310241_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20200331

&Division of Water Quality
Fa0lity` Number '7 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation°
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: Co fiance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: -3l -?.o Arrival Time: (30 qfn Departure Time: 112 3 U p-r, J County:
Farm Name: Mg c; 0►n np y, 1 6WV1 xR ra rm Owner Email:
Owner Name: stow L-AN RRowfJ Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: SCOTT U D- JO
Certified Operator: pr-_ N o -(L&­J iJ
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design Current.:
Swine, Capacity, Pop.,
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
y'3 p
b
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other`
Other
Title:
Integrator:
Phone:
Region: w AQ
Certification Number: 17 1q:j
Certification Number:
Latitude:
Design.
Current
Wet Poultry
Capacity
Pop.
Layer
Non -Layer
Design
Current
Dry Poultry
Capacity
'Pon.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Longitude:
Design 'C.urref a
Cattle . ° Capacity° Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
l As any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑]Yes
EfNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
EfNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
E To ❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑YesIo
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
To ❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
ssa
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

FaciliNumber: jDate of Inspection: 3-31- Gab
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes
Structure 1 Structure 2
Identifier: ( a�
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): p�3
M1140 ❑ NA ❑ NE
F4<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes [?(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes &No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
/NNo
7. -Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
[:]Yes
[
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
[lo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
[:]Yes
2 vo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
2(No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): G(5-1 % 9
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? [:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑Yes [N ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable [—]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Yes [2/No
❑ Yes C2To
❑ Yes U 1V
❑ Yes [No
❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes JZ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑Yes VNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑NA
❑NE
❑ NA
❑ NE

Facility Number: 31 - AA t Date of Inspection: 1 ­31 -oa0
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes [2"'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes E6 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes [2(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes i No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ' ❑ NE
❑ Yes B No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes F�/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes D?'�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facilitv to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
�it 1twr+5
3.1 3,a
V,,,,
i 1 tip. �o � -Sti.oati
jo�jowv-
1 J
Reviewer/InspectorName: S6AO PEtZVY Phone: 0(u)
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:4Y�2��Date: 3—Ik- 0_40
Page 3 of 3 21412015