20200610 Ver 1_401 Application_20200506

DWR
mrlslon of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
April 11, 2020 Ver 3.1
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
C Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned * Version#*
20200610 1
Is a payment required for this project?*
r No payment required
What amout is owed?*
r Fee received
r $240.00
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
IT $570.00
Reviewing Office *
Select Project Reviewer*
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone]
Stephanie Goss:eads\szgoss
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Silverstone
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Lauren Norris -Heflin
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
Lauren. [e-mail]
Date Submitted
5/6/2020
Nearest Body of Water
Neuse River
Basin
Neuse
Water Classification
C, NSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.759708
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Wake
Is this a NCDMS Project
r Yes r No
Longitude:
-78.527697
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
W Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
L.1
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?

W Nationwide Permit (NWP)
r Regional General Permit (RGP)
r Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
18,29
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
r Individual Permit
29 - Residential Developments
18 - Minor Discharges
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
F- 401 Water Quality Certification - E)press
P Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
RES - Neu -Con Stream SOA - Poplar Creek - Silverstone.pdf
Wildlands - Silverstone - McClenny Acres Stream SOA 05-05-2020.pdf
Wildlands - Silverstone - Stream SOA 04-29-2020.pdf
RES - Buffer SOA - Silverstone.pdf
Wildlands - Silverstone - NFLR Buffer SOA 05-06-2020.pdf
Wildlands - Silverstone - Wolfe Buffer SOA 05-06-2020.pdf
138.95KB
515.15KB
513.08KB
121.66KB
527.51 KB
131.27KB
r Yes r No
r Yes r No
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
r Yes r No
B. Applicant Information v
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
W Owner r Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Cassa Knightdale, LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c. Responsible party:
Adam Adler
2d.Address
Street Address
801 Brickell Ave
Address Line 2
Suite 2360
city
State / Province / Region
Miami
Florida
Postal / Zip Code
Country
33131
USA

2e. Telephone Number: 2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Lauren Norris -Heflin
4b. Business Name:
Timmons Group
4c.Address
Street Address
5410 Trinity Road
Address Line 2
Suite 102
City
State / Province / Region
Raleigh
North Carolina
Rstal / Zip Code
Country
27607
USA
4d. Telephone Number: 4e. Fax Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
Lauren. [e-mail]
Agent Authorization Letter*
Silverstone - Agent Authorization and Property Owner Authorization - Completed.pdf 421.32KB
C. Project Information and Prior Project History C^U
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality/ town:
Knightdale
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
1733919712
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Hodge Road
Address Line 2
City
Knightdale
Postal / Zip Code
27545
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Neuse River
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
C; NSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Neuse
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030202011103
4. Project Description and History
2b. Property size:
158.58
State / Province / Fegion
NC
Country
USA
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*

The project site consists of approximately 158.58 acres site located southeast of the intersection of Hodge Road and Interstate 495 (Knightdale Bypass), to the west of Hodge Road and
to the east of the Neuse River in Knightdale, North Carolina within Wake County. The Site is currently occupied by mixed hardwood -dominated forested area, approximately 0.38-acres
of wetland, and 9,297 linear feet of stream. The project site is bound by residential development and mixed hardwood -pine forests to the north and south, Hodge Road to the east, and
the Neuse River to the west.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
2_Fig 1 - VIC.pdf 976.42KB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
Figure 5- NRCS Soils.pdf 723.4KB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.38
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
9,297
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The purpose of this project is to construct an affordable and family friendly residential subdivision with cohesion and the necessary amenities southwest of the Town of Knightdale.
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The proposed residential development will consist of 276 single-family lots, 103 townhomes, and associated amenities including roadway, storrnwater control measures (SCMs), and
utility improvements (i.e. public water supply and sanitary sewer alignment). The project is located to the west of Hodge Road, south of Panther Rock Blvd and east of the Neuse River.
The proposed project requires the following impacts to jurisdictional features: three (3) road crossings, one (1) drainage/road impact, nine (9) drainage impacts, three (3) 30-ft wide
utility easements associated with gravity sewer line crossings. These impacts require 0.044 acres of permanent wetland impacts, 0.024-acres of temporary wetland impact, 283 linear
feet of permanent stream impact, 137 linear feet of temporary stream impact, 34,911 square feet of permanent Zone 1 buffer impacts, and 34,239 square feet of permanent Zone 2
buffer impacts.
Additional impacts to waters of the U.S. are not proposed. The proposed project is the final and complete phase of the project with appropriate land use control measures in place for
specific areas which require them. Traditional equipment will be used consisting of front-end loaders, bulldozers, paving equipment, graders, and earth movers.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
20200505 Silverstone Environmental Impacts.pdf 11.22MB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
r Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r N/A
Corps AID Number:
unknown
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company: Soil & Environmental Consultants (S&EC)
Other:
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
Tasha Alexander of the USACE confirmed the delineation on January 9, 2018.
Sara Knies of DWR confirmed the delineation and stream buffers on January 28, 2016. A buffer determination was issued on February 8, 2016 (NBRRO# 15-519).
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
Approved Delineation Map by others.pdf 589.21KB
SilverStone - Buffer Determination Letter.pdf 6.23MB
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes C No
7b. If yes, explain.
The proposed Silverstone site Will be constructed in 6 phases. However, this application consists of all proposed impacts for the entire site (all 6 phases).
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
No.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory

1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
W Wetlands W Streams -tributaries
r Open Waters r Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
m Buffers
2a1 Reason (?)
2b. Impact type * M
2c. Type of W.
2d. W. name *
2e. Forested *
2f. Type of
Jurisdicition*(')
2g. Impact
area*
1
Road Crossing 1p
Unknown
W12
Yes
Both
0.041
(acres)
3A
Road Crossing 1p
Unknown
W11
Yes
Both
0.003
(acres)
r_-]
Utilities
f
__]
Unknown
W8
Yes
Both
0.024
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.068
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.068
2h. Comments:
The proposed road crossing impacts are required for connecting the southern and western portions of the site. The proposed utility impact is required
for the installation of the gravity sewer line. Both road crossings will include the installation of culverts along the adjacent streams to maintain the
hydrologic connection between the up gradient and down gradient areas.
Impact 7B is associated with the installation of a gravity sewer line and is considered a permanent, no net loss impact. The proposed sewer line will be
installed through temporary ground disturbance for open cut installation which is anticipated to cause temporary disturbance to the portions of the
wetland area located within the 30-ft wide easement. Upon completion of the temporary impacts, the area will be restored to pre -project contours and
elevations, stabilized, and re -seeded with a riparian mix
3. Stream Impacts
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.lmpact type *
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name *
3e. Stream Type *
3f. Type of
3g. S. width *
3h. Impact
❑
(?) IIJurisdiction*
length*
Road Crossing 1
9 ( )
Permanent
Other
Stream J
Perennial
Both
5
F12
en feet)
S2
Road Crossing (1)
Temporary
Other
Stream J
Perennial
Both
7
12
Average (feet)
(lir�rfeet)
S3
Road Crossing 2A
9 ( )
Permanent
Other
Stream H
Perennial
Both
3
118
Average (feet)
(linearfeet)
S4
Road Crossing (2A)
Temporary
Other
Stream H
Perennial
Both
3
10
Average (feet)
(lir�rfeet)
S5
Road Crossing 3A
9 ( )
Permanent
Other
Stream G
Intermittent
Both
3
39
Average (feet)
(linearfeet)
S6
Road Crossing (3A)
Temporary
Other
Stream G
Intermittent
Both
3Average
5(li
(feet)
zarfeet)
87
Utilities (513)
Temporary
Other
Stream H
Perennial
Both
6
45
Average (feet)
(linearfeet)
gg
Utilities (713)
Temporary
Other
Stream H
Perennial
Both
6Average
3(li
(feet)
�rfee )
S9
Utilities (10A)
Temporary
Other
Stream D
Perennial
Both
12
34
Average (feet)
(linearfeet)
31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
31. Total permanent stream impacts:
283
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
420
3j. Comments:
31. Total temporary stream impacts:
137

All permanent stream impacts are associated with road crossings required for connecting the southern and western portions of the site. Culverts will
be installed along each stream segment at these road crossings and will count toward compensatory mitigation. Culvert details, including the plan and
profile, for each road crossing are included in the attached Impact Maps.
The proposed temporary utility impacts are required for the installation of the gravity sewer line. The proposed sewer line will be installed through
open cut. Upon completion of the temporary impacts, the streambed will be restored to pre -project elevations and widths using natural streambed
material. The trench will be backfilled with the excavated natural streambed material to a depth of at least 12-inches or to bottom depth of impact area,
whichever is shallower. Streambanks will be restored to pre -project grade and contours.
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)?
Check all that apply.
17 Nauss r Tar -Pamlico
r Catawba r Randleman
r Goose Creek r Jordan Lake
r Other
6b. Impact Type
6c. Per or Temp
6d. Stream name
6e. Buffer mitigation required?
6f. Zone 1 impact
6g. Zone 2 impact
Road Crossing (1)
P
Stream J
Yes
8,341
6,557
Road Crossing (2A)
P
Stream H
No
7,720
5,083
Drainage (213)
P
Stream H
No
863
840
Road Crossing (3A)
P
Stream G
No
4,025
4,476
Drainage (313)
P
Stream G
No
621
431
Drainage (4A)
P
Stream H
No
842
461
Drainage (413)
P
Stream J
No
891
547
Drainage (5A)
P
Stream H
No
630
456
Utilities (513)
P
Stream H
Yes
2,855
1,475
Utilities (513)
P
Stream H
No
0
1,567
Drainage for road crossing (6)
P
Stream F
Yes
357
416
Drainage (7A)
P
Stream H
No
676
482
Utilities (713)
P
Stream H
Yes
3,238
1,191
Utilities (7C)
P
Stream H
Yes
0
7,457
Utilities (8)
P
Stream D
No
591
406
Utilities (9)
P
Stream D
No
623
428
Utilities (10A)
P
Stream D
Yes
2,034
1,563
Drainage (1013)
P
Stream D
No
604
403
6h. Total buffer impacts:
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Temporary impacts: 0.00 0.00
Zone 1
Zone 2
Total Permanent impacts: 34,911.00
34,239.00
Zone 1
Zone 2
Total combined buffer impacts: 34,911.00
34,239.00
6i. Comments:
The proposed road crossing impacts are required for connecting the southern and western portions of the site.
The proposed utility impacts are required for the installation of the gravity sewer line.
The proposed drainage impacts are required for drainage of the SCMs on -site.
The proposed drainage for road crossing impact (#6) is required to connect a naturally low area located outside of the project's limits of disturbance
with the down -slope area.
Supporting Documentation
20200505 Silverstone Environmental Impacts.pdf 11.22MB

E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Impacts to jurisdictional features have been avoided and minimized to the maximum extent practicable by incorporating resourceful site planning,
including the utilization of the wetland delineation to adjust the layout to avoid and minimize impacts during the design phase of the project. The
proposed impacts are required in order for the project's goals to be realized.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Proper sedimentation and erosion control methods will be utilized during all phases of construction and installation as described in accordance with
the requirements of the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual (May 2013)
and local codes. All work will take place during dry conditions and can be facilitated from high , non -jurisdictional, stable ground. The contractor shall
install silt fence, inlet protection, sediment traps, diversion ditches, temporary coffer dams, tree protection, and cleaning only as necessary to install
devices. All erosion and sediment control measures Will be checked for stability and operation following every runoff producing rainfall, but in no case
less than once every week. Any needed repairs will be made immediately to maintain all measures designed. An erosion control inspections report is
required and Will be kept by the owner's representative.
Measures will be taken to prevent oil, tar, trash, debris and other pollutants from entering the adjacent jurisdictional features. Any excess excavated
materials not utilized as back fill will be placed and contained within upland areas and permanently stabilized to prevent erosion into adjacent
jurisdictional features. Therefore, stockpiling of excavated material within jurisdictional waters of the U.S. will be strictly prohibited as part of the
construction of this project. All project construction activities initialed within jurisdictional waters of the U.S. will be carried to completion in an
expeditious manner to minimize the period of disturbance within jurisdictional waters.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes r No
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
IW DWR W Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?
W Mitigation bank r Payment to in -lieu fee r Permittee Responsible
program Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
Wildlands Engineering and/or RES
3b. Credits Purchased/Requested (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Quantity:
Stream 566
Riparian buffer 67,278
Attach Receipt and/or letter
RES - Neu -Con Stream SOA - Poplar Creek - Silverstone.pdf
138.95KB
Wildlands - Silverstone - McClenny Acres Stream SOA 05-05-2020.pdf
515.15KB
Wildlands - Silverstone - Stream SOA 04-29-2020.pdf
513.08KB
RES - Buffer SOA - Silverstone.pdf
121.66KB
Wildlands - Silverstone - NFLR Buffer SOA 05-06-2020.pdf
527.51 KB
Wildlands - Silverstone - Wolfe Buffer SOA 05-06-2020.pdf
131.27KB
3c. Comments
Wildlands Engineering was contacted for stream and buffer mitigation credits. Stream credits are available through Wildlands Holdings III, LLC, and
buffer credits are available through Wildlands Holdings V, LLC. Upon consultation with Wildlands, they currently only have partial stream credits
(341.3-ft) available. Further, both stream and buffer credits may no longer be available at the time of permit issuance.
Therefore, additional SOAs for the required stream and buffer mitigation credits were obtained from RES.
6. Buffer mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWR
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? If yes, you must fill out this entire form - please contact DWR for more
information.
r Yes r- No
6b. If yes, then identifythe square feet of impact.
6c. Reason for impact
6d. Total impact
Multiplier
6e. Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
ings, drainages, and sewer line
Enstalcla�bon
16,825
3
50,475

Zone 2 road crossings, drainages, and sewer line 11,202 1.5 16,803
installation
6f. Total buffer mitigation required
67278
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, is payment to a mitigation bank or NC Division of Mitigation Services proposed?
r Yes r No
6h. Attach the acceptance letter from the mitigation bank or NC Division of Mitigation Services.
RES - Buffer SOA - Silverstone.pdf 121.66KB
Wildlands - Silverstone - NFLR Buffer SOA 05-06-2020.pdf 527.51 KB
Wildlands - Silverstone - Wolfe Buffer SOA 05-06-2020.pdf 131.27KB
6j. Comments:
Impact 1 is a perpendicular road crossing which will result in impacts to more than 1/3-acre or the riparian buffer and is therefore Allowable with
Mitigation.
Zone 1 and Zone 2 Impacts associated with Impact 5B, 7B, and 10A are perpendicular sanitary sewer line utility impacts with a width of greater than
10-ft, and are therefore Allowable with Mitigation. A portion of impact 513 (1,567-sq. ft. in Zone 2) and impact 7C consist of non -perpendicular Zone 2
utility line impacts and are therefore Allowable, not requiring mitigation.
Impact 6 is a proposed drainage associated with a road crossing impact. f is required to connect a naturally low area located outside of the project's
limits of disturbance with the down -slope area. As a road crossing impact that is not a stream crossing it is Allowable with Mitigation.
Impacts 2A and 3A are perpendicular road crossings that impact less than 150-linear feet of buffer and less than 1/3-acre of buffer, and are therefore
Allowable.
Impacts 2B, 313, 4A, 4B, 5A, 7A, 8, 9, and 10B are new drainages from proposed SCMs which will control nitrogen and attenuate flow, and are
therefore Allowable.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes r No
What type of SCM are you providing?
r Level Spreader
r Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
r Wetland Swale (higher SMNT)
V Other SCM that removes minimum 30 % nitrogen
f Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
Diffuse Flow Documentation
20200505 Silverstone Environmental Impacts.pdf 11.22MB
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15ANCAC 02H .1003(2)?
(- Yes r No
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater
program?
r Yes r No
r N/A - project disturbs < 1 acre
2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply:
W Local Government r State
Local Government Stormwater Programs
GI Phase II W NSW r USMP f Water Supply
Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.
Knightdale
Comments:
Knightdale will review the stormwater management plan for this site. Water quality treatment and water quantity control will be provided through the use of SCMs designed to capture
storm precipitation and release it slowly.
G. Supplementary Information

1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r Yes r No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? *
r Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The proposed project is single and complete and is not anticipated to result in additional impacts.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r Nor NIA
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r Yes r No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?'
r Yes r No
51. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
USFWS IPaC noted 6 species with the potential to occur in the vicinity of the project area. These include the red -cockaded woodpecker, the Neuse
River waterdog, the Carolina madtom, the Atlantic pigtoe, the dwarf wedgmussel, and Michauxts sumac. There are no critical habitats in our project
area according to USFSW IPaC.
The red -cockaded woodpecker's habitat includes pine trees 60 years old or older. The project occurs on a site that was clearcut in 2013. This has led
to a dense mid -story and understory habitat which is not conducive to RCW foraging habitat. The project should have no effect on the red -cockaded
woodpecker.
The Neuse river voterdog, Carolina madtom, and Atlantic pigtoe all prefer habitat with excellent water quality, which does not include the streams on
this site. Further, the site is not located within critical habitat areas for any of these species. The project therefore may affect, but is not likely to
adversely affect these species.
Dwarf wedgemussel can be found in the Swift Creek sub -basin, which does not include our project area. The proposed project may affect, but should
not adversely affect the dwarf wedgemussel.
Michaux's sumac prefers open, disturbed areas as habitat. Due to the clearcut in 2013, the understory and mid -story are too dense to support
Michawes sumac. The proposed project should have no effect on Michawes sumac.
According to NCNHP, there is NHP Natural Area within the project area along the Neuse River. Dwarf Wedgemussel was observed in the project area
in 1951 and Neuse river wraterdog was observed in 1987. There have been no recent sightings of either species, according to NCNHP. Further, it
should be noted that the project review area overlaps with a portion of the Neuse River, which will not be impacted.
Consultation Documentation Upload
USFWS_ Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office.pdf 159.66KB
NCNHP_Silverstone.pdf 1.34MB

6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
NOAA Essential Fish Habitat Mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
The State Historic Preservation Office Historic Properties Map was reviewed to determine if the site has the potential to impact historic resources. The
map showed 26 surveyed sites within 1 mile of the project Site. There was one surveyed resource formerly on -site (River Plantation, WA3681) which is
no longer extant.
No historic resources listed on or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places were identified within or in the vicinity of the Site.
Therefore, the proposed project should have no effect on historic resources.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
04.22.20_NCSHPO Map.pdf 284.81 KB
04.22.20_NCSHPO Data.pdf 207.74KB
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
r Yes r No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMArequire ments:
Partof the western portion of the site is located within the regulatory 100-year floodplain, portions of Zone AE with a base flood elevation of 174-ft
above mean sea level. Impacts to the floodplain were minimized to the maAmum extent practicable.
Proposed impacts 9, 10A, and 10B fall within this area and are therefore proposed to be permitted under NWP 18. Total impacts associated with 9,
10A, and 10B are: 34-ft (396-sq. ft.) of temporary stream impact for gravity sewer line installation, 2,034-sq. ft. of Zone 1 Buffer Impact & 1,563-sq. ft.
of Zone 2 Buffer Impact for gravity sewer line installation, and 1,227-sq. ft. of Zone 1 Buffer Impact & 831-sq. ft. of Zone 2 Buffer Impact for drainage of
SCMs which will attenuate flow and control nitrogen.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FEMA Flood Insurance Maps #3720173300J and #3720174300J (effective 5/2/2006) were used. The project's western side is located within Zone AE,
which is an area of special flood hazard area/part of the 100-year floodplain. Base flood elevation is at 174 feet.
A portion of the regulatory floodway is located along the western site boundary along the Neuse River but will remain undisturbed. The rest of the site
is in Zone X which is an area of minimal flood hazard outside of the 100-year floodplain.
Miscellaneous
Comments
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
Signature
jJ By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Lauren A. Norris -Heflin
Signature
Date
5/6/2020
U

 541o Trinity Rd. Suite 112 | Raleigh, NC 27607 TEL [phone] FAX [phone] Site Development | Residential | Infrastructure | Technology www.timmons.com

AGENT AUTHORIZATION and
PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION FORM

All Blanks to be Filled in by Current Landowner

The Department of the Army
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District
PO Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890

NCDEQ – Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650

To Whom It May Concern:

I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein, do
authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon
the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations and issuing a
determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.
This the ________ day of ________________, 2020_.
(number) (Month) (Year)

This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.

Project Name: Silverstone________________ Location: Knightdale, NC________

Property Owner’s Name (Print):________________________________________________________

Property Owner’s Signature:___________________________________________________________

Property Owner’s Mailing Address:______________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________

Property Owner’s Telephone:_________________________ Fax No. __________________________

Property Owner’s Email Address:_______________________________________________________

U.S.G.S . QUADRANGLE(S):DATE(S ):WATERSHED(S):HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE(S):
TIMMONS GROUP JOB NUMBER:PROJECT STUDY LIMITS:LATITUDE:LONGITUDE:
SILVERST ONE SUBDIVISIONWAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINAFIGURE 1: VICINITY MAP
37910
35°45'34.95"N 78°31'39.71"W
164.3 ACRES RALEIGH EAST1998
03020201UPPER NEUSE
These plans and associated documents are the exclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP and may not be reproduced in whole or in part and shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever, inclusive, but not limited to construction, bidding, and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.
Path: \\tg-radc\RAProj\805\37910 - Silverstone\GIS\Comm on S hared E xhibits\37910-VIC.mxd
5
0 3,200 6,400 9,600 12,800Feet
Site limits are approximate.Topographic imagery from USGS.
Site Limits
U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE(S):DATE(S):WATERSHED(S):HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE(S):
TIMMONS GROUP JOB NUMBER :PROJECT STUD Y LIMITS:LATITUDE:LON GITUDE:
SILVERSTONEWAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINAFIGURE 5: NR CS SOILS
44872
35.759915-78.527332
145.3 ACRES RALEIGH EAST2016
03020201UPPER NEUSE (NEUSE RIVER BASIN)
These plans and associated docum ents are the exclusive property of TIM MONS GRO UP and may not be reproduced in whole or in part and shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever, inclusive, but not limited to construction, bidding, and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIM MONS GRO UP.
Path: Y:\805\44872 - Silverstone\GIS\44872-JD-NRCS_Soils.mxd
5
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000Feet
Site limits are approximate.Soils from NRC S Wake, Co. Soil Survey (1970)
Silverstone
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri
Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c)
OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Local districts & boundaries
Local individual resources & centerpoints
Local Landmark
Local Landmark, Gone
Local HD Center Point
Surveyed Only individual resources & centerpoints
Surveyed Only
Surveyed in NRHD
Surveyed Only, Gone
Surveyed in NRHD, Gone
Blockface- Multiple properties
Blockface in NRHD
4/22/2020 4:52:29 PM 0 0.25 0.50.13 mi
0 0.4 0.80.2 km
1:18,056
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office
Town of Cary, Johnston County, State of North Carolina DOT, Esri, HERE, Garmin, INCREMENT P, NGA, USGS | Esri, HERE |
OBJECTID Id Site ID Status Local StatusHD status Site Name DescriptionNotes Internal Year NR Year SL Year DOE Year LandmarkYear SurveyedNR nominationDOE Report or Local LinkCountyQuad NameTownship Density Location Photo Link Spatial AccuracyLatitude Longitude Year Survey Updatex y
128793 0 WA0282 SO None None House c. 1910 bungalow Wake Garner St. MatthewsL W side SR 2516, 0.5 mi S of SR 1007 Knightdale vicinity35.74753 -78.5168 -8740448 4265939
132334 0 WA-R130 SO None None House 1940s Wake Raleigh EastSt. MatthewsH W side SR 2516, 0.2 mi N of SR 1007 2408 Hodge Road Not sp*35.7584 -78.5188 -8740678 4267430
159326 0 WA7102 SO None None House c. 1955 brick RanchIneligible 2012; CH 98-0457; WA Co Rpt #540; R-2721 2012 https://files.nc.gov/ncdcr/historic-preservation-office/PDFs/CH 98-0457.pdf#page=Wake Raleigh EastSt. MatthewsL 5101 Faison Ridge Road Garner vicinity[Report]35.76727 -78.5171 -8740489 4268646
159327 0 WA7101 SO None None House c. 1955 RanchIneligible 2012; CH 98-0457; WA Co Rpt #540; R-2721 2012 https://files.nc.gov/ncdcr/historic-preservation-office/PDFs/CH 98-0457.pdf#page=Wake Raleigh EastSt. MatthewsL 5113 Faison Ridge Road Garner vicinity[Report]35.76697 -78.5181 -8740599 4268605
159328 0 WA7100 SO None None House c. 1955 concrete block RanchIneligible 2012; CH 98-0457; WA Co Rpt #540; R-2721 2012 https://files.nc.gov/ncdcr/historic-preservation-office/PDFs/CH 98-0457.pdf#page=Wake Raleigh EastSt. MatthewsL 5117 Faison Ridge Road Garner vicinity[Report]35.76684 -78.5185 -8740642 4268587
159329 0 WA7091 SO None None House c. 1910 19th-20th C. trad/vernIneligible 2012; CH 98-0457; WA Co Rpt #540; R-2721 2012 https://files.nc.gov/ncdcr/historic-preservation-office/PDFs/CH 98-0457.pdf#page=Wake Raleigh EastSt. MatthewsL 7409 Poole Road Garner vicinity[Report]35.75541 -78.5118 -8739898 4267019
159330 0 WA7090 SO None None House c. 1925 Craftsman/bungalowIneligible 2012; CH 98-0457; WA Co Rpt #540; R-2721 2012 https://files.nc.gov/ncdcr/historic-preservation-office/PDFs/CH 98-0457.pdf#page=Wake Raleigh EastSt. MatthewsL 7317 Poole Road Garner vicinity[Report]35.75521 -78.5154 -8740293 4266991
159347 0 WA7086 SO None None House c. 1900 Weatherboard:Plain 19th-20th C. trad/vernIneligible 2012; CH 98-0457; WA Co Rpt #540; R-2721 2012 https://files.nc.gov/ncdcr/historic-preservation-office/PDFs/CH 98-0457.pdf#page=408WakeGarnerSt. MatthewsL 3033 Hodge Road Garner vicinity[Report]35.74485 -78.5165 -8740416 4265570
162213 0 WA7098 SO None None House c. 1955 brick RanchIneligible 2012; CH 98-0457; WA Co Rpt #540; R-2721 2012 https://files.nc.gov/ncdcr/historic-preservation-office/PDFs/CH 98-0457.pdf#page=408WakeRaleigh EastSt. MatthewsL 502 Ellen Drive Garner vicinity[Report]35.76671 -78.5172 -8740491 4268570
162214 0 WA7099 SO None None House c. 1955 brick RanchIneligible 2012; CH 98-0457; WA Co Rpt #540; R-2721 2012 https://files.nc.gov/ncdcr/historic-preservation-office/PDFs/CH 98-0457.pdf#page=408WakeRaleigh EastSt. MatthewsL 5125 Faison Ridge Lane Garner vicinity[Report]35.76658 -78.5193 -8740728 4268551
162215 0 WA7097 SO None None House c. 1955 brick RanchIneligible 2012; CH 98-0457; WA Co Rpt #540; R-2721 2012 https://files.nc.gov/ncdcr/historic-preservation-office/PDFs/CH 98-0457.pdf#page=408WakeRaleigh EastSt. MatthewsL 508 Ellen Drive Garner vicinity[Report]35.76631 -78.5184 -8740626 4268514
162216 0 WA7096 SO None None House c. 1955 brick RanchIneligible 2012; CH 98-0457; WA Co Rpt #540; R-2721 2012 https://files.nc.gov/ncdcr/historic-preservation-office/PDFs/CH 98-0457.pdf#page=408WakeRaleigh EastSt. MatthewsL 510 Ellen Drive Garner vicinity[Report]35.76618 -78.5188 -8740669 4268496
162291 0 WA7087 SO None None House c. 1948 Minimal TraditionalIneligible 2012; CH 98-0457; WA Co Rpt #540; R-2721 2012 https://files.nc.gov/ncdcr/historic-preservation-office/PDFs/CH 98-0457.pdf#page=408WakeGarnerSt. MatthewsL 2905 Hodge Road Garner vicinity[Report]35.74618 -78.5156 -8740314 4265753
186135 0 WA7103 SO None None House c. 1960 brick RanchIneligible 2012; CH 98-0457; WA Co Rpt #540; R-2721 2012 https://files.nc.gov/ncdcr/historic-preservation-office/PDFs/CH 98-0457.pdf#page=Wake Raleigh EastSt. MatthewsL 4716 Old Faison Road Garner vicinity[Report]35.77378 -78.5053 -8739176 4269539
186137 107120 WA7094 SO None None House 1900-1910 1-story hip roof houseIneligible 2012; CH 98-0457; WA Co Rpt #540; R-2721Formerly assigned Site ID WA-R129 https://files.nc.gov/ncdcr/historic-preservation-office/PDFs/CH 98-0457.pdf#page=Wake Raleigh EastSt. MatthewsL 2405 Hidge Rd, Garner[Report]35.75927 -78.5171 -8740484 4267548
186138 0 WA7092 SO None None Store c. 1950 concrete block Std Comm/IndustIneligible 2012; CH 98-0457; WA Co Rpt #540; R-2721 2012 https://files.nc.gov/ncdcr/historic-preservation-office/PDFs/CH 98-0457.pdf#page=Wake Raleigh EastSt. MatthewsL 2429 Hodge Road Garner vicinity[Report]35.75476 -78.5166 -8740432 4266930
187199 WA1674 SD None None Farm Complex (Gone)1900-1915 farm complexGone between 1993-1998 Wake Raleigh EastSt. MatthewsH E side SR 2516, 0.5 mi N of SR 2515[USGS]35.77548 -78.5238 -8741224 4269772
187200 WA1673 SD None None Vinson-Wall House (Gone)c. 1910-1920s traditional form houseGone between 2005-2010 Wake Raleigh EastSt. MatthewsH NE jct SR 2515 & SR 2516[USGS]35.76748 -78.5189 -8740686 4268674
187204 WA7104 SO None None House c. 1920 1-story side gable19th-20th c. trad/vern houseIneligible 2012; CH 98-0457; WA Co Rpt #540; R-2721 https://files.nc.gov/ncdcr/historic-preservation-office/PDFs/CH 98-0457.pdf#page=408WakeRaleigh EastSt. MatthewsH 4100 Clifton Road [PIN]35.77065 -78.5032 -8738935 4269109
187209 WA4215 SO None None Jeffreys Cemetery Wake Raleigh EastSt. MatthewsH N side SR 1007, 0.8 mi. E of SR 2516[Addr]35.75374 -78.5037 -8738989 4266789
187210 WA7089 SO None None House c. 1910 1-story Triple A 19th-20th c. trad/vern houseIneligible 2012; CH 98-0457; WA Co Rpt #540; R-2721 https://files.nc.gov/ncdcr/historic-preservation-office/PDFs/CH 98-0457.pdf#page=408WakeRaleigh EastSt. MatthewsH 2709 Hodge Road [Report]35.75066 -78.5161 -8740368 4266367
187211 WA4214 SO None None Anderson Point Farm (Current site)Appears to have been moved about 1000' S from original site between 1999-2005 Wake Raleigh EastSt. MatthewsH End of SR 2517 between Neuse River & Crabtree Creek[Addr]35.76952 -78.5428 -8743343 4268955
190989 8943 WA3681 SD None None River Plantation (Gone)c. 1825 1 1/2-story gable roof frame house w/ ruinous fieldstone chimneysLocation is approximateThis & other parcels nearby listed as "Hinton Land" / File no help in pinpointing Wake Raleigh EastSt. MatthewsH Between SR 2516 and Neuse River[File]35.75859 -78.5318 -8742123 4267455
199464 107121 WA7095 SA None None Ellendale Subdivisionc. 1960 RanchesIneligible 2012; CH 98-0457; WA Co Rpt #540; R-2721 https://files.nc.gov/ncdcr/historic-preservation-office/PDFs/CH 98-0457.pdf#page=408WakeRaleigh EastSt. MatthewsH Ellen Drive and Faison Ridge Road, Knightdale[Report]35.76666 -78.5182 -8740608 4268563
199589 0 WA7088 SO None None House c. 1940 asbestos shingle Craftsman/bungalowIneligible 2012; CH 98-0457; WA Co Rpt #540; R-2721 2012 https://files.nc.gov/ncdcr/historic-preservation-office/PDFs/CH 98-0457.pdf#page=Wake Garner St. MatthewsL 2737 Hodge Road Garner vicinity[Report]35.74907 -78.5161 -8740371 4266149
199631 WA7093 BF None None Houses c. 1948 1 1/2-story cross gable frame houseIneligible 2012; CH 98-0457; WA Co Rpt #540; R-2721Formerly assigned Site ID WA-R131 https://files.nc.gov/ncdcr/historic-preservation-office/PDFs/CH 98-0457.pdf#page=408WakeRaleigh EastSt. MatthewsH 2429 Hodge Rd, Garner[Report]35.75763 -78.5171 -8740485 4267324
March 16, 2020
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2020-SLI-0864
Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-01944
Project Name: Silverstone

Subject:List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The species list generated pursuant to the information you provided identifies threatened,
endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical
habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally-listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally-protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or
03/16/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-01944   2

evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally-listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally-protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require
development of an eagle conservation plan (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/
eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects should follow the wind energy
guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and
bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http://
www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm; http://
www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/
comtow.html.
Not all Threatened and Endangered Species that occur in North Carolina are subject to section 7
consultation with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon, sea
turtles,when in the water, and certain marine mammals are under purview of the National Marine
Fisheries Service. If your project occurs in marine, estuarine, or coastal river systems you should
also contact the National Marine Fisheries Service, http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis
of this office at [e-mail].
03/16/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-01944   3

▪
Attachment(s):
Official Species List
03/16/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-01944   1

Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]
03/16/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-01944   2

Project Summary
Consultation Code:04EN2000-2020-SLI-0864
Event Code:04EN2000-2020-E-01944
Project Name:Silverstone
Project Type:** OTHER **
Project Description:Residential project
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www.google.com/maps/place/35.76157493302743N78.52127347106378W
Counties:Wake, NC
03/16/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-01944   3

1.
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 6 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheries , as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Birds
NAME STATUS
Red-cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Endangered
Amphibians
NAME STATUS
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
Proposed
Threatened
Fishes
NAME STATUS
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528
Proposed
Endangered
1
03/16/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-01944   4

Clams
NAME STATUS
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164
Proposed
Threatened
Dwarf Wedgemussel Alasmidonta heterodon
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/784
Endangered
Flowering Plants
NAME STATUS
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
Endangered
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.
NCNHDE-11641
March 16, 2020
Kate Hefner
Timmons Group
5410 Trinity Road
Raleigh, NC 27606
RE: Silverstone
Dear Kate Hefner:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project
boundary. These results are presented in the attached ‘Documented Occurrences’ tables and map.
The attached ‘Potential Occurrences’ table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one-mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one-mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally-listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one-mile
radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional
correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Clean Water
Management Trust Fund easement, or an occurrence of a Federally-listed species is documented
near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at [e-mail] or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Intersecting the Project Area
Silverstone
March 16, 2020
NCNHDE-11641
Element Occurrences Documented Within Project Area
Taxonomic
Group
EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last
Observation
Date
Element
Occurrence
Rank
Accuracy Federal
Status
State
Status
Global
Rank
State
Rank
Amphibian 8259 Necturus lewisi Neuse River Waterdog 1987-01-13 H 3-Medium Proposed
Threatened
Special
Concern
G2 S2
Crustacean 29723 Orconectes
carolinensis
North Carolina Spiny
Crayfish
2015-10-30 E 3-Medium ---Special
Concern
G3 S3
Freshwater
Bivalve
7699 Alasmidonta
heterodon
Dwarf Wedgemussel 1951 H 3-Medium Endangered Endangered G1G2 S1
Freshwater
Bivalve
25712 Alasmidonta undulata Triangle Floater 2016-12-23 E 3-Medium ---Threatened G4 S3
Freshwater
Bivalve
7828 Elliptio roanokensis Roanoke Slabshell 2016-12-23 E 3-Medium ---Special
Concern
G3 S3
Freshwater
Bivalve
19137 Lampsilis radiata Eastern Lampmussel 2016-07-28 E 3-Medium ---Threatened G5 S3
Freshwater
Bivalve
28706 Lasmigona subviridis Green Floater 2016-07-28 E 3-Medium ---Endangered G3 S2
Natural
Community
29776 Piedmont Bottomland
Forest (Typic Low
Subtype)
---2002-05-29 BC 3-Medium ------G2?S2
Natural
Community
29775 Piedmont Levee Forest
(Typic Subtype)
---2002-05-29 BC 3-Medium ------G3G4 S3S4
Natural Areas Documented Within Project Area
Site Name Representational Rating Collective Rating
Neuse River (Clayton) Forests R2 (Very High)C4 (Moderate)
Managed Areas Documented Within Project Area*
Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type
City of Raleigh Greenway - Neuse River Greenway City of Raleigh Local Government
*NOTE: If the proposed project intersects with a conservation/managed area, please contact the landowner directly for additional information. If the project intersects with a Dedicated Nature Preserve
(DNP), Registered Natural Heritage Area (RHA), or Federally-listed species, NCNHP staff may provide additional correspondence regarding the project.
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/content/help. Data query generated on March 16, 2020; source: NCNHP, Q1 Jan 2020.
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 6
Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Silverstone
March 16, 2020
NCNHDE-11641
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic
Group
EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last
Observation
Date
Element
Occurrence
Rank
Accuracy Federal
Status
State
Status
Global
Rank
State
Rank
Amphibian 8259 Necturus lewisi Neuse River Waterdog 1987-01-13 H 3-Medium Proposed
Threatened
Special
Concern
G2 S2
Crustacean 29723 Orconectes
carolinensis
North Carolina Spiny
Crayfish
2015-10-30 E 3-Medium ---Special
Concern
G3 S3
Dragonfly or
Damselfly
32043 Coryphaeschna ingens Regal Darner 2004-Pre H?5-Very
Low
---Significantly
Rare
G5 S2?
Freshwater
Bivalve
7699 Alasmidonta
heterodon
Dwarf Wedgemussel 1951 H 3-Medium Endangered Endangered G1G2 S1
Freshwater
Bivalve
25712 Alasmidonta undulata Triangle Floater 2016-12-23 E 3-Medium ---Threatened G4 S3
Freshwater
Bivalve
7828 Elliptio roanokensis Roanoke Slabshell 2016-12-23 E 3-Medium ---Special
Concern
G3 S3
Freshwater
Bivalve
11071 Fusconaia masoni Atlantic Pigtoe 1951 H 3-Medium Proposed
Threatened
Endangered G2 S3
Freshwater
Bivalve
19137 Lampsilis radiata Eastern Lampmussel 2016-07-28 E 3-Medium ---Threatened G5 S3
Freshwater
Bivalve
28706 Lasmigona subviridis Green Floater 2016-07-28 E 3-Medium ---Endangered G3 S2
Freshwater
Bivalve
28707 Strophitus undulatus Creeper 2010-07-26 E 3-Medium ---Threatened G5 S3
Freshwater
Bivalve
15066 Villosa constricta Notched Rainbow 1951 H 3-Medium ---Threatened G3 S3
Freshwater Fish 10676 Noturus furiosus Carolina Madtom 1902-08-18 H 3-Medium Proposed
Endangered
Threatened G2 S2
Natural
Community
29776 Piedmont Bottomland
Forest (Typic Low
Subtype)
---2002-05-29 BC 3-Medium ------G2?S2
Natural
Community
29775 Piedmont Levee Forest
(Typic Subtype)
---2002-05-29 BC 3-Medium ------G3G4 S3S4
Vascular Plant 8079 Rhus michauxii Michaux's Sumac 2019-09-25 CD 2-High Endangered Endangered G2G3 S2
Vascular Plant 39143 Scutellaria nervosa Veined Skullcap 2019-05-14 BC 2-High ---Endangered G5 S1
Page 3 of 6
Natural Areas Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Site Name Representational Rating Collective Rating
Neuse River (Clayton) Forests R2 (Very High)C4 (Moderate)
Walnut Creek Sumac Site R4 (Moderate)C5 (General)
Managed Areas Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type
City of Raleigh Open Space City of Raleigh Local Government
City of Raleigh Greenway - Neuse River Greenway City of Raleigh Local Government
Town of Knightdale Open Space Town of Knightdale Local Government
NC Clean Water Management Trust Fund Funded
Project
NC DNCR, Clean Water Management Trust
Fund
State
NC Department of Transportation Mitigation Site NC Department of Transportation State
City of Raleigh Open Space - Anderson Point Park City of Raleigh Local Government
Town of Knightdale Greenway Town of Knightdale Local Government
Town of Knightdale Greenway - Mingo Creek
Greenway
Town of Knightdale Local Government
City of Raleigh Greenway - Lower Walnut Creek
Greenway
City of Raleigh Local Government
City of Raleigh Open Space - Poole Road Canoe
Access Area
City of Raleigh Local Government
City of Raleigh Open Space - Anderson Point River
Access
City of Raleigh Local Government
Town of Knightdale Open Space Town of Knightdale Local Government
City of Raleigh Greenway - Neuse River Greenway City of Raleigh Local Government
Wake County Easement Wake County Private
City of Raleigh Greenway City of Raleigh Local Government
Town of Knightdale Open Space Town of Knightdale Local Government
City of Raleigh Greenway - Neuse River Greenway City of Raleigh Local Government
City of Raleigh Open Space - Planned
Neighborhood Park NPS33
City of Raleigh Local Government
City of Raleigh Easement City of Raleigh Private
City of Raleigh Open Space City of Raleigh Local Government
City of Raleigh Greenway - Neuse River Greenway City of Raleigh Local Government
City of Raleigh Greenway City of Raleigh Local Government
City of Raleigh Open Space City of Raleigh Local Government
City of Raleigh Greenway - Neuse River Greenway City of Raleigh Local Government
Town of Knightdale Open Space Town of Knightdale Local Government
City of Raleigh Open Space City of Raleigh Local Government
City of Raleigh Open Space City of Raleigh Local Government
Page 4 of 6
Managed Areas Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type
City of Raleigh Open Space City of Raleigh Local Government
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/content/help. Data query generated on March 16, 2020; source: NCNHP, Q1 Jan 2020.
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 5 of 6
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Page 6 of 6