NC0006564_Wasteload Allocation_19950127

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NC0006564
PERMITTEE NAME: Baxter Healthcare Corporation
FACILITY NAME:
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Major -V Minor
Pipe No.: 001
Design Capacity: 1.2 MGD
Domestic (% of Flow): 21.0 %
Industrial (% of Flow): 79.0
Comments:
Extensive Notes -regarding recommended limits.
RECEIVING STREAM: North Fork Catawba River
Class: C
Sub -Basin: 03-08-30
Reference USGS Quad: Little Switzerland T; ;nS ' (please attach)
County: McDowell
Regional Office:_ AS � vi t
Previous Exp. Date: 4/30/94 Treatment Plant Class: II
Classification changes within three miles:
None.
Requested by: Sean Goris 47
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
�oP� 54 S+(4)
Date: 12/6/93
!Modeler
Date Rec.
#
Drainage Area (mil- ) 3' Avg. Streamflow (cfs):�
7Q10 (cfs)L_ L';�_`Winter 7Q10 (cfs) 2 30Q2 (cfs) . 44
Toxicity Limits: IWC �,� % Acute/ J/,C dA�
06arn, �& 1e"V
�ei�i��lv►: � � e J11C,SIQ 15 51; air X ;�,m,1 �i a�o+.Un�s.n
};rr,r &A# I Rear Lake &M6.
Recommended Limits
FLOW (MGD)
Daily Max.
1.2
Monthly Avg
BOD5 (#/day):
1323.83
882.55
TSS (#/day):
PH (SU):
2207.95
6-9
1471.96
COD (#/day):
2536.83
6-9
1691.22
Fecal Coliform (#/100m1}4
^200
Chlorine (ug/1)
*Mom�d�--
NH3N (mg/1)
weekly
Total N (mg/1):
monitor
2/month
Total P (mg/1):
monitor
monthly
Temperature (C)
monitor
monthly
Chronic Toxicity
monitor
P/F @ 9.4
weekly
quaterly
A LA 4� i,5 (e a v�
�/ n ; �.�'1 I.u.
Comments: .. - / U `v v r `- oY

FOR APPROPRIATE DISCHARGERS, LIST COMPLETE
GUIDELINE LIMITATIONS BELOW
[::::Effluent Characteristics Monthly
Average Dail
too 5 a Maximum Comments
13 Z 3 . 03
iy �l: gib
ZZ o 7. '9$
C,
y
Type of Product Produced
^ET�ENQ05 5a�v'r NS Lbs/pay produced Effluent Guideline Reference
l / D0, DOD �^'k►'S � e
41() Gr=2 PAip.; y 3 y yZ.

`��FI.U�r`(i (� LiYt-�-�o►�s CALLrb►Z; �
RAkIr tZ l -USG �or�PNJ 60a(�ra6�
rnq v t.r�- 5yi3GA-, i D vt Ccdr�c.�.�l
.T
air comics o� ya�c��.-ra� l�•a r , �*-1 T�5�- A)eAC
y �L ►c-ter cr�� � �5 FV04,k qo cue pA - qZ 644-4 o --
t4f_ .� �� �. 1 i� Go..s'"%1' u t p�l� 77U--p r�ic
.�.} �� t' � nl l u7�h� vr-' I�ot�� c-a � ✓U� s T 13.E G�k G. v ��--n� ,
74� wws7- t�1-r� r,���� Lca•��r D�c-v r�o n �1' rz t4-,4-4,rr=
5710
t Dr— w4 4va4L Ptiow. ,
71 Dr L U TT.o,,,t �A�rLb'S
IK4D:5] -- - * - - -I'A's" m6q5uoisz
r..ecTso�•.t l -lr/r -tr' 13vDg = 561 .0 Buzrr �
175rxh. ,i34-, f 94za F1=-v-c4 A�T.4uh�.l� wA�'F„r� stow SGrhin��-r�u,
lbZ�d Zoo �+ . 13�M o �,_ 9,3 y = . 660„�
g , �Z7,�
TA U35 �g �z7. 11 �, �� . 363 „�� � �.�� i 2806, 7q 1
,41

O
God
186yo,74/ * , i0 X 3 = 6gZ,oZ /
l�vZ Mb1� � 3d ��� '�` �'3`a = y0.53 L&--IJ"7
TSr-ft '9qZ. O 2 - - 1710,
ppocS6 s
363 x 7ft6Lrrvg/0 / 5. 7,E w �
ZS 49 Z. Z 16�/. 7 Z- yh'-O jl ,
1 Z>"-5 ZS �fdeN s y A rb ©, 8
Z'�,,qm �Ie%,, e = 2s0 -MA if

1 ✓ 55E�S•Ov ° -" T IfE 7's 5 t�.�.�, �-�a ion./ l�� /,
s
7'?t� �3ot� S �.,� �►�"►� �l l��-r��� ��s vsr� h �Y� GF,e y3,� � ���
( YZ
7 r4f- 4Yo, 53 = ry 7/.11&

Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Permit Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Topo Quad:
FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Request #
Baxter Healthcare Corporation
NC0006564
Industrial - 79% and Domestic - 21%
Existing
Renewal
North fork Catawba River
C
030830
McDowell
Asheville
Sean Goris SUSavi W� ISov►
12/6/93
D 10 SE Little Switzerland
7683
Stream Characteristic:
USGS #
Date:
Drainage Area (mi2):
78.3
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
18
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
28
Average Flow (cfs):
149
30Q2 (cfs):
44
IWC M:
9.4
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
Existing flows from 1987 USGS request. Updated flows using current USGS procedure.
Updated model using new flows including interaction with American Threads; DO min. = 5.61
mg/1 at model end going into Lake James. Effluent guideline for BODS will protect water quality.
IWC changed from 9.4 to 7.7%. However, since facility is not expanding the existing flows will
be used. Recommend adding a Fecal Coliform limit because facility already has chlorination
system installed Facility will be sent chlorine letter and Cl- should esnokmm be effluent
monitored.
ial Schedule Requirements and additionO comments from Reviewers:
Recommended by:
0--h 9444-j-,
Reviewed by
Instream Assessment:
Regional Supervisor:
Permits & Engineering:
// 1d/yam
t� Date:
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY: JAN 19 1995

TOXICS/METALS/CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Type of Toxicity Test: Chronic (ceriodaphnia) Qrtly @ 9.4%
Existing Limit: P/F @ 9.4%
Recommended Limit: P/F @ 9.4%
Monitoring Schedule: FEB, MAY, AUG, NOV
Existing Limits
Daily Max.
Monthly Avg
FLOW (MGD)
1.2
BODS (#/day):
1814
907
TSS (#/day):
3028
1514
pH (SU):
6-9
6-9
COD (#/day):
3404
1702
NH3N (mg/1)
monitor
monthly
Fecal Coliform (#/100m1)
monitor
monthly
Total N (mg/1):
monitor
monthly
Total P (mg/1):
monitor
monthly
Temperature (C)
monitor
weekly
Chronic Toxicity
P/F @ 9.4
quaterly
Recommended Limits
Daily Max.
Monthly Avg
FLOW (MGD)
1.2
BODS (#/day):
1323.03
88Z.55
TSS (#/day):
2207.95
1471.9&
pH (SU):
6-9
6-9
COD (#/day):
1691. ,;z 2-
253 6- 93
NH3N (mg/1)
monitor
2/month
Fecal Coliform (#/100ml) 400
200
Chlorine (ug/1)
monitor
weekly
Total N (mg/1):
monitor
monthly
Total P (mg/1):
monitor
monthly
Temperature (C)
monitor
weekly
Chronic Toxicity
P/F @ 9.4
quaterly
Limit Changes Due to: 1nutyt ���, ICoG�far
Fecal Coliform limit because of excessive concentrations of POC being discharged (W&W ,',Ian tOd b
Chlorine monitor due to fecal limit �{
BODS, TSS, COD: changes which effected effluent guidelines limits (production changes)
Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of
the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based
effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
OR
X No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.

INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Upstream Location: 50 feet Upstream from outfall
Downstream Location: 200 yards Downstream from outfall
Parameters: Temp, D.O., pH, BODS, COD, Fecal coli, TmNdity
Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies:
Existing Permit does not require facility to do instream monitoring; however, facility has
been monitoring instream at least as long as 1/93. Monitoring frequencies vary with parameters.
Should this b//e�� a requirement in their new permit? Re ion and P & E please commend.
ji)ON�L`FDYI�� �OI�Teh�p AD, ('6Y1(lUf yr Q/yt� %eCul UG7vr `v`y1rwei b.� -zxr,* o.
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDMONS
AAdd luacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility demonstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes No
If no, which parameters cannot be met?
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not?
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) N (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? N (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.

FaWity NameA -=9,a— �u ir462fe - Y 2_ . Permit # 0 0 U 0& 5% 1 Pipe # DD
La-ittc.;tty HI uXR-1 l r PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMI1` (QRTRL Y)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit chronic toxicity using test procedures outlined in:
1.) The North Carolina Ceriodaphnia chronic effluent bioassay procedure (North Carolina Chronic Bioassay
Procedure - Revised *September 1989) or subsequent versions.
The effluent concentration. at which there may be no observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality
is _ A9% (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina procedure document). The permit holder shall perform.
s rt r monitoring using this procedure to establish compliance with the permit condition. The first test will be
performed after thirty days from the effective date of this permit during the months of
t /0'4. ✓ . Effluent Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES
permitted fir 1 effl ent discharge below all treatment processes.
All toxicity testing results required as pat of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge
vionitoring Form '1VIR-1) for the naonth in which it was performed, using the parameter code TGP3B.
Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements performed in
association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity
sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly monitoring will
begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this monthly test .requirement will
revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and
modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism
survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate
retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit suitable test results will constitute
noncompliance with monitoring requirements.
7Q10 1Y_ __ efs
Permitted Flow _ �� 2 MGD
IWC i C %
Basin & Sub -basin . ckrAWAi� 0 -
Receiving Stream &J�A_ F
County _ m 1 h we l;---- —
QCL P/f Version 9/91
Recommended by:
Date _.9 .0

SUMMER
EXISTING FLOWS CBOD:BO05=3
11/9/94 INTERACTION INCLUDED
__________ MODEL. RESULT; __-.. ----__
i schar ger• : COATS AMERICAN
eceivin Stream : NORTH FORK CATAWBA RIVER
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
"he End D.O. is 5.25 mg/l.
he End CBOD is 17.03 pig/I.
"he End NBOD is 0.41 mg/l.
WLA
WLA
WLA
00 Min CBOD
NBOD
DO
Waste Flaw
(mg/1) Milepaint Reach # (mg/1)
(mg/1)
(mg/1)
(mgd)
segment
1
5.25 5.50 3
Reach
1
33.63
0.00
0.00
2.00000
Reach
2
(,�{pp;J ='-3 255.00
0.00
0.00
1.20000
Reach
3
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000
}
�Y ,4���.'��..^f/,
DS'T' r �7t d,. �z'✓j. rES•�r l <' 1'11�,.
xti.
i. vX 6 ��� 'h
i:.F n

Da1C4, v Peo i-41co of Loir 7G 3
t.
rl wus) �
W 7O 10 = c S
JJ�J '-79e 3YY.
i�U't 61, Ut '7rP y � ci0 C F I }�a., 4 3 914 � a
C Car.,'
r 1 n 49 � +
� a ,� �_ o ► f s bias "Cl [c u l a I CL-1
bo sd o l,.I amp- P vo duc ea ea c [-, (At I
6 vl
29
GO1J _ ll� 9 .?rr /� a 53 ,7, y 14.
1.
L�
to
coyyr`,)GSi 11b r1 � � i� �v �UTltY�S 1,s P1,11iC�Y
rr i i p
?�fYDSC. G1
(N)9CI) 6� c �ftii �,Qipr��oy;}c. Gmst
and d+ sl-1 Wo Ltv cld-)L, L� (it f_ c_ Lc_
CA�%{�i3Itcl�r I}1GrII (tYLc's , 12F;,
Nu { 7A 4r�"1 1' ru
,f
-
;:�je1
I I^

slc u4 Tow �ati 1 I
i-91C k I n QPP /I.ca. �'"/)
c h Idyl �w ki-v)
S lTe G. vri . S f-a.Yr 4 o v d
✓ i o u n 0 ns PION -e V 4C_S U l
eoOfa Jam- resumJ s o614 it becapl-LL
do So �cav"-
� � �
- C,(r1orIht conyT)'f I ., .1aj}?4evs
Ji C
Yu
V
J
i��G�{0 L �'1 ��
ll LC.�C
'
�ea�
4
P :7_:�r: .
511
N1I3N 0,41
4,�' '. �'
0.1®
()
?r
�5u
2g
loAd A1
i'
1,5
1,5
Z.o
V
ec�mr -v,d
{{
addth
Ferai (,-, I w, ��i # = ?.t34r1UO)W
PXrem
L 11 e?< L
(1
J
0

1-61a /�lllt le

7X;
A
A�lr
4-1 ✓0.
I?
7:5
)3 7
7,7
e.p7V C& L) 93 1,e 4) 0,15,e,
tp ? 5
t(j()Uld 1e4V?Zl
g(c 0 0 Vat'
6 wul
C9
510� OlAtheil /e/

Lake James
At present Lake James is fully supporting its designated uses and there is no indication
that the lake is adversely. impacted by the discharge of oxygen consuming wastes. However, there
is significant development activity in the Lake James watershed. Future development has the
potential to increase pollutant loading to Lake James, particularly oxygen demanding wastes,
nutrients, and suspended solids. DEM is currently working with the Western Piedmont
of Governments Council
(WPCOG) and the U.S. Geological Survey
to develop and
water quality study of Lake James to assess water quality conditionsS)in the reservoir forplresentt a 5n- o l
and possible future conditions. A water quality model and a geographical information system
(GIS) are planned to be used to anticipate and plan for water quality impacts of future activities in
the Lake James watershed. This study, planned to be completed by the second issuance of the
Catawba Basinwide plan in April 2000.

SUMMER
UPDATED FLOWS
9/94
'
INCLUDES BAXTER TO LAKE
JAMES
------------
MODEL RESULTS ---------------
Discharger
:
COATS AMERICAN
Receiving Stream :
NORTH FORK
CATAWBA RIVER
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The End D.O.
is 5.61
mg/l.
The End CBOD
is 14.33
mg/l.
The End NBOD
----------------------------------------------------------------------
is 0.45
mg/l.
WLA
WLA
WLA
DO Min
CBOD
NBOD
DO
Waste Flow
(mg/1)
Milepoint
---------
Reach # (mg/1)
------- ____
(mg/1)
____
(mg/1)
__
(mgd)
__________
Segment 1
------
5.61
6.50
3
Reach 1
25.00
0.00
0.00
2.00000
Reach 2
264.00
0.00
0.00
1.20000
Reach 3
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000

*** MODEL. SUMMARY DATA ***
Discharger : COATS AMERICAN Subbasin : 030830
Receiving Stream : NORTH FORK CATAWBA RIVER Stream Class: C
Summer 7Q10 : 22.3 Winter 7Q10 : 32.9
Design Temperature: 25.0
ILENGTHI SLOPEI VELOCITY I OEPTHI Kd I Kd I Ka I Ka I KN I KH I KHR i KHR I S00 I S00 I
I mile I ft/miI fps I ft Idesignl @201 Idesignl @201 Idesignl @201 (design) 1201 Idesignl @20° I
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
Segment t I 0.101 30.001 0.672 1 1.59 1 0.49 1 0.39 119.79 1 17.751 0.73 1 0.50 1 0.73 1 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 1
Reach 1 I I I I I I I I i I I I I
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
Segment 1 1 5,301 30.001 0,721 1 1.61 1 0.50 1 0.40 121.21 1 19.021 0.73 1 0.50 1 0.73 1 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 1
Reach 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I I I I I I I I I I
Segment 1 1 1.1 1.00I 100 1 4,00 1 0.25 1 0.20 1 0.56 1 0,501 0.44 1 0.30 1 0.44 1 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 1
Reach 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1
F 1 ow
1
c f s
Segment 1 Reach 1
Waste 1
3.100
Headwaters)
22.300
Tributary 1
0.000
* Runoff (
0.000
Segment i Reach 2
Waste 1 1.860
Tributary I 0.000
* Runoff 1 0.320
Segment 1 Reach 3
1 CBOD 1
NBOD 1
D.O. 1
! mg/1 I
mg/1 !
mg/l
1 25.000 1
0.000 i
0.000
1 2.000 1
1.000 i
7.440
2.000 1
1.000 I
7.440
I 2.000 I
1.000 1
7.440
1264.000 1 0.000 1 0.000
1 2.000 1 1.000 1 7.440
1 2.000 1 1.000 1 7.440
Waste 1 0.000 ( 0.000 I 0.000 1 0.000
Tributary ( 0.000 ( 2.000 1 1.000 { 7.440
* Runoff I 0.000 I 2.000 I 1.000 1 7.440
* Runoff flow is in cfs/mile

JUMMtK
UPDATED
FLOWS 9/94
INCLUDES
BAXTER TO
5eg #
i Reach
I Seq Mi i
D.O. I
CBOD I
NBOD I
Flaw I
1
1
0.00
6.53
4.81
0.88
25.40
1
1
0.05
6.67
4.80
0.88
25.40
1
1
0.10
6.79
4.79
0.87
25.40
1
2
0.10
6.33
22.47
0.81
27.26
1
2
0.20
6.56
22.35
0.81
27.29
1
2
0.30
6.75
22.24
0.80
27.32
1
2
0.40
6.91
22.12
0.80
27.36
1
2
0.50
7.04
22.00
0.79
27.39.
1
2
0.60
7.15
21.88
0.79
27.42
1
2
0.70
7.24
21.77
0.78
27.45
1
2
0.80
7.32
21.65
0.78
27.48
1
2
0.90
7.39
21.54
0.77
27.52
1
2
1.00
7.44
21.43
0.77
27.55
1
2
1.10
7.49
21.31
0.77
27.58
1
2
1.20
7.53
21.20
0.76
27.61"
1
2
1.30
7.56
21.09
0.76
27.64
1
2
1.40
7.59
20.98
0.75
27.68
1
2
1.50
7.62
20.87
0.75
27.71
1
2
1.60
7.64
20.76
0.74
27.74
1
2
1.70
7.66
20.65
0.74
27.77
1
2
1.80
7.67
20.54
0.74
27.80
1
2
1.90
7.68
20.43
0.73
27.84
1
2
2.00
7.70
20.32
0.73
27.87
1
2
2.10
7.71
20.22
0.72
27.90
1
2
2.20
7.71
20.11
0.72
27.93
1
2
2.30
7.72
20.00
0.71
27.96
1
2
2.40
7.73
19.90
0.71
28.00
1
2
2.50
7.73
19.79
0.71
28.03
1
2
2.60
7.74
19.69
0.70
28.06
1
2
2.70
7.75
19.59
0.70
28.09
1
2
2.80
7.75
19.48
0..69
28.12
1
2
2.90
7.75
19.38
0.69
28.16
1
2
3.00
7.76
19.28
0.69
28.19
1
2
3.10
7.76
19.18
0.68
28.22
1
2
3.20
7.77
19.08
0.68
28.25
1
2
3.30
7.77
18.98
0.67
28.28
1
2
3.40
7.77
18.88
0.67
28.32
1
2
3.50
7.78
18.78
0.67
28.35
1
2
3.60
7.78
18.68
0.66
28.38
1
2
3.70
7.78
18.58
0.66
28.41
1
2
3.80
7.78
18.49
0.66
28.44
1
2
3.90
7.79
18.39
0.65
28.48
1
2
4.00
7.79
18.29
0.65
28.51
1
2
4.10
7.79
18.20
0.64
28.54
1
2
4.20
7.79
18.10
0.64
28.57
1
2
4.30
7.80
18.01
0.64
28.60
1
2
4.40
7.80
17.91
0.63
28.64
1
2
4.50
7.80
17.82
0.63
28.67
1
2
4.60
7.80
17.73
0.63
28.70
1
2
4.70
7.81
17.64
0.62
28.73
1
2
4.80
7.81
17.54
0.62
28.76
1
2
4.90
7.81
17.45
0.62
28.80
1
2
5.00
7.81
17.36
0.61
28.83
1
2
5.10
7.82
17.27
0.61
28.86
1
2
5.20
7.82
17.18
0.61
28.89
1
2
5.30
7.82
17.09
0.60
28.92
1
2
5.40
7.82
17.00
0.60
28.96
1
3
5.40
7.82
17.00
0.60
28.96
1
3
5.50
7.56
16.74
0.58
28.96
1
3
5.60
7.32
16.48
0.57
28.96
1
3
5.70
7.08
16.23
0.55
28.96
1
3
5.80
6.86
15.98
0.54
28.96
1
3
5.90
6.65
15.73
0.52
28.96
1
3
6.00
6.45
15.49
0.51
28.96
1
3
6.10
6.27
15.25
0.50
28.96
1
3
6.20
6.09
15.01
0.48
28.96
1
3
6.30
5.92
14.78
0.47
28.96
1
3
6.40
5.76
14.55
0.46
28.96
1
3
6.50
5.61
14.33
0.45
28.96
I Seq # I
Reach # I
Seg Mi I
D.O. I
CBOD I
NBOD I
Flow I
LAKE JAMES

USGS weighted low flow estimate procedure
Facility Baxter Healthcare Corp NPDES # INC0006564 Stream':North Fork CE
...................... I_.._.._.._.._.._.._ _..
Region HA10 NOTE: procedure applies for regions HA3, HAS,
DA LFPR 0 sq mile HA9, and HA10, else see flow SOP
w7Q10 LFPR cfs
DA new 78.3 sq mile
MAR 1.75 cfs/sq mile
QA eq 137.03 cfs
STEP 1 calculate drainage area ratio
RATIO = new drainage area = #DIV/01
drainage area at gage
IF 0.25 < RATIO < 4, CONTINUE to STEP 2, ELSE too far from gage
#DIV/0!
STEP 2 determine weight of gage (weight_LFPR)
A. RATIO < i
weiaht La11Q
_ 0 _ 1
#DIV/0!#DIV/0!
1 0.25
weight = #DIV/0!
B. RATIO > 1
weight Ls3t14
_ 0 _ 1
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!
1 4
STEP 3 calculate 7010_EQ using regional equation
HA3 39.95 cfs
HA5 8.46 cfs
HA9 8.46 cfs
HA10 32.87 cfs 7010_EQ = 32.87 cfs/sq mile
STEP 4 calculate 7010 yield using weighted equation
7Q10yield = [weight_LFPR * 7010_LFPR] + [weight EQ * 7Q10_EQ]
DA_LFPR DA_new
yield = #DIV/0! + #DIV/01 _ #DIV/0! cfs/mile
STEP 5 calculate w7Q10
7Q10 = 7Q10yield * DA_new
winter 7Q10 = #DIV/0! cfs

USGS weighted low flow estimate procedure
Facility Baxter Healthcare Corp NPDES # '!NC0006564 Stream North Fork Ci
Region _ _ HA10_.._.. NOTE: procedure applies for regions HA3, HAS,
DA_LFPR 0 sq mile HA9, and HA10, else see flow SOP
3002 LFPR cfs
DA_new _ _ 78.3 _ _ sq mile
MAR 1_75 cfs/sq mile
QA_eq 137.03 cfs
STEP 1 calculate drainage area ratio
RATIO = new drainage area = #DIV/01
-----------------------
drainage area at gage
IF 0.25 < RATIO < 4, CONTINUE to STEP 2, ELSE too far from gage
#DIV/0!
STEP 2 determine weight of gage (weight_LFPR)
A. RATIO < 1
weiaht MtLQ
_ 0 _ 1
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!
1 0.25
weight = #DIV/0!
B. RATIO > 1
weiaht
mti24
0
1
_ _
#DIV/0!
1
4
STEP 3 calculate 30Q2_EQ using regional equation
HA3 44.95 cfs
HA5 11.79 cfs
HA9 11.79 cfs
HA10 47.14 cfs 30Q2_EQ = 47.14 cfs/sq mile
STEP 4 calculate 3002 yield using weighted equation
3002yield = [weight_LFPR * 30Q2_LFPR] + [weight_EQ * 30Q2_EQj
DA_LFPR DA_new
yield = #DIV/01
STEP 5 calculate 30Q2
3002 = 3002yield * DA_new
3002 =1 #DIV/0! jcfs
+ #DIV/01 I #DIV/0! cfs/sq mile

USGS weighted low flow estimate procedure
Facility Banter Healthcare Corp NPDES # NC0006564 Stream':North Fork Cc,
....................... 1.......................
Region HA10 NOTE: procedure applies for regions HA3, HAS,
DA_LFPR sq mile HA9, and HA10, else see flow SOP
s7Q10 LFPR cfs
DA_new _ _ 78.3 _ sq mile
MAR 1 75 cfs/sq mile
QA_eq 137.03 cfs
STEP 1 calculate drainage area ratio
RATIO = new drainage area
drainage area at gage
IF 0.25 < RATIO < 4, CONTINUE to STEP 2, ELSE too far from gage
#DIV/0!
STEP 2 determine weight of gage (weight_LFPR)
A. RATIO < 1
we w Is fiQ
_ 0 _ 1
#6IV/0! #DIV/0!
1 0.25
weight =1 #DIV/0!
B. RATIO > 1
weight
m Q
0
1
_ _
#DIV/O!
#DIV/0!
1
4
STEP 3 calculate 7Q10_EQ using regional equation
HA3 20.89 cfs
HA5 1.98 cfs
HA9 1.98 cfs
HA10 22.31 cfs 7010 EQ = 22.31 Jcfs
STEP 4 calculate 7010 yield using weighted equation
7Q10yield = [weight_LFPR * 7Q10_LFPR] + [weight_EQ * 7Q10_EQ]
DA LFPR DA new
yield = #DIV/0!
STEP 5 calculate s7Q10
7010 = 7010yield * DA_new
summer 7Q10 = #DIV/0! jcfs
+ #DIV/0! I #DIV/0! cfs/sq mile

Baxlefflealthcare Corporation 64
Upstream:
50 feet upstream
Month
Temp
DO
Saturation
Fecal
Aug-94
20
8.2
90%
70
14
3.9 J
Jul-94
20
8.1
89%
350
17,4
10.2
Jun-94
20
8.2
90%
130
IS,1
6.3
May-94
14
9.4
91 %
350
9, b
1.6
Apr-94
12
9.6
89%
70
4,7
2.9
Mar-94
8
10.6
89%
80
1 A,5
3.6
Feb-94
6
11.2
90%
480
31
7.4
Jan-94
3
11.2
0%
10
13M
3.1
Dec-93
5
11.5
90%
18
12.,l
1.3
Nov-93
8
10.7
90%
110
13, 3
0.9
Oct-93
12
9.1
84%
60
R, 7
1.2
Se 93
19
8.1
87%
70
5.9
Residual Chlorine
7010 (cfs)
22.3
Design Flow (mgd)
1.2
Design Flow (cfs)
1.856
Stream Std (µg/1)
17
Upstream bkgrd level (µg/1)
0
1 W C (%)
7.7%
Allowable Concentration (µgA)
221.3
Allowable Conoemratbn (mg/Q
0.221
Downstream:
200 yards downstream
Temp
DO
Saturation
Fecal
Co p.
1-
20
8.1
899b
110
13, z
4.1
21
8.0
90%
420
12,5
11.3
20
8.1
899b
120
! l� , 9
6
14
9.4
91 %
300
10
2
12
9.6
890/0
20
3.5
8
10.5
88%
40
56
4.2
6
11.0
88%
1460
0
10.5
4
11.0
849b
30
/5,9
4.3
5
11.4
890/0
280
15, Z
1.6
9
10.5
91 %
100
zo. �
1.6
13
8.9
85%
620
10,7
2
19
7.8
840/6
50
7.3
Ammonia [2 / 4 mg/I] - Residual Chlorine - Fecal Collform
Fecal LImh 2001100ml
Ratio of 12.0 :1
insiream waste Goncemrations
Ammonia as NH3
(summer)
22.3
7010 (cfs)
1.2
Design Flow (mgd)
1.856
Design Flow (cfs)
1
Stream Std (mg/1)
0.22
Upstream bkgrd level (mgA)
7.7%
IWC (%)
10.4
Allowable Concentration (mg/1)
Ammonia as NH3
(winter)
32.9
7Q10 (cfs)
1.2
Design Flow (mgd)
1.856
Design Flow (cfs)
1.8
Stream Std (mg/1)
0.22
Upstream bkgrd level (mgA)
5.3%
IWC (%)
29.8
Allowable Concentration (mg/1)

SOC°.PRi0RITY PROJECT:
T F YES; SOC NUMBER
TO: PEPMITS AND ENG.I,NEERING UNIT
WATER QUAL, I TY ,SECTION
ATTENTION: Sean Gori. S
DATE: October 1.:1, 1993
Yes No X
4.)
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
COUNTY McDowell_ ~�
PERMIT NUMBER NCO06564 o i',
w�-
PART I - GENERAL INFORMA'l,l(-)
1. Facility and Address: BAXTER HE.'.-T1=1CARE CORPORATION
PO BOX :1.390
MARION NC'. 2£ 752
2. Date of Investigation• Janu.al-y r-;, 10c13
3. Report Prepared By: James R. R,-�-iri
4. Persons Contacted and Telephone Phil Castro
704-756-4151
5. Directions to Site: Baxter Heal-111 1, - Corporation is located near
the intersection of NCSR 1569 ,irirl 'M crliway 2.21 North of the Town of
Marion in McDowell County.
6. Discharge Point (s) , List for all -i i s,-!harge points:
Latitude: 350 47' 3'1" r'on(ji f-,;-ara: 820 oil 10"
Attach a USGS map extract: and treatment facility site and
discharge point on map.
U.S.G.S. Quad No. U.S.r.S Name Little Switzerland, NC
7. Site size and expansio:;. area Cnr1,^.i ,--nt-, with application?
X Yes _ No If No, explai.r..i:
8. Topography ( relationship to floe-) r 1 ,4_i n included): Flat, adjacent
to flood plain.
Pa(:rf' 1

9. Location of nearest dwelling: Grearer than 500 feet.
10. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: North Fork Catawba
River.
a. Classification: C
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: ("TB 030830
C. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream
uses: Mountain stream with rncky/sandy substrate used as a
source of water for recreat.i-n, wildlife, and agricultural
support.
PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCJ4A R C" E AND TREATMENT WORKS
1. a. Volume of wastewater to be permit -.red. 1.2 MGD (Ultimate
Design Capacity)
b. What is the current permi_ttP(T--- opacity of the Wastewater
Treatment facility? 1_2 MGD
C. Actual treatment capacity of t;he current facility (current
design capacity 1.2 MGD
d. Date(s) and construction activities allowed by previous
Authorizations to Constru.c:t. ;rc,red in the previous two years:
None
e. Please provide a description of. existing or substantially
constructed wastewater t.r.eatmer.t facilities: Existing;
Influent-microscreening, Fl,) f-gu.alization basin, aeration
basin, clarifiers, te.r.ti i-y 1_i I r-.ers, chlorination, land
application of sludge.
f. Please provide a descriptions of proposed wastewater treatment
facilities: No additional fs-itilJ es proposed, permit renewal
only.
g. Possible toxic impacts t:o waters: None known or
suspected.
h. Pretreatment Program (POTW^ Not Applicable.
in development -).PPr,Z
should be required r-)ok. n�Qded
2. Residuals handling and scheme: Land
Application.
a. If residuals are being )_and applied, please specify DEM
Permit Number WQ0004.222
Pane 2

Residuals Contractor Land. AppliraLion is conducted by Baxter
Healthcare Company.
Telephone Number
b. Residuals stabilization: PSRP PFRP OTHER X
Solids are handled in liquid form. The writer is unaware of
the extent to which the solids would meet PSRP or PFRP
requirements.
C. Landfill:
d. Other disposal/utilization scheme (Specify) :
3. Treatment plant classification. (attarh completed rating sheet): 2
4. SIC Codes(s): 2834
Wastewater Code(s) of actual wa.st.ewat;er, not particular facilities
i.e., non -contact cooling water oli.-,rharge from a metal plating
company would be 14, not 56.
Primary 33 Secondary 02, 16
Main Treatment Unit Code: 0210'1
PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
1. Is this facility being constructed. with Construction Grant Funds
or are any public monies involved- (mlinicipals only)? No
2. Special monitoring or limitati ronC (i n-Juding toxicity) requests:
No
3. Important SOC, JOC, or Comp].,, snr-- -chedule dates
(Please
indicate) None
Date
Submission of Plans and Specific: , Fi r-'r,
Begin Construction
Complete Construction
4. Alternative Analysis Evaluation: Fia; the facility evaluated all
of the non -discharge options avail_ahln. Please provide regional
perspective for each option eva.l.iiated.
Spray Irrigation:
Connection to Regional Sewer System:
Page

Subsurface:
Other disposal options:
5. Other Special Items:
PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Renewal of Baxter Healthcare Co rrlo :, I. -ion ` s NPDES Permit is
recommended.
S.ana, e of Report Preparer
lye
dater-`11a.lity Regional S pervisor
1992
Dat-.n
P iq- 4

WELL 1
WELL 2
WELL 3
WELL 4-A
WELL 4-B
WELL 5
030 f CHLORINATION
WATER FLOW SCHEMATIC
(IN THOUSANDS OF GALLONS)
RAW
WATER CARBON FIL
TANK
210
DEIONIZERS STILLS
STERILIZERS
WELL 9 63
SANITARY 163 COOLING PONDS 100
162
135 BOILERS
135
TOTAL 660 WASTE
TREATMENT 760
PLANT
BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION
P.O. BOX 1390
MARION, NC 28752
NC0006564
1993 PAGE 1 OF 1
360
PRODUCTION
363
207,
PRODUCT
NORTH FORK
CATAWBA RIVER

DISCHARGE SERIAL NUMBER
001
13. Activity Description Give a
narrative description of activity
Producing this discharge.(see
instructions)
14. Activity Causing Discharge For
each SIC Code which describes
the activity causing this discharge,
Supply the type and maximum
amount of either the raw material
consumed (Item 14a) or the product
produced (Item 14b) in the units
specified in Table 1 of the Instruc-
tion Booklet. For SIC Codes not
listed in Table 1, use raw material
or production units normally used
for measuring production.(see
instructions)
a. Raw Materials
SIC Code
2140
b. Products
SIC Code
2834
[ffi" GENCY USE
1 213. Manufacture of intravenous solutions. The
com asition of IV solutions is rimarily dextrose
or dextrose in combination with salt: (NACI)or'
other ingredients. Some saline solutions and
distilled water solutions are also produced.
Maximum Unit
Name
Shared Discharges
Name Maximum Unit Shared Discharges
Amount/Day (See Table 1) (Serial Number)
Intravenous i,100,nnn Liters L
Solutions -
I1-3

15. Waste Abatement
a. Waste Abatement Practices
(.escribe fhr; waste abatement
nract."rs tree oi, this discharric
vi,U, .. brief narrative. (see
instructions)
b. Waste Abatement Codes
Usiltg the codes listed in Table
It of the Instruction Booklet,
describe the waste abatement
processes for this discharge in
thr• order m which they ocuir
1 215•
215b
DISCHARGE SERIAL NUMBER
001
FOR AGENCY USE
Narrative:__ Neutralization, nutrient. addition, aeration
_(48 hr. retention time) , flocculation, clarification
with sludge return to aeration basin, aero ic_______
digester for sludge digestion, lip -flow sand _
filters, cooling pond water discharg_e.is processed
throu_&b the u-flow sand filters....____
(1)
CNEUTR
(2) PSCREE
(3) PEQUAL
(4)
CNUTRI
(5) BACTIV
(q CFLOCC
(7)
PSKIMC
j8) PSANDF
(9) SAEROB
(10)
SLANDP
(11)
(t:') _—•—
(13)
(14)
()�)
` (16)
(17)
(1bl
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
I

DISCHARGE SERIAL NUMBER
17. Description of Intake and Discharge
FOR AGENCY USE
L..
For each of the parameters listed below, enter In the appropriate box the value or code letter answer called for.(sea Instructions)
In addition, enter the parameter name and code and all required values for'any of the following parameters if they were checked In Item 161
ammonia, cyanide, aluminum, arsenic, barylllum, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury, nickel, selenium, zinc, phenols; oil and grease,
,nd chlorine (residual). -
Influent Effluent
b CkD
c�
Parameter and Code 5 2 a r o > c [a > c a c �.
>,
�313
E Sole Iowa z
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)
Flows
Gallons per day
99056 50050
1.03 MGD
PH
Units
00400
8.1
Temperature (winter)
"F
44(P--8 74025
N/A
Temperature (summer)
'F
9F#w-7 74026
N
Biochemical Oxygen Demand
(BOD 5-day)
mg/l
00310
559
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)'
mg/1
00340
620
Total Suspended (nonfilterable)
Solids
mg/l .
00530
40
Specific Conductance
micromhos/cm at 250 C
00095
N/A
Settleable Matter (residue)
mf/l
00545
N/A
*Other discharges sharing intake flow (serial numbers).(see instructions)
v
.76 MGD' .20 MGD 11.3 MGD I DAILY 1365 1 c
6.5 1 7.8 f DAILY 1260
150C f 60C I 150C I DAILY
22°C I 10°C I 280C I DAILY
11l
=I
3 mg/1 1 1 mg/1 ! 10 m9/1 I WEEKLY 1 52f c
16 mg/11 4 mg/1 1143 mg/1 j DAILY I260I c
3. mg/1 1 .4 mg/1 176 mg/1 I DAILY 12601 c
N/A I N/A
N/A j N/A
1;

17. (Cont•d.)
Parameter and Code
Ammonia
Phosphorous
.LULa-L AJ-Lro en
Fecal Coliform'
* Log avg
Is. Plant Controls Check If the fol-
lowing plant controls are available
for this discharge,
Alternate power source for major
Pumping facility.
Alarm or emergency procedure for
Power or equipment failure
Complete Item 19 If discharge is
from cooling and/or steam water
generation and water treatment
additives are used.
IS. Water Treatment Additives If the
discharge Is treated with any con.
ditioner, Inhibitor, or alglcide,
answer the following;
a. Name of Material(s)
b. Name and address of manu-
facturer
DISCHARGE SERIAL NUMBER
001
FOR AQENCV USE -
4
Influent mg/l
mg/1
Effluent.<...,
�i
Y
OO .2
c
A
aid
<
�� °y
�uu"
12
a
w�
F
cab•
a
.1.& �•�
5' x... u
A.o x._
<
E
Z<
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
.95
.32
.01,
5.60
Weekly
-52
c
.87
Weekly
52
c
5.36
7.15
28.2
.98
Weekl
52
c
N/A
410
0
4400
Weekly
52
g
N/A
1.5NTU .7NTU
8.4NTU
Daily
260
c
C�Als (Two separate electrical feeds are .run to WTP by
:a:.. Rutherford Electrical Corporation)
' BALM
zsr' Nalco 7763-& 8100 added prior to clarification
only during sludge bulking
ttisb:. Nalco Chemical Company
One Nalco Center
Na erville IL 60566-1024
C. Quantity (pounds added per > ;:: Na1�63 7#/mg
mllllon gallons of water treated).
Nalco 8100 28#/mg

DISCHARGE SERIAL NUMBER
001
FOR AGENCY USE -
d- Chemical composition of these `"' .
_Nalco
7763 liquid anionic floccu ant
additives (see Instructions).
Nalco
8100 aqueous solution of a of ate n
amide. chloride
Complete items 20-25 if there is a thermal discharge
(e.g., associated with a steam and/or power generation
plant, steel mill, petroleum refinery, or any other
manufacturing process) and -the total discharge flow is
10 million gallons per day or more. (see instructions)
20. Thermal Discharge Source Check
N/A
the appropriate item(s) Indicating '
the source of the discharge. (see
Instructions)
Boller BlowdownwA.
❑BLBD
Boller Chemical Cleaning -"' 'CIBCCL
Ash Pond Overflow s. ;'
❑APOF
Boller Water Treatment — EvaporaF':-?;
❑ EPBO
for Slowdown
Oil or Coal Fired Plants — Effluent
❑OCFP
from Air Pollution Control Devices
Condense Cooling Water
❑COND
Cooling Tower Blowdown
❑ CTBD
Manufacturing Process
❑ MFPR
Other
❑ OTH R
21. Dtscharge/Receiving Water Temper-
ature Difference
Give the maximum temperature
difference between the discharge t`•:;'
and receiving waters for summer
and winter operating conditions.
(see instructions)
Summer
Winter :Id
OF.
22. Discharge Temperature, Rate of
Change Per Hour
OF./hour
N/A
Give the maximum possible rate of
temperature change per hour of
discharge under operating con-
ditions. (see Instructions)
23. Water Temperature, Percentile
NSA
Report (Frequency of Occurrence)
In the table below, enter the. _
temperature which Is exceeded 10%
of the year, 5% of the year, 1% of
the year and not at all (maximum -
yearly temperature). (see instructions)
Frequency of occurrence
a. Intake Water Temperature
(Subject to natural changes)
b. Discharge Water Temperature
10%
5% 1%
Maximum
OF
OF OF
of
OF
OF OF
OF
24. Water Intake velocity : NIA feet^.,
(see Instructions)
25. Retention Time Give the length of NIA minutes
time. In minutes, from start of a k'J
water temperature rlse to discharge
of cooting water. (see instructions)
II-8

r
DISCHARGE SERIAL NUMBER
+ 001 FOR AGENC gUY E
26. Additional Information
� Item
Information
Chlorination Per conversation with NC Asheville Regional Office, _chlorination__
was discontinued rior to 1988. No stream standard violations
have resulted. Chlorination could be resumed should it become
necessary to do so because two chlorine control chambers are
e i ting as pArt of the -F- I 't .
I (-9

ace.,,
I N C O R P O R A T E D
4 THE ASSURANCE OF CUALITY
r
August 23, 1993
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
Mr. Phil Castro
Baxter Healthcare Corporation
P.O. Box 1390
Highway 221 North
Marion, NC 28752
RE: PACE Project No. A30722.516
Client Reference: Influent Analysis
Dear Mr. Castro:
Enclosed is the report of laboratory analyses for samples received
July 22 - 28, 1993.
Footnotes are given at the end of the report.
If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free
to contact us.
Sincerely,
��- --x/ AL
Kay a Parris
Project Manager
Enclosures
54 Ravenscroft Drive Offices Serving: Minneapolis; Minnesota Charlotte. North Carolina
Asheville, NC 28801 Tampa, Florida, Asheville, North Carolina
TEL [phone] Iowa City, Iowa New York, New York
FAX: [phone] San Francisco, Caliicrria Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Kansas City, Missouri Denver, Colorado
Los Angeles. California
An Equal Opportunity Employer

pace't
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
THE ASSURANCE OF DUALITY
Baxter Healthcare Corporation August 23, 1993
P.O. Box 1390 PACE Project Number: A307225
Highway 221 North
Marion, NC 28752
Attn: Mr. Phil Castro
Client Reference: Influent Analysis
PACE Sample Number: 93 0116353 93 0118720
Date Collected: 07/22/93 07/28/93
Date Received: 07/22/93 07/28/93
Influent Influent
Parameter Units MDL Composite Grab
(1)
INORGANIC ANALYSIS
INDIVIDUAL PARAMETERS
Chlorine, Residual mg/L 0.1 - 0.34 (2)
Cyanide, Total mg/L 0.002 - ND
Oil and Grease mg/L 1.0 - 16
Phenol mg/L 0.0060 - 0.008
Sulfide mg/L 0.10 - 0 A0
TABLE III
Antimony mg/L 0.003 ND -
Arsenic mg/L 0.001 0.002 -
Beryllium mg/L 0.02 ND -
Cadmium mg/L 0.01 ND -
Chromium mg/L 0.02 ND -
Copper mg/L 0.01 0.065 -
Lead mg/L 0.1 ND -
Mercury mg/L 0.0002 0.0007 -
Nickel mg/L 0.05 ND -
Selenium mg/L 0.001 0.003 -
Silver mg/L 0.01 0.049 -
Thallium mg/L 0.001 ND -
Zinc mg/L 0.01 0.29 -
TABLE IV
Bacteria, Fecal Coliform col/100ml 10 ND (3) -
Chloride mg/L 1 90 -
Fluoride, Total Recoverable (Electrode) mg/L 0.1 0.11 -
Sulfate mg/L 1 34 -
Sulfite mg/L D.50 0.50 -
Nitrogen, Ammonia mg/L 0.05 1.0 -
Phosphorus, Total mg/L 0.010 0.54 -
54 Ravenscroft Drive Offices Serving: Minneapolis, Minnesota Chav;otte, North Carolina An Equal Opportunity Employer
Asheville, NC 28801 Tampa, Florida Asheville, North Carolina
TEL: [phone] Iowa City, Iowa New York, New York
FAX: [phone] San Francisco, California Pittsburgh, Pcimsylvania
Kansas City, Missouri Denver, Colorado
Los Angeles, California

ace'o
I N C O R P O R A T E 0
THE ASSURANCE OF DUALITY
Mr. Phil Castro
Page 2
Client Reference: Influent Analysis
PACE Sample Number:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Client Sample ID:
Parameter
INORGANIC ANALYSIS
TABLE IV
Surfactants
Aluminum
Barium
Boron
Cobalt
Iron
Magnesium
Molybdenum
Manganese
Tin
Titanium
NITROGEN, TOTAL
Nitrogen, Kjeldahl
Nitrogen, Nitrate plus Nitrite
Nitrogen, Total
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
METHOD 608-PESTICIDES AND PCBS IN WATER
a-BHC
b-BHC
g-BHC (Lindane)
d-BHC
Heptachlor
Aldrin
Heptachlor epoxide
Endosulfan I
Dieldrin
Endrin
4,4-DDD
Endosulfan II
4,4-DDT
54 Ravenscroft Drive
Asheville, NC 28801
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
August 23, 1993
PACE Project Number: A3072251
93 0116353 93 0118720
07/22/93 07/28/93
07/22/93 07/28/93
Influent Influent
Units MDL Composite Grab
(1)
mg/L
0.01
1.4
mg/L
0.1
0.94
mg/L
0.10
ND
mg/L
0.05
0.14
mg/L
0.02
ND
mg/L
0.05
1.2
mg/L
0.10
10
mg/L
0.05
ND
mg/L
0.01
ND
mg/L
0.05
0.93
mg/L
0.05
ND
mg/L
1.0
3.6
mg/L
0.10
1.5
mg/L
0.1
5.1
ug/L
0.05
ND
ug/L
0.05
ND
ug/L
0.05
ND
ug/L
0.10
ND
ug/L
0.05
ND
ug/L
0.05
ND
ug/L
0.80
ND
ug/L
0.10
ND
ug/L
0.02
ND
ug/L
0.06
ND
ug/L
0.10
ND
ug/L
0.10
ND
ug/L 0.10 ND
Offices Serving: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Tampa, Florida
Iowa City, Iowa
San Francisco, California
Kansas City, Missouri
Los Angeles, California
Charlotte, North Carolina
Asheville, North Carolina
New York, New York
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Denver, Colorado
An Equal Opportunity Employer

pace,,
C 0 R P 0 R A T E 0
THE ASSURANCE OF QUALITY
Mr. Phil Castro
Page 3
Client Reference
Influent Analysis
PACE Sample Number:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Client Sample ID:
Parameter
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
METHOD 608-PESTICIDES AND PCBS IN WATER
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
August 23, 1993
PACE Project Number: A3072251
93 0116353 93 0118720
07/22/93 07/28/93
07/22/93 07/28/93
Influent Influent
Units MDL Composite Grab
(1)
4,4-DDE
ug/L
0.10
NO -
Endrin aldehyde
ug/L
0.20
ND -
Endosulfan sulfate
ug/L
0.70
NO -
Toxaphene
ug/L
2.4
NO -
PCB-1016
ug/L
0.5
NO -
PCB-1221
ug/L
0.5
ND -
PCB-1232
ug/L
0.5
NO -
PCB-1242
ug/L
0.5
NO -
PCB-1248
ug/L
0.5
NO -
PCB-1254
ug/L
1.0
ND -
PCB-1260
ug/L
1.0
NO -
Chlordane (tech)
ug/L
0.20
NO -
GCMS FOR SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS-8270
Phenol
ug/L
10
NO -
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
ug/L
10
NO -
2-Chlorophenol
ug/L
10
NO -
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ug/L
10
NO -
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ug/L
10
NO -
Benzyl alcohol
ug/L
20
NO -
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ug/L
10
NO -
2-Methylphenol (o-Cresol)
ug/L
10
ND -
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
ug/L
10
NO -
4-Methylphenol
ug/L
10
NO -
n-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
ug/L
10
NO -
Hexachloroethane
ug/L
10
ND -
Nitrobenzene
ug/L
10
NO -
Isophorone
ug/L
10
NO -
2-Nitrophenol
ug/L
50
NO -
2,4-Dimethylphenol
ug/L
10
NO -
Benzoic acid
ug/L
50
NO -
bis(2-chloroethoxy)Methane
ug/L
10
NO -
2,4-Dichlorophenol
ug/L 50 ND -
54 Ravenscroft Drive Offices Serving: Minneapolis, Minnesota Charlotte, North Carolina
Asheville, NC 28801 Tampa, Florida Asheville, North Carolina
TEL: 704-i54.1176 Iowa City, Iowa New York, New York
FAX: [phone] San Francisco, California Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Kansas City, Missouri Denver, Colorado
Los Angeles, California
An Equal Opportunity:smployer

• y S
-,ace
0
I N C O R P O R A T E D
THE ASSURANCE OF QUALITY
Mr. Phil Castro
Page 4
Client Reference: Influent Analysis
PACE Sample Number:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Client Sample ID:
Parameter
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
GCMS FOR SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS-8270
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
August 23, 1993
PACE Project Number: A3072251
93 0116353 93 0118720
07/22/93 07/28/93
07/22/93 07/28/93
Influent Influent
Units MDL Composite Grab
(1)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
ug/L
10
NO -
Naphthalene
ug/L
10
NO -
4-Chloroaniline
ug/L
20
ND -
Hexachlorobutadiene
ug/L
10
NO -
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
ug/L
20
NO -
2-Methylnaphthalene
ug/L
10
NO -
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
ug/L
10
NO -
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
ug/L
10
ND -
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
ug/L
10
NO -
2-Chloronaphthalene
ug/L
10
NO -
2-Nitroaniline
ug/L
40
ND -
Dimethyl phthalate
ug/L
10
NO -
Acenaphthylene
ug/L
10
ND -
3-Nitroaniline
ug/L
40
NO -
Acenaphthene
ug/L
10
ND -
2,4-Dinitrophenol
ug/L
10
NO -
4-Nitrodiphenyl
ug/L
50
ND -
Dibenzofuran
ug/L
10
ND -
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
ug/L
10
NO -
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
ug/L
10
NO -
Diethyl phthalate
ug/L
10
ND -
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
ug/L
10
ND -
Fluorene
ug/L
10
NO -
4-Nitroaniline
ug/L
40
ND -
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol
ug/L
50
ND -
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
ug/L
10
ND -
4-Bromophenol phenyl ether
ug/L
10
NO -
Hexachlorobenzene
ug/L
10
NO -
Pentachlorophenol
ug/L
50
NO -
Phenanthrene
ug/L
10
ND -
Anthracene
54 sii : craft Drive
Asheville, NC 28801
TEL- 704.254-7176
FAX: [phone]
ug/L
Offices Serving: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Tampa, Florida
Iowa City, Iowa
San Francisco, California
Kansas City, Missouri
Los Angeles, California
10 NO
Charlotte, North Carolina
Asheville, North Carolina
New York, New York
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Denier, Colorado
An Equal Opportunity Employer

Pcet
C 0 R P 0 R A T E 0
THE ASSURANCE OF allALITY
Mr. Phil Castro
Page 5
Client Reference: Influent Analysis
PACE Sample Number:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Client Sample ID:
Parameter
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
GCMS FOR SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS-8270
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
August 23, 1993
PACE Project Number: A3072251
93 0116353 93 0118720
07/22/93 07/28/93
07/22/93 07/28/93
Influent Influent
Units MDL Composite Grab
(1)
Di-n-butyl phthalate
ug/L
10
NO -
Fluoranthene
ug/L
10
NO -
Pyrene
ug/L
10
NO -
Benzyl butyl phthalate
ug/L
10
NO -
3,3-Dichlorobenzidine
ug/L
20
NO -
Benzo(a)anthracene
ug/L
10
NO -
Bis(2-ehtylhexyl)phthlate
ug/L
10
29 -
Chrysene
ug/L
10
NO -
Di-n-octylphthalate
ug/L
10
NO -
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
ug/L
10
NO -
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
ug/L
10
NO -
Benzo(a)pyrene
ug/L
10
NO -
Indeno(1,2,3,-cd)pyrene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
GCMS FOR VOLATILE ORGANICS-8240
Chloromethane
Bromomethane
Vinyl Chloride
Chloroethane
Methylene chloride
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
1,1-Dichloroethylene
1,1-Dichloroethane
Trans-1,2-dichloroethylene
Chloroform
1,2-Dichloroethane
2-Butanone (MEK)
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
54 Ravenscroft Drive
Asheville, NC 28801
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
ug/L
10 NO
-
ug/L
10 NO
-
ug/L
10 NO
-
ug/L
10 -
NO
ug/L
10 -
NO
ug/L
10 -
NO
ug/L
10 -
NO
ug/L
5.0 -
NO
ug/L
100 -
NO
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
w^ Offices Serving: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Tampa, Florida
Iowa City, Iowa
San Francisco, California
Kansas City, Missouri
Los Angeles, California
5.0 -
NO
5.0 -
NO
5.0 -
NO
5.0 -
ND
5.0 -
7.8
5.0 -
NO
100 -
NO
5.0 -
ND
5.0 -
NO
Charlotte, North Carolina
Asheville, North Carolina
New York, New York
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Denver, Colorado
An Equal Opportunity Employer

r
p,ace,1,
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
THE ASSURANCE OF QUALITY
Mr. Phil Castro August 23, 1993
Page 6 PACE Project Number: A3072251
Client Reference: Influent Analysis
PACE Sample Number: 93 0116353 93 0118720
Date Collected: 07/22/93 07/28/93
Date Received: 07/22/93 07/28/93
Client Sample ID: Influent Influent
Parameter Units MDL Composite Grab
(1)
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
GCMS FOR VOLATILE ORGANICS-8240
Vinyl acetate
ug/L
50 -
ND
Bromodichloromethane
ug/L
5.0 -
NO
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
ug/L
5.0 -
ND
1,2-Dichloropropane
ug/L
5.0 -
ND
Trans-1,3-dichloropropene
ug/L
5:0 -
ND
Trichloroethylene
ug/L
5.0 -
ND
Dibromochloromethane
ug/L
5.0 -
ND
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
ug/L
5.0 -
ND
Benzene
ug/L
5.0 -
ND
Cis-1,3-dichloropropene
ug/L
5.0 -
ND
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether
ug/L
5.0 -
ND
Bromoform
ug/L
5.0 -
ND
2-Nexanone
ug/L
50 -
ND
4-Methyl-2pentanone (MIBK)
ug/L
50 -
ND
Tetrachloroethylene
ug/L
5.0 -
ND
Toluene
ug/L
5.0 -
ND
Chlorobenzene
ug/L
5.0 -
ND
Ethyl Benzene
ug/L
5.0 -
ND
Styrene
Xylenes, (total)
ug/L 5.0 -
ug/L 5.0 -
54 Ravenscroft Drive"
= °`r zas Serving: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Asheville, NC 28801
Tampa, Florida
TEL: [phone]
Iowa City, Iowa
FAX: [phone]
San Francisco, California
Kansas City, Missouri
Los Angeles, California
Charlotte, North Carolina
Asheville, North Carolina
New York, New York
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Denver, Colorado
ND
ND
An Equal Opportunity Employer

I N C O R P O R A T E D
THE ASSURANCE OF QUALITY
QJ
- Mr. Phil Castro
Page 7
Client Reference: Influent Analysis
A REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
These data have been reviewed and are approved for release.
" MA &
Barbara M. Miller
Supervisor, Inorganic Chemistry
VCL� -/. ���
Walter L. Miller
Regional Director
August 23, 1993
PACE Project Number: A3072251
54 Ravenscroft Drive Offices Serving: tririnawohs, Minnesota Charlotte, North Carolina
Asheville, NC 28801 Tampa, Florida Asheville, North Carolina
TEL: [phone] Iowa City, Iowa new York, New York
FAX: [phone] San Francisco, California Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Kansas City, Missouri Denver, Colorado
Los Angeles, California
An Equal Opportunity Employer

cice
1 N C U fl P 0 R A T E o REPORT i F LABORATORY ANALYSIS
THE ASSURANCE OF QUALITY
Mr. Phil Castro FOOTNOTES August 23, 1993
Page 8 for pages 1 through 7 PACE Project Number: A3072251
Client Reference: Influent Analysis
MDL Method Detection Limit
ND Not detected at or above the MDL.
(1) Sample for fecal coliform analysis is a Grab sample.
(2) Analysis conducted in excess of EPA recommended holding time.
(3) Fecal sample had excessive amount of non -fecal background growth.
154 Aavenscroft Drive
Asheville, NC 28801
TEL-704.254-7176
FAX: [phone]
Offices Serving: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Tampa, Florida
Iowa City, Iowa
San Francisco, California
Kansas City, Missouri
Los Angeles, California
harlotte, North Carolina
Asheville, North Carolina
New York, New York
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Deriver, Colorado
An Equal Opportunity Employer