

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017
Page 2
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: _______________________________________________
City, State: _______________________________________________
County:
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN):
B. REQUESTORINFORMATION
Name:
Mailing Address:
_________________________________________
Telephone Number: _________________________________________
Electronic Mail Address: ________________________________________
Select one:
I am the current property owner.
I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant
1
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain. ________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
2
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
738 Grove Ave
Raleigh, NC
Wake
0783387915
Chris Hopper
3040 NC Highway 42 W
Clayton, NC 27520
[phone]
[e-mail]
STEVENS, WILLIAM E STEVENS, BERTIE
9 AUDITORIUM CIR
WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH NC 28480-2713
Not Available
✔
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017
Page 3

D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION
3,4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Print Name
Capacity: Owner Authorized Agent5
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST:(Check as many as applicable)
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources underCorpsauthority.
Iintendto construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcelwhich may
require authorization from the Corps, andthe JDwould beusedto avoid and minimize
impacts tojurisdictional aquatic resources and as aninitialstep in a future permitting
process.
I intendto construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcelwhich may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
Iintendto construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
Other:___________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
4 If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
See Attached Agent Authorization Form
✔
✔
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017
Page 4

F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be “waters of the United States” or “navigable waters of the United States”on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional “waters of
the United States”. PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
“preliminary” in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional “waters of the United States” or “navigable waters of the United
States” are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other “affected
party” (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
Size of Property or Review Area acres.
The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
8.35
✔
✔
✔
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017
Page 5

H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: ______________________
Longitude: ______________________
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6ƒNorth ArrowƒGraphical ScaleƒBoundary of Review Area ƒDateƒLocation of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations: ƒJurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.ƒJurisdictional non-wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non-Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.ƒIsolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non-
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non-Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non-jurisdictional (i.e.
“Isolated”, “No Significant Nexus”, or “Upland Feature”). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations: ƒWetland and non-wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non-wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
____________________________________________________________________________
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled “Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations” to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards.http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Program/Jurisdiction/
35.7801
-78.7169
✔
✔
✔
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017
Page 6

Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination formxPJDs,please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form7 and include the
Aquatic Resource TablexAJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form
8
Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
Other Assessment Forms
_____________________________________________________________________________
7 www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/regdocs/JD/RGL_08-02_App_A_Prelim_JD_Form_fillable.pdf
8 Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose:The information thatyouprovide will beusedinevaluating your requestto determine
whether thereareany aquatic resources within the project areasubjecttofederaljurisdictionunder the regulatory
authorities referencedabove.
RoutineUses:Thisinformation maybeshared with the Departmentof Justice andotherfederal, state,and local
government agencies, and the public,andmaybe made available aspartof a public notice as required byfederal
law. Your nameandproperty location wherefederal jurisdiction is to bedetermined will beincluded in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD),which will bemade available tothe public on the District's website
andontheHeadquartersUSAGEwebsite.
Disclosure:Submission ofrequested information is voluntary; however, ifinformation is notprovided, the
requestforanAJDcannot beevaluatednorcananAJD be issued.
✔
✔
✔
✔
Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A.REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B.NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD:
C.DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D.PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: County/parish/borough: City:
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.:Long.:
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody:
E.REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH “MAY BE”SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non-wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource “may be”
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
SA 35.7801 -78.7178 487 Linear Feet Non-Wetland 404
WA 35.7805 -78.7178 0.2009 Acre Wetland 404
WB 35.7799 -78.7179 0.2877 Acre Wetland 404
WC 35.7801 -78.7192 1.1463 Acres Wetland 404
Chris Hopper- Carolina Ecosystems, Inc. 3040 NC Hwy 42 W, Clayton, NC 27520
NC Wake Raleigh
35.7801 -78.7169
Simmons Branch
May 24, 2018
1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring “pre-
construction notification” (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant’s acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit)or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there “may be” waters of the U.S. and/or that there “may be”navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: ________________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale: _______BBBBBBBBBBBB.
Data sheets prepared by the Corps: ________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
Corps navigable waters’ study: ____________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: ________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
USGS NHD data.
USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: _________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: __________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: ________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
State/local wetland inventory map(s): ____________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
FEMA/FIRM maps: ________________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
100-year Floodplain Elevation is: ____BBBBBBBBBBBB.(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: Aerial (Name & Date): ______BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
or Other (Name & Date): ______BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: __________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
Other information (please specify): ______________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member person requesting PJD
completing PJD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)
1
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.
Vicinity Map
Raleigh West (2013) 1:24,000
2017 NC Statewide Aerial Photography
February 2019
Figure 1: Vicinity Map
Grove Avenue
Wake County, NC
0 2,2501,125
Feet³Study Area
USGS Streams
Cary
Raleigh
Project Location:
Wake County,NC
Latitude:35.780013 Longitude:-78.717192 Wal
nut
Cr
eekSi
m
m
o
n
s
B
r
a
n
c
h
Richland Creek
§¨¦40
§¨¦40
§¨¦440
§¨¦440
§¨¦440
§¨¦40
Western Blvd
Jones Franklin Rd¬«54
¬«54
¬«54
¬«54
WASAWBWCGrove AveWake County, NC0 60 120Feet³Figure 2: USGS MapMap Date:Revised: Revised: Revised: Raleigh West_2013 US Geological Survey 1:24000 Quadrangle MapFebruary 2019Study AreaStreamsWetlands
Grove AveWake County, NC0 60 120Feet³Figure 3: Jurisdictional Features MapMap Date:Revised: Revised: Revised: 2017 NC Statewide Aerial PhotographyFebruary 2019Study AreaStreamsWetlandsWASAWBWC
J�
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4-11
Date: Q S l ?�l / 8
Pro1'ect/Site: 6- ✓L ✓G
Latitude: 7 S.
Evaluator: ?rc f 4 0' f is r
County: WAki�
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent �,
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other SJ4
if 2 19 or perennial if z 30'
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e g Quad Name:
I�
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
-ripple-pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
5. Active/relict floodplain
co
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
GI UMA41 UItU Mb GIC ItVI IMUU, bet; uiscusswns ut manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = I I , 5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes =
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = 4 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Oth r = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: e xA cc -, C 0( A -
M4 f4. -,�5�� c�--,-)e
Uef� d(c,�(�)cn �Jrr1.1'tjI

kxe 4 VI; i
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
/. Ave,.oS a'l�l
Project/Site: �� v� City/County: � n K C Sampling Dater OM
Applicant/Owner: r L-/`^ �fl1Stated✓ : AC Sampling Point: W/t- 0�
Investigator(s): O't T ,f'P,- Section, Township, Range: /V
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):-+errN G &1 Local relief (concave, convex, none): (A11W(1 Slope (°k): .-A
Subregion (LRR or MLtRA)): /:3G P Lat: 2 S , l s0,� Long: — 7 S. '1179 Datum: W �sS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: w t k, .4 V C It/� NWI classification: (' F o
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed?/A/� Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic?�y () (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes �L No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No within a Wetland? Yes ✓ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (66)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Saturation (A3)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_C Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (62)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (134)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No x Depth (inches): X
Water Table Present? Yes
No:_ Depth (inches):_
Saturation Present? Yes
No � Depth (inches):_
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot ize: 10 ) %Cover Species? Status
1. A((r /,�/ti-. Li ✓ 9
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
0 U = Total Cover.
50% of total cover: `� 20% of total cover:
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 5 ) d
2. A '( C rL.. 5 r. M r-A
6
7
5 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: i 20% of total cover:
t
Herb-Stratuumm (Plot size: S )
2. Af',W i 1l M 161- 3-A JQa i' 0 _1/- r�6 t✓
"" A lk G f
Sampling Point: 6- 0Z
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
(B)
Percent of Dominant Species
4
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
(B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
,/y- 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
6.-
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7
height.
8.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
g.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
10.
m) tall.
11.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
= Total Cover
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Woody
Vine Stratum (Plot size: /� .1, )
/}
height.
2. V'
i I'll
.17
+N
3.'
r A,rw
W1i 11k
IS" ✓
-t
4.
Hydrophytic
5
_=
Vegetation
Present? Yes V No
Total Cover
50% of total cover:
(� 20% of total cover:
S
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
le Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvae Loc
p L (0`1 F yfa 9� OR 5 4 5 6 ^07
�� ►o S � � 60 s 5 � ��
YA "ve 4
Sampling Point: uJA-QZ
Texture Remarks
5L
5_
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric So
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes1`/ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: rnyc AyC City/County: °' �� Sampling Date:
ApplicanUOwner: 1. /Lt ` State: L Sampling Point: `� d
Investigator(s): S a 1 `^ 7 C� Section, Township, Ranger/N��
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): L^ I t f ( ° p t- Local relief (concave, convex, none): C r) '+ Git Slope (%): n - ON
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: 35,7$0% Long: 79- 7)7,- Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: � I., ^- r ey NWI classification: PAD
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed?/two Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes' No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? ^/o (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ✓ within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No_-Z—
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
econdarylndicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
_
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (616)
_
Water Marks (61)
_ nce of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Season Water Table (C2)
_
Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Reductio ed Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (63)
_ Thin Muck (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ O xplain in Re s)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_
Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_
Inundation Visible on Aerial Image
_ Shallow Aquitard (133)
Water -Stained Leaves (69)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No!.
includes ca illa Erin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
��
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species?
Status
1.1X'^C �C wS 4l
(9
aCt^
fAL
3.�L�Cn i��(�M
A ✓
/�(,
4.
5.
6.
7.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
S 20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
,. (3ixC�crAC
2. REc� r-,5�,ti,
t ✓
��
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
5 n
=—Total Cover G
(S
S I 50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb
s� Stratum (Plot size: )
7, ii A tin f P n I n FA G t„
4
5
3,
7.
B.
9.
10.
11.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 0 )
2.d0\e,nc:Stir�
( 0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: _— 20% of total cover:_
(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
q ILA P
Sampling Point: Z
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
(B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
(B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hvdroohvtic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes ✓ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

w4 Lip
SOIL
Sampling Point: W A Q Z
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
% Color (moist) % Tvoe Loc
Texture Remarks
n"'�
lob i S
S L
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3) '
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al):
Thick Dark Surface (Al2) r
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral S (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
2Location: PL=Pore Lininq, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric So
Dark Surface (S7) ---------------- _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Polyvalue Below ce (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Thin Dark dace (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loa leyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
eted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
Redox DbfkSurface (F6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Dark ce (F7) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Redox Depressions
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12)
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

r, Wef
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region �(
Project/Site: G r A VC4 v r City/County: `W'i Ke- Sampling Date: o d v� e
Applicant/Owner: F L' ^^ Slate: N (r Sampling Point: ' O
/�S
Investigator(s): Pre S 4 0^ 1) C r Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): l ( r r 9 t G Local relief (concave, convex, none): C 99 (^ ✓L Slope (%): 0 " a`
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): fi Lat: 3S- 77 99 Long: - V. 7/ 80 Datum: W &A
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: P EM
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes , Z No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed?/ o Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? ff 0 (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes � No Is the Sampled Area L
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes S� No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes '� No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required• check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3)
ZC Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Sediment
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (131)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (133)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No )r\ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No� Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes ca illa fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

w i3 i,-c t
VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: n ) %Cover Species? Status
^
2. L',0adjand(Q6 +..I:�: F[r, 2 ✓ Fflct.,
3. N 1- 1, +g C /f ,
7.
6 0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: rJ 20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: I ) 1n A
7✓ FALH
2.
4.
7
9.
= Total Cover
� 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ) � ,,
3. A %V L,., rAc h,
Sampling Point: W
Dominance Test
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species 66
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Z2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
6 Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7, height.
8.
Sapling/Shrub —Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9. than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
10. m) tall.
it
(/ = Total Cover r N
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: n )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

�,j B wt-f
SOIL
Sampling Point: W
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
inches Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
i14 IoyR ti/d 5 IoYR l;' S
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (At)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (At0) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
7 Depleted Matrix (F3)
_
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (At0) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

UP
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
j City/County: 1 , r" 0S '+N
Pro ecVSite: � 0 V L � V C WttihG SamplingDate:
Applicant/Owner: F t, m, State: Sampling Point: — n s
Investigator(s): Prt 54o" I to <� Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): ( 5 l o c Local relief (concave, convex, none): 0 ^ ✓(x Slope (/o): 0 — JL
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): - 1 6 Lat: 3S, %801 Long: ''1 R . -7l'11 Datum:
\
Soil Map Unit Name: W G I" a LC NWI classification: P�
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (if no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? �o Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? M. (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No )`(_
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes N04--
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ ly Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C
_ Drainage Patterns (610)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxi Rhizo es on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (616)
_ Water Marks (B1)
_ Prese uced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
cent Iron Reduc in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
Geomorphic Position (132)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (133)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No�_
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Testworksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
13
1. P t , S } , L ^
v 1'
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3. L% (: � r"(� � r" ^ �" ( n r r n
�
f ,,�
Species Across All Strata:
(B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
y
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
% 0 = Total Cover
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
S 20% of
total cover: I L4
OBL species
x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
FACW species
x 2 =
1. 11 e X 0 16' f ^
(0
r EAC "
FAC species
x 3 =
2-L; t r ^ ^^ 5 " ^ C $ L
�(�_
� , vN
FACU species
x 4 =
3
UPL species
x 5 =
d
Column Totals:
(A)
(B)
5. Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
_ 2 -Dominance Test is >50%
g. _ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
= Total Cover 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
% 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: —
Herb Stratum (Plot size: S ) data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
1.0 M - 4 Or" v C (,L rv� r�i �, (� ✓ Ff�C Ini — Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4.
5.
6.
7.
10.
11.
�= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
1
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1 )
1. 14Cd(-, Ile l: x
2. ,-14"cno L'RIt. f - -PA t►r (,7 CA
3. \j : + : ti rQLAl 10L
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 1 '2• 7 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Hydrophytic
Vegetation k
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

w6 L'IP
SOIL
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Ty Loc Texture Remarks
o-� IoO s/t-1 roo sL
(d t 100
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (At 0) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N.
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix
'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ 1_6amX Gleyed Matrix (F2
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Deplete ix_kP8T _
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Su F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Dark Surface
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, -
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No V
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

wc.
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: V ro V C Ave CI:y C;;unly _ Sampling Date:(2 16( �l fi
Applicant/Owner: F � NM State: A✓L Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): rf l � n 1 Section, Township, Range:_ _�1A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): 4 < rrg4. L Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope ON
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): l3 6 Lat: 3S • 7801 Long: --IS. 1 I q Z Datum: LIj�S 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Gn 0 F4X NWI classification: () Fo
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? A Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes %/ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? A10 (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland. Yesy No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
_ Geomorphic Position (132)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (135)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ] )
Absolute
% Cover
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
,<< r(.st-
Ho
._11
r-)rc
2.
—s ¢c-
F A c
3.
t o oleo f to
4.
5.
6.
7.
�-
Total Cover
`?
50% of total cover:
20% of
total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plosize: I.
)
('igLN
1.66c,(,5
qI A
3.
n n an 0 (l
4.
5.
7
0 = Total Cover
`50% of total cover: _ d_ 20% of total cover:_
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
2. nx:Ls !/rc a(%n t /q.1,lA S 10 ✓FAG
3.
4. -
7
9,
1C
Sampling Point: W G 03
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
(B)
Percent of Dominant Species S / ^7
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
(B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hvdroohvtic Veaetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 -Prevalence Index is :53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Veaetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
0 = Total Cover of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
50% of total cover: a D 20% of total cover:_
, Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: I a ) height.
1. Neac,4 ke1:x S ✓ �Ac
4. Hydrophytic
5.- Vegetation
10 = Total Cover Present? Yes �✓ No
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

W ( fin' C I
SOIL
Sampling Point: UiM3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color most %
Color (moist) % Type
Loc
Texture Remarks
0_ 6
Y y 45
10j R S t; 15
(2 L
5 L_ -----
6
1oj'R 5/c is-
D=Depletion, RM=Reduced
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox(S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches).
Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric So
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses IF12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes " No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

Ve
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Grp "c A-e City/County: K Sampling Date: 0 5- d ti Z /�10
Applicant/Owner: F.L' M State: IV I- Sampling Point: I`✓L n
Investigator(s): i cJ n ^ L r Section, Township, Range: AA
T
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc..): h • f (f 1/2 n C 2 -7Local relief (concave, convex, none): L O"� �� �` Slope (%): n - a
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): 11 Lat: JS - 1 )9 1 Long: "- 7 • - q / Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: C 0 1 AnX NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes t" No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? /Y9 Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes✓ No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? 4-�Q (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No ✓
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No_ithin a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No__,L
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required• check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ sely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl
_ Drainag Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizos on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (61)
_ Presenc educed Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (82)
_ t Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Thin ace (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain in Re
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (85)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aeria agery (67)
_ failew Aquitard (D3)
_ Water -Stained Leaves 9)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

�11/ L v e
VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
/
Sampling Point:
Tree Stratum n
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
�-- (Plot size:
1, 1' 7- n ,- 1 �l G(� Q
�n ✓
FA L
Number of Dominant Species W
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2.At-<< rib r--
n ✓
(AC
3. L : c n cl t , pro - f
o ✓
roc
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7.
b 9 Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover: �1 n
20% of total cover:
I
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
FACW species x 2 =
1. per- ( r / ^ �r
r)y(
l' /� C
FAC species x 3 =
2. 4 ^ < + r ^'ti 5 f
✓
FA(K
FACU species x 4 =
3
UPL species x 5 =
4
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
S
�rL = Total Cover
(fl
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
�
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
2.
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
. 5
5
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
6.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7.
height.
8.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
g.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
10
m) tall.
11.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
= Total Cover
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
50% of total cover:
I 0 (
20% of total cover:
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1. A �4 Hel,x �� F,gc�l
2. 1 JOY—' t r) (tc - row r�� `(�^
1 p ✓
r� (.
3�rn L;f f CIS qr%Op �tFn� �Z v
F&AA-
4.
Hydrophytic
5
—�=
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

\.a/6 U0
SOIL
Sampling Point. W L _ 03
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvoe Loc Texture Remarks
�-a 10YR�n � sL_
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosoi (At)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
�h1\
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 1_4_.-------
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loarny-CQleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Mar F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (At0) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
—,Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
X
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

3040 NC Hwy 42 West; Clayton, NC 27520
P:919-359-1102 – F:919-585-5570

PROPERTY ACCESS AND AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM

Property Information

Property Address
and/or Description

738 Grove Ave

City: Raleigh State: NC County: Wake Property Size (Acres): 8.35

Property Owner Information

Owner: Authorized Agent*:

Name: STEVENS, WILLIAM E STEVENS, BERTIE D

Title:

N/A

Street Address:

9 AUDITORIUM CIR

City: Wrightsville Beach State: NC Zip Code:28480-2713

*Written proof of authorization from owner required.

Authorization

I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein, do authorize
representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein
described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the
U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors
Act of 1899.

Additionally, I hereby grant Carolina Ecosystems, Inc. (CEI) staff, their designated contractors and representatives, as
well as other Federal, State or local authorities access to the above referenced property when necessary for the purposes of
conducting on-site environmental consulting services. I also grant CEI the authority to act as authorized agent on behalf of
the owner of the above listed property for the communication, submission, and/or application to relevant government
entities, including local, state, and federal authorities, for the review, acceptance, concurrence, and/or approval of
environmental information, documents, and/or permit requests concerning the above listed property. These services may
include regulatory determinations of environmental features on my property such as issuing a determination associated
with streams and wetlands. I certify that I am the legal owner or authorized agent of the legal owner of the above property
and have authority to grant such access. I have made CEI aware of, and supplied all available records related to, previous
environmental investigations on the subject property of which I have knowledge.

Owner/Agent (signature) Date

Parcel Identification
Number(s) (PIN)

0783387915