Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
NC0006564_Wasteload Allocation_19950127
NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION PERMIT NO.: NC0006564 PERMITTEE NAME: Baxter Healthcare Corporation FACILITY NAME: Facility Status: Existing Permit Status: Renewal Major -V Minor Pipe No.: 001 Design Capacity: 1.2 MGD Domestic (% of Flow): 21.0 % Industrial (% of Flow): 79.0 Comments: Extensive Notes -regarding recommended limits. RECEIVING STREAM: North Fork Catawba River Class: C Sub -Basin: 03-08-30 Reference USGS Quad: Little Switzerland T; ;nS ' (please attach) County: McDowell Regional Office:_ AS � vi t Previous Exp. Date: 4/30/94 Treatment Plant Class: II Classification changes within three miles: None. Requested by: Sean Goris 47 Prepared by: Reviewed by: �oP� 54 S+(4) Date: 12/6/93 !Modeler Date Rec. # Drainage Area (mil- ) 3' Avg. Streamflow (cfs):� 7Q10 (cfs)L_ L';�_`Winter 7Q10 (cfs) 2 30Q2 (cfs) . 44 Toxicity Limits: IWC �,� % Acute/ J/,C dA� 06arn, �& 1e"V �ei�i��lv►: � � e J11C,SIQ 15 51; air X ;�,m,1 �i a�o+.Un�s.n };rr,r &A# I Rear Lake &M6. Recommended Limits FLOW (MGD) Daily Max. 1.2 Monthly Avg BOD5 (#/day): 1323.83 882.55 TSS (#/day): PH (SU): 2207.95 6-9 1471.96 COD (#/day): 2536.83 6-9 1691.22 Fecal Coliform (#/100m1}4 ^200 Chlorine (ug/1) *Mom�d�-- NH3N (mg/1) weekly Total N (mg/1): monitor 2/month Total P (mg/1): monitor monthly Temperature (C) monitor monthly Chronic Toxicity monitor P/F @ 9.4 weekly quaterly A LA 4� i,5 (e a v� �/ n ; �.�'1 I.u. Comments: .. - / U `v v r `- oY FOR APPROPRIATE DISCHARGERS, LIST COMPLETE GUIDELINE LIMITATIONS BELOW [::::Effluent Characteristics Monthly Average Dail too 5 a Maximum Comments 13 Z 3 . 03 iy �l: gib ZZ o 7. '9$ C, y Type of Product Produced ^ET�ENQ05 5a�v'r NS Lbs/pay produced Effluent Guideline Reference l / D0, DOD �^'k►'S � e 41() Gr=2 PAip.; y 3 y yZ. `��FI.U�r`(i (� LiYt-�-�o►�s CALLrb►Z; � RAkIr tZ l -USG �or�PNJ 60a(�ra6� rnq v t.r�- 5yi3GA-, i D vt Ccdr�c.�.�l .T air comics o� ya�c��.-ra� l�•a r , �*-1 T�5�- A)eAC y �L ►c-ter cr�� � �5 FV04,k qo cue pA - qZ 644-4 o -- t4f_ .� �� �. 1 i� Go..s'"%1' u t p�l� 77U--p r�ic .�.} �� t' � nl l u7�h� vr-' I�ot�� c-a � ✓U� s T 13.E G�k G. v ��--n� , 74� wws7- t�1-r� r,���� Lca•��r D�c-v r�o n �1' rz t4-,4-4,rr= 5710 t Dr— w4 4va4L Ptiow. , 71 Dr L U TT.o,,,t �A�rLb'S IK4D:5] -- - * - - -I'A's" m6q5uoisz r..ecTso�•.t l -lr/r -tr' 13vDg = 561 .0 Buzrr � 175rxh. ,i34-, f 94za F1=-v-c4 A�T.4uh�.l� wA�'F„r� stow SGrhin��-r�u, lbZ�d Zoo �+ . 13�M o �,_ 9,3 y = . 660„� g , �Z7,� TA U35 �g �z7. 11 �, �� . 363 „�� � �.�� i 2806, 7q 1 ,41 O God 186yo,74/ * , i0 X 3 = 6gZ,oZ / l�vZ Mb1� � 3d ��� '�` �'3`a = y0.53 L&--IJ"7 TSr-ft '9qZ. O 2 - - 1710, ppocS6 s 363 x 7ft6Lrrvg/0 / 5. 7,E w � ZS 49 Z. Z 16�/. 7 Z- yh'-O jl , 1 Z>"-5 ZS �fdeN s y A rb ©, 8 Z'�,,qm �Ie%,, e = 2s0 -MA if 1 ✓ 55E�S•Ov ° -" T IfE 7's 5 t�.�.�, �-�a ion./ l�� /, s 7'?t� �3ot� S �.,� �►�"►� �l l��-r��� ��s vsr� h �Y� GF,e y3,� � ��� ( YZ 7 r4f- 4Yo, 53 = ry 7/.11& Facility Name: NPDES No.: Type of Waste: Facility Status: Permit Status: Receiving Stream: Stream Classification: Subbasin: County: Regional Office: Requestor: Date of Request: Topo Quad: FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION Request # Baxter Healthcare Corporation NC0006564 Industrial - 79% and Domestic - 21% Existing Renewal North fork Catawba River C 030830 McDowell Asheville Sean Goris SUSavi W� ISov► 12/6/93 D 10 SE Little Switzerland 7683 Stream Characteristic: USGS # Date: Drainage Area (mi2): 78.3 Summer 7Q10 (cfs): 18 Winter 7Q10 (cfs): 28 Average Flow (cfs): 149 30Q2 (cfs): 44 IWC M: 9.4 Wasteload Allocation Summary (approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.) Existing flows from 1987 USGS request. Updated flows using current USGS procedure. Updated model using new flows including interaction with American Threads; DO min. = 5.61 mg/1 at model end going into Lake James. Effluent guideline for BODS will protect water quality. IWC changed from 9.4 to 7.7%. However, since facility is not expanding the existing flows will be used. Recommend adding a Fecal Coliform limit because facility already has chlorination system installed Facility will be sent chlorine letter and Cl- should esnokmm be effluent monitored. ial Schedule Requirements and additionO comments from Reviewers: Recommended by: 0--h 9444-j-, Reviewed by Instream Assessment: Regional Supervisor: Permits & Engineering: // 1d/yam t� Date: RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY: JAN 19 1995 TOXICS/METALS/CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS Type of Toxicity Test: Chronic (ceriodaphnia) Qrtly @ 9.4% Existing Limit: P/F @ 9.4% Recommended Limit: P/F @ 9.4% Monitoring Schedule: FEB, MAY, AUG, NOV Existing Limits Daily Max. Monthly Avg FLOW (MGD) 1.2 BODS (#/day): 1814 907 TSS (#/day): 3028 1514 pH (SU): 6-9 6-9 COD (#/day): 3404 1702 NH3N (mg/1) monitor monthly Fecal Coliform (#/100m1) monitor monthly Total N (mg/1): monitor monthly Total P (mg/1): monitor monthly Temperature (C) monitor weekly Chronic Toxicity P/F @ 9.4 quaterly Recommended Limits Daily Max. Monthly Avg FLOW (MGD) 1.2 BODS (#/day): 1323.03 88Z.55 TSS (#/day): 2207.95 1471.9& pH (SU): 6-9 6-9 COD (#/day): 1691. ,;z 2- 253 6- 93 NH3N (mg/1) monitor 2/month Fecal Coliform (#/100ml) 400 200 Chlorine (ug/1) monitor weekly Total N (mg/1): monitor monthly Total P (mg/1): monitor monthly Temperature (C) monitor weekly Chronic Toxicity P/F @ 9.4 quaterly Limit Changes Due to: 1nutyt ���, ICoG�far Fecal Coliform limit because of excessive concentrations of POC being discharged (W&W ,',Ian tOd b Chlorine monitor due to fecal limit �{ BODS, TSS, COD: changes which effected effluent guidelines limits (production changes) Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed. OR X No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations. INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Upstream Location: 50 feet Upstream from outfall Downstream Location: 200 yards Downstream from outfall Parameters: Temp, D.O., pH, BODS, COD, Fecal coli, TmNdity Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies: Existing Permit does not require facility to do instream monitoring; however, facility has been monitoring instream at least as long as 1/93. Monitoring frequencies vary with parameters. Should this b//e�� a requirement in their new permit? Re ion and P & E please commend. ji)ON�L`FDYI�� �OI�Teh�p AD, ('6Y1(lUf yr Q/yt� %eCul UG7vr `v`y1rwei b.� -zxr,* o. MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDMONS AAdd luacy of Existing Treatment Has the facility demonstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment facilities? Yes No If no, which parameters cannot be met? Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional office recommendations: If no, why not? Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) N (Y or N) (If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan) Additional Information attached? N (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments. FaWity NameA -=9,a— �u ir462fe - Y 2_ . Permit # 0 0 U 0& 5% 1 Pipe # DD La-ittc.;tty HI uXR-1 l r PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMI1` (QRTRL Y) The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit chronic toxicity using test procedures outlined in: 1.) The North Carolina Ceriodaphnia chronic effluent bioassay procedure (North Carolina Chronic Bioassay Procedure - Revised *September 1989) or subsequent versions. The effluent concentration. at which there may be no observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality is _ A9% (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina procedure document). The permit holder shall perform. s rt r monitoring using this procedure to establish compliance with the permit condition. The first test will be performed after thirty days from the effective date of this permit during the months of t /0'4. ✓ . Effluent Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES permitted fir 1 effl ent discharge below all treatment processes. All toxicity testing results required as pat of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge vionitoring Form '1VIR-1) for the naonth in which it was performed, using the parameter code TGP3B. Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address: Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch North Carolina Division of Environmental Management 4401 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, N.C. 27607 Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream. Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly monitoring will begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this monthly test .requirement will revert to quarterly in the months specified above. Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits. NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit suitable test results will constitute noncompliance with monitoring requirements. 7Q10 1Y_ __ efs Permitted Flow _ �� 2 MGD IWC i C % Basin & Sub -basin . ckrAWAi� 0 - Receiving Stream &J�A_ F County _ m 1 h we l;---- — QCL P/f Version 9/91 Recommended by: Date _.9 .0 SUMMER EXISTING FLOWS CBOD:BO05=3 11/9/94 INTERACTION INCLUDED __________ MODEL. RESULT; __-.. ----__ i schar ger• : COATS AMERICAN eceivin Stream : NORTH FORK CATAWBA RIVER ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "he End D.O. is 5.25 mg/l. he End CBOD is 17.03 pig/I. "he End NBOD is 0.41 mg/l. WLA WLA WLA 00 Min CBOD NBOD DO Waste Flaw (mg/1) Milepaint Reach # (mg/1) (mg/1) (mg/1) (mgd) segment 1 5.25 5.50 3 Reach 1 33.63 0.00 0.00 2.00000 Reach 2 (,�{pp;J ='-3 255.00 0.00 0.00 1.20000 Reach 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00000 } �Y ,4���.'��..^f/, DS'T' r �7t d,. �z'✓j. rES•�r l <' 1'11�,. xti. i. vX 6 ��� 'h i:.F n Da1C4, v Peo i-41co of Loir 7G 3 t. rl wus) � W 7O 10 = c S JJ�J '-79e 3YY. i�U't 61, Ut '7rP y � ci0 C F I }�a., 4 3 914 � a C Car.,' r 1 n 49 � + � a ,� �_ o ► f s bias "Cl [c u l a I CL-1 bo sd o l,.I amp- P vo duc ea ea c [-, (At I 6 vl 29 GO1J _ ll� 9 .?rr /� a 53 ,7, y 14. 1. L� to coyyr`,)GSi 11b r1 � � i� �v �UTltY�S 1,s P1,11iC�Y rr i i p ?�fYDSC. G1 (N)9CI) 6� c �ftii �,Qipr��oy;}c. Gmst and d+ sl-1 Wo Ltv cld-)L, L� (it f_ c_ Lc_ CA�%{�i3Itcl�r I}1GrII (tYLc's , 12F;, Nu { 7A 4r�"1 1' ru ,f - ;:�je1 I I^ slc u4 Tow �ati 1 I i-91C k I n QPP /I.ca. �'"/) c h Idyl �w ki-v) S lTe G. vri . S f-a.Yr 4 o v d ✓ i o u n 0 ns PION -e V 4C_S U l eoOfa Jam- resumJ s o614 it becapl-LL do So �cav"- � � � - C,(r1orIht conyT)'f I ., .1aj}?4evs Ji C Yu V J i��G�{0 L �'1 �� ll LC.�C ' �ea� 4 P :7_:�r: . 511 N1I3N 0,41 4,�' '. �' 0.1® () ?r �5u 2g loAd A1 i' 1,5 1,5 Z.o V ec�mr -v,d {{ addth Ferai (,-, I w, ��i # = ?.t34r1UO)W PXrem L 11 e?< L (1 J 0 1-61a /�lllt le 7X; A A�lr 4-1 ✓0. I? 7:5 )3 7 7,7 e.p7V C& L) 93 1,e 4) 0,15,e, tp ? 5 t(j()Uld 1e4V?Zl g(c 0 0 Vat' 6 wul C9 510� OlAtheil /e/ Lake James At present Lake James is fully supporting its designated uses and there is no indication that the lake is adversely. impacted by the discharge of oxygen consuming wastes. However, there is significant development activity in the Lake James watershed. Future development has the potential to increase pollutant loading to Lake James, particularly oxygen demanding wastes, nutrients, and suspended solids. DEM is currently working with the Western Piedmont of Governments Council (WPCOG) and the U.S. Geological Survey to develop and water quality study of Lake James to assess water quality conditionsS)in the reservoir forplresentt a 5n- o l and possible future conditions. A water quality model and a geographical information system (GIS) are planned to be used to anticipate and plan for water quality impacts of future activities in the Lake James watershed. This study, planned to be completed by the second issuance of the Catawba Basinwide plan in April 2000. SUMMER UPDATED FLOWS 9/94 ' INCLUDES BAXTER TO LAKE JAMES ------------ MODEL RESULTS --------------- Discharger : COATS AMERICAN Receiving Stream : NORTH FORK CATAWBA RIVER ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The End D.O. is 5.61 mg/l. The End CBOD is 14.33 mg/l. The End NBOD ---------------------------------------------------------------------- is 0.45 mg/l. WLA WLA WLA DO Min CBOD NBOD DO Waste Flow (mg/1) Milepoint --------- Reach # (mg/1) ------- ____ (mg/1) ____ (mg/1) __ (mgd) __________ Segment 1 ------ 5.61 6.50 3 Reach 1 25.00 0.00 0.00 2.00000 Reach 2 264.00 0.00 0.00 1.20000 Reach 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00000 *** MODEL. SUMMARY DATA *** Discharger : COATS AMERICAN Subbasin : 030830 Receiving Stream : NORTH FORK CATAWBA RIVER Stream Class: C Summer 7Q10 : 22.3 Winter 7Q10 : 32.9 Design Temperature: 25.0 ILENGTHI SLOPEI VELOCITY I OEPTHI Kd I Kd I Ka I Ka I KN I KH I KHR i KHR I S00 I S00 I I mile I ft/miI fps I ft Idesignl @201 Idesignl @201 Idesignl @201 (design) 1201 Idesignl @20° I ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Segment t I 0.101 30.001 0.672 1 1.59 1 0.49 1 0.39 119.79 1 17.751 0.73 1 0.50 1 0.73 1 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 1 Reach 1 I I I I I I I I i I I I I ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Segment 1 1 5,301 30.001 0,721 1 1.61 1 0.50 1 0.40 121.21 1 19.021 0.73 1 0.50 1 0.73 1 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 1 Reach 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I I I I I I I I I I Segment 1 1 1.1 1.00I 100 1 4,00 1 0.25 1 0.20 1 0.56 1 0,501 0.44 1 0.30 1 0.44 1 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 1 Reach 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 F 1 ow 1 c f s Segment 1 Reach 1 Waste 1 3.100 Headwaters) 22.300 Tributary 1 0.000 * Runoff ( 0.000 Segment i Reach 2 Waste 1 1.860 Tributary I 0.000 * Runoff 1 0.320 Segment 1 Reach 3 1 CBOD 1 NBOD 1 D.O. 1 ! mg/1 I mg/1 ! mg/l 1 25.000 1 0.000 i 0.000 1 2.000 1 1.000 i 7.440 2.000 1 1.000 I 7.440 I 2.000 I 1.000 1 7.440 1264.000 1 0.000 1 0.000 1 2.000 1 1.000 1 7.440 1 2.000 1 1.000 1 7.440 Waste 1 0.000 ( 0.000 I 0.000 1 0.000 Tributary ( 0.000 ( 2.000 1 1.000 { 7.440 * Runoff I 0.000 I 2.000 I 1.000 1 7.440 * Runoff flow is in cfs/mile JUMMtK UPDATED FLOWS 9/94 INCLUDES BAXTER TO 5eg # i Reach I Seq Mi i D.O. I CBOD I NBOD I Flaw I 1 1 0.00 6.53 4.81 0.88 25.40 1 1 0.05 6.67 4.80 0.88 25.40 1 1 0.10 6.79 4.79 0.87 25.40 1 2 0.10 6.33 22.47 0.81 27.26 1 2 0.20 6.56 22.35 0.81 27.29 1 2 0.30 6.75 22.24 0.80 27.32 1 2 0.40 6.91 22.12 0.80 27.36 1 2 0.50 7.04 22.00 0.79 27.39. 1 2 0.60 7.15 21.88 0.79 27.42 1 2 0.70 7.24 21.77 0.78 27.45 1 2 0.80 7.32 21.65 0.78 27.48 1 2 0.90 7.39 21.54 0.77 27.52 1 2 1.00 7.44 21.43 0.77 27.55 1 2 1.10 7.49 21.31 0.77 27.58 1 2 1.20 7.53 21.20 0.76 27.61" 1 2 1.30 7.56 21.09 0.76 27.64 1 2 1.40 7.59 20.98 0.75 27.68 1 2 1.50 7.62 20.87 0.75 27.71 1 2 1.60 7.64 20.76 0.74 27.74 1 2 1.70 7.66 20.65 0.74 27.77 1 2 1.80 7.67 20.54 0.74 27.80 1 2 1.90 7.68 20.43 0.73 27.84 1 2 2.00 7.70 20.32 0.73 27.87 1 2 2.10 7.71 20.22 0.72 27.90 1 2 2.20 7.71 20.11 0.72 27.93 1 2 2.30 7.72 20.00 0.71 27.96 1 2 2.40 7.73 19.90 0.71 28.00 1 2 2.50 7.73 19.79 0.71 28.03 1 2 2.60 7.74 19.69 0.70 28.06 1 2 2.70 7.75 19.59 0.70 28.09 1 2 2.80 7.75 19.48 0..69 28.12 1 2 2.90 7.75 19.38 0.69 28.16 1 2 3.00 7.76 19.28 0.69 28.19 1 2 3.10 7.76 19.18 0.68 28.22 1 2 3.20 7.77 19.08 0.68 28.25 1 2 3.30 7.77 18.98 0.67 28.28 1 2 3.40 7.77 18.88 0.67 28.32 1 2 3.50 7.78 18.78 0.67 28.35 1 2 3.60 7.78 18.68 0.66 28.38 1 2 3.70 7.78 18.58 0.66 28.41 1 2 3.80 7.78 18.49 0.66 28.44 1 2 3.90 7.79 18.39 0.65 28.48 1 2 4.00 7.79 18.29 0.65 28.51 1 2 4.10 7.79 18.20 0.64 28.54 1 2 4.20 7.79 18.10 0.64 28.57 1 2 4.30 7.80 18.01 0.64 28.60 1 2 4.40 7.80 17.91 0.63 28.64 1 2 4.50 7.80 17.82 0.63 28.67 1 2 4.60 7.80 17.73 0.63 28.70 1 2 4.70 7.81 17.64 0.62 28.73 1 2 4.80 7.81 17.54 0.62 28.76 1 2 4.90 7.81 17.45 0.62 28.80 1 2 5.00 7.81 17.36 0.61 28.83 1 2 5.10 7.82 17.27 0.61 28.86 1 2 5.20 7.82 17.18 0.61 28.89 1 2 5.30 7.82 17.09 0.60 28.92 1 2 5.40 7.82 17.00 0.60 28.96 1 3 5.40 7.82 17.00 0.60 28.96 1 3 5.50 7.56 16.74 0.58 28.96 1 3 5.60 7.32 16.48 0.57 28.96 1 3 5.70 7.08 16.23 0.55 28.96 1 3 5.80 6.86 15.98 0.54 28.96 1 3 5.90 6.65 15.73 0.52 28.96 1 3 6.00 6.45 15.49 0.51 28.96 1 3 6.10 6.27 15.25 0.50 28.96 1 3 6.20 6.09 15.01 0.48 28.96 1 3 6.30 5.92 14.78 0.47 28.96 1 3 6.40 5.76 14.55 0.46 28.96 1 3 6.50 5.61 14.33 0.45 28.96 I Seq # I Reach # I Seg Mi I D.O. I CBOD I NBOD I Flow I LAKE JAMES USGS weighted low flow estimate procedure Facility Baxter Healthcare Corp NPDES # INC0006564 Stream':North Fork CE ...................... I_.._.._.._.._.._.._ _.. Region HA10 NOTE: procedure applies for regions HA3, HAS, DA LFPR 0 sq mile HA9, and HA10, else see flow SOP w7Q10 LFPR cfs DA new 78.3 sq mile MAR 1.75 cfs/sq mile QA eq 137.03 cfs STEP 1 calculate drainage area ratio RATIO = new drainage area = #DIV/01 drainage area at gage IF 0.25 < RATIO < 4, CONTINUE to STEP 2, ELSE too far from gage #DIV/0! STEP 2 determine weight of gage (weight_LFPR) A. RATIO < i weiaht La11Q _ 0 _ 1 #DIV/0!#DIV/0! 1 0.25 weight = #DIV/0! B. RATIO > 1 weight Ls3t14 _ 0 _ 1 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 1 4 STEP 3 calculate 7010_EQ using regional equation HA3 39.95 cfs HA5 8.46 cfs HA9 8.46 cfs HA10 32.87 cfs 7010_EQ = 32.87 cfs/sq mile STEP 4 calculate 7010 yield using weighted equation 7Q10yield = [weight_LFPR * 7010_LFPR] + [weight EQ * 7Q10_EQ] DA_LFPR DA_new yield = #DIV/0! + #DIV/01 _ #DIV/0! cfs/mile STEP 5 calculate w7Q10 7Q10 = 7Q10yield * DA_new winter 7Q10 = #DIV/0! cfs USGS weighted low flow estimate procedure Facility Baxter Healthcare Corp NPDES # '!NC0006564 Stream North Fork Ci Region _ _ HA10_.._.. NOTE: procedure applies for regions HA3, HAS, DA_LFPR 0 sq mile HA9, and HA10, else see flow SOP 3002 LFPR cfs DA_new _ _ 78.3 _ _ sq mile MAR 1_75 cfs/sq mile QA_eq 137.03 cfs STEP 1 calculate drainage area ratio RATIO = new drainage area = #DIV/01 ----------------------- drainage area at gage IF 0.25 < RATIO < 4, CONTINUE to STEP 2, ELSE too far from gage #DIV/0! STEP 2 determine weight of gage (weight_LFPR) A. RATIO < 1 weiaht MtLQ _ 0 _ 1 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 1 0.25 weight = #DIV/0! B. RATIO > 1 weiaht mti24 0 1 _ _ #DIV/0! 1 4 STEP 3 calculate 30Q2_EQ using regional equation HA3 44.95 cfs HA5 11.79 cfs HA9 11.79 cfs HA10 47.14 cfs 30Q2_EQ = 47.14 cfs/sq mile STEP 4 calculate 3002 yield using weighted equation 3002yield = [weight_LFPR * 30Q2_LFPR] + [weight_EQ * 30Q2_EQj DA_LFPR DA_new yield = #DIV/01 STEP 5 calculate 30Q2 3002 = 3002yield * DA_new 3002 =1 #DIV/0! jcfs + #DIV/01 I #DIV/0! cfs/sq mile USGS weighted low flow estimate procedure Facility Banter Healthcare Corp NPDES # NC0006564 Stream':North Fork Cc, ....................... 1....................... Region HA10 NOTE: procedure applies for regions HA3, HAS, DA_LFPR sq mile HA9, and HA10, else see flow SOP s7Q10 LFPR cfs DA_new _ _ 78.3 _ sq mile MAR 1 75 cfs/sq mile QA_eq 137.03 cfs STEP 1 calculate drainage area ratio RATIO = new drainage area drainage area at gage IF 0.25 < RATIO < 4, CONTINUE to STEP 2, ELSE too far from gage #DIV/0! STEP 2 determine weight of gage (weight_LFPR) A. RATIO < 1 we w Is fiQ _ 0 _ 1 #6IV/0! #DIV/0! 1 0.25 weight =1 #DIV/0! B. RATIO > 1 weight m Q 0 1 _ _ #DIV/O! #DIV/0! 1 4 STEP 3 calculate 7Q10_EQ using regional equation HA3 20.89 cfs HA5 1.98 cfs HA9 1.98 cfs HA10 22.31 cfs 7010 EQ = 22.31 Jcfs STEP 4 calculate 7010 yield using weighted equation 7Q10yield = [weight_LFPR * 7Q10_LFPR] + [weight_EQ * 7Q10_EQ] DA LFPR DA new yield = #DIV/0! STEP 5 calculate s7Q10 7010 = 7010yield * DA_new summer 7Q10 = #DIV/0! jcfs + #DIV/0! I #DIV/0! cfs/sq mile Baxlefflealthcare Corporation 64 Upstream: 50 feet upstream Month Temp DO Saturation Fecal Aug-94 20 8.2 90% 70 14 3.9 J Jul-94 20 8.1 89% 350 17,4 10.2 Jun-94 20 8.2 90% 130 IS,1 6.3 May-94 14 9.4 91 % 350 9, b 1.6 Apr-94 12 9.6 89% 70 4,7 2.9 Mar-94 8 10.6 89% 80 1 A,5 3.6 Feb-94 6 11.2 90% 480 31 7.4 Jan-94 3 11.2 0% 10 13M 3.1 Dec-93 5 11.5 90% 18 12.,l 1.3 Nov-93 8 10.7 90% 110 13, 3 0.9 Oct-93 12 9.1 84% 60 R, 7 1.2 Se 93 19 8.1 87% 70 5.9 Residual Chlorine 7010 (cfs) 22.3 Design Flow (mgd) 1.2 Design Flow (cfs) 1.856 Stream Std (µg/1) 17 Upstream bkgrd level (µg/1) 0 1 W C (%) 7.7% Allowable Concentration (µgA) 221.3 Allowable Conoemratbn (mg/Q 0.221 Downstream: 200 yards downstream Temp DO Saturation Fecal Co p. 1- 20 8.1 899b 110 13, z 4.1 21 8.0 90% 420 12,5 11.3 20 8.1 899b 120 ! l� , 9 6 14 9.4 91 % 300 10 2 12 9.6 890/0 20 3.5 8 10.5 88% 40 56 4.2 6 11.0 88% 1460 0 10.5 4 11.0 849b 30 /5,9 4.3 5 11.4 890/0 280 15, Z 1.6 9 10.5 91 % 100 zo. � 1.6 13 8.9 85% 620 10,7 2 19 7.8 840/6 50 7.3 Ammonia [2 / 4 mg/I] - Residual Chlorine - Fecal Collform Fecal LImh 2001100ml Ratio of 12.0 :1 insiream waste Goncemrations Ammonia as NH3 (summer) 22.3 7010 (cfs) 1.2 Design Flow (mgd) 1.856 Design Flow (cfs) 1 Stream Std (mg/1) 0.22 Upstream bkgrd level (mgA) 7.7% IWC (%) 10.4 Allowable Concentration (mg/1) Ammonia as NH3 (winter) 32.9 7Q10 (cfs) 1.2 Design Flow (mgd) 1.856 Design Flow (cfs) 1.8 Stream Std (mg/1) 0.22 Upstream bkgrd level (mgA) 5.3% IWC (%) 29.8 Allowable Concentration (mg/1) SOC°.PRi0RITY PROJECT: T F YES; SOC NUMBER TO: PEPMITS AND ENG.I,NEERING UNIT WATER QUAL, I TY ,SECTION ATTENTION: Sean Gori. S DATE: October 1.:1, 1993 Yes No X 4.) NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION COUNTY McDowell_ ~� PERMIT NUMBER NCO06564 o i', w�- PART I - GENERAL INFORMA'l,l(-) 1. Facility and Address: BAXTER HE.'.-T1=1CARE CORPORATION PO BOX :1.390 MARION NC'. 2£ 752 2. Date of Investigation• Janu.al-y r-;, 10c13 3. Report Prepared By: James R. R,-�-iri 4. Persons Contacted and Telephone Phil Castro 704-756-4151 5. Directions to Site: Baxter Heal-111 1, - Corporation is located near the intersection of NCSR 1569 ,irirl 'M crliway 2.21 North of the Town of Marion in McDowell County. 6. Discharge Point (s) , List for all -i i s,-!harge points: Latitude: 350 47' 3'1" r'on(ji f-,;-ara: 820 oil 10" Attach a USGS map extract: and treatment facility site and discharge point on map. U.S.G.S. Quad No. U.S.r.S Name Little Switzerland, NC 7. Site size and expansio:;. area Cnr1,^.i ,--nt-, with application? X Yes _ No If No, explai.r..i: 8. Topography ( relationship to floe-) r 1 ,4_i n included): Flat, adjacent to flood plain. Pa(:rf' 1 9. Location of nearest dwelling: Grearer than 500 feet. 10. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: North Fork Catawba River. a. Classification: C b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: ("TB 030830 C. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses: Mountain stream with rncky/sandy substrate used as a source of water for recreat.i-n, wildlife, and agricultural support. PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCJ4A R C" E AND TREATMENT WORKS 1. a. Volume of wastewater to be permit -.red. 1.2 MGD (Ultimate Design Capacity) b. What is the current permi_ttP(T--- opacity of the Wastewater Treatment facility? 1_2 MGD C. Actual treatment capacity of t;he current facility (current design capacity 1.2 MGD d. Date(s) and construction activities allowed by previous Authorizations to Constru.c:t. ;rc,red in the previous two years: None e. Please provide a description of. existing or substantially constructed wastewater t.r.eatmer.t facilities: Existing; Influent-microscreening, Fl,) f-gu.alization basin, aeration basin, clarifiers, te.r.ti i-y 1_i I r-.ers, chlorination, land application of sludge. f. Please provide a descriptions of proposed wastewater treatment facilities: No additional fs-itilJ es proposed, permit renewal only. g. Possible toxic impacts t:o waters: None known or suspected. h. Pretreatment Program (POTW^ Not Applicable. in development -).PPr,Z should be required r-)ok. n�Qded 2. Residuals handling and scheme: Land Application. a. If residuals are being )_and applied, please specify DEM Permit Number WQ0004.222 Pane 2 Residuals Contractor Land. AppliraLion is conducted by Baxter Healthcare Company. Telephone Number b. Residuals stabilization: PSRP PFRP OTHER X Solids are handled in liquid form. The writer is unaware of the extent to which the solids would meet PSRP or PFRP requirements. C. Landfill: d. Other disposal/utilization scheme (Specify) : 3. Treatment plant classification. (attarh completed rating sheet): 2 4. SIC Codes(s): 2834 Wastewater Code(s) of actual wa.st.ewat;er, not particular facilities i.e., non -contact cooling water oli.-,rharge from a metal plating company would be 14, not 56. Primary 33 Secondary 02, 16 Main Treatment Unit Code: 0210'1 PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION 1. Is this facility being constructed. with Construction Grant Funds or are any public monies involved- (mlinicipals only)? No 2. Special monitoring or limitati ronC (i n-Juding toxicity) requests: No 3. Important SOC, JOC, or Comp].,, snr-- -chedule dates (Please indicate) None Date Submission of Plans and Specific: , Fi r-'r, Begin Construction Complete Construction 4. Alternative Analysis Evaluation: Fia; the facility evaluated all of the non -discharge options avail_ahln. Please provide regional perspective for each option eva.l.iiated. Spray Irrigation: Connection to Regional Sewer System: Page Subsurface: Other disposal options: 5. Other Special Items: PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Renewal of Baxter Healthcare Co rrlo :, I. -ion ` s NPDES Permit is recommended. S.ana, e of Report Preparer lye dater-`11a.lity Regional S pervisor 1992 Dat-.n P iq- 4 WELL 1 WELL 2 WELL 3 WELL 4-A WELL 4-B WELL 5 030 f CHLORINATION WATER FLOW SCHEMATIC (IN THOUSANDS OF GALLONS) RAW WATER CARBON FIL TANK 210 DEIONIZERS STILLS STERILIZERS WELL 9 63 SANITARY 163 COOLING PONDS 100 162 135 BOILERS 135 TOTAL 660 WASTE TREATMENT 760 PLANT BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION P.O. BOX 1390 MARION, NC 28752 NC0006564 1993 PAGE 1 OF 1 360 PRODUCTION 363 207, PRODUCT NORTH FORK CATAWBA RIVER DISCHARGE SERIAL NUMBER 001 13. Activity Description Give a narrative description of activity Producing this discharge.(see instructions) 14. Activity Causing Discharge For each SIC Code which describes the activity causing this discharge, Supply the type and maximum amount of either the raw material consumed (Item 14a) or the product produced (Item 14b) in the units specified in Table 1 of the Instruc- tion Booklet. For SIC Codes not listed in Table 1, use raw material or production units normally used for measuring production.(see instructions) a. Raw Materials SIC Code 2140 b. Products SIC Code 2834 [ffi" GENCY USE 1 213. Manufacture of intravenous solutions. The com asition of IV solutions is rimarily dextrose or dextrose in combination with salt: (NACI)or' other ingredients. Some saline solutions and distilled water solutions are also produced. Maximum Unit Name Shared Discharges Name Maximum Unit Shared Discharges Amount/Day (See Table 1) (Serial Number) Intravenous i,100,nnn Liters L Solutions - I1-3 15. Waste Abatement a. Waste Abatement Practices (.escribe fhr; waste abatement nract."rs tree oi, this discharric vi,U, .. brief narrative. (see instructions) b. Waste Abatement Codes Usiltg the codes listed in Table It of the Instruction Booklet, describe the waste abatement processes for this discharge in thr• order m which they ocuir 1 215• 215b DISCHARGE SERIAL NUMBER 001 FOR AGENCY USE Narrative:__ Neutralization, nutrient. addition, aeration _(48 hr. retention time) , flocculation, clarification with sludge return to aeration basin, aero ic_______ digester for sludge digestion, lip -flow sand _ filters, cooling pond water discharg_e.is processed throu_&b the u-flow sand filters....____ (1) CNEUTR (2) PSCREE (3) PEQUAL (4) CNUTRI (5) BACTIV (q CFLOCC (7) PSKIMC j8) PSANDF (9) SAEROB (10) SLANDP (11) (t:') _—•— (13) (14) ()�) ` (16) (17) (1bl (19) (20) (21) (22) (23) (24) (25) I DISCHARGE SERIAL NUMBER 17. Description of Intake and Discharge FOR AGENCY USE L.. For each of the parameters listed below, enter In the appropriate box the value or code letter answer called for.(sea Instructions) In addition, enter the parameter name and code and all required values for'any of the following parameters if they were checked In Item 161 ammonia, cyanide, aluminum, arsenic, barylllum, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury, nickel, selenium, zinc, phenols; oil and grease, ,nd chlorine (residual). - Influent Effluent b CkD c� Parameter and Code 5 2 a r o > c [a > c a c �. >, �313 E Sole Iowa z (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) Flows Gallons per day 99056 50050 1.03 MGD PH Units 00400 8.1 Temperature (winter) "F 44(P--8 74025 N/A Temperature (summer) 'F 9F#w-7 74026 N Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD 5-day) mg/l 00310 559 Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)' mg/1 00340 620 Total Suspended (nonfilterable) Solids mg/l . 00530 40 Specific Conductance micromhos/cm at 250 C 00095 N/A Settleable Matter (residue) mf/l 00545 N/A *Other discharges sharing intake flow (serial numbers).(see instructions) v .76 MGD' .20 MGD 11.3 MGD I DAILY 1365 1 c 6.5 1 7.8 f DAILY 1260 150C f 60C I 150C I DAILY 22°C I 10°C I 280C I DAILY 11l =I 3 mg/1 1 1 mg/1 ! 10 m9/1 I WEEKLY 1 52f c 16 mg/11 4 mg/1 1143 mg/1 j DAILY I260I c 3. mg/1 1 .4 mg/1 176 mg/1 I DAILY 12601 c N/A I N/A N/A j N/A 1; 17. (Cont•d.) Parameter and Code Ammonia Phosphorous .LULa-L AJ-Lro en Fecal Coliform' * Log avg Is. Plant Controls Check If the fol- lowing plant controls are available for this discharge, Alternate power source for major Pumping facility. Alarm or emergency procedure for Power or equipment failure Complete Item 19 If discharge is from cooling and/or steam water generation and water treatment additives are used. IS. Water Treatment Additives If the discharge Is treated with any con. ditioner, Inhibitor, or alglcide, answer the following; a. Name of Material(s) b. Name and address of manu- facturer DISCHARGE SERIAL NUMBER 001 FOR AQENCV USE - 4 Influent mg/l mg/1 Effluent.<..., �i Y OO .2 c A aid < �� °y �uu" 12 a w� F cab• a .1.& �•� 5' x... u A.o x._ < E Z< (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) .95 .32 .01, 5.60 Weekly -52 c .87 Weekly 52 c 5.36 7.15 28.2 .98 Weekl 52 c N/A 410 0 4400 Weekly 52 g N/A 1.5NTU .7NTU 8.4NTU Daily 260 c C�Als (Two separate electrical feeds are .run to WTP by :a:.. Rutherford Electrical Corporation) ' BALM zsr' Nalco 7763-& 8100 added prior to clarification only during sludge bulking ttisb:. Nalco Chemical Company One Nalco Center Na erville IL 60566-1024 C. Quantity (pounds added per > ;:: Na1�63 7#/mg mllllon gallons of water treated). Nalco 8100 28#/mg DISCHARGE SERIAL NUMBER 001 FOR AGENCY USE - d- Chemical composition of these `"' . _Nalco 7763 liquid anionic floccu ant additives (see Instructions). Nalco 8100 aqueous solution of a of ate n amide. chloride Complete items 20-25 if there is a thermal discharge (e.g., associated with a steam and/or power generation plant, steel mill, petroleum refinery, or any other manufacturing process) and -the total discharge flow is 10 million gallons per day or more. (see instructions) 20. Thermal Discharge Source Check N/A the appropriate item(s) Indicating ' the source of the discharge. (see Instructions) Boller BlowdownwA. ❑BLBD Boller Chemical Cleaning -"' 'CIBCCL Ash Pond Overflow s. ;' ❑APOF Boller Water Treatment — EvaporaF':-?; ❑ EPBO for Slowdown Oil or Coal Fired Plants — Effluent ❑OCFP from Air Pollution Control Devices Condense Cooling Water ❑COND Cooling Tower Blowdown ❑ CTBD Manufacturing Process ❑ MFPR Other ❑ OTH R 21. Dtscharge/Receiving Water Temper- ature Difference Give the maximum temperature difference between the discharge t`•:;' and receiving waters for summer and winter operating conditions. (see instructions) Summer Winter :Id OF. 22. Discharge Temperature, Rate of Change Per Hour OF./hour N/A Give the maximum possible rate of temperature change per hour of discharge under operating con- ditions. (see Instructions) 23. Water Temperature, Percentile NSA Report (Frequency of Occurrence) In the table below, enter the. _ temperature which Is exceeded 10% of the year, 5% of the year, 1% of the year and not at all (maximum - yearly temperature). (see instructions) Frequency of occurrence a. Intake Water Temperature (Subject to natural changes) b. Discharge Water Temperature 10% 5% 1% Maximum OF OF OF of OF OF OF OF 24. Water Intake velocity : NIA feet^., (see Instructions) 25. Retention Time Give the length of NIA minutes time. In minutes, from start of a k'J water temperature rlse to discharge of cooting water. (see instructions) II-8 r DISCHARGE SERIAL NUMBER + 001 FOR AGENC gUY E 26. Additional Information � Item Information Chlorination Per conversation with NC Asheville Regional Office, _chlorination__ was discontinued rior to 1988. No stream standard violations have resulted. Chlorination could be resumed should it become necessary to do so because two chlorine control chambers are e i ting as pArt of the -F- I 't . I (-9 ace.,, I N C O R P O R A T E D 4 THE ASSURANCE OF CUALITY r August 23, 1993 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Mr. Phil Castro Baxter Healthcare Corporation P.O. Box 1390 Highway 221 North Marion, NC 28752 RE: PACE Project No. A30722.516 Client Reference: Influent Analysis Dear Mr. Castro: Enclosed is the report of laboratory analyses for samples received July 22 - 28, 1993. Footnotes are given at the end of the report. If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact us. Sincerely, ��- --x/ AL Kay a Parris Project Manager Enclosures 54 Ravenscroft Drive Offices Serving: Minneapolis; Minnesota Charlotte. North Carolina Asheville, NC 28801 Tampa, Florida, Asheville, North Carolina TEL 704.254.7176 Iowa City, Iowa New York, New York FAX: 704.252.4618 San Francisco, Caliicrria Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Kansas City, Missouri Denver, Colorado Los Angeles. California An Equal Opportunity Employer pace't REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS THE ASSURANCE OF DUALITY Baxter Healthcare Corporation August 23, 1993 P.O. Box 1390 PACE Project Number: A307225 Highway 221 North Marion, NC 28752 Attn: Mr. Phil Castro Client Reference: Influent Analysis PACE Sample Number: 93 0116353 93 0118720 Date Collected: 07/22/93 07/28/93 Date Received: 07/22/93 07/28/93 Influent Influent Parameter Units MDL Composite Grab (1) INORGANIC ANALYSIS INDIVIDUAL PARAMETERS Chlorine, Residual mg/L 0.1 - 0.34 (2) Cyanide, Total mg/L 0.002 - ND Oil and Grease mg/L 1.0 - 16 Phenol mg/L 0.0060 - 0.008 Sulfide mg/L 0.10 - 0 A0 TABLE III Antimony mg/L 0.003 ND - Arsenic mg/L 0.001 0.002 - Beryllium mg/L 0.02 ND - Cadmium mg/L 0.01 ND - Chromium mg/L 0.02 ND - Copper mg/L 0.01 0.065 - Lead mg/L 0.1 ND - Mercury mg/L 0.0002 0.0007 - Nickel mg/L 0.05 ND - Selenium mg/L 0.001 0.003 - Silver mg/L 0.01 0.049 - Thallium mg/L 0.001 ND - Zinc mg/L 0.01 0.29 - TABLE IV Bacteria, Fecal Coliform col/100ml 10 ND (3) - Chloride mg/L 1 90 - Fluoride, Total Recoverable (Electrode) mg/L 0.1 0.11 - Sulfate mg/L 1 34 - Sulfite mg/L D.50 0.50 - Nitrogen, Ammonia mg/L 0.05 1.0 - Phosphorus, Total mg/L 0.010 0.54 - 54 Ravenscroft Drive Offices Serving: Minneapolis, Minnesota Chav;otte, North Carolina An Equal Opportunity Employer Asheville, NC 28801 Tampa, Florida Asheville, North Carolina TEL: 704.254.7176 Iowa City, Iowa New York, New York FAX: 704-252.4618 San Francisco, California Pittsburgh, Pcimsylvania Kansas City, Missouri Denver, Colorado Los Angeles, California ace'o I N C O R P O R A T E 0 THE ASSURANCE OF DUALITY Mr. Phil Castro Page 2 Client Reference: Influent Analysis PACE Sample Number: Date Collected: Date Received: Client Sample ID: Parameter INORGANIC ANALYSIS TABLE IV Surfactants Aluminum Barium Boron Cobalt Iron Magnesium Molybdenum Manganese Tin Titanium NITROGEN, TOTAL Nitrogen, Kjeldahl Nitrogen, Nitrate plus Nitrite Nitrogen, Total ORGANIC ANALYSIS METHOD 608-PESTICIDES AND PCBS IN WATER a-BHC b-BHC g-BHC (Lindane) d-BHC Heptachlor Aldrin Heptachlor epoxide Endosulfan I Dieldrin Endrin 4,4-DDD Endosulfan II 4,4-DDT 54 Ravenscroft Drive Asheville, NC 28801 TEL: 704.254.7176 FAX: 704-252.4618 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS August 23, 1993 PACE Project Number: A3072251 93 0116353 93 0118720 07/22/93 07/28/93 07/22/93 07/28/93 Influent Influent Units MDL Composite Grab (1) mg/L 0.01 1.4 mg/L 0.1 0.94 mg/L 0.10 ND mg/L 0.05 0.14 mg/L 0.02 ND mg/L 0.05 1.2 mg/L 0.10 10 mg/L 0.05 ND mg/L 0.01 ND mg/L 0.05 0.93 mg/L 0.05 ND mg/L 1.0 3.6 mg/L 0.10 1.5 mg/L 0.1 5.1 ug/L 0.05 ND ug/L 0.05 ND ug/L 0.05 ND ug/L 0.10 ND ug/L 0.05 ND ug/L 0.05 ND ug/L 0.80 ND ug/L 0.10 ND ug/L 0.02 ND ug/L 0.06 ND ug/L 0.10 ND ug/L 0.10 ND ug/L 0.10 ND Offices Serving: Minneapolis, Minnesota Tampa, Florida Iowa City, Iowa San Francisco, California Kansas City, Missouri Los Angeles, California Charlotte, North Carolina Asheville, North Carolina New York, New York Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Denver, Colorado An Equal Opportunity Employer pace,, C 0 R P 0 R A T E 0 THE ASSURANCE OF QUALITY Mr. Phil Castro Page 3 Client Reference Influent Analysis PACE Sample Number: Date Collected: Date Received: Client Sample ID: Parameter ORGANIC ANALYSIS METHOD 608-PESTICIDES AND PCBS IN WATER REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS August 23, 1993 PACE Project Number: A3072251 93 0116353 93 0118720 07/22/93 07/28/93 07/22/93 07/28/93 Influent Influent Units MDL Composite Grab (1) 4,4-DDE ug/L 0.10 NO - Endrin aldehyde ug/L 0.20 ND - Endosulfan sulfate ug/L 0.70 NO - Toxaphene ug/L 2.4 NO - PCB-1016 ug/L 0.5 NO - PCB-1221 ug/L 0.5 ND - PCB-1232 ug/L 0.5 NO - PCB-1242 ug/L 0.5 NO - PCB-1248 ug/L 0.5 NO - PCB-1254 ug/L 1.0 ND - PCB-1260 ug/L 1.0 NO - Chlordane (tech) ug/L 0.20 NO - GCMS FOR SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS-8270 Phenol ug/L 10 NO - bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether ug/L 10 NO - 2-Chlorophenol ug/L 10 NO - 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 10 NO - 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 10 NO - Benzyl alcohol ug/L 20 NO - 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 10 NO - 2-Methylphenol (o-Cresol) ug/L 10 ND - bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether ug/L 10 NO - 4-Methylphenol ug/L 10 NO - n-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine ug/L 10 NO - Hexachloroethane ug/L 10 ND - Nitrobenzene ug/L 10 NO - Isophorone ug/L 10 NO - 2-Nitrophenol ug/L 50 NO - 2,4-Dimethylphenol ug/L 10 NO - Benzoic acid ug/L 50 NO - bis(2-chloroethoxy)Methane ug/L 10 NO - 2,4-Dichlorophenol ug/L 50 ND - 54 Ravenscroft Drive Offices Serving: Minneapolis, Minnesota Charlotte, North Carolina Asheville, NC 28801 Tampa, Florida Asheville, North Carolina TEL: 704-i54.1176 Iowa City, Iowa New York, New York FAX: 704-252.4618 San Francisco, California Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Kansas City, Missouri Denver, Colorado Los Angeles, California An Equal Opportunity:smployer • y S -,ace 0 I N C O R P O R A T E D THE ASSURANCE OF QUALITY Mr. Phil Castro Page 4 Client Reference: Influent Analysis PACE Sample Number: Date Collected: Date Received: Client Sample ID: Parameter ORGANIC ANALYSIS GCMS FOR SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS-8270 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS August 23, 1993 PACE Project Number: A3072251 93 0116353 93 0118720 07/22/93 07/28/93 07/22/93 07/28/93 Influent Influent Units MDL Composite Grab (1) 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ug/L 10 NO - Naphthalene ug/L 10 NO - 4-Chloroaniline ug/L 20 ND - Hexachlorobutadiene ug/L 10 NO - 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol ug/L 20 NO - 2-Methylnaphthalene ug/L 10 NO - Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ug/L 10 NO - 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol ug/L 10 ND - 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol ug/L 10 NO - 2-Chloronaphthalene ug/L 10 NO - 2-Nitroaniline ug/L 40 ND - Dimethyl phthalate ug/L 10 NO - Acenaphthylene ug/L 10 ND - 3-Nitroaniline ug/L 40 NO - Acenaphthene ug/L 10 ND - 2,4-Dinitrophenol ug/L 10 NO - 4-Nitrodiphenyl ug/L 50 ND - Dibenzofuran ug/L 10 ND - 2,4-Dinitrotoluene ug/L 10 NO - 2,6-Dinitrotoluene ug/L 10 NO - Diethyl phthalate ug/L 10 ND - 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ug/L 10 ND - Fluorene ug/L 10 NO - 4-Nitroaniline ug/L 40 ND - 2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol ug/L 50 ND - N-Nitrosodiphenylamine ug/L 10 ND - 4-Bromophenol phenyl ether ug/L 10 NO - Hexachlorobenzene ug/L 10 NO - Pentachlorophenol ug/L 50 NO - Phenanthrene ug/L 10 ND - Anthracene 54 sii : craft Drive Asheville, NC 28801 TEL- 704.254-7176 FAX: 704-252.4618 ug/L Offices Serving: Minneapolis, Minnesota Tampa, Florida Iowa City, Iowa San Francisco, California Kansas City, Missouri Los Angeles, California 10 NO Charlotte, North Carolina Asheville, North Carolina New York, New York Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Denier, Colorado An Equal Opportunity Employer Pcet C 0 R P 0 R A T E 0 THE ASSURANCE OF allALITY Mr. Phil Castro Page 5 Client Reference: Influent Analysis PACE Sample Number: Date Collected: Date Received: Client Sample ID: Parameter ORGANIC ANALYSIS GCMS FOR SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS-8270 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS August 23, 1993 PACE Project Number: A3072251 93 0116353 93 0118720 07/22/93 07/28/93 07/22/93 07/28/93 Influent Influent Units MDL Composite Grab (1) Di-n-butyl phthalate ug/L 10 NO - Fluoranthene ug/L 10 NO - Pyrene ug/L 10 NO - Benzyl butyl phthalate ug/L 10 NO - 3,3-Dichlorobenzidine ug/L 20 NO - Benzo(a)anthracene ug/L 10 NO - Bis(2-ehtylhexyl)phthlate ug/L 10 29 - Chrysene ug/L 10 NO - Di-n-octylphthalate ug/L 10 NO - Benzo(b)fluoranthene ug/L 10 NO - Benzo(k)fluoranthene ug/L 10 NO - Benzo(a)pyrene ug/L 10 NO - Indeno(1,2,3,-cd)pyrene Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene Benzo(g,h,i)perylene GCMS FOR VOLATILE ORGANICS-8240 Chloromethane Bromomethane Vinyl Chloride Chloroethane Methylene chloride Acetone Carbon Disulfide 1,1-Dichloroethylene 1,1-Dichloroethane Trans-1,2-dichloroethylene Chloroform 1,2-Dichloroethane 2-Butanone (MEK) 1,1,1-Trichloroethane Carbon tetrachloride 54 Ravenscroft Drive Asheville, NC 28801 TEL: 704.254.7176 FAX: 704-252.4618 ug/L 10 NO - ug/L 10 NO - ug/L 10 NO - ug/L 10 - NO ug/L 10 - NO ug/L 10 - NO ug/L 10 - NO ug/L 5.0 - NO ug/L 100 - NO ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L w^ Offices Serving: Minneapolis, Minnesota Tampa, Florida Iowa City, Iowa San Francisco, California Kansas City, Missouri Los Angeles, California 5.0 - NO 5.0 - NO 5.0 - NO 5.0 - ND 5.0 - 7.8 5.0 - NO 100 - NO 5.0 - ND 5.0 - NO Charlotte, North Carolina Asheville, North Carolina New York, New York Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Denver, Colorado An Equal Opportunity Employer r p,ace,1, REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS THE ASSURANCE OF QUALITY Mr. Phil Castro August 23, 1993 Page 6 PACE Project Number: A3072251 Client Reference: Influent Analysis PACE Sample Number: 93 0116353 93 0118720 Date Collected: 07/22/93 07/28/93 Date Received: 07/22/93 07/28/93 Client Sample ID: Influent Influent Parameter Units MDL Composite Grab (1) ORGANIC ANALYSIS GCMS FOR VOLATILE ORGANICS-8240 Vinyl acetate ug/L 50 - ND Bromodichloromethane ug/L 5.0 - NO 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/L 5.0 - ND 1,2-Dichloropropane ug/L 5.0 - ND Trans-1,3-dichloropropene ug/L 5:0 - ND Trichloroethylene ug/L 5.0 - ND Dibromochloromethane ug/L 5.0 - ND 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/L 5.0 - ND Benzene ug/L 5.0 - ND Cis-1,3-dichloropropene ug/L 5.0 - ND 2-Chloroethylvinyl ether ug/L 5.0 - ND Bromoform ug/L 5.0 - ND 2-Nexanone ug/L 50 - ND 4-Methyl-2pentanone (MIBK) ug/L 50 - ND Tetrachloroethylene ug/L 5.0 - ND Toluene ug/L 5.0 - ND Chlorobenzene ug/L 5.0 - ND Ethyl Benzene ug/L 5.0 - ND Styrene Xylenes, (total) ug/L 5.0 - ug/L 5.0 - 54 Ravenscroft Drive" = °`r zas Serving: Minneapolis, Minnesota Asheville, NC 28801 Tampa, Florida TEL: 704-254.7176 Iowa City, Iowa FAX: 704-252.4618 San Francisco, California Kansas City, Missouri Los Angeles, California Charlotte, North Carolina Asheville, North Carolina New York, New York Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Denver, Colorado ND ND An Equal Opportunity Employer I N C O R P O R A T E D THE ASSURANCE OF QUALITY QJ - Mr. Phil Castro Page 7 Client Reference: Influent Analysis A REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS These data have been reviewed and are approved for release. " MA & Barbara M. Miller Supervisor, Inorganic Chemistry VCL� -/. ��� Walter L. Miller Regional Director August 23, 1993 PACE Project Number: A3072251 54 Ravenscroft Drive Offices Serving: tririnawohs, Minnesota Charlotte, North Carolina Asheville, NC 28801 Tampa, Florida Asheville, North Carolina TEL: 704.254.7176 Iowa City, Iowa new York, New York FAX: 704-252.4618 San Francisco, California Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Kansas City, Missouri Denver, Colorado Los Angeles, California An Equal Opportunity Employer cice 1 N C U fl P 0 R A T E o REPORT i F LABORATORY ANALYSIS THE ASSURANCE OF QUALITY Mr. Phil Castro FOOTNOTES August 23, 1993 Page 8 for pages 1 through 7 PACE Project Number: A3072251 Client Reference: Influent Analysis MDL Method Detection Limit ND Not detected at or above the MDL. (1) Sample for fecal coliform analysis is a Grab sample. (2) Analysis conducted in excess of EPA recommended holding time. (3) Fecal sample had excessive amount of non -fecal background growth. 154 Aavenscroft Drive Asheville, NC 28801 TEL-704.254-7176 FAX: 704-252.4618 Offices Serving: Minneapolis, Minnesota Tampa, Florida Iowa City, Iowa San Francisco, California Kansas City, Missouri Los Angeles, California harlotte, North Carolina Asheville, North Carolina New York, New York Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Deriver, Colorado An Equal Opportunity Employer