20030969 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20030724 (2)

AT? Michael F. Easley, Governor
O
R
O? QG William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
'
-, Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
i
U rector
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy D
Division of Water Quality
November 17, 2003
DWQ# 03-0969
Wake County
Mr. Roy Mashburn
101 Keybridge Drive
Morrisville, NC, 27560
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Mashburn:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions, to place fill in 197 linear feet of intermittent streams
and 0.15 acre of wetlands to construct the proposed Kit Creek Road Extension Project in Cary, Wake County, as described
in your application received by the Division of Water Quality on July 24, 2003, and in additional correspondence received
September 24 and October 6, 2003. After reviewing your application, we have determined that this fill is covered by
General Water Quality Certification Number 3404, which can be viewed on our web site at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. This Certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit Number 14 when it is issued
by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. In addition, you should get any other federal, state or local permits before you go
ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge and Water Supply
Watershed'regulations. Also this approval will expire when the accompanying 404 permit expires unless otherwise
specified in the General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your
project, you must notify us in writing and you may be required to send us a new application for a new certification. If the
property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for
complying with all conditions. If total wetland and/or stream fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre or
150 linear feet of perennial streams, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h).
For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification, as well as the additional
conditions listed below:
1. You are required to return the attached Certification of Completion form to notify DWQ when all work included in the 401
Certification has been completed;
2. The culverts required for this project shall be installed in such a manner that downstream profiles are not altered (i.e. the
depth of the channel must not be reduced by a widening of the streambed). Existing stream dimensions (including the
pattern and profile) are to be maintained above and below locations of each culvert. The culverts shall be designed and
installed to allow for aquatic life movement as well as to prevent head cutting of the streams. If any of the existing pipes
are or become perched, the appropriate stream grade shall be re-established or, if the pipes installed in a perched
manner, the pipes shall be removed and re-installed correctly.
The establishment of native, woody vegetation and other soft stream bank stabilization techniques must be
used where practicable instead of rip rap or other bank hardening methods; If rip-rap is necessary, it shall
not be placed in the stream bed, unless specifically approved by the Division of Water Quality.
3. Heavy equipment shall be operated from the bank rather than in the stream channel in order to minimize sedimentation
and reduce the likelihood of introducing other pollutants into the stream;
4. No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond the
footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre-Construction Notification. All construction activities, including the design,
installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices, shall be
performed so that no violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules occur;
pow
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands)
Customer Service #: 1-877-623-6748
Mr. Roy Mashburn
November 17, 2003
5. Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications governing the proper
design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best Management Practices in order to protect
surface waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed, installed, operated, and
maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control
Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control measures must be
such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most recent version of the North Carolina
Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow
sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects, including contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated with the
project.
c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be designed, installed, operated, and
maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina Surface Mining Manual.
d. The reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the reclamation in accordance with the
requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act.
6. Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum extent practicable. If
placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is unavoidable, they shall be removed and
the natural grade restored within six months of the date that the Division of Land Resources has released the project;
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act
within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition which conforms to
Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, Mail Service Center 6714,
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you have
any questions, please telephone Steve Mitchell in the DWQ's Raleigh Regional Office at 919-571-4700 or Cyndi Karoly in
the Central Office in Raleigh 919-733-9721.
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
AW K/cbk
Attachments
cc: Corps of Engineers Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Steve Mitchell, Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
Central Files
File Copy
Sean Clark, S&EC, 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, NC, 27614
030969
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact:
Non-Discharge Branch WQ Supervisor:
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Kit Creek Road Extension County Wake
Project Number 03 0969 County2
Recvd From APP Region Raleigh
Received Date 7/24/03 Recvd By Region
Project Type road extension
Certificates Stream Stream Impacts (ft.)
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet INEM
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
14 OTH O Y O N F__ 16-41-1-17 F C 7777 ,x,605. 0.15 197.0(1 F_ 197.00
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? O Y ON Did you request more info? O Y ON
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? O Y O N
Is Mitigation required? O Y O N Recommendation: O Issue O Issue/Cond O Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 355124 Longitude (ddmmss) 785343
Comments:
2003
August 7
,
Who decided that this featu re was intermittant?
Why does the stream have to b crossed in a spot where the imp acts are LARGE?
Why can't the crossing be m oved to get out of the buffer and th e stream entirely?
Or mooooved to lessen the footage.
HOLD
October 6, 2003 Should be OK to issue. Other than the fact that the stream impact is still large, it
is located directly opposite the connector road and is at best intermittent.
November 13, 2003 What is total impact?
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
Date:
Triage Check List
Project Name: - ff*/
DWQ#: 03-00
County: 3i kP-
To: ? ARO Mike Parker
? FRO Ken Averitte
? MO Alan Johnson
[E,RRO Steve Mitchell
From: r
? WaRO Tom Steffens
? WiRO Noelle Lutheran
? WSRO Daryl Lamb
Telephone : (919)
The file attached is being forwarded to your for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
? Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
Minimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Meuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
? Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
? Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
C?
Comments: J?

Ve Pelt 5e VCr"--
ei?
k17 41
f'A-1

Environmental Consultants, PA
Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]

FILE COPY
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Attn: John Dorney C
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Suite 250 QC T - 6 2003
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: Reply to the Division of Water Quality's September 4, 2003 letter requesting further
information for the proposed Kit Creek Parkway Extension, Wake County, North
Carolina
Dear Mr. Dorney.
This letter is in response to your letter dated September 4, 2003 (copy attached), which
requested additional information for the proposed Kit Creek Parkway Extension. On
Friday October 3, 2003 I met with Mr. Steve Mitchell on site to determine if the stream
being impacted is perennial or intermittent and to present the Town of Cary's
thoroughfare plan along with other information supporting the proposed placement and
need of the Kit Creek Parkway Extension. The following restates your questions as
shown on your letter and then provides our response.
1. Please provide a discussion of the criteria you used to determine. that the stream
you propose to impact is intermittent, and how you arrived at your decision.
During the past three years I have seen this feature many times in several different
seasons and have, never seen any water in it. We did however check for invertebrates
in the stream channel and were unable to find any. The channel does not contain
many large rocks, leaf packs, or other areas suitable for invertebrate larvae and has
never been observed to contain water so is not very hospitable for aquatic life. As I
stated above on October 3, 2003 Mr. Steve Mitchell and I evaluated the stream. Mr.
Mitchell determined that the stream was intermittent.
2. Please investigate whether the proposed crossing can be placed at a location
where the impacts will be reduced. Maps illustrating existing wetlands and
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office: Hickory Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive 622 Coon Mountain Lane
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455 Taylorsville, NC 28681
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
October 6, 2003
S&EC Project # 00-5492
DWQ Project # 03-0969
streams (not only those portions of the systems you propose to impact) may be
helpful along with your narrative. Please explain why the crossing cannot be
shifted out of the stream and buffer entirely or moved to reduce the area of
:x
impact.
Kit Creek Parkway currently ends on the east side of Highway 55. The proposed
portion of the extension requesting permits is_on the attached copy of the Town of
Cary Thoroughfare Plan and must be placed in the proposed location in order to tie
into the existing portion on the opposite side of Highway 55.
Please cal i questions or require further explanation.
i cerely,
Attachments: 1) DWQ letter dated September 4, 2003
2) Town of Cary Northwest Area Plan Roads and Transit (Map 3 of 3)
CC: Mr. Steve Mitchell (NC-DWQ Raleigh Regional) via fax
Ms. Andrea Wade (USACE)
2
Michael F. Easley, Governor
xG WA7'Fn William G. Ross Jr., Secretary

v r
QG
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources

_ Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
T Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
September 4, 2003
Wake County
DWQ Project No. 03-0969
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED s?
Mr. Roy Mashburn
101 Keybridge Drive
Morrisville, NC, 27560
Dear Mr. Mashburn:
On July 24, 2003, the NC Division of Water Quality received your application for a 401 Water Quality Certification
for permanent fill in 0.15 acres of wetlands and 197 linear feet of streams in order to construct the proposed Kit Creek
Road Extension in Wake County. In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0506, a site evaluation has been conducted by Mr.
Steve Mitchell of the DWQ Raleigh Regional Office. Based on this review, we have determined that significant uses could
be removed or degraded by this project. Insufficient evidence is provided in your application to conclude that your project
must be built as planned in waters and wetlands. Therefore, unless modifications of the proposal are made, we will move
toward denial of the 401 Certification as required in 15A NCAC 2H .0507(e). Specifically, please investigate the following
so that we may further review your application for avoidance and minimization of impacts as required in 15A NCAC 2H
.0506(b):
1. Please provide a discussion of the criteria you used to determine that the stream you propose to impact is intermittent,
and how you arrived at your decision;
2. Please investigate whether the proposed crossing can be placed at a location where the impacts will be reduced. Maps
illustrating existing wetlands and streams (not only those portions of the systems you propose to impact) may be helpful
along with your narrative. Please explain why the crossing cannot be shifted out of the stream and buffer:-entirely or
moved to reduce the area of impact.
Until the information requested in this letter is provided, I will request (by copy of this letter)rthat the Corps of
Engineers place this project on hold. Also, this project will be placed on hold for our processing due to incomplete
information (15A NCAC 2H .0507(h)).
Thank you for your attention. If you have any questions, please contact Steve Mitchell or Debbie Edwards in our
Raleigh Regional Office at [phone] or Cyndi Karoly in Raleigh at [phone].
r?
S' 7/1'
John Dorney
JRD/cbk
cc: Corps of Engineers Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Sean Clark, 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, NC, 27614
030969
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (htW://h2o enr state.nc.us/ncwetlands)
Customer Service #: 1-877-623-6748
' ETtn 0401 GROW
SEP 2 4 1003
September 22, 2003 TERQUCTYSECVON -
Mr. John Dorney
NC Division of Water Quality
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Re: DWQ Project No. 03-0969 - Wake County
Dear Mr. Dorney;
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
080969
Mr. Mashburn has shared your September 4, 2003 letter, to him about his permit, with the Town of Cary.
This proposed major thoroughfare is an extension of Kitt Creek Parkway west of the intersection of NC 55/
Kitt Creek Parkway. This proposed major thoroughfare was approved by the Town Council when it
adopted its NW Land use & Transportation Plan in the fall of 2002. The approved plan for Village at the
Park Development requires that the developer build this major link in the transportation system with the
first phase of his development. The intersection of NC 55/Kitt Creek Parkway was recently constructed in
RTP and is signalized. This project will align with this intersection.
We are enclosing a copy of the approved maps for your information. This information is presented to assist
you in your review of this project. Our telephone conversion with Cyndi Karoly on September 19 was
helpful in providing this information. The developer's engineer will provide a response to item 1.
If we can provide additional information please contact us.
Sincerely,
C. Richard (Dick) Moore
Traffic Systems Manager
Engineering Department
919-462-3937
[e-mail]
cc: Roy Mashburn - 101 Keybridge Drive - Morrisville, NC 27560
TOWN Of CARY
318 North Academy Street *Cary, NC 27513•PO Box 80056Cary, NC 27512-8005
tel [phone] • fax [phone] www.townofcary.org
w + Michael F. Easley, Governor
Q ??
OG William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
`
C) Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
. !
' Division of Water Quality
' Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
September 4, 2003
Wake County
DWQ Project No. 03-0969
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Roy Mashburn
101 Keybridge Drive
Morrisville, NC, 27560
Dear Mr. Mashburn:
On July 24, 2003, the NC Division of Water Quality received your application for a 401 Water Quality Certification
for permanent fill in 0.15 acres of wetlands and 197 linear feet of streams in order to construct the proposed Kit Creek
Road Extension in Wake County. In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0506, a site evaluation has been conducted by Mr.
Steve Mitchell of the DWQ Raleigh Regional Office. Based on this review, we have determined that significant uses could
be removed or degraded by this project. Insufficient evidence is provided in your application to conclude that your project
must be built as planned in waters and wetlands. Therefore, unless modifications of the proposal are made, we will move
toward denial of the 401 Certification as required in 15A NCAC 2H .0507(e). Specifically, please investigate the following
so that we may further review your application for avoidance and minimization of impacts as required in 15A NCAC 2H
.0506(b):
1. Please provide a discussion of the criteria you used to determine that the stream you propose to impact is intermittent,
and how you arrived at your decision;
2. Please investigate whether the proposed crossing can be placed at a location where the impacts will be reduced. Maps
illustrating existing wetlands and streams (not only those portions of the systems you propose to impact).may be helpful
along with your narrative. Please explain why the crossing cannot be shifted out of the stream and buffer: entirely or
moved to reduce the area of impact.
Until the information requested in this letter is provided, I will request by copy of this letter)rthat the Corps of
Engineers place this project on hold. Also, this project will be placed on hold for our processing due to incomplete
information (15A NCAC 2H .0507(h)).
Thank you for your attention. If you have any questions, please contact Steve Mitchell or Debbie Edwards in our
Raleigh Regional Office at [phone] or Cyndi Karoly in Raleigh at [phone].
S' cerely, 7
11 John Dorney
i
JRD/cbk
cc: Corps of Engineers Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Sean Clark, 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, NC, 27614
030969
9'C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (hgp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands)
Customer Service #: 1-877-623-6748
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact:
Non-Discharge Branch WQ Supervisor:
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Steve Mitchell
Facility Name Kit Creek Road Extension County Wake
Project Number 03 0969 County2
Recvd From APP Region Raleigh
Received Date 7/24/03 Recvd By Region
Project Type road extension
Certificates Stream Stream Impacts (ft.)
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req. ME
J4 OTII O ti O N F_ 16-41-1-17 I NS 7N' 3Q605. 0.15 197.0(1 F- 197.00
OY ON F_F_F___F_F_F__F_
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
r
a`
r
t
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? 0 Y 0 N Did you request more info? 0 Y 0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? 0 Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? 0 Y O N Recommendation: 0 Issue 0 Issue/fond 0 Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 355124 Longitude (ddmmss) 785343
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
Date:'
Triage Check List
Project Name: (I . (a 5 -
AllE?,?PY
Mike Parker
Ken Averitte
To: ? ARO
? FRO
? MRO
X---RRO
C; e Mitch 11
From:
DWQ#:
County:
VI) JIN?..
? WaRO Tom Steffens
? WiRO Noelle Lutheran
? WSRO Daryl Lamb
Telephone : [phone] c(?'Ln
The file attached is being forwarded to your for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
? tream length impacted
Stream determination
? land determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
? Minimizatiordavoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Neuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
? Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
? Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
Comments: ?ier csr -".?"'e.?` ' .
Environmental Consultants, PA
Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]

NCDENR-DWQ
Attn: Mr. John Dorney
2321 Crabtree Blvd
Parkview Building
Raleigh, NC 27604
COPY
RE: NWP 14/401 Water Quality Certification
Kit Creek Road Extension
Wake County, North Carolina
US Army Corps of Engineers
Attn: Ms. Andrea Wade
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road
Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 27
?? p9
NETLMD81401 GROUP
JUL z 4 zoos
Dear Ms. Wade and Mr. Dorney, !Rke9W4TYt%&X*ion On behalf of Mr. Roy Mashburn (property owner), from
the US Army Corps of Engineers to use Nationwide Permit 14 to cover proposed
permanent impacts to a stream channel and adjacent wetlands (see attached overall map).
We also request written concurrence from the North Carolina Division of Water Quality
that the project complies with the 401 Water Quality Certifications associated with
Nationwide Permit 14. A Pre-construction Notification Application (PCN) is attached,
which includes an agent authorization form.
The project proposes impacts resulting from the construction of a road extension to Kit
Creek Road (SR 1639) as part of the Town of Cary Thoroughfare Plan. The proposed
road extension is located approximately %i mile south of the Durham/Wake county
border, between Alston Avenue (SR 1630) and NC Highway 55 in Wake County, North
Carolina. The site is currently a wooded, undeveloped tract. The areas immediately
adjacent to the project site are proposed for development as The Village at the Park
P.U.D. The road extension is proposed as part of the Town of Cary Thoroughfare Plan
and will bisect The Village at the Park by connecting N.C. Highway 55 and Alston
Avenue. Please refer to the attached USGS map, which displays the location of the
proposed project.
The applicant requested a detailed wetland delineation and buffer evaluation on the
property prior to site plan development in order to avoid jurisdictional wetlands and
waters and riparian buffers to the maximum extent practicable. S&EC performed a
detailed wetland delineation on the property in 2000. Ms. Amanda Jones, of the
USACE, approved the wetland survey map on July 9, 2002 (AID # 200221159). In May
2003, an application was submitted for a NWP 39 for impacts related to the adjacent
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office: Hickory Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive 622 Coon Mountain Lane
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455 Taylorsville, NC 28681
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone] Phone [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
loon-40- a- %r July 24, 2003
S&EC Project #5492
proposed development of The Village at the Park. Pursuant to this permit, approval for
Section 401 Certification (DWQ# 03-0626) for that project was received on May 22,
2003. A 404 approval was received in July.
The proposed roadway will impact approximately 0.154 acres of jurisdictional
wetlands and 197 linear feet of intermittent stream channel. These impacts are
elaborated upon within the attached PCN form and are sh6wn on the attached impact
maps.
The proposed road (Kit Creek Extension) is required in the Town of Cary Thoroughfare
Plan. The Kit Creek Road extension will also provide an alternate route from Alston
Avenue to N.C. Highway 55. Since this road extension is part of the Town of Cary
Thoroughfare Plan, S&EC believes that this project constitutes a separate and complete
project, independent of the adjacent proposed subdivision.
The USACE's current policy requires applicants to avoid and minimize wetland and
stream channel impacts to the maximum extent practicable and may require
compensatory mitigation to offset unavoidable losses of waters of the US when impacts
exceed the requirements for notification (0.10 acre). The proposed road is required to
connect to an existing portion of Kit Creek Parkway and is an integral part of a
Thoroughfare Plan. Because the applicant has minimized impacts to the maximum extent
practicable, S&EC believes further compensatory mitigation should not be required by
the USAGE, however if mitigation is required payment to the NC-Wetland Restoration
Program is proposed.
NC-DWQ's current policy requires written concurrence for stream impacts of greater or
equal to 150 linear feet of stream length per project in non-buffered river basins. We
request written concurrence that the project complies with the 401 Water Quality
Certification associated with Nationwide Permit 14. NC-DWQ's current policy does not
require mitigation for wetland impacts below 1 acre or perennial stream channel impacts
less than 150 linear feet per project.
Please call if you require any additional information or have any questions.
Sincerely,
Sean Peffer
Environmental Scientist
aaaakllm'
Sean Clark
Environmental Scientist
Attachments:
Pre-construction (PCN) notification form
Agent Authorization form
USGS Site Vicinity Map
Wake County Soil Survey Map
Impact Map
$200 check (or copy) for DWQ processing fee
Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Mr. Roy Mashburn
Mailing Address: 101 Keybridge Drive
Morrisville NC 27560
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: NA
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Sean Clark
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants Inc.
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Telephone Number: 919-846-5900 Fax Number: 919-846-9467
E-mail Address: sclark(a,sandec.com
Pagel of 8
III. Project Information.
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Kit Creek Road Extension
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): NA
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):
4. Location
County: Wake
Nearest Town: Cary
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): The project site is bounded to the
east by Highway 55 and is located approximately one mile south of Genlee, in Wake County,
NC. The site falls within the ETJ of Cary.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 035051'35.64"N/078'53'43.98"W
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): NA
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake):
UT of Kit Creek
8. River Basin: Cape Fear River Basin
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/mays/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site is currently forested and undeveloped.
Surrounding land is either in residential developments, agriculture, or forested and
undeveloped.
Page 2 of 8
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
proposed project consists of construction of a road extension from an existing portion of Kit
Creek Parkway (SR 1639) as part of the Town of Cary Thoroughfare Plan. Heavy machinery
typically used for the earthwork required for the installation of the access road.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The proposed road extension will create an
alternate route from Alston Avenue to NC Highway 55.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
Ms. Amanda Jones of the USACE approved a wetland survey map on July 9, 2002 (AID
#200221159). In May 2003 an application was submitted for a NWP 39 for the proposed
adjacent development. 401 certification (DWQ #03-0626) was received in May 2003. 404
certification was received in July 2003.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
There are no additional future permits known to be needed at this time.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The proposed impacts will
result from the installation of a road crossing over an intermittent stream channel and its
Page 3 of 8
adiacent wetlands. The proposed road crossing will impact 197 linear feet of intermittent
stream channel and 0.15 acres of wetland.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact Area of Located within Distance to
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact 100-year Floodplain** Nearest Stream Type of Wetland***
(indicate on map) (acres) (yes/no) (linear feet)
Impact 1 Permanent/fill 0.15 No 0 Piedmont Alluvial Forest
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.18
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.15 acres
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact Length of Average Width Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent?
(indicate on map) (linear feet) Before Impact (please specify)
Impact 1 Permanent/
Culvert

197'

UT of Kit Creek

+ 4'

Intermittent
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several intemet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapguest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 197 linear feet proposed
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact Area of Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact
(if applicable) (lake, pond, estuary, sound,
(indicate on map) (acres) bay, ocean, etc.)
NA NA NA NA NA
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Page 4 of 8
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): NA
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): NA
Size of watershed draining to pond: NA Expected pond surface area: NA
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The applicant requested a delineation of the wetlands and waters on property prior to site
plan development in order to avoid impacts to jurisdictional areas to the maximum extent
practicable. However, an unnamed tributary to Kit Creek separates the Alston Avenue from
Highway 55, making it necessary to construct the road extension over the channel in order to
adhere to the Town of Cary Thoroughfare Plan.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
Page 5 of 8
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/stn-ngide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Based on similar permits approved for NWP 14 and because the applicant has minimized
impacts to the maximum extent practicable with the proposed road crossing, S&EC does not
believe that stream or wetland mitigation should be required, however if mitigation is
required payment to the NC Wetland Restoration Program is proposed.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wT/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): NA
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): NA
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):NA
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
Page 6 of 8
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
NA NA 3 NA
NA NA 1.5 NA
Total NA NA
* Gone I extends out 3U feet perpendicular trom near bank of cnannel; Gone t extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Impervious surfaces for the project will total less than 30% of the site.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
NA
Page 7 of 8

XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
NA
Applk'ant/Agerit's Signature bite 7
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 8 of 8
OETUN.20.2002.1:10:08RM1198ePERIMETER REALTY 5&EC
Name:
Address:
N0.892 P.2i2 M/02
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Wdgc Road - Raleigh, Nom Carolina 27614 - Phone; (91.9) 8465900 + Pax: [phone]
AGENT AUTHORIZA.VON FORM
All Blanks To Be Filled In 13 'Tkt C t ot,,rr
s'a 4 G
MD124/S U14-c--45 AlC
Phone: _ S'1 a `
Project Name/ Description: A) c S'1 ? C? G S'Tia / `? C'r4 ,?
Date: _ r ?/--?o / 0 -L- _
The Department of the Army
U-5-'Army Corps of E?Rgizteers, Wilmington District
P.O, Box 1890
WilmixWop, NC 2MO2
pield Qf'?ce: [..?'t4 /f
Re: Wed3nds Related Consulting and Pernvltting
To Whom It May Concern
1, the currents miter, hereby designate and authorize Soil & Envuoxm ental Cowttltartts, PA to
act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of pear it applications, to f=is:h upon request
supplemental information in support of applications, etc, from this day forward- The ?2' 7,,& day of
This notification supersedes any previous cozrespondence concerning the agent for this project
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons,, is valid only for
government officials to enter the property when accompanied by S&EC staff. You should call S&EC
to arrange at site meeting prior to visiting the site.,
ka y ? ?iyri?/
Print Property Owner's Name
cc: Mr. 7obn Doxney
NCDENR - UWQ
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27604
chdmc Office,
C
Property a ?" tore
cc: lvfr. Sean Clark
Sofa & EnvirOnMeAtAl Consultants, PA
blank agent auth fomn.doc
236 LePhdlfiP Court. Suite c 710 oY 3817-8 Lgwndale Dpvo 710 Boston Road
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455 Tayloreville, NC 28681
Phone: [phone] phone; [phone] Phone (828) 63S-5820
Fay: (704) 720_9406 FAx: [phone]
Fax; (82B) 635-5820
it-, ?-` l•:?,?0 .??7'?j ?? ??• I????^\
.:...., % (?••-=1 300
)YI
M C
A

0
I I I I S OU!
O
0

a

)03
g?
eek

C
/<I
?r
a\
GREEN LEVEL QUADRANGLE
1 NORTH CAROLINA
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
SWA DURHAM SOUTH 15' QUADRANGLE
Project #: Scale:
54e2.01 IUate: „ te. 2000,
Figure 1- USGS Quad
Project Alston Ave. & Highway 55 ? Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Mgr.: SC 03104/02 11010 Raven Ridge Rd. Raleigh, NC 27614
Goodman, Segar, Hogan, & [phone] .[phone]
Hoffler Web Page: www.SandEC.com
Green Level, Wake County, NC
7' ^,` .;\T "^'
1 L`P? y t y1
-`?C? {{ly,l /-;? 2 1 Sid
r ill ?
i.. ?7 it t I r / Irb. A`
\Vey
rs „ { ?
.n.. ?? y? 1. 44u F.•`C S f<
x?
F ?Ys ° r K
F
t? ag .S, v >" sC2 a ?y
3 ?f r ?'a ° s r g ti?` t ?f
WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA - SHEET NUMBER 35

Project M
5492.01 Scale:
1" =1320'

Figure 2 - Soil Survey
Project
Mgr.: SC Date:
03104102
Alston Ave. & Highway 55
Perimeter Realty
NC
C
t
oun
y,
Green Level, Wake
?VAM Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Rd. Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] [phone]
MM Web Page: www.SandEC.com
w4? WAKE ROAD
SR 1631
SITE
O
Y
0 KIT CREEK ROAD
? ZJ
i
¢

m o H P`
¢ 2
I?
$
{ F,,
¢ e ?fS'TI? I
o rcF T?f i ', a?
o
^
a N ?i T ?' ?

E
Z rc¢
U.?. ?
J w
A0?Y
€ Wo? 9' i
€ ZW=o°"
ZI,Jw=??
L LJZ??? o
O
1
Z NL RN

...??
-
Wjap2
06
Q V CINITY MAP - N T
S o?Qa;Q
. .
.
B XH
s z J=f?
T
ti Jwo??
N
=
Y
5 I^/?
V
1V 16j0Q'
/
^
V 1Z U?1 P
8 r `
V ow _
a WUTV-

'1 A 1'1Y
fl I ??_ / tt
H O
••
? 4
OSO.W
G
8 W
1
&
7 n ?
. 0
N8x
ro F
1)4.1 3
K
If
Z

g, '
6 f a W
QQ =

` ZJ u
. a
af

$
-
___- (7
9 o a'Vl
?
? P
n
N Z
w
? w
¢
U
a 4
s

ti
Z z b
e
? a J
%
O

GRAPHIC
SCALE ? z
z o
? ~=
a 1 120' /
/ w
~?
x?
120 0 120 240 W
z
A < g
Q
p W 3 i
Z
s =
Li
LLJ
? a W I
?
?
O

TYPE
STREAM IMP
C ZONE 1 IMPACT ZONE 2 IMPACT
PENF
S
F
R F
>
INPACT A
(LIN. FT.) A
EAR BUFFE A
(SO. FT.) P
E
BWFE
EA
(SR. FT.) EILAND ILEAC
(SO. FT.) F--1 w

$

CAPE R OFFER
B

197

10,983 SF

6,406 SF

6,730 SF a

U

I
N
! t
W
a i`-'o i
?U"

l ? l1E
1
45.
1 5 N 8
r.?
GRAPHIC SCALE
1" = 50'
150'
EXEX Rr
50 0 50 100
i6N

ZONE 1 IMPACT ZONE 2 IMPACT
O
F
N T
F
O
TYPE STREAM IMPACT FE
-APE
FEAR
BU BUF
E
APE
FEAR WETLAND IMPACT
IMPACT (LIN. FT.) (SQ. FT.) (SQ. FT.) (SQ. FT.)
CAPE FEAR 197 10
983 SF 6,406 SF 6
730 SF
BUFFER , ,
NSET
i
i
c;
, i'I ~ 4'i;
r : +
~n~; ~~~I
s
o . „ ' ~ d. ~ „.,z t~ a
w~~„
P 5
,h' 4, x f r . ~i ~ ;
- ~r
~r~..
i
' P~^~ . i ~ ;
' I~
r~ 4
To Durham and I.40 H

~ u , .d„ ~ x.k a
~ ~ /
, 1,
1 b i i - ~ ~ ~ ~ k"
.~p. i ~ Z ' t, ~
0 ~ m ~ o r 1~
A ,P ~ , _
C ~ ~ ~
~ m r csson 0 1
~ ~7~~~ o. ~~a a
E~ X I' ~ ~ ~ .
~ s• G To Downtown Durham o
Q~ The circled number labels on the map indicate that additional, special land use
to and Baseball Stadium a 10 en - recommendations exist for that area. Unless otherwise noted in the descri tions below a ~ p )w, a
~ Krr ' C~~S"K ~ iv I I li Ilh In n rh I Ihvin h m Ir h i h ~ g en abe app es to a t e a d u de t o abe a g t e sa a co o s ad rig up to t o :o the
pKY Z point where the color changes on the map (ignoring roads and railroads). See Plan
~ v ~ ~ } r
~ ~ Recommended PubNc School Search Area document for more detail
~ f' ~ 0 xan rl m Pro'ected School Needs: J r~ ~ t
1 High School Needed by 2004; will Meet Needs Through Buildout ~ n on
i 1 Middle School Needed by 2008; will Meet Needs Through Buildout F . .
i 1 Elem. School Needed b 2008; in Addition to Morrisville Pk !L ` ~ ~ ; ~ Y ~ Y
r] Ste hens Drive Site and Hawes Tract Town of Ca Site otential o r . P ry , P 1 American Tobacco Trail multi-use path is located in an unused railroad
~ If g l ~ , ~ ~ need for a total of 2.5 elementary schools at buildout. right-of-way, linking Cary with downtown Durham and southwest Wake
To American 4 Q ~ County.
moll
Tobar~coTrail ~ , ` ti
F~ ~
2 Multi-use paths paralleling east and west sides of Green Level to Durham ~ rn
o~ ~~~a v 9 Ro d to a located off- ro d in a wide lin r I n ff r, P h a b a ea a dscaped bu a at
"`G ~ should beset back about 20 feet or more on average from road right-of-
C
y way, except near intersections. Total buffer width should be about 30-50
feet on avera e. Other multi-use aths arallelin ke roadwa s are also 9 p P 9 Y Y ~A
, a shown on ma . p
~C L
3 Multi-use path to be located in 100 ft. buffer along I-540 right-of-way.
t ` 'A A AIRPORT S Y J'ik Ur vD Shown on west side of I-540, but could switch to east side.
i. ~t#] H BL oop
~ • ° ~ ~ I r ~ , ~
~ ~ ~ ~ a~ r a t"" ~ ~
~ , ~ . ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ n, ~ ~ry~ ~ o ~ 4 Ana roximatel 400 ft. wide o en s ace corridor will follow Kit Creek. A J pp Y p P ~ , A
~~.Y CNA + ~ ~ m I i- h i I wi hin h n in ~ ~ua a; w ~ , , ~ ~ a ~ ~ u t use pat s to be ocated t (but at edge oft t e ope space
y Y
S ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , Kti,,„ ~ ~ ~ To corridor. Path will likely be located north and east of Kit Creek. Within
~ A ~ ~ ,o ~w*~~= ~ AIRPORT RTP the ath will run closer to Louis Ste hens Drive. Theo en s ace .M ~ BLVD
• r 4 ~ d ~ F ~ corridors boundaries shown on the map are illustrative only. The corridors y t, . ors
~ x g iS' ~ should average about 400 ft. m total width; the actual spot width may vary I ry
4 ~ - ~ ~ in laces. Corridor de th from the stream need not be uniform on both ~ p p
'r r
' ~ ~1 ~ sides of the stream m some sections the corridor ma actual) be dee er Y Y p 't
o x on the north side in others on the u h sid . ~ ~ sot e
~ Nanc k
Y $ nch a Co+'Mdo c,. ~ ,
4 r ~ 5 ~ Co w
r;, ? 1(~ r ~ a ~ ~ ~ 5 A roximatel 400 ft. wide o en s ace corridors will follow Nanc Branch, h
f ~ ~,.~y pp Y p p Y ..~.~i m M rris Branch and Panther Creek. Multi-use aths are to be located within
a~`~" O ,g ~ r, r< o Q p ;hin
~ ~l y 4 c ~ (but at edge of) these open spaces corridors. Topography indicates paths hs
U 11..x. n x m r should probably be located on north side of the streams. The open space ice
< ~ M w ~ ~ ~ ~ ,.~h , ~ fi ~ z cprndors boundaries shown on the map are illustrative only. The corridors ors
WCPSS ~ Q K ti ~ ~ should avera a about 400 ft. m total width the actual s of width ma va
0 HIGH SCHOOL ~ r ao 9 p Y ry N. ~~w ~ P ry
SITE ~ ~ Y M K in places. Corridor depth from the stream need not be uniform on both ar en er
~ t~ y~ sides of the stream; in some sections the corridor may actually be deeper sr
AMBERLY PKWY ~ ' on the north side in others on the south side. is arc is nc
a r
a= ~s a . ~ ,
I 1 ~ ~ ti
A o q ~
C ..,0 6 Multi-use path paralleling north-south collector road. Path should be I
orMs Branch C orr(dor PA located off-road in a wide linear landsca ed buffer buffer not shown since ' p ce
r ,NW. road alignment not yet determined). Path shown on west side of road, but ut
q~ ARPENTER•FI M ~ , v
FS S RE STA R y roR~ erminus could be located on other side, as long as path doesn t switch sides more
than once. Path should be set back about 20 feet or more on avera a from Amenit g Y om
X30 F y doc Si~+r~ in _F road ri ht-of-wa exce t near intersections. Total buffer width should be I~R 9 9 Y, p r
~ ~ c~ aor ~y, Center about 30-50 feet on avera e.
G ak ~ Gre ~ ~ e~ ~ Morrisville
y t~? j x
4 r a r~ r, > r, } ~
CornmerCral 7 Bicvclelpedestrian routes may use road and sidewalk along sections of i
+
t~~ ~ ~ ~ n r n r- h r h R n M rri ville- renter Road on final in Ca pe to Upc u c oad a d o s Cap ( g) ~ ~ . Morrisville ~ti o p .
~ - _ indicated sections of Carpenter Historic Distract. 1 bw. =
inu ~ , Term f~~ t s? 4 ~ ,t ~ _ To CrabtrCreek f ~1 ~ , ~ ! ~ ~ ~
Amer~i ~ a ~ K
Y ry ~ ~ j . -Lake.. C ~ ,Par , N em. School Slte Q e r:~ . c L,,.., 11~. ~ ~ 8 M I i- ath I nned rallel west side of Louis Ste hens Road as g u t use p p a to pa p ,
w 1_:,. , R ~ Black Creek Green c~ R i o
~ o ~ - , ~Il shown. ' ?
~ _ , ' „ P rk a ,
r .C' E--.New Elem. School Site
q ~ Z I ho in Center pp 9 Morrisville 9 Multi-use path planned to parallel west side of Davis Dnve, as shown.
~ W v 1 Car Y ~
..nn ~ ~r z, ~ f
V-~ 4 i o ~ ~ ~ v,,r.
. J ~ . ~ ` ~ ,9 ~ 10 Multi-use ath alon Green Level to Durham Road could alternative) be ~ ~ ~ P g Y
r i ~ 'A ~ x,. , ~ r - r n i i r m r n h h f P rather Creek's crossin outed alo g nd Gated st ea b a c, sout o a g
~ ~ ~ ~ t.,,~ ~i f' ~ 7 j _ ~ of Green Level to Durham Road. l ~ ~ a,
r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w -
/ ~ ,j
1 P ti
"t ~ 11 Multi-use path parallels west side of Howard GrovelCounty Line Road H~ h ~i
Hi hcroft 9 . P rk Elementar until ath veers off west of road further south alon count line. Path ~ Y p g Y I bk.
h~ - o Broo s rk T a 1 and Sears Park School School i should beset back about 20 feet or more on average from road right-of
So Cat am a uth to h h ~ ` j way except near intersections. Total buffer width should be about 30-50
~ and Green Level ~ and Wake Counties ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ f n v r her multi- se aths arallelin ke roadwa s are also eet o a e age Ot u p p g y y i0
J ~ ~ p.~ ~ ~
» ~ ~ ~ r . . ~ ~ ~ i ~ shown on map. e ~
. ~ o roo ~ ar ,u o ; ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ o
_ ~ and Green Level cN
- ~ H
4, ~ ~ . . E ~ ' _ - ~
o ~ j ~ erminus meni les ,
y.
en ace Terminus Amenities are intended to be public facilities at two locations near where the the .
u tl- se at rldors u ers ar S Nanc Branch, Morris Branch, and Panther Creek corridors meet in the West, and Or , , , Y id
e a ain in the East near historic car enter. e estrlan an Ic c g ~ P
ommunlt ecreatlon
or:
v,~h a Rr a ce ~ R o 4
_ ~ M q i The eastern terminus amenity might include public uses such as a historic or
` cultural museum or interpretive center, public arts and crafts center, performance xls In oa
ar ~ ~ u Ic area, ark, water features, commune center, libra ,farmers market, or festival p tY ry ti.
. . - atherin lace.
11~YI - \1 ~ nr ~ o m o In Icates nee or PARK g g p
~ r ~ e w ere In t a ar some The western terminus amernt might include public uses such as a nature Y
z ~ ~ ~ a. r ni I n iv I n rd n r it head to in r r iv r i n l n ota ca ate a is a e t a to et e o educat o a ce to b
//r ~1 ~ ca ~ v ( P )9 p enera area o t e s m o utu re oa
dr` ~ W i r 'r -w hen r . American To cco Tra I o bi d atc oute ba
o ~ r N
~ J
~ Q c~, a r e e orate a rm or o
6'; ~ C1 In order to meet Town parks and water quality objectives, about 300-350 acres of ~f
Oa Wa roSSln n IneerS public parklopen space land are required in the northwest area.
nne rl a Or u r0 a The needed 300-350 acres of ublic arkslo en s ace is in addition to the re uired P P p p q ed
50 ft. and 100 ft. stream buffers and the four 400 ft. wide open space corridors for Kit ~8 r._..~. Kit
o fe t e ar own ounce on a fem er Creek, Nancy Branch, Morris Branch, and Panther Creek.
u Ic coo earc rea
a so a com anon a rea an ocument or a ~t~ona eta! s ee ,
M~:.~
a f qGm ~w.:
t.
jam,
i
~~16 p
b d

. ~ j .P _ _
~ j
, ,3 ,
r e. ~
h: t' ` =o~~
_ , t,- - _ - _ r ~ µ - - - - u. ~ .3
l r - _ ! n n.
awra-u..
+h ~ - f5 ~c ~ t M
e c Kn ~.a' 4aiwv~... Mi _ s
" _ `T
_t .RE: uzP9Fk " _«_v_~. _ ~ S - F` M.- a X33'_^:
._.s: - 4 9 n ...ern ....;Pei Tnr $~'n 'S1°•, ,e. -fir [ll^, '
M1 r3 tri r _h ~r, R6 i m ~ y - + ~ ,
r s., t e. ~ ~ ~ n

~ I
I ~i ~ ~ ~ ~ I / \ /
i ~ r, ~ L). .d \ ~
I ~ ~ , ~ 1 - j j ~ /
/1 1 f' ~ ~ \ ~
~ / 1 / t
~ 1
~~I ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ j i ~ ~ / / /
' ~;q ~t ' ~
/ ~ , ~ y- ~i ,,i 9t.~ % ~ ~ ~
i ~ ~ 1 \ ~--'r' ~
I ~ _ ~ ~ t .~=-~--,------1 1 ~ ~ i1 ~ ~
f p1 ; ~ ~
- ~ ~ t 1 1 ~ ® ~ ~
~ / , ~ ~~----r -~1 I ~ 1
~ \ i 1' 1~
~ ~ (y--{ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ m i ~ ~1 l' ~ ~ csson ~ i i /t~~,
-~_C o J ,r-,.~ ~ i ~ ~ M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . j ~ C
1 ~u.~~ W t t ~ ~ ~ ~
1'--- .1 ~ - li r - x ~ / ~ ' a ~ ~'l
~ \ ~ i' \
/ '1; ~ Q~~ ~ ~ / ,
r 1 ~ i ~ ~y
K PKY ~ ~
~r S ~ 1 v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
1 j { r' r~,~•, ~ \
l r , r _ xan ri _ _ , - ~
~ ~
~ To Durha on oun ~ i i , ~
` . , r ~ ~
1 j ti_` • ~ / ! l 4 J i~ - ~~rrr i
i - .
~ ~ ti { 1 ` , ~ ~
? i '
1 ~ ~ ! ~ ~ , i ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ '`'i~
~ _ ~
~,~C ~
l i ~ - - h-" V 1_. , - ~i li ` ~ , t - ~ ~ _ ~ ~ , ~1 _ _ ,
' ~ . \ , i ~ . ~ ',.;`'~~~o ~J ~ \
_ ~ I 1
r ~ \ ~ ~ ? ~ r
~ r.---~.~ ~ v ~J ~ ~ ~ A , ~ ~
- . ~ i /
r ~ j ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ r . ~ ~ , i ~ i TO i .
so 1- _ ~ , k ~ ~ , i AI ~ /
Ild Chatha - - -r 0~ m Goff Club ~ ~ ~ ~ R BLVD
J; r-- l 1 ; I ~ - ' j 1 ~ 1 • i
+ + i i ~i~ ` .1 i i ~F~ ~ ~
1 The circled number labels on the map indicate that additional, special land use
~ ~ - - - ~ c;;~ recommendations exist for that area. Unless otherwise noted in the descri tions below, ,a ~ p
/ ~ ~ , given label applies to all the land under the label having the same color shading up to tf•
~ ~.,,1 - - ~ ~ ~ ~ Td- ~ % ~ - %"1, oint where the color Chan es on the ma i norin roads and railroads .See Plan
i~ i _ ~ ~ \ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ AIRP'
i - 1 ; ~ ~ / i _ _ ~ ~ doc men f r ,~tv' u t o more detail
i ~ ~ ~ ` / ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~
. ; ~ i
~ f ~ ~ ~
~ ~ i t I / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~l ~ , ~ ~
r ~ ~ ~ = ~ ' 1 "Conn Line Road" artiall coin rised of Howard Grove Pkw and Yates
l//~~ V 1 ~ r4 _ 1 ~ tY (p Y p Y ~
' r, ~ Store Road to the south should eventual) connect with Grandale Drive in ) Y F ~
~ ran. t ~ i Durham County, via Wake Road. Alignment not determined.
1 't 0 ~ i ~ -
~ ~ ~ ~ t~~ ~ n 7c ~ ~
_ ~ _ r ~ - ~ t 1 `"~'t' \ 1 r~. ~ ~ 0 2 Kit Creek Road may need to continue west of Alston Avenue, depending
r~ ~ I~" ~ . 1 ~ r~ C v an ~ ~ - 1 Co . ~ ~ mdo ~ 1
- 1 ~ ~ l ~ 1 1 ~ ~ ~ _ on future develo merit and trafFc need. Ali nment of this extension has 1 , p 9
_ - _ Pvt. Rec. ~ l ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 - 1' . ~ ~ ~Y not been set.
1 ~ ~ ~ - ~ / , 1 i ~ ~ r ~ ti i \ G 70
I ,
- I ~ 1 1 1 rr---• ( r• rrr--I' ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ 1
~ . + AMBERLY PKWY a---•- 3 0 Kelly Chapel Road will be continued eastward into RTP to link u with r p i ~ t ~ , ~ \
~ ~ ~ _ ~ South Loop Road.
t l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i i ~ ~ , i 1 , ~ ~ ~ ,
i ~ it 1 1 i 0 ti,, 9
1 1 ~ I ~ ~ , s ~ ~ 4 r ~ , ; G een Level to Durham Road to be realigned to a through north-south
~ ~ 1 ~ % ~
+ _ ~ I ~ L ~ - movement here, as indicated conce tuall . p Y ~ i- ~ ~ ~ L~`
1 i ~ R~ /,r s~ ,~,,y
. 1 k~ i • ~ r I' '4 ~ r ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ RP NT - !e y ~ ~ ~R RE STA -
; STOR R ~ ~q ~,~L - ~ R 1 ~ D p ~,4 aF _ „ ~ ` 5 Continuation of County Line Road, southward (from 2001 comprehensive
~ i ~ FN ti _ { ~ ~ ~ oA NT R ~ ~ t~~ trans ortation Ian .Need ali nment to be studied in more detail with
_ _ - ~ _ - ~ F ~ ~ /r ~ R r ~ ~.,v p P) 9 0 i,~ , ,
ti ~ ! v ~ i G ~ ' ~ ' ~ ; ~ ~V:=`~~ future Southwest Ca Area Plan. Sho ~ ry P ,
'P _ ~ ~ ~ c - ~ ~ ~ ,
ti ~ / ~P _ ~ o- _ (Morris ~ - ,
_ _ ~ 1i V~. 1 i - 6 Potential right - of -way closings for some or all of the shaded portions of
1 ~ ~ i ~ a ~ i %i~~% v i Alston Av n in n r v l in n n r li nmen . ~ e, depe d g o ede a op e t a d ea g is
.r ~ , '',i ~ ~ i
1 ~ ~ i f G r ~ A, I ~I f ~ I
- t _ ~ ~ a
. ~ ' -----r--, . i i~'
J ~ Z ~ ' ~ ~ C.~ ~ __~I f' ` ~ r ~ n~
a ~ , J ~
j , , - ~ ~ tl ~ ® ~ 1
~ ~ t 1 , r-- I ' I G ~ I ~ ~ , l_
~ I k ~F~r ~',~`1'~ V ' i ~ t ~ ~ ~
~ Pvt. Rec. t Q / y ~
~ ~ ~f ~ ~ - , ; ~ Sho 'n Cent ~ pI~ 9 . ^ ~ ~ Morrr villa
N 1 ,y/ W , ~g 1 ~ - _-r ~ ~ ~ s ~
f~- yellow are throughfare sections where additional S - ~ : , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ti~ ^~A ~ _ ~v
reserved to support future HOY lanes, busltransit ~ ~ f ,,\y r ~ r C~ r
it facilities, Approx, 24.50 ft of additional 1 I ~
tmended for each roadwa , 0 Y ~ 1 Throu hfar In r h n es: ~ , a e tocaa
- ~ l.. <
for specific recommentations and recommended ~ / .l ~ - ~ ,f~~ The arterial intersections recommended for rade - se eration
reach such roadway segment.) t ~ ~ 9 p i, r ~y~, ~ w;<;,,.:~
. ~ should use a pedestrian -friendly, compact design such as a ~~CC.~~.,?~~ 1) ~~~y
:~ll[~P_ CP_C+IMC nf'^~_ ti ~ - i~',. , , i ; iil,/;~ _ ~ /'r',.«'J`~_ ; I .,.,.~W r! t _ ~nii~re _ Inns in4ernh~nne A Innel evemnle Winne eviele in Dnln~nh
~ ~ ~ ~
ham Rd./Alston Ave L ~ v~' ~ ~~g~ fk~ ~s omon Pkwy 1 ~ ~ ~ SCh001 e t~ ~ ' ~ at Wade Avenue and Oberlin Road.
~ ,
~ I~, ~ ~ ~ I~,-,t \ ~ ; - Nib fcg ; \
j
~a
a v~~~~ y
~ ~ ~ 6RF~ ~
i ~ ~
1 ~
Recommendations for Reco ~0~~~~~~ Existing Roads Futur ~i\ 2 Lane Undivided Road
recommended Grade Separated
Roadway Crossing '
Future Roads (bridge, tunnel) ~
2 L =V-~ • 2 Lane Undivided Road ~
_ Freeway F
Interchange
~;;~,p,;;y 2 Lane Road 4 La ~ O~ ~ w/ L ~ f Ca/'1/ ~i w/ Paved Median 4Lane Road ~
Re uired Arterial
w/ Landscaped Median ~ Q
Grade-Separated
l~ , ~ 4 Lane Road
Collector Road Intersection Wade/Oberlin Interchange
.~J~ Roads and Transit w/ Landscaped Median (tYPi 6 Lane Road with
(typically 2-3 lanes, potential Arterial
with or without median) ~ Grade,Separated
NOT TO SCALE W~ Landscaped Median Irrtersection
~ ~ ~ Collector Road _ ~ Proposed I-540
Adopted by the Cary Town Councl! on September 12, 2002 (typically 2-3 lanes,
See also the companion NW Cary Area Plan document fa addltlonal details with or without median)
Transit Corridor

_ _ _ _ 1 ~
i
1 r ,6, ~I
r;; °c;

4 ~ r `,t Flt , i i ~ I
F-
1
~T a~ - 1 f~
= ti
.,f ' n E, ; ~~7f i
~ k ~,~M 17ss~ ~ ~
_ `v~. J F.~yry;.,- ~ y~;
r~ a 1.
} ..1 0 ,
w.: ~s rr ~n 1 I
/ ' 1 ~ I
/ 1' / ~ , / ,
~ ~(1 I ~ ,

I
I
I
~ The circled number labels on the ma indicate that additional s ecial land use p p
4 ` _ 1' _ , recommen ations xi f r h r nl h rwi noted in the descri tions below a d e st o f at a ea U ess of a se
J' ~ p ,
given label applies to all the land under the label having the same color shading up to the
L I 1 - ` ! D . ; - point where the color changes on the map (ignoring roads and railroads. See Plan ~
L.~, - ~ r ®1 ~ ~ ~ , o -Y-- - - ~ _ ~~r i r ~ _ ~ ; document for more detail
3 ' j ~ ~E 3 ~ t .lY I i i ~ ~ ~
, ~y~ ~ ~ p i~ I ~ ~ ~
I i ICI a. _ ~ csson _ ~ i 0 _ , 1 Development at densities of more than 1 dwelling per 5 acres should be I i
A ~ _ ~ ~ cl ter in n erv ti n subdivision desi n to reserve rural us ed us g co s a o g p f-- ~ ,
WA d . _ , ~ . ' ' ~ _ ~ character, o en s aces.
i' ~ p p
` - t ~ ,r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a f. a~ - ~ to. t Q,i / ~ F:
. ~ _ . , ~ - 0 ~ ~ 1 ~ F 11 n r VLDR r h w h l r i n i II - io en ~ 2 0 C NS uses ea the a ea tote est s ou d use es de t a y III
' - - . - lCIT C~ compatible transitional building styles having height, bulk, and design ,r I~p
US Arm Cor of En ineers Land ~ Y p 9 ~ 1~ Z coin atible with sin le-famil uses. p 9 Y
i ~ ~ ~ _ _ ~ r~ 1 ~ - - ? ~ ~ G1 ~ ~ i r ~
~ r xan ri , » a 3 Transitional office building styles should be used having height, bulk, and
~ ~ ~ i ~ ' ~ ~
1 ~ ~ design compatible with adjacent VLDR single-family to the west. n~,on;,.. E.y
- . - ~ ~ ~ . , e~ i ~ / ~ ~ ? ~
~ ~ A ~ y ~ ~ i _ a . , 1 4 Intense mixed use center with focus on commercial/retail and office uses,
~ p ~ ~ ~ - v~ith some high-density housing, such as apartments aver shops or offices.
~ I _ ~ ~ i~ ~ S ~ , ~ ~ i
~ 4 ` ~ - ~ i
~ ~ ! jl 6 , ~ , . - 5 About 113 of this approximately 165 acre mixed-use area west of I-540 and 2 ~ f
- J - __'--i _.i ~ ~ ~ I ; , ~ _ east of Green Level to Durham Road should be used for commerciallretail,
> v~ j ~ 1 ~ ~ 113 for office, and 113 for a mix of medium and high density residential, in /rl {
_ J~ FC11NS - ti. ~ ~ ~ I~ ~ ~ an integrated, pedestrian and transit-friendly environment. Maximum of
r _ OR H i ~ - ~ - . f. _ about 500 000 s . ft. of commercial
~ ~ ~ ~ c.= ~;,~o q
i i ~a I I I . 1 I c' ~ I A
'c, i ~ _ 6 About 1l3 of this large approximately 282 acre mixed-use area east of C~ s
I i 4 ~ ~ I-540 and west of NC 55 should be used for commercial/retail 113 for
ti w Fr,i` - Q i ~L~ • ~ " ; ~ office, and 113 far a mix of medium and high density residential, in an vr{
~ ~ r"'...a..~ 1 ~ ~I ~ ~ _~a~ i ~ ~ ~ inte rated edestrian and transit-friend) environment. Maximum of about
OFCAN _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . To ~ 9 , p Y ~ ~ ~ i j
OR - a HDR ` 750 000 to 1000 000 s . . of commercial. Ai ft q S i `a. Q U
r _ _ i _ r _ I ~ ~ • TH ~ r, ~ VD ~~4 ~ ~ ~ I ~ l 4p 1 . ,
, ,i ~ \ i ~ = 7 Rid efield Farms lots should onl convert from VLDR to MDR uses when A 9 Y
~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~ 1; , ri at least 3 or more adjacent lots are consolidatedlassembled for that
, r I r ~ I - 1 ` I ! ~ l r. Vii, ~ ~ ~ . _ purpose.
~ ~ RD t ~ _ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,
LDR TO MDR T ; r.. ~ ~ , . p _ ~ ~ , w G A ~ t1` : T
+ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~I / ~ ~ ~ _ ~ w ~ 9~ ~ 8 Up to a maximum of 10 dwellings/acre. ~ ~ ~ I ti, AIRP~ r
r _ _ ~ ~ OR E 1 1 ~ > ,r ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~;r, 5
_ ' OFClIND , , ~ ~ ; ~ ~,~wp._ ~ L~ M ~ ~
f - , , ~ t ~ -~,~5' { 1 _1 ~ ~A _ ~ ~ti l ~ 9 U to a maximum of 16 dwellin s/acre. `0 _ p 9
~ , _ ~ , - .,R - ~t ~ ~ i i - ~
- - - . i d- y ~ ~ 1 J1, ~ ~
.t - ~ ~ °~f ~ i r,~ , ; ~ ~ 10 U to a maximum of 6 dwellin slacre. 'I
, r__.~_.. , OFCIIND , w__., ~ ~ ;1 ~ p 9
~ ' Y; ~ 9 '
n " i ti t.-
MDR TO HD ~ J+ ~ , i 1 1 , l ; 11 At least half the MXD area should be used for medium or hi h densi
i i ~ f ~ `I ~ ~ , i _ ~ E 9 ty . i . ~ +t ¢
, r sidential. ~ _
w~ i y _ MDR TO HDR ~ , ~ ; ~ , i
~ _ a 12 Densities transition from HDR to MDR moving eastward and southward I
LDR TO MD ~ ~ ~ ' . , ~ . i~ t r 1 t ~ 1 ' m from the Ca Glen Villa a Center, Bounda Line shown between HDR
~ ; r , • i R , t ' I ~ :-w~ ~ 't ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~i ~ and MDR i n I. , ~ ~ ti s co ceptua
, r l i ~
pR TO HD ~ ; ~ _ t j IY - • ~ 'i pv
i oFC~ ~ ~ ~ 13 Area to be u ed f r u li mm ni f ili i h rk h . N _ _ s o b c co u ac t es, suc as a s, sc oo s, ~ ~ p ty p r 1- n
MDR TO HDR ! + - M k ~ RLY PKIIIII( j ~ ~ _ t:~, , community center, etc. I' ~
. _ . LDR TOMDR ~ l~ i ~ s s ~ ,ti
P~ _ _ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ 1 ~ j r ii ~ 1 ~ r _r~~ ~ # ~ r r ~ ,I ~~.7 1 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~I!'~ ~ 14 L""and uses around this intersection or interchan a will be re-examined in
i ~ + ~ ~ 1 , 1 ~ . u ._-..1 _ g
p. / { J ~ ~ ~ the future with the Southwest Ca Area Plan. ~ ~ > . 1 ~ i
~N; 7 ' ~ w 1 w -tea ,
~ ~ MDR ~ ~ ~ MDR TO HDR + 1 ~ ~ , I ~ 15 If intersection of Morrisville Pk and NC 55 becomes rode-se orated , M ~ wY 9 p , p~ ,
Ri ~ s~~ e~~ ~ ~ then a limited amount of OFC/INS at the northwest intersection quadrant
~ ~ HDR ~ , ~ ~ - T~- ~ ~ - - , l l ~ r _ ' .,Yq ~ ~ : r; ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ AR ~ ma be a ro riate, Otherwise MDR should be maintained. ~ ,qp M Y pp p
~ _ T ARP ~ ~ ; 1, ~ F ENTER ,,IRE S7A R 1 ~ , , _ ' , ~ ~ N 1 S STORE R~ + t ~ k ~ - ,
, o r... ~ ~ 1 ~ + t - ~ i e~, -vv_ ~ t ~ v , CI_.:, - . Rp 1 _ ~
ti ~ ~ ~ 16 OFCIINS uses are recommended for NC 55 and McCrimmon Parkwa ,f, / Y Sho
~ - , t fronta e. Either OFCIIND or OFCIINS uses area ro riate for the r,=,:' I r ~ ~-r r, - 9 pp p
- , ~ ~ ~ - 1 ~ A r} ~ r ~ I Y~ r 4~,- ~ , . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - balance of the area es eciall near the railroad line. ~ ~ p Y
i ~ ~y ~ - V ~ i~ t I it _ ~ ~ ~ J. / 7 !r-. 1- ? f. Morris
~ l~' 'I ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ i ~_I~ ~1 r~~,. ~ 17 Office uses should be focused around transit facile see Ma 2 . Future 1 - ~7r~s. _ tY ( p
~ ~ ! , 4 r yJ~''~y a I' ~ H t i~ q$„ ~ ~ ~ ; _ p ~ t ~°a ~ - r ~C~ _ ~ ~._~r~- ± ~ p ~ rig
. ~ r ~ i r. ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ _ i V ~ ~ ' ~ i ~ development should reserve land for transit facility. I ~ _ i ~ 'r
a~~~ ti ~ r ~r,~ ~z .
r . k~ k ~ , i ~ , - , 18 MDR develo ment should be clustered, usin conservation subdivision ~ - p 9 . .
i _ ~ 1 ~k^ 'T- 1 ~ 1"`--_--7--~ - ~ ~ - i . r, { ~ , ; design to preserve rural character and open spaces along Good Hope
~i _ ~ T~ T~- _ , N ~ ~ _ ~ { I / Y , 1> E ,rp~ r . ' i~ - rJl, 2. P ~ y Church Road. No communication towers.
/ ~ (i i c ~L ~ ~ , , ~ R
i A { ~ R ;r ~ -
~ ~ ~ ~ I r n t -L, y - _ ~ - ~1 19 LDR develo ment should be clustered, usm conservation subdwision t p 9 _ _ _ ~ ~ .
~ r,,~~,~,. t - ~ Q~ i - A \ 1 p k design to preserve rural character and open spaces along Morrisville _ ~1
ho e ~ i ~ • ~ ~ Carpenter Road. No communication towers. p trig n Morrr~ville
- ~ ~ , %1f ~ ~ t ~ ~g ~k_ - 7 t ~ L._, . ,
to ~ " - W t - ~ ;1~ . ~ ~ I I ~
~ I ~ Sr ~ , ~ t ~ ~ ~ r ~ r~~r 20 MDR develo merit in this area should be clustered, usin conservation a
_ ~ subdivision desi n to reserve rural character and o en s aces viewed ~ ~ ~ ~r- ' ~ ~ ~ i ~ nom' i - r ~ ~
_ _ - ti * F-:. ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~i ~ from Morrisville Car enter Road. No communication towers. _ T p yy ~ a rje ;
0~ ,h ~ ~ ~ ~ --i T. ~ v ~ fl ' I ai
, ~ 5v ~.t`~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ -j i` ~ ~ - - ~ ~ . fr r r - 1 21 In hi MXD r n ix f mm r i l ffi r l w- -m i m i i s a ea a m o co eca ce o o to ed u dens 0 4~ 4
k' 1 l ~1
r. _ _ , ~ ~ :v ,:a ~ rest entia uses are posse e, to create a unique estmation wit s ops, ti 1 ~ ~ ,.3 - ,u ~ ~ ~ g. p p
i t - . ~ ~ - ~ , indoorloutdoor dinin and ublic facilities such as a ark and cultural --t=1 ~ _F ~ s
11 1~~ - _ ~ , ~ _ 't -~fi, Hi h ~ ~ ~ ~ = ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ center. No conventional sho in centers bi box retailers or g , _ a, - _ ~ ; h'-~ pp 9 ~ 9 rk ~ . _ . ~ ~ ~ p
~ , _ ~ ~ ~ 1~~~~ r=~' ' . . ~ - - ~ ~ ~ ~ su ermarkets. Individual buildin s should be architectural) com atible School _ ~ p g y p
~ , ti ~ i~ '~v ~ ; - ' ~ with the Historic District, and of limited height, bulk, and scale. No
~ ~ - ; , l~ _ ~ ' - - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ communication towers.
~ 1 1 i ` ~ ~T ,;y \ _
~ ~ ~ I 1 f , ~
i ~ I i 1 _ ,,1 . ~ ~i, ~ ,rv ~ - , , 22 This OFCIINS area could also serve as an expansion of the Carpenter 1 74~
~ ~ - ~ = - ~C°. _ f Villa e commercial center on the south side of Morrisville Car enter Road. ~ 9 p
~ _ - t 'k -~a~~ ~ _ ~ !"t~ ' y' I' s r~ , 1' 11 ~ ~ ~ a..
~ ~ 1 i ~ /'N ~ sip ~ l ~ ~ 23 If MDR develo s here instead of OFC/IND the MDR uses should _..~E i ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ s f,.
- - =1' - Y~; - - ~r ~ p I i,". ~ .
~ ti r } ~ ti i~ , t ans t on to sin a-fame) to the north near Morrisville. _ s
- ~ sl e ' i en sldent ,esldential 24 This MDR area, south of Airport Boulevard Extension, should have a mix, d~
P - ~ f 4 ar s, u ers, asingle-family detached and attached housing, and possibly some multi-
n , sin e- aml attac a etas etac e ' ~ family. Overall density should be about 3-8 dwellingslarre. Higher-denisty
- ommercla en ace
or mu tl- aml a artmen col nen con o housin should be sited to the west and southwest. Towards the east and 9
mo re t an units acre ommunl ecreatlon northeast, densities should drop tosingle-family uses near Morrisville. e
h4 Ri N R I ,
y ~ < P / ¦ • 25 This MDR area, north of Airport Boulevard Extension, should have a mix of
~ - elm n• u e sit esl J t esl entla - . Ixe se a e or on single-family detached and attached housing, with an overall density of 3-8 *V+
sin e- aml attac a or e1 or etac e i ,
11~Y~ - . ~ dwell~ngslacre. Towards the east and northeast, densities should drop to
~ rl ~ ~ ~ to units acre n , rm Or 0 single-family uses near Morrisville.
.I ~ ~
'~1 . n Ineers Ice nstltutlona • 26 This MDR area should have amix ofsingle-family detached and attached
° - OW I ens es I entl ro e ~s I entla housing, a variety of lot saes, and an overall density of about 3-8
sin e- aml dwellingslacre.
to units acre - ICe n ustrla an oun a 7 2 While this area is intended to develop primarily as OFCIINS, some
service-related uses such as hotels, restaurants, and service-oriented
- e ow ensl e~ ISI eSl entla mm r i l m r ri h co eca ay be app op ate. T e scale and amount of such uses will
o to f e a ' own ounc! an a fem utu re oa p e5
er - sln a aml etac e a depend on the nature of the transportation linkage to RTP via the 0 Kelly . , acre min.
-nstltutlona Chapel Road -South Loop Road connection.
• o • t size or u to unl acre ~ ee a so a com anon west a rea an ocument or i acre w en usin
• • ~ onservatlo n u Ivlslon e ISlon eSl n 28 Single-family up to 4 unitslacre, maximum.
a ~trona etas s
The land uses shown on this map generally follow existing lot lines. Development will normally follow these boundaries. However, the final boundaries may vary according to the merits of a plan ~'~s~~ ?
proposal and whether it meets the intent of the overall plan vision, ;r
',t ,~s ~~~rr;YYt gg M ~ M I~Y6 I y 8r~~
a
« :ac.~ ~.ri .~.c~.s L... ~ yct
EP24 200 SEP 2 4 Zpp~
p n°"~
,'Y 4 ~ r

1
r' CP'I{1 f /+~o
s~~ ;EIS
4` P" f~q'', r
. ~d',~
A

~ Ii 1
r ~ ' 9
~t~'~ qtr tii 4 ~ I j
,i; ~ M1a + ~
~ P ' \
~ ~'~ta~!t.a~ ~
1 d '"i R~ { 1
t I~~ ~
L 1 _
~ o3r"'~° ° Y~~'~ Y is s'
.t. r ~ ~ ~V {4 y
r ~ ~ ~ - ,r' 1 J iF -
~ P M~; 7
t. 7 i , i - ~
1 J
i ~ J l % fl
~ 1 I 1, y.
~ r
i
i ~
i
i i
~ ,w_
~ ~ t i
~ ~ \
~ ~ F
` ~
i ~ _ _ ~ ;0, _ ~ _ ~ , l ~ - - t
_ , ?
~ i t.~, ~ -a ~p _ ~ ~n
, ; ~ ~ i a - 1 1 ~ /
~ ~ ~J m ~ r u - ~ ~ t ~ CSSOI~ 1 1 q i ti
1 C ii _ _ ~ ~ , rtc ;
- _ ~ f W~ - ~ - 1 i ~ ~
_ F~ ' r ~ I i
~ ~ ~ ~ j ~ i ~ , _ 0 i ~
a ~ , ~ Q. ~o en ,
~ D .r K PKY ~o i
h + rrr"r ~ 1 _ , . , yt ~ x ~
~ v ~ _ _ ~ _ 1 I ~ ~ ~ ~ „
- - ~ + i 1 - , ~ ~
_ , ~ ~ ~ ,
~ i ~ o
To Dur ~ ~ ~ ha oun I 1 1 ~ ~ ~ n nV t~ 1 ~ ~ , on ~ -
_ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 o _ ~ -
~ ~ _ ~ ~ • - _ ~ r r a
i I 1~ ~ ~ /
~ -----.._.~~`~1 ~ ~ ~ Q ~ , ~ -
- - , ~ - x--''~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ I A ~
. ~ ~ ~ t.. ~ r----- ~ i f i i ! ~ ~ / ~ / ~ ~ ~
- ~ ~ ~ ? I
_ ? ~
~ ~ ? / ~ ~ ~ ~ _
~ ~
Y I ~__t J t
f ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ s ,
A ? Q
I I 1 ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~
L. I ~ • _r_ - (r~ ~ ~I r ~ ? ~ ~ ~ ~ ? Ir ~ ~ ~ A,`'\
r-~ _ it
i ~ ~ i j ' ~ ~ r i - ~ ~ s, ~ I f ~ i ~ _ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ • _-1 . ii ~ ~ ~ v - ~ , ~ ~ w r, ? / ~ ~ - ~r~ ~ ' / o ~ .r? ~ ~ ~ / f. cwt a
t ~Id Chatha ~ ~ ~ ~ ,---a _ , .r_.. m Golf Club ~ ~ I t~ ~ ~ \
~P ? ~ ~ .r •r?• ~1 J•
; I ~ l,~i ~ ~ ,r'~ J i~ j r + I ~ ? J ~ ~ 1 ~ ~r1 'i r, ~ - lil, r
~ ~ ~,K ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ LY ~ F-- ~ ~
kAp J \ ,p 4 if, ~ ~ ~ -r I The circled number label • • ~ s on the map indicate that additional s i
1 , j.r ~ ~ ~ ~ - - ~ ~ pec al land use ` ~ ~ recommendations exi
- ~ 1 , t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , st for that area. Unless otherwise noted in ~ ~ the descriptions below a
_ ~ - - ~ ~ ~ I a~ _ ~ + ~ ~ ~ iven label a li ' ~ T 9 pp es to all the land under the abel having the same color shadin u ~ ~ ~ g p to the
i, A i 1 ~ ~ ~ 1' i 1 I ~ _ - ~ y A~RP~ point where the color chan _ ~ ges on the map (ignonn roads and railroads . 9 )See Plan
~ ~ , ~ ~i ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / 1~\ j) I " _ - - - , } ~ a~tv document form r o e detail
1 I ~ - r-s~ , t ~ _
~ 7 ~ ~~[_x- ~ - ~ i ~ r ~ ~ti , ~ ~ ' / ~ ~ 1 , , , 1tl _ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ t i"
~ i~ ~
C r ~ ~ A,' ~ l ~ \ ~ ^a
, il, r~ ~ 1 \ 1 ~ y,, 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 .'Coun
f r~;' ~ ~ i Q ,f r' ~ ~ a ~ / ~ ~ ~ , , , ty Line Road (partiall coin used of How ~ ~ , ~ 1 r Y p and Grove Pkwy and Yates Ali
, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ransit ~ ~ ~ ~ Store Road to the south should ev n • t..-, ~ ~ ) e tuall connect with Gran t i . ACV
~ ~ ~ ~ Y dale Dnve in ~ r ~ - ~ Durham Coun ,via Wake Road. Ali n T 4
_ tion _ - _ r ~ tY ment not determi - g ned. _ ,

~ , ~r ' o
~ ~ ~ _ t C or t~ orr~do 2 Kit Creek Road m ~ ay need to continue west of AI ston Avenue, de endin p g {
~ ~ / I ~ ~ Pvt. Rec. ~ ' 1 ~ ~ j ` / I ti ~ ; - z on future develo ment and traffic need. Ali ~ ~t- m p gnment of this extension has
i ~ / ( ~ I~ ' ` 1 ~ ~ ti ~ ,r'' ~ i ~ ~ not been set. r S;
% ! ~ a ~ - 1t ~ I i ~ ~ ~ ~ _ G
~ 1 ~ ~ T - ---r ~ , I ~ - i~ a, ~ ~ i ~ ~
~ ~ ~ I ~ , ~ ~ i
• , AMBERLY PKWY I t ~ , ~ ~ • ~ - - ~i ~ i ~ „ ~ ~~r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a-- • ~ r-- r~, \ e Cha r"~ 3 O'K II • ~ F - y pe Road will be continued eastward in to RTP to link u with
+1/ ~ << _ _ i + _ . South Loo Road. p r~ ~ 1
z. ~ 5 ~ rt ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ + t ~ ~
~ 9 ~ ~ ~ I I ' t ~ 1 f l r 1F f,
~ 1 z l ~ / ~ _ i r' 1 i ~ ~ s I ~ 1 ~ ~ ~,ti ~ ~ I f o , ~ 4 Gr
„ r, i , , - ~ ~ ~ - een Level to Durham Road to be reap ned ~ ~ ~ „ g to a through north-south
~ ~ 5 ~ ~ / l ~ ~ ~ y ~ ~ 1, ~ M I ~ ~ :~,a movement here, as indicated conce ptually.
R
~ ARP~NTER. ~IR ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ S ~ ST S A 1 r o i R~. ~ - ~ ~ , . I ~ L ~ + T ~ q 1 } Ar ~++"'~r~ A
I 4 I ~ 1 - 1 ~ , - f i 1~ i ~ - ~ ~1 t ,f FN ~ ~F 5 Continuation of Coun Lin ,y
~ I ~ / ~ I I R ty a Road, southward from 2001 c 1 R p
ti ' ~ t l o~ r--~ r ti' ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ - trans ortati ~_A , , ~ , ~ ~ p on plan). Need ali nment to be s t . ~ 9 tudied in more detail with
I 1 ~ ~ ,P ~ _ - ~ _ r, 1 - ~ rt ~ ~ ' ~ w r- ~ ~ , r i-'~ . , - ~ ,7 pp r~ future Southwest Ca \ ~r F~('~~ ry Area Plan.
- Lk~'~~ r~rir~'h ~1Rrrn.~ '~~;~-C7 ~y ' ~'nnfn~r?TT,
,~r - i~ ~ ` i ~ ~ . 1 ~ [ ~ ~
by ~r~ ~~i. i ~ _ (Morris _
_ , ~ r ~ - ~ e ~ ~ I' ~ 6 Poten i , 9 e sh t al right - of - wa closin s for some or all
_ ~ _ ~ . ~ Y of th aded portions of ~ ~ ~ ~ Alston Ave, de endin on redevelo m n
___~r 1 ; _ I p e t n r - ~ ~ t';- , 9 p a d reali nments. ~~~8 ~ i r F . ~ ~ 9 I ~ ~
0 ~ ~ 1~ 1 ~ , _ f ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ i, iF_ ~ ~i i ~ 1 ~~~I' ~ ii//,
1 _ - , r ~ ~ ~ _ I ~i S t''~ ~ I 1 fll i l ~ /i i/ /A Y.' u ~ G i r ? - - i l <r~ 'S.. ~ it h/~~ ~ % / ~ I,, , -
dG ~ /li,; , i, r.f- qil~~,//,i
_ ~ - v ~ i _ _ ~ ~ n - 1 -a'~ III ~~1 , 3 t ~ ~.1 ~ Y ~
t ~ ~ I , ~ - i
~ i Y Y ~ ~ i ~ ~ rC J,~ Pvt. Rec. ~ - - - - { ~ _
~a ~ Q ,,gin ~ h ~ i . J(, ~ 4 ~ x
J TRANSIT. W ~ ~ ~ G N _ ~ Sho 'n Cent ~ ~ ~ t ~ 9
/ ~ _ W i Roads highlighed in ellow are throw hfare s ;,~r~ ~ - I - Marri~ ville, ~ _ 1
Y g ections where additional s - right-of-way is to be reserved to su o ~ - ' _ t f pp rt future HOV lanes, busltransit C vl ~y` ~ r Zl ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~~R~. i
_ ~ lanes, or other transit facilities. A rox pp . 24 - 50 ft of additional F ~n
ri ~ ~ ~ - g t-of-way is recommended for each roadwa . - ~ ~ ~ ~ V
yi ~ ~ ~ 1 y - ( 1 1 ?~r;. lt';'
; _ 1 (See Plan document for speafic recommentations and r " - ~ 1 T hrou hfare In a_ terchanges:
ecommended ~ 1 rl ht of wa g y wi t for each such roadway segment.} ~ 1 _
f ~ ' The arterial intersections recommen
i Hlghli hted roads include secti ~ 1 9 ons of: ded for rode - se eration ire 9 p %r,C: ~;~/i ?
Green Leve - _ 1 I to -Durham Rd.lAlston Ave should us _ e a pedestrian - fnendl , com act desi n such ~ Y p g as a Hi h ~
l 1 Amberly PkuuylMcCrimmon Pkwy 1 ~ 9 s uare -loo interch ~ ~ - q an e, A local ,I~ rk - - p g exam le of one en# p exists m Raleigh
1 1 Louts Ste hens Dr p - 1 School. ~ ~ = at Wad a Avenue an ,rS ~ _ d Oberlin Road.
;Davis Dr 1 1 _ . _ I ~ F ~ ~ ~ n / _ ~j i
Klt Creek Rd i 1 ~ ~~~~~~/ii~. ~/iii ~,//~.?fi ~ -r T ,,F~ ,~j ~
---_~I 1 , - - - _ ,1 - i 1 1 i.;
i 1 , ~ 1 '1
r t ~ r - - .5 ~
N i C i ~,'I r
- NO 1 ~ ~ r~ ~
1 / r I" ~ ~
I1 I~ 1 - - ~ ~.x. ~ N ~ ,a~, - , 1 - ~
~ ~ III ~ ~ III ~ ~
¦ co mm en ¦
a io ns 10 nS o ra e r ear ate eco mm en e
oa wa ros sin
t~ xis ~n oa s oa s u ure oa s
M11 X M° k • ri a to nne _ _
a~ ~ ~ ane n • . Ivl a o~ ~ N 4 ~ oa • • one n ivi e
oa
reewa .kn ~M ~s
11~~1 s. ~I . rite
r~ ~ ane oa rr ~ rc an a ; one oa
w ave a Ian ion
, //l~ 11 ~~,n. w an sc a uare rte ~ ~ a e e ion ria ~ ~fi.
¦ ~ ane oa ra e e o rate r ~ ; ~u .
oe ct n or t oa ersecti on
w an sca e e la e Ian ~ w - ~ ~ ~ _ WadelOberlin Interchan e 9
ica ones _
' ote • nti a rte ria ~~Y
ane oa wit or wit o ut me ion jf~s~
ra e- a orate
w a ~ n sca e e tai D e' • ion nter SeCtl on
0 ect0 r oa Ado ted b the Ca Fo
A Y ry wn Councll.on Se tember 1 p 2, 2002 . . _ Ica - anes ro ose -
See also the com anon • • ~ p NW Ca area Plan docu rY rnent for addrtlona! detarls anes
Wlt or wit out t r '
me lal me ion ansit orri or
a? -~E*. ~X.^'~.
III
`s I
e~epf c ,b 1~ I
air
~ S Ep ~
~ Z00 3 4 03
y
.rii~, ; , ~ 8
I
%I
_ F
_ . .i. ~~yi
. ~ .r~ .m. r ~r - f'L
i 1
, ; qkL.
fi~^„ 'AIF
dam' RS p
^~^p~a-^
c..
q?:.: