20091337 Ver 1_401 Application_20091209

December 17, 2009
Update to attached, re: Jacksonville line relocation:

COURTESY
? P
During and after an express review with DENR, I'd note the following updates to the attached:
• Molly Ellwood, NCWRC, indicated that the proposed work and approach appeared
reasonable (copies are being sent to Ms. Shannon Deaton and Ms. Ellwood)
• Jon Giles, Coastal Management, indicated the project might still fit under the .1600
general permit for utility projects, and would make a final determination after the Corps
authorized the Section 10 crossing and verified no 404 would be needed. As he is
moving to anew job, PEC will contact Steve Everhart for the final determination. PEC
will also notify the adjacent property owners by certified mail, return receipt requested.
• The preconstruction notification was dropped off at the Corps office for review. A
courtesy copy (again assuming no 404 and thus no 401) is being mailed to DWQ
(Wetlands Unit and WiRO)
• The requested modification to the erosion control plan (clearly show limits of
disturbance) was made and overnighted to Land Quality
• SHPO has previously indicated (in a letter to consultant) there were no issues with the
site.
DECL t 2009
DENR - WATFR QUAllTY
WER ANDS AND STp ygTER BRANCH
Progress Energy
December 16, 2009
Mr. Dan Sams, Regional Engineer
NCDENR - Land Quality Section
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
Subject: Progress Energy Carolinas Overhead Electric Transmission Line Relocation to
Facilitate NCDOT Bridge Project near Jacksonville, NC
Dear Mr. Sams:
Progress Energy Carolinas (PEC) has been asked to the NC Department of Transportation to
relocate the existing Castle Hayne 230kV Sub - Jacksonville City 115kV overhead electric
transmission line (Line A, for further discussion) adjacent to the US Highway 17 bridge crossing
the New River at Jacksonville, NC, to facilitate NCDOT's rebuilding of that bridge (Figure 1, in
attached "Green Book" under Environmental Report tab, and unnumbered aerial photograph,
folded).
Rather than temporarily relocate the transmission line during construction, and then rebuild it in
the current location, PEC has decided to "co-locate" (placed on common structures on a single
right-of-way, ROW) a portion of the above line onto the existing Jacksonville - Jacksonville
City 115kV West overhead electric transmission line (Line B, for further discussion).
Approximately 7,440 feet of Line A will be removed and co-located within the Line B ROW.
The ROW for Line A will be restored and will revert to the previous owner. Co-location of the
two lines will necessitate rebuilding approximately 9,615 feet of Line B (6,620 feet of which will
be co-located), and adding approximately 884 feet of line within a new ROW to connect the two
lines. Similarly, approximately 455 feet of new ROW will be added to terminate Line A at the
Jacksonville City substation. Existing and new ROWS are shown on the "key sheet" (in attached
Green Book, under "Maps" tab). The existing Line A to be removed is shown in green. The
portion of the Line B ROW being double-circuited, and the two sections of new ROW, are
shown in red.
The two short sections of proposed new ROW will result in clearing 1.58 acres. The remainder
of the work will take place in existing cleared ROW, totaling 27.9 acres. This existing ROW
will not require further clearing. However, PEC is including it in the total disturbed area
(rounded to 30 acres) because we expect vehicle traffic will disturb the area somewhat. We have
enclosed checks for the normal review fee ($65/acre, or $1,950) and for the express review fee
($2,000, for 8 or more acres).
PEC intends to start work on or about February 1, 2010, and complete work by May 1, 2010.
Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.
P0. Box 1551
Raleigh, NC 27602
PEC will utilize its standard clearing specifications (in attached Green Book, under Construction
Specifications tab) which include cutting vegetation in uplands to near-ground level, leaving
stumps at 4" or less, and leaving other vegetative root mat intact to the extent possible. In
delineated wetlands, vegetation will be hand cut. Wetlands areas to be hand-cut are shown in
enclosed Figure CT-56026, sheets 1 & 2 (folded).
PEC intends to install silt fencing adjacent to creeks and wetlands, as shown on Figures IA and
CT-56026, sheets 1 & 2. PEC also intends to install standard construction entrances at access
locations (aerial photo, folded). Both measures are shown on the detail sheet (Figure CT-52838,
folded).
PEC would note that we are separately applying for applicable permits or concurrence to the
following:
• NCDENR Division of Coastal Management, for coverage under the CAMA general
permit for utility lines
• State Historic Preservation Office, for compliance with NHPA
• Corps of Engineers, for coverage under Nationwide Permit No. 12 for utility lines
(covering crossings of navigable waters)
• US Fish & Wildlife Service, for concurrence of no impacts to federally threatened or
endangered species
• NC Wildlife Resources Commission, for concurrence of no impacts to anadromous fish
species
• NC Division of Water Quality, 401 Unit, as a courtesy notification (no permanent
impacts to Clean Water Act jurisdictional waters/wetlands are anticipated)
• US Coast Guard, for navigation clearances
We appreciate your consideration of the enclosed erosion control plan. If you have any
questions, please contact Mr. Buzz Bryson in our Environmental Permitting & Compliance Unit
at 919-546-6637 (office), 919-812-1120 (cell) or [e-mail] (email).
Ve truly yours,
Richard A. Brown
General Manager -
Construction & Engineering
RAB/wtb
Enclosures:
1. "fire Erosion control plan)
2. Large format aena d site/detail drawings (3)
3. Financial Responsibility T/ Own x ress Form
4. Checks for express review and normal fee
cc: Mr. Stephen Lane
NC Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, NC 28557
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
NC DENR-DWQ
Wetlands and Stormwater Branch
401 Oversight/Express Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Ms. Renee Gledhill-Earley
Environmental Review Coordinator
State Historic Preservation Office
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh NC 27699-4617
Ms. Shannon Deaton
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
1721 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
LT Chris Vargo
U.S. Coast Guard
Chief, Operations
Marine Safety Unit Wilmington
721 Medical Center Drive
Suite 100
Wilmington, NC 28401
Mr. John Hammond
US Fish & Wildlife Service
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636 - 3726

?ot WArF
O
.
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification PC Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
F1 Section 404 Permit ®Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 12 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ® Yes ? No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
® Yes ? No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ? Yes ® No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ® Yes ? No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? Z Yes ? No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Progress Energy Carolinas Relocation of Electric Transmission Line for US 17 Bridge
Project
2b. County: Onslow
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Jacksonville
2d. Subdivision name: N/A C 0 U FATE
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state

project no: N/A ell,
,?p!
3. Owner Information

3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Carolina Power & Light Co. d/b/a Progress Energy Carolinas holds perpetual easement
to right-of-way for existing lines, and will obtain easement for small portion of new line
location.
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): Richard A. Brown, General Manager, Transmission Construction & Engineering
3d. Street address: 100 East Davie Street
3e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27601 Ls 1-19 L!? U IV' M M)
3f. Telephone no.: 919-546-3122 DEC U I *AAA
3g. Fax no.: 919-546-7552
3h. Email address:
DERR . wATEA QMrry
[e-mail] WETLANDS
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ? Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: William (Buzz) Bryson
5b. Business name
(if applicable): Progress Energy Carolinas, Environmental Permitting and Compliance
5c. Street address: 100 East Davie Street
5d. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27601
5e. Telephone no.: 919-546-6637 (office); 919-812-1120 (cell)
5f. Fax no.: 919-546-6386
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
Latitude: 34.756660 Longitude: -
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): 77.437440
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: 30 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to New River
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: SB NSW
2c. River basin: White Oak
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Land on either side of river at existing line location immediately north of US 17 bridge is commercial. Proposed location
further upstream (on an existing transmission line right-of-way (ROW) is undeveloped lowland on the west, and
developed on the east.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
26
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
2520
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
PEC has been requested by NCDOT to relocate a section of the existing transmission line to facilitate NCDOT's
rebuilding of the US Highway 17 bridge across the New River.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
PEC proposes to relocate approximately 7,440 feet of the existing Castle hayne 230kV Sub - Jacksonville City 115kV
transmission line. The line will be "co-located" (placed on common structures) with the existing Jacksonville - Jacksonville
City 115kV West transmission line. To accomplish that, PEC will rebuild approximately 9,615 feet of the latter line, and
add approximately 884 feet and 455 feet of connecting ROWs on either end of the project.
All work except for the 1,339 feet (1.58 acres) of connecting ROW sections will take place in existing ROW. There will be
no further expansion of those existing ROW footprints. For clearing the 1.58 acres, PEC will utilize conventional methods
in uplands, but hand cut all wetlands areas.
Poles for overhead line will be "direct embedded" (i.e., no foundation material, such as concrete, will be used). Work in
wetlands will be done on mats and/or by using low-ground-pressure equipment. Work in open water will utilize a barge or
similar equipment. There will be no dredging or jurisdictional discharges.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past? ? Yes ® No ? Unknown
Comments: PEC has commissioned a contractor to delineate
wetlands, and will submit that information to the Corps. No
impacts to wetlands are anticipated during the sampling.
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
? Preliminary Final
?
of determination was made?
4c who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
If yes Agency/Consultant Company: Environmental Services
. , Inc.
Name (if known): Environmental Services, Inc. Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ® Yes ? No ? Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
The currently installed line was permitted by the Corps under RHA Section 10
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
? Wetlands ? Streams - tributaries ? Buffers
? open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary
W1 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W2 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W4 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments: Proposed relocation will result in no discharges to waters or wetlands. Impacts to wetlands will be temporary
disturbance during equipment access. Permitting request is for Section 10 only.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g•
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S2 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S3 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S4 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S5 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S6 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments: Proposed line relocation will not impact streams, other than Section 10 crossing
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number - (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4E Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: Proposed line will not impact open water, other than Section 10 crossing
6. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ®No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
? Neuse ?Tar-Pamlico ? Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number - Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary impact required?
?Yes
131 ?P?T ? No
?Yes
B2 ?P?T ? No
B3 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: Proposed relocation will not impact buffers.
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
As planned, work will not impact wetlands or waters.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Work in wetlands will be done from mats and/or using low-ground-pressure equipment. Erosion control measures (silt
fencing) will be installed on ROW at wetlands boundaries. Abandoned ROW will be restored with vegetative cover.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ? Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps

2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? ? Mitigation bank
? Payment to in-lieu fee program

? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.

Zone 6c.
Reason for impact 6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier 6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ? Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
? Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 0%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ? Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Line relocation will not result in any
impervious surface. Abandoned ROW will have vegetative cover installed, as needed. Construction stormwater will
apply.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
? Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
? DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? N/A
? Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ? NSW
? USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ? No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
? Coastal counties
? HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? ORW
(check all that apply): ? Session Law 2006-246
? Other: N/A
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
? Yes ? No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? Yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ? Yes ? No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ® Yes ? No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
? Yes
® No
letter.)
Comments: NEPA review of all nationwide permits was done during reauthorization.
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
No wastewater will be generated.
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ® Yes ? No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ® Yes ? No
impacts?
® Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Consultation with USF&WS and NCDMF.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ? No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NCDMF, which said this area (north of US Hwy 17 bridge) was under NCWRC jurisdiction. Project is being submitted to
NCWRC for review.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ? No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Project is being submitted to SHPO for review
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ® Yes ? No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: Essentially an in-kind replacement of existing overhead line
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? NC Floodplain Mapping Information System
Richard Brown December 16,
2009
L
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/ gent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only R an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
? \ T .? ;F
r
- -,? ,.?,- i+-_?` '^- ,?,:??- -?-.,.?,a?., w'_+e- s ? ?o ?? l4 1,
At.
-? .rte . _ .. •
?7- S
/M -.. -lW _ _ yc
a XQwe!s ! Su q? Park
'y - - - -- - - at 12
_?: i ••• y ?yCCfr1
j 40, -4

%I
J
• ?!.1?\?_ (.,,/I,rFTivh Cnh .' I , N?_ ? ? n ? ?•!I' v^ 1 I Qo_ r ? _ ?•„
lk-
land
' `
iL? `j,-1 t Wilson.,
?- Bay
JIL-
a - s Tarlk _ •..... rda? t? o
Q Project Boundary* Pine (Cif i ,
Jacks PE
0 1000 2000
arier
Feet ?FL?J??? ?•
Source: USGS Digital Raster Graphics,
Jacksonville North (1975) and Jacksonville Disclaimer. The information depicted on this figure is for informational purposes only and was not
Progress Energy South (1988 Quadrangles; Pro eCt centerline prepared for, and is not suitable for legal or engineering purposes. This in,brtnation presented is not for
provided by Progress nergy. regulatory review and is intended for use only by a Professional Land Surveyor prior to regulatory review.
ENVIRONMENTAL. General Project Location Project: ER06039.56
S
524 S. ERVICES, INC. New Date: Jun 2009
Raleigh. Hope Road Jacksonville 115kV Line Relocation
(919) 212-178 12-M0Caroline 27810 Drwn/Chkd: KT/RT
(919)
[phone] FAX Onslow County, North Carolina
w .amnmmentalaervicesinc.oom Figure: 1
a rolec? -loc.dgn, 06/01109. 12:45 PM