20021885 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20020129

F WArF
\O?? 9pG Michael F. Easley, Governor
y William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
? y
p Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
February 19, 2003
DWQ Project No. 02-1885
Pitt County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Page 1 of 3
Bradford Osborne
1306 Sonata Street
Greenville, NC 27858
Subject Property: Bradford Osborne Property, Lot 108, Silverleaf Ct., Phase IV, Ironwood SD, Greenville, NC
UT to Tar River [03-43-05, 28-(84), WS-IV (water supply) NSW (nutrient sensitive)]
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
Dear Mr. Osborne:
On December 9, 2003, the Division of Water quality (DWQ) received your Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) application
to place 0.015 acres of fill within wetlands for the purpose of constructing a home at the subject property. The DWQ has
determined that your application was either incomplete and/or provided inaccurate information as discussed below. The
DWQ will require additional information in order to process your application to fill wetlands on the subject property.
Therefore, unless we receive the additional information requested below, we will have to move toward-denial of your
application as required by 15A NCAC 2H .02500 and will place this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this
additional information. Please provide the following information so that we may continue to review your project.
1. Section 1: Processing
In Section 1 (1) of the PCN application,,you did not check the box for "Section 404 Permit" and in Section 1 (2) you did
not state what Nationwide, Regional or Genioral Permit Number you are requesting to use. The proposed fill will most
likely require the use of a Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and Water Quality Certification
from the DWQ. Please contact the USACE Washington Regulatory Field Office (252-975-1616 ext. 25) to determine
which permit they will allow or suggest that y u use for the proposed activity if you have not already done so. Please
be sure to provide them with the Action ID number 199503797. Once you obtain this information, then please
complete Section 1 of the PCN application. this will allow us to determine which DWQ Water Quality Certification to
review the proposed fill under.
2. Section 8: River Basin
You did not complete Section 8 of the PCN application. Based on information provided in Section 7 and a map
search conducted by the DWQ staff to confirm the project's location, the DWQ determined that the proposed activity is
located within the Tar-Pamlico River Basin. Please confirm that this is accurate. This information is important to
determine which DWQ regulations apply to they property.
,I
3. Section 10: Project Description
You stated in Section 10 of the PCN application that the overall project is "building house within "MBL" lines". The
DWQ staff assumed that you are referring to the "MBL" area designated on the preliminary plot plan provided with the
application. Please confirm that this is accurate. Please define the area of wetland fill on the proposed plot plan.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, We ands/401 Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27691-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-22 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands/
DWQ Project No. 021885; February 19, 2003; Page 2 of 3
4. Section 11: Project Purpose
You stated in Section 11 of the PCN application that the purpose of the proposed work was "to fit the house on the lot
and within minimum boundary lines". The proposed footprint for the "2-story brick house" appears to be located within
the "MBL" area, but not over the "wetland limits" area. Therefore, it is not clear as to the location of the wetlands area
you are proposing to fill. Nor is it clear as to why you need to fill the wetlands to construct the home. Please provide
additional justification as to why a home can not be built on the lot without impacting the wetlands.
5. Section IV: Prior Project History
You stated in Section IV of the PCN application that a 404 Permit (Action I.D. 199503797) was received from the
USACE which "requested certification on a larger amount of wetlands area". You did not provide the DWQ Project
Number. The DWQ staff conducted a review of projects issued under your name. No projects were found. The DWQ
then conducted a review of projects issued under the subdivision name, "Ironwood". On August 14, 1995 the DWQ
authorized the use of General Water Quality Certification Number 2671 with additional conditions to impact 7.38 acres
of wetlands to construct the proposed Ironwood Subdivision / Golf Course Development under DWQ Project Number
95499 (see attached). This Certification allowed the applicant, "Ironwood Development, Inc.", to use Nationwide
Permit Number 26 previously permitted for use by the USACE on July 25, 1995. Your lot was identified on the
subdivision plans provided with the approved application. One of the conditions of the 1995 authorization was that a
"deed restriction shall be added to all lots with jurisdictional wetlands to prevent future wetland fill". The DWQ staff
could not find a request for an adjudicatory hearing to contest the conditions. As such, the DWQ staff assumes that
the conditions of the 1995 authorization where accepted and that the approved impacts have occurred.
As stated within the deed language provided with the 1995 authorization, "the intent of the deed restriction is to
prevent additional wetland fill, so the property owner should not assume that a future application for fill will be
approved". As such it is the inclination of the DWQ staff to deny your proposed request to fill the wetlands on the
property. Please provide additional justification as to why a home can not be built on the property without impacting
the wetlands.
Section VI (1): Impact' Description
You did not complete Section Vi (1) of the PCN application. Please complete this section and provide a written
description of the proposed impacts. Specifically, it is not clear whether you are proposing to fill the wetlands to
construct the home or to provide a lawn around the home. Please specify exactly how and why you intend to fill the
wetlands.
7. Section VI (2): Wetland Impacts
You did not complete the table within Section VI (2) of the PCN application. Please complete this section.
8. Section VII: Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
You stated within Section VII of the PCN application that you "need the area within the "MBL" to fit the house on the
lot". However, it appears based on the proposed plot plan that the house can be fit on the lot without impacting the
wetlands. Please provide additional justification as to why a house can not be built on the lot without impacting the
wetlands.
9. Section VIII: Mitigation
You stated in Section VIII of the PCN application that mitigation was not applicable for the proposed impacts. The
DWQ staff has determined that mitigation will be required for any wetlands filled on tlie'property due to the cumulative
wetland impacts that were approved in 1995. Therefore, please complete Section VIII of the PCN application and
state how you intend to mitigate for the proposed impacts.
10. Section XI: Stormwater
It is not clear what you meant by "none" in Section XI of the PCN application. Please describe the existing and
proposed impervious area versus the total area on the site and discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to
protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from the property. Another condition of the 1995 authorization was
that "stormwater shall be directed so as not to directly flow into streams on the property". Please complete this
section of the form and describe how you intend to comply with the stormwater condition of the 1995 authorization.
DWQ Project No. 021885; February 19, 2003; Page 3 of 3
Please respond within three weeks of the date of this letter by sending this information to me in writing and to Mr. Tom
Steffens of the DWQ Washington Regional Office. If we do not hear from you within three weeks, we will assume that you
no longer want to pursue this project and we will consider the project as withdrawn.
This letter only addresses the application roview and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands, waters or protected
buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your application are not authorized (at this time) by the DWQ.
Please call Mr. Bob Zarzecki at [phone] of the Wetlands/401 Unit if you have any questions regarding this matter.
Sincerely,
r1ands/40 t, DW .
Attachments: DWQ Project No. 95499, Auglust 14, 1995, GC 2671 Authorization Letter
cc: Kevin Avolis, Avolis Engineering, P.O. Box 15564, New Bern, NC 28561
USACE Washington Regulatory Field Office, Post Office Box 1000, Washington, North Carolina 27889-1000
Tom Steffens, DWQ Washington Regionall Office
File Copy
DWO021885
February 19, 2003
bz

F WATF
\OG Michael F. Easley
Governor
r William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
W Division of Water Quality
i
MEMO
To: John Dorney
From: Bob Zarzecki
Date: February 18, 2003
Re: DWO Project No. 02-1885, Bradford Osborne, Pitt County
02-1885 (see attached) was received on 12/00/02 and sent to the WaRO on 12/12/02. WaRO provided comments
sometime after 12/12/02 (comments were not dated) to "Issue n/c". It was then put in my box, presumably to write the
Issue letter, sometime after WaRO comments, I most likely saw WaRO comments to "Issue n/c" and put it in my pile of
projects to write approval letters on. I kept pushing it back to the end of the pile because other higher priority projects
came up. I failed to check the "drop dead" datle and as such the project is now past the 60-day review period and would
normally be waived. I found the file today andlbegan to write the "waiver " letter once I realized that it had past 60 days.
In writing the letter I came across the followings issues.
Basic facts provided within the PCN: The PCN was submitted by the property owner (possible homebuilder). The PCN
states that no buffers will be impacted and it doesn't appear that any will. The PCN states that they plan to build a "house
with in "MBL" lines". Todd sent it to the WaROI stating "proposed impact to wetlands but none are shown on plans". The
h "triage check list" also stated (not sure who wrote it), "discuss w/ applicant specifics of impact areas - just how much
needs to be impacted for what specific purposo -no need for impacts just to produce the "green carpet lawn" area". The
PCN stated under "prior project history", "Actiorl ID 199503797 - Requested certification on a larger amount of wetlands
area." It did not provide the "DWQ Project Nunhber".
My review on 2/18/03: 1 found the project location on the USGS and soil survey with the aid of the Pitt Co. ,web-based
GIS database. I checked Filemaker for any prior projects under the name Osborne. Nothing came up. I then checked for
any projects under the subdivision name (Ironwood) and found DWQ Project No. 95499 (see attached). [went to the lab
and pulled the file. It contained the DWQ Certification issued on August 14, 1995 and the USACE Permit 199503797.
The Certification required, "A deed restriction shall be added to all lots with jurisdictional wetlands to prevent future
wetland fill". It also required that "DEM shall b6copied on all mitigation reports including an as built report after
construction". The file did not contain any such reports. The 1995 "Joint Form" requested 1.67 acres of fill, 4.88 acres of
flooding and 0.83 acres of excavation. The authorization letter gave "approval to placed fill in 7.38 acres of wetlands or
waters". One of the "mitigation techniques" proposed in the 1995 cover letter was "(5) The total wetlands created and/or
enhanced will total a minimum of 10.78 acres". Jt looks like you circled "10.78" and wrote a note "inc. pond". The
Certification also required no direct discharge of! stormwater into the streams.
Does the fact that they failed to provide the "DWQ Project Number" in the "Prior Project History" section of the new PCN
constitute an incomplete application? If so, can we deny the project (or at least request additional information) based on
"no practical alternatives" and the 1995 deed restrictions? If not, please return and I'll write the waiver letter. I apologize
for letting this project slip through. `
jb opo
V
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 01 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 2 699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604J2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fa ), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/
I
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact: tom steffens
Non-Discharge Branch WQ Supervisor: Roger Thorpe
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF RE1P6RT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Bradford Osborne County Pitt
Project Number 02 1885
Recvd From APP
Received Date 12/9/02 Recvd 6y Region
Project Type residential
Certificates Stream
Permit Wetland
Type Type
TPBR Buffers
County2
Region Washington
Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Impact Score Index' Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
FY QN F__ ' I r-F- F_ F_ F_
IY ON F_ F_ F_
Stream Impacts (ft.)
E E
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? Q Y 0 N Did you request more info? Q Y O N
Have Project Chan ges/Conditiohs Been Discussed With Applicant? Q Y Q N
Is Mitigation required? p Y O N Recommendation: Q Issue 0 Issue/fond O Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) Longitude (ddmmss)
Comments:
Issue n/c y
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
Mitigation Wetland
Facility Name Bradford Osborne County Pitt
Project Number 02 1885 Regional Contact: tom steffens
Date:
Comments (continued from page 1):
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 2
Triage Check List
Date: 4102_ Project Name:
DWQ#: OL, `S
County: ?rtl
To: ? ARO Mike Parker WaRp _p&o-ra-E Sawye
? FRO Ken Averitte ? WiRO Joanne Steenhuis
? MRO Mike Parker ? WSRO Jennifer Frye
? RRO Steve Mitchell
From: Telephone : (919)
The file attached is being forwarded to your for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
? Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
? Minimization/avoidance issues 2
uffer Rules (Meuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
? Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
? Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
Comments:

6, lM?p.rt° dCX ?-?al

411 ` - 0 C_,L - tt""
Pitt Countv Online Parcel Information System http://opis.co.pitt nc.us/scripts/esrima...=352&Height=267&UFolio=059043&Mode=SO

t??a

* PARCEL NUMBER: 059043

A
-.t
!
}
C AccountNumber 11936130

`
r
ii
g e Ld
o Urnt?e
i
f
r 1 l fy- LocationDirection

.
Lbt3 et' ` 9, i R L E A F
! ?? LocationType CT
1 tNtttllty ; NVILLE 1':,
OwnerName OSBORNE BRADFORD EARL

CrC Owt irt?"sdi '430B:E b4RRYr
OwnerAddress2

City GREENVILLE
W
U YY aB .. {
.i?N 1
.Sr AMM
Y' W
' C r C f•
,
ZlpCode 27834
I
.- ---?`
°
I r-

LQ *FF 11 ,
r
d ! E r"?...? DeedBook 1196

t1 VJaC MapBlockLot 4669.17-01-8277.000
t
CensusTract
3714717
??yy
RescueTaxDistrict GREENVILLE

'? r I UseCodeRESIDENTIAL
W B ye 1f7l
ExA } x +

NrA
CJ HeatedSgFt
I SalesMonth 09
VJaB 31t? kI tAO
MOM
.
SalesPrlce $54,000

TotatTaxValue $45,000

LandValue S45,000
h *

t i'4 ,
Wiiwili
f t ?? TaxesBilled 5582.75

ElementarySchool FALKLAND
Disclaimer: This tax record is prepared for the invento of real property within iap wMa at-_
Pitt County and is compiled from recorded deeds, pl ts, tax maps, surveys,
and other public records. Users of this data are he eby notified that the HtghSchool FARMVILLE CENTRAL
aforementioned public primary information sources s ould be consulted for Data Current As Of:
verification. Pitt County assumes no legal responsibility for the information
i
t
i
d h Fri 02/14/2003 4:20
con
a
ne
ere
n.
Copyright ® 2001, Pitt County, North Carolina.
?? vA
1 of 1 ; 2/18/03 12:34 PA
TopoZone - The Web's Topographic Map wysiwyg://428/http://www.topozone.com/print.asp?z=18&n=3946529&e=278256&s=
. C
Target
is UTM
topoZlune com
Copydyht O20i)t1 Maps a In carte. kw.'.
r r'-• J ,
Roc
e ? _ : t ? t ? / ? pia : ? ? ?? ? ?•
r "x
ru 5
*14 IM,
1 1:7
,Lws 6 44
µ - +r
0 Soo 1000 1500 2000
meters I I - I
Miles 0 015 1.0
i
i
I of 2 2/18/03 12:44 PM
TopoZone - The Web's Topographic Map wysiwyg:H428/http://www.topozone.coni/print.asp'?z=18&n=3946529&e=278256&s=e
r
The
TopoZone
is
produced
by Maps
a la
ca rte,
Inc.-
2000
Maps a la
carte,
Inc. - All
rights
reserved.
Use of
this site
is
governed
by our
Conditions
and
Terms of
Use. We
care
about
your
privacy -
please
consult
our
Privac
Statement
for
details.
2 of 2 2/18/03 12:44 PM
WaB 12450000 FEET
N (Joins sheet 25) O
i 33
AV LaB
Y? ? ? w;?? ? ? >r ti? y 'r ?: i? , .ej ? i ?z'o ? r ?/.- d r rM ? ? R? - J??I • r, r
d. P
?. NrB2v „ e , ?r t
GoA r r it
NrB Ra r'I , r+ ta[rr e
AYA
GoA NrB`v.@b } Y? y ' fr r 1.
B.rt.F .r'aw,
° Po ?tx E
o Nr6 r/ J
o GoA Z, Y(fit) a ,
Go?1 A. AgB p LL
11 ry LY 00
11 .NyA' I C f LL?
LY I)q'_
r?
ll y ?'~ f "t y+ r A K
GoA
t r n Y,?
AgB
•-• Ly
u °o y ?a 4 r 1?d Z t
GoA
.13
o ?y ,rr Cr 2?°' .r Pao
pgo o Y
GoA
" ?a ?AgH
"o pa
E Co r a? g
CrB2 R,d Os qf
en 'a 13
O o ExA ck Sprinq. Tua
et m
y OC? f S
00 8 "`?" VOICV '. OF AMER A • « I CrB2 ' WeB It,
,-, $ /? Ex6 Pa ?.. O
r. N CrC
U, 3' W u)
US INFORMATION AGENCY qyq • •` r? dr CrB2 -11
0~
(n l 6
a
d . rC
r13
• CB v
0 o LY A
Bb r t?" a
O E p^d 5? tJ H `4 - f y ???
00 ' a ?? ate. ( i a `fi't i . NrB /C w
?', ti4E i9tdt', 1 ,? f CC 00
O
Crd !? fi5r N
° ° • A r 3 £ce F crC
o
GoA : ?' , i y a r. W B o
4,.
B y > , Wa8 AYB GoA
Wa8slva?,..- ?Ge w Cr6
00 GoA rt r AyB
t +. r Nr6
v ?:-^r 1 {r v- v NrB d CrC
6
LY Ra ;?, fs l rri'` T,?+ j1N9 e`?• Oo
n ar }? Ly ExA • \ \ a
Nr6yt? x 4 ?_. c+ CrB2
Bb A r " + .• WaB 'Nr8
LY r! O?B 5'. I 00
6C; t u-r
GoA
B2rt
N? WaB LY i? Wa6 Ly
NrB - - 2 465 000 FEET (Joins sheet 40)
? FILE CG, ;
Office Use Only: F.7noers'on May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not app icable to this project, please enter "Not a
I. Processing ' f
DEC g
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
les
u
? Section 404 Permit ? Ripa 'an Zow
? Section 10 Permit Isola WQ
401 Water Quality Certification -
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested:
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check herd: ?
4. If payment into the NorthCarolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (veiify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is vVithin a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Num
E-mail Address:
Fax Number: 6?5,3) 353- 893 j
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the' Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
Fax Number:
Page 5 of 12
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Tdpographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: F o r4 05k"o r-? 1 e,
2. T. LP. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): W-A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):
4. Location
County: F, Nearest Town: Gr- yrV,???c'I n
Subdivision name (include ph4se/lot number):-r-or?c?oc C /l)t?Ji" yer?ec ?,
Directions to site (include road numbe s, landmarks, e
f n ca4ed . 5 ni .'la 5d i ????? ,ys`f i.7., US -1V aN AY S- '4 NC /43
7:1Ef0Y,\w669 5tJod,VJV--+",\
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long):
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing Of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): n . y5`7
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): T.a r- R; ye, r-
8. River Basin:
(Note - this must be one of
River Basin map is available
arth Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/mat) s/. )
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Re_-s;<.?eyC?,a??y?Si'??)
Page 6 of 12
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
11. Explain the purpose 'o?/f/'the proposed work:
,//
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations 4nd/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phased of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 7 of 12
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: NA
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acreia) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
es/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
linear feet)
Type of Wetland***

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at httn://www.fenia.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland. to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: b a o?
Total area of wetland impact proposed: ,, 0 i5'
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linearjfeet
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
leasespecify)

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib Wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows.' USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.tono7one.com,
www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: i?dAC
Page 8 of 12
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbod
y
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,

bay, ocean, etc.

List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetlan and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, letc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance: and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. 'the applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desiredi site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. n 1
,d,,,/ ? a-40- (r//7/t .4 ?. e ' I /3L ?n t ? t 4L-e- Lnvve On- AF?
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 9 of 12
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples' of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers t protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and v*lues by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable ini the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possib e, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affecte? stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
2. Mitigation may also be mad
Program (NCWRP). Please n
[phone] to determine
to submittal of a PCN. For a
NCWRP, check the NCWRP
the NCWRP is proposed, ple
following information:
by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
e it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
ailability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
litional information regarding the application process for the
vebsite at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
e check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
1,11A
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigati requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetla d mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetlan mitigation requested (acres):
Page 10 of 12
IX. Environmental Documentation (required
Does the project involve an exp6nditure
(federal/state) land?
Yes ? No
by DWQ)
of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
If yes, does the project require 'preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National ov North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review boen finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No V
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian
It is the applicant's (or agent's)
required state and local buffers
justification for these impacts in
and must be clearly identifiable
map, whether or not impacts a
Regional Office may be includ
applicant's discretion.
Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
sponsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
sociated with the project. The applicant must also provide
ction VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (}Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirementfi), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No 57 If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers. Imp
Zone* s ua eact
( feet) Multiplier Req
M ti u red
on
1 3
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page I 1 of 12
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 213.0242 or.0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)'
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
/t/o,1 C
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DVVQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
C±1 L1 0,4c-, a- s"Lt--
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit appncation?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional);
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow proc$ssing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down! schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
4)plicant/Agent's SignatiIre ' Date
signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
` I
$ I NORTH
?+ I MB 58 , pGS.
24
Pf S [W r
IR NWOOD DEVELM4ENT, INC.
SITE I DB 2ss, PG 602

EIP,
5??40 „
VICINITY MAP q)
,pp ? L 86
\6

EIP . \ EI

\
a

' p'" PORCH o 20.7' 20' DRAINAGE
EASEMENT ?.
a a
'
8.3 24.0
PROPOSED \ ^?`
\

°
rn, 2-STORY
BRICK
HOUSE

'
'.'

9.7'
a
,n o
17.7 /
sp
IMITS

_
(107)
8.0'

?°o \
W ° PORCH o :2
r,

15.7' ?,3.r WETLAND L
,

(109)
O

\ /?mv TOTAL AREA = 0.459 ACRE

°L co NOTES
6? 1. !THIS PROPERTY IS NOT LOCATED IN A
yj - SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARDOUS AREA AS
D&ERMINED BY THE DEPT. OF HOUSING
N 07.47'22" W AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT.
28.95' (CH) ALL HOUSE DIMENSIONS ARE TO FRAME.
2
R = 50.00 5.0 ' ,
'REFERENCE RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS IN
3
MIN.
IP EIP .
DEI D BOOK 833, PAGE 165 OF THE PITT
COUNTY REGISTRY.
;DRIVEWAY RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS ARE 5'
4
.
OFF PROPERTY LINE.

C? Q

Qy /
CCB FB ---, PG.-- I IRONWOOD 108
I, BRIAN L. SOUVA, HEREBY. CERTIFY THAT
THIS MAP WAS DRAWN UNDER MY
DIRECTION AND, SUPERVISION FROM AN
ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER MY DIRECTION
AND SUPERVISION, THAT THE ERROR OF
CLOSURE AS's%CALCULATED BY LATITUDES
AND DEPARTURES-JIS, 1:10,000.
WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL THIS
21 st DAY OF FEBRUARY , 2001

? I Ir --
BRIAN L. SOUVA, PLS L-3873
I LEGEND
I R/W = RIGHT-OF-WAY
MBL = MINIMUM BUILDING LINE
EIP = EXISTING IRON PIPE
R = RADIUS
CH = CHORD
B/B = BACK OF CURB TO
BACK OF CURB
PARCEL #59043
PRELIMINARY PLOT PLAN FOR
EAST CAROLINA CONSTRUCTION
LOT 108, IRONWOOD, CLUSTER
SUBDIVISION, PHASE IV
REFERENCE: MAP BOOK 50, PAGES 24
& 24A OF THE PITT COUNTY REGISTRY
GREENVILLE, FALKLAND TWSP., PITT CO., N.C.
DATE: ;FEBRUARY 21, 2001 SCALE: 1 40'
B Baldwin and ASSOCIATES
LAND SURVEYING & PLANNING
7F 105-D GREENVILLET N.C. 27858URT
A [phone]