20031190 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20030926

F fil L E
Triage Check List
Date: Project Name:
63- t I C0
DWQ#:
County: )In" s''`'ue
To: ? ARO Mike Parker ? WaRO Tom Steffens
? FRO Ke B,v' to ? WiRO Noelle Lutheran
MRO _ ? WSRO Daryl Lamb
RRO Steve Mitchell
From: Colo _ Telephone : (919)

The file attached is being forwarded to your for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
? Wetlan d determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
nimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Meuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
? Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
Check drawings for accuracy
Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
Comments: C _-Ck?_n tl7 '
e

J
i

l

Carolina Wetland Services
Isolated Wetlands Permit
T
Toll Brothers Site - Phase I
Union County, North Carolina
Carolina Wetland Services Project No. 2003-0345
September 15, 2003
Prepared For:
Mr. Bob Kardos, Regional Manager
Toll Brothers
10800 Sikes Place, Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28277
[phone]
and
Mr. Rich Keagy, P.E.
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
5265 Parkway Plaza Boulevard, Suite 130
' Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
[phone]
t+r??
f`
`'
1 ?l ,
a
AETLANDS1401Cftp
`ATERQUALITY
SECTjON
Prepared By:
' Mr. Gregory C. Antemann, P.W.S.
Mr. Isaac J. Hinson
t Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
5000 Nations Crossing Road, Suite 230
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
' [phone]
5000 Nations Crossing Road, Suite 230 • Charlotte, NC 28217 • [phone] Office • [phone] Fax
??l www.carolinawetlandservices.com

Toll Brothers Site - Phase I September 15, 2003
Isolated Wetlands Permit Application Project No. 2003-0345

Table of Contents
Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................... 1
Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................................... 2
Current Land Use ...............................................................................................................................

Jurisdictional Delineation .................................................................................................................. 3
Pre-Application Meetings ................................................................................................................. 4
Agency Correspondence ........................................................................................................................ 5
' Purpose and Need for the Project .......................................................................................................... 5
Avoidance and Minimization ................................................................................................................ 5
Proposed Impacts to On-Site Features ...................................................................................................
Com
ensator
Miti
ation 6
6
p
y
g
......................................................................................................................
' List of Attachments
Attachment A - Figure 1. USGS Site Location Map
' Attachment A - Figure 2. NRCS Soil Survey
Attachment A - Figure 3. Wetland Boundary Survey
Attachment B - Agent Certification of Authorization Form
Attachment C - Isolated Wetlands Notification Application
Attachment D - Routine On-Site Data Forms
Attachment E - Stream Classification Forms
Attachment F Representative Photographs
' =
Attachment G - Agency Correspondence
Attachment H Figures 4a and 4b. Proposed Impacts

1
Toll Brothers Site - Phase I September 15, 2003
Isolated Wetlands Permit Application Project No. 2003-0345

Executive Summary

The Toll Brothers Phase I Site is located in Union County, North Carolina approximately 1.5 miles
west of the Rea Road - Marvin School Road intersection (Attachment A - Figures 1 and 2).
' Phase I of this project proposes to develop approximately 177 acres of woods and farmland into a
residential subdivision. Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. is the engineer responsible for developing
the site plan. Toll Brothers is in charge of developing the project and has contracted Carolina
' Wetland Services, Inc. (CWS) to provide permitting services for this project (Attachment B).
The results of the on-site field investigations conducted by CWS indicate that there is one
jurisdictional stream channel (Perennial Stream A), nine jurisdictional wetland areas
' (Wetlands AA-II), and one non jurisdictional isolated wetland area located within the project limits
(Attachment A - Figure 3). Unavoidable impacts to on-site features will total approximately 0.94
' acre of non jurisdictional isolated wetlands. On behalf of Toll Brothers, CWS is submitting an
Isolated Wetlands Permit application with attachments in accordance with North Carolina
Administrative Code T15A: 02H.1300 (Attachment Q. On-Site compensatory mitigation is being
proposed for this project for the 0.94 acre of impacts to non jurisdictional isolated wetland areas.
' Toll Brothers is proposing the establishment of 24.6 acres of riparian buffers along on-site streams
and wetlands. Additional mitigation will consist of removing invasive vegetation from the
preserved portions of the isolated wetland.

I
I

I

I
I

I
1

Toll Brothers Site - Phase I September 15, 2003
Isolated Wetlands Permit Application Project No. 2003-0345
Existing Conditions
The Toll Brothers Phase I Site is located in Union County, North Carolina, approximately 1.5 miles
west of the Rea Road - Marvin School Road intersection (Attachment A - Figures 1 and 2).
Phase I of this project proposes to develop approximately 177 acres of woods and farmland into a
residential subdivision. Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. is the engineer responsible for developing
the site plan. Toll Brothers is in charge of developing the project and has contracted Carolina
Wetland Services, Inc. (CWS) to provide permitting services for this project (Attachment B). The
following sections describe the existing conditions of the project area.
Current Land Use
The current land use for the site is agricultural and is generally comprised of cleared pasture and
large wooded areas. The current land usages for the surrounding areas are agricultural, residential,
and institutional and consist of old farms, several new residential developments, and a new
elementary school. Dominant canopy vegetation within the project area includes willow oak
(Quercus phellos), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), red cedar (Juniperus virginiana),
hackberry (Celtis laevigata), shagbark hickory (Carya ovata), sycamore (Platanus occidentalis),
tag alder (Alnus serrulata), black willow (Salix nigra), and white oak (Quercus alba). Dominant
ground cover consists of Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), soft rush (Juncus effusus), poison ivy
(Toxicodendron radicans), various sedges (Carex spp.), multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora),
Kentucky bluegrass (Festuca arundinacea), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica),
spring-beauty (Claytonia virginica), dogbane (Apocynum cannabinum), and bulbous buttercup
(Ranunculus bulbosus).
According to the Soil Survey of Union County (Attachment A - Figure 2), on-site soils
predominantly consist of Iredell loam (IrA), with inclusions of Gaston clay loam (GaB2) and
Chewacla silt loam (ChA) soils. Iredell loam soils exhibit slow permeability and low to moderate
water capacity. Chewacla soils are located along the floodplain of Sixmile Creek and are
frequently flooded for brief periods of time and are known to contain hydric inclusions within
Union County, North Carolina.
2
Toll Brothers Site - Phase I September 15, 2003
Isolated Wetlands Permit Application Project No. 2003-0345
I
Jurisdictional Delineation
From March 12-24, 2003, CWS's Gregg Antemann, Isaac Hinson, Ron Johnson, and Kip
Kerecman delineated on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S.' within the project area. Jurisdictional
areas were delineated on-site using the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) - Routine On-Site
Determination Method. This method is defined in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual 2 Routine On-Site Data Forms representative of on-site wetlands and adjacent
upland areas have been included as Attachment D. Jurisdictional stream channels were classified
according to recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ)3 and USACE guidance.
NCDWQ Stream Classification and USACE Intermittent Channel Evaluation Forms representative
of Stream A have been included as Attachment E.
The results of the on-site field investigations conducted by CWS indicate that there is one
jurisdictional stream channel (Stream A), nine jurisdictional wetland areas (Wetlands AA-II), and
one non jurisdictional isolated wetland area located within the project limits
(Attachment A - Figure 3). Stream A is an unnamed tributary to Sixmile Creek. Sixmile Creek is
part of the Catawba River basin (HU# 03050103)4 and is rated "Class C Waters" by the NCDWQ.
On-Site jurisdictional areas are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1. Summary of On-Site Jurisdictional Areas
Jurisdictional
Area Approximate
Acreage (ac.) Approximate
Length (If)
Perennial Stream A -- 3,8541f
Wetland AA 0.26 ac. --
Wetland BB 0.30 ac. --
Wetland CC 0.92 ac. --
Wetland DD 0.03 ac. --
Wetland EE 0.02 ac. --
Wetland FF 0.05 ac. --
Wetland GG 0.05 ac. --
Wetland HH 0.7 ac. --
Wetland II 0.05 ac. --
Total 2.38 ac. 3,8541f
' "Jurisdictional waters of the U.S." includes essentially all surface waters such as: all navigable waters and their tributaries, all
interstate waters and their tributaries, all wetlands adjacent to these waters, and all impoundments of these waters.
z Environmental Laboratory. 1987. "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual," Technical Report Y-87-1, US Army
Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
3 North Carolina Division of Water Quality Stream Classification Method. Version 2.0. 1999.
° "HU#" is the Hydrologic Unit Code. Hydrologic Unit Map, State of North Carolina. U.S. Geological Survey. 1974.

Toll Brothers Site - Phase I September 15, 2003
Isolated Wetlands Permit Application Project No. 2003-0345
Stream A is approximately 3,854 linear feet in length and generally flows northwest along the
northern property boundary to its confluence with Sixmile Creek (Attachment A - Figure 3). This
stream channel was evaluated to be Perennial and exhibits moderate sinuosity, a continuous bed
and bank, an eight-foot average ordinary high water width, and substrate consisting of coarse sand
to boulders. Fish, crayfish, bivalves, amphibians, and benthic macroinvertebrates were also
observed within the channel during field investigations (Attachment E - SCP 1). Perennial Stream
A scored 40.5 out of a possible 71 points on the NCDWQ Stream Classification Form. A
photograph of Stream A is included as Attachment F - Photograph A.
Wetlands AA-II are all located along Sixmile Creek and Perennial Stream A
(Attachment A - Figure 3). These wetlands are primarily situated within open pasture areas and
exhibit dominant vegetation consisting of soft rush, various sedges, and Kentucky bluegrass. Other
vegetation includes hackberry, sycamore, tag alder, black willow, poison ivy, and Japanese
honeysuckle. These wetlands also exhibit low-chroma soils and inundation and saturation within
the upper twelve inches of the soil profile (Attachment D - DP 1, DP3, and DP4). Photographs of
Wetland AA and Il are included as Attachment F - Photographs B and C.
A non jurisdictional isolated wetland area is located in the north-central portion of the site
(Attachment A - Figure 3). This isolated wetland is approximately 3.34 acres in size. This area is
forested and was determined to be non jurisdictional based on its lack of a surface water connection
to any jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This area exhibits dominant vegetation that includes
hackberry, willow oak, sweetgum, poison ivy, and shagbark hickory. This area also exhibits
inundated, low-chroma soils, with saturation in the upper twelve inches of the soil profile. Data
points representative of this non jurisdictional isolated wetland area and adjacent upland areas have
been included as Attachment D - DP5 and DP6. A photograph of the isolated wetland area is
included as Attachment F - Photograph D.
Pre-Application Meetings
On June 5, 2003, CWS representatives met on-site with Mr. Steve Chapin of the USACE and
Mr. Mike Parker of the NCDWQ - Mooresville Office, to review the jurisdictional determination
of the on-site features. All present parties agreed that the 3.34-acre wetland area lacks a surface
water connection and therefore is isolated and non jurisdictional. The Wetland Boundary Survey
(Figure 3) was signed and verified by Mr. Chapin on August 1, 2003. In addition to the June 5th
meeting, CWS met on-site with Mr. Alan Johnson of the NCDWQ on July 21, 2003 to review
on-site stream classifications and wetlands and to discuss proposed plans for the project.
4

1

J
Toll Brothers Site - Phase I September 15, 2003
Isolated Wetlands Permit Application Proiect No. 2003-0345
Agency Correspondence
A letter was forwarded to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) on June 3, 2003, to
determine the presence of any federally-listed or candidate endangered or threatened species or
critical habitat located within the project area. The USFWS replied that several federally-
protected species are known to exist in close proximity to the site and requested that an on-site
protected species survey be conducted. This assessment was performed by CWS biologists
Gregg Antemann and Isaac Hinson on May 2, 2003, and consisted of a literature and records
search and a pedestrian survey. The NCNHP database indicated that two federally-endangered
species, one candidate for federal listing, and seven Species of Federal Concern have been
sampled in Union County, North Carolina. The results of the on-site field investigation indicate
that no plant species formally proposed or listed as endangered or threatened by current Federal
regulations are found within the project boundaries.
On May 12, 2003, CWS submitted to USFWS a Protected Species Survey Report, which
summarized the results of the site assessment. The report concludes that no federally-protected
species will be affected by the proposed project and recommends that impacts to Stream A be
minimized to protect potential protected mussel species. In a letter dated July 2, 2003, the
USFWS indicated that they "concur with [the] determination that the proposed project will not
affect endangered or threatened species".
Purpose and Need for the Project
Phase I of the Toll Brothers Site project proposes to develop approximately 177 acres of woods
and farmland into a residential subdivision. The purpose of this project is to provide single-
family housing to an area that is experiencing significant population growth. The proposed
subdivision will provide custom-built homes on one-acre lots in close proximity to Charlotte.
Avoidance and Minimization
Impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U. S. have been reduced to the maximum extent
practicable. This project proposed to avoid impacts to Perennial Stream A and 82% (4.69 acres)
of all on-site wetland areas. In addition, the isolated wetland has been incorporated into the site
master plan and will largely remain as a forested wetland area.
5
Toll Brothers Site - Phase I September 15, 2003
Isolated Wetlands Permit Application Project No. 2003-0345
Proposed Impacts to On-Site Features
Unavoidable impacts to on-site features will total approximately 0.94 acre of non jurisdictional
isolated wetlands (Attachment H - Figures 4a and 4b). This project proposes to fill approximately
0.94 acre of the isolated wetland to accommodate residential construction
(Attachment H - Figure 4b). On behalf of Toll Brothers, CWS is submitting an Isolated
Wetlands Permit application with attachments in accordance with North Carolina Administrative
Code T1 5A: 02H.1300 (Attachment Q.
Compensatory Mitigation
On-Site compensatory mitigation is being proposed for the 0.94 acre of impacts to the isolated
wetland area. Toll Brothers is proposing the establishment of approximately 24.6 acres of
riparian buffers along on-site streams and wetlands. Approximately 23.8 acres of proposed
riparian buffer will be enhanced along the on-site floodplains of Perennial Stream A and Sixmile
Creek through cattle exclusion. A minimum 15-foot buffer will also be established around the
perimeter of the preserved portions of the isolated wetland area. The location and size of the
proposed buffers are illustrated in Attachment H - Figure 4a. Additional mitigation will consist
of enhancing the non jurisdictional isolated wetland by removing invasive plant species, such as
Chinese privet and Japanese honeysuckle, from preserved portions of the wetland. The
understory of the eastern half of the isolated wetland is dominated by Chinese privet. Removal
of the existing invasive species should allow for the natural recruitment and colonization of
native wetland vegetation.
I
6

i
y ?- r
'f i+ \, t fit] 6y 1 \
Approximate Scale 1" = 2000'
Reference: USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Series, Weddington and Catawba NE Quadrangles, North Carolina-South Carolina, dated 1988 and 1993, respectively.
Carolina Wetland Services
5000 Nations Crossing Road, Suite 230
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
Figure 1. USGS Site Location Map
Toll Brothers Site - Phase I
Union County, North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2003-0345
PREPARED BY DATE CHECKED BY DATE
-3::J %A T - ?A 3 6t'4 • y.?3
9
F"I
r-
WO
C{)LINTY ?
ChA 1 Me82
IrA \O
°` r k ` IrA
H Me82
?V. t \'` l;??? ? Meaz
.. c ? ?,"` Me62 (??
Ga82
IrA
?S g -svti"?a Me62
10
McB2 IrA -
IrA ri GaB'i
ChA
..4? .? {CC, Me82
IrA
IrA
irA GaG2
GaC2
I ` Me87 1J
Site
ZnB
ItA q / M? e32 Me82 \? G382
J \
IrA
MeB2
00
`\ \
r IrA `.
ChA ?aC Gai:?t0. (. ??"T
ZnC
i Q' ` f I -\\ r ?t
J l?"t r? ?.PaE2 GaB[ Ch Zn6 ; IrA
I!A \ \
ADB ! Me62
Paf2 3t6
ApC-
Ce62 ¢ '{ a / IrA I ` Gaff? Gaf7?
Ch A
APR AP? •\\.. Ga62 NA `\?A' irA r ••'?' Zn6
Approximate Scale 1" = 2000'
Reference: NRCS Soil Survey of Union County, North Carolina, Sheet No. 16, dated 1991
Carolina Wetland Services Figure 2. NRCS Soil Survey
5000 Nations Crossing Road, Suite 230 Toll Brothers Site - Phase I
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217 Union County, North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2003-0345
PREPARED I3Y DATE CHECKED BY DATE
i
?ll?ia?l? !i

d (i; ! ! rr

z
z o
O F
G W

O
?
F
Q 0
U
W
? O

U z
o o

?
¢ o
o
Q

U
W
F

z
U) o

Yl B! .? i! ;H1 lift H
• • t 2 t ?
? o
M
00
O
CC ? U
oo U
V°
T
ot?,
oIn
ca
'vaUo
O ?
I s
zz
'C i y u V
c
U ?
? c a N
M 0 .0 1<
?F?V oa
w
m
?h
a
u:
a
LLI
W
ar ? =?
F v
p w ) N ?,
LL-
c o - ' ? t
v -
) 60
3 llti.
f ?1lt!
J v ° ?!
C c
v J
U
)
+
3
v ._ fs s
= oo -(U
v z - /.
c c°
v c
+J m 2-.4-
m c U
v ? 3o v
c v
v c
Q) M
119 3 ,t ? ? ?-? ? ? v w
z
D Q) <<y?s v z
?.--? ' --- cn `v •N j U-
Q 4) r w 0
C) 1?
O N In n U
+W Q7 p
3 do zz
U 3 v?
x -vv 1 ¢?
V) c
Y` __ ,. Uz
W OT = GI O' Y' 0.
-00
u l1 ? v ?,e C
g5 LL- L- ?CD
? O O W W F
vv «Jv H r?
I JS om m 30 o a, o z
;(u 06 Q ID a
ao o OM o ?r W x
?Q, w LIJ a) z >
z
iQ v yy Q? < m
L ?9 6 3o rt 11 = -0 v o
rf v C4
vrn vz
o acv 1 ---- 7
: p ------------
3:
3 z
W
® 11 Q C,
1'1 QU FZ
v ¢ F
o d? N It N Q o
U a? z N
V) 3 0 0
Q- N
O
Q
o
e e? o
o s
z° X I I ?' Aj
U_ O0 Ii? w
Cl- O C)
a I z ...
Q
-m , m
1
1
I
¦111M 11111M 111111111 111M IMI r ¦MI 111111111 1111101 11111110 111M

AGENT CERTIFICATION OF AUTHORIZATION
u

u

I

n
0

f'
representing Toll Brothers, hereby certify
that I have authorized Gregory C. Antemann of Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. to act on
my behalf and take all actions necessary to the processing, issuance, and acceptance of
this permit and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
We hereby certify that the above information submitted in this application is true and
accurate to the best of our knowledge.
A plican's signature
`Pct rVp
bI24163
Date
Agent's signature
Date
Completion of this form will allow the agent to sign all future application correspondence.

L
Office Use Only: Form Version April 2001
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
I
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
1. Processing
' 1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
? Section 404 Permit
? Section 10 Permit
' ? 401 Water Quality Certification
? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested:
Isolated Wetlands Permit
' 3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
t 4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NC)VRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
' 1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Toll Brothers, Contact: Mr. Bob Kardos
Mailing Address: 10800 Sikes Place, Suite 100
' Charlotte, North Carolina 28277
' Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: rkardos(a,tollbrothersinc.com
' 2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Gregory C. Antemann, PWS
' Company Affiliation: Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
Mailing Address: 5000 Nations Crossing Road, Suite 230
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
Telephone Number: 704-527-1177 Fax Number: 704-527-1133
' E-mail Address: gregg(a,carolinawetlandservices.com

Pagel of 7
I
III. Project Information
1. Name of project: Toll Brothers Site - Phase I
2. T.I.P. Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
' 3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 06222003C
4. Location
' County: Union Nearest Town: Charlotte
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Longview South
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): From Charlotte, take Interstate 77
' (1-77) south to Exit 2 (I-485 towards Pineville). Go east on I-485 to Exit 59 (Rea Road).
Turn right onto Rea Road and travel for approximately 4 miles to Marvin School Road. Turn
right onto Marvin School Road and travel for approximately 2/3 mile to Joe Kerr Road. Turn
right onto Joe Kerr Road and travel for approximately '/Z mile and the site is located on the
4-'k+ o;A- -V+k- -A
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): N35° 0' 34" - W800 48' 50"
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
'
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application: The
current land use for the site is agricultural and is ggenerally comprised of cleared pasture and
wooded areas
.
7. Property size (acres): 177 acres
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Sixmile Creek
' 9. River Basin: Catawba River
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
' River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/admin/maps/.)
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: Phase I of the Toll Brothers Site project
proposes to develop approximately 177 acres of woods and farmland into a residential
' subdivision. The purpose of this project is to provide single-family housing to an area that is
experiencing significant population growth. The proposed subdivision will provide custom-
built homes on one-acre lots in close proximity to Charlotte.
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project: Heavy equipment typically
used for site grading and paving work will be used.
' 12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: The current land usages for the
surrounding areas are agricultural, residential, and institutional and consist of old farms,
' several new residential developments, and a new elementary school.

Page 2 of 7
IV. Prior Project History
I
I
I
I
I

1

7

This project has no previous history.
V. Future Project Plans
Phase II of this project will occur at a later date. Phase II will consist of developing the
remaining 144 acres of the site and will likely require Section 404/401 permitting.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
1. Wetland Impacts

Wetland Impact

Area of Impact Located within

100-year
Distance to
Site Number Type of Impact*
(acres) *
Floodplain Nearest Stream Type of Wetland***
indicate on map)
( (yes/no) (linear feet)
Isolated Wetland Site grading 0.94 ac. No 6301f Non-jurisdictional Isolated
Wetland (forested)
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding. .
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http:%/www.feina.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property:
2.38 acres jurisdictional wetlands and 3.34 acres non-jurisdictional wetlands
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.94 acre of non-jurisdictional wetlands
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact Length of Average Width Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent?
(indicate on ma) (linear feet) Before Impact (please specify)

N/A
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapguest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: N/A
Page 3 of 7
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S. N/A
Open Water Impact Area of
Name Waterbody Type of Waterbody
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact
(if applicable) (lake> estuary,
pond, m3'> sound,
(indicate on map) (acres) bay, ocean, etc.)

N/A
List each impact separately and identity temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
' flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
' 4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
' included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
' Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
' Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
' Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A
Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been reduced to the maximum extent
practicable. This project proposed to avoid impacts to Perennial Stream A and 82% (4.69 acres)
' of all on-site wetland areas. In addition, the isolated wetland has been incorporated into the
master plan and will largely remain as a forested wetland area.

' Page 4 of 7
VIII. Mitigation
On-Site compensatory mitigation is being proposed for the 0.94 acre of impacts to the isolated
wetland area. Toll Brothers is proposing the establishment of approximately 24.6 acres of
riparian buffers along on-site streams and wetlands. Approximately 23.8 acres of proposed
riparian buffer will be enhanced along the on-site floodplains of Perennial Stream A and Sixmile
Creek through cattle exclusion. A minimum 15-foot buffer will also be established around the
perimeter of the preserved portions of the isolated wetland area. The location and size of the
proposed buffers are illustrated in Attachment H - Figure 4a. Additional mitigation will consist
of enhancing the non-iurisdictional isolated wetland by removing invasive plant species such as
Chinese privet and Japanese honeysuckle, from preserved portions of the wetland. The
understory of the eastern half of the isolated wetland is dominated by Chinese privet. Removal
of the existing invasive species should allow for the natural recruitment and colonization of
native wetland vegetation.
Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wip/index.htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information: N/A
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ? No
' If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
' If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
' Yes ? No ?
I Page 5 of 7

I X.

LI!
F

Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify: )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers. N/A
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
' Gone 1 extends out.SU feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
' of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
' N/A
' XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
' Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
A storm water management plan is not proposed for this project given the low-density nature of
the development (less than 30 % impervious area). Storm water outfalls will not be discharged
directlv into on-site stream channels and wetland areas.

Page 6 of 7

XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
I
I
7
I

J

I

Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Each home will be connected to the public sanitary sewer andwater system.
XIII. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Construction is scheduled to begin upon receipt of appropriate permits.
c.. [ w JS or
0-r -
Applic
t/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 7 of 7
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Toll Brothers Site - Phase I Date: 03/12/03
Applicant/Owner Toll Brothers County: Union
Investigator: Isaac Hinson and Ron Johnson Stater NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Ye No Community ID: Wetlan
d
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID: DPI
If needed, explain on reverse.) I
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicato r
1. Juncus effusus herb FACW+ Dominant Plant Soecies t m Indicator
9.
2. Carex sp. herb - 10.
3. 11.
4. 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
100%
Remarks:
All dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter.
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in remarks):
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
X Inundated
X Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations: _ Sediment Deposits (on leaves)
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: 0-2" (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) _ Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: Oil (in.) X FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology indicators are resent.
Routine On-Site Data Forms Page 1 of 2 9/9/2003
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Iredell loam Drainage Class poorly drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): thermic T iC Ha ludalfs Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No.
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moistl (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-12" B 2.5Y 3/1 2.5Y 3/3 common silt loam
faint
Histosol _ Concretions
Histic Epipedon - High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
- Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
- Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List (Inclusions)
_ Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_' Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
H dric soil indicators are resent.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No (Circle
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(Circle)
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Ils this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
Data point is representative of a jurisdictional wetland area
Approved by HOUSACE 2/92
Routine On-Site Data Forms Page 2 Of 2 9/9/2003
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Toll Brothers Site - Phase I Date: 03/12/03
Applicant/Owner Toll Brothers County: Union
Investigator: Isaac Hinson and Ron Johnson State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID: inland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID: DP2
If needed, explain on reverse.) I
VEGETATION
Dominant Plan Species
1. Juniperus virginiana Stratum
tree Indicator
FACU- Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indic or
9.
2. Quercus rubra tree FACU 10.
3. Ligustrum sinense shrub FAC 11.
4. Toxicodendron radicans vine FAC 12.
5. Liquidambar styraciflua tree FAC+ 13.
6.. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
60%
Remarks:
More than 50% of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in remarks):
- Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
- Aerial Photographs
- Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
_ Inundated
_ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations: _ Sediment Deposits (on leaves)
_ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) _ Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: >1211 (in.) _ FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology indicators are absent.
Routine On-Site Data Forms Page 1 Of 2 919/2003
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Iredell loam Drainage Class poorly drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): thermic T is Ha ludalfs Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-12" B 10YR 4/3 N/A N/A silt loam
_ Histosol _ Concretions
Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List (Inclusions)
Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
H dric soil indicators are absent.
Wt I LAND UL 1 CKMINA IIUN
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No (Circle
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No (Circle
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
Approved by HOUSACE 2192
Routine On-Site Data Forms page 2 of 2 9/9/2003
i
i
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Toll Brothers Site - Phase I Date: 03/12/03
Applicant: Toll Brothers County: Union
Investigator(s): Isaac Hinson and Ron Johnson State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID: W ttan
Is; the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID: DP3
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species
1. Alnusserrulata Stratum Indicator
tree FACW Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
9.
2. Salix nigra tree OBL 10.
3. Carex spp. herb - 11.
4. Juncus effusus herb FACW+ 12.
5. Platanus occidentalis tree FACW- 13.
6. Festuca arundinacea herb FAC- 14.
7. Toxicodendron radicans vine FAC 15.
8. Lonicera japonica vine FAC- 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
71°0
Remarks:
More than 50° of dominant veg
etation is FAC or wetter.
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in remarks):
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
- Aerial Photographs
_ Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
X Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations: _ Sediment Deposits (on leaves)
_ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: 0-2" (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
- Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) - Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology indicators are resent.
Routine On-Site Data Forms Page 1 of 2 9/9/2003
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Iredell loam Drainage Class poorly drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): thermic T is Ha ludalf Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Descriotion.
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moistl (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-12" B 2.5Y 3/1 2.5Y 3/3 common silt loam
faint
Histosol _ Concretions
- Histic Epipedon - High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
- Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
- Aquic Moisture Regime X Listed on Local Hydric Soils List (Inclusions)
_ Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors - Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
H dric soil indicators are resent.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? a No .,(Circle
Wetland Hydrology Present? Ye No (Circle)
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Ye No
Remarks:
Data point is representative of a jurisdictional wetland area.
Approved by HQUSACE 2/92
Routine On-Site Data Forms Page 2 of 2 9/9/2003
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Toll Brothers Site - Phase I Date: 03121/03
Applicant: Toll Brothers County: Union
Investigator(s): Isaac Hinson and Kip Kerecman State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID: wetlan
d
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID: DP4
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Juncus effusus herb FACW+ Dominant Plant Species Stra um Indicator
9.
2. Celtis laevigata tree FACW 10.
3. Carex spp. herb 11.
4. Platanus occidentalls tree FACW- 12.
5. 13. .
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
10Q%
Remarks:
All dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter.
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in remarks):
_ Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs
_ Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
X Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water Marks
X Drift Lines
Field Observations: _ Sediment Deposits (on leaves)
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: 0-24" (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
X Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) _ Water-Stained Leaves
X Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: Or' (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology indicators are present.
Routine On-Site Data Forms Page I of 2 9/9/2003
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Iredell loam Drainage Class poorly drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): thermic T is Ha ludalfs Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (rMunsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-12" B 2.5Y 4/2 5YR 3/4 many clay
prominent
_ Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon - High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List (Inclusions)
_ Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
H dric soil indicators are resent.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? AYe No (Circle
Wetland Hydrology Present? No (Circle)
Hydric Soils Present? No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Ye No
Remarks:
Data point is representative of a jurisdictional wetland area.
Approved by HQUSACE 2192
Routine On-Site Data Forms Page 2 Of 2 9/9/2003
i
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Toll Brothers Site - Phase I Date: 03/12/03
Applicant: Toll Brothers County: Union
Investigator(s): Gregg Antemann and Kip Kereeman State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID: iso we
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID: DP5
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species
1. Quercus phellos Stratum Indicator
tree FACW- Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
9.
2. Carya ovata tree FACU 10.
3. Celds laevigata tree FACW 11.
4. Claytonia virginica herb FACU- 12.
5. Toxicodendron radicans vine FAC 13.
6. Liquidambar styraciflua tree FAC+ 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
67%
Remarks:
More than 50% of dominant ve
getation is FAC or wetter.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in remarks):
- Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
- Aerial Photographs
_ Other
No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in upper 12 Inches
_ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations: _ Sediment Deposits (on leaves)
X Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: 0-2" (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) _ Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0-8" (in.) _ FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology indicators are present.
Routine On-Site Data Forms Page 1 of 2 919/2003
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Iredell loam Drainage Class poorly drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): thermic T is Ha ludalfs Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile De crition:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-2" A 10YR 2/1 N/A N/A sandy loam
2-12" B 2.5Y 4/1 N/A N/A silt loam
_ Histosol _ Concretions
Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime X Listed on Local Hydric Soils List (Inclusions)
_ Reducing Conditions - Listed on National Hydric Soils List
X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Hydric soil indicators are present.,
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Ay"
No (CirclTis Wetland Hydrology Present? No (Ci
rcle
Hydric Soils Present? No this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
Data point is representative of a non-jurisdictional isolated wetland area based on the absence of
surface water connection to any jurisdictional waters of the U.S.
Approved by HQUSACE 2/92
Routine On-Site Data Forms Page 2 Of 2 9/9/2003
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Toll Brothers Site - Phase I Date: 03/12/03
Applicant: Toll Brothers County: Union
Investigator(s): Gregg Antemann and Kip Kerecman State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID: upland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID: DP6
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plan S ecies
1. Juniperus virginiana Stratum Indicator
tree FACU- Dominant Plant Species Stratum Iadica or
9.
2. Carya ovata tree FACU 10.
3. Quercus rubra tree FACU 11.
4. Quercus alba tree FACU 12.
5. Ligustrum sinense shrub FAC 13.
6. Lonicera japonica vine FAC- 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
17%
Remarks:
Less than 50° of dominant veg
etation is FAC or wetter.
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in remarks):
- Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
- Other
No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
_ Inundated
_ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: _
_ Sediment Deposits (on leaves)
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) _ Water-Stained Leaves
X Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: >121f (in.) _ FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology indicators are absent.
Routine On-Site Data Forms Page 1 of 2 9/9/2003
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Iredell loam . Drainage Class poorly drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): thermic T is Ha ludalfs Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (_Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-2" A 10YR 2/1 N/A N/A loamy sand
2-10" B 2.5Y 3/2 N/A N/A loamy sand
>10" B 2.5Y 4/2 10YR 4/8 manv clay loam
prominent
_ Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List (Inclusions)
_ Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Hydric soil indicators are present.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes o Circle
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(Circle)
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
Approved by HQUSACE 2192
Routine On-Site Data Forms Page 2 of 2 9/9/2003
NCDWO Stream Classification Form SCPl - Perennial Stream A
Project Name: Toll Brothers Site - Phase I River Basin: Catawba River County: Union Evaluator(s): IJH and RGJ
DWQ Project Number: Nearest Named Stream: Sixmile Creek Signature(s): 'X:;rK jt,(J"
' Date: 3/12/03 USGS QUAD: Weddington and Catawba NE, NC-SC Longitude: W80* 48' 50" Latitude: N35° 0' 34"
Location/Directions: From Charlotte, take Interstate 77 (I-77) south to Exit 2 (I-485 towards Pineville). Go east on I-485 to Exit 59 (Rea Road). Tum
right onto Rea Road and travel for approximately 4 miles to Marvin School Road. Turn right onto Marvin School Road and travel for approximately
2/3 mile to Joe Kerr Road. Turn right onto Joe Kerr Road and travel for approximately 1/2 mile and the site is located on both sides of the road.
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then am of this form is not necessary. Also, if in the best professional judgementof the evaluator, the
feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-this rating system should not be used*
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
I. Geomoroho1_ouy Absent Weak Moderate Strong
'
1) Is There A Riffle-Pool Seauence? 0 1 ® 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
Different From Surrounding Terrain?
0
1
2
3) Are Natural Levees Present? ® 1 2 3
4) Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 I ® 3
'
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
Floodvlain Present?
0
®
2
3
6) Is The Channel Braided? ® I 2 3
7) Are Recent Alluvial Deposits Present? 0 ® 2 3
8 Is There A Banldull Bench Present? 0 1 2
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0
(*NOTE: IfBed & Bank Caused By Ditching And WITHOUT Sinuosity Then Score=0*) 1 2
10) Is A 2' Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Tovo Map AndlOr In Field) Present? Yes=3
NoA
'
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICATORPOINT.• 15
II. Hydrology
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharge Present?
0
1
®
3
PRIMARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 2
III. Biology
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? 2 1 0
2) Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? 2 1 0
'
3) Is Periphyton Present? 0 N 2 3
4) Are Bivalves Present? 0 1 5 3
PRIMARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 9
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
1. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Head Cut Present In Channel? 0 U 1 1.5
2) Is There A Grade Control Point In Channel? 0 0.5 ® 1.5
'
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainage Way? 0 0.5 ® 1.5
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOL OGY INDICA TOR POINTS: 2.5
II. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
'
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
Present In Streambed? 1.5 nl 0.5 0
' 4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since 0 0.5 1 1©
Last Known Rain? (*NOTE. IfDiteh Indicated In #9 Above Skin This Step And #5 Below)
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry 0 0.5 © 1.5
Conditions Or In Growin Season)?
' 6) Are Hydric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut)? Yes 1. No=0
SECONDARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 7
TIT_ Rinlnw
1 Are Fish Present? 0 0.5 1.5
2) Are Amphibians Present? 0 0.5 1.5
3 Are A uaticTurtles Present? 0 0. 1 1.5
4 Are Crayfish Present? 0 05 1 1.5
5 Are Macrobenthos Present? 0 0. I 1.5
Are Iron Oxidizin Bacteria/Fung_Lm Present? 0 9 1 1.5
7) Is Filamentous Algae Present? 0 0.5 19 1.5
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL. Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
(*NOTE. If Total Absence Of All Plants In Streambed 2 1 0.75 0.5 0 0
As Noted Above Skip This Step UNLESS SAV Present*).
SECONDARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 5
TOTAL POINTS (Primary +Secondary)= 40.5 (If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent)
IMI INTERMITTENT CHANNEL
' EVALUATION FORM SCP1- Perennial Stream A
ACTION ID: APPLICANT NAME: DATE: 3/12/03
PROPOSED CHANNEL WORK (i.e., culvert, relocation, etc.):
WATERBODY/RIVER BASIN: Unnamed Trib to Sixmile Creek/Catawba River basin COUNTY/CITY: Union/Waxhaw
RECENT WEATHER CONDITIONS: 70 degrees and sunny, no rain within 48 hours
P SP NP Observation Comments or Descri tion
X Fish/Shellfish/Crustaceans Present Fish, crayfish, and bivalves
X Benthic Macro Invertebrates Aquatic snails, fingernail clam, dragonfly larvae
X Amphibians Present/Breeding Frogs and tadpoles
X Algae And/Or Fungus water quality function) Green algae
X Wildlife Channel Use (i.e. tracks, feces, shells, others) Raccoon tracks
X Federally Protected Species Present (Discontinue)
X Riffle/Pool Structure
X Stable Streambanks Some erosion

X Channel Substrate
i.e. gravel, cobble, rock, coarse sand)
Coarse sand to boulders

X
Riparian Canopy Present SP =/> 50% closure) Liquidambar styracii lua, Quercus phellos,
Celtis laevi ata, Juni erus vir iniana
X Undercut Banks/ hi-stream Habitat Structure
X Flow In Channel 8-foot average ordinary hi water width

X Wetlands Adjacent to/Contiguous with Channel
(Discontinue)
N/A Persistent Pools/Saturated Bottom (June thru Sept.)
N/A See s/Groundwater Discharge (June thru Sept.)
X Adjacent Flood lain Present
X Wrack Material or Drift Lines
X Hydro hytic Ve etation in/adjacent to channel Juncus a usus, Salix ni a, Celtis laevi ata
Important To Domestic Water Supply? Y /
Does Channel Appear On A Quad Or Soils Map? O/ N Approx. Drainage Area: Approximately 5 Square Miles
Determination:
® Perennial Channel (stop) ® Important Channel: 3,854 LF PROJECT MGR. Initials
? Intermittent Channel (proceed) ? Unimportant Channel: LF
? Ephemeral Channel (no jd) (attach map indicating locatio f important/umm ortant channel)
? Ditch Through Upland (no jd) Evaluator's Signature: C .
P=Present SP=Strongly Present NP=Not Present Gregory C. Antemann, PWS
Toll Brothers Site - Phase I September 15, 2003
Isolated NN'etlands Permit Anulication Protect No. 2003-0345
I

I

r

0
I"i

^G x t
?}y} 7
iiC p
Jv`
t-
_,+r t
_ r
?iY 'fib- f i•
e

j?
r
*1 4?
Y 1 r ? ?
Photograph A. View of Perennial Stream A

... ..
?
f ? ? ?
??' ?
a-?
rt . ? ._
-
.,,i?trr,..•"`..,s '
i:W

r.

R t'' - - t v "-y K
oz ? 4t Y n bl''

r r s.
,

?? ?.i F .7i-.` "???g P )?r
k
P t '.t! ? 1 e f j ep ?k Ka
Ti-
?V ?~ •. ?`? ?'.;
\"'e+ `f p Ji$
t
,
i
:.... ? ? •?+,??l.u ., it [ - ?w

Photograph B. View of Wetland AA
I
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
Toll Brothers Site - Phase 1 September 15, 2003
Isolated Wetlands Permit Application Proiect No. 2003-0345
r k I
1 414,
M r. I 1
'4Y 9r i ?.l
lo. V
4 .W.
Y?? r M ? a r y-'!sue
' ".?'g _?'} • ,,'..?h?+CFr,??\t-?, ,? '?, p?` ? 'YI'T't, .r .?? ry_*rt.;.. ?ti,: ?r..F' "iq??t ??, ?y..
Photograph C. View of Wetland II
ii
Photograph D. View of Non-Jurisdictional Isolated Wetland
Toll Brothers Site - Phase I September 15, 2003
Isolated Wetlands Permit Application Proiect No. 2003-0345
Attachment G - Agency Correspondence
I
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
July 2, 2003
Mr. Isaac Hinson
Staff Biologist II
Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
5000 Nations Crossing Road, Suite 230
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
Dear Mr. Hinson:

I

Subject: 321-Acre Toll Brothers Site, Longview South Subdivision, Protected Species Survey,
Union County, North Carolina
In your letter dated June 3 2003; you requested our comments with regard to the subject project.
The following comments are provided in accordance with the provisions of the Fish and Wildlife
Coordination Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 661-667e), and section 7 of the Endangered Species
Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543) (Act).
Aquatic Resources - According to the information you provided, a freshwater mussel shell was
collected within the project area from Perennial Stream A. You indicated that this mussel shell is
thought to be the Carolina creekshell (Villosa vaughaniana), a federal species of concern. We
are very concerned that the direct impacts to Perennial Stream A and the increased storm-water
runoff that will occur as a result of the development of the project area may affect the water
quality and the native freshwater mussel species associated with Six Mile Creek, Marvin Branch,
and Perennial Stream A. Very few streams in Union and Mecklenburg Counties still support
relatively diverse native freshwater mussel faunas, and of those few that do, Six Mile Creek
supports one of the healthiest populations of this rapidly declining faunal group. Native
freshwater mussels are considered to be the most endangered group of animals in the continental
United States. They are also one of the most reliable indicators of water quality and the health
and stability of aquatic ecosystems. They are highly sensitive to the effects of the sedimentation,
nutrients, and chemical pollutants that often are carried in storm-water runoff from residential
areas. Increased storm-water runoff is often associated with large-scale developments, which
results in the scouring of stream banks and channels, making the stream habitat unsuitable f6r
freshwater mussels and numerous other aquatic species. Accordingly, we recommend that the
project be redesigned to avoid direct impacts to Perennial Stream A within the project area. To
avoid direct impacts to the streams and wetlands within the project area, only 6 houses

(approximately) out of the 310 proposed for construction would have to be redesigned or
eliminated from the plans. We also recommend that measures such as the establishment and
protection of forested stream buffers and the use of wetland retention areas, as well as other
storm-water control measures addressed below, be incorporated into the project to help catch and
filter storm-water runoff and to help protect the quality of Six Mile Creek and its tributaries and
' the significant aquatic resources they continue to support. Without the incorporation of such
measures, we will recommend to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) that a permit not be
issued for this project.
' Federally Listed Species - According to (1) our records, (2) a review of the protected species
' survey you provided, and (3) telephone conversations you had with Ms. Denise Moldenhauer of
our staff, no listed species occur on the site. We concur with your determination that the
proposed project will not affect endangered or threatened species. Therefore, we believe the
' requirements under section 7 ofthe Act are fulfilled. However, obligations under section 7 of the
Act must be reconsidered if (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that
may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered, (2) this action
' is subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review, or (3) a new species
is listed or critical habitat is determined that may be affected by the identified action.
Fish and Wildlife Resources - We are concerned about the direct and indirect impacts to
wetlands and streams and the potential secondary and cumulative impacts associated with this
proposed development. We would like to review the acreage of wetlands and linear feet of
' streams that will be impacted as a result of the project as well as an analysis of practicable
alternatives that would avoid and minimize impacts. We strongly suggest that an alternative be
developed that avoids impacts to streams and wetlands on the property. Adopting ordinances
that protect wide forested riparian corridors and the 100-year floodplain and that adequately treat
storm water in development areas is essential to the protection of water quality and aquatic
habitat in rapidly developing landscapes. During the process of developing construction plans,
we recommend that you address the issues of erosion control, impervious surfaces, and
storm-water control. We recommend that the following measures be incorporated in order to
' minimize impacts to fish and wildlife resources.
1. Loss of riparian buffers and inadequately controlled storm-water runoff from
' residential and other developed areas are major factors resulting in the
degradation and loss of aquatic resources. Forested riparian buffers serve as
filters for contaminants, lessen storm-water velocities, provide thermal cover,
' and protect stream-bank stability. Forested buffers should be a minimum of
100 feet wide along perennial streams and 50 feet wide along intermittent
streams and wetlands. Utility lines should be kept out of riparian buffer areas.
' When it is not possible to implement the minimum buffers, we suggest that
sewer lines be constructed of a substance equal to the durability of ductile iron,
and both sewer and water lines should be located as far away from streams as
' functionally possible.
' 2

2. In addition to the protection of riparian buffers, we strongly discourage the
installation or construction of sewer lines or structures in the 100-year
' floodplain for commercial or residential development. Construction in the
floodplain increases the potential for flooding adjacent properties and
interferes with the natural hydrological process of the waterways.
Undeveloped floodplains provide the riparian vegetation that is used by aquatic
and terrestrial wildlife, supply a rich food source to aquatic communities, and
trap sediment from entering aquatic systems.
' 3. The construction of roadways in new neighborhoods can produce short-term
' direct impacts as well as long-term cumulative effects. Studies have shown a
serious decline in the health of receiving waters when 10 to 15 percent of a
watershed is converted to impervious surfaces. We recommend reduced road
widths and the use of grassed swales in pluc_ of curb and gutter. We also
' recommend on-site storm-water management (i.e., bioretention areas) that will
result in no net change in the hydrology of the watershed. These designs often
' cost less to install and significantly reduce environmental impacts from
residential development.
' 4. Stringent measures to control erosion and sediment should be installed and
maintained in order to prevent unnecessary impacts to aquatic resources within
and downstream of the project site. Herbaceous vegetation should be planted
' on all bare soil immediately following any ground-disturbing activities in order
to prevent soil erosion. Fertilizers, herbicides, and pesticides should not be
used near streams.
5. Heavy equipment should not be operated in streams or on stream banks. All
mechanized equipment operated near surface waters should be inspected to
prevent contamination from toxic materials.
' We appreciate having the opportunity to review this project. We would be happy to meet with
you and the Corps to discuss our concerns and assist in any way we can to help you design and
implement the project in a way that will meet your objectives while avoiding impacts to
significant terrestrial and aquatic resources. Please contact Denise at 828/258-3939, Ext. 226, if
' you have any questions. In any future correspondence concerning this project, please reference
our Log Number 4-2-03-257.
Sincerely,
1r, ?
Brian P. Cole
' State Supervisor
' 3

' cc:
Mr. Steve Chapin, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Asheville Regulatory Field Office, 151 Patton
' Avenue, Room 208, Asheville, NC 28801-5006
Mr. Rich Keagy, P.E., Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., 5265 Parkway Plaza Boulevard,
Suite 130, Charlotte, NC 28217
' Ms. Danielle R. Pender, Eastern Piedmont Permit Coordinator, Falls Lake Office, North Carolina
Wildlife Resources Commission, 1142 I-85 Service Road, Creedmoor, NC 27522
4
Riparian Buffer
rr,
4z-y
?A, -1,
V V J 0 'i

0

c
r
1
?n
a Joe Kerr Road
/PP9MOMTE St-a mm
1• - 4W 9/2/03 FIGURE 4a. PROPOSED IMPACTS AND
cwcnmwmVmasw? ,a P0. oaw er RIPARIAN BUFFER PROTECTION PLAN
EI WNttirn Om" pd,Sm*230
cm>omt,NOmC,ohw 28217 WH TOLL BROTHERS SITE - PHASE I
309 9a ata® of UNION COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
SHM
1
OF
2
f
I? I NON-JURISDICTIONAL
ISOLATED WETLAND AREA
/I - ---'8-/ _
//ice!-•--------^ - -- ,?', -? ;<4??,?.,//,,,?-?} } //?
Isolated Wetland Area,
f 10.94 Acre Impacted

J

? I I
I

?^I 1 1 ?/ 1 1 1 1 ?- >- /m
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney
Non-Discharge Branch
Regional Contact: Michael L Parker
WO Supervisor: Rex Gleason
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Toll Brothers Site Phase I
Project Number 03 1190
Recvd From APP
Received Date 9/26/03 Recvd By Region 10/3/2003
Project Type residential subdivision
County Union
County2
Region Mooresville
Certificates Stream Stream Impacts (ft.)
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. -Supp. Basin Req. Req. ME
I S T Isolated F7 _0N F__ 11-138-3 F F__ 3.838. (1.94
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Buffer enhance Buffers 23.80 F-
F_ I F_
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? 0 Y 0 N Did you request more info? 0 Y 0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? 0 Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? 0 Y O N Recommendation: 0 Issue 0 Issue/fond 0 Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 350034 Longitude (ddmmss) 804850
Comments:
Add Info letter prepared on 10/28/03
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
Facility Name Toll Brothers Site Phase I County Union
Project Number 03 1190 Regional Contact: Michael L Parker
Date:
Comments (continued from page 1):
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 2
Page 1 of 1
Greaa Antemann
From: "Mike Horan" <[e-mail]>
To: "Gregg Antemann" <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 4:35 PM
Subject: Re: Isolated Wetlands Permit - Toll Brothers - Union County
The clock start date will start when check arrives in mail. I talked with Isaac on 9/25/03 about the
application fee. He said he would get with you about that?
The DWQ # is 03-1190
Gregg Antemann wrote:
CJ JJ
Mike, I have not heard anything for you yet about this project.Please let me know when the 60-day
clock started and what the DWQ No. will be.Thanks for your help, Gregg
----- Original Message -----
From: Mike Horan
To: Gregg Antemann
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 1:05 PM
Subject: Re: Isolated Wetlands Permit - Toll Brothers - Union County
Gregg, I have I responded to you on this If I had great if not I overly apologize.Please
respond
Gregg Antemann wrote:
Mike, Could you please give me the DWQ number for this project.l am assuming that
it is logged in.We sent it overnight to arrive on Tuesday.Thanks, Gregg Gregg
Antemann, P.W.S.
Carolina Wetland Services
5000 Nations Crossing Road, Suite 230
Charlotte, NC 28217
Office: 704-527-1177
Fax: [phone]
Cell: 704-408-1683
g [e-mail] naweti a nd services.com
4/Er/ A
VItHQUALITYSECTIOX
9/25/2003
F w A ?F Michael F. Easley, Governor
?Q
, Q
O G William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
f E
i
d N
l R
t
, nv
ronment an
ura
esources
Department o
a
r
5; Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
-I - Division of Water Quality
0 Coleen Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
September 18, 2003
Mr. Robert J. Kardos, Assistant Vice-President
Toll Brothers
10800 Sikes Place
Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28277
f nay' 1! ? j? ? r f ? ,..
l
ET DS/ 1 ftUp
9
,' fQd3
ATEAQUALITYSECR
ON
Subject: 401 Water Quality Certification
Longview South Subdivision, Phase I
Union County
Dear Mr Kardos:
This Office has received information from the Division of Land Resources that you may be
planning to disturb jurisdictional wetlands and/or 150+ linear feet of a stream channel during the
construction of the subject development.
Please be advised that the Division of Water Quality (the Division) requires that approval be
obtained prior to disturbing more than 0.1 acre of wetlands and/or 150 linear feet of stream channel
under current Division of Water Quality 401 Certifications. It should also be noted that it is the
ultimate responsibility of the ACOE to determine whether or not any channel being impacted is
indeed a stream for which they may claim jurisdiction. Please note that although Division approval
may not be required for channel impacts below the 150-foot threshold under NWP 39, the Army
Corps of Engineers (ACOE) requires that application be made to them for any impact to
jurisdictional waters no matter what the length.
For jurisdictional channel impacts, compensatory mitigation may be required by the Division
to replace unavoidable lost or degraded aquatic life uses of these streams, either through in stream
measures and/or riparian techniques-such as buffer establishment or vegetative planting for
temperature control (typically referred to as stream bioengineering). In determining whether a
stream mitigation will be necessary, the Division will need to ascertain whether the stream supports
aquatic activity (such as fish, crayfish, salamanders, etc.,).
?Ef?V
Customer Service
1 877 623-6748
Division of Water Quality 919 North Main Street Mooresville, NC 28115 Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
Mr. Robert J. Kardos
September 18, 2003
Page Two
In order to obtain Division approval for any proposed stream and/or wetland impacts,
seven (7) copies of the Preconstruction Notification Application (PCN), along with supporting
maps and documentation, should be completed and returned to the addresses listed in the
application. Please make sure that all maps submitted with the application are of suitable scale
(e.g. 1" 100') and delineate all impacted streams, ponds, and/or wetlands on the project site.
Downloadable copies of the Division's General Certifications as well as the PCN can be accessed
at the Division's Wetland web page:
http://h2o.ehnr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/
If you do not have access to this web page, please contact this Office at the phone number listed
below and a copy of the PCN will be forwarded to you. If you have already filed for the 401
Certification, please disregard this notice. You should also note that issuance of a ACOE 404
Permit or receipt of a written ACOE delineation verification does not relieve you of your
responsibility for determining the need for a 401 Water Quality Certification prior to proceeding
with any channel or wetland impacts.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Mr. Michael L. Parker, Mr.
Samar Bou-Ghazale, Mr. Alan Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Susan Yates, DLR
John Dorney, DWQ
Steve Chapin, USACOE
h : \401 \s tream\kardos. stm