Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20200622 Ver 1_401 Application_20200508DWR Division of Water Resources Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form April 11, 2020 Ver 3.1 Initial Review Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?* r Yes r No Is this project a public transportation project?* C Yes IT No Change only if needed. BIMS # Assigned 20200622 Is a payment required for this project?* r No payment required r Fee received r Fee needed - send electronic notification Reviewing Office * Wilmington Regional Office - (910) 796-7215 Information for Initial Review 1a. Name of project: Surf City North Topsail Beach Coastal Storm Risk Management Project 1a. Who is the Primary Contact?* Keleigh Cox 1b. Primary Contact Email:* keleigh.c.cox@usace.army.mil Date Submitted 5/8/2020 Nearest Body of Water Atlantic Ocean Basin White Oak Water Classification SB Site Coordinates Latitude: Longitude: 34.448242-77.508427 A. Processing Information County (or Counties) where the project is located: Pender Onslow Is this a NCDMS Project r Yes r No Is this project a public transportation project?* r Yes r No 1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: * Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act) r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act) Version#* 1 What amout is owed?* r $240.00 r $570.00 Select Project Reviewer* Robb Mairs:eads\rlmairs2 1c. Primary Contact Phone:* (910)251-4070 U 1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization? r Nationwide Permit (NWP) W Regional General Permit (RGP) r Standard (IP) 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? r Yes r- No Regional General Permit (RGP) Number: RGP Numbers (for multiple RGPS): 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR: W 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit r Individual Permit 198000048 - Emergency Activities on Ocean Beaches le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWR401 Certification: For the record only for Corps Permit: r 401 Water Quality Certification - E)press r Riparian Buffer Authorization 1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?* r Yes r No 1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? r Yes r No 1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? r Yes r No Acceptance Letter Attachment 1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties? r Yes r No 1i. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? r Yes r No r Unknown 1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed? r Yes r No B. Applicant Information 1d. Who is applying for the permit? r Owner 7 Applicant (other than owner) le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?* r- Yes r No 2. Owner Information 2a. Name(s) on recorded deed: Beaches of Surf City and North Topsail Beach 2b. Deed book and page no.: 2c. Responsible party: US Army Corps of Engineers 2d.Address Street Address 69 Darlington Avenue Address tine 2 city Wilmington Postal / Zip Code 28403 2e. Telephone Number: (910)251-4070 2g. Email Address:* keleigh.c.cox@usace.army.mil State / Rovime / Fbgim NC Country United States 2f. Fax Number: r Yes r No f Yes r No 3. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 3a. Name: Keleigh Cox 3b. Business Name: 3c.Address Street Address 69 Darlington Avenue Address Une 2 City Wilmington Fbstal / Zip Code 28403 3d. Telephone Number: (910)251-4070 3f. Email Address:* keleigh.c.cox@usace.army.mil C. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Project Information 1b. Subdivision name: (ff appropriate) 1c. Nearest municipality/town: Towns of Surf City and North Topsail Beach 2. Project Identification 2a. Property Identification Number: 2c. Project Address Street Address Address Line 2 city Fbstal / Zip Code 3. Surface Waters 3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:* Atlantic Ocean 3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:* SB 3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?* White Oak 3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located. 030203020301 4. Project Description and History State / Province / Pagim NC Country United States 3e. Fax Number: 2b. Property size: State / Province / legion Country 4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:* The beaches at both Surf City and North Topsail Beach offer extensive public recreational opportunities for activities such as swimming, sunbathing, walking, surfing, bird watching, and fishing. The aesthetic value of this beach community is evidenced by the popularity of the area for family oriented recreational use and tourism. In addition to being important to local, regional, and national recreation and tourism, both Surf City and North Topsail beaches provide nesting habitat for endangered and threatened sea turtles, as well as habitat for the threatened piping plover, red knot, and seabeach amaranth. 4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?* r Yes r No r Unknown 4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR) 4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR) 4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0 4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property: 0 4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:* The Surf City and North Topsail Beach (SCNT) study area is located on Topsail Island, which is a 22-mile-long and 0.5-mile-wide barrier island approximately 40 miles northeast of Wilmington, North Carolina. The linear extent for construction of the SCNT CSRM project is about 10 miles. This area is at risk from hurricanes and winter storms, which regularly erode the shoreline, causing damage to structures and environmental resources. This project would be built to protect the shoreline against erosion. 41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:* The Coastal Storm Risk Management (CSRM) project will include the creation of a 7-foot high by 50-foot optimum wide berm and a 15-foot high by 25-foot wide dune along approximately 10 miles of shoreline. Initial construction of the project will require approximately 13 million cubic yards of borrow material. Several borrow areas have been identified and are typically between one and six miles offshore and have pre -dredge bottom depths between 35 and 50 feet. The renourishment interval for the SCNT CSRM project is six years. 4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project. SCNTBeach-95pct_PlansRev042020. pdf 5. Jurisdictional Determinations 5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the propertyor proposed impact areas?* r Yes r No Comments: 5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?* r Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r N/A Corps AID Number: 5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Name (if known): Agency/Consultant Company: Other: 5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project?* r Yes r No 70.73MB O Unknown 71b. If yes, explain. Coordination is ongoing with resource agencies to expand the hopper dredging window of December 1 to March 31, which is the window documented in the 2012 FEIS and supplemental EA completed in 2014. This project would be conducted in two to three phases. The first phase (first year) of the initial construction of the project would use the current environmental windows for dredging (December 1 to March 31). The following consecutive years of initial construction would be constructed using expanded windows coordinated with resource agencies during development of a new Environmental Assessment pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) that will address impacts of expanded windows for construction. As stated above, this project will have a six -year renourishment interval. renourishments will be done in accordance with the expanded windows that result from coordination during the NEPA process, which is ongoing. Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity? D. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply): r- Wetlands r- Streams -tributaries W Open Waters r" Pond Construction 4. Open Water Impacts r- Buffers 4a. Site # _114al. Impact Reason 4b. Impact type 4c. Name of wat,rbody 4d. Activity type 4e. Wate rbody type 4f. Impact area SCNTB Construction of a CSRM Project T Atlantic Ocean tion t Ocean E�] 4g. Total temporary open water Impacts: 6.00 4g. Total permanent open water impacts: 0.00 4g. Total open water impacts: 6.00 4h. Comments: The acreage of impacts is an estimate of intertidal, nearshore areas, and borrow areas within 3 miles potentially affected by beach placement. The acreage of the impact is for the full construction template; however, the impact related to initial construction will occur over two to three years. Renourishment impacts will occur within one year, but will include less material placed on the beaches, resulting in a shorter duration for impacts. E. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project: Closely coordinated with resource agencies to determine Best Management Practices and avoid environmental impacts. Expansion of the construction windowwill also reduce the number of disturbance events to the beaches and aquatic resources. 1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques: Endangered species observers will be on hopper vessels to record impacts to mammals and endangered species. Environmental protocols are in place for dredging vessels if mammals are sighted or endangered species are taken. For the beach placement, sea turtle nest monitoring Will take place to make sure placement doesn't adversely affect sea turtles. Tilling will be implemented, escarpments will be shaved off, and only 90 % beach compatible sand will be placed on the beach. Shoreline longitudinal dikes will be created as material is placed along the beach to reduce turbidity and loss of sand placed on the beach; these dikes wall be flattened as the project moves down the shore. These are just a fewexamples of how impacts will be minimized. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? r Yes r No 2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why: Impacts to open waters (ocean) are temporary and minor. F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? r Yes r No If no, explain why: N/A 2. Stormwater Management Plan 2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?* r Yes r No 2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15ANCAC 02H .1003(2)? r Yes r No 2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater program? r Yes r N/A - project disturbs < 1 acre r No Comments: Although the project impacts more than one acre, and SMP is not applicable. All work will take place on the beachfront with construction of a dune and berm on the shorelines of Surf City and North Topsail Beach. G. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation 1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?* r Yes r No 1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? * r Yes r No 1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized bythe State Clearing House?* r Yes r No Comments:* The Final EIS and Record of Decision or the first contract was completed in 2012; followed by an final EA in 2014. As noted above, a new EA is being prepared to expand the environmental windows for initial construction contracts following the first contract. The new EA is projected to be completed in the Summer of 2020 and will be coordinated through the State Clearinghouse. The completed NEPA documents can be provided, if needed. 2. Violations (DWR Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? * r Yes r No 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement) 3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?* r Yes r No 3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. The beaches of Surf City and North Topsail Beach are fully developed and the project will not result in additional development. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement) 4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?* r Yes r Nor N/A 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?* r Yes r No 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?* r Yes r No 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. Raleigh 5d. Is another Federal agency involved?* r Yes r No What Federal Agency is involved? National Marine Fisheries Service and Bureau of Ocean Energy Mgmt 5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8? r Yes r No 5f. Will you cut anytrees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.? r Yes r No 5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal? r Yes r No 5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?* r Yes r No r Unknown 51. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.? r Yes r No 5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? Epsting literature/studies, information obtained through coordination with USFWS, NMFS, EPA, and BOEM; benthic, cultural and hardbottom surveys conducted by contract for the Corps. The USFWS and NMFS biological opinions are too large to upload, but can be provided separately, if needed. Consultation Documentation Upload Species List_ Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office(27Feb).pdf 179.09KB 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?* r Yes r No Are there submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) around the project vicinity?* r Yes r No r Unknown 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?* NOAA EFH Mapper and coordination with NMFS 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?* r Yes r No 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?* State Historic Preservation Office coordination 7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload SCNT_FEIS= _SHPO_Concurrence= _9Feb2010.pdf 142.43KB 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?* r Yes f No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: The project Will reduce risks associated with flooding from storm surge and other high water events along the shore. 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?* FEMA floodplain mapping Miscellaneous Comments Although the Section 404 permit box is checked on this form (as required to be able to submit this PCN), the Corps of Engineers is seeking a Section 401 Water Quality Certification, only. Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested. Borrow Area Acreage Information.pdf 1.45MB Signature W By checking the box and signing below, I certify that: • I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form; • I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act"); • I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act"); • I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND • I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form. Full Name: Keleigh Cristanna Cox Signature J 4 / Date 5/8/2020 NORTH CAROLINA STATE CLEARI NGHOUSE DEPARTME NT OF ADMI NISTRATION I NTERGOVERNME NTAL REVIEW HOS: IRRITION/DRAINAGE/f'LOOD STATE NUMBER: 10-E-0000-0249 COUNTY: PENDER ONSLOW CONT tir §@§OW§@ ! ,I JAN 1 5 2010 DATE RECEIVED: 01/14/2010 AGENCY RESPONSE : 03/03/2010 REVI EW CLOSED: 03/08/2010 MS RENE E GLEDHILL-EARLEY CLEARINGHOUSE COORDINATOR DEP T OF CULTURAL RESOURCES STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE MSC 4617 -ARCHIVES BUILDING RALEIGH NC REVIEW DISTRIBUTION CAPE FEAR COG CC&PS -DIV OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMEN T DENR -COASTAL MGT OENR LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS DEPT OF AGRICULTURE DEPT OF CULTURAL RESOURCES DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION EASTCRN CARO LINA COUNC I L PROJEC T INFORMATION APPLICANT : Department of the Army HlSTa/IC PREsERvAIIOH CfFK J , TYPE : National EnvironmenLal Policy Act Draft Environmental ImpacL Statemenl DESC ; Develop Coastal Storm Damage Reduction plan for Surf City and Norlh Topsail Beach The attached projecl has been submitted to the N. C. State Clearinghouse for intergovernmental review. Please review and submit your response by the above indicated date to 1301 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-1301. If add itional review time is needed , please contact this office at (919)807-2425 . AS A RESULT OF THIS REVIEW THE FOLLOWI NG IS SUBMITTED : 0 NO COMMENT D COMMENTS A'l"l'lI.CHED SrGNED BY Q. ... n ~(n ;OO-JQ,a.C DATE do'S . Ii) ~'J E flO Borrow Area Information for the Surf City North Topsail EA Figure 1. Borrow Areas for the Surf City & North Topsail Beach CSDR Project. Borrow Area Information for the Surf City North Topsail EA Borrow Area Area (mi2) Recoverable Material Volume (yd3) Borrow Area A 3.59 13,457,335 Borrow Area B 0.25 820,000 1 Borrow Area C 0.93 2,570,0001 Borrow Area D 0.73 1,860,0001 Borrow Area G 0.98 2,642,798 Borrow Area H 0.25 1,428,988 Borrow Area J 1.83 1,641,596 Borrow Area L 2.70 3,616,546 Borrow Area N 1.66 2,539,483 Borrow Area O 2.62 7,053,742 Borrow Area P 0.71 3,395,655 Borrow Area OP 3.94 Not Assessed Borrow Area Q (Expanded) 0.89 Not Assessed Total 20.37 35,776,143 Table 1. Borrow Areas and Material Volumes. Borrow area volumes are based on dredging boundaries (or dredge cuts) within each borrow area. These boundaries are routed around hard bottom habitat and are developed for dredging contracts. Dredging boundary configuration and volumetric estimates may change based on changing field conditions or collection of new data. 1 The respective borrow area has not been included in the plans and specifications for initial beach nourishment construction. As a result, this volume has been excluded from the total. Borrow Area Information for the Surf City North Topsail EA Borrow Areas below estimated volume calculations within and beyond the territorial seas limit with preliminary dredge boxes. Dredge box delineations and/or volumes are subject to change and should only be regarded as drafts that are currently under development. Borrow Area Information for the Surf City North Topsail EA Borrow Area Information for the Surf City North Topsail EA February 27, 2020 United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office Post Office Box 33726 Raleigh, NC 27636-3726 Phone: (919) 856-4520 Fax: (919) 856-4556 In Reply Refer To: Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2020-SLI-0748 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-01673 Project Name: SCNTB Ocean Subject:List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project To Whom It May Concern: The species list generated pursuant to the information you provided identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list. Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized, funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any federally-listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the Service is necessary. In addition to the federally-protected species list, information on the species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or 02/27/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-01673   2    evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the web site often for updated information or changes If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally-listed species known to be present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys. If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely to adversely affect) a federally-protected species, you should notify this office with your determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects, before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles. Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require development of an eagle conservation plan (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/ eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects should follow the wind energy guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and bats. Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http:// www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm; http:// www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/ comtow.html. Not all Threatened and Endangered Species that occur in North Carolina are subject to section 7 consultation with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon, sea turtles,when in the water, and certain marine mammals are under purview of the National Marine Fisheries Service. If your project occurs in marine, estuarine, or coastal river systems you should also contact the National Marine Fisheries Service, http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/ We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit to our office. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis of this office at john_ellis@fws.gov. 02/27/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-01673   3    ▪ Attachment(s): Official Species List 02/27/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-01673   1    Official Species List This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed action". This species list is provided by: Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office Post Office Box 33726 Raleigh, NC 27636-3726 (919) 856-4520 02/27/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-01673   2    Project Summary Consultation Code:04EN2000-2020-SLI-0748 Event Code:04EN2000-2020-E-01673 Project Name:SCNTB Ocean Project Type:SHORELINE / BEACH PROTECTION / RENOURISHMENT Project Description:Construction of new CSRM project. Project Location: Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:// www.google.com/maps/place/34.41603142921346N77.50711651646432W Counties:Onslow, NC | Pender, NC 02/27/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-01673   3    1. Endangered Species Act Species There is a total of 18 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list. Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species list because a project could affect downstream species. IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA Fisheries , as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the Department of Commerce. See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office if you have questions. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce. Mammals NAME STATUS Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045 Threatened West Indian Manatee Trichechus manatus There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. This species is also protected by the Marine Mammal Protection Act, and may have additional consultation requirements. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4469 Threatened 1 02/27/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-01673   4    Birds NAME STATUS Eastern Black Rail Laterallus jamaicensis ssp. jamaicensis No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10477 Proposed Threatened Piping Plover Charadrius melodus Population: [Atlantic Coast and Northern Great Plains populations] - Wherever found, except those areas where listed as endangered. There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6039 Threatened Red Knot Calidris canutus rufa No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1864 Threatened Red-cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614 Endangered 02/27/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-01673   5    Reptiles NAME STATUS American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776 Similarity of Appearance (Threatened) Green Sea Turtle Chelonia mydas Population: North Atlantic DPS There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6199 Threatened Hawksbill Sea Turtle Eretmochelys imbricata There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3656 Endangered Kemp's Ridley Sea Turtle Lepidochelys kempii There is proposed critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5523 Endangered Leatherback Sea Turtle Dermochelys coriacea There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1493 Endangered Loggerhead Sea Turtle Caretta caretta Population: Northwest Atlantic Ocean DPS There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location overlaps the critical habitat. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1110 Threatened 02/27/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-01673   6    Flowering Plants NAME STATUS American Chaffseed Schwalbea americana No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1286 Endangered Cooley's Meadowrue Thalictrum cooleyi No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3281 Endangered Golden Sedge Carex lutea There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6025 Endangered Pondberry Lindera melissifolia No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1279 Endangered Rough-leaved Loosestrife Lysimachia asperulaefolia No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2747 Endangered Seabeach Amaranth Amaranthus pumilus No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8549 Threatened Critical habitats There is 1 critical habitat wholly or partially within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. NAME STATUS Loggerhead Sea Turtle Caretta caretta https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1110#crithab Final