Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout310776_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20200402&Division of Water Resources b'r5 Facility Number 7j 1 - ® 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency IType of Visit: (D Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: U %� Farm Name: I.T A (J. S MaY-56 r'Ay-&) Owner Email: Owner Name: Le S l 8 R 0hi h4 Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: Onsite Representative: Certified Operator: Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: L,esl;e Wb44-ad Title: Latitude: Phone: Integrator: Region: W19 Certification Number: I L G O a Certification Number: Design Current Design Current Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Wean to Finish Wean to Feeder Feeder to Finish 30 oZ '3 5 & $ Farrow to Wean Farrow to Feeder Farrow to Finish Gilts Boars Other Other iLayer Non-Layer Design Current Dry Poultry Capacity Pon. Layers Non -Layers Pullets Turkeys Turkey Poults Other Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? Longitude: Design Current Cattle Capacity Pop. Dairy Cow Dairy Calf Dairy Heifer Dry Cow Non -Dairy Beef Stocker Beef Feeder Beef Brood Cow ❑ Yes 2(No _ ❑ NA ❑ NE [—]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes Zo ❑ NA ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes [2No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes Ea o ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Page I of 3 21412015 Continued Facility Number: jDate of Inspection: e4-0a -a091O Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑_ NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? M"Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE . (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? [:]Yes [!5/Xo ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Eg-4 ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [� No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [v�No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): C I Sig i d✓ 10 GC 13. Soil Type(s): 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ENo ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [2/No ❑ NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes E!J'/No ❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes [KKNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ET o ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code ❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes glNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [YNo ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: © �3 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA' ❑ NE Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [EI/No ❑ NA ❑ NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes E�No ❑ NA ❑ NE permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [ff No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes B/No ❑ NA ❑ NE 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations.or any other comments. . Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary). WOY k ten.. eYoS16v\dl/l c¢Y✓1-!K.'e . `4gOoh Ctkv. w.-I1, A� �'� A50'il 0.',4 �e-se 1 eet .0. 'lv+aion*..At`K2 la4 -io c�oG�flle�(1�' e.11 v�d1YdC oiY��' C`�6,r�C� S�YI �' n�T PAO a��pl,ed +0 Ne...t• �blk ��\Od Y� . PeP�; La��i�r. w�S �?p)iCd f1z Ce kF r--1-es +1,-4 oece:J PAN of IS ►�i�� ��,e.,, �6lLo vl7 S4�6c�arn5, tiw�,no�e. a1exr w AL w r mvl- S Tea ✓ ins cr=,{ate �;�1, •-r►��e �e��; is c,�v�c ear; Cv cr C 15 � � . i', 3w e'n o� Fotto,:,,�n C.o�'h '.� � '(ln�S fi 5 k1.,e� f :c�s�' 'yea-C• Ir�oJ"J� i n � ud ), A -11►1 S new S�� �tJ Ro.:v�6cea,ke R,,P e�,�ar-Nq 1�s ohs L;t C)I e 3 kern AA e ev GQStG'Gt "P;n' lines o+n PMCIS►yltai' dtmS dkvsf PAN Q�.t kJAralA, 'A J keep Nij� F13 paK rw R COU5 Reviewer/Inspector Name: �o N � y Phone: L b I�— 9s77 Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Page 3 of 3 Date: L-- I —a0a0 21412015