20031156 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20030915

r
WAr? Michael F. Easley, Governor
O?
9
Q William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
7 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
j [ Alan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
Division of Water Quality

Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
December 23, 2003
Mr. Bert Kymalainon
South Scan, Incorporated
3128 Gold Dust Lane
Willow Spring, NC, 27592
Subject Property: Avant Glen, Phase Two
DWQ Project No. 031156
Wake County
Page 1 of 2
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATE per the Neuse River Buffer
Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0233) with ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Dear Mr. Kymalainon:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill within or
otherwise impact 0.44 acres of wetlands for the purpose of constructing the Avent Glen Phase Two subdivision at the
subject property in Wake County, as described within your application received September 15, 2003 and in additional
correspondence received November 5, 2003. After reviewing your application, we have decided that the impacts are
covered by the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) General Water Quality Certification Number(s) 3374 and 3402
(GC3374/3402). The Certification(s) allows you to use Nationwide Permit(s) 12 and 39 when issued by the US Army
Corps of Engineers (USACE). This letter shall also act as your approved Authorization Certificate for impacts to the
protected riparian buffers per 15A NCAC 2B .0233. In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with any other
required federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Erosion and
Sediment Control and Non-discharge regulations. Also, this approval will expire when the accompanying 404 permit
expires unless otherwise specified in the General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your project,
you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold, the new owner must
be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If
total fills for this project (now or In the future) exceed one acre of wetland or 150 linear feet of stream,
compensatory mitigation may be required as described In 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). For this approval to be valid,
you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below.
Conditions:
1. Erosion & Sediment Control Practices
Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications governing the proper
design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best Management Practices in order to protect surface
waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed, installed, operated, and
maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control
Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control measures must
be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most recent version of the North
Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices shall be maintained on all construction sites,
borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects, including contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated
with the project.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, WETLANDS / 401 UNIT
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands
Mr. Bert Kymalainon
Page 2 of 3
Date:
c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be designed, installed, operated, and
maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina Surface Mining Manual.
d. The reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the reclamation in accordance with the
requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act.
2. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond the footprint of the
impacts depicted in the Preconstruction Notice Application. All construction activities, including the design,
installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices, shall be
performed so that no violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules occur.
3. No Sediment & Erosion Control Measures w/n Wetlands or Waters
Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum extent
practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is unavoidable, they shall
be removed and the natural grade restored within six months of the date that the Division of Land Resources has
released the project.
4. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer Rules, and any
subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached certificate of completion to the
401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650;
5. Deed Notifications
Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all retained jurisdictional wetlands, waters and
protective buffers in order to assure compliance for future wetland, water and buffer impact. These mechanisms
shall be put in place prior to impacting any wetlands, waters and/or buffers approved for impact under this
Certification Approval and Authorization Certificate. A sample deed notification can be downloaded from the
401/Wetlands Unit web site at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may result in criminal and/or
civil penalties. This Certification shall become null and void unless the above conditions are made conditions of the
Federal 404 and/or coastal Area Management Act Permit. This Certification shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or
CAMA permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved wetland or stream impacts),
you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for
a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office
of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its conditions are final
and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
Any disputes over determinations regarding this Authorization Certificate (associated with the approved buffer impacts)
shall be referred in writing to the Director for a decision. The Director's decision is subject to review as provided in
Articles 3 and 4 of G.S. 150B.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act and the
Neuse riparian buffer protection rule as described within 15A NCAC 2B .0233. If you have any questions, please
telephone John Dorney at 919-733-9646 or Bob Zarzecki at 919-733-9726.
X/T -ft
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.,
NC DWQ, Director

Mr. Bert Kymalainon
Page 3 of 3
Date:
AW K/cbk
Attachments: Certificate of Completion
G C 3374, 3402
Cc: Hal Owen, P.O. Box 400, Lillington, NC, 27546
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
DLR Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
DWQ # 03-1156
Date: December 23, 2003
F WAIF Michael F. Easley, Governor
`O?0 9pG William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Uj Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
.r Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
Wetlands/401 Unit
Street Address: 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Mailing Address: 1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Contact Information: Phone #: [phone]
L / f Fax #: [phone]
Fax To: Fax #:
Company: Date:
Number of pages including cover sheet: L
Notes or special instructions:
V
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (http://h2o.enr.state. nc. us/ncwetlands
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact: Steve Mitchell
Non-Discharge Branch WO Supervisor:
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Avent Glen Phase Two
Project Number 03 1156
Recvd From APP
Received Date 9/15/03 Recvd By Region
Project Type single family residential s/d
County Wake
County2
Region Raleigh
Certificates Stream Stream Impacts (ft.)
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req. ME
? r-?
12 forested FT _0N ? 27-43-15-(r C _F F- NSW 30,403. 0.44 F_
g ©TH 10 Y - ? F- 30,403.. ? ? I F_
NBR Buffers WT _0N ?rF-r- 30,403. r- F_ F- F_
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet

Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? Q Y O N Did you request more Info? Q Y O N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? Q Y O N
Is Mitigation required? Q Y O N Recommendation: 0 Issue O Issue/fond O Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) Longitude (ddmmss)
Comments:
december 10, 2003
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
a
Triage Check List ' iL I P
Date: 1V(& 103 Project Name: A-/ent Ten PAasc
DWQ#: 031
County: VJa k
To: ? ARO Mike Parker ?' WaRO Tom Steffens
? FRO Ken Averitte ? WiRO Noelle Lutheran
? MRO Alan Johnson ? WSRO Daryl Lamb
RRO Steve Mitchell
From: Amanda M uc//cr Telephone : (919) -7/ s 3'1;,7-5-
The file attached is being forwarded to your for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
? Stream length impacted
0 Stream determination
? Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
? Minimization/avoidance issues
9 Buffer Rules (Meuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
? Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
? Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
X Cumulative impact concern w1 po ss;Uc - AhArc PAa g es
Comments:

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISM
P. 0. lox 400, 266 Old Coats Road
Ullington, NC 27546
Phonc [phone] / Fax [phone]
I' mail: halowen@intrstannct
3 November, 2003
Mr. John R. Domey
NC Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Reference: Avent Glen Subdivision - Phase Two, Holly Springs
Wake County, North Carolina
DWQ #03-1156
Dear Mr. Dorncy,
WETLANDS1401 GROUP
NO V 0 ! X 003
WATER QUALITySECTIO
N
As requested, we have enclosed seven copies of the map that shows the construction details
for stonn water drainage for the above referenced project. The stonnwater controls for this phase will
be tying into an existing stonnwater system; therefore, stonnwater outfalls and diffuse flow provisions
are not addressed.
The map also indicates that no Neuse River butter impacts are associated with this project.
The site was carefully reviewed by Mr. Hal Owen, Licensed Soil Scientist, for the presence of
intennediate or perennial stream channels, but it appears that none are present at this site. The wetland
area indicated on the map is a depression and lacks an adequate surface water outlet or an associated
stream channel in the immediate vicinity of this property.
The enclosed map includes a modification to the location of the sanitary sewer casement.
Please note that the sanitary sewer easement has been moved to the property line between Lots 18 and
19 in an effort to reduce wetland impacts. The previous location between Lots 19 and 20 would have
resulted in a temporary wetland impact of 0.055 acre. The new location of the sewer line will have no
wetland impacts.
Soil Science Investigations 0 Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting
HAI, OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
We believe this satisfies DWQ's request for additional information, and that the wetland
pen-nit application is now complete. If this is not the case, and you have additional questions or
requests, please contact us as soon as possible.
Sincerely,
KIZ?6vx'o'-' 8. N'e'rC..,b
Krissina B. Newcomb
Environmental Scientist III

Hal Owen
Licensed Soil Scientist
Senior Environmental Scientist
CC: South Scan
Soil Science Investigations • Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting
w a 1?6gQ?
? r

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
September 22, 2003
DWQ # 03-1156
Wake County
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
South-Scan Inc.
Attn: Mr. Bert Kymalainon
3128 Gold Dust Lane
Willow Spring, NC 27592
Subject Property: Avent Glen subdivision, Phase II
Dear Mr. Kymalainon:
On September 15, 2003 the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) was notified by receipt of your application regarding your plan
to fill wetlands or waters for the purpose of constructing a residential subdivision in Wake County. Approval from DWQ is
required to disturb these areas. Please provide 7 copies of the following information and refer to the DWQ # listed above in
your reply. Please show these on maps of suitable scale (for instance 1" = 100 feet) so we can begin to determine your
projects' compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500.
1. Please show all impacts including all fill slopes, dissipaters, and bank stabilization on the site plan. Please
provide a site plan that includes topographic contours.
2. Please indicate all buffer impacts on the site plan. The soil maps indicate that there are two streams that may be
impacted by the development of this property. These streams are subject to the Neuse Buffer Rules. Please
contact Steve Mitchell or Debbie Edwards to determine the origins of theses streams on the property.
3. Please indicate all stormwater outfalls on the site plan.
4. Please indicate the diffuse flow provision measures on the site plan. All stormwater outlets must be addressed.
Please telephone Todd St. John at 919-733-9584 if you have any questions or would require copies of our rules or procedural
materials. This project will remain on hold as incomplete in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0505(c). The processing time
for this application will begin when this information is received. If we do not hear from you by writing or by fax at (919)
733-6893 within three (3) weeks we will assume you no longer want to pursue the project and will consider it withdrawn.
Sincerely,
r??,A
y
JRD/bs 40Quality Certification rogram
cc: Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
Raleigh Corps of Engineers
Central Files
File Copy
Hal Owen & Associates, Post Office Box 400, Lillington, NC 27546
e
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (http://h2o em state.nc.tis/newetiands)
Customer Service #: 1-877-623-6748
HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
SOIL UENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS FILE COPY
1' 0. Box 400,266 Old Coats Road
Lillington, NC 27546
Phone [phone] / Fax [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
8 September, 2003
Ms. Andrea Wade
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office ,,,
US Army Corps of Engineers ?/?/??/??I
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120 C",W
Raleigh, NC 27615 P
`RQUAII
Reference: Avent Glen - Phase Two, Holly Springs
]YSE/+'rj?N
Wake County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Wade
The wetlands have been delineated at the above referenced property, located at the tennination
of Onondaga Drive, Holly Springs Township, Wake County, North Carolina. Enclosed please find
the wetland delineation map demonstrating the wetland area flagged by Hal Owen & Associates, Inc.,
and survey located by Stancil and Associates, Inc. Also enclosed for your use is an owner/ agent
authorization form, wetland data forms, a photocopy of the USGS topographic map with site
indicated, and a photocopy of the Wake County Soil Survey with site indicated.
The limit of wetland impacts by the subdivision has been adjusted so that the total impact will
be less than 1 /2 acre. The subdivision plan proposes to impact 0.389 acre of wetland and can likely be
authorized under Nationwide Permit 39. A sewer line is proposed between lots 19 and 20 that will
cause temporary wetland impacts of 0.055 acre, and appears to meet the conditions of Nationwide
Pen-nit 12. Original grade will be restored in this area after installation is complete. The enclosed Pre-
Construction Notification details the proposed wetland impacts.
I trust that this provides all the information that you require to certify the wetland delineation
and authorize the proposed impacts. If you have any questions or need additional information, please
feel tree to contact me at your convenience.
Sine ely,
Hal Owen
Licensed Soil Scientist
Environmental Scientist
CC: NC Division of Water Quality
owner: South-Scan Inc. (Mr. Bert Kymalainon)
3128 Gold Dust Lane, Willow Spring, NC 27592
919-331-0131
Soil Science Investigations • Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting
Pav 1 of
?w ovl(r.'d c?rA.ropn
W1'A?
AMA
ir ??w
J
Q
r 7 9-w
h
y?
m
•Z
9 O

REID- 0018068
OWNERI SOUTH SCAN INC
ADDR1 3128 GOLD DUST LN
ADDR2 WILLOW SPRING NC
27592-9215
ADDR3
DEED BOOK 08076
DEED PAGE: 1909
DEED DATE 6/5/1998
DEED ACRES: 5 04
BLDG VAL 0
LAND VAL 70561
BILLING CLASS 1
LTA&BHR&T
DESCRIPTION DEVELOPERS BM9(3-
1428
MAP NAME 064915
PIN NUM 0649537462
PIN EXT
CITY HOL
TOWNSHIP 6
YEAR BUILT. 0
SALEPRICE 0
SALEDATE:
TYPE USE 00
DESIGN STYLE
UNITS 0
LAND CLASS V
ZONING R-10
ADDRESS
ST NUM: 0
ST MISC:
DIR PREFIX
ST NAME: NEW HILL
ST TYPE. RD
DIR SUFFIX
Parr' Number 0649537462
Map created on 6252003 9 02 40 AM
n O ;-1•, rhttp-.//152.31.32.36/imaps/printmap.asp?pin=0649537462c?pinext=c rninX=2043400.33099057&ni'ii)'=691021.532892286&m
6/25/2003
•JIJL-Z4-;!QQS . t Ht r:ll I?,,L UWEN b. "SID= INC
24 July, 2003
iti15, Andrea Wade
Raleigh Regulatory Ficld OfSicc
US Army Corps of Engmcars
4508 Falls of the Nouyc Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 7,7615
910 GGIS :1544 P. a?
Property Deskmptiotl:
South Scan PropatV
Onondaga Street. Molly Springs, Wake County, North Carolina
e? lit ,ot t/ it/? 4,q owner of Cie about rferancecl property,
auLhorice chc US, ,finny C'crps ?f L-tigineers tti er-Ter the sut;jecc property or the purpnae of wetland
dehilcat?on revitnv
i ..isu authonzc ,qtr. [Tal Oweii of li,tl Owut 3 A,seciatrs. 111c, tO act to my behalf as my
a?cnt tI: 1'iUies`.tn applications I' r wdard certifi::atioa ardorpC11111ts
Datc
Signature
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Avent Glen Phase 2 Date:_ 16 July, 2003
Applicant/Owner: South-Scan Inc. (Bert Kymalainon) County: Wake
Investigator: Hal Owen, Krissina Briggs State: North Carolina

Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site'? ® Yes ? No Community ID: wetland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? ? Yes ® No Transit ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? ? Yes ® No Plot ID: 1
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
I . Liquidainbar stvracVItia Tree FAC+ 9.
2. Acer rubrum Tree FAC 10.
3. Acer rnbrurn Shrub FAC 11.
4. Arundinarria gigantea Herb FACW 12.
5. Cares Herb -- 13.
6. Smilax rotundi%olia Vine FAC 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Perc ent of dominant species that arc OBL, FACW or FAC 515 X 100 = 100'%)
(excluding FAC-).
Remarks: Hydrophytic vegetation was observed .
HYDROLOGY
? Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks) Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
? Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
? Aerial Photographs ? Inundated
? Other ? Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
® No recorded Data Available ® Water Marks
? Drift Lines

Field Observations: ? Sediment Deposits
? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: na (in.) Secondary Indicators- (2 or more required)
® Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: na (in.) ? Water-Stained Leaves
? Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: >20 (in.) ? FAC Neutral Test
? Other (explain in remarks)
Remarks: Wetland Hydrology indicator was observed.
SouthScan-wdfs
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Mayodan gravelly sand
y loam 6-10%slopes, eroded Drainage Class: well-drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Hapludults Confirm Mapped Type'? E] Yes ® No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc.

0-3 10YR 3/2 Loam
3 -9 10YR 4/ l l OYR 3/4 few, fine, distinct Loam
9-20 2.5Y 7/1 10YR 5/6 medium, tine, prominent Loam

Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosol ? Concretions
? I-Iistic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soil
? Sulfidic Odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
? Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
® Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydric soil indicator observed.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present'? ® Yes ? No
Wetland Hydrology Present'? ® Yes ? No Is this Sampling Point within a Wetland'?
Hydric Soils Present? ® Yes ? No ® Yes ? No
Remarks: This observation point is located approximately 10 feet from wetland point 7.
SouthScan-wdfs
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site:_ Avent (?Ign Phase 2 Date: 16 July, 2003

Applicant/Owner: South-Scan Inc. (Bert Kymalainon) County: Wake
Investigator: Hal Owen, Krissina Briggs State: North Carolina

Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site'? ® Yes ? No Community ID: non-wetland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)'? ? Yes ® No Transit ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area'? ? Yes ® No Plot ID: 2
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Quercus nigru Tree FAC 9.
2. Acer rubrum "free FAC 10.
3. Pintos tactla Tree FAC 11.
4. Vaccinium conrnbosum Shrub FACW 12.
5. Lveopochunt digitutunt 'Vine -- 13.
6. Vitis Vine -- 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of dominant species that ate OBL, FAC W or FAC 4/4 X 100 = 100 0/,
(excluding FAC-).
Remarks: I-1 drophytic vegetation was observed .
HYDROLOGY
? Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks)
? Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
? Aerial Photographs ? Inundated
? Other ? Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
® No recorded Data Available ? Water Marks
? Drift Li
nes
Field Observations: ? Sediment Deposits
? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: na (in.) Secondary Indicators: (2 or more required)
? Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: na (in.) ? Water-Stained Leaves
? Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: >13 (in.) ? FAC Neutral Test
? Other (explain in remarks)
Remarks: Wetland Hydrology indicator was not observed .
SouthScan-ssdfs
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Mayodan gravelly sandy loam 2-6% Slopes eroded Drainage Class: well-drained
Field Observatiods
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Topic Hapludults Confirm Mapped Type'? ® Yes ? No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc.
0- 11 I0YR 5/4 gravelly sandy loam

11 - 13 10YR 6/6 sandy loam

Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosol ? Concretions
? I-Iistic Epipedon
? Sulfidic Odor
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in sandy Soil
? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Listed on Local Iiydric Soils List
? Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
? Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydric soil indicator not observed.
WETLAND DE'T'ERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present'? ® Yes ? No
Wetland Hydrology Present? ? Yes ® No Is this Sampling Point within a Wetland 1
Hydric Soils Present'? ? Yes ® No ? Yes ® No _
Remarks: This observation point is located approximately 20 feet from wetland point7.
iouthScan-wdt's
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Avent Glen Phase 2 Date: 16 July, 2003
Applicant/Owner: South-Scan Inc. (Bert Kymalainon) County: Wake
Investigator: Hal Owen, Krissina Briggs State: North Carolina

Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site'? ® Yes ? No Community ID: wetland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? ? Yes ® No Transit ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area'? ? Yes ® No Plot ID: 3
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Acer rubrum Tree FAC 9. Rubus spp. Herb
2. Liquidambar stvracii lua Tree FAC+ 10. Smitax rotundifolia Vine FAC
3. Oxvdencb-um urboretrm Tree NI I t.
4. Acer rubrum Shrub FAC 12.
5. Liquidambar stvracglua Shrub FAC+ 13.
6. Faccinhan corvmbosum Shrub FACTV 14.
7. Arundinaria gigantea Herb F110V 15.
8. carer spp. Herb -- 16.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FAC W or FAC 7/7 X 100 = 100 %
(excluding FAC-).
Remarks: Hydrophytic vegetation was observed .
HYDROLOGY
? Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks) Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
? Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
? Aerial Photographs ? Inundated
? Other ? Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
® No recorded Data Available ? Water Marks
? Drift Lines

Field Observations: ® Sediment Deposits
® Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: na (in.) Secondary Indicators- (2 or more required)
? Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: na (in.) ? Water-Stained Leaves
? Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: >18 (in.) ? FAC Neutral Test
? Other (explain in remarks)
Remarks: Wetland I lydrology indicator was observed.
SouthScan-wdfs
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Mayodan gravelly sandy loam, 6-10% slopes, eroded Drainage Class: well-drained
Field Observations ,
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Hanludults Confirm Mapped Type'? ? Yes ® No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc.
0-7 2.5Y 4/1.5 sandy loam
7- 16 2.5Y 6/2 10YR 5/6 few, fine, distinct sandy loam
2.5Y 4/1.5 common, tine, distinct
16 - 18 IOYR 6/1 10YR 5/6 many, medium, prominent sandy loam

Hydric Soil Indicators:
? I-listosol ? Concretions
? Ilistic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soil
? Sulfidic Odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
? Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
® Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydric soil indicator observed.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present'? ® Yes ? No
Wetland Hydrology Present'? ® Yes ? No Is this Sampling Point within a Wetland'?
Hydric Soils Present'? ® Yes ? No ® Yes ? No
Remarks: This observation point is located approximately 20 feet from wetland point 4.
SouthScan-wdfs
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Avent le-n Phase 2 Date: 16 July, 2003

Applicant/Owner: South-Scan Inc. (Bert Kymalainon) County: Wake
Investigator: Hal Owen, Krissina Briggs State: North Carolina

Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site'? ® Yes ? No Community ID: non-wetland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? ? Yes ® No Transit ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? ? Yes ® No Plot ID: 4
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Pinus taeda Tree FAC 9.
2. Ilex myrtifolia Tree FACW 10.
3. Liriodendron tulipifera Shrub FAC 11.
4. vaccinium corymbosum Shrub FACW 12.
5. Arundinaria gigantea Herb FACW 13.
6. Smilax rotundifolia Vine FAC 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Perc ent of dominant species that are OBL, FAC W or FAC 6/6 X 100 = 100 %
(excluding FAC-).
Remarks: Hydrophytic vegetation was observed .
HYDROLOGY
? Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks) Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
? Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
? Aerial Photographs ? Inundated
? Other ? Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
® No recorded Data Available ? Water Marks
? Drift Lines

Field Observations: ? Sediment Deposits
? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: na (in.) Secondary Indicators: (2 or more required)
? Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: na (in.) ? Water-Stained Leaves
? Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: >18 (in.) ? FAC Neutral Test
? Other (explain in remarks)
Remarks: Wetland Hydrology indicator was not observed .
SouthScan-wdfs
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Mayodan gravelly sand y loam, 2-6% slopes, eroded Drainage Class: well-drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Hapludults Confirm Mapped Type? ? Yes ® No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contiast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc.
0- 14 2.5Y 4/3 2.5Y 4/6 few, fine, faint sandy loam
14- 18 2.5Y 4/2 2.5Y 4/6 few, fine, faint sandy loam

Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosol ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soil
? Sulfidic Odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
? Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
? Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydric soil indicator not observed.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ® Yes ? No
Wetland Hydrology Present'? ? Yes ® No Is this Sampling Point within a Wetland?
Hydric Soils Present'? ? Yes ® No ? Yes ® No
Remarks: This observation point is located approximately 10 feet from wetland point 4.
SouthScan-wdfs
Avent Glen Phase 2
Bert Kymalainon
_ _
` I r
ve \ I /
Felton 11
/ Ch,i o J I? \
..nom - - ... -'
I ,
Fe1tonvi[le'1 a,Q _-
{
r ,\ C /cn
J 1 L%;
17
' mot/ l \ I /,? 1 1! P" 4cp;,
,
? c I \\
_ ? ?? r, ) III I . J 7
1 ?1? /? \ 4 4
-- I r-- c
._ ? .?7 4 •-?' III 1_•-110 . n `-? ? ??` ••F
I 1vIA? I .
l I ,?? ", c, ff14 I •?? _) , /?//)
JI
( »
71
'
60
17,
C.- ??• 1\ ?.. \. ?l / ?' _ ),+ ?q rte` ;i- 440• r•\' p\ ?• 0
3-D TopoQuads Copyright o 1999 DeLorme Yarmouth, ME 04096 Source Data: CSGS 950 ft Scale: I : 24,000 Detail: I3-7 Datum. WGS84
> m m m O
C/)
x
Soil Survey of Wake County, North Carolina -- Sheet 83 Avent Glen base 2
r- Bert Kymalainon
AfA�. MYC2 -/ ,� T ``
C p om
,.� � Y' •r • � L'.'
y •* �ilr rC
CrHv 1 \
182 C, el
E � j rB e�
CrE I \ e
MfE Wt8 R• y 1
2
M B
' )
Y
MfE 2 En
MYC
j ,� %�A� f T.• \ EnC nC2 1
JNYC2 �O ' a 1 er r 'r � � rC 1 \ �, [�• .
`r EnC EnB \ 1p•H
MyH - . t En C EnL"2e Ge02 a
fER`
IDr EnC2
MvD MYD. r; *• ; /• ".W 1F Hr B
k� � � {, 7 v,
liyo MyB i II d+'/ En8 y �, u+. 1 \ ' W I
t
i• MfD2 Hr02' :, '�
M p HrD2 HrC ' ,y �EhB j' e8 / � � •
MBC ` H F(rD Hr8
� 2 I � 'q ° �B •r '� • �HrC Gel a
a
Mgt,° B .�r k
t^Mg(I A5�1
2G
GeC2 Q Gec
I rY;` Y,tG r 82 p
Ge82
MW
M M B HrC2 n
B
r .
A.. ,,,�p
C�c?
\ I . °°M¢B2 _ Ca j ' v
\iig02' CaC2 P�0 • 2 f GeU
MID2 w.. �� :� T1 1 • 9
Mg aG r'W8282 A C
L•.'► •r
Mn e 2 AsB2, w
Ce
..• �. ' : �' � y ` �i � DB2
,A M 11 r °. Ce[
1MgB
•.y. ♦M � Ge.fi2' C ��
�, 4f1 • r
N 5 .
II n
_ / " f / �r2•, ' .ii Sr APB _�' " �

Office Use Only: Fonn Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 39 & 12
WOC#3362 & #3374
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: South Scan, Incorporated (Mr. Bert Kymalainon)
Mailing Address: 3128 Gold Dust Lane
Willow Spring NC 27592
Telephone Number: 919-331-0131 Fax Number: 919-331-0131
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Hal Owen
Company Affiliation: Hal Owen & Associates Inc.
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 400
Lillington, NC 27546
Telephone Number: 910-893-8743 Fax Number: 910-893-3594
E-mail Address: halowen(ci),intrstar.net
Page 5 of 12
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Avent Glen Phase Two
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0649.15-63-1407
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Holly Springs
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Avent Glen Phase 2, Lots 19, 20, and 21
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): From NC Hwy Bypass turn
east onto Ballentine Street, left (north) on Saranac Ridge Drive and right on Onondaga
Court. Property is located at the termination of Onondaga Court.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): apex. N35"39.2' W78"50.7'
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): 5.177
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): UT to Middle Creek
8. River Basin: Neuse
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/adniin/niaps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: This property is currently wooded. The surrounding area is
dominantly residential.
Page 6 of 12
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The _property will be divided into lots served by a common paved road public water and
sewer. Roads and homes will be constructed using bulldozers pans trackhoes and other
typical construction equipment.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Avent Glen Phase Two is proposed as a single
family residential subdivision.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 7 of 12
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Proposed impacts to wetlands
are from fills associated with the construction of homes on Lots 19, 20, and 21. Temporary
wetland impacts are expected from installation of the sewer line between lots 19 and 20 which
will be restored to original grade.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Located within
100-year Floodplain**
es/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
linear feet
Type of Wetland***
I fill 0.389 no 2000 forested wetland
2 mechanized clearring 0.055 No 2000 Forested wetland

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, till,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local Floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fenui.eov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (detennination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.708
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.444 ac. (0.389 permanent, 0.055 temporary)
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
linear feet
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent'?
leasespecify)
na

List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.uss,s.tov. Several internct sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topoionc.cnm,
www.mamucst.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: na
Page 8 of 12
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres)
(if Name applicable) ) Wat Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)
na

-- _.. _....., ....,,.,...., ..,,t, ,.,. I-- t,U< 'Ilk; IIM „nmcu to: fill, cxcavanon, urcuging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): E] uplands F] stream F-] wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): na
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
infonnation related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Homes on Lots 19, 20, and 21 have been sited with the minimum front setback allowed and
house footprints are limited to a narrow depth design During, the initial planning of this
subdivision, the road was shitted and these lots desimned longer than is typical to reduce impacts
to the wetland area.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 9 of 12
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands/stn-ngide.htm1.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Wetland impacts have been avoided as best feasible for this project It is proposed that
the undisturbed wetlands (0.318 acre) be protected within the subdivision's restrictive
covenants.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Page 10 of 12
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes F-] No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse`? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes F? No
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
cone i extenus out .ru reet perpenmcuiar from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page I I of 12
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Impervious area = 1.526 acre which is 29.5% of the total area.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Sewer provided by the Town of Holly Springs.
Projected sewer flow is 14 units 0 360 gpd - 5040 gpd
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules`?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
- .
_L Apbffca'r;t_/Agcnt's1"Sign9ure Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
landa 0. Leslie
Ded Boor 7Be4, P.g. 748 /
?, tf
3
9
2
b
V
z
Cardell Ledie
Daed Boot 4728, Par. 2W
Bo.k of Yap- 1988, Ara. 708
O I
aR
' a'°oq n
LSGRIVD:

- Lad Sltr+.?sd
Una. Not
ad iP
Am te1=. Pedestal
Y
- t
rrht of lq Ifaa n Voids, 7abe
=
M
m
ma
o
l
a
mt 6mL .P mdat
APl
PLS Bdwt? P1 Na0
P1 N
l s t/I rye-d-rq
0
10

BS a
et
hva State St
D..C 2-
r
PLt CGhln t
'
CS cotfna Spladlo, Bet D.B. Do" Boat
RS
R Jbdbad 9pfke P.B. Plat Boot
ALB
PP BdaUU llrhtaood 9tat•
Pour • am..
PN' Boot d Y?pp?.
P
M
M

LP
light Pol. and d
.
er
Nonebar
OBR 01rhud A7-trt. U.- Aa Ac
t}ane.
1 I A-frl. rrAmmeO
Slnst Addreae Sq R
CP YII. Araf
Computd Point
NAD 27 North Amencaa Datum of 1971
NAD M North A=.n•aa Alum of 1981
N.C.G.S. North Carolina Geod.tic Sums,
NOTRS Robert L Utley
• Iron shin a.t et d Prop-ty oanura Ded Boot 2787. Pan lie
aatr add elher.rive.
• Ass" d.tweninad by coordta.t. math-d.
• AU u r oar/dtm.ealao. are a«imetat
Around dhrtao~ aislear othorwfw mdtosf.d
,,,edee1111ie1ir,
,fig CAlto Il1.
ot?SID ll{
: a .9:
?? ? leete 5.?•
rytuess%"
Revised: 09-08-03
Wetlands Area (30,831 sq. ft.)
Course Bearing Distance
L-1 S 16-2433 w 81.89
L-2 S 14'32'58" 11 75.45'
L-3 S 85'28'38" w 2771'
L-4 N 89'16'51 A 24.68'
L-5 N 72'56'14 W 33.07'
L-6 S 66'31'55" )I 33.52'
L-7 N 31'2825" A 44.31'
L-8 N 60-2836 - # 33.47'
L-9 N 20'38'42 N 46.64'
L-10 N 31'5923" A 19.89'
L-11 N 37'31'28" E 16.91'
L-12 N 373128 E 16.41'
L-13 N 7442'19' E 34.35'
L-14 X 42'12'07" E 43.57'
L-15 N 79'4321' E 2e. 92'
L-16 N 85-2945 " E 21.74'
L-17 N 55'58'02 E 3.99'
L-18 S 7556'51 a E 102.44'
s o7olys't
30.57'
-?Ar Tamaqua Lane
I
I
Te-1 orary 7;e Pact-
Sewer L.1`^e
0.0 5S - acre.
1 8R 1
?i
Ip•
U
0
Perfnane^f
Wetlands Map
Avent Glen Subdivision
(Formerly Dewar Property)
Holly Springs Township Town of Holly Springs
lake County, NC PIN: 0649.15-63-1407
Scale: 1 " c 60' Zoned. R-10
0 e0 t20
.RAP C 5
Owned and Developed by.
South-Scan, Incorporated
3128 Gold Duet Lane pillow Spring, NC 27592 919-331-0131
?r?pcct
PB8/BID BP
STANCIL & ASSOCIATES
0. 399 Acre PROPESS90NAL LAND SURVEYOR, P.A.
98 Depot Street, P.O. Box 730, An`1en N.C.
\ [phone] [phone] (PAX)

s,3 \ ?
a ? \
a
r
O
g
'
raY.r w'
ona 1e
MAN n'
MAMM to
'
Rlar
/ NOTd:
/ A 10, 70' slrel nlao?le
eh.D b. revered .1 a!!
/ .e,a.r iatr,.tfrona
/ m•.a It-
/ O
157.57'
---'--------
i
s5
Phase vt
I The Orb of Arent Acre
I I Boot of Yap. 200$ Pan 120 '
--------------?
O? I
? I
o I
I
I?? I
I I
I
I
LBHS1375D.dwg
J+Uje
'yids,
a4:-.r--4 f? ?c
Avent Glen Subdivision
Book of Naps 2001, Page 1392
27501
? FLOOD EALRD STATdifENT
!04 .ho.n on tA,. plat as,. rat
loatd .ifhin th. l11YA 100 year
rood Hazard An. as ah- an
FnU map N. 77181 C 0 MG B
rf7e•41w Dot.., Yarah a 19M2
um &Wdins Setbacks
Sect/on 404 Jurlsdlctloa CerttllCAtlon
M.
oartldee that this cop, of this plat acou AWY
depieta the boundary of tha luriediotfon of Saetion
401 of the our later At u datei'mind by th.
Ynd ndrned an tWx data. 0111aa. than b • cbaare
ib the Le or our publiahed reralalioan thin
det rminatlon of Sect. 404 Jurisdiction my b. rahd
upon Jar • pr id net to .toed do tsar hom thfs
data. this determlaation - made atilfrnrr the 1987
Cory. of Boalneen I.Uud. D.Un-U012 14nusl.
Nam.:
nun
D. t--
I -------- 17
DWQ# Date C//1V 103 Who Reviewed: 7 O
Plan Detail Incomplete
? Please provide a location map for the project..
nw, g a ?rk
Please show all sJM impacts including all fill slopes, dissipaters, and bank stabilization on the site plan. ?,4? ?Kt
? Please show all wetland impacts including fill slopes on the site plan.
a Please indicate all buffer impacts on the site plan. G
? Please indicate proposed lot layout as overlays on the site plan.
? Please indicate the location of the protected buffers as overlays on the site plan.
? Please locate all isolated or non-isolated wetlands, streams and other waters of the State as overlays on the site plan.
? Please provide cross section details showing the provisions for aquatic life passage.
? Please locate any planned sewer lines on the site plan.
? Please provide the location of any proposed stormwater management practices as required by GC
? Please provide detail for the stormwater management practices as required by GC .
? Please specify the percent of project imperviousness area based on the estimated built-out conditions.
Please indicate all stormwater outfalls on the site plan. a ?/?
Please indicate the diffuse flow provision measures on the site plan. A'? rrn *4 " O - 4S
M ,x a aaa
? Please indicate whether or not the proposed impacts already been conducted.
Avoidance and/or Minimization Not Provided

Ire
? The labeled as on the plans does not appear to be necessary. Please eliminate the or provide additional
information as to why it is necessary for this project.
? This Office believes that the labeled on the plans as can be moved or reconfigured to avoid the impacts to the
. Please revise the plans to avoid the impacts.
? This Office believes that the labeled on the plans as can be moved or reconfigured to minimize the impacts to the
. Please revise the plans to minimize the impacts.
? The stormwater discharges at the location on the plans labeled will not provide diffuse flow through the buffer because
. Please revise the plans and provide calculations to show that diffuse flow will be achieved through the entire buffer. If it
is not possible to achieve diffuse flow through the entire buffer then it may be necessary to provide stormwater management
practices that remove nutrients before the stormwater can be discharged through the buffer.
t? 11?.
Other
?j
? The application fee was insufficient because over 150 feet of stream and/or over 1 acre of wetland impacts were requested. Please 0,11
provide $ . This additional fee must be received before your application can be reviewed. ! ,
? Please complete Section(s) on the application. S
? Please provide a signed copy of the application.
? Please provide copies of the application, copies of the site plans and other supporting information.
Mitigation
? of compensatory mitigation is required for this project. Please provide a compensatory mitigation plan. The
plan must conform to the requirements in 15 A NCAC 2H .0500 and must be appropriate to the type of impacts proposed.
? Please indicate which 404 Permit the USACE would use to authorize this project.
0
Q O ~ 0
ti
Wo
Z o0
o ~ 30
~ HD
W
~ ¢a ~o
' W TLAND C3 ELINEATION
INE
10 YEAR BACKWAT R Sy
E EV. = 440.36 t~ d
N , ti
~ WE LAND AREA TO J x 1 ~ ~ SILT-~~ ~ ~ R MA IN = 16, 962 qFt ~~j' J
PROPOSED 20 ~ I * * ~ X E-EI~CE / V t!f ~ ?y ° W W r
SANITARY SEWER n w ~ ~ I,. ~ ~ z y ti- r 2 0
EASEMENT /I ~ ~ „ 9 ~ ~ ~ .k. b OH
/ ~ fir. ~ .Y. ` 4. .k. .p'[. S
10 M rm ralna e e en 0
i
18 srL r 11 ~
o"` z ~ ~ ~ ~1 ~ FENC 1 0 - R X x ~ ~ - Silt Fence N
_~F~S. Ut 11t 01 n
a- ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ CONTRACTOR 0 MA TCH y E ~ ase fi ~ ~ GRADE IN TH FIELD me t o f~ I ~me t .______,~.---.m-----m- Temporary Diversion Ditch O Q
' a I ~ l0 ~
I ~a 1 I ~ k N
' ' Sediment Basin/Trap N O ~
I `~I G GO1 ~ R1""..
2 ~ 2 TYPE 3 BARRICADE Curb Inlet w\ Inlet Protection ~ ~ p ® •u ~
TREET I A T END OF S ~ ox
2 o ~ Flared End Section W o ~
I 3 aQ Asa. a G V 0 "y
l ~ PROPOSED 20 . V GL O
0 DRAINAGE • ~ ",y ~ ~ . L
A r cI 24 #5 EASEMENT . Construction Entrance G ~ ~ 24 ~ o~ o ( r~
. 2 a ~ N th
sr WETLAND AREA 0 BE ~z Gp Of •
~ IN= 6962SFt FILLED q t Os p^~
„ ,f os I e~ = ores
CLASS B RIP RAP PAD 6 „st, ~ _ ' sf. s~ T-Qh~N OF HOLLY SPRINGS enu a rea ~
2 ' x 27 ' PLACED A T END OF N ze CONS CI'~QN ._ENTRANCE od Plain On-site 2fi No FEMA 100 Year Flo ~ a~
CONSTRUCTION PHASE 2 I - ` ~li.~ r.~ • Looms ~
f • . -site • Ma odan Gravel Sa o On lY Sa1s y z
r v -q.:. , C I ~ . i~~rr. . \ a
. Note
C I ~ ` - .0 for Drains a Curb and Gutter See Sheet D 2 g ,
Q t 17 , - #3 ~ Sediment Bain Calculations. 25 S ead and
I _ _ ~ Pr
C I ~ ry
~ ~ti
w -L--~ ____TOWN--•OF ~-1DL ~P 8
~ o a STANDARD SILT FENCE . #p0 ~ N ~ CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
`'1 L NECESSARY APPROVALS AND PERMITS REQUIRED TO LEGALLY ,~..,___r OBTAIN AL
_ 2 ~ f ~ DEVELOP SITE.
!f ~ ~ 2. SCHEDULE APRE-CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE AT THE SITE WITH EROSION
7 44 CONTROL PER50NNEL, TtL OWNER (OR REPRESENTATIVE) AND GRADING ~ ~ CONTRACTOR. m
~ _ ~ _ °o ` STAKE CLEARING LIMITS FOR ENTIRE SITE, ~ ~ J, 3. ~ N
1s ' IN5TALL ALL NEWLY APPROVEED EROSION CONTROL OEVICE5 (SEDIMENT TRAPS, 4. _ ^ ~ ~ y
SILT FENCE AND TEMPORARY DIVER5ION DITCHES) AS SHOWN ON APPROVED PLANS. ~ ~ ~ ~ N t
J ~ 5. OBTAIN A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FROM ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER. y ~ ti W ~ 1yw~ ~ U~U
9 _ ~ .V. ~Z O Wy / VICES THAT ARE NOT ~ y .-''i 6. REMOVE ALL PREVIOUSLY APPROVED EROSION CONTROL DE ~ ~ J ~
0 \ ~ REQUIRED BY THE NEWLY APPROVED EROSION CONTROL PLAN. ~ WW V Q ~ ~ i ,
A CONTROL DEVICES AFTER EVERY RAINFALL EVENT. REPAIR ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~H f ' 7. INSPECT ALL EROSION ~ ~ r'"~~ AND MAINTAIN AS NECESSARY TO INSURE ALL DEVICES ARE WORKING PROPERLY. a ~ i
~ _ 4~ w ~ B. STABILIZE ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN !5 WORKING DAYS OF COMPLETION OF ANY o ~ y ~ y 'f ,
0 f ~`f _ PHASE OF CLEARING OR GRADING. SEE SEEDING SCHEDULE ON SHEET C-3.1.
4 \ ~ J ? r , AS NECESSARY PER SEEDING SCHEDULE ON SHEET C-3.1. 9. SEED ALL DISTURBED AREAS
I f CONTROL OFFICER. 1 10. CALL FOR FINAL INSPECTION BY HOLLY SPRINGS EROSION
15 5 \ l E OF COMPLETION (OR EQUAL) FROM HOLLY SPRINGS EROSION n i~ °f 08TAIN CERTIFICAT
~ O ~ 0 ,r~ TOWN OF HOLLY SPRINGS A CONTROL OFFICER.
SION TOWN OF HOLLY SPRING,' ~ , m i STANDARD TEMP. DIVER p i 29 ~
C? STANDARD CURB INLET ~ , G, ~ DITCH ~
p ; - 10 N~~ /
\ I o es . o 0 l Q _ ra e en
~ ~ / f \ r N". ~ hall conform to Town of Holly Springs design and
1). All constructions G I construction standards. ~
~ 1 . - verif the location of all existing ~ ~ ( ~ 2). It is the contractors responslbillty to Y ~ O
C I ~ i utilities. - re-reducin valve ~
®11 ~ / .y O J: J'~ r i _ h water service shall be equipped with a pressu 9 C I 3) . Eac ~0 on the private side of the meter. •r"I V
Q, / LINE BEARING DISTANCE ' ~ ~ - o o I,, -~'~r f stret trees and street lighting will be field coordinated to 3 4) . Location o t
„ 14 cI a L 1 N07 '01 ' 39 E 606.92 ~ # 10 N V I ~ ; ~ ~ eliminate conflict. 11 intersections. ~
' '58"E 105.44 ~ ~ o N06 45 L2 ~ j ;'I 5). Sight distance triangles shall be reserved at a ~ the end of all streets in conformance with MUTCD. L
. 11 L3 S76 09'57"E 197.91 ~ ~ 4 r' • ~ 6). Place "Type 3 Barricades at tion ins ector C ~ - etin with the Town of Holly Springs canstruc p Q 2 7). A pre construction me g
36.19 L4 S75 56 51 E 1 2 I a innin an construction. ~ ~ ([phone]) shall be required before b g 9 Y
L5 S11 •23'44"W 190.00 I A' WN OF HOLLY SPRINGS TO ~ ~ PVC i e at a minimum of 1.009K slope and 8). All sanitary sewer services shall be 4 P P C W
11A L6 S13 30 ' 31 "E 55.13 ~ STANDARD TEMP. DIVERSION clean out laced at edge of right of way. O r P h a 1" ~
~ ~ L7 S07 09'29"W 87.24 TOWN 0 DITCH t ' 11 water line services shall be "3/4" Type "K" Copper Pipe wit G I f 9) . A •ri i~ ~ ~ i water meter placed at right of way.
• AR Le Sol o9'2s°w 21.3o SPRINGS STAND ~ ' I i A sociates. ~ ~ 10). Wetland delineation provided by Hal Owen & s a
• ~ SEDIMENT BASIN L9 S07 07 32"W 58.81 ~ +I al Owen & Associates, no jurisdictional streams U y I ~ f 11). Per a field investigation by H
(BASIN "B o~ D ` ~ n-site. +i and and roadwa topographic surveys provided by Lester
L10 S07 1'41"W 36.19 I BL 3 12) . Boundary, wetl Y ~ 'I Stancil & Associates. M
L11 S00 °47'9"W 15.25 CI 1 ~~2 ~ o r I ~ Ul ~ _
L12 S00'47'29"W 14.58 1 • eo. oo * o 1 1 1 C ~ ~
L13 S00 47 29 W BASIN B' ~ o
L14 S00 °47'29"W 80.00 / r j l U
L 15 .fi. . i~,t,,. N89'iz'31"W 358.35 ~ , j
ti 10' Utility Easement _ WETLANDS 140 GROUP
' , y - - ~ - - - - m m
N 0 5 o OV 2003
YI" CI i ' a _____._._.____e_~.~ z
,F: ~ ~ ' # 13i , ! ~ ; ~ ! TOWN OF HOLLY SPRLNGS ~ ~ JY~ WATER QUALITY SECTION L
! ~ ~ ' ~ ; ~ STANDARD SEDIMENT BASIN ,t -L;> +r
(BASIN A ) cI 0 ORAMIM6 Z
~ ` SHEET
~ ~ TOWN OF HOLLY SPRINGS ~ ~ E GRAPHIC SCALE i"=40' L
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE .,.K U'
.F r~ ¦
40 0 40 80 120 Z
PR&ECT NUIBEA
142-200 1 1