20031189 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20030925

Facility Name Newell
County Union
Project Number 03 1189
Regional Contact: Alan Johnson
Date: 10/17/2003
Comments (continued from page 1):
Site #1 a Channel D, intermittent. Proposal is to install a culvert for a road crossing.
Site #2: Channel A. perennial. Proposal is to install a culvert for a road crossing. This was the
largest channel observed at the site and, e xcept for a few water pools, it was dry. How ever, the
stream characteristics appeared to be stron g-'-m bed, stream sinuosity, voi d of vegetation
and leaf lifter in the channel)- Given the "w et" year and the size of the channel (-4'W x 4' H) some
flow in the channel would be expected.
Site #3; Channel B, intermitte nt. Proposal is to fill t he upper portion (headwaters) of this channel.
The cha nnel u irnately conver ges with channel A a pproximately 200 ft upstream of site #2. The
channe l was dry (from headwa ters to stream A). Th ere was no strong stream characteristics
observe d. As staff walked dow nstream from the he adwaters (-150 linear ft.) , the channel
"dissa are ", but re-emerge d 75 to 100 ft, downs tream.

Site #4: Headwaters (epheme ral channel) to chann el A. intermittent. Proposal is to install a culvert
for a ro ad crossing, The chan nel was dry except fo r a couple of pools observed downstream of the
impose d impact area.

Site #5: Channel C, intermitten t. Proposal is to fill t his channel. An isolated channel similar to site #3.
The cha nnel was drv and had some stream charact ierestics (gravel bed, sinuosity). The channel
dissipat ed into a small low qua lity wetland area.

All chan nels observed were dr v including the "pere nnial" channel. No aquatic animals or plants were
observe d. Buffers and deed re strictions are propos ed for the remainder of the stream channels at the
site.

There a re stormwater concern s related to the propo sed club house (jn the center of the site off Billie
Howie Rd.) and a portion of th e development that is along the prope[Ly line north of the intersection of
Billie H owie Rd. and Indian Tra ils Rd.

Wetlan d impacts at the site are less than 0.1 acres.

Recom mend anpproval. 401 i ssued by MRO,

cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 2
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact: Alan Johnson
Non-Discharge Branch WO Supervisor: Rex Gleason
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Newell
Project Number 03 1189
Recvd From APP
Received Date 9/25/03 Recvd By Region 10/6/2003
Project Type residential subdivision
County Union
County2
Region Mooresville
Certificates Stream Stream Impacts (ft.)
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req. ME
39 F_O Y _@N I 11-138-2-2 F _cI - 30,838. F 528.00 147.00 381.00
12 Y N I F-F-30838. 0.03 (F_- F_
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? O Y OQ N Did you request more Info? O Y 0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? 0 Y O N
Is Mitigation required? O Y (ON Recommendation: OQ ISSue O ISSue/Coed O Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 345933
Longitude (ddmmss) 804115
Comments:
Staff visited the site on October 8th. The a lien cant proposes stream impacts at five sites at the
subject location. Two sites (#1 & #2) were identified as important by the a Inn icant, thus they would
be subject to mitigation if the 150 ft. threshold is exceeded. Site #1 was described as an important
intermittent stream and site #2 as an im o?perennial. Staff inspected four (sites #2 thru #5) of
the five proposed impact sites. All stream channels were drv. except for a couple of pools above site
#2. There was no observable aquatic life (crawfish, salamanders, etc.) present.
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
Triage Check List
Date: ?-I r'03 Project Name: L&W4 11
DWQ#: ?3- I r x
County:
TO: ? ARO Mike Parker ? WaRO Tom Steffens
? FRO Ken Averitte ? WiRO Noelle Lutheran
MRO Alan Johnson ? WSRO Daryl Lamb
? RRO Steve Mitchell
From: K A- Telephone : (919) 733 --1 '714
The file attached is being forwarded to your for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
,?{{ Stream length impacted
L Stream determination
? Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
03Iinimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Neuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
Mitigation Ratios
Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
? Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
Comments: 4 ; : : C 11%
031189
LE
Wm;t FI Copy
Wetland and Natural Resource
Consultants, Inc. September 23, 2003

US ACE, Asheville Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Mr. Steve Chapin
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
Re: Nationwide Permit 39 Request
Centex Homes, Newell Property
Union County, North Carolina
Mr. Chapin and Mr. Dorney:
NC Division of Water Quality, Wetlands Unit
Attn: Mr. John Dorney
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
The purpose of this PCN is to request authorization for proposed impacts to regulated Waters of the
U.S. for the above referenced project Impacts are necessary and have been minimized to the maximum
extent practicable for the purpose of constructing the proposed residential subdivsion (see attached
application forms and maps).
Minimization and avoidance has been achieved through exhaustive redesign efforts based on the field
approved delineation. Less than 150 linear feet of perennial or intermittent channel with important
aquatic function will be piped for access to high ground. Approximately 99.5 percent of regulated
channels on the property will be avoided (no impacts from proposed development) and no permanent
loss of regulated wetlands is proposed.
Thank you in advance for your timely consideration of this PCN. Please call with questions or to discuss
the project in further detail.
Respectfully submitted,
Tamp Bandy
NET1A51A1 ??I9"",:?./F
HATERQUALITYSECTION
Newton Office Clyde Office
PO Box 224 wnrinc.com 217 Paragon Parkway, ## 142
Newton, NC 28658 Clyde, NC 28721
828-465-3035 828-627-0051
828-465-3050 Fax [phone] Fax
cup-$3-83 Lb 1me AM WNRC QMQ445%090 P.02
!Wt4;t
atland and Natural Resource
vnsuitants, Inc.
Department of the Army
Wdrnl%wn District, Co" cif Engineers ?
Attn. Ken Dopy, Chief Rgpbtory Division
Pd em Is"
Wilmington, North Carolina, 2M02-1890
-and-
NC Division of Water Quallrj
Attn: John Dorney
2321 Crabtree Mvd.
Aalsigh. North Carolln% 27604-2260 '
I, the current landowner of she property identified below, hereby authorize Wedand and Natural
Resource Consultants, Inc. to act on my behd as my agent during the processing of permits to Impart
Wadands and Waters of the US that are regulated by the Clam Water Act and the Rivers and Harbors ,
Ac
Federal and SMe agents are authorized to be an said property when accompanied by Wetland and
Natural Resource Consuhants, Inc. staff.
Wetland and Nscural Resource Consultants, Inc. is authorized to pr*Ade supplernentRI informatIon
needed for permit processing at the request of the Corps or DWQ.
property Owner of Record;
Addresx 1V ,fir
Addreea?
A &MM Lhm k
Phone Number- 7G?N S7 Q/
Property Location:i/ w
OWn*M ftnature: r
pate: D
---.. ewde %Ajr?
Nawan OfAQ -. ? 217 pvUem Prrkvn?? 0142
PC Box M CI 20721
NNehw% NC UL" W4174051
lE!-d Z00/ZDO d 191-1 -MNO ZZ;ti EXZ-d3S

31
N.. 0' 0 90 0' b 1,09 ' Z 5 b

+ ,-?
- 'gym

?
eY' d' 4 ? ,:? S 5 d ? f ? I ?fy'p? ,,,- ? r*!. ? ? ^a
•4
ti
f" 4
yg

Y -H { yr h -y 'L
"xsFy a'

..:.r'•-

s
,

?
.

F
t
`s J
.
r
e
, y # 1
:
;' { 7
fib

r
•, (
" pr
i %
z (
t

S
d
21
t
a +t
r ? s t?
,k _ r f ?, w ? pi

'
g ;M d

Y ?l 14,e
I
e, ?
3 i
J ? a jam.
w t ,?
J

I, ? F P'
I ? ? f
•,
?
? 4 .
? .

f F...
'
J m
vt 0 1 ld `u •
Q ?' _
f t

.
. "A 0 t a f
t ?,? v s tt ?,- '4 i

+I
h 'Ir
k
,

f • , !
e
%

,h
40

JI
N,. 06. 0 ,,0' a A'
1 17 a
^s
O

5
J
D
co
O
3
C
W '
O
$ L
I Z Z
0 =3
To
U
D C
c
O
10
a.
(0
JU
d
U1
O
O
to
a
S
o
L
0?0 C
O) ?
zom
U

L >
o P.
CL
N
N
ZN
E O
0u
a
C
}' D
u

d?
o ° 0 o
v
a, Q d
V) v? y VI
d qI
d Oa . Q 0 V1
- w 00--o Q, O d
Vl 41 V) = N N N N O
C d N C C• C C C N N
Us-
0. V L ?'.' U L V V G
y L f' N
Lo CL OD OD
w - OD CD
O O O°
O O w
N N 41 N O C 4, _ N N 4
O
++
OD N co %; N
E E E L E
4, N 4' f0 ?` N N Q a Q
N
Gl ,? C y A W,, >
c c.y E Cap >.rn
C N ??00
ftl O ry G r
u v v y v t9 E d Q
c c c w >?oo N
a A U O ca GO I
m u v T 10- Em
I c c CO I I= c
ca U?vt Emm ?N
m?ca co U
I I
co U co
t
Co c i ? s,

Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this protect, please enter "Not appiicame or ..N/H .)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested:39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification is not
required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete section
VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page 4), and the
project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern
(see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
H. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Centex Homes, Contact: Mr. Chris Robusto
Mailing Address: 4235 South Stream Blvd., Suite 400
Charlotte, NC 28217
Telephone Number: 704-574-0316 Fax Number: 704-522-0975
E-mail Address: n/a
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Tamp Bandy
Company Affiliation: Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants, Inc.
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 224
Newton, North Carolina 28658
Telephone Number: 828-302-3437 Fax Number: 828465-3050
E-mail Address: wnrincQ)aol.com
M. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local landmarks such
as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property boundaries and
development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map and site plan must include
a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings, impervious surfaces, or other facilities
must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should include the appropriate USGS Topographic
Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps
may be included at the applicant's discretion, so long as the property is clearly defined. For
administrative and distribution purposes, the USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no
larger than 11 by 17-inch format; however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-
Page 1 of 7
size construction drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans
are reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that the
project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Newell
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): n/a
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 06-048-007
4. Location
County: Union Nearest Town: Marvin
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): unknown at this time
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): south on hwy 16 from Charlotte, east on
Hwy 84, south on Waxhaw - Indian Trail Road (See attached maps)
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 34°59'33"N 80°41'15"W
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): 409
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): unnamed tributaries to Price Mill Creek
8. River Basin: Catawba
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The River
Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project at the
time of this application: Site consists of wooded and abandoned agricultural areas. Surrounding
properties consist of residential and agricultural lands.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Development of a
residential subdivision using typical heavy earthmoving equipment.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: develop a residential subdivision
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this project
(including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include the USACE
Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and certifications were
issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits, certifications or other useful
information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and buffer impacts, along with associated
mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project, list and describe permits issued for prior
segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with construction schedules.
no previous actions known
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work, and
provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
no intent to modify proposed plans
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to wetlands,
open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also provide justification
for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent and temporary, must be listed
herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all
streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are
proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as
appropriate. Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly
for wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is
needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 2 of 7
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Regulated wetlands and channels have been
located in the Geld and surveyed within all reaches of land disturbing activities associated with
the development of the property, and are shown on the attached maps.
2. Individuallv list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Area of Located within Distance to
impact
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact 100-year
Floodplain** Nearest
Stream Type of Wetland***
(on ma )
(acres) (es/no) (linear feet)

n/a
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to:
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list
impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood
Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodpiain maps. Maps are available through the
FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or online at http://www.fema.gov.
***List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested
wetland, beaver pond, Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be
made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: entire floodplain not
evaluated for total extent of wetlands
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.034 temporary under NW12
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream
Impact No.
on ma
Type of Impact* Impact
Length
linear ft)
Stream Name** Average
stream width
Before Impact Perennial or
intermittent?
leasespecify)
NW39-1 culvert / rip-rap 74 UT to Price Mill 4 int / imp.
NW39-1 temporary (water line) 6 UT to Price Mill 4 int / imp.
NW39-2 culvert / rip-rap 73 UT to Price Mill 6 per/ imp.
NW39-2 temporary (water line) 6 UT to Price Mill 6 per / imp.
NW39-3 fill 155 UT to Price Mill 2 int / not imp.
NW394 culvert / rip-rap 52 UT to Price Mill 2 int / not imp.
NW39-5 fill 162 UT to Price Mill 2 int / not imp.
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts
and associated rip-rap, dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include
linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain), stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions,
etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed, plans and profiles showing the
linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed
tributary) to the nearest downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the
USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at www.usgs.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and
printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com, www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 147 total linear feet to peregnial
or intermittent / important, 381 total linear feet to intermittent / not important or temporary
Page 3 of 7
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic Ocean and
.41- -.+- -f +k. TT C 1 6-Inw•
au v?uva
Open Water
Impact
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
No. (on (acres) (if applicable) bay, ocean, etc.)
map)

n/a
n/a

List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limned to: fill,
excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Pond Creation
if construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be included
above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should be described here
and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created. in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of draw-down
valve or spillway, etc.): n/a
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond, local
stormwater requirement, etc.): n/a
Size of watershed draining to pond: n/a Expected pond surface area: n/a
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and financial
viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact site layouts, and
explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts were minimized once the
desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction techniques to be followed during
construction to reduce impacts.
Impacts to perennial and intermittent / important stream beds has been minimized to the
maximum extent practicable (two proposed road crossings to important streams have been
abandoned) Impacts to regulated wetlands have been totally avoided.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC Division of
Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to freshwater wetlands
or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide Permits,
published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when necessary to ensure
that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors including size and type of proposed
impact and function and relative value of the impacted aquatic resource will be considered in determining
acceptability of appropriate and practicable mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be
appropriate and practicable include, but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing
and maintaining wetland and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and
replacing losses of aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving
similar functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order for
USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application lacking a required
Page 4 of 7
mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete. An applicant may also
choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for
Stream Work in North Carolina, available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide as much
information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions and/or map, if
offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet) of mitigation proposed
(restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view, preservation mechanism (e.g., deed
restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a description of the current site conditions and proposed
method of construction. Please attach a separate sheet if more space is needed.
approximately 12,000 linear feet of stream located on the site will not be impacted by the
proposed development. Deed notifications will be placed on all that have regulated channels or
wetlands. Extensive buffers have been maintained to the maximum extent practicable to all
channels. Site aradina is to be completed such that each lot that is adinent to a stream
incorportates a buffer prior to flow entering the creek. Land disturbance or vegetation
removal within COS areas has been minimized or avoided to provide more buffer / natural
areas.
Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program
(NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at [phone]
to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior to submittal of a PCN.
For additional information regarding the application process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check
the appropriate box on page three and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): n/a
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): n/a
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): n/a
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): n/a
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): n/a
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public (federal/state)
land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of
the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? Note: If you are not sure
whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA coordinator at [phone] to review
current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a copy of
the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to required state
and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide justification for these
impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein, and must be clearly
Page 5 of 7
identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a map, whether or not impacts
are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ Regional Office may be included as
appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233 (Meuse), 15A
NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer
Requirements), or other (please identify nta?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer mitigation is
required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Miti ation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation of
Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or Payment
into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified within
15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
n/a
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from the
property.
Existing impervious areas consist of a single dwelling and other incidental driveways. The
proposed development site has a density of 1.2 dwelling units per acre which equates to an average
imperviousness of 20-25% (nationally recognized values for this type of development). Detention is
provided on the property between Waxhaw - Indian Trail and Billy Howie Roads (as seen on
impact may NW39 5) Extensive buffers have been maintained to the maximum extent practicable
to all channels Site grading is to be completed such that each lot that is adiaent to a stream
incorportates a buffer prior to the flow entering the creek. Land disturbance or vegetation removal
within the COS areas has been minimized or avoided to provide more buffer / natural areas.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater
generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
sanitary sewer outfall
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ?No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ?No
Page 6 of 7
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired construction
dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may choose to list constraints
associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on work schedules (e.g., draw-down
schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or
other issues outside of the applicant's control).
n/a
03
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 7 of 7
Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter 'ivot Appucaoie or -iviA .)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
? 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 12
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification is not
required, check here:
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete section
VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page 4), and the
project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern
(see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
H. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Centex Homes, Contact: Mr. Chris Robusto
Mailing Address: 4235 South Stream Blvd., Suite 400
Charlotte, NC 28217
Telephone Number: 704-574-0316 Fax Number: 704-522-0975
E-mail Address: n/a
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Tamp Bandy
Company Affiliation: Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants, Inc.
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 224
Newton, North Carolina 28658
Telephone Number: 828-302-3437 Fax Number: 828-465-3050
E-mail Address: wnrinc(i?aol.com
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local landmarks such
as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property boundaries and
development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map and site plan must include
a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings, impervious surfaces, or other facilities
must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should include the appropriate USGS Topographic
Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps
may be included at the applicant's discretion, so long as the property is clearly defined. For
administrative and distribution purposes, the USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no
larger than 11 by 17-inch format; however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-
Pagel of 7
size construction drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans
are reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that the
project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Newell
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): n/a
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 06-048-007
4. Location
County: Union Nearest Town: Marvin
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): unknown at this time
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): south on
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 34°59'33"N 80°41'15"W
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): 409
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): unnamed tributaries to Price Mill Creek
8. River Basin: Catawba
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The River
Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project at the
time of this application: Site consists of wooded and abandoned agricultural areas. Surrounding
properties consist of residential and agricultural lands.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Development of a
residential subdivision using typical heavy earthmovine equipment.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: develop a residential subdivision
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this project
(including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include the USACE
Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and certifications were
issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits, certifications or other useful
information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and buffer impacts, along with associated
mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project, list and describe permits issued for prior
segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with construction schedules.
no previous actions known
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work, and
provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
no intent to modify proposed plan within the foreseeable future
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to wetlands,
open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also provide justification
for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent and temporary, must be listed
herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all
streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are
proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as
appropriate. Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly
for wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is
needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 2 of 7
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Regulated wetlands and channels have been
located in the field and surveyed within all reaches of land disturbing activities associated with
the development of the property, and are shown on the attached mans.
7 T-A;.,;d..a11v 1ia+ wPf1anA ;mr?ants hPlnw-
Wetland
Impact
Site Number
on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact

)
(acres) Located within
100-year
Floodplain *
(es/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
linear feet
Type of Wetland***
NW12-1 temporary, sewer line 0.011 yes 116 forested
NW12-2 temporary, sewer line 0.015 yes 115 forested
NW12-3 temporary, sewer line 0.008 yes 54 forested

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not hmlted to.
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list
impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood
Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through. the
FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or online at http://www.fema.gov.
***List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested
wetland, beaver pond, Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be
made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: entire floodplain not
evaluated for total extent of wetlands
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.034 under NW12
3 Individuall list all intermittent and erennial stream im acts below:
Stream
Impact No.
on ma
Type of Impact* Imppact
Length
(linear ft)
Stream Name** Average
stream width
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
leasespecify)
n/a
n/a

4
n/a
n/a
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts mcluae, nut are not 11mTEeu w: Uuivciis
and associated rip-rap, dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include
linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain), stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions,
etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed, plans and profiles showing the
linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed
tributary) to the nearest downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the
USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at www.usgs.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and
printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com, www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Page 3 of 7
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: no stream impacts under NW12
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic Ocean and
anu nthPr water nfthe. I1.S_) helnw-
Open Water
Impact
Type of Impact* Area of
Pas)
Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody
lake, pond, estuary, sound,
No. (on
(acres) (if applicable)
bay, ocean, etc.)
map)

n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill,
excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Pond Creation
if construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be included
above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should be described here
and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of draw-down
valve or spillway, etc.): n/a
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond, local
stormwater requirement, etc.): n/a
Size of watershed draining to pond: n/a Expected pond surface area: n/a
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and financial
viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact site layouts, and
explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts were minimized once the
desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction techniques to be followed during
construction to reduce impacts.
Initially Proposed sewer line locations were evaluated for wetlands and some eliminated for
locations that avoid impacts all together. Minimal impacts have been achieved by currently
proposed locations.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC Division of
Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to freshwater wetlands
or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide Permits,
published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when necessary to ensure
that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors including size and type of proposed
impact and function and relative value of the impacted aquatic resource will be considered in determining
acceptability of appropriate and practicable mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be
appropriate and practicable include, but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing
Page 4 of 7
and maintaining wetland and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and
replacing losses of aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving
similar functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order for
USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application lacking a required
mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete. An applicant may also
choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for
Stream Work in North Carolina, available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide as much
information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions and/or map, if
offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet) of mitigation proposed
(restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view, preservation mechanism (e.g., deed
restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a description of the current site conditions and proposed
method of construction. Please attach a separate sheet if more space is needed.
backfills will be placed to original grade, maximum maintenance corridor will be 10' wide
Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program
(NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at [phone]
to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior to submittal of a PCN.
For additional information regarding the application process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check
the appropriate box on page three and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): n/a
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): n/a
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): n/a
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): n/a
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): n/a
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public (federal/state)
land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of
the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? Note: If you are not sure
whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA coordinator at [phone] to review
current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a copy of
the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to required state
and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide justification for these
impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein, and must be clearly
Page 5 of 7
identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a map, whether or not impacts
are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ Regional Office may be included as
appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233 (Meuse), 15A
NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer
Requirements), or other (please identify HDa ?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer mitigation is
required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation of
Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or Payment
into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified within
15A NCAC 2B .0242 or. 0260.
n/a
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from the
property.
No stormwater will be generated from sewer line
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater
generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
sanitary sewer outfall
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ?No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ?No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired construction
dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may choose to list constraints
associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on work schedules (e.g., draw-down
schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or
other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Page 6 of 7
n/a
q zz??
,,ft
Signature
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 7 of 7
°c
4 ? t. •?+ 8 x= a ?. `\
y 4w 1 I 2 G ?? ?z
° 2 e\ ez
?,ej M?``??'?=,ev g • \ e' ; i?a ? I \\.. .,' / , ? ? e 1? `eye ?,
`•?< '2?' \{j\? rib ,pl \? I .?\I ?i /? II
x.14. ',` \ ?. ??\ ¢1 ??' ? ''1 ,? ?? t I \ ? ? ?SC•F` \\\?\
I I
.A
/? - b ry I i ?? 1
• is V? _ _ ••? ?? xD / Cq Q. VI r 1 ! [ \ ~ 4.?i.
}\ I W
A N"
41
. ? rcct (? \??4
Centex Hones, Newell Property 'v •? ?? / ?1 / ?????? ??
Impact Sheet Details Locations
I ? e °i e?qc \ \
I
I
- -
?j - -- - 1=-- I --?
- >4h0'0 -
-t- UU
i
RD 626.
j7p
O
6-.7 FIDE?
O O
O OO O O
I O
--A -i-p
?O ------- _ I O
J
i
' - I
--
- I_
r
0
Q
n ? n 0- P O? I
C 16 .>0
O O
r
D9
F?
- ? o ;oo o ?
??pF
O/
632 5° -
-
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: Newell Date: 07/22/03
Applicant / Owner: Centex Homes County: Union
Investigator: Bandy State: North Carolina
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes ® No ? Community ID:U land
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes El No ® Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes ? No ® Plot ID:DF4
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Indicator Stratum Dominant Plant Species In icat r Stratum
1. Acer rubrum FAC tree 9. Partenocissus quinq. FAC vine
2. Fraxinus pennsylvanica FACW sapling 10. Toxicodendron redicans FAC vine
3. Liquidambar styraciflua FAC+ tree 11. Wis rotundifolia FAC vine
4. Liriodendron tulipifera FAC tree 12. Rubus spp FAC herb
5. Alnus alta FACU sapling 13. Eulalia viminea FAC+ herb
6. Juniperus virginiana FACU sapling 14.
7. Lonicera japonica FAG vine 15.
8. Ligustrum sinense FAC shrub 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 77
Remarks: area dominated by AC species
HYDROLOGY
? Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
? Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
? Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
? Other ? Inundated
? Saturated in Upper 12"
® No Recorded Data Available ? Water Marks
? Drift Lines
Field Observations: ? Sediment Deposits
? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) Secondary Indicators:
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >16" (in.) ? Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
? Water-Stained Leaves
? Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: >1611 in.
( ) ? FAC-Neutral Test
? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Cid Drainage Class: Somewhat poorly drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Ultic Hapludalfs Confirm Mapped Type? Yes ? No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-7 A 10YR 5/3 / loam
7-10 E 2.5Y 7/3 2.5Y 8/2 common/faint loam
10-16 Bt 2.5Y 8/3 / clay loam

Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosol ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
? Sulfidic Odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
? Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
? Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes[] No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes ? No
Is the Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? Yes ? No
Remarks:
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: Newell Date: 07/22/03
Applicant / Owner: Centex Homes County: Union
Investigator: Bandy State: North Carolina
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes ® No[:] Community ID:Upland
is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes ? No ® Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes ? No ® Plot ID:DFi
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species In i or Stratum Dominant Plant Species Indi for Stratum
1. Acer rubrum FAC tree 9. Partenocissus quinq. FAC vine
2. Fraxinus pennsylvanica FACW sapling 10. Toxicodendron redicans FAC vine
3. Liquidambar styrac#lua FAC+ tree 11. Wis rotundifolia FAC vine
4. Lihodendron tulipffera FAC tree 12.
5. Alnus alta FACU sapling 13.
6. Juniperus virginiana FACU sapling 14.
7. Lonicera Japonica FAC- vine 15.
8. Ligustrum sinense FAC shrub 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 13
Remarks: area dominated by FAC species, No dominant OBL and only one dominant FACW species present

HYDROLOGY
? Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
? Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
? Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
? Other ? Inundated
? Saturated in Upper 12"
® No Recorded Data Available ? Water Marks
? Drift Lines
Field Observations: ? Sediment Deposits
? Drainage Patterns In Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: 10n.) Secondary Indicators:
? Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >16" in.) ? Water-Stained Leaves

Soil Survey Data
? Local
Depth to Saturated Soil: >16" in.
( ) ?FAC-Neutral Test
? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Zion Drainage Class: Moderately well drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Ultic Hapludalfs Confirm Mapped Type? Yes ? No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
00=8 AP 10YR 5/3 / loam
8-16 Btl 10YR 7/4 / clay loam

/
Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosol ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
? Sulfidic Odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
? Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
? Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ? No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes[] No
Is the Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? Yes[] No
Remarks:
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: Newell Date: 07/22/03
Applicant / Owner: Centex Homes County: Union
Investigator: Bandy State: North Carolina
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes ® No[:] Community ID:Wetland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes ? No ® Transect ID:20 sewer line
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes ? No ® Plot ID:DF2
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species 1 do icator Stratum Dominant Plant Species I d for Stratum
1. NVyssa sylvatica FAC tree 9. Sambucus canadensis FACW- herb
2. Fraxinus pennsylvanica FACW sapling 10. Toxicodendron redicans FAC vine
3. Liquidambar styraciflua FAC+ tree 11. Wis rotundifolia FAC vine
4. Linodendron tulipifera FAC tree 12. Rubus spp FAC herb
5. Acer rubrum FAC sapling 13. Juncus effusus FACW+ herb
6. Juniperus virginiana FACU sapling 14. Comus amomum FACW+ sapling
7. Lonicera japonica FAC- vine 15. Arundinada grgantea FACW herb
8. Ligustrum sinense FAC shrub 16. Alnus serrulata FACW+ shrub
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 87
Remarks: recently formed wetland with herbaceous lavers moving toward wetter species
HYDROLOGY
? Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
? Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
? Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
? Other ? Inundated
® Saturated in Upper 12"
® No Recorded Data Available ? Water Marks
? Drift Lines
Field Observations: ? Sediment Deposits
? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) Secondary Indicators:
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 11" (in.) ? Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
? Water-Stained Leaves

Local Soil Survey Data
?
Depth to Saturated Soil: 11" (in,
) ? FAC-Neutral Test
? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Chewacla Drainage Class: Somewhat poorly drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): (Ch) Fluvaquentic Dystrochrepts Confirm Mapped Type? Yes E] No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-7 A 10YR 5/3 / silt loam
7-16 Bw I OYR 7/2 10YR 6/4 common/distinct loam

/
Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosol ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
? Sulfidic Odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
? Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
® Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Appears that soils are historically brighter Chewacla series with recent sewer line installation causing
wetter conditions, and subsequent prolonged saturation periods.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No[]
Hydric Soils Present? Yes ® No ?
Is the Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? Yes ® No ?
Remarks:
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: Centex Homes 2. Evaluator's name: Tamp Bandy
3. Date of evaluation: 7/22/03 4. Time of evaluation: 3:30 pm
5. Name of stream: UT to Price Mill Creek 6. River basin: Catawba
7. Approximate drainage area: 40 8. Stream order: 1
9. Length of reach evaluated: 70 10. County: Union
11. Site coordinates (if known): NW39-1 12. Subdivision name (if any): Newell
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
(see attached NW39-1 details and location map)
14. Proposed channel work (if any): road crossing and temporary waterline installation reach
15. Recent weather conditions: d-r
16. Site conditions at time of visit: no recent disturbances, wooded buffers with near by development and sewerline within sight of
evaluation location
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: ? Section 10 ? Tidal Waters ? Essential Fisheries Habitat
? Trout Waters ? Outstanding Resource Waters ? Nutrient Sensitive Waters ? Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? ?YES ?NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
Unknown, pond shows on USGS, but appears to have been removed during construction of adjacent residential development
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? ®YES ?NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? ?YES ®NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 30% Residential % Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
20% Forested % Cleared / Logged 50% Other (abandoned agLricultural)
22. Bankfull width: 4 ft 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 18 inches
24. Channel slope down center of stream: ? Flat (0 to 2%) ® Gentle (2 to 4%) ? Moderate (4 to 10%) ? Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: ? Straight ?Occasional bends ®Frequent meander ?Very sinuous ? Braided channel
instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
'
? ' ;,
R
IC C
E R C I >CCS C.. . CO
E!
?ast lVjtMrtntain
Presence of fl persistent pools
stream
i 0-5 0-4 0-5 4
no flow or saturation = 0 isn flow max points)
Evidence of past human alteration
2 0-6 0-5 0-5 3
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max ints
Riparian zone
3 0-6 0--4 0-5 3
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
4 0-5 0-4 - 0-4 4
extensive discharges = 0• no discharges = max points)
Groundwater discharge
-
5
no discharge = 0• springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max 0
3 0-4 b-4 3
f Presence of adjacent floodplain
6 0-4 0-4 0-2 3
+ no flood lain = 0, extensive flood lain = max points)
Entrenchment / floodplain access
7
p 0-5 0-4 0'--2 4
(dee
ly entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)

Presence of adjacent wetlands _
8
j 0-6 0-4
0
2
1
no wetlands = 0, large ad
acent wetlands = max rots -
Channel sinuosity
9 0-5 0-4 0-3 3
(extensive channeliaation = 0• natural meander = m Lx points) _
Sediment input
-
10
extensive deposition= 0• little or no sediment
= max points 0-5 0
4 0-4 2
Size $ diversity of channel bed substrate
11 N 0-4 0-5 2
fine homogenous = 0; large. diverse sizes = ,max points)
Evidence of channel incision' or widening
12
(deeply incised ='O,, stable bed & banks = mac points) 0-5 0-4 0-5 2
Presence 6f major bank failures
13 severe erosion = 0' nb'grosio stable banks = inax " points) 0 -5 0-5 0-5 3
Root depth and density on blinks
14 0-3 0-4 0-5 3
no visible roots = 0' dense roots throughout = max rots
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
15 0-5 0- 4 0-5 3
substantial impact =0; no evidence -max' points)
Presence of riffle. oollripple-poot complexes
16 0-3 0-5 0-6 2
no riffles/ripples or p?ols 0, well-developed = max; points)

k" Habitat complexity
17 0-6 0-6 0-6 3
little or no habitat= 0" ftequent, varied habitats = max
Canopy coverage over streambed
18 ?" $ 0 -'S 0-5 4
no shadin ve etatibn m 0 continuous canopy = max rots
Substrate embeddedness
19
1 embedded = 0- loose swacture = max: 0;-4 0--4 2
Liq Presence ofstreaum invertebrates (see page 4)
20 0-4 0-5 0-5 2
no evidence - 0• corum numerous t"xs = max rots
Presence of amphibians
21 0-4 0-4 0-4 1
no evidence = 0• common numerous t)Ws = max points)

22 1Prese'nce of fish.
0'=-4
0-4
0-4
no evidence = 0-, common, xiutnerous types = max points)
Evidence of wildlife use -
23 nevi =0.: abuildanteviden cc max

i is
po 11

0-6

-5

-3

3
.t•, i a cA Fa'' ?? 4 ? '•'C'?s?5' £?.!R !?k ++
?n
r J
L? : ?
y l?'''.I FE'S'(
h?f'C},Y'4 At `? I
,!.•
' +,a, r5.:
h?}h' •? Y
??(
l
? i s
:!
?4?t ? 114
? 1? t
„ ?i•
? ? X
?
_
.
,.
. Y ?.
}
... -", ?::) .'4 : •'.. ?F p hfap 1 ?l k. i:. a'A. i?.. •'?_,. ?F'.. ? .
4
4a h?.
., W:?°h; r?''A L
. •5tib .
, t .?' ..?.:. >
.>2::: •:t; •?,'• : S • .?.4 . ?;y:,}S.. r.r,'h:R ! ,k r? i N:
FSi,°4:. b aJ .G.1 '•1J•?t'„i',`;t "?M'{,; fir. ` -•[ 't"
I ! .uf•e :N M??itl -: l U : fe'ilr:>" L
Ma i^gti. f t` ? S G} T }" i >
,jht t t"?i• ., A.?•

* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
USACE AID#
DWQ#
Site # (indicate on attached
MI STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: Centex Homes
3, Date of evaluation: 7/22/03
5. Name of stream: UT to Price Mill Creek
7. Approximate drainage area: 110
9. Length of reach evaluated: 70
11. Site coordinates (if known): NW39-2
2. Evaluator's name: Tamp Bandy
4. Time of evaluation: 3:30 pm
6. River basin: Catawba
8. Stream order: 2
10. County: Union
12. Subdivision name (if any): Newell
,I
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
(see attached NW39-2 details and location man)
14. Proposed channel work (if any): road crossing and temporary waterline installation reach
15. Recent weather conditions: d9a
16. Site conditions at time of visit: no recent disturbances
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: ? Section 10 ? Tidal Waters ? Essential Fisheries Habitat
? Trout Waters ? Outstanding Resource Waters ? Nutrient Sensitive Waters ? Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? ?YES ENO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? ®YES ?NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? '[YES JONC
21. Estimated watershed land use: 10% Residential % Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
90% Forested % Cleared / Logged % Other ()
22. Bankfull width: 5 ft
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 4 ft
24. Channel slope down center of stream: ? Flat (0 to 21/6) ® Gentle (2 to 4%) ? Moderate (4 to 10%) ? Steep (>100/0)
25. Channel sinuosity: ? Straight ?Occasional bends ®Frequent meander ? Very sinuous ? Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 52 Comments: perennial and important
Evaluator's Signature
1
4
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
CHARACTERIS'J<WS ECURE IC?1N YO[lY3 irINGE ' 'SCARE
__
Coastal Piedmont mountain

1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
_
0-5
0-4
t) -5
4
_(110 glow or saturation = 0 strong; flow = max points)
T
2 ]Evidence of past human alteration 0_b 0-S ?
0-5 2
extensive alteration= 0. no alteration = max ints

3 Riparian zone
0-6
0•-4
0-5
4
no butter = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)

4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
extensive discharges = 0. no discharges = max points)

5 Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
4
(no discharge = 0-. springs, sees wetlands. etc. = max

6 Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
t}-2 _
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max tots _

?
7 Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
O-4
0-2
1
(deeply entrenched = 0, frenuent flooding = max points _

8 Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
t)-4
0-2
no wetlands = Oi large adjacent wetlands = max points)

9 Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
3
_. -_(extensive channelization = 0• natural meander = max points)

10 Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
3
extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points] _

11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
.
NA*

0-4

0- 5

3
_ fine homogenous = 0-, large, diverse sizes = max?oints

l2 Evidence of channel incision or widening
0--5
0-4
0- 5
1
r _-(dceiv incised = 0; stable bed. & banks = max inks -- - -?-
1 Presence of major bank failures 0-5 0
-5 0-5 1
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points) .

14
Root depth and density on banks - --?_

0-3
..
__
0-=4

0--5

2
,. ono visible roots = 0• dense roots throe hout= max points)
_
ri
t
r
r
r
15 Impact by ag
culture, lives
ock, o
timbe
p
oduction 0 `5 0-4 0-5 1
-(substantial impact =0; no evidence= max points - -

lb Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
3
no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)
'-'t
17 Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
3
little or no habitat = 0; fre uent varied habitats = max
18 Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-S
0-5
5
no shading vegetation = 0, continuous canopy = max arts
19 Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
3
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max

20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0--4
0-5
0-5
2
no evidence = 0• comuno numerous types = max points)

21 Presence of amphibians

-
0-4
0-4
0-4
2
no evidence = 0
, common, numerous types = max points
Presence of fish
22
0`-4
0--4
0-4 1
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max pints
?
Evidence of 'wildlife use
23
0-fi
0-$
O-5? 3
ono evidence = 0 abundant evidence
= max points)- +
_
, - -_ _ _ ---
------ -_---
Total Points Possible too 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first }gage) ? 52
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
2
J
DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached
e ia s i STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: Centex Homes 2. Evaluator's name: Tamp Bandy
3. Date of evaluation: 7/22/03 4. Time of evaluation: 3:30 pin
5. Name of stream: UT to Price Mill Creek 6. River basin: Catawba
7. Approximate drainage area: 16 acre 8. Stream order: 1
9. Length of reach evaluated: 100 10. County: Union
11. Site coordinates (if known): NW39-5 12. Subdivision name (if any): Newell
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
(see attached NW39-5 details and location map)
14. Proposed channel work (if any): fill
15. Recent weather conditions: d
16. Site conditions at time of visit: no recent disturbances
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: ? Section 10 ? Tidal Waters ? Essential Fisheries Habitat
? Trout Waters ? Outstanding Resource Waters ? Nutrient Sensitive Waters ? Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? DYES ENO If yes, estimate the water surface area: offisite
pond shown on USGS no longer present (filled and graded by adjacent land owner, appears to be have constructed in high ground)
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? EYES ?NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? DYES ENO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 10% Residential % Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
901/6 Forested % Cleared / Logged % Other (__)
22. Bankfull width: 5 ft 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 2 ft
24. Channel slope down center of stream: ? Flat (0 to 2%) E Gentle (2 to 4%6) ? Moderate (4 to 10%) ? Steep (>10%6)
25. Channel sinuosity: ? Straight EOccasional bends ?Frequent meander ?Very sinuous ? Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 26 Comments: Typical of ephemeral / intermittent and not-important streams to be impacted on
site, No flows or aquatic life present during evaluations and mostly unstable. Appear to have formed from headcutting from recent
agricultural land uses (morphology similar to ephemeral channels)
USACE AID#
Evaluator's Signature Date
I V
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
? ?
3 * t ??.?• : tt. .. 3._9W9 ?I-t ???;qY t-: '4 N -
•; ^33 .t, Nt.'.v v,- 'RS°k?,(?+ JF H ,pk f ?+' i Y
t t? M d. V ?
€ ^ 1 "'
q ?`}
dW xi ? ,,'

_ , sm1• rH..- r ?? 4 N, ''?F"rvi M.i b

: 4?,
IF
W
Presenee
t ow persistent pools"in stream
-
?$ 1 ,
no flow ot'' on = t3 strop flow max tntis 0
5 0 - 4 tJ` 5
y z idlsntt li?uman alt+arntion "

extenstvd Wt6*ioti =,.O• no alteration = max ints - l? - 6 0-5
0 --5
1
3 Rlpi?11ian zone µ

no buffer Q'. Conti ou , wide.buffer.
= max ints 4
6 0- 4 0-5 3
Evid ' hutment 0
r
c6enifcal€ discharges
?
4
` ,
ten
i
= O
di
h
no
dischair = 0 ? 5 ; 4-
0 0-4 2
ex
s
ve
sc
arges ,
"
?
max ints
A Groundwrater discharge
t 5
no dischargg 0, fS?Tings Seeps, wetian etc. = mast 0- 3 0-4 6-4
b Presence of adjacent flood"plain `
t
>
(no f1 plain 0 extensi a flood lain t max ints 0 0-4 0-2 3
Enttnchmpnt ,? fltwdjins n'?ss -

.
dee l entreneh€d 0, frequent ,
flopdi =:'tJ= nfs 0 _ 4
a (12 i
8,
.
"'d

no wetlands -.:0-, 1 adjacent wetlands = max inls 0-6 0-4 0-2

9 Channel sinuosity
-

extensive chimneliz.atrou natural meander= ma.?poiuts 1 0---5 0
4 0-3 1
Sedltnent iinpat '

Yx- 10
extensive 'non= C° jtttle or no sed,mettt = znaY ' oints 0 5. Q- 4 0- 4 1
`ti 11 5rze &=diversify df'.cti?oi<ncl.bed 5ulystra#e A*

5
s
fine homogenous f7; df?e diverse'sizes = max lets
' iT 0-4 0-5 1
}
12 Evidence of cl thncl inetsio
n ots mdet?ing
'

dee l znc sed - 0' stable bcd &bi nks'- tnaxvoints 0- 5 0-4 0--5 1
13 Presence-of major hank fallures ° '
-'.
1
severeerosxo. no'erosion, stable' lrauks Inax fnts
--- - -- - 5
0
- "
k
1 Rq dt ith anti dcasity on b?dks
4
0
- 5
2
nn visible r 0; der?seroots throe hdtzt +iiitt5t - 0

15 Impact, by agriculture, livestpek, on?timber -prodijdion

substanl ? im ct'-0;yno evidence max into 0 5 . 0-4 0 - 5 1
?:. 16 Presentc M'tiffle-lyooUripple-pool;comp7ces Q, ' '

no riffles/t'ippt?S ai`_?OoN = 0, well-develokd = max mints (Y
5 0 6
17: _' H'ab'itat complexity

the or no,h0ital = 0,. ucut vanedtabitats = max , 0_ 0-6 0-6 1
.18 Cagopy 6 rage over i> bed 0 µ 5 ' 0= S 0- 5 4
no shading vegbtatf4?-'0;continuous Cailopy mgr nts ".
Y
_

r 19 [ISitbstratC embeddedness "r -
4 - _
0 - 4
2
, dccpI ghibedded = 0; loose stnicti re =mail
0 . Presence o1'?re4m Invertebrates (see page 4) ? '
µ µ
2
no evidence = ( ;gtbmon, numerDus types = ipax points 0
j4 0
S 0 5
1 Mknce of amphibians : -
2
no evidenee = 0,,common; nanicrous types max F, is i
•- 0--4 0-4 0-4 .-
•; .' ?rbdence ot"tish- t
=
22
na evidence 0 'ebrntnon. numerorts t?s = }nax?oints 0-4 0-- 4 -4'?"
'Ndenre of wildlife,use

a
'
0
6
AL 5
0-3
110 evidence _ 1.
bididantev
ce = inax i ,
? ?`?
'
3
•??t':?1 1? ?•J'3 f ?t?0? q?V +.+,W+.ti . ? ?A?. . N
?4
, T y^y?F

?+t?°
ja.;;?y,.'ia?•P,
i?d"",5'a;•u,;;ib;i>,scR??•7? _ ,•a d t
4?
yh^''.+ 'ui 26
* T hese c haracteristics are not assessed in coastal ctrPamc
R~`a
t
~~l~s
~ ~R Mp1
2'~
GRAY
,i NIR
Raw ~ - _ 37 8' WIRE FEN ~
77L3 ~~w o „R~22~5, E 7~8 ~ 1'S ~L33 ~ ~ „ 3~
N 87 47 48 ~ 25 53 J o ~ CN~~ N g S3 E 30 ~ 47 T o ~ d o ~
~ 242, 99 .R r _a ~ G
? ~ ~ p~ ~A & ~ S p N~ 3 ~ I T~ C~ QSNgItiq~, ~,~n ~ I N B
~ " 9 q F~~14~9~~( R~ 3J~d I g99~ ~ R ~ ~ Z ~ ~ C~ ~D ' V ~ W
~ 61~> 4> 616 I~ N O <J 4 0 0 l C
d- 0~6 r
s., ~ - 6~~ ~~~~,~j.. ~ y,, o~ ~ , ~
U `"a~„ 0~~3 I 11
a ~ Ul ~ A ~
i ~q ~ / i
/ ~jd` E~~S I I ) ~ lij ice:, ~o
~,D~i ~ Fq~_ ~ 1 i ~ ~ 1 ' ' ' J ° ~ O i
~ ~ ~'4.__ 9 ~ T i / ~ c'~ , p ~ ~4 6?~ > ' T' ~ i - N ~ ~ ~ ~ _ / r,~ 1 ~
/ i i ~ 1 l 1 ! rN 6 s~ N ~S''1 1~~r o1.SMH ~ ~
~/J 16 Q ~ s / ~ o , s ~i
~ ~ ~ ; T ~ l' ,~ro,~ o% ~9 ~ ~ ~ ! , ~ ~ ~T 0~~ `0 % ~ 'o ~ ~ ~
1~~ ~ z , ~ 1, ~ o ti 1 N l ( ~ ~,1 i ~ I~~ ~~i ,~O e r
41 ~ l 1 8, o~ , N ~ i i a I~~S1~ 6 ~ ~ ~ 4 i
~ ~ ~ ~'F~~'F~~ ~ C~, ~ ~z
~ S ~ ~ ~ / g, ~ ~ / ~ ~s / N~ ~ 71 ~ i ~ T C '1
o ~ ~l , s o ~ / S S ~ T -II` - ~
1 ~ ~ 3 ~ S ~ ~ EI 8 1 ~ / ~ J a V / i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
M, ~ ~ on, T ~ 1 , 9 ~ I OT l ~ ~ 4T ~ ~ l ~ ~ - 6 l~ ti
q 48 p 3~ e ~i j l S p IN 6r SS / ~ 6 6. ; ~ 96
~ ~ IKE ~ ~ ~ ~ N S 6 ~1, / ~S & 0,, S 6~ < 6' 57 3 o~ 6 9
9 s ~ ~ ~ E 1048, 0 ~ ,3 ~ o rR~r i 6, T 8 ~ ~ TRF~ 7 1 ~ ~
o ti ~ ~ 3 ~ ~J \ ~f ~ C ° 43e-- / i<q ~ ~ ~ X51 ~ ~9 ~ t
~T J i ti o / ~ Ti I ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~E < ~ ~ r ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ 0~ ~ ~ v _ / ~ ~ ~ o , ~ , 1 F ~
- - - ~ ~ 1 1 ~ ~ d m'~ `OS s ~ 1 r r ~ sy
B mce' m° ~ ~m ~ 0 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ oN BNa , I
' I K ~ o o i gip. I ~ ~p S'~. Q" 3p ~`~F~ I 9~ 3> E SS IR 1
/ ! may. ~i I
,Ij s 2 ~ e ,i s 1° ~
7~ o ~ rh ~C a \ _ ~(1 ~ Q w „a *ww '3~~ 211 h~ v i ~o°~ i A„ ,d - ~ ~ ~ i,i~r~~~ 5
~6 ~ e C/' ~ ~~6 T ~ E 1
8 ~ ~ ,7 - - ti ~ ~ t 6~ SS ~ k 3 p~ ~ O - - - - r.- - - ' i_, - -
~0 - ti ~ - O 9 0 o.. u
a~ Q ~ ~ ~ i o Q ~ / ~ ~ - ~ a ~ o~ ~ 5 ~ ~ - --r ; , s
0 Qo ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ , o° U ~ a i ~F ' I~ ~ / l E i ~ ~ w ~ R
01 ~ ~ O i wee I ~ ~ ~ V Q~~ ~ 1 , ~
I O ~ I E a ~ ~ R i ~I i ~ 1 ~ ~ ~
Z _ / ~ r 1~I r~ - ~ + l"~rc;"C ~ %~~i ~ ~ ~ ~ - - , ,
m \ ~ 1 ;v\ Q o / i
ti ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ W ~i ~ _O ~ i ( , ~
~ / ~ 4 - ~ R ~ \ i ~ ~ P ~ 1~-pTf1y.m I ^r~~Lp1 g'{~ ' r - ~ .1. J ti ll• 0 / I ~ ~ `W I i 'VL 0 j ~J ~ 8 ~L ~o,. ~ ~ 1
' 1 c a, ~ / ~ ~9 S ~ ~ z4 C, <o , T =
~ zeq , - ~ _ ~q c ~ T 0 Ili ~ S f N - ~ a~~( T
2 - ,o ~ ~ . z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Si` p~ ~ ~ 0 EI ~ ~ o ~ - ~ y N -A ~ T F _ -L ~ s y
T o ~ ~ F ` ~ Nqr by l / ~ q~R FS ~ ' ~ _ 7 I I S
1 ~ ~ j ~ E, 9~8~ # ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ iG Y ~ f ti ~ 9 ~ < < , , ~ ~ 6 ~ 1 E ~S ~ , S
1 ~ ~ r ~p - - ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ f T 6 ~ % ~ - l ~ / ,
1 ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 `Z~ ~ ~n,, ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ` ~ ~ s a r 'E'I
T M, a
N 1 ~ ~ ~ ~--t---~-' ~T ~g ~ , ~ ~~~'V~4 ~ ~ ' ; ~ M S ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ S 56. SMN
~ < v m ~ - ~ o ~ ~ ~ 0 0 4+s ~ ~ 4Q H T o.o ~,.7 38~~ ~ s ~ , ~ i c M
T 1- s, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , , ~ ~ 1 r ~ / ~ B
T ~ ri ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ 8.24
'gyp ~ o 6, 1 ~ ~ ~ a
o ~ ~ V ~ ~ ' 14+2 ~ I ~ a 5+6 _ ? ~ I ~ - a ~ ~ 9 i' ~ ~ / n ~ 8
o g o, p o~ ~ A 1 ~ + , ~ ~ ~
~ ~ E p ~ m ~ I • s. ~ \ A f'l
0 O ~ A 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • S $ ~ ~ ~ / ~ TI ° M,
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r~(~1 / ~ fTl
1R ~ E c ~ ~ C av 2 ~ ~ b \ ~ ~L x 1 "'ccclll it C7 f'l
C ~ so ~I 9 ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ a ~ ~ ~ co
wy' - 'p per' a as 5 • \ i , ~ o V - i ~ i~~- i . A ` 4. 44 ~ an. ~a 'I ~ . i ~ i ~ ~l i
~ ~ ~ ~ ti ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ae ~ ~ O is a +35 I ~ ~ n~ ^ q~~p
~ ~ _ ~ ~~1 . ~ ~ , . 17.95) ~ j i~ ~ ~ y i "b.- n /Q~ - - ,f eo
~ ~ ~ _ ~ _
1 J ~ t ~ ~€~,ca ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t~ ~ i ~ 1 - - , ~ ~ _ ~ / ; i Otis ~ ~ ~ ~ S,yV ~ ~ _ _
~ B ~ ~ - ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ j~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ b E~ - ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; , ti _ ~ i „ ~ _ i „ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ; t ~ i ~ , . ,mss ~ ~%r , ~ ~ ti ~ ~~r 4 - ~ ~ 1 v ~ i
_ _ r _ ~ ~ - - ; t~ \ 5 0
~ o ti•i~ ti ~ ~5 ~ ~ I 1 ~ ~ _ _ _ ; . ~ ~
ry cb 6~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ O _ _ _ ~ _ - 1 ~x~ l~ ~ ~ A. ~ ~ ~ - o ~ ~ J - e.w id ~ - ' - .~du0 m` ~ i / a +88:84 xo~eo~ -~`j - - - ~ ~ j - ~ - ~ ~ S ( ~ ~ ~ ~ l Y ~ ' i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - A V f
~ 4.84' ~ ~ ~ I ~ - ~ / S i % i / ~ ~ I~ ~ _ ~ 2+. ^k I ~ , ~ ~ ~ °
oor eu.m i o ~~a ~ ~ / 6,~7 . i „ff c ( ~ - Ar w reaso ~ _ ~c,2 ~ ~ ti .o ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 i ~ ~ ~ S 1 ~ aze °j ~ ~I V~ ~ ~ i l /gyp) / - ~ l W ` f.~} ~ i R .B`3~~ - ~ 4 I V pP8 i ~ ~ ~ ~ _ _ _ ~ T ~ 1 ,1 l~ , ~ ~
i 7 V x ~ ~ i _ / ~0 _ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ 111 j
~ _ _ ~ - - _ - M-, - - - aeu ~ 1 e ~ / ~ I /
0 ~ / / T 9 ,p a ~ A I, ~ p ~ ' ~ a5 ~ ~ z5 ~ ~~l- Zf ~ ~A ~ i f i ~ i '~l ' ; ~ \(~~~~~.gyyq°~ , i -moo+t - ~ ~ ~ ~ / ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ / i
~ rw. ea 8 ~ nie w i ~ a.,P ~ 1 ~ ~ / ~ ~ / '~.A ~ ~S r ~,i ~ t ~ ~A ~ -OVA ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 6+38. 1 ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ { l ~I! ~
i" ~ ~ t~" , ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ r~ i ~ cA _ ~ l i ~ ~ nb ~/1~~ ~ I~ I ~ 9 ~~1 i 0 ' ~ i ii _ ~ '
_ _ _ k ~ \ i~ a _ W I f 1 w.
~ 'ti o i ~d / mu ~ ~ ~ I \ /rte - C _ g' 6 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v t N, l ~ I v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , a z ~
~n ~ Z l ~ ~ ~ .c" ~ ~ ~ 3+12.8~~ ~ i Q/~ ~ ~1 wore ~ "~;it, ~ ~ ~ i / ~ I ~ , 2 e~ o ~ I ``A\ ~ ~ ~ `!:h ~ l x'.00' L / it - ~ ~ ~j,, ~ ~ V ~ --i ~ r ~~~I IN M,' 1~! ~ a a v i .a ,r _ ~ ~T l 'S ~ ~ us _ ~ ~ ~E._~~ h ~ v' a
/ / ~ V ` \,L~. ~ 11\ .111\ j ~A. ~ W° ~ ~~I l Q, ~ , ~ ~ ~ `t , ~ ~ ~ ~ - - ~ ~ Q, ~
~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ~ a2 ~ ~ ~ 111 I ~ _ , Ali GQ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,i~~ ,Q- ~ Q• ~ ~ 8~i i % ~ 'see ~ ~ ~ ~ Vin.. / ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ a l 0. I i v - i ~
~ . f . ~il_
ti, c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~9C~ ~ s. ~ti ~ 1, _ Q ti, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - ~ ~ i i f ~ ~ ~ l ~ 43 ~ i ~ ~ r ) ~ , , /i' Po l ~ 1~ ' , 1 ~ ill ill, _ v ~ / ~y ' Q ~ f ~ ~F~`4 = / i'p
q ~R~ . ~ ~ " :~i~ ~ ~ Mti~ ~ T ~,-er.~ ~ ; , ~ ~ a i I,,, - _ - ',a' ~ ~ o
~ ~ i i l ",v 3 N ~ ~ I I~ ~ • 1S / .~°,~o ~ f ~ ~ ~a' S ' r ~ ~ ~ I S I i ~ ~ ~ _ ~ I ~ ~ - 1. i'~I - '-"'.~,.w._.-'' .y,.w I - a ~I W s _ ~ - ~ ~ ~ v 1 ~ ~ ~--~1C~M l r _ a` ~ - I ~,~~7 ~ ~ ,y~ Haas ti
& \ \ _ A ~ - ~ ~ ~ tiT c~ o q o
1 ~ ~ a ~ nu~ ' a l l ~ 9 ~ J ~ i ~ ~o ~ ~ ~ ek ~ i i i
/ l~ f ~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / - ~i I i ~ ~ - ~ / 4 ~ ~ i l 8 > / q ;a ` a' %
~ ~ ~ 1 j ° i ~ ~ ~ 35 ~ / ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ J ~ ~ r
r l ~ ' ~ ~ ~ 1 / / ~ ~I ~ l I ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ , " ~
~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~J q~ ~ i 1 i ~ ~ - i T l~ ~ ~ I~ ~ ~ i O
~1 ! , q ~l R ~ I k v ~ ~ I i ~ i a I I' i- - v ~ ~ i' ~ ~ so r
0 ~ ~ i _ , / / N p I ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ 7 o ~ M - ~ ~ r' ;4 s~ \ ti v ~ . c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v 0 ~ • i~ - / /~~f ~ ( ( i,~9 - 8/. ,4' ry Sfq ~ ~ rq, 4 ~ p+ner
6 N S i s ~ / / i 4~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / 0 \ ? 2 72: / ~ I ~ ~ ~ {I I 2 ~ Y ,~i , ~ ~ 9b I 3 s(~-q j P*a ~ ~o A p 1 ~ + IOL
~ / z o ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ /i ~8 ~ ~
~ i ~ / ~ a / ~ ~ ~ 09 /VD ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ as, ~ s.o ~ ~ ~ - ~ ,My J III , ~ , - , w e,~., 2 i v \ E % - / - ~ ~ ~ I ti~ ~ e ti 6b* C"n
~ ~ ~ ; i ~ ~ T T "l ~ ~ ~ ~ v m ~ ~ ~ A ~ ~ S 'i r n h S i ~ haw ~1 ~ rn q ~ «t' ` ~ i~ ~ R ~ / ~l e j 0 ~ q a„. ~ ~ vv
I v T q I I ~ ~k N CT C ~I ~ ~ ~ f - C-i
~ ~ 0, S ~ _ ~ ~ ~ i A i ~fi
~ ~ 0 6, ~ G V qq 6~ ~1 ~ ~~Q 6 _/~~il ~ n ~ APT s ~ i~~ ~.~nytw - ~ .C~1 ~ 6' g ~ 9 c 8 W wpb bt C" .9 b
r f z ~ 0~ 8, ~ r < > ~ ~ ~ ~ ICI v ~ ~ ? ~ - - Fz A ~ A y°'~ v ~ a/ tiJf~l
~ ~ Fl, ~ ~ 8~ ~ ~ ~ 0 1 _ ~ ~i y ~ l ~ C~' i - a«eeso ~ ~ ~ i ~d'bJbd I ~ti
~ a ~ Q Q tidy ~ ~1 ~ r
Q ~ 3~ 3 y s~ s y~ _ - ~0 , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ,
o ~ C ~ ~ l , ~ y ~e~'~ A i~ i I ' ~ i ~ ~ ? s v°C ~ tilt , ` j ~ R ~ ~ Cj ,f i ~ , j ~ ~ ~ : ~ J - ; Shy, j ~ _ ~I % I, f~ ~ r I i ~ ~ j~n,~1
N~ ~ T n~~ v ~ s ~ b, T JJ G
q a\ ~ ~ > ~F > ~ ~ ~ ~ .,;+u pJ . ~ / { A ~ V / ~ ~ - . 4J S(y ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ \ `ice m ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ \ I
sITE~ ~q ~ G 0- i I \ ~ /j ~ t-92:1_y ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ' 1 + l~ s ~ off- ~ \ ! 6, ~ ~ ~ ' ~ / ~ o • v ~ ~ 'J I ~ mac, ,~cb~b
do ~ o° IC ~ ~0 ~ F ST l~ q, ~ ~ 7-0 ~a r I I - I k~ ? ~ 1 ~ - ~ / , o ~ "taw i y ~ I l . w _ ~ M \ a~
e T nE J ,~~Ij ~ ~ ~ 49'+ 2. ~ ~„o ~ r.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I 0(j~ ~3 4 ~ j . AA b ~ # ~ ~,~g ~ ~ ~ ~I ~ ,~V p, V ~ i / / A ~~00 L I h y. f Q. g ~ ~ I ti
l ~ A ~ 1 V ~ ~ ' ~ ~ - X', ~ ~ cyf,, X24 ~ vS~ b)n-~3',~. i 'V ~ ~ a~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ G m, ~a I \ ~ I ~ 8 j ~ ~ t lv .dr:~s:~s l~i~ ~ ~ My ~ ~ s sr~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ) ~ ) P b0~ ~ O~ ~P ,~O
N~ -n+- I ~ _ i ~1 ~j / o \ ti ~_~s~c ~ ~ ( ~~J)( ~ yI \ ~a~~ 11 O~TS~4 ~ ~ ~ w / _ x ~ 1 , i J
TO ~ T~ w~ ~ ~ T \ ~ / ~ - a. c ~ ~ ~ V ~ ~ I 'P ~ A ~ j~ ~ N ~V
~0, ~ ~ ti ao~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l~ 0 - I ~ Ip 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i ,L. ~ N~, V pia ~ F± , ti ~ 0 3
ti - (
VICINITY MAP NAT DRAWN TD SCALE 4 p ~ _ A l~~ ( l 1 /
I ~
~ ti ~ / ~ / ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
400 200 0 200 400 ~ ~ ~ ~S / - ~ A 1~v ~ o ~ ~ - m ~ - ~
/ l
/ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ' \<9"g ~ E M ar. ^k: I ~ "1 ~ ~ ~ r.. c
SCALE IN FEET ~G ~P. A -F ~ ~x ~ ~ --3
P", ; ~ ~ ~ i , 'mss k I(i
Fj ~ ~ A ~v - _ ~ ~ T ~i ~ t45 7 ~ ~ -.~A 1 , ~ ~ ~ ~ ASS % U
~ it t- _ { ~ - _ ~ '
~ ' F;~ I 1b z _3" I --,{~,o ~ ~ , _ ~ ~ a _ I
p~ 'Z - ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ RIM y 96 d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ IMF, 54
d v ~ ~ ~ S g, F~ ~ ~ I ~ - j ~ N qs>
d ~ ~2 ~ Z ~ o I
,L o ~ F ~ ~I
S
N ~ T o- o M,o ~
FI 6, ~0 0 Is I p ~ N F M
~S rp T T ~ a ~ 1~
I 0 T ~
~ k B ~
~ S T 0 0 ~
z 6, s F ~ ~ c OS ~ S
No z ti rF ~ Tq z s. OQ
~ 6