310278_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20200403

Cl Division of Water Resources;
Facility Number - aT0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: 7Routine
Hance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: p Arrival Time: Departure Time: 1S County:
FarmName: J 6 m N 4 �i� f,y� �Ij Owner Email:
Owner Name: �� Nh C Wrn rtP iSC�,/�, Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative: 1_otl 11 NcrAlk&C-^ 1g1tm\e,�
Certified Operator: L k t.\ G r". jg o n ,7E7
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Region: (�
Certification Number: 1 :2, of
Certification Number:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry: Capacity Pop.
Layer
y 0a . Non -Layer
Design Current
Drv-Poultry Capacity . Pop.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Longitude:
Design,. Current
Cattle Capacity' Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
11
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
6o
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
ZN o
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there .evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
L�JZo`
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
LJ
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: ':�> I - jDate of Inspection: - 3 oa 0
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes Eg"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: —�
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):--�
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes R No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes D,N- O ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 2lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [0"N'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [J] N ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [3'-N'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Yes []'No
❑ Yes [✓�No
❑ Yes [ to
❑ Yes Ea4o
❑ Other:
❑NA
❑NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑NA
❑NE
❑NA
❑NE
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes []/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 6 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes YNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
ED Yes
[�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[3/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ENo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility .to better explain situations (use additional pales as necessary):
I'd
CC-mce m(� r-
Ccfrd rC-. (C(}vi 1 v'e Q C_ orb WG�
`0\):'.
q1)
're-Cof-d S CWc:��;r� �iv'VozS, and Walke,4 uc vc-rrn
i vy. oA)D )Zn �'� ce d CAre So,
MIA -
CPO j U decj ouer- --the
sokh fr')rr'1 Mvk'e -►eA
— e) aVn �`� f e — S ha.-,T
-fhQ l��Uo�
mc+rAK.r ,,.►�`), i n _"h; S
_1ec-M *
��'►-4 ��ei �s rjjA-rkQr,,
ie ;S
mores e�CCu�c� �►
��,sae�-- ��,
Reviewer/Inspector Name: .0 0 !J D � fLt2_L/ Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 04— 03 20EL ,
Page 3 of 3 21412015