20200321 Ver 1_Stream Restoration Plan_20200505

Strickland, Bev
From: Morgan, Katie <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2020 3:33 PM
To: Johnson, Alan
Cc: Janiczak, Catherine M CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
Subject: RE: [External] RE: Copart design DWR #19-0321
• External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
m nc. ov
Good afternoon Alan,
Below is the link to download the Stream Restoration Plan for the Gastonia Site. Please let me know if you have any
questions.
19-266450.2 Stream Restoration Plan- Fairview Drive, Gastonia, NC [reports. partneresi.coml
Have a Great Day!
Katie L. Morgan, PWS, EP
Senior Project Manager — Professional Wetland Scientist (#3100)
PARTNER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE, INC.
New Orleans, LA
C:423-838-1845 1 0: 504-777-3956 1 D: 800-419-4923 ext. 3748
More Than Just Assessments. Solutions — For a complete list of services, click here[nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.comI
From: Johnson, Alan <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2020 11:12 AM
To: Morgan, Katie <[e-mail]>
Cc: Janiczak, Catherine M CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] RE: Copart design DWR #19-0321
I haven't received comments since the plan received reducing below the 150
threshold. Reminder, I asked about reducing the impacts and it was said it wasn't
possible. Once the mitigation requirement was shown, the impacts were reduced.
suggested further steepening the slopes and increasing the retaining walls to further avoid the
impact.
If another plan was devised, I haven't received.
1

Thanks
Alan
From: Morgan, Katie [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2020 11:55 AM
To: Johnson, Alan <[e-mail]>; Janiczak, Catherine M CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
<[e-mail]>
Cc: Jonathan. [e-mail]; Perez, Douglas J <[e-mail]>; Pitner, Andrew
<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] RE: Copart design DWR #19-0321
External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
[e-mail]
Alan,
Did you receive the Grading Plan set showing the details of the retaining wall and stream impacts?
The restoration plan will be sent over today.
Have a Great Day!
Katie L. Morgan, PWS, EP
Senior Project Manager — Professional Wetland Scientist (#3100)
PARTNER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE, INC.
New Orleans, LA
C:423-838-1845 1 0: 504-777-3956 1 D: 800-419-4923 ext. 3748
More Than Just Assessments. Solutions — For a complete list of services, click here[nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com
From: Johnson, Alan <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, May 4, 2020 3:04 PM
To: Janiczak, Catherine M CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>; Morgan, Katie
<[e-mail]>
Cc: Jonathan. [e-mail]; Perez, Douglas J <[e-mail]>; Pitner, Andrew
<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] RE: Copart design DWR #19-0321
I am awaiting the information regarding the proposed impacts. Considering earlier comments
stated that retaining walls weren't possible.
From: Janiczak, Catherine M CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, May 4, 2020 3:57 PM

To: Morgan, Katie <[e-mail]>
Cc: Jonathan. [e-mail]; Perez, Douglas J <[e-mail]>; Pitner, Andrew
<[e-mail]>; Johnson, Alan <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] RE: Copart design DWR #19-0321
External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
[e-mail]
The tolling agreement must be signed before the permit can be issued. I am reviewing the permit while I wait for the
tolling agreement to get signed. I believe I was also waiting on an update on the original engineering designs. In the end,
it will all come down to getting that tolling agreement signed. Thank you and let me know if you have any other
questions.
Catherine M. Janiczak
Regulatory Specialist
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Charlotte Regulatory Satellite Office
Phone: [phone]
From: Morgan, Katie <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, May 4, 2020 3:37 PM
To: Janiczak, Catherine M CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Cc: Jonathan. [e-mail]; Perez, Douglas J <[e-mail]>; Pitner, Andrew
<[e-mail]>; Johnson, Alan <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: [External] RE: Copart design DWR #19-0321
Thank you Catherine,
I will send these comments over to Copart and get back to you with their response.
Would you be able to get me an ETA for the permit?
Have a Great Day!
Katie L. Morgan, PWS, EP
Senior Project Manager — Professional Wetland Scientist (#3100)
PARTNER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE, INC.
New Orleans, LA
C:423-838-1845 1 0: 504-777-3956 1 D: 800-419-4923 ext. 3748
More Than Just Assessments. Solutions — For a complete list of services, click here
From: Janiczak, Catherine M CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, May 4, 2020 5:18 AM
To: Morgan, Katie <[e-mail]>
Cc: Jonathan. [e-mail]; Perez, Douglas J <[e-mail]>; Pitner, Andrew

<[e-mail]>; Johnson, Alan <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] RE: Copart design DWR #19-0321
Good morning,
Please see our attorney's comments below and send me the additional information requested as soon as you can:
I have reviewed the attachment, and need some documentation in order to determine whether it is appropriate or
not. I note the following:
1) It is signed by G R DePasquale (assumed to be Gregory R. DePasquale) as "Business/Land Owner". However, to sign
on behalf of the Corporation, he needs to be signing in the capacity of his position. According to the Secretary of State's
website, Gregory R. DePasquale is identified as the Secretary. Therefore, his signature block should be amended to
reflect his name and position.
2) With regard to the Office/position, a Secretary may or may not be authorized to execute such a document. We will
need to see a copy of the Bylaws and/or a Corporate Resolution that authorizes the Secretary to sign documents like
this and bind the Corporation.
Thank you and let me know if you have any questions.
Catherine M. Janiczak
Regulatory Specialist
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Charlotte Regulatory Satellite Office
Phone: [phone]
From: Janiczak, Catherine M CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2020 3:08 PM
To: Morgan, Katie <[e-mail]>
Cc: Jonathan. [e-mail]; Perez, Douglas J <[e-mail]>; Pitner, Andrew
<[e-mail]>; Johnson, Alan <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] RE: Copart design DWR #19-0321
Good afternoon,
Alan is correct in his statements below. Because this is a violation, a signed tolling agreement (attached) is required. A
PCN must be submitted which can be found on our website
here: Blocked https://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Permits/2017-Nationwide-
Permits/Pre-construction-Notification/ lorotect-us.mimecast.coml
Part of the stream will have to be restored, otherwise, an individual permit is required which takes a lengthy
Environmental Impact Statement which can take months to complete.
Because the impacts are over 150 linear feet, mitigation is required on all impacts.
Yes, the Corps will need to assess the impacts onsite so we will need to set up a site visit in May. May 6t" is my next
availability if you would like to set something up. Thank you and let me know if you have any questions.
Catherine M. Janiczak
Regulatory Specialist
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Charlotte Regulatory Satellite Office
Phone: [phone]
From: Johnson, Alan <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2020 11:47 AM
To: Morgan, Katie <[e-mail]>
Cc: Janiczak, Catherine M CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>;
Jonathan. [e-mail]; Perez, Douglas J <[e-mail]>; Pitner, Andrew
<[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: [External] RE: Copart design DWR #19-0321
You need to get the information Cathy is required. I am not familiar with Partners and not
sure Cathy has been to the site to verify the delineation.
300 ft is the threshold for IP, so not sure if you might need to push down a bit to be sure you
are below threshold, otherwise you are in a different game.
My understanding is that until Cathy gets certain information, the corps does not review the
project (or something to that affect). Given that this is a violation and it is address a bit
differently.
We should also receive, be submitted a stream restoration plan/design for the impacted
area. It may be well to have all the players there for a site visit to discuss retaining wall,
delineation, stream restoration.
I went by the site a few weeks ago when we were having all that rain to take a look. I was
slipping and sliding up and down the hill, and hoping I didn't slide away, so I didn't make it
down the channel to take a look.
From: Morgan, Katie [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2020 11:34 AM
To: Johnson, Alan <[e-mail]>
Cc: Janiczak, Catherine M CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>;
Jonathan. [e-mail]; Perez, Douglas J <[e-mail]>; Pitner, Andrew
<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] RE: Copart design DWR #19-0321
• External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
re am nc. ov
Hi Alan,
Thank you for your time. I apologize in the delay in getting you this information. Finding a new normal with the changes
from the pandemic has been a challenge. It took some additional time to get all of the files from servers in the physical
office to home offices.
5

1. 300-feet is the correct amount of impact (so we will need to update the PCN). The PCN was submitted with the
impact noted in the initial NOV. Plans were not finalized prior to submitting the PCN. Copart was able to reduce
the amount of impact to the jurisdictional stream to 250 feet. The additional 250-feet of stream identified in the
NOV will be restored. The developer tried to keep impact to 150-feet; however, site design did not allow. Due to
slopes, safety, soil type, and cost the engineer recommends filling and piping the segment shown in the attached
map and restoring the remaining 250-feet of stream. The site is waiting on a formal determination of jurisdiction
for the smaller stream. Assuming the smaller stream is jurisdictional
2. Attached is a map of the stream delineation. Please use the attached map as a guide to stream location and
measures. The entire site was densely covered in kudzu at the time of the wetland delineation, as such the
stream in question was not observed during the initial delineation. Partner returned to the site in February and
delineated the stream feature. The stream features were mapped by a surveyor.
3. Kelly Williams has been contacted for mitigation forms and information. Upon receipt of correspondence I will
send an update.
4. The developer tried to keep impact to 150-feet; however, site design did not allow. Due to slopes, safety, soil
type, cost, and potential for a blow out from a retaining wall the engineer recommends filling and piping the
segment shown in the attached map and restoring the remaining 250-feet of stream. The developer was able to
avoid impact to 250-feet of the initially impacted stream identified in the NOV and proposes to restore the 250-
feet of non -impacted stream. Additionally, only 50-feet of the secondary stream awaiting formal jurisdictional
determination will be impacted. The remainder of the stream within the development will be restored.
I believe Cathy and site personnel were corresponding about the site visit. I will provide an update regarding site
visit status as soon as possible. Due to travel restrictions and the current pandemic, alternatives to physically
being onsite for out of town representatives may be needed. We will explore the option of a video chat with
onsite personnel and out of town representatives for the site walk with regulators.
Have a Great Day!
Katie L. Morgan, PWS, EP
Project Manager — Professional Wetland Scientist (#3100)
PARTNER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE, INC.
New Orleans, LA
C:423-838-1845 1 0: 504-777-3956 1 D: 800-419-4923 ext. 3748
From: Johnson, Alan <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2020 2:27 PM
To: Morgan, Katie <[e-mail]>
Cc: Janiczak, Catherine M CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>;
Jonathan. [e-mail]; Perez, Douglas J <[e-mail]>; Pitner, Andrew
<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] RE: Copart design DWR #19-0321
Ok, some more information required other than the retaining vs fill material.
1) 1 made an assumption about the potential stream impacts proposed for the site, so was
focusing on the fill. HOWEVER, the PCN states 500 ft of stream. That is an INDIVIDUAL
PERMIT potentially, unless waived by the army corps. To be below the threshold for an

IP, you must be less 300 ft of stream (a diagram below shows 250 and 50 ft (300 ft) of
impact). Mitigation would potentially be waived with impacts less than 150 ft of stream.
2) The delineation papers did not include a map of the stream and/or lengths from the
consultants. Below are several different maps included in the information submitted for
this project.
A) is the "Gastonia Industrial 18-07-0510" that was included. The yellow and red lines (I
assume channels) were not Identified in the legend. Nor the length if pertinent.
DOW 4 #EMI
O1MLpq
RW4ML BTU► `�
;o#al Area
T12 33 Aon
B) The sed/eros plan shows this illustration. I compared to the illustration above and
have extended in the associated color

ZV BUFFER
OFF WETLANDS
Z
WIN 059 W.,
PROTECTIM
-'n
nv @
(ME OETALI/
[TYN
CV
8

'4_
3) Mitigation forms are required. Contact Kelly Williams with the Division of Mitigation
Services for the information required. Mitigation cost is approximately $500 If. It may
be at a 2:1 ratio, thus doubling the cost.
4) 1 have recommended retaining walls to minimize the need of fill material and reduce the
stream impact. Avoidance and minimization must be shown or a pertinent reason must
be provided.
Cathy Janiczak with the corps is waiting for information before she can move forward
with the application (if I am correct). Given the information regarding the potential
stream impacts (Individual permit or Nationwide permit) and the confusion regarding
the proposed streams. This project will remain on hold till a site visit can be conducted
with the army corps and the proper representatives with the company. It may be good
to have the wetland personnel to confirm their stream origins and engineer to provide
information regarding the ability to avoid the streams. Work avoiding any
stream/wetlands at the site may continue however the work should not continue with
the expectation of the current submitted design being constructed with the current
proposed fill till clarity can be provided.
Thanks,
Alan Johnson
9

From: Morgan, Katie [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2020 2:07 PM
To: Johnson, Alan <[e-mail]>
Cc: Janiczak, Catherine M CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] RE: Copart design DWR #19-0321
External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
[e-mail]
Hi Alan,
I spoke with Copart, the site has already been redesigned to impact as little of the stream as possible and changing the
design to incorporate a retaining wall is not feasible for this project.
Have a Great Day!
Katie L. Morgan, PWS, EP
Project Manager — Professional Wetland Scientist (#3100)
PARTNER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE, INC.
New Orleans, LA
C:423-838-1845 1 0: 504-777-3956 1 D: 800-419-4923 ext. 3748
From: Johnson, Alan <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2020 1:01 PM
To: Morgan, Katie <[e-mail]>
Cc: Janiczak, Catherine M CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Subject: Copart design DWR #19-0321
Why is it not possible to utilize retaining wall to avoid the channel. This is typical here in the
piedmont. Currently the stream impact is due to fill material and slopes for parking. Walls
should allow a greater buffer around the channel.
10

Also: Given the height of the slopes there will be a condition to mat the slopes and work them
to completion asap so they can be matted and a monitoring condition could be required for
the stream below the impact to ensure flow is maintained. If impacted additional mitigation
cost could be required.
DWR
DNIT-lon of Water Ftesources
Alan D Johnson — Senior Environmental Specialist
NC Dept. of Environment & Natural Resources (NCDENR)
Division of Water Resources - Water Quality Regional Operations
610 East Center Ave., Suite 301, Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulation.
11

ZZ

SHEET ECAB

fr/j/��\�y
I �ti

PARTNER
STREAM RESTORATION PLAN
Gastonia, NC
Fairview Drive
Gastonia, North Carolina, 28052
May 5, 2020
Partner Project No. 19-266450.2
Prepared for:
Copart
14885 Dallas Parkway
Dallas, Texas 75254

PARTNER
May 5, 2020
Mr. Mason Laycock
Copart
14885 Dallas Parkway
Dallas, Texas 75254
Subject: Stream Restoration Plan
Gastonia, NC
Fairview Drive
Gastonia, North Carolina, 28052
Partner Project No. 19-266450.2
Dear Mr. Laycock:
Partner Engineering North Carolina, PLLC (Partner) is pleased to provide the results of the Stream
Restoration Plan report for the abovementioned address (the "subject property"). This assessment was
performed in general conformance with the scope and limitations as detailed in our proposal.
This assessment included review of available online resources and client provided information. An
assessment was made, conclusions stated, and recommendations outlined.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide environmental services to you. If you have any questions
concerning this report, or if we can assist you in any other matter, please contact me at
[e-mail].
Sincerely,
Katie L. Morgan, WPIT
Project Manager
Gary Reynolds
Relationship Manager
8720 Red Oak Boulevard, Charlotte, North Carolina 28217 0 Phone [phone] Fax [phone]

PARTNER
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0
INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................................1
1.1
Purpose................................................................................................................................................................................1
1.2
Scope of Work...................................................................................................................................................................1
1.3
Limitations...........................................................................................................................................................................1
2.0
SITE DESCRIPTION...............................................................................................................................2
2.1
Site Location and Legal Description.........................................................................................................................2
2.2
Background........................................................................................................................................................................2
2.3
Project Summary..............................................................................................................................................................3
2.3.1
Permitting.................................................................................................................................................................3
3.0
RESTORATION PLAN............................................................................................................................4
3.1
Basis for Design................................................................................................................................................................4
3.2
Restoration Goals.............................................................................................................................................................4
3.3
Restoration Components..............................................................................................................................................4
4.0
IMPLEMENTATION............................................................................................................................... 6
4.1
Site Preparation and Plant Installation....................................................................................................................6
4.2
Planting Plan......................................................................................................................................................................6
5.0
RESTRICTIONS......................................................................................................................................8
5.1
Construction and Material Storage...........................................................................................................................8
5.2
Grading or Alteration of Hydrology..........................................................................................................................8
5.3
Planting Non -Native Species.......................................................................................................................................8
5.4
Tree Removal.....................................................................................................................................................................8
6.0 SIGNATURES OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS...................................................................9
7.0 REFERENCES........................................................................................................................................10
Attachments
Site Grading Plan
— C5.0
Site Grading Plan
— C5.1
Site Grading Plan
— C5.2
Site Grading Plan
— C5.3
Site Grading Plan
— C5.4
Stream Restoration Plan PARTNER
Project No. 19-266450.2
May 5, 2020
Page ii

PARTNER
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Partner has prepared a Stream Restoration Plan in general conformance with the scope and limitations as
detailed in our proposal for the property located at Fairview Drive and Dallas Bessemer City Highway in
the City of Gastonia, Gaston County, North Carolina (the "subject property'). The Stream Restoration Plan
is designed to provide Copart with a restoration plan for the 350-linear feet (LF) of impacted jurisdictional
stream on the subject property.
1.1 Purpose
The purpose was to improve ecosystem health and water quality by restoring natural stream functions
and implement stormwater best management practices' (BMPs) demonstration sites to treat runoff in
degraded areas within the watershed.
1.2 Scope of Work
The scope of work for this Stream Restoration Plan was performed in general conformance with the scope
and limitations as detailed in our proposal.
1.3 Limitations
Partner warrants the findings and conclusions contained herein were accomplished in accordance with the
methodologies set forth in the Scope of Work. These methodologies are described as representing good
commercial and customary practice for conducting a Stream Restoration Plan of a property for the
purpose of identifying wetlands and streams on the subject property. There is a possibility that even with
the proper application of these methodologies there may exist on the subject property conditions that
could not be identified within the scope of the assessment or which were not reasonably identifiable from
the available information. Partner believes the information obtained concerning the subject property is
reliable. However, Partner cannot and does not warrant or guarantee that the information provided by
these other sources is accurate or complete. The conclusions and findings set forth in this report are
strictly limited in time and scope to the date of the evaluations. The conclusions presented in the report
are based solely on the services described therein, and not on scientific tasks or procedures beyond the
scope of agreed -upon services or the time and budgeting restraints imposed by the Client. No other
warranties are implied or expressed.
Some of the information provided in this report is based upon research of available documents, records,
and maps held by the appropriate government and private agencies. This report is subject to the
limitations of historical documentation, availability, and accuracy of pertinent records.
Stream Restoration Plan PARTNER
Project No. 19-266450.2
May 5, 2020
Page 1

2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION
2.1 Site Location and Legal Description
The subject property is situated between Fairview Drive and Dallas Bessemer City Highway in Gastonia,
North Carolina, is located on the north side of Fairview Drive and the west side of Dallas Bessemer City
Highway. According to the Gaston County Assessor, the subject property ownership is currently vested in
Gastonia Industrial Realty Co. since 1988 and consists of three parcels totaling (approximately) 110.24
acres.
The onsite jurisdictional stream is an unnamed tributary to Long Creek and is located within the
northwest -central portion of the subject property. Prior to disturbance, the area was primarily wooded
land.
2.2 Background
Natural stream functions in many areas of North Carolina are threatened by historical and ongoing
alterations in watershed hydrology and land use, resulting in unstable streams with poor habitat and
water quality. Causes of degradation include channelization, sediment inundation, stormwater runoff, road
crossings, and loss of riparian vegetation.
Development activities impacted a jurisdictional stream on the subject property in November 2019. The
jurisdictional stream encountered the following impact during the development activities:
• Removal of riparian vegetation within the buffer zone around the stream
• Sediment discharge into the stream from construction activities
Stream restoration can be defined as the application of engineering, geologic, and biological principles to
improve hydrological and biological functions of the stream corridor. Components of a successful stream
restoration project may include:
1. adjusting the stream channel size and shape;
2. establishing a hydrological connection between the channel and floodplain;
3. adding in -stream structures for stability and habitat enhancement;
4. stabilizing streambanks by regrading and/or establishing native vegetation; and
5. establishing a forested riparian corridor.
The natural channel design approach makes use of reference stream morphology and biology information
to devise a comprehensive project aimed at restoring and maintaining natural stream functions over the
long term. The purpose of this project was to design and implement a natural channel design project to
achieve the highest water quality and habitat potential for the impacted jurisdictional stream on the
subject property.
Stream Restoration Plan PARTNER
Project No. 19-266450.2
May 5, 2020
Page 2

2.3 Project Summary
Approximately 500-linear feet (LF) of jurisdictional stream was impacted during development activities on
the subject property in November 2019. A North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural
Resources Division of Water Resources - Water Quality Regional Operations (NCDENR-DWR) Notice of
Violation (NOV-2019-PC-0739) was issued for unauthorized impact to the jurisdictional stream. The
impacts to 150-LF of the jurisdictional stream are in the process of being permitted by the United States
Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). The Stream Restoration Plan herein addresses the restoration of the
remaining 350-LF of impact to the jurisdictional stream on the subject property.
2.3.1 Permitting
Preconstruction notification was provided to North Carolina Department of Environmental and Natural
Resources and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regulatory staff, and permits received in compliance with
federal and state (401/404 and Jordan buffer rules) requirements. With regard to requirements to avoid or
minimize impacts, the Stream Restoration Plan is designed to restore the jurisdictional stream to pre -
impact conditions. Avoidance and minimization measures include pursuing construction in dry periods to
the maximum extent possible and stabilizing disturbed areas by the end of each day. A Sediment and
Erosion Control Plan has been authorized by NCDENR-DWR for the subject property and approved
sediment and erosion control measures will be implemented during restoration activities.
Stream Restoration Plan PARTNER
Project No. 19-266450.2
May 5, 2020
Page 3

3.0 RESTORATION PLAN
3.1 Basis for Design
The jurisdictional stream was impacted during development activities at the subject property in November
2019. To address areas of degraded aquatic habitat on the unnamed tributary of Long Creek jurisdictional
stream, a stream restoration effort is proposed as part of the permitting impact to the 150-LF of the
jurisdictional stream. Additionally, the stream restoration effort will address the unauthorized impact to
the additional 350-LF of jurisdictional stream on the subject property.
Restoration is designed to stabilize the existing channel against severe erosion and bank failure, protect
planned structures, and where appropriate, to reestablish more natural channel morphology. The
restoration plan strives to achieve a balance between the risk of significant or catastrophic bank failure
and the loss of riparian habitat. The general location of the proposed restoration plan is shown on the
Grading & Drainage Plan Sheet C5.3 (C5.3) and is referred to as the restoration area. It is proposed that
the existing impacted jurisdictional stream is restored to pre -impact conditions.
3.2 Restoration Goals
The goals and targets for the restoration and future management of the Restoration Area are to:
• Stabilize existing channels against severe erosion and bank failure,
• Restore a more natural stream morphology,
• Balance the risk of catastrophic bank failure and the loss of riparian habitat,
• Improve prospects for fish passage,
• Improve native species cover and diversity along the creek banks and surrounding upland slopes,
and
• Remove man-made structures and other impediments to flow.
3.3 Restoration Components
Restoration efforts of the jurisdictional stream at the subject property will include a combination of the
following:
• Removal of Residual Sediment from Initial Impact
Residual sediment from initial impact of the jurisdictional stream will be removed from the
streambed by hand shovel to the best practicable extent possible.
• Biodegradable Matting, Seed, and Straw
A biodegradable matting (coir) made from coconut fibers will be installed along all graded
streambanks throughout the project area. The matting will be secured with wooden stakes.
Temporary and permanent native riparian seed and straw mulch will be placed under the matting.
Stream Restoration Plan PARTNER
Project No. 19-266450.2
May 5, 2020
Page 4

The matting will provide short term bank erosion protection while the riparian vegetation gets
established.
• Boulder Sills and J-hook Vanes
Boulder sill structures will be constructed in the channel to provide grade control, create bedform
diversity, and help maintain pool scour. J-hook boulder vanes will be constructed to direct flow
away from streambanks while providing grade control and maintaining scour pools. Additionally,
natural woody debris will be placed along the stream bank to promote development of pools and
provide suitable refuge for aquatic species.
• Floodplain Benches
Floodplain benches will be graded adjacent to the channel in incised areas. Floodplain benches
allow flood flows to spread out on a floodplain to dissipate energy and minimize erosion.
• Native Riparian Planting
Native riparian plants will be installed along the project reach.
Stream Restoration Plan PARTNER
Project No. 19-266450.2
May 5, 2020
Page 5

4.0 IMPLEMENTATION
The following sections describe specific elements of restoration implementation. Additionally, a
Stormwater Control Plan has been prepared by LBYD Engineers to address during- and post -construction
water quality protection. Standard best management practices such as grading during the dry season,
implementation of silt fencing, and educating construction personnel on proper erosion control practices
will ensure that downstream water quality is protected.
4.1 Site Preparation and Plant Installation
Revegetation with native wetland, riparian, and upland species will enhance habitat quality and diversity
on this segment of the jurisdictional stream and will help to stabilize the creek bank. The jurisdictional
stream restoration is designed to avoid any existing mature native riparian species and has targeted non-
native and invasive trees, shrubs, and vines for removal.
Following grading and prior to planting, the restoration areas designated in the planting plans will be
cleared of invasive species and other weeds that may threaten native plant establishment. Mulch or other
weed and erosion control materials are highly recommended. Details on these features will be developed
as part of landscaping specifications.
4.2 Planting Plan
A combination of planting methods will be completed to improve the chance of successfully fulfilling the
restoration objectives of bank stabilization, flood attenuation and habitat enhancement.
Where appropriate and possible on -site salvaged vegetation of potential transplants may include small
trees up to 3 inches in diameter, shrubs, and herbaceous plants. Sycamores are an easily salvaged species.
Salvaged tree transplants will be pruned to approximately 6-feet and the entire root mass will be scooped
with the bucket of a track hoe. Salvaged shrubs will be pruned to 3 or 4 feet and harvested like the trees.
Salvaged herbaceous plants can be harvested by hand shovel and placed at the toe slope along the
water's edge, where woody vegetation is not appropriate. Vegetation needing excavation with heavy
machinery will not be salvaged from within wetland areas, buffer zones, or other regulated areas on the
subject property.
As with transplants, it may be possible to harvest stake material from the site. Stakes are branches or small
limbs cut from a larger tree or shrub. If material is not available on -site, vegetation may be sourced from
local nurseries. Silky dogwood (Cornus amomum) and willow (Salix spp.) are good candidates for staking.
Some species of shrubs and trees can be propagated from cuttings and root stems, although this
technique is labor-intensive. Stakes should range from one-half inch to 2 inches in diameter with an
average length of 3 feet. The stakes will be cut with an angle on the bottom and flush on tops, with buds
oriented upward. All sides of the branches will be trimmed cleanly so the cutting is one stem. Stakes will
be planted in late fall to early spring while they are dormant. The stakes will be installed in areas where
erosive forces are greatest, such as along meander bends and behind in -stream structures. Stakes usually
are installed 2 to 4 feet apart using triangular spacing along the streambanks. Stakes will be driven into
Stream Restoration Plan PARTNER
Project No. 19-266450.2
May 5, 2020
Page 6

the ground with a rubber hammer, or by making a hole using a metal bar and slipping the stake into it.
Each stake will be tamped in at a right angle to the slope, keeping one-half to four -fifths of the stake
below the ground surface. At least two buds (lateral and/or terminal) will remain above the ground
surface. The soil will be packed firmly around the hole afterward.
Bare -root material may be used for vegetation. Bare -root material will be planted by loosening the soil in
the planting area to a depth of at least 5-inches. Planting holes will be made with a mattock, dibble,
planting bar, shovel or other appropriate tool. The rootstock will be planted in a vertical position with the
root collar about one-half inch below the soil surface. The planting trench or hole will be deep and wide
enough to permit the roots to spread out and down. The plant stem will be kept upright. Soil will be
replaced and tamped firmly around each transplant to eliminate air pockets.
Permanent seeding provides maximum habitat diversity and ground cover. A biodegradable matting (coir)
made from coconut fibers will be installed along all graded streambanks throughout the project area. The
matting will be secured with wooden stakes. Temporary and permanent native riparian seed and straw
mulch will be placed under the matting.
Stream Restoration Plan PARTNER
Project No. 19-266450.2
May 5, 2020
Page 7

5.0 RESTRICTIONS
The following restrictions on activities in the Restoration Area are intended to prevent disturbance of the
creek banks, existing vegetation, and installed native plantings. Any deviation from these restrictions will
require approval from the NCNDR-DWR.
5.1 Construction and Material Storage
Solid materials, including wood, masonry/rock, glass, paper, or other materials shall not be stored
anywhere in the restoration areas. Solid waste materials should be properly disposed of off -site.
Construction and storage of materials within the restoration areas is limited to maintenance of
exclusionary fencing, and other planned features as described in Section 4.0. Piles of plant debris may be
produced during non-native species removal. These debris piles may only be left in the restoration areas
on sites that are already covered in non-native plants or bare ground, and only if necessary, to suppress
regrowth of invasive plants or to prevent erosion. Otherwise, these piles should be removed from the
restoration areas and composted when feasible. A layer of certified weed -free mulch such as rice straw
may also be applied to larger areas of exposed soil since these create potential for erosion or re -invasion
by non-native species.
5.2 Grading or Alteration of Hydrology
With the exception of restoration activities described in this report, no grading or other ground
disturbance shall occur in the restoration areas due to potential erosion or changes in hydrology of the
creek and adjacent wetlands and riparian areas. Care shall be taken to avoid disturbing the existing grade
and surrounding soils as much as possible when removing invasive plants or planting native species.
5.3 Planting Non -Native Species
No non-native plant species may be planted in the restoration areas. Species listed as invasive shall not be
planted anywhere on the property as it would pose a risk to the establishment and maintenance of native
plantings. Locally -native plants are recommended for all exterior landscaping.
5.4 Tree Removal
If any of the riparian or upland trees in the restoration area become diseased or are a danger to public
safety or property, removal will be allowed. This statement does not imply permission to undertake the
removal of any tree without obtaining any appropriate tree removal permits, if applicable. In addition,
removal will be consistent with Federal, North Carolina, or Gaston County requirements.
Stream Restoration Plan PARTNER
Project No. 19-266450.2
May 5, 2020
Page 8

6.0 SIGNATURES OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS
Partner has completed a Stream Restoration Plan for the property located at Fairview Drive and Dallas
Bessemer City Highway in the City of Gastonia, Gaston County, North Carolina in general conformance
with the scope and limitations of the protocol and the limitations stated earlier in this report. Exceptions
to or deletions from this protocol are discussed earlier in this report.
By signing this report, we declare that, to the best of our professional knowledge and belief, we have the
specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature,
history, and setting of the subject property.
Prepared By:
Katie L. Morgan, PWS
Senior Project Manager
Professional Wetland Scientist (#3100)
Reviewed By:
Angelique Crews
Certified Floodplain Manager
Senior Author
Stream Restoration Plan PARTNER
Project No. 19-266450.2
May 5, 2020
Page 9

7.0 REFERENCES
Reference Documents
Doll, Barbara A, et al. "Stream Restoration A Natural Channel Design Handbook." Stream Restoration,
North Carolina Stream Restoration Institute and North Carolina Sea Grant, 2017,
www.bae.ncsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/sr_guidebook.pdf.
Lichvar, R.W., D.L. Banks, W.N. Kirchner, and N.C. Melvin. 2016. The National Wetland Plant List: 2016
wetland ratings. Phytoneuron 2016-30: 1-17. Published 28 April 2016. ISSN 2153 733X
http://www.phytoneuron.net/
"Natural Resources Conservation Service." NRCS,
www.n res.usda.gov/wps/portal/n res/main/national/water/manage/restoration/.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 2018. National Wetland Plant List, version 3.3
http://wetland_pIants.usace.army.miI/
Environmental Data Resources (EDR), Radius Report, February 7, 2019
Federal Emergency Management Agency, Federal Insurance Administration, National Flood Insurance
Program, Flood Insurance Map, accessed via internet, February 7, 2019
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, accessed via internet,
February 7, 2019
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Web Soil Survey,
accessed via the internet, February 7, 2019
United States Geological Survey, accessed via the Internet, February 7, 2019
United States Geological Survey Topographic Map 2013, 7.5-minute series, accessed via internet, February
7, 2019
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment PARTNER
Project No. 19-266450.2
February 7, 2019
Page 10

ATTACHMENTS
I V.11 A' i'Ll I � :1

5' X 5' PRE -CAST CONCRETE RISER SECTION WITH LIGHT DUTY MANHOLE FRAME AND
REMOVABLE COVER (PROVIDED BY FLOOD -CON. INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR)
TOP EL= 713.75
10' WIDE BERM REQ'D. °
°d FLOOD CON AUTOMATED OUTLET
TOP OF BERM EL= 713.60
5 STRUCTURE(AOS)
5 GATES- 4", 8", 12", 20, 24" DIA.
3:1 MAX ° ° ° ° CONTACT JON RASMUSSEN, P.E.
° 3:1 MAX ° ° 205-807-1799
20' WIDE CONCRETE SPILLWAY REQ'D.
BOTTOM OF SPILLWAY EL= 712.60 °
COMPACTED
STRUCTURAL FILL 30" OUTLET OPENING
(FROM POND)
°
708.00 TEMPORARY POOL
30" DIA RCP DESIGN VOLUME = 50,193 CU.FT.
SEE PLAN 1 tit 706.00 PERMANENT POOL
-IIIII IIIII IIIII I1111 IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII
VERTICAL HEADWALL WITH
OUTLET PROTECTION
(SEE PLANS)
I II I I I I II I I II I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I II I I II °4 ° 150"(MIN) I I I I I I I I
INV. OUT
= 705.00rT1 I ir
6' WIDE 6H:1V
. t VEGETATED SHELF
—IIIII IIIII I IIIII I I I I I 111 J ELEV= 706.00 (TYP) @
ANTI -SEEP COLLAR COMPACTED SUBGRADE
SCM (WET POND)
Vmp = 121,467 CU.FT.
ui
AUTOMATED OUTLET STRUCTURE (NORTH POND) N.T.S.
701.00
w
LO
N
1
200 400
300
SCALE: 1"=200'
4' X 4' PRE -CAST CONCRETE RISER SECTION WITH LIGHT DUTY MANHOLE FRAME AND
REMOVABLE COVER (PROVIDED BY FLOOD -CON. INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR)
TOP EL= 746.50
10' WIDE BERM REQ'D. d °
TOP OF BERM EL= 746.00 ° d FLOOD -CON AUTOMATED OUTLET
STRUCTURE(AOS)
3:1 MAX ° ° ° d 4' 4 GATES- 2", 5", 10", 15" DIA.
° WIDECONC3:1 MAX CONTACT JON RASMUSSEN, P.E.
10' RETE SPILLWAY REQ'D. 205-807-1799
BOTTOM OF SPILLWAY EL= 745.00 °
COMPACTED 18" OUTLET OPENING
STRUCTURAL FILL (FROM POND)
742.00 TEMPORARY POOL
°
Z
10 DESIGN VOLUME = 13,903 CU.FT.
��i 117 �
—IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII=IIIII IIIII—IIIII �
VERTICAL HEADWALL WITH
OUTLET PROTECTION
(SEE PLANS)
24" DIA RCP
SEE PLAN
ANTI -SEEP COLLAR
INV. OUT
= 739.00
740.00 PERMANENT POOL
LJ ° 150"(MIN) — 3-1 SCM (WET POND)
Vmp = 33,645 CU.FT.
6' WIDE 6H:1V
-IIIII IIIII I IIIII IIIIIN�I�VEGETATED SHELF @
ELEV= 740.00 (TYP.) = 735.0(
COMPACTED SUBGRADE
AUTOMATED OUTLET STRUCTURE (EAST POND) N.T.S.
w
w
w
Ak
LBYD
ENGINEERS
Birmingham, Alabama
Huntsville, Alabama
Auburn, Alabama
Tampa Bay, Florida
www.lbyd.com
LBYD, Inc.
Civil and Structural
Engineers
880 Montclair Road
Suite 600
Birmingham, AL 35213
Phone [phone]
C-2887
© copyright 2018
These drawings and design intent are the
sole property of LBYD Inc. which may not
be reproduced without written permission.
LBYD Project Number
102-18-503
SeaCAROl
\\\\\\\\I I I I I I I I /
N0�'FEss�o'.!2�',
'a SEAL
�i 035360
�
o
ti
o
CV
O
N_
O
N
U)
Z
LU
�
Z
O
w
2E
U
}
�
O
~
U
Z
0
O
U
w
w
tZ
a
o
ui
o
Lo
co
LU
�
LI-
I IY
M
LU
M
3:
LU
Q
-
z
DC
0
Q
U
LL
=
0
F-
U
z
pC
z
Q
Q
F
z
Q
0
o p
z
0
a_
U
Sheet Title
OVERALL
GRADING & DRAINAGE
PLAN
Date
10/18/2019
Checked By Drawn By
LWI TJR/ARS
Sheet Number Sequence
C5.0 Total6
32

4
4
4
4
4
e
e
LBYD
ENGINEERS
Birmingham, Alabama
Huntsville, Alabama
Auburn, Alabama
Tampa Bay, Florida
www.lbyd.com
LBYD, Inc.
Civil and Structural
Engineers
880 Montclair Road
Suite 600
Birmingham, AL 35213
Phone [phone]
C-2887
copyright 2018
These drawings and design intent are the
sole property of LBYD Inc. which may not
be reproduced without written permission.
BYD Project Number
102-18-503
Seal
CA Rozz
IN
I= ; a SEAL � •�
_ 035360
AIIIIIp.����020
o
CV
N
O
CV
CV
o
O
CD
V C
z
LLI
z
cG
G
O
cw
cc
c
0
U
U
Q
U
LLI
LLI0- 0-
0
LLI
CO
0
LLI
CO
LLI
LLI
re
LI.J
LLI
z
DC
0
oc
Q
U
LL
�
0
F-
U
z
pC
z
Q
Q
F
z
Q
0
Ip
0-
V)
0
U
Title
GRADING & DRAINAGE
PLAN
10/18/2019
Checked By
Drawn By
LWI
TJR/ARS
Sheet Number
Sequence
i C5.1
Total'
32

Ak
LBYD
ENGINEERS
Birmingham, Alabama
Huntsville, Alabama
Auburn, Alabama
Tampa Bay, Florida
www.lbyd.com
LBYD, Inc.
Civil and Structural
Engineers
880 Montclair Road
Suite 600
Birmingham, AL 35213
Phone [phone]
C-2887
© copyright 2018
These drawings and design intent are the
sole property of LBYD Inc. which may not
be reproduced without written permission.
LBYD Project Number
102-18-503
Seal
CARO\\\\\\\\I I I I I I I I /
N0�'FEss�o'.!2�',
'a SEAL
�i 035360
A N E 020
o
0
CV
CV
CD
0
N
O
CV
V C
�
z
z
w
LLI
ccc
cG
G
O
0
U
U
Q
U
LLI
LLI
0-
0-
0
0
LLI
LLI
U)
07
LLI
LLI
N�
LU
DC
LU
z
O
—
a
Q
U
LL
O
F—
U
z
pC
z
Q
Q
F--
z
n
Q
O
o
0—
V)
z
0
a_
U
Sheet Title
GRADING & DRAINAGE
PLAN
E
:10/18/2019
Checked By Drawn By
LWI TJR/ARS
Sheet Number Sequence
C5.2 Total
32