NC0025071_Regional Office Historical File Pre 2016

VFV
Pat McCrory
Governor
'N r- 'N'T
'
February 23, 2015
Melinda Ward, Superintendent
Mebane Bridge Wastewater Treatment Plant
204 Mebane Bridge Rd.
Eden, NC 27288
Donald van der Vaart
Secretary
Reference: Sampling Results from Eden WWTP, 204 Mebane Bridge Rd., Eden
Permit No. NCO025071, Rockingham County
Dear Ms. Ward:
On June 18, 2014, Shuying, Wang and Stephen Berry of Winston-Salem Regional Office, Water
Quality Regional Operations Section, North Carolina Division of Water Resources, sampled the onsite
unused lagoon and two associated monitoring wells to determine if the wells should be kept or
abandoned because they have not been used or sampled since 1997. The sampling results are attached
for your information.
As indicated in the attached lab reports, the lagoon was sampled for all parameters required by the
permit, including BOD, fecal coliform, suspended residue, chloride, color, cyanide, hardness, specific
conductance, sulfate, total dissolved solids, nutrients, selected meals, and organic compounds. The
results show no targeted parameters were detected above their respective state surface water quality
standards except for fecal coliform was detected at a concentration of 132 col/100 ml. Fecal coliform
is not uncommon for surface waters and is not necessarily related to the onsite waste water.
The samples collected from the two monitoring wells were analyzed for almost the same parameters as
for the lagoon water samples. No fecal coliform was detected in the monitoring well samples, but
chromium, lead, iron, and manganese were detected in both monitoring wells at concentrations
exceeding the 15A NCAC 2L Groundwater Quality Standards:
Sampling Point I Chromium (Cr) ugj
Iron (Fe) ug/L
Manganese (Mn) uF&
Lead (pb) ug/L
MW-N 115
..... .......... .. .
44000
1000
22
MW-SE 42
63000
1400
23
SLG IOU
NA
NA
2.OU
JNCACI5A2L 10
300
50
is
MW-N = monitoring well located to the north of the lagoon; MW-SW = monitoring well located south-west of
the lagoon; SLG = lagoon sample; NA = not analyzed; U = Undetected at the lab detection limit
450 W. Hanes WJ Road, Suite 300. Winstm-Salern, North Carolina 27105
Pharr: 336-776MM k FAX. [phone] t Custmer Service 1-877-623-6748
Internet hV./12gM1 naknr m� _ o%L
An Equai Opportur4y = Affimvbye AcWn EmpioW

Mebane Bridge Wastewater Treatment Plant
February 23, 2015
Page 2 of 2
Chromium and lead were not detected in the lagoon sample. Iron and manganese were not tested for
the lagoon sample because they were not required by the permit for lagoon monitoring. No obvious
correlation between lagoon water and shallow groundwater was found from this sampling event;
however iron and manganese are common in the Piedmont groundwater. When rocks are high in iron
and manganese, lead and chromium are present, and geo- and biogeochemical conditions are
favorable, elevated levels of these elements can be detected in natural groundwater. Furthermore, for
this case, the elevated levels of chromium, lead, iron, and manganese are very possibly attributable to
the high turbidity of the groundwater samples, which was noted in the field.
Because there is no evidence that elevated metal elements were from the onsite waste water or from
the waste water treatment process and it is possible that they were naturally occurring or resulted from
the high turbidity of the groundwater samples. Therefore, no further action is recommended for the
shallow groundwater. The monitoring wells be abandoned in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C
(available at http:llportal.ncdenr.orglweb/wglatasi. The wells should be abandoned within 30 days
from the receipt of this letter and well abandonment records should be submitted to this office within
30 days after well abandonment.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Shuying Wang or me at the letterhead
address or phone number. Your cooperation will be greatly appreciated!
Sincerely,
Sherri V. Knight, P. E.
Regional Assistant Supervisor
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDENR
cc: WSRO Files
Debra Watts, DWR WQROS, Groundwater Protection Unit, Raleigh
Rockingham County Health Department

PFV
AJ Nf>�C ;Pt
OPOE R NO, f DA I F SWPPE 0
336-613-5004
[e-mail]
620 ELUNGTON RD.
REIDSVILLF, NC 27320
TERPAS
DATE:5-1 6-J-5
r O's
OrIf ORDERED 0-1-f SHIPPED
DESCRI P riON UNI I PRICZ
A
OJZ' ta_5
If not PAID IN FULL within thirty (30) days, all materials
can be retrieved without owners permission. Cussomer is
I still reWonsMe for bibor.
1ATIOICE
005802
:NVCC-7S3-3
PRINTED IN U.S,A-
�'d
U860H uuA-1 dot,:Co GL tL ielN

Ire-
LWIELLCDN
PA
e: t)50.1iG
chyarTo m Stm
TAPcok
ana aodt�» rloo�r aaaier
a VrEI.Ln4Qoft W&Tjoft
MTF WELL rmm* r v (if
COOKWumpawroorp)
�•r�x'c�alrlsr�a�r. ��,
WmAdp*
t*& - $erb:s a >itaw+r.rpq s«ir.i l
t]Nc (6t roc) .
3.'Ii►ZM TW*
TT� Q[i! n AN=NA M
Nt$}a''Eyyiii'Y�?W! Gtj
7 tl'1taaG ti `DBE
0--V dMMMY.MAMANr.C=Mook)6go* L4tMk fta Apcm%
TOPOG&OWC / LAMD SEt"YII1iic
Aw va&y Fm midac odw
LATfltaue
— —" m"AUNRsatt3 4rka
I rdN(3TtLtt7E dvcw d fwm
Lsr3mddifly�lt�ie ttr CAMS T%xwwf Mc tt v
Rs+tsia �/+.tlJ+ueor AWAAD W OW AW LIMA** MW�d
aemr+�dm�rJtmw $`+��t�''gJ
�.. iwCB.mc.'rhsai.�attiettsio� d..s,rt.d �titoeM. c.�+:.ta a/sa
� � W +nRf i��Me cosMtet* �► «�etE+a..s�i�ssipa �s�j
FACli�1Tlf ID tt+�if`a�plietiis)
MUM CW PFACMXff 14 c , ,J h l• t� .�e!
STRWAMORESS
cstr«iaw setae TAPCWC
14AME e- rk Q
MADDRESS
�
MY or Torn C
t 33G,_Ga�7-
Amoodt:-�oao
5. VIM lW AM&
s ,rant
b 'Wumle W Mdo ► ftm* s
Mearotao`poiatis �ttabateLdat:G
b. CA$DiC: I-&* nt�ttr,
7- 1
(Atae�t of b99i-�% csk�on y�1
8. S AIJNGMATISKW—
TYPE ilkitM
Wa w �SOL
Dow
TAN orMecisl
Aato►syt - --
I& WXLLMAGR►3EDnw04attritttis *mr6amen=*eirslcord*
*xmamwfttosldeptbiepthmdftw�Sfu=m(traarieesl - -
at ow wdL sett irha�ai gyp . ari dyris afd
typsofllli mtas3alo,.at
1L "-=ww.LA&AMwM=1.'
znanNoMYCM=yr&%Tl ea ViaLWA%SABANDQ D=ACooRXLO=
Virg liltlt-W="Uca RUXTWSrAMDAW MTUTAoWm
DATE
s": `Ti stt4WMVAUVWLaa WALOWOMC'W%V DAW
tMP*Aftvwawatr 4atfseidxlpin&'t.at.teu�.r.iiarar�..a
a�rRrtsoa �,�
s rto�atspy+e.lire+w�rasr�O.ri�i..a1s 11t ire. or JOWQmdkj VIM* 30d,m
j�' d L gc"M-9££
U860H uuk-; dLt,:Co 9� L1 jeN

OV
LWO.LCI)wn mum
L fow a w
CkyarTam *ft awce e
�aeaie-l�oaea.atlmr
stz$vral.anit�'
s�:fie ��C la"11
Couwff xt, r s Of -
�.rQ2'�7tlQ�s�c>p�tiaabie's -
���s�isiie � ifadrd� IZ+siir�i.i
aMartiKsel -
3. vrsaa. A TMMR vwby A
i'
i�ts�:r�c -
M� _
iAinu
—" •�•�. a��atgyl�,Oriit
&-Saw= GPS Toposwvwc mmp
+/+a�a�erieairresa�sari8tr5a�s�ad .
I•, ]VAC.tfSG•"yrelar�.ir�sie..il
�� �'�-� �t ss�ise# w�i waeirlse•Ys,m�tp.}
RAM Or FACMUY
AMMOSS Me-
C"it�arTcwro sec
4b- Combo rmea w=L awry
MAN& 41 .J iN
Sam.}' woms�4® ` - Vh e DA6r 3 -C
CSVarTmm 0
sarc-.-----�--
LS3% �� �� 7'
Z�d �gco-trC9-9cz
�tsoaaaea.- 7Jsuiioo a�flitaler Q�atb►
& WILLM7'AIIik
a. Tam nspt- ,L__.__t. Noma _
bR tiiaerls�tel ._s �it
$I �__.l�ILalarmwdm bm
& CA61 M
A-Cw tvAvbfftvmkt I ij,
k'Cmig%cmnv&- I d
tAWMWaCWN, .MwwQ
!t NLAIJNGN&T mu-
momoft
�s�
WL
- t
Tjpe mwxw
� �Z�1dtlrieilloe#iafitlataadlt6aliCaiabit
a s60r6� eae� �!� dgMk aattorofawaos a�p'�
fa &C men•vaod - ieroiarala alawLtt psi#�a6aaa„ rto%dn�saai
t�pesaf�aws�tifaed,
1L
z ciamca�ts�c�uz�wa�tz,vri►em000aam
I= wmTws=wvRavmftml=v#lmovmw
mave►T+�aac lrina.c�e�
sKarrw�ce7ri"ax+F'Xta ""—_
UBBOH UUA( dpb=Efl 9 L L 6 GeV;

F
09782
XCD".Laboratory Section Wesults
r_
County: ROCKINGHAM
Sample D�
AC09782
River Basin
PO Number #
14W16422
Report To WSROSP
Date Received:
DWR
06111912014
Time Received
07:66
Collector S WANG
Labworks LoginlD
TASCENZO
Region: MR0
DbUlm of Waw Resources Final Report Date:
7124114
Sample Matrix. SURFACEWATER
Report Print Date:
Final Repot t
07/2412014
Loc,Type:
Emergency Yes/No
visitio
COC YestNo
Loc. Descr.: SLG
Location 0 4POTSNCO026071
I Collect Date: 06MIN2014 Collect Time 09:40
Sample Depth
If this report is labeled preliminary report, the results have not been validated. Do not use for Regulatory Purposes.
CAS # Anal)qe,Name PQL Result/ Units Method Ahalysi Validated by
Qualifie Reference Date
LAB
Sample temperature at receipt by lab 1.9 6/191'14 RBYRD
MIC
BOD, 5-Day in liquid
2.0
5.7 G5 GI
mg/L
APHA52108
6119114
ESTAFFORDI
Specific Conductance in liquid
14.9
14.9 U
pmhosicm
APHA25108
7116114
ESTAFFORD1
WET
Residue -Suspended in liquid
62
10 U'p
mg/L
SM 2540 D-1997
6123114
MOVERMAN
Cyanide, total in liquid
0.02
0.02 U,J2
mg/L
EPA 335 4 REV 1
711/14
CGREEN
Platinum Cobalt Color
-TITLE-
color units
SM 21208 2001
6120114
MOVERMAN
PTCO
5
11
color units
SM 2120B 2001
6/20/14
MOVERMAN
pH_PTC0
6.6
color units
SM 2120B 2001
6/20/14
MOVERMAN
Ion Chromatography
_TITLE-
mgJL
EPA 300.0 rev2A
6130/14
MOVERMAN
Chloride
1.0
1.0 U
molt
EPA 300,0 rev2 1
6/30/14
MOVERMAN
Fluoride
0A
0.4 U
mg/L
EPA 300, 0 rev2.1
6/30/14
MOVERMAN
Sulfate
2.0
2.0 U
mg/L
EPA X0.0 rev2.1
W0114
MOVERMAN
Total Dissolved Solids in liquid
12
28
mg/L
SM 2540 C-1997
6/24/14
CGREEN
Bromide
1'0
1.0 U
mgiL
EPA 300, 0 rev2.1
6130/14
MOVERMAN
NUT
NH3 as N in liquid
0.02
0.02 U
mgfL as N
EPA 350.1 REV 2
6119114
CGREEN
Total Kjeldahl N as N in liquid
0.2
1.1
ng,,L as N
EPA 351.2 REV 2
6124114
CGREEN
NO2+NO3 as N in liquid
0.02
0.02 U
mg/L as N
EPA 353.2 REV 2
6/23/14
CGREEN
Phosphorus -total as P in liquid
0.02
0.24
mg/L as P
EPA 365.1 REV 2
6/20114
CGREEN
MET
7440-22-4
Ag by ICPMS
1'0
1.0 U
u91L
EPA 200.8
6/30/14
ESTAFFORDI
7440-36-0
Antimony by ICPMS
10
IOU
41L
EPA 200.8
6130114
ESTAFFORDI
7440-38-2
As by ICPMS
ZO
2.0 U
ug/L
EPA 200,8
6/30/14
ESTAFFORDI
7440-41-7
Be by ICP
5,0
5.0 U
u91L
EPA 2007
718114
ESTAFFORDI
7440-43-9
Cd by ICPMS
0.50
0.50 U
ug/L
EPA 200.8
6/30/14
ESTAFFORDI
7440-47-3
Cr by ICPMS
10
IOU
ug/L
EPA 200.8
6130114
ESTAFFORDI
7440-50-8
Cu by ICPMS
ZO
22
ugiL
EPA 200,8
6130114
ESTAFFORDI
Hardness by Titration
1.0
7.0
mg/L
SM 2340C
6/20i14
ESTAFFORDI
Laboratory Section>> 1623 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1623 [phone]
.era jetalled descrfpit'o; Of it,,* WdOs mfef to =Li12Uid' AVLCW
11pol4t'Jim 9-1
Page 1 of 5

Location ID 4PO79MC0025071
CAS # Ana! e Name
7439-97-6 Hg 245.1
j 'V CO3'Wk Laboratory Section lZrsufts
Sample 10 AC09782 Collect Date 06/1812014 Collect Ttme:, 09:40
PQL Result/ Method
QualifiUnits er Reference
0.2 0.20 U ug/L EPA 245.1
Anal iS Validated by
Date
6125114 ESTAFFORDI
7440-02-0
Ni by ICPMS
2.0
2.0 U
ug/L
EPA200.8
6/30114
ESTAFFORDI
7439-92-1
Pb by ICPMS
ZO
2.0 U
ug/L
EPA 200 8
M0114
ESTAFFORD1
7782-49-2
Se by ICPMS
5,0
5.0 U
ugfL
EPA 200, 8
6/30114
ESTAFFORDI
7440-2"
Thallium (TI) ICPMS
ZO
2.0 U
4L
EPA 200, 8
6130/14
ESTAFFORDi
7440-66-6
Zn by ICPMS
10
26
ug!L
EPA 200,8
6/30/14
ESTAFFORDI
VOL
744041-7
Volatile Organics in liquid
_TITLE_
ug/L
EPA50301624i8260
6120/14
CJOHNSON
75-71-8
Dichlorodifluoromethane
2.0
Not detected
ug/L
EPA5030162418260
6/20/14
CJOHNSON
74-87-3
Chloromethane
2-0
Not detected
ugiL
EPA5030/62418260
6120/14
CJOHNSON
75-01-4
Vinyl Chloride
2.0
Not detected
ug/L
EPA5030/62418260
6/20114
CJOHNSON
74-83-9
Bromomethane
2.0
Not detected
ugiL
EPA50301624,18260
6/20114
CJOHNSON
75-00-3
Chloroethane
2.0
Not detected
ug/L
EPA5030162418260
6420114
CJOHNSON
75-69-4
Trichlorofluoromethane
2.0
Not detected
ug/L
EPA5030/624!8260
6/20114
CJOHNSON
75-35-4
1, 1 -Dichloroethene
1.0
Not detected J2
ugiL
EPA50301624,18260
6/20114
CJOHNSON
75-09-2
Methylene Chloride
1.0
Not detected
ugiL
EPA5030/62418260
6t20/14
CJOHNSON
156-60-5
trans- 1,2-Dichloroethene
1-0
Not detected
ugiL
EPA50301624/8260
6120114
CJOHNSON
1634-04-4
Methyl Tert-Butyl Ether
1-0
Not detected
ug/L
EPA5030162418260
6/20114
CJOHNSON
75-34-3
1,1-Dichloroethane
1.0
Not detected
ugiL
EPA5030162418260
6120114
CJOHNSON
156-59-2
cis- 1,2-Dichloroethene
1.0
Not detected
ugiL
EPA5030162418260
6/20114
CJOHNSON
74-97-5
Bromochloromethane
1,0
Not detected
ugiL
EPA5030/624,18260
6/20114
CJOHNSON
67-66-3
Chloroform
1.0
Not detected
ugiL
EPA5030162418260
6120/14
CJOHNSON
594-20-7
2,2-Dichloropropane
2.0
Not detected
ugiL
EPA5030i62418260
6120114
CJOHNSON
107-06-2
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,0
Not detected
ugiL
EPA50301624,8260
8/2004
CJOHNSON
71.5"
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
1.0
Not detected
ugiL
EPA5030162418260
6120/14
CJOHNSON
563-58-6
1,1-Dichloropropene
1.0
Not detected
ugiL
EPA5030/624,'8260
6120114
CJOHNSON
56-23-5
Carbon Tetrachloride
1,0
Not detected
LGiL
EPM03016241'8260
8/20114
CJOHNSON
71-43-2
Benzene
1.0
Not detected
ugiL
EPAS030/62418260
6/20114
CJOHNSON
74.95-3
Dibromomethane
1.0
Not detected
ugiL
EPA5030/62418260
6/20114
CJOHNSON
78-87-5
1,2-Dichloropropane
1.0
Not detected
ugiL
EPAS030/62418260
6/20114
CJOHNSON
79-01-6
Trichloroethene
1.0
Not detected
ugiL
EPA5030162418260
5120114
CJOHNSON
75-27-4
Bromodichicromethane
1.0
Not detected
ugiL
EPA5030162418260
6120114
CJOHNSON
10061-01-5
cis-1 .3-Dichloropropene
2.0
Not detected
ugiL
EPA5030162418260
6/20114
CJOHNSON
I006I-02-6
trans- 1,3-Dichloropropene
ZO
Not detected
ugiL
EPA5030/62418260
6/20114
CJOHNSON
79-00-5
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1.0
Not detected
ugiL
EPA5030162418260
6/20114
CJOHNSON
108-88-3
Toluene
1,0
Not detected
ugiL
;-:PA5030162418260
6/20/14
CJOHNSON
142-28-9
1,3-Dichloropropane
1.0
Not detected
ug/L
EPA5030162418260
6/20114
CJOHNSON
124-48-1
Dibromochloromethane
2.0
Not detected
ugiL
EPA5030/62418260
6120/14
CJOHNSON
106-934
(EDB)1,2-Dibromoethane
1.0
Not detected
UG'I
EPA5030,162418260
6/20/14
CJOHNSON
127-18-4
Tetrachloroethene
1.0
Not detected
ugiL
EPA5030f624!8260
6/20/14
CJOHNSON
106-90-7
Chlorobenzene
1.0
Not detected
ugiL
EPA5030/62418260
6/20/14
CJOHNSON
10041-4
Ethylbenzene
1.0
Not detected
ugiL
EPAS030/624/8260
6/20114
CJOHNSON
Laboratory Section>> 1623 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1623 [phone]
For a cWWedde%cwboq of I" ZuaiEfmr codes V* W t;t5 ­j2 22fjj-.
Page 2 of 5

%C,a4T, La6oratory Section Rfsufts
Location ID,
4PO79NCO025071
Sample 10: AC09782 Collect Date
06M812014 Collect Time.: 09:40
VOL
-
Result/ Units
PQL
Method Analysis Validated by
CAS #
Anal yte Name
qualifier
Reference Date
75-25-2
Bromoform
2.0 Not detected ugiL
EPA5030162418260 6120114 CJOHNSON
108-38-3
rn,p-Xylene
2.0
Not detected
jgJL
EPA5030/62418260
6420/14
CJOHNSON
100-42-5
Styrene
1.0
Not detected
ugiL
EPA50=62418260
6120/14
CJOHNSON
79-34-5
1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1.0
Not detected
4L
EPA5030162418260
6/20114
CJOHNSON
630-20-6
1, 1, 1,2-Tetrachloroethane
1.0
Not detected
u%IL
EPA5030/62418260
6t20114
CJOHNSON
95-47-6
o-Xylene
1.0
Not detected
UGIL
EPA5030/624/8260
6/20/14
CJOHNSON
96-18-4
1,2,3-TdcNoropropane
1.0
Not detected
U q'I
EPA5030J624/8260
6120/14
CJOHNSON
98-82-8
lsopropylbenzene
1-0
Not detected
ugiL
EPA5030/62418260
6/20/14
CJOHNSON
108-86-1
Brornobenzene
1.0
Not detected
ugiL
EPA5030162418260
6120114
CJOHNSON
103-65-1
n-Propylbenzene
1.0
Not detected
U411-
F:.PA5030162418260
6/20/14
CJOHNSON
95-49-8
2-Chlorotoluene
1.0
Not detected
UgIL
EPA5030162418260
6120/14
CJOHNSON
106-43-4
4-Chlorotoluene
1.0
Not detected
ugly
EPAS030162418260
6/20/14
CJOHNSON
108-67-8
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
1.0
Not detected
ugiL
EPA5030/624/8260
6120114
CJOHNSON
98-06-6
tort-Butylbenzene -
1.0
Not detected
ugiL
EPA5030/62418260
6/20/14
CJOHNSON
95-63-6
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1.0
Not detected
ugiL
EPAKW62418260
6120114
CJOHNSON
135-98-8
sec-Butylbenzene
1.0
Not detected
ugiL
EPA5030162418260
6/20/14
CJOHNSON
541-73-1
m-Dichlorobenzene (1,3)
1,0
Not detected
ugiL
EPA5030/624i8260
6/20114
CJOHNSON
106-46-7
p-Dichlorobenzene (1,4)
1,0
Not detected
ug/L
EPA50301624/8260
6120/14
CJOHNSON
95-50-1
o-Dichlorobenzene (1,2)
1.0
Not detected
U911L
EPA50301624/8260
6/20/14
CJOHNSON
99-87-6
p-Isopropyttoluene
1,0
Not detected
jg/L
EPA5030/62418260
6120114
CJOHNSON
104-51-8
n-Butylbenzene
1,0
Not detected
ug/L
EPA50301624i8260
6120114
CJOHNSON
96-12-8
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloro propane
2,0
Not detected
ug/L
EPA50301624i8260
&2004
CJOHNSON
120-82-1
1,2,4-Tdchlorobenzene
1,0
Not detected
ug/L
EPA50301624i8260
6120/14
CJOHNSON
91-20-3
Naphthalene
2,0
Not detected
ugVl-
EPA5030/62418260
6/20114
CJOHNSON
87-68-3
Hexachlorobutadiene
1.0
Not detected
ugiL
EPA5030/62418260
6120/14
CJOHNSON
87-61-6
1,2,3-T6chlorobenzene
1.0
Not detected
ugil-
EPA5030/6241826C
6/2004
CJOHNSON
SEM
Semivolatile Organics (BNAs) in liquid
—TITLE—
ugiL
EPA6251827013511.
7f7i14
NGOOD
62-53-3
Aniline
12
Not detected
ugiL
EPA625i82701351C
717i14
NGOOD
108-95-2
Phenol
10
Not detected
ugli-
EPA625/827W510
71704
NGOOD
111-444
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
10
Not detected
ugiL
EPA6251827013510
717114
NGOOD
95-57-8
Chlorophenot, 2-
10
Not detected
ugiL
EPA625/8270/351 0
71704
NGOOD
541-73-1
Dichlorobenzene, 1,3
10
Not detected
ugiL
EPA625i8270I3510
7/7114
NGOOD
10646-7
Dichlorobenzene, 1,4-
10
Not detected
ug/L
EPA625i82701351 0
7/7114
NGOOD
100-51-6
Benzyl alcohol
30
Not detected J2
ugiL
EPA625182701351 0
7/7/14
NGOOD
95-50-1
Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-
10
Not detected
ugiL
EPA62518270i3510
717114
NGOOD
95-48-7
Methylphenol, 2-
10
Not detected
ugiL
EPA62518270,,3510
7f7II4
NG000
39638-32-9
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
10
Not detected
ugiL
EPA6251827013510
7,7i14
NGOOD
106-44-5
Methylphenol, 4-
10
Not detected
ugiL
EPA625/827013510
7f7i14
NGOOD
621.64-7
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
10
Not detected
ugiL
EPA625/8270`3510
717114
NGOOD
67-72-1
Hexachloroethane
10
Not detected
ugiL
EPA625/827013510
7qI14
NGOOD
98-95-3
Nitrobenzene
10
Not detected
ugiL
EPA6251827013510
717114
NGOOD
Laboratory Section>> 1623 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.1623 [phone]
FW a detedf,-C desc-'Von :)f 91a q480ip, codes refer !o
Page 3 of 5

COTIV, Laboratory Section Wfsuits
Location ID 4P079NC0026071 Sample ID AC09782 Collect Date 0611812014 Collect Time:: 09:40
CAS #
78-59-1
Analvte Name
Isophorone
PQL
10
Result/
Qualffler
Not detected
Units
ug/L
Method
Reference
EPA62 013510
Analysis
Date
7/7114
Validated by
NGOOD
88-75-5
Nftrophenol, 2-
10
Not detected
ug/L
EPA6251827013510
7f7/14
NGOOD
105-67-9
Dimethylphenol, 2,4-
10
Not detected
ugiL
EPA62518270/3510
7M14
NGOOD
65-8"
Benzoic; acid
50
Not detected
ug/L
EPA625/827013510
717114
NGOOD
111-91-1
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
10
Not detected
ug/L
EPA625/8270/3510
7f7/14
NGOOD
120-83-2
Dichlorophenol, 2,4-
10
Not detected
ug/L
EPA625/827013510
7/7/14
NGOOD
120-82-1
Tdchlorobenzene, 1,2,4-
10
Not detected
ug/L
EPA62518270/3510
7(7/14
NGOOD
91-20-3
Naphthalene(SV)
10
Not detected
ug"L
EPA625/827013510
7/7114
NGOOD
106-47-8
Chloroanifine, 4-
12
Not detected
ugil-
EPA625/827Oi3510
717/14
NGOOD
87.68-3
Hexachlorobutadiene(SV)
10
Not detected
u9sI
EPA62518270i3510
7f7/14
NGOOD
59-50-7
Chloro-3-methyl phenol, 4-
15
Not detected
ug;L
EPA625/827013510
717114
NGOOD
91-57-6
Methylnaphthalene, 2-
10
Not detected
ug/L
EPA625i827013510
7/7/14
NGOOD
77-47-4
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
12
Not detected
ug!L
EPA625/827013510
717/14
NGOOD
88-06-2
Trichlorophenol, 2,4,6-
10
Not detected
ug/L
EPA625/8270/3510
717/14
NGOOD
95-954
Trichlorophenot, 2,4,5-
12
Not detected
ug/L
EPA62518270f'351 0
7/7i14
NGOOD
91-58-7
Chloronaphthalene, 2-
10
Not detected
uqIL
EPA62518270/3510
7,7/14
NGOOD
88-74-4
Nitroanifine, 2-
10
Not detected
ug/L
EPA625/827013510
7/7/14
NGOOD
131-11-3
Dimethyl phthalate
10
Not detected
ug/L
EPA625/827Oi351 0
7/7/14
NGOOD
208-96-8
Acenaphthylene
10
Not detected
ug/L
EPA625/827013510
7MI4
NGOOD
606-20-2
Dinitrotoluene, 2,6-
10
Not detected
ugiL
EPM25/8270i351 0
717114
NGOOD
99-09-2
Nitroanifine, 3-
50
Not detected
jqiL
EPA625/827013510
7/7114
NGOOD
83-32-9
Acenaphthene
10
Not detected
ugIL
EPA62518270i'3510
717114
NGOOD
51-28-5
Dinitrophenol, 2,4-
50
Not detected
uqjL
EPA625/827013510
7MI4
NGOOD
100-02-7
Nitrophenol, 4-
50
Not detected J2
ug/L
EPA625/827013510
7r7/14
NGOOD
132-64-9
Dibenzofuran
10
Not detected
ugiL
EPA625/8270/3510
7/7/14
NGOOD
121-14-2
Dinitrotoluene, 2,4-
10
Not detected
ugiL
EPA62518270,'3510
7/7114
NGOOD
84-66-2
Diethyl phthalate
10
Not detected
ug/L
EPA62518270/3510
7,M14
NGOOD
7005-72-3
Chlorophenyl phenyl ether, 4-
10
Not detected
ug/L
EPA62518270,'3510
7,704
NGOOO
86-73-7
Fluorene
12
Not detected
u9;L
EPA625Y8270,'3510
7MI4
NGOOD
100-01.6
Nitroanifine, 4-
50
Not detected J2
ugil-
EPA625/8270/3510
7/7/14
NGOOD
534-52-1
Dinitro-2-methyl phenol, 4.6-
50
Not detected
ug/L
EPA625(8270,'3510
7f7/14
NGOOD
86-30-6
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
10
Not detected
ug;L
EPA625/827Q13510
7r7114
NGOOD
101-55-3
Bromophenyl phenyl ether, 4-
10
Not detected
ug/L
EPA6251827013510
7M14
NGOOD
118-74.1
Hexachlorobenzene
10
Not detected
ug/L
EPA625/8270/3510
7MI4
NGOOD
87-86-5
Pentachlorophenol
30
Not detected
ug"L
EPA625/8270!3510
7M 14
NGOOD
85-01.8
Phenanthrene
10
Not detected
ugiL
EPA625/827013510
717114
NGOOD
120-12.7
Anthracene
10
Not detected
ug/L
EPA625/8270/3510
7/7/14
NGOOD
84-74-2
Di-n-butyl phthalate
10
Not detected
ugiL
EPA625W7Qf3510
717/14
NGOOD
2 C j6-44-0
Fluoranthene
10
Not detected
ugil-
EPA62518270/351O
76114
NGOOD
129-00-0
Pyrene
10
Not detected
ug/L
EPA625/8270/3510
7MI4
NGOOD
85-68-7
Butylbenzyl phthalate
10
Not detected
ug/L
EPA625M70/3510
717/14
NGOOD
91-94-1
Dichlorobenzidine, 33-
30
Not detected
jg,I
EPA625/8270/3510
7/7114
NGOOD
Laboratory Section>> 1623 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1623 [phone]
For a O*a," dosa,pfial W Sne qjW.16e, Wdes oefe, "0
Page 4 of 5

_%C E)14�, Laboratory Section Results
Location ID: 4PO79NCO026071 Sample ID. AC09782 Collect Date 06/18/2014 Cailecl Time. 09:40
CAS #
56-55-3
Anale Name
Benzo(a)anthracene
PQL
10
Result/
ualrfier
Not detected
Units
uglL
Method
Reference
EPA625/827013510
An_. alysis
.Date
7l704
Validated by
NGOOD
218-01-9
Chrysene
10
Not detected
uglL
EPAS251827013510
7/7/14
NGOOD
117-81-7
Bis(2-ethythexyl)phthalate
10
Not detected
ugJL
EPA62518270!3510
7,7114
NGOOD
117-84-0
Di-n-octyl phthalate
10
Not detected
uglL
EPA6251827013510
717114
NGOOD
205-99-2
Benzo(b)fiuoranthene
10
Not detected
ugIL
EPA62"27013510
7f7114
NGOOD
207.08-9
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
10
Not detected
uglL
EPA6251827013510
7/7114
NGOOD
50-32-8
Benzo(a)pyrene
10
Not detected
ug/L
EPA625/8270/3510
7/7114
NGOOD
193-39-5
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
15
Not detected
ug1L
EPA62518270r3510
7t7/14
NGOOD
53-70-3
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
15
Not detected
ug/L
EPA625/827013510
717/14
NGOOD
191-24-2
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
15
Not detected
ug1L
EPA6251827013510
7r7114
NGOOD
Sample Comments
VOL :VOA-J2-estimated-1 analyte(s) failed < LCL in the CV2.
wet:TSS- U,P- reanalyzed with color sample, only 250 mL available
MIC:BOD-G5- GGA std exceeded the range 198+1- 30.5 mg/L
MIC:BOD-GI-DO depletion of dilution water blank > 0.2 mgiL
WET:CYANIDE-J2-estimated-LFMD failed to meet QC criteria.
SEMI:SV-J2-estimated-1 analyte(s) failed to meet curve fit criteria.
SEMI:SV-J2-estimated-2 analyte(s) failed <LCL in CV2.
1-Surrogate failed < LCL in CV2 end, however, passed in beginning CV2.
Laboratory Section» 1623 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1623 [phone]
For adstttd9cdescnpg:ana'thartuatrfiercccear8f@rep g�sr.nnt�xa+�:9LED�f?> a ,.a 2j a iher ,aces< -a.;: as 6•rtw, �91t+,tes3ttL>
Page 5 of 5

COUNTY vRockrn�ham
RIVER BASIN:
REPORT TO Wmsacin•3alcm Rgsol s Office
Other :
COLI-ECTOR(S) 5 Wang 5 Liet y
f:stimated HOD Range
(4 w
DIVISION OF WATFR RESOURCES
Surface Water Fieldshrcl
Pki�RrrY AMBIENI 0 QA l� �''''I
STREAM El EFFLU0,11
D COMPLIANCE D CHAIN Uf CCls' moy El LAKI?: E-1 INFLUENT
LML:Rt';i3NC. ti' VISA IU � I: 'T3,lARY
Station Laratiuw: � � �rr����`
Lab Number
.
Date Received,
'fine Rccciyw. :
Received By
Data Reteascd
Date Rcpurtcd .
Seed: Chiurinated: Remarks.
_.._.._..-........_-._... _._.�,_.,�..
[=A,"voan Code Date He%,o (yyfmmldd) Date Ewd (,}imnJdd) Time Begin T"imt End Depth - DM, DO, OHM V.I., Type - A, H. L Cnmpusdta, T. S. B Sample Type
41`079NC0028071
x
BoD 310 m 1-
C(7I7 iq�Uo mRI
COD 1'..y 335 nt dI.
X
„
Cu9i(ortn Mi Fecal 31616 1100ml
Cohfomt MF Tuint3t504 ;Iuun l
1L 01,110n. whe Im1i 31615 11 UOml
3
Ctohliirm Fecal Sucp 31673 IIMFmi
...._� __.. ... ............-a.e.w.
R—d.+r I vial 505
.
Vuiatric 505
Fixed S10 m I
X
m Rcsidw:. Sus dcd 531E 'L
Volm,k 535
Fixed 14o
units
Acid0yin pit4.5436 m A_
Acidity to pfil 9 3 435 MO.
Alkalinity tot fig-3415 wgif.
AlkalinaytoI14.5410 —.- ni 3.
I(X 660 �� rn 1'
Turbidity 76 N ITJ
Coltloan Iotailubc JI1tOmi
COMMENTS:
X
Chlmde 940
mgr,
C'tAoio bell , Et'A a43.fI modified stptiun u L
X
(:o1or I rue 90
('ulur (Il ) 83pit-
Color pH 7.6 82
u.
X
C unde '120
Fluoride Y51
mu,4.
turtnaldehadc716111,
Un:+r+e and 0,ls S56
X
Itatdncss Tcwal 9W
X
S die CwuJ 9
ufbho rem
MHAS 38260
m 1.
u ,
?(
Sulfate 945
Sulfide 745
Dunn
Tannin$ t.r inn
u 3.
I iexaA altm Chromium
U 1,
Bicarbonate
mlo-
Carbon.ate
mgti,
X
'fwai Dissolved tiohds
mE+i,
X
Nil) +1t N610
m-I_
X
'I A.N ati N 62i ......�,
m .
X
NO2 plus NO3 as N 63(1
nt
X
P.'iutal as P 665
m
1104 as 1170507
ni
11 Dc"01'ed asp bm
m 'L
K-i'cuaasium
m 1-
X
Cd Cadmium 1011
X
t:'r-('hronr.um 'fda11034
a L,
X
Ni-NrcLai IU67
UIL4,
X
Pb- Fcart 1051
ttg71..
X
Zn- Z— 1092
"Ail
V 4anadtuni
U I.
X
A(t- SiNri 1077
u
A1-Ala mnum It0S
u
X
11" litf)MUM 100
u / L
C. C.1crum 916
MWI,
CoCohair 1037
u !L
Fr- Iran 1045
u
M.h'ML.-belenurn
u L
X
Sb-Ammori
SnA nt
UPI I
X
TI= 1iii1hurn
Ti-Titanium
u I,
I! -1631
.
00.
Li -Lithium 113'.
u -
Mg. Ma litesiwn 92'
m
MmMan arteu 1055
UWL
Na- 9rdrwn 929
m
X
Amvvc:Iout 1002
u
X
Sc Scictrium 1147
u
Iia- Mcmwy 719M
USA-
H.'Rown'
u
Otpnowitlortm Pcsucides
Or • totrvs Pesticides
Orem ofogyn Pesticides
Acid Hotueides
X
AmoNcuiraib.Acid EA1,actable Or
nits
tPI I Diesci Ran e
X
Pur o-able Or cs (VOA lwuln rc `d)
TPH Gasoline Karisc
TPWi3IT.X Goscilme Kamp
ph as lankaut
Tvir4wi
lime Sm mtival ("C):
Revision: 0g123,i s 3

PFWW
9VC DUAkLaboratory Section RM(ts
cwnty; RocwNallAM
Sample ID:
AC09M
River Basin
PO Number p
14OOM
Report To VnROAP
Date Roomed,
96119O2014
Collector.
F
Time Recarvood,
47:66
Region fig¢
Dkson of WResources
Logni)
u?svff14nal
Sample Matrix: QgouwgW=g
FLabwoft
Report Date_
Wy
Loc. Type: MONITORING WELL
Final Mao
Report Print Date:
O7r3GM14
Emergency YesiNe
Visitic
COC Yes/No
Loc. Oescr.: �09 Al W - Al
Location 10: 4PO79MCM5071
I Collect Daw 051'16l2Q14
Collect Time, 13-10
Sample DOW,
N this report is labeled preliminary report the results have not been validated. Do not use for Regulatory purposes.
CAS # Ana Name PQL ReSVIV Units Method Analysis valtdaled by
Qualiffe Reference Date
LAS
Sample temperature at receipt by lab 1.9 C 6/19/14 RBYRD
MIC
Specific Conductance in liquid 14,91 37 pmhosicm APHA 25108 7116i14 ESTAFFORDI
0-:41
Residue -Suspended in liquid
6.2
2530
mg/ L
SM 2540 D-1997
812114
MOVERMAN
Cyanide, total in liquid
0.02
0.02 U
MWL
EPA 335,4 REV 1
111/14
CGREEN
Platinum Cobalt Collor
-TITLE-
cow units
SM 21208 2001
6t2004
MOVERMAN
PTCO
5
5.0 U
color units
SM 21208 2001
6MI14
MOVERMAN
pf-l_PTCO
6.1
Color units
SM 21208 2001
6(20 14
MOVERMAN
Ion Chromatography
-TITLE-
rng/L
EPA 3001 rev2,1
6M/14
MOVERMAN
Chloride
1.0
2.5
mg/L
EPA 300,0 revZi
SM/14
MOVERMAN
Fluoride
0.4
0.4 U
mg(L
EPA 300.0 rev2A
6rM14
MOVERMAN
Sulfate
2.0
2.0 U
mwl-
EPA 300,0 rev2,1
6W14
MOVERMAN
Total Dissolved Solids in liquid
12
40
mg(-
SM 2540 C-1997
6t24114
CGREEN
Bromide
1.0
11.0 U
ngn-
EPA 3MO rev2_1
WW14
MOVERMAN
NUT
NI-113 as N in liquid
0.02
OA2 U
mgiL as N
EPA 360 1 REV 2
a(19M4
CGREEN
Total K4eldahl N as N in liquid
02
0.2 U
rng!L as N
EPA 351.2 REV 2
6t24j14
CGREEN
NOZ-IN03 as N in liquid
0.02
0.67
mgfL as N
EPA 353,2 REV 2
6t23114
CGREEN
Phosphorus -total as P in liquid
0,02
0.30
Mg/L as P
EPA 365.1 REV 2
6120114
CGREEN
MET
7440-22-4
Ag by JCPMS
1.0
1.0 U
V91L
EPA200,8
6t27114
ESTAFFORDI
7440-38-2
As by ICPMS
2,0
2.0 U
u9VL
EPA 2001
612TM4
ESTAFFORD1
7440-70-2
Ca by ICP
010
3.9
MGVL
EPA 200,7
8t25114
ESTAFFORDI
7440-43-9
Cd by fUrnaCe
0.50
0.50 U
LOL
EPA 200,9
7AV14
ESTAFFORDI
7440-47-3
Cr by ICP
10
is
L41-
EPA 200,7
&2&14
ESTAFFORDI
7"0-5"
Cu by furnace
2-0
35
j9&
EPA 200.9
7/9114
ESTAFFORDI
7439-8"
Fe by ICP
50
44000 J2
4L
EPA 200 7
&25114
ESTAFFORDI
7439-97-6
Hg 245,1
0.2
0,20 U
-VL
EPA 246,11
&25114
ESTAFFOR01
7440-0%-7
K by ICP
010
6.7 J2
Fr9fL
EPA 2001
6/25114
ESTAFFORDI
7439-954
Mg by ICP
010
6.9 J2
mg/L
EPA 200,7
612504
ESTAFFORDI
Laboratory Secftn>,-. 1623 Mall SOMACO center, Raleigh. NC 27599-1623 (919) 733-SWS
Page 1 of 3

,V(- V%V, Laboratory Section Irsults
Location 113: 4POTWC0025071 Sample 10: ACCOW Collect Date: OW1412014 OWleo Time:: 0,10
CM #
7439-9"
Analyte Name
Mn by ICP
PQL
10
Resul#1
Qualiiier
1000 J2
Units
UW1
method
Reference
EPA 2003
AnaNsis
6t25114
VAlidabld bV
ESTAFFORDI
7444-23-5
Na by ICP
0.10
4.0
m9fL
EPA200.I
6/25114
ESTAFF01RDI
7440-024
Ni by fumace
2.0
14
UgA-
EPA201).O
719114
ESTAFFOR01
7439-92-1
Pb by ICPMS
ZO
22
A&
EPA 200.8
8127M4
ESTAFFORDI
TM2-49-2
Se by lCPjTS
5.0
5.0 U
ug/L
EPA 200,8
6127/14
ESTAFFORDI
744""
Zn by lCP
10
91 J2
U9&
EPA 200.7
W25M4
ESTAFFORDI
SEM
7439-96-5
Senlivolatile Organics (BNAs) in liquid
-TITLE-
Ug/L
EPA6251827012.5I0
7/7,'14
NGOOO
62-53-3
Aniline
12
Not detected
LVIL
EPA626M27013510
717114
NGOOD
108-96-2
Phenol
10
Not detected
UWL
EPA62516270/3510
717/U
NGOOO
Ill 44 4
Bis(2--chloroetho)ether
10
Not detected
UWL
EPA62W827M510
71/14
NGOOD
95-57-8
Chlomphenol. 2-
10
Not detected
UWL
EPA6251827WSIO
7/7114
NGOOD
541-73-1
Dichlorobenzene, 1,3
10
Not detected
UWL
EPA6251827041610
7/7114
WOOD
106-46-7
Dichlorobenzene, 1,4-
10
Not detected
J!Pt
EPA8251/8270n510
7171114
NGOOD
100-51-6
Benzyll alcohol
30
Not detected J2
UWL
EPA625M270/3$10
M114
WOOD
96-50-1
Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-
10
Not detected
agiL
EPA62&6270135I 0
70114
NGOOD
9548-7
Methylphenol, 2-
10
Not detected
L9YL
EPA62518270MI0
717114
NGOOO
39638-32-9
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
10
Not detected
UWL
EPAS25M27MSIO
Mi14
WOOD
106-44.5
Methylphenol, 4-
10
Not detected
U94-
EPA625i$27013510
77114
NGOOO
621-64-7
N-n&osodi-n-propylamine
10
Not detected
UWL
EPA62 M7013610
7MI4
NGOOD
67-72-1
Hexachloroethane
10
Not detected
uwL
EPA6251827CM10
717114
NGOOD
98-95-3
Nitrobenzene
10
Not detected
UWL
EPA625t827W510
7/704
NGOOD
78.59-1
lsophorone
10
Not detected
UGVL
EPA62SM270/3510
7/7114
NGOOD
88-75-5
Nitrophertol, 2-
10
Not detected
uglL
EPA62518270/3510
717M4
NGOOD
105-67-9
Dimethylphenol, 2,4-
10
Not detected
U9)L
EPA62518270MIO
1/7/14
NCKM
654k"
Benzoic acid
50
Not detected
UQfL
EPA62518270rI510
71114
NGOOD
111-91-1
Bis(2-chlaroetboxy)methane
10
Not detected
ug/L
EPA62518270r3510
V714
NGOOD
120-63-2
OichloWhenol, 2,4-
10
Not detected
L9'L
EPA625i827013510
717114
WOOD
120-62-1
Trichkwobenzene, 1,2,4-
10
Not detected
u9iL
EPA62&827CM10
717/14
NGOOD
91-20-3
Naphthalerve(SV)
10
Not detected
IWL
EPA625WTC13510
717/14
NGOOD
106-47-8
Chloroaniline, 4-
12
Not detected
uqL
EPA6251827013510
7/7t14
NGOOD
37-68-3
Hexachlorobutadierte(SV)
10
Not detected
u9it
EPA6254127011510
V7114
NGOOD
59-W7
Chlor0-3-methyl phenol, 4-
15
Not detected
u9iL
EPA62"27=5iO
717M4
NGOOD
91-57-6
Methylnaphthatene, 2-
10
Not detected
4L
EPM251827013510
7/7i14
WOOD
77-47-4
Hexachtorocyclopentadiene
12
Not detected
ug,,L
EPA6251827013510
7/7/14
WOOD
SO-W2
Trichlorophenot, 2,4,5-
10
Not detected
ug/L
EPA625t8270MIO
V7/14
NGOOO
96-954
Thchlorophend, 2,4,5-
12
Not detected
UWL
EPA625/827013510
7/7114
NGOOD
41-58-7
Chloronaphthalene, 2-
10
Not detected
U911L
EPA625M27013510
717114
NGOOD
88-744
Nib-owiline, 2-
10
Not detected
UWL
EPA6251827CM10
7/7/14
NO(M
t3l-11.3
Dimethyl phthalate
10
Not detected
UgA
EPAS2518270MI0
717A4
WOOD
208-9"
Acenaphthylene
10
Not detected
Ug/L
EPA62518270/3510
7/7t14
NGOOO
606-20-2
Dindrotoluene, 2.6-
10
Not detected
ugiL
EPA62M270/3510
717114
NGOOO
Laboratory Secdon» 1623 Mail Service Cent", Raleigh, NC 278991623 (919) T33-M8
Y It* :�tW" 'Ofm O -v" Z'
Page 2 of 3

,N,r ImAR- LaioratorySection Woufts
Locatkxt 10- 4POTIMCM5071 Sample 10-, AC09966 Collect Date: O6rIWM4 Coiled rift::
SEM
CAS Al AnW_k_Name P Result/ vall Metbg_� Anabf.!�_is yajdawd C!y
Qualifier Referpnoe -Pik
49-09-2 Nitroanifine, 3- 50 Not detected UVI EPA6M27013510 IRM4 NGOOD
83-32-9
Acenaphthene
10
Not detected
Lvt
EPASM627M510
717/14
WOOD
61-26-5
Dinitropherol, 2,4-
50
Not detected
UQ/L
EPA625i827Of351O
7/704
NGOOD
100-02-1
Nftrophenol, 4-
50
Not detected J2
ug&
EPA62WO970f3510
717114
NGOOD
132-64-9
Dibenzofuran
10
Not detected
U91L
EPA626W7013610
717/14
NGOOD
121.14-2
Dinitrotoluene, 2,4-
10
Not detected
uwt
EPA6251027MSIO
717114
WOOD
84-66-2
Diethyl phthalate
10
Not detected
U91L
EPA62SM27013510
77/14
WOOD
7005-72-3
Chlorophenyi phenyi ether, 4-
10
Not detected
ug&
EPA62WO270f3510
7/7f14
WOOD
86-73-7
Fluorene
12
Not detected
u9&
EPA62&827=510
W114
WOOD
100-01-6
Nitroaniline, 4-
50
Not detected J2
ug&
EPM25f827OJ3510
717114
WOOD
534-52-1
Dinitro-2-methyl phenol, 4,6-
50
Not detected
uQIL
EP462&827=510
7/7114
NGOOD
W30-6
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
10
Not detected
ugiL
EPA5251827013510
717114
NGOOO
101-55-3
Bromophenyl phenyl ether. 4-
10
Not detected
4t
EPA62518270f35IO
717114
WOOD
118-74-1
Hexachlorob8nzene
10
Not detected
U911-
EPA62"27C13510
TRI14
WOOD
87-86-5
Pentachlorophenot
30
Not detected
ugiL
EPA62&827ot36IO
7/7114
NGOOD
85-01-8
Phenanthrene
10
Not detected
ug!L
EPA6254270MIO
717114
NGOOD
120-127
Anthracene
10
Not detected
a41-
EPA6251827OM10
717114
NGOOD
84-74-2
Di-n-butyl phthalate
10
Not detected
41-
EPA62"270MW
77f14
NGOOD
206-44-0
Fluoranthene
10
Not detected
u9fL
EPA625f8270MIO
WIM4
NGOOD
129-00-0
Pyrene
10
Not detected
uWL
EPA625/827MS10
M14
WOOD
85-68-7
Butylbenzyl phthalate
10
Not detected
UVI
EPA62518270MIO
70114
NGOOD
91-94-1
Dichlorobenzidine, 3,3'-
30
Not detected
u9fl-
EPA6251927OM10
70114
NGOOD
W56-3
Benzo(a)anthracene
10
Not detected
uIpt
EPA62518VCV3510
717/14
NGOOD
218-01-9
Chrysene
10
Not detected
uwt-
EPA62518270t35IO
7f7M4
NGOOD
117-61-7
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
10
Not detected
WVL
EPA625t8270/3510
717J14
NGOOD
117-W
Di-n-octyl phthalate
10
Not detected
U91
EPA62&827013510
717114
NGOOD
206-99-2
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
10
Not detected
uqIL
EPA62518270f351O
717114
NGOOD
207-08-9
Benzo(k)ftuoranthene
10
Not detected
ugIL
EPA626f827M510
7/7/14
NGOOD
50-32-9
Benzo(a)pyrene
10
Not detected
u9IL
EPA6251827013510
717114
NGOOD
193-39-5
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
15
Not detected
ug/L
EPA6M027=510
717114
NGOOD
53-70-3
Dibenzo(ah)anthracerve
15
Not detected
4L
F-PA6258827W510
7RI14
WOOD
191-24-2
Benzo(g,hj)peryiene
15
Not detected
uwt
EPA625f6270/3510
7f7114
WOOD
Laboratory Sectlow,;- 1623 Mail Service Cantor, Raleigh. NC 27SWM23 (919) 733-11906
For 4,W*W M" Mfw M
Page 3 of 3

'A' , C �R[Vk Lagoratory Section *suks
Location 10. 4PO79NCO026071 Sample ID AC09806 Collect Date 06/118/2014
SEM
r-A-q it Annhula Nnm® Dni Result/ I 1�;#Method
uuantier
Sample Comments
MET:Fe,Mn,Zn,Ca & Mg-J2-estimated- LFM <70%, matrix and high solids
SEMI:SV-J2-estimated-1 analyte(s) failed to meet curve fit.
SEMI:SV-J2-estimated-2 analyte(s) failed <LCL in CV2.
1-Surrogate failed <LCL in end CV2,-however, passed in beginning CV2-
Collect Time: 13:10
Laboratory Section— 1623 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1623 [phone]
For a cesu;pt,on of tt,,e modes refer to �.'r j,.poa —
Page 4 of 4
Analysis IV

AQUIFER PROTEC ION FIEI.,DSHE.ET
Location rode. 4P079NC'0025071
County Ruckingham
(quad Nu Serial No.
L'at _ Long_ —_
,J Water
❑ soil
❑ tither
❑ Chain of Custody
Report'To: ARO, FRO, MRO, RRO. WaRO, WViRO, 1`
W;SFiU, Kinston f O, Fed. Trutt, Central Off, Other:
Shipped by, BUS, Courier. Fland Del, Other:
Colic lor(s): S. WAN(tt S_ BERRY Date: 608/2014
F I'F ) ANA1 YSPS
01 aoo __ ... ___ Spec. Cortd.,, at 2)1C
T._
I em a Odor
P�tn ._ _— _ _ r C.
Appearance _
Field Analysts By;
�.....,
f3(0 3 fit angft.
_._ ... ......... ... _.__.__--
COD Hugh 340 mgfT
COD Low 335
(. olifen Ml' lvtcat ti6l6 IlMini
-^""
tom Mr l'otai � � 1t0011il 4
,
mlltte
I urbidily 76IFResidue,
Total Suspended 530 mgtl.
pH 403 umrs
-
Alkahnay to pli 4.5 410 mkiL
Aikalinuy to pit 9 3 415 tngJt_
C atbonait: 44 t mgtL
�.._
_ .._ _._ _
tticarWogitc
440
Carbon dioxide 405 mg/t.
_
X
a mg/L
Chloride 940
_.
_ ____.._-._....,.....
Chrointurr^Hex 1032 ugfl.
X (valor True SO Ct3
X Cyanide 720 t mtfl_
Lab Comments
North Carolina
Department of Environnient and Natural Resources
DIVISION OF INA TER RESOURCES -AQUIFER PROTFC71ON SECTION
SAMPLE PRIQRITY ILI (-I n 51
❑ Routine Lab Number _.A Q-ell rt)Q
17 Emergency W— Date Received j I Time:
Rec`d Pay, Froln:BUu, r , Nand Del_,
Other,
Data Entry lly�_ � L.k: _.
—11
Date Reported:
_ Purpose
Firxte_ : /P 13 iseline, Co
O%vnrr^ iI.
G ^
Location or Sit=t
Description of sampling po
Sampling Method
­
X
t7iss Solids 70300
Fluonrk 951vy ^__
npli,
nit.
-
Ilardoess(non •caib)902
xrt�L
X
X
Spcci£tc Cood. 95
.......... _._._.
Sulfate 90
timhos/ctrt
_....... ____
in * L
..
Sulfide 745
ing&
thl and Citeasc
ing/t _
X
X
NH as N 610
'fKN as N 625
ang/t
nigh
X
}
NO, t NO, as N 630
P total as P 665
Nitrate (NO, as N) 620
rni;(L
tit) tT.
mgfL—
Nitrite (NC1� as N) 615
mgtL
Ci W-54 kEV 8R01 a Frn t7+solved Analysis-subnut @hared sample and k-rne Gts" in block.
Cole, L US I , Pesticide Study, Federal 'I'rust, tither:
(Dacia �}
(puaiptng tirrie, ate lenp., etc.)
X
•
Ag Silver 46566
pit
X
AI Aitin inum 46557
As-Arcentc 4051
Ba-Barium 4655$�
_ �t
X
Ca-C:alctuin 46552
to 1.
X
_
c;d•Cadintum 46559
X
G-f;hwtntutn 46559 u�..
�u
X
Y
X
Cu-t'LMtcr 46562
Ft -Iron 46563
Hg-Mercury 71%0
L
u ,
urJL
X
K-potassium 4055
l _
Mg-Magiiesinm 46554
rn L
X
Mn-Manganese 46565
ueL
`5;
X
Na-sod um 46556
Ni-Nickcl
Mill
u ,tL
X
Pt txad 46564
tr L
X
X
Se• 5cicnium
Zn-linc46567
u,

PM12
XCWfAR.Laboratory Section 4?ssuhs
coumy: ROCKINGHAM
Sample ID:
AC09812
River Basin
PO Number #
14OMS
Report To MR10
Date Received
06119MI4
Time Received:
07:55
Collector- SWANG
Labiworks LoglnlD
MSWFT
Region: WBRO
'Mislon of Water Resources
Final Report Dew
719114
Sample Mfftft: O=rKtW&tt
Report Print Date�
Final Report
07IDWX14
Loc. Type- MONMONG WIELL
EmeMency YesiNo
VISAID
CDC YealNo
Loc. Descr.; The City of Eden
I Location 10: 0071INC0025071 I Collect Date: 0Sl1111=141 1 Collect Tine: 13,00 1 Sample Depth I
ff This report is labeled preliminary report the results have not been validated. Do not use for Regulatory purposes.
CAS # AnaMe Name PP Resultif Units Meth9d Analysi Validated
Qu lifter Reference to
LAB
Sample temperature at receipt by lab
1.9
Ic
6/19114
RBYRD
VOL
Volatile Organics in liquid
—TITLE—
Ug/l.
EPA5030162418260
612004
CJOHNSON
75-71-8
Dichlorodifluororrvethane
2,0
Not detected
UVL
EPA503M24IU60
6/20/14
CJOHNSON
74.87-3
Chloromethane
2.0
Not detected
ugk
EPA50301624i8260
6120114
CJOHNSON
75-04-4
Vinyl Chloride
ZO
Not detected
ugiL
EPA50306624f82160
6/2W14
CJOHNSON
74-83-9
Bromomethane
ZO
Not detected
j9/1.
EPAS030,V24/8260
&20114
CJOHNSON
75-00-3
Chloroethane
2.0
Not detected
LjgtL
EPA50=62418260
6/20/14
CJOHNSON
75-69-4
Trichlorofluoromethane
2.0
Not detected
jg/L
EPA50301624i8260
6120/14
CJOHNSON
75-35-4
1,1-Dichloroethene
1.0
Not detected J2
Ljg/L
EPA60=62418260
&MM4
CJOHNSON
75-09-2
Methylene Chloride
1.0
Not detected
j9/L
EPASMA2418260
6120114
CJOHNSON
156-60-6
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
1.0
Not detected
uQil-
EPA5030,t2418260
6120114
CJOHNSON
1634-04-4 Methyt Tert-Butyl Ether 1.0 Not detected u9it. EPA,50=62418260 6/M14 CJOHNSON
75-34-3
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,0
Not detected
igit.
EPA5030162418260
8t20f14
CJOHNSON
156-59w2
cis-1,2-Dichloroeftne
1.0
Not detected
uWL
EPA5030162418260
6120M4
=HNSON
74-97-5
Bromochloromethane
1.0
Not detected
agii.
EPAS0301624/8260
6120/14
CJOHNSON
67-66-3
Chloroform
1.0
Not detected
JWL
EPA60301624M260
60114
CJOHNSON
594-20-7
2,2-Dichloropropane
2.0
Not detected
.41L
EPAS03411524/8260
W004
CJOHNSON
107.06Q
1,2-Dichloreethane
1.0
Not detected
-QiL
EPA5030i,524/8260
6120114
CJOHNSON
71-55-6
11 .1-Trichloroethane
1,0
Not detected
a91L
EPA50301624/8260
612004
CJOHNSON
583-58-6
1,1-Dichloropropene
1.0
Not detected
Ug&
EPAS030162418260
6120114
CJOHNSON
56-23-5
Carbon Tetrachloride
1,0
Not detected
ug/L
EPA50=62418260
612LW 14
CJOHNSON
71 A3-2
Benzene
1,0
Not detected
ug!L
EPA50301624/8260
W0114
CJOHNSON
74-95-3
Dibromomethane
1,0
Not detected
U94
EPA50301624/82 0
6120i'14
CJOHNSON
7"7-5
1,2-Dichloropropane
1,0
Not detected
u9it.
EPA50301e2418260
6=04
CJOHNSON
79-W-6
Trichloroethene
1.0
Not detected
U911.
EPA5030162418260
6120/14
CJOHNSON
75-27-4
Bromodichloromethane
1-0
Not detected
ugil-
EPA50=62418260
612004
CJOHNSON
10061-01-5
cis-1,3-Dichtoropropene
ZO
Not detected
U911.
EPA603016241$260
6120114
CJOHNSON
10061.02-6
trans-1,3-Dichlompropene
2.0
Not detected
uglL
EPA5030162418260
612004
CJOHNSON
7"0-5 1, 1,2-Trichloroethane 1.0 Not detected U91 EPAWM62418260 6120J14 CJOHNSON
108-88-3 Toluene 1,0 Not detected �l EPA5030.162418260 6/20114 CJOHNSON
Laboratory Secfion>> 1623 Mail Service Center, Raleigh. NC 276WI623 [phone]
F,o a qYw4w wd.s -Wo, Io
Page 1 of 3

AC DKt- CaboratorySectm Podts
Locafron CO; 4PO79NCMSO71 Sample IC). ACO"12 Coned Oats: 06116120t4 Coiled Time:: 13:00
VOL
CAS #
142-28-9
Analyte Name
1,3-Dichloropropane
PQL
1.0
ResuIV
Qualifier
Not detected
nit
U91L
Method
Reference
EPAS030162418260
An" alWs
Date
612W14
CJOHNSON
124-48-1
Dibromochloromethane
2.0
Not detected
u94-
EPA5030/624AM
6120/14
C"NSON
106•934
(EDB)1,2-Dtbromoethane
1.0
Not detected
ug/L
EPA5030162418260
6120t14
CJOHNSON
127-18.4
TetraChloroethene
1.0
Not detected
ug/L
EPA5030/624/8260
6/Z4/14
CJOHNSON
108-90-7
Chiorobenzene
1.0
Not detected
ug1L
EPA50301624AM
6/M14
CJOHNSCNN
100-41.4
Ethylbenzene
1.0
Not detected
ugVL
EPA503M2418260
6f1 U
CJOHNSON
75-25-2
Brornofarm
2.0
Not detected
ug/L
EPA6030162418260
6t24t14
CJOHNSON
106-38-3
rn,p-Xylene
2.0
Not detected
u91
EPA503Es1624dat260
6M14
CJOHNSON
100.42-5
Styrene
1.0
Not detected
1-
EPA503OW418M
6i20/14
CJOHNSON
79-34-5
1,1,2,2-Tetrachioroethane
1.0
Not detected
LVL
EPA5030162416260
8/20/14
CJOHNSON
630-20-6
1.1,1,2-Tetrachiamethane
1.0
Not detected
ug/L
EPAS030t62418260
Si20114
CJOHNSON
95-47.6
o-Xylene
1.0
Not detected
ug/L
EPA5='624/8260
6120/14
CJOHNSON
96-19-4
1,2,3-Trichtoropropane
1.0
Not detected
u91L
EPA5030162418260
6/20114
CJOHNSON
9e-82-8
Isopmpyibenzene
1.0
Not detected
ug1L
EPAS030162418260
8120/14
CJOHNSON
108.6s-1
Bromobenzene
1.0
Not detected
ugn.
EPA50301e24/8M
6r"14
CJOHNSON
103.85.1
n-Propyibenzene
1.0
Not detected
ug1L
EPA50=62418260
6/20114
CJOHNSON
95.4"
2-Chlorotoluene
1.0
Not detected
ug1L
EPA =6241e26o
SM14
CJOHNSON
10643-4
4-Ch omtoluene
1.0
Not detected
ug&
EPAS0301624/9260
6M14
CJOHt4ON
108.67-8
1,3,5-Trimethyibenzene
1.0
Not detected
u9iL
EPA5030162418260
612W14
CJOHNSON
98-0e-8
tart-Butylbenzene
1.0
Not detected
ug1L
EPA5030162418260
6M14
CJOHNSON
95-63-6
1,2,4-Trimethyibenzene
1.0
Not detected
ug1L
EPA503M2418250
6/20114
CJOHNSON
135.98-8
sec-Butyibenzene
1.0
Not detected
ust
EPA5030I62418264
W0114
CJOHNSON
541-73-1
m-Dichlorobenzene (1,3)
1.0
Not detected
UVL
EPAS030/62418M
WM14
CJOHNSON
1 7
p-Dichlorobenzene (1,4)
1.0
Not detected
u9it
EPA50301624/8260
6/20114
CJOHNSON
95-50-1
o-Dichlombenzene (1,2)
1.0
Not detected
ug/L
EPA50301624/8260
6/20/14
CJOHNSON
99.87-6
p-isopropyltoluene
1.0
Not detected
ug7L
EPA5030le24/8260
61201114
CJOHNSON
104-61-8
n-Butyibenzene
1.0
Not detected
u91L
EPA5030162418260
6120114
CJOHNSON
96'12-8
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane
2.0
Not detected
ug1L
EPA5030.'624/6260
6120114
CJOHNSON
120-82-1
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1.0
Not detected
u91L
EPAS030162418260
6rM14
CJOHNSON
91.20.3
Naphthalene
2.0
Not detected
ug1L
EPAS=V2418260
W20/14
CJOHNSON
87-69-3
Hexachlorobutadiene
1.0
Not detected
u91L
EPA5030162418260
&M14
CJOHNSON
67-61-6
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
1.0
Not detected
ugiL
EPA803062418260
WM14
CJOHNSON
Laboratory Sectiors» 1623 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27609.1623 [phone]
Fol a deta *d deec Vion It-0 rier W8 'eier to «•z,<;;�t., ._ __ ..-s�. --- _a.._�+�- t _ ?_ ... ;.:. s._3 .vs:� �a ,. -x::� �:�a _ ... as»a�tw,w;,x� . ,.._ -� . _.
Page 2 of 3

pppr— AV 011 v4k 1,aboratorySection ats
Location 10: 4P079NC0025071 Sample 10, AC09912 Collect Date: 0611111=14 Collect TO*:: 13:00
VOL
fIA0 -M A— kk on] Result/ Method Ana iS Valtdated by
Sample Comments
VOL:VOA-J2-estimated-1 analyte(s) failed < LCL in the CVZ
Labors" Section>> 1523 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27OW1623 (919) 733-3W8
Far a
Page 3 of 3

AQUIFER PROTECTION FIELDSI SET
Location code
County_
(quad No
Lat.
J Serial No.
Long..__. --.._......._..._......_.
U Water
❑ soil
❑ Other
❑ Chain of Custody
SANtP�E PRIORITY
❑ Routine
❑ Emergency
Report To: ARO, PRO, MRO, RRO, WaRO, WAO, °
1 SS1, Kinston t=O, Fed. Trust, Central Off, Other:
Shipped by: Bus, (Clrrzr, Hand Del-, Other:_ Purpose:
FIELD ANAI_NSES � � � I '—� �i� Baseline, Cum
C'atlector(s): // Date
�$ Me
' —� wrier �! r��..w.Vp.i,,,
Pit 4ua :Spec (and �, — at 25°C, Location or Site
"Temp ro C Odor Description of sam
Appearance Sampling Method
Field Analysis By _ _ _._ ._ .— _-- Remarks
Mpatimetit of Environment and Natural Resources
ItVISION OF WATER RESOURCESAQUIFER PRO E.C(: IOON SECTION
�
Lab Number'
Date Received —`�.--.-. Time
Rec'd By: From:Hus, Courier, Hart(] Del.,
Other:
Data Entry fly: ____
Date Reported:_ --
Cone LUST, I Pesticide Study, Federal Trust, Other.
(urcte one) ...................
-- _ Sample nterva Jor
-. _ ._..— ._.-.._._.—.
6C70 310 m1eft Drss Solids 70100 in Ag-Silver 46566
_.__ __.. .. __
COD Low 335 — --��- -�mg/L - Hia,d,ess Total 900 mgli_ -� As-Arscmc 401
COT) Ihg7 t4J my![ F.umide 951 in AI-Alumm,m 46557
i
C ohforin Mh Fecal "31616 110(Mil Hardness (non-carb) 902 MWL Ha-flarium 46558
._--.._....... __._ _ .... __.-._. _--.-- _
Cohfonn. MF Coral 11504 /I001111 Phenols 32730 ugll a-Calcmm 46552
. TOC 680 nigtl, Specific Cord 95 rct.4hosrcrn v CdA admtum 46559
_ ._._ - ----...... __._._-_ .�._ ..._. _ _.... --__ -
I urbidits, 76 NT1) 1 Suilaie 945 mwL Cr-Chrommm 46559
Residue, Total Sus.1wnded 5:30 mpft- Sulfidc'145 mglt. Cu-Copper 46562
__ ...... ..__.._te- Iron 465b1
Ohl and Grease mg/l. H} Mercury 7 i 90Cf
I pH 403 units 1 K•Potassium 46555
Alkalinity to pH
4.5 41 U mg t :vg-Magnesium 46554
........... _..-
Alkalinity to pH 8 3 415 mgll Ma -Manganese 46565
Carbonate 445 nigit NH, as N 610 mg/l. Na-Sodrom 46556
._. _ - _. ......... ......... ..... 1—....._
Atearbonate 440 mglt. TKN as N 625 mgA Ni-Nickel
C:artion dioxide 405 mg7L NO, t NO; as N 630 n, Pb-Lead 46564
....................._.. _........-- mg
1 Chloride 940 mg%t. P: Total as 11665 nigh, Se-Salenium
_�..._._,.,.r ... .._... .... ._.-...._ ._._
Chromium. Hex 1032 ugll. Nitrate (NO,,asN)620 mg1L !at -Zinc ............. ......
Color, Tl ere 80 — ..... CU Nnnte (NOT as N) 615 mg/L.
Cyanide 720 m,VL
Lab Comments
(ptenfung time. air tamp, etc.)
Or anochlonne Pesticides
Or ono hosphorvs Pesticides
Nitrogen Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
P('}3s
„
, Semrvolati!e Organics
TPH Diesel Range_._.
....... - _
Volatile (thVnies (VOA butile)
fPl1 Gasoline Range .... __
TPII 11TEX Gasoline Range
LA M E.0NI3 Y
emperature on arrival (C): C
_.. _..... ................ _ ........._ — --- -- ..._..
t;W-54 REV. 812U!3 For Disx>lved Analysis-subtmt TiUerod sample and write "U1S" in block,

PW$07
'V C (DWkLaboratm Section Roufts
County: WO-C iHAM
Sample ID:
AC09$07
River Basin
PO Number #
14GO2"
Report To W-3
Date Received:
WL
461 212414
'nme Received,
07:55
Collector 5 WAN
Region:
Labworks Logiln(D
'bMsIltim Wda lkesewxft
MSWFT
of Final Report Date:
8IW14
Sample Matrix GROUNDWATER
Final Rog2irt Report Print Date;
0808/2014
Loc,Type: MON17ORWO MILL
Emergency Yes/No
VISAID
COC Yes/No
Loc. Descr.: THE CITY OF EDEN WWTP
I Location ID: 4PO79NCO025071 I Collect Date; 06118=14 1 Collect Time: 11:30 1 Sample Depth I
If this report is labeled preliminary report, the results have not been validated. Do not use for Regulatory purposes.
CAS # AnaKrte Name PQL ResutV Units Method Analysi Validated by
Quall -bel Reference Date
LAB
Sample temperature at receipt by lab 1.9 6119114 RSYRD
MIC
Specific Conductance in liquid 14.9 130 pmhostcm APHA 25106 711&14 ESTAFFORD1
WET
Residue -Suspended in liquid
61
1270
mg/L
SM 2540 D-1997
6123114
MOVERMAN
Cyanide, total in liquid
0,02
0.02 U
MQIL
EPA 335.4 REV 1
711114
CGREEN
7439-97-6
Platinum Cobalt Color
-TITLE-
color units
SM 21208 2001
6120114
MOVERMAN
PTCO
5
6.0 U
color units
SM 21208 2001
6/20114
MOVERMAN
PH-PTCO
6.2
color units
SM 21208 2001
6120114
MOVERMAN
Ion Chromatography
-TITLE-
mg/L
EPA 300,0 rev2,1
6/30114
MOVERMAN
Chloride
1.0
11
mgVL
EPA 300,0 rev2.1
&W14
MOVERMAN
Fluoride
OA
0.4 U
rriglL
EPA 300.0 rsv2. 1
6130114
MOVERMAN
Sulfate
2,0
16
mg/L
EPA 300,0 rev2_1
6MI14
MOVERMAN
Total Dissolved Solids in liquid
12
112
mg&
SM 2540 C-1997
6124114
CGREEN
Bromide
1'0
11.0 U
rng1L
EPA 300.0 rev2_1
6W14
MOVERMAN
NUT
NH3 as N in liquid
0.02
0.02 U
mg/L as N
EPA 3501 REV 2
6i 404
CGREEN
Total Kjeldahl N as N in liquid
02
0.30
mgVi- as N
EPA 3511 REV 2
6124114
CGREEN
NO2+NO3 as N in liquid
0.02
3.6
mgVL as N
EPA 353.2 REV 2
6123/14
CGREEN
Phosphorustotalas P in liquid
0.02
0.69
mg/L as P
EPA 385.1 REV 2
6120114
CGREEN
MET
7440.22-4
Ag by ICPMS
1'0
1.0 U
ugVL
EPA 200,8
6127/14
ESTAFFORDI
7440-36-0
Antimony by 1CPMS
10
10 UIJ2
ugil-
EPA 200,8
6/27114
ESTAFFORDI
7440-38-2
As by ICPMS
2,0
2,0 U/J2
U9&
EPA 200,8
6127114
ESTAFFORDI
7440-70-2
Ca by ICP
OAO
71
MW'L
EPA 200.7
6/25114
ESTAFFORDI
7440-43-9
Cd by ICPMS
0.50
0.68
ug'L
EPA 200.8
&27/14
ESTAFFORDI
7440-47-3
Cr by ICP
10
42
ugh.
EPA 200,7
U504
ESTAFFORDI
7440-50-8
Cu by furnace
2.0
24
ugiL
EPA 200,9
719114
ESTAFFORDI
743""
Fe by ICP
50
63M
ug/L
EPA 200.7
&25114
ESTAFFORD1
Hardness by Calculation
1.0
48
MV-
SM2340SEPA 200.7
W7114
MOVERMAN
7439-97-6
Hg 2451
0,2
0.20 U
UWIL
EPA 245A
6125A4
ESTAFFORDI
Laboratory Section,>> 1623 Mail Service Center, Raleigh. NC 27699-1623 (919) 733-31108
Fw awWed,1*saWWn o{ to qua0w wow-e1w 10
Page 1 of 2

Laboratory section ijmdts
LocabonID: 4POTONIM25071 Sample 10: ACOMT Coped Date: 06/IMM4 Collect Fame:: 11:30
MET
AS #
7440-09-7
Analyte Name
K by ICP
PQL
0.10
ResuIV
Qualifier
4.5
Units
mg/L
Method
Reference
EPA 200 7
AnalysisValideled
Date
6/2SM4
by
ESTAFFORD1
7439-9"
Mg by ICP
0.10
6.9
nVL
EPA 200.7
6/25114
ESTAFFORDI
7439-96-5
Mn by ICP
10
140
U9VL
EPA 2001
6125114
ESTAFFORDI
7440-23-6
No by ICP
OAO
21
mgtL
EPA 200.7
6125/14
ESTAFFORDI
7440-02-0
NI by fumace
2.0
25
ugIL
EPA 200,9
M14
ESTAFFORDI
7439-92-1
Pb by ICPMS
2.0
23
u9il.
EPA 200,8
6/77114
ESTAFFORDI
7782-49-2
Se by ICPMS
5.0
5.0 UIJ2
UWL
EPA 200A
6r27114
ESTAFFORDI
7440-28-0
Thallium (TI) ICPMS
2.0
10 U
U9VL
EPA 200.8
6/27114
ESTAFFORDI
74404"
Zn by ICP
10
1110
Uw`L
EPA 2007
6125114
ESTAFFORDI
Sample Comments
MET: As, So, Sb-J2-estimated-LFM >70% due to matrix interference
Laboratory Section>> 1623 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 276MI1623 [phone]
F"' a '*wed .164aT60" .4 014 4U&IAwCCd*d I** to I' �-i�
Page 2 of 2

r
5
AQUIFER. PROTECTION FIELDSHI,ET
Location code 4P079NCtl 25071
County —Rockingham
Quad No_,®____-_ ___ Serial No
[,at. Long.
TYPE
❑ Soil
❑ Other
❑ Chain of Custody
SAMPLE _PRIORITY
Routine —�
❑ Emergency
Repor11o: ARC), FRO, MRO, RRO, WaRO, WiRO,
I"—
WSRO., Kinston FO, Fed. Trust, Central OfL., Other:
Shipped by- Bus, Courier Hand Del,, Other:
L urpose:
Collector(s): S WANG/ S. BI3RRY
Date:6118/2014 Time 3ascltnc,
FIELD ANALYSES
Owner__ G
P11'00 ............ ... ... Spcc. Cond.,),
. _._.._.._at 25°C Location or Site,
i-eflip_tp QC; Odor
Description of°sampling
Appearance _ ....._.. _
, _. Sampling Method
Field Analysis Lay: _ _ _._
Remarks
LABORATORY ANiAI YSFS
_......... __.........
13t7f� 3 i0
_...__
rngtL
COD High 340
COD Low 335
Cotifornt MF Fecal 31616
_
mgl/t-��
ioltt•T'6t8t-i'P�-'"�j
tt=1e{' QOn:! �
I urbiday 76
14TU
Residue, Total Stopended 530
argil, i
i
'
pH 403
orals
[­-t-_
Alkalinity to pH 4-5 410
nib/l,
i Alkalinity to pH $.3 415
Mgt(,
Carbonate 445
.... _____._._...__
f3icart"nine 440
nig/L
-.._...
tngn,
...
Carton dioxide 405
arg/L
x >l
(':htoridc 940
mg/L
Chromium Hex 1032
ugJl-
X
l
Color Tnnr 80
C,yanedi; 720
CU
mgll
`t,ab
Diss. Solids 70300 nil
Fluoride 951
j
Hatiloess: Total 9XXI --- nil
-liodoess(non aarb)902..._----��-- art
ug
Specific Cond.95 pMlsos,
Sulfate 945 mi
Sulfide 745 rnl
Oil and Grease- nij
}
_ ..._.
(X,)
Ntlt as N 610 nil
_.—_ ...............................
TKN as N 625 rnj
._
NO, + NO, as N 630 rnl
��
...._ _..._-_.._—.._..-_ __ __....__
P Total as P 665 fill
Nitrate (NO, as N) 620 aq
Nitrite (NOwasN)6t5
,— —mj
C W-54 REV 8/2013 For Dissolved Analysis-sobnni littered sample and write " DIS" in block
C3ttpartment of Environment and Natural Resout'crs
)I VISION Or WATER RtESOURCES-A01,11FER PROTECTION SECTION
LabNtlmber
Ai�—� Lute Received._ _ _._. __. Time:
Reed lay: From Bus, Courier, Iland DO.,
Other:
Data Entry By:,, Ck:.__
Date Reported:_ ....
iance, LUST, Pesticide Study, Federal Trust, Other:,
�. (CxC� one), . .
i

AF.Wwava
'vr D",La6oratory Section &sufts
County: ROCKING44A
Sample 0:
AC09808
River aaam
PO Number#
14G82"
Report To WSRDAP
Date Received:
W9WW14
Collector. s WAN
Time Received:
07:55
Labworks LoginlD
MSMFT
Region:
[Xvision of VWer Resources
Final Report Dew
719114
Sample Matrix: Gmundwift
Loc. Type: 111IM117MINGWELL
Final Report Report Print Dater
07109120I4
Emergency YestNo
VIS;tlD
CDC YSSINO
Loc. Descr.: The City of Eden
Location ID- 4PO70NCO025071
7-oZt-D'at,
061194014
Collect Time: 11:30
saff0o Depth
If this report is labeled preliminary report, the results have not been validated. Do not use for Regulatory PUWSOS.
CAS Anabq& Name PQL Resuill VMethod AnsIlysis y8fid"d
Quatifie nits Reference Date
LAS
Sample temperature at receipt by tab
1.9
cW19i14
RBYRD
VOL
Volatile Organics in liquid
-TITLE-
ugIL
EPAS030/62418260
6120114
CJOHNSON
75171-8
Dichlorodifluoromethane
2.0
Not detected
ugil-
EPA503042418i60
6MI/14
CJOHNSON
74-87-3
Chloromethane
2.0
Not detected
ugtL
EPA50341624/11260
6120114
CJOHNSON
75-01-4
Vinyl Chloride
2.0
Not detected
ug/L
EPA$030162418260
612004
CJOHNSON
74-83-9
Bromomethane
2.O
Not detected
ugA-
EPA5030162418260
6120/14
CJOHNSON
75-M3
Chloroethane
2,0
Not detected
ug/L
EPA5030162418260
W0114
C.10+404SON
75-69-4
Trichlomfluoromethane
2.0
Not detected
ugIL
EPA5030162418260
6/M14
CJOHNSON
75-35-4
1,1-Dichtoroethene
1.0
Not detected J2
ugil.
EPA503016248260
6/20114
CJOHNSON
75-09-2
Methylene Chloride
1.0
Not detected
U91L
EPA5030/62418280
6f20J14
CJ0Ht4SCIN
156.60-5
trans- 1,2-Dichloroethene
1.0
Not detected
ug,*L
EPA50301624182.60
6/M14
CJOHNSON
1634-0"
Methyl Tert-Butyl Ether
1.0
Not detected
U911
EPAS0301624182W
6JM14
CJOHNSON
75-34.3
1,1-Dichloroethane
1.0
Not detected
UWL
EPA5030/62418260
6fM14
CJOHNSON
IW59-2
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
1'0
Not detected
ugii.
EPA5030M2418260
6i20/14
CJOHNSON
74-97-5
Bromochloromethane
1,0
Not detected
ug/L
EPASM162418260
6120/14
CJOHNSON
67-66-3
Chloroform
1.0
Not detected
jg;L
EPA5030/62418260
6M14
CJOHNSON
594-20-7
2,2-Dichloropropane
2.0
Not detected
4L
EPA50=624i8260
6120f14
CJOHNSON
107.06-2
1,2-Dichloroethane
1.0
Not detected
JWL
EPA5=162418260
&2o1I4
WCHNSON
71-55-6
1, M -Trichloroethane
1.0
Not detected
Iq'L
EPA5030t624/S260
6/20/14
CJOHNSON
563-58-6
1,1-Dichloropropene
1.0
Not detected
ag/l.
EPA5030162418260
61?0/14
CJOHNSON
56-23-5
Carbon Tetrachloride
1.0
Not detected
JWL
EPAS030/62418M
620114
CJOHNSON
71-43-2
Benzene
1.0
Not detected
ug/L
EPA503016241$2160
6M/14
CJOHNSON
74-95-3
Dibromomethane
1.0
Not detected
U91-
EPAS030/624/8260
W20/14
CJOHNSON
78-87-5
1,2-Dichloropropane
1.0
Not detected
jgil-
EPA5030t62418260
6120114
CJOHNSON
79-01-6
Trichloroethene
11'0
Not detected
igil.
EPA503OI624/8260
fv2W14
CJOHNSON
75-27-4
Bromodichloromethane
1.0
Not detected
U91
EPA5030162418260
M20/14
CJOHNISON
1 W61 -01 -5
cis- 1,3-Dichloropropene
2.0
Not detected
u9it
EPAS030f62418260
6/2W14
CJOHNSON
10061-02-6
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
ZO
Not detected
411-
EPA5OM624/8260
6=/14
CJOHNSON
79-00-5
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1.0
Not detected
uw'L
EPASM6241260
6t20/14
CJOHNSON
108-88-3
Toluene
1,0
Not detected
uglL
EPASO=624/8260
6120M4
CJOHNSON
Laboratory Section-:- 1823 Mall Service Center, Raleigh. NC 276MIS23 (919) 733-M$
Fx 4,W.Wled d":now of to uuahfw'�" 'War w
Page 1 of 3

AZ','MtAk r-a6oratMSec.lion I{fsidts
17lon 10:
4P079NC0025071
Sample 0: AC09110111 Coiled Date:
0813=4 Collect Tim: 11:30
VOL
CAS #
Analyte Name
PQL Result/ Units
qualffie
Method. Analysis Vmfidatwl Ov
Reference Date
142.28-9
1,3-Dichloropropane
1-0 Not detected UgIL
EPA50301624/8260 6120114 CJOHNSON
124-48-1
Dibromochloromethane
2.0
Not detected
ugit
EPA50W62418260
6120/14
CJOHNSON
106-93-4
(EDB)1,2-D!bfomoethane
1,0
Not detected
ug/L
SPASOW624/6260
610114
CJOHNSON
127-184
Tetrachloroethene
1A
Not detected
uwI_
EPAS0301624182W
6=114
CJOHNSON
108-90-7
Chlorobenzene
1,0
Not detected
4L
EPA5030162418260
6rM14
CJOHNSON
100-41-4
Ethylbenzere
1.0
Not detected
ug/L
EPAS030162418260
6120114
CJOHNSON
75-25.2
Bromoform
2-0
Not detected
agiL
EPA50301624/8260
6120114
CJOHNSON
106-38-3
m,p-Xyiene
ZO
Not detected
U9/L
EPA5030162418260
6120i14
CJOHNSON
100-42-5
Styrene
1.0
Not detected
U911.
EPA5030/624i8260
W0114
CJOHNSON
79-34-5
1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1.0
Not detected
uwt
EPA5030162418260
6/20114
CJOHNSON
630-20-6
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethene
1,0
Not detected
4L
EPA5030162418260
6/M14
CJOHNSON
95-47-6
O-Xylene
1.0
Not detected
ugiL
EPA50301$2418260
6/20114
CJOHNSON
96-18-4
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1.0
Not detected
UWI-
EPA5030i624/8260
6/20114
CJOHNSON
98-82-8
lsopropylberizene
1.0
Not detected
ug/L
EPAS0301624/8260
6120114
CJOHNSON
108-86-1
Bromobenzene
1.0
Not detected
U91L
EPAS0301624/8260
6I20i14
CJOHNSON
103-85-1
n-Propylbenzene
1,0
Not detected
ugA.
EPA5030i'624/8260
6r20114
CJOHNSON
9549-8
2-Chlorotoiuene
1.0
Not detected
UWL
EPA503&62418260
&20114
CJOHNSON
106-434
4-Chloroto4uene
1.0
Not detected
UgIL
EPA5030i62418260
6/20/14
CJOHNSON
108-67-8
1,3,5-Thmethylbenzene
1.0
Not detected
uqIL
EPA5030162418260
6I20t14
CJOHNSON
98-06-6
tent-Butylbenzene
1.0
Not detected
UWL
EPA50301624tS260
6120114
CJOHNSON
95.63-6
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1.0
Not detected
ug/L
EPAS030162418M
6120/14
CJOHNSON
135-98-8
sec-Butylbenzene
1.0
Not detected
UWL
EPA60301624i8260
6/20114
CJOHNSON
541.73-1
m-Dichlorobenzene (1,3)
1.0
Not detected
UWL
EPAS0301624/8260
6/20114
CJOHNSON
106-46-7
p-Dichlorobenzene (1,4)
1.0
Not detected
U9JL
EPA50301624/8260
6/20/14
CJOHNSON
95-50-1
o-Dichlorobenzene (1,2)
1,0
Not detected
U9VL
EPA5030162418260
612004
CJOHNSON
99-87-6
p-isopropyttoluene
1.0
Not detected
uq/L
EPA5030,'624t8260
6MA4
CJOHNSON
104-51-8
n-Butybenzene,
1,0
Not detected
ug/L
EPA50301624i8260
6120114
CJOHNSON
96-12-8
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane
2.O
Not detected
UWL
EPAS030162418260
612004
CJOHNSON
120-82-1
1,2,4-Tdchlorobenzene
1.0
Not detected
ugVL
EPA5030162418260
6120114
CJOHNSON
91-20-3
Naphthalene
2,0
Not detected
uglL
EPA5030t62418260
6120114
CJOHNSON
87-68-3
Hexachlorobutadiene
1,0
Not detected
ugk
EPA50301624182I50
6120114
CJOHNSON
87-61-6
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
1-0
Not detected
UWL
EPA50301624/8260
6/20114
CJOHNSON
Laboratory Secflon>> 1623 Mail Service Canter, Raleigh, NC 2709-1623 [phone]
Fv I dWAi*d Oss,,pW Y I# qLAO*wd" refor � 'q" 14
Page 2 of 3

Location ID: 4P079NC00MTI
VOL
r'AQ It An�KAM-
NrDuk f al5oratorysectionlZouhs Iq
Sample 10: AC09M Collect Date: 06(I6t2414 Collect Tmm:: 11.30
ant Result! I Inifc, Method Analysis Validated by
Sample Comments
VOLNOA-J2-estimated-1 analyte(s) failed < LCL in the CV2.
Laboratory Section>> 1623 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1623 [phone]
Fu a data; the quivhrw 000" w.
Page 3 of 3

PF
_A
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory Donald R. van der Vaart
Governor Secretary
August 26, 2015
City of Eden
Attn: Mr. Brad Corcoran, City Manager
308 East Stadium Drive
Eden, NC 27288
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
NPDES Permit NCO025071
Mebane Bridge Wastewater Treatment Plant
Rockingham County
Dear Mr. Corcoran:
Mr. Lon Snider of the Winston-Salem Regional Office of the North Carolina Division of Water
Resources conducted a compliance evaluation inspection of the Mebane Bridge Wastewater Treatment
Plant on August 13, 2015. The assistance and cooperation of the Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC)
of the facility, Ms. Melinda Ward, was greatly appreciated. Inspection findings are summarized below.
The facility is located at 191 Mebane Bridge Road, in Eden, in Rockingham County. The permit
authorizes the city to operate this 13.5 MGD plant, which consists of a flow meter, bar screens, grit
separator, extended aeration basins, secondary clarifiers, chlorination facilities, de -chlorination, aerobic
digestion, dissolved air flotation (DAF), sludge lagoons, and polymer addition. Effluent produced at the
facility is discharged to the Dan River, which is currently classified as WS-IV waters in the Roanoke River
Basin.
Site Review
The facility was very clean at the time of the inspection and appears to be well operated and
managed.
The WWTP is functioning at approximately half -capacity. The reduction in flow has allowed the
City to take components offline for maintenance. At the time of the inspection, one aeration basin was
offline as were two of the four clarifiers. The WWTP seems to be capable of meeting effluent limits
under its current configuration. As noted in the attached inspection report the clarity of the water in
the chlorine contact chamber was remarkable.
450 West Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300, Winston-Salem, NC 27105
Phone: [phone] Intemet: www.ncwater.org
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer — Made in part by recycled paper

Documentation Review
Mr. Snider evaluated laboratory data during the inspection. Operation logs were reviewed and
found to meet all requirements. Comparison of available lab reports and field monitoring data with
Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) shower no concerns or errors. Chain of custody records were
available and complete. The visitation and operation/maintenance logs were reviewed and found to be
complete and current. The City of Eden has a current field laboratory certification for dissolved oxygen,
pH, temperature, residual solids, and total suspended solids. All other required lab testing for the facility
is conducted by Pace Analytical.
The facility operates 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. The assigned ORC, Ms. Ward, and the other
operators have the appropriate and current certifications to operate the facility.
We appreciate your efforts to effectively operate and maintain this treatment system. No
response to this letter is required. If you have questions regarding the inspection or this letter, please do
not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Sherri V. Knight, P.E.
Assistant Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources
cc: WSRO
Central Files

United States Environmental Protection Agency
Form Approved.
EPA Washington, D.C. 20460
OMB No. 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 IN 1 2 15 1 3 I NCO025071 I11 12 15/08/13 17 18 L ,. j 19 L G 201 I
21111111 I1111111111111IIII1IIIIII IIIIIII1III �6
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 CIA ------------------- — Reserved -------------------
67 70 I I 71 itI lI 72 I n, I 73 � 74 751 I I I I I I '80
L_1 LJ II
Section B: FacilityData
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
Entry Time/Date
Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
10:00AM 15/08/13
15/03/01
Mebane Bridge WWTP
204 Mebane Bridge Rd
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
Eden NC 27288
11:1 DAM 15/08/13
18/04/30
Name(s) of Onsite Rep resentative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
d/
Melinda Sessoms Ward/ORC/336-627-1009/
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Brad Corcoran,PO Box 70 Eden NC 272890070/City
No
Manager/336-623-2110/3366232726
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Program Sludge Handling Disposal Facility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Waters
Laboratory
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Lon Snider WSRO WQ//336-776-9701/
Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers ate
� Lc' 7>
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page#

NPDES
yr/mo/day
31 NCO025071 �11 121 15/08/13 1
17
Inspection Type
18 ICI
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
11
Page#

Permit: NCO025071 Owner -Facility: Mebane Bridge WWrP
Inspection Date: 08/13/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? E ❑ ❑ ❑
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable ❑ ❑ ❑
Solids, pH, DO, Sludge Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment: Facility analyzes process control parameters daily.
Permit Yes No NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new ❑ ❑ E ❑
application?
Is the facility as described in the permit? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Are there any special conditions for the permit? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Permit expires in 2018.
Record Keeping
Yes No NA NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
N
❑
❑
❑
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)?
E
❑
❑
❑
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
E
❑
❑
❑
Is the chain -of -custody complete?
0
❑
❑
❑
Dates, times and location of sampling
Name of individual performing the sampling
Results of analysis and calibration
Dates of analysis
Name of person performing analyses
Transported COCs
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters?
0
❑
❑
❑
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ?
❑
❑
❑
(If the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator
N
❑
❑
❑
on each shift?
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
N
❑
❑
❑
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site?
0
❑
❑
❑
Page# 3

Permit: NCO025071 Owner -Facility: Mebane Bridge WWfP
Inspection Date: 08/13/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Record Keeping Yes No NA NE
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: All records are in order and up to date.
Laboratory
Yes No NA NE
Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory?
E
❑
❑
❑
Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters) performed by a certified lab?
S
❑
❑
❑
# Is the facility using a contract lab?
0
❑
❑
❑
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees
0
❑
❑
❑
Celsius)?
Incubator (Fecal Coliform) set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/- 0.2 degrees?
0
❑
❑
❑
Incubator (BOD) set to 20.0 degrees Celsius +/- 1.0 degrees?
❑
❑
❑
Comment: The lab data and calibration records were detailed and matched what was on the DMR's
Flow Measurement - Influent
Yes No NA NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the flow meter operational?
0
❑
❑
❑
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
0
❑
❑
❑
Comment: Calibrated quarterly.
Bar Screens
Yes No NA NE
Type of bar screen
a.Manual
❑
b.Mechanical
Are the bars adequately screening debris?
N
❑
❑
❑
Is the screen free of excessive debris?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is disposal of screening in compliance?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the unit in good condition?
0
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Grit Removal
Yes No NA NE
Type of grit removal
a.Manual
❑
b. Mechanical
Page# 4

Permit: NCO025071 Owner -Facility: Mebane Bridge WWTP
Inspection Date: 08/13/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Grit Removal Yes No NA NE
Is the grit free of excessive organic matter?
E
❑
❑
❑
Is the grit free of excessive odor?
0
❑
❑
❑
# Is disposal of grit in compliance?
0
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Aeration Basins
Yes No NA NE
Mode of operation
Ext. Air
Type of aeration system
Surface
Is the basin free of dead spots?
E ❑
❑
❑
Are surface aerators and mixers operational?
0 ❑
❑
❑
Are the diffusers operational?
❑ ❑
N
❑
Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process?
0 ❑
❑
❑
Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface?
0 ❑
❑
❑
Is the DO level acceptable?
0 ❑
❑
❑
Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/1)
E ❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Secondary Clarifier
Yes No NA NE
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier?
0
❑
❑
❑
Are weirs level?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of weir blockage?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting?
E
❑
❑
❑
Is scum removal adequate?
N
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the drive unit operational?
N
❑
❑
❑
Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)?
N
❑
❑
❑
Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc?
E
❑
❑
❑
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately'% of the sidewall depth)
❑
❑
❑
Comment: Flow coming over the wiers had no flock coming over and was ultra clear.
Aerobic Digester Yes No NA NE
Is the capacity adequate? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Page# 5

Permit: NCO025071
Inspection Date: 08/13/2015
Owner -Facility: Mebane Bridge VW TP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
11
Aerobic Digester
Yes No NA NE
Is the mixing adequate?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of excessive foaming in the tank?
0
❑
❑
❑
# Is the odor acceptable?
0
❑
❑
❑
# Is tankage available for properly waste sludge?
N
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Disinfection -Gas
Yes No NA NE
Are cylinders secured adequately?
M
❑
❑
❑
Are cylinders protected from direct sunlight?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is there adequate reserve supply of disinfectant?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the level of chlorine residual acceptable?
E
❑
❑
❑
Is the contact chamber free of growth, or sludge buildup?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is there chlorine residual prior to de -chlorination?
0
❑
❑
❑
Does the Stationary Source have more than 2500 Ibs of Chlorine (CAS No. 7782-50-5)?
❑
❑
0
❑
If yes, then is there a Risk Management Plan on site?
❑
❑
0
❑
If yes, then what is the EPA twelve digit ID Number? (1000-
If yes, then when was the RMP last updated?
Comment: Contact chamber was crystal clear with no signs of sludge build up
De -chlorination
Yes No NA NE
Type of system ?
Liquid
Is the feed ratio proportional to chlorine amount (1 to 1)?
N ❑
❑
❑
Is storage appropriate for cylinders?
N ❑
❑
❑
# Is de -chlorination substance stored away from chlorine containers?
0 ❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Are the tablets the proper size and type? ❑ ❑ N ❑
Are tablet de -chlorinators operational? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
Number of tubes in use?
Comment:
Influent Sampling Yes No NA NE
# Is composite sampling flow proportional? E ❑ ❑ ❑
Is sample collected above side streams? E ❑ ❑ ❑
Page# 6

Permit: NCO025071 Owner -Facility: Mebane Bridge WWfP
Inspection Date: 08/13/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Influent Sampling Yes No NA NE
Is proper volume collected? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the tubing clean? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Celsius)?
Is sampling performed according to the permit? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Effluent Sampling
Yes No
NA NE
Is composite sampling flow proportional?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is sample collected below all treatment units?
E
❑
❑
❑
Is proper volume collected?
N
❑
❑
❑
Is the tubing clean?
0
❑
❑
❑
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees
N
❑
❑
❑
Celsius)?
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type
0
❑
❑
❑
representative)?
Comment:
Standby Power
Yes No NA NE
Is automatically activated standby power available?
❑
❑
❑
0
Is the generator tested by interrupting primary power source?
❑
❑
❑
0
Is the generator tested under load?
❑
❑
❑
Was generator tested & operational during the inspection?
❑
❑
❑
Do the generator(s) have adequate capacity to operate the entire wastewater site?
❑
❑
❑
Is there an emergency agreement with a fuel vendor for extended run on back-up power?
❑
❑
❑
Is the generator fuel level monitored?
❑
❑
❑
E
Comment: Gemratpr os maintained by Duke Power and is up at the water treatment plant
Solids Handling Equipment
Yes No NA NE
Is the equipment operational?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the chemical feed equipment operational?
❑
❑
❑
Is storage adequate?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of high level of solids in filtrate from filter presses or vacuum filters?
❑
❑
❑
0
Is the site free of sludge buildup on belts and/or rollers of filter press?
❑
❑
❑
S
Page# 7

Permit: NC0025071 Owner -Facility: Mebane Bridge WWTP
Inspection Date: O6/13/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Solids Handling Equipment Yes No NA NE
Is the site free of excessive moisture in belt filter press sludge cake? ❑ ❑ ❑
The facility has an approved sludge management plan? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Upstream / Downstream Sampling Yes No NA NE
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type, and 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
sampling location)?
Comment:
Page# 8

Taylor -Smith, Aana
From: Melinda Ward [[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 6:54 PM
To: Taylor -Smith, Aana
Subject: Re: Mebane Bridge Jan 2013 DMR
I'll be back in Thursday and will correct it then.
Melinda
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 2, 2013, at 12:58 PM, "Taylor -Smith, Aana" <[e-mail]> wrote:
Hi Melinda,
I tried calling you today but it didn't seem to go through, so I thought I'd try your email. On the January
2013 DMR, a violation was triggered in BIMS for monitoring frequency violations on the week of
12/30/2012—1/5/2013. 1 know the reason for that is probably because there was no sample taken on
1/1/2013 due to the holiday, but if you wouldn't mind going back and writing in HOLIDAY for that date
and submitting an amended DMR, that would be great. I'll fix it in BIMS so it doesn't show up as a
violation.
Thank you so much, and hope you had a great holiday weekend!
Aana Taylor -Smith
Surface Water Protection Section
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
Phone: [phone]
Fax [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may
be disclosed to third parties.

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Charles Wakild, P. E.
Governor Director
23 August 2012
City of Eden
Attn: Mr. Brad Corcoran, City Manger
308 East Stadium Drive
Eden, NC 27288
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
NPDES Permit NCO025071
Mebane Bridge Wastewater Treatment Plant
Rockingham County
Dear Mr. Corcoran:
Natural Resources
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Mr. Mike Thomas of the Winston-Salem Regional Office of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality
conducted a compliance evaluation inspection of the Mebane Bridge Wastewater Treatment Plant on 20 August
2012. The assistance and cooperation of the Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC) of the facility, Ms.
Melinda Ward was greatly appreciated. Inspection findings are summarized below.
The facility is located at 191 Mebane Bridge Road, in Eden, in Rockingham County. The permit authorizes
the city to operate this 13.5 MGD plant, which consists of a flow meter, bar screens, grit separator, extended
aeration basins, secondary clarifiers, chlorination facilities, de -chlorination, aerobic digestion, dissolved air
flotation (DAF), sludge lagoons, and polymer addition. Wastewater produced at the facility is discharged to the
Dan River, which is currently classified as WS-IV waters in the Roanoke River Basin.
Site Review
The facility was very clean at the time of inspection and appears to be well operated and managed. Most of
the minor corrosion that was observed during the last compliance inspection has been addressed.
The WWTP is functioning at approximately half capacity. The reduction in flow is allowing the City to
take components offline for maintenance. At the time of inspection one aeration basin was offline for cleaning
and maintenance as were two of the four clarifiers. The WWTP seems to be capable of meeting effluent limits
under its current configuration.
During the last inspection it was noted that the two lagoons were offline for maintenance. The newer of the
two lagoons has been cleaned and appears to be in good condition with no indication of erosion or burrowing
animals. The older lagoon is no longer in service and has been filled, graded, and stabilized with vegetation.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, Winston-Salem Regional Office
Location: 585 Waughtown St. Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service:1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer
NorthCarolina
Nahmally

City of Eden
Compliance Evaluation Inspections NCO025071
Page 2
Documentation Review
Mr. Thomas evaluated laboratory data during the inspection. Operation logs were reviewed and found to
meet all requirements. Comparison of available lab reports and field monitoring data with discharge
monitoring reports (DMR) showed no concerns or errors. Chain of custody records were available and
complete. The visitation and operation/maintenance logs were reviewed and found to be complete and current.
The City of Eden has a current field laboratory certification for dissolved oxygen, pH, temperature, residual
solids and total suspended solids. All other required lab testing for the facility is conducted by Pace Analytical.
The facility operates 24 hours a day 7 days a week. The assigned Operator in Responsible Charge, Ms.
Ward, as well as, the other operators has the appropriate, current certifications to operate the facility.
We appreciate your efforts to effectively operate and maintain this treatment system. No additional
response to this letter is required. If you have questions regarding the inspection or this letter, please do not
hesitate to contact Mr. Thomas or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
�1
W. Corey Basinger
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection
Winston-Salem Region
Attachments:
1. BIMS Inspection Report
Cc: WSRO — SWP w/ atch
Central Files w/ atch
NPDES West Unit

United States Environmental Protection Agency
Form Approved.
EPA Washington, D.C. 20460
OMB No. 2040-0057
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 INI 2 IJ 31 NCO025071 111 121 12/08/20 117 181 C I 191 S I 20I I
1-
Remarks
21111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111116
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating 131 QA —------------- ---------- Reserved —--------- -------
671 169 70IU 71 UI 72I N I 73I I 174 751 I I I I I I 180
�I
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
Entry Time/Date
Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
Mebane Bridge WWTP
10:00 AM 12/08/20
10/05/01
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
191 Mebane Bridge Rd
Eden NC 27288
11:30 AM 12/08/20
12/04/30
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Mark T Bullins,PO Box 70 Eden NC 272890070/Superintendent/336-627-7783/3366279189 No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit 0 Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance ■ Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Program 0 Sludge Handling Disposal Facility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Waters
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Michael S Thomas WSRO WQ///
Aev Z'-�— /Z
Signaturepof Manage nt Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
�ir2lG�Li�i�
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page # 1

NPDES
yr/mo/day
31 NCO025071 11 12, 12/08/20 117
Inspection Type
18u
C
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
Page # 2

Permit: NCO025071
Inspection Date: 08/20/2012
Owner - Facility: Mebane Bridge WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit
(if the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new application?
Is the facility as described in the permit?
# Are there any special conditions for the permit?
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
Comment:
Record Keeping
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)?
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
Is the chain -of -custody complete?
Dates, times and location of sampling
Name of individual performing the sampling
Results of analysis and calibration
Dates of analysis
Name of person performing analyses
Transported COCs
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters?
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ?
(If the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator on each shift?
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification?
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site?
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review?
Comment:
Effluent Pipe
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained?
Yes No NA NE
Yes No NA NE
Yes No NA NE
Page # 3

Permit: NC0025071 Owner - Facility: Mebane Bridge WWTP
Inspection Date: 08/20/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Effluent Pipe Yes No NA NE
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Comment:
Flow Measurement - Influent Yes No NA NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is flow meter calibrated annually? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Is the flow meter operational? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Flow meter is calibrated quarterly.
Flow Measurement - Effluent Yes No NA NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Is flow meter calibrated annually? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Is the flow meter operational? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Comment: Meter is calibrated quarterly.
Bar Screens Yes No NA NE
Type of bar screen
a.Manual
❑
b.Mechanical
■
Are the bars adequately screening debris?
■
❑ ❑
❑
Is the screen free of excessive debris?
■
❑ ❑
❑
Is disposal of screening in compliance?
■
01311
Is the unit in good condition?
■
❑ ❑
❑
Comment:
Grit Removal
Yes
No NA
NE
Type of grit removal
a.Manual ❑
b.Mechanical ■
Is the grit free of excessive organic matter? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the grit free of excessive odor? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Page # 4

Permit: NCO025071
Inspection Date: 08/20/2012
# Is disposal of grit in compliance?
Comment:
Aeration Basins
Mode of operation
Type of aeration system
Is the basin free of dead spots?
Are surface aerators and mixers operational?
Are the diffusers operational?
Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process?
Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface?
Is the DO level acceptable?
Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/1)
Owner - Facility: Mebane Bridge WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Comment:
Secondary Clarifier
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater?
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier?
Are weirs level?
Is the site free of weir blockage?
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting?
Is scum removal adequate?
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge?
Is the drive unit operational?
Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)?
Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc?
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately % of the sidewall depth)
Comment:
Pumps-RAS-WAS
Are pumps in place?
Are pumps operational?
Are there adequate spare parts and supplies on site?
Yes No NA NE
■nnn
Yes No NA NE
Ext. Air
Surface
Yes No NA NE
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■nnn
■nnn
■nnn
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■n❑❑
■ n n n
■❑❑❑
■nnn
Yes No NA NE
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ n n n
■nnn
Page # 5

Permit: NCO025071 Owner - Facility: Mebane Bridge WWTP
Inspection Date: 08/20/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Pumps-RAS-WAS Yes No NA NE
Comment:
Disinfection -Gas Yes No NA NE
Are cylinders secured adequately?
Are cylinders protected from direct sunlight?
Is there adequate reserve supply of disinfectant?
Is the level of chlorine residual acceptable?
Is the contact chamber free of growth, or sludge buildup?
Is there chlorine residual prior to de -chlorination?
Does the Stationary Source have more than 2500 Ibs of Chlorine (CAS No. 7782-50-5)?
If yes, then is there a Risk Management Plan on site?
If yes, then what is the EPA twelve digit ID Number? (1000- - )
If yes, then when was the RMP last updated?
Comment:
De -chlorination
Type of system ?
Is the feed ratio proportional to chlorine amount (1 to 1)?
Is storage appropriate for cylinders?
# Is de -chlorination substance stored away from chlorine containers?
Comment:
Are the tablets the proper size and type?
Are tablet de -chlorinators operational?
Number of tubes in use?
Comment:
Aerobic Digester
Is the capacity adequate?
Is the mixing adequate?
Is the site free of excessive foaming in the tank?
# Is the odor acceptable?
# Is tankage available for properly waste sludge?
Comment:
Yes No NA NE
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Yes No NA NE
Page # 6

Or
Permit: NC0025071 Owner - Facility: Mebane Bridge WWTP
Inspection Date: 08/20/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Solids Handling Equipment Yes No NA NE
Is the equipment operational? ■ n n
Is the chemical feed equipment operational?
Is storage adequate?
Is the site free of high level of solids in filtrate from filter presses or vacuum filters?
Is the site free of sludge buildup on belts and/or rollers of filter press?
Is the site free of excessive moisture in belt filter press sludge cake?
The facility has an approved sludge management plan?
Comment:
Chemical Feed
Is containment adequate?
Is storage adequate?
Are backup pumps available?
Is the site free of excessive leaking?
Comment:
Drying Beds
Is there adequate drying bed space?
Is the sludge distribution on drying beds appropriate?
Are the drying beds free of vegetation?
# Is the site free of dry sludge remaining in beds?
Is the site free of stockpiled sludge?
Is the filtrate from sludge drying beds returned to the front of the plant?
# Is the sludge disposed of through county landfill?
# Is the sludge land applied?
(Vacuum filters) Is polymer mixing adequate?
Comment: Drying beds are offline and are being used as a storage site for collected
screenings and grit until sent to landfill.
Lagoons
Type of lagoons?
# Number of lagoons in operation at time of visit?
Are lagoons operated in?
Yes No NA NE
Yes No NA NE
nn■o
nn■n
nn■n
00 0
nn■n
❑n■n
00 0
■ Q
0n■n
rr-Tw, �a_w:ftiiiiiiiiiiii
Facultative
1
Parallel
Page # 7

Permit: NCO025071
Inspection Date: 08/20/2012
Lagoons
# Is a re -circulation line present?
Is lagoon free of excessive floating materials?
Owner - Facility: Mebane Bridge WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
# Are baffles between ponds or effluent baffles adjustable?
Are dike slopes clear of woody vegetation?
Are weeds controlled around the edge of the lagoon?
Are dikes free of seepage?
Are dikes free of erosion?
Are dikes free of burrowing animals?
# Has the sludge blanket in the lagoon (s) been measured periodically in multiple locations?
# If excessive algae is present, has barley straw been used to help control the growth?
Is the lagoon surface free of weeds?
Is the lagoon free of short circuiting?
Yes No NA NE
Comment: Older lagoon is no longer in use and has been cleaned, filled, graded, and
planted.
Operations $ Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? E ❑ ❑ ❑
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable Solids, pH, DO, Sludge ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment:
Influent Sampling
# Is composite sampling flow proportional?
Is sample collected above side streams?
Is proper volume collected?
Is the tubing clean?
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)?
Is sampling performed according to the permit?
Comment: See inspection report.
Effluent Sampling
Is composite sampling flow proportional?
Is sample collected below all treatment units?
Yes No NA NE
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
■❑❑❑
Page # 8

or
Permit: NCO025071 Owner - Facility: Mebane Bridge WWTP
Inspection Date: 08/20/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Effluent Sampling Yes No NA NE
Is proper volume collected? ■ 0 0
Is the tubing clean? ■ D D 0
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)? ■ 0 ❑ ❑
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type representative)? ■ ❑ Q Q
Comment: See inspection report.
Upstream / Downstream Sampling Yes No NA NE
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type, and sampling location)? ■ El D 0
Comment:
Page # 9

ppppppp-
MEMORANDUM
To:
Through:
From:
Division of Water Quality
September 25, 2012
Corey Basinger
Regional Supervisor, Surface Water Protection, WSRO
Cindy A. Moore
Supervisor, Aquatic Toxicology Unit
Carol Hollenkampt-
Quality Assurance Officer, Aquatic Toxicology Unit
Subject: Whole effluent toxicity test results
Eden WWTP
NPDES Permit # NC0025071 /001
Rockingham County
The aquatic toxicity test using flow -proportional composite samples of effluent discharged from Eden
WWTP has been completed. Eden WWTP has a permitted effluent discharge that is 13.5 MGD entering the
Dan River (7Q10 of 386 CFS). Whole effluent samples were collected on September 11 by Jenifer Carter
and facility representative Chris Powell and September 13 by facility representative Mike Thomas for use in
a chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia pass/fail toxicity test. The test using these samples resulted in a pass.
Toxicity information follows.
Test Type
Test Concentrations
Test Result
Control Survival
Control Mean Reproduction
Test Treatment Survival
Treatment Mean Reproduction
First Sample pH
First Sample Conductivity
First Sample Total Residual Chlorine
Second Sample pH
Second Sample Conductivity
Second Sample Total Residual Chlorine
3-Brood Ceriodaphnia dubia pass/fail
5.4% sample
Pass
100%
22.8
92%
22.6
6.91 SU
374 micromhos/cm
<0.1 mg/L
6.92 SU
370 micromhos/cm
<0. l mg/L
Test results for the above samples indicate that the effluent would not be predicted to have water quality
impacts on receiving water. These samples were split and tested by Pace Analytical. The chronic
Ceriodaphnia dubia pass/fail toxicity test run by Pace Analytical also resulted in a pass. Please contact us
if further effluent toxicity monitoring is desired. We may be reached at [phone].
Basin: ROA03
cc: Central Files
Jenifer Carter, WSRO
Aquatic Toxicology Unit Environmental Sciences Section

PCarter, Jenifer
From: Carter, Jenifer
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 9:12 AM
To: '[e-mail]'
Subject: FW: Eden/Mebane bridge passed.
Melinda,
Let me know if you have any questions about the results noted in the email below.
Jenifer Carter
Before printing this email, please consider your budget and the environment.
If you must print, please print only what you need and save ink with the free Eco-Font.
NC DENR Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Voice: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Hollenkamp, Carol
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 8:29 AM
To: Carter, Jenifer
Subject: Eden/Mebane bridge passed.
Hi Jenifer,
Just wanted to let you know Eden/Mebane Bridge test passed, and the split test w/Pace passed also. I will send out the
memo tomorrow or Friday. Sorry for the delay.
Carol Hollenkamp
Aquatic Toxicology Unit/Environmental Sciences Section
North Carolina Division of Water Quality/DENR
1621 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Website: http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ess/atu
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.

AMPLE COLLECTION FO ARO FRO MRO RRO WaRO WiRO WS�R
Facility/Water Body
NPDES # NC 0 0 Outfall # Q
County
Basin/Sub-basin �% O
Receiving Stream
Collector(s) (print) /71 K6
Grab D Composite [:��
Date Began Time Began
q/!a/l;2- 0:3o
Sampling Site
Description
Samples per Hour for w Hours
Date End Time End
/ 13 / la 1 8 :3o
Container: 211, (1 gal) PE cubitainer ❑Other (describe) �Q� m • r— # of containers_
Chlorinated: O Yes ❑ No Collected on Ice: �es ❑ No Shipped on Ice: es ❑ No
Method of Shipment: Courier'rBus ❑ St<1 Other (explain):
Date/time of transfer to,.p r- . •fy;/r,''wi-hrw / JJ+e<^ (CAP rAw.— inr o` A;+;—1 tr.—F 'l
Comments: J CGU `1 J
9 r rq 7�Y 1'rlbf,�Z-
"S lit" sample, s littin lab name: �nC
lr u.— au ie wan sufficient ice to maintain temperature o A/. U to 4. U-(_' unto detLve : to A I V Lab * *
Collector(s)
Signature: Date: o
ATU Temperature Rcd
Sample No. @ receipt, °C on Ice
RECEIVED CONDUCTIVITY, TRC,
date mhos/cm - µmhos/cm mg/L
time I date date
by I I time
time
from-1 by by
Lab
Comments:
Shi' sam' "les for DWQ/Environmental Sciences Branch
Aquatic Toxicology Unit
Mail Service Center 1621 Street address: 4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621 Raleigh, NC 27607
ESB Courier #: 520101 phone: [phone]

LE COLLECTION FORM ARO FRO MRO RRO waKU w
w
PP Facility/Water Body`e�/ Pe �r�ye
NPDES # [NC� 0 0 �� Outfall #
County I 'Woo ' n 9 ltG nN
Basin/Sub-basin 4 6 !T 1 '0 3
Receiving Stream -Pao ,e1 Ve-,r
i Collector(s) (print) Jr L rt 5 Powe 11
Grab Composite Samples per=Hour:fo \ 4 Hours
Date Bean Time Began Date End Time End
�9 / !v / aoid- 9 / l/ / I g I X : ;.�
Sampling Site
Description
Container: 2< (1 gal) PE cubitainer
% Chlorinated: WYes ❑ No llec
Method of Shipment: Courier Bus
Date/time of transfer to
# of containers C
on Ice: es U Nb_ ' Shipped on Ice: L, es U No
Staff _Qther (explain): —
I'll
Ie / / "zS (see reverse for additional transfers)
Comments:
10 "Split" sample, splitting lab name:
1— T!
** Pack sam
Collector(s
Signature:I
ATU
Sample No.
RECEIVED
date
time
by
from
Lab
Comments:
IShip sam les to:
with sufficientleg to
DWQ/Environmental Sciences Branch
Aquatic Toxicology Unit
Mail Service Center 1621
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
ESB Courier #: 520101
U. U to 4.U-U unto
date
time
LOALU LRD""
Date:
Red
on Ice
TRC,
mg/L
date
time
Street address: 4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
phone: [phone]

United States Environmental Protection Agency
Form Approved.
E PA Washington, D.C. 20460
OMB No. 2040-0057
Approval expires B-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 INI 2 U 31 NCO025071 ( 11 121 12/08/20 117 18I C I 19I S I 201 I
Remarks
21111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111116
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating 131 QA -- -- - -- - --- -Reserved— — - --- —
67 I 169 701 I 711 I 72111 73' I 174 751 I I I I I I 180
W
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
Entry Time/Date
Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
Mebane Bridge WWTP
10:00 AM 12/08/20
10/05/01
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
191 Mebane Bridge Rd
Eden NC 27288
11:30 AM 12/08/20
12/04/30
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Tities(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Mark T Bullins,PO Box 70 Eden NC 272890070/Superintendent/336-627-7783/3366279189
No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit 0 Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Program N Sludge Handling Disposal Facility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Waters
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Michael S Thomas WSRO WQ///
/Z
Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page # 1

NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type N
3 NCO025071 I11 121 12/08/20 17 18L�
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
Page # 2

pr
Permit: NCO025071 Owner - Facility: Mebane Bridge WWTP
Inspection Date: 08/20/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Yes No NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new application?
n
n ■ n
Is the facility as described in the permit?
■
El Cl 0
# Are there any special conditions for the permit?
n
■ ❑ o
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
■
Q n n
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
■
n Q D
Comment:
Record Keeping
Yes
No
NA NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
■
n
n ❑
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
■
❑
n 0
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)?
■
00
n
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
■
0
n n
Is the chain -of -custody complete?
■
n
Q n
Dates, times and location of sampling
■
Name of individual performing the sampling
■
Results of analysis and calibration
■
Dates of analysis
■
Name of person performing analyses
■
Transported COCs
■
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters?
■
0
❑ Q
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ?
■
❑
❑ ❑
(If the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator on each shift?
■
0
❑ ❑
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
■
❑
Q ❑
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
■
n
n
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification?
■
0
0 11
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site?
■
0
n
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review?
■
n
n ❑
Comment:
Effluent Pipe
Yes No
NA NE
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained?
■
n
n n
Page # 3

Permit: NC0025071 Owner - Facility: Mebane Bridge WWTP
Inspection Date: 08/20/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Effluent Pipe Yes No NA NE
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Comment:
Flow Measurement - Influent
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
Is the flow meter operational?
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
Comment: Flow meter is calibrated quarterly.
Flow Measurement - Effluent
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
Is the flow meter operational?
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
Comment: Meter is calibrated quarterly.
Bar Screens
Type of bar screen
a.Manual
b.Mechanical
Are the bars adequately screening debris?
Is the screen free of excessive debris?
Is disposal of screening in compliance?
Is the unit in good condition?
Yes No NA NE
Yes No NA NE
Yes No NA NE
❑
Comment:
Grit Removal Yes No NA NE
Type of grit removal
a.Manual ❑
b.Mechanical ■
Is the grit free of excessive organic matter? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the grit free of excessive odor? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Page # 4

Permit: NC0025071 Owner - Facility: Mebane Bridge WWTP
Inspection Date: O8120/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Grit Removal Yes No NA NE
# is disposal of grit in compliance? ■ I=1 ❑ n
Comment:
Aeration Basins Yes No NA NE
Mode of operation Ext. Air
Type of aeration system Surface
Is the basin free of dead spots? ■ ❑ n ❑
Are surface aerators and mixers operational? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are the diffusers operational? ❑ n ■ n
Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process?
■
❑
❑
n
Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface?
■
n
n
n
Is the DO level acceptable?
❑
❑
❑
■
Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/1)
n
❑
❑
■
Comment:
Secondary Clarifier
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater?
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier?
Are weirs level?
Is the site free of weir blockage?
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting?
Is scum removal adequate?
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge?
Is the drive unit operational?
Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)?
Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc?
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately % of the sidewall depth)
Comment:
Pumps-RAS-WAS
Are pumps in place?
Are pumps operational?
Are there adequate spare parts and supplies on site?
Yes No NA NE

Permit: NC0025071 Owner - Facility: Mebane Bridge WWTP
Inspection Date: 08/20/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Pumps-RAS-WAS Yes No NA NE
Comment:
Disinfection -Gas Yes No NA NE
Are cylinders secured adequately?
■
❑ ❑ 0
Are cylinders protected from direct sunlight?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
Is there adequate reserve supply of disinfectant?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
Is the level of chlorine residual acceptable?
❑
❑ ❑ ■
Is the contact chamber free of growth, or sludge buildup?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
Is there chlorine residual prior to de -chlorination?
❑
❑ ❑ ■
Does the Stationary Source have more than 2500 Ibs of Chlorine (CAS No. 7782-50-5)?
❑
❑ ❑ ■
If yes, then is there a Risk Management Plan on site?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, then what is the EPA twelve digit ID Number? (1000- - )
If yes, then when was the RMP last updated?
Comment:
Type of system ? Liquid
Is the feed ratio proportional to chlorine amount (1 to 1)? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Is storage appropriate for cylinders? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
# Is de -chlorination substance stored away from chlorine containers? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Are the tablets the proper size and type? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Are tablet de -chlorinators operational? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Number of tubes in use?
Comment:
Aerobic Digester Yes No NA NE
Is the capacity adequate? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the mixing adequate? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the site free of excessive foaming in the tank? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Is the odor acceptable? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Is tankage available for properly waste sludge? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Page # 6

nor
Permit: NC0025071 Owner - Facility: Mebane Bridge WWTP
Inspection Date: 08/20/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Solids Handling Equipment Yes No NA NE
Is the equipment operational? ■ n n n
Is the chemical feed equipment operational?
■
n
n
n
Is storage adequate?
■
n
n
n
Is the site free of high level of solids in filtrate from filter presses or vacuum filters?
■
n
n
n
Is the site free of sludge buildup on belts and/or rollers of filter press?
■
n
n
n
Is the site free of excessive moisture in belt filter press sludge cake?
■
n
n
n
The facility has an approved sludge management plan?
❑
n
n
■
Comment:
Chemical Feed
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is containment adequate?
Is storage adequate?
Are backup pumps available?
Is the site free of excessive leaking?
Comment:
Drying Beds
Is there adequate drying bed space?
Is the sludge distribution on drying beds appropriate?
Are the drying beds free of vegetation?
# Is the site free of dry sludge remaining in beds?
Is the site free of stockpiled sludge?
Is the filtrate from sludge drying beds returned to the front of the plant?
# Is the sludge disposed of through county landfill?
# Is the sludge land applied?
(Vacuum filters) Is polymer mixing adequate?
Comment: Drying beds are offline and are being used as a storage site for collected
screenings and grit until sent to landfill.
Lagoons
Type of lagoons?
# Number of lagoons in operation at time of visit?
Are lagoons operated in?
Yes No NA NE
nn■o
nn■❑
nn■n
n n ■ n
nn■n
nn■n
n n ■ n
nn■0
nn■n
Yes No NA NE
Facultative
1
Parallel
Page # 7

Permit: NCO025071 Owner - Facility: Mebane Bridge WWTP
Inspection Date: 08/20/2012 Inspection Type• Compliance Evaluation
Lagoons Yes No NA NE
# Is a re -circulation line present? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Is lagoon free of excessive floating materials? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Are baffles between ponds or effluent baffles adjustable? ❑ ❑ ■ n
Are dike slopes clear of woody vegetation? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are weeds controlled around the edge of the lagoon? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are dikes free of seepage? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are dikes free of erosion? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are dikes free of burrowing animals? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the sludge blanket in the lagoon (s) been measured periodically in multiple locations? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# If excessive algae is present, has barley straw been used to help control the growth? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Is the lagoon surface free of weeds? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the lagoon free of short circuiting? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Older lagoon is no longer in use and has been cleaned, filled, graded, and
planted.
Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable Solids, pH, DO, Sludge ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment:
Influent Sampling Yes No NA NE
# Is composite sampling flow proportional? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Is sample collected above side streams? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is proper volume collected? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the tubing clean? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is sampling performed according to the permit? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: See inspection report.
Effluent Sampling Yes No NA NE
Is composite sampling flow proportional? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Is sample collected below all treatment units? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Page # 8

Permit: NCO025071 Owner - Facility: Mebane Bridge WWTP
Inspection Date: 08/20/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Effluent Sampling Yes No NA NE
Is proper volume collected? ■ ❑ 0 0
Is the tubing clean? ■ n n n
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)? ■ ❑ 0
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type representative)? ■ 0 ❑ Q
Comment: See inspection report.
Upstream / Downstream Sampling Yes No NA NE
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type, and sampling location)? ■ Q 0 Q
Comment:
Page # 9

ppppppp-
November 7, 2011
NPDES Unit
Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Gentlemen:
eu* of c&n 4
SUBJECT: Annual Pollutant Analyses
NPDES Permit #NC0025071
DMM x,l
NOV 13 20o
RECEIVED
NOV 10 2011
CEDTRAL WQ/BOQES
Per the requirements of the subject NPDES permit, please find enclosed a copy
of the monitoring information for the annual pollutant analyses.
Please contact me at 336-627-1009, Ext 130 if there are any questions regarding
this information.
Sincerely
Melinda Ward
Wastewater Superintendent
Enclosure
RECEIVED
NOV 0 9 2011
Information Processin
DWQ/8 essing Unit
PO. Boa 70 • Eden, NC 27289-0070 9 [phone] . Fax [phone]

Annual Adoaitorla d Pollutant Scan
PPPe!rm7itNo. NCO025071 RECEIVED Month September
Outfall 001 N.C.Dept. of ENR Year 2011
NOV 2 9 2011
Facility Name Mebane Bridge WWTP Winston-Salem ORC Melinda Ward
Date of sampling September 13, 201�1 Regional Office Phone [phone] EXT. 130
Analytical Laboratory Pace Anlytical and Mebane Bridge WWTP Lab
Parameter
Sample
Type
Analytical
Method
Quantitation
Level
Sample
Result
Units of
Measurement
Number of
samples
Ammonia as N
Composite
EPA350.1
0.1
<0.10
mg/1
1
Dissolved oxygen
Composite
4500-OG
0.1
7.9
mg/1
1
Nitrate Nitrite
Composite
E353.2
0.2
5.4
mg/1
1
Total Kjeldahl nitrogen
Com osite
E351.2
0.5
<0.5
mg/1
1
Total Phosphorus
Composite
E365.1
0.05
0.23
mg/1
1
Total dissolved solids
Composite
SM2540C
25
226
mg/1
1
Hardness
Composite
SM2340B
0.65
88.7
mg/1
1
Chlorine total residual, TRC
Grab
4500-CLG
16
L <16
u 1
1
Oil and grease
Grab
1664-A
5
<5
mg/1
1
Metals total recoverable), cyanide
and total
phenols
Antimony
Composite
E200.7
0.005
<0.005
mg/1
1
Arsenic
Composite
E200.7
0.005
<0.005
mg/1
1
Beryllium
Composite
E200.7
0.001
<0.001
mg/1
1
Cadmium
Composite
E200.7
0.001
<0.001
mg/1
1
Chromium
Composite
E200.7
0.005
<0.005
mg/1
1
Copper
Composite
E200.7
0.005
0.022
mg/1
1
Lead
Composite
E200.7
0.005
<0.005
mg/1
1
Mercury
Composite
E245.1
0.2
<0.2
u 1
1
Nickel
Composite
E200.7
0.005
<0.005
mg/1
1
Selenium
Composite
E200.7
0.01
<0.010
mg/1
1
Silver
Composite
E200.7
0.005
<0.005
mg 1
1
Thallium
composite
E200.7
0.01
<0.010
mg/1
1
Zinc
Composite
E200.7
0.01
0.059
mg 1
1
Cyanide
Grab
SM450OCN-E
0.005
0.0073
m 1
1
Total phenolic compounds
Grab
E420.4
0.01
<0.01
mg/1
1
Volatile organic compounds
Acrolein
Grab
E624
100
< 100
u 1
1
Acrylonitrile
Grab
E624
100
< 100
u 1
1
Benzene
Grab
E624
5
<5
u 1
1
Bromoform
Grab
E624
5
<5
u 1
1
Carbon tetrachloride
Grab
E624
5
<5
u 1
1
Chlorobenzene
Grab
E624
5
<5
u 1
1
Chlorodibromomethane
Grab
E624
5
11.5
u 1
1
Chloroethane
Grab
E624
10
< 10
u 1
1
2-chloroethylvinyl ether
Grab
E624
10
<10
u 1
1
Chloroform
Grab
E624
5
5.2
u 1
1
Dichlorobromomethane
Grab
E624
5
12
u 1
1
1,1-dichloroethane
Grab
E624
5
<5
u 1
1
1,2-dichloroethane
Grab
E624
5
<5
u 1
1
Trans-1,2-dichloroethylene
Grab
E624
5
<5
Ug 1
1
Parameter
Sample
Type
Analytical
Method
Quantitatioa
Level
Sample
Result
Units of
Measurement
Number of
samples
Volatile organic compounds Cont.)
1, 1 -dichloroethylene
Grab
E624
5
<5
u 1
1
1,2-dichloro ropane
Grab
E624
5
<5
u 1
1
1,3-dichloro ropylene
Grab
E624
5
<5
u 1
1
Ethylbenzene
Grab
E624
5
<5
u 1
1
Form - DMR- PPA-1 Page 1

PpPe7rmito. NC0025071
Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Scan
Month September
Outfall 001
Year 2011
Methyl bromide
Grab
E624
10
<10
u 1
1
Methyl chloride
Grab
E624
5
<5
u 1
1
Methylene chloride
Grab
E624
5
<5
u 1
1
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
Grab
E624
5
<5
u 1
1
Tetrachloroethylene
Grab
E624
5
<5
u 1
1
Toluene
Grab
E624
5
<5
u 1
1
1,1,1-trichloroethane
Grab
E624
5
<5
u 1
1
1,1,2-trichloroethane
Grab
E624
5
<5
u 1
1
Trichloroeth lene
Grab
E624
5
<5
u 1
1
Vinyl chloride
Grab
E624
5
<5
u 1
1
Acid -extractable compounds
P-chloro-m-creso
Composite
E625
5.9
<5.9
u 1
1
2-chloro henol
Composite
E625
5.9
<5.9
u 1
1
2,4-dichloro henol
Composite
E625
5.9
<5.9
u 1
1
2,4-dimeth 1 henol
Composite
E625
11.8
< 11.8
u 1
1
4,6-dinitro-o-cresol
Com site
E625
23.5
<23.5
u 1
1
2,4-dinitro henol
Composite
E625
58.8
<58.8
u 1
1
2-nitrophenol
Composite
E625
5.9
<5.9
u 1
1
4-nitrophenol
Composite
E625
58.8
<58.8
u 1
1
Pentachloro henol
Composite
E625
29.4
<29.4
u 1
1
Phenol
Composite
E625
5.9
<5.9
u 1
1
2,4,6-trichloro henol
Composite
E625
11.8
< 11.8
u 1
1
Base -neutral compounds
Acena hthene
Composite
E625
5.9
<5.9
u 1
1
Acena hthylene
Composite
E625
5.9
<5.9
u 1
1
Anthracene
Composite
E625
5.9
<5.9
u 1
1
Benzidine
Composite
E625
58.8
<58.8
u 1
1
Benzo a anthracene
Composite
E625
5.9
<5.9
u 1
1
Benzo a yrene
Composite
E625
5.9
<5.9
u 1
1
3,4 benzofluoranthene
Composite
E625
5.9
<5.9
u 1
1
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Composite
E625
5.9
<5.9
u 1
1
Benzo k fluoranthene
Composite
E625
5.9
<5.9
u 1
1
Bis 2-chloroetho methane
Composite
E625
11.8
<11.8
u 1
1
Bis 2-chloroeth 1 ether
Composite
E625
5.9
<5.9
u 1
1
Bis 2-chloroiso ro yl ether
Composite
E625
5.9
<5.9
u 1
1
Bis 2-ethylhe 1phthalate
Composite
E625
5.9
6.3
u 1
1
4-bromo hen 1 phenyl ether
Composite
E625
5.9
<5.9
u 1
1
Butyl benz3rl phthalate
Composite
E625
5.9
<5.9
u 1
1
2-chlorona hthalene
Composite
E625
5.9
<5.9
u 1
1
4-chlorophen 1 phenyl ether
Composite
E625
5.9
<5.9
u 1
1
Parameter
Sample
Type
Analytical
Method
Quantitation
Level
Sample
Result
Units of
Measurement
Number of
samples
Base -neutral compounds coat.
Chrysene
Composite
E625
5.9
<5.9
u 1
1
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Composite
E625
5.9
<5.9
u 1
1
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Composite
E625
5.9
<5.9
u 1
1
Dibenzo a,h anthracene
Composite
E625
5.9
<5.9
u 1
1
1,2-dichlorobenzene
Grab
E624
5
<5
u 1
1
1,3-dichlorobenzene
Grab
E624
5
<5
u 1
1
1,4-dichlorobenzene
Grab
E624
5
<5
u 1
1
3,3-dichlorobenzidine
Composite
E625
29.4
<29.4
u 1
1
Diethyl phthalate
Composite
E625
5.9
<5.9
u 1
1
Dimethyl phthalate
Composite
E625
5.9
<5.9
u 1
1
2,4-dinitrotoluene
Composite
E625
5.9
<5.9
u 1
1
2,6-dinitrotoluene
Composite
E625
5.9
<5.9
u 1
1
Form - DMR- PPA-1 Page 2

POpp-
Permit No, NC0025071
Outfall 001
Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Scan
Month September
Year 2011
1,2-di hen lhydrazine
Composite
E625
5.9
<5.9
u 1
1
Fluoranthene
Composite
E625
5.9
<5.9
u 1
1
Fluorene
Composite
E625
5.9
<5.9
u 1
1
Hexachlorobenzene
Composite
E625
5.9
<5.9
u 1
1
Hexachlorobutadiene
Composite
E625
5.9
<5.9
u 1
1
Hexachloroc clo-entadiene
Composite
E625
11.8
<11.8
u 1
1
Hexachloroethane
Composite
E625
5.9
<5.9
u 1
1
Indeno 1,2,3-cd rene
Composite
E625
5.9
<5.9
u 1
1
Isophorone
Composite
E625
11.8
<11.8
u 1
1
Naphthalene
Composite
E625
5.9
<5.9
u 1
1
Nitrobenzene
Composite
E625
5.9
<5.9
u 1
1
N-nitrosodi-n-pro ylamine
Composite
E625
5.9
<5.9
u 1
1
N-nitrosodimeth lamine
Composite
E625
5.9
<5.9
u 1
1
N-nitrosodi hen lamine
Composite
E625
11.8
<11.8
u 1
1
Phenanthrene
Composite
E625
5.9
<5.9
u 1
1
rene
Composite
E625
5.9
<5.9
u 1
1
1,2,4,-trichlorobenzene
Composite
E625
5.9
<5.9
1
1
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction
and supervision in accordance with a system to design to assure that qualified perdonnel properly
gather and evaluat the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons that
manage the system, or those persons directly responsibel for gathering the information, the
information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate and complete. I am
aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the
possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations.
Authorized Representative name
Signature
Date
Form - DMR- PPA-1 Page 3

ilytical
)acelabs.com
Project: WW Testing 09/13/11
Pace Project No.: 92102139
Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
205 East Meadow Road - Suite A 2225 Riverside Dr.
Eden, NC 27288 Asheville, NC 28804
[phone] [phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS lc,
A 14.
Pace Analytical Services, inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Sample: MB Effluent
Parameters
Lab ID: 92102139001 Collected: 09/13/11 08:04
Results Units Report Limit DF
Received: 09/13/11 09:40 Matrix: Water
Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
5210E BOD, 5 day EDN
Analytical Method: SM 5210B
BOD, 5 day
V2.0 mg/L
2.0
1
09/13/11 16:23
09/18/11 11:58
B4
200.7 MET ICP
Analytical Method: EPA 200.7 Preparation Method: EPA 200.7
Antimony
ND mg/L
0.0050
1
09/19/11 10:25
09/21/11 19:53
7440-36-0
Arsenic
ND mg/L
0.0050
1
09/19/11 10:25
09/21/11 19:53
7440-38-2
Beryllium
ND mg/L
0.0010
1
09/19/11 10:25
09/21/11 19:53
7440-41-7
Cadmium
ND mg/L
0.0010
1
09/19/11 10:25
09/21/11 19:53
7440-43-9
Calcium
25.5 mg/L
0.10
1
09/19/11 10:25
09/21/11 19:53
7440-70-2
Chromium
ND mg/L
0.0050
1
09/19/11 10:25
09/21/11 19:53
7440-47-3
Copper
0.022 mg/L
0.0050
1
09/19/11 10:25
09/21/11 19:53
7440-50-8
Lead
_ ND mg/L
0.0050
1
09/19/11 10:25
09/21/11 19:53
7439-92-1
Magnesium
6.1 mg/L
0.10
1
09/19/11 10:25
09/21/11 19:53
7439-95-4
Molybdenum
.-. ND mg/L
0.0050
1
09/19/11 10:25
09/21/11 19:53
7439-98-7
Nickel
_ ND mg/L
0.0050
1
09/19/11 10:25
09/21/11 19:53
7440-02-0
Silver
ND mg/L
0.0050
1
09/19/11 10:25
09/21/11 19:53
7440-22-4
Zinc
_ 0.059 mg/L
0.010
1
09/19/11 10:25
09/21/11 19:53
7440-66-6
Thallium
ND mg/L
0.010
1
09/19/11 10:25
09/21/11 19:53
7440-28-0
Selenium
_ ND mg/L
0.010
1
09/19/11 10:25
09/21/11 19:53
7782-49-2
2340E Hardness, Total (Ca1c.)
Analytical Method: SM 2340B
Total Hardness
J 88.7 mg/L
0.65
1
09/21/11 19:53
246.1 Mercury
Analytical Method: EPA 245.1
Preparation Method: EPA 245.1
Mercury
J ND ug/L
0.20
1
09/19/11 12:10
09/20/11 14:37
7439-97-6
625 MSSV
Analytical Method: EPA 625 Preparation Method: EPA 625
1,2,4-Tdchlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.9
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
120-82-1
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine
ND ug/L
5.9
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
122-66-7
.. 2,4,6-Tdchlorophenol
ND ug/L
11.8
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
88-06-2
- 2,4-Dichlorophenol
ND ug/L
5.9
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
120-83-2
_ 2,4-Dimethylphenol
ND ug/L
11.8
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
105-67-9
- 2,4-Dinitrophenol
ND ug/L
58.8
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
51-28-5
_ 2,4-Dinitrotoluene
ND ug/L
5.9
1
09/19/11 16:30
09/21/11 19:39
121-14-2
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
ND ug/L
5.9
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
606-20-2
- 2-Chloronaphthalene
ND ug/L
5.9
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
91-58-7
- 2-Chlorophenol
ND ug/L
5.9
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
95-57-8
-- 2-Nitrophenol
ND ug/L
5.9
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
88-75-5
- 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
ND ug/L
29.4
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
91-94-1
- 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
ND ug/L
23.5
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
534-52-1
r. 4-Bromophenylphenyl ether
ND ug/L
5.9
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21111 19:39
101-55-3
- 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
ND ug/L
5.9
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
59-50-7
- 4-Chlorophenylphenyl ether
ND ug/L
5.9
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
7005-72-3
4-Nitrophenol
ND ug/L
58.8
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
100-02-7
- Acenaphthene
ND ug/L
5.9
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
83-32-9
Acenaphthylene
ND ug/L
5.9
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
208-96-8
• Anthracene
ND ug/L
5.9
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
120-12-7
Date: 09/28/2011 08:27 AM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
Page 4 of 31
This report shall not be reproduoed, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc

Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
Pace Analytcal Services, Inc.
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
®
a'y1 /tiol
205 East Meadow Road - Suite A
2225 Riverside Dr.
9800 Kirwey Ave. Suite 100
pacelaabs.com
Eden, NC 27288
Asheville, NC 28804
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
[phone]
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: WW Testing 09/13/11
Pace Project No.: 92102139
Sample: MB Effluent
Parameters
Lab ID: 92102139001 Collected: 09/13/11 08:04
Results Units Report Limit DF
Received: 09/13/11 09:40 Matrix: Water
Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
625 MSSV
Analytical Method: EPA 625 Preparation Method: EPA 625
Butylbenzylphthalate
ND ug/L
5.9
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
85-68-7
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
ND ug/L
5.9
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
207-08-9
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
ND ug/L
5.9
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
191-24-2
Benzo(a)anthrecene
ND ug/L
5.9
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
56-55-3
- Benzidine
ND ug/L
58.8
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
92-87-5
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
ND ug/L
5.9
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
205-99-2
Benzo(a)pyrene
ND ug/L
5.9
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
50-32-8
. bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
ND ug/L
11.8
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
111-91-1
.• bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether
ND ug/L
5.9
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
111-44-4
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) ether
ND ug/L
5.9
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
108-60-1
- bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
6.3 ug/L
5.9
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
117-81-7
Chrysene
ND ug/L
5.9
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
218-01-9
r Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
ND ug/L
5.9
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
53-70-3
-� Dimethylphthalate
ND ug/L
5.9
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
131-11-3
Di-n-butylphthalate
ND ug/L
5.9
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
84-74-2
Di-n-octylphthalate
ND ug/L
5.9
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
117-84-0
- Diethylphthalate
ND ug/L
5.9
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
84-66-2
Fluorene
ND ug/L
5.9
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
86-73-7
.. Fluoranthene
ND ug/L
5.9
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
206-44-0
.- Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
ND ug/L
5.9
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
87-68-3
Hexachlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.9
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
118-74-1
. Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
ND ug/L
11.8
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
77-47-4
+ Hexachloroethane
ND ug/L
5.9
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
67-72-1
w Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
ND ug/L
5.9
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
193-39-5
_. Isophorone
ND ug/L
11.8
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
78-59-1
--Naphthalene
ND ug/L
5.9
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
91-20-3
- N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine
ND ug/L
5.9
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
621-64-7
Nitrobenzene
ND ug/L
5.9
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
98-95-3
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
ND ug/L
5.9
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
62-75-9
.� N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
ND ug/L
11.8
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
86-30-6
^ Phenol
ND ug/L
5.9
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
108-95-2
-.• Phenanthrene
ND ug/L
5.9
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
85-01-8
Pentachlorophenol
ND ug/L
29.4
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
87-86-5
Pyrene
ND ug/L
5.9
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
129-00-0
Nitrobenzene-d5 (S)
58 %
10-120
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
4165-60-0
2-Fluorobiphenyl (S)
59 %
15-120
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
321-60-8
Terphenyl-d14 (S)
65 %
11-131
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
1718-51-0
Phenol-d6 (S)
28 %
10-120
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
13127-88-3
2-Fluorophenol (S)
40 %
10-120
1
09119/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
367-12-4
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (S)
67 %
10-137
1
09/19/11 15:30
09/21/11 19:39
118-79-6
2540C Total Dissolved Solids
Analytical Method: SM 2540C
Total Dissolved Solids
226 mg/L
25.0
1
09/15/11 18:59
Total Nitrogen Calculation
Analytical Method: 40CFR PART 503
Nitrogen
5.4 mg/L
0.60
1
09/27/11 15:09
7727-37-9
Date: 09/28/2011 08:27 AM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
Page 5 of 31
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc

!7ceAlnoalyfical
paceiabs.com
1
Project: WW Testing 09/13/11
Pace Project No.: 92102139
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
205 East Meadow Road - Suite A
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Sample: MB Effluent
Lab ID: 92102139001 Collected: 09/13/11 08:04
Received:
09/13/11 09:40 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results Units
Report Limit
DF
Prepared
Analyzed
CAS No. Qual
350.1 Ammonia
Analytical Method: EPA 350.1
Nitrogen, Ammonia
J ND mg/L
0.10
1
09/26/11 12:38
7664-41-7
351.2 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
Analytical Method: EPA 351.2
Nitrogen, Kjeldahl, Total
,/ND mg/L
0.50
1
09/2,01 14:19
7727-37-9
353.2 Nitrogen, NO2/NO3 pres.
Analytical Method: EPA 353.2
Nitrogen, NO2 plus NO3
4 5.4 mg/L
0.20
1
09/21/11 17:48
365.1 Phosphorus, Total
Analytical Method: EPA 365.1
Phosphorus
J 0.23 mg/L
0.050
1
09/25/11 12:43
7723-14-0
Sample: MB Effluent
Lab ID: 92102139002 Collected: 09/13/11 08:16
Received:
09/13/11 09:40 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results Units
Report Limit
DF
Prepared
Analyzed
CAS No. Qual
MBIO 9222D Fecal Coliform EDN
Analytical Method: SM 9222D
Fecal Coliforms
2.0 CFU/100 mL
1.0
1
09/13/11 14:09
ul
HEM, Oil and Grease
Analytical Method: EPA 1664A
Oil and Grease
ND mg/L
5.0
1
09/22/11 13:35
624 Volatile Organics
Analytical Method: EPA624
-^ Chloromethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
09/20/11 11:18
74-87-3
- Vinyl chloride
ND ug/L
5.0
1
09/20/11 11:18
75-01-4
- Bromomethane
ND ug/L
10.0
1
09/20/11 11:18
74-83-9
-° Chloroethane
ND ug/L
10.0
1
09/20/11 11:18
75-00-3
Trichlorotluoromethane
ND ug/L
10.0
1
09/20/11 11:18
75-69-4
-Methylene Chloride
ND ug/L
5.0
1
09/20/11 11:18
75-M2
_1,1-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
09/20/11 11:18
75-35-4
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
09/20/11 11:18
156.60-5
_.1,1-Dichloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
09/20/11 11:18
75-34-3
as-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
09/20/11 11:18
156-59-2
- Chloroform
5.2 ug/L
5.0
1
09/20/11 11:18
67-66-3
- 1,1,1-Trichloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
09/20/11 11:18
71-55-6
-• Carbon tetrachloride
ND ug/L
5.0
1
09/20/11 11:18
56-23-5
Benzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
09/20/11 11:18
71-43-2
- 1,2-Dichloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
09/20/11 11:18
107-W2
- Trichloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
09/20/11 11:18
79-01-6
,-1,2-Dichloropropane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
09/20/11 11:18
78-87-5
- Bromodichloromethane
12.0 ug/L
5.0
1
09/20/11 11:18
75-27-4
- trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
09/20/11 11:18
10061-02-6
.. Toluene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
09/20/11 11:18
108-88-3
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
09/20/11 11:18
10061-01-5
-1,1,2-Trichloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
09/20/11 11:18
79-00-5
-Tetrachloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
09/20/11 11:18
127-18-4
Date: 09/28/201108:27 AM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
Page 6 of 31
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc

ilytical
pecelabs.com
Project: WW Testing 09/13/11
Pace Project No., 92102139
Sample: MS Effluent
Parameters
624 Volatile Organics
Dibromochloromethane
.,. Chlorobenzene
,. Ethylbenzene
Bromoform
.. 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
-k 1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
-1,2-Dichlorobenzene
-Acrolein
Acrylonitrile
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
Toluene-d8 (S)
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
420.4 Phenolics, Total
Phenol
450OCNE Cyanide, Total
Cyanide
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
205 East Meadow Road - Suite A
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kinsey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Lab ID: 92102139002 Collected: 09/13/11 08:16 Received: 09/13/11 09:40 Matrix: Water
Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
Analytical Method: EPA 624
11.5 ug/L
ND ug/L
ND ug/L
NO ug/L
ND ug/L
ND ug/L
ND ug/L
ND ug/L
ND ug/L
ND ug/L
NO ug/L
97 %
93 %
96 %
96 %
Analytical Method: EPA 420.4
ND mg/L
Analytical Method: SM 4500-CN-E
0.0073 mg/L
5.0
1
09/20/11 11:18
124-48-1
5.0
1
09/20/11 11:18
108-90-7
5.0
1
09/20/11 11:18
100.41-4
5.0
1
09/2011111:18
75-25-2
5.0
1
09/20/11 11:18
79-34-5
5.0
1
09/20/11 11:18
541-73-1
5.0
1
09/20/11 11:18
106-46-7
5.0
1
09/20/11 11:18
95-50-1
100
1
09/20/11 11:18
107-02-8
100
1
09/20/11 11:18
107-13-1
10.0
1
09/20/11 11:18
110-75-8
70-130
1
09/20/11 11:18
1868-53-7
70-130
1
09/20/11 11:18
460-00-4
70-130
1
09/20/11 11:18
2037-26-5
70-130
1
09/20/11 11:18
17060-07-0
0.010
1
09/20/11 11:44
108-95-2
0.0050
1
09/23/1114:45
57-12-5
Sample: MB Influent
Parameters
Lab ID: 92102139003 Collected: 09/13/11 07:33
Results Units Report Limit DF
Received: 09/13/11 09:40 Matrix: Water
Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
5210E BOD, 5 day EDN
Ana cal Method: SM 5210B
BOD, 5 day
J 166 mg/L
2.0
1
09/13/11 16:23
09/18/11 11:58
134
200.7 MET ICP
Analytical Method: EPA 200.7
Preparation Method: EPA 200.7
Arsenic
ND mg/L
0.0050
1
09/19/11 10:25
09/21/11 19:56
7440-38-2
Cadmium
ND mg/L
0.0010
1
09/19/11 10:25
09/21/11 19:56
7440-43-9
Chromium
0.013 mg/L
0.0050
1
09/19/11 10:25
09/21/11 19:56
7440-47-3
Copper
0.43 mg/L
0.0050
1
09/19/11 10:25
09/21/11 19:56
7440-50-8
Lead
ND mg/L
0.0050
1
09/19/11 10:25
09/21/11 19:56
7439-92-1
Molybdenum
ND mg/L
0.0050
1
09/19/11 10:25
09/21/11 19:56
7439-98-7
Nickel
ND mg/L
0.0050
1
09/19/11 10:25
09/21/11 19:56
7440-02-0
Silver
ND mg/L
0.0050
1
09/19/11 10:25
09/21/11 19:56
7440-22-4
Zinc
0.29 mg/L
0.010
1
09/19/11 10:25
09/21/11 19:56
7440-66-6
Selenium
ND mg/L
0.010
1
09/19/11 10:25
09/21/11 19:56
7782-49-2
245.1 Mercury Analytical Method: EPA 245.1 Preparation Method: EPA 245.1
Mercury ND ug/L 0.20 1 09/19/11 12:10 09/20/11 14:40 7439-97-6
Date: 09/28/2011 08:27 AM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 7 of 31
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Ina.

4
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
October 26, 2011
Ms. Melinda Ward, Superintendent
City of Eden
191 Mebane Bridge Road
Eden, NC 27288
SUBJECT: Pretreatment Compliance Inspection
City of Eden
NPDES # NCO025071
Rockingham County
Dear Ms. Ward:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
A Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) was performed on October 21, 2011 by George Smith of this office.
Mr. Ralph Potter was present for the inspection. The purpose of this inspection was to determine the effectiveness of
the City's pretreatment program, which includes, reviewing the files, POTW plant performance, industry monitoring
data, and adherence to the enforcement response plan (ERP).
Back round
This is a 13.5 MGD permitted facility that is operating only one aeration basin. Industry closings significantly
reduced the flow into the plant.
The City has two (2) significant industrial users, and one is categorical per CFR 433.
POTW Interview
There are no industries that are in significant noncompliance. There are no industrial related issues causing WWTP
compliance problems.
Pretreatment Profram Elements Review
The Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO) was last approved on June 14, 2010.
The Enforcement Response Plan (ERP) was last approved on May 22, 2001.
Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP), was approved August 31, 1994.
Headworks Analysis (HWA) was approved January 7, 2009. The next HWA is due April 1, 2012.
The Industrial Waste Survey (IWS) was approved March 14, 2011. The next IWS is due October 1, 2015.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, Winston-Salem Regional Office
Location: 585 Waughtown St. Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107 One
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 NorthCarolina
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org naturally
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

PCI
October 26, 2011
Page 2 of 3
LTMP File Review
The LTMP is being conducted at the proper locations and frequencies. The proper detection levels are used and all
data is maintained in a spreadsheet.
Industrial User Permit (IUP) File Review
A review of the file for Well McLain (#1012) revealed that the monitoring data was well organized and correctly
judged for compliance. This industry is regulated per 40 CFR 433.
A review of the file for Karastan (#1005) revealed that the monitoring data was well organized and correctly judged
for compliance.
All two SIUs were required to have a slug control plan, and were kept on file.
Mr. Ralph Potter continues to implement the pretreatment program in an excellent manner. If you have any questions
please contact George Smith or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
W. Corey Basinger
Regional Supervisor
cc: PERCS Unit
WSRO Files

NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION (PCI) REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1Comnlete Prior To PCI; Review Program Info Database Sheet(s
1. Control Authority (POTW) Name: Lru 6f E0/,--n
2. Control Authority Representative(s): _Q ,r./Pk PO -Czar
3. Title(s): Pre- r're-ta" e-at R,&ryCsor
4. Last Inspection Date: /b /2 9/Ib Inspection Type (Check One): ❑ PCI ®-Xudit
5. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection and Program Info Sheet(s)? YES ❑ NO
6. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ YES ❑-11O
Order Type, Number, Parameters: N14 Are Milestone Dates Being Met? ❑ YES ❑ NO
PCS CODING
Trans.Code Main Program Permit Number MM/DD/YY Inspec.Type Inspector Fac. Type
LILI 1 N I C 1 0 Io 1X15-10171/1 I/011/1//1 ! P 1 I S l ! i 1
(DTIA) (TYPI) (INSP) (FACC)
7. Current Number Of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs)?
SIUS
8. Current Number Of Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs)?
CIUS
9. Number of SIUs Not Inspected By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
p
10. Number of SIUs Not Sampled By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
O
11. Enter the Higher Number of 9 or 10
NOIN
12. Number of SIUs With No IUP, or With an Expired IUP
O
NOCM
13. Number of SIUs in SNC for Either Reporting or Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi -Annual Periods (Total Number of SIUs in SNC)
d
PSNC
14. Number of SIUs in SNC For Reporting During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
D
MSNC
15. Number of SIUs In SNC For Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
b
SNPS
16. Number of SIUs In SNC For Both Reporting and Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi-annual Periods
O
POTW INTERVIEW
17. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any NPDES Limits Violations?
If Yes, What are the Parameters and How are these Problems Being Addressed?
18. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any Problems Related to an Industrial
Discharge (Interference, Pass -Through, Blockage, Citizens' Complaints, Increased
Sludge Production, Etc.)?
If Yes, How are these Problems Being Addressed?
19. Which Industries have been in SNC for Limits or Reporting during SNC for
either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods? Not Been Published for SNC for
Public Notice?(May refer to PAR if Excessive SIUs in SNC) Not Put
20. Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules or Orders? For all SIUs on an
Order, Has a Signed Copy of the Order been sent to the Division?
21. Are Any Permits Or Civil Penalties Currently Under Adjudication? If Yes, Which
Ones?
❑ YES
O
❑ YES
O
Limits:
Reporting:
dished:
A4 DIJL,
Av( n
❑ YES
O
LTMP/STMP FILE REVIEW:
22. Is LTMP/STMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies? 23YES ❑ NO
23. Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMP/STMP Monitoring? ®'YES ❑ NO
24. Is LTMP/STMP Data Maintained in a Table or Equivalent? 0J'fES ❑ NO Is Table Adequate? 014ES ❑ NO
25.
yourself'
26.
All LTMP/STMP effluent data reported on Discharge Monitoring Report? ELES ❑ NO DWQ Inspector, please verify
If NO to 23 - 26, list violations
C
27. Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated from or Added to LTMP/STMP? ❑ YES ❑ NO
If yes, which ones? Eliminated: N /#- Added: N /*
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 1

28. PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW- Please review POTW files, verify POTW has copy of Program
Flement in their files- emmnlete with sunnorting documents and copy of PERCS Approval Letter. and dates consistent with Program Info:
Program Element
Last Submittal
Date In file?
Last Approval
Date In file
Date Next Due,
If Applicable
Headworks Analysis WA
❑ Yes ❑ No
1-7-07
ZYes ❑ No
5(- / -/
Industrial Waste Survey S
❑ Yes ❑ No
-1 - /
v❑'Yes ❑ No
©- - /
Sewer Use Ordinance SUO
❑ Yes ❑ No
- ig-lb
Er Yes ❑ No
Enforcement Response Plan (ERP)
❑ Yes ❑ No
- - p
[Yes ❑ No
9
Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP)
❑ Yes ❑ No
V - 31—q
'Yes ❑ No
1
TNilrTQTRIAT. TTCF.R PF.RN41T ITTTPI FILF. REVIEW (3 IUP FILE REVIEWS OR 1 FILE REVIEW AND 1 IU INSPECTION)
29L User Name
l .MAX� n 2• Z12 Q�; v IF�K777
30. IUP Number I
10 /
/003-
31. Does File Contain Current Permit? I
Q'Yes ❑ No
ER Yes ❑ No 11 ❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Permit Expiration Date J
Tvig 9 / w j-
.%z A 3D av13
33. Categorical Standard Applied (I.E. 40 CFR, Etc.) Or N/A
q33 IF
Nip -11
34. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior
9-Yes ❑ No
9V—es ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
to Permit Issue Date?
35. Does File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year?
❑ les No
Plies ❑ No r 0 Yes ❑ No
36. a. Does the File Contain a Slug/Spill Control Plan?
a. [9"fes []No
a. es ❑No a. []Yes []No
b. If No, is One Needed? (See Inspection Form from POTW)
mv- QNQ b. ❑Yes ❑No
37. For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certification, Does File Contain a Toxic
ljY &0No❑N/A
❑Yes❑NoVN/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A
Organic Management Plan (TOMP)?
38. a. Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from the Division?
a. es ❑No
I
a. OTVes []No
a. ❑Yes ❑No
b. All Issues Resolved?
b.❑Yes❑No 1/A
b.❑Yes❑NotlA
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
39. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Complete
es No
['Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
its Sampling as Required by IUP, including flow?
40. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain -Of -Custody Forms?
t es ❑ No
es ❑ No ILEJ
Yes ❑ No
41. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the SIU Complete its
aPres❑No❑N/A
es❑No❑N/A
11
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
Sampling as Required b IUP, including flow?
41b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did SIU submit all reports
es❑No❑N/A
es❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
on time?
42a. For categorical lUs with Combined Wastestream Formula (CWF), does
ffE]Yes[]No/A
❑Yes❑Nopi /A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
file includeprocess/dilution flows as Required by IUP?
42b. For categorical lUs with Production based limits, does file include
0Yes0No10i /A
❑Yes❑No /A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
production rates and/or flows as Required by IUP?
43a. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
❑ No
❑ Y No
El Yes El No
All Limits Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SILT Sam lin ?
N H
N
43b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
❑Yes❑No /A
❑Yes❑No /A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
All Re ortin Non-Com liance from SIU Sampling?
44. a. Was the POTW Notified by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of All Self-
a.❑Yes❑NocWrA
a.❑Yes❑No A
a.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
Monitoring Violations?
b. Did Industry Resample and submit results to POTW Within 30 Days9
b.❑Yes❑Noei�1/A
b.❑yes❑NoZtviA
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
c. If applicable, Did POTW resample within 30 days of becoming aware
c.❑Yes❑Nopd/A
c.❑YesallorSty/A
c.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
of SIU limit violations in the POTW's sampling of the SIU?
46. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was the SIU in SNC?
❑Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ❑ No
47. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken
OYesONoQRCA
❑Yes❑No /A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
as Specified in the POTW's ERP (NOVs, Penalties, timing, etc.)?
48. Does the File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices?
❑Yes❑No /A
❑Yes❑No /A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No /A
❑Yes❑No /A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
49. Does The File Contain Proof Of Penalty Collection?
50. a. Does the File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders?
a.❑Yes❑No /
a.❑Yes❑NoR1 /A
a.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
b.❑YesONo❑N/A
b. Is SILT in Compliance with Order?
b.❑Yes❑NouW/A
b.❑Yes❑NoLWjA
51. Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any of This
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ElNo
Requested Information For You?
An- J'vn lot! JAn- jrn air;
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 2

FILE REVIEW COMMENTS:
NI
Main Program Permit Number
1. Industry Inspected:
2. Industry Address:
3. Type of Industry/Product:
4. Industry Contact:
Phone:
MM/DD/YY Inspec.Type
1 I I I 1 ij
(DTIA) (TYPI)
5. Does the POTW Use the Division Model Inspecti=of
or Equival,
6. Did the POTW Contact Conduct the Followin Industrial
Comments:
A. Initial Interview ❑ Y NO
B. Plant Tour ES ❑ NO
C. Pretreatment To ❑ YES ❑ NO
D. Sampling ew ❑ YES ❑ NO
E. Exit rview ❑ YES ❑ NO
Industrial Ins on Comments:
Fax:
YES ❑ NO
OVERALL SUMMARY AND COMMENTS:
Comments:�4,j 1i4k fe,- ►VAII'' 4ern For P0111t11nt M041torinr,
Requirements:
Recommendations:
Inspector Fac.
NOD: ❑ YES E10
NOV: ❑ YES P NO
QNCR: ❑ YES 81NO
POTW Rating: /
Satisfactory V Marginal Unsatisfactory
PCI COMPLETED BY: i o��"t, DATE: 10/ 11 /1 /
L2 I
(FACC)
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 3

/ 14+4J
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Mr. Brad Corcoran, City Manager
City of Eden
308 E. Stadium Drive
Eden, North Carolina 27288
Dear Mr. Corcoran:
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
October 24, 2011
N.C.Dept. of ENR
OCT 3 12011
Winston-Salem
Regional office
Dee Freeman
Secretary
SUBJECT: City of Eden
Northern Smith River and Dry Creek Sewer
Improvements
Approval of Addenda Nos. 1 Through 3
SRF Project No. 370458-04
Reference is made to Addenda Nos. 1 through 3, received October 6, 2011 and October
17, 2011 respectively, from the engineer for revisions to the subject project.
The proposed addenda, as described in the attachments, have been reviewed by this
office, and are hereby approved, and eligible for funding in accordance with the loan offer and
conditions thereof.
The approval of these addenda does not constitute any change in the amount of your loan
for this project.
It is the responsibility of the recipient and the consulting engineer to insure that the
project plan documents are in compliance with Amended N.C.G.S. 133-3 (ratified July 13,
1993). The administrative review and approval of addenda do not imply approval of a restrictive
specification for bidding purposes; nor is it an authorization for noncompetitive procurement
actions.
Adequate time must be allowed for the potential bidders and this office to receive and act
on addenda prior to the receipt of bids for subject project.
A copy of the approved addenda is attached for your files, and one (1) copy retained for
our files.
1633 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1633 One
Location: 2728 Capital Blvd. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 NorthCarolina
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service:1-877-623-6748
Internet: ppor.nnity \ A rmafive rg
Action
�aturallry
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer

Mr. Brad Corcoran, City Manager
Page 2
October 24, 2011
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
Anita E. Reed, P.E., P.E. at [phone].
Sincerely,
Seth Robertson, P.E., Supervisor
Design Management Unit
Construction Grants & Loans Section
AR/sr
Attachment
cc: Mark W. Fisher, P.E., W.K. Dickson & Co., Inc., 720 Corporate Center Drive,
Raleigh, 27607
DWQ Winston-Salem Regional Office
Mark Hubbard, P.E.
Michael Adamio
SRF File

PP
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
26 May 2011
City of Eden
Attn: Mr. Brad Corcoran, City Manger
308 East Stadium Drive
Eden, NC 27288
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
NPDES Permit NCO025071
Mebane Bridge Wastewater Treatment Plant
Rockingham County
Dear Mr. Corcoran:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Mr. Mike Thomas of the Winston-Salem Regional Office of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality
conducted a compliance evaluation inspection of the Mebane Bridge Wastewater Treatment Plant on 25 May
2011. The assistance and cooperation of the Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC) of the facility, Ms.
Melinda Ward was greatly appreciated. Inspection findings are summarized below.
The facility is located at 191 Mebane Bridge Road, in Eden, in Rockingham County. The permit authorizes
the city to operate this 13.5 MGD plant, which consists of a flow meter, bar screens, grit separator, extended
aeration basins, secondary clarifiers, chlorination facilities, de -chlorination, aerobic digestion, dissolved air
flotation (DAF), sludge lagoons, and polymer addition. Wastewater produced at the facility is discharged to the
Dan River, which is currently classified as WS-IV waters in the Roanoke River Basin.
Site Review
The facility was very clean at the time of inspection and appears to be well operated and managed. Mr.
Thomas noted some minor corrosion on some of the older pieces of equipment. Ms. Ward indicated that staff
was working on the problem and that funding has been requested to address the problem.
Flows at the plant have been greatly reduced due to the loss of several large industries in the area. As a
result the WWTP is functioning at approximately half capacity. The reduction in flow is allowing the City to
take components offline for maintenance. At the time of inspection one aeration basin was offline for cleaning
and maintenance as were two of the four clarifiers. The WWTP seems to be capable of meeting effluent limits
under its current configuration.
The addition of a sludge press and sludge holding tank was completed in January of 2010. As a result, the
WWTP has taken the two sludge holding lagoons offline for maintenance. The sludge handling facility
produces a high quality sludge cake that is land applied locally.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, Winston-Salem Regional Office
Location: 585 Waughtown St. Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service:1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer
Nne
orthCarolina
VWUM AY

City of Eden
Compliance Evaluation Inspections NCO025071
5/26/2011
Page 2
Ms. Ward indicated to Mr. Thomas that there were components at the facility such as the additional bar
screens downstream of the aeration basin and the chemical feed station that are no longer necessary due to the
loss of industry mentioned above. Based on this, Ms. Ward said the City is contemplating making some minor
equipment changes to the facility. Any possible equipment changes and the new sludge handling facility will
need to be added to the permit at the time of renewal.
Documentation Review
Mr. Thomas evaluated laboratory data during the inspection. Operation logs were reviewed and found to
meet all requirements. Comparison of available lab reports and field monitoring data with discharge
monitoring reports (DMR) showed no concerns or errors. Chain of custody records were available and
complete. The visitation and operation/maintenance logs were reviewed and found to be complete and current.
The City of Eden has a current field laboratory certification for dissolved oxygen, pH, temperature, residual
solids and total suspended solids. All other required lab testing for the facility is conducted by Pace Analytical.
The facility operates 24 hours a day 7 days a week. The assigned Operator in Responsible Charge, Ms.
Ward, as well as, the other operators has the appropriate, current certifications to operate the facility.
We appreciate your efforts to effectively operate and maintain this treatment system. No additional
response to this letter is required. If you have questions regarding the inspection or this letter, please do not
hesitate to contact Mr. Thomas or me at [phone].
Sincer ly,
W. Corey Basinger
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection
Winston-Salem Region
Attachments:
1. BIMS Inspection Report
Cc: WSRO — SWP w/ atch
Central Files w/ atch
NPDES West Unit

United States Environmental Protection Agency
Form Approved.
EPA Washington, D.C. 20460
OMB No. 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 IN 2 151 3I NCO025071 111 121 11/05/25 117 181 r1 19I SI 201
I I-J LJ
Remarks
21111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111116
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA --Reserved
671 1 69 70 U 711U 721 N I 73 Iw ' 174 751 I I I I I LBO
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also indude
Entry Time/Date
Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
09:30 AM 11/05/25
10/05/01
Mebane Bridge WWTP
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
191 Mebane Bridge Rd
Eden NC 27288
11:00 AM 11/05/25
12/04/30
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)rritles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
Melinda Sessoms Ward/ORC/336-627-1009/
Name, Address of Responsible Officialffitle/Phone and Fax Number
Dennis Asbury, PO Box 70 Eden NC Contacted
272890070/Superintendent/336-627-2110/3366233933 No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Program Sludge Handling Disposal Facility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Waters
Laboratory
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Michael S Thomas WSRO WQ///
Signatu of Mana ment Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbersp� Date
nar
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page # 1

NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type i
3I NC00250 I11 12I 11/05/25 117 18' '
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional
lssheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
Page # 2

Permit: NCO025071 Owner - Facility: Mebane Bridge VWVTP
Inspection Date: 05/25/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Yes No NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Is the facility as described in the permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
# Are there any special conditions for the permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? ■ Cl ❑ ❑
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Permit expires in April 2012. Ms. Ward is already working on the permit
renewal. The sludge handling facility will need to be added to the facility description at
the time of renewal.
Record Keeping
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)?
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
Is the chain -of -custody complete?
Dates, times and location of sampling
Name of individual performing the sampling
Results of analysis and calibration
Dates of analysis
Name of person performing analyses
Transported COCs
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters?
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ?
(If the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator on each shift?
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification?
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site?
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review?
Comment:
Effluent Pipe
Yes No NA NE
Page # 3

Permit: NC0025071 Owner - Facility: Mebane Bridge VWVrP
Inspection Date: 05/25/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Effluent Pipe
Yes No NA
NE
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained?
E 0
0
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris?
■ 0 Q
C
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly?
❑ ❑ ■
❑
Comment:
Flow Measurement - Influent
Yes No NA
NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
0 Cl n
n
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
❑ E n
n
Is the flow meter operational?
N 0 n
Q
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
n n
n
Comment: Flow meter is calibrated quarterly.
Flow Measurement - Effluent
Yes No NA
NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
0 0 0
n
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
❑ E O
Q
Is the flow meter operational?
E n n
n
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
n n n
0
Comment: Meter is calibrated quarterly.
Bar Screens
Yes No NA
NE
Type of bar screen
a. Manual
O
b.Mechanical
Are the bars adequately screening debris?
❑ Q
0
Is the screen free of excessive debris?
0 ❑ Q
Is disposal of screening in compliance?
E Q O
Q
E n n
n
Is the unit in good condition?
Comment: Screenings are collected in waste bins and stored onsite in the old drying
beds. The material is then sent to landfill.
Yes No NA NE
Type of grit removal
a. Manual n
b.Mechanical
Page # 4

Permit: NCO025071
Inspection Date: 05/25/2011
Is the grit free of excessive organic matter?
Is the grit free of excessive odor?
Owner - Facility: Mebane Bridge WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
# Is disposal of grit in compliance?
Comment: Grit is collected in bins and stored onsite in the old drying beds. The
material is then sent to landfill.
Aeration Basins
Mode of operation
Type of aeration system
Is the basin free of dead spots?
Are surface aerators and mixers operational?
Are the diffusers operational?
Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process?
Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface?
Is the DO level acceptable?
Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/1)
Comment: At the time of inspection one basin was ofFline for cleaning and
maintenance.
Secondary Clarifier
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater?
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier?
Are weirs level?
Is the site free of weir blockage?
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting?
Is scum removal adequate?
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge?
Is the drive unit operational?
Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)?
Is the overflow Gear of excessive solids/pin floc?
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately % of the sidewall depth)
Comment:
Yes No NA NE
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■nnn
Yes No NA NE
Ext. Air
Surface
Yes No NA NE
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■nnn
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■nnn
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ n n n
■❑❑0
Page # 5

"N4
Permit: NCO025071 Owner - Facility: Mebane Bridge VVWTP
Inspection Date: 05/25/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Yes No NA NE
Pumps-RAS-WAS
Are pumps in place? ■ O 0 0
Are pumps operational? ■ ❑ 0 13
Are there adequate spare parts and supplies on site? ■ Q ❑ O
Comment:
Disinfection -Gas Yes No NA NE
Are cylinders secured adequately? ■ O Q ❑
Are cylinders protected from direct sunlight? ■ ❑ Q ❑
Is there adequate reserve supply of disinfectant? ■ ❑ Q Q
Is the level of chlorine residual acceptable? Q O 0 ■
Is the contact chamber free of growth, or sludge buildup? ■ Q Q
Is there chlorine residual prior to de -chlorination? Q Q ❑ ■
Does the Stationary Source have more than 2500 Ibs of Chlorine (CAS No. 7782-50-5)? O n ❑ ■
If yes, then is there a Risk Management Plan on site? ■ ❑ O Q
If yes, then what is the EPA twelve digit ID Number? (1000- -__-)
If yes, then when was the RMP last updated?
Comment:
Yes No NA NE
De -chlorination
Liquid
Type of system ?
Is the feed ratio proportional to chlorine amount (1 to 1)?
0 ❑ ❑ ■
❑ ❑ ■ O
Is storage appropriate for cylinders?
# Is de -chlorination substance stored away from chlorine containers?
■ ❑ ❑ Q
Comment:
❑ ❑ ■ 0
Are the tablets the proper size and type?
01100
Are tablet de -chlorinators operational?
Number of tubes in use?
Comment:
Yes No NA NE
Aerobic Digester
■❑n0
Is the capacity adequate?
■000
Is the mixing adequate?
Is the site free of excessive foaming in the tank? ■ Q 0 Q
Page # 6

Permit: NC0025071 Owner - Facility: Mebane Bridge VVWTP
Inspection Date: 05/25/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Aerobic Digester Yes No NA NE
# Is the odor acceptable? ■ 0 O
# Is tankage available for properly waste sludge? ■ ❑ n 0
Comment:
Solids Handling Equipment
Yes No
NA
NE
Is the equipment operational?
■ n
n
n
Is the chemical feed equipment operational?
■ Cl
❑
Is storage adequate?
■ ❑
n
Q
Is the site free of high level of solids in filtrate from filter presses or vacuum filters?
■ n
Cl
❑
Is the site free of sludge buildup on belts and/or rollers of filter press?
■ n
❑
n
Is the site free of excessive moisture in belt filter press sludge cake?
■ n
Q
n
The facility has an approved sludge management plan?
n n
Q
■
Comment:
Chemical Feed
Yes No NA
NE
Is containment adequate?
■ Q ❑
Is storage adequate?
■ n n
n
Are backup pumps available?
■ Q ❑
Is the site free of excessive leaking?
■ ❑ ❑
❑
Comment: Not adding chemicals at this time.
Drying Beds
Yes No NA
NE
Is there adequate drying bed space?
n n ■
n
Is the sludge distribution on drying beds appropriate?
0 ❑ E
Q
Are the drying beds free of vegetation?
n ❑ ■
❑
# Is the site free of dry sludge remaining in beds?
n n ■
Is the site free of stockpiled sludge?
n ❑ ■
n
Is the filtrate from sludge drying beds returned to the front of the plant?
Q Q ■
n
# Is the sludge disposed of through county landfill?
n ❑ ■
n
# Is the sludge land applied?
n n ■
n
(Vacuum filters) Is polymer mixing adequate?
n n ■
n
Comment: Drying beds are offline at this time and are being used as a storage site for
collected screenings and grit until sent to landfill.
Page # 7

Permit: NCO025071 Owner - Facility: Mebane Bridge VWVFP
Inspection Date: 05/25/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Lagoon s
Yes No NA NE
Type of lagoons?
Facultative
# Number of lagoons in operation at time of visit?
2
Are lagoons operated in?
Parallel
# Is a re -circulation line present?
00 ❑ 0
Is lagoon free of excessive floating materials?
N O O Q
# Are baffles between ponds or effluent baffles adjustable?
0 0 a 0
Are dike slopes clear of woody vegetation?
0 ❑ ❑ Q
Are weeds controlled around the edge of the lagoon?
s ❑ 0 ❑
Are dikes free of seepage?
0 ❑ ❑ Q
Are dikes free of erosion?
E Q 0 Q
Are dikes free of burrowing animals?
0 ❑ ❑
# Has the sludge blanket in the lagoon (s) been measured periodically in multiple locations?
Q 0 0 E
# If excessive algae is present, has barley straw been used to help control the growth?
O Q 0
Is the lagoon surface free of weeds?
❑ 0 Q
Is the lagoon free of short circuiting?
Q 0 O
Comment: Both lagoons are offline at the present. Sludge is now sent to a holding
tank to be pressed.
Operations & Maintenance
Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally dean with acceptable housekeeping?
00 ❑ 0
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable Solids, pH, DO, Sludge Q ❑ ■ ❑
Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment:
Influent Sampling
Yes No NA NE
# Is composite sampling flow proportional?
00 00
Is sample collected above side streams?
0 0
Is proper volume_ collected?
Q ❑ O
Is the tubing clean?
Q Q Q
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)?
E Q 0 0
Is sampling performed according to the permit?
0 ❑ O Q
Comment: See inspection report.
Effluent Sampling
Yes No NA NE
Page # 8

Permit: NCO025071
Inspection Date: 05/25/2011
Effluent Sampling
Is composite sampling flow proportional?
Is sample collected below all treatment units?
Is proper volume collected?
Is the tubing clean?
Owner - Facility: Mebane Bridge WVVrP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)?
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type representative)?
Comment: See inspection report.
0 E 0 0
■000l
■000l
■ ❑ 0 0
■ n n p
■000
Upstream 1 Downstream Sampling Yes No NA NE
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type, and sampling location)? ■ ❑ ❑ 0
Comment:
Page # 9
s

02-09-2009 05:32PM FROM-Censtruction Grants And Loans 9107156229 T-012 P.005/005 F-35T
City of Eden t
Mebane Bridge Road WWTP
Biosolids Dewatering Facility f r�
�.c_ vi
Phase 2 -- Process, Plumbing, Mechanical and Electrical Package
A To C No. 025071A03 4 ;
Issued February 6, 2009
Engineer's Certification s; M�;; i
I, TiLE:fZ Q. P ► 4 yF► lrt_ as a duly registered Professional Engineer in
the State of North Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically/weekly/Full time)
the construction of the Phase 2, Biosolids Dewatering Facility (Process, Plumbing, Mechanical,
and Electrical Package) at the Mebane Bridge Road WWTP, located at 204 Mebane Bridge
Road, south of Eden in Rockingham County for the City of Eden, hereby state that, to the best of
my abilities, due dare and diligence was used in the observation of the following construction:
A biosoiids dewatering facility consisting of a 50,000 gallon bolted -steel sludge
storage tank; a 28-foot by 46-foot dewatering building which houses a 350 gpm
sludge feed pump, a 2 meter sludge belt filter press rated at 2,000 poundsAtour,
polymer feed system, and washwater pump; sludge conveyer; a 14,800 ft2
dewatering sludge storage shelter; associated site work and yard piping, in
conformity with the project plans, specifications, and other supporting data
subsequently tiled and approved by the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources.
I certify that the construction of the above referenced project was observed to be built within
substantial compliance and intent of the approved plans and specifications.
We understand that the Biosolids Dewatering Facility may NOT be operated until both the Phase
1 (Site Work and Foundation Package, A to C No. 025071A02) .Engineer Certification and this
Engineer Certification have been completed.
-'1
Signature Registration No. a2S6f
Date IA110 2oG01
Send to: Construction Grants & Loans
DENR/DWQ
1633 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1633
CMO
A
.�
S i•`�' 1 =
's 22
i t�•1�� a
• �j vtill`dGV ���
��ieaaa a•teaa�..

ppppppp-
July 29, 2010
NPDES Unit
Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Gentlemen -
14'
i
L
ECEN".3
D„_,
13 2010
st(,
icn
SUBJECT: Annual Pollutant Analyses
NPDES Permit #NC0025071
ELC
SEP 8 2010
Per the requirements of the subject NPDES permit, please find enclosed a copy
of the monitoring information for the annual pollutant analyses.
Please contact me at 336-627-1009, Ext 130 if there are any questions regarding
this information.
Sincerely
D �
Melinda Ward
Wastewater Superintendent
Enclosure
RECEIVED
N.C. Dspt. of ENR
SEP 13 2010
Winstm uem
L Res► bffk.
W�
AUG - 3 2010
P0. Biel ''t • Filch, NC 2-289--111170 . [phone] • Fa, [phone]
)(1 13a

Pppp-
PPem
Outfll No. NCO025071
001
Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Scan
Month June
Year 2010
Facility Name Mebane Bridge WWTP ORC Melinda Ward
Date of sampling June 8, 2010 Phone [phone] EXT. 130
Analytical Laboratory Pace Anlytical and Mebane Bridge WWTP Lab
Parameter
Sample
Type
Analytical
Method
Quantitation
Level
Sample
Result
Units of
Measurement
Number of
soma les
Ammonia as N
Composite
EPA350.1
0.1
<0.10
1
1
Dissolved oxygen
Composite
4500-OG
0.1
6.86
1
1
Nitrate Nitrite
Composite
E353.2
0.1
0.36
Mg/1
1
Total K'eldahl nitrogen
Composite
E351.2
0.5
1.1
1
1
Total Phosphorus
Composite
E365.1
0.1
0.1$
1
1
Total dissolved solids
Composite
SM2540C
25
178
1
1
Hardness
Composite
SM2340B
0.65
61.7
1
1
Chlorine total residual, TRC
Grab
4500-CLG
10
< 10
u 1
1
Oil and grease
Grab
1664-A
5
<5
1
1
Nitrate Nitrite, TKN, & Total Phosphorus
were sampled on June 2, 2010
Metals total recoverable
de and total
phenols
Antimony
Composite
E200.7
0.005
<0.005
mg/1
1
Arsenic
Composite
E200.7
0.005
<0.005
1
1
Beryllium
Composite
E200.7
0.001
<0.001
mg/1
1
Cadmium
Composite
E200.7
0.001
<0.001
1
1
Chromium
Composite
E200.7
0.005
<0.005
mg/1
1
Copper
Composite
E200.7
0.005
0.0089
l
1
Lead
Composite
E200.7
0.005
<0.005
1
1
Mercury
Com osite
E245.1
0.2
<0.2
u 1
1
Nickel
Composite
E200.7
0.005
<0.005
1
1
Selenium
Composite
E200.7
0.01
<0.010
mg/1
1
Silver
Composite
E200.7
0.005
<0.005
mg 1
1
Thallium
Composite
E200.7
0.01
<0.010
1
1
Zinc
Composite
E200.7
0.01
0.049
1
1
Cyanide
Grab
SM450OCN-E
0.005
<0.005
1
Total phenolic compounds
Grab
E420.4
0.01
<0.01
1 4-1
1
Volatile organic compounds
Acrolein
Grab
E624
100
< 100
u 1
1
Acrylonitrile
Grab
E624
100
< 100
u 1
1
Benzene
Grab
E624
5
<5
u 1
1
Bromoform
Grab
E624
5
<5
u 1
1
Carbon tetrachloride
Grab
E624
5
<5
Ug 1
1
Chlorobenzene
Grab
E624
5
<5
u 1
1
Chlorodibromomethane
Grab
E624
5
<5
u 1
1
Chloroethane
Grab
E624
10
< 10
u 1
1
2-chloroeth lvin 1 ether
Grab
E624
10
< 10
u 1
1
Chloroform
Grab
E624
5
15.6
u 1
1
Dichlorobromomethane
Grab
E624
5
8.1
u 1
1
1,1-dichloroethane
Grab
E624
5
<5
u 1
1
1,2-dichloroethane
Grab
E624
5
<5
u 1
1
Trans- l,2-dichloroeth lene
Grab
E624
5
<5
u 1
1
Parameter
Sampleon
Method
Level
p
Result
is o
Measuremaent
o
Volatile otganic compounds Cont.
1,1-dichloroeth lene
Grab
E624
5
<5
u 1
1
1,2-dichloro ro ane
Grab
E624
5
<5
u 1
1
1,3-dichloropropylene
Grab
E624
5
<5
u 1
1
Eth lbenzene
Grab
E624
5
<5
u 1
1
r vrui - L ivt n- FFA- i rage 1

rermip�tNo. NCO025071
ll 001
Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Scan
Month June
Year 2010
Methyl bromide
Grab
E624
10
< 10
u 1
1
Methyl chloride
Grab
E624
5
<5
u 1
1
Methylene, chloride
Grab
E624
5
<5
u 1
1
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
Grab
E624
5
<5
u 1
1
Tetrachloroeth lene
Grab
E624
5
<5
u 1
1
Toluene
Grab
E624
5
<5
u 1
1
1, 1, 1 -trichloroethane
Grab
E624
5
<5
u 1
1
1,1,2-trichloroethane
Grab
E624
5
<5
u 1
1
Trichloroeth lene
Grab
E624
5
<5
u 1
1
Vinyl chloride
Grab
E624
5
<5
u l
1
Acid-aateact ,I; L mxapounds
P-chloro-m-creso
Composite
E625
5
<5
u 1
1
2-chloro henol
Composite
E625
5
<5
u 1
1
2 4-dichloro henol
Composite
E625
5
<5
u l
1
2,4-dimeth 1 henol
Composite
E625
10
<10
u 1
1
4,6-dinitro-o-cresol
Composite
E625
20
<20
u 1
1
2,4-dinitro henol
Composite
E625
50
<50
u 1
1
2-nitrophenol
Composite
E625
5
<5
u l
1
4-nitrophenol
Composite
E625
50
<50
u 1
1
Pentachloro henol
Composite
E625
25
<25
u 1
1
Phenol
Composite
E625
5
<5
u 1
1
2,4,6-trichloro henol
Composite
E625
10
<10
u 1
1
Base -neutral compounds
Acena hthene
Composite
E625
5
<5
u 1
1
Acena hth lene
Composite
E625
5
<5
u 1
1
Anthracene
Composite
E625
5
<5
u 1
1
Benzidine
Composite
E625
50
<50
u 1
1
Benzo a anthracene
Composite
E625
5
<5
u l
1
Benzo a ene
Composite
E625
5
<5
u l
1
3,4 benzofluoranthene
Composite
E625
5
<5
1
1
Benzo i lene
Composite
E625
5
<5
u l
1
Benzo k fluoranthene
Composite
E625
5
<5
u l
1
Bis 2-chloroetho methane
Composite
E625
10
<10
u 1
1
Bis 2-chloroeth 1 ether
Composite
E625
5
<5
u l
1
Bis 2-chloroiso ro 1 ether
Composite
E625
5
<5
u l
1
Bis 2-eth lh 1phthalate
Composite
E625
5
<5
u l
1
4-bromo hen 1 phenyl ether
Composite
E625
5
<5
u 1
1
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Composite
E625
5
<5
u l
1
2-chlorona hthalene
Composite
E625
5
<5
u 1
1
4-chloro hen 1 phenyl ether
Composite
E625
5
<5
u l
1
Parameter
Sample
Analytical
Method
Level
Sample
Resnk
Vans of
Measummeat
Itpmbw of
=wa les
Base-nm tfal compounds coat.
Chrysene
Composite
E625
5
<5
u 1
1
Di-n-butyl phthalate,
Composite
E625
5
<5
u l
1
Di-n-octyl phthalate,
Composite
E625
5
<5
u l
1
Dibenzo a,h anthracene
Composite
E625
5
<5
u 1
1
1,2-dichlorobenzene
Grab
E624
5
<5
1
1
1,3-dichlorobenzene
Grab
E624
5
<5
u 1
1
1,4-dichlorobenzene
Grab
E624
5
<5
u 1
1
3,3-dichlorobenzidine
Composite
E625
25
<25
u 1
1
Diethyl phthalate
Composite
E625
5
<5
u l
1
Dimeth 1 phthalate
Composite
E625
5
<5
u l
1
2,4-dinitrotoluene
Composite
E625 .
5
<5
u 1
1
2,6-dinitrotoluene
Composite
E625
5
<5
u 1
1
L lvxi\- 1 1 !l-1 rage z

rppp-
ermi,�t. NC0025071
nl
Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Scan
Month June
Year 2010
1 2-di hen lh drazine
Composite
E625
5
<5
u l
1
Fluoranthene
Composite
E625
5
<5
u 1
1
Fluorene
Composite
E625
5
<5
u 1
1
Hexachlorobenzene
Composite
E625
5
<5
u 1
1
Hexachlorobutadiene
Composite
E625
5
<5
u 1
1
Hexachloroc clo- entadiene
Composite
E625
10
< 10
1
1
Hexachloroethane
Composite
E625
5
<5
1
1
Indeno 1,2,3-cd ene
Composite
E625
5
<5
1
1
Iso horone
Composite
E625
10
< 10
u 1
1
Naphthalene
Composite
E625
5
<5
u 1
1
Nitrobenzene
Composite
E625
5
<5
u 1
1
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
Composite
E625
5
<5
u l
1
N-nitrosodimeth lamine
Composite
E625
5
<5
1
1
N-nitrosodi hen lamine
Composite
E625
10
< 10
1
1
Phenanthrene
Composite
E625
5
<5
1
1
rene
Composite
E625
5
<5
u 1
1
1,2,4,-trichlorobenzene
Composite
E625
5
<5
u 1
1
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction
and supervision in accordance with a system to design to assure that qualified perdonnel properly
gather and evaluat the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons that
manage the system, or those persons directly responsibel for gathering the information, the
information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate and complete. I am
aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the
possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations. n
Date
Form - DMR- PPA-1 Page 3

Project:
Pace Project No.
Sample: MB Eff
�g e
cat
Krbw
W W Testi 06/02/10
927OW
PaceAnalytical Services, Inc.
370 West Meadow Road
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Lab ID: 9270683001 Colleted: 0610211010:02 Received: 06/02/1010:35 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results Units Report Lind
DF
Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
MBIO 9222D Fecal Coliform qDN
Analytical Method: SM 9222D
Fecal Colifonns
/
5.0 CFU/100 mL 1.0
1
06AM10 14:43 u1
Sample: MBEff
L.abID: 9270583002 Colliectled: 06102h009:02
Received: OSW1010:35 Matra: Water
Parameters
Results Units Report Limit
DF
Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
5210B BOD, 5 day EDN
Analytical Method: SM 5210B
BOD, 5 day ✓
2.6 mg/L 2.0
1
06/0211015:29 06/07/1013:43
200.7 MET ICP
Analytical Method: EPA200.7 Preparation Method: EPA200.7
Copper
0.012 mg/L 0.0050
1
06KWIO 12:00 06KO10 20:51 7440-50-8
Total Nitrogen Calculation
Analytical Method: 40CFR PART 503
Nitrogen
1.5 mg/L 0.60
1
06/09/1010:46 7727-37-9
351.2 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen;
Analytical Method: EPA3512
Nitrogen, Kjeldahl, Total J
1.1 mg& 0.50
1
06/07/10 12:39 7727-37-9
353.2 Nitrogen, NO2/NO3 prey.
Analytical Method: EPA3532
Nitrogen, NO2 plus NO3
0.36 mg/L 0.10
1
061CW1012:07
365.1 Phosphorus, Total
Analytical Method: EPA365.1
Phosphorus J
0.18 mg/L 0.10
1
06/06/1015:11 7723-14-0
Sample: MB Inf
Lab ID: 9270583003 Collected: 06/02/1008.12
Received: 06J02f101035 Matra: Water
Parameters
5210E BOD, 5 day EDN
BOD, 5 day
350.1 Ammonia
Nitrogen, Ammonia
Sample: Upstream
Parameters
2120E Color ADMI
Color, ADMI
Adjusted Color, ADMI
pH
Date: 06/11/2010 01:19 PM
Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
Analytical Method: SM 5210B
) 177 mg/L 2.0 1 06/02/1015:29 06107/1013:43
AnaTl Method: EPA350.1
12.0 mg/L 1.0 10 06/10/10 10:15 7664-41-7
Lab ID: 9270583004 Collected: O6MIO 07:12 Received: 06WJ1010-35 Matra: Water
Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
Analytical Method: SM 2120E CoiorADMI
ND units 25.0 1 06A 311012:52
/ ND units 25.0 1 0610311012:52
6.7 units 1.0 1 061=1012:52
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not he reproduced, except in fui,
wfthout the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 4 of 14

lrace7Ana�ytical
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
e
370 West Meadow Road
=
Eden, NC 27288
wwwpacela6scom
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: MB WW'
sting WAM/10
Pace Project No.: 9270955
Sample: MB Aeration South
Lab ID: 9270955003 Collected: 06AW10 0&31
Received: 069MI0 09:35 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results Units Report Umilt OF
Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
200.7 MET ICP
Analytical Method: EPA 200.7 Preparation Method: EPA2W.7
Selenium
NO moll. 0,010 1
06111/1015.15 06/16/10 20:34 7782-49-2
245.1 Mercury
Analytical Method: EPA245.1 Preparation Method: EPA245.1
Mercury
2.2 ug/L 0.20 1
06=1009:40 06=1013:18 7439-97-6
450OCNE Cyanide, Total
Analytical Method: SM 45OD4CN-E
Cyanide
0.0075 mg/L 0.0050 1
0612011013:45 57-12-6 R1
Sample: MB Inf
Lab ID: 9270955004 Collected: 06I09/1011:17
Received: 06/06/1011:20 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results Urals Report Limit OF
Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
HEM, Oil and Grease
Analytical Method: EPA 1664A
Oil and Grease
NO mg/L 5.0 1
06/16/1010:55
Sample: MB Eff '
lab ID: 9270955005 Cosected: 06/08/10 08:59
Received: 06/=10 09-35 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results Units Report Urnit OF
Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
6210B BOD, 5 day EDN
Analytical Method: SM 5210B
BOD, 5 day 14
2.6 mg& 2.0 1
06I09/1016:20 06114/1016:22
200.7 MET ICP
Analytical Method_ EPA 200.7 Preparation Method: EPA 200.7
Antimony
NO mg/L 0.0050 1
06/15/1012:00 06/17/10 01:48 7440-36-0
Arsenic J
� NO mg/L 0.0050 1
06/15J1012:00 06/17/1001:48 7440-38-2
Beryllium
IND mg/L 0.0D10 1
06/1511012..00 06/17/1001:48 7440-41-7
Cadmium
NO mg/L 0.0010 1
06/15/10 12:00 06/17/10 01:48 7440-43-9
Calcium !
J
16.7 mg/L 0.10 1
06/15/1012:00 06/17/10 01:48 7440-70-2
Chromium
NO mg/L 0.0050 1
06/15MO 12.00 06/17/10 01:48 7440-47 3
Copper
f 9 0089 mg/L 0.005D 1
06/15/1012.00 06/17/10 01:48 7440-50-8
Lead J
J NO mg/L 0.0050 1
06115✓1012:00 08/17/10 01:48 7439-92-1
Magnesium
4.9 rrglL 0.10 1
06/15MO 12:00 06/17/10 01:48 7439-95.4
Molybdenum J
NO mg/L 0.0050 1
06/15/1012:00 06/17/10 01:48 7439-98-7
Nickel f
J NO mg/L 0.005D 1
06/15/1012:00 06/17/10 01:48 7440-02-0
Silver
J NO mg/L 0.0050 1
06/15/1012:00 06M7/1001:48 7440-22-4
Zinc
10.049 mg/L 0.010 1
06/15/1012..00 06/17/10 01:48 7440-66-6
Thallium
,� NO mg/L 0.010 1
=115MO 12:00 06/17/1001:48 7440-28-0
Selenium J
NO mg/L 0.010 1
06/15/1012:00 06/17/10 01:48 7782-49-2
2340B Hardness, Total (Ca
.) Analytical Method: SM 2340B
Calcium
16700 ug/L 100 1
06/17/1001:48 7440-70-2
Magnesium
4850 ug/L 100 1
06/17/10 01:48 7439-95-4
Total Hardness
,� 61.7 mg/L 0.65 1
06/17/10 01:48
Date: 06/23/2010 04:07 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 5 of 31
This report shalt not be reproduced, except in
full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..

21 �g •
Lcom
Project: MBWWTe
Pace Project No.: 9270955
Sample: MB Eff
Parameters
245.1 Mercury
,1
Mercury
2540C Total Dissolved Solids
Total Dissolved Solids >/
350.1 Ammonia
Nitrogen, Ammonia`
Sample: MB Eff
Parameters
MBIO 9222D Fecal Colitorm E
Fecal Coliforms
624 Volatile Organics
Chloromethane -
Vinyl chloride
Bromomethane.�,
Chloroethane..r-
Trichlorofluoromethane
Methylene Chloride.-
1,1-Dichloroethene
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene -
1,1-Dichloroethane
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1,1,1-Trichloroethane _
Carbon tetrachloride -
Benzene,/
1,2-Dichloroethane
Trichloroethene
1,2-Dichloropropane �.
Bromodichloromethane a...
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene-
Toluene
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene-
1,1,2-Trichloroethane -
Tetrachloroethene-
Dibromochloromethane -+
Chlorobenzene .
Ethylbenzene..+
Bromoform-
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane -
1,3-Dichloroberizene _,=
Date: 06/23/2010 04:07 PM
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
06MID
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
370 West Meadow Road
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
Lab ID: 9270955005 Collected_ 06AM1008-59 Received: UA"1u uaso mauu. •wa
Results Units Report Limit OF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Q_ u ll
Analytical Method: EPA245.1 Preparation Method: EPA245-1
NO ug/L 0.20 1 W22110 09:40 06rMIO 13:38 7439-97-6
Analytical Method: SM 2540C
178 mg/L 25.0 1 06/10/1017:52
Analytical Method: EPA350.1
NO mg/L 0.10 1 06122/10 00:06 7664-41-7
Lab ID: 9770955006 Collected: 06d08/1008:55 Received: 06f06IOOW35 Matrix: Water
Rest Units
Report Limit OF Prepared
Analyzed CAS No. Qual
ON Analytical Method: SM 9222D
12.0 CFU/100 mL
1.0 1
06/06/1014:04 u1
Analytical Method: EPA624
AD ug/L
5.0 1
06115/1016:26 74-873
` NO ugA-
5.0 1
06/15/1016:26 75-01-4
T, NO UgIL
10.0 1
0611511016:26 74-83-9
AND ugAL
10.0 1
06/15/1016:26 75-003
NO ug/L
10.0 1
OW15/1016:26 75-69-4
-ND ug/L
5.0 1
06/15/10 16:26 75-09-2
,,ND �
5.0 1
0611511016:26 75-35-4
AND ug/L
5.0 1
0611511016:26 156-605
NO ug/L
5.0 1
06115/1016:26 75-34-3
NO ug/L
5.0 1
06115✓1016:26 156-59-2
f 15.6 ug/L
5.0 1
0611511016:26 67-66-3
-ND ug/L
5.0 1
0611511016:26 71-55-6
/NO uS&
5.0 1
06/15/1016:26 56-23-5
/ NO ug/L
5.0 1
06/15/1016:26 71-432
/ ND ug/L
5.0 1
06115/1016:26 1074)6-2
i NO ug/L
5.0 1
06/15/10 16:26 79-01-6
NO ug/L
5.0 1
06/15/10 16:26 78-87-5
8.1 uglL
5.0 1
06115/1016:26 75-27-4
ug/L
5.0 1
06(15/1016:26 10061-025
,/ND
-NO ug[L
50 1
06M5/1016.26 108-883
./NO ug/L
5.0 1
06/15/1016:26 10061-01-5
_ NO ugAL
5.0 1
06/15/1016:26 79-00-5
IND ug/L
5.0 1
06115/1016:26 127-18-4
6/ND uDn-
5.0 1
06115/1016:26 12448-1
4ND ug/L
5.0 1
06/15/1016:26 108-90-7
.AND ug/L
5.0 1
06115/1016:26 100-41-4
f NO ug/L
5.0 1
0611511016:26 75-25-2
- NO ug/L
5.0 1
0611511016:26 79-34-5
- NO ug/L
-T. 5.0 1
06/15/1016:26 541-73-1
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
Page 6 of 31
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..

i
Pam Analytical Services, Inc.
aceAna/ytica!
370 West Meadow Road
wwwpacelabscom
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: MB VWV
Testing OB/08110
Pace Project No.: 92
Sample: MB Eff
Lab ID: 9270955006 Collected: 0%W10 08-55 Received:
06108/10 09-35 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results Units Report lick OF Prepared
Analyzed CAS No. Qual
624 Volatile Organics
Analytical Method: EPA624
1,4-Dichlorobenzene --
NO ug/L — 5.0 1
06✓15/1016:26 106-46-7
1,2-Dichlorobenzene —
NO ug/L 5.0 1
06115/1016:26 95-50-1
jAcrolein
I% NO ug/L J 100 1
06115/1016-.26 107-02-8
Acrylonitrile
NO ug/L 100 1
06/15/1016:26 107-13-1
2-Chloroethyivinyl ether.wo,t.
.AND ug/L 10.0 1
06/15/1016:26 110-75-8
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
109 % 88-113 1
06/15/10 16:26 1868-53-7
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
95 % 86-111 1
06/15/10 16:26 460-004
Toluene-d8 (S)
101 % 92 105 1
0611511016:26 2037-26-5
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
112 % 70.130 1
06/15/1016:26 17060-07-0
420.4 Phenolics, Total
Analytical Method: EPA 420.4
Phenol
NO mg/L 0.010 1
06/15/1014:14 108-95-2
4500CNE Cyanide, Total
Analytical Method: SM 450D-CN-E
Cyanide
NO mg/L 0.0050 1
06/20/1013:59 57-12-5
Sample: Upstream
Lab 1D: 9270955007 Collected: 060MIO 07.18 Received:
06M10 09:35 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results Unite Report Limit OF Prepared
Analyzed CAS No. Quaff
2120E Color ADMI
Anarl Method: SM 2120E ColorADMI
Color, ADMI
NO units 25.0 1
06/08/1015:48
Adjusted Color, ADMI
NO casts 25.0 1
06108/1015:48
pH
7.0 units 1.0 i
061=1015:48
Adjusted pH, ADMI
7.6 units 1.0 1
06/08/1015:48
Sample: Downstream
Lab ID: 9270956008 Collected: 06MWIO 07:45 Received:.
06108/10 09:35 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results Units Report haul OF Prepared
Analyzed GAS No. Qual
2120E Color ADMI
Analytical Method: SM 2120E Color ADMI
Color, ADMI
NO urns 25.0 1
06f08/1015:54
Adjusted Color, ADMI
NO units 25.0 1
06/08/1015:54 •-
pH
7.3 units 1A 1
06/08/1015:54
Adjusted pH, ADMI
7.6 units 1.0 1
06MVIO 15:54
Sample: MB Eff
Lab ID: 9270955009 Collected. OSM1011:15 Received:
06108/10 11:20 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results Units Report Limit OF Pmpared
Analyzed CAS No. Qual
HEM, Oil and Grease
Analytical Method: EPA 1664A
s \
Oil and Grease `I J
NO mg/L 5.0 1
06/16/10 10:55
)ate: 06/23/2010 04:07 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
Page 7 of 31
This report shall not be reproduced, except in fun,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..

d
P1735cnalyb"cal
^ wwwpece/sbscom
i
r
Project: MB
Pace Project No.: 927
Testing 06A8/10
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
370 West Meadow Road
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
Sample: MB Eff
Lab ID: 9270955010
Collected: OfiWRO08.59
Received: 06M1011:20
Matrix: Water
Parameters
j
Rem Ur*s
Report Un* OF
prepared Analyzed
CAS No. Qual
625 MSSV
Analytical Method: EPA625 Preparation McBrod: EPA625
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
NO ug/L
5.0
1
06MWIO 10-00 06/11/1018:46
1,2-Diphenyihydrazine !_
NO ug/L
-5.0
1
06A W1010-00 06/11/10 18:46
2,4,6-Trichiorophenol _
NO ug1L
10.0
1
06MIO 10-00 06111/1018:46
2,4-Dichlorophenol _
,ND ug/L
5.0
1
06109/1010-00 O6/11/1018:46
2,4-Dimethylphenol -
_ NO ug/L
10-0
1
06A9V1010:00 06/11/1018:46
2,4-Dindrophenol.,
_y NO ug/L
50.0
1
06A9l1010:00 06/11/10 18:46
2,4-Dindrotoluene., „
NO ug/L
5.0
1
06/M1010.00 06/11/10 18:46
2,6-Dinitrotoluene .�.
2-Chloronaphthalene
-_ NO ug1L
_ 5.0
1
OSM1010:00 0611111018:46
2-Chlorophenol
NO ug/L
5.0
1
06A911010-00 06/11/1018:46
ter,.
2-Nitrophenol
NO ug/L
5.0
1
06M1010-00 06/11/1018:46
-,
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
_NO ug/L
5.0
1
06109/1010:00 06✓11/10 18:46
_
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
_ 25.0
1
06A9/1010:00 06/11/1018:46
4-Bromophenylphenyl ether
NO ug/L
20.0
1
06(=1010-00 06/11/10 18:46
4-Chioro-3-methylphenol -
ug/L
- 5.0
5.0
1
1
06MWlo 10:00 06/11/1018:46
06A9/1010-00
4-Chlorophenylphenyl ether
-.ND
_ NO ug/L
-5.0
1
06/11/1018:46
OSM1010:00 06/11/10 18:46
4-Nitrophenol
NO u9n-
50.0
1
06A9/1010:00 06/11/1018:46
Acenaphthene -
-_ NO ug/L
5.0
1
OSM1010:00 06/11/10 18:46
Acenaphthylene _
NO ug/L
5.0
1
06A811010::00 06/11/1018:46
Anthracene
,_. NO ug/L
5.0
1
06A9/101000 06(11/1018:46
Butylbenzylphthalate -
NO ug/L
5.0
1
06109/1010:00 06/11/1018:46
Benzo(k)fluoranthene -
` NO ug/L
5.0
1
06A9/1010-00 06/11/10 18:46
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene �.
NO ug/L
5.0
1
06MIO 10.00 06/11/10 18:46
Benzo(a)anthracene �„
..� NO ug/L
5.0
1
06/09/1010-00 06/11/1018:46
Benzidine
NO ug/L
50-0
1
06A)W1010:00 06/1111018:46
Benzo(b)fluoranthene-
NO ug/L
5.0
1
06/09/1010:00 06111/1018:46
Benzo(a)pyrene _,
s NO ug/L
5.0
1
06A9/1010:00 06/11/1018:46
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane -{'
NO ugA-
--� 10.0
1
061W1010�00 06/1111018:46
bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether,
,�. NO ug/L
5.0
1
ONW1010,00 06✓11/1018:46
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) ether
NO ug/L
_ 5-0
1
06/=1010.00 06/11/1018:46
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
NO ug/L
., 5.0
1
061139/1010:00 06/11/10 18:46
Chrysene.
NO ug/L
-5.0
1
06/0911010:00 06/11/10 18:46
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
NO ug/L
- 5.0
1
06109/1010:00 0611111018:46
Dimethylphthalate
NO ug/L
.� 5.0
1
06/09iI1010-00 06✓11/1018:46
Di-n-butylphthalate �.
_ NO ug/L
_ 5.0
1
O6/09/1010:00 06/11/1018:46
Di n-octylphthalate
NO ug/L
-5.0
1
06/W1010:00 06/11/10 18:46
Diethylphdhalate
-.ND ug/L
_ 5.0
1
06/0911010:00 06111/1018:46
Fluorene
Fluoranthene
_ NO
,_. 5.0
1
061=1010.00 06/11/1018:46
.._
Hexachloro-15-butadiene
NO ug/L
_ NO ug/L
_._ _ 5.0
1
06MIO 10.00 06/11/1018:46
Hexachlorobenzene _
NO ug/L
._ 5.0
1
0&=101000 06/11/1018:46
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
_
_ _.. NO ug/L
5.0
1
06M1010:00 06/11/10 18:46
Hexachloroethane
NO ug/L
-10.0
1
06/0911010:00 06/11/10 18:46
Indeno(1,2,3-ed)pyrene._i
NO ug/L
5.0
1
06/09/1010:00 06111/1018:46
lsoph
5.0
1
06/W1010.00 06/11/1018:46
Na
Naphthalene
hale
NO ug/L
10-0
1
O6A)W1010:00 06(11/1018:46
�.r
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine
f� NO ug/L
5.0
1
06/09/1010:00 06/11/10 18:46
NO ug/L
5.0
1
06AM1010:00 06/11/1018:46
Date: 06/23/2010 04:07 PM
REPORT OF
LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reprodrxeck except in ful,
without the written consent or pace Analytical Services, Inc -
120-82-1
122-66-7
88-W2
120-83-2
105-67-9
51-285
121-14-2
606-20-2
91-W7
95-57-8
88.755
91-94-1
534-52-1
101-55-3
59-50-7
7005-72-3
100-02-7
83-32-9
208.96-8
120-12-7
85-68-7
207-W9
191-24-2
56-553
92-87-6
205-99-2
50-32-8
111-91-1
111-44 4
108-60-1
117-81-7
218-01-9
53-70-3
131-11-3
84-74-2
117-84-0
84-66-2
86-73-7
206-44-0
87-68-3
118-74-1
77-47-4
67-72-1
193-39-5
78-59-1
91-20-3
621-64-7
Page 8 of 31

e
dcal
Mac=
Project: MB W W 7ing 06108/10
Pace Project No.: 9270955
Sample: MB Eff
Parameters
625 MSSV
Nitrobenzene _.
N-Nitrosodimethylamine—
N-Nitrosodiphenyhamine
Phenol
Phenanthrene
Pentachlorophenol
Pyrene
Nitrobenzene-d5 (S)
2-Ruorobiphenyl (S)
Terphenyl-d14 (S)
Phenol-d6 (S)
2-Ruorophenol (S)
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (S)
Date: 06/23/2010 04:07 PM
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
370 West Meadow Road
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
L.ablD-. 9270955010 Collected: 06AW1008-59 Received: OSM1011:20 Matrix: Water
Results Units
Report Limit
OF
Prepared Analyzed
CAS No. Qual
Analytical Method: EPA625
Preparation Method: EPA625
ND ug/L
5.0
1
06KW1010.00 06/11/1018:46
98-953
aa. NO ug/L
_s 5-0
1
06AW1010.00 06/11/10 18:46
62-759
NO uglL
10.0
1
06A 1010:00 06111/1018:46
86-30-6
NO ug/L
5-0
1
061=1010.00 06/11/1018:46
108-95-2
NO ug/L
5.0
1
06A911010:00 06/11/1018:46
85.01-8
NO ug/1-
25.0
1
06A9/1010.00 06/11/10 18:46
87-86-5
NO ug/L
5.0
1
06/W1010:00- 06/11/10 18:46
129-00-0
43 %
10-120
1
06109/1010:00 06111/1018:46
41654M-0
45 %
15-120
1
06AWIO 10:00 06/11/1018:46
321-60-8
67 %
11-131
1
06A9/1010.00 06/11/1018:46
1718-5.1-0
14 %
10-120
1
061=1010:00 06/11/1018:46
131274%3
23 %
10-120
1
06A9/1010-00 06/11/1018:46
367-12-4
54 %
10-137
1
061=1010-00 06111/1018:46
118-79-6
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report stag not be reproduoeA except in fuR,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 9 of 31

Ppppp-
# NC
FFacility: Tow
0043290 Month: July
Year: 2010
n of Danbury - WTP
Class: 1 County:
Stokes
RECEIVED
N.C. Deot. of FNG
ORC: Mark Delehant Grade:
PC 1 ORC Certification #
994060
sP32010
Signature:C
-Well
10501
0
Has ORC Ch ng"ea. : NO Phone:
[phone]
nsto,-sais
Reaai�7�
Certified Lab Name: Pace Analytical Services Inc.
Lab#:
Eden - #633 1_ZntO-
Person(s) Collecting samples: Mark Delehant
Lab ORC have February
Lab #: Asheville #40 (Metals Only
ILC
1, 2010.
Comments and changed effective
aampnng Location: ttnuent uiscnarge if uu i"Mill
50050
00010
00400
50060
CO530
01045
01055
.1
o
v>
L
Q - -
O
`o =
a O a�
i .
Q .E
O F-
O �'
�N/ p'an^;
I.L V/
O
3
0
L.L
cLa
m a�
Q
E
2
Q
FU a)
3 L
N
IY U
-a �
m a�i '
.. Q � pn
N vI
H
m e
.,
Ct L
H
c
�a CD
Y t6 ut
Q)
H-
2400 clock
Hrs
Y/B/N
mgd
deg c
su
ug/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
0730
0.5
YES
0.003
NA
7.8
13 ug/1
2.5 mg/I
.15 mg/I
.20 mg/1
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
0730
0.5
YES
0.003
NA
7.8
26 ug/I
3.2 mg/I
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Composite(C)/Grab(G):
NA
G
G
G
G
G
G
Monthly Average Limit:
> 6 < 9
30.0 mg/I
Monthly Average:
0.003
7.8
19.5 ug/1
2.9 mg/1
.15 mg/1
.20 mg/1
Daily Maximum:
0.003
7.8
26 ug/I
3.2 mg/1
.15 mg/1
.20 mg/I
Daily Minimum:
0.003
7.8
13 ug/I
2.5 mg/1
.15 mg/1
.20 mg/I
Monthly Avg % Removal (85%):
1
1
0

Q�
Sewer Collection System Annual rer onnance rReport
City of Eden, North Carolina
July 1, 2009 to June 30, 2010
I. General Information
FUL
D,_
3 0 2010nst.!,,
Regiona! Oice
Facility/System Name: City of Eden, Sewer Collection and Treatment System
Responsible Entity: City of Eden, Brad Corcoran, City Manager
Person in Charge/ Contact: Collection System and Pump Stations, Mark T. Bullins,
Operator -in -Responsible Charge, 336-627-7783
Mebane Bridge Wastewater Treatment Plant, Melinda S. Ward,
Operator -in -Responsible Charge, 336-627-1009
Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant, Ralph Potter,
Operator -in -Responsible Charge, 336-627-1009
Applicable Permits: Sewer Collection System — WQC200018
Mebane Bridge Wastewater Treatment Plant — NPDES Permit NCO025071
Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant — NPDES Permit NCO025151
Land Application of Wastewater Residuals — NC Permit WQ0003035
Description of Collection and Treatment Process:
The collection system consists of 145+ miles of gravity and force main sewer pipelines. The
pipelines are composed of a mixture of clay and ductile iron pipe, ranging in size from 2 to 36 inches.
Age of the sewer pipelines range from new to more than 50 years old. Collection is accomplished by
gravity from homes and businesses until it is necessary to pump from low elevations in force main
sewer lines that transport the sewage to the treatment plants. There are 19 pump stations in the
collection system. These range in size from pumping a few thousand gallons per day to more than
five million gallons a day (MGD). The City has two separate collection drainage areas. The
Northeast section of the city that is primarily domestic sewage is treated at the Dry Creek
Wastewater Treatment Plant (DCWWTP) which has a capacity of 0.5 million gallons a day. The rest
of the city sewer drains, collects or is pumped to the Mebane Bridge Wastewater Treatment Plant
(MBWWTP), which can treat 13.5 million gallons per day.
The treatment plants have treated on average about 0.295 MGD at DCWWTP and 3.793
MGD at MBWWTP. This means that currently the Dry Creek plant operates at about one half of its
permitted capacity and the Mebane Bridge plant operates at less than one third. The plants are
nearly identical in their process design with their main difference only being in scale. Each of the
plants has mechanical barscreens to remove larger inert material. Each plant has a grit removal
system following the barscreening. Extended aeration using activated sludge is the next process at
each plant to reduce and remove biochemical oxygen demand. The sludge is separated from
treated water by circular clarifiers. Collected sludge or biosolids are wasted to the aerobic digesters
or returned to the aeration system. Treated water to the effluent leaves the clarifiers and is
disinfected with chlorine and then dechlorinated. The treated effluent is then returned to the Dan
River meeting all State Permit Discharge requirements.
JUL 2
5
s
Annual Performance Report
Page 1 of 3

PPFF"
I1. Maintenance
Collection System
The City of Eden completed the requirements for the Special Order of Consent and
requested to have the Order removed. The state approved this request in October 2009.
The City has Collection & Distribution field personnel to respond to emergencies in order to
maintain the sewer collection system. Their job is to repair broken lines, installation of new sewer
line, mow and maintain sewer outfall lines, and respond to, rectify and mitigate sewer bypasses.
Personnel are on call nights and weekends year round to respond to emergency problems in the
collection system. The City's 19 pump stations are monitored by (2) Collection & Distribution
Operators 24 hours per day, 7 days per week, by remote telemetry (Mission Communications) and
physically checked on normal workdays by Collection & Distribution personnel for proper operation.
Maintenance crews along with C&D personnel perform scheduled preventative maintenance on
each of these pump stations to protect the equipment and insure long life. An extensive warehouse
of supplies and parts are maintained to address emergency breakdowns and failures in the pump
stations and the sewer lines.
The following was accomplished during fiscal year 2009-2010:
A total of 37 Inflow & Infiltration problems were responded to and repaired.
A total of 194 laterals and sewer mains were responded to and unstopped.
A total of 14.55 miles (76,832') of sewer mains throughout the City of Eden were cleaned by
sewer jet or rodder and inspected by CCTV throughout the City of Eden.
Treatment Plants
Treatment Plant Operators are on duty 24 hours per day, 7 days per week, to insure proper
treatment of all incoming wastewater. They monitor plant equipment and do inspections during each
shift to insure process control and the mechanical operation of the equipment Maintenance
personnel are available each day to service equipment and are on call nights and weekends for
emergency repairs, if the treatment equipment suffers failure. A large parts inventory is maintained
of the items that have historically been prone to failure.
III. Perfonnance
Collection Svstem Operations
There were 35 events in the past 12 months where raw sewage was overflowed or bypassed
from the gravity collection system to surface waters. Gravity flow/Force Mains pipelines in the
collection system bypassed to surface waters totaled 6,970 gallons. Causes of these overflows
were blockages from grease, roots entering pipes at taps and pipe joints, and collapsed sewer force
mains.
Of our 19 pump stations; (7) pump stations had sanitary sewer overflows during the last 12
months in 16 separate events. They were as follows: Bridge Street (5) — 141,465 gallons, Covenant
Branch (9) — 197,241 gallons, Meadow Greens (4) — 115,492 gallons, New Street (2) — 6,412
gallons, Village(2) — 20,205 gallons, Dan River (1) — 32,619 gallons and Junction (1) 2,250 gallons.
The cause for these overflows were inflow and infiltration of storm water from extreme weather
conditions with storm events that deposited up to 10.71 inches of rain, some in conjunction with melt
from frozen precipitation already on the ground.
When overflows or bypasses occurred, the affected sites were evaluated, treated with
hydrated lime and/or receiving streams monitored for environmental impacts as conditions dictated.
Annual Performance Report Page 2 of 3

Treatment Plants Operations
Compliance with North Carolina NPDES (National Pollution Discharge Elimination System)
Permit is based on meeting discharge parameters set forth in the NPDES Permit. This information is
reported monthly to the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources through
self -monitoring reports. The following is a summary of our plant permit compliance for the last 12
months:
Reporting Month
Mebane Bridge Plant
Dry Creek Plant
July 2009
Compliant
Compliant
August 2009
Compliant
Compliant
September 2009
Compliant
Compliant
October 2009
Non -Compliant'
Compliant
November 2009
Compliant
Compliant
December 2009
Non-compliant3
Non -Compliant'
January 2010
Compliant
Compliant
February 2010
Compliant
Compliant
March 2010
Compliant
Compliant
April 2010
Compliant
Compliant
May 2010
Compliant
Compliant
June 2010
Compliant
*Compliant
The Dry Creek WWTP was non -compliant for the month for violation of its permitted flow limit.
It exceeded its monthly limit of 0.5 MGD due to I & I.
2 The Mebane Bridge WWTP was non -compliant for one day due to effluent pH being outside of
the limits of 6-9 SU.
3 The Mebane Bridge WWTP was non -compliant for the month for failure to collect and analyze
required monthly samples within the allowed timeframe.
*The Dry Creek permit was rescinded on June 14, 2010 and the facility was officially closed out.
IV. Notification
This report will be submitted to the State Division of Water Quality and be released to the local news
media and posted on the City's internet web site at www.ci.eden.nc.us.
V. Certification
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my
direction of supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel
properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or
persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the
information, the information submitted is, to the best of knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and
complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including
the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violation."
Brad
Signature of
'7 /9 /6
Date
Annual Performance Report Page 3 of 3

�� 4")
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
April 20, 2010
Ms. Melinda S. Ward, Wastewater Superintendent
City of Eden
P. O. Box 70
Eden, NC 27289-0070
Subject: NPDES Permit Modification
Permit Number NCO025071
City of Eden — Mebane Bridge WWTP
Rockingham County
Dear Ms. Ward:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
RECEIVED
Deot. of ENR
MAY t 1 2010
Winston-Salem
Regional Office
Division personnel have reviewed and approved your application for minor modification of the subject permit.
Accordingly we are forwarding the attached modified permit limits and monitoring pages. These pages should be
inserted into your permit and the old ones discarded. As a result of this modification, condition A. (4.) of the
permit (Conditional Monitoring for Mercury) is no longer applicable, and that page of the permit may also be
discarded.
This modification removes monitoring requirements and effluent limitations for mercury as terms of the NPDES
permit. As you noted in your request, mercury concentrations in the effluent shall continue to be monitored as
part of the facility's pretreatment requirements. Should elevated mercury concentrations be observed through that
monitoring, the permit requirements may be reinstituted.
This modification is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the
Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency dated
October 15, 2007 (or as subsequently amended).
Please note that this permit is not transferable except after notice to the Division. The Division may require
modification or revocation and reissuance of the permit. This permit does not affect the legal requirements to
obtain other permits which may be required by the Division of Water Quality or permits required by the Division
of Land Resources, the Coastal Area Management Act or any other Federal or Local governmental permit that
may be required. If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Bob Sledge at telephone
number [phone].
Sincerely,
C leen H. Sullins
- r
cc: Central Files
Winston-Salem Regional Office/Surface Water Protection Section
NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 One
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 NortilCcl) 01111�1 Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1.877-623-6748 Nor f' aro fi /
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org

Permit NCO025071
41
A. (l.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
During the period beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until permit expiration,
the Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and
monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
EFFLUENT
CHARACTERISTICS
LIMITS
MONITORING
REQUIREMENTS
Monthly
Average
Weekly
Average
Daily
Maximum
Measurement
Frequency
Sample
Type
Sample Location'
Flow
13.5 MGD
Continuous
Recording
Influent or Effluent
BOD, 5-day 20°C) 2
30.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
Daily
Composite
Effluent, Influent
Total Suspended Solids TSS 2
30.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
Daily
Composite
Effluent, Influent
NH3 as N (April 1-October 31
14.8 m L
35.0 m L
Daily
Composite
Effluent
NH3 as N November 1—March 31
3/Week
Composite
Effluent
H 3
Daily
Grab
Effluent
pH
Footnote 1
Grab
Upstream',
Downstream'
Fecal Coliform
(geometric mean
200 ! 100 ml
400 / 100 ml
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Total Residual Chlorine (TRC) 4
28 µg/L
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Temperature, °C
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Temperature, 2C
Footnote 1
Grab
Upstream',
Downstream'
Conductivity,,nohm/cm
Footnote 1
Grab
Upstream,
Downstream
Dissolved Oxygen (DO), m /L
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Dissolved Oxygen (DO), mg/L
Footnote 1
Grab
Upstream',
Downstream'
Total Copper, L 5
2/Month
Composite
Effluent
Total Nitrogen (TN)
TN = NO2 + NO3 + TKN, m L
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Total Phosphorus TP , m L
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Chronic Toxicity 6
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Total Zinc, p L s
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Color 7
300 ADMI
3/Quarter
Grab
Effluent
Color 7
Footnote 1
Grab
Upstream',
Downstream'
Effluent Pollutant Scan a
Annual
Composite/
Grab
Effluent

Permit NCO025071
(continued from A.(1.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS) '
Notes:
1. Sample locations: Upstream - Upstream at NCSR 1964, Downstream - Downstream at NCSR 700.
Upstream and downstream samples shall be grab samples. Stream samples shall be collected
three times per week during June, July, August and September and once per week during the
remaining months of the year.
2. The monthly average BOD5 and TSS concentrations shall not exceed 15% of the respective influent
value (85% removal).
3. The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units.
4. Total Residual Chlorine compliance is required for chlorine or chlorine derivative used for disinfection.
The Division shall consider all effluent TRC values reported below 50 ug/l to be in compliance with the
permit. However, the Permittee shall continue to record and submit all values reported by a North
Carolina certified laboratory (including field certified), even if these values fall below 50 ug/1.
5. Sampling for zinc, copper, and silver should coincide with sampling for chronic toxicity test.
6. Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) P/F at 5.4%. Toxicity testing shall be performed in the months of
March, June, September and December (see Part A.(2.).
7. Limit is an instantaneous maximum (i.e. not to be exceeded at any time) not a daily maximum.
8. See Special Condition A.(3.) for list of pollutants.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.

AL
+ 4fA
As:= �
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
March 9, 2010
MELINDA S WARD
WASTEWATER SUPERINTENDENT
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
CITY OF EDEN
PO BOX 70
EDEN NC 27289-0070
Subject: Acknowledgement of Permit Modification Request for NCO025071
City of Eden
Mebane Bridge WWTP
Rockingham County
Dear Ms. Ward:
RECEIVED
N.C. DeOL of ENR
MAR 15 2010
Winston salam
Regional Office
The Division of Water Quality acknowledges receipt of your permit modification request and has assigned it to a
reviewer.
The reviewer will perform a detailed review and contact you with a request for additional information if necessary. To
ensure the maximum efficiency in processing permit applications, the Division requests your assistance in providing a
timely and complete response to any additional information requests.
Please note at this time, processing permit applications can take as long as 60 — 90 days after receipt of a complete
application.
If you have any questions, please contact Robert Sledge at 919-807-6398, or via email at [e-mail]. If the
reviewer is unavailable, you may leave a message, and they will respond promptly.
PLEASE REFER TO THE ABOVE APPLICATION NUMBER WHEN MAKING INQUIRIES ON THIS PROJECT.
Sincerely,
Dina Sprinkle
Cc: Central Files
Winston Salem Regional Office Surface Water Protection Section
Permit application file NCO025071
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 One
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service:1-877-623-6748 NO h fC�arolina
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org �) atura!!r�
An Faumity al Onnorh! Affirmative Action Fmnlover

PPPPP,PP-
eitg of, &-ka
Department - s� � l
2Ucr✓jkwat" J ua anent J &Tnt MAR 0 32010
March 1, 2010
Coleen H. Sullins
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Dear Ms. Sullins,
This letter is in regards to the provisional section of our NPDES permit, NCO025071, regarding
Mercury. "Section A. (4.) Conditional Monitoring for Mercury: Provisional Limit with weekly
monitoring for Mercury take effect August 1, 2010. If the first 12 months of monitoring data
from the effective date shows no reasonable potential to exceed water quality standards, the
Permittee can petition the Division to remove this requirement, which can be done by letter from
the Division without having to reopen the permit. This does not effect the pretreatment
monitoring requirements."
Our permit became effective February 1, 2009, so we began monitoring for Mercury at this time.
So far, we have collected 13 months of data to share with your office and are continuing to
monitor twice a month until this is removed or goes into effect in August. We feel that this is
sufficient enough data to prove that our plant shows no reasonable potential for exceeding water
quality standards at this time. Therefore, I am petitioning your office to remove this requirement
for Mercury monitoring during this permit cycle. I understand that we must continue monitoring
quarterly in accordance with our Pretreatment requirements, and that if any data shows results
higher than the current limit, we may be required to resume monitoring.
If more information is needed, please feel free to contact me anytime at extension 130.
Sincerely,
Melinda S. Ward
Wastewater Superintendent
Attachment
Cc: Winston Salem Regional Office
Brad Corcoran, City Manager
Dennis Asbury, Director of Environmental Services
P. O. Box 70 • Eden, NC 27289-0070 9 [phone] • Fax [phone]

Mebane Bridge WWTP Mercury Results
Date Result ng/L
2/2/2009
<200
2/9/2009
<200
2/16/2009
<200
2/23/2009
<210
2/25/2009
<200
3/2/2009
<200
3/4/2009
<200
3/9/2009
<200
3/10/2009
<200
3/16/2009
<200
4/6/2009
<200
4/13/2009
<200
5/4/2009
<200
5/11/2009
<200
6/2/2009
<200
6/8/2009
<200
7/6/2009
<200
7/13/2009
<200
8/3/2009
<200
8/10/2009
<200
9/9/2009
<200
9/15/2009
<200
10/7/2009
<200
10/12/2009
<200
11/2/2009
<200
11/9/2009
<200
11/30/2009
<200
12/8/2009
<200
1/5/2009
<200
1/12/2009
<200
2/1/2009
<200
2/8/2009
<200
* Sample analyzed twice and this is the average.
* The first sample for December was mistakenly taken
in November and not caught until January.

RECEIVED
N.C. Deot of ENR
FEB 0 4 2010
Winston-Salem
Regional Office
eitv q e&n
oepwytment of F. W&0nrtterttCd Sexuice6
Wwtewatex .J uaUnent Want
Febru 010
4,1on Bo
ENR Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Quality, Surface Water Protection
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Mr. Boone,
For the month of December, we were noncompliant for copper and mercury due to one of
the two samples for each not being collected and analyzed. I am not sure why the copper
sample was not sent in. We usually send this sample off the first and second Wednesday
of the month. The first Wednesday, we analyzed total phosphorus and total nitrogen and
copper was listed at the bottom for copper, but the sample was never collected or listed at
the top with the list of analysis. Our lab technician has been preprinting the chain of
custodies so that he won't forget what is required each week, but he apparently used the
wrong chain. I would like for him to write these out for each day instead of preprinting
them so that he has to double check the requirements for each week, but I haven't
decided when to implement this due to other problems we are experiencing with him.
For mercury, our lab technician usually collects these samples on the first and third
Mondays and Tuesdays. On November 30, he collected the first sample and tried to
report it for the first sample of December. He sent the sample off the following week and
never realized that the November date would not work for December. Due to this, we
have amended the November DMR to reflect this extra mercury. We did not catch this
mistake until early in January when we were preparing our report. The Tuesday samples
are considered extra in case we have any issues with a sample and need to run more for
an average of the week. We save these until the results for the two mercury samples are
reported to us, but when we looked for these, they had already been discarded by our lab
technician without him first finding out the results.
All of these issues stemmed from our lab technician not paying attention to details in
sampling. We have worked with him on how to keep track of the requirements from
week to week as well as how to double check each month to make sure that nothing has
been missed. For some reason, he still is not taking the time to look back over his work.
For this as well as other problems that we have seen in the lab, we have proceeded with
disciplinary actions against him in the hopes that he will take his job more seriously. We
P. O. Box 70 • Eden, NC 27289-0070 9 [phone] • Fax [phone]

February 2, 2010
have also laid out steps that he must follow in order to prevent further mistakes as well as
prevent his dismissal in the event that he does not follow the steps laid out for him.
I have also looked at other ways that this could have been prevented and have decided to change
when the results are entered on the monthly report. I receive the information and review the
results to make sure that there are no problems with the lab. The results are then entered onto the
report by our Chief Operator once all of the data has been received for the month. This was how
it was set up by the previous Superintendent and when questioned, the Chief Operator did not
want it changed. Because of this oversight, I am now requiring him to begin entering the data as
it comes in. This way, if something is overlooked, it has a greater chance of being caught before
the month is over.
If you have further suggestions on how to prevent these reoccurrences, I would appreciate the
feedback. I strive to go above and beyond what is required in order to meet the State
requirements as well as protect the environment around me.
Sincerely,
Melinda S. Ward
Wastewater Superintendent
Cc: Brad Corcoran, City Manager
Dennis Asbury, Director of Environmental Services
Ralph Potter, Chief Operator

1 !
1
li
MONITORING REPORT(MR) VIOLATIONS for:
ReportDate: 02/18/10 Page: 1 of 1
PERMIT: N00021373 FAGILI I T: I own oT mayoaan - mayoaan vwvv i r ...........y...... ....._._.. __._...
Limit Violation
MONITORING OUTFALL/
VIOLATION
UNIT OF
CALCULATED
REPORT PPI
LOCATION
PARAMETER
DATE
FREQUENCY
MEASURE
LIMIT
VALUE
VIOLATION TYPE
VIOLATION ACTION
02 -2009 001
Effluent
BOD, 5-Day (20 Deg. C)
02/14/09
3 X week
mg/I
45
83.25
Weekly Average Exceeded
Proceed to NOV
02 001
Effluent
Coliform, Fecal MF, M-FC
02/14/09
3 X week
#/100ml
400
6,000
Weekly Geometric Mean
Proceed to NOV
-2009
Broth,44.5C
Exceeded
03 -2009 001
Effluent
Solids, Total Suspended
03/07/09
3 X week
mg/I
45
67
Weekly Average Exceeded
Proceed to NOV
12 -2009 001
Effluent
Solids, Total Suspended -
12/19/09
3 X week
mg/I
45
87.23
Weekly Average Exceeded
None
Concentration
Monitoring Violation
MONITORING OUTFALL /
REPORT PPI
LOCATION
PARAMETER
VIOLATION
DATE
FREQUENCY
UNIT OF
MEASURE
LIMIT
CALCULATED
VALUE
VIOLATION TYPE
VIOLATION ACTION
09 -2009 001
Effluent
Lead, Total (as Pb)
09/05/09
Weekly
ugh
Frequency Violation
None
10 -2009 001
Effluent
Lead, Total (as Pb)
10/03/09
Weekly
ug/I
Frequency Violation
None
10 -2009 001
Effluent
Selenium, Total (as Se)
10/03/09
Weekly
ugh
Frequency Violation
None
11 -2009 001
Effluent
Selenium, Total (as Se)
11/28/09
Weekly
ug/I
Frequency Violation
None
05 -2009 001
Effluent
Silver, Total (as Ag)
05/31/09
2 X month
ug/I
Frequency Violation
None
08 -2009 001
Effluent
Silver, Total (as Ag)
08/31/09
2 X month
ug/I
Frequency Violation
None

Permit Enforcement History by Owner
02/18/10
1
Owner: Town of Mayodan
Facility: Mayodan VVVVTP
Permit: NCO021873
Region: Winston-Salem
Penalty
Assessment penalty
Case Number MR Approved Amount
County: Rockingham
Enforcement
Costs Damages
Remission
Request
Received
Enf Conf
Held
Enf
Remission
Amount
EMC
Hearing
Held
EMC OAH Collection
Remission Remission Memo Sent
Amount Amount to AGO Total Paid
Balance Due
Has
Pmt
Plan
Case
Closed
LV-1998-0179 10/19/98
$250
$49.00
$.00
11/02/98
12/08/98
$.00
$299.00
$.00
No
02/01/99
LV-1999-0060 02/11/99
$750
$76.00
$.00
03/05/99
03/31/99
$.00
$826.00
$.00
No
05/07/99
LV-2000-0045 02/18/00
$1.500
$73.00
$.00
03/17/00
01/23/01
$.00
$1,573.00
$.00
No
03/13/01
LV-2000-0179 06/02/00
$250
$73.00
$.00
05/10/01
$323.00
$.00
No
07/02/01
LV-2000-0343 08/28/00
$2,000
$73.00
$.00
09/12/00
10/04/00
$.00
05/10/01
$2,073.00
$.00
No
06/29/01
LV-2002-0552 11/14/02
$250
$99.00
12/09/02
02/05/03
$.00
$349.00
$.00
No
05/02/03
LV-2003-0021 01/15/03
$250
$99.00
02/05/03
04/02/03
$.00
$349.00
$.00
No
05/02/03
LV-2003-0051 01/29/03
$250
$99.00
02/26/03
04/02/03
$.00
$349.00
$.00
No
05/02/03
LV-2004-0004 9-2003 01/07/04
$3,000
$97.00
01/29/04
03/31/04
$.00
$3,097.00
$.00
No
04/23/04
LV-2004-0067 10-2003 05/12/04
$1,000
$97.00
$1,097.00
$.00
No
05/27/04
LV-2004-0594 9-2004 12/08/04
$500
$97.00
$597.00
$.00
No
01/18/05
LV-2005-0025 10-2004 01/10/05
$500
$97.00
$597.00
$.00
No
01/24/05
LV-2005-0128 1-2005 03/29/05
$3,000
$97.00
$3,097.00
$.00
No
04/20/05
LV-2005-0167 2-2005 05/03/05
$500
$97.00
$597.00
$.00
No
05/24/05
LV-2005-0199 3-2005 06/01/05
$625
$97.00
$722.00
$.00
No
06/27/05
LV-2006-0325 6-2006 08/25/06
$350
$104.00
$454.00
$.00
No
09/26/06
LV-2006-0373 7-2006 10/03/06
$350
$104.00
$454.00
$.00
No
11/09/06

Total Cases: 17 $1,528.00
02/18/10
$16,863.00 $.00
Total Penalties: $16,853.00 Total Penalties after remission(s): $16,863.00

PV
MAR 0 3 2010
&nsco,rsale,,
Regional ofnce
W�M M Z
Depwament of &iavWmtwt" Sew ce6
V a 3 tewaterc J wa�Want
March 1, 2010
Coleen H. Sullins
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Dear Ms. Sullins,
This letter is in regards to the provisional section of our NPDES permit, NC0025071, regarding
Mercury. "Section A. (4.) Conditional Monitoring for Mercury: Provisional Limit with weekly
monitoring for Mercury take effect August 1, 2010. If the first 12 months of monitoring data
from the effective date shows no reasonable potential to exceed water quality standards, the
Permittee can petition the Division to remove this requirement, which can be done by letter from
the Division without having to reopen the permit. This does not effect the pretreatment
monitoring requirements."
Our permit became effective February 1, 2009, so we began monitoring for Mercury at this time.
So far, we have collected 13 months of data to share with your office and are continuing to
monitor twice a month until this is removed or goes into effect in August. We feel that this is
sufficient enough data to prove that our plant shows no reasonable potential for exceeding water
quality standards at this time. Therefore, I am petitioning your office to remove this requirement
for Mercury monitoring during this permit cycle. I understand that we must continue monitoring
quarterly in accordance with our Pretreatment requirements, and that if any data shows results
higher than the current limit, we may be required to resume monitoring.
If more information is needed, please feel free to contact me anytime at extension 130.
Sincerely,
Melinda S. Ward
Wastewater Superintendent
Attachment
Cc: Winston Salem Regional Office
Brad Corcoran, City Manager
Dennis Asbury, Director of Environmental Services
P. O. Boa 70 • Eden, NC 27289-0070 0 [phone] • Fax [phone]

PV
Date
Mebane Bridge WWTP Mercury Results
Result ng/L
2/2/2009
<200
2/9/2009
<200
2/16/2009
<200
2/23/2009
<210
2/25/2009
<200
3/2/2009
<200
3/4/2009
<200
3/9/2009
<200
3/10/2009
<200
3/16/2009
<200
4/6/2009
<200
4/13/2009
<200
5/4/2009
<200
5/11/2009
<200
6/2/2009
<200
6/8/2009
<200
7/6/2009
<200
7/13/2009
<200
8/3/2009
<200
8/10/2009
<200
9/9/2009
<200
9/15/2009
<200
10/7/2009
<200
10/12/2009
<200
11/2/2009
<200
11/9/2009
<200
11/30/2009
<200
12/8/2009
<200
1/5/2009
<200
1/12/2009
<200
2/1/2009
<200
2/8/2009
<200
* Sample analyzed twice and this is the average.
The first sample for December was mistakenly taken
in November and not caught until January.

pppppr, Ay -a
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natura
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
26 February 2010
City of Eden
Attn: Mr. Brad Corcoran, City Manager
308 East Stadium Drive
Eden, NC 27288
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
NPDES Individual Wastewater Permit NCO025071
Mebane Bridge Wastewater Treatment Plant
Rockingham County
Dear Mr. Corcoran:
Resources
Dee Freeman
Secretary
1. Ron Boone, of the Winston-Salem Regional Office (WSRO) of the NC Division of Water
Quality (DWQ or the Division), conducted a compliance evaluation inspection (CEI) of the
Mebane Bridge Wastewater Treatment Plant on 17 February 2010. The Operator in
Responsible Charge (ORC) of the Mebane Bridge facility, Ms. Melinda Ward was present for
the inspection. Her assistance and cooperation in setting up and facilitating the inspection is
greatly appreciated. Inspection checklists are attached for the city's records.
General Information
2. The plant is located at 191 Mebane Bridge Road, Eden, Rockingham County, NC. The permit
authorizes the city to operate this 13.5 MGD plant, which consists of a flow meter, bar screens,
grit separator, extended aeration basins, secondary clarifiers, chlorination facilities,
dechlorination, aerobic digestion, dissolved air floatation (DAF), sludge lagoons, and polymer
addition. Some changes have taken place at the plant however; the DAF units are no longer in
use and a sludge press has been added. The permit authorizes the city to discharge treated
effluent from the plant to the Dan River, this section of which is currently classified as WS-IV
(water supply) waters in the Roanoke River Basin.
Site Review
3. The plant is very well operated and managed; it was very clean and well maintained at the time
of the inspection. The following items were noted:
a. The influent flow is used for reporting. The composite samples for the influent do not
fully meet permit requirements but are considered sufficient at this time.
b. The grit chamber is currently down for repairs but is expected to be placed back in
service soon.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, Winston-Salem Regional Office
Location: 585 Waughtown St. Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107 One
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 NorthCarolina
Internet: www,ncwaterquality.org
/ vaturalty
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

City of Eden
Attn: Mr. Brad Corcoran, City Manager
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Mebane Bridge Wastewater Treatment Plant, NCO025071
26 February 2010
Page 2 of 3
C. Only one of the two aeration basins is currently in use. The mixed liquor appeared
healthy and well managed. There is a new solar powered mixer that Ms. Ward said has
been quite effective. There are bar screens on the effluent of each basin that Ms. Ward
is considering removing from service because the plant receives relatively little fiber
from the textile industry now, which was the primary reason for the screens.
d. The secondary clarifiers have recently undergone major repairs to replace their baffles
and weirs and do other general maintenance and repairs inside the clarifiers. The
condition of the clarifiers was greatly improved from last year's inspection.
e. The plant effluent was very clear and of high quality at the time of the inspection.
f. As was noted during last year's inspection, the northern wall of the aerated digester had
a catastrophic failure many years ago. At that time, an "expedient repair" was made to
get the unit back into service. That repair is still there and although it still appears to be
structurally sound, the city should consider a more appropriate permanent repair.
g. The northern sludge lagoon appears to be in good condition. The southern lagoon
however, is in a slightly worse state of disrepair. Ms. Ward also mentioned removing
this unit from service and inquired as to what special requirements there would be from
DWQ in doing so. There would be no special requirements or permits from this office
(Surface Water Protection (SWP)), however the city needs to notify DWQ's Aquifer
Protection Section (APS) to coordinate and permit the proper closure of this sludge
lagoon. Please contact Sherry Knight at 336-771-5000 to initiate this process.
h. The city just recently finished construction on a new biosolids facility at the plant. The
facility consists of one sludge press, storage tank, and sludge cake storage facility.
i. The actual outfall could not be reached during the inspection due to extremely damp
and muddy conditions. However, a distant visual observation showed the right-of-way
to the outfall to be clear and accessible.
Documentation Review
4. The following documentation was reviewed:
a. Laboratory records, both in-house and contract, were reviewed. All records were
complete, accurate, well organized and available for review. At least five years worth of
records are kept on file. Laboratory records matched discharge monitoring reports and
no transcription or other errors were noted. The city has a current field laboratory
certification for residual chlorine, conductivity, dissolved oxygen, pH and temperature.
All laboratory chains of custody were also complete, well organized and available for
review.
b. Operation and maintenance records were also complete, current well organized and
available for review.
C. An operator visitation log is also kept. It is complete and current.
d. An annual compliance report for the period 07/01/2008 through 06/30/2009 was
received by the Division on 09/14/2009 and is on file.
e. The plant is currently operated 24/7.
f. Ms. Ward and Ralph Potter, backup ORC, have current appropriate certifications to
enable them to operate the plant.
g. The plant had only one limit violation over the previous twelve months. This was a pH
violation in October 2009 in which the effluent measured 5.4 standard units, which is

1pP PPP_
d Corcoran, City Manager
mpliance Evaluation Inspection
Mebane Bridge Wastewater Treatment Plant, NCO025071
26 February 2010
Page 3 of 3
approximately 10 percent below the lower limit for pH on the effluent. DWQ took no
action on this violation.
5. No written reply to this letter is required. Please continue to help the Division to protect waters
of the State through your continued efforts to comply with all conditions of NC0025071. If you
have any questions or concerns regarding the inspection or this letter, please contact me or
Mr. Boone at 336-771-5000.
Sincerely,
Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Winston-Salem Region
Division of Water Quality
Attachments:
1. Inspection Checklist NC0025071
Cc: WSRO/SWP
NPDES West Unit
Central Files

P F7
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Form Approved.
EPA Washington, D.C. 20460
OMB No. 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 I NI 2 15I 31 NCO025071 111 121 10/02/17 117 18LCI 19I SI 20I
J 1=
Remarks
21111111111111111111111111 1111 IIII IIII IIII II I I 11I6
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA --------------------------- Reserved ----------------------
67I 169 701 I 711 I 721 NJ 73I I 174 751 I I I I I 11 80
�__t__I
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
Entry Time/Date
Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
Mebane Bridge WWTP
09:00 AM 10/02/17
09/02/01
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
191 Mebane Bridge Rd
Eden NC 27288
12:00 PM 10/02/17
12/04/30
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
Melinda Ward//336-627-1009 ext 130/3366279968
Melinda Sessoms Ward/ORC/336-627-1009/
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Dennis G Asbury,308 E Stadium Dr Eden NC
272883299/Director/336-627-2110/3366233933 No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit ■ Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Program 0 Sludge Handling Disposal Facility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Waters
Laboratory
Section D: Summary of Find in/Comments Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Ron Boone WSRO WQ//704-663-1699 Ext.2202/
D .2-12 ���b/ e
-_9
Signature of Mana ent Q A Review Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page # 1

NPDES
yr/mo/day
31 NCO025071 111 121
10/02/17 1
17
Inspection Type
18' _ f
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
Please refer to the attached inspection summary letter.
Page # 2

Permit: NC0025071 Owner -Facility: Mebane Bridge WWTP
Inspection Date: 02/17/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Flow Measurement - Influent Yes No NA NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting? ■ 0 ❑ 0
Is flow meter calibrated annually? ❑ ■ 0
Is the flow meter operational? ■ p ❑ ❑
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter? ■ Q
Comment: Meter is calibrated quarterly. Please refer to the attached inspection
summary letter.
Flow Measurement - Effluent Yes No NA NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting? Q ■ ❑
Is flow meter calibrated annually? ❑ ■ 0 0
Is the flow meter operational? ■ 0
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter? n n n ■
Comment: Meter is calibrated quarterly. Please refer to the attached inspection
summary letter.
Bar Screens Yes No NA NE
Type Of bar screen
a.Manual
b.Mechanical ■
Are the bars adequately screening debris? ■ ❑ Q
Is the screen free of excessive debris? ■ ❑ Q
Is disposal of screening in compliance? ■ Q 0
Is the unit in good condition? ■ I] D 0
Comment: Please refer to the attached inspection summary letter.
Type of grit removal
a.Manual
b.Mechanical ■
Is the grit free of excessive organic matter? ❑ 0 I] ■
Is the grit free of excessive odor? ❑ Q O ■
# Is disposal of grit in compliance? ■ ❑ ❑
Comment: Grit removal inoperable at the time of the inspection; expected to be back
in service soon. Please refer to the attached inspection summary letter.
Page # 3

Permit: NCO025071
Inspection Date: 02/17/2010
Owner - Facility: Mebane Bridge WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Aeration Basins
Yes
No NA
NE
Mode of operation
Ext.
Air
Type of aeration system
Surface
Is the basin free of dead spots?
■
❑ 0
Are surface aerators and mixers operational?
■
Q Q
0
Are the diffusers operational?
❑
Q ■
Q
Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process?
■
n O
n
Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface?
■
n 0
n
Is the DO level acceptable?
n
n n
■
Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/1)
❑
❑ Q
■
Comment: Please refer to the attached inspection summary letter.
Secondary Clarifier
Yes
No NA
NE
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater?
■
n n
n
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier?
■
n Q
n
Are weirs level?
■
n n
n
Is the site free of weir blockage?
■
n n
n
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting?
■
n n
n
Is scum removal adequate?
■
Q 0
Q
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge?
■
Q Q
Q
Is the drive unit operational?
■
Q Q
0
Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)?
■
❑ 0
Q
Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc?
■
n n
n
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately'/. of the sidewall depth)
■
n n
n
Comment: Please refer to the attached inspection summary letter.
Pumps-RAS-WAS
Yes
No NA NE
Are pumps in place?
■
Q Q
0
Are pumps operational?
■
❑ 0
Q
Are there adequate spare parts and supplies on site?
■
n n
0
Comment: Please refer to the attached inspection summary letter.
Disinfection -Gas
Yes
No NA NE
Are cylinders secured adequately?
■ n 00
Page # 4

PPPP7,1,t-00025071 Owner - Facility: Mebane Bridge WWTP
Inspection Date: 02/17/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Disinfection -Gas
Yes
No
NA
NE
Are cylinders protected from direct sunlight?
■
❑
❑
n
Is there adequate reserve supply of disinfectant?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the level of chlorine residual acceptable?
n
❑
❑
■
Is the contact chamber free of growth, or sludge buildup?
■
n
❑
❑
Is there chlorine residual prior to de -chlorination?
❑
❑
❑
■
Does the Stationary Source have more than 2500 Ibs of Chlorine (CAS No. 7782-50-5)?
n
❑
❑
■
If yes, then is there a Risk Management Plan on site?
■
❑
❑
❑
If yes, then what is the EPA twelve digit ID Number? (1000 - )
If yes, then when was the RMP last updated?
06/01/2009
Comment: Please refer to the attached inspection summary letter.
De -chlorination
Yes
No
NA
NE
Type of system ?
Liquid
Is the feed ratio proportional to chlorine amount (1 to 1)?
❑
n
❑
■
Is storage appropriate for cylinders?
n
n
■
❑
# Is de -chlorination substance stored away from chlorine containers?
■
n
❑
n
Are the tablets the proper size and type?
❑
❑
■
n
Comment: Please refer to the attached inspection summary letter.
Are tablet de -chlorinators operational?
❑
❑
■
❑
Number of tubes in use?
Comment: Please refer to the attached inspection summary letter.
Effluent Pipe
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained?
■
n
n
n
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris?
n
n
❑
■
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly?
❑
n
■
n
Comment: Outfall could not be accessed during inspection due to extremely wet
conditions but right-of-way to outfall was clear. Please refer to the attached inspection
summary letter.
Aerobic Digester
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is the capacity adequate?
■
❑
0
n
Is the mixing adequate?
■
n
❑
❑
Page # 5

Permit: NC0025071
Inspection Date: 02/17/2010
Owner - Facility: Mebane Bridge WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Aerobic Digester
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is the site free of excessive foaming in the tank?
■
n
n
n
# Is the odor acceptable?
■
n
n
n
# Is tankage available for properly waste sludge?
■
n
n
n
Comment: Please refer to the attached inspection summary letter.
Solids Handling Equipment
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is the equipment operational?
■
n
n
n
Is the chemical feed equipment operational?
■
n
n
n
Is storage adequate?
■
❑
n
n
Is the site free of high level of solids in filtrate from filter presses or vacuum filters?
■
n
n
n
Is the site free of sludge buildup on belts and/or rollers of filter press?
■
n
n
n
Is the site free of excessive moisture in belt filter press sludge cake?
■
n
n
n
The facility has an approved sludge management plan?
n
❑
n
■
Comment: Please refer to the attached inspection summary letter.
r__J
Yes
No
NA NE
Is containment adequate?
■
n n
n
Is storage adequate?
■
n n
n
Are backup pumps available?
■
n n
n
Is the site free of excessive leaking?
■
n n
n
Comment: Please refer to the attached inspection summary letter.
Drying Beds
Yes
No NA
NE
Is there adequate drying bed space?
n
n ■
n
Is the sludge distribution on drying beds appropriate?
n
n ■
n
Are the drying beds free of vegetation?
n
n ■
n
# Is the site free of dry sludge remaining in beds?
n
n ■
Cl
Is the site free of stockpiled sludge?
n
n ■
n
Is the filtrate from sludge drying beds returned to the front of the plant?
n
n ■
n
# Is the sludge disposed of through county landfill?
n
n ■
n
# Is the sludge land applied?
n
n ■
n
(Vacuum filters) Is polymer mixing adequate?
n
n ■
n
Page # 6

Permit: NC0025071
Inspection Date: 02117/2010
Owner - Facility: Mebane Bridge WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Drying Beds
Yes
No
NA
NE
Comment: Drying beds are inoperable; only used as needed. Please refer to the
attached inspection summary letter.
Lagoons
Yes
No
NA
NE
Type of lagoons?
# Number of lagoons in operation at time of visit?
2
Are lagoons operated in?
Parallel
# Is a re -circulation line present?
n
■
❑
❑
Is lagoon free of excessive floating materials?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Are baffles between ponds or effluent baffles adjustable?
n
Cl
■
❑
Are dike slopes clear of woody vegetation?
■
❑
n
❑
Are weeds controlled around the edge of the lagoon?
■
n
n
n
Are dikes free of seepage?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are dikes free of erosion?
❑
■
❑
❑
Are dikes free of burrowing animals?
n
E
n
n
# Has the sludge blanket in the lagoon (s) been measured periodically in multiple locations?
❑
❑
■
❑
# If excessive algae is present, has barley straw been used to help control the growth?
❑
Cl
■
❑
Is the lagoon surface free of weeds?
■
n
❑
❑
Is the lagoon free of short circuiting?
n
n
n
Comment: These are sludge holding lagoons where the sludge is stored prior to
removal or processing through the new sludge press facility. Please refer to the
attached inspection summary letter.
Operations & Maintenance
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping?
■
n
n
n
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable Solids, pH, DO, Sludge
■
❑
❑
❑
Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment: City has made numerous improvements to the plant since last inspection,
most notably all four clarifiers have been completely drawn down and repaired and
maintained. The weirs and baffles have been replaced completely in all four clarifiers.
Also, the sludge press facility is complete and one aeration basin has been removed
from service. A new solar mixer has been installed in the basin and mixed liquor looks
good. Please refer to the attached inspection summary letter.
Laboratory Yes No NA NE
Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Page # 7

Permit: NCO025071 Owner - Facility: Mebane Bridge WWTP
Inspection Date: 02/17/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Laboratory Yes No NA NE
Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters) performed by a certified lab? ■ ❑ ❑ Q
# Is the facility using a contract lab? ■ Cl Q Q
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)? ■ Q 0 0
Incubator (Fecal Coliform) set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/- 0.2 degrees? ❑ Q ❑ ■
Incubator (BOD) set to 20.0 degrees Celsius +/- 1.0 degrees? 0 ❑ Q ■
Comment: The city has a current field laboratory certification for total residual chlorine,
conductivity, dissolved oxygen, pH, and temperature. They also just recently were
certified to run total suspended solids. They use a contract laboratory for all other
parameters. Please refer to the attached inspection summary letter.
Influent Sampling
Yes
No
NA
NE
# Is composite sampling flow proportional?
❑
■
Q
Is sample collected above side streams?
■
❑
❑
Q
Is proper volume collected?
■
Is the tubing clean?
■
n
C1
n
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)?
■
n
n
n
Is sampling performed according to the permit?
■
n
n
n
Comment: Please refer to the attached inspection summary letter.
Effluent Sampling
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is composite sampling flow proportional?
0
■
n
n
Is sample collected below all treatment units?
■
O
0
Q
Is proper volume collected?
■
Is the tubing clean?
■
n
n
n
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)?
■
Q
❑
❑
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type representative)? ■ Q U U
Comment: Please refer to the attached inspection summary letter.
Upstream / Downstream Sampling Yes No NA NE
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type, and sampling location)? ■ ❑ ❑ Q
Comment: Please refer to the attached inspection summary letter.
Ywc Nn NO NF
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new application? ❑ Q ■
Is the facility as described in the permit? ❑ ■ ❑ f]
Page # 8

mpppppp�
Permit: NC0025071
Owner - Facility: Mebane Bridge WWTP
Inspection Date: 02/17/2010
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit
Yes
No
NA
NE
# Are there any special conditions for the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
MOOD
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment: Plant description needs to be updated with several changes that have
occurred over the years but nothing that cannot wait till permit renewal. Please refer to
the attached inspection summary letter.
Record Keeping
Yes
No
NA
NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
■
❑
❑
Cl
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the chain -of -custody complete?
■
❑
❑
❑
Dates, times and location of sampling
■
Name of individual performing the sampling
■
Results of analysis and calibration
■
Dates of analysis
■
Name of person performing analyses
■
Transported COCs
■
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters?
■
❑
❑
❑
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ?
■
❑
❑
❑
(If the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator on each shift?
■
n
❑
❑
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site?
■
❑
❑
❑
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment: Please refer to the attached inspection summary letter
Page # 9

C"_ q q men
Wa3tematen J watment J taut
February 2, 2010
Ron Boone
NC DENR Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Quality, Surface Water Protection
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Mr. Boone,
For the month of December, we were noncompliant for copper and mercury due to one of
the two samples for each not being collected and analyzed. I am not sure why the copper
sample was not sent in. We usually send this sample off the first and second Wednesday
of the month. The first Wednesday, we analyzed total phosphorus and total nitrogen and
copper was listed at the bottom for copper, but the sample was never collected or listed at
the top with the list of analysis. Our lab technician has been preprinting the chain of
custodies so that he won't forget what is required each week, but he apparently used the
wrong chain. I would like for him to write these out for each day instead of preprinting
them so that he has to double check the requirements for each week, but I haven't
decided when to implement this due to other problems we are experiencing with him.
For mercury, our lab technician usually collects these samples on the first and third
Mondays and Tuesdays. On November 30, he collected the first sample and tried to
report it for the first sample of December. He sent the sample off the following week and
never realized that the November date would not work for December. Due to this, we
have amended the November DMR to reflect this extra mercury. We did not catch this
mistake until early in January when we were preparing our report. The Tuesday samples
are considered extra in case we have any issues with a sample and need to run more for
an average of the week. We save these until the results for the two mercury samples are
reported to us, but when we looked for these, they had already been discarded by our lab
technician without him first finding out the results.
All of these issues stemmed from our lab technician not paying attention to details in
sampling. We have worked with him on how to keep track of the requirements from
week to week as well as how to double check each month to make sure that nothing has
been missed. For some reason, he still is not taking the time to look back over his work.
For this as well as other problems that we have seen in the lab, we have proceeded with
disciplinary actions against him in the hopes that he will take his job more seriously. We
P. O. Box 70 • Eden, NC 27289-0070 • [phone] • Fax [phone]

Cit* of Edw
DepaWment of Ef SP1lUtm
W as kwaten J watrnent J eani
have also laid out steps that he must follow in order to prevent further mistakes as well as
prevent his dismissal in the event that he does not follow the steps laid out for him.
I have also looked at other ways that this could have been prevented and have decided to
change when the results are entered on the monthly report. I receive the information and
review the results to make sure that there are no problems with the lab. The results are
then entered onto the report by our Chief Operator once all of the data has been received
for the month. This was how it was set up by the previous Superintendent and when
questioned, the Chief Operator did not want it changed. Because of this oversight, I am
now requiring him to begin entering the data as it comes in. This way, if something is
overlooked, it has a greater chance of being caught before the month is over.
If you have further suggestions on how to prevent these reoccurrences, I would appreciate
the feedback. I strive to go above and beyond what is required in order to meet the State
requirements as well as protect the environment around me.
Sincerely,
Melinda S. Ward
Wastewater Superintendent
Cc: Brad Corcoran, City Manager
Dennis Asbury, Director of Environmental Services
Ralph Potter, Chief Operator
P. O. Box 70 • Eden, NC 27289-0070 • [phone] • Fax [phone]

Pp�
EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Owner: City of Eden Facility: Mebane Bridge WWTP
PARAMETER
MONTHS
LIMITS
Permit Number: NCO025071 Outfall : 001
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
PCs
Description Code
J
A
N
F
VI
A
P
R
M
A
Y
J
U
N
A
U
S
E
P
O
C
T
N
O
V
E
Monthly Average or
Geometric Mean
Quarterly Average
Weekly Average or
Geometric Mean
Daily Minimum
Dail Maximum
y
Measurement
Frequency
Sample
Type
Sample
Location
Temperature, Water Deg. 00010
5 X week
Grab
E
Centigrade
Temperature, Water Deg. 00010
X
X
Y
X
X
X
X
X
Weekly
Grab
D,U
Centigrade
Temperature, Water Deg. 00010
X
X
X
X
3 X week
Grab
D,U
Centigrade
Color, Spectrophoto-Metric Filter - 00083
See Permit
Grab
E
ADMI
30( admi unit
Color, Spectrophoto-Metric Filter - 00083
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Weekly
Grab
D,U
ADMI
Color, Spectrophoto-Metric Filter - 00083
X
X
X
X
3 X week
Grab
D,U
ADMI
Conductivity 00094
X
X
y
X
X
X
X
X
Weekly
Grab
D,U
Conductivity 00094
X
X
X
X
3 X week
Grab
D,U
DO, Oxygen, Dissolved 00300
5 X week
Grab
E
DO, Oxygen, Dissolved 00300
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Weekly
Grab
D,U
DO, Oxygen, Dissolved 00300
X
X
X
X
3 X week
Grab
D,U
pH 00400
6 sU
5 X week
Grab
E
su
pH 00400
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Weekly
Grab
D,U
pH 00400
X
X
X
X
3 X week
Grab
D,U
Date: 02/03/10 Page

EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Owner: City of Eden Facility: Mebane Bridge WWTP
Permit Number: NCO029071 Outfall : 001
RARAMFTER MONTHS LIMITS MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
PCS
Description Code
J
A
N
F
M
A
P
R
M
A
Y
J
U
N
J
A
S
E
P
O
C
T
N
O
V
D
Monthly Average or
Geometric Mean
Quarterly Average
Weekly Average or
Geometric Mean
Daily Minimum
Daily Maximum
Measurement
Frequency
Sample
Type
Sample
Location
Copper, Total (as Cu) 01042
2 X month
Composite
C
Zinc, Total (as Zn) 01092
X
X
X
Quarterly
Composite
E
Coliform, Fecal MF, M-FC 31616
200 #/100ml
400#/100ml
5 X week
Grab
E
Broth,44.5C
Flow, in conduit or thru treatment 50050
13 5 mgd
Continuous
Recorder
E
plant
Chlorine, Total Residual 50060
5 X week
Grab
E
2! ug/I
BOD, 5-Day (20 Deg. C) - C0310
30 mg/I
45mg/l
5 X week
Composite
E.1
Concentration
Solids, Total Suspended - C0530
30 mg/I
45mgil
5 X week
Composite
EI
Concentration
Nitrogen, Total (as N) - C0600
Monthly
Composite
E
Concentration
Nitrogen, Ammonia Total (as N) - C0610
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
14.8 mg/1
35mg/1
5 X week
Composite
E
Concentration
Nitrogen, Ammonia Total (as N) - C0610
X
X
x
X
X
3 X week
Composite
E
Concentration
Phosphorus, Total (as P) - C0665
Monthly
Composite
E
Concentration
Mercury, Total (asHg) - COMER
224ny/1
Weekly
Composite
E
Concentration
Mercury, Total (asHg) - COMER
2 X month
Composite
E
Concentration
Annual Pollutant Scan 1126 NC01
Annually
Grab
E
parameters)
Date: 02/03/10 Page

EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Owner: City of Eden Facility: Mebane Bridge WWTP
PARAMETER
P/f STAIRE: 7Day Cnr
Cenodaphnia
MONTHS
G133"d X X X X
LIMITS
Permit Number: NCO025071 Outfall : 001
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
D �nCer'.y Composite f-
Date: 02/03/10 Page 3

EFFLUENT
NPDES PERMIT NO. NCO025071 DISCHARGE NO. 001 MONTH November YEAR 2009
FACILITY NAME Mebane Bridge Wastewater Treatment Plant CLASS IV COUNTY Rockingham
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE (ORC) Melinda Ward GRADE IV PHONE [phone] Ext 130
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES (1) Mebane Bridge WWTP (2) Pace Analytical
CHECK BOX IF ORC HAS CHANGED 1..� PERSON(S) COLLECTING SAMPLES Operators
Mail ORIGINAL and ONE COPY to:
ATTN: CENTRAL FILES X
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY (SIGNATURE OF OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE) DATE
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER BY THIS SIGNATURE, I CERTIFY THAT THE REPORT IS
RALEIGH, NC 27699-1617 ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
W
0
E
I-Y
> ii
Q c
o g
ro
Oa
Yy
in
Oc
m
ga.
m
o
m
h
Oc
O
50050 00010
00400
50060
00310
00610 1
00530
31616
00300
00600 1
00665
00082 1 00083 1 01077 1 01042
ENTER PARAMETER CODE ABOVE
NAME AND UNITS BELOW
7y
� �
W
"
J F W
Q q ~
O ¢
a
W
3
O
x
Q
o
'�
O MG/L
U
N
0
m
Z
W
00
D:
F
Q
O
f
Q
o
W
2
W W
a�
N W
a
Or
,-.
O m
LL2
JO
J d
a°
w 0
--
Z
W
}
x
0
;
O
rn
Zp
0
O
w
J
r
O
F-
co
=
J0
FO
O
a
S
m
p
U
7
Q
°
U
j
J
W
o
O
U
HRS
HRS
Y/B/N
MGD
'C
UNITS
_„-;'._.,..`-
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
#100ML
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
ADMI JADMI
MG/L
MG/L
0700
24
7.765
2 107001
24
Y
3.820
16
6.8
21
6.2
0.7
26.0
2
8.3
310700
1
24
Y
3.304
15
6.5
10
2.7
<0.1
13.0
2
8.4
4 107001
24
Y
3.107
14
6.6
16
2.5
0.1
12.6
1
8.9
8.0
0.29
<0.005
0.028
:5 :
0700 1
24
Y
2.881
15
6.5
< 10
2.7
11.7
<1
8.7
6 107001
24
Y
2.791
13
6.4
< 10
3.0
10.0
1
8.8
7:
0700 1
24
2.632
8 107001
24
2.366
9.
07001
24
Y
2.992
14
6.4
< 10
2.9
<0.1
10.5
1
8.6
10
07001
24
Y
6.295
16
6.5
18
3.0
0.3
11.6
9
8.4
0.035
11
07001
24
18.784
12
07001
24
Y
15.585
12
6.5
< 10
15.6
1.0
29.8
460
8.7
13:
07001
24
Y
9.540
14
6.6
< 10
6.3
17.1
19
8.9
14
07001
24
5.212
15
07001
24
4.200
16
07001
24
Y
4.263
15
6.6
< 10
<2.0
<0.1
10.6
1
8.8
171
07001
24
1 Y
3.659
16
6.6
< 10
3.0
<0.1
11.8
<1
8.9
18
07001
24
Y
3.919
14
6.5
< 10
2.4
<0.1
9.4
<1
9.0
19
07001
24
Y
3.689
15
6.6
< 10
3.3
9.6
3
8.8
20
0700
24
Y
3.443
16
6.3
J < 10
2.6
10.6
<1
9.3
21:
0700
24
3.040
22
0700
24
3.531
23.
0700
24
Y
7.169
14
6.6
12
<2.0
<0.1
6.6
26
9.4
24
0700
24
Y
5.299
15
6.8
< 10
5.2
0.7
11.4
40
8.9
25.
0700
24
B
4.051
15
6.7
18
3.0
<0.1
6.0
16
9.0
26.0700
24
3.108
27:
0700
24
3.004
2810700
24
3.042
29
0700
24
2.996
30
0700
24
Y
3.449
13
6.7
< 10
3.5
<0.1
14.9
21
8.9
31
0700
24
AVERAGE
4.965
14
<13
<4.1
<0.4
12.9
<5
8.8
8.0
0.29
1 <0.005
0.032
1:8 784:::
1 ..
MINIMUM
2.365
12
6.3
<10
<2
0.1
5.6
<1
8.3
8.0
0.29
<0.005
0.028
Monthly Limit
13.500
28
30
14.8
30
T266
300
1 300
DEM Form MR -I (01100)

AMENDED EFFLUENT
NPDES PERMIT NO. NCO025071 DISCHARGE NO. 001 MONTH November YEAR 2009
FACILITY NAME Mebane Bridge Wastewater Treatment Plant CLASS IV COUNTY Rockingham
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE (ORC) Melinda Ward GRADE IV PHONE [phone]
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES (1) Mebane Bridge WWTP (2) Pace Analytical
CHECK BOX IF ORC HAS CHANGED PERSON(S) COLLECTING SAMPLES Operators
Mail ORIGINAL and ONE COPY to:
ATTN: CENTRAL FILES
DIV. OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
DEHNR
P.0 BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NC 27626-0535
DEM Form MR -1.1 (1 / 92 )
X
(SIGNATURE OF OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE) DATE
BY THIS SIGNITURE, I CERTIFY THAT THE REPORT IS
ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE

EFFLUENT
NPDES PERMIT NO. NCO025071 DISCHARGE NO. 001 MONTH November YEAR 2009
FACILITY NAME Mebane Bridge Wastewater Treatment Plant CLASS IV COUNTY Rockingham
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE (ORC) Melinda Ward GRADE IV PHONE [phone]
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES (1) Mebane Bridge WWTP (2) Pace Analytical
CHECK BOX IF ORC HAS CHANGED PERSON(S) COLLECTING SAMPLES Operators
Mail ORIGINAL and ONE COPY to:
ATTN: CENTRAL FILES
DIV. OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT X
DEHNR (SIGNATURE OF OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE) DATE
P.0 BOX 29535 BY THIS SIGNATURE, I CERTIFY THAT THE REPORT IS
RALEIGH, NC 27626-0535 ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
-•
—OEM
W1 M-MYsTsTIOMMUers1
1 11
1 ee1
1 1
moremorem
1 11
1 1
1 1
1 11
N. B
ffmcmrzm
/ //
/ 11
a eee
1 1
e of
/ /1
1 1
1 1
e of
—Mom
1 1
UsTeren
UITITIM1re
070
UITITIMa
eee
1 1
UITITIM
1 11
1 1
1 1
1 11
DEM Form MR - 1.1 (1 192 )

NPDES NO: NC0025071
Influent
DISCHARGE NO: 001 MONTH: November YEAR: 2009
FACILITY NAME: Mebane Bridge Wastewater Treatment Plant
COUNTY: Rockingham
lose
Mime
HIN
ME
mmmm
mm
mmmm
I===
MONTHLYAVERAGE
___-_--
MONTHLY MINIMUM
SAMPLE TYPE C or G
DEM Form MR-2 (11/84)

FACILITY NAME:
STREAM
NPDES NO: NCO025071
Mebane Bridge Wastewater Treatment Plant
Dan River
LOCATION: NCSR 1964
Upstream
DISCHARGE NO: 001
Enter Parameter Code above i
Name and Units Below
DEM Form MR-3 (11/84)
MONTH: November YEAR 2009
COUNTY: Rockingham
STREAM: Dan River
LOCATION: Highway 700
Downstream
..
.
.
.

Facility Status: (Please check one of the following)
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies meet permit requirements �X
Compliant
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies do NOT meet permit requirements
Noncompliant
If the facility is noncompliant, please comment on corrective actions being taken in respect to equipment, operation,
maintenance, etc., and a time table for improvements to be made.
Estimated BOD Values: Effluent -11/12 - 0.0 mg/I DO remained for all dilutions set.
Estimated BOD Values: Influent -11/13 & 11/16 - DO usage <2.0mg/I for all dilutions set
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my
inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the
information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant
penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Brad Corcoran , City Manager
Permittee (Please print or type)
Signiture of Permittee**
(Required)
Date
City of Eden PO. Box 70 Eden, NC. 27289-0070 336-623-2110 4/30/2012
Permittee Address Phone Number Permit Exp. Date
00010 Temperature
00076 Turbidity
00080 Color (Pt -Co)
00082 Color (ADMI)
00095 Conductivity
00300 Dissolved Oxygen
00310 BOD5
00340 COD
00400 pH
00530 Total Suspended
Residue
00545 Settleable Matter
00556 Oil & Grease
00600 Total Nitrogen
00610 Ammonia Nitrogen
00625 Total Kjeldhal
Nitrogen
00630 Nitrates/Nitrites
00665 Total Phosphorous
00720 Cyanide
00745 Total Sulfide
00927 Total Magnesium
00929 Total Sodium
00940 Total Chloride
PARAMETER CODES
00951 Total Fluoride 01067 Nickel
01002 Total Arsenic 01077 Silver
01092 Zinc
01027 Cadmium 01105 Aluminum
01032 Hexavalent Chromium
01147 Total Selenium
01034 Chromium
31616 Fecal Coliform
32730 Total Phenolics
01037 Total Colbalt
34235 Benzene
01042 Copper
34481 Toluene
01045 Iron
38260 MBAS
01051 Lead
39516 PCBs
01062 Molybdenum
50050 Flow
50060 Total
Residual
Chlorine
71880 Formaldehyd
71900 Mercury
81551 Xylene
Parameter Code assistance may obtained by calling the Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit at [phone] or by visiting
the Water Quality Section's web site at h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wqs and linking to the Unit's information pages.
Use only units designated in the reporting facilities permit for data reporting.
* ORC must visit facility and document visitation of facility as required per 15A NCAC 8A .0202 (b) (5) (B).
** If signed by other than the permittee, delegation of signatory authority must be on file with the state per 15A NCAC 2B .0506 (b)
(2) (D)•

O
0
wJojlloo jeoa:1 o
N
£HN
J
009
M
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
r
O
O
O
CD
C7
00
lenpisaki Zlo
M
0
0
w
v
v
v
CDe-
ao
v
v
v
v
v
e-
v
v
e-
v
C6
v
N
N
N
M
M
h
O
to
le
ti
C)
O
O
CD
M
It
CD
C)
Q)
m
co
04
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
C6M
a;
06
O
O
CO
tl)
M
W
N
M
W
1*
W
W
I
W)
W)
M
'cr
CO
N
dwal
�-
ORO
M
It
et
In
LO
CD
cD
<D
O
YY
M
CD
OD
Ih
r—
Co
CC)
M
�
Hd
co
co
co
co
C6
C6
co
cc
cc
co
co
co
co
0
6
6
0
0
91"
`n
A�Iv4
�
owll
x
w
N
c7
v
(D
f-
co
Cn
O
: ?
E
31va
N
(h
v
�n
CD
I�
ao
rn
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
M
—

TSS
O
�
chi TVSS
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
60 Min. Settlable
0
3 ORG Color
O
w
o ADJ Color
3
O

Q
o
rn
u.r
=
a
E
0)
ci
O
m
Z
I
0
0
C7
0
8.9
S.0
C
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
ADMI
1
2
6.860
17.800
6.9
3
6.850
18.100
7.7
4
6.920
19.100
7.4
5
7.050
18.800
6.0
6
7.010
17.900
6.4
7
8
9
7.060
18.100
6.8
10
7.100
15.200
6.5
11
12
6.700
16.200
6.7
13
6.710
16.600
7.8
14
15
16
6.850
17.800
7.6
17
6.830
18.300
7.2
18
6.720
17.600
7.2
19
6.570
18.000
6.4
20
6.510
17.800
7.1
21
22
23
6.850
15.700
6.8
24
6.750
15.800
7.1
25
7.010
16.000
7.1
26
27
28
29
301
6.600
16.700
6.8
31
RAGE 7
17
7.0
Imam 7
19
7.8
IMUM 7
15
6.0
imit

a!
OR
ao
m
0o
OR
r�
n
OR
00
0o
cc
W�
v,
rn
OR
ao
LO
rn
v
Hd
<c
co
cc
cc
to
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
to
W
Cc
(6
co
U)
owl l T
NIW 0£
J_
SSAIW
J
SSIW
•O•a
J
dwal
Hd
fN
owll
x
w
g
�
N
M
v
"n
(O
f-
co
O)
O
. X
�
E
alva
N
M
v
(D
f�
ao
O
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
M
—

rn�
w
cn
cn
A
w
cn
A
w
is
w�
m
A
m
cn
cn
CA
cn
Temp
W
t0
N
N
V
C1
A
V
W
V
w
v
rn
m
m
rn
V
V
V
m
rn
rn
rn
rn
A
cn
rn
ca
tr
a>
w
D.O.
Cn
O
O
W
N
W
<n
-+
in
A
N
w
co
W
w
W
A
N
0
N
O
N
N"
O
V
M
CD
N
cn
cn
�
N
AO
O
OD
W
c3i MLSS
O
O
co
W
CJl
O
W
-Al
O
O
OD
O
N
O
01
O
cn
O
W
O
O
O
A
O
A
O
A
O
O
O
w
O
w
O
W
O
O
O
CO
O
O
O
O
MLVSS
v
000
—
o
0
0
'
0
0
0
0o
0
�
0
0
v+
0
�
0
w
0
is
0
i i
0
w
0
c
0
y
0
rn
0
3 30 MIN

3
3
3.
W
W
O
N
CO
N
CO
N
J
PO
M
N
0
N
A
N
W
N
N
N
to(p
O
(O
07
J
Q1
Ln
A
W
N
O
00
J
CD
CT
A
W
N
DATE
c
3
3
m
= Time
CD
rn
v
�4
7
:,4
rn
�p
C/) pH
c
CO
CD
4�
00
�
-�
PO
c
�
o
w
� Temp
co
co
c
c
cn
it
-+
co
D.O.
cc
N
o_ Conductivity
N
O
Oo
w
a)
A
O
n
o ORG Color
o ADJ Color
FECAL
=
U) Time

V
V
V
V
91
W pH
N
W
N
V
c
0
Temp
to
ao
w
o
is
o
0
3
D.O.
w
o
co
�
N
Q
o
rn
N
CDo
�''�
Conductivity
W
N
O
CO
V
(T
c�
3 ORG Color
3 ADJ Color
FECAL

Cover Sheet from
Staff Member to
Regional Supervisor
DMR Review Record
Facility: !�As MabaNt Permit/PipeNo.: Di ,25�7/ Month/Year
ww iP
Monthly Average Violations
Parameter Permit Limit DMR Value % Over Limit
Weekly/Daily Violations
Date Parameter Permit Limitfrvpe DMR Value % Over Limit
io A� �� s, Iy lb L4- z
Monitoring Frequency Violations
Date Parameter Permit Frequency Values Reported # of Violations
Other Violations
ova
2P:r-7
Completed by: Date: �//0
Regional Water Quality
Supervisor Signoff:Aw",
Date:
P�eo� 113, �7,a�

FV
Sewer Collection System Annual Perfor
City of Eden, North Carolin
n"CF.IVED
July 1, 2008 to June 30, 2009 pp
Uv L 7 1009
I. General Information
'� .WATER QUALITY
Facility/System Name: City of Eden, Sewer Collection and Treat`rstem
POINT SOURCE BRANCH
Responsible Entity: City of Eden, Brad Corcoran, City Manager
Person in Charge/ Contact: Collection System and Pump Stations, William Harvey, (— Received
Operator -in -Responsible Charge, 336-627-7783 N.C. Deot. of ENR
Mebane Bridge Wastewater Treatment Plant, Melinda S. Ward,
Operator -in -Responsible Charge, 336-627-1009 SEP 14 2009
Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant, Ralph Potter, Winston-Salem
Operator -in -Responsible Charge, 336-627-1009 Regional office
Applicable Permits: Sewer Collection System — WQC200018
Mebane Bridge Wastewater Treatment Plant — NPDES Permit NCO025071
Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant — NPDES Permit NCO025151
Land Application of Wastewater Residuals — NC Permit W00003035
Description of Collection and Treatment Process:
The collection system consists of 145+ miles of gravity and force main sewer pipelines. The
pipelines are composed of a mixture of clay and ductile iron pipe, ranging in size from 2 to 36 inches.
Age of the sewer pipelines range from new to more than 50 years old. Collection is accomplished by
gravity from homes and businesses until it is necessary to pump from low elevations in force main
sewer lines that transport the sewage to the treatment plants. There are 19 pump stations in the
collection system. These range in size from pumping a few thousand gallons per day to more than
five million gallons a day (MGD). The City has two separate collection drainage areas. The
Northeast section of the city that is primarily domestic sewage is treated at the Dry Creek
Wastewater Treatment Plant (DCWWTP) which has a capacity of 0.5 million gallons a day. The rest
of the city sewer drains, collects or is pumped to the Mebane Bridge Wastewater Treatment Plant
(MBWWTP), which can treat 13.5 million gallons per day.
The treatment plants have treated on average about 0.256 MGD at DCWWTP and 5.161
MGD at MBWWTP. This means that currently the Dry Creek plant operates at about one half of its
permitted capacity and the Mebane Bridge plant operates at less than half. The plants are nearly
identical in their process design with their main difference only being in scale. Each of the plants
has mechanical barscreens to remove larger inert material. Each plant has a grit removal system
following the barscreening. Extended aeration using activated sludge is the next process at each
plant to reduce and remove biochemical oxygen demand. The sludge is separated from treated
water by circular clarifiers. Collected sludge or biosolids are wasted to the aerobic digesters or
returned to the aeration system. Treated water to the effluent leaves the clarifiers and is disinfected
with chlorine and then dechlorinated. The treated effluent is then returned to the Dan River meeting
all State Permit Discharge requirements.
Annual Performance Report Page 1 of 3

FV
II. Maintenance
Collection System
The City of Eden is presently under a Special Order of Consent and has met all requirements
on time to date.
The City has Collection & Distribution field personnel to respond to emergencies in order to
maintain the sewer collection system. Their job is to repair broken lines, installation of new sewer
line, mow and maintain sewer outfall lines, and respond to, rectify and mitigate sewer bypasses.
Personnel are on call nights and weekends year round to respond to emergency problems in the
collection system. The City's 19 pump stations are monitored by (2) Collection & Distribution
Operators 24 hours per day, 7 days per week, by remote telemetry (Mission Communications) and
physically checked on normal workdays by Collection & Distribution personnel for proper operation.
Maintenance crews along with C&D personnel perform scheduled preventative maintenance on
each of these pump stations to protect the equipment and insure long life. An extensive warehouse
of supplies and parts are maintained to address emergency breakdowns and failures in the pump
stations and the sewer lines.
The following was accomplished during fiscal year 2008-2009:
A total of 79 Inflow & Infiltration problems were responded to and repaired.
A total of 213 laterals and sewer mains were responded to and unstopped.
A total of 18.46 miles (97,466') of sewer mains throughout the City of Eden were either
CCTV & or Rodded throughout the City of Eden.
Treatment Plants
Treatment Plant Operators are on duty 24 hours per day, 7 days per week, to insure proper
treatment of all incoming wastewater. They monitor plant equipment and do inspections during each
shift to insure process control and the mechanical operation of the equipment. Maintenance
personnel are available each day to service equipment and are on call nights and weekends for
emergency repairs, if the treatment equipment suffers failure. A large parts inventory is maintained
of the items that have historically been prone to failure.
III. Performance
Collection Svstem Operations
There were 20 events in the past 12 months where raw sewage was overflowed or bypassed
from the gravity collection system to surface waters. Gravity flow/Force Mains pipelines in the
collection system bypassed to surface waters totaled 7,411 gallons. Causes of these bypasses
were blockages from grease, roots entering pipes at taps and pipe joints, and vandalism where
rocks, sticks, boards and other debris were placed in manholes.
Of our 19 pump stations; (4) pump stations had bypassing during the last 12 months in 16
separate events. They were as follows: Bridge Street (4) — 39,796 gallons, Covenant Branch (6) —
125,881 gallons, Meadow Greens (4) — Railroad (2) 1,224 gallons.
When overflows or bypasses occurred, the affected sites were evaluated, disinfected or
receiving streams monitored for environmental impacts as conditions dictated.
Annual Performance Report Page 2 of 3

FV
Treatment Plants Operations
Compliance with North Carolina NPDES (National Pollution Discharge Elimination System)
Permit is based on meeting discharge parameters set forth in the NPDES Permit. This information is
reported monthly to the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources through
self -monitoring reports. The following is a summary of our plant permit compliance for the last 12
months:
Reporting Month
Mebane Bridge Plant
Dry Creek Plant
July 2008
Compliant
Compliant
August 2008
Compliant
Compliant
September 2008
Compliant
Compliant
October 2008
Compliant
Compliant
November 2008
Compliant
Non -Compliant'
December 2008
Compliant
Non-Complian?
January 2009
Compliant
Compliant
February 2009
Compliant
Compliant
March 2009
Compliant
Compliant
April 2009
Compliant
Compliant
May 2009
Compliant
Compliant
June 2009
Compliant
Compliant
' The Dry Creek WWTP was non -compliant for the week for violation of its permitted fecal
coliform limit.
2 The Dry Creek WWTP was non -compliant for the month for failure to collect and analyze
required quarterly samples within the allowed timeframe.
3 The Mebane Bridge WWTP met all limits, but failed to achieve 85% removal of Total
Suspended Solids.
IV. Notification
This report will be submitted to the State Division of Water Quality and be released to the local news
media and posted on the City's internet web site at www.ci.eden.nc.us.
V. Certification
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my
direction of supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel
properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or
persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the
information, the information submitted is, to the best of knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and
complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including
the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violation."
Brad Co ran
Signature of City Manager
,9arLe
Date
Annual Performance Report Page 3 of 3

LEMA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
11 March 2009
Mr. Brad Corcoran, City Manager
City of Eden
308 East Stadium Drive
Eden, NC 27288
SUBJECT: NPDES General Stormwater Permit NCG110000 &
No Exposure Certification NCGNE0580
Mebane Bridge Wastewater Treatment Plant
Rockingham County
Dear Mr. Corcoran:
1. Our office sent you a letter on 31 December 2008 notifying you that the City of Eden needed to apply for an
obtain an NCG110000 NPDES General Stormwater Permit for the city's Mebane Bridge Wastewater
Treatment plant. In response to that correspondence we received a No Exposure Certification (NEC) from
Ms. Melinda Ward, the city's Wastewater Superintendent, on 16 January 2009.
2. As a result of 'Ms. Ward's NEC submittal and a visit to plant by Mr. Ron Boone, of this office, to verify
conditions at the plant, we have determined that there is currently no stormwater point source discharge
from the plant to waters of the State. Consequently, neither the NCG110000 general stormwater permit,.
nor the No Exposure Certification is required by the city for stormwater discharges from the plant.
3. Please bear in mind however, that if conditions at the plant change and a stormwater point source
discharge occurs at a later time, then the city would need to obtain either the general permit or the NEC.
4. Please consider this the Division's official acknowledgement that neither the general permit nor the NEC
are required for the Mebane Bridge Wastewater Treatment Plant, at this time. If you have any questions
regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Boone or me at 336-771-5000.
Sincerely,
Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Winston-Salem Region
Division of Water Quality
Attachments:
BIMS Inspection Checklist
CC: Central Files w/ atchs
WSRO/SWP Files w/ atchs
Melinda Ward, ORC Mebane Bridge Wastewater Treatment Plant
P.O. Box 70 ,
Eden, NC 27289-0070
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, Winston-Salem Regional Office
Location: 585 Waughtown St. Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet www.ncwaterquality.org
ne
NorthCarolina
NatumilY

Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: Facility Status: Active Permit: NCGNE0580 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Rockingham Region: Winston-Salem
Date of Visit: 02/15/2009 Entry Time:08:00 AM Exit Time: 09700 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Mebane Bridae Wastewater Plant Owner Email: dennis.asburvOci.ede
Owner: City of Eden Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: PO Box 70 Eden NC 272890070
. � Physical Address: 204 Mebane Bridge Rd Eden NC 27288
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
Question Areas:
0 Discharges & Stream Impacts
Integrator:
Latitude: Longitude: _
Certified Operator: Melinda Sessoms Ward Operator Certification Number: 991630
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Melinda Ward Phone:
On -site representative Melinda Ward Phone:
Primary Inspector: Ron B Phone: [phone]
Ext.2202
Inspector Signature: Date: --3
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Inspection revealed that there is no SW point source discharge from the plant. Therefore, no SW permit or No Exposure Certification
is required.
Page: 1

x NA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor
Director Secretary
RECEIVED
February 6, 2009 N.C. Dept. of ENk
FEB 2 0 2009
Mr. Stephen B. Corcoran
Winston-Salem
City of Eden
Regional Office
__--
308 East Stadium Drive
Eden, North Carolina 27288
SUBJECT: Authorization to Construct
A to C No. 025071A03
City of Eden
Mebane Bridge W WTP
Biosolids Dewatering Facility — Phase 2
Process, Plumbing, Mechanical, and Electrical Package
Rockingham County
Dear Mr. Corcoran:
A letter of request for an Authorization to Construct was received November 17, 2008, by
the Division, and final plans and specifications for the subject project have been reviewed and
found to be satisfactory. Authorization is hereby granted for the Phase 2 (Process, Plumbing,
Mechanical & Electrical) construction of the Biosolids Dewatering Facility at the existing 13.5
MGD Wastewater Treatment Plant, with discharge of treated wastewater into the Dan River in
the Roanoke Basin. With the completion of Phase 1 (Site Work and Foundation Package, A to C
No. 025071A02) and the Phase 2 Biosolids Dewatering Facility construction projects, the
Biosolids Dewatering Facility will be operational.
This authorization results in no increase in design or permitted capacity and is awarded
for the construction of the following specific modifications:
A biosolids dewatering facility consisting of a 50,000 gallon bolted -steel sludge storage
tank; a 28-foot by 46-foot dewatering building which houses a 350 gpm sludge feed
pump, a 2 meter sludge belt filter press rated at 2,000 pounds/hour, polymer feed system,
and washwater pump; sludge conveyer; a 14,800 ft` dewatering sludge storage shelter;
associated site work and yard piping, in conformity with the project plans, specifications,
and other supporting data subsequently filed and approved by the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources.
This Authorization to Construct is issued in accordance with Part III, Paragraph A of
NPDES Permit No. NCO025071 issued December 23, 2008, and shall be subject to revocation
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 One
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 NorthCarolina
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] \ Customer Service: 1-877.623.6748 / 1
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer bL K` I�tily

Mr. Stephen B. Corcoran
February 6, 2009
Page 2
unless the wastewater treatment facilities are constructed in accordance with the conditions and
limitations specified in Permit No. NC0025701.
The sludge generated from these treatment facilities must be disposed of in accordance
with G.S. 143-215.1 and in a manner approved by the North Carolina Division of Water Quality.
In the event that the facilities fail to perform satisfactorily, including the creation of
nuisance conditions, the Permittee shall take immediate corrective action, including those as may
be required by this Division, such as the construction of additional or replacement wastewater
treatment or disposal facilities.
The Winston-Salem Regional Office, telephone number [phone], shall be notified
at least forty-eight (48) hours in advance of operation of the installed facilities so that an on site
inspection can be made. Such notification to the regional supervisor shall be made during the
normal office hours from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. on Monday through Friday, excluding State
Holidays.
Upon completion of construction and prior to operation of this permitted facility, a
certification must be received from a professional engineer certifying that the permitted facility
has been installed in accordance with the NPDES Permit, this Authorization to Construct and the
approved plans and specifications. Mail the Certification to. Construction Grants & Loans,
DWQ/DENR, 1633 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1633.
Upon classification of the facility by the Certification Commission, the Permittee shall
employ a certified wastewater treatment plant operator to be in responsible charge (ORC) of the
wastewater treatment facilities. The operator must hold a certificate of the type and grade at
least equivalent to or greater than the classification assigned to the wastewater treatment
facilities by the Certification Commission.
The Permittee must also employ a certified back-up operator of the appropriate type and
grade to comply with the conditions of T15A:8G.0202. The ORC of the facility must visit each
Class I facility at least weekly and each Class II, III and W facility at least daily, excluding
weekends and holidays, must properly manage the facility, must document daily operation and
maintenance of the facility, and must comply with all other conditions of T15A:8G.0202.
A copy of the approved plans and specifications shall be maintained on file by the
Permittee for the life of the facility.
During the construction of the proposed additions/modifications, the permittee shall
continue to properly maintain and operate the existing wastewater treatment facilities at all times,
and in such a manner, as necessary to comply with the effluent limits specified in the NPDES
Permit.
You are reminded that it is mandatory for the project to be constructed in accordance
with the North Carolina Sedimentation Pollution Control Act, and when applicable, the North

Mr. Stephen B. Corcoran
February 6, 2009
Page 3
Carolina Dam Safety Act. In addition, the specifications must clearly state what the contractor's
responsibilities shall be in complying with these Acts.
Prior to entering into any contract(s) for construction, the recipient must have obtained all
applicable permits from the State.
Failure to abide by the requirements contained in this Authorization to Construct may
subject the Permittee to an enforcement action by the Division of Water Quality in accordance
with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A to 143-215.6C.
The issuance of this Authorization to Construct does not preclude the Permittee from
complying with any and all statutes, rules, regulations, or ordinances which may be imposed by
other government agencies (local, state, and federal) which have jurisdiction.
One (1) set of approved plans and specifications is being forwarded to you. If you have
any questions or need additional information, please contact Seth Robertson, P.E. at telephone
number [phone].
Sincerely,
6_,6--�oleen H. Sullins
kp:sr
cc: C.V. Brooks, IV, P.E. — Hightill Infrastructure Engineering, P.C., 3804 Park Avenue,
Unit A, Wilmington, NC 28403
Rockingham County Health Department
DWQ, Winston-Salem Regional Office, Surface Water Protection
DWQ, Technical Assistance and Certification Unit
DWQ, Point Source Branch, NPDES Program
Daniel Blaisdell, P.E.
Ken Pohlig, P.E.
Seth Robertson, P.E.
ATC File

City of Eden
Mebane Bridge Road WWTP
Biosolids Dewatering Facility
Phase 2 — Process, Plumbing, Mechanical and Electrical Package
A To C No. 025071 A03
Issued February 6, 2009
Engineer's Certification
I, , as a duly registered Professional Engineer in
the State of North Carolina, having been authorized to. observe (periodically/weekly/full time)
the construction of the Phase 2, Biosolids Dewatering Facility (Process, Plumbing, Mechanical,
and Electrical Package) at the Mebane Bridge Road WWTP, located at 204 Mebane Bridge
Road, south of Eden in Rockingham County for the City of Eden, hereby state that, to the best of
my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the following construction:
A Biosolids dewatering facility consisting of a 50,000 gallon bolted -steel sludge
storage tank; a 28-foot by 46-foot dewatering building which houses a 350 gpm
sludge feed pump, a 2 meter sludge belt filter press rated at 2,000 pounds/hour,
polymer feed system, and washwater pump; sludge conveyer; a 14,800 ft2
dewatering sludge storage shelter; associated site work and yard piping, in
conformity with the project plans, specifications, and other supporting data
subsequently filed and approved by the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources.
I certify that the construction of the above referenced project was observed to be built within
substantial compliance and intent of the approved plans and specifications.
We understand that the Biosolids Dewatering Facility may NOT be operated until both the Phase
1 (Site Work and Foundation Package, A to C No. 025071A02) Engineer Certification and this
Engineer Certification have been completed.
Signature Registration N
Date
Send to: Construction Grants & Loans
DENR/DWQ
1633 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1633

LPIWA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Mr. Stephen B. Corcoran
City of Eden
308 East Stadium Drive
Eden, North Carolina 27288
Dear Mr. Corcoran:
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
February 18, 2009
SUBJECT: City of Eden
Mebane Bridge WWTP
Dee Freeman
Secretary
kECEIVED
N.C. Dept. of E N R
FEB 2 0 2009
Winston-Salem
Regional Office
Biosolids Dewatering Facility — Phase 2
Process, Plumbing, Mechanical, and Electrical Package
A to C No. 025071 A03
Transmittal of Approved Plans and Specifications
Enclosed is a copy of the plans and specifications, which were approved on February 6,
2009. The subject documents have been stamped "approved" for your records. A copy is also
being forwarded to your engineer and to the Winston-Salem Regional Office. The Permittee
should retain these documents for the life of the facility.
Should you have questions regarding this matter, call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
. ° ,%
Seth Robertson, P.E., Supervisor
Design Management Unit
kp: sr
Enclosures
cc: C.V. Brooks, IV, P.E. — Highfill Infrastructure Engineering, P.C., 3804 Park Avenue,
Unit A, Wilmington, NC 28403
Mike Matousek, Kemp, Inc., 2217 Lynmore Drive, Sherrills Ford, NC 28673
Bill Cotter, Synagro, LLC, 1270 Lancaster Highway, Pineville, NC 28134
DWQ Winston-Salem Regional Office
Daniel Blaisdell, P.E.
Ken Pohlig, P.E.
ATC File
1633 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1633 One
Location: 2728 Capital Blvd. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 NorthCal'olina
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] \ Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org �aturall�
An Equal opportunity \ Affirmative Acton Employer

TFEB
EIVED
Ark
oL of ENRF
_ 12009
NCDENR Winston-Salem i
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Region,,, °"�
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
February 6, 2009
Mr. Stephen B. Corcoran
City of Eden
308 East Stadium Drive
Eden, North Carolina 27288
SUBJECT: Authorization to Construct
A to C No. 025071 A03
City of Eden
Mebane Bridge WWTP
Biosolids Dewatering Facility — Phase 2
Process, Plumbing, Mechanical, and Electrical Package
Rockingham County
Dear Mr. Corcoran:
A letter of request for an Authorization to Construct was received November 17, 2008, by
the Division, and final plans and specifications for the subject project have been reviewed and
found to be satisfactory. Authorization is hereby granted for the Phase 2 (Process, Plumbing,
Mechanical & Electrical) construction of the Biosolids Dewatering Facility at the existing 13.5
MGD Wastewater Treatment Plant, with discharge of treated wastewater into the Dan River in
the Roanoke Basin. With the completion of Phase 1 (Site Work and Foundation Package, A to C
No. 025071A02) and the Phase 2 Biosolids Dewatering Facility construction projects, the
Biosolids Dewatering Facility will be operational.
This authorization results in no increase in design or permitted capacity and is awarded
for the construction of the following specific modifications:
A biosolids dewatering facility consisting of a 50,000 gallon bolted -steel sludge storage
tank; a 28-foot by 46-foot dewatering building which houses a 350 gpm sludge feed
pump, a 2 meter sludge belt filter press rated at 2,000 pounds/hour, polymer feed system,
and washwater pump; sludge conveyer; a 14,800 ft2 dewatering sludge storage shelter;
associated site work and yard piping, in conformity with the project plans, specifications,
and other supporting data subsequently filed and approved by the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources.
This Authorization to Construct is issued in accordance with Part III, Paragraph A of
NPDES Permit No. NCO025071 issued December 23, 2008, and shall be subject to revocation
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 One
512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 NorthCarolina Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] \ Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.nnity \ Affirmative
rg
Action
Naturally
An Equal Opportunity 1 ANinnative Action Employer "

Mr. Stephen B. Corcoran
February 6, 2009
Page 2
unless the wastewater treatment facilities are constructed in accordance with the conditions and
limitations specified in Permit No. NC0025701.
The sludge generated from these treatment facilities must be disposed of in accordance
with G.S. 143-215.1 and in a manner approved by the North Carolina Division of Water Quality.
In the event that the facilities fail to perform satisfactorily, including the creation of
nuisance conditions, the Permittee shall take immediate corrective action, including those as may
be required by this Division, such as the construction of additional or replacement wastewater
treatment or disposal facilities.
The Winston-Salem Regional Office, telephone number [phone], shall be notified
at least forty-eight (48) hours in advance of operation of the installed facilities so that an on site
inspection can be made. Such notification to the regional supervisor shall be made during the
normal office hours from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. on Monday through Friday, excluding State
Holidays.
Upon completion of construction and prior to operation of this permitted facility, a
certification must be received from a professional engineer certifying that the permitted facility
has been installed in accordance with the NPDES Permit, this Authorization to Construct and the
approved plans and specifications. Mail the Certification to: Construction Grants & Loans,
DWQ/DENR, 1633 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1633.
Upon classification of the facility by the Certification Commission, the Permittee shall
employ a certified wastewater treatment plant operator to be in responsible charge (ORC) of the
wastewater treatment facilities. The operator must hold a certificate of the type and grade at
least equivalent to or greater than the classification assigned to the wastewater treatment
facilities by the Certification Commission.
The Permittee must also employ a certified back-up operator of the appropriate type and
grade to comply with the conditions of T15A:8G.0202. The ORC of the facility must visit each
Class I facility at least weekly and each Class Il, III and IV facility at least daily, excluding
weekends and holidays, must properly manage the facility, must document daily operation and
maintenance of the facility, and must comply with all other conditions of T15A:8G.0202.
A copy of the approved plans and specifications shall be maintained on file by the
Permittee for the life of the facility.
During the construction of the proposed additions/modifications, the permittee shall
continue to properly maintain and operate the existing wastewater treatment facilities at all times,
and in such a manner, as necessary to comply with the effluent limits specified in the NPDES
Permit.
You are reminded that it is mandatory for the project to be constructed in accordance
with the North Carolina Sedimentation Pollution Control Act, and when applicable, the North

Mr. Stephen B. Corcoran
February 6, 2009
Page 3
Carolina Dam Safety Act. In addition, the specifications must clearly state what the contractor's
responsibilities shall be in complying with these Acts.
Prior to entering into any contract(s) for construction, the recipient must have obtained all
applicable permits from the State.
Failure to abide by the requirements contained in this Authorization to Construct may
subject the Permittee to an enforcement action by the Division of Water Quality in accordance
with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A to 143-215.6C.
The issuance of this Authorization to Construct does not preclude the Permittee from
complying with any and all statutes, rules, regulations, or ordinances which may be imposed by
other government agencies (local, state, and federal) which have jurisdiction.
One (1) set of approved plans and specifications is being forwarded to you. If you have
any questions or need additional information, please contact Seth Robertson, P.E. at telephone
number [phone].
Sincerely,
/6JColeen H. Sullins
kp:sr
cc: C.V. Brooks, IV, P.E. — Highfill Infrastructure Engineering, P.C., 3804 Park Avenue,
Unit A, Wilmington, NC 28403
Rockingham County Health Department
DWQ, Winston-Salem Regional Office, Surface Water Protection
DWQ, Technical Assistance and Certification Unit
DWQ, Point Source Branch, NPDES Program
Daniel Blaisdell, P.E.
Ken Pohlig, P.E.
Seth Robertson, P.E.
ATC File

City of Eden
Mebane Bridge Road WWTP
Biosolids Dewatering Facility
Phase 2 — Process, Plumbing, Mechanical and Electrical Package
A To C No. 025071A03
Issued February 6, 2009
Engineer's Certification
I, , as a duly registered Professional Engineer in
the State of North Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically/weekly/full time)
the construction of the Phase 2, Biosolids Dewatering Facility (Process, Plumbing, Mechanical,
and Electrical Package) at the Mebane Bridge Road WWTP, located at 204 Mebane Bridge
Road, south of Eden in Rockingham County for the City of Eden, hereby state that, to the best of
my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the following construction:
A biosolids dewatering facility consisting of a 50,000 gallon bolted -steel sludge
storage tank; a 28-foot by 46-foot dewatering building which houses a 350 gpm
sludge feed pump, a 2 meter sludge belt filter press rated at 2,000 pounds/hour,
polymer feed system, and washwater pump; sludge conveyer; a 14,800 ft'`
dewatering sludge storage shelter; associated site work and yard piping, in
conformity with the project plans, specifications, and other supporting data
subsequently filed and approved by the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources.
I certify that the construction of the above referenced project was observed to be built within
substantial compliance and intent of the approved plans and specifications.
We understand that the Biosolids Dewatering Facility may NOT be operated until both the Phase
1 (Site Work and Foundation Package, A to C No. 025071A02) Engineer Certification and this
Engineer Certification have been completed.
Signature Registration No.
Date
Send to: Construction Grants & Loans
DENR/DWQ
1633 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1633

ppppppp,
eit*
-
—5
5
am
n
L_r a� ( SeXU4Ceb
7Z0
WcotewaieA J wabnent Want
a
z
V v
January 14, 2009
�c
o
Stormwater Permitting Unit
Division of Water Quality
7
1617 Mail Service Center
��
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
To Whom It May Concern:
We recently received a letter from our regional office in Winston Salem informing us that
we were suppose to have a general stormwater permit for our facility. This has never
been mentioned in previous inspections, but we are now prepared to correct this
oversight.
Our facility is greater than 1.0 MGD, but because of our plant design, we feel that we are
eligible for the "No Exposure Certificate". Currently all of our plant drains are collected
together and pumped back to the head of the plant. All of our chemicals are in secondary
containment areas with storm drains connected to the plant drain system. All screenings
and grit are drained on sand drying beds that were previously used for sludge disposal.
The beds are equipped with an underground drain system to collect leachate from the
solids and pump them back to the head of the plant. The only system in place for
stormwater that is not pumped back to the head of the plant is a drainage ditch around the
perimeter of the plant that collects rainwater and carries it away from the plant to prevent
inflow into our basins.
Attached is our application for a "No Exposure Certificate" completed to the best of my
knowledge. Please review and inform us as to whether or not we are indeed eligible. We
will be happy to comply with any additional information or inspections.
Sincerely,
PA;,t,0& (aj
Melinda S. Ward
Wastewater Superintendent
Cc: Ronald Boone, NC-DWQ, Winston Salem Regional Office
P. O. Box 70 a Eden, NC 27289-0070 9 [phone] • Fax [phone]

pppp'r'
A'*AA&
NCDENR
r, vR,4w,,i .Vlh NcLrA nr _Ilrs
Division of Water Quality / Surface Water Protection
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
NO EXPOSURE CERTIFICATION for Exclusion
NCGNE0000
NO EXPOSURE CERTIFICATION
FOR AGENCY USE ONLY
Date Received
Year
Month
Day
Certificate of Coverage
NCGNE 5 tJ
Please check here if this is a renewal: ❑ RENEWAL
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System application for exclusion from a Stormwater Permit based
on NO EXPOSURE:
Submission of this No Exposure Certification constitutes notification that your facility does not require a
permit for stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity in the State of North Carolina because
it qualifies for a no exposure exclusion. A condition of no exposure at an industrial facility means all
industrial materials and activities are protected by a storm resistant shelter (with some exceptions) to
prevent exposure to rain, snow, snowmelt, and/or runoff.
For permitted facilities in North Carolina, DWQ must approve your application for No
Exposure Certification before this exclusion is effective. Until you are issued a No
Exposure Certification and your NPDES permit is rescinded, your facility must continue
to abide by the terms and conditions of the current permit.
Industrial materials or activities include, but are not limited to: material handling equipment or activities,
industrial machinery, raw materials, intermediate products, by-products, final products, or waste products.
Material handling activities include the storage, loading and unloading, transportation, or conveyance of
any raw material, intermediate product, final product or waste product. A storm resistant shelter is not
required for the following industrial materials and activities: drums, barrels, tanks, and similar containers
that are tightly sealed, provided those containers are not deteriorated and do not leak. "Sealed" means
banded or otherwise secured and with locked or non -operational taps or valves; adequately maintained
vehicles used in material handling; and final products, other than products that would be mobilized in
stormwater discharges (e.g., rock salt).
A No Exposure Certification must be provided for each facility qualifying for the no exposure exclusion. In
addition, the exclusion from NPDES permitting is available on a facility -wide basis only —not for individual
outfalls. If any industrial activities or materials are, or will be, exposed to precipitation, the facility is not
eligible for the no exposure exclusion. By signing and submitting this No Exposure Certification form, you
certify that a condition of no exposure exists at this facility or site and are obligated to comply with the
terms and conditions of 40 CFR 122.26(g).
You are required to reapply for the No Exposure Exclusion once every five (5) years.
For questions, please contact the DWQ Regional Office for your area. (See page 6)
(Please print or type)
1) Mailing address of ownerr'/operator (address to which all certification correspondence will be mailed):
Name t i+ c t 6 'f E&F.i'1
Contact
Street Address
City
Telephone No.
�ci-e,.n State ZIP Code S 1
33 (co23—al/ ,x '9 Fax- 33L, C 3—'40gI
Page 1 of 6
SWU-NE-120108 Last revised 12/1/2008

ppppr-
NCGNEOOOO No Exposure Certification
2) Location of facility producing discharge:
Facility Name
Facility Contact
Street Address
City
County
Telephone No.
3) Physical location information:
Please provide a narrative description of how to get to the facility (use street names, state ro
distance and direction from a roadway intersection). j�4_M t &n 1'1'le 60-n Q Tm i
(A copy of a map with the facility clearly located on it should be included with the certification application.)
4) Is the facility located on Native American Lands? ❑ Yes 4R'No
5) Is this a Federal facility? ❑ Yes ONO
6) Latitude 3(D . y g Longitude �� Y (deg., min., seconds)
7) This NPDES No Exposure Exclusion application applies to which of the following:
❑ New or Proposed Facility Date operation is to begin c� / _
r� Existing Date operation began I i lP
❑ Renewal of existing No Exposure Certification Certification No.: NCGNE
8) Was this facility or site ever covered under an NPDES Stormwater Permit? ❑ Yes is 0
If yes, what is the NPDES Permit Number?
9) Standard Industrial Classification:
and
Provide the 4 digit Standard Industrial Classification Code (SIC Code) that describes the primary industrial
activity at this facility
SIC Code: 1_/ -1 S 12,
10) Provide a brief description of the types of industrial activities and products produced at this facility:
11) Does this facility have any Non -Discharge permits (ex: recycle permits)?
❑ No
L.'fes
If yes, list the permit numbers for all current Non -Discharge permits for this facility: D D D O 3 S
Page 2 of 6
SWU-NE-120108 Last revised 12/1/2008

P pppr-
NCGNE0000 No Exposure Certification
Exposure Checklists (12. - 14.)
12) Are any of the following materials or activities exposed to precipitation, now or in the foreseeable
future? (Please check either "Yes" or "No.") If you answer "Yes" to any of these items, you are not
eligible for the no exposure exclusion.
a. Using, storing, or cleaning industrial machinery or equipment, and areas where ❑ Yes E!rNo ❑ N/A
residuals from using, storing or cleaning industrial machinery or equipment remain
and are exposed to stormwater
b. Materials or residuals on the ground or in stormwater inlets from spills/leaks ❑ Yes Ao ❑ N/A
c. Materials or products from past industrial activity
❑ Yes V'No ❑ N/A
d. Material handling equipment (except adequately maintained vehicles)
❑ Yes I"No ❑ N/A
e. Materials or products during loading/unloading or transporting activities
❑ Yes VNo ❑ N/A
f. Materials or products stored outdoors (except final products intended for outside
❑ Yes "o ❑ N/A
use [e.g., new cars] where exposure to stormwater does not result in the discharge
of pollutants)
g. Materials contained in open, deteriorated or leaking storage drums, barrels, tanks,
❑ Yes "o ❑ N/A
and similar containers
h. Materials or products handled/stored on roads or railways owned or maintained by
❑ Yes VNo ❑ N/A
the discharger
i. Waste material (except waste in covered, non -leaking containers [e.g., dumpsters])
❑ Yes eo ❑ N/A
j. Application or disposal of process wastewater (unless otherwise permitted)
❑ Yes Rr`No ❑ N/A
k. Particulate matter or visible deposits of residuals from roof stacks and/or vents not
❑ Yes EiNo ❑ N/A
otherwise regulated (i.e., under an air quality control permit) and evident in the
stormwater outflow
I. Empty containers that previously contained materials that are not properly stored
❑ Yes P/No ❑ N/A
(i.e., not closed and stored upside down to prevent precipitation accumulation)
m. For any exterior ASTs, as well as drums, barrels, tanks, and similar containers
❑ Yes BINo ❑ N/A
stored outside, has the facility had any releases in the past three (3) years?
13) Above Ground Storage Tanks (ASTs): If you answer "No" to any of the following items, you are not
eligible for the no exposure exclusion.
a. Are exterior ASTs or piping free of rust, damaged or weathered coating, pits, or
deterioration, or evidence of leaks?
b. Is secondary containment provided for all exterior ASTs? If so, is it free of any
cracks, holes, or evidence of leaks, and are drain valves maintained locked shut?
Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
'(Yes []No ❑ N/A
Page 3 of 6
SWU-NE-120108 Last revised 12/1/2008

P P
NCGNE0000 No Exposure Certification
14) Secondary Containment: If you answer "No" to any of the following items, you are not eligible for the
no exposure exclusion.
a. Is secondary containment provided for single above ground storage containers El"Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
(including drums, barrels, etc.) with a capacity of more than 660-gallons?
b. Is secondary containment provided for above ground storage containers stored O/Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
in close proximity to each other with a combined capacity of more than 1,320-
gallons?
c. Is secondary containment provided for Title III Section 313 Superfund Aes ❑ No ❑ N/A
Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) water priority chemicals*?
d. Is secondary containment provided for hazardous substances** designated in 40 2"Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
CFR §116?
e. Are release valves on all secondary containment structures locked? ❑ Yes ❑ No i/N/A
15) Hazardous Waste:
a. Is this facility a Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, or Disposal Facility?
❑ Yes W/No ❑ N/A
b. Is this facility a Small Quantity Generator (less than 1000 kg. of hazardous waste
❑ Yes VNo ❑ N/A
generated per month) of hazardous waste?
c. Is this facility a Large Quantity Generator (1000 kg. or more of hazardous waste
❑ Yes "o ❑ N/A
generated per month) of hazardous waste?
If you answered yes to questions b. or c., please provide the following information:
Type(s) of waste:
How is material stored:
Where is material stored:
How many disposal shipments per year:
Name of transport / disposal vendor:
Vendor address:
Footnotes to Questions 14) c. & d.
*Note that amounts below the 660-gallon (single) and 1,320-gallon (combined) bulk storage minimums require
secondary containment. However, some exceptions may be made for de minimis amounts of certain substances,
and/or other qualifiers, as described in the exemptions from reporting requirements of Title III SARA 313 in 40 CFR
§372.38.
**Note that amounts below the 660-gallon (single) and 1,320-gallon (combined) bulk storage minimums require
secondary containment. However, some exceptions may be made for amounts less than the Reportable Quantities
of the hazardous substances listed in 40 CFR §117.3.
Page 4 of 6
SWU-NE-120108 Last revised 12/1/2008

CCGNE00 00 No Exposure Certification
16) Certification:
I certify under penalty of law that I have read and understand the eligibility requirements for claiming a condition of "no
exposure" and obtaining an exclusion from NPDES stormwater permitting.
I certify under penalty of law that there are no discharges of stormwater contaminated by exposure to industrial activities
or materials from the industrial facility or site identified in this document (except as allowed under 40 CFR 122.26(g)(2)).
I understand that I am obligated to submit a no exposure certification form once every five (5) Years to the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality and, if requested, to the operator of the local municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4) into
which the facility discharges (where applicable). I understand that I must allow the North Carolina Division of Water
Quality, or MS4 operator where the discharge is into the local MS4, to perform inspections to confirm the condition of no
exposure and to make such inspection reports publicly available upon request.
In the event that the site no longer qualifies for a No Exposure Exclusion, I understand that I must obtain coverage under
an NPDES permit prior to any point source discharge of stormwater from the facility. Additionally, I certify under penalty of
law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. Based on my
inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the
information, the information submitted is to the best of my knowledge and belief true, accurate and complete. I am aware
that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for
knowing violations.
I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in this application and that to the best of my knowledge and belief
such information is true, complete, and accurate.
Printed Name of Person Signing: 6r#.j
Title: C i InL A.1 A.40,1
(Signature of Applicant)
iO4 vq
(Date Signed)
Please note: This application for the No Exposure Exclusion is subject to approval by the
NCDENR Regional Office prior to issuance. The Regional Office may inspect your facility for
compliance with no exposure conditions prior to that approval. The Regional Office may also
inspect your facility at any time in the future for compliance with the No Exposure Exclusion.
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6 13Q) provides that:
Any person who knowingly makes any false statement, representation, or certification in any application, record, report, plan, or other
document filed or required to be maintained under this Article or a rule implementing this Article; or who knowingly makes a false
statement of a material fact in a rulemaking proceeding or contested case under this Article; or who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly
renders inaccurate any recording or monitoring device or method required to be operated or maintained under this Article or rules of the
[Environmental Management) Commission implementing this Article shall be guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor which may include a fine
not to exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000).
There is currently no flee for a No Exposure Exclusion.
Page 5 of 6
SWU-NE-120108 Last revised 12/1/2008

PPP7NC
Areas Subject to Phase II Post -Construction & Other Stormwater Progra... Page I of I
Areas Subject to Phase II Post -Construction & Other Stormwater Program Requirements
Map Legend
Interstates
sa-m+ate•
04*
LOUT Roads
■
Ove, woo:+q
Secondary
sto.mwater
Rograms
'
Roads
Phase ll Areas no
atherwee
Primary Roads
iftme'aa
■
SA waters
sI
Us ngnwer
'V
IIC Mghwar
0
1C��ounties
HYdro9raphy
(Arts)
Hydrography
■ 1:24K Polrgons
Municipal
Boundaries
Stormwater
Jurisdiction
. Coastal
Stormwater
Rogram
. Lotat Stmmwatn
Roryam
. Non -coastal State
stormwater
Rawam
(coot)
The map representations are the best available
as of July 1, 2008. Please check with the local
government (city or county) in your location to
verify specific storrnwater requirements. .
Areas subject to Stormwater Post -Construction
(Permitting) are based on existing programs an
Session law 2006-246. NC Division of Water
Quality, 1/6/2009
r
Ro..i _eve't St i-o:
.mot
',
_ 1st St ,�
z r —•���
1-
O ,
o
_
87
f
Y
P'
I
Results
Contact :
Npne
DENR Region :
Winston-Salem
County :
ROCKINGHAM
None, incorporated
Permitting
None
Basis :
Eden
TYPe
area
Notes :
Not in Phase II county
httn-//204-211.239-202/stormwater/print.asnx?CMD=INIT&XMIN=-79.80916266766013&... 1 /6/2009

P P
NCGNE0000 No Exposure Certification
Final Checklist
This application should include the following items:
r This completed application and all supporting documentation.
A map with the location of the facility clearly marked.
❑ If this is a renewal, indicated current NCGNE number in Question 7.
Mail the entire package to:
Stormwater Permitting Unit
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Note
The submission of this document does not guarantee the issuance of a No Exposure Exclusion.
For questions, please contact the DWQ Regional Office for your area.
DWQ Regional Office Contact Information:
Asheville Office ...... [phone]
Fayetteville Office ...
[phone]
Mooresville Office ...
[phone]
Raleigh Office ........
[phone]
Washington Office ...(252)
946-6481
Wilmington Office ...
[phone]
Winston-Salem ......
[phone]
Central Office .........(919)
807-6300
Page 6of6
SWU-NE-120108 Last revised 12/1/2008

December 19, 2008
5520
Ms. Melinda S. Ward
Mebane Bridge WWTP
PO Box 70
Eden, NC 27289-0070
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
SUBJECT: Wastewater/Groundwater Laboratory Certification Renewal
FIELD PARAMETERS ONLY
Dear: Mrs. Ward
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
RECEIVED
N eot of ENR
JAN p
,.. Z, 0-Salern
Regional ophao
The Department of Environment and Natural Resources, in accordance with the provisions of NC GS 143-215-
.3 (a) (10), 15 NCAC 2H .0800, is pleased to renew certification for your laboratory to perform specified
environmental analyses required by EMC monitoring and reporting regulations 15 NCAC 2B .0500, 2H .0900 and
2L .0100, .0200, .0300, and 2N .0100 through .0800.
Enclosed for your use is a certificate describing the requirements and limits of your certification. Please review
this certificate to insure that your laboratory is certified for all parameters required to properly meet your
certification needs.
Please contact us at 919-733-3908 if you have questions or need additional information.
Sincerely,
Pat Donnel y
Certification Branch Manager
Laboratory Section
Enclosure
cc: Ramon L. Cook
Dana Satterwhite
Winston-Salem Regional Office
No`rhCarolina
,Natum!!y
Laboratory Section 1623 Mail Service Center; Raleigh, NC 27699-1623 Phone [phone]
Location: 4405 Reedy Creek Road; Raleigh, NC 27607 FAX [phone]
Internet: www.dwglab.orglCustomer Service 1-877-623-6748
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF THE
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
LABORATORY CERTIFICATION PROGRAM
In accordance with the provisions of N.C.G.S. 143-215.3 (a) (1), 143-215.3 (a)(10) and NCAC 2H.0800:
Field Parameter Only
MEBANE BRIDGE WWTP
Is hereby certified to perform environmental analysis as listed on Attachment I and report monitoring data to DWQ for
compliance with NPDES effluent, surface water, groundwater, and pretreatment regulations.
By reference 15A NCAC 2H .0800 is made a part of this certificate.
This certificate does not guarantee validity of data generated, but indicates the methodology, equipment, quality control procedures,
records, and proficiency of the laboratory have been examined and found to be acceptable.
This certificate shall be valid until December 31, 2009
Certificate No. 5520

Attachment
North Carolina Wastewater/Groundwater Laboratory Certification
Certified Parameters Listing
FIELD PARAMETERS ONLY
'Lab Name: Mebane Bridge WWTP
Address: PO Box 70
Eden, NC 27289-0070
Certificate Number.
Effective Date:
Expiration Date:
Date of Last Amendment:
5520
01 /01 /2009
12/31 /2009
The above named laboratory, having duly met the requirements of 15A NCAC 21-1.0800, is hereby certified for the measurement of the parameters listed below.
CERTIFIED PARAMETERS
INORGANICS
RESIDUAL CHLORINE
Std Method 4500 CI G
CONDUCTIVITY
Std Method 2510B
DISSOLVED OXYGEN
Std Method 4500 O G
pH
Std Method 4500 H B
TEMPERATURE
Std Method 2550E
This certification requires maintance of an acceptable quality assurance program, use of approved methodology, and satisfactory performance on evaluation samples. Laboratories are
subject to civil penalties and/or decertification for infractions as set forth in 15A NCAC 21-1.0807.

0�0� W A T �
�r
`i
Mr. Brad Corcoran, City Manager
City of Eden
308 East Stadium Drive
Eden, NC 27288
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
26 November 2008
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
NPDES Permit NC0025071, Mebane Bridge Wastewater Treatment Plant &
NPDES Permit NC0025151, Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant
Rockingham County
Dear Mr. Corcoran:
1. On 21 November 2008, Mr. Ron Boone of the Winston-Salem Regional Office of the
Division of Water Quality (DWQ) conducted compliance evaluation inspections (CEI) of
the City of Eden's Mebane Bridge Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) located at 191
Mebane Bridge Road and the Dry Creek WWTP located on NC Hwy 770 east, in Eden,
Rockingham County, North Carolina. The assistance and cooperation of Ms. Melinda
Ward, Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC) of the Mebane Bridge facility, and -Mr.
Ralph Potter, ORC of the Dry Creek Facility, was greatly appreciated. Inspection findings
are summarized below and inspection reports are attached for your records.
Mebane Bridge Wastewater Treatment Plant, NCO025071
2. The Mebane Bridge WWTP discharges into receiving waters known as the Dan River,
this section of which is currently classified as a WS-IV (water supply) water in the
Roanoke River basin. The plant consists of an influent flow meter, bar screens, grit
separator, extended aeration basins, secondary clarifiers, gas chlorination, liquid sodium
bisulfite dechlorination, polymer addition, aerobic digestion, sludge lagoons, and a
dissolved air floatation unit, which is no longer in use. There is also an effluent flow
meter. The influent meter is used for reporting flow.
Documentation Review
3. This permit is currently expired and under review by the Division. The initial draft was
issued and we have received the city's comments on the draft. A second draft should
soon be issued for comment and approval. Please note that the conditions of the
previous permit, effective 1 September 2002, with a major modification that became
effective 1 August 2005, remain in full effect until the new permit is issued.
4. Mr. Boone evaluated laboratory data and all required records were available and
complete. Comparison of lab reports with discharge monitoring reports (DMR) revealed
no transcription errors. Chains of custody were also complete. All lab records were well
organized. The plant lab's certification for field laboratory tests is current and expires on
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 585 Waughtown Street; Winston-Salem, NC 27107 Phone [phone] No��thCarolina
Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org Fax [phone] aillCally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/] 0% Post Consumer Paper

Mr. Brad Corcoran
26 November 2008
Page 2 of 4
31 December 2008. The only discrepancy noted was the incorrect reporting of data for
several required parameters, including BOD5, TSS and ammonia. The values for these
parameters are currently being rounded and reported to the nearest milligram, however
the permit requires these parameters to be reported down to the nearest tenth of a
milligram. Discussion with Ms. Ward revealed a simple electronic formatting error in the
spreadsheet that automatically rounds the entered values to the nearest milligram. Ms.
Ward stated that she would have this corrected immediately.
4. Ms. Ward has daily sign -in logs that are complete and current. Records of plant
operations and maintenance were also available, complete and current. All records aside
from laboratory records must be maintained for a period of three years.
Site Review
5. Several of the floating rotor aerators were out of service for maintenance during the
inspection. Ms. Ward stated that they were still able to sustain sufficient dissolved
oxygen levels in the basins without the aerators. There were no other indicators of
insufficient aeration noted. The basins did appear to have some mild dead spots, most
likely due to the out -of -service rotors, but again, this doesn't appear to be adversely
affecting plant efficiency.
6. The perimeter scum baffles on the secondary clarifiers were severely corroded and in
need of replacement. The corrosion has completely eaten through the baffles at water
level and the upper halves are completely separated from the lower halves over a large
percentage of their overall linear footage. Ms. Ward stated that she is currently in the
process of gathering quotes from several contractors for baffle replacement. Scum
entrapment and removal doesn't appear to have become an issue despite the poor
condition of the baffles.
7. The chemical feed lines for the sodium bisulfite are installed above ground and are
supported by five -gallon buckets. Although this hasn't caused any problems, the city
should strongly consider a more permanent installation of these lines. Ms. Ward
indicated that the previous underground installation of the chemical feed lines resulted in
frequent breakage of the pipes and that eventually operators decided to install the pipes
aboveground. The lines should be better supported with a more permanent and reliable
type of support system.
8. The NCG110000 general stormwater permit covers wastewater treatment plants with an
average daily flow of more than 1 million gallons per day, however the plant currently
does not have an NCG110000 permit. The city must immediately submit a Notice of
Intent (NOI) for the NCG110000 permit. Please use the following link to navigate to the
Division's web page where the NOI can be downloaded and printed.
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/su/Forms Documents htm

V
ad Corcoran
ember 2008
of 4
Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant NC0025151
9. The Dry Creek WWTP also discharges into receiving waters known as the Dan River, this
section of which is currently classified as a WS-IV (water supply) water in the Roanoke
River basin. The plant consists of an influent pump station, influent flow meter, bar
screen, grit separator, extended aeration basin, secondary clarifier, tablet chlorinator,
effluent flow meter and an aerobic digester.
10. According to Mr. Potter, the city plans to' shut down and decommission this plant,
permanently diverting all flow through the Railroad pump station to the Mebane Bridge
plant. The city is highly encouraged to make this a priority to eliminate the discharge and
permit. Please note that in order for this to occur, all plant units will need to be
completely drained and all plant wastes completely removed and properly disposed.
Also, the influent and effluent lines will need to be permanently capped or plugged, so as
to prevent all inflow and any further accumulation of waste in the plant. Mr. Boone will
need to perform another inspection of the facility to verify that is has been properly and
permanently shutdown and isolated prior to permit rescission.
Documentation Review
11. This permit is currently expired and under review by the Division. The initial draft was
issued and we have received the city's comments on the draft. Please note that the
conditions of the previous permit, effective 1 June 2002, remain in full effect until the new
permit is issued.
12. .Mr. Boone evaluated laboratory data and all required records were available and
complete. Comparison of lab reports with discharge monitoring reports (DMR) revealed
no transcription errors. Chains of custody were also complete. All lab records were well
organized. The plant lab's certification for field laboratory tests is current and expires on
31 December 2008. The only discrepancy noted was the incorrect reporting of data for
several required parameters, including BOD5, TSS and ammonia. The values for these
parameters are currently being rounded and reported to the nearest milligram, however
the permit requires these parameters to be reported down to the nearest tenth of a
milligram. Discussion with Mr. Potter revealed a simple electronic formatting error in the
spreadsheet that automatically rounds the entered values to the nearest milligram. Mr.
Potter stated that he would have this corrected immediately.
13. Mr. Potter has daily sign -in logs that are complete and current. Records of plant
operations and maintenance were also available, complete and current. All records aside
from laboratory records must be maintained for a period of three years.
Site Review
14. The plant appears to be well maintained, although some of the equipment, such as the
samplers and chlorination system, were somewhat dilapidated and/or outdated. Despite
this, the equipment still appears to be fully functional. The Division recognizes that this is
in part due to the impending closure of the facility and the reluctance to expend capital

Mr. Brad Corcoran
26 November 2008
Page 4 of 4
C
assets at the facility. At the same time we must convey to the city the importance of
maintaining all plant equipment in the best condition at all times. This should underscore
the value of decommissioning the Dry Creek plant and diverting flow to the Mebane
Bridge plant as soon as possible.
15. Please submit to the Division the NOI for the NCG110000 general stormwater permit for
the Mebane Bridge plant as soon as possible. When submitting the NOI to the Division's
central office in Raleigh, please also send a courtesy copy to this office so we're aware of
your submittal. If you have any questions regarding the inspection or this letter, please
do not hesitate to contact Mr. Boone or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
.mod✓ e,ix—
Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Winston-Salem Region
Division of Water Quality
Attachments:
1. BIMS Inspection Report NC0025071, Mebane Bridge WWTP
2. BIMS Inspection Report NC0025151, Dry Creek WWTP
cc: WSRO — SWP w/ atch
Central Files w/ atch
NPDES West Unit

United States Environmental Protection Agency
EPA Washington, D.C. 20460
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Form Approved.
OMB No. 2040-0057
Approval expires 8-31-98
Transaction Code NPDES
yr/mo/day
Inspection Type
Inspector
1 Nf 2 15I 31 NCO025071
�f
111 121 08/11/21
117 18I CI
19' SI
_
Remarks
Fac Type
20 U
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating 81 QA --------------------------- Reserved ----------------------
67I 169 70I —! I 71 U 72I NI `I 73I ( 74 751 I I I I I I 180
Section B: Facility Data u
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include Entry Time/Date Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
Mebane Bridge WWTP 08:30 AM 08/11/21 05/08/01
191 Mebane Bridge Rd Exit Time/Date Permit Expiration Date
Eden NC 27288
10:30 AM 08/11/21 07/04/30
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
Ralph H Potter/ORC/336-627-1009/
Other Facility Data
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Dennis G Asbury,308 E Stadium Dr Eden NC Contacted
27288/Director/336-627-2110/3366233933 No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit . Flow Measurement 0 Operations & Maintenance Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Program . Sludge Handling Disposal N Facility Site Review ■ Effluent/Receiving Waters
Laboratory 0 Storm Water
Section D: Summary of Find in/Comments Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessarv)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Ron Boone WSRO WQ//704-663-1699 Ext.2202/
Signature of Management Q A Reviewer
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers
Date ¢
11/�4le'
Page # 1

NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type 1
3� 11 12 17 18 N00025071 I I 08/11/21 I C
UJ
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
Please refer to inspection summary letter.
Page # 2

Permit: NCO025071
Inspection Date: 11/21/2008
Owner - Facility: Mebane Bridge WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Laboratory
Yes
No NA NE
Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory?
■
❑ ❑
❑
Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters) performed by a certified lab?
■
❑ ❑
❑
# Is the facility using a contract lab?
■
❑ ❑
0
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)?
■
❑ ❑
❑
Incubator (Fecal Coliform) set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/- 0.2 degrees?
❑
❑ ■
❑
Incubator (BOD) set to 20.0 degrees Celsius +/- 1.0 degrees?
❑
❑ ■
❑
Comment: Plant field certification expires 12/31/08. Pace Analytical lab is used for
non -field parameters.
Record Keeping
Yes
No
NA
NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
■
[i
❑
❑
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the chain -of -custody complete?
■
❑
❑
❑
Dates, times and location of sampling
■
Name of individual performing the sampling
■
Results of analysis and calibration
■
Dates of analysis
■
Name of person performing analyses
■
Transported COCs
■
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters?
MOOD
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ?
■
❑
❑
❑
(If the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator on each shift?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site?
■
0
❑
❑
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Permit
Yes No
NA
NE
Page # 3

Permit: NC0025071
Inspection Date: 11/21/2008
Owner - Facility: Mebane Bridge WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
'IN
Permit
Yes
No NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new application?
■ ❑ ❑
❑
Is the facility as described in the permit?
■ ❑ ❑
❑
# Are there any special conditions for the permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
■ ❑ ❑
Q
-Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Influent Sampling
Yes
No
NA
NE
# Is composite sampling flow proportional?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is sample collected above side streams?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is proper volume collected?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the tubing clean?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is sampling performed according to the permit?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Flow Measurement - Influent
Yes
No
NA
NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the flow meter operational?
■
❑
❑
❑
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
❑
❑
■
❑
Comment: Meters calibrated quarterly. No flow recorder, only a flow totalizer.
Bar Screens
Yes
No
NA
NE
Type of bar screen
a.Manual
❑
b.Mechanical
■
Are the bars adequately screening debris?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Is the screen free of excessive debris?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Is disposal of screening in compliance?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Is the unit in good condition?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Comment:
Page # 4

Permit: NCO025071
Inspection Date: 11/21/2008
Owner • Facility: Mebane Bridge WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Grit Removal
Yes
No NA NE
Type of grit removal
a.Manua)
❑
b.Mechanical
■
Is the grit free of excessive organic matter?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
Is the grit free of excessive odor?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
# Is disposal of grit in compliance?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Aeration Basins
Yes
No NA NE
Mode of operation
Ext. Air
Type of aeration system
Surface
Is the basin free of dead spots?
■
0 ❑ ❑
Are surface aerators and mixers operational?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
Are the diffusers operational?
❑
❑ ■ ❑
Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface?
01300
Is the DO level acceptable?
0
❑ ❑ ■
Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/1)
❑
❑ ❑ ■
Comment: Some of the floating rotor aerators were out of service during the
inspection but the ORC stated this is not detrimentally affecting their ability to maintain
the DO level.
Secondary Clarifier
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are weirs level?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of weir blockage?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is scum removal adequate?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the drive unit operational?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)?
■
❑
❑
❑
Page # 5
•

Permit: NCO025071 Owner - Facility: Mebane Bridge WWTP Nil
Inspection Date: 11/21/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Secondary Clarifier Yes No NA NE
Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately'/. of the sidewall depth) 0000
Comment: Perimeter baffles were severely corroded to the point of separation at
water surface level. ORC stated this is not detrimentally affecting operations and that
she is currently in the process of gathering contractor quotes for the replacement of the
baffles.
Pumps-RAS-WAS
Yes No NA NE
Are pumps in place?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Are pumps operational?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Are there adequate spare parts and supplies on site?
00 ❑ ❑
Comment:
Disinfection -Gas
Yes No NA NE
Are cylinders secured adequately?
N ❑ El ❑
Are cylinders protected from direct sunlight?
E ❑ ❑ ❑
Is there adequate reserve supply of disinfectant?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the level of chlorine residual acceptable?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is the contact chamber free of growth, or sludge buildup?
❑ ❑ ❑ .
Is there chlorine residual prior to de -chlorination?
❑ ❑ ❑
Does the Stationary Source have more than 2500 Ibs of Chlorine (CAS No. 7782-50-5)?
❑ ❑ 0 ❑
If yes, then is there a Risk Management Plan on site?
Cl ❑ 0 ❑
If yes, then what is the EPA twelve digit ID Number? (1000 - )
If yes, then when was the RMP last updated?
Comment:
De -chlorination
Yes No NA NE
Type of system ?
Liquid
Is the feed ratio proportional to chlorine amount (1 to 1)?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is storage appropriate for cylinders?
❑ ❑ N ❑
# Is de -chlorination substance stored away from chlorine containers?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Are the tablets the proper size and type? fl ❑ N ❑
Are tablet de -chlorinators operational? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
Page # 6

rr
Permit: NCO025071 Owner - Facility: Mebane Bridge WWTP
Inspection Date: 11/21/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Aerobic Digester Yes No NA NE
Comment: Northern wall of digester failed some time back and was repaired. Eastern
wall of digester appears to be experiencing some of the same issues; walls are
beginning to buckle slightly at seams in concrete. City needs to monitor this closely to
detect and prepare for failure.
Drying Beds
Yes No NA NE
Is there adequate drying bed space?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the sludge distribution on drying beds appropriate?
❑ ❑ 0 ❑
Are the drying beds free of vegetation?
0 ❑ ❑
# Is the site free of dry sludge remaining in beds?
n ❑ ❑
Is the site free of stockpiled sludge?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is the filtrate from sludge drying beds returned to the front of the plant?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Is the sludge disposed of through county landfill?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
# Is the sludge land applied? *
0 ❑ 0 ❑
(Vacuum filters) Is polymer mixing adequate?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Drying beds used only to dry grit and bar screenings before being
disposed. Beds not used for sludge.
Standby Power
Yes No NA NE
Is automatically activated standby power available?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the' generator tested by interrupting primary power source?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the generator tested under load?
0 ❑ 0 ❑
Was generator tested & operational during the inspection?
0 0 ❑ ❑
Do the generator(s) have adequate capacity to operate the entire wastewater site?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is there an emergency agreement with a fuel vendor for extended run on back-up power?
❑ ❑ ❑ E
Is the generator fuel level monitored?
E ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? E ❑ ❑ ❑
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable Solids, pH, DO, Sludge ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment:
Page # 8

71
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Form Approved.
EPA Washington, D.C. 20460
OMB No. 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day
Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 ! NI 2 I SI 31 NCO025151 111 121 08/11/21 117
J u
18UC 19us 20I I
tJ !J J
Remarks
211111111111111111111I I I I I I I I I III111111111
Jill1116
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA
------------------------- Reserved ------- —---- ------
67 69 70 U 711 I 72 ) N)
=—�
73I Iu_1 174 751 I I I I I Li 80
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
Entry Time/Date
Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
Dry Creek WWTP
11:00 AM 08/11/21
02/06/01
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
NC Hwy 770 E
Eden NC 27288
01:00 PM 08/11/21
07/04/30
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
Ralph H Potter/ORC/336-627-1009/
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Dennis G Asbury,308 E Stadium Dr Eden NC
27288/Director/336-627-2110/3366233933 No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit N Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Program 0 Sludge Handling Disposal Facility Site Review
Effluent/Receiving Waters
Laboratory
Section D: Summary of Find in /Comments Attach additional sheets of narrative
and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Ron Boone WSRO WQ//704-663-1699 Ext.2202/ j
62 a G/aq
Signature of Manageme A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers
Date
t'o�
�(/Ai(ai
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page # 1

NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type 1
3� NCO025151 I11 12I 08/11/21 117 18' _'
UJ
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
Please refer to inspection summary letter.
Page # 2

Permit: NCO025151
Inspection Date: 11/21/2008
Owner - Facility: Dry Creek WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
'IN
Record Keeping
Yes No NA NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
■ Cl ❑ ❑
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the chain -of -custody complete?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Dates, times and location of sampling
■
Name of individual performing the sampling
■
Results of analysis and calibration
■
Dates of analysis
■
Name of person performing analyses
■
Transported COCs
■
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters?
■
❑
❑
❑
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ?
■
❑
❑
❑
(If the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator on each shift?
❑
■
❑
❑
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site?
■
❑
❑
❑
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Laboratory
Yes
No
NA
NE
Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters) performed by a certified lab?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Is the facility using a contract lab?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)?
■
❑
❑
❑
Incubator (Fecal Coliform) set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/- 0.2 degrees?
❑
❑
■
❑
Incubator (BOD) set to 20.0 degrees Celsius +/- 1.0 degrees?
❑
❑
■
❑
Comment:
Permit
Yes
No
NA
NE
Page # 3

Permit: NCO025151
Inspection Date: 11/21/2008
Owner - Facility: Dry Creek WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit
Yes No NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new application?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the facility as described in the permit?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Are there any special conditions for the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the inspector granted'access to all areas for inspection?
■ 0 ❑ ❑
Comment:
Pump Station - Influent
Yes No NA NE
Is the pump wet well free of bypass lines or structures?
■ ❑ ❑ I]
Is the wet well free of excessive grease?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are all pumps present?
■ ❑ fl ❑
Are all pumps operable?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are float controls operable?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is SCADA telemetry available and operational?
■ 0 ❑ ❑
Is audible and visual alarm available and operational?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Influent Sampling
Yes No NA NE
# Is composite sampling flow proportional?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is sample collected above side streams?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is proper volume collected?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the tubing clean?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is sampling performed according to the permit?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Flow Measurement - Influent
Yes No NA NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
■ ❑ n ❑
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
■ ❑ fl ❑
Is the flow meter operational?
■ ❑ ❑ 0
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Comment: Meters calibrated quarterly. No flow recorder, only a flow totalizer.
Bar Screens
Yes No NA NF
Page # 4

Permit: NCO025151
Inspection Date: 11/21/2008
Owner - Facility: Dry Creek WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
'IN
Bar Screens
Yes
No NA NE
Type of bar screen
a.Manual
❑
b.Mechanical
■
Are the bars adequately screening debris?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
Is the screen free of excessive debris?
■
000
Is disposal of screening in compliance?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
Is the unit in good condition?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Type of grit removal
a.Manual
❑
b.Mechanical
■
Is the grit free of excessive organic matter?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the grit free of excessive odor?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Is disposal of grit in compliance?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Aeration Basins
Yes
No
NA
NE
Mode of operation
Ext.
Air
Type of aeration system
Surface
Is the basin free of dead spots?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are surface aerators and mixers operational?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are the diffusers operational?
❑
❑
■
❑
Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process?
■
❑
❑
❑
Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the DO level acceptable?
❑
❑
❑
■
Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/1)
❑
❑
❑
■
Comment:
Secondary Clarifier
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier?
■
❑
❑
❑
Page # 5

Permit: NC0025151
Inspection Date: 11/21/2008
Owner - Facility: Dry Creek WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Secondary Clarifier
Yes No NA NE
Are weirs level?
■ ❑ ❑ 0
Is the site free of weir blockage?
■ 0 ❑ ❑
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is scum removal adequate?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the drive unit operational?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately '/. of the sidewall depth)
❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Comment:
Pumps-RAS-WAS
Yes No NA NE
Are pumps in place?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are pumps operational?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are there adequate spare parts and supplies on site?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Disinfection -Tablet
Yes No NA NE
Are tablet chlorinators operational?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are the tablets the proper size and type?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Number of tubes in use?
1
Is the level of chlorine residual acceptable?
❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Is the contact chamber free of growth, or sludge buildup?
■ ❑ ❑ Cl
Is there chlorine residual prior to de -chlorination?
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Comment:
Flow Measurement - Effluent
Yes No NA NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
■ ❑ 0 ❑
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the flow meter operational?
■
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Comment: Meters calibrated quarterly. No flow recorder, only a flow totalizer.
Effluent Sampling
Yes No NA NE
Page # 6

Permit: NCO025151
Inspection Date: 11/21/2008
Owner - Facility: Dry Creek WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Effluent Sampling Yes No NA NE
Is composite sampling flow proportional? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is sample collected below all treatment units? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is proper volume collected? ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the tubing clean? ❑ ❑ ❑
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type representative)? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Effluent Pipe Yes No NA NE
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris? ❑ ❑ ❑ 0
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly? ❑ ❑ N ❑
Comment:
Upstream / Downstream Sampling Yes No NA NE
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type, and sampling location)? IN ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Aerobic Digester
Yes
No NA
NE
Is the capacity adequate?
0
❑ ❑
❑
Is the mixing adequate?
❑ ❑
❑
Is the site free of excessive foaming in the tank?
0
0 ❑
❑
# Is the odor acceptable?
0
❑ ❑
❑
# Is tankage available for properly waste sludge?
0
❑ ❑
0
Comment:
Operations $ Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable Solids, pH, DO, Sludge ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment:
Page # 7
"IN

V2111/2008 09:47
r
336-627-9189
PUBLIC WORKS EDEN
PAGE 02
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTEC710H AGENCY
REGION 4
ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER
61 FORSYTH STREET
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960
UFR.TIF D MAIL 7005 3110 0002 5134 4343
RETURN RECEIPT REOUEN,TED
The Honorable John E_ Grogan
Mayor, City of Eden
308 East Stadium Drive
Eden, North Carolina 27288
RE"I r,0 nFr4 - 3 202
Re: Information Request - Section 308 of the Clean Water Act
NPDES Permit Nos. NCO025071 and NCO025151
Eden Mebane Bridge and Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plants (WWTPs)
Dear Mayor Grogan:
Pursuant to Section 308 of the Clean Water Act (CWA), 33 U.S.C. § 1318, the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) hereby requests the City of Eden (the City) to provide
the information set forth in Enclosure A regarding the WWTPs noted above and their associated
sanitary sower collection systems. The City is required to respond to this information request
within thirty (30) days of its receipt of this letter. The response should be directed to:
Ms. Alends Johnson
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4
Water Programs Enforcement Branch'
61 Forsyth Street, S.W.
Atlanta, GA 30303-8960
The City's response to this information request should specifically reference the
particular section and number of the request and should be organized for the purpose of clarity.
In addition, all information submitted must be accompanied by the following certification sighed
by a responsible City official in accordance with 40 C.P.R. § 122.22:
"I certify under penalty of law that this doct}{tE}ent and all attachments were prepared
under my direction or supervision in acCA)rdWe with a system designed to assure that
qualified personnel properly gather and ev the information submitted. Based on my
inquiry of the person or persons who mall the system, or those persons directly
responsible for gathering the information, I 'fy that the information submitted is, to
the best of my knowledge and belief, true, orate, and compliste. I am aware that there
are significant penalties for submitting false information, inelu the possibility of fine
1.
and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Mtvmet Addrosa (UAL) a h"P14V**-"*-91
Roevd04Pacy01e104 0 PMAtad wlI) V&"able 00 99aW In" 00 Rowated Payer (MV*" Mn 30% Poelog sluff"

12/11/2008 09:47 336-627-9189 PUBLIC WORKS EDEN PAGE 03
Failure to comply with this information request may result in enforcement proceedings
under Section 309 of the CWA, 33 U.S.C. § 1319, which could result in the judicial imposition
of civil or criminal penalties or the administrative imposition of civil penalties. In addition, there
is potential criminal liability for the falsification of any response to the requested information.
The City shall preserve until further notice all records (either written or electronic) which
exist at the time of receipt of this letter that relate to any of the matters set forth in this letter.
The term "records" shall be interpreted in the broadest sense to include information of every sort.
The response to this information request shall include assurance that these record protection
provisions were put in place, as required. No such records shall be disposed of until written
authorization is received from the Chief of the Water Programs Enforcement Branch at the U.S.
EPA, Region 4.
If you believe that any of the requested information constitutes confidential business
information, you way assert a confidentiality claim with respect to such information except for
affluent data. Further details, including how to make a business confidentiality claim, are found
in Enclosure B.
Also enclosed is a document entitled U.S. EPA Small Business Resources Information
Sheet which, may assist you in understanding the compliance assistance resources and tools
available to the facility. However, any decision to seek compliance assistance at this time does
not relieve the City of its obligations to EPA or the State, does not create any new rights or
defenses, and will not affect EPA's decision to pursue enforcement action. In addition, the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requires its registrants to periodically disclose
envirommntal legal proceedings in statements filed with the SEC. To assist you, EPA has also
enclosed a document entitled Notice of Securities and Exchange Commission Registrants' Duty
to Disclose Environmental Legal Proceedings.
If you have questions regarding this notice and information request, please feel free to
contact Ms. Alenda Johnson at [phone].
Sincerely,
/•
Doug F. Mundrick, P.E., Chief
Wat Programs Enforcement Brancb
`Vltat& Management Division
Enclosures (4)
cc: Ms. Coleen Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality, NC DENR

V2/11/2008 09:47 336-627-9189 PUBLIC WORKS EDEN PAGE 04
ENCLOSURE A
SSO PROGRAM
1. Provide the following:
a. The size of the City's Sanitary Sewer Collection System (SSS) (linear feet or
b. A list of the pump stations in the SSS, including size (gpm), and indicate if back
up power is available and if it is adequate to fully operate the pump station;
C. A list of all constructed overflow points in the SSS (including pump stations)
prior to the headworks of the City's WWTPs.
d. The average design flow of the City's VIWTTs;
C. The peak design flow of the City's WWTPs; to Wq � f�
f. The annual average flow of the City's WWTPs; and '1 r
S. The population served by the City's WWTPs and their respective SSS.
Z. For purposes of this Information Request, a sanitary sewer overflow (SSO) is an
overflow, spill, release, or diversion of wastewater from the.SSS. SSOs include
overflows or releases of wastewater that reach waters of the United States (US);
overflows or releases of wastewater that do not reach waters of the US; and wastewater
backups into buildings that are caused by blockages or flow conditions. in a sanitary
sewer other than a building lateral. Wastewater backups into buildings caused by a
blockage or other malfunction of a building lateral that is privately owned is not an SSO.
Provide a listing of all SSOs that occurred in the past five (5) years. For each SSO
provide the following, if available:
a. Date(s) of the SSO;
b. Time (and Date if other than a. above) when the City was notified that the SSO
event occurred;
C. Time (and Date if other than a. above) when the City (or contractor) crew
responded to the SSO;
d. Time (and Date if other than a. above) when the SSO ceased;
e. Time (and Date if other than a. above) when corrective action was completed;
f. Location of the SSO, including source (pump station, manhole, etc.);
g. Ultimate destination of the SSO, such as surface waterbody (by name), storm
drain leading to surface waterbody (by name), dry land, building, etc.;
h. Volume of the SSO;
i. Cause of the SSO such as grease, roots, other blockages, wet weather (infiltration
and inflow), loss of power at pump station, pump failure, etc.;
j. Corrective actions taken to stop the SSO; and
k. Corrective actions taken to prevent this or similar SSOs in the future.
3. Does the City have a formal written plan for responding to, addressing, and reporting
SSOs (i.e. a'Sewer Overflow Response Plan)? If so:

12/11/2008 09:47
336-627-9189
PUBLIC WORKS EDEN
PAGE 05
"41-
What procedures are in place to document SSOs? b all of the information in
Question 2 above inchWed?
What procedures am in puce to estimate SSO volume?
What procedures are in place to identify root causes of SSOs?
what procedures are in place to contain and clean up SSOs?
what procedures are in place to address wastewater backups into buildings caused
by mainline problems?
what procedures are in place to identify wet weather related SSOs and
reconnaissance of these during rain events?
What procedures am in place for 24-hour reporting of SSOs to the permitting
authority. the State of North Carolina?
What procedures are in place for monthly reporting of SSOs to the permitting
authority, the Sate of North Carolina?
1s there a person or position responsible for each of the above activities?

/11/2008 09:47 336-627-9189 PUBLIC WORKS EDEN
PAGE 06
ENCLOSURE B
RIGHT TO ASS T BUSINESS CONFIDENTIALITY CLAIMS
�_ (40 C_F.R. Part 2)
Except for effluent data, you may, if you desire, assert a business confidentiality claim as to any
or all of the information that EPA is requesting from you. The EPA regulation relating to
business confidentiality claims is found at 40 C.F.R. Part 2.
If you assert such a claim for the requested information, EPA will only disclose the information
to the extent and under the procedures set out in the cited regulations. If no business
confidentiality claim accompanies the information. EPA may make the information available to
the public without any further notice to you.
40 C.P.R. $2.203(b). Method and time of asserting business confide4tfarity claim. A
business wbich is submitting information to EPA may assert a business confidentiality claim,
covering the information by placing on (or attaching to) the information, at the time it is
submitted to EPA, a cover sheet, stamped or typed legend or other suitable form of notice
employing language such as "trade secret." "proprietary," or "company confidential." Allegedly
confidential portions of otherwise non -confidential documents should be clearly identified by the
business, and may be submitted separately to facilitate identification and handling by EPA. if
the business desires confidential treatment only until a certain date or until the occurrence of a
certain event, the notice should so state.

RECEIVED
N.C. Dept of ENR
OCT3�
WiaetonSalem
Regional Office
October 30, 2008
M
Michael F. Easley, Governor
State of North Carolina
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
Mr. Brad Corcoran
City Manager
City of Eden
308 E. Stadium Drive
Eden, NC 27288
Subject: Corrected Draft Pages for Renewal Permit
NPDES Permit NCO025071
City of Eden Mebane Bridge WWTP
Rockingham County
Dear Mr. Corcoran:
Enclosed with this letter is a copy of three corrected pages for the September 24, 2008 renewal draft
permit for your facility. These are technical corrections and do not require a second public notice but
will be send to all previous draft permit recipients for comment and approval. This corrected permit is
a follow up to the October 29, 2008 letter sent to you. Please discard the three effected September
draft pages and replace them with the corrected pages. Review the corrected draft very carefully so
that you thoroughly understand the corrections to conditions and requirements it contains.
Summary of Corrections
1) The Ammonia Nitrogen calculated Aprill - October 31 weekly average limit was
corrected for this draft permit. The ammonia nitrogen policy developed between the EPA and
the state does not require imposing any limits if the calculated limit value exceeds 35 mg/1.
The calculated April 1 - October 21 weekly average exceeds 35 mg/1 and as such no limit is
required. The calculated April l - October 31 monthly average, 14.8 mg/1, is required.
2) The Special Condition narrative for Mercury compliance was corrected for this draft
permit. The special condition narrative was corrected to meet the intend of defining provisional
conditions requiring compliance 18 months after the effective date of the issued permit. The
purpose of the intend is to allow the Permittee to (1) collect 12 months of data and either
petition the Division to re-evaluate the collected data for removing the Mercury limit and
imposing another monitoring frequency, and/or to (2) put in place the necessary systems to
meet the Mercury limit compliance weekly average of 224 ng/l. A provisional limit defines the
conditions that will allow specific changes without re -opening an active permit.
3) The Chlorinated Phenolic Compounds compliance evaluation correction was made for
this draft permit. The aesthetic water quality standard for WS waters, odor and taste, is for
chlorinated phenolic compounds only. The correct compliance evaluation for chlorinated
phenolic compounds was conducted and does not support imposing a limit or any additional
monitoring. The phenolic compound parameter was corrected to its previous status as a
pretreatment parameter. The annual effluent pollutant scan for chlorinated phenolic
compounds will continued to be evaluated for future permit renewals.
Page 1 of 2
Division of Water Quality, Point Source Branch Telephone [phone] ore
FAX [phone] NorthCarolina
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 On the Internet at hit h2o.(919) te. 6495 ,NatuCallb,
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 p.-1�
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer

ppppppp,
If you have questions concerning the draft corrections for your facility, please call Ron Berry at (919)
807-6403 or by email at ron.berry®ncmail.net-
if no additional adverse comments are received from the public or from you, this permit will likely be
issued in November 2008, with an effective date of January 1, 2009, expiring on April 30, 2012.
Sincerely,
ptv" 6&t�"
Ron Berry
Eastern NPDES Program
Attachments
Cc: Winston Salem Regional Office/Surface Water Protection Section
DEH/Winston Salem Regional Office (with DEH approval form)
Virginia DEQ/Robert Goode [email pdf, rpgoode®deq.vvirginia.gov]
City of Danville/ Barry Dunkley [email pdf, Dunk1BT_®ci.Danville.va.us]
PERC Unit/Dana Folley
NPDES Unit
Page 2 of 2

Permit NCO025071
A. (1.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS -
CORRECTED DRAFT
During the period beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until permit expiration,
the Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and
monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
EFFLUENT -
CHARACTERISTICS
LIMITS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Monthly
Average
Weekly
Average
Daily
Maximum
Measurement
Frequency
Sample
Type
Sample Location'
Flow
13.5 MGD
Continuous
Recording
Influent or Effluent
BOD, 5-day 20°C 2
30.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
Daily
Composite
Effluent, Influent
Total Suspended Solids TSS 2
30.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
Daily
Composite
Effluent, Influent
NH3 as N (April 1-October 31
14.8 m /L
Daily
Composite
Effluent
NH3 as N November 1—March 31
3Meek
Composite
Effluent
H 3
Daily
Grab
Effluent
pH
Footnote 1
Grab
Upstream',
Downstream'
Fecal Coliform
(geometric mean
200 / 100 ml
400 1100 ml
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Total Residual Chlorine TRC 4
28 µg/L
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Temperature, °C
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Temperature, °C
Footnote 1
Grab
Upstream',
Downstream'
Conductivity, Nohm/cm
Footnote 1
Grab
Upstream,
Downstream
Dissolved Oxygen (DO), m /L
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Dissolved Oxygen (DO), mg/L
Footnote 1
Grab
Upstream',
Downstream'
Total Copper, /L 5
2/Month
Composite
Effluent
Mercury6
224 ng/L
2/Month
Composite
Effluent
Total Nitrogen (TN)
TN = NO2 + NO3 + TKN, m /L
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Total Phosphorus JP), m /L
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Chronic Toxicity 7
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Total Zinc, /L 5
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Total Silver, /L 5
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Color 8
300 ADMI
3/Quarter
Composite
Effluent
Color 8
Footnote 1
Grab
Upstream,
Downstream
Effluent Pollutant Scans
Annual
Composite/
Grab
Effluent

-444'qq
Permit NCO025071
(continued from A.(1.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS)
Notes:
1. Sample locations: Upstream - Upstream at NCSR 1964; Downstream - Downstream at NCSR 700.
Upstream and downstream samples shall be grab samples. Stream samples shall be collected
three times per week during June, July, August and September and once per week during the
remaining months of the year.
2. The monthly average BOD5 and TSS concentrations shall not exceed 15% of the respective influent
value (85% removal).
3. The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units.
4. Total Residual Chlorine compliance is required for chlorine or chlorine derivative used for
disinfection. The Division shall consider all effluent TRC values reported below 50 ug/ 1 to be
in compliance with the permit. However, the Permittee shall continue to record and submit
all values reported by a North Carolina certified laboratory (including field certified), even if
these values fall below 50 ug/l.
5. Sampling for zinc, copper, and silver should coincide with sampling for chronic toxicity test.
6. Provisional limit and monitoring shall apply as stated in Special Condition A.(4.).
7. Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) P/F at 5.4%. Toxicity testing shall be performed in the months of
March, June, September and December (see Part A.(2.).
8. Limit is an instantaneous maximum (i.e. not to be exceeded at any time) not a daily maximum.
9. See Special Condition A.(3.) for list of pollutants.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.

ppppppp-
Permit NCO025071
(continued from A.(1.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS)
Notes:
1. Sample locations: Upstream - Upstream at NCSR 1964; Downstream - Downstream at NCSR 700.
Upstream and downstream samples shall be grab samples. Stream samples shall be collected
three times per week during June, July, August and September and once per week during the
remaining months of the year.
2. The monthly average BODs and TSS concentrations shall not exceed 15% of the respective influent
value (85% removal).
3. The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units.
4. Total Residual Chlorine compliance is required for chlorine or chlorine derivative used for
disinfection. The Division shall consider all effluent TRC values reported below 50 ug/1 to be
in compliance with the permit. However, the Permittee shall continue to record and submit
all values reported by a North Carolina certified laboratory (including field certified), even if
these values fall below 50 ug/l.
5. Sampling for zinc, copper, and silver should coincide with sampling for chronic toxicity test.
6. Provisional limit and monitoring shall apply as stated in Special Condition A.(4.).
7. Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) P/F at 5.4%. Toxicity testing shall be performed in the months of
March, June, September and December (see Part A.(2.).
8. Limit is an instantaneous maximum (i.e. not to be exceeded at any time) not a daily maximum.
9. See Special Condition A.(3.) for list of pollutants.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.

ppppppp-
Permit NCO025071
A. (4.) CONDITIONAL MONITORING FOR MERCURY -CORRECTED DRAFT
Provisional Limits and weekly monitoring for Mercury take effect 18 months from the effective date of
this permit. If the first 12 months of monitoring data shows no reasonable potential to exceed water
quality standards, the Permittee can petition the Division to (1) remove the limit and to (2) reduce the
measurement frequency to quarterly, which can be done by letter from the Division without having to
reopen the permit.

Mr. Brad Corcoran
City Manager
City of Eden
308 E. Stadium Drive
Eden, NC 27288
Dear Mr. Corcoran:
41-1—
Michael F. Easley, Governor
State of North Carolina
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
RECEIVED
October 29, 2008 N.C. Dept of ENR
I
OCT 302008
Winston-Salem
Regional Office
Subject: Response to Comments on Renewal Drafts
(1) NPDES Permit NCO025071
City of Eden Mebane Bridge WWTP
(2) NPDES Permit NCO025151
City of Eden Dry Creek WWTP
Rockingham County
The Division has reviewed the comments in your staff October 20, 2008 letter. We have the following
information to offer after re-evaluation of the North Carolina statues water quality standards, and as
requested in your letter. We are addressing both permit draft renewals for the City of Eden WWTPs.
Dry Creek NCOO25151
It has been the Division policy to include a permit page for an approved expanded capacity since
Permittees typically want to keep any approved capacity. We acknowledge this is not the case and
support you efforts for centralization of your treatment efforts to the Mebane Bridge facility. However,
to be consistent with Division policy we will continue to list the expanded capacity permit page in the
renewal permit. When you rescind the Dry Creek NPDES permit all permit pages will be deemed null
and void.
The 18 months timetable to meet TRC compliance, 28 µg/1, is per the Division standard policy to allow
you a one time opportunity to install the necessary equipment to meet the imposed TRC limit. We
acknowledge the City of Eden plans are to close this facility and cease discharge prior to the 18 month
deadline. If any discharge did occur after the 18 month period you will have to be in compliance with
the TRC limit. As often the case, your preliminary investigation indicates additional equipment would
be required to meet the TRC compliance limit requiring construction approval and capital investment.
onth
The decision on ow to timetablewillbegrd in 1s up to you. To be the applicable permit page. consistent
onlVision policy the 18 the expanded permit TRC compliance .
TRC compliance is immediate upon expansion.
Mebane Bridge NCO025071
The evaluation to determine if a pollutant parameter has the possible potential to exceed any
applicable water quality standards is part of the normal permit review process and is based on the
most recent 48 month data you have submitted through DMRs or PPAs. In the case of mercury the
one high data point did occur within this time frame and prompted the addition of the provisional
ut without
compliance tocumented evideble. We nce of heethat the facility should not create err or a full documented disclosure of all urcebwe have to
substantial documented
assume there is an unknown source.
Page 1 of 2
Telephone [phone] One
Point Source Branch
Division of Water Quality, FAX [phone] No hCarolina
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617Qi1lCQ!!1,/
On the Internet at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604n Enual O000dunity/Affirmative Action Employer

There is one major correction the Division will make, the provisional mercury compliance limit should
not go into effect until 18 months after the permit effective date. During the first 18 months 2/Month
monitoring is required. If after the first 12 months of monitoring you feel the data show no reasonable
potential to exceed the mercury compliance limit then you can petition the Division in writing to
remove the mercury limit and reduce the monitoring frequency back to the pretreatment condition of
quarterly without reopening the permit. If no petition is received or the Division evaluation of the first
12 months mercury data does not support the removal of the mercury compliance limit, the mercury
compliance limit with weekly monitoring is required beginning after the 18 month provisional timeline.
The 2/Month monitorimg is consistent with Division policy for NPDES effluent monitored parameters
for your facility. Unfortunately, we can only reduce the mercury monitoring under the terms specified
in the provisional limit.
Per your written request we provide the following statue quote:
The aesthetic problem, odor and taste, issdeWS d under Waters North
as Carolina
Statute 15A NCAC 02B .0216
(3) Quality standards applicable to Class
(e) "Chlorinated phenolic compounds: not greater than 1.o µg/l to protect water supplies from
taste and odor problems due to chlorinated phenols shall be allowed. Specific phenolic
compounds may be given a different limit if it is demonstrated not to cause taste and odor
problems and not to be detrimental to other best usage"
After verification of which available data defines chlorinated phenolic compounds the Division re-
evaluated the possible potential to exceed the chlorinated phenolic compounds water quality standard
and has concluded no potential exist and no limits is required. Monitoring requirements will revert
back to pretreatment total phenols requiremre�eatmenthave group. The further
renewalconcerns
permi twill be corrected
out total phenols
monitoring you should contact the DWQ p
accordingly. The Fact Sheet will be revised to read as follows:
Phenolic Compounds - Monitoring is part of pretreatment requirement. There is a water quality
standard, aesthetic standard dealing with odor and taste, required for chlorinated phenolic compounds
because the receiving stream, Dan River, is class fled as a WS. Evaluation of available PPA data
low detection limits so nofurther action is
indicates all tchlorinated
renewals
at s will include nolic compounds
o of tare he PPA dat for chlorinated phenolic compounds.
Future permit renewals
l be issued
further comments and
A corrected draft permit for questions concerning this letter please lrcall Ron Berryat [phone] or by
approval. If you have
email at ron.beny®ncmail.net.
Sinc
erely,
&V--,
Ron Berry
Eastern NPDES Program
Attachments:
Cc: Winston Salem Regional Office/Surface Water Protection Section (copy of City of Eden October
20, 2008 letter)
NPDES Unit (original City of Eden October 20, 2008 letter)
Central Files (copy of City of Eden October 20, 2008 letter)
Page 2 of 2

ppppppp-
i /�
0Ci 2 2 L
� f �
W w kwate)c J wattneid J eant
October 20, 2008
Ron Berry
Eastern NPDES Program
Division of Water Quality, Point Source Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Subject: Comments for Draft of Renewal Permits
NPDES Permit NCO025071
City of Eden Mebane Bridge WWTP
NPDES Permit NCO025151
City of Eden Dry Creek WWTP
Rockingham County
Dear Mr. Berry,
Our staff has received and reviewed both of the draft NPDES permits for our city's
wastewater treatment plants. We understand the changes being proposed and the
reasoning behind these changes, but we still wish to comment on a few of these changes.
Concerning the permit renewal for the Dry Creek WWTP, #NC0025151, there was only
one major change noted along with directives to go along with a plant expansion. We
will not be pursuing a plant expansion. I'm not sure if this section could be removed, but
it will not be needed for the future. We are currently looking at plans for closing Dry
Creek permanently and rerouting all flows to the Mebane Bridge Plant. As for the TRC
limit, we have reviewed the plant layout and have determined that modifications to the
effluent structure would have to be in place before we could effectively chlorinate and
dechlorinate. This pushes us further in our desire to close the Dry Creek plant. We are
hoping to have plans in place within a year to have all flows diverted before the end of
2009. This should keep us within the 18 month timeline that will be imposed to meet the
new TRC limit.
Concerning the permit renewal for the Mebane Bridge WWTP, #NC0025071, there were
several major changes noted but we only wish to comment on two. We see no problems
with the new effluent weekly average maximum limit. We have always seen results less
than our current monthly average, so meeting the new limit should not be a problem. We
have no problems with the reduction in silver monitoring as well.
P. O. Box 70 • Eden, NC 27289-0070 • [phone] • Fax [phone]

We are, though, concerned about the increased monitoring for Mercury as well as the
weekly average maximum limit. We have already budgeted for our annual analysis and
this increase in testing was not planned for. For as far back as 2001, we have
consistently shown < 0.0002 mg/L Mercury in our Effluent. The majority of our Influent
data has also been < 0.0002 mg/L with only five data points being above the detection
limit. Only one date showed a hit of 0.0011 mg/L in the Effluent while the Influent for
that day was 0.0008 mg/L. We feel strongly that this was an erroneous reading either
from contamination through sampling or the analysis itself. Nothing could be identified
at the time to prove a lab error, but with the Effluent being higher than the Influent, an
error would have had to occur. It is not feasible that we would produce Mercury in our
operation. We understand the protocol for reasonable potential, but I'm asking that you
reconsider the length of time for required conditional monitoring. We ask that it be
reduced to 3 — 6 months with the understanding that if another hit occurs, we will
continue the bi-monthly sampling for the rest of the permit term.
Our other concern is with the newly imposed Phenol limit. We are not aware of any
aesthetic problems with the downstream drinking water supply or do we foresee any
problems contributed from our plant due to the size of the stream that we discharge into.
First, we would like to see a Fact Sheet that shows how this limit was initially
established. Next, we ask that you consider a conditional monitoring requirement for a 3
— 6 month period for this parameter with the understanding that if we have any results
above the limit, we will continue monitoring bi-monthly. Otherwise, we can revert back
to monitoring quarterly for the duration of the permit. We know there have been a few
results near or above the new proposed limit, but again, we feel that some amount of lab
error could have contributed to these results. In the past year, we have switched private
labs due to some continual problems and have worked on improving our sampling
techniques from within. Due to the difficulty of treating Phenol once it comes into the
plant, we ask that we be given a chance to prove that there is not a problem.
These above mentioned concerns are all that we have at this time. Thank you for the
opportunity to discuss these issues with your office and present a response for your
review. We will soon lose our largest industrial contributor which will surely impact the
overall makeup of our stream. It will also have a detrimental financial impact on our
facility as well as the community as a whole. Any reconsideration of these matters will
be appreciated.
Sincerely,
A
Melinda S. Ward
Wastewater Superintendent
Cc: Brad Corcoran
Dennis Asbury
Ralph Potter

October 29, 2008
Ms. Shari L. Bryant, Regional Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
Division of Marine Fisheries
1721 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Michael F. Easley, Governor
State of North Carolina
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
r
IYECt. r" F—�0 2008rSalern
l Office
Subject: NPDES Proposed Permit Response
Permit Number NCO025071
City of Eden Mebane Bridge WWTP
Rockingham County
Dear Ms. Bryant:
The Division reviewed the comments in your October 23, 2008 letter for the Mebane Bridge facility. We
have the following additional information to offer and will convey to the City of Eden your concerns about the
impact to the diverse aquatic community in the Dan River.
The Mebane Bridge facility is a domestic treatment facility with an active pretreatment program for it
industrial sources that has a monthly average treated effluent discharge less than 7,000,000 gallons per day.
Mebane Bridge currently has a Total Chlorine Residual (TRC) acute limit, 28 1Lg/1, that will be continued in the
renewal permit. During the last permit cycle Mebane Bridge had no TRC violations. Mebane Bridge uses
chlorination followed by declorination. Since June 2005 Mebane Bridge has passed all twelve of its quarterly
effluent chronic toxicity tests and the required four second species toxicity tests. There is sufficient power back
up capability to operate this facility. Mebane Bridge is conducting routine instream Fecal Coliform testing at the
same time as it is testing for Fecal Coliform in its discharge. This testing has demonstrated the source of high
Fecal Coliform in Dan River is not Mebane Bridge.
Ammonia as nitrogen, considered a toxic parameter, is limited in the current permit during the summer
months and will continue to be limited in the summer in the renewal permit. No ammonia nitrogen limit violations
have occurred in the current active permit. New stream flow data from USGS was used to recalculate the renewal
permit required ammonia nitrogen limit, 14.8 mg/1 a monthly average.
The levels of metals reported routinely to the Division for the effluent, some potential toxic parameters,
were evaluated for possible potential to exceed water quality standards. No possible potential to exceed water
quality standards were found except for one mercury reading. The mercury reading was not consistent with the
other mercury data available. Consequently, in the renewal permit Mebane Bridge will be required to supply
sufficient data to prove mercury is not a concern in the effluent or a limit will be imposed. The Division will issue
the renewal permit with a 18 month provisional compliance condition for mercury and will advise the City of
Eden that in future application alternative disinfection methods should be considered.
If you have any questions, please contact Ron Berry at telephone number [phone].
SincereI
Ron Berry
cc: Central Files (w/ copy October 23, 2008 letter)
NPDES Permit File [w/ original October 23, 2008 letter)
Winston Salem Regional Office, Water Quality Section [w/ copy October 23, 2008 letter)
Division of Water Quality, Point Source Branch Telephone [phone]
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 FAX [phone] NorthCarolina
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 On the Internet at hItp.V1h2o.enrstate.nc.u4/ Natu-6111f
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer

® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Gordon Myers, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Ron Berry, NPDES Unit
Division of Water Quality
FROM: Shari L. Bryant, Piedmont Region Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: 23 October 2008
SUBJECT: Proposed Permit Renewal for Mebane Bridge WWTP, City of Eden, Rockingham
County, NPDES Permit No. NCO025071
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission have reviewed the subject
document. Our comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (as
amended), Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d), North
Carolina General Statutes (G.S. 113-131 et seq.), and North Carolina Administrative Code 15A NCAC
10I.0102.
The City of Eden has applied for renewal of its NPDES permit to discharge treated combined
domestic wastewater into Dan River in the Roanoke River basin. According to the public notice, total
residual chlorine (TRC), mercury, phenolic compounds, ammonia nitrogen, and color are water quality
limited.
Dan River supports a diverse aquatic community and there are records for the federal and state
endangered Roanoke logperch (Percina rex), the federal species of concern and state endangered green
floater (Lasmigona subvirdis), the state threatened bigeye jumprock (Scartomyzon ariommus), and the
state significantly rare Roanoke hogsucker (Hypentelium roanokense) in Dan River.
We offer the following recommendations to reduce impacts to aquatic resources, particularly to
the Roanoke logperch.
If the facility uses chlorine disinfection, chlorine systems should be replaced by ultraviolet light
or ozone systems. Chlorine is acutely toxic to aquatic organisms and can form secondary
compounds that are detrimental to aquatic life.
2. If not already in place, a stand-by power system should be installed.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this permit renewal. If we can be of further
assistance, please contact our office at [phone].
ec: Rob Nichols, WRC
Tom Augspurger, USFWS
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]

O�O� W AT �R�G
In 7
r-
Ljy
p �
Mr. Stephen B. Corcoran
City of Eden
308 East Stadium Drive
Eden, North Carolina 27288
Dear Mr. Corcoran:
RECEIVED
N.C. Deot. of ENR
OCT 21 2008
Winston-Salem
Rogional office
October 13, 2008
ROW --
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
SUBJECT: Authorization to Construct
A to C No. 025071 A02
Colleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
i
FE c EoV% E
- p,
n OCT 1 7
d
DENR RAtEIGH REC :,�;',L OF i:ICE
City of Eden
Mebane Bridge Road W WTP
Biosolids Dewatering Facility
Phase 1 — Site Work & Foundations Package
Rockingham County
A letter of request for Authorization to Construct was received August 5, 2008, by the
Division, and final plans and specifications for the subject project have been reviewed and found
to be satisfactory. Authorization is hereby granted for the Phase 1 (Site Work and Foundation
Package) construction of the Biosolids Dewatering Facility at the existing 13.5 MGD
Wastewater Treatment Plant, with discharge of treated wastewater into the Dan River in the
Roanoke Basin. With the completion of Phase 1 and the future Phase 2 Biosolids Dewatering
Facility construction projects, the Biosolids Dewatering Facility will be operational.
This authorization results in no increase in design or permitted capacity and is awarded
for the construction of the following:
Concrete foundations for the (approximately) 28-foot by 46-foot dewatering
building, the 80-foot by 185-foot sludge storage shelter, and the 50,000 gallon
sludge storage tank, and associated site work and yard piping, in conformity with
the project plans, specifications, and other supporting data subsequently filed and
approved by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
The issuance of this Phase 1 Authorization to Construct (ATC) for the Site Work &
Foundation Package of the Mebane Bridge Road WWTP Biosolids Dewatering Facility in no
way implies that issuance of the authorization for the Phase 2 construction of this facility will be
granted. The Phase 2 ATC for the Biosolids Dewatering Facility may be issued after a complete
review of the plans and specifications for this portion of this project. Construction of facilities
other than those approved in this ATC shall not take place until the Phase 2 ATC is issued.
This Authorization to Construct is issued in accordance with Part III, Paragraph A of
NPDES Permit No. NCO025071 issued August 9, 2002, and shall be subject to revocation unless
lhcarolina
�Naturally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www.ncwaterouality.org 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27604 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

FV
Mr. Stephen B. Corcoran
October 13, 2008
Page 2
the wastewater treatment facilities are constructed in accordance with the conditions and
limitations specified in Permit No. NC0025701.
The sludge generated from these treatment facilities must be disposed of in accordance
with G.S. 143-215.1 and in a manner approved by the North Carolina Division of Water Quality.
In the event that the facilities fail to perform satisfactorily, including the creation of
nuisance conditions, the Permittee shall take immediate corrective action, including those as may
be required by this Division, such as the construction of additional or replacement wastewater
treatment or disposal facilities.
The - aaeem Regional —Office, telephone number [phone], shall be notif
at orty-eight (48) hours in advance of operation of the installed facilities so that an on sib
inspection can be made. Such notification to the regional supervisor shall be made durin
normal office hours from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. on Monday through Friday, ex g State
Holidays.
Upon completion of construction and prior to operation of this permitted facility, a
certification must be received from a professional engineer certifying that the permitted facility
has been installed in accordance with the NPDES Permit, this Authorization to Construct and the
approved plans and specifications. Mail the Certification to: Construction Grants & Loans,
DWQ/DENR, 1633 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1633.
Upon classification of the facility by the Certification Commission, the Permittee shall
employ a certified wastewater treatment plant operator to be in responsible charge (ORC) of the
wastewater treatment facilities. The operator must hold a certificate of the type and grade at
least equivalent to or greater than the classification assigned to the wastewater treatment
facilities by the Certification Commission.
The Permittee must also employ a certified back-up operator of the appropriate type and
grade to comply with the conditions of T15A:8G.0202. The ORC of the facility must visit each
Class I facility at least weekly and each Class II, 1II and IV facility at least daily, excluding
weekends and holidays, must properly manage the facility, must document daily operation and
maintenance of the facility, and must comply with all other conditions of T15A:8G.0202.
A copy of the approved plans and specifications shall be maintained on file by the
Permittee for the life of the facility.
During the construction of the proposed additions/modifications, the permittee shall
continue to properly maintain and operate the existing wastewater treatment facilities at all times,
and in such a manner, as necessary to comply with the effluent limits specified in the NPDES
Permit.
You are reminded that it is mandatory for the project to be constructed in accordance
with the North Carolina Sedimentation Pollution Control Act, and when applicable, the North

Mr. Stephen B. Corcoran
October 13, 2008
Page 3
Carolina Dam Safety Act. In addition, the specifications must clearly state what the contractor's
responsibilities shall be in complying with these Acts.
Prior to entering into any contract(s) for construction, the recipient must have obtained all
applicable permits from the State.
Failure to abide by the requirements contained in this Authorization to Construct may
subject the Permittee to an enforcement action by the Division of Water Quality in accordance
with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A to 143-215.6C.
The issuance of this Authorization to Construct does not preclude the Permittee from
complying with any and all statutes, rules, regulations, or ordinances which may be imposed by
other government agencies (local, state, and federal) which have jurisdiction.
One (1) set of approved plans and specifications is being forwarded to you. If you have
any questions or need additional information, please contact Seth Robertson, P.E. at telephone
number [phone].
Sincerely,
(-41-- Coleen H. Sullins
kp:sr
cc: Tyler Highfill, P.E. — Highfill Infrastructure Engineering, P.C., 1150 SE Maynard Rd,
Suite 250, Cary, NC 27511
Rockingham County Health Department
DWQ Winston-Salem Regional Office, Surface Water Protection
DWQ, Technical Assistance and Certification Unit
DWQ, Point Source Branch, NPDES Program
Daniel Blaisdell, P.E.
Seth Robertson, P.E.
Ken Pohlig, P.E.
ATC File

I RECEIVED
Michael F. Easley, Governor
�i
N.C. Dept of ENR
State of North Carolina
SEP 2 6 2008
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
r�
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
y
Winston-Salem
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
IT,
Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
September 24, 2008
Mr. Brad Corcoran
City Manager
City of Eden
308 E. Stadium Drive
Eden, NC 27288
Subject: Draft of Renewal Permit
NPDES Permit NCO025071
City of Eden Mebane Bridge WWTP
Rockingham County
Dear Mr. Corcoran:
Enclosed with this letter is a copy of the renewal draft permit for your facility. Be aware there are
several major changes from your existing permit. Please review the draft very carefully so that you
thoroughly understand the conditions, measurement units, and requirements itin conta.
Your permit is among several in the Roanoke River basin that are up for renewal. Some narrative
corrections have been made, where warranted:
Summary of Changes
1) An Ammonia Nitrogen (Aprill - October 31) effluent weekly average maximum limit has
been added to this permit. Ammonia nitrogen is both a toxicant and water quality parameter.
When a monthly average maximum limit is imposed on a POTW the EPA requires a weekly
average maximum limit either 3 times the monthly limit or a maximum of 35.0 mg/l, which
ever is lower.
2) A Total Silver effluent monitoyjg. requency was reduced to quarterly in this permit.
Total Silver is a major toxicant. RP as conducted and no correlation to toxicity was shown.
Total Silver quarterly monitoring is required for pretreatment monitoring.
3) A Mercury effluent conditional monitoring with a weekly average maximum limit has
been added to this permit. Mercury is a major water quality parameter. A RPA was conducted
and the potential to exceed a weekly average maximum limit of 224 ng/L was shown. The
reported data had only one detected value so a conditional monitoring protocol was define to
allow the Permitte to reduce monitoring after 12 months if the data is below the weekly
average maximum limit. This same condition also terminates the use of the reduce monitoring
condition anytime the weekly average maximum limit is exceeded.
4) A Phenolic compounds monitoring with a weekly average maximum limit has been added
to this permit. Phenolic compounds concentration is an aesthetic standard for WS waters,
odor and taste. The City of Danville has its drinking water supply intake downstream of this
discharge.
Narrative Change
5) An Effluent Pollutant Scan parameter with annual submittal has been added to this
permit. The scan was required in the previous permit and defined as a Special Condition. It
will continue to be required and defined as a Special Condition, for clarity it was added to the
permit page.
Page 1 of 2
Division of Water Quality, Point Source Branch Telephone [phone] One
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 FAX [phone] NorthiCarolina
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 On the Internet at http://h2o.enrsiate.nc.us/ Nah(ra!!y
An Equal OpportunWAffirmative Action Employer

The permit draft will be sent to the Aquatic Toxicology Unit , Virginia DEQ, City Of Danville, and the
Division of Environmental Health (DEH) for comment. Since this discharge is into a WS class stream
DEH approval will be required.
Concurrent with this notification the Division is publishing a notice in the newspaper having
circulation in the general Rockingham County area, soliciting public comments on this permit draft.
Please provide any comments you may have regarding this draft to DENR - DWQ, NPDES
Program no later than 30 days after receiving this draft permit.
Following the 30-day public comment period, the Division will review all pertinent comments and take
appropriate action prior to issuing a final permit. If you have questions concerning the draft for your
facility, please call Ron Berry at [phone] or by email at [e-mail].
If no adverse comments are received from the public or from you, this permit will likely be issued in
November 2008, with an effective date of December 1, 2008, expiring on April 30, 2012.
Sincerely,
)L &V
Ron Berry
Eastern NPDES Program
Attachments
Cc: EPA/Region 4/Marchall Hyatt [with Fact Sheet, application]
Winston Salem Regional Office/Surface Water Protection Section [with Fact Sheet]
DEH/Winston Salem Regional Office (with DEH approval form)
Environmental Sciences Branch/Aquatic Toxicology Unit/Susan Meadows
Virginia DEQ/Robert Goode [email pdf, [e-mail]]
City of Danville/ Barry Dunkley [email pdf, [e-mail]]
PERC Unit/Dana Folley
NPDES Unit
Page 2 of 2

Permit NCO025071
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
.ry..RTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PF.PMTT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful
standards and regulations promulgated .and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
City of Eden
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at the
Mebane Bridge WWTP
204 Mebane Bridge Road (NCSR 1964)
south of Eden
Rockingham County
to receiving waters designated as the Dan River in the Roanoke River Basin
in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other
conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III and IV hereof.
This permit shall become effective.
This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on April30, 2012.
Signed this day.
F::N
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

Permit NCO025071
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
All previous NPDES Permits issued to this facility, whether for operation or discharge are hereby
revoked. As of this permit issuance, any previously issued permit bearing this number is no longer
effective. Therefore, the exclusive authority to operate and discharge from this facility arises under the
permit conditions, requirements, terms, and provisions included herein.
The City of Eden is hereby authorized to:
1. Continue to operate the existing 13.5 MGD wastewater treatment facility
consisting of a flow meter, bar screens, grit separator, extended aeration
basins, secondary clarifiers, chlorination facilities, dechlorination, aerobic
digester, dissolved air flotation (DAF), sludge lagoons, and polymer addition
located at the Mebane Bridge Wastewater Treatment Plant on 204 Mebane
Bridge Road (NCSR 1964), south of Eden, in Rockingham County, and
2. Discharge from said treatment works at the location specified on the attached
map into the Dan River, classified WS-IV waters in the Roanoke River Basin.

A
%
4k
V
ss
V,
1 -yy YY4'� '' V ', y \ F t t F � r� r � _: yl � + j � � � �� -4� / � � ,L� {t .
NCO025071
/*
OOSSI
x
39 NA
a ZZ
VO
ie
t %
V's
Sir,
ass o� pyri gf1it C 20'61
USGS Quad: B20NW Southeast Eden, NC
Latitude: 36' 25' 17" N Stream Class: WS-IV
Longitude: 79' 44' 35" W Subbasin: 030203
Receiving Stream: Dan River
Facility
Location
tth I NCO025071 Mebane Bridge WWTP
IVORockingham County

Permit NC0025071
LUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS- DRAFT
During the period beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until permit expiration,
the Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and
monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
:EFFLUN
CHARi4�TERIS�IQS
�d
LIMIT,S�
.. MONITOR REQUIREMENTS
Month) YY
Average
Wee
Average <.
�` Dail
.ti rY
,Maximuim
Measurement
Frequency
.Sam le
pg .,
Type
Sample Location
, ,
Flow
13.5 MGD
Continuous
Recording
Influent or Effluent
BOD, 5-day 20°C 2
30.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
Daily
Composite
Effluent, Influent
Total Suspended Solids (TSS)2
30.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
Daily
Composite
Effluent, Influent
NH3 as N(April 1-October 31
14.8 m /L
35.0 m /L
Daily
Composite
Effluent
NH3 as N November 1—March 31
3/Week
Composite
Effluent
H 3
Daily
Grab
Effluent
pH
Footnote 1
Grab
Upstream',
Downstream'
Fecal Coliform
(geometric mean
200 1100 ml
400 / 100 ml
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Total Residual Chlorine TRC 4
28 µg/L
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Temperature, °C
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Temperature, °C
Footnote 1
Grab
Upstream',
Downstream'
Conductivity, Nohm/cm
Footnote 1
Grab
Upstream,
Downstream
Dissolved Oxygen (DO), m /L
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Dissolved Oxygen (DO), mg/L
Footnote 1
Grab
Upstream,
Downstream
Total Copper, /L 5
2/Month
Composite
Effluent
Mercury6
224 ng/L
2/Month
Composite
Effluent
Phenolic Compounds
36 /L
2/Month
Composite
Effluent
Total Nitrogen (TN)
TN = NO2 + NO3 + TKN, m /L
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Total Phosphorus TP , m /L
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Chronic Toxicity7
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Total Zinc, /L 5
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Total Silver, L 5
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Color 8
300 ADMI
3/Quarter
Composite
Effluent
Color 8
Footnote 1
Grab
Upstream,
Downstream'
Effluent Pollutant Scan 9
Annual
Composite/
Grab
Effluent

Permit NCO025071
om A41.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS)
ations: Upstream Upstream at NCSR 1964; Downstream - Downstream at NCSR 700.
upstream and downstream samples shall be grab samples. Stream samples shall be collected
three times per week during June, July, August and September and once per week during the
remaining months of the year.
2. The monthly average BOD5 and TSS concentrations shall not exceed 15% of the respective influent
value (85% removal).
3. The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units.
4. Total Residual Chlorine compliance is required for chlorine or chlorine derivative used for
disinfection. The Division shall consider all effluent TRC values reported below 50 ug/1 to be
in compliance with the permit. However, the Permittee shall continue to record and submit
all values reported by a North Carolina certified laboratory (including field certified), even if
these values fall below 50 ug/l.
5. Sampling for zinc, copper, and silver should coincide with sampling for chronic toxicity test.
6. Conditional monitoring shall apply as stated in Special Condition A.(4.) and is determined by
compliance with the weekly average maximum limit of 224 ng/l.
7. Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) P/F at 5.4%. Toxicity testing shall be performed in the months of
March, June, September and December (see Part A.(2.).
8. Limit is an instantaneous maximum (i.e. not to be exceeded at any time) not a daily maximum.
9. See Special Condition A.(3.) for list of pollutants.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.

Permit NCO025071
K. (2.) CHRONIC TOXICITY PERMIT LIMIT (QUARTERLY) -DRAFT
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit observable._ inhibition of reproduction or significant
mortality to Ceriodaphnia dubia at an effluent concentration of 5.4%.
The permit holder shall perform at a minimum, guarterlu monitoring using test procedures outlined
in the "North Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised February 1998,
or subsequent versions or "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure"
(Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions. The tests will be performed during the months of
March, June, September and December. Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at
the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes.
If the test procedure performed as the first test of any single quarter results in a failure or ChV below
the permit limit, then multiple -concentration testing shall be performed at a minimum, in each of the
two following months as described in "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test
Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions.
The chronic value for multiple concentration tests will be determined using the geometric mean of the
highest concentration having no detectable impairment of reproduction or survival and the lowest
concentration that does have a detectable impairment of reproduction or survival. The definition of
"detectable impairment," collection methods, exposure regimes, and further statistical methods are
specified in the "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -
February 1998) or subsequent versions.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent
Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the months in which tests were performed, using the
parameter code TGP313 for the pass/fail results and THP313 for the Chronic Value. Additionally, DWQ
Form AT-3 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Branch no
later than 30 days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made.
Test data shall be complete, accurate, include all supporting chemical/physical measurements and
all concentration/response data, and be certified by laboratory supervisor and ORC or approved
designate signature. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and
reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is
required, the Permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT)
test form indicating the facility name, permit number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of
the report with the notation of "No Flow" in the comment area of the form. The report shall be
submitted to the Environmental Sciences Branch at the address cited above.
Should the Permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required,
monitoring will be required during the following month.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re-
opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum
control organism survival, minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate environmental
controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate follow-up testing to be completed
no later than the last day of the month following the month of the initial monitoring.

Permit NCO025071
) EFFLUENT POLLUTANT SCAN -DRAFT
The permittee shall perform an annual pollutant scan of its treated effluent for the following parameters:
Ammonia (as N)
Trans-1,2-dichloroethylene
Bis (2-chtoroethyl) ether
Chlorine (total residual, TRC)
1,1-dichloroethylene
Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether
Dissolved oxygen
1,2-dichloropropane
Bis (2othylhexyl) phthalate
NitratelNitrite
1,3-dichloropropylene
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
Kjeldahl nitrogen
Ethylbenzene
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Oil and grease
Methyl bromide
2ohloronaphthalene
Phosphorus
Methyl chloride
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Total dissolved solids
Methylene chloride
Chrysene
Hardness
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Antimony
Tetrachloroethylene
Di-noctyl phthalate
Arsenic
Toluene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Beryllium
1, 1. 1 -trichloroethane
1,2-dichlorobenzene
Cadmium
1, 1,2-trich loroethane
1,3-dichlorobenzene
Chromium
Trichloroethylene
1,4-dihlorobenzene
Copper
Vinyl chloride
3,3-dichlorobenzidine
Lead
Acid -extractable compounds:
Diethyl phthalate
Mercury
P-chloro-m-creso
Dimethyl phthalate
Nickel
2-chlorophenol
2,4-dinitrotoluene
Selenium
2,4-dichlorophenol
2,6-dinitrotoluene
Silver
2,4-dimethylphenol
1,2-diphenylhydrazine
Thallium
4,6-dinitro-o-cresol
Fluoranthene
Zinc
2,4-dinitrophenol
Fluorene
Cyanide
2-nitrophenol
Hexachlorobenzene
Total phenolic compounds
4-nitrophenol
Hexachlorobutadiene
Volatile organic compounds:
Pentachlorophenol
Hexachlorocyclo-pentadiene
Acrolein -
Phenol
Hexaahloroethane
Acrylonitrile
2,4,6-tdchlorophenol
Indeno(1,2,3od)pyrene
Benzene
Base -neutral compounds:
Isophorone
Bromoform
Acenaphthene
Naphthalene
Carbon tetrachloride
Acenaphthylene
Nitrobenzene
Chlorobenzene
Anthracene
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
Chlorodibromomethane
Benzidine
N-nitrosodimethylamine
Chloroethane
Benzo(a)anthracene
N-nit osodiphenylamine
2-chloroethylvinyl ether
Benzo(a)pyrene
Phenanthrene
Chloroform
3,4 benzofluoranthene
Pyrene
Dichlorobromomethane
Benzo(ghi)perylene
1,2,4-bichlombenzene
1,1-dihloroethane
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
1,2-dichloroethane
Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane
➢ The total set of samples analyzed during the current term of the permit must be representative
of seasonal variations.
➢ Samples shall be collected and analyzed in accordance with analytical methods approved under
40 CFR Part 136.
➢ Unless indicated otherwise, metals must be analyzed and reported as total recoverable.
➢ Test results shall be reported to the Division in DWQ Form- DMR-PPA1 or in a form approved
by the Director, within 90 days of sampling. A copy of the report shall be submitted to each the
NPDES Unit and the Compliance and Enforcement Unit to the following address: Division of
Water Quality, Water Quality Section, , 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina
27699-1617.

Permit NCO025071
DITIONAL MONITORING FOR MERCURY -DRAFT
During the period beginning on the permit effective date and continuing until the permit expiration
date the weekly average maximum limit of 224 ng/1 shall apply. Beginning with the first month after
the effective date of this permit and continuing for the next 12 consecutive months, the Permittee
shall meet the 2/Month monitoring requirement. After the 12 consecutive months reporting period if
the weekly average maximum limit of 224 ng/1 was not exceeded at any time then the Permittee can
reduce monitoring to quarterly. If at anytime during the quarterly monitoring the weekly maximum
limit of 224 ng/1 is exceeded then the Permittee shall be required to monitor 2/Month until the
permit expiration.

ve6�-,Mll 3�� lsca�;� 6(iciel- &kd�rlrl
NCDENR/ DWQ FACT SHEET
NPDES PERMIT RENEWAL
NPDES No. NCO025071
Facility Information
Applicant/Facility Name:
City of Eden / Mebane Bridge Wastewater Treatment Plant
Applicant Address:
308 East Stadium Drive, Eden, North Carolina 27288
Facility Address:
191 Mebane Bridge Road, Eden, North Carolina 27288
Permitted Flow
13.5 MGD
Type of Waste:
domestic 55%) and industrial 45%) with pretreatment program
Facility/Permit Status:
Class IV /Active; Permit renewal
County:
Rockingham County
Miscellaneous
Receiving Stream:
Dan River
Regional Office:
Winston-Salem
Stream Classification:
WS-IV
State Grid / USGS Quad:
B20NW/SE Eden,
NC
303 d Listed?
No
Permit Writer:
Ron Berry
Subbasin:
03-02-03
Date:
August 21, 2008
Drainage Area (mi):
1701
A4"F
Lat. 36°28' 17" N Long. 79° 44' 35" W
Summer 7Q 10 cfs
370 (July 1994)
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
600 (July 1994)
30 2 cfs
740 (July 1994)
Average Flow cfs :
IWC (%):
5.35% (13.5
MGD)
Background for Permit Renewal
The facility serves the City of Eden (pop. 16,000), the town of Wentworth (pop. 2,700) and four
Significant Industrial Users (SIUs). These SIUs are regulated through the City's pretreatment
program.
At the request of the permittee, June 2006, the permitted flow was reinstated to its previous 13.5
MGD compliance limits and monitoring because of increased industrial influent flow. Since its
discharge is 22 miles upstream of the water supply intake for Danville, Virginia, a color limit
(instantaneous maximum) of 300 ADMI was required. The 300 ADMI limit is based on a 1990
color mass balance model that was used for previous color limit determinations at various
permitted flows and is still considered valid.
Since June 2006 the permittee has failed to meet its effluent color limit only 1 out of the 12
reported measurements. However, the instream color monitoring data shows no definable
impacted on the downstream station located approximately 4 miles below the discharge. Danville
was provided a copy of the draft for comment.
The latest USGS steam data was used to recalculate the IWC and other related dilution factors.
The IWC % increased to 5.35% and was applied where applicable.
Because the receiving stream classification is WS, will submit draft for DEH approval. Also,
because of impact on aquatic species discussed in previous renewal will submit draft copy to NC
Wildlife Resources Commission for comment. Since the receiving stream is the water supply for
Danville Virginia, will submit draft for Virginia Department of Health approval. A copy will be
sent to the City of Danville for comment.
Fact Sheet
NPDES NC0025071
Page I of 5

In late 2006 the City of Eden began monthy instream monitoring of fecal coliform as rf
by the Dan River Association. Data submitted as required by general terms and con&
permit.
COMPLIANCE HISTORY
From May 2006 to April 2008 the following compliance violations occurred:
1) 3 violations, failure to meet minimum 85% removal of TSS
2) 3 violations, exceedance of maximum weekly average 45 mg/L TSS
3) 1 violation, exceedance of maximum monthly average 30 mg/L TSS
4) 3 violations, exceedanace of maximum instantaneous 300 AMI Color
5) 1 violation, exceedance of maximum weekly average Fecal Coliform 400/100 ml
6) 1 violation, exceedance of maximum monthly average Fecal Coliform 200/100 ml
PERMITTING STRATEGY
Reasonable Potential Analysis (RPA includes all DMR, pretreatment data., PPA)
Total Copper — Action level toxicant, no failed WET test. Predicted value above acute and
chronic. Reported values above acute only. Will continue to monitor 2/Month in conjunction
with WET sampling.
Total Silver — Action level toxicant, no failed WET test. All reported values below detection
limit. Predicted value exceeds acute and chronic value. Will reduce to monitor quarterly in
conjunction with WET sampling. Matches pretreatment requirements.
Total Zinc — Action level toxicant, no failed WET test. Predicted value above acute value but
lower than chronic value. No reported values above acute or chronic. Will continue to monitor
quarterly in conjunction with WET sampling. Matches pretreatment requirements.
Cyanide — Potential major pollutant of concern. Predicted value exceeds acute and chronic.
Reported values below PQL. Will recommend as part of pretreatment to continue monitoing
quarterly.
Mercury — Potential major pollutant of concern. Effluent monitored as part of pretreatment
requirements. Only one value above detection limit, same value above chronic. No acute limit.
Predicted value exceeds chronic limit. Will add to NPDES effluent monitoring as conditional
2/Month monitoring with weekly max average limit 224 ng/1 to activate immediately if any one
of the first 12 consecutive monthly measurements after the effective date exceed the weekly max
limit. If none of the 12 consecutive months values exceed the weekly max average limit of 224
ng/1 limit then permit monitoring will return to quarterly monitoring to meet pretreatment
requirements.
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) — Data from PPA. This is a water quality standard required
because the receiving stream, Dan River, is classified as a WS. No acute limit. Predicted value
below chronic. Highest reported value below chronic limit. No action required.
Hardness (CaCO3) - Small data set. This is a water quality standard required because the
receiving stream, Dan River, is classified as a WS. No acute limit. Predicted value below
chronic limit. Highest reported value below chronic limit. No action required.
Fact Sheet
NPDES \C'0025071
Page 2 of 5

Phenolic Compounds — Monitoring is part of pretreatment requirement. This is a water quality
standard required because the receiving stream, Dan River, is classified as a WS. This is an
aesthetic standard, dealing with odor and taste. No acute limit. Predicted value exceeds chronic
limit. Several reported values exceed chronic. Will require as NPDES effluent monitoring and
increase to 2/Month monitoring with weekly average maximum limit 36 µg/l. Will impact
pretreatment program.
Arsenic
Effluent monitored quarterly as part of pretreatment program. All reported data below detection
limit. Predicted value below chronic. No acute. No changes recommended, continue quarterly
pretreatment monitoring.
Cadmium
Effluent monitored quarterly as part of pretreatment program. All reported data below detection
limit. Predicted value below acute and chronic. No changes recommended, continue quarterly
pretreatment monitoring.
Chromium
Effluent monitored quarterly as part of pretreatment program. All reported data below detection
limit. Predicted value below acute and chronic. No suspected toxicity. No changes
recommended, continue quarterly pretreatment monitoring.
Molydenum
Effluent monitored quarterly as part of pretreatment program. Predicted value below chronic. No
acute. No changes recommended, continue quarterly pretreatment monitoring.
Lead
Effluent monitored quarterly as part of pretreatment program. All reported data below detection
limit. Predicted value below acute and chronic. No changes recommended, continue quarterly
pretreatment monitoring.
Other Parameters
Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) data from April 2006 through March 2008 was reviewed
and is summarized in Table I.
Table I: Summa DMR Data — March 2006 to April 2008
ow
Flow
(MGD)
BOD5
(mg/L)
TSS
(-g/L)
NH3-N
(mg/L)
Fecal
4/100m 1 Coliform
(µgIL)
DO
(mg/L)
Color
(ADMI)
TN
(mg/L)
TP
(mg/L)
Average
7.01
3.03
11.44
0.19
53.28
15.6
7.87
243.6
3.556
1.315
Maximum
8.7
8.4
41.6
4.3
614.9
27
18.1
603
12.90
3.21
Minimum
5.3
1.5
6.3
0.1
4.4
10
0.5*
86
1.11
0.08
* Suspect meter problem, lowest DO reported value = 3.9 mg/L
BOD5 — Primary effluent pollutant for WWTP. Will maintain existing permit effluent monitoring
and compliance including 85% removal.
Total Suspended Solids (TSS) - Primary effluent pollutant for WWTP. Will maintain existing
permit effluent monitoring and compliance including 85% removal.
Ammonia Nitrogen (NH3-N) — Primary effluent toxicant for WWTP. Calculated IWC with
latest stream data, monthly max limit increased to 14.8 mg/l. Added weekly max limit 35.0 mg/1
to meet EPA guidelines as directed in October 2002 policy letter for NPDES permit renewals and
Fact Sheet
NPDES NC'0025071
Page 3 of 5

removed re -opener condition. Will maintain existing permit monitoring requirements,
and winter.
pH —
Primary effluent pollutant for WWTP. Will maintain existing permit effluent mo:�.
and conpliance. Will maintain existing permit instream monitoring.
Fecal Coliform - Primary effluent pollutant for WWTP. Will maintain existing permit effluent
monitoring and conmpliance. Note: Current instream monitoring is not part of permit
requirments. lnstream study being provided to Dan River Association on a voluntary bases.
Compared effluent and instream data and noted fecal coliform high levels in the Dan River are
not negatively impacted by or traceable to WWTP effluent.
Total Residual Chlorine (TRC) — Primary effluent water quality standard. Calculated IWC with
latest stream data, no change to limit. Will maintain existing permit effluent monitoring and
compliance. Will add footnote to clarify chlorine derivative definition and measurement
detection protocol.
Temperature — Primary effluent impact factor for WWTP. Will maintain existing permit
effluent monitoring. Will maintain existing permit instream monitoring.
Conductivity — Primary indicator of impact of effluent dissolved solids on receiving stream.
Will maintain existing permit instream monitoring.
Dissolved Oxygen (DO) — Primary effluent pollutant for WWTP. Will maintain existing permit
effluent monitoring and compliance. Will maintain existing permit instream monitoring.
Total Nitrogen (TN) — Major pollutant of concern for nutrients from WWTP. Will maintain
existing permit effluent monitoring.
Total Phosphorus (TP) - Major pollutant of concern for nutrients from WWTP. Will maintain
existing permit effluent monitoring.
Color — Major pollutant of concern for aesthetic from WWTP with industrial sources. Specific
concern on impact to downstream water supply intakes. Reported data shows no impact of
effluent color on downstream color. Will maintain existing permit effluent monitoring and
compliance. Will maintain existing permit instream monitoring. Virginia Department of Health
will be asked to approve draft.
Chronic WET test — Primary test for toxicity evaluation of effluent. Will edit special condition
text in existing permit to reflect most current language and new test concentration. Will maintain
existing effluent monitoring and compliance. ESS will be asked to comment on the draft.
PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR PERMIT MODIFICATION ISSUANCE
Draft Permit Mod to Public Notice:
Permit Scheduled to Issue:
September 24, 2008
December 2008
Fact Sheet
NPDES NCO025071
Page 4 of 5

NPDES DIVISION CONTACT
If you have questions regarding any of the above information or on the attached modification, please
contact Ron Berry at [phone] or email [e-mail].
NAME: DATE: qJZ 3/a
REGION COMMENTS
e ke — � j 1d1g2-ld .
NAME:
DATE:
SUPERVISOR: DATE:
Fact Sheet
NPDES NCO025071
Page 5 of 5

o iii�­'Z�
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources)
September 9, 2008
CERTIFIED MAIL #7008 0150 0002 7876 7761
RETURN RECEIPT REOUESTED
Dennis Asbury, Director Public Utilities
City of Eden
P.O. Box 70
Eden, NC 27289-0070
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION, NOV-2008-LV-0429
Permit No. NCO025071
Mebane Bridge WWTP, City of Eden
Rockingham County
Dear Mr. Asbury:
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
A review of the Mebane Bridge WWTP's monitoring report for June 2008 showed the following
violations:
Parameter
Date
Limit Value
Reported Value
Limit Type
Coliform, Fecal MF, M-FC
06/14/08
400 #/100ml
887.19 #/100m1
Weekly
Broth,44.5C
Geometric
Mean Exceeded
Remedial actions, if not already implemented, should be taken to correct the above noncompliance problems.
Please be aware that violations of your NPDES permit could result in enforcement action by the Division of
Water Quality for this and any additional violations of State law.
If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Ron Boone at 336-771-5000.
Sincerely,
Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Winston-Salem Region
Division of Water Quality
Cc: _ SWP Central Files
WSRO Files
NPDES Unit
o Carolina
N
Nak ally
N.C. Division of Water Quality 585 Waughtown Street Winston-Salem, NC 27107 [phone] Customer Service
1(800)623-7748
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

ov,�,�,L�-0�2I
Q DMR Review Record
Facility: �e /�► ,` ) tJ Permit/Pipe No.:
Parameter
Monthly Average Violations
Permit Limit DMR Value
Cover Sheet from
Staff Member to
Regional Supervisor
Month/Year a
% Over Limit
Weekly/Daily Violations
Date Parameter Permit Limit/Type DMR Value % Over Limit
Date Parameter
Monitoring Frequency Violations
Permit Frequency Values Reported # of Violations
Other // Violations
—71 14c � e (ice- v �0`4.�ST>'L S "% / d %
Completed by: ,'
Regional Water Quality
Supervisor SiQnoff:
/111-t-C
d,rle--
kp/
Date: fi,zff/45fr
Date: I

4
EF :E ENT
P..S PERMIT NO.
DISCHARGE NO. 001 MONTH June YEAR 2008
FAbILITY NAME Mebane Bridge Wastewater Treatment Plant CLASS IV COUNTY Rod6ngham
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE (ORC) McRnd and GRADE IV PHONE [phone]
Q�RTIFIED LABORATORIES (1) Mebane Brid a WWT (2) Meritech, Inc. 111, 1�048
emmamFoae VAS c"m ® PE SON(S) COLLECTING SAMPLES OPerrators
Mail ORIGINAL and ONE COPY to: a
ATTN: CENTRAL FILES Z�Q� X
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY (SmAnAE OF OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE)
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER BY THIS SIGNITURE, I CERTIFY THAT THE l REPORT IS AUG
RALEIGH, NC 27699-1617 ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY AUG
E 1120
I
NCO025071
G
► Y
i�
o
c
Ir-
O
O
00010
0040D
50000
00310le
7EFF[-
1y
�
�
y�U
1-
_
a
i
<
v
F
0
m
�
Z
5
<
�ii W
? o'
a40
��$
O
&
p
cOi Eg
LL..
Z
O
n
sJ
a
lu
O
I=
Z
O
40
A�
'� _
on
F0
o
.,
V
a
C1
y
W
IL
0
U
J�
Q
G
4
0700
24
5.989
2
0700
24
Y
6.250
27
7.3
10
6
<0.10
17
21
6.8
73
0700
24
Y
6.220
27
7.5
<10
3
<0.10
22
17
6.8
4
0700
24
Y
6.191
27
7.5
<10
7
<0.10
17
38
6.8
<0.005
0.067
5
0700
24
Y
6.083
28
7.3
<10
6
<0.10
18
70
7.1
6
07001
24
Y
5.475
29
7.6
22
6
<0.101
18
700
6.7
7'<
0700
24
5.463
8
0700
24
5.450
7
07 00
24
Y
5.950
30
7.7
<10
6
<0.10
19
760
.1
10
0700
24
Y
6.217
30
7.4
<10
6
<0.10
12
>1720
6.
11
0700
24
Y
6.139
30
7.5
<10
4
<0.10
12F43
6.
3.42
2.28
<0.005
0.073
12
0700
24
Y
5.941
30
7.6
<10
5
<0.10
26
6
13`
0700
24
Y
5.571
30
7.5
<10
3
<0.10
7
.6
14
0700
24
5.422
-S
0700
24
5.726
16
0700
24
Y
6.018
29
7.8
<10
5
<0.10
166.7
17
0700
24
Y
5.853
29
7.6
27
5
<0.10
186.3
18
0700
24
Y
6.034
28
7.5
<10
4
<0.10
256.3
is
0700
24
Y
5.645
28
7.4
<10
6
<0.10
24
70
6.0
20
0700
24
Y
5.296
28
7.4
<10
5
<0.10
21
1 27
5.9
21
0700
24
5.509
22
0700
24
5.630
.23
0700
24
Y 1
5.969
28
7.4
1 <10
5
0.10
19
38
6.5
24
07001
24
Y
6.060
29
7.7
26
7
<0.10
24
20
6.7
25
0700
24
Y
5.953
29
7.7
27
7
<0.101
16
56
6.7
26
0700
24
Y
5.400
30
7.4
13
5
<0.10
15
36
6.7
27
0700
24
Y
6.084
25
7.3
<10
6
<0.10
15
74
4.5
28
0700
24
5.434
`26
0700
24
6.068
30107001
24
Y
6.082
30
7.2
<10
10 1
<0.10
14
35
6.4
M.
07001
24
AVERAGE
5.837
29
<14
6
<0.11
18
94
6.5
3.42
2.28
<0.005
0.070
MAXiilUM50
30
7 8 ` 2? :<
to '
..410
26 ..:172D`
71 :>
3 42
2.28
fiQ #30510
ff73
MINIMUM
5.296
25
7.2
<
3
<0.10
7
17
4.5
3.42
2.28
<0.005
0.067
C
C.
C
77797
Monthly Limit
13.500
28
30
12.7
30
200
300
300
DEM Form MRa (UVUUI

Facility Status: (Please check one of the following)
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies meet permit requirements a
Compliant
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies do NOT meet permit requirements FX
Noncompliant
If the facility Is noncompliant, please comment on corrective actions being taken in respect to equipment, operation,
maintenance, etc., and a time table for improvements to be made.
Weekly Avg Fecal Coldorm violation for the week of 619= 41/13=. Data from contract tab was received after violation had occurred.
Adjrultrndts of plantoperations perforned after data was received and have placed facility back within permit Betts.
Estimated BW Values: Influent 3 Effluent 4= S 6= - High GGA - see attachment
Estimated BW Values: Influent 3 Effluent 4/2,6r13 3 W4 - DO Depletion of dilution water Wank exceeded 0.2mg1l
Estimated BOD Values: Influent A Effluent - 04- Due to laboratory error - See attached letter
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the Information submitted. Based on my
inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the
information submitted is, to the best of ry knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant
penalties for subrniltbng false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Brad Corcoran, M Manager
Permittee ( or type)
'711 .
Signiture of Pemmittee - Date
(Required)
City of Eden 308 E. Stadium Dr. Eden, NC 330-M-2110 4/=007
Permtttee Address Phone Number Permit Exp. Date
PARAMETER CODES
00010 Temperature
00666 Oil A Grease 00061 Total Fluoride
01067 Nickel 50060 Total
00076 Turbidity
00600 Total Nitrogen 01002 Total Arsenic
01077 Silver Residual
00080 Color (Pt -CO)
00610 Ammonia W*ogen
01082 Zinc Chlorine
00082 Color (ADMQ
00625 Total KoWiat 01027 Cadmium
01105 Al minum
Nitrogen
00088 Conductivity
00630 NitratewNitrhtes
01032 Hexavalent Chromium
01147 Total Selenium
71880 For aldehyd ,
00300 Dissolved Oxygen
01034 Chromium
31614 Fecal Cofiform
71800 Mercury
00310 BODE
00666 Total Phosphorous
32730 Total Phenolics
81"1 Xylem
00340 COD
007" Cyanide
01037 Total Colbalt
34236 Benzene
NM PH
00746 Total Sulfide
01042 Copper
34481 Toluene
00630 Total Suspended
00927 Total Magnesium
01048 Iron
38M MBAS
Residue
00828 Total Sodium
01051 Lead
39616 PCBs
00645 Settleable Matter
00840 Total Chloride
01062 Molybdenum
60060 Flow
Parameter Code assistance may obtained by calling the Pout Source ComplianodEnforcernent Unit at (818) 7334M or by visiting
the Water Quality Sections web site at h2o enrstate
.rnc.ushm and linking to the Unirs kdorration pages.
Use only writs designated in the reporting facilities permit for data reporting.
ORC must visit facility and document visitation of facility as required per 16A NCAC 8A .0202 (b)16) (B)• -� fi r
RR if signed by other than the pemauthority ro rttee, delegation of signatory ust be on file with the state per 1SA&A4 iB.0006 (b)
(2) (D)•
J0
R

EFFLUENT
NPDES PERMIT NO. NCO025071 DISCHARGE NO. 001 MONTH June YEAR 2008
FACILITY NAME Mebane Bridge Wastewater Treatment Plant CLASS IV COUNTY Rocldngham
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE (ORC) Melinda Ward GRADE IV PHONE [phone]
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES (1) Mebane Bridge WWTP (2) Meritech, Inc.
CHECK BOX IF ORC HIIB CHANGED PERSON(S) COLLECTING SAMPLES Operators
Mail ORIGINAL and ONE COPY to:
ATTN: CENTRAL FILES —m DIV. OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT XA `
DEHNR (sr.NATuffE OF OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE) DATE
P.O BOX 29535 BY THIS SIGNITURE, I CERTIFY THAT THE REPORT IS
RALEIGH, NC 2762640535 ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
r rr
r e
r re
a rr
I r r
r r e
e �,I�
r r r
r rr
r r a
r r r
r I
r rr
11
111
111
11 1
1/ 1
1111.
11 1
111
11 1
11 1
1 1
f 11
p�r�q �5q�yr
r�l1�P�tllAil�
•
1 1
1 1!
! 1 1
! 1 /
ow
1!! E.
!! 1
!! 1
! 1 1
I f l
! 1
! 1!
•
_
INOTIMMOTIM017M
UsTW
1111.
11 1
Ulu,1
USTIMI
ff,1 1
1 1
Ulm1
OEM Form MR -1.1 (1192 )

j',,.;' L 21 08
bbbbob.-

ppppppp-
Influent
NPDES NO: NC0025071
DISCHARGE NO: 001
MONTH: June YEAR: 2008
FACILITY NAME: Mebane Bridge Wastewater Treatment Plant COUNTY: Rockingham
ENTER PARAMETER CODE ABOVE&
DEM Form MR-2 (11/84)

-L inT.I! t, I
ift 21 03
bbbbilb,

mmppppp�
NPDES NO: NCO025071 DISCHARGE NO: 001 MONTH: June YEAR 2008
FACILITY NAME: Mebane Bridge Wastewater Treatment Plant COUNTY: Rockingham
STREAM: Dan River STREAM: Dan River
LOCATION: NCSR 1964 LOCATION: Highway 700
Upstream
00010
00300
00400
00310
00340
31616
00095 00082 00083
0
`'
°1V
O O
a
m
U
:�
Enter Parameter Coda above
Name and Units Below
U
U O
W
U
HRS
•C
MG/L
-
MG/L
MG/L
100 m1
UO/C
JADMI
ADM
1
2
0729
21
7.9
6.5
280
40
<25
<25
3
0740
21
7.7
6.9
190
32
<25
<25
4
5
0725
22
7.8
6.9
46
<25
<25
7
8
9
107221
25
7.41
6.4
50
39
<25
<25
10
0721
26
6.5
6.4
40
<25
<25
11
12
0725
25
7.1
6.7
31
<25
<25
13
14
15
16
0727
23
7.1
6.2
60
37
<25
<25
17
0727
24
7.0
6.0
29
<25
<25
18
19
0721
21
8.41
6.2
39
<25
<25
20
21
22
23
0724
21
7.9
6.2
1
1
42
51
<25
<25
24
0709
21
7.81
6.8
31
<25
<25
25
26
06521
22
7.2
6.6
35
<25 1<25
27
28
29
30
0719
23
7.0
6.0
115
44
<25
<25
31
Average 1
23
7.4
96
38
<25
<25
Mabmum
26
8.4
6.9
280
51
<25
<25
Minimum
211
6.51
6.01
11
42
29
<25 1<25
DEM Form MR-3 (11/84)
Downstream
s
..
•
•
i
•
•
'
•

JJL 21 0$

MERIT 'CH INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
A Division of Water Technology and Controls, Inc.
June 11, 2008
Dear Mr. Ralph Potter,
I regret to inform you that due to a lab error your influent and effluent samples for BOD analysis
from the Mebane Bridge facility, received by us on June 3`d, were overlooked and therefore not
run within the 48 hour hold time. The result we are reporting is flagged with a qualifier of
Q2 — Holding time exceeded following receipt by lab.
I deeply regret this error and apologize for any inconvenience it has caused. Please feel free to
contact me if you have further questions,
Sincerely,
Lillian W. Alverson
QA — QC Officer
Meritech, Inc.
642 Tamco Road • P.O. Box 27 • Reidsville, NC 27320
[phone] • [phone] Fax

Mf
JUL 21 03
bbbbbil,

Contact: Ralph Potter
Client: City of Eden
191 Mebane Bridge Road
Eden, NC 27288
Meritech, Inc.
Environmental Laboratory
Laboratory Certification No. 165
Page 2 of 2
Report Date:
Date Sample Rcvd:
7/11/08
6/30/08
Mebane Bridge WWTP
Meritech Work Order # 06300804 Sample: MB Rd Upstream 6/30/08
Parameters Result Analysis Date Reporting Limit Method
Fecal Coliform
Meritech Work Order # 06300805
115 col/100 mL 6/30/08 1 col/100 mL SM 9222D
Sample: Hwy 700 Downstream 6/30/08
Parameters
Result
Analysis Date
Reporting Limit
Method
Fecal Coliform
780 col/100 mL
6/30/08
1 col/100 mL
SM 9222D
Data is valid; however, all QC requirements were not met. The glucose glutamic acid standard was out of
limits due to being read at seven days as opposed to 5 days due to a laboratory error.
This Qualifier is being used after consultation with Gary Frances of NC DENR.
G5 The glucose/ glutamic acid standard exceeded the range of 198 ± 30.5 mg/L.
I hereby certify that have reviewed and approve these data.
Laboratory Representative
642 Tamco Road, Reidsville, North Carolina 27320
tel.[phone] fax.[phone]

sy
NIL 21 CS
bbbahlb,

MONITORING REPORT(MR) VIOLATIONS for:
Permit: nc002507 MRs Between: 6-2( and Region:
Facility Name: % Param Name: % County:
Major Minor: %
Report Date: 08/29/08 Page 1 of 1
Violation Category: umli Jiolation Program Category:
Subbasin: % Violation Action:
PERMIT: NCO025071 FACILITY: City of Eden - Mebane Bridge WWTP COUNTY: Rockingham REGION: Winston-Salem
Limit Violation
MONITORING OUTFALL /
VIOLATION
UNIT OF
CALCULATED
REPORT PPI
LOCATION
PARAMETER
DATE
FREQUENCY
MEASURE
LIMIT
VALUE
VIOLATION TYPE
VIOLATION ACTION
07 -2007 001
Effluent
Color, Spectrophoto, Wtr
07/24/07
See Permit
mg/I
300
357
Daily Maximum Exceeded
Proceed to NOV
Smpl at 7.6 PH
07 -2007 001
Effluent
Color, Spectrophoto, Wtr
07/25/07
See Permit
mg/I
300
352
Daily Maximum Exceeded
Proceed to NOV
Smpl at 7.6 PH
07 -2007 001
Effluent
Color, Spectrophoto, Wtr
07/26/07
See Permit
mg/I
300
333
Daily Maximum Exceeded
Proceed to NOV
Smpl at 7.6 PH

RECEIVED
N.C. DeDt. oENR
AUG 2 g 2008 i
Winstcn•Sale-
Regional Office
August 26, 2008
Mr. Stephen B. Corcoran
City of Eden
308 East Stadium Drive
Eden, North Carolina 27288
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
SUBJECT: Request for Additional Information
City of Eden
Mebane Bridge Road WWTP
Biosolids Dewatering Facility
Phase I — Site Work & Foundations Package
ATC No. 02507IA02
Rockingham County
Dear Mr. Corcoran:
A review of the plans and specifications in support of the request for Authorization to
Construct has been completed by the Construction Grants and Loans Section (CG&L). The
comments resulting from this review are being transmitted directly to your engineer for
clarification and resolution; a copy is attached for your reference. Our goal is to issue the
Authorization to Construct as soon as possible. If a complete response is not received within 30
days, the application and supporting information will be returned.
Upon receipt of satisfactory responses from your engineer to our comments, the review of
the plan documents will be completed. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please
do not hesitate to contact Ken Pohlig, P.E., State Project Review Engineer, at [phone].
Sincerely,
VGA
Seth Robe son, P.E., Supervisor
Construction Grants and Loans Section
Design Management Unit
kp/sd
Attachment to all
cc: Tyler Highfill, P.E. — Highfill Infrastructure Engineering, P.C., 1 150 SE Maynard Rd,
Suite 250, Cary, NC 27511
DWQ Winston-Salem Regional Office
Daniel Blaisdell, P.E.
Seth Robertson, P.E.
Ken Pohlig, P.E.
ATC Files
Construction Grants and Loans Section 011e
1633 Mail Service Center Raleigh NC 27699-1633 North C arol i n a
Phone: [phone] / FAX: [phone] / Internet: www.nccgl.net
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper f�Vatmrully

Construction Grants & Loans Section
Design Management Unit
City of Eden
Mebane Bridge Road WWTP
Biosolids Dewatering Facility
Phase I — Site Work & Foundations Package
ATC No. 02507IA02
Request for Additional Information
General Comments
(1) We understand that you are waiting for the Sedimentation and Erosion Control Permit.
Please provide CG&L with a copy of the permit once it is issued.
(2) You are reminded that a full Residuals Management Plan must be received as part of the
Phase 2 ATC application submittal package. Please ensure that the Residuals Management
Plan includes:
(a) documentation of the sludge production for the past 2 years, including both the
average WWTP flows and the annual sludge production (dry tons),
(b) calculations documenting the proposed design capacity of 1,700 dry tons/year,
(c) documentation on the sizes of the existing sludge lagoons, how they are operated, and
the typical percent solids of sludge being pumped out of them.
Review of Plans
(3) Sheet C-1.2 Piping Plan
(a) Provide a cleanout at every bend in every gravity sludge pipe (6-inch and 8-inch).
(b) Please provide an RPZ backflow preventer in the 4-inch water line feeding to the
yard hydrant just outside the Dewatering Sludge Storage Shelter, if one is not already
provided.
(c) Detail 2 on this sheet is for a vent on the 8-inch gravity wastewater drain pipe. Is this
vent required, since it is located less than 70 feet from Manhole A? Is this manhole
vented?
(d) We assume that the connection of the 6-inch forcemain to the 50,000 gallon Sludge
Storage Tank cannot be made until Phase 2 construction project, when the actual tank
is in place. If so, please indicate this on the plans.
(e) Regarding the proposed 6-inch force main which leads to the 50,000 gallon Sludge
Storage Tank, where does the existing 6-inch forcemain come from?
(4) Please provide a proposed layout of the equipment to be installed in the Dewatering
Building, as applicable on Sheets S-1 and S-2

July 16, 2008
5520
Ms. Melinda S. Ward
Mebane Bridge VW TP
PO Box 70
Eden, NC 27289-0070
Pen/
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
N.C. Rapt of ENk
JUL 18 M
WinstonSaiE
Regional Office
SUBJECT: North Carolina Wastewater/Groundwater Laboratory Certification (NC WW/GW LC)
Laboratory Certification Maintenance Inspection
Dear Ms. Ward :
Enclosed is a report for the inspection performed on July 8, 2008 by Mr. Ramon Cook.
Where finding(s) are cited in this report, a response is required. Within thirty days of receipt,
please supply this office with a written item for item description of how these finding(s) were
corrected. If the finding(s) cited in the enclosed report are not corrected, enforcement actions
may be recommended. For certification maintenance, your laboratory must continue to carry
out the requirements set forth in 15A NCAC 2H .0800.
Copies of the checklists completed during the inspection may be requested from this
office. Thank you for your cooperation during the inspection. If you wish to obtain an electronic
copy of this report by email or if you have questions or need additional information, please
contact us at 919-733-3908.
Sincerely,
Dana Satterwhite
Certification Unit Supervisor
Laboratory Section
Enclosure
cc: Ramon Cook
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Nose Carolina
AtrrrallY
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1623 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1623 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www.dwqlab.org Location: 4405 Reedy Creek Rd Raleigh, NC 27607 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

LABORATORY NAME:
NPDES PERMIT #:
ADDRESS:
CERTIFICATE #:
DATE OF INSPECTION:
TYPE OF INSPECTION:
AUDITOR(S):
LOCAL PERSON(S) CONTACTED:
I. INTRODUCTION:
On -Site Inspection Report
Mebane Bridge WWTP
NC0025071/ NCO025151
PO Box 70
Eden, NC 27289-0070
5520
July 8, 2008
Field Maintenance
Ramon L. Cook
Melinda Ward
This laboratory was inspected to verify its compliance with the requirements of 15A NCAC 2H .0800 for the
analysis of environmental samples.
II. GENERAL COMMENTS:
The laboratory is spacious and well equipped. All facilities and instrumentation are well maintained.
Some further quality control procedures need to be implemented. Technical assistance procedure
documents are attached for ATC verification of Conductivity and pH meters.
III. FINDINGS, REQUIREMENTS, COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
PH — Standard Methods, 18t' Edition, 4500-H+ B
Dissolved Oxygen — Standard Methods, 18t' Edition, 4500 O G
Temperature — Standard Methods, 20t' Edition, 2550 B
Conductivity- Standard Methods, 18"' Edition, 2510 B
A. Finding: The temperature -sensing device on the pH, DO, thermometers, and conductivity
meter, used to obtain temperature readings has not been calibrated against a certified
thermometer annually.
Requirement: All thermometers and temperature measuring devices must be checked every
12 months against a NIST certified or NIST traceable thermometer and the process
documented. NIST certified or NIST traceable thermometers used for temperature
measurement must be recalibrated in accordance with the manufacturer's recalibration date. If
no recalibration date is given, the NIST certified or NIST traceable thermometer must be
recalibrated on a periodic basis to not exceed five years. Ref: NC WW/GW LC Technical
Assistance for Field Analysis for pH revised 9/07, NC WW/GW LC Technical Assistance for
Field Analysis for DO revised 9/07, NC WW/GW LC Technical Assistance for Field Analysis for
Conductivity revised 9/07, NC WW/GW LC Technical Assistance for Field Analysis for
Temperature revised 9/07.

Page 2
Lab #5520 Mebane Bridge WWTP
Dissolved Oxygen — Standard Methods, 18th Edition, 4500 O G
Recommendation: It was noted that the YSI 58 meter being used is antiquated and may not
remain a viable instrument for future analytical purposes. It is recommended that a new meter be
purchased as a replacement, and the old meter be used as a backup.
Conductivity - Standard Methods 18th Edition, 2510 B
A. Finding: The laboratory was calibrating the conductivity meter by mixing buffers together to
acquire a different calibration standard.
Note: Conductivity samples and standards must not be diluted.
Requirement: Conductivity standards may be purchased in the ranges desired, or they may be
prepared using Potassium Chloride (KCI). KCI standards can be prepared according to Table
2510:1 found on page 243 of Standard Methods, 18th Edition — Method 2510 A. Standards must
be clean. A portion of the standard should not be used for more than one calibration. Discard
any used standard portions. Ref: NC WW/GW LC Technical Assistance for Field Analysis for
Specific Conductance revised 6/07.
Conductivity - Standard Methods 18th Edition, 2510 B
pH — Standard Methods, 18th Edition, 4500—H+ B
A. Finding: The Automatic Temperature Compensator (ATC) has not been verified.
Requirement: The ATC must be verified annually (i.e., every twelve months) by analyzing a
buffer at 25°C (the temperature that conductivity values are compensated to) and a
temperature(s) that bracket the temperature ranges of the samples to be analyzed. This may
requirethe analysis of a third temperature reading that is > 25°C. Ref: North Carolina
Wastewater/Groundwater Laboratory Certification (NC WW/GW LC) Policy Statement February
2006.
IV. PAPER TRAIL INVESTIGATION:
The paper trail consisted of comparing field testing records to Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs)
submitted to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality. Data were reviewed for Mebane Bridge
WWTP (NPDES #'s NC0025071 and NC0025151) for March 2008, April 2008, and May 2008. No
transcription errors were detected. The facility appears to be doing a good job of accurately transcribing
data.
V. CONCLUSIONS:
Correcting the above -cited findings and implementing the recommendations will help this lab to produce
quality data and meet certification requirements. The inspector would like to thank the staff for its
assistance during the inspection and data review process. Please respond to all findings.
Report prepared by: Ramon L. Cook Date: July 9, 2008
Report reviewed by: Jeffrey R. Adams Date: July 9, 2008

Technical Assistance Procedure
Automatic Temperature Compensator (ATC) Check Procedure for Conductivity Meter:
The following must be performed on an annual (i.e., 12 month) basis:
1. Pour an adequate amount of conductivity standard into a beaker or other container and
analyze at 25°C. Document the temperature and conductivity value.
2. Lower the temperature of the standard by placing the container in cool water or a
refrigerator to less than the lowest anticipated sample temperature and analyze.
Document the temperature and conductivity value.
3. If samples greater than 25°C are to be analyzed, perform the following additional step:
Place the container in warm water or a water bath and raise the temperature above 250C
to greater than the highest anticipated sample temperature and analyze. Document the
temperature and conductivity value.
As the temperature increases or decreases, the value of the conductivity standard must be
within ± 10% of the true value of the standard.
Comment: Anticipated temperatures can be obtained from a review of the Discharge Monitoring
Reports (DMRs) from the peak summer and winter months. Historical data should provide a
reasonably accurate estimation of ranges that will bracket the expected sample temperatures.

Technical Assistance Procedure
Automatic Temperature Compensator (ATC) Check Procedure for pH meter:
The following must be performed on an annual (i.e., 12 month) basis:
1. Pour an adequate amount of buffer into a beaker or other container and analyze at 25°C.
Document the temperature and pH value.
2. Lower the temperature of the buffer by placing the container in cool water or a refrigerator
to less than the lowest anticipated sample temperature and analyze. Document the
temperature and pH value.
3. If samples greater than 250C are to be analyzed, perform the following additional step:
Place the container in warm water, or a water bath and raise the temperature above 250C
to greater than the highest anticipated sample temperature and analyze. Document the
temperature and pH value.
As the temperature increases or decreases, the value of the buffer must be within ± 0.1 S.U. of
the true value of the buffer.
Comment: Anticipated temperatures can be obtained from a review of the Discharge Monitoring
Reports (DMRs) from the peak summer and winter months. Historical data should provide a
reasonably accurate estimation of ranges that will bracket the expected sample temperatures.

RECEIVED
N.C, Deot. of ENR
JUN26M
Winston-Salem
Regional Office
eitq q Cd v
DcpaWmad of &U4WnMZntd Sep 40W
Waikwa&4 .l uaMtertt J eatd
June 24, 2008
<Iiicwinston
Salem Regional Office
585 Waughtown Street
Winston Salem, North Carolina 27107-2241
Dear Ms. White,
This letter is a follow up to the call I made to your office on June 23, 2008 regarding a
temporary bypass of treatment due to necessary, emergency plant maintenance. On
Friday, June 20, 2008, one of our operators noticed a leak that we believed to be in one of
our main water lines in the plant. It has had problems before and was in a similar
location. This line is a 3" line that feeds our chlorine and polymer feed systems.
Because of the time of day and the problem of obtaining parts for a 3" line, it was
decided that it would be best to wait until Monday to do the repairs. Everything was still
feeding properly, and personnel were kept on call due to the nature of the problem.
On Monday morning, June 23, 2008, we cut off the water to the plant at 0820 to begin
work on the line. No polymer or chlorine was being fed during this time, but chlorine
tablets were spread around the troughs of the clarifiers and near the flash mixer to make
sure that we treated the effluent as much as we could. City crews made the necessary
repairs. The water was then turned back on to the plant at 1320 and everything was
checked to make sure that it was working properly. The chlorine residual was around 0.5
mg/1 when checked later that afternoon. Due to the polymer not feeding, some pin floc
began to escape the clarifier. Our TSS for the day was 25 mg/1, which is twice what is
normal but well below our weekly average of 45 mg/1 as well as our monthly average of
30 mg/l. No other problems were noted during this time.
If any further information is needed, please feel free to call my office.
Sincerely,
-N" ALb_j
Melinda S. Ward
Wastewater Superintendent
cc: Ralph Potter
P. O. Box 70 9 Eden, NC 27289-0070 • [phone] • Fax [phone]

RECEIVED
N.C. Dect. of ENR
MAR 2 0 2008
l/ at -- Winston-Salem
e Regional Office
i9eptni tt&d 4 &wiwnmentd Sewiceo
/��11�1t0//tfY�Pf/ TflP17fMPH1 dill
MarWaught�ot
Dav
NC-on Salem Regional Office
treet
Winston Salem, North Carolina 27107-2241
Dear Mr. Russell,
This letter is a follow up to the call I made to your office on March 14, 2008 regarding a
spill of biosolids on our plant site. At approximately 8:15am on March 14, 2008, the
ORC of the Dry Creek Wastewater Plant along with a sewer -vac truck operator from our
Collections crew were attempting to remove digester sludge from the digester at the
plant. About five minutes after they had begun, they noticed a substantial leak in the rear
hatch. They attempted to secure the hatch, but all attempts failed. At that time, they
proceeded to back the truck up to the aeration basin and allow the flow to run back in.
The truck holds close to 2000 gallons, and it is estimated that between 800 and 1000
gallons made it to the ground. A berm was constructed at the lower slope of the property
to keep the solids from leaving the plant site. The sewer -vac was then used to vacuum
what solids it could pick up off of the ground. It is estimated that close to 600 gallons
were recovered in this method. After recovering what they could, personnel spread 200
pounds of hydrated lime on the affected surface. At no time did any of the contents leave
the plant site or enter any waterways. Upon inspection of the truck, it was found that a
large amount of plastics were stuck around the rear hatch preventing it from sealing
properly. The plastics were collected from a previous pump station clean out. No one
was aware of the plastics before operation began on this day. An investigation is
underway to find a possible source of the plastics.
If any further information is needed, please feel free to call my office.
Sincerely,
Melinda S. Ward
Wastewater Superintendent
cc: Ralph Potter
P. n. Bor 70 9 F.den. NC 27289-0070 . [phone] • Fax [phone]

O� F W AT �RpG
r
1p!
O 'C
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
COUNTY OF ROCKINGHAM
IN THE MATTER OF )
NORTH CAROLINA )
PERMIT NUMBER WQCS00018 )
HELD BY THE CITY OF )
EDEN )
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
SPECIAL ORDER BY CONSENT
EMC SOC WQ SO4-009
Pursuant to provisions of North Carolina General Statutes (G.S.) 143-215.2 and 143-215.67, this Special Order by
Consent is entered into by the City of Eden, hereinafter referred to as the City, and the North Carolina
Environmental Management Commission, an agency of the State of North Carolina created by G.S. 143B-282, and
hereinafter referred to as the Commission:
1. The City and the Commission hereby stipulate the following:
(a) The City holds North Carolina Permit Number WQCS00018 for operation of an existing wastewater collection
system, but is unable to consistently comply with Condition I.2. regarding sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs) as
set forth in Permit Number WQCS00018. Specifically, frequent and repetitive SSOs have occurred at the City's
Meadow Greens, Merriman Street (Covenant Branch), and Long Street (Dan River) pump stations and/or their
respective collection subsystems. Compliance will require preparation of plans and specifications for collection
system upgrades including, but not limited to, gravity sewer collection and outfall replacement and
rehabilitation, pump station upgrades/improvements, and sewer line (force main) rehabilitation.
(b) Noncompliance with final conditions constitutes causing and contributing to pollution of the waters of this
State, and the City is within the jurisdiction of the Commission as set forth in G.S. Chapter 143, Article 21.
(c) The City desires to cause or allow the discharge of 571,250 gpd of additional wastewater to the collection
system, and the discharge of such additional wastewater will not result in any significant degradation to the
quality of any waters.
(d) The City has secured or will secure financing for planning, design, or construction of a new or improved
wastewater collection system which, once constructed and operated, will be sufficient to adequately collect
wastewater presently being made tributary to the collection system in the Meadow Greens, Merriman Street
(Covenant Branch), and Long Street (Dan River) collection subsystems, such that the City will be able to
comply with final permit conditions.
(e) Since this Special Order is by Consent, neither party will file a petition for a contested case or for judicial
review concerning its terms.
2. The City, desiring to comply with the Permit identified in paragraph l(a) above, hereby agrees to do the
following:
(a) Provide the Winston-Salem Regional Office of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ), located at
585 Waughtown Street, Winston-Salem, NC 27107, with a list of all additions of flow under the City's Special
Order by Consent, and update this list quarterly.
(b) Undertake the following activities in accordance with the indicated time schedule:

a •
I) Operation and Maintenance recommendations:
i) Continue to respond to all SSOs as per conditions found in Permit No. WQCS00018.
ii) Complete any necessary replacement of air release and vacuum valves on the Meadow Greens,
Covenant Branch, and Dan River force mains by March 31, 2005.
iii) Issue letters to property owners where defects (direct inflow connections) have been found,
requiring repair by September 30, 2004. All such repairs, whether accomplished by private
property owners or City Agents, shall be completed by December 31, 2004.
II) Schedules (engineering, construction & compliance):
i) Complete baseline flow monitoring studies within the Meadow Greens, Covenant Branch, and
Dan River subbasins by December 31, 2004.
ii) Submit permit applications and all supporting materials for any necessary regulatory permits
required for outfall repairs\replacements within the Meadow Greens, Covenant Branch, and Dan
River subbasins by January 31, 2005.
iii) Begin construction of outfall repairs\replacements within 120 days of receipt of all necessary
permits.
iv) Complete construction of outfall repairs\replacements within 365 days of giving contractor
"Notice to Proceed".
v) Complete analyses of cleaning needs\benefits for each of the three relevant force mains by May
31, 2005. Should the analyses indicate that cleaning of any sections of force main would be of
substantial benefit, those sections shall be cleaned by January 31, 2006.
vi) Complete elimination of major and previously identified sources of inflow in each of the three
relevant collection subbasins by June 30, 2005.
vii) Submit permit applications and all supporting materials for any necessary regulatory permits
required for additional outfall repairs\ replacements within the Meadow Greens, Covenant Branch
and Dan River subbasins by March 9, 2007.
viii) Complete construction of outfall repairs\replacements within 180 days of receipt of all necessary
permits.
ix) Complete post -construction flow monitoring of the Meadow Greens, Covenant Branch and Dan
River subbasins within 45 days of acceptance of outfall repairs\replacements.
x) Submit permit applications for any necessary regulatory permits required for pump station
improvements at the Meadow Greens, Covenant Branch and Dan River pump stations within 180
days of completion of gravity sewer line repairs\replacements.
xi) Begin construction of pump station improvements within 120 days of receipt of all necessary
permits.
xii) Complete construction of pump station improvements within 365 days of giving contractor
"Notice to Proceed".
(c) No later than thirty (30) calendar days after any date identified for accomplishment of any activity listed in 2(b)
above, submit to the Director of DWQ written notice of compliance or noncompliance therewith. In the case of
noncompliance, the notice shall include a statement of the reason(s) for noncompliance, remedial action(s)
taken, and a statement identifying the extent to which subsequent dates or times for accomplishment of listed
activities may be affected.
3. The City agrees that unless excused under paragraph four (4), the City will pay the Director of DWQ, by check
payable to the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, stipulated penalties
according to the following schedule for failure to meet deadlines set out in paragraphs 2(b) and 2(c).

0
•
Violation Description
Stipulated Penalty
Failure to meet any milestone date identified in
$500 per day
paragraph 2 (b) above.
Failure to submit any report required by paragraph 2
$500 per day
(c) above.
4. The City and the Commission agree stipulated penalties are not due if the City satisfies the Division of Water
Quality noncompliance was caused by extraordinary circumstances:
a. An act of God;
b. An act of war;
c. An intentional act or omission of a third party, but this defense. shall not be available if the act or omission is
that of an employee or agent of the defendant or if the act or omission occurs in connection with a contractual
relationship with the City;
d. An extraordinary event beyond the City's control. Contractor delays or failure to obtain funding will not be
considered as events beyond the City's control; or
e. Any combination of the above causes. Failure within thirty (30) days of receipt of written demand to pay the
penalties, or challenge them by a contested case petition pursuant to G.S. 150B-23, will be grounds for a
collection action, which the Attorney General is hereby authorized to initiate. The only issue in such an action
will be whether the thirty (30) days has elapsed.
5. In accordance with provisions of G.S. 143-215.67(b), the Commission allows the City to accept 571,250 gnd
additional wastewater to the collection system, through Division issued sewer extension permits or through City
taps, while this Special Order by Consent is in effect. If the City should fail to meet any agreed upon milestone
date contained in paragraph 2 (b) above, the Division may prohibit new sources of wastewater from being
introduced into the collection system until such time as the milestone activities are accomplished. Per G.S. 143-
215.67(a), upon expiration of this Special Order by Consent, the City shall not knowingly introduce new
sources of wastewater into any part of the collection system or treatment works which lacks adequate capacity
to convey and\or treat such waste.
6. This Special Order by Consent and any terms and conditions contained herein, hereby supersede any and all
previous Special Orders, Enforcement Compliance Schedule Letters, terms and conditions contained therein
issued in connection with Permit No. WQCS00018. In the event of a Permit modification or renewal,
requirements contained therein shall supersede those contained in this Special Order by Consent, except as
modified and contained herein.
7. Noncompliance with the terms of this Special Order by Consent are subject to enforcement action in addition to
the above -stipulated penalties, including injunctive relief pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6.(C).
8. The City, upon signature of this Special Order by Consent, will be expected to comply with all schedule dates,
terms, and conditions of this document.
9. This Special Order by Consent shall expire 90 days after completion of the pump station improvements at the
City's Meadow Greens, Covenant Branch, and Dan River pump stations.

a
jpVFOR THE CITY OF EDEN:
Print Name and Title of Signing Official
Date
Signature of Signing Official
FOR THE NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION:
Date
Chairman of the Commission

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
I I I I I I First -Class Mail
Postage &Fees P;_�`
USPS
Permit No. G-10
• Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box •
NCDENR-Division of Water Quality
&-��
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
liiliflilitiii!'llFii�ililiif!};!}FlSi;lild!}tF}i�FF�ifilfti7�

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
Article Addressed to:
Dennis Asbury, Director
City of Eden -Public Utilities
PO Box 70
Eden, NC 27289
A.
X 4 Agent
❑ Addresser
B. Receiv y (Printed Name) j e ooff'Ni
f t5O w.si /
D. Is delivery address different from Item 1? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3. rvice Type
Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail
Registered ❑ Retum Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2'/ 7008 0150 0002 7876 7761,/
PS Form 3811. February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt /7 _ r r Ap CAti 102595-02-M-15,

UNITED STATE�,p
'1.�
CQ ^ll`d t Ei Aw F-iid
5EVEU FOUR it
• Sender: Please print your name, address, anaZIP+4 in thi
NCDENR- Water Quality Section
,P) C" 0 &,x �"
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
. _ rI I IIrrf 1 1 I llrrrlIIIII l I r l l r I r l I I I rr I I I I I r I r I I l I r I l i I r l I r I Irr

■ G,rmplete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete A.
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse LX
so that we can return the card to you. B
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
Article Addressed to:
Mr. Brad Corcoran, Manager
City of Eden
308 East Stadium Drive
Eden, NC 27288
40 Agent
❑ Addresse<
C. Date of Ddlivob
Is deliveryUddress different from item 1?, Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
PO x '710
l..- V' ' V C-
3. VVVService Type
yet Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail
`Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
7008 �0150 0002 7876 8768 a
oS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt _ F Cl 'Iti 10259502-M-154