20040587 Ver 1_401 Application_20040412

CAarlotte•Mecklen6urq
~~_~~:.. ~. ~ - X47 ~ P.., 401 OSSE~
~..~ ,,._l~~
~r"T ~~~
Apri18, 2004
Mr. John Dorney
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Wetlands/401 Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd:, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
Subject: Pre-Construction Notification Pursuant
to a Nationwide Permit Nos. 3 and 13
City of Charlotte Storm Water Services
501 Lyles Court Maintenance Project
Charlotte, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Dorney:
City of Charlotte Storm Water Services (CSWS) is submitting aPre-Construction
Notification pursuant to Nationwide Permit Nos. 3 and 13. The 501 Lyles Court
Maintenance Project is located in Charlotte, North Carolina, approximately one mile
northeast of the North Tryon Street -Sugar Creek Road intersection
(Attachment A -Figures 1 and 2). This project is intended to prevent further loss of
property by stabilizing a currently eroding stream bank and replacing a failing storm
water pipe. We are sending you seven copy of this submittal in accordance with the
notification requirements for Water Quality Certification No. 3353.
If you have any questions concerning this project, don't hesitate to contact me at
[e-mail] or [phone]. Thank you for your attention to this
matter.
Sincerely,
Jarrod J. Karl
Wetland Specialist
WETLANDS/4Q1 GROUP
APR 1 2:2004
WATER QUAtITySEC
TioN

O~O~ W AT ~9QG
r
~ _ s a -i
O 'C
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
April 20, 2004
Mecklenburg County
DWQ Project #: 04-0587
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATE
The City of Charlotte Storm Water Services
Attn: Jarrod Karl
600 East Fourth Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
Subject Property: 501 Lyles Court Maintenance Project
Dear Mr. Karl:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions, to impact 225 feet of perennial
stream for the purpose of bank stabilization as you described in your application dated April 8, 2004.
After reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is covered by General Water Quality
Certification Numbers 3376 and 3399, which may be viewed on our website at
ham://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. This certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit Numbers
3 and 13 when the Corps of Engineers issues it. In addition, you should get any other federal, state or
local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and
Erosion Control, Coastal Stormwater, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations. This
approval will expire when the accompanying 404 or CAMA permit expires unless otherwise
specified in the General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application except as
modified below. If you change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a
new application. If the property is sold, the new. owner must be given a copy of this Certification and
approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total wetland fills for
this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, compensatory mitigation may be required as
described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) (6) and (7). This approval shall expire when the corresponding
Nationwide Permit expires or as otherwise provided in the General Certification. For this approval to
be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional
conditions listed below.
Conditions of Certification:
Certification of Completion
1. Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or
applicable Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (Fax), (http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands

Page 2
Mr. Karl
Apri120, 2004
the attached certificate of completion to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of
Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may result
in criminal and/or civil penalties. This Certification shall become null and void unless the above
conditions are made conditions of the Federa1404 and/or coastal Area Management Act Permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing.
You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written
petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of
Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and
its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act. If you have any questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919-733-1786 or Alan Johnson at our
Mooresville Regional Office at 704-663-1699.
JRD/bs
Attachments
cc: Corps of Engineers Asheville Field Office
Mooresville DWQ Regional Office
File copy
Central Files
Carolina Wetlands Services, 5000 Nations Crossing Road, Suite 230, Charlotte, NC 28217
Sincerely,

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Carolina Wetland Services
Pre-Construction Notification Pursuant to
Nationwide Permit Nos. 3 and 13
501 Lyles Court Maintenance Project
Charlotte, North Carolina
Carolina Wetland Services Project No. 2004-0619
April 8, 2004
Prepared For:
The City of Charlotte Storm Water Services
600 East Fourth Street
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
[phone]
Prepared By:
Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
5000 Nations Crossing Road, Suite 230
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
~ [phone]
1
~~~ 5000 Nations Crossing Road, Suite 230 Charlotte, NC 28217 (704) 527-I 177 Office • [phone] Fax
!~~1~ www.carolinawetlandservices.com

0
501 Lyles Court Maintenance Project April 8, 2004
Nationwide Permit Nos. 3 and 13 Project No 2004-0619
Table of Contents
Executive Summary ...................................................................................... 1
.........................................
Existing Conditions
...............................................................................................................................
Current Land Use 2
............................................................................................................................... 2
Jurisdictional Delineation .................................................................................................................. 2
Results ....................................................................................................
. 3
.
..........................................
Agency Correspondence ..............................................
...
. 3
.
.
....................................................................
Cultural Resources ............................................................................................................................. 3
Protected Species ................................................................................................ 3
...............................
Purpose and Need for the Project
.......................................................................................................... 3
Avoidance and Minimization ................................................................................................................ 4
Proposed Impacts to Jurisdictional Waters ............................................................................................ 4
Compensatory Mitigation .......................................................:.............................................................. 4
List of Attachments
Attachment A -Figure 1. USGS Site Location Map
Attachment A -Figure 2. NRCS Soil Survey
Attachment A -Figure 3. Approximate Jurisdictional Boundary Field Map
Attachment B -Pre-Construction Notification Application -Nationwide Permit Nos. 3 and 13
Attachment C -Routine On-Site Data Form
Attachment D -Stream Classification Forms
Attachment E - Representative Photographs
Attachment F - Figures 4 and 5. Proposed Impacts
i

' 501 Lyles Court Maintenance Project April 3, 2004
Nationwide Permit Nos. 3 and 13 Project No 2004-0619
~x~~~.#ive Su~analr~
' The 501 Lyles Court Maintenance Project is located in Charlotte, North Carolina a roximatel
pP Y
one mile northeast of the North Tryon Street -Sugar Creek Road intersection
' (Attachment A -Figures 1 and 2). This project is intended to prevent further loss of property by
stabilizing a currently eroding stream bank and replacing a failing storm water pipe. Charlotte
Storm Water Services (CSWS) has contracted Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. (CWS) to provide
' permitting services for this project.
The results of the on-site field investigation conducted by CWS indicate that there is one
jurisdictional stream channel (Stream A) located within the project limits
' (Attachment A -Figure 3). Impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been
reduced to the maximum extent practicable. Unavoidable impacts associated with this project
will include approximately 150 bank feet of hard stabilization (i.e., gabion wall), 65 bank feet of
soft stabilization (i.e., bank regrading with erosion control matting), and installation of
approximately 10 linear feet of rip rap apron (Attachment F -Figure 4). On behalf of CSWS;
CWS is submitting aPre-Construction Notification application with attachments in accordance
' with Nationwide Permit General Condition No. 13, and pursuant to Nationwide Permit (NWP)
Nos. 3 and 13 and Water Quality Certification No. 3353 (Attachment C).

501 Lyles Court Maintenance Project April 8; 2004
Nationwide Permit Nos. 3 and 13 Project No 2004-0619

~x~sting Conditions
The 501 Lyles Court Maintenance Project is located in Charlotte, North Carolina, approximately
one mile northeast of the North Tryon Street -Sugar Creek Road intersection
(Attachment A -Figures 1 and 2). This project is intended to prevent further loss of property by
stabilizing a currently eroding stream bank and replacing a failing storm water pipe. Charlotte
Storm Water Services (CSWS) has contracted Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. (CWS) to provide
permitting services for this project. The following sections describe the existing conditions of
the project area.
Current Land Use
The current land use for the project area consists ofsingle-family residences with maintained
lawns. Surrounding land usages includes residential and institutional (Eastway Middle School)
areas. Dominant vegetation includes common blackberry (Kobus argutz~s), Japanese honeysuckle
(Lonicera japonica), common blue violet (Viola sororia), wild garlic (Allizcm canadense), soft rush
(Juncos eff sus), Christmas fern (Polystichum acrostichoides), sweetgum (Liquidambar
styraciflua), tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), autumn olive (Elaeagnus umbellata), and poison
ivy (Toxicodendron radicans). According to the Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County', on-site soils
consist of Monacan soils (MO) (Attachment A -Figure 2). This soil type is somewhat poorly
drained and exhibits moderate permeability and high water capacity. This soil type is known to
contain hydric inclusions in Mecklenburg County.z
Jurisdictional Delineation
On March 31, 2004, CWS's Isaac Hinson and Andrea Hughes investigated on-site jurisdictional
waters of the U.S.3 using the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Routine On-Site
Determination Method. This method is defined in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual.4 No wetland areas were identified within the project limits. A Routine
On-Site Data Form representative of on-site non-jurisdictional upland areas has been included as
Attachment C. Jurisdictional waters of the U.S. were classified according to recent North Carolina
Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ)5 and USACE guidance. NCDWQ Stream Classification and
USACE Intermittent Channel Evaluation Forms for Stream A have been included as Attachment D.
'United States Depamnent of Agriculture (USbA), 1980. Soil survey of Mecklenburg County, North Carolina.
Z USDA, 1996. North Carolina Hydric Soils List.
' `jurisdictional water of the U.S." includes essentially all surface waters such as: all navigable waters and their tributaries, all
interstate waters and their tributaries, all wetlands adjacent to these waters, and all impoundments of these waters.
° Environmental Laboratory, 1987. "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual," Technical Report Y-87-1, US Army
Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
s North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1999. Stream Classification Method. Version 2.0. 1999.
2

501 Lyles Court Maintenance Project April 8, 2004
Nationwide Permit Nos. 3 and 13 Project No X004-0619
Results
The results of the on-site field investigation indicate that there is one jurisdictional stream channel
(Stream A) located within the project limits (Attachment A -Figure 3). Stream A is portion of
Little Sugar Creek, which is part of the Catawba River basin (HLT# 03050103)6 and is classified as
"Class C" waters by the NCDWQ. Stream A was evaluated to be Perennial and exhibited a ten to
twelve-foot average bankfull width and strong flow. Biological sampling within Stream A resulted
in a moderate presence of crayfish and a moderate presence of benthic macroinvertabrates
(Attachment D - SCP1). Perennial Stream A scored 42 out of a possible 71 points on the NCDWQ
Stream Classification Form and 46 out of 100 on the USACE Stream Quality Assessment
Worksheet. Photographs of Perennial Stream A have been included as
Attachment E - Photographs A and B.
Agency Correspondence
Cultural Resources
A letter was forwarded to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) on Apri17, 2004 to
determine the presence of any areas of architectural, historic, of archaeological significance that
would be_affected by the project. As of the date of this submittal, a response from SHPO has not
been received.
Protected Species
A letter was forwarded to the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) on
Apri17, 2004 to determine the presence of any federally-listed species or critical habitat located
within the project area. As of the date of this submittal, a response from NCNHP has not been
received.
Purpose and Need for the Project
The 501 Lyles Court Maintenance project is intended to prevent further loss of property by
stabilizing a currently eroding stream bank and replacing a failing storm water pipe. The right
bank of Stream A is eroding and is threatening the residence at 501 Lyles Court. The fences at
this and adjacent residences are collapsing (Attachment E -Photograph B) and require
immediate maintenance. Activities will include improving channel dimension by reshaping the
bank and installing hard and soft stabilization along Little Sugar Creek (Perennial Stream A).
~ "HU#" is the Hydrologic Unit Code. U.S. Geological Survey, 1974. Hydrologic Unit Map, State of North Carolina. U.S.
Geological Survey. 1974.
-,

501 Lyles Court Maintenance Project April 8, 2004
Nationwide Permit Nos. 3 and 13 Project No 20040619
In addition, an existing adjacent storm pipe will be replaced to correct slumping in the vicinity of
' the pipe outfall and to bring the storm drainage system to current City standards.
' r~voidance and Minianization
' Impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been reduced to the maximum extent
practicable. The project design has limited the length of gabion basket to the minimal length
' necessary to protect adjacent properties. In addition, soft stabilization will be used to protect
properties located downstream of 501 Lyles Court. Proper sediment and erosion control measures
will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream waters.
Proposed Impacts to Jurisdictional Waters
' Proposed impacts under NWP No. 13 will include both hard and soft
stabilization of the nght bank
of Stream A. Hard stabilization will total approximately 150 bank feet, and will consist of the
placement of three gabion baskets along the right bank of Stream A (Attachment F -Figures
4 and 5). Soft stabilization will total approximately 65 bank feet, and will consist of laying back
the slope (from 2:1 to 3:1) and installing permanent erosion control matting. Proposed impacts
under NWP No. 3 will consist of the installation of l O linear feet of rip rap apron at the outfall of
the proposed storm drainage pipe replacement. On behalf of CSWS, CWS is submitting aPre-
Construction Notification application with attachments in accordance with Nationwide Permit
' General Condition No. 13, and pursuant to Nationwide Permit (NWP) Nos. 3 and 13 and Water
Quality Certification No. 3353 (Attachment C).
Compensatory Mitigation
' Given the nature of the proposed activities, no mitigation is currently being proposed for this
project. These activities will result in an overall benefit to the water quality of downstream
' waters by reducing bank erosion and downstream sediment loading. CSWS believes that this
project is self-mitigating given the water quality improvements that will result from construction
of the project.
4

I Approximate Scale 1" = 2400'
Reference: USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Senes, Derita Quadrangle. North Carolina, dated 1996.
Carolina Wetland Services
5000 Nations Crossing Road, Suite 230
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
I'igua-e 1. USES Site Location Data
501 Lyles Court Maintenance Project
Charlotte, North Carolina
CWS ProjectNo. 2004-0619
PREPARED BY DAT~Ey, CHECKED BY DATE I~
i-

el
Ens
Approximate Scale 1" = 2000,
Reference: NRCS Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County, North Carolina, Sheet No. 4, dated 1980.
i
Carolina Wetland Services Figure 2. NRCS Soil Survey
5000 Nations Crossing Road, Suite 230 501 Lyles Court Maintenance Project
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217 Charlotte, North Carolina i
CWS Project No. 2004-0619
PREPARED BY DATE CHECKED BY DATE

Perenn al 5treamA~~
Little S g r Creek g
~~ ~
~ ~ ~
~.
~s~ r
/ .. me I.
^,
w~ .' scri
i ~~~-. ,., ~',,,
~__"
LEGEND
Perenniat Stream Channel
® 50-FootSWlMBttfl`er
• SCP1 Stream Classification Point
• DP1 Data Point
Photo t_ocation and Direction
N
Approximate Scale 1" = 50'
Note: Jurisdictional waters were investigated by
Carolina Wetlands Services (CWS) on March 31, 2004.
Jurisdictional areas have rwt been delineated nor
verified by the U.S. ,4rrny Corps of Engineers.
~~ Carolina Wetland Services
~; 5000 Nations Crossing Road, Suite 230
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
Reference: GIS layers provided by Mecklenburg County Iand Us: and
Envvonmental Services, dated 2602.
~ Figure 3. Approximate Jurisdittioaab
Boundar}~ Field Map
501 Lyles Court Maintenance Project
Charlotte, North Cazolirta
CWS Project No. 20fD~1-0$19
(PREPARED BY ATE I~CC[[Q..D DATE
,~-. ~ ~' `Z'ee' Is GA '`}' ' ~ ° d

REQUEST FOR JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
DATE: Apri18, 2004
COUNTY Mecklenburg County, North Carolina TOTAL ACREAGE OF TRACT 0.40 acre
PROJECT NAME (if applicable) 501 Lyles Court Maintenance Project
PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT (name, address and phone):
Charlotte Storm Water Services
POC: Mr. Jarrod J. Karl, at [phone]
600 East Fourth Street
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202-2844
NAME OF CONSULTANT, ENGINEER, DEVELOPER (if applicable):
Carolina_Wetland Services, Inc.
POC: Gre~ory C. Antemann, PWS at [phone]
5000 Nations Crossing Road, Suite 230
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
STATUS OF PROJECT (check one):
( ) On-going site work for development purposes
(X) Project in planning stages
(Type of project: bank stabilization and pipe replacement )
( ) No specific development planned at present
( )Project already completed
(Type of project: )
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED:
Check items submitted- - forward as much information as is available. At a minimum, the following first two items must be
forwarded.
(X) USGS Site Location Map (Attachment A -Figure 1)
' (X) NRCS Soil Survey (Attachment A -Figure 2)
(X) Approximate Jurisdictional Boundary Field Map (Attachment A -Figure 3)
(X) Pre-Construction Notification Application -Nationwide Permit Nos. 3 and 13 (Attachment B)
' (X) Routine On-Site Data Form (Attachment C)
(X) Stream Classification Forms (Attachment D)
(X) Representative Photographs (Attachment E)
(X) Proposed Impacts (Attachment F -Figures 4 and 5)
C
ignature of Property Owner or
Authorized Agent
Mr. Jairod J. Karl

Office Use Only: Form Version Apri12001
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
Section 404 Permit
^ Section 10 Permit
® 401 Water Quality Certification
^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested:
Nationwide Permit Nos. 3 and 13
' 3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII -Mitigation), check here: ^
II. Applicant Information
' 1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Charlotte Storm Water Services, Contact: Mr. Jarrod J. Karl
Mailing Address: 600 East Fourth Street
' Charlotte North Carolina 28202

' Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number:~704) 336-6586
E-mail Address: jkarl(a~ci.charlotte.nc.us
2. Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: N/A
Company Affiliation: N/A
Mailing Address: N/A

' Telephone Number: N/A Fax Number: N/A
E-mail Address: N/A

' Page 1 of 7

' III. Project Information
1. Name of project: 501 Lyles Court Maintenance Project
' 2. T.LP. Project Number NCDOT Onl N/A
J ( Y)
' 3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 08910210

' 4. Location
County: Mecklenburg Nearest Town: Charlotte
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): From downtown Charlotte, travel
' north on Interstate 85 (I-85) to Exit 41 (Sugar Creek Road). Turn right onto Sugar Creek
Road and travel for approximately 'h mile. Turn left onto Hidden Valley Road and travel for
approximately 1/2 mile. Turn left onto Cinderella Road and travel for approximately %Z mile.
' Turn right onto Bilmark Avenue, then right onto Springview Road then left onto Lyles
Court. The site is located at the end of Lyles Court behind the house at 501 Lyles Court.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): N35° 15' S4" - W80° 46' S4"
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the coordinates for
each crossuig of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application: The
existing project area is comprised mostly ofsingle-family residences with maintained lawns.
' 7. Property size (acres): approximately 0.40 acre
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Little Sugar Creek
9. River Basin: Catawba River
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
' River Basin map is available at http:'/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admiiv'maps/.)
' 10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: The 501 Lyles Court Maintenance project is
intended to upgrade the area's existing storm water drainage system and to stabilize a portion
of the channel's bank using a gabion wall.
' 11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project: A trackhoe and typical
construction equipment will be used for this project.
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: Institutional and residential land usages
surround the nroiect.

L!
1
' Page 2 of 7

r

lJl
1

i ~.
1
1
1
1
IV. Prior Project History
A storm water ape that drains Lyles Court and the surrounding streets and gutters was
previously installed at this project location. The date and circumstances of this activity are
unknown.
V. Future Project Plans
There are no future project plans for this area.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
1. Wetland Im acts

Wetland Impact
Type of
Area of Impact Located within
100-year
Distance to

Site Number
Impact*
(acres)
Floodplain**
Nearest Stream ***
Type of Wetland
(indicate on map) (yes/no) (linear feet)
N/A
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, till,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http:;%~~~c=w.tetna.~ov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property:. N/A
Total area of wetland impact proposed: N/A
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact Length of Average Width Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent?

(indicate on map) (lf-linear feet)
(bf-bank feet) ~ Before Impact (please specify)
Stream A Gabion wall installation 150 bf Little Sugar Creek 10 - 12 if Perennial
(NWP No. 13)
Channel reshaping with
Stream A erosion control matting 65 bf Little Sugar Creek 10 - 12 if Perennial
(NWP No.13)
Stream A Rip rap apron
(NWP No. 3) l O if Little Sugar Creek 10 - 12 if Perennial
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
Page 3 of 7

www.us~s.~ov. Several Internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., u~ww.tonozone.com,
wtivw.ma~yuest.com, etc.).
' Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: NWP No. 13: Hard
Stabilization = 150 bank feet; soft stabilization = 65 bank feet. NWP No. 3: Rip rap
apron = l O linear feet.
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S. N/A
' Open Water Impact Area of Type of Waterbody
* Name of Waterbody
Site Number Type of Impact Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound,
indicate on ma (if applicable)
' (~ p) (acres) bay, ocean, etc.)
N/A
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
' 4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
' included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
1 Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
' Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
' Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A
Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
' Impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been reduced to the maximum extent
practicable. The project design has limited the len t~gabion basket to the minimal length
necessary to protect the adjacent property. In addition, soft stabilization will be used to protect
properties located downstream of 501 Lyles Court. Proper sediment and erosion control measures
will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream waters.
' VIII. Mitigation
Given the nature of the proposed activities, no mitigation is currentl~being_proposed for this
project. These activities will result in an overall benefit to the water quality of downstream
waters by reducing bank erosion and downstream sediment loading. CSWS believes that this
project is self-mitigating given the water auality improvements that will result from construction
' of the project.
1
' Page 4 of 7

1. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http:/h2o.enr.state.nc.uslwrt~iindex.ht~ii. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):_
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ® No ^
' If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No
' If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ^ No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Onl )
Y
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
' and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify: SWIM buffer )?
Yes ® No ^ If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
N/A
Page 5 of 7

~ c,
~ t,,.
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers. N/A
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
T gone i extends out SU feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additiona120 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
CSWS will implement proper erosion and sediment control and stabilize the buffered areas
immediately following construction as required by SWIM buffer regulations for CSWS projects
Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Sources of nearby impervious cover include roads, driveways, and rooftops. This nroiect will
not cause an increase in the impervious coverage of the project area.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
XIII. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ^ No
Page 6 of 7

1
1
Dt~er ~ircaa~asta~aces {flptiona~):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules {e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species; accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Construction is scheduled to begin immediately following receipt of the appropriate permits.
`~ ~~®
App lcant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Paee 7 of 7_

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: 501 Liles Court Maintenance Project Date: 39 /31/04
Appticant/Owner: Charlotte Storm Water Services County: Mecklenburg
Investigator(s): Isaac Hinson and Andrea Hughes State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID: u lan
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID: DPl
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant S ecies Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum Indicator
L Liquidambarstyraciflua tree FAC+ 9. Allium canadense herb FACU-
2. Liriodendron tulipifera tree FACU 10. Juncus effusus herb FACW+
3. Elaeagnus umbellata shrub - 11.
4. Rubus argutus shrub FAC 12.
5. Lonicera japonica vine FAC- 13.
6. Toxicodendron radicans vine FAC 14.
7. Polystichum acrostichoides herb FAC 15.
8. Viola sororia herb FAC 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
75
Remarks:
More than 50% of dominant veg etation is FAC or wetter
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in remarks):
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs
Other
~ No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
_ Inundated
_ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations: _ Sediment Deposits (on leaves)
_ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
_ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
X Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: >12 (in.) _FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology indicators are absent
Routine On-Site Data Form
Page 1 of 2
4/8/2004

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): MOnaCan SOilS Drainage Class poorly drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): thermic FluvaC luentic Eutrochrepts Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Pr file Descri tion:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-12 B 7.SYR 4/3 N/A N/A silt loam
Histosol _ Concretions
Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime X Listed on Local Hydric Soils List (Inclusions)
Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Hydric soil indicators are absent.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No (Circle
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(Circle)
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
Approved by HQUSACE 2/92
Routine On-Site Data Form Page 2 of 2 4/8/2004

OFFICE USE ONLY: USAGE AID# DWQ #
_~_ .~. __...__.__. ___ _.___... SCPl -Perennial Stream A ~._~_.._~. _. ~~_. _ _.~_.__~
' ° S'C'REAM QgJAI,I~~' ASSESSMEl~T~ W012KS~EET ~ ."l
t, ,i ,~,~
,., '
1. Applicant's Name: Charlotte Storm Water Services 2. Evaluator's Name: Isaac Hinson and Andrea Hughes
3. Date of Evaluation: 3/31/04 4. Time of Evaluation: 11:00 am
5. Name of Stream: Little Sugar Creek 6. River Basin: Catawba
7. Approximate Drainage Area: 595 acres 8. Stream Order: Second
9. Length of Reach Evaluated: 1501inear feet
10. County: Mecklenburg
11. Location of reach under evaluation (include nearby roads and landmarks): From downtown Charlotte, travel north on Interstate
85 (I-851 to Exit 41 (Sugar Creek Roadl. Turn right onto Sugar Creek Road and travel for approximately '/z mile. Turn left onto
Hidden Valley Road and travel for approximately 1/2 mile. Tum left onto Cinderella Road and travel for approximately 1/z mile.
Tum right onto Bilmark Avenue, then right onto Springview Road, then left onto Lyles Court. The site is located at the end of Lyles
Court behind the house at 501 Lyles Court.
' 12. Site Coordinates (if known): N35° 15' S4" W80° 46' S4"
13. Proposed Channel Work (if any): Channel reshaping and stabilization
14. Recent Weather Conditions: Rain within;48 hours
' 15. Site conditions at time of visit: 55° and cloudy
16. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
' -Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
17. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation poinf? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 1.4 acres
18. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 19. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
' 20. Estimated Watershed Land Use: 80 % Residential % Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
Forested % Cleared /Logged 20 % Other (Institutional )
' 21. Banlcfull Width: 10-12' 22. Bank Height (from bed to top of bank): 5-8'
23. Channel slope down center of stream: -Flat (0 to 2%) X Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
' 24. Channel Sinuosity: Straight X Occasional Bends -Frequent Meander -Very Sinuous -Braided Channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page. 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every charactenstic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each
characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the
worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or
weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character
of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more
continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score
' of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 46 Comments: A moderate presence of crayfish and benthic macroinvertebrates,
consisting of chironomid midges, damselfly larvae, and caddisfly larvae, were sampled from the stream. __
Evaluator's Signature ~.-~ Date ~ ~~ ! 0~°~'
This channel evaluation form is intende to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers in order to make a preliminary assessment of
stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USAGE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change -version 05/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
1

' S~'I2-EA1~ (VITALITY ASSESSMEN'~ WORKS~E'T '
- -- - -- - - - - - -
- c Fi.a~z.~t rr
~z~s~~lcs - -
IJcoREGlc~~r pol~v~~ a ~~c:~ - - -

_
- -- ~
c~~~~C.~~ ---~
h]C[~RlOl1C ~ ~'IOllnt31R
~~ i
scok~
I- I
_
Presence of flow/persistenrpe~ois.in streamr .
n f[ow or saturation.- 0: strong, flow Dina.
-- _ p x, points) ~ - ~ ~? - ~ 4
~, ~ Evidence of pasthuruan alteration i -
J _ (extensive alteration - 0; no alteration = max points}
- ~ ~ - ~' i ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~
~ 1
Riparian zone
-- -
--
~ ~~;~ buffer= 0; contieuous': wide buffe. ~:~,~~ pvinC~.) ~ ~) - ~; ~~, ~~ - ~ u ~ ! 2
Evidence ofnutrient or chemical discharges i ~ -~ - --

~ (extensive`dischai-ges O;nodischar~es=maxpointsi ~ ~) ~) - ~ ! i) - ~ ~~
I i 1
Groundwater discharbe ~ -
i
'~ ~ (nom discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands .eEC. - max pomi~; i ~ ~~ - I ~) - ~ ~ i~ - `~ ~ 3
Presence of adjacent floodplain -
i r, i ~ - ~ ~~ -

r, ~ ~ no floodplam 0; extensive tloodpiain max points) r ~ - a i r) ~ ~ ~ ~ - _ 2
Entrenchment f floodplain access - ~• ~ _ ~, - ---
~ taeepiy entrencnca = U, irequenttloodin~ = rnax points) i '' - ~` I ~~ = Z

8 Presence of adjacent kvetlands~ ~ i
~

r- u- r; ~~ ~ ~ r) -_ 1

(no yetlands - O; large adjacent wetlands = max points ~ I
~ Channel sinuosity i ---±- --
'(extensive cli~iiuielization=0, naturalmeander max points) ~~ ~ ~'~ ~~ I ~ ~7 - ' 1
I
I O Sedunent iTiput ~ -~ i -- - I
(~ . ~ ensivedeposition= 0; little or no sedimcn~ - maxpoints) j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ - ~ 1
~
11 - -- ~_-
Size & diversity of'channelbed substrate ~ - _ -
(tine: h~~mo~enous = 0; large,: diverse sizes =max. points) ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ - > 3
.Evidence of channel incision or widening
i~ (deepl~~ incised O; stablebed &banks = max points) 0 5 0 4 Q j ~ 2
~ ~ ~
P

~
J 1~ -
resence_ofmajor bank failures
~

~,
(severe erosion-= O; no erosion. Stable banks= maxpoints) . 0 5 0 5 0 5 2
~ I~ Root. depth anddensityon banks

-
'
(no visible roots = 0; dense. roots throughout= max points) ~ _ ~ ~ ,~ -0 5 ~
~'
'~ l~ ~ Iiupactby agriculture or livestock production
(_~ubstantial unpact 0;. no evidence = ma,Y points)
0 5
Q 4
0 ~
4
~
16 Presenceof riffle-pooUripple-pool complexes
~ 1 ~ (ho riffles; ripples orpools ~; well developed.-max points} ~ ' ~ 5 -~ 6 2

~ 'C ~
1"
~ Habitat complexity -_ -
~ , ~ (little or no habitat 0; treyuent, varied habitats max. points):
0 6
0- 6 it 6
3
~ ~ 18 Canopy coverage over streambed O O
- ;

~
(no shading vegetation 0; continuouscanopy-= max points). ~ ~
I ,
~
I 19 Substrateembeddedness ~ ~ -
(deeplyembedded_= 0; loose structure = max) ~ ~`~~ ~ 4 0 4 2
~~
Presence of stream invertebrates ~ ~ i
~.
'~ {no evidence = Q; common, numerous typesr max .points i

L ~ ~
21
Presence of;amphihians --
~ ~
a ' ~ (no evidence =0; common, numarous. types =-max pointsl ~' 4 0 4' U -1 0
`
~ ~
~~ - ----
Presence`of fish .
(no evidence _ 0; conunon, nuinerous~tvpes =max pointsj,,, ~ ~ `' ~~ ~ ~~ ~ 0
~~ Evidence of~r°ildlife-use - - ~ - --I
''
I t i _ ~ ~ Z
(no-e~~idence O; abundante~idence max pointsl 0> ~
f ~tal Yoint~ Poti,il~fc lilO ;~;(i
- -- - -
f
T~OT:~L. SCORI. (aJ~~~ enter ~~n ii<<:r pa~~c)
L - -_- -- - _ __
-- -- -
"` These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams. -
2
46
J~

' NCDWO Stream Classification Form SCPl -Perennial Stream A
Project Name: 501 Lyles Court Maintenance Project River Basin: Catawba River County: Mecklenburg Evaluator(s): IJH and ALH
DWQ Project Number: Nearest Named Stream: Little Sugar Creek Signature(s): ~~{
~'
~
' Date: 3/31/04 USGS QUAD: Derita, NC Longitude: W80° 46' S4" Latitude: N35° 15' S4" J
~`
1`y
Location/Directions: From downtown Charlotte, travel north on Interstate 85 (I-85) to Exit 41 (Sugar Creek Road). Tum right onto Sugar Creek Road
and travel for approximately %z mile. Turn left onto Hidden Valley Road and travel for approximately 1/2 mile. Tum left onto Cinderella Road and
travel for approximately %z mile. Turn right onto Bilmark Avenue, then right onto Springview Road, then left onto Lyles Court. The site is located at
the end of Lyles Court behind the house at 501 Lyles Court.
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use ojthis form is not necessary. Also, ijin the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the
featurr is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural strram-this rating system should not be used*
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
I. Geomorpholo2v Absent Weak Moderate Strone
1) Is There ARiffle-Pool Seuuence? 0 1 ® 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
Different From Surroundine Terrain? 0 1 2
3) Are Natural Levees Present? ® 1 2 3
' 4)Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 ~I 2 3
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
6) Is The Channel Braided? ® 1 2 3
7) Are Recent Alluvial Deposits Present? 0 1 ® 3
8 Is There A Bankfull Bench Present? 0 1 2
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0
(*NOTE: If Bed & Bank Caused By Ditchin¢And WITHOUT Stnaosity Then Score=0*) 1 2
' 10) Is A 2n° Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Topo Map AnrUOr In Field) Present?
Yes
No=O
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS:
II. Hvdrolot:v I8
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Stron¢
' 1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharge Present?
0
1
2
PRIMARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 3
III. Biology
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Stron¢
1 Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? 2 1 0
2) Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? 2 1 0
3) Is Periphyton Present? 0 1 ® 3
4) Are Bivalves Present? ® 1 2 3
' PRIMARYBIOLOGYINDICATORPOINTS: 8
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One Member Per Line)
I. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Stronz
1) Is There A Head Cut Present In Channel? ® 0.5 1 1 5
2) Is There A Grade Control Point In Channel? 0 0.5 1 1.~
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Draina¢e Way? 0 0 5 1
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICATORPOINTS: 3
' II. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
~.~
3) Are Wrack Lines Present? 0 0 5 1 1 5
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since 0 0.5 1 1©.
Last Known Rain? /*.NOTE: /f Ditch Indicated In #9 Above Skip This Step And #5 Below*)
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry 0 0.5 I 1©.
Conditions Or In Growing Season)?
6) Are Hvdric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut)? Yes No=O
SECONDARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 7. S

TOTAL POINTS (Primary +Secondary)= 41 (If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Strenm Is At Least Intermittent)

7) Is Filamentous Aleae Present? 0 ~ 1 1 5
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
(* NOTE: !f Total Absence Of All Plants bt Stremnbed 2 1 0.75 0.5 0 0
As Noted Above Skip This Step UNLESS SAV Present*).
SECONDARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 1.5

' 501 Lyles Court Maintenance Project April 8, 2004
Nationwide Permit Nos. 3 and l3 Project No. 2004-0619
Photograph A. View of Stream A at Lyles Court
Photograph B. View of eroding banks along Stream A

~ ~
\ -
~-~ \
OJ
~Yles G
l 509

Proposed Channel Reshaping and
Erosion Control Matting
65 bank feet
500 f
Perennial Stream Ail
LEGEND
Perennial Stream Channel
Proposed Pipe Replacement
Proposed Gabion Baskets
Proposed Slope Protection
Q
N
Approximate Scale 1" = 50'
Note: Jurisdictional waters were investigated by
Carolina Wetlands Services (CWS) on March 31, 2004.
Jurisdictional areas have not been delineated nor
verified by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
F4~ Carolina Wetland Services
~` 5000 Nations Crossing Road, Suite 230
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
Reference' GlS layers prodded by Mecklenburg County Land Use and
Figure 4. Proposed Impacts
501 Lyles Court Maintenance Project
Charlotte, North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2004-0619
~PRE~~' ~D~±~'~IC/~~ECAED (DATE
t ~~ ~°~~
Proposed Gabian Wall
150 bank feet

~,~
'~
u

O
M V

w

~
N ~
U ~ ~,
W
~
N
'~
¢
F
~' y
•
'
~
c
V
Q~ ~ ^
~ ~
~ ~
'~ ° ~ °
~' C7
o
'
~° ~ ~~~~
~ ~U ° c ~V~

a~z~

~+
~
w> Q
Q ~,
O ~ r.+ •~
~N Y
_
~"., '~ °
° j
~Cj~°F
x
O
ZU a A ~U~
o
~ o x ~ a C
U o ~
W ~o
~.
~ ~,
z ~ G~
~, Q
a
W
_w~,
u.
~-
~^t t~E
~.~- ~i °
..
~ ~~
~~
~,~
;,