310272_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20200330

(YDivision of Water Resources 131
Facility Number 3 t - FTF;__1 O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
of Visit: Corypliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
in for Visit: Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: rj3-'3o—a6 0 Arrival Time: 0710 nbw� Departure Timer County: /i ✓i
Farm Name: ��ow.Qg ��'fa.r of �'�Y�^^- Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: '� ow• + S S" t r o d
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Title:
Integrator:
Phone:
Region: W 1 tzo
Certification Number: 0,9
Certification Number:
Latitude:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -Layer
Non -
Other
Poults
Design Current
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o ElNA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes VNY
"❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes EENo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: 31 -} 01 Date of inspection: 03
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes F2<0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: t
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): 9 • S
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes E!r/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
[2(No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
Ejj/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
(No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
2/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): 56,C),
13. Soil Type(s): jaikotl,Q
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes �To ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 5 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [2lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Yes rNo ❑NA ❑ NE
❑Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes EJ�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes E21<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes E]�Noo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [—]Yes ET<O ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: 12, N - jDate of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Eg�No
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes aeN-o
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes EKNo
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes Eg/No
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes E�14o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 6/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes QNNo ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes r_Noi�o
o❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
L; Me AS need�ec�
can-6-1vP ViQrk in' an week-/ y Sfaek,n'/g1e'r 1.11' � Record S
Sendk ; ,% Raz,, 6m.akec wq_iver Wi'A &vinvo-1 fL*Pr-+
Reviewer/Inspector Name: -Ca_.H pJ �z,Y' Phone: -9T77
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: j r 3 0 " 20;L.0-
Page 3 of 3 21412015