Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20071843 Ver 1_Year 1 Monitoring Report_20091215o1- 1S43 LMG LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP i.c. Environmental Consultants November 11, 2009 Mr. Mickey Sugg U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington Regulatory Field Office 69 Darlington Ave. Wilmington, N.C. 28403 RE: Stone Farm Regional Mitigation Bank - Year 1 Annual Monitoring Report (Phase 1) 1 a.rt..? J Dear Mickey: On behalf of the bank sponsor, Land Management Group, Inc. (LMG) is submitting two (2) copies of the Year 1 Annual Monitoring Report. This report chronicles the development of Phase I of the project which includes the entire Carolina bay. The project is performing well during the early stages and has met the applicable success criteria for both the vegetative and hydrologic components. Please take a moment to review the attached report and feel free to contact me if you have any questions or comments. I can be reached via email (bmanning(@Imgroup.net) or mobile phone (910.471.0005) to discuss the project in greater detail. Thank you for your time and attention to these matters. Sincerely, ManNry,WIS Brent qV: c.e:lf ren, Mannl"Y. Vd/5. Manning, PWS Brent Manning, PWS Environmental Scientist Cc. Michael Borton, OIB Construction LMG files Q12@19uep=p DEC 1 5 2009 UENR - WATER DUALITY WETLANDS AND STJRMWATER BRANCH www.lmgroup.net • info@Imgroup.net • Phone: 910.452.0001 • Fax: 910.452.0060 3805 Wrightsville Ave., Suite 1.5, Wilmington, NC 28403 • P.O. Box 2522, Wilmington, NC 28402 Stone Farm Regional Mitigation Bank Annual Monitoring Report - Year 1 (Phase One) Brunswick County, NC Lumber River Basin (Cataloging Unit #03040207) k ? ? T ink, -1 W. ti L,, P.r ' ti- p. Ay zl- ^? ? ?? yam, Prepared for: Decaro/ Wi//iamson Enterprises, LLC Prepared by., LMG ;. .Lti 1111:L% tf i:RUI:C Wilmington, N.C. October 2009 1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW WmA inflnn As approved by the Mitigation Bank Review Team (MBRT), the bank Sponsor began implementation of Phase One of the restoration project (the 145 ac. Carolina bay) in October 2007 (Figure 1). These activities included logging, plug installation, planting of characteristic seedlings, and installation of monitoring devices. Placement of fill material within existing ditches was authorized under Nationwide Permit 27 issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) on January 25, 2008 (Action ID# 2003-00682) and the corresponding 401 Water Quality Certification issued on January 2, 2008 (DWQ Project #20071843). Mitigation Goals and Objectives The proposed restoration project is intended to provide suitable, high-quality wetland and stream restoration to mitigate for authorized impacts within the Lumber River Basin (USGS 8-digit Hydrologic Unit 03040207; DWQ Subbasin 03-07-57). The objective of the project is to restore natural vegetative and hydrologic conditions throughout the nonriverine, riverine, and Coastal Plain stream habitat that have been compromised by previous land use activities. The primary functions of the restoration project are to provide surface water storage, sediment retention, and organic carbon transport to downstream food-webs. This project provides an invaluable opportunity to restore an entire watershed within a region currently experiencing acute development pressures. Furthermore, the potential for nutrient removal and niche-habitat utilization will also be realized given the large scope of the project. Phase One of the project is intended to restore the hydrology and vegetation of a previously drained and timber-managed headwater Carolina bay. Doing so will contribute to enhanced water quality and food-web support of downstream waters. The vegetative restoration component will reestablish a mixture of pond pine (Pinus serotina) and native hardwoods coinciding with existing topography and the restored hydroperiod. The resulting assemblage of characteristic canopy and sub-canopy species will restore valuable refuge and feeding habitat previously impacted by site management practices. Project Implementation Restoration activities within the bay were initiated in October 2007 with the logging of the loblolly pine (Pinus taeda). Logging crews were instructed to remove all loblolly pines, sweet gum, and other non-target species in preparation for planting in February 2008. Land Management Group, Inc. (LMG) staff supervised the logging crews to ensure that target species such as red bay (Persea borbonia) and sweetbay (Magnolia virginiana) were not removed. Earthwork initially included the installation of eleven (11) interior ditch plugs (approximately 30' in length) to facilitate logging activities throughout the site. These plugs were constructed using adjacent spoil material and tree debris from the logging operations. Prior to project construction, appropriate 401/404 authorization was received for placement of the plugs within the ditches. Once logging was completed, additional plugs were installed at the northern (#8) and eastern (#14) outlets of the Carolina bay (Figure 2). These plugs exceed 100-ft in length and consist of fill material sourced from adjacent spoil piles and a permitted on-site borrow pit. All areas that were disturbed during the installation process were covered with a seed mixture to minimize erosion. Refer to the previously submitted mitigation plan for photographs of the initial post-construction conditions. Limited grading in the areas directly adjacent to the ditches was also conducting to direct drainage towards the bay. Prior to installation of these plugs, water was directed towards the Sandpiper Golf Course via the northern outlet and towards Old Georgetown Road via the eastern outlet. Based upon site observations and preliminary shallow groundwater level monitoring, installation of the plugs resulted in a discernible effect on the groundwater hydrology (i.e. groundwater levels observed closer to the soil surface). However, after subsequent site inspections in the months following the initial earthwork (including a site visit with Mickey Sugg of the USACE Wilmington Regulatory Branch Office), it was evident that some of the plugs were not functioning properly. Subsurface drainage was observed in certain plug locations, and water levels within the interior ditches were not being maintained. Therefore, it was decided that Plugs #2 through #4 would need to be replaced. These plugs were rebuilt between April 20-22, 2009 using clean fill material from the surrounding spoil piles. Each plug is now comprised of compacted sandy-clay material and is functioning properly. Also, note that additional reinforcement to plug #1 will occur in conjunction 2 with the stream restoration phase of this project., These activities will create a 100' plug similar to those installed at #8 and #14. Approximately 77,000 hardwood tree seedlings were planted throughout the bay between March 3 and March 7, 2008. Seedlings were planted on approximate 9-ft centers, corresponding to an average density of 536 seedlings per acre. Planting was supervised by LMG personnel to ensure proper spacing and planting depths. Atlantic white cedar (Chamaecyparis thyoides) and bald cypress (Taxodium distichum) comprised a majority of the seedlings planted, totaling approximately 46,000. Species such as swamp tupelo (Nyssa biflora), tulip poplar (Liriodendron tuiipifera), and river birch (Betu/a nigra) were also planted (See Table 1 for a complete list and quantities). Tulip poplar and river birch were planted in slightly higher landscape positions near the rim of the bay, while the remaining species were planted in the central portions that will likely experience longer flooding durations. An additional 20,000 pond pine (Pinus serotina) seedlings were also planted throughout the restored bay area in April 2009. Table 1. Stone Farm Mitigation Bank - Phase 1 Planting List (March 2008/April 2009) Carolina Bay/High Pocosin 146 ac. Nonriverine Restoration 2008 Planting Common Name Scientific Name % Composition # Planted Atlantic White Cedar Chamaecyparis thyoides 15% 14,400 Bald Cypress Taxodium distichum 31% 30,000 Swamp Tupelo Nyssa biflora 13% 13,050 River Birch Betula nigra 13% 12,261 Ironwood Carpinus carolinium 5% 4,475 Tulip Poplar Liriodendron tulipifera 2% 2,000 Elderberry Sambucus canadensis 2% 1,600 2009 Supplemental Planting Pond Pine Pinus serotina 20% 20,000 TOTAL 97,786 3 2.0 MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Annual monitoring will be conducted near the end of each growing season for a period of five years. This monitoring will include both a vegetative and hydrologic component per the approved mitigation banking instrument. The vegetative component includes an assessment of the conditions within each of the 24 permanent monitoring plots that have been established throughout the project area (Figure 3). Vegetative planting will be deemed successful if survivorship of plantings and volunteers of desirable species' meets or exceeds a target stem density of 320 stems/acre at the end of three years and 260 stems/acre at the end of five years. The hydrologic component of the monitoring employs a total of six (6) shallow groundwater monitoring wells which record water table levels on a daily basis (Figure 3). Data from this equipment is downloaded every three months (i.e. once quarterly) and graphed with appropriate local precipitation totals and WETS table information to determine if the site has met the established hydrologic success criteria. Hydrologic monitoring will be deemed successful if the static water table is at, or within, 12" of the soil surface for 12.5% of the growing season (equivalent to 32 days based upon SCS-established growing season dates) during periods of normal rainfall. Monitoring reports will include results of vegetative monitoring and photographic documentation of site conditions. Reports will also identify any contingency measures that may need to be employed to remedy any site deficiencies. For instance, deer browse tubes and fencing may need to be used if evidence of significant herbivory or deer browse is observed. In addition, supplemental planting may be necessary in areas of reduced survivorship. 3.0 MONITORING RESULTS (YEAR 1) Vegetation Monitoring Monitoring of the on-site vegetation was conducted on September 11 and 12, 2008. A total of 1,104 individuals of the planted species were counted throughout the twenty-four (24) plots, which correlates to an average of 460 stems/acre within the project area (Table 2). Bald cypress Desirable species are considered as noninvasive species characteristic of non-riparian habitats. 4 TABLE 2. ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET (YEAR 1) - VEGETATION PLOTS Stone Farm - Phase 1 (Carolina Bay) SPECIES PLOT 1 PLOT 2 PLOT 3 PLOT 4 PLOT 5 PLOT 6 PLOT 7 PLOT 8 PLOT 9 PLOT 10 PLOT 11 PLOT 12 PLOT 13 TOTAL Bald Cypress 25 18 28 31 29 28 11 12 19 0 2 0 22 225 Black Gum 14 3 18 3 30 12 10 1 4 20 7 2 24 148 Atlantic White Cedar 9 1 0 18 0 2 6 0 3 7 5 0 0 51 River Birch 7 13 1 0 2 4 3 1 2 9 17 16 5 80 Elderberry 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 22 11 0 0 13 0 50 American Ti-Ti 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 30 15 6 10 81 Loblolly Bay 0 5 18 15 27 15 13 5 17 0 13 0 1 129 Sweetba 18 0 3 1 0 5 5 12 6 5 3 0 0 58 Red Bay 7 10 22 36 22 23 24 14 34 24 38 27 11 292 Wax Myrtle 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 11 12 16 0 48 American Holly 0 0 7 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 50 87 Fetterbush 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 10 TOTAL 80 54 97 132 110 91 76 67 96 106 137 90 123 1259 SPECIES PLOT 14 PLOT 15 PLOT 16 PLOT 17 PLOT 18 PLOT 19 PLOT 20 PLOT 21 PLOT 22 PLOT 23 PLOT 24 TOTAL Bald Cypress 30 30 23 20 27 22 25 16 21 29 26 269 Black Gum 18 15 14 11 13 8 6 6 16 16 6 129 Atlantic White Cedar 0 0 0 0 9 37 13 0 0 5 10 74 River Birch 3 8 8 8 4 16 13 4 7 0 4 75 Elderberry 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 5 American Ti-Ti 20 0 0 10 30 30 50 0 50 5 0 195 Loblolly Bay 1 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 10 7 25 Sweetba 1 2 1 2 2 2 0 1 7 0 1 19 Red Bay 16 23 18 18 29 16 12 14 22 18 17 203 Wax Myrtle 4 3 7 4 12 10 8 6 4 3 0 61 American Holly 0 14 0 0 40 30 50 0 10 0 0 144 Fetterbush 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 93 99 73 74 166 174 179 47 137 86 71 1199 Planted Specie Acceptable Volunteer (Taxodium distichum) was the most abundant woody species, with a total of 494 individuals. Other planted species such as black gum (Nyssa sylvatica), river birch (Betu/a nigra), and Atlantic white cedar (Chamaecyparis thyoides) were also prevalent within the monitored plots. In addition to the planted species, numerous volunteers were also observed within each plot. A majority of these individuals were representative of the target vegetative, including red bay (Persea palustris), sweetbay (Magnolia virginiana), and loblolly bay (Gordonia lasianthus). Shrub species such as American ti-ti (Cyrilla racemiflora) and American holly (Ilex opaca) were also observed. When combined with the planted species, an average density of 1,003 stems/acre exists within the project area. The combination of planted species and acceptable volunteers suggest that the site is progressing well towards the target community. During the Year 1 monitoring event, each of the 24 plots exceeded the minimum success criteria and contained a variety of shrub and tree species. This diversity of species and age classes will likely continue through the duration of the project due to the abundant native seed source and natural dispersal patterns. These results are also encouraging given the drought conditions that preceded the initial planting in March 2008 and continued to persist throughout the 2008 growing season. Monitoring data from the Palmer Long- Term Drought Index classified the drought for this period as a D3 (Extreme) level. Refer to Appendix A for photographs of current site conditions and Appendix B for information regarding individual plot totals. While average stem densities in most plots are sufficient to meet the applicable success criteria, a key component of the pocosin vegetative community remains absent from the project due to availability of nursery stock. A total of 20,000 pond pine (Pinus serotina), a dominant specie within several variants of the pocosin ecosystem, were planted in April 2009 to provide additional diversity within the developing canopy layer. This supplemental planting increases the density of planted species to 674 stems/acre throughout the project area (Table 1). Occurrence and growth of planted pond pine will be reflected in the monitoring data provided in the Year 2 annual monitoring report. 5 Hydrologic Monitoring Monitoring of hydrologic conditions was initiated in April 2008. Per the approved mitigation plan, a total of six (6) shallow groundwater monitoring wells were installed throughout the site. Data from these wells depict a gradual shift in water table depths between April 2008 and June 2008 due to the installation of the ditch plugs. This transition becomes more dramatic following the installation of the final ditch plug in mid-June. Following this installation, discharge rates began to decrease and water tables remain closer to the surface for extended periods. Periods of shallow ponding were also observed during August and September. Overall, each of the six wells met the hydrologic success for the 2008 growing season. A summary of the results is provided in Table 3. Complete hydrologic monitoring data are provided in Appendix C. Table 3. Summary of Year 1 Hydrologic Monitoring Well Number 2008 Growing Season Number of Consecutive Days Meeting Wetland Hydrology Criteria Minimum Success Criteria (12.5%) Well 1 Aug. 13 - Nov. 27 107 32 Well 2 Aug. 13 - Nov. 27 107 32 Well 3 June 22 - Nov. 27 159 32 Well 4 Aug. 26 - Nov. 27 96 32 Well 5 June 22 - Nov. 27 159 32 Well 6 July 7 - Nov. 27 144 32 4.0 CONCLUSION Based on the data collected in conjunction with the Year 1 monitoring event, the site appears to be progressing well towards the target Carolina bay wetland community. Hydrologic data confirm the re-establishment of hydrology characteristic of non-riparian wetter variety wetland habitat via the installation of plugs. Water table depths were observed at levels at or near the surface for long periods, exceeding the established success criteria. These data support the restoration of key hydrologic functions relating to water storage and groundwater recharge within the system. Plot monitoring within the restored bay indicates low mortality rates of planted trees and shrubs. The vegetative component of the project appears to be progressing well as evidenced by the 6 growth and survivorship of planted species and the recruitment of characteristic volunteer species. Each of the 24 plots exceeded the minimum success criteria during the Year 1 monitoring event. Observed heights ranged from 1' to 5' among the planted and volunteer individuals, suggesting that conditions within the restored bay are suitable for healthy community development. Based on the results from the Year 1 monitoring, it is expected that the site will continue to evolve into a mature Carolina bay ecosystem which exhibits a vegetative structure and hydrologic regime similar to undisturbed examples found throughout southeastern North Carolina. 7 Figures -- " rl O pp / ? r ' V till. ' - ? S?F:,tiG6Rq _ _ ? ?1,ill l{rn?i? hs -___ Np A ? ' SRAFlCN fib - ? 1 Srpur r] Rti R 9 O J _ rF l r ._ . AK , f L _ _ - - 3O F_ dJf Ra55TCIY 904 ._ n •-- _. l e?.. r _ ` b ? ?- 0.l i ' IRIS VIISYi? ?? I _ - I ` s fr S A 4q ` 0 1 - 1 P l .QO ~nsd Shallale . •? Ltp E ap . >>?T • ? piE P1 p ,_ o G CL. Cj v J q` ? ? s s q?F+ i of x M ? ' \ iRSSlnu. s X j r ( / AuY4LR 9vE- v? 2?. N' ' '. Caxl Hun 9i4 E,.S' Phase One ,G ect Area ?% ?, Pro' 1y ?t `?? X45 Y `Cos?II os C nod, a? I W 1 S'r?j r'?r'j a l r u,xata'M? 4,? \ o .? ?? ?iP Lr a 1 '. I r 179 5" - R k.R•Ilr I •f?? C t 1 1 i - ,?y 1 C0.L.8A , •? ? ?f?r ?/ "I?"-??{+ exE i_ l 1i4L,f ,-Sr {r acute- nor ys 81adc'i" ? \ ? o-?f" ?a arac - Nn^ ? ' ? L _ _ p br - Z ? , ttlc A?ptl ? \, lh '\r , _ 1 _ ding. Sll ?1.l I z s:' ??4?-- ,,r,? het' c,?. ?\ ?.,?,.?•r r,? In ,;I,,,,, , • , (rs Gro.t , 1 _ B, 'h ? „?. U I)ri.:l rh Vor1h Mvrf p. ffi,dLII t N Figure 1. Vicinity Map Stone Farm Regional Mitigation Bank Brunswick County, NC DeLorme Gazatteer Brunswick County 0 2 4 mi Land Management Group, Inc. y 4 .? a • ... .1.Y a '_?;,• may. 7i . a. v "*W i QJ Ff . i efi r a,.I .r ?• F d F '#' IL > r,' y,'? .a4 k??,y? ?$ G t?•?,? '4:+°a°*`"f.. {'ty?.. ?_.* ,?r,??,r??? . ro?i ?P?r ••sJ t1 fir. :°?p`.??-? +:`r ?Tl _ ? . 'may ?• n _ , el ', LL??.i, err .+, ?. .?`??, ._ ?-. $t-t`'a l+'L.,a'?* -?`'?ii.? `s #?'?11_r'_61'{'a.+! lea' r .. =?fi??.:?'?'?? .. N Figure 2. Stone Farm Regional Mitigation Bank Ditch Plug Locations Brunswick County LMG 0 600 1,200 LANDMANAGEMENTGROUP- Cl I fnvlramenal CansuVrans Feet y 4 .? a • ... .1.Y a '_?;,• may. 7i . a. v "*W i QJ Ff . i efi r a,.I .r ?• F d F '#' IL > r,' y,'? .a4 k??,y? ?$ G t?•?,? '4:+°a°*`"f.. {'ty?.. ?_.* ,?r,??,r??? . ro?i ?P?r ••sJ t1 fir. :°?p`.??-? +:`r ?Tl _ ? . 'may ?• n _ , el ', LL??.i, err .+, ?. .?`??, ._ ?-. $t-t`'a l+'L.,a'?* -?`'?ii.? `s #?'?11_r'_61'{'a.+! lea' r .. =?fi??.:?'?'?? .. N Figure 3. Stone Farm Regional Mitigation Bank Well/Plot Locations Brunswick County LMG 0 600 1,200 LANDMANAGEMENTGROUP- Cl I fnvlramenal CansuVrans Feet Appendix A. Site Photographs Typical vegetation monitoring plot. e ..4 ry Typical vegetation monitoring plot with inundation visible. '??" 7as Tit Flooded ditch subsequent to earthen plug installation. Typical vegetation monitoring plot with inundation visible. Appendix B. Vegetation Monitoring Data Sheets STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - CAROLINA BAY ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS PLOT NUMBER SPECIES STRATUM (T, SA, or SH) Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer Species Number of Individuals Counted toward Success Criteria Bald Cypress T 11 1 ft Planted 11 Bald Cypress T 13 2 ft Planted 13 Bald Cypress T 1 3 ft Planted 1 Black Gum T 10 1 ft Planted 10 Black Gum T 4 2 ft Planted 4 Atlantic White Cedar T 9 1 ft Planted 9 River Birch T 2 1 ft Planted 2 River Birch T 5 2 ft Planted 5 Elderberry SH 0 Seedling Planted 0 Musclewood SH 0 Seedling Planted 0 Red Bay T 2 1 ft Volunteer 2 Red Bay T 2 2 ft Volunteer 2 Red Bay T 2 4 ft Volunteer 2 Red Bay T 1 5 ft Volunteer 1 Sweetbay T 3 1 ft Volunteer 3 Sweetbay T 6 2 ft Volunteer 6 Sweetbay T 4 3 ft Volunteer 4 Sweetbay T 5 4 ft Volunteer 5 TOTAL SHRUBS 0 OBSERVED DENSITY PER PLOT 80 TOTAL TREES OF PLANTED SPECIES 55 OBSERVED DENSITY PER ACRE 800 TOTAL TREES OF VOLUNTEERED 25 TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 80 STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - CAROLINA BAY ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS PLOT NUMBER SPECIES STRATUM (T, SA, or SH) Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer Species Number of Individuals Counted toward Success Criteria Bald Cypress T 7 1 ft Planted 7 Bald Cypress T 9 2 ft Planted 9 Bald Cypress T 2 3 ft Planted 2 Black Gum T 1 1 ft Planted 1 Black Gum T 2 2 ft Planted 2 Atlantic White Cedar T 1 1 ft Planted 1 River Birch T 10 1 ft Planted 10 River Birch T 3 2 ft Planted 3 Elderberry SH 0 Seedling Planted 0 Musclewood SH 0 Seedling Planted 0 Loblolly Bay T 1 2 ft Volunteer 1 Loblolly Bay T 1 3 ft Volunteer 1 Loblolly Bay T 1 4 ft Volunteer 1 Loblolly Bay T 2 5 ft Volunteer 2 Red Bay T 4 1 ft Volunteer 4 Red Bay T 3 2 ft Volunteer 3 Red Bay T 2 3 ft Volunteer 2 Red Bay T 1 6 ft Volunteer 1 Wax Myrtle SH 2 2 ft Volunteer 2 Wax Myrtle SH 2 3 ft Volunteer 2 Red Maple T 5 5 ft Volunteer 5 OBSERVED DENSITY TOTAL SHRUBS 4 54 PER PLOT TOTAL TREES OF OBSERVED DENSITY PLANTED SPECIES 35 (PER ACRE) 540 TOTAL TREES OF VOLUNTEERED 20 SPECIES TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 59 STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - CAROLINA BAY ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS PLOT NUMBER SPECIES STRATUM (T, SA, or SH) Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer Species Number of Individuals Counted toward Success Criteria Bald Cypress T 22 1 ft Planted 22 Bald Cypress T 6 2 ft Planted 6 Black Gum T 13 1 ft Planted 13 Black Gum T 5 2 ft Planted 5 Atlantic White Cedar T 0 Seedling Planted 0 River Birch T 1 1 ft Planted 1 Elderberry SH 0 Seedling Planted 0 Musclewood SH 0 Seedling Planted 0 Loblolly Bay T 4 1 ft Volunteer 4 Loblolly Bay T 1 2 ft Volunteer 1 Loblolly Bay T 3 3 ft Volunteer 3 Loblolly Bay T 2 4 ft Volunteer 2 Loblolly Bay T 8 5 ft Volunteer 8 Red Bay T 3 1 ft Volunteer 3 Red Bay T 11 2 ft Volunteer 11 Red Bay T 6 3 ft Volunteer 6 Red Bay T 2 5 ft Volunteer 2 Sweetbay T 2 1 ft Volunteer 2 Sweetbay T 1 3 ft Volunteer 1 American Holly SH 7 1 ft Volunteer 7 Red Maple T 12 6 ft Volunteer 12 OBSERVED DENSITY TOTAL SHRUBS 7 97 PER PLOT TOTAL TREES OF OBSERVED DENSITY PLANTED SPECIES 47 (PER ACRE) 970 TOTAL TREES OF VOLUNTEERED 55 SPECIES TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 109 STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - CAROLINA BAY ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS PLOT NUMBER SPECIES STRATUM (T, SA, or SH) Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer Species Number of Individuals Counted toward Success Criteria Bald Cypress T 16 1 ft Planted 16 Bald Cypress T 15 2 ft Planted 15 Black Gum T 1 1 ft Planted 1 Black Gum T 2 2 ft Planted 2 Atlantic White Cedar T 17 1 ft Planted 17 Atlantic White Cedar T 1 2 ft Planted 1 River Birch T 0 Seedling Planted 0 Elderberry SH 0 Seedling Planted 0 Musclewood SH 0 Seedling Planted 0 Loblolly Bay T 4 2 ft Volunteer 4 Loblolly Bay T 5 3 ft Volunteer 5 Loblolly Bay T 1 4 ft Volunteer 1 Loblolly Bay T 5 5 ft Volunteer 5 Red Bay T 17 1 ft Volunteer 17 Red Bay T 13 2 ft Volunteer 13 Red Bay T 6 3 ft Volunteer 6 Sweetbay T 1 1 ft Volunteer 1 Wax Myrtle T 3 2 ft Volunteer 3 Sweet Gum T 3 6 ft Volunteer 3 American Ti-ti SH 20 2 ft Volunteer 20 Red Maple T 12 4 ft Volunteer 12 American Holly SH 5 2 ft Volunteer 5 OBSERVED DENSITY TOTAL SHRUBS 25 (PER PLOT) 132 TOTAL TREES OF OBSERVED DENSITY PLANTED SPECIES 52 (PER ACRE) 1320 TOTAL TREES OF VOLUNTEERED 70 SPECIES TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 147 STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - CAROLINA BAY ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS PLOT NUMBER SPECIES STRATUM (T, SA, or SH) Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer Species Number of Individuals Counted toward Success Criteria Bald Cypress T 14 1 ft Planted 14 Bald Cypress T 15 2 ft Planted 15 Black Gum T 13 1 ft Planted 13 Black Gum T 17 2 ft Planted 17 Atlantic White Cedar T 0 Seedling Planted 0 River Birch T 2 1 ft Planted 2 Elderberry SH 0 Seedling Planted 0 Musclewood SH 0 Seedling Planted 0 Loblolly Bay T 6 2 ft Volunteer 6 Loblolly Bay T 11 3 ft Volunteer 11 Loblolly Bay T 6 4 ft Volunteer 6 Loblolly Bay T 4 5 ft Volunteer 4 Red Bay T 4 1 ft Volunteer 4 Red Bay T 9 2 ft Volunteer 9 Red Bay T 7 3 ft Volunteer 7 Red Bay T 2 5 ft Volunteer 2 Red Maple T 14 5 ft Volunteer 14 TOTAL SHRUBS 0 OBSERVED DENSITY (PER PLOT) 110 TOTAL TREES OF PLANTED SPECIES 61 OBSERVED DENSITY (PER ACRE) 1100 TOTAL TREES OF VOLUNTEERED SPECIES 63 TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 124 STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - CAROLINA BAY ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS PLOT NUMBER SPECIES STRATUM (T, SA, or SH) Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer Species Number of Individuals Counted toward Success Criteria Bald Cypress T 22 1 ft Planted 22 Bald Cypress T 6 2ft Planted 6 Black Gum T 10 1 ft Planted 10 Black Gum T 2 2ft Planted 2 Atlantic White Cedar T 2 1 ft Planted 2 River Birch T 4 1 ft Planted 4 Elderberry SH 0 Seedling Planted 0 Musclewood SH 0 Seedling Planted 0 Loblolly Bay T 3 1 ft Volunteer 3 Loblolly Bay T 6 2ft Volunteer 6 Loblolly Bay T 3 3 ft Volunteer 3 Loblolly Bay T 2 4 ft Volunteer 2 Loblolly Bay T 1 5 ft Volunteer 1 Red Bay T 9 1 ft Volunteer 9 Red Bay T 11 2ft Volunteer 11 Red Bay T 2 3 ft Volunteer 2 Red Bay T 1 4 ft Volunteer 1 Sweetbay T 1 1 ft Volunteer 1 Sweetbay T 2 2ft Volunteer 2 Sweetbay T 2 4 ft Volunteer 2 Wax Myrtle SH 1 1 ft Volunteer 1 Wax Myrtle SH 1 2ft Volunteer 1 Red Maple T 30 5 ft Volunteer 30 OBSERVED DENSITY TOTAL SHRUBS 2 (PER PLOT) 91 TOTAL TREES OF OBSERVED DENSITY PLANTED SPECIES 46 (PER ACRE) 910 TOTAL TREES OF VOLUNTEERED 73 SPECIES TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 121 STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - CAROLINA BAY ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS PLOT NUMBER SPECIES STRATUM (T, SA, or SH) Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer Species Number of Individuals Counted toward Success Criteria Bald Cypress T 11 1 ft Planted 11 Black Gum T 10 1 ft Planted 10 Atlantic White Cedar T 6 1 ft Planted 6 River Birch T 3 1 ft Planted 3 Elderberry SH 4 1 ft Planted 4 Musclewood SH 0 Seedling Planted 0 Loblolly Bay T 2 2 ft Volunteer 2 Loblolly Bay T 3 3 ft Volunteer 3 Loblolly Bay T 3 4 ft Volunteer 3 Loblolly Bay T 5 5ft Volunteer 5 Red Bay T 11 1 ft Volunteer 11 Red Bay T 4 2 ft Volunteer 4 Red Bay T 7 3 ft Volunteer 7 Red Bay T 1 4 ft Volunteer 1 Red Bay T 1 5ft Volunteer 1 Sweetbay T 1 1 ft Volunteer 1 Sweetbay T 1 2 ft Volunteer 1 Sweetbay T 1 3 ft Volunteer 1 Sweetbay T 1 4 ft Volunteer 1 Sweetbay T 1 5ft Volunteer 1 Red Maple T 10 5ft Volunteer 10 OBSERVED DENSITY TOTAL SHRUBS 4 (PER PLOT) 76 TOTAL TREES OF OBSERVED DENSITY PLANTED SPECIES 34 (PER ACRE) 760 TOTAL TREES OF VOLUNTEERED 52 SPECIES TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 86 STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - CAROLINA BAY ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS PLOT NUMBER SPECIES STRATUM (T, SA, or SH) Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer Species Number of Individuals Counted toward Success Criteria Bald Cypress T 10 1 ft Planted 10 Bald Cypress T 2 2 ft Planted 2 Black Gum T 1 1 ft Planted 1 Atlantic White Cedar T 0 Seedling Planted 0 River Birch T 1 1 ft Planted 1 Elderberry SH 22 1 ft Planted 22 Musclewood SH 0 Seedling Planted 0 Loblolly Bay T 2 1 ft Volunteer 2 Loblolly Bay T 3 3 ft Volunteer 3 Red Bay T 4 1 ft Volunteer 4 Red Bay T 4 2 ft Volunteer 4 Red Bay T 1 3 ft Volunteer 1 Red Bay T 3 4 ft Volunteer 3 Red Bay T 1 5 ft Volunteer 1 Red Bay T 1 6ft Volunteer 1 Sweetbay T 1 1 ft Volunteer 1 Sweetbay T 4 2 ft Volunteer 4 Sweetbay T 4 3 ft Volunteer 4 Sweetbay T 1 4 ft Volunteer 1 Sweetbay T 2 5 ft Volunteer 2 Red Maple T 8 6ft Volunteer 8 OBSERVED DENSITY TOTAL SHRUBS 22 (PER PLOT) 67 TOTAL TREES OF OBSERVED DENSITY PLANTED SPECIES 36 (PER ACRE) 670 TOTAL TREES OF VOLUNTEERED 39 SPECIES TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 75 STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - CAROLINA BAY ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS PLOT NUMBER SPECIES STRATUM (T, SA, or SH) Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer Species Number of Individuals Counted toward Success Criteria Bald Cypress T 16 1 ft Planted 16 Bald Cypress T 3 2 ft Planted 3 Black Gum T 4 1 ft Planted 4 Atlantic White Cedar T 3 1 ft Planted 3 River Birch T 1 1 ft Planted 1 River Birch T 1 2 ft Planted 1 Elderberry SH 11 1 ft Planted 11 Musclewood SH 0 Seedling Planted 0 Loblolly Bay T 2 1 ft Volunteer 2 Loblolly Bay T 5 2 ft Volunteer 5 Loblolly Bay T 6 3 ft Volunteer 6 Loblolly Bay T 4 4ft Volunteer 4 Red Bay T 8 1 ft Volunteer 8 Red Bay T 15 2 ft Volunteer 15 Red Bay T 8 3 ft Volunteer 8 Red Bay T 2 4ft Volunteer 2 Red Bay T 1 5 ft Volunteer 1 Sweetbay T 2 1 ft Volunteer 2 Sweetbay T 1 2 ft Volunteer 1 Sweetbay T 1 4ft Volunteer 1 Sweetbay T 1 5 ft Volunteer 1 Sweetbay T 1 6 ft Volunteer 1 Red Maple T 20 4ft Volunteer 20 OBSERVED DENSITY TOTAL SHRUBS 11 (PER PLOT) 96 TOTAL TREES OF OBSERVED DENSITY PLANTED SPECIES 39 (PER ACRE) 960 TOTAL TREES OF VOLUNTEERED 77 SPECIES TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 116 STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - CAROLINA BAY ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS PLOT NUMBER 10 SPECIES STRATUM (T, SA, or SH) Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer Species Number of Individuals Counted toward Success Criteria Bald Cypress T 0 Seedling Planted 0 Black Gum T 11 1 ft Planted 11 Black Gum T 9 2ft Planted 9 Atlantic White Cedar T 7 1 ft Planted 7 River Birch T 6 1 ft Planted 6 River Birch T 3 2ft Planted 3 Elderberry SH 0 Seedling Planted 0 Musclewood SH 0 Seedling Planted 0 Red Bay T 3 1 ft Volunteer 3 Red Bay T 10 2ft Volunteer 10 Red Bay T 10 3 ft Volunteer 10 Red Bay T 1 4 ft Volunteer 1 Sweetbay T 3 1 ft Volunteer 3 Sweetbay T 2 2ft Volunteer 2 Wax Myrtle SH 6 1 ft Volunteer 6 Wax Myrtle SH 5 2ft Volunteer 5 Amer. Titi SH 30 2ft Volunteer 30 Red Maple T 2 3 ft Volunteer 2 TOTAL SHRUBS 41 OBSERVED DENSITY (PER PLOT) 106 TOTAL TREES OF PLANTED SPECIES 36 OBSERVED DENSITY (PER ACRE) 1060 TOTAL TREES OF VOLUNTEERED SPECIES 31 TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 108 STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - CAROLINA BAY ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS PLOT NUMBER 11 SPECIES STRATUM (T, SA, or SH) Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer Species Number of Individuals Counted toward Success Criteria Bald Cypress T 2 1 ft Planted 2 Black Gum T 6 1 ft Planted 6 Black Gum T 1 2ft Planted 1 Atlantic White Cedar T 5 1 ft Planted 5 River Birch T 14 1 ft Planted 14 River Birch T 3 2ft Planted 3 Elderberry SH 0 Seedling Planted 0 Musclewood SH 0 Seedling Planted 0 Loblolly Bay T 1 1 ft Volunteer 1 Loblolly Bay T 7 2ft Volunteer 7 Loblolly Bay T 4 3ft Volunteer 4 Loblolly Bay T 1 4ft Volunteer 1 Red Bay T 4 1 ft Volunteer 4 Red Bay T 7 2ft Volunteer 7 Red Bay T 7 3ft Volunteer 7 Red Bay T 8 4ft Volunteer 8 Red Bay T 9 5 ft Volunteer 9 Red Bay T 3 6 ft Volunteer 3 Sweetbay T 3 2ft Volunteer 3 Wax Myrtle SH 8 1 ft Volunteer 8 Wax Myrtle SH 4 2ft Volunteer 4 American Holly SH 25 2ft Volunteer 25 American Ti-ti SH 15 2ft Volunteer 15 OBSERVED DENSITY TOTAL SHRUBS 52 (PER PLOT) 137 TOTAL TREES OF OBSERVED DENSITY PLANTED SPECIES 31 (PER ACRE) 1370 TOTAL TREES OF VOLUNTEERED 54 SPECIES TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 137 STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - CAROLINA BAY ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS PLOT NUMBER 12 SPECIES STRATUM (T, SA, or SH) Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer Species Number of Individuals Counted toward Success Criteria Bald Cypress T 0 Seedling Planted 0 Black Gum T 2 1 ft Volunteer 2 Atlantic White Cedar T 0 Seedling Planted 0 River Birch T 11 1 ft Planted 11 River Birch T 5 2 ft Planted 5 Elderberry SH 13 1 ft Planted 13 Musclewood SH 0 Seedling Planted 0 Red Bay T 7 1 ft Volunteer 7 Red Bay T 9 2 ft Volunteer 9 Red Bay T 4 3 ft Volunteer 4 Red Bay T 2 4 ft Volunteer 2 Red Bay T 2 5 ft Volunteer 2 Red Bay T 3 6 ft Volunteer 3 Wax Myrtle SH 9 1 ft Volunteer 9 Wax Myrtle SH 5 2 ft Volunteer 5 Wax Myrtle SH 2 3 ft Volunteer 2 Fetter-bush SH 10 1 ft Volunteer 10 Titi SH 6 2 ft Volunteer 6 TOTAL SHRUBS 32 OBSERVED DENSITY (PER PLOT) 90 TOTAL TREES OF PLANTED SPECIES 29 OBSERVED DENSITY (PER ACRE) 900 TOTAL TREES OF VOLUNTEERED SPECIES 29 TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 90 STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - CAROLINA BAY ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS PLOT NUMBER 13 SPECIES STRATUM (T, SA, or SH) Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer Species Number of Individuals Counted toward Success Criteria Bald Cypress T 21 1 ft Planted 21 Bald Cypress T 1 2 ft Planted 1 Black Gum T 20 1 ft Planted 20 Black Gum T 4 2 ft Planted 4 Atlantic White Cedar T 0 Seedling Planted 0 River Birch T 4 1 ft Planted 4 River Birch T 1 2 ft Planted 1 Elderberry SH 0 Seedling Planted 0 Musclewood SH 0 Seedling Planted 0 Red Bay T 4 1 ft Volunteer 4 Red Bay T 1 2 ft Volunteer 1 Red Bay T 2 3 ft Volunteer 2 Red Bay T 1 4 ft Volunteer 1 Red Bay T 2 5 ft Volunteer 2 Red Bay T 1 6 ft Volunteer 1 Loblolly Bay T 1 3 ft Volunteer 1 Amer. Titi SH 10 2 ft Volunteer 10 American Holly SH 50 2 ft Volunteer 50 TOTAL SHRUBS 60 OBSERVED DENSITY (PER PLOT) 123 TOTAL TREES OF PLANTED SPECIES 51 OBSERVED DENSITY (PER ACRE) 1230 TOTAL TREES OF VOLUNTEERED SPECIES 12 TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 123 STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - CAROLINA BAY ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS PLOT NUMBER 14 SPECIES STRATUM (T, SA, or SH) Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer Species Number of Individuals Counted toward Success Criteria Bald Cypress T 23 1 ft Planted 23 Bald Cypress T 7 2 ft Planted 7 Black Gum T 15 1 ft Planted 15 Black Gum T 3 2 ft Planted 3 Atlantic White Cedar T 0 Seedling Planted 0 River Birch T 3 1 ft Planted 3 Elderberry SH 0 Seedling Planted 0 Musclewood SH 0 Seedling Planted 0 Loblolly Bay T 1 2 ft Volunteer 1 Red Bay T 3 1 ft Volunteer 3 Red Bay T 6 2 ft Volunteer 6 Red Bay T 5 3 ft Volunteer 5 Red Bay T 1 4 ft Volunteer 1 Red Bay T 1 5 ft Volunteer 1 Sweetbay T 1 1 ft Volunteer 1 Wax Myrtle SH 1 1 ft Volunteer 1 Wax Myrtle SH 2 2 ft Volunteer 2 Wax Myrtle SH 1 3 ft Volunteer 1 Amer. Titi SH 20 2 ft Volunteer 20 OBSERVED DENSITY TOTAL SHRUBS 24 (PER PLOT) 93 TOTAL TREES OF OBSERVED DENSITY PLANTED SPECIES 51 (PER ACRE) 930 TOTAL TREES OF VOLUNTEERED 18 SPECIES TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 93 STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - CAROLINA BAY ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS PLOT NUMBER 15 SPECIES STRATUM (T, SA, or SH) Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer Species Number of Individuals Counted toward Success Criteria Bald Cypress T 16 1 ft Planted 16 Bald Cypress T 14 2ft Planted 14 Black Gum T 7 1 ft Planted 7 Black Gum T 8 2ft Planted 8 Atlantic White Cedar T 0 Seedling Planted 0 River Birch T 7 1 ft Planted 7 River Birch T 1 2ft Planted 1 Elderberry SH 0 Seedling Planted 0 Musclewood SH 0 Seedling Planted 0 Loblolly Bay T 1 2ft Volunteer 1 Loblolly Bay T 3 3 ft Volunteer 3 Red Bay T 14 1 ft Volunteer 14 Red Bay T 6 2ft Volunteer 6 Red Bay T 2 3 ft Volunteer 2 Red Bay T 1 4ft Volunteer 1 Sweetbay T 1 2ft Volunteer 1 Sweetbay T 1 4ft Volunteer 1 Wax Myrtle SH 1 1 ft Volunteer 1 Wax Myrtle SH 2 2ft Volunteer 2 Sumac SH 5 2ft Volunteer 5 American Holly SH 14 2ft Volunteer 14 Red Maple T 2 2ft Volunteer 2 OBSERVED DENSITY TOTAL SHRUBS 22 (PER PLOT) 99 TOTAL TREES OF OBSERVED DENSITY PLANTED SPECIES 53 (PER ACRE) 990 TOTAL TREES OF VOLUNTEERED 31 SPECIES TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 106 STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - CAROLINA BAY ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS PLOT NUMBER 16 SPECIES STRATUM (T, SA, or SH) Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer Species Number of Individuals Counted toward Success Criteria Bald Cypress T 14 1 ft Planted 14 Bald Cypress T 9 2ft Planted 9 Black Gum T 7 1 ft Planted 7 Black Gum T 7 2ft Planted 7 Atlantic White Cedar T 0 Seedling Planted 0 River Birch T 5 1 ft Planted 5 River Birch T 3 2ft Planted 3 Elderberry SH 0 Seedling Planted 0 Musclewood SH 0 Seedling Planted 0 Loblolly Bay T 1 3 ft Volunteer 1 Loblolly Bay T 1 4 ft Volunteer 1 Red Bay T 1 1 ft Volunteer 1 Red Bay T 13 2ft Volunteer 13 Red Bay T 4 3 ft Volunteer 4 Sweetbay T 1 2ft Volunteer 1 Wax Myrtle SH 3 1 ft Volunteer 3 Wax Myrtle SH 4 2ft Volunteer 4 Red Maple T 55 5 ft Volunteer 55 TOTALSHRUBS 7 OBSERVED DENSITY (PER PLOT) 73 TOTAL TREES OF PLANTED SPECIES 45 OBSERVED DENSITY (PER ACRE) 730 TOTAL TREES OF VOLUNTEERED SPECIES 76 TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 128 STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - CAROLINA BAY ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS PLOT NUMBER 17 SPECIES STRATUM (T, SA, or SH) Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer Species Number of Individuals Counted toward Success Criteria Bald Cypress T 9 1 ft Planted 9 Bald Cypress T 8 2ft Planted 8 Bald Cypress T 3 3ft Planted 3 Black Gum T 6 1 ft Planted 6 Black Gum T 5 2ft Planted 5 Atlantic White Cedar T 0 Seedling Planted 0 River Birch T 6 1 ft Planted 6 River Birch T 1 2ft Planted 1 River Birch T 1 3ft Planted 1 Elderberry SH 0 Seedling Planted 0 Musclewood SH 0 Seedling Planted 0 Loblolly Bay T 1 3ft Volunteer 1 Red Bay T 4 1 ft Volunteer 4 Red Bay T 7 2ft Volunteer 7 Red Bay T 6 3ft Volunteer 6 Red Bay T 1 4ft Volunteer 1 Sweetbay T 1 1 ft Volunteer 1 Sweetbay T 1 3ft Volunteer 1 Wax Myrtle SH 1 1 ft Volunteer 1 Wax Myrtle SH 3 2ft Volunteer 3 Amer. Titi SH 10 2ft Volunteer 10 Red Maple T 4 4ft Volunteer 4 OBSERVED DENSITY TOTAL SHRUBS 14 (PER PLOT) 74 TOTAL TREES OF OBSERVED DENSITY PLANTED SPECIES 39 (PER ACRE) 740 TOTAL TREES OF VOLUNTEERED 25 SPECIES TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 78 STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - CAROLINA BAY ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS PLOT NUMBER 18 SPECIES STRATUM (T, SA, or SH) Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer Species Number of Individuals Counted toward Success Criteria Bald Cypress T 11 1 ft Planted 11 Bald Cypress T 16 2 ft Planted 16 Black Gum T 2 1 ft Planted 2 Black Gum T 11 2 ft Planted 11 Atlantic White Cedar T 9 1 ft Planted 9 River Birch T 3 1 ft Planted 3 River Birch T 1 2 ft Planted 1 Elderberry SH 0 Seedling Planted 0 Musclewood SH 0 Seedling Planted 0 Red Bay T 2 1 ft Volunteer 2 Red Bay T 17 2 ft Volunteer 17 Red Bay T 5 3 ft Volunteer 5 Red Bay T 3 4ft Volunteer 3 Red Bay T 2 5 ft Volunteer 2 Sweetbay T 1 1 ft Volunteer 1 Sweetbay T 1 4ft Volunteer 1 Wax Myrtle SH 2 1 ft Volunteer 2 Wax Myrtle SH 8 2 ft Volunteer 8 Wax Myrtle SH 2 3 ft Volunteer 2 Red Oak T 1 1 ft Volunteer 1 Amer. Titi SH 30 2 ft Volunteer 30 American Holly SH 40 3 ft Volunteer 40 Red Maple T 10 4ft Volunteer 10 OBSERVED DENSITY TOTAL SHRUBS 82 (PER PLOT) 167 TOTAL TREES OF OBSERVED DENSITY PLANTED SPECIES 53 (PER ACRE) 1670 TOTAL TREES OF VOLUNTEERED 42 SPECIES TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 177 STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - CAROLINA BAY ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS PLOT NUMBER 19 SPECIES STRATUM (T, SA, or SH) Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer Species Number of Individuals Counted toward Success Criteria Bald Cypress T 14 1 ft Planted 14 Bald Cypress T 8 2ft Planted 8 Black Gum T 2 1 ft Planted 2 Black Gum T 6 2ft Planted 6 Atlantic White Cedar T 37 1 ft Planted 37 River Birch T 13 1 ft Planted 13 River Birch T 3 2ft Planted 3 Elderberry SH 3 1 ft Planted 3 Musclewood SH 0 Seedling Planted 0 Red Bay T 1 1 ft Volunteer 1 Red Bay T 3 2ft Volunteer 3 Red Bay T 2 3 ft Volunteer 2 Red Bay T 6 4 ft Volunteer 6 Red Bay T 3 5 ft Volunteer 3 Red Bay T 1 6 ft Volunteer 1 Sweetbay T 1 1 ft Volunteer 1 Sweetbay T 1 2ft Volunteer 1 Wax Myrtle SH 1 1 ft Volunteer 1 Wax Myrtle SH 4 2ft Volunteer 4 Wax Myrtle SH 4 3 ft Volunteer 4 Wax Myrtle SH 1 4 ft Volunteer 1 Amer. Titi SH 30 2ft Volunteer 30 American Holly SH 30 1 ft Volunteer 30 Red Maple T 5 3 ft Volunteer 5 OBSERVED DENSITY TOTAL SHRUBS 73 (PER PLOT) 174 TOTAL TREES OF OBSERVED DENSITY PLANTED SPECIES 83 (PER ACRE) 1740 TOTAL TREES OF VOLUNTEERED 23 SPECIES TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 179 STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - CAROLINA BAY ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS PLOT NUMBER 20 SPECIES STRATUM (T, SA, or SH) Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer Species Number of Individuals Counted toward Success Criteria Bald Cypress T 5 1 ft Planted 5 Bald Cypress T 17 2ft Planted 17 Bald Cypress T 3 3 ft Planted 3 Black Gum T 3 1 ft Planted 3 Black Gum T 3 2ft Planted 3 Atlantic White Cedar T 12 1 ft Planted 12 Atlantic White Cedar T 1 2ft Planted 1 River Birch T 6 1 ft Planted 6 River Birch T 7 2ft Planted 7 Elderberry SH 2 1 ft Planted 2 Musclewood SH 0 Seedling Planted 0 Red Bay T 3 2ft Volunteer 3 Red Bay T 3 3 ft Volunteer 3 Red Bay T 1 4 ft Volunteer 1 Red Bay T 4 5 ft Volunteer 4 Red Bay T 1 6 ft Volunteer 1 Wax Myrtle SH 6 2ft Volunteer 6 Wax Myrtle SH 2 3 ft Volunteer 2 Amer. Titi SH 50 2ft Volunteer 50 American Holly SH 50 1 ft Volunteer 50 Red Maple T 6 3 ft Volunteer 6 OBSERVED DENSITY TOTAL SHRUBS 110 (PER PLOT) 179 TOTAL TREES OF OBSERVED DENSITY PLANTED SPECIES 57 (PER ACRE) 1790 TOTAL TREES OF VOLUNTEERED 18 SPECIES TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 185 STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - CAROLINA BAY ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS PLOT NUMBER 21 SPECIES STRATUM (T, SA, or SH) Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer Species Number of Individuals Counted toward Success Criteria Bald Cypress T 14 1 ft Planted 14 Bald Cypress T 2 2 ft Planted 2 Black Gum T 3 1 ft Planted 3 Black Gum T 3 2 ft Planted 3 Atlantic White Cedar T 0 Seedling Planted 0 River Birch T 3 1 ft Planted 3 River Birch T 1 2 ft Planted 1 Elderberry SH 0 Seedling Planted 0 Musclewood SH 0 Seedling Planted 0 Red Bay T 3 1 ft Volunteer 3 Red Bay T 7 2 ft Volunteer 7 Red Bay T 2 3 ft Volunteer 2 Red Bay T 2 4 ft Volunteer 2 Sweetbay T 1 1 ft Volunteer 1 Wax Myrtle SH 1 1 ft Volunteer 1 Wax Myrtle SH 2 2 ft Volunteer 2 Wax Myrtle SH 3 3 ft Volunteer 3 TOTAL SHRUBS 6 OBSERVED DENSITY (PER PLOT) 47 TOTAL TREES OF PLANTED SPECIES 26 OBSERVED DENSITY (PER ACRE) 470 TOTAL TREES OF VOLUNTEERED SPECIES 15 TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 47 STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - CAROLINA BAY ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS PLOT NUMBER 22 SPECIES STRATUM (T, SA, or SH) Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer Species Number of Individuals Counted toward Success Criteria Bald Cypress T 12 1 ft Planted 12 Bald Cypress T 9 2ft Planted 9 Black Gum T 3 1 ft Planted 3 Black Gum T 13 2ft Planted 13 Atlantic White Cedar T 0 Seedling Planted 0 River Birch T 2 1 ft Planted 2 River Birch T 5 2ft Planted 5 Elderberry SH 0 Seedling Planted 0 Musclewood SH 0 Seedling Planted 0 Red Bay T 4 1 ft Volunteer 4 Red Bay T 6 2ft Volunteer 6 Red Bay T 10 3 ft Volunteer 10 Red Bay T 2 4 ft Volunteer 2 Sweetbay T 2 1 ft Volunteer 2 Sweetbay T 2 2ft Volunteer 2 Sweetbay T 3 3 ft Volunteer 3 Wax Myrtle SH 1 1 ft Volunteer 1 Wax Myrtle SH 3 2ft Volunteer 3 Amer. Titi SH 50 2ft Volunteer 50 American Holly SH 10 2ft Volunteer 10 Red Maple T 6 4 ft Volunteer 6 OBSERVED DENSITY TOTAL SHRUBS 64 (PER PLOT) 137 TOTAL TREES OF OBSERVED DENSITY PLANTED SPECIES 44 (PER ACRE) 1370 TOTAL TREES OF VOLUNTEERED 35 SPECIES TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 143 STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - CAROLINA BAY ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS PLOT NUMBER 23 SPECIES STRATUM (T, SA, or SH) Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer Species Number of Individuals Counted toward Success Criteria Bald Cypress T 7 1 ft Planted 7 Bald Cypress T 22 2 ft Planted 22 Black Gum T 2 1 ft Planted 2 Black Gum T 14 2 ft Planted 14 Atlantic White Cedar T 5 1 ft Planted 5 River Birch T 0 Seedling Planted 0 Elderberry SH 0 Seedling Planted 0 Musclewood SH 0 Seedling Planted 0 Loblolly Bay T 1 2 ft Volunteer 1 Loblolly Bay T 3 3 ft Volunteer 3 Loblolly Bay T 4 4 ft Volunteer 4 Loblolly Bay T 2 5 ft Volunteer 2 Red Bay T 9 1 ft Volunteer 9 Red Bay T 4 2 ft Volunteer 4 Red Bay T 4 3 ft Volunteer 4 Red Bay T 1 4 ft Volunteer 1 Wax Myrtle SH 2 1 ft Volunteer 2 Wax Myrtle SH 1 2 ft Volunteer 1 Amer. Titi SH 5 2 ft Volunteer 5 Red Maple T 20 4 ft Volunteer 20 OBSERVED DENSITY TOTAL SHRUBS 8 (PER PLOT) 86 TOTAL TREES OF OBSERVED DENSITY PLANTED SPECIES 50 (PER ACRE) 860 TOTAL TREES OF VOLUNTEERED 48 SPECIES TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 106 STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - CAROLINA BAY ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS PLOT NUMBER 24 SPECIES STRATUM (T, SA, or SH) Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer Species Number of Individuals Counted toward Success Criteria Bald Cypress T 10 1 ft Planted 10 Bald Cypress T 16 2 ft Planted 16 Black Gum T 4 1 ft Planted 4 Black Gum T 2 2 ft Planted 2 Atlantic White Cedar T 9 1 ft Planted 9 Atlantic White Cedar T 1 2 ft Planted 1 River Birch T 2 1 ft Planted 2 River Birch T 2 2 ft Planted 2 Elderberry SH 0 Seedling Planted 0 Musclewood SH 0 Seedling Planted 0 Loblolly Bay T 3 1 ft Volunteer 3 Loblolly Bay T 3 2 ft Volunteer 3 Loblolly Bay T 1 6 ft Volunteer 1 Red Bay T 4 1 ft Volunteer 4 Red Bay T 6 2 ft Volunteer 6 Red Bay T 6 3 ft Volunteer 6 Red Bay T 1 4 ft Volunteer 1 Sweetbay T 1 1 ft Volunteer 1 Red Maple T 60 5 ft Volunteer 60 OBSERVED DENSITY TOTAL SHRUBS 0 (PER PLOT) 71 TOTAL TREES OF OBSERVED DENSITY PLANTED SPECIES 46 (PER ACRE) 710 TOTAL TREES OF VOLUNTEERED 85 SPECIES TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 131 Appendix C. Year 1 Well Monitoring Data Hydrology Assessment Precipitation data obtained from: Shallotte Ag station Coop-TP 317813 and Brunswick County Intl Airport KSUT (www.nc-climate.ncsu.edu) 30% & 70% precipitation data obtained from the Longwood WETS Station NC5116 1978-2009 (wcc.nres.usda.gov) Monitoring Well Record ?? Stone Farm Mitigation ? Brunswick County, NC ? 01-02-240 ? Bay Wells 1, 2, & 3 ? WM 40 ? April 1, 2008 - ? June 30, 2008 ? One reading per day ? at 7:00 am N N c 0 .Q d a 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 June 2008 ---------------- Q? Q? Q? Q? P Q? P ?P ?P NN No N":, Nod FShallotte Raingauge -30 day total 30% -70% WKSUT Raingauge 6 0 V Z -6 J -12 as -18 V -24 cC fn -30 ? -36 O C7 -42 I Final Plug Installed 6-16-08 I --------------------- ---------- ------------------------- ------------------------------------------ ----.---ial-- ---------------- ----------------------------- 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 NN No N":, Nv Fm-Shallotte Well 1 (EBDACA2) +Well 2 (EBDB2D9) Land Management Group, Inc. Well 3 (EBD7CB4) 12in below surface www.lmgroup.net Raingauge 00 00 00 00 S§' S§' 11o It o0 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Slide A-1 ?D R 0 M M Precipitation data obtained from: Shallotte Ag station Coop-TP 317813 and Brunswick County Intl Airport KSUT (www.nc-climate.ncsu.edu) 30% & 70% precipitation data obtained from the Longwood WETS Station NC5116 1978-2009 `(wcc.nres.usda.gov) Monitoring Well Record ?? Stone Farm Mitigation ? Brunswick County, NC ? 01-02-240 ? Bay Wells 1, 2, & 3 ? WM 40 ? July 1, 2008 - ? September 30, 2008 ? One reading per day ? at 7:00 am Land Management Group, Inc. www.lmgroup.net N c 0 .Q d a Hydrology Assessment 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 6 September 2008 ------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------- ------ ------------- -------------------------------- -------------------------- -------- ---- -------- -- -- ----------- ---------------------- ------- -------- - ----- - - -------- -------- - ----------------------------------------------------------- ------- -------- ------ 'Q 'Q 'Q NoP 45 115Y P It P 4Y k5 05 ?k0 X05 2k5 205 FShallotte Raingauge -30 day total 30% -70% MKSUT Raingauge N d t 0 V Z -6 J -12 as 18 V -24 cC fn -30 -36 O C7 -42 ----- -- ----- --- ------- - -- - - --------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------- --------------------------- ------ ---- 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ?o\ ?o\ Poi Poi Poi Poi Poi P°? ?o\ ?o\ ?o\ ?o\ ?o\ 5?Q 5?Q 5?Q 5?Q 5?Q 5?Q ? ? ? ? ? ? ? -Well 1 (EBDACA2) -+-Well 2 (EBDB2D9) Well 3 (EBD7CB4) 12in below surface WShallotte Raingauge 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Slide A-2 ?D R 0 M M Hydrology Assessment Precipitation data obtained from: Shallotte Ag station Coop-TP 317813 and Brunswick County Intl Airport KSUT (www.nc-climate.ncsu.edu) 30% & 70% precipitation data obtained from the Longwood WETS Station NC5116 1978-2009 `(wcc.nres.usda.gov) Monitoring Well Record ?? Stone Farm Mitigation ? Brunswick County, NC ? 01-02-240 ? Bay Wells 1, 2, & 3 ? WM 40 ? Otober 1, 2008 - ? December 31, 2008 ? One reading per day ? at 7:00 am N c 0 .Q d a N d t V as as J as cC as V cC N 7 O a 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 6 December 2008 ------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- ----------------------------------------------------------- ------------- -------- --------------------------------------------------- -------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- --- --- ------------------------------------------- ------------- ---- ------ --- --- -- ---------- ------------ ---- ------------------ ------------- Oo? Oo? Oo? Oo? Oo? Oo? Oo? ?a? ?aA ?a? ?a? ?a? Ora Ora Ora Ora Ora Ora N(Z; 45 115Y 4Y `5 N(Z; 45 115Y lt? FShallotte Raingauge -30 day total 30% -70% MKSUT Raingauge 0 -6 - - -12 -18 -- -24 - - -30 - - -36 -42 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N(Z 4 11o It oo -*-Well 1 (EBDACA2) -+-Well 2 (EBDB2D9) Land Management Group, Inc. Well 3 (EBD7CB4) 12in below surface www.lmgroup.net WShallotte Raingauge 0 00 00 00 rd rd rd O O O 0 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Slide A-3 m n R 0 M M Hydrology Assessment Precipitation data obtained from: Shallotte Ag station Coop-TP 317813 and Brunswick County Intl Airport KSUT (www.nc-climate.ncsu.edu) 30% & 70% precipitation data obtained from the Longwood WETS Station NC5116 1978-2009 `(wcc.nres.usda.gov) Monitoring Well Record ?? Stone Farm Mitigation ? Brunswick County, NC ? 01-02-240 ? Bay Wells 4, 5, & 6 ? WM 40 ? April 1, 2008 - ? June 30, 2008 ? One reading per day ? at 7:00 am N N c 0 .Q d a 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 June 2008 ------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- --- ------------------------------------------------------ ----------- --- -------- ------- ------ ------- --- -------- --------------------- -- --- ------ 11 1 -1 6 0 V -6 Z J -12 as -18 V -24 cC fn -30 ? -36 O C7 -42 FShallotte Raingauge -30 day total 30% -70% WKSUT Raingauge Final Plug Installed 6-16-08 I ---------- ----- -------------- --------------------------- &> &> &> &> &> &> &> &> &> &> &> &> &> &> 00 NN No N":, Nv Fm-Shallotte Well 4 (EBDC720) +Well 5 (AB36D1 E) Land Management Group, Inc. Well 6 (A286178) 12in below surface www.lmgroup.net Raingauge 00 00 00 00 S§' S§' 11o It o0 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Slide B-1 ?D R 0 M 2 Precipitation data obtained from: Shallotte Ag station Coop-TP 317813 and Brunswick County Intl Airport KSUT (www.nc-climate.ncsu.edu) 30% & 70% precipitation data obtained from the Longwood WETS Station NC5116 1978-2009 `(wcc.nres.usda.gov) Monitoring Well Record ?? Stone Farm Mitigation ? Brunswick County, NC ? 01-02-240 ? Bay Wells 4, 5, & 6 ? WM 40 ? July 1, 2008 - ? September 30, 2008 ? One reading per day ? at 7:00 am Land Management Group, Inc. www.lmgroup.net N c 0 .Q d a Hydrology Assessment 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 September 2008 ------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------- ------ ------------- -------------------------------- -------------------------- -------- ---- -------- -- -- ----------- ---------------------- ------- -------- - ----- - - -------- -------- - ----------------------------------------------------------- ------- -------- ------ '. ? ,?.?? 2?, 2? o?, ?P ?oP ??P 2oP 2?P ooP k0 05 ?k0 ,?05 2k5 205 MShallotte Raingauge -30 day total 30% -70% WKSUT Raingauge 6 N d t 0 V Z -6 J -12 as 18 V 24 cC fn -30 -36 O C7 -42 ---- ,--------------------- --------- ------ - --------- . --- & ***I. % W A k**v*j -------------- ------------ - ---- ------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------- 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ?o\ ?o\ Poi Poi Poi Poi Poi Poi ?o\ ?o\ ?o\ ?o\ ?o\ 5?Q 5?Q 5?Q 5?Q 5?Q 5?Q ? ? ? ? ? ? ? -Well 4 (EBDC720) -+-Well 5 (AB36D1 E) Well 6 (A286178) 12in below surface WShallotte Raingauge 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Slide B-2 ?D R 0 M M Hydrology Assessment Precipitation data obtained from: Shallotte Ag station Coop-TP 317813 and Brunswick County Intl Airport KSUT (www.nc-climate.ncsu.edu) 30% & 70% precipitation data obtained from the Longwood WETS Station NC5116 1978-2009 `(wcc.nres.usda.gov) Monitoring Well Record ?? Stone Farm Mitigation ? Brunswick County, NC ? 01-02-240 ? Bay Wells 4, 5, & 6 ? WM 40 ? Otober 1, 2008 - ? December 31, 2008 ? One reading per day ? at 7:00 am O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N(Z 4 11o It oo -*-Well 4 (EBDC720) -+-Well 5 (AB36D1 E) Land Management Group, Inc. Well 6 (A286178) 12in below surface www.lmgroup.net WShallotte Raingauge N c 0 .Q d a 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 December 2008 ------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- ----------------------------------------------------------- ------------- -------- --------------------------------------------------- -------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- --- --- ------------------------------------------- ------------- ---- ------ --- --- -- ---------- ------------ ---- ------------------ ------------- N(Z; 45 115Y o`? Oo? Oo? Oo? Oo? Oo? Oo? Oo? ?a? ?a? ?a? ?a? ?a? ?a? Ora Ora Ora Ora Ora Ora 4Y `5 N(Z; 45 115Y lt? FShallotte Raingauge -30 day total 30% -70% MKSUT Raingauge 6 N d t 0 V -6 Z J -12 as -18 V -24 cC fn -30 ? -36 O U -42 0 00 00 00 rd rd rd O O O 0 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Slide B-3 ?D R 0 M M