HomeMy WebLinkAbout20071843 Ver 1_Year 1 Monitoring Report_20091215o1- 1S43
LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP i.c.
Environmental Consultants
November 11, 2009
Mr. Mickey Sugg
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
69 Darlington Ave.
Wilmington, N.C. 28403
RE: Stone Farm Regional Mitigation Bank - Year 1 Annual Monitoring Report (Phase 1)
1 a.rt..? J
Dear Mickey:
On behalf of the bank sponsor, Land Management Group, Inc. (LMG) is submitting two (2) copies of the
Year 1 Annual Monitoring Report. This report chronicles the development of Phase I of the project
which includes the entire Carolina bay. The project is performing well during the early stages and has
met the applicable success criteria for both the vegetative and hydrologic components.
Please take a moment to review the attached report and feel free to contact me if you have any
questions or comments. I can be reached via email (bmanning(@Imgroup.net) or mobile phone
(910.471.0005) to discuss the project in greater detail. Thank you for your time and attention to these
matters.
Sincerely,
ManNry,WIS
Brent
qV: c.e:lf ren, Mannl"Y. Vd/5.
Manning,
PWS
Brent Manning, PWS
Environmental Scientist
Cc. Michael Borton, OIB Construction
LMG files
Q12@19uep=p
DEC 1 5 2009
UENR - WATER DUALITY
WETLANDS AND STJRMWATER BRANCH
www.lmgroup.net • info@Imgroup.net • Phone: 910.452.0001 • Fax: 910.452.0060
3805 Wrightsville Ave., Suite 1.5, Wilmington, NC 28403 • P.O. Box 2522, Wilmington, NC 28402
Stone Farm Regional Mitigation Bank
Annual Monitoring Report - Year 1
(Phase One)
Brunswick County, NC
Lumber River Basin
(Cataloging Unit #03040207)
k ? ? T
ink,
-1 W.
ti L,, P.r
' ti-
p. Ay
zl-
^? ? ?? yam,
Prepared for:
Decaro/ Wi//iamson Enterprises, LLC
Prepared by.,
LMG
;. .Lti 1111:L% tf i:RUI:C
Wilmington, N.C.
October 2009
1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW
WmA inflnn
As approved by the Mitigation Bank Review Team (MBRT), the bank Sponsor began
implementation of Phase One of the restoration project (the 145 ac. Carolina bay) in October 2007
(Figure 1). These activities included logging, plug installation, planting of characteristic seedlings,
and installation of monitoring devices. Placement of fill material within existing ditches was
authorized under Nationwide Permit 27 issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) on
January 25, 2008 (Action ID# 2003-00682) and the corresponding 401 Water Quality Certification
issued on January 2, 2008 (DWQ Project #20071843).
Mitigation Goals and Objectives
The proposed restoration project is intended to provide suitable, high-quality wetland and stream
restoration to mitigate for authorized impacts within the Lumber River Basin (USGS 8-digit
Hydrologic Unit 03040207; DWQ Subbasin 03-07-57). The objective of the project is to restore
natural vegetative and hydrologic conditions throughout the nonriverine, riverine, and Coastal Plain
stream habitat that have been compromised by previous land use activities. The primary functions
of the restoration project are to provide surface water storage, sediment retention, and organic
carbon transport to downstream food-webs. This project provides an invaluable opportunity to
restore an entire watershed within a region currently experiencing acute development pressures.
Furthermore, the potential for nutrient removal and niche-habitat utilization will also be realized
given the large scope of the project.
Phase One of the project is intended to restore the hydrology and vegetation of a previously
drained and timber-managed headwater Carolina bay. Doing so will contribute to enhanced water
quality and food-web support of downstream waters. The vegetative restoration component will
reestablish a mixture of pond pine (Pinus serotina) and native hardwoods coinciding with existing
topography and the restored hydroperiod. The resulting assemblage of characteristic canopy and
sub-canopy species will restore valuable refuge and feeding habitat previously impacted by site
management practices.
Project Implementation
Restoration activities within the bay were initiated in October 2007 with the logging of the loblolly
pine (Pinus taeda). Logging crews were instructed to remove all loblolly pines, sweet gum, and
other non-target species in preparation for planting in February 2008. Land Management Group,
Inc. (LMG) staff supervised the logging crews to ensure that target species such as red bay
(Persea borbonia) and sweetbay (Magnolia virginiana) were not removed.
Earthwork initially included the installation of eleven (11) interior ditch plugs (approximately 30' in
length) to facilitate logging activities throughout the site. These plugs were constructed using
adjacent spoil material and tree debris from the logging operations. Prior to project construction,
appropriate 401/404 authorization was received for placement of the plugs within the ditches. Once
logging was completed, additional plugs were installed at the northern (#8) and eastern (#14)
outlets of the Carolina bay (Figure 2). These plugs exceed 100-ft in length and consist of fill
material sourced from adjacent spoil piles and a permitted on-site borrow pit. All areas that were
disturbed during the installation process were covered with a seed mixture to minimize erosion. Refer to the
previously submitted mitigation plan for photographs of the initial post-construction conditions. Limited
grading in the areas directly adjacent to the ditches was also conducting to direct drainage towards
the bay. Prior to installation of these plugs, water was directed towards the Sandpiper Golf Course
via the northern outlet and towards Old Georgetown Road via the eastern outlet.
Based upon site observations and preliminary shallow groundwater level monitoring, installation of
the plugs resulted in a discernible effect on the groundwater hydrology (i.e. groundwater levels
observed closer to the soil surface). However, after subsequent site inspections in the months
following the initial earthwork (including a site visit with Mickey Sugg of the USACE Wilmington
Regulatory Branch Office), it was evident that some of the plugs were not functioning properly.
Subsurface drainage was observed in certain plug locations, and water levels within the interior
ditches were not being maintained. Therefore, it was decided that Plugs #2 through #4 would need
to be replaced. These plugs were rebuilt between April 20-22, 2009 using clean fill material from
the surrounding spoil piles. Each plug is now comprised of compacted sandy-clay material and is
functioning properly. Also, note that additional reinforcement to plug #1 will occur in conjunction
2
with the stream restoration phase of this project., These activities will create a 100' plug similar to
those installed at #8 and #14.
Approximately 77,000 hardwood tree seedlings were planted throughout the bay between March 3
and March 7, 2008. Seedlings were planted on approximate 9-ft centers, corresponding to an
average density of 536 seedlings per acre. Planting was supervised by LMG personnel to ensure
proper spacing and planting depths. Atlantic white cedar (Chamaecyparis thyoides) and bald
cypress (Taxodium distichum) comprised a majority of the seedlings planted, totaling
approximately 46,000. Species such as swamp tupelo (Nyssa biflora), tulip poplar (Liriodendron
tuiipifera), and river birch (Betu/a nigra) were also planted (See Table 1 for a complete list and
quantities). Tulip poplar and river birch were planted in slightly higher landscape positions near the
rim of the bay, while the remaining species were planted in the central portions that will likely
experience longer flooding durations. An additional 20,000 pond pine (Pinus serotina) seedlings
were also planted throughout the restored bay area in April 2009.
Table 1. Stone Farm Mitigation Bank - Phase 1 Planting List (March 2008/April 2009)
Carolina Bay/High Pocosin 146 ac. Nonriverine Restoration
2008 Planting
Common Name Scientific Name % Composition # Planted
Atlantic White Cedar Chamaecyparis thyoides 15% 14,400
Bald Cypress Taxodium distichum 31% 30,000
Swamp Tupelo Nyssa biflora 13% 13,050
River Birch Betula nigra 13% 12,261
Ironwood Carpinus carolinium 5% 4,475
Tulip Poplar Liriodendron tulipifera 2% 2,000
Elderberry Sambucus canadensis 2% 1,600
2009 Supplemental Planting
Pond Pine Pinus serotina 20% 20,000
TOTAL 97,786
3
2.0 MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Annual monitoring will be conducted near the end of each growing season for a period of five
years. This monitoring will include both a vegetative and hydrologic component per the approved
mitigation banking instrument. The vegetative component includes an assessment of the
conditions within each of the 24 permanent monitoring plots that have been established throughout
the project area (Figure 3). Vegetative planting will be deemed successful if survivorship of
plantings and volunteers of desirable species' meets or exceeds a target stem density of 320
stems/acre at the end of three years and 260 stems/acre at the end of five years.
The hydrologic component of the monitoring employs a total of six (6) shallow groundwater
monitoring wells which record water table levels on a daily basis (Figure 3). Data from this
equipment is downloaded every three months (i.e. once quarterly) and graphed with appropriate
local precipitation totals and WETS table information to determine if the site has met the
established hydrologic success criteria. Hydrologic monitoring will be deemed successful if the
static water table is at, or within, 12" of the soil surface for 12.5% of the growing season (equivalent
to 32 days based upon SCS-established growing season dates) during periods of normal rainfall.
Monitoring reports will include results of vegetative monitoring and photographic documentation of
site conditions. Reports will also identify any contingency measures that may need to be employed
to remedy any site deficiencies. For instance, deer browse tubes and fencing may need to be used
if evidence of significant herbivory or deer browse is observed. In addition, supplemental planting
may be necessary in areas of reduced survivorship.
3.0 MONITORING RESULTS (YEAR 1)
Vegetation Monitoring
Monitoring of the on-site vegetation was conducted on September 11 and 12, 2008. A total of
1,104 individuals of the planted species were counted throughout the twenty-four (24) plots, which
correlates to an average of 460 stems/acre within the project area (Table 2). Bald cypress
Desirable species are considered as noninvasive species characteristic of non-riparian habitats.
4
TABLE 2. ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET (YEAR 1) - VEGETATION PLOTS
Stone Farm - Phase 1 (Carolina Bay)
SPECIES PLOT 1 PLOT 2 PLOT 3 PLOT 4 PLOT 5 PLOT 6 PLOT 7 PLOT 8 PLOT 9 PLOT 10 PLOT 11 PLOT 12 PLOT 13 TOTAL
Bald Cypress 25 18 28 31 29 28 11 12 19 0 2 0 22 225
Black Gum 14 3 18 3 30 12 10 1 4 20 7 2 24 148
Atlantic White Cedar 9 1 0 18 0 2 6 0 3 7 5 0 0 51
River Birch 7 13 1 0 2 4 3 1 2 9 17 16 5 80
Elderberry 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 22 11 0 0 13 0 50
American Ti-Ti 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 30 15 6 10 81
Loblolly Bay 0 5 18 15 27 15 13 5 17 0 13 0 1 129
Sweetba 18 0 3 1 0 5 5 12 6 5 3 0 0 58
Red Bay 7 10 22 36 22 23 24 14 34 24 38 27 11 292
Wax Myrtle 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 11 12 16 0 48
American Holly 0 0 7 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 50 87
Fetterbush 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 10
TOTAL 80 54 97 132 110 91 76 67 96 106 137 90 123 1259
SPECIES PLOT 14 PLOT 15 PLOT 16 PLOT 17 PLOT 18 PLOT 19 PLOT 20 PLOT 21 PLOT 22 PLOT 23 PLOT 24 TOTAL
Bald Cypress 30 30 23 20 27 22 25 16 21 29 26 269
Black Gum 18 15 14 11 13 8 6 6 16 16 6 129
Atlantic White Cedar 0 0 0 0 9 37 13 0 0 5 10 74
River Birch 3 8 8 8 4 16 13 4 7 0 4 75
Elderberry 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 5
American Ti-Ti 20 0 0 10 30 30 50 0 50 5 0 195
Loblolly Bay 1 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 10 7 25
Sweetba 1 2 1 2 2 2 0 1 7 0 1 19
Red Bay 16 23 18 18 29 16 12 14 22 18 17 203
Wax Myrtle 4 3 7 4 12 10 8 6 4 3 0 61
American Holly 0 14 0 0 40 30 50 0 10 0 0 144
Fetterbush 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 93 99 73 74 166 174 179 47 137 86 71 1199
Planted Specie
Acceptable Volunteer
(Taxodium distichum) was the most abundant woody species, with a total of 494 individuals. Other
planted species such as black gum (Nyssa sylvatica), river birch (Betu/a nigra), and Atlantic white
cedar (Chamaecyparis thyoides) were also prevalent within the monitored plots.
In addition to the planted species, numerous volunteers were also observed within each plot. A
majority of these individuals were representative of the target vegetative, including red bay (Persea
palustris), sweetbay (Magnolia virginiana), and loblolly bay (Gordonia lasianthus). Shrub species
such as American ti-ti (Cyrilla racemiflora) and American holly (Ilex opaca) were also observed.
When combined with the planted species, an average density of 1,003 stems/acre exists within the
project area.
The combination of planted species and acceptable volunteers suggest that the site is progressing
well towards the target community. During the Year 1 monitoring event, each of the 24 plots
exceeded the minimum success criteria and contained a variety of shrub and tree species. This
diversity of species and age classes will likely continue through the duration of the project due to
the abundant native seed source and natural dispersal patterns. These results are also
encouraging given the drought conditions that preceded the initial planting in March 2008 and
continued to persist throughout the 2008 growing season. Monitoring data from the Palmer Long-
Term Drought Index classified the drought for this period as a D3 (Extreme) level. Refer to
Appendix A for photographs of current site conditions and Appendix B for information regarding
individual plot totals.
While average stem densities in most plots are sufficient to meet the applicable success criteria, a
key component of the pocosin vegetative community remains absent from the project due to
availability of nursery stock. A total of 20,000 pond pine (Pinus serotina), a dominant specie within
several variants of the pocosin ecosystem, were planted in April 2009 to provide additional diversity
within the developing canopy layer. This supplemental planting increases the density of planted
species to 674 stems/acre throughout the project area (Table 1). Occurrence and growth of
planted pond pine will be reflected in the monitoring data provided in the Year 2 annual monitoring
report.
5
Hydrologic Monitoring
Monitoring of hydrologic conditions was initiated in April 2008. Per the approved mitigation plan, a
total of six (6) shallow groundwater monitoring wells were installed throughout the site. Data from
these wells depict a gradual shift in water table depths between April 2008 and June 2008 due to
the installation of the ditch plugs. This transition becomes more dramatic following the installation
of the final ditch plug in mid-June. Following this installation, discharge rates began to decrease
and water tables remain closer to the surface for extended periods. Periods of shallow ponding
were also observed during August and September. Overall, each of the six wells met the
hydrologic success for the 2008 growing season. A summary of the results is provided in Table 3.
Complete hydrologic monitoring data are provided in Appendix C.
Table 3. Summary of Year 1 Hydrologic Monitoring
Well
Number 2008 Growing
Season Number of Consecutive Days
Meeting Wetland Hydrology
Criteria Minimum Success
Criteria (12.5%)
Well 1 Aug. 13 - Nov. 27 107 32
Well 2 Aug. 13 - Nov. 27 107 32
Well 3 June 22 - Nov. 27 159 32
Well 4 Aug. 26 - Nov. 27 96 32
Well 5 June 22 - Nov. 27 159 32
Well 6 July 7 - Nov. 27 144 32
4.0 CONCLUSION
Based on the data collected in conjunction with the Year 1 monitoring event, the site appears to be
progressing well towards the target Carolina bay wetland community. Hydrologic data confirm the
re-establishment of hydrology characteristic of non-riparian wetter variety wetland habitat via the
installation of plugs. Water table depths were observed at levels at or near the surface for long
periods, exceeding the established success criteria. These data support the restoration of key
hydrologic functions relating to water storage and groundwater recharge within the system.
Plot monitoring within the restored bay indicates low mortality rates of planted trees and shrubs.
The vegetative component of the project appears to be progressing well as evidenced by the
6
growth and survivorship of planted species and the recruitment of characteristic volunteer species.
Each of the 24 plots exceeded the minimum success criteria during the Year 1 monitoring event.
Observed heights ranged from 1' to 5' among the planted and volunteer individuals, suggesting
that conditions within the restored bay are suitable for healthy community development. Based on
the results from the Year 1 monitoring, it is expected that the site will continue to evolve into a
mature Carolina bay ecosystem which exhibits a vegetative structure and hydrologic regime similar
to undisturbed examples found throughout southeastern North Carolina.
7
Figures
--
"
rl O
pp / ? r '
V
till.
' - ? S?F:,tiG6Rq _ _ ? ?1,ill l{rn?i? hs
-___ Np A ? ' SRAFlCN fib - ?
1
Srpur
r] Rti
R
9
O
J _ rF l r ._ .
AK
,
f L _ _ - - 3O F_
dJf Ra55TCIY
904 ._ n •-- _.
l
e?..
r
_ `
b
? ?- 0.l
i
' IRIS VIISYi? ??
I
_ - I
` s fr S A 4q
`
0
1
- 1 P
l .QO ~nsd Shallale . •? Ltp E ap .
>>?T • ? piE P1
p
,_ o
G CL.
Cj
v
J
q`
?
? s s
q?F+ i
of x
M
?
'
\
iRSSlnu. s
X j r (
/ AuY4LR 9vE- v? 2?.
N'
' '. Caxl Hun
9i4
E,.S' Phase One
,G
ect Area ?% ?,
Pro'
1y ?t
`?? X45
Y
`Cos?II os C nod, a? I W 1
S'r?j r'?r'j a l r u,xata'M? 4,? \ o
.? ?? ?iP Lr a 1 '. I r 179
5"
-
R k.R•Ilr I •f?? C t
1 1
i
- ,?y 1
C0.L.8A
,
•? ? ?f?r ?/ "I?"-??{+ exE i_ l 1i4L,f ,-Sr {r acute- nor
ys
81adc'i"
?
\
? o-?f"
?a
arac -
Nn^
?
'
?
L
_ _
p
br
-
Z
?
,
ttlc
A?ptl ? \, lh '\r , _ 1 _ ding. Sll ?1.l I
z s:' ??4?-- ,,r,? het' c,?. ?\ ?.,?,.?•r r,? In ,;I,,,,,
,
•
, (rs Gro.t ,
1 _
B, 'h
?
„?.
U I)ri.:l
rh
Vor1h
Mvrf p. ffi,dLII t
N Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Stone Farm Regional Mitigation Bank Brunswick County, NC
DeLorme Gazatteer
Brunswick County
0 2 4
mi Land Management Group, Inc.
y 4 .? a • ... .1.Y a '_?;,• may. 7i . a. v "*W i QJ Ff . i efi r a,.I .r ?• F d F
'#' IL
> r,' y,'? .a4 k??,y? ?$ G t?•?,? '4:+°a°*`"f.. {'ty?.. ?_.* ,?r,??,r??? . ro?i ?P?r ••sJ t1 fir. :°?p`.??-? +:`r
?Tl _ ? . 'may ?• n _ , el
', LL??.i, err .+, ?. .?`??, ._ ?-. $t-t`'a l+'L.,a'?* -?`'?ii.? `s #?'?11_r'_61'{'a.+! lea' r .. =?fi??.:?'?'?? ..
N Figure 2.
Stone Farm Regional Mitigation Bank
Ditch Plug Locations
Brunswick County LMG
0 600 1,200 LANDMANAGEMENTGROUP-
Cl I fnvlramenal CansuVrans
Feet
y 4 .? a • ... .1.Y a '_?;,• may. 7i . a. v "*W i QJ Ff . i efi r a,.I .r ?• F d F
'#' IL
> r,' y,'? .a4 k??,y? ?$ G t?•?,? '4:+°a°*`"f.. {'ty?.. ?_.* ,?r,??,r??? . ro?i ?P?r ••sJ t1 fir. :°?p`.??-? +:`r
?Tl _ ? . 'may ?• n _ , el
', LL??.i, err .+, ?. .?`??, ._ ?-. $t-t`'a l+'L.,a'?* -?`'?ii.? `s #?'?11_r'_61'{'a.+! lea' r .. =?fi??.:?'?'?? ..
N Figure 3.
Stone Farm Regional Mitigation Bank
Well/Plot Locations
Brunswick County LMG
0 600 1,200 LANDMANAGEMENTGROUP-
Cl I fnvlramenal CansuVrans
Feet
Appendix A. Site Photographs
Typical vegetation monitoring plot.
e ..4
ry
Typical vegetation monitoring plot with inundation visible.
'??" 7as
Tit
Flooded ditch subsequent to earthen plug installation.
Typical vegetation monitoring plot with inundation visible.
Appendix B. Vegetation Monitoring Data Sheets
STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - CAROLINA BAY
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER
SPECIES STRATUM
(T, SA, or SH) Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer
Species Number of Individuals
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Bald Cypress T 11 1 ft Planted 11
Bald Cypress T 13 2 ft Planted 13
Bald Cypress T 1 3 ft Planted 1
Black Gum T 10 1 ft Planted 10
Black Gum T 4 2 ft Planted 4
Atlantic White Cedar T 9 1 ft Planted 9
River Birch T 2 1 ft Planted 2
River Birch T 5 2 ft Planted 5
Elderberry SH 0 Seedling Planted 0
Musclewood SH 0 Seedling Planted 0
Red Bay T 2 1 ft Volunteer 2
Red Bay T 2 2 ft Volunteer 2
Red Bay T 2 4 ft Volunteer 2
Red Bay T 1 5 ft Volunteer 1
Sweetbay T 3 1 ft Volunteer 3
Sweetbay T 6 2 ft Volunteer 6
Sweetbay T 4 3 ft Volunteer 4
Sweetbay T 5 4 ft Volunteer 5
TOTAL SHRUBS 0 OBSERVED DENSITY
PER PLOT 80
TOTAL TREES OF
PLANTED SPECIES
55 OBSERVED DENSITY
PER ACRE
800
TOTAL TREES OF
VOLUNTEERED 25
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 80
STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - CAROLINA BAY
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER
SPECIES STRATUM
(T, SA, or SH) Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer
Species Number of Individuals
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Bald Cypress T 7 1 ft Planted 7
Bald Cypress T 9 2 ft Planted 9
Bald Cypress T 2 3 ft Planted 2
Black Gum T 1 1 ft Planted 1
Black Gum T 2 2 ft Planted 2
Atlantic White Cedar T 1 1 ft Planted 1
River Birch T 10 1 ft Planted 10
River Birch T 3 2 ft Planted 3
Elderberry SH 0 Seedling Planted 0
Musclewood SH 0 Seedling Planted 0
Loblolly Bay T 1 2 ft Volunteer 1
Loblolly Bay T 1 3 ft Volunteer 1
Loblolly Bay T 1 4 ft Volunteer 1
Loblolly Bay T 2 5 ft Volunteer 2
Red Bay T 4 1 ft Volunteer 4
Red Bay T 3 2 ft Volunteer 3
Red Bay T 2 3 ft Volunteer 2
Red Bay T 1 6 ft Volunteer 1
Wax Myrtle SH 2 2 ft Volunteer 2
Wax Myrtle SH 2 3 ft Volunteer 2
Red Maple T 5 5 ft Volunteer 5
OBSERVED DENSITY
TOTAL SHRUBS 4 54
PER PLOT
TOTAL TREES OF OBSERVED DENSITY
PLANTED SPECIES 35 (PER ACRE) 540
TOTAL TREES OF
VOLUNTEERED 20
SPECIES
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 59
STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - CAROLINA BAY
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER
SPECIES STRATUM
(T, SA, or SH) Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer
Species Number of Individuals
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Bald Cypress T 22 1 ft Planted 22
Bald Cypress T 6 2 ft Planted 6
Black Gum T 13 1 ft Planted 13
Black Gum T 5 2 ft Planted 5
Atlantic White Cedar T 0 Seedling Planted 0
River Birch T 1 1 ft Planted 1
Elderberry SH 0 Seedling Planted 0
Musclewood SH 0 Seedling Planted 0
Loblolly Bay T 4 1 ft Volunteer 4
Loblolly Bay T 1 2 ft Volunteer 1
Loblolly Bay T 3 3 ft Volunteer 3
Loblolly Bay T 2 4 ft Volunteer 2
Loblolly Bay T 8 5 ft Volunteer 8
Red Bay T 3 1 ft Volunteer 3
Red Bay T 11 2 ft Volunteer 11
Red Bay T 6 3 ft Volunteer 6
Red Bay T 2 5 ft Volunteer 2
Sweetbay T 2 1 ft Volunteer 2
Sweetbay T 1 3 ft Volunteer 1
American Holly SH 7 1 ft Volunteer 7
Red Maple T 12 6 ft Volunteer 12
OBSERVED DENSITY
TOTAL SHRUBS 7 97
PER PLOT
TOTAL TREES OF OBSERVED DENSITY
PLANTED SPECIES 47 (PER ACRE) 970
TOTAL TREES OF
VOLUNTEERED 55
SPECIES
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 109
STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - CAROLINA BAY
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER
SPECIES STRATUM
(T, SA, or SH) Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer
Species Number of Individuals
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Bald Cypress T 16 1 ft Planted 16
Bald Cypress T 15 2 ft Planted 15
Black Gum T 1 1 ft Planted 1
Black Gum T 2 2 ft Planted 2
Atlantic White Cedar T 17 1 ft Planted 17
Atlantic White Cedar T 1 2 ft Planted 1
River Birch T 0 Seedling Planted 0
Elderberry SH 0 Seedling Planted 0
Musclewood SH 0 Seedling Planted 0
Loblolly Bay T 4 2 ft Volunteer 4
Loblolly Bay T 5 3 ft Volunteer 5
Loblolly Bay T 1 4 ft Volunteer 1
Loblolly Bay T 5 5 ft Volunteer 5
Red Bay T 17 1 ft Volunteer 17
Red Bay T 13 2 ft Volunteer 13
Red Bay T 6 3 ft Volunteer 6
Sweetbay T 1 1 ft Volunteer 1
Wax Myrtle T 3 2 ft Volunteer 3
Sweet Gum T 3 6 ft Volunteer 3
American Ti-ti SH 20 2 ft Volunteer 20
Red Maple T 12 4 ft Volunteer 12
American Holly SH 5 2 ft Volunteer 5
OBSERVED DENSITY
TOTAL SHRUBS 25
(PER PLOT) 132
TOTAL TREES OF OBSERVED DENSITY
PLANTED SPECIES 52 (PER ACRE) 1320
TOTAL TREES OF
VOLUNTEERED 70
SPECIES
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 147
STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - CAROLINA BAY
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER
SPECIES STRATUM
(T, SA, or SH) Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer
Species Number of Individuals
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Bald Cypress T 14 1 ft Planted 14
Bald Cypress T 15 2 ft Planted 15
Black Gum T 13 1 ft Planted 13
Black Gum T 17 2 ft Planted 17
Atlantic White Cedar T 0 Seedling Planted 0
River Birch T 2 1 ft Planted 2
Elderberry SH 0 Seedling Planted 0
Musclewood SH 0 Seedling Planted 0
Loblolly Bay T 6 2 ft Volunteer 6
Loblolly Bay T 11 3 ft Volunteer 11
Loblolly Bay T 6 4 ft Volunteer 6
Loblolly Bay T 4 5 ft Volunteer 4
Red Bay T 4 1 ft Volunteer 4
Red Bay T 9 2 ft Volunteer 9
Red Bay T 7 3 ft Volunteer 7
Red Bay T 2 5 ft Volunteer 2
Red Maple T 14 5 ft Volunteer 14
TOTAL SHRUBS 0 OBSERVED DENSITY
(PER PLOT) 110
TOTAL TREES OF
PLANTED SPECIES
61 OBSERVED DENSITY
(PER ACRE)
1100
TOTAL TREES OF
VOLUNTEERED
SPECIES
63
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 124
STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - CAROLINA BAY
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER
SPECIES STRATUM
(T, SA, or SH) Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer
Species Number of Individuals
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Bald Cypress T 22 1 ft Planted 22
Bald Cypress T 6 2ft Planted 6
Black Gum T 10 1 ft Planted 10
Black Gum T 2 2ft Planted 2
Atlantic White Cedar T 2 1 ft Planted 2
River Birch T 4 1 ft Planted 4
Elderberry SH 0 Seedling Planted 0
Musclewood SH 0 Seedling Planted 0
Loblolly Bay T 3 1 ft Volunteer 3
Loblolly Bay T 6 2ft Volunteer 6
Loblolly Bay T 3 3 ft Volunteer 3
Loblolly Bay T 2 4 ft Volunteer 2
Loblolly Bay T 1 5 ft Volunteer 1
Red Bay T 9 1 ft Volunteer 9
Red Bay T 11 2ft Volunteer 11
Red Bay T 2 3 ft Volunteer 2
Red Bay T 1 4 ft Volunteer 1
Sweetbay T 1 1 ft Volunteer 1
Sweetbay T 2 2ft Volunteer 2
Sweetbay T 2 4 ft Volunteer 2
Wax Myrtle SH 1 1 ft Volunteer 1
Wax Myrtle SH 1 2ft Volunteer 1
Red Maple T 30 5 ft Volunteer 30
OBSERVED DENSITY
TOTAL SHRUBS 2
(PER PLOT) 91
TOTAL TREES OF OBSERVED DENSITY
PLANTED SPECIES 46 (PER ACRE) 910
TOTAL TREES OF
VOLUNTEERED 73
SPECIES
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 121
STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - CAROLINA BAY
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER
SPECIES STRATUM
(T, SA, or SH) Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer
Species Number of Individuals
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Bald Cypress T 11 1 ft Planted 11
Black Gum T 10 1 ft Planted 10
Atlantic White Cedar T 6 1 ft Planted 6
River Birch T 3 1 ft Planted 3
Elderberry SH 4 1 ft Planted 4
Musclewood SH 0 Seedling Planted 0
Loblolly Bay T 2 2 ft Volunteer 2
Loblolly Bay T 3 3 ft Volunteer 3
Loblolly Bay T 3 4 ft Volunteer 3
Loblolly Bay T 5 5ft Volunteer 5
Red Bay T 11 1 ft Volunteer 11
Red Bay T 4 2 ft Volunteer 4
Red Bay T 7 3 ft Volunteer 7
Red Bay T 1 4 ft Volunteer 1
Red Bay T 1 5ft Volunteer 1
Sweetbay T 1 1 ft Volunteer 1
Sweetbay T 1 2 ft Volunteer 1
Sweetbay T 1 3 ft Volunteer 1
Sweetbay T 1 4 ft Volunteer 1
Sweetbay T 1 5ft Volunteer 1
Red Maple T 10 5ft Volunteer 10
OBSERVED DENSITY
TOTAL SHRUBS 4
(PER PLOT) 76
TOTAL TREES OF OBSERVED DENSITY
PLANTED SPECIES 34 (PER ACRE) 760
TOTAL TREES OF
VOLUNTEERED 52
SPECIES
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 86
STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - CAROLINA BAY
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER
SPECIES STRATUM
(T, SA, or SH) Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer
Species Number of Individuals
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Bald Cypress T 10 1 ft Planted 10
Bald Cypress T 2 2 ft Planted 2
Black Gum T 1 1 ft Planted 1
Atlantic White Cedar T 0 Seedling Planted 0
River Birch T 1 1 ft Planted 1
Elderberry SH 22 1 ft Planted 22
Musclewood SH 0 Seedling Planted 0
Loblolly Bay T 2 1 ft Volunteer 2
Loblolly Bay T 3 3 ft Volunteer 3
Red Bay T 4 1 ft Volunteer 4
Red Bay T 4 2 ft Volunteer 4
Red Bay T 1 3 ft Volunteer 1
Red Bay T 3 4 ft Volunteer 3
Red Bay T 1 5 ft Volunteer 1
Red Bay T 1 6ft Volunteer 1
Sweetbay T 1 1 ft Volunteer 1
Sweetbay T 4 2 ft Volunteer 4
Sweetbay T 4 3 ft Volunteer 4
Sweetbay T 1 4 ft Volunteer 1
Sweetbay T 2 5 ft Volunteer 2
Red Maple T 8 6ft Volunteer 8
OBSERVED DENSITY
TOTAL SHRUBS 22
(PER PLOT) 67
TOTAL TREES OF OBSERVED DENSITY
PLANTED SPECIES 36 (PER ACRE) 670
TOTAL TREES OF
VOLUNTEERED 39
SPECIES
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 75
STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - CAROLINA BAY
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER
SPECIES STRATUM
(T, SA, or SH) Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer
Species Number of Individuals
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Bald Cypress T 16 1 ft Planted 16
Bald Cypress T 3 2 ft Planted 3
Black Gum T 4 1 ft Planted 4
Atlantic White Cedar T 3 1 ft Planted 3
River Birch T 1 1 ft Planted 1
River Birch T 1 2 ft Planted 1
Elderberry SH 11 1 ft Planted 11
Musclewood SH 0 Seedling Planted 0
Loblolly Bay T 2 1 ft Volunteer 2
Loblolly Bay T 5 2 ft Volunteer 5
Loblolly Bay T 6 3 ft Volunteer 6
Loblolly Bay T 4 4ft Volunteer 4
Red Bay T 8 1 ft Volunteer 8
Red Bay T 15 2 ft Volunteer 15
Red Bay T 8 3 ft Volunteer 8
Red Bay T 2 4ft Volunteer 2
Red Bay T 1 5 ft Volunteer 1
Sweetbay T 2 1 ft Volunteer 2
Sweetbay T 1 2 ft Volunteer 1
Sweetbay T 1 4ft Volunteer 1
Sweetbay T 1 5 ft Volunteer 1
Sweetbay T 1 6 ft Volunteer 1
Red Maple T 20 4ft Volunteer 20
OBSERVED DENSITY
TOTAL SHRUBS 11
(PER PLOT) 96
TOTAL TREES OF OBSERVED DENSITY
PLANTED SPECIES 39 (PER ACRE) 960
TOTAL TREES OF
VOLUNTEERED 77
SPECIES
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 116
STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - CAROLINA BAY
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER 10
SPECIES STRATUM
(T, SA, or SH) Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer
Species Number of Individuals
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Bald Cypress T 0 Seedling Planted 0
Black Gum T 11 1 ft Planted 11
Black Gum T 9 2ft Planted 9
Atlantic White Cedar T 7 1 ft Planted 7
River Birch T 6 1 ft Planted 6
River Birch T 3 2ft Planted 3
Elderberry SH 0 Seedling Planted 0
Musclewood SH 0 Seedling Planted 0
Red Bay T 3 1 ft Volunteer 3
Red Bay T 10 2ft Volunteer 10
Red Bay T 10 3 ft Volunteer 10
Red Bay T 1 4 ft Volunteer 1
Sweetbay T 3 1 ft Volunteer 3
Sweetbay T 2 2ft Volunteer 2
Wax Myrtle SH 6 1 ft Volunteer 6
Wax Myrtle SH 5 2ft Volunteer 5
Amer. Titi SH 30 2ft Volunteer 30
Red Maple T 2 3 ft Volunteer 2
TOTAL SHRUBS 41 OBSERVED DENSITY
(PER PLOT) 106
TOTAL TREES OF
PLANTED SPECIES
36 OBSERVED DENSITY
(PER ACRE)
1060
TOTAL TREES OF
VOLUNTEERED
SPECIES
31
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 108
STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - CAROLINA BAY
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER 11
SPECIES STRATUM
(T, SA, or SH) Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer
Species Number of Individuals
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Bald Cypress T 2 1 ft Planted 2
Black Gum T 6 1 ft Planted 6
Black Gum T 1 2ft Planted 1
Atlantic White Cedar T 5 1 ft Planted 5
River Birch T 14 1 ft Planted 14
River Birch T 3 2ft Planted 3
Elderberry SH 0 Seedling Planted 0
Musclewood SH 0 Seedling Planted 0
Loblolly Bay T 1 1 ft Volunteer 1
Loblolly Bay T 7 2ft Volunteer 7
Loblolly Bay T 4 3ft Volunteer 4
Loblolly Bay T 1 4ft Volunteer 1
Red Bay T 4 1 ft Volunteer 4
Red Bay T 7 2ft Volunteer 7
Red Bay T 7 3ft Volunteer 7
Red Bay T 8 4ft Volunteer 8
Red Bay T 9 5 ft Volunteer 9
Red Bay T 3 6 ft Volunteer 3
Sweetbay T 3 2ft Volunteer 3
Wax Myrtle SH 8 1 ft Volunteer 8
Wax Myrtle SH 4 2ft Volunteer 4
American Holly SH 25 2ft Volunteer 25
American Ti-ti SH 15 2ft Volunteer 15
OBSERVED DENSITY
TOTAL SHRUBS 52
(PER PLOT) 137
TOTAL TREES OF OBSERVED DENSITY
PLANTED SPECIES 31 (PER ACRE) 1370
TOTAL TREES OF
VOLUNTEERED 54
SPECIES
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 137
STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - CAROLINA BAY
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER 12
SPECIES STRATUM
(T, SA, or SH) Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer
Species Number of Individuals
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Bald Cypress T 0 Seedling Planted 0
Black Gum T 2 1 ft Volunteer 2
Atlantic White Cedar T 0 Seedling Planted 0
River Birch T 11 1 ft Planted 11
River Birch T 5 2 ft Planted 5
Elderberry SH 13 1 ft Planted 13
Musclewood SH 0 Seedling Planted 0
Red Bay T 7 1 ft Volunteer 7
Red Bay T 9 2 ft Volunteer 9
Red Bay T 4 3 ft Volunteer 4
Red Bay T 2 4 ft Volunteer 2
Red Bay T 2 5 ft Volunteer 2
Red Bay T 3 6 ft Volunteer 3
Wax Myrtle SH 9 1 ft Volunteer 9
Wax Myrtle SH 5 2 ft Volunteer 5
Wax Myrtle SH 2 3 ft Volunteer 2
Fetter-bush SH 10 1 ft Volunteer 10
Titi SH 6 2 ft Volunteer 6
TOTAL SHRUBS 32 OBSERVED DENSITY
(PER PLOT) 90
TOTAL TREES OF
PLANTED SPECIES
29 OBSERVED DENSITY
(PER ACRE)
900
TOTAL TREES OF
VOLUNTEERED
SPECIES
29
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 90
STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - CAROLINA BAY
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER 13
SPECIES STRATUM
(T, SA, or SH) Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer
Species Number of Individuals
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Bald Cypress T 21 1 ft Planted 21
Bald Cypress T 1 2 ft Planted 1
Black Gum T 20 1 ft Planted 20
Black Gum T 4 2 ft Planted 4
Atlantic White Cedar T 0 Seedling Planted 0
River Birch T 4 1 ft Planted 4
River Birch T 1 2 ft Planted 1
Elderberry SH 0 Seedling Planted 0
Musclewood SH 0 Seedling Planted 0
Red Bay T 4 1 ft Volunteer 4
Red Bay T 1 2 ft Volunteer 1
Red Bay T 2 3 ft Volunteer 2
Red Bay T 1 4 ft Volunteer 1
Red Bay T 2 5 ft Volunteer 2
Red Bay T 1 6 ft Volunteer 1
Loblolly Bay T 1 3 ft Volunteer 1
Amer. Titi SH 10 2 ft Volunteer 10
American Holly SH 50 2 ft Volunteer 50
TOTAL SHRUBS 60 OBSERVED DENSITY
(PER PLOT) 123
TOTAL TREES OF
PLANTED SPECIES
51 OBSERVED DENSITY
(PER ACRE)
1230
TOTAL TREES OF
VOLUNTEERED
SPECIES
12
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 123
STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - CAROLINA BAY
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER 14
SPECIES STRATUM
(T, SA, or SH) Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer
Species Number of Individuals
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Bald Cypress T 23 1 ft Planted 23
Bald Cypress T 7 2 ft Planted 7
Black Gum T 15 1 ft Planted 15
Black Gum T 3 2 ft Planted 3
Atlantic White Cedar T 0 Seedling Planted 0
River Birch T 3 1 ft Planted 3
Elderberry SH 0 Seedling Planted 0
Musclewood SH 0 Seedling Planted 0
Loblolly Bay T 1 2 ft Volunteer 1
Red Bay T 3 1 ft Volunteer 3
Red Bay T 6 2 ft Volunteer 6
Red Bay T 5 3 ft Volunteer 5
Red Bay T 1 4 ft Volunteer 1
Red Bay T 1 5 ft Volunteer 1
Sweetbay T 1 1 ft Volunteer 1
Wax Myrtle SH 1 1 ft Volunteer 1
Wax Myrtle SH 2 2 ft Volunteer 2
Wax Myrtle SH 1 3 ft Volunteer 1
Amer. Titi SH 20 2 ft Volunteer 20
OBSERVED DENSITY
TOTAL SHRUBS 24
(PER PLOT) 93
TOTAL TREES OF OBSERVED DENSITY
PLANTED SPECIES 51 (PER ACRE) 930
TOTAL TREES OF
VOLUNTEERED 18
SPECIES
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 93
STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - CAROLINA BAY
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER 15
SPECIES STRATUM
(T, SA, or SH) Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer
Species Number of Individuals
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Bald Cypress T 16 1 ft Planted 16
Bald Cypress T 14 2ft Planted 14
Black Gum T 7 1 ft Planted 7
Black Gum T 8 2ft Planted 8
Atlantic White Cedar T 0 Seedling Planted 0
River Birch T 7 1 ft Planted 7
River Birch T 1 2ft Planted 1
Elderberry SH 0 Seedling Planted 0
Musclewood SH 0 Seedling Planted 0
Loblolly Bay T 1 2ft Volunteer 1
Loblolly Bay T 3 3 ft Volunteer 3
Red Bay T 14 1 ft Volunteer 14
Red Bay T 6 2ft Volunteer 6
Red Bay T 2 3 ft Volunteer 2
Red Bay T 1 4ft Volunteer 1
Sweetbay T 1 2ft Volunteer 1
Sweetbay T 1 4ft Volunteer 1
Wax Myrtle SH 1 1 ft Volunteer 1
Wax Myrtle SH 2 2ft Volunteer 2
Sumac SH 5 2ft Volunteer 5
American Holly SH 14 2ft Volunteer 14
Red Maple T 2 2ft Volunteer 2
OBSERVED DENSITY
TOTAL SHRUBS 22
(PER PLOT) 99
TOTAL TREES OF OBSERVED DENSITY
PLANTED SPECIES 53 (PER ACRE) 990
TOTAL TREES OF
VOLUNTEERED 31
SPECIES
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 106
STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - CAROLINA BAY
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER 16
SPECIES STRATUM
(T, SA, or SH) Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer
Species Number of Individuals
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Bald Cypress T 14 1 ft Planted 14
Bald Cypress T 9 2ft Planted 9
Black Gum T 7 1 ft Planted 7
Black Gum T 7 2ft Planted 7
Atlantic White Cedar T 0 Seedling Planted 0
River Birch T 5 1 ft Planted 5
River Birch T 3 2ft Planted 3
Elderberry SH 0 Seedling Planted 0
Musclewood SH 0 Seedling Planted 0
Loblolly Bay T 1 3 ft Volunteer 1
Loblolly Bay T 1 4 ft Volunteer 1
Red Bay T 1 1 ft Volunteer 1
Red Bay T 13 2ft Volunteer 13
Red Bay T 4 3 ft Volunteer 4
Sweetbay T 1 2ft Volunteer 1
Wax Myrtle SH 3 1 ft Volunteer 3
Wax Myrtle SH 4 2ft Volunteer 4
Red Maple T 55 5 ft Volunteer 55
TOTALSHRUBS 7 OBSERVED DENSITY
(PER PLOT) 73
TOTAL TREES OF
PLANTED SPECIES
45 OBSERVED DENSITY
(PER ACRE)
730
TOTAL TREES OF
VOLUNTEERED
SPECIES
76
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 128
STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - CAROLINA BAY
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER 17
SPECIES STRATUM
(T, SA, or SH) Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer
Species Number of Individuals
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Bald Cypress T 9 1 ft Planted 9
Bald Cypress T 8 2ft Planted 8
Bald Cypress T 3 3ft Planted 3
Black Gum T 6 1 ft Planted 6
Black Gum T 5 2ft Planted 5
Atlantic White Cedar T 0 Seedling Planted 0
River Birch T 6 1 ft Planted 6
River Birch T 1 2ft Planted 1
River Birch T 1 3ft Planted 1
Elderberry SH 0 Seedling Planted 0
Musclewood SH 0 Seedling Planted 0
Loblolly Bay T 1 3ft Volunteer 1
Red Bay T 4 1 ft Volunteer 4
Red Bay T 7 2ft Volunteer 7
Red Bay T 6 3ft Volunteer 6
Red Bay T 1 4ft Volunteer 1
Sweetbay T 1 1 ft Volunteer 1
Sweetbay T 1 3ft Volunteer 1
Wax Myrtle SH 1 1 ft Volunteer 1
Wax Myrtle SH 3 2ft Volunteer 3
Amer. Titi SH 10 2ft Volunteer 10
Red Maple T 4 4ft Volunteer 4
OBSERVED DENSITY
TOTAL SHRUBS 14
(PER PLOT) 74
TOTAL TREES OF OBSERVED DENSITY
PLANTED SPECIES 39 (PER ACRE) 740
TOTAL TREES OF
VOLUNTEERED 25
SPECIES
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 78
STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - CAROLINA BAY
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER 18
SPECIES STRATUM
(T, SA, or SH) Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer
Species Number of Individuals
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Bald Cypress T 11 1 ft Planted 11
Bald Cypress T 16 2 ft Planted 16
Black Gum T 2 1 ft Planted 2
Black Gum T 11 2 ft Planted 11
Atlantic White Cedar T 9 1 ft Planted 9
River Birch T 3 1 ft Planted 3
River Birch T 1 2 ft Planted 1
Elderberry SH 0 Seedling Planted 0
Musclewood SH 0 Seedling Planted 0
Red Bay T 2 1 ft Volunteer 2
Red Bay T 17 2 ft Volunteer 17
Red Bay T 5 3 ft Volunteer 5
Red Bay T 3 4ft Volunteer 3
Red Bay T 2 5 ft Volunteer 2
Sweetbay T 1 1 ft Volunteer 1
Sweetbay T 1 4ft Volunteer 1
Wax Myrtle SH 2 1 ft Volunteer 2
Wax Myrtle SH 8 2 ft Volunteer 8
Wax Myrtle SH 2 3 ft Volunteer 2
Red Oak T 1 1 ft Volunteer 1
Amer. Titi SH 30 2 ft Volunteer 30
American Holly SH 40 3 ft Volunteer 40
Red Maple T 10 4ft Volunteer 10
OBSERVED DENSITY
TOTAL SHRUBS 82
(PER PLOT) 167
TOTAL TREES OF OBSERVED DENSITY
PLANTED SPECIES 53 (PER ACRE) 1670
TOTAL TREES OF
VOLUNTEERED 42
SPECIES
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 177
STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - CAROLINA BAY
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER 19
SPECIES STRATUM
(T, SA, or SH) Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer
Species Number of Individuals
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Bald Cypress T 14 1 ft Planted 14
Bald Cypress T 8 2ft Planted 8
Black Gum T 2 1 ft Planted 2
Black Gum T 6 2ft Planted 6
Atlantic White Cedar T 37 1 ft Planted 37
River Birch T 13 1 ft Planted 13
River Birch T 3 2ft Planted 3
Elderberry SH 3 1 ft Planted 3
Musclewood SH 0 Seedling Planted 0
Red Bay T 1 1 ft Volunteer 1
Red Bay T 3 2ft Volunteer 3
Red Bay T 2 3 ft Volunteer 2
Red Bay T 6 4 ft Volunteer 6
Red Bay T 3 5 ft Volunteer 3
Red Bay T 1 6 ft Volunteer 1
Sweetbay T 1 1 ft Volunteer 1
Sweetbay T 1 2ft Volunteer 1
Wax Myrtle SH 1 1 ft Volunteer 1
Wax Myrtle SH 4 2ft Volunteer 4
Wax Myrtle SH 4 3 ft Volunteer 4
Wax Myrtle SH 1 4 ft Volunteer 1
Amer. Titi SH 30 2ft Volunteer 30
American Holly SH 30 1 ft Volunteer 30
Red Maple T 5 3 ft Volunteer 5
OBSERVED DENSITY
TOTAL SHRUBS 73
(PER PLOT) 174
TOTAL TREES OF OBSERVED DENSITY
PLANTED SPECIES 83 (PER ACRE) 1740
TOTAL TREES OF
VOLUNTEERED 23
SPECIES
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 179
STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - CAROLINA BAY
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER 20
SPECIES STRATUM
(T, SA, or SH) Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer
Species Number of Individuals
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Bald Cypress T 5 1 ft Planted 5
Bald Cypress T 17 2ft Planted 17
Bald Cypress T 3 3 ft Planted 3
Black Gum T 3 1 ft Planted 3
Black Gum T 3 2ft Planted 3
Atlantic White Cedar T 12 1 ft Planted 12
Atlantic White Cedar T 1 2ft Planted 1
River Birch T 6 1 ft Planted 6
River Birch T 7 2ft Planted 7
Elderberry SH 2 1 ft Planted 2
Musclewood SH 0 Seedling Planted 0
Red Bay T 3 2ft Volunteer 3
Red Bay T 3 3 ft Volunteer 3
Red Bay T 1 4 ft Volunteer 1
Red Bay T 4 5 ft Volunteer 4
Red Bay T 1 6 ft Volunteer 1
Wax Myrtle SH 6 2ft Volunteer 6
Wax Myrtle SH 2 3 ft Volunteer 2
Amer. Titi SH 50 2ft Volunteer 50
American Holly SH 50 1 ft Volunteer 50
Red Maple T 6 3 ft Volunteer 6
OBSERVED DENSITY
TOTAL SHRUBS 110
(PER PLOT) 179
TOTAL TREES OF OBSERVED DENSITY
PLANTED SPECIES 57 (PER ACRE) 1790
TOTAL TREES OF
VOLUNTEERED 18
SPECIES
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 185
STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - CAROLINA BAY
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER 21
SPECIES STRATUM
(T, SA, or SH) Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer
Species Number of Individuals
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Bald Cypress T 14 1 ft Planted 14
Bald Cypress T 2 2 ft Planted 2
Black Gum T 3 1 ft Planted 3
Black Gum T 3 2 ft Planted 3
Atlantic White Cedar T 0 Seedling Planted 0
River Birch T 3 1 ft Planted 3
River Birch T 1 2 ft Planted 1
Elderberry SH 0 Seedling Planted 0
Musclewood SH 0 Seedling Planted 0
Red Bay T 3 1 ft Volunteer 3
Red Bay T 7 2 ft Volunteer 7
Red Bay T 2 3 ft Volunteer 2
Red Bay T 2 4 ft Volunteer 2
Sweetbay T 1 1 ft Volunteer 1
Wax Myrtle SH 1 1 ft Volunteer 1
Wax Myrtle SH 2 2 ft Volunteer 2
Wax Myrtle SH 3 3 ft Volunteer 3
TOTAL SHRUBS 6 OBSERVED DENSITY
(PER PLOT) 47
TOTAL TREES OF
PLANTED SPECIES
26 OBSERVED DENSITY
(PER ACRE)
470
TOTAL TREES OF
VOLUNTEERED
SPECIES
15
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 47
STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - CAROLINA BAY
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER 22
SPECIES STRATUM
(T, SA, or SH) Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer
Species Number of Individuals
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Bald Cypress T 12 1 ft Planted 12
Bald Cypress T 9 2ft Planted 9
Black Gum T 3 1 ft Planted 3
Black Gum T 13 2ft Planted 13
Atlantic White Cedar T 0 Seedling Planted 0
River Birch T 2 1 ft Planted 2
River Birch T 5 2ft Planted 5
Elderberry SH 0 Seedling Planted 0
Musclewood SH 0 Seedling Planted 0
Red Bay T 4 1 ft Volunteer 4
Red Bay T 6 2ft Volunteer 6
Red Bay T 10 3 ft Volunteer 10
Red Bay T 2 4 ft Volunteer 2
Sweetbay T 2 1 ft Volunteer 2
Sweetbay T 2 2ft Volunteer 2
Sweetbay T 3 3 ft Volunteer 3
Wax Myrtle SH 1 1 ft Volunteer 1
Wax Myrtle SH 3 2ft Volunteer 3
Amer. Titi SH 50 2ft Volunteer 50
American Holly SH 10 2ft Volunteer 10
Red Maple T 6 4 ft Volunteer 6
OBSERVED DENSITY
TOTAL SHRUBS 64
(PER PLOT) 137
TOTAL TREES OF OBSERVED DENSITY
PLANTED SPECIES 44 (PER ACRE) 1370
TOTAL TREES OF
VOLUNTEERED 35
SPECIES
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 143
STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - CAROLINA BAY
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER 23
SPECIES STRATUM
(T, SA, or SH) Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer
Species Number of Individuals
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Bald Cypress T 7 1 ft Planted 7
Bald Cypress T 22 2 ft Planted 22
Black Gum T 2 1 ft Planted 2
Black Gum T 14 2 ft Planted 14
Atlantic White Cedar T 5 1 ft Planted 5
River Birch T 0 Seedling Planted 0
Elderberry SH 0 Seedling Planted 0
Musclewood SH 0 Seedling Planted 0
Loblolly Bay T 1 2 ft Volunteer 1
Loblolly Bay T 3 3 ft Volunteer 3
Loblolly Bay T 4 4 ft Volunteer 4
Loblolly Bay T 2 5 ft Volunteer 2
Red Bay T 9 1 ft Volunteer 9
Red Bay T 4 2 ft Volunteer 4
Red Bay T 4 3 ft Volunteer 4
Red Bay T 1 4 ft Volunteer 1
Wax Myrtle SH 2 1 ft Volunteer 2
Wax Myrtle SH 1 2 ft Volunteer 1
Amer. Titi SH 5 2 ft Volunteer 5
Red Maple T 20 4 ft Volunteer 20
OBSERVED DENSITY
TOTAL SHRUBS 8
(PER PLOT) 86
TOTAL TREES OF OBSERVED DENSITY
PLANTED SPECIES 50 (PER ACRE) 860
TOTAL TREES OF
VOLUNTEERED 48
SPECIES
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 106
STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - CAROLINA BAY
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER 24
SPECIES STRATUM
(T, SA, or SH) Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer
Species Number of Individuals
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Bald Cypress T 10 1 ft Planted 10
Bald Cypress T 16 2 ft Planted 16
Black Gum T 4 1 ft Planted 4
Black Gum T 2 2 ft Planted 2
Atlantic White Cedar T 9 1 ft Planted 9
Atlantic White Cedar T 1 2 ft Planted 1
River Birch T 2 1 ft Planted 2
River Birch T 2 2 ft Planted 2
Elderberry SH 0 Seedling Planted 0
Musclewood SH 0 Seedling Planted 0
Loblolly Bay T 3 1 ft Volunteer 3
Loblolly Bay T 3 2 ft Volunteer 3
Loblolly Bay T 1 6 ft Volunteer 1
Red Bay T 4 1 ft Volunteer 4
Red Bay T 6 2 ft Volunteer 6
Red Bay T 6 3 ft Volunteer 6
Red Bay T 1 4 ft Volunteer 1
Sweetbay T 1 1 ft Volunteer 1
Red Maple T 60 5 ft Volunteer 60
OBSERVED DENSITY
TOTAL SHRUBS 0
(PER PLOT) 71
TOTAL TREES OF OBSERVED DENSITY
PLANTED SPECIES 46 (PER ACRE) 710
TOTAL TREES OF
VOLUNTEERED 85
SPECIES
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 131
Appendix C. Year 1 Well Monitoring Data
Hydrology Assessment
Precipitation data obtained
from: Shallotte Ag station
Coop-TP 317813 and Brunswick
County Intl Airport KSUT
(www.nc-climate.ncsu.edu)
30% & 70% precipitation data
obtained from the Longwood
WETS Station NC5116
1978-2009
(wcc.nres.usda.gov)
Monitoring Well Record
?? Stone Farm Mitigation
? Brunswick County, NC
? 01-02-240
? Bay Wells 1, 2, & 3
? WM 40
? April 1, 2008 -
? June 30, 2008
? One reading per day
? at 7:00 am
N
N
c
0
.Q
d
a
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
June 2008
----------------
Q?
Q? Q? Q? P Q? P
?P ?P NN No N":, Nod
FShallotte Raingauge -30 day total 30% -70% WKSUT Raingauge
6
0
V
Z -6
J -12
as
-18
V -24
cC
fn -30
? -36
O
C7 -42
I Final Plug Installed 6-16-08 I
--------------------- ---------- -------------------------
------------------------------------------
----.---ial-- ---------------- -----------------------------
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
NN No N":, Nv
Fm-Shallotte Well 1 (EBDACA2) +Well 2 (EBDB2D9)
Land Management Group, Inc. Well 3 (EBD7CB4) 12in below surface
www.lmgroup.net Raingauge
00 00 00 00
S§' S§'
11o It o0
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Slide A-1
?D
R
0
M
M
Precipitation data obtained
from: Shallotte Ag station
Coop-TP 317813 and Brunswick
County Intl Airport KSUT
(www.nc-climate.ncsu.edu)
30% & 70% precipitation data
obtained from the Longwood
WETS Station NC5116
1978-2009
`(wcc.nres.usda.gov)
Monitoring Well Record
?? Stone Farm Mitigation
? Brunswick County, NC
? 01-02-240
? Bay Wells 1, 2, & 3
? WM 40
? July 1, 2008 -
? September 30, 2008
? One reading per day
? at 7:00 am
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
N
c
0
.Q
d
a
Hydrology Assessment
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
6
September 2008
-------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------- ------
-------------
-------------------------------- --------------------------
-------- ----
-------- -- -- ----------- ----------------------
------- -------- - ----- - - -------- -------- -
-----------------------------------------------------------
------- -------- ------
'Q 'Q 'Q
NoP 45 115Y P It P 4Y k5 05 ?k0 X05 2k5 205
FShallotte Raingauge -30 day total 30% -70% MKSUT Raingauge
N
d
t 0
V
Z -6
J -12
as
18
V -24
cC
fn -30
-36
O
C7 -42
----- -- ----- --- ------- - -- - - ---------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------- --------------------------- ------ ----
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
?o\ ?o\ Poi Poi Poi Poi Poi P°?
?o\
?o\
?o\
?o\
?o\ 5?Q 5?Q 5?Q 5?Q 5?Q 5?Q
? ?
?
?
?
?
?
-Well 1 (EBDACA2) -+-Well 2 (EBDB2D9)
Well 3 (EBD7CB4) 12in below surface
WShallotte Raingauge
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Slide A-2
?D
R
0
M
M
Hydrology Assessment
Precipitation data obtained
from: Shallotte Ag station
Coop-TP 317813 and Brunswick
County Intl Airport KSUT
(www.nc-climate.ncsu.edu)
30% & 70% precipitation data
obtained from the Longwood
WETS Station NC5116
1978-2009
`(wcc.nres.usda.gov)
Monitoring Well Record
?? Stone Farm Mitigation
? Brunswick County, NC
? 01-02-240
? Bay Wells 1, 2, & 3
? WM 40
? Otober 1, 2008 -
? December 31, 2008
? One reading per day
? at 7:00 am
N
c
0
.Q
d
a
N
d
t
V
as
as
J
as
cC
as
V
cC
N
7
O
a
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
6
December 2008
-------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
-----------------------------------------------------------
-------------
-------- ---------------------------------------------------
-------- ----------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
--- --- -------------------------------------------
-------------
---- ------ --- --- -- ----------
------------ ----
------------------ -------------
Oo? Oo? Oo? Oo? Oo? Oo? Oo? ?a? ?aA ?a? ?a? ?a? Ora Ora Ora Ora Ora Ora N(Z; 45 115Y
4Y `5 N(Z; 45 115Y lt? FShallotte Raingauge -30 day total 30% -70% MKSUT Raingauge
0
-6 - -
-12
-18 --
-24 - -
-30 - -
-36
-42
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
N(Z 4 11o It oo
-*-Well 1 (EBDACA2) -+-Well 2 (EBDB2D9)
Land Management Group, Inc. Well 3 (EBD7CB4) 12in below surface
www.lmgroup.net WShallotte Raingauge
0 00 00 00
rd
rd
rd
O O
O
0
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Slide A-3
m
n
R
0
M
M
Hydrology Assessment
Precipitation data obtained
from: Shallotte Ag station
Coop-TP 317813 and Brunswick
County Intl Airport KSUT
(www.nc-climate.ncsu.edu)
30% & 70% precipitation data
obtained from the Longwood
WETS Station NC5116
1978-2009
`(wcc.nres.usda.gov)
Monitoring Well Record
?? Stone Farm Mitigation
? Brunswick County, NC
? 01-02-240
? Bay Wells 4, 5, & 6
? WM 40
? April 1, 2008 -
? June 30, 2008
? One reading per day
? at 7:00 am
N
N
c
0
.Q
d
a
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
June 2008
-------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
--- ------------------------------------------------------
----------- --- -------- ------- ------ ------- --- --------
--------------------- -- --- ------
11 1 -1
6
0
V
-6
Z
J -12
as
-18
V -24
cC
fn -30
? -36
O
C7 -42
FShallotte Raingauge -30 day total 30% -70% WKSUT Raingauge
Final Plug Installed 6-16-08 I
---------- -----
--------------
---------------------------
&> &> &> &> &> &> &> &> &> &> &> &> &> &> 00
NN No N":, Nv
Fm-Shallotte Well 4 (EBDC720) +Well 5 (AB36D1 E)
Land Management Group, Inc. Well 6 (A286178) 12in below surface
www.lmgroup.net Raingauge
00 00 00 00
S§' S§'
11o It o0
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Slide B-1
?D
R
0
M
2
Precipitation data obtained
from: Shallotte Ag station
Coop-TP 317813 and Brunswick
County Intl Airport KSUT
(www.nc-climate.ncsu.edu)
30% & 70% precipitation data
obtained from the Longwood
WETS Station NC5116
1978-2009
`(wcc.nres.usda.gov)
Monitoring Well Record
?? Stone Farm Mitigation
? Brunswick County, NC
? 01-02-240
? Bay Wells 4, 5, & 6
? WM 40
? July 1, 2008 -
? September 30, 2008
? One reading per day
? at 7:00 am
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
N
c
0
.Q
d
a
Hydrology Assessment
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
September 2008
-------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------- ------
-------------
-------------------------------- --------------------------
-------- ----
-------- -- -- ----------- ----------------------
------- -------- - ----- - - -------- -------- -
-----------------------------------------------------------
------- -------- ------
'. ? ,?.?? 2?, 2? o?, ?P ?oP ??P 2oP 2?P ooP k0 05 ?k0 ,?05 2k5 205
MShallotte Raingauge -30 day total 30% -70% WKSUT Raingauge
6
N
d
t 0
V
Z -6
J -12
as
18
V 24
cC
fn -30
-36
O
C7 -42
---- ,--------------------- --------- ------ - --------- . ---
& ***I. % W A k**v*j --------------
------------ - ---- ------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
?o\ ?o\ Poi Poi Poi Poi Poi Poi
?o\
?o\
?o\
?o\
?o\ 5?Q 5?Q 5?Q 5?Q 5?Q 5?Q
? ?
?
?
?
?
?
-Well 4 (EBDC720) -+-Well 5 (AB36D1 E)
Well 6 (A286178) 12in below surface
WShallotte Raingauge
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Slide B-2
?D
R
0
M
M
Hydrology Assessment
Precipitation data obtained
from: Shallotte Ag station
Coop-TP 317813 and Brunswick
County Intl Airport KSUT
(www.nc-climate.ncsu.edu)
30% & 70% precipitation data
obtained from the Longwood
WETS Station NC5116
1978-2009
`(wcc.nres.usda.gov)
Monitoring Well Record
?? Stone Farm Mitigation
? Brunswick County, NC
? 01-02-240
? Bay Wells 4, 5, & 6
? WM 40
? Otober 1, 2008 -
? December 31, 2008
? One reading per day
? at 7:00 am
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
N(Z 4 11o It oo
-*-Well 4 (EBDC720) -+-Well 5 (AB36D1 E)
Land Management Group, Inc. Well 6 (A286178) 12in below surface
www.lmgroup.net WShallotte Raingauge
N
c
0
.Q
d
a
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
December 2008
-------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
-----------------------------------------------------------
-------------
-------- ---------------------------------------------------
-------- ----------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
--- --- -------------------------------------------
-------------
---- ------ --- --- -- ----------
------------ ----
------------------ -------------
N(Z; 45 115Y o`?
Oo? Oo? Oo? Oo? Oo? Oo? Oo? ?a? ?a? ?a? ?a? ?a? ?a? Ora Ora Ora Ora Ora Ora 4Y `5 N(Z; 45 115Y lt? FShallotte Raingauge -30 day total 30% -70% MKSUT Raingauge
6
N
d
t 0
V
-6
Z
J -12
as
-18
V -24
cC
fn -30
? -36
O
U -42
0 00 00 00
rd
rd
rd
O O
O
0
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Slide B-3
?D
R
0
M
M