NC0021873_Regional Office Historical File Pre 2016

PPPPPPP'
UNITED WATER
PO Box 1279
Clemmons, NC 27012
TEL [phone]
FAX [phone]
November 19, 2014
ATTN: Central Files
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Dear Sirs,
N.C-Dopt pt 5NR
DEC 16 2014
Winston-5aii-al
DEC u Z014
CENTRAL FILES
DWR SECTION
Enclosed is an amended PPA report for the Town of Mayodan WWTP (NPDES Permit No.
NC0021873) for September, 2014. The month and year were changed to September, 2014 instead
of June, 2013.
We are sorry for any inconvenience this may have caused. If you have any questions or require
additional information, please advise.
Sincerely,
r r . , �. , .
Director of Operations
GS/lm
cc: Mr. Michael Brandt
Mr. Jamie Whitten

ppp'Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Scan
mit No. NC0021873 Month September
PP,0Fe
utfall 001 Year 2014
Facility Name Mayodan WWTP ORC Jamie Whitten
Date of sampling 09/09/ 14 Phone [phone]
Analytical Laboratory Environment One
Parameter
Sample
Type
Analytical
Method
Quantitation
Level
Sample
Result
Units of
Measurement
Number of
samples
Ammonia (as N)
Composite
350.1
0.02
0.17
mg/1
1
Dissolved oxygen
Composite
360.1
0
6.21
mg/1
1
Nitrate/Nitrite
Composite
353.2
0.02
9
mg/1
1
Total Kjeldahl nitrogen
Composite
351.2
0.25
1.95
mg/l
1
Total Phosphorus
Composite
365.4
0.05
3.71
mg/l
1
Total dissolved solids
Composite
2540C
10
319
mg/1
1
Hardness
Composite
2340C
N/A
69
mg/1
1
Chlorine (total residual, TRC)
Grab
4500c1g
0.012
<10
mg/1
1
Oil and grease
Grab
1664 A
5
<5
mg/1
1
Metals (total recoverable), cyanide
and total phenols
Antimony
Composite
200.8
0.003
mg/1
1
Arsenic
Composite
200.8
0.005
<0.005
mg/1
1
Beryllium
Composite
200.7
0.001
mg/l
1
Cadmium
Composite
3113B
0.001
<0.001
mg/1
1
Chromium
Composite
200.7
0.005
<0.005
mg/1
1
Copper
Composite
200.7
0.01
0.038
mg/1
1
Lead
Composite
3113B
0.005
<0.005
mg/1
1
Mercury
Composite
245.1
0.2
0.0000325
mg/1
1
Nickel
Composite
200.7
0.01
<0.010
mg/1
1
Selenium
Composite
3113B
0.002
<0.010
mg/l
1
Silver
Composite
200.7
0.005
<0.001
mg/1
1
Thallium
Composite
200.8
0.001
mg/1
1
Zinc
Composite
3113B
0.01
0.08
mg/1
1
Cyanide
Grab
4500 CN E
0.005
<0.005
mg/1
1
Total phenolic compounds
Grab
51OA/B
0.005
<0.005
mg/1
1
Volatile organic compounds
Acrolein
Grab
624
100
<100.00
ug/1
1
Acrylonitrile
Grab
624
50
<50
ug/ 1
1
Benzene
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/ 1
1
Bromoform
Grab
624
5
51.6
ug/1
1
Carbon tetrachloride
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Chlorobenzene
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/l
1
Chlorodibromomethane
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/l
1
Chloroethane
Grab
624
10
<10
ug/1
1
2-chloroethylvinyl ether
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/l
1
Chloroform
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Dichlorobromomethane
Grab
624
5
15.2
ug/1
1
1, 1 -dichloroethane
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/l
1
1,2-dichloroethane
Grab
1 624 1
5
1 <5
ug/1
1
Trans-1,2-dichloroethylene I
Grab
1 624 1
5
1<5
ug/l
1
Form - DMR- PPA-1 Page 1

PIOF,eritlNNC0021873utfl1
Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Scan
Month September
Year 2014
Parameter
Sample
Type
Analytical
Method
Quantitation
Level
Sample
Result
Units of
Measurement
Number of
samples
Volatile organic compounds (Cont.)
1, 1 -dichloroethylene
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
1,2-dichloropropane
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/l
1
1,3-dichloropropylene
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/l
1
Ethylbenzene
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Methyl bromide
Grab
624
10
<10
ug/1
1
Methyl chloride
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Methylene chloride
Grab
624
10
<10
ug/ 1
1
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Tetrachloroethylene
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Toluene
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
1, 1, 1 -trichloroethane
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
1,1,2-trichloroethane
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Trichloroethylene
Grab
624
5
<5
ug/1
1
Vinyl chloride
Grab
624
10
<10
ug/1
1
Acid -extractable compounds
P-chloro-m-creso
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/ 1
1
2-chlorophenol
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/ 1
1
2,4-dichlorophenol
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
2,4-dimethylphenol
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
4,6-dinitro-o-cresol
Grab
625
50
<50
ug/1
1
2,4-dinitrophenol
Grab
625
50
<50
ug/1
1
2-nitrophenol
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
4-nitrophenol
Grab
625
50
<50
ug/1
1
Pentachlorophenol
Grab
625
50
<50
ug/1
1
Phenol
Grab
625
10
<2
ug/1
1
2,4,6-trichlorophenol
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Base -neutral compounds
Acenaphthene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/ 1
1
Acenaphthylene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Anthracene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Benzidine
Grab
625
100
<100
ug/1
1
Benzo(a)anthracene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Benzo(a)pyrene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
3,4 benzofluoranthene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Grab
625
20
<20
ug/1
1
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/ 1
1
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
2-chloronaphthalene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/ 1
1
Form - DMR- PPA-1 Page 2

Pemit No0NC0021873
O0u1
Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Scan
Month September
Year 2014
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Parameter
Sample
Type
Analytical
Method
Quantitation
Level
Sample
Result
Units of
Measurement
Number of
samples
Base -neutral compounds (coat.)
Chrysene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/ 1
1
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
1,2-dichlorobenzene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
1,3-dichlorobenzene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
1,4-dichlorobenzene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
3,3-dichlorobenzidine
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Diethyl phthalate
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
Dimethyl phthalate
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
2,4-dinitrotoluene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
2,6-dinitrotoluene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
1,2-diphenylhydrazine
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Fluoranthene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Fluorene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/ 1
1
Hexachlorobenzene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Hexachlorobutadiene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Hexachlorocyclo-pentadiene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Hexachloroethane
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/ 1
1
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Isophorone
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Naphthalene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Nitrobenzene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/1
1
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
N-nitrosodimethylamine
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/ 1
1
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/ 1
1
Phenanthrene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
Pyrene
Grab
625
10
<10
ug/l
1
1,2,4,-tichlorobenzene
Grab 1
625
1 10
<10
I ug/1 I1
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction
and supervision in accordance with a system to design to assure that qualified perdonnel properly
gather and evaluat the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons that
manage the system, or those persons directly responsibel for gathering the information, the
information submitted is , to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate and complete. I am
aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the
possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations. I
Gary
name
Form - DMR- PPA-1 Page 3

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
July 16, 2014
Michael Brandt
Town of Mayodan
210 W Main St.
Mayodan, NC 270279
Subject: NOTICE OF DIFFENCICY (NOD-2014-MV-0024)
NPDES Permit No. NCO021873
Mayodan WWTP
Rockingham County
Dear Mr. Brandt:
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
A review of Mayodan WWTP's monitoring reports for March 2014 showed the following
violations:
Parameter
Dates Omitted
Measuring
Violations
Frequency
Mercury
1 /01 / 14 to
Quarterly
1
3/31/2014
Remedial actions, if not already implemented, should be taken to correct the above noncompliance
problem. Please be aware that violations of your NPDES permit could result in enforcement action
by the Division of Water Resources for this and any additional violations of State law.
If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Lon Snider at [phone].
Sincerely,
Sherri V. Knight, P.E.
Assistant Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations
Division of Water Resources
cc: Central Files - SWP
WSRO
585 Waughtown Street, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107
Phone: [phone] Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity 1Affirmative Action Employer- Made in part by recycled paper

DMR Review Record
Facility: R h� �Aa W T�
Permit No.: ±NLOOa 1'9? 3 Pipe No.:
Month/Year:
Monthly Average Violations
Parameter
Permit Limit DMR Value
% Over Limit
Action
Weekly/Daily Violations
Date Parameter
Permit Limit Limit Type DMR Value
% Over Limit
Action
Monitorinq Frequency Violations
Date Parameter
Permit Frequency Values Reported
# of Violations
Action
Meccr�
0
I
ti w
Other Violations/Staff Remarks:R711,�-
��
N°-�
MU -
Supervisor Remarks: 7"%l 7 7 U�� .�6, ;t iY4-, O'Ld� 64"40 a
Completed by: Date: 1
Assistant Regional
Supervisor Sign Off:
Date:
a
Regional Supervisor Sign Off: WI Date: 0-7,J, z-o

EFFLUENT SUPPLEMENT
PERMIT NO. NCO021873 DISCHARGE N 001
TY NAME Mayodan WWTP MONTH
RATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE (ORC Mar YEAR 2014
Jamie Whitten CLASS III COUNTY Rockingham
RTIFIED LABORATORIES (1) Environment One, Pace Analytical GRADE IV
HECK BOX IF ORC HAS CHANGED PHONE[phone]
PERSONS (2)
Mail ORIGINAL and ONE COPY to: O COLLECTING SAMPLES
Jamie Whitten
ATTN: CENTRAL FILES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY c
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER x r
RALEIGH, NC 27626 NATURE OF OPEATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE) Z3 ATE
BY THIS SIGNATURE I CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT IS
ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
THP6C TG11 THP36 00720 01027 01034 01042 01067 01051 71900 01092 D Fathead Chroic Cn Cd 01077 01002 01062 01147 00556
A Minnow Toxicity Chronic
Cr Cu Ni Pb T Toxicity Tox Hg Zn A9 As
E Mo Se O& G
% P/F %
1 UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L
2 UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG?L UG/L MG/L
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 -
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
!0
1
2
3
3
i
P
AVERAGE
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
:omP(C)/Grab (G)
Aonthly Limit
'EM Form MR-1 (01/00
<5.0 7.0
2.5 7.0 <10.0
<5.0 7.0 5.0
<5.0 7.0 <10.0
G C C C C C G <10.0
C C C C C C

N.C.Dept. of ENR
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resou
Pat McCrory
Governor
Attn: Bob Scott
Town of Madison
310 Carter Street
Madison, NC 27025
Dear Mr. Scott:
June 5, 2014
JUN 12 2014
Winston-Salem
Regional Office
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
Subject: Acknowledgement of Permit Renewal
Permit NCO021873
Rockingham County
The NPDES Unit received your permit modification application on May 30, 2014. A member of the
NPDES Unit will review your application. They will contact you if additional information is required to
complete your permit renewal. You should expect to receive a draft permit approximately 30-45 days
before your existing permit expires.
If you have any additional questions concerning renewal of the subject permit, please contact Charles
Weaver [phone].
Sincerely,
Wren Thedford
Wastewater Branch
cc: Central Files
Winston-Salem Regional Office
NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone]M Fax: [phone]/Customer Service:1-877-623-6748
Internet:: www.ncwater.org
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Aja
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Pat McCrory Thomas A. Reeder John E. Skvarla, III
Governor Director Secretary
January 24, 2014
Michael Brandt
Town of Mayodan
210 W Main St.
Mayodan, NC 270279
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION (NOV-2014-MV-0008)
NPDES Permit No. NCO021873
Mayodan WWTP
Rockingham County
Dear Mr. Brandt:
A review of Mayodan WWTP's monitoring report for October 2013 showed the following violations:
Parameter
Date Omitted
Measuring
Violation
Frequency
Coliform, Fecal MF, M-FC
10/19/13
3 X week
1
Broth,44.5C
Coliform, Fecal MF, M-FC
10/12/13
3 X week
1
Broth,44.5C
Remedial actions, if not already implemented, should be taken to correct the above noncompliance
problem. Please be aware that violations of your NPDES permit could result in enforcement action by the
Division of Water Resources for this and any additional violations of State law.
If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Lon Snider at [phone].
Sincerely,
W. Corey Basinger
Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations
Division of Water Resources
cc: Central Files - SWP
WSRO
North Carolina Division of Water Resources, Winston-Salem Regional Office
Location: 585 Waughtown St. Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
'Vi�/ An Equal Opportunity\ Affirmative Action Employer
Nne
orthCarolina
Naturally

Cover Sheet from
Staff Member to
Regional Supervisor
DMR Review Record
Facility.: AA w Permit/Pipe No.: I IC00118'13 Month/Year
Parameter
Date Parameter
Monthly Average Violations
Permit Limit DMR Value % Over Limit
Weekly/Daily Violations
Permit Limit/Tvpe DMR Value % Over Limit
Monitoring Frequency Violations
Date Parameter Permit Fre uencv Values Reported # of Violations
of
Other Violations
1W- aoN- NlV-o0-0$
Completed by: l�✓� �+rl� Date:
Regional Water Quality l I
Supervisor Signoff: Date:
N�V

TMS
EFFLUENT ®EC 0 5 2013
NPDES PERMIT NO. NCO021873 DISCHARGE N 001 MONTH Oct YEAR 2013
FACILITY NAME MayodanWWTP CLASS III COUNTY Rockingham r,
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE (ORC) Jamie Whitten GRADE IV PHONE[phone] Ito
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES (1) Environement One, Pace Analytical (2)
CHECK BOX IF ORC HAS CHANGED PER COLLECTING SAMPLES Jamie Whitten
Mail ORIGINAL and ONE COPY to:
ATTN: CENTRAL FILES DEC 0 4 Z01'� +
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY 4STU�R�E
I I" 6 J�
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER OF OATOR IN.RESPONSIBLECHARGE) DATE
RALEIGH, NC 27626 BY THIS SIGNATURE I CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT IS
ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
50050
00010
00400
50060
00310
00610
00530
31616
00300
00600
00665
00625
00095
D
A
T
E
Oper
Arrival
Time
Oper
Time
On
Site
ORC
On
Site
FLOW
Temp
pH
Resd
CL
BOD5
20 C
NH3
TSS
FECAL
COLI
(geo
mean)
D.O.
Total
Nitrogen
Total
P
Rainfall
TKN
Cond
Eff _x_
Inf _
Daily
Rate
Hrs
Hrs
Y/N
MGD
C
SU
UG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
#/100ML
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
Inches
MG/L
umhos/cm
1
700 '
8.0
Y
0.477
22.0
6.7
<10.0
<2.0
0.12
<2.5
<1.0
6.8
13.82
3.60
1 1.86
386.0
2
700
8.0
Y
0.659
22.0
6.8
<10.0
<2.0
0.11
<2.5
2.0
6.9
379.0
3
700
8.0
Y
0.590
22.0
6.7
<10.0
6.8
391.0
4
700
8.0
Y
0.630
5
1,000
4.0
Y
0.658
6
1,400
4.0
Y
0.658
7
700
8.0
1 Y
0.658
22.0
6.7
<10.0
3.1
6.8.
383.0.
8
700
8.0
Y
0.976
22.0
6.9
<10.0
<2.0
0.10
<2.0
6.8
1.00
390.0
9
700
8.0
Y
0.654
22.0
6.7
<10.0
715.01-
0.13
5.7
6.7
398.0
10
700
8.0
Y
0.691
22.0
6.6
<10.0
1.0
6.8
396.0
11
700
8.0
Y
0.716
22.0
6.7
<10.0
6.9
380.0
12
900
4.0
Y
0.783
13
900
4.0
Y
0.783
14
700
8.0
Y
0. 883
22.0
6.6
<10.0
3.0
6.8
400.0
15
700
8.0
Y
0.672
22.0
6.7
<10.0
<2.0
<0.04
<2.5
6.7
382.0
16
700
8.0
Y
0.661
21.0
6.8
<10.0
1 <2.0
0.08
<2.5
<1.0
6.9
400.0
17
700
8.0
Y
0.658
22.0
6.7
<10.0
6.8
391.0
18
700
8.0
Y
0.822
21.0
6.7
6.8
397.0
19
1000
4.0
Y
1.894
20
1,700
4.0
Y
1.894
<10.0
21
700
8.0
Y
1.894
21.0
6.7
<10.0
<1.0
6.8
392.0
22
700
8.0
Y
0.637
21.0
6.8
<10.0
<2.0
<0.04
<2.5
<1.0
6.6
390.0
23
700
8.0
Y
0.679
21.0
6.7
<10.0
<2.0
<0.04
<2.5
<1.0
6.9
386.0
24
700
8.0
Y
0.551
21.0
6.7
<10.0
6.8
392.0
25
700
8.0
Y
0.527
21.0
6.6
<10.0
6.8
396.0
26
930
4.0
Y
0.714
27
1,400
4.0
Y
0.714
28
700
8.0
Y
0.714
21.0
6.7
<10.0
<1.0
6.9
400.0
700
8.0
Y
0.540
22.0
6.7
<10.0
3.7
0.05
3.2
<1.0
6.8
391.0
q31
700
8.0
Y
0.623
22.0
6.6
<10.0
<2.0
0.05
<3.5
<1.0
6.8
38&0
700
8.0
Y
0.614
22.0
6.8
<10.0
6.7
398.0
AVERAGE
0.791
21.6
0.0
2.7
0.07
1.9
1.3
6.8
13.82
3.60 1
1.00
1.86
391.1
MAXIMUM
1.894
22.0
6.9
<10.0
15.0
0.13
5.7
3.1
6.9
13.82
3.60
1.00
1.86
400.0
MINIMUM
0.477
21.0
6.6
<10.0
<2.0
<0.04
<2.0
<1.0
6.6
13.82
3.60
1.00
1.86
379.0
Comp(C)/Grab (G)
G
G
G
C
C
C
G
G
C
C
C
C
G
Monthly. Limit
t All �n _
2.5
30.00
30.00
200.00
-� j -,,-„LO WV,c ,wi ,nCt. nu unu❑on aepietea at least z.0 mgn wren a resiauai of at least 1.0 mg/I on October 9, 2013 for the B(
DEM Form MR-1 (01/00)

A4
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Pat McCrory Thomas A. Reeder John E. Skvarla, III
Governor Director Secretary
January 6, 2014
Michael Brandt
Town of Mayodan
210 W Main St
Mayodan NC 27027
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION (NOV-2014-LV-0002)
NPDES Permit No. NCO021873
Mayodan WWTP
Rockingham County
Dear Brandt:
A review of Mayodan WWTP's monitoring rebort for September 2013 showed the fnlinurina vinintinnc-
Parameter
Date
Limit Value
Reported Value
Limit Type
Coliform, Fecal MF, M-FC
09/07/13
400 #/100m1
2,420 #/100ml
Weekly
Broth,44.5C
Geometric Mean
Exceeded
Remedial actions, if not already implemented, should be taken to correct the above noncompliance
problem. Please be aware that violations of your NPDES permit could result in enforcement action by the
Division of Water Resources for this and any additional violations of State law.
If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Lon Snider at [phone] at.
Sincerely,
W. Corey Basinger
Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations
Division of Water Resources
cc: Central Files - SWP
WSRO
North Carolina Division of Water Resources, Winston-Salem Regional Office
Location: 585 Waughtown St. Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer
NorthCarolina
;Vatura!!tf

Cover Sheet from
Staff Member to
Regional Supervisor
DMR Review Record
Facility: IA8h" A&n WLAiTP PermitfPipe No.: Month/Year
Parameter
Monthly Average Violations
Permit Limit DMR Value % Over Limit
Weekly/Daily Violations
Date Parameter Permit LimitfTvne DMR Value %Over Limit
t-doz, � Sos 3 x t
Date Parameter
Monitoring Frequency Violations
Permit Frequency Values Reported # of Violations
Other Violations
ow
Completed by• inn <,n ` j`4l—
Regional Water Quality
Supervisor Signoff:
Date: . Ili%) 13
���� Date: ,�2� 7�—

UPLUEN
NPDES PERMIT NO. NCO021873 DISCHARGE N 001
FACILITY NAME Mayodan WWTP
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE (ORC) Jamie Whitten
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES (1) Environement One, Pace Anafy6caf -
CHECK BOX IF ORC HAS CHANGED I PERSONS) C
TNOY2�
MONTH Sep YEAR 2013
CLASS III COUNTY Rockingham (,
GRADE IV PHONE[phone] ��
(2)- I a
_LECTING SAMPLES Jamie Whitten
Mail ORIGINAL and ONE COPY to: �0 / •-
ATTN: CENTRAL FILES ,/ c
EP,
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY �u X U - Z (Q :
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER Ir.
OV 06 2013 ATURE OF OPEATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE) DATE
RALEIGH, NC 27626 WA RI�UHUTY 3EC710N BY THIS SIGNATURE I CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT IS
INFORMAMONPROCES':3ING UNITACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
50050
00010
00400
50060
00310
00610
00530
31616
00300
00600
00665
60625
00095
D
A
T
E
Oper
Arrival
Time
Oper
Time
On
Site
ORC
On
Site
FLOW
Temp
pH
Resd
CL
BOD5
20 C
NH3
TSS
FECAL
COLI
(geo
mean)
D.O.
Total
Nitrogen
Total
P
Rainfall
TKN
Cond
Eff _x_
Inf
Daily
Rate
1
Hrs
100 '
Hrs
3.0
Y/N
N
MGD
0.733
C
SU
UG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
#/100ML
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
Inches
MG/L
umhos/cm
2
1,000
4.0
N/H
0.733
*
3
4
700
700
8.0
8.0
Y
Y
0.733
0.841
26.0
25.0
6.6
6.7
< 0.0
<10.0
5.2
4.7
2.98
3.78
6.0
4.3
2,420.0
2,420.0
6.8
6.7
5.64
3.23
4.90
420.0
396.0
5
6
700
700
8.0
8.0
Y
Y
0.454
0.583
25.0
6.5
<10.0
2,420.0.
6.7
412.0
7
1,300
3.0
Y
0.640
8
1,700
3.0
Y
0.640
9
10
700
700
8.0
8.0
Y
Y
O.ti40
0.713
24.0
24.0
6.6
6.7
<10.0
<10.0
3.4
0.94
<2.5
2,420.0
2,420.0
6.9
6.7
412.0
384.0
11
12
700
700
8.0
8.0
Y
Y
0.700
0.680
25.0
6.6
<10.0
2.1
0.99
<2.5
<1.0
1.0
6.8
379.0
13
700
8.0
Y
0.991
2.0
0.50
14
900
3.0
Y
0.690
15
930
3.0
Y
0.690
16
17
18
700
700
700
8.0
8.0
8.0
Y
Y
Y
0.690
0.709
0.780
22.0
22.0
22.0
6.8
6.7
6.8
<10.0
<10.0
<10.0
3.5
2.1
0.08
0.09
3.3
3.3
2.0
4.1
<1.0
6.9
6.6
6.7
431.0
440.0
441.0
19
700
8.0
Y
0.553
20
700
8.0
Y
0.711
21
900
4.0
Y
0.815
22
1,000
3.0
Y
0.815
23
24
700
700
8.0
8.0
Y
Y
0.815
0.580
22.0
22.0
6.8
6.7
<10.0
<10.0
2.7
0.41
5.8
2.0
6.9
0.10
440.0
399.0
25
26
700
700
8.0
8.0
Y
Y
0.730
0.631
22.0
6.7
<10.0
2.6
0.17
<2.5
1.0
6.8
400.0
27
700
8.0
Y
0.582
28
1,300
4.0
Y
0.622
29
900
3.0
Y
0.622
30
Y,<1.0
700
8.0
Y
0.622
22.0
6.7
<10.0
6.8
380:0
AVERAGE
0.691
0.0
3.3
1.18
3.3
16.9
6.8
5.64
3.23
0.30
4.90
410.3
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
Comp(C)/Grab (G)
Monthly Limit
*Please see attached
0.991
0.454
2.5
for Conductivit
E22.
Sam
6.8
6.5
G
I
<10.0
<10.0
G
A
5.2
2.1
C
30.00
3.78
0.08
C
6.0
<2.5
C
30.00
2,420.0
<1.0
G
200.00
6.9
6.6
G
5.64
5.64
C
3.23
3.23
C
0.50
0.10
C
4.90
4.90
C
441.0
379.0
G
y pes on ug 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, and 21, 2013.
DEM Form MR-1 (01/00)

AILTV4 -Wv WA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resou
Division of Water Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
Michael Brandt
Town Manager
210 West Main Street
Mayodan, NC 27027
Water Quality Programs
Thomas A. Reeder
Director
November 22, 2013
Subject: Pretreatment Review of Industrial Waste Survey (IWS)
Town of Mayodan
NPDES Permit #: NCO021873
Rockingham County
Dear Mr. Brandt:
KtCEIVED
N.0 Dr;;t of ENR
Winston-Salem
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
PERCS Unit of the Division of Water Resources has reviewed the Industrial Waste Survey (IWS) for the
Town of Mayodan. The IWS was received by the Division on October 17, 2013, via email.
The review indicates that the IWS is adequate and meets the minimum requirements of 40 CFR 403.8
(f)(2). Proper completion of an Industrial Waste Survey is required by Part III (B) of your NPDES
permit.
Please remember it is the responsibility of the POTW to continue efforts to ensure that any Significant
Industrial Users (SIUs), as defined by 15A NCAC 02H .0903(b)(33) (A) through (D), are identified and
subsequently added to the Town's pretreatment program. This includes evaluation of new IUs before
they commence discharge and evaluation of existing IUs determined to be not SIUs that make changes
to their process.
Next IWS Due Date: Your next updated IWS is due on October 1, 2018, unless conditions at the
POTW change significantly and thus warrant an earlier submittal.
Thank you for your continued cooperation with the Pretreatment Program. If you have any questions or
comments, please contact Monti Hassan at [phone] [[e-mail]] or Deborah
Gore, Unit Supervisor at [phone] [[e-mail]].
Kho
irely_�r as . e e d e r
MH/Mayodan.IWS.2013
cc: Nadine Blackwell, United Water, PO Box 1279, Clemmons, NC, 27012 (email)
Monti Hassan, PERCS Unit
George Smith, Winston-Salem Regional Office
Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 One
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] PERCS Unit FAX: [phone] Customer Service:1-877-623-6748 NorthCarolina
Internet: www.ncwaterguality.org PERCS Unit: http://h20.enr.state.nc.us/PERCS �aturall�
An Equal opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer

Pat McCrory
Governor
A�jh
r�ph
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Division of Water Quality
Charles Wakild, P. E.
Director
17 April 2013
Michael M. Brandt, Town Manager
Town of Mayodan
210 West Main Street
Mayodan, NC 27027
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspections
NPDES Individual Wastewater Permit NCO021873
NPDES General Stormwater Permit NCG110000
Certificate of Coverage: NCG110142
Mayodan Wastewater Treatment Plant
Rockingham County
Dear Mr. Brandt:
Resources
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
Ms. Aana Taylor -Smith of the Winston-Salem Regional Office of the North Carolina Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) conducted compliance evaluation inspections at the Mayodan Wastewater Treatment
Plant (WWTP) on 17 April 2013. Inspections were conducted for both the NPDES Individual Wastewater
Permit and NPDES General Stormwater Permit. The assistance and cooperation of Mr. Jamie Whitten,
Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC) were greatly appreciated. Inspection findings are summarized
below and checklists are attached for your reference.
NPDES Individual Wastewater Permit NCO021873
The plant is located at the south end of Cardwell Road in Mayodan, Rockingham County, North Carolina.
The NPDES individual wastewater permit authorizes the Town to operate this 2.5 MGD plant, which
consists of a mechanical bar screen, dual path aeration basins, secondary clarifiers, liquid chlorination,
gas/liquid dechlorination, sludge thickener, aerobic digester, and sludge drying beds. The plant is
currently operating under reduced flow conditions, with an average of about 0.8 MGD. The permit
authorizes the Town to discharge treated wastewater into the Mayo River, which is currently classified
as Class C wasters in the Roanoke River Basin.
Site Review
The facility was clean and well -secured. The treatment system was inspected and found to be
operational. The tubing on the influent composite sampler was dirty and will need to be replaced.
Additionally, a screw was loose on one of the secondary clarifier skimmer arms, causing it to be
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, Winston-Salem Regional Office
Location: 585 Waughtown St. Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107 One
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 NorthCarohna
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org �l//�
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer Naturally

Town of Mayodan
4/17/2013
Page 2 of 3
slightly tilted. Please correct this problem to ensure a level skimmer. Safety measures, secondary
containment, and maintenance at the site were excellent. The outfall was also inspected and found
to be in good condition. The discharge point appeared free of pollutant indicators. Access to the
discharge point was well -maintained.
Documentation Review
Ms. Taylor -Smith evaluated laboratory data during the inspection. Comparison of lab reports and
field monitoring data with discharge monitoring reports (DMRs) showed no concerns or errors.
Chain of custody records were available and complete. The ORC visitation and
operation/maintenance logs were reviewed and found to be complete and current. Records of
sludge hauling and generator service were also available. The NPDES permit NC0021873 expired on
31 May 2012. The NPDES Unit of the DWQ received a renewal application from the Town of
Mayodan on 19 December 2011. A draft permit was sent to the facility and the Winston-Salem
Regional Office of the DWQ on 16 January 2013. Both the expired permit and a copy of the draft
renewal permit were made available at the time of inspection.
NPDES General Stormwater Permit NCG110142
This certificate of coverage became effective in February 2009 and allows the Town to discharge
stormwater related to industrial activity from the WWTP to the Mayo River as described in an earlier
section of this report. The general permit expires on 31 May 2013, and the Town of Mayodan has
submitted a renewal request as required.
Site Review
The site was very clean and well -maintained. All necessary secondary containment is in place. All
three outfalis were inspected and found to be in good condition. No evidence of erosion or
instability was noted at the outfalis.
Documentation Review
The Stormwater Pollution and Prevention Plan (SPPP) was reviewed and found to be complete,
comprehensive, and current. All required monitoring and inspections have been completed and are
well -documented. The facility is exempt from the vehicle maintenance analytical monitoring
requirement. No issues or discrepancies were noted.

PF4/1712013
wn of Mayodan
Page 3 of 3
We appreciate your efforts to effectively operate and maintain this treatment system. No additional
response to this letter is required. If you have questions regarding the inspections or this letter, please
do not hesitate to contact Ms. Taylor -Smith or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
W. Corey Basinger
Surface Water Regional Supervisor
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
Attachments:
1. BIMS Inspection Report— NPDES Individual Wastewater Permit NC0021873
2. BIMS Inspection Report— NPDES General Stormwater Permit NCG110142
cc: Central Files w/ attachments
NPDES West Unit w/ attachments
WSRO — SWP w/ attachments

United States Environmentai Protection Agency
Form Approved.
EPA Washington, D.C. 20460
OMB No. 2040-0
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 I N I 2 15� 3I NC0021873 111 12I 13/04/17 117 18I C I 19I S I 20 U
Remarks
21111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111116
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating 61 QA----------------------Reserved--------------
67 I 169 70 U 711 I 72 LJ 73 L1J 74 751 I I I I I I 180
i�
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
Entry Time/Date
Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
09:00 AM 13/04/17
07/11/01
Mayodan WWTP
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
210 W Main St
Mayodan NC 270272019
10:30 AM 13/04/17
12/05/31
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
///
Jamie C. Whitten/ORC/336-427-5733/
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Debra E Cardwell,210 W Main St Mayodan NC 270272019/Town Contacted
No
Manager/336-427-0241/3364277592
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Program Sludge Handling Disposal Facility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Waters
Laboratory
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
WSRO WQ//336-771-5000/
Aana Taylor-SmitihT�
/ q ,Z Is
Signature of Management Q Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
i =J' sr':...s
tom+ ♦ "° ��^" � L S
«:�i 4v L / :. F'
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page # 1

PPPVNPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type
3 NCO021873 I11 12I 13/04/17 117 18I1
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
Please refer to combined inspection letter for NPDES permits NCO021873 and NCG110142.
Page # 2

Permit: NCO021873
Inspection Date: 04/17/2013
Owner - Facility: Mayodan WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit
Yes
No
NA
NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new application?
■
0
fl
11
Is the facility as described in the permit?
■
❑
Q
Q
# Are there any special conditions for the permit?
1300
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
■
n
n
n
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
■
n
n
Q
Comment: Permit expired 5/31/2012. Permittee submitted renewal request as
required, which was received by the NPDES unit on 12/19/2011. Draft permit was sent
to the facility & WSRO on 1/16/2013. A copy of the draft permit was also available at the
time of inspection.
Record Keeping
Yes
No
NA
NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
■
❑
Q
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
■
❑
0
❑
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)?
■
n
n
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
■
n
n
O
Is the chain -of -custody complete?
■
0
Q
❑
Dates, times and location of sampling
■
Name of individual performing the sampling
■
Results of analysis and calibration
■
Dates of analysis
■
Name of person performing analyses
■
Transported COCs
■
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters?
■
n
n
❑
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ?
❑
❑
■
❑
(If the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator on each shift?
n
n
■
Q
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
■
❑
Q
11
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
■
n
n
Q
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification?
■
0
n
n
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site?
■
n
❑
n
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review?
n
Cl
■
n
Comment: Back-up ORC: Corey Brannock, Grade IV.
Page # 3

PPV
Permit: NC0021873
Inspection Date: 04/17/2013
Owner - Facility: Mayodan WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Laboratory
Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory?
Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters) performed by a certified lab?
# Is the facility using a contract lab?
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)?
Incubator (Fecal Coliform) set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/- 0.2 degrees?
Incubator (BOD) set to 20.0 degrees Celsius +/- 1.0 degrees?
Comment: Environmental One performs analysis for parameters except fecal coliform.
Pace Analytical performs analysis for fecal coliform. Field parameter certification = 5046.
Standby Power
Is automatically activated standby power available?
Is the generator tested by interrupting primary power source?
Is the generator tested under load?
Was generator tested & operational during the inspection?
Do the generator(s) have adequate capacity to operate the entire wastewater site?
Is there an emergency agreement with a fuel vendor for extended run on back-up power?
Is the generator fuel level monitored?
Yes No NA NE
Yes No NA NE
■nnn
■000
■ ❑ Q ❑
n■p❑
■nnp
■000
■n❑Q
Comment: The facility uses a 1000 kW generator that is checked weekly and serviced
quarterly by Carolina Caterpillar. Records were available for all service.
Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? ■ 0 ❑ ❑
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable Solids, pH, DO, Sludge ❑ ❑ ■ Q
Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment:
Flow Measurement - Influent
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
Is the flow meter operational?
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
Comment: Influent flow meter only shows peaks of flow and is not used for reporting
or composite samples.
Flow Measurement - Effluent
Yes No NA NE
n■❑n
nr0■0
171N00
0000
Yes No NA NE
Page # 4

Permit: NCO021873 Owner - Facility: Mayodan WWTP
Inspection Date: 04/17/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Flow Measurement - Effluent
Yes
No NA
NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
■
❑ ❑
0
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
■
❑ ❑
❑
Is the flow meter operational?
■
❑ ❑
❑
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meters
■
❑ ❑
❑
Comment: Last calibrated 9/28/2012 by M. Millis with Carolina Technical Services.
Pump Station - Influent
Is the pump wet well free of bypass lines or structures? `
Is the wet well free of excessive grease?
Are all pumps present?
Are all pumps operable?
Are float controls operable?
Is SCADA telemetry available and operational?
Is audible and visual alarm available and operational?
Comment: AN alarms are available with a dialer at both the pump station and the
generator.
Bar Screens
Type of bar screen
a.Manual
b.Mechanical
Are the bars adequately screening debris?
Is the screen free of excessive debris?
Is disposal of screening in compliance?
Is the unit in good condition?
Comment:
Aeration Basins
Mode of operation
Type of aeration system
Is the basin free of dead spots?
Are surface aerators and mixers operational?
Are the diffusers operational?
Yes No NA NE
Yes No NA NE
Ext. Air
Page # 5

Ppv
Permit: NC0021873
Inspection Date: 04/17/2013
Owner - Facility: Mayodan WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Aeration Basins
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process?
■
❑
❑
❑
Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface?
■
n
n
n
Is the DO level acceptable?
■
n
n
n
Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/1)
■
n
n
n
Comment: One surface aerator was turned off for routine maintenance at the time of
inspection, but was functional.
Equalization Basins
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is the basin aerated?
Cl
■
❑
❑
Is the basin free of bypass lines or structures to the natural environment?
■
n
❑
n
Is the basin free of excessive grease?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are all pumps present?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are all pumps operable?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are float controls operable?
❑
❑
■
❑
Are audible and visual alarms operable?
n
n
■
❑
# Is basin size/volume adequate?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment: Used mostly in the case of I&I during large rain events.
Secondary Clarifier
Yes No
NA
NE
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier?
■
❑
n
n
Are weirs level?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of weir blockage?
■
n
n
n
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is scum removal adequate?
■
n
❑
n
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the drive unit operational?
■
n
n
n
Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc?
■
n
n
n
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately'/4 of the sidewall depth)
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment: Sludge level is measured with sludge judge. One skimmer needs a screw
tightened.
Page # 6

Permit: NC0021873
Inspection Date: 04/17/2013
Aerobic Digester
Is the capacity adequate?
Is the mixing adequate?
Is the site free of excessive foaming in the tank?
# Is the odor acceptable?
Owner - Facility: Mayodan WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
# Is tankage available for properly waste sludge?
Comment:
Drying Beds
Is there adequate drying bed space?
Is the sludge distribution on drying beds appropriate?
Are the drying beds free of vegetation?
# Is the site free of dry sludge remaining in beds?
Is the site free of stockpiled sludge?
Is the filtrate from sludge drying beds returned to the front of the plant?
# Is the sludge disposed of through county landfill?
# Is the sludge land applied?
(Vacuum filters) Is polymer mixing adequate?
Comment: Not currently in use due to decrease in influent; could be put into operation
if necessary.
Pumps-RAS-WAS
Are pumps in place?
Are pumps operational?
Are there adequate spare parts and supplies on site?
Comment:
Disinfection -Liquid
Is there adequate reserve supply of disinfectant?
(Sodium Hypochlorite) Is pump feed system operational?
Is bulk storage tank containment area adequate? (free of leaks/open drains)
Is the level of chlorine residual acceptable?
Is the contact chamber free of growth, or sludge buildup?
Is there chlorine residual prior to de -chlorination?
n❑■❑
nn■n
nn■n
nn■n
❑❑■n
nn■n
n❑■n
nn■❑
nn■n
Yes No NA NE
Yes No NA NE
■nn❑
■❑❑❑
■❑n❑
■nnn
■❑n❑
■❑❑n
Page # 7

PPFV
Permit: NC0021873 Owner -Facility: Mayodan WWTP
Inspection Date: 04/17/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Disinfection -Liquid
Yes
No
NA
NE
Comment: The facility recently switched from gas chlorination to liquid.
De -chlorination
Yes
No
NA
NE
Type of system ?
Gas
Is the feed ratio proportional to chlorine amount (1 to 1)?
■
n
n
n
Is storage appropriate for cylinders?
■
n
❑
# Is de -chlorination substance stored away from chlorine containers?
■
n
n
n
Comment:
Are the tablets the proper size and type?
n
n
■
n
Are tablet de -chlorinators operational?
n
n
■
n
Number of tubes in use?
Comment: The facility is in the process of switching from sulfur dioxide gas to a
sodium bisulfite liquid dechlorination process. At the time of inspection, the facility was
using up the rest of their gas before they switch over.
Effluent Pipe
Yes
No,
NA
NE
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained?
■
n
n
n
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris?
■
n
n
n
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly?
n
n
■
n
Comment:
Influent Sampling
Yes
No
NA
NE
# Is composite sampling flow proportional?
n
■
n
n
Is sample collected above side streams?
■
n
n
n
Is proper volume collected?
■
n
n
n
Is the tubing clean?
n
■
❑
n
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)?
■
n
n
n
Is sampling performed according to the permit?
■
n
n
n
Comment: Please remember to replace the tubing for the composite sampler.
Effluent Sampling
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is composite sampling flow proportional?
■
n
n
Q.
Is sample collected below all treatment units?
■
n
n
n
Is proper volume collected?
■
n
n
n
Page # 8

Permit: NCO021873
Inspection Date: 04/17/2013
Owner - Facility: Mayodan WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Effluent Sampling Yes No NA NE
Is the tubing clean? ■ ❑ 0 Q
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)? ■ ❑ ❑ Q
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type representative)? ■ ❑ ❑ I_l
Comment:
Upstream / Downstream Sampling Yes No NA NE
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type, and sampling location)? ■ ❑ Q ❑
Comment:
Page # 9

Permit: NCG110142
SOC:
County: Rockingham
Region: Winston-Salem
Compliance Inspection Report
Effective: 02/13/09 Expiration: 05/31/13 Owner: Town of Mayodan
Effective: Expiration: Facility: Mayodan Wastewater Treatment Plant
293 Cardwell Rd
Contact Person: Debra E Cardwell
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Title:
Inspection Date: 04/17/2013 Entry Time: 09:00 AM
Primary Inspector: Aana Taylor -Smith
Secondary Inspector(s):
Mayodan NC 27027
Phone: [phone]
Certification:
Exit Time: 10:30 AM
Phone:
Phone: [phone]
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Municipal WWTP > 1MGD, Stormwater Discharge, COC
Facility Status: ■ Compliant 0 Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCG110142 Owner - Facility: Town of Mayodan
Inspection Date: 04/17/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Inspection Summary:
Please refer to combined inspection letter for permits NCG110142 and NC0021873.
Reason for Visit: Routine
Page: 2

FPPV
Permit: NCG110142 Owner -Facility: Town of Mayodan
Inspection Date: 04/17/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas? ■ 0 fl 0
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment? ■ ❑ ❑ 0
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually? ■ 11 0 [1
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program? ■ ❑ I] D
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? f_I ❑ ■ 0
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Comment:
Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# if the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ ■ [I
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Permit expires 5/31/2013; renewal has been submitted.
Page: 3

COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION
Facility: W(_�tdnV) ►MLAVVP NPDES: N(`�C��LtE3"l3
Permit Effective Dates: to S t / 12- i�XtP,Wr;I,, `h �roCe s S
Inspection Date: Inspection Time: nf10D /pm
-AV CI ^-> 1 'M (a b o r I -e s S
PERMIT paS-IF Iea-,V-
Complete copy of current NPDES permit j2,W.,d d j 12 a —
SELF -MONITORING PROGRAM
_je/DMRs (Dates: to )
Mar OCfi Zut2
LABORATORY
Lab Data (per DMR dates)
Laboratories used for analysis E4N4j' rC)yjWe,jn -P(Aen.J, t r VerZtA
Chain of Custody forms (per DMR dates)
Influent and/or effluent samplers
✓Field Parameter certification # �; 0 4t_o
/ FLOW MEASUREMENT
`� Flow meter calibration records �Y . 9 I2-8/ IZ C04 Tec� SyLS
M P 1 i1S
V Flowcharts
/ SLUDGE HANDLING DISPOSAL
V Sludge / Residuals hauling records
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE
ORC current certifi
Back Up certificatic

FFV
v/ Process control data (includes field parameters tested and equipment calibrations)
V Generator Inspection / under load checks
RECORDS & REPORTS
011,C Wastewater Annual Report (fiscal or calendar year — if applicable)
Daily Operator's log / ORC visitation log
V/ Maintenance log
FACILITY SITE REVIEW
Plant visual inspection of treatment units
i7 � Cgd.2 v %?Tl 4 vl b SA-0- mn i A � wt-Z -A- l�e�e ucL+,s r
EFFLUENT/RECEIVING WATERS
Stream accessible for inspection (at effluent discharge pipe)

Taylor -Smith, Aana
From: Taylor -Smith, Aana
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 1:13 PM
To: 'Blackwell, Nadine'
Subject: RE: Mayodan WWTP Inspection
Attachments: Mayodan WWTP Inspection Letter.pdf
Please find attached the PDF I mentioned. Let me know if you have any comments/questions.
Have a great weekend!
Aana Taylor -Smith
Surface Water Protection Section
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
Phone: [phone]
Fax [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to
third parties.
From: Blackwell, Nadine [mailto:Nadine. Blackwell(WniteclWater.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 1:12 PM
To: Taylor -Smith, Aana
Subject: RE: Mayodan WWTP Inspection
Yes, please. Thanks.
From: Taylor -Smith, Aana [mailto:Aana.Taylor-Smith(c)ncdenr.gov]
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 1:06 PM
To: Blackwell, Nadine
Subject: Mayodan WWTP Inspection
Hi Nadine,
I just completed a compliance evaluation inspection for the Mayodan Wastewater Treatment Plant yesterday (4/17/13)
and I was wondering if you would like a copy of the inspection report. I did both the stormwater permit and the
wastewater permit, so they'll both be included. Just let me know and I'll email you a PDF if you'd like.
Thanks!
Aana Taylor -Smith
Surface Water Protection Section
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
Phone: [phone]
1

Division of Water Quality
April 22, 2013
To: Corey Basinger
Regional Supervisor, Surface Water Protection, WSRO
Through: Cindy A. Moore
Supervisor, Aquatic Toxicology Unit
From: Carol Hollenkamp M
Quality Assurance Officer, Aquatic Toxicology Unit
Subject: Whole effluent toxicity test results
Mayodan WWTP
NPDES Permit # NCO021873/001
Rockingham County
The aquatic toxicity test using flow -proportional composite samples of effluent discharged from Mayodan
WWTP has been completed. Mayodan WWTP has a permitted effluent discharge that is 4.5 MGD entering
the Mayo. River (7Q 10 of 75 CFS). Whole effluent samples were collected on March 19 and March 21 by
Jenifer Carter and facility representative Jamie Whitten for use in a chronic Cerodaphnia dubia pass/fail
toxicity test. The test using these samples resulted in a pass. Toxicity information follows.
Test Type
Test Concentrations
Test Result
Control Survival
Control Mean Reproduction
Test Treatment Survival
Treatment Mean Reproduction
First Sample pH
First Sample Conductivity
First Sample Total Residual Chlorine
Second Sample pH
Second Sample Conductivity
Second Sample Total Residual Chlorine
3-Brood Ceriodaphnia dubia pass/fail
5 % sample
Pass
100%
31.9
100%
30.9
698 SU
328 micromhos/cm
0.19 mg/L
6.84 SU
343 micromhos/cm
0.76 mg/L
Test results for the above samples indicate that the effluent would not be predicted to have water quality
impacts on receiving water. These samples were split and tested by Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
The chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia pass/fail toxicity test run by Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc. also
resulted in a pass. Please contact us if further effluent toxicity monitoring is desired. We maybe reached at
[phone]. ,,,
Basin: ROA02
cc: Central Files
Jenifer Carter, WSRO
Aquatic Toxicology Unit Environmental Sciences Section

�KNR - Div. Of Water Quality Re ion
CITY SAMPLE COLLECTION FORM page 1 of
ARO FRO MRO RRO WaRO WiRO WSRO A
Facility/Water Body I MGi v Q da o Mj-rl'
NPDES #
Outfall #
County iG�G �`7 h� Basin/Sub-basin
Receiving Stream a �! ✓e.
Collector(s) (print) J-d, m e��
IMN 1111MON
Grab Sample ❑ Composite Sample F Composite Type:
-'" ❑ Constant Time/Constant Volume: samples/hour for hours
[Flow Proportional
Sampling Equipment Used: ❑ DWQ Portable Sampler or [Facility's Sampler
Date Began Time Began Date End Time End
/l8/%3 ON00 1 3//gl/3 1 L� )8:��
Sampling Site
Description
Container: ®4L (1 gal) PE cubitainer ❑Other (describe) # of containvs
Chlorinated: ['Yes ❑ No Collected on Ice or in Refrigerated Sampler: es ❑ No Shipped on Ice: 1'es ❑ No
Method of Shipment: Courier []Bus ❑ Staff ❑ , Other (explain):
Date/time of transfer to shipper or courier box: 3 19 / l :5 .
Comments:
" S lit" sam le, splitting lab name:
,L' L
Did DWQ staff erfonn the s lit? �/a��� s}`' If NO, then did DWQ staff witness the s lit?
�/1/'irA.e
�= iDate:
e handler recordq-
Relin uished by:
Received by:
Date:
Time:
Relinquished by:
Received by:
Date:
Time:
Relinquished by:
Received by:
Date:
Time:
Relinquished by:
Received by:
Date:
Time:
DWQ/Environmental Sciences Section
Aquatic Toxicology Unit
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
ESS Courier #: 520101
Use street address only if shipping Fed& or UPS
Street address: 4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
phone: [phone]

NC DENR - Div. Of Water Quality
OXICITY SAMPLE COLLECTION FORM — page 2of 2
ATU Temperature Rcd
Sample No. - receipt, °C on Ice
RECEIVED CONDUCTIVITY, TRC,
date mhos/cm - µmhos/cm mg/L
time 1 I date I I date
by I I time I I time
from I I by
Lab
Comments:
Additional Notes (include date, time, signature, with notes):
Sampling instructions
1. SPLIT TESTS: Make sure the collector fills out, prints, and signs both the ATU sample collection form and the facility/contract
laboratory Chain of Custody (COC) form. If one person collects the sample, and another individual splits the sample, both should
sign the COC and the ATU sample collection form. All information on both COC and the ATU sample collection form should agree
(i.e., the date/time/signature for the collector, relinquished by/date/time, site description, pipe #, etc.) ATU uses only "true" splits for
certified laboratory evaluations. A split sample is a single, well mixed, equally divided, composite or grab sample, sent to different
laboratories to conduct whole effluent toxicity tests. A well mixed sample before each ''/< pour is critical to keep any effluent solids
from settling to the bottom. DWQ staff should be there to observe and instruct the facility staff in the collection/split process to
insure the sample is handled correctly. Ideally the DWQ staff should perform the split. If extenuating circumstances (i.e. late sample
collection times, etc.) would make this impractical, it should be noted on the sample collection form that DWQ staff was not present
at the time of the sample split. If the facility personnel collects and splits the sample, they need to sign the ATU sample collection
form as the collector, and also that they relinquished the sample to DWQ staff. DWQ staff will then need to sign and put the time
that they received the sample. Also, any additional information noted about the sample would be helpful to record on the ATU
sample collection form and the facility's COC (things such as color, smell, floating solids, suspended solids, etc.)
2. The person collecting the sample must sign the form for "Collector (signature)" at the bottom of page 1. Any subsequent transfer of
the sample must be recorded in the "Additional Sampler Handler records". In the "Collectors (print)" section at the top of page 1,
print the name of all collectors involved in the process. If the collector or additional sampler handler is a facility representative,
indicate this on the form.
3. With the adoption of the new chronic toxicity sampling schedule on January 1, 2011, samples may be collected earlier than 1000
hours. We do request notification, however, if a sample is to be collected earlier than 0600 hours. The maximum holding time for
chronic toxicity samples is 36 hours for first use and 72 hours from first use for test renewals. The maximum holding time is 36
hours for acute toxicity samples. The holding time for composite samples begins at the time of completion of the 24-hr composite.
4. Rinse sample container with sample before filling. Completely fill the sample with no air space.
5. Constant Tune/Constant Volume composite samples should be at least 100 mLs volume per sample and collected at least every 20
minutes unless the detention time of the facility is >24 hours. More information on types of composites can be found in "NPDES
Permit Standard Conditions".
6. Sample collection material may be tempered glass, polyethylene, perfluorocarbon plastics including Teflon®, 304 or 316 stainless
steel, polypropylene, polyvinylchloride, Tygone, or silicone. All non-perfluorocarbon plastics should be discarded after use. DWQ
staff should not reuse non-perfluorocarbon plastics (polypropylene, LDPE, HDPE, polyvinylchloride, etc.) at different facilities for
collecting effluent samples. Tempered glass and perfluorocarbon (Teflon plastics may be reused after bioassay cleaning.
7. All samples should be iced during collection and transport to ensure a sample holding temperature of <6°C. The sample must be
received at <_6°C or the sample will be invalid. Be sure to completely fill the coolers with ice and use large coolers whenever
possible. This is particularly crucial for shipping samples during warm weather months. Also, please notify ATU staff if samples
are being mailed in multiple coolers.

ppp-
C DENR - Div. Of Water Quality Region
OXICITY SAMPLE COLLECTION FORM pa e 1 of ARO FRO MRO RRO WaRO WiRO WSRO :�j
-7r Facility/Water Body / / lO VoTa -n (/&
NPDES #FRIll
Men
Outfall # C' /
County
C (11)6=41
Basin/Sub-basin
Receiving Stream
Eam
Collector(s) (print)
Grab Sample ❑ Composite Sample Composite Type:
❑ Constant Time/Constant Volume: samples/hour for hours
low Proportional
Sampling Equipment Used: ❑ DWQ Portable Sampler or ®'Facility's Sampler
Date Began Time Began Date End Time End
Sampling Site 61'rlce'f)
Description
Container: ©IL (1 gal) PE cubitainer []Other (describe) # of containers I
Chlorinated: [l,*fes ❑ No Collected on Ice or in Refrigerated Sampler: D Yes ❑ No Shipped on Ice: �es ❑ No
Method of Shipment: Courier 92"Bus ❑ Staff ❑ Other (explain):
✓ Date/time of transfer to shipper or courier box: . 7%�// :g /',
Comments:
r<
S lit' sam le, splitting lab name: zt��) V/ rewin 6 fi
Did DWQ staff perform the split? /;" i If NO, then did DW9 staff witness the split?
Collector(s)
Signature: _ .. ` / /- ff { f/ / t" { Date:
AArlitinnal camnla hnnAlar n-onrrlc•
Relinquished by:
Received by:
Date:
Time:
Relinquished by:
Received by:
Date:
Time:
Relinquished by:
Received by:
Date:
Time:
Relinquished by:
Received by:
Date:
Time:
DWQ/Environmental Sciences Section
Aquatic Toxicology Unit Use street address only if shipping FedFx or UPS
1621 Mail Service Center Street address: 4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621 Raleigh, NC 27607
ESS Courier #: 520101 phone: [phone]

NC DENR - Div. Of Water Quality
OXICITY SAMPLE COLLECTION FORM — page 2of 2
ATU Temperature
Sample No. @ receipt, °C
RECEIVED CONDUCTIVITY,
date mhos/cm - µmhos/cm
time I I date
by I I time
from
Lab
Comments:
Additional Notes (include date, time, signature, with notes):
Rcd
on Ice
TRC,
mg/L
date
time
Sampling instructions
1. SPLIT TESTS: Make sure the collector fills out, prints, and signs both the ATU sample collection form and the facility/contract
laboratory Chain of Custody (COC) form. If one person collects the sample, and another individual splits the sample, both should
sign the COC and the ATU sample collection form. All information on both COC and the ATU sample collection form should agree
(i.e., the date/time/signature for the collector, relinquished by/date/time, site description, pipe #, etc.) ATU uses only "true" splits for
certified laboratory evaluations. A split sample is a single, well mixed, equally divided, composite or grab sample, sent to different
laboratories to conduct whole effluent toxicity tests. A well mixed sample before each '/< pour is critical to keep any effluent solids
from settling to the bottom. DWQ staff should be there to observe and instruct the facility staff in the collection/split process to
insure the sample is handled correctly. Ideally the DWQ staff should perform the split. If extenuating circumstances (i.e. late sample
collection times, etc.) would make this impractical, it should be noted on the sample collection form that DWQ staff was not present
at the time of the sample split. If the facility personnel collects and splits the sample, they need to sign the ATU sample collection
form as the collector, and also that they relinquished the sample to DWQ staff. DWQ staff will then need to sign and put the time
that they received the sample. Also, any additional information noted about the sample would be helpful to record on the ATU
sample collection form and the facility's COC (things such as color, smell, floating solids, suspended solids, etc.)
2. The person collecting the sample must sign the form for "Collector (signature)" at the bottom of page 1. Any subsequent transfer of
the sample must be recorded in the "Additional Sampler Handler records". In the "Collectors (print)" section at the top of page 1,
print the name of all collectors involved in the process. If the collector or additional sampler handler is a facility representative,
indicate this on the form.
3. With the adoption of the new chronic toxicity sampling schedule on January V, 2011, samples may be collected earlier than 1000
hours. We do request notification, however, if a sample is to be collected earlier than 0600 hours. The maximum holding time for
chronic toxicity samples is 36 hours for first use and 72 hours from first use for test renewals. The maximum holding time is 36
hours for acute toxicity samples. The holding time for composite samples begins at the time of completion of the 24-hr composite.
4. Rinse sample container with sample before filling. Completely fill the sample with no air space.
5. Constant Time/Constant Volume composite samples should be at least 100 mLs volume per sample and collected at least every 20
minutes unless the detention time of the facility is >24 hours. More information on types of composites can be found in "NPDES
Permit Standard Conditions".
6. Sample collection material may be tempered glass, polyethylene, perfluorocarbon plastics including Teflon®, 304 or 316 stainless
steel, polypropylene, polyvinylchloride, Tygon®, or silicone. All non-perfluorocarbon plastics should be discarded after use. DWQ
staff should not reuse non-perfluorocarbon plastics (polypropylene, LDPE, HDPE, polyvinylchloride, etc.) at different facilities for
collecting effluent samples. Tempered glass and perfluorocarbon (Teflon®) plastics may be reused after bioassay cleaning.
7. All samples should be iced during collection and transport to ensure a sample holding temperature of <6°C. The sample must be
received at <6°C or the sample will be invalid. Be sure to completely fill the coolers with ice and use large coolers whenever
possible. This is particularly crucial for shipping samples during warm weather months. Also, please notify ATU staff if samples
are being mailed in multiple coolers.

A
Mickey, Mike
From: Mickey, Mike
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 10:08 AM
To: Mckay, James
Cc: Taylor -Smith, Aana
Subject: RE: Draft of NPDES permit NCO021873 - Town of Mayodan WWTP
James — The draft permit has been reviewed. No corrections or typos noted. Send it on. Mike.
Mike Mickey
Mike. Mickev(a)NCDENR.eov
NC Division of Water Quality
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Phone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Mckay, James
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 12:44 PM
To: Basinger, Corey; Meadows, Susan; Reid, Steve
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: Draft of NPDES permit NCO021873 - Town of Mayodan WWTP
Attached is a copy of the draft renewal permit for the Town of Mayodan WWTP. It should go out to public notice and
comment period next Wednesday.
Please send any questions or comments to me.
Thanks,
Jim McKay, Environmental Engineer
NC DENR / Division of Water Quality / Surface Water Protection Section
Point Source Branch
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
919/807-6404 (work); 919/807-6489 (fax)
"Please note, my email address has changed to [e-mail]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records law and may be
disclosed to third parties.

PPPFFP'
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Pat McCrory Charles Wakild, P. E. John E. Skvarla, III
Governor Director Secretary
January 16, 2013
Debra Cardwell
Town Manager
Town of Mayodan
210 W. Main Street
Mayodan, North Carolina 27027
Subject: Draft Renewal of
Permit No. NCO021873
Mayodan Waste Water Treatment Plant
Rockingham County
Facility Class WW III/ IV
Dear Ms. Cardwell:
Enclosed with this letter is a copy of the draft permit renewal for your facility. Please review the draft
carefully to understand the conditions, measurement units, and requirements.
This draft permit has the following changes from your current permit:
• Add TRC footnote per permitting strategy.
• Revise annual effluent parameter scan to 3 scans per permit cycle.
• Adjust ammonia limits to not higher than 35 mg/ L. 1lo i � \i,4 .C-) I -ETC
• Instream Monitoring - no changes recommended.
• All monitoring requirements of the LTMP remain in place.
• A Mercury Minimization Plan (MMP) has been added as A.(7.) in accordance with the recent
mercury TMDL implementation strategy.
• Based on the RPA at 2.5 MGD; removed monitoring for lead, selenium, and zinc, based on RPA.
Removed limits for Total Lead (Daily Max) and Total Selenium (Weekly Average and Daily Max),
based on both acute and chronic standards RPA. Changed to Quarterly monitoring for copper and
silver. Add Quarterly monitoring for chromium. Add annual average limit and quarterly monitoring
for mercury.
• Based on the RPA at 3.0 MGD, removed monitoring for lead, selenium, and zinc based on RPA.
Removed limits for Total Lead (Daily Max), and Total Selenium (both Weekly Average and Daily
Max), based on standards RPA. Changed to Quarterly monitoring for copper and silver. Add Monthly
average and Daily Maximum limits with monthly monitoring for chromium, and annual average limit
with quarterly monitoring for mercury. V
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone]
Internet: www.ncwaterguality.org
An Equal Opportunity', Affirmative Action Employer
Nne
orthCarohna
Natur'111Y

Based on the RPA at 4.5 MGD, removed monitoring for lead, selenium, and zinc, based on RPA4q4
Removed limits for Total Lead (Daily Max), mercury (Weekly Average) and Total Selenium (both
Weekly Average and Daily Max), based on standards RPA. Changed to Quarterly monitoring for
copper and silver. Add Monthly average and Daily Maximum limits with monthly monitoring for
chromium, and annual average limit with quarterly monitoring for mercury.
Concurrent with this notification, the Division is publishing a notice in the newspaper having circulation
in the general Rockingham County area, soliciting public comments on this permit draft. Please provide
any comments you may have regarding this draft to DENR — DWQ, NPDES Program no later than 30
days after receiving this draft permit.
Following the 30-day public comment period, the Division will review all pertinent comments and take
appropriate action prior to issuing a final permit. If you have questions concerning the draft for your
facility, please call me at [phone] or by email at [e-mail].
If no adverse comments are received from the public or from you, this permit will likely be issued in
March 2013, with an effective date of April 1, 2013, expiring on May 31, 2017.
Sincerely,
Jim McKay
Complex NPDES Permitting
Attachments: NC0021873 Renewal Draft
CC: Winston-Salem Regional Office/ Attn: Corey Basinger - via email
NPDES File
Aquatic Toxicology Attn: Susan Meadows - via. email
Steve Reid - via. email
EPA Region IV with application and Fact Sheet
[e-mail] - via email

MAa
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Charles Wakild, P.E. Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
March 27, 2012
Michael Brandt
Town of Mayodan
210 W Main St
Mayodan NC 27027
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
NOV-2012-LV-0180
Permit No. NCO021873
Mayodan WWTP
Rockingham County
Dear Mr. Brandt:
A review of Mayodan WWTP's monitoring report for December 2011 showed the following
violations:
Parameter
Date
Limit Value
Reported Value
Limit Type
Solids, Total Suspended -
12/03/11
45 mg/l
76.75 mg/1
Weekly
Concentration
Average
Exceeded
Remedial actions, if not already implemented, should be taken to correct the above
noncompliance problem. Please be aware that violations of your NPDES permit could result in
enforcement action for this by the Division of Water Quality for this and any additional
violations of State law.
If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Mike Thomas at (336) 771-
5000.
cc: SWP — Central Files
WSRO Files
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, Winston-Salem Regional Office
Location: 585 Waughtown St. Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
Sincerely,
W. Corey Basinger
Surface Water Regional Supervisor
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
Nne
orthCarolina
Aatura!!y
An Equal Opportunity1 Affirmative Action Employer

— ZoIZ
Cover Sheet from
Staff Member to
Regional Supervisor
DMR Review Record
Facility: 4eayodan WW[A Permit/Pipe No.:4W Month/Year%
/JC a0Z Igl 3
Parameter
19
Date Parameter
Monthly Average Violations
Permit Limit DMR Value % Over Limit
s
DMR��Value � % Over Limit
�Ti ✓
;-�'
Monitoring Frequency Violations
Date Parameter Permit Frequency Values Reported # of Violations
e 6 s Ilk-
<� Wc..eik
Other Vinlatinns
Week]v/Daily Violation
Permit Limitrrvpe
L
/ _,jO
(tlff 20/ : P&eexl — D ✓ / k c ft 7S-S =AAP ✓
Completed by: Date: z
Regional Water Quality
Supervisor Signoff: .,i�,C' Date:�-

PppEFFLUENT
NPDES PERMIT NO. NCO021873 DISCHARGE N 001 MONTH Dec YEAR 2011
FACILITY NAME Mayodan WWTP CLASS III COUNTYRockingham
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE (ORC) Jamie Whitten GRADEIV PHONE336-
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES (1) Environement One )
CHECK BOX IF ORC HAS CHANGED PERSON(jLtTI •AMPLES Jamie Whittf
Mail ORIGINAL and ONE COPY to: ;
ATTN: CENTRAL FILES
i
4•g(bt. of ENR
-MR 12 2012
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER F E Q 2 2p12 x ATURE OF OPEATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE) L DATE
RALEIGH, NC 27626 BY THIS SIGNATURE I CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT IS
61ATRA.I. FILES ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
50050
00010
00400
56060
00310
00610
00530
31616
00300
00600
00665
00625
00095
D
A
T
E
Oper
Arrival
Time
Oper
Time
On
Site
ORC
On
Site
FLOW
Temp
pH
Resd
CL
BOD5
20 C
NH3
TSS
FECAL
COLI
(gep
mean)
D.O.
Total
Nitrogen
Total
P
Rainfall
TKN-
Cond
Eff �x
Inf _
Daily
Rate
Hrs
Hrs
Y/N
MGD
C
SU
UG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
#/100ML
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
Inches
MG/L
umhos/cm
,.1'
a , 2rr
..�
&0:��5
' x
� s
a-...4
i... i
..,...rr . ,r
VPaY
. •
Y ,.
� ux 3
, _'Y ,..R ..
is Y?
: �' .
_N
3� .-f.
-Nt.as-...¢
2
700
8.0
Y
0.952
22.0
6.7
<10.0
<2.0
1.50
11.0
1.0
6.8
3
1r100 z
�� 0�
Y
0792;�
=> "'�"�;�..��
�ur3'"a
��'��e;��s
���
.s . '.. ek.�:
� ��
`i �i.t .`
�_ �•.:
.�..,
4
1,400
3.0
Y
0.792
6
'700
8.0
Y
0.780
22.0
6.8
<10.0
<2.0
0.21
<8.3
<1.0
6.8
13.96
1.71
2.28
402.0
`7'2E:D
E,
39�
M
6
�`
,.�
IO.
69 ;
8
700
8.0
Y
1.4708
22.0
6.7
<10.0
3.9
3.65.
16.0
1.0
1.00
435.0
P%^-t��^^
y.
, t:' �.ki
-'�?
p`i�' �
. �=���
g ��'�^
s�.. IY4y
t€€3e:` .t„�,
.''1�
����:
•3: i
p6.9
rQ��
- f
4 � -
C t i.1
�" �'i
-_
16
1,003_10
3.0.
Y
0.768
•-
�.
` .
12
700
8.0
Y
0.768
-
f k^c'�
700,E
6xs
Q�.
�'
Y
a6.6
14
700
8.0
Y
0.768
22.0
<10.0
3.7
0.15
<8.3
5.0
6.9
410.0
'15:
M_;:
3,
16
700
8.0
Y
0.689
Mmmm
18
1,300
3.0
Y
0.889
-
20
700
8.0
B
0.770
23.0
6.6
<10.0
3.1
0.04
5.8
2.0
6.6
375.0
2f
; 700
$ 4 jF
j B
80 _�A2
d
2w
=
t
,
2
g
S
'T
. s fi
22
700
8.0
B
1.026
22.0
6.7
<10.0
2.4
0.07
7.5
<1.0
6.7
398.0
23
:.
" 700
,.
8 �,,.
i
a=B
._ 3. .rr
.. ,` .. ..
._a;r ..,
Y
tom: �'., �'`,
{ M! �
.,.t.. ...
;i ,4.Y' 3•.4
.jai t
.�
k
M.,u
24
700
3.0
B
0.767
26
1,000
3.0
Y/H
0.767
MQ� t,
".'8�fl�.�
tE
53
28
700
8.0
Y
2.077
20.0
6.7
<10.0
5.1
0.08
8.3
7,000.0
6.8
1.00
374.0
29.
; 7 W
�
' ��?��
C v,
. _
e+
.�0
'` .,,
w,b�
G ,
�
'()
C "
x '^" -�•
'H'
�� y�
. . _
k.:•
a �i
� � g
i!c':� ,Y
� � u '�
34 Y2 _
:� �. � t.
� �
� it
��.�� �
f
� 2�0 _
30
700
8.0 1
Y
0.822
31
;:1 K1
3 0
> Y
QNA.
AVERAGE
0.910
21.8
0.0
2.9
0.86
7.7
3.2
6.8
13.96
1.71
1.00
2.28
385.2
IMAM�i2(iJ
,
r.>` ©"
�� 10 0
5LC�r
' *p001]
`6 9 ,
"
_7,•;';
1 00
g�
430 4
MINIMUM
0.671
20.0
6.6
<10.0
<2.0
<0.04
<5.0
<1.0
6.6
13.96
1.71
1.00
2.28
292.0
omA(/Gab.()
G
G
. G
F
Monthly Limit
2.5
30.00
30.00
200.00
DEM Form MR-1 (01/00)

Facility Status: (Please check one of the following)
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies meet permit requirements F-I
Compliant
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies do NOT meet permit requirements
Noncompliant
f the facility is noncompliant, please comment on corrective actions being taken in respect to equipment, operation, maintenance, etc.,
nA a tima-tah1P fnr imrnnvP.mentR M he made.
I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
vith a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. B ased on my inquiry
if the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information
ubmitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
ubmitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment 13 wi olations:'
Gary
Town of Mayodan
Sig a of erm. a
(Required) .
336-427-5733
001/
Date
05-31-2012
'ermittee Address
Phone Number
Permit Exp, Date
210 W. Main Street Mayodan, NC 27027
PARAMETER CODES
)0010 Temperature
00556 Oil & Grease 00951 Total Fluoride
01067 Nickel
50060 Total
Residual
)0(Y76 Turbidity
00600 Total Nitrogen 01002 Total Arsenic
01077 Silver
Chlorine
)0080 Color (Pt -Co)
00610 Ammonia Nitrogen
01092 Zinc
)0082 Color (ADMI)
00625 Total Kjeldhal 01027 Cadmium
01105 Aluminum
)0095 Conductivity
Nitrogen
00630 Nitrates/Nitrites 01032 Hexavalent Chromium
01147 Total Selenium
71880 Formaldehyde
)0300 Dissolved Oxygen
01034 Chromium
31616 Fecal Coliform
71900 Mercury
)0310 BOD5
00665 Total Phosphorous
32730 . Total Phenolics
81551 Xylene
)0340 COD
00720 Cyanide 01037 Total Cobalt
34235 Benzene
)0400 pH
00745 Total Sulfide 01042 Copper
34481 Toluene
)0530 Total Suspended
00927 Total Magnesium 01045 Iron
38260 MBAS�
Residue
00929 Total Sodium 01051 Lead
39516 PCBs
)0545 Settleable Matter
00940 Total Chloride 01062 Molybdenum
50050 Flow
'arameter Code assistance may obtained by calling the Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit at [phone]
or by visiting
he Water Quality Section's
web site at h2o.enr.state.nc.us/w9s and linking to the Unit's
information pages.
Jse only units designated in the reporting facility's permit for reporting data.
ORC must visit facility and document visitation of facility as required per 15A NCAC 8G .0204.
* If signed by other than the peamittee, delegation of signatory authority must be on file with the state per 15A NCAC 2B .0506 (b)
2) (D)•

PPFFF, .
EFFLUENT SUPPLEMENT
NPDES PERMIT NO. NCO021873 DISCHARGE N 001 MONTH Dec YEAR 2011
FACILITY NAME Mayodan WWTP CLASS III COUNTY Rockingham
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE (ORC Jamie Whitten GRADEIV PHONE[phone]
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES (1) Environment One (2)
CHECK BOX IF ORC HAS CHANGED PERSON(S) COLLECTING SAMPLES Jamie Whitten
Mail ORIGINAL and ONE COPY to:
ATTN: CENTRAL FILES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NC 27626
X 12
URE OF OPEATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE) DATE
BY THIS SIGNATURE I CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT IS
ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
THP6C
TGP3B
THP36
00720
01027
01034
01042
01067
01051
71900
01092
01077
01002
01062
01147
00556
D
A
T
E
Fathead
Minnow
Toxicity
Chroic
Toxicity
Serial
Chronic
Tox
Cn
Cd
Cr
Cu
Ni
Pb
Hg
Zn
Ag
As
Mo
Se
O& G
%
P/F
%
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG?L
UG/L
MG/L
LUG/L
2
�.. ,
4
61
25.0
<5.0
76.0
<5.0
<10.0
8
t
10
1�-.
5"ky, a
k -=-. s�
�_ 4"c*
"-93' ',..�.
�a''L „,'_i, 'Y
t "`ts'
`� u;:: ��.
'� ,l��Y'�'
�-"•r. ta...
���,�A�
.�fa'
,�^-�, �C;.S*?ys.:'
'"L._
s4 Y'�a� {
�.
12
14
<5.0
<10.0
16
18
4�
20
t
t :'"d`�:.. �t
.?• i -.. 4
,�,'Sb �;� t
�, '"'�.`{
..}.�
�'' '�:v
.�§ h
y{,,.-�i
��.. 9
K
i;S i
xs
b:
4 "�a Y}
L
j �F �'
22
t. k4
24
26
27
x,
-cyrr.�, .:'
�yy,, "F
�s �t•�M
s t- �
t?
'#s
c., zt T
cat i S
rti� ,y. rz�
'�kc`
�n ,C' Y�' �
.��
fir i b a.s
28
a
30
�2.5
AVERAGE
2.5
0.5
27.5
5.0
2.5
0.00008
75.5
2.5
2.5
0.0
5.0
tM IN)tIV
MINIMUM
<5.0
<1.0
<5.0
25.0
<10.0
<5.0
0.00008
75.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<10.0
Monthly Limit
DEM Form MR-1 (01/00)

Facility Status: (Please check one of the following)
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies meet permit requirements F-I
Compliant
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies do NOT meet permit requirements Rr
Noncompliant
f the facility is noncompliant, please comment on corrective actions being taken in respect to equipment, operation, maintenance, etc.,
I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
vith a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry
if the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information
ubmitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
ubmitting false information, including the possibility of fines and impris ent for iolations."
Gar Stain ac
P ttee (Pl e riot or e)
Date
Town of Mayodan
336-427-5733
05-31-2012
,ermittee Address
Phone Number
Permit Exp. Date
210 W. Main Street Mayodan, NC 27027
PARAMETER CODES
)0010 Temperature
00556 Oil & Grease 00951 Total Fluoride
01067 Nickel
01077 Silver
50060 Total
Residual
)0076 Turbidity
00600 Total Nitrogen 01002 Total Arsenic
01092 Zinc
Chlorine
)0080 Color (Pt -Co)
)0082 Color (ADMI)
00610 Ammonia Nitrogen
00625 Total Kjeldhal 01027 Cadmium
01105 Aluminum
)0095 Conductivity
Nitrogen
00630 Nitrates/Nitrites 01032 Hexavalent Chromium
01147 Total Selenium
71880 Formaldehyde
)0300 Dissolved Oxygen
01034 Chromium.
31616 Fecal Coliform
71900 Mercury
)0310 BODS
00665 Total Phosphorous
32730 . Total Phenolics
81551 Xylene
)0340 COD
00720 Cyanide 01037 Total Cobalt
34235 Benzene
)0400 pH
00745 Total Sulfide 01042 Copper
34481 Toluene
)0530 Total Suspended
00927 Total Magnesium 01045 Iron
38260 MBAS
Residue
00929 Total Sodium 01051 Lead
39516 PCBs
)0545 Settleable Matter
00940 Total Chloride 01062 Molybdenum
50050 Flow
,arameter Code assistance may obtained by calling the point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit at [phone]
or by visiting
he Water Quality Section's
web site at h2o.enr.stat&.nc.us/wQs and linking to the Unit's
information pages.
Jse only units designated in the reporting facility's permit for reporting data.
ORC must visit facility and document visitation of facility as required per 15A NCAC 8G .0204.
`* If signed by other than the peamittee, delegation of signatory authority must be on file with the state per 15A NCAC 2B .0506 (b)
2) (D).

0
INFLUENT
NPDES PERMIT NO. NCO021873 CHARGE No. 001 MONTH Dec YEAR 2011
FACILITY NAMEMayodan WWTP COUNTY Rockingham
85852
00400
00010
00310
00610
00530
00300
00600
00665
00625
71900
1 01042
01034
01067
01027
01051
01092
D
A
T
E
Time
COMP
pH
Temp
BOD-5
NH3-N
TSS
DO
T. Nitr
T
Phos
TKN
Hg
Cu
Cr
Ni
Cd
Pb
Zn
TIME
TIME
UNITS
Deg C
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L.
MG/L
MG/L.
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
~
2
1,000
7.1
23.0
1.2
4
5
1 000
Ar
a723
f1..3
«
x
a
s g
rL
6
1,000
24
7.1
23.0
78.0
43.0
1.4
^>
x
8
1,100
24
7.1
23.0
76.0
57.0
1.6
10
i�
� �� "
'°�'� °�sv
q'G'�.sa ';
,� �,
� "�
fj�
?.A��b ✓ �.
a
,t'`��t,+.x�
r
1��-�,, ��
f � r5: ��i
o�y � o-
's'��Z ��°r
MEMEL
M
12
14
1,100
24
7.2
23.0
115.0
21.64
75.0
1.4
31.0
<5.0
<10.0
<1.0
<5.0
80.0
16
-
�:�'e"t'..'
>,.?':
'°�. �--..�-ire&
t
g� Y=".,��
Y
�"�C •'�-
,r"Rs,�, ,an
'
,5.��c �+
;€ &-.>
� �z=
a .'i �
.3 ;?:�3
- �
.'r.'.
18--
1
20
1,000
24
7.2
23.0
88.0
61.0
1.3
'�•a. s,
,,
w ,rr,,
tom:
.T ^i` F
.s. v
_ 1.2
-
�V�i`iaw`vo-
uTs
:2
5
�'`-`;y
22
830
24
7.4
22.0
119.0
94.0
23
'.F.Y
L�
3^=
' �_ vJ
:� J�i",�M 5.ai`
5.
'�-a'd.
�S t4",'�
.C�''kS u•?�
��G
"_-`a'"y'hr�.-
� ..S
�.'.^h.. `�
�
,„ f _
224
26
28
1,000
24
7.3
21.0
133.0
107.0
1.2
30
�'^xf`.'
>
- '_ �' .. .??.
,�.,�s.:
%'
$
- �
y.v
�'
k:� "�a
� c
r '.
S �` •R,f.'=Y:.
'�yY.4'�Y�
<�.,4� _
� ,r.-�
j' A
AVERAGE
A11A1 UN,fl..'"
22.6
98.9
21.6
63.6
1.3
s
31.0
3%s£
2.5
Y?u0
5.0
01f�5
0.5
2.5
O F
80.0
0 9
MINIMUM
7.1
21.0
62.0
21.6
38.0
1.21
1
31.0
<5.0
<10.0
<1.0
<5.0
80.0
_
C�;,�
t✓C''
C
DEM Form MR-1 01/00)

PPFV INFLUENT SUPPLEMENT
NPIDES PERMIT NO. NCO021873 —CHARGE No. 001 MONTH DecEAR 2011
FACILITY NAMEMayodan WWTP COUNTY Rockingham _
01062
01002
00720
01147
01077
D
A
T
E
mo
As
Cn
Se
Ag
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
<10.0
<5.0
<5.0
<10.0
1.0
16
18
20
22
OEM=
24
26
28
30
557
Avg
0.0
2.5
2.5
5.0
1.0
Min
<10.0
<5.0
<5.0
<

rES jPrNo.NC0021873
DISCHARGE No. 001
MONTH Dec YEAR 2011
FACILITY NAM]Mayodan WWTP COUNTY Rockingham
STREAM Mavo River
STREAM Mavo River
LOCATION Upstream at NC 134 LOCATION
Upstream
Downstream t NCSR 2177
Downstream
00010
00400
00310
00300
31616
00095
00010
00400
00310
00300
31616
00095
D
Time
Temp
pH
BOD
D.O.
Fecal
Con-
Time
Temp
pH
BOD
D.O.
Fecal
Con -
A
24 hr.
*C
20 *C
Coli
ductiv-
24 hr.
°C
20 *C
Coli
ductiv-
T
clock
(Geo
ity
clock
(Geo
ity
E
mean)
mean)
umhos/
umhos/
Hrs
°C
Units
mg/I
mg/I
/1 00ml
cm
Hrs
°C
Units
mg/I
mg/I
W100m
cm
2'
4
3 •;
14.0
8
100
15.0
7.2
8.0
70.0
130
7.1
7.8
68.0
9 .1
10
1�i'.
.3ds�
..$aFy.�-5''
,,
't LpF
r''�'Uy
4...1
K
- �'..i •2.
b� 9e_
�"
4
5 L?"�'.
-:'>.F
s
....a4T S4.
�i.. �'-_
2 ``3
� rs
'a tilt
'dt
y.'�? �
'�.� _� 'Y
�" <+
bE
xT Y''
�'•+ � c�
NF fi.,.
_
12
Y
..'�.
M
�
14
15
130
a5tl
r7:2*
3
78'z
fi8��
s
tfi
77 s
„";67'
16
18
x'My
.
�7.8
EM
20
1,045
16.0
7.3
8.1
72.0
1,130
15.0
7.2
69.0
� 5
�?n
a E
22
23:
9 �
� �. 55
� � � �i >
�� &'r
� t�$
f
�
�
y " �
x'� ��a
� t= m'3,
f t�
"GSr
r�o- n
�,� �
�Y'
a t y
„�
}�'��• r
+Yn�
# �, ur
't
J°��;�%,+
o- �
5
s
24
26
2�8"
30
Average
15.3
8.0
70.0
415
14.3
7.8
68.0
laximur16
0�
r
71fis55:i
�(1151
Minimum
15.0
7.2
7.8�68.0130
4.017.1
7.7,:r
67.0
DEM Form MR-3 (01/00)

�CF WATF9P Form WWTP-BYPASS/UPSET
�O v Treatment Plant (WWTP) Bypass/Upset R IVED ort
co
DUG r N.C.Dept. of ENR
> FEB 17 2012
o �
Winston-Salem
This form shall be submitted to the appropriate DWQ Regional Office within five ays o e irs dge
of the unanticipated bypass or upset.
Permittee: Town of Mayodan Permit Number: NC0021873
Facility Name: Mayodan WWTP County: Rockingham
Incident Started: Date: 02-09-12
Incident Ended: Date: 02-09-12
Weather Conditions during Bypass/Upset event
Level of Treatment:
Time: 7:00 AM
Time: 8:30 AM
Clear
_None _Primary Treatment X Secondary Treatment _Chlorination/Disinfection Only
Estimated Volume of Spill/Bypass: 21,000 (must be given even if it is a rough estimate)
Describe how the volume was determined: Basesd on solids level in stream plus stream width and length of
area and what flow and solids were on plant grounds
Did the Spill/Bypass reach the Surface Waters? X Yes No
If yes, please list the following:
Volume Reaching Surface Waters: 12,400 Surface Water Name: Tributary of Mayo River
Did the Spill/Bypass result in a Fish Kill? Yes X No
Was WWTP compliant with permit requirements? X Yes No
Were samples taken during event? X Yes _No
Source of the Upset/Spill/Bypass (Location or Treatment Unit):
Aeration Basin No. 4
Cause or reason for the Upset/Spill/Bypass:
An anchor cable broke on an aerator causing the aerator to float over to the basin wall and surge water and
solids over the wall onto the ground which flowed into the stream.

Form WWTP-BYPASS/UPSET
Page 2
Describe the repairs made or actions taken:
New cables were purchased and the aerator was repositions and anchored.
Action taken to contain lessen the impact, clean up, and remediate the site (if applicable) due to the bypass:
On February 9, the sludge was removed from the ground by tractor and then lime and straw was applied.
Also a berm of straw bells was placed in front of the stream to keep solids from washing into the stream.
GARCO, which is an environmental recovery company, was contracted to remove the residuals from the
stream. This was completed on February 11.
Action taken or proposed to be taken to prevent occurrences:
Inspect cables on aerators more often and schedule to repair or replace cables on an annual basis.
Were adequate equipment and resources available to fix the problem?
Additional comments about the event:
01��10

/16/2012
Feb. 15
15:06 3364275733
2012 2:45PM UNITED WATER
UNITEDWATER MAYODAN PAGE 01
No.6268 P. 4
Form WWTP-BYPASS/UPSFT
Page 3
24-Flour Report Made To: dlvlsion of Water Quality Emergency Management
Contact Name: Mike Thomas Date: 02-09- 2 Time: 9:00
Other Agencies Notified (Health Dept, etc):
Person Reporting Event: Corey Brannock Phone Number: 6427- 733
Did DWQ request an additional written report? Yes _X_No
If Yes, what additional information is needed:
As a representative for the responsible party, I certify that the Information contained in this
report is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
Person Submitting Claim: Jamie Whitten
Signe
Title:
Date: F brua 2012
Telephone Number: i 336-427-5733
Any additional information to be submitted should be sent to the appropriate Division Regional
Office within five days of first knowledge of the Bypass with reference to the incident number
(the incident number is only generated when electronic entry of this form is completed, if used).

Mauney, Steve
From: Mauney, Steve
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 3:43 PM
To: Basinger, Corey
Cc: Thomas, Mike
Subject: Emailing: CIMG0320.JPG, CIMG0321.JPG, CIMG0322.JPG, CIMG0323.JPG,
CIMG0324.JPG, CIMG0325.JPG
Attachments: CIMG0320.JPG; CIMG0321.JPG; CIMG0322.JPG; CIMG0323.JPG; CIMG0324.JPG;
CIMG0325.JPG
These pictures are of the Mayodan WWTP site. I estimated the spill area to be 3400 square
feet on the surface of the ground and with 2 inches of water/sludge that would have either
collected on top of the ground or soaked in. That gives about 4240 gallons of stuff that did
not go to the stream. United Water estimated the solids in the creek to be 4 inches deep and
affecting the stream for 500 feet at 5 foot width. That yields 6200 gallons of activated
solids that settled in the flowing stream. I estimated that it would have taken an equivalent
amount of the supernatant water from the plant to move those solids across the ground into
the creek. That puts 12,400 gallons in the creek.
Town crews and United Water staff scraped up the solids on the site that could be initially
removed and put them in their drying beds. After the solids dry some more they will be able
to remove the solids and the straw from the site. Andy Purgason of Garco Environmental,
Industrial & Recycling from Asheboro came up this afternoon to estimate the cleanup cost.
Jamie Whitten just called and said that Garco will be on site tomorrow morning at 7am to
begin the cleanup.
The message is ready to be sent with the following file or link attachments:
CIMG0320.JPG
CIMG0321.JPG
CIMG0322.JPG
CIMG0323.JPG
CIMG0324.JPG
CIMG0325.JPG
Note: To protect against computer viruses, e-mail programs may prevent sending or receiving
certain types of file attachments. Check your e-mail security settings to determine how
attachments are handled.
1

Thomas, Mike
From: corey brannock [[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 1:21 PM
To: Thomas, Mike
Subject: Mayodan WWTP Fecal Results
FECAL COUNTS
Up Creek
Down Creek
2/9/12
<810
<7100
2/ 10/ 12
500
550
2/ 11/ 12
450
400
2/13/12
240
390
2/ 14/ 12
200
260
2/ 15/ 12
240
230
2/16/12
410
350
2/ 17/ 12
340
310
Up River
Down River
2/9/12
33
38
1

ppppppp-
TOWN OF MAYODAN
RECEIVED
N.C. i t. of ENR
FEB 2 l 2012
Winston-Salem
210 W. MAIN STREET • MAYODAN, N. C. 27027 • [phone] FAX [phone]
February 10, 2012
System Performance Annual Report
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
RE: Mayodan Wastewater Plant
NPDES Permit No.: NCO021873
Rockingham County
Dear Sirs,
Enclosed you will find the Annual Performance Report for the year of 2011 for the Town
of Mayodan, North Carolina Wastewater Treatment Plant. We believe the report to be
complete and accurate. The customers will be notified of the availability of the report
through the local newspaper or sewer bills.
If you have any questions, please advise.
Sincerely,
Town of Mayodan
Michael Brandt
Town Manager
FEB 14 2012

ppppppp-
TOWN OF MAYODAN
WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY
ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
For the Calendar Year 2011
prepared: January 2012

2011 Annual Performance Report
for the
Town of Mayodan
Wastewater Treatment Facility
General Information
Facility/System Name: Town of Mayodan Wastewater Treatment Plant
Responsible Entity: Town of Mayodan
Person in Charge/Contact: Michael Brandt
Town Manager
210 W. Main Street
Mayodan, NC 27027
[phone]
Description of Collection System or Treatment Process:
The Mayodan Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) is an extended aeration
activated sludge treatment plant, processing a combination of industrial and
domestic wastewater. The treatment scheme includes influent bar screens, an
influent lift station, three aeration basins and secondary clarifiers. The treated
water is chlorinated and dechlorinated, prior to discharge to the Mayo River.
Excess biological sludge is thickened in one of two gravity thickeners and
subsequently digested in an aerobic digester. The stabilized sludge is then land
applied (on permitted sites) either as a liquid directly from the digester or it may be
dewatered (prior to land application) on the sand drying beds and then land applied.
Figure I presents a schematic layout of the wastewater treatment plant.
II. Compliance Performance
The North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
(NCDENR) regulates the Town of Mayodan effluent discharge under the National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). The NCDENR issued to the
Town a NPDES Permit, which includes water quality limits and sampling and
monitoring requirements. The NPDES Permit requires the Town to test more
than 18 different constituents in the treated water. The monitoring frequency for
these constituents are set at various intervals such as continuous, daily, weekly,
monthly, and quarterly. During the reporting period, the Town conducted 3,606
tests of the treated water before it was discharged to the creek. The WWTP
achieved a compliance level of 99.58% with the NPDES Permit requirements.
Following is a summary of the testing for the parameters, which are, assigned
Water Quality standards by the NPDES Permit. Please note the summary does
not include parameters, which incorporates a monitoring requirement only, nor
does it include daily process control testing.

PPPPPPP_
Constituent
Number of Test
Re uired
Number of Test
Conducted*
Flow
Continuous
Continuous
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD)
312
316
Total Suspended Solids TSS
312
318
Ammonia
156
158
Fecal Coliform
156
162
Conductivity
156
157
Chlorine
156
159
Total Nitrogen
12
13
Total Phosphorus
12
12
Copper
24
27
Lead
52
55
Selenium
52
55
Silver
24
27
Zinc
24
27
Toxicity
4
8
In addition to the required testing, the Town conducted over 2496 in-house test to
ensure the proper operation of the wastewater treatment plant.
Following is a summary of permit violations, which occurred during the year:
May 2011
The weekly average limit for TSS was exceeded during the week of May 3, 2011.
The weekly average limit for Fecal Coliform was exceeded during the week of
May 18, 2011.
June 2011
The weekly average limit for Fecal Coliform was exceeded during the weeks of
June 14, 2011 and June 28, 2011.
September 2011
The weekly average limit for Fecal Coliform was exceeded during the week of
September 6, 2011.
November 2011
The weekly average limit for TSS was exceeded during the week of November
29, 2011.
December 2011
There were two weekly samples missed for Lead and Selenium during the week
of December 19, 2011.

III. Certification
I have personally examined and am familiar with the information submitted in this
document and attachments. Based upon my inquiry of those individuals
immediately responsible for obtaining the information reported herein, I believe
that the submitted information is true, accurate and complete. I am aware that
there are significant penalties for submitting false information.
Signed this 30 19 day of , 2012.
Michael Brandt
(Name) Town Manager
(Signature)

7LV4
NCDENR
Forth Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Debra E. Cardwell, Town Manager
Town of Mayodan
210 W Main St
Mayodan NC 270272019
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
NOV-2011-LV-0616
Permit No. NCO021873
Mayodan WWTP
Rockingham County
Dear Ms. Cardwell,
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
December 13, 2011
Dee Freeman
Secretary
A review of Mayodan WWTP's monitoring report for September 2011 showed the following violations:
Parameter
Date
Limit Value
Reported Value
Limit Type
Coliform, Fecal MF, M-FC
09/10/11
400 #/100ml
1,404.21 #/100ml
Weekly
Broth,44.5C
Geometric Mean
Exceeded
Remedial actions, if not already implemented, should be taken to correct the above noncompliance
problem. Please be aware that violations of your NPDES permit could result in enforcement action for this
by the Division of Water Quality for this and any additional violations of State law.
If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Mike Thomas at [phone].
cc: SWP — Central Files
WSRO Files
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, Winston-Salem Regional Office
Location:585 Waughtown St. Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
Sincerely,
n
W. Corey Basinger u
Surface Water Regional Supervisor
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
Nne
orthCarofina
Aaturallry
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer

00o -20 L'cam` (,:)
Cover Sheet from
Staff Member to
Regional Supervisor
DMR Review Record
Facility: __ W PermitlPipe No.: Montl>/Year /1
Monthly Averacre Violations
Parameter
Permit Limit DMR Value % Over Limit
Weekly/Daily Violations
Date Parameter Permit LimitlI v e DN1R Value % Over Limit
Monitoring Frequency Violations
Date Parameter Permit Freouencv Values Reported # of Violations
Other Violations
1kj D t %S S/
Jr'�% � ►� ��< Yi��it�/`cam Le>4�5 -Ion
Completed by: 44�', �72
Date: ��
Regional Water Quality Date:
Supervisor Signoff:

r(CIiC 1 Y L V
LNC.Dept.of ENREFFLUENT y 4 2011
ppppppp NPDES PERMIT NO. NCO021873 DISCHARGE N 001 MONTH Sep YEAR Winston-Salem
e ionsi Office
FACILITY NAME Mayodan WWTP CLASS III COUNTY
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE (ORC) Jamie Whitten GRADE IV PHONE[phone]
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES (1) Environement (2)
CHECK BOX IF ORC HAS CHANGED ',' PERSON(S) COLLECTING SAMPLES
Mail ORIGINAL and ONE COPY to: OCT 3 0 2011
ATTN: CENTRAL FILES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
x
Jamie Whitten
_a n-
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER _ DATE
IS
RALEIGH, NC 27626ER
SI TURE OF O EATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE y
4'. S SIGNATURE I CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT IS
ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TOTHE EST, OF MYWLEDkE2 �1 �
50050
00010
00400
50060
00310'
00610
00530
31616
063QQ
•. Q0600
00665
.
00625
'00095-
D
A
T
E
Oper
Arrival
Time
Oper
Time
On
Site
ORC
On
Site
FLOW
Temp
pH
Resd
CL
BOD5
20 C
NH3
TSS
FECAL
COLI
(geo
mean)
D.O.
Total
Nitrogen
Total
P
�.
Rainfall
TKN' .
, Cond
Eff _x_
Inf _
Daily
Rate
Hrs
Hrs
Y/N
MGD
C
SU
UG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
#/100ML
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
Inches
MG/L
umhos/cm
:,1
700
$ 0
, ��X
5
" x,
��" :
554 0 -
2
700
8.0
Y
0.817
0.25
''3
1000'<'
�30
'�Y�
't)�23
�
�-���'"�
g
;�Y
;•: �,
. ,,,,
�e-
�•� a�
�A `'�� �
�tis'��,`
r.,':
4
1,300
3.0
Y
0.723
6
•700
8.0
Y
0.723
25.0
6.1
<1 Q.0 .
5.0
1.19
6.2
000.0
6.9
24.09
5.38
1.00
8.45
556.0
7
700
$AY
Yk
ME
462'
0
6=7
:_
110
5590
8
700
8.0
Y
0.739
25.0
' 6.2
'k10.0
'10.0
7.14
22.0
6,000.0
6.8
555.0
E 9.
7K
80
L
.rY {
Y
v'H'.-Jf
m
4
10
1,000
3.0
Y
0.626
n.
e
r
MUM
::�� .t�
,fE: a xrf. ,
�•�� #
12
700
8.0
Y
0.626
25.0
'
14
700
8.0
Y
0.586
6.3
<10.0
<2.0
0.09
17.0
14.0
6.7
111
505.0
•: ti26 �
A
'`'& 2 f
` 0{a
��'A
r 14
rOC@saj
16
700
8.0
Y
0.629
Un
gig
18
1,500
3.0
Y
0.667
19
700
'
8 0
Yam,
X7 .F
2 �
.F;
_ .�,_
�yfi,.
.. Ala.'%:.
5- 4.
�a
5
"
"
20
700
8.0
Y
0.688
24.0
6.2
<10.0
<2.0
0.19
4.5
1.0
6.8
548.0
2.1
22
700
8.0
Y
1.202
25.0
6.2
<10.0
<2.0
12.88
19.0
1.0
6.9
0.25
620.0
24
1,300
3.0
Y
0.967
25
=1445.DD
3 Q
Y�,'
..�7
�:� "
,�
s+�
x°�,,�- �''
� �.�a� �.
� �-,a�
�'.� �t E� +
�� ��
� 'i� •
�;
� r� '
26
700
8.0
Y
0.967
27'
700
ME
'Y
r1).'8
23 Q
6.1
<10.0
2.3
28
700
8.0
Y
1.017
23.0
0.26
4.8
3.0
6.8
443.0
301
700
8.0
Y
0.646
24.5
MUM
0.0
2.5
1.96
M
„
AVERAGE
0.776
8.1
27.1
6.8
24.09
5.38
0.77
8.45
522.2
MINIMUM
0.585
23.0
6.0
<10.0
<2.0
0.07
<2.8
1.0
6.7
24.09
5.38
0.25
8.45
442.0
£ ,
h.,
y,G
t' f,
,;--,. -, ..
G..y;;(�C
Mr a Zz
..; yti` E
G.::,,
Monthly Limit
2.5
30.00
16.10
30.00
200.00
DEM Form MR-1 (01/00)
*GGA check standard was not 198 + 30.5 mg/1.

Facility Status: (Please check one of the following)
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies meet permit requirements F-I
Compliant
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies do NOT meet permit requirements
Noncompliant
f the facility is noncompliant, please comment on corrective actions being taken in respect to equipment, operation, maintenance, etc.,
nd a time -table for improvements to be made. w „ ----i 1-0 - /, N \ \ I
I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
vith a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry
if the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information
ubmitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
ubmitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for kno ' g violations. "
St Gary ba
ign • of Date
(Required
Town of Mayodan 336-427-5733 05-31-2012
'erroittee Address Phone Number Permit Exp. Date
210 W. Main Street Mayodan, NC 27027
PARAMETER CODES
)0010 Temperature
00556
Oil & Grease
00951
Total Fluoride
01067
Nickel
0076 Turbidity
00600
Total Nitrogen
01002
Total Arsenic
01077
Silver
)0080 Color (Pt -Co)
00610
Ammonia Nitrogen
01092
Zinc
)0082 Color (ADMI)
00625
Total Kjeldhal
01027
Cadmium
01105
Aluminum
Nitrogen
)0095 Conductivity
00630
Nitrates/Nitrites
01032
Hexavalent Chromium
01147
Total Selenium
)0300 Dissolved Oxygen
01034
Chromium
31616
Fecal Coliform
)0310 BOD5
00665
Total Phosphorous
32730
. Total Phenolics
)0340 COD
00720
Cyanide
01037
Total Cobalt
34235
Benzene
X)4.00 pH
00745
Total'Sulfide
01042
Copper
34481
Toluene
)0530 Total Suspended
00927
Total Magnesium
01045
Iron
39260
MBA3'
Residue
00929
Total Sodium
01051
Lead
39516
PCBs
)0545 Settleable Matter
00940
Total Chloride
01062
Molybdenum
50050
Flow
50060 Total
Residual
Chlorine
71880 Formaldehyde
71900 Mercury
81551 Xylene
'arameter Code assistance may obtained by calling the Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit at [phone] or by visiting
he Water Quality Section's web site at h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wqs and linking to the Unit's information pages.
Jse only units designated in the reporting facility's permit for reporting data.
ORC must visit facility and document visitation of facility as required per 15A NCAC 8G .0204.
* If signed by other than the permittee, delegation of signatory authority must be on ffie with the state per 15A NCAC 2B .0506 (b)
2) (D)•

ppppppp EFFLUENT SUPPLEMENT
NPDES PERMIT NO. NCO021873 DISCHARGE N 001 MONTH Sep YEAR 2011
FACILITY NAME Mayodan WWTP CLASS III COUNTY Rockingham
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE (ORC Jamie Whitten GRADE IV PHONE[phone]
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES (1) Environment One (2)
CHECK BOX IF ORC HAS CHANGED PERSON(S) COLLECTING SAMPLES
Mail ORIGINAL and ONE COPY to:
ATTN: CENTRAL FILES
Jamie Whitten
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER x DATE
NATURE OFMPEAT�ORIN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE)
RALEIGH, NC 27626 BY THIS SIGNATURE 1 CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT IS
ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF -MY KNOWLEDGE
THP6C
TGP3B
THP3B
00720
01027
01034
01042
01067
01051
71900
01092
01077
01002
01062
01147
00556
D
A
T
E
Fathead
Minnow
Toxicity
Chroic
Toxicity
Serial
Chronic
Tox
Cn
Cd
Cr
Cu
Ni
Pb
Hg
Zn
Ag
As
Mo
Se
0& G
%
P/F
%
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG?L
UG/L
MG/L
2
-
-
^'3
! • ,..t'b'.
-='
... ..;X9 W
✓'
iy,L'dM
i
a
��� �
�• 3 �-
�
x"�.
4
6
•
20.0
<5.0
118.0
<5.0
<10.0
,�.:7..
ILA
ML
10
r
,,ova
W}, ,
a .
- t t
� r
12
Y�
1
(�
20,U
}'
�Y'M
F."Thx
i i v
Yi
fr i�
:4h
µ
£ 'i,e
��h
2M'.:kf
(
14
P
16
17
ys^��',}=_,7
,.t�,t.,, :x
.+�sr.:m
p
-��,"}
av'�""�
faty%
��
x.„tyy".rn
•ti�R.ti,`..✓},Y;
.,..
18
20
21.
.... - a .
. i.. s%..
x���
n'4.10,
.. s ...
34.0
��
w4^fi'`
t.�
., ...
<5.0
.a"�':L
107.0
x. '-1
<5.0
-1 `h
3,•
<10.0
.k
"'Kf,
22
23
t
x
w.
t
,
244
25
26
gTell
..�:
f
J'�`.'
ii_"Y+te'S5$
•S:
A'
28
30
AVERAGE
27.0
2.5
112.5
2.5
5.0
-
MINIMUM
20.0
<5.0
107.0
<5.0
<10.0
Com C JGrati
-
tv
Monthly Limit
DEM Form MR-1 (01/00)

Facility Status: (Please check one of the following)
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies meet permit requirements F-I
Compliant
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies do NOT meet permit requirements
Noncompliant
f the facility is noncompliant, please comment on corrective actions being taken in respect to equipment, operation, maintenance, etc.,
I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
vith a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry
if the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information
ubmitted ig, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
ubmitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for ' g 'olations. "
Town of Mayodan
336-427-5733
V
05-31-2012
,ermittee Address
Phone Number
Permit Exp. Date
210 W. Main Street Mayodan, NC 27027
PARAMETER CODES
)0010 Temperature
00556 Oil & Grease
00951
Total Fluoride
01067
Nickel
50060 Total
)0076 Turbidity
00600 Total Nitrogen
01002
Total Arsenic
01077
Silver
Residual
)0080 Color (Pt -Co)
00610 Ammonia Nitrogen
01092
Zinc
Chlorine
)0082 Color (ADW
00625 Total Kieldbal
01027
Cadmium
01105
Aluminum
Nitrogen
10095 Conductivity
00630 Nitrates/Nitrites
01032
Hexavalent Chromium
01147
Total Selenium
71880 Formaldehyde
)0300 Dissolved Oxygen
01034
Chromium
31616
Fecal Coliform
71900 Mercury
)0310 BOD5
00665 Total Phosphorous
32730
. Total Phenolics
81551 Xylene
)0340 COD
00720 Cyanide
01037
Total Cobalt
34235
Benzene
)0400 pH
00745 Total Sulfide
01042
Copper
34481
Toluene
)0530 Total Suspended
00927 Total Magnesium
01045
Iron
38260
MBAS'
Residue
00929 Total Sodium
01051
Lead
39516
PCBs
)0545 Settleable Matter
00940 Total Chloride
01062
Molybdenum
50050
Flow
'arameter Code assistance may obtained by calling the Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit at [phone] or by visiting
be Water Quality Section's web site at h2o.enr.stat6.nc.us/wos and linking to the Unit's information pages.
Ise only units designated in the reporting facility's permit for reporting data.
ORC must visit facility and document visitation of facility as required per 15A NCAC 8G .0204.
* If signed by other than the permittee, delegation of signatory authority must be on file with the state per 15A NCAC 2B .0506 (b)
2) (D).

ppppppp INFLUENT
NPIDES PERMIT NO. NCO021873 CHARGE No. 001
FACILITY NAMEMayodan WWTP
MONTH Sep YEAR 2011
COUNTY Rockingham
85852
00400
00010
00310
00610
00530
00300 1
00600
00665 1
00625
71900
01042
01034
01067
01027
01051
NOW
D
A
T
E
Time
COMP
pH
Temp
BOD-5
NI-13-N
TSS
DO
T. Nitr
T.
Phos
TKN
Hg
Cu
Cr
Ni
Cd
Pb
Zn
TIME
TIME
UNITS
Deg C
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L,
MG/L,
MG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
2
4
6
1,000
24
6.9
26.0
135.0
98.0
1.4
ILL
8
1,000
24
7.0
26.0
114.0
88.0
1.2
MEOW
wx,{Wt
10.
W
12
14
1,100
24
6.9
26.0
155.0
94.0
1.21
1
16
18,
98.0
0
20
1,000
24
7.0
25.0
76.0
1.2
22
1,100
24
6.9
25.0
310.0
268.0
1.4
24
25
26
T7
E�qg
ENE
RE
Me
503
&2jL
�JVMN
28
1,000
24
6.9
24.0
'75.0
46.0
1.2
219
1,
30
3f
AVERAGE
25.5
126.0
96.1
1.3
MAXIMUM
"0T.
MINIMUM
.9
24.0
1 75.0
146.0
1.21
1
Co*C
C'
C
DEM Form MR-1 01/00)
*GGA check standard was not 198 + 30.5 mg/l.

PPLfS No.NC0021873 DISCHARGE No. 001 MONTH Sep YEAR 2011
FACILITY NAMMayodan WWTP COUNTY Rockingham
STREAM Mayo River STREAM Mayo River
LOCATION Upstream at NC 134 LOCATION
Upstream
Downstream t NCSR 2177
Downstream
00010
00400
00310
00300
31616
00095
00010
00400
00310
00300
31616
00095
D
A
T
E
Time
24 hr.
clock
Temp
°C
pH
BOD
20 °C
D.O.
Fecal
Coli
(Geo
mean)
Con-
ductiv-
ity
umhos/
Time
24 hr.
clock
Temp
°C
pH
BOD
20 °C
D.O.
Fecal
Coli
(Geo
mean)
Con -
ductiv-
ity
umhos/
Hrs
°C
Units
mg/I
mg/I
/100m
cm
I Hrs
°C
Units
mg/I
mg/I
W100m
cm
2
I F'i',.-;
=¢' im
.4.,i.k� �}�T
S"
2 ��
'�d1 £r',
� .-9d
� YkY.'P-G
fS4
�.;
�
� �"��#S
'r3 •�+
-i�Y :
.� S
...,`.a�. C
�
L
4
v
6
100
18.0
6.8
7.8
68.0
130
17.0
6.7
7.6
66.0
3T
&+' �6 d3�
r
;ry
e,
r ,
4 �•
~ _
8
200
17.0
6.9
7.9
70.0
230
16.0
6.8
7.8
68.0
g,
10
:7 �,;
.J � iW
it:;
'°;S � v fr
�M$�.rw
.a°�i GK?•FL
. � w - "`
i P+F�
h�;JsFi .�
Y`.a4T`
x
����1k'h
:t`,;
.. �'[i'.f.
4'. �' t
"'� i• ;"�
.:iz?'„ �
1 S �
.
122
-
14
130
17.0
7.0
8.0
68.0
200
17.0
6.9
8.0
67.0
-
16
18
a
230
16.0
20
100
17.0
6.9
8.0
72.0
6.7
7.9
70.0
21,.
_:.
130
a,c
e� v
_ r
mod. , a
¢.
r.
-.
..
•._. .<
- ....
..
v. :
-.. ..
'- �
.-
s
22
130
18.0
7.0
8.0
70.0
200
17.0
6.8
7.8
70.0
24y
{
v
�2y6
57•.:
28
130
17.0
7.0
8.0
70.0
200
16.0
6.9
7.8
68.0
4,
8�Kf21�';.'
GU7�
y760
e
30
Average
17.4
7.9
70.1
185
16.5
7.8
68.3
Minimum 117.01
6.8 1 1
7.8
68.0
130
16.016.71
17.6
66.0
DEM Form MR-3 (01/00)

K�yrl
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Division of '*ater Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
October 20, 2011
Debra E Cardwell, Manager Town
Town of Mayodan
210 W Main St
Mayodan NC 27027
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Permit No. NCO021873
Mayodan WWTP
Rockingham County
Dear Ms Cardwell, Manager Town:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
A review of Mayodan WWTP's monitoring report for July 2011 showed the following violations:
Parameter
Date
Limit Value
Reported Value
Limit Type
Coliform, Fecal MF, M-FC
07/02/11
400 #/100m1
1,288.22
Weekly
Broth,44.5C
#/100ml
Geometric
Mean
Exceeded
Remedial actions, if not already implemented, should be taken to correct the above
noncompliance problem. Please be aware that violations of your NPDES permit could result in
enforcement action for this by the Division of Water Quality for this and any additional
violations of State law.
If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Mike Thomas at (336) 771-
5000.
cc: SWP — Central Files
WSRO Files
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, Winston-Salem Regional Office
Location: 585 Waughtown St. Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
Sincerely,
W. Corey Basinger
Surface Water Regional Supervisor
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
None
rthCarolina
;Vatul" libl'
An Equal Opportunity ? Affirmative action, Employer

Cover Sheet from
Staff Member to
Regional Supervisor
DMR Review Record
Facility: M44oc in WOW Permit[Pipe No.: 6C.ozL53:L Month/Year
Monthly Average Violations
Parameter Permit Limit DMR Value % Over Limit
Weekly/Daily Violations
Date Parameter Permit Limit/Tvpe DMR Value % Over Limit
46
�L Fe �� 1/[aD � lcx �- _ rZ . Z-Z.- Zz2
Monitoring Frequency Violations
Date Parameter Permit Frequency Values Reported # of Violations
Completed by: Date:
Regional Water Quality ` Date:
rZoGj
Supervisor Signoff: 6 y

pppppp,
EFFLUENT d f F OPI E E)
NPDES PERMIT NO. NCO021873 DISCHARGE N 001 MONTH Jul YEAR 2011 �p 1 f �'l! f?
FACILITY NAME Mayodan WWTP CLASS III COUNTY Rockingham 5
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE (ORC) Jamie Whitten GRADEIV PHONE[phone]
i:2 p ,
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES (1) Environement One (2)
CHECK BOX IF ORC HAS CHANGED �.. --- PERSON(S) COLLECTING SAMPLES Jamie Whitten
F 666E D
N,C, Dept, of ENR
Mail ORIGINAL and ONE COPY to: n
ATTN: CENTRAL FILES OCT Q 3Q��
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY Winston-Salem 1�
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER Regional Of-' x DATE
RALEIGH, NC 27626 �ATURE OPEATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE)
'7 BY THIS SIGNATURE I CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT IS
ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
50050
00010
0 4 0
50060
00310
00610
00530
31616
00300
00600
006651
006
I 095
D
A
T
E
Oper
Arrival
Time
Oper
Time
On
Site
ORC
On
Site
FLOW
Temp
pH
Resd
CL
BOD5
20 C
NH3
TSS
FECAL
COLI
(geo
mean)
D.O.
Total
Nitrogen
Total
P
Rainfall
uu
TKN
aa tt
Cond
Eff _x_
Inf
Daily
Rate
Hrs
Hrs
Y/N
MGD
C
SU
UG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
#/100ML
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
Inches
MG/L
umhos/cm
1
700.
8.0
Y
0.800
15.0
2
1,000
3.0
Y
0.450
3
1,300
3.0
Y
0.450
j
-
4
1,700
3.0
Y/H
0.450
5
700
8.0
Y 1
0.450-
22.0
6.6
<10.0
<2.0
0.39-
4.9
570.0 .
6.9
23.71
5.98
0.10
2.91
5200.
6
700 1
8.0
Y 1
0.723
22.0
6.3
<10.0
4.3
0.34
14.0
15.0
6.8 1
504.0
71
700
8.0
1 Y
0.615
22.0
6.2
<10.0
<2.0
0.16
10.0
<1.0
6.9
24.85
2.05
517.0 j
81
700
8.0
j Y
0.813
1.10
9
1,100
3.0
Y
0.798
10
1,300
3.0
Y
0.798
-
11
700
8.0
Y
0.798
12
700
8.0
Y 0.735
22.0
6.4 <10.0
3.5
0.22
5.2 !
8.0 %
6.9
432.0
13
700
8.0
Y
0.668
23.0
6.4
<10.0
<2.0
0.18
3.9
6.0
6.8
463.0' '
14
700
8.0
Y
0.860
23.0
6.3
j <10.0
2.1
0.21
5.8 j
6.0
6.8
-
481.0
15
700
8.0
Y
0.555
-
161
1,030
3.0
Y
0.704
171
1,400
3.0
Y -
0.704
181
700
8.0
Y
0.704
j
19
700
8.0
Y
0.766
25.0
6.0
<10.0
<2.0
0.14
5.8
7.0
6.8
1
561.0
20
700
8.0
Y
0.798
25.0
6.2
<10.0
<2.0
0.19
5.5
23.0
6.9
j
555.0
21
700
8.0
B
0.728
28.0
F 6.3 -
<10.0
2.6
0.16
6.6 `
38.0
6.8
548.0
22.
700
8.0
B
0.714
3.0
Y
1.013
3.0
Y
1.013
8.0
Y
1.013
L
8.0
Y
0.758
28.0
6.8
<10.0
<2.0
0.21
<5.6
2.0
6.9
486.0
8.0
Y
0.540
29.0
6.2
<10.0
<2.0
0.15
<3.1
2.0
6.8
484.0
8.0
Y
0.706
29.0
6.2
<10.0 <2.0
0.32
6.4
3.0
6.9
495.0
29
700
8.0
Y
0.783
30
1,000
8.0
Y
0.741
31
1,700
8.0
Y
0.741
AVERAGE
0.722
j 24.8
0.0
1.7
0.22
6.0
9.0 6.9
24.28
5.98
0.60 2.48
503.8
MAXIMUM
1.013
29.0
6.8
<10.0
4.3
0.39
14.0
570.0
6.9
24.85
5.98
1.10
2.91
561.0
MINIMUM
0.450
22.0
6.0
<10.0
<2.0
0.14
<3.1
<1.0
6.8
23.71
5.98
0.10
2.05
432.0
Comp(C)/Grab (G)
G
G
G
C
C
C
G
G
C
C
C
C
G
Monthly Limit
2.5
30.00
16.10
30.00
200.00
DEM Form MR-1 (01/00)

Facility Status: (Please check one of the following)
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies meet permit requirements
Compliant
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies do NOT meet permit requirements 17
Noncompliant
f the facility is noncompliant, please comment on corrective actions being taken in respect to equipment, operation, maintenance, etc.,
nd a time -table for improvements to be made.
I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
vith a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry
if the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information
ubmitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am a are that there are significant penalties for
ubmitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment violations."
Gar to ba /
'lr
Date
Town of Mayodan
336-427-5733
V
05-31-2012
Phone Number
Permit Exp. Date
'ermittee Address
210 W. Main Street Mayodan, NC 27027
PARAMETER CODES
)0010 Temperature
00556 Oil & Grease 00951
Total Fluoride
01067 Nickel
01077 Silver
50060 Total
Residual
10076 Turbidity
00600 Total Nitrogen 01002
Total Arsenic
01092 Zinc
Chlorine
)0080 Color (Pt -Co)
)0082 Color (ADNM
00610 Ammonia Nitrogen
00625 Total Kjeldbal 01027
Cadmium
01105 Aluminum
)0095 Conductivity
Nitrogen
00630 Nitro es/Nitrites 01032
Hexavalent Chromium
01147 Total Selenium
71880 Formaldehyde
71900 Mercury
)0095 Dissolved Oxygen
01034
Chromium
31616 Fecal Coliform
32730 Total Phenolics
81551 Xylene
)0310 BODS
00665 Total Phosphorous
.
)0340 COD
00720 Cyanide 01037
Total Cobalt
34481 Benzene
)0400 pH
00745 Total*Sulfide 01042
Copper
34481 Toluene
38260 MBAS
)0530 Total Suspended
00927 Total Magnesium 01045
Iron
39516 PCBs
Residue
)0545 Settleable Matter
00929 Total Sodium 01051
00940 Total Chloride 01062
Lead
Molybdenum
50050 Flow
'arameter obtained by calling the Point
Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit at [phone]
or by visiting
Code assistance may
be Water Quality Section's web site at h2o.enr.stat6.nc.us/wqs and linking to the Unit's
information pages.
—
Jse only units designated in the reporting facility's permit for reporting data.
ORC must visit facility and document visitation of facility as required per 15A NCAC 8G .0204.
* If signed by other than the permittee, delegation of signatory authority must be on file with the state per 15A NCAC 2B .0506 (b)
2) (D).

EFFLUENT SUPPLEMENT
NPDES PERMIT NO. NCO021873 DISCHARGE N 001 MONTH Jul YEAR 2017
FACILITY NAME Mayodan WWTP CLASS III COUNTY Rockingham
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE (ORC Jamie Whitten GRADEIV PHONE[phone]
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES (1) Environment One (2)
CHECK BOX IF ORC HAS CHANGED PERSON(S) COLLECTING SAMPLES Jamie Whitten
Mail ORIGINAL and ONE COPY to:
ATTN: CENTRAL FILES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NC 27626
a
2L4 DATE
TURE OAPEA�TOFZ IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE)
BY THIS SIGNATURE I CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT IS
ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
���
ee a
e e
e e-
e e-
a e.
e e
•ee
a e•
e e
a ee
a e.
�
ee
..
�u`s *.�.r,�
+bs'"�a_R'�'kk:
'g�
-y ;g
iu7Yc�4
��F.`.�
f $`
°
y'G
t't�^'".FF!i'a,`'I'�si
z���t
bL
T.v
x,1'i'
r'
In
L
IZYc
p"0ee
ffm"I'VISMIMDEMEAN
R
�
s
�s.%,cs '%
x�'-x�:."�'�C`,."3
�ar,,Z
",``+`y,'".�`rt.3.`�p,,'�
`•.x � �
x
.0
�)'
i xr
j
y CE
.yf
`�.£'- �:��
�i°,'$,
�,-...Ti
C".+ wR�'
p
t k'� h
1
*'�',=
c•
t �w.
10
WIN .
IT1.L%�
RZ
UP
L
M t.
v `
E
�'
�>n'�
.r
-
Monthly Limit
DEM Form MR-1 (01I00)

Facility Status: (Please check one of the following)
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies meet permit requirements
Compliant
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies do NOT meet permit requirements F-1
Noncompliant
f the facility is noncompliant, please comment on corrective actions being taken in respect to equipment, operation, maintenance, etc.,
nd a time -table for improvements to be made.
I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
vith a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry
if the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information
ubmitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
ubmitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for win iolations. "
Gary,,Rfa.i#back
Town of Mayodan 336-427-5733
or
Vl
05-31-2012
'ermittee Address Phone Number Permit Exp. llate
210 W. Main Street Mayodan, NC 27027
PARAMF:M CODES
0010 Temperature
00556 Oil & Grease
00951
Total Fluoride
)0076 Turbidity
00600 Total Nitrogen
01002
Total Arsenic
)0080 Color (Pt -Co)
00610 Ammonia Nitrogen
)0082 Color (ADMI)
00625 Total Kjeldbal
01027
Cadmium
Nitrogen
)0095 Conductivity
00630 Nitrates/Nitrites
01032
Hexavalent Chromium
)0300 Dissolved Oxygen
01034
Chromium
)0310 BOD5
00665 Total Phosphorous
)0340 COD
00720 Cyanide
01037
Total Cobalt
)0400 pH
00745 Total Sulfide
01042
Copper
)0530 Total Suspended
00927 Total Magnesium
01045
Iron
Residue
00929 Total Sodium
01051
Lead
)0545 Settleable Matter
00940 Total Chloride
01062
Molybdenum
01067 Nickel 50060 Total
01077 Silver Residual
01092 Zinc Chlorine
01105 Aluminum
01147 Total Selenium 71880 Formaldehyde
31616 Fecal Coliform 71900 Mercury
32730. Total Phenolics 81551 Xylene
34235 Benzene
34481 Toluene
38260 MBAS
39516 PCBs
50050 Flow
'arameter Code assistance may obtained by calling the Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit at [phone] or by visiting
he Water Quality Section's web site at h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wns and linking to the Unit's information pages.
Jse only units designated in the reporting facility's permit for reporting data.
ORC must visit facility and document visitation of facility as required per 15A NCAC 8G .0204.
* If signed by other than the permittee, delegation of signatory authority must be on file with the state per 15A NCAC 2B .0506 (b)
2) (D)•

INFLUENT
NPDES PERMIT NO. NCO021873
CHARGE No. 001 MONTH Jul YEAR 2011
FACILITY NAMEMayodan WWTP COUNTY Rockingham
DEM Form MR-1 01/00)

NPDES No.NC0021873 DISCHARGE No. 001 MONTH Jul YEAR 2011
FACILITY NAM Mayodan WWTP COUNTY Rockingham
STREAM Mayo River STREAM Mayo River
LOCATION Upstream at NC 134 LOCATION Downstream t NCSR 2177
Upstream Downstream
DEM Form MR-3 (01/00)

4
bodbodL
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Debra E. Cardwell, Town Manager
Town of Mayodan
210 W Main St
Mayodan NC 27027
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Permit No. NCO021873
Mayodan W WTP
Rockingham County
Dear Ms. Cardwell:
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
September 14, 2011
Dee Freeman
Secretary
A review of Mayodan WWTP's monitoring report for June 2011 showed the following violations:
Parameter
Date
Limit Value
Reported Value
Limit Type
Coliform, Fecal MF, M-FC
06/18/11
400 4/100m1
689.12 #/100m1
Weekly
Broth,44.5C
Geometric Mean
Exceeded
Remedial actions, if not already implemented, should be taken to correct the above noncompliance
problem. Please be aware that violations of your NPDES permit could result in enforcement action for this
by the Division of Water Quality for this and any additional violations of State law.
If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Mike Thomas at [phone].
cc: SWP — Central Files
WSRO Files
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, Winston-Salem Regional Office
Location: 585 Waughtown St. Winston-Salem. North Carolina 27107
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.nowaterquality.org
Sincerely,
W. Corey Basinger
Surface Water Regional Supervisor
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
Nne
orthCarolina
Natur,44
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer

Cover Sheet from
Staff Member to
Regional Supervisor
DNIR Review Record
Facility: N'&tjtyIAA WWIP PermitfPipeNo.: Alcoezig�& Month/Year tort
Monthly Average Violations
Parameter Permit Limit DMR Value % Over Limit
Date Parameter
Weekl /Daily Violations
Permit Limit/I e DMR Value % Over Limit
Monitoring Frequency Violations
Date Parameter Permit Freguencv Values Reported # of Violations
Other Violations
SEE n/r�� AVR—
Completed by: 1—Z-� Date:
Regional Water Quality Date: Z� `r
Supervisor Signoff:

PPDESPERMIT NO. NC0021873 DISCHARGE N 001
FACILITY NAME Mayodan WWTP
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE (ORC) Jamie Whitten
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES (1) Environement One
CHECK BOX IF ORC HAS CHANGED
EFFLUENT
MONTH Jun YEAR 2011
CLASS III COUNTY Rockingham
GRADE IV PHONE[phone]
Jamie Whitten L
ALIG 9 f71 '
Mail ORIGINAL and ONE COPY to: ,f SEP 0 6 2011
�''►
ATTN: CENTRAL FILES ,•r,,,; ;,.;;
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY �� s Ftegio4.5
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER x DATE
RALEICH, NC 27626 ii::'s: is ; t i `•' CTi
ATURE OF OPEATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHAR
niarr : tics I�roc essing U.,'BY THIS SIGNATURE 1 CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT IS
ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
50050
00010
00400
50060
00310
00610
00530
31616
00300
00600
00665
00625.
'DO095
D
A
T
E
Oper
Arrival
Time
Oper
Time
On
Site
ORC
On
Site
FLOW
Temp
pH
Resd
CL
BOD5
20 C
NH3
TSS
FECAL
COLI
(geo
mean)
D.O.
Total
Nitrogen
Total
P
Rainfall
TKN•
Cond
Eff x_
Inf
Daily
Rate
Hrs
Hrs
Y/N
MGD
C
SU
UG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
#/100ML
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
Inches
MG/L
umhos/cm
2
700
8.0 ^
Y
0.710
21.0
6.6
<10.0
2.6
0.14
3
4.1
17.0
6.9
•4=
421.0
3aOTS
�8:0,
41
1_
4
1,000
3.0
Y
1.153
121, _
1.153
z
. ."
,
6
•700
8.0
Y
,
8
29
700
€{� ,
8.0
w
Y
, . 5 "
0.701
2,A
22.0
6.7
<10.0
<2.0
0.15
3.2
n
10.0
6.9
3 ,
443.0
9
7bb
:b
Y� n.
fi9;2r0:
6
b:.
2`.
452 fly;
N
10
700
8.0
Y
0.804
1,300 3.0
Y
0.782
12
A
14
"
700
8.0
Y
0.510
21.0
6.7
<10.0
3.0
0.32
4.3
275.0
6.9
464.0
15
k-
_
M.
x
16
700
8.0
Y
0.672
21.0
6.6
<10.0
2.3
0.21
6.4 850.0
6.8
483.0
17
:2OU" ,
.8 {
zfl.7H
18
1,400
3.0
Y
0.718
20
700
8.0
Y
0.718
M1
21
700
8 4:.
�f
Q 7
3
1
04,
22
700
8.0
Y
0.618
22.0
6.7
<10.0
2.8
1.30
8.9
38.0
6.9
536.0
23
70, ' '
Otp
s Y
r fl
i 0 .t:
v < 0 p';
Ob
24
700
8.0
Y
0.856
25
1;41)©
AgaAMIMMOMM;,
4
26
1,200
3.0
Y
0.602
27,
70
t a
4.
28
700
8.0
Y
2.127
22.0
6.0
<10.0
4.0
0.26
15.0
5,100.0
6.8
0.25
517.0
29
�:.70,
$0tY�fl758,t
: ...,..
-..,
2 ®.°..
,a6
<0
M39
y0��l�93�
°t1;90k6$,
..
ro
-.
. "h
r
i 590�,i
. ..
30
700+
8.0
Y
0.305
22.0
6.3
<10.0
2.4
0.24
11.0
6,000.0
6.7
492.0
31
,, -x,.
xz
:
. xx
Ln
vd3 f
E92
AVERAGE
0.797
21.6
0.0
2.9
0.30
7.2
106.2
6.8
15.27
4.03
0.18
1.35
471.5
MAXIMUM
2.127
�22 n'
7 fl;.
<16.0
15 0`:.8,000:0,
+ 6.9
#5.27
4:fl3,
0.25 k
1;35{,
;536 0 a
MINIMUM
0.305
21.0
6.0
<10.0
<2.0
0.14
3.2
1.0
6.7
15.27
4.03
0.10
1.35
385.0
'E G .;x'
x. C�
All
Monthly Limit
2.5
1 30.001
16.101
30.001
200.00
DEM Form MR-1 (01/00)

Facility Status: (Please check one of the following)
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies meet permit requirements F-1
Compliant
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies do NOT meet permit requirements
Noncompliant
f the facility is noncompliant, please comment on corrective actions being taken in respect to equipment, operation, maintenance, etc.,
-A .. +:,..e F.,1,1e Fn,. fn 110 mwiP
i certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
vith a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry
if the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information
ubmitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
ubmitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for lmow' g violations."
nbacA
use print
Town of Mayodan 336-427-5733
Z'010
Date
05-31-2012
'ermittee Address Phone Number Permit Exp. Date
210 W. Main Street Mayodan, NC 27027
PARAMLf'TER CODES
10010 Temperature 00556 Oil & Grease 00951
10076 Turbidity 00600 Total Nitrogen 01002
)0080 Color (Pt -Co) 00610 Ammonia Nitrogen
)0082 Color (ADMI) 00625 Total Kjeldhal 01027
Nitrogen
)0095 Conductivity
)0300 Dissolved Oxygen
)0310 BOD5
)0340 COD
)0400 pH
)0530 Total Suspended
Residue
)0545 Settleable Matter
Total Fluoride
Total Arsenic
Cadmium
00630 Nitrates/Nitrites 01032 Hexavalent Chromium
01034 Chromium
00665 Total Phosphorous
01067 Nickel 50060 Total
01077 Silver Residual
01092 Zinc Chlorine
01105 Aluminum
01147 Total Selenium 71890 Formaldehyde
31616 Fecal Coliform 71900 Mercury
32730 . Total Phenolics 81551 Xylene
00720
Cyanide
01037
Total Cobalt
34235 Benzene
00745
Total Sulfide
01042
Copper
34481 Toluene
00927
Total Magnesium
01045
Iron
38260 MBAS
00929
Total Sodium *
01051
Lead
39516 PCBs
00940
Total Chloride
01062
Molybdenum
50050 Flow
larameter Code assistance may obtained by calling the Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit at [phone] or by visiting
he Water Quality Section's web site at h2o.enr.stat6.nc.us/wus and linking to the Unit's information pages.
Jse only units designated in the reporting facility's permit for reporting data.
ORC must visit facility and document visitation of facility as required per 15A NCAC 8G .0204.
* If signed by other than the permittee, delegation of signatory authority must be on file with the state per 15A NCAC 2B .0506 (b)
2) (D)•

EFFLUENT SUPPLEMENT
PNPDESPNO.PPP NCO021873 PERMIT DISCHARGE N 001 MONTH Jun YEAR 2011
FACILITY NAME Mayodan WWTP CLASS III COUNTY Rockingham
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE (ORC Jamie Whitten GRADE IV PHONE[phone]
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES (1) Environment One (2)
CHECK BOX IF ORC HAS CHANGED PERSON(S) COLLECTING SAMPLES
Mail ORIGINAL and ONE COPY to:
ATTN: CENTRAL FILES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NC 27626
Jamie Whitten
ZS'
x
NATURE OF OPEATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE) DA
BY THIS SIGNATURE I CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT IS
ACCURATE AND,COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
���
11 1
1 1
1 1
1 1•
1 1.
1 1
•/1
1 1•
1 1
/ 11
1 1.
�
11
•�
��^�iY�n
&s
%* #�Setr'1s�
��2
��iSnYfrvr
�
9s.
�
��t
f✓i-ic4��'::
• .
i•:5c�`,'`.:ka.�r6s`atL�es'&t'Ee�t:�+u:�'�,.'Iµir
���'+e�k'E+�Y-.�..xtar.avF
a
OWN
�R MJME,
M� � +L L�J
�Z
'r4*�'M`�E
�'v.'L
-�' �
}K. •������Y0.
�Bwm
'w3^ 2.
� 3� ie'�y� tfi
^F
���""iL,�` ,;�L
�.
t
,nv i'.�
t.{ i
0V14'
- 14"A
Fs�;4�n*
�1Wh�•dr§
RV"U
!J 4
N t• 'v
R. } fx^ .�..
,. L- +f..K'i.
' .. rra,i;9p
G'
0.X e�a�._+n#•-,
@ ,
���®�u__EEG—__----_—
t .. ,.
s,.,:wrr. ,:•8
3 .�.::WS.;t.y.w.,
�Y' x��'�
ui:'�
�.r '�$'t`..'
�r '"'z.n�k..rK,"
�e«�`B'jCa
`�"'S.r'�.tta �:i'a'�
�+,'� i
t'.� u+� tl w;:.
°sue., u^'���'sAt�1.c+.l�iY
�'*� a.
'�# r
nS iC
i =e,
�
•7'fi
;�'�.. r.`�'E�.
:w'
.. ..
��'.w .tv �.�
i 12yq,
� ,ydA,B�A,.h
"?
d st"�tS
.Z.
� �` �
�+ "�&?�^`.S
S h�'e�..v'"i�
�Qy�.'.-
!'r it � -�
i
Y'•. -
.N�#' ^r
?�
7.
+�€:».
�� -
9=:tw:
.. X�Y.�,
]R`.•aaE-"-a
'+�iY%k`A�laY�
..
Ht•. S.a
�'a��p���j�`�
'4� +i
�,'ti
3 •�T'
..SFY!-a+
4
DEM Form MR-1 (01/00)

Facility Status: (Please check one of the following)
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies meet permit requirements F-1
Compliant
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies do NOT meet permit requirements N?�
Noncompliant
f the facility is noncompliant, please comment on corrective actions being taken in respect to equipment, operation, maintenance, etc.,
nd a time-tqor improvements to be made.
;,, . -)�
I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
vith a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. B ased on my inquiry
if the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information
ubmitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
ubmitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knawiiW violations."
Gary S-faiAback
Town of Mayodan 336-427-5733
05-31-2012
'ermittee Address Phone Number Permit Exp. Date
210 W. Main Street Mayodan, NC 27027
PARAMETER CODES
10010 Temperature 00556 Oil & Grease 00951 Total Fluoride
)0076 Turbidity 00600 Total Nitrogen 01002 Total Arsenic
)0080 Color (Pt -Co) 00610 Ammonia Nitrogen
)0082 Color (ADMI) 00625 Total Kjeldhal 01027 Cadmium
Nitrogen
01067
Nickel 50060 Total
01077
Silver Residual
01092
Zinc Chlorine
01105
Aluminum
0095 Conductivity
00630 Nitrates/Nitrites
01032
Hexavalent Chromium
01147
10300 Dissolved Oxygen
01034
Chromium
31616
)0310 BOD5
00665
Total Phosphorous
32730
)0340 COD
00720
Cyanide
01037
Total Cobalt
34235
)0400 pH
00745
Total'Sulfide
01042
Copper
34481
)0530 Total Suspended
00927
Total Magnesium
01045
Iron
38260
Residue
00929
Total Sodium
01051
Lead
39516
)0545 Settleable Matter
00940
Total Chloride
01062
Molybdenum
50050
Total Selenium
71880 Formaldehyde
Fecal Coliform
71900 Mercury
Total Phenolics
81551 Xylene
Benzene
Toluene
MBA3
PCBs
Flow
'arameter Code assistance may obtained by calling the Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit at [phone] or by visiting
be Water Quality Section's web site at h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wqs and linking to the Unit's information pages.
Ise only units designated in the reporting facility's permit for reporting data.
ORC must visit facility and document visitation of facility as required per I SA NCAC 8G .0204.
* If signed by other than the permittee, delegation of signatory authority must be on file with the state per 15A NCAC 2B .0506 (b)
2) (D).

INFLUENT
NPDES PERMIT NO. NCO021873
CHARGE No. 001 MONTH Jun YEAR 2011
FACILITY NAMEMayodan WWTP COUNTY Rockingham
85852
00400 1
00010
00310
00610
00530
00300
00600
00665 1
00625
71900
01042
01034
01067
01027
01051
01092
D
A
T
E
Time
COMP
pH
Temp
BOD-5
NH3-N
TSS
DO
T. Nitr
T.
Phos
TKN
Hg
Cu
Cr
Ni
Cd
Pb
Zn
TIME
TIME
UNITS
Deg C
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L.
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L.
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
2
1,130
24
7.1
22.0
115.0
97.0
1.6
F
4
taw
�t*wr
6
MOM
8
1,130
24
7.2
22.0
110.0
113.0
1.8
10
12
14
900
. 24
7.2
22.0
130.0
L
88.0
1.8
1.5
16
830
24
7.1
22.0
103.0
95.0
18
20
72.0
<5.0
<10.0
-
<1.0
<5.0
NMI A
165.0
22
1,100
24
7.2
23.0
160.0
18.96
163.0
1.6
23
'1,13b
24
7y
23:0
"I15
.:Si
1
24
26
MEN.
24
7.0
23.0
84.0
.•
Emma
WR
28
1,000
85.0
1.2
29
30
1,030
24
7.1
23.0
81.0
57.0
1.4
AVERAGE
22.6
106.1
19.0
98.4
1.5
72.0
2.5
5.0
0.5
2.5
165.0
�,aHA_AX1Ml1M�� ...``72=_
•.23{i
y60
'19�0
63D
�`� 8
�����`
�* ..
:;..�
r-,:�„ '�
��2'U",
`5.0�.
r„''lfl.;0,
��1 0
<�0
'16��`
MINIMUM
1 7.0
22.0
70.0
19.0
57.0
1.2
72.0
<5.0
<10.0
<1.0
<5.0
165.0
Comp(CNGrab"G),�
7 G,
DEM Form MR-1 01/00)

C0021873 DISCHARGE No. 001 MONTH Jun YEAR 2011
PAWCILITY NAM Mayodan WWTP COUNTY Rockingham
STREAM Mayo River STREAM Mayo River
LOCATION Upstream at NC 134 LOCATION
Upstream
Downstream t NCSR 2177
Downstream
1/1 111.11
11 1
11 11�
111'
---
-
111 1
1111
11 1
11 11�
111'
_-_
I
'
1
;
/1
I
•
1
1
!
SIN
` 1
feu-=M
{Mrt-
.. '.
ro
s �' ,. "`. _
�����j
,.-„
�1
�:
���f
t� W�i -
l; �:
���
.&�i`�.c�
�
i ...��'
a9ws�� eFri«
i•5.� 5+�Y..
c
DEM Form MR-3 (01/00)

PWA
ACIAIr
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
25 August 2011
Town of Mayodan
Attn: Debra E. Caldwell, Town Manager
210 West Main Street
Mayodan, NC 27027
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
NPDES Individual Wastewater Permit NC001873 &
NPDES General Stormwater Permit NCG110142
Mayodan Wastewater Treatment Plant
Rockingham County
Dear Ms. Cardwell:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Mr. Mike Thomas of the Winston-Salem Regional Office of the North Carolina Division of Water
Quality conducted a compliance evaluation inspection of the Mayodan Wastewater Treatment Plant
(WTP) on 25 August 2011. The assistance and cooperation of Mr. Jamie Whitten and Mr. Corey
Brannock was greatly appreciated. Inspection findings are summarized below.
The plant is located at the south end of Cardwell Road. The permit authorizes the city to operate
this 2.5 MGD plant, which according to the permit consists of a mechanical bar screen, grit removal,
dual path aeration basins, secondary clarifiers, gas chlorination, gas dechlorination, sludge thickener,
aerobic digester, and sludge drying beds. The permit authorizes the city to discharge treated
wastewater into the Mayo River, which is currently classified as Class C waters in the Roanoke River
Basin.
Site Review
The facility was clean and well secured. The treatment system was inspected and found to be
operational. The facility has no specific grit removal unit. This change needs to be documented in the
permit description. In addition, Mr. Whitten informed Mr. Thomas that the plant is in the process of
switching from gas chlorination and de -chlorination to a liquid process for both. This change needs to
be documented in the permit description as well. The outfall was also inspected and found to be in
good condition. The discharge point appeared free of pollutant indicators and was in very good
condition. Access to the discharge point was well maintained.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, Winston-Salem Regional Office
Location: 585 Waughtown St. Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107
Phone: [phone] FAX: 336-771 A6301 Customer Service:1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Acton Employer
None
rthCarolina
Naturally

Town of Mayodan
Compliance Evaluation Inspection NPDES0021873
& NPDES 110142
8/25/2011
Page 2
Documentation Review
Mr. Thomas evaluated laboratory data during the inspection. Comparison of available lab reports
and field monitoring data with discharge monitoring reports (DMR) showed no concerns or errors.
Chain of custody records were available and complete. The visitation and operation/maintenance logs
were reviewed and found to be complete and current.
NCG110142
This Certificate of Coverage became effective in February 2009 and allows the City to discharge
stormwater related to industrial activity from the WWTP to the Mayo River as described in an earlier
section of this report.
Site Review
The site appeared to be very clean and well maintained at the time of inspection. Mr. Thomas
noted no issues or discrepancies.
Documentation Review
The Stormwater Pollution and Prevention Plan was reviewed and found to be complete,
comprehensive and current. All required monitoring and inspections were complete and well
documented. Employee training occurs at regular intervals. No discrepancies were noted.
We appreciate your efforts to effectively operate and maintain this treatment system. No
additional response to this letter is required. If you have questions regarding the inspection or this
letter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Thomas or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
W. Corey Basinger
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection
Winston-Salem Region
Attachments:
1. BIMS Inspection Report
Cc: WSRO — SWP w/ atch
Central Files w/ atch
NPDES West Unit

United States Environmental Protection Agency
Form Approved.
EPA Washington, D.C. 20460
OMB No. 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 IJ 2 31 N00021873 111 121 11/08/25 117 18I CI 19I GI 20I
J S--r J
Remarks
2111111111111111111111111111111111111IIIIIIIIII116
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 CIA ---------Reserved--
67 I 169 701 I 71 LI 72I N I 73 W 74 751 I I I I I I 180
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
Entry Time/Date
Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
10:00 AM 11/08/25
07/11/01
Mayodan WWTP
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
210 W Main St
Mayodan NC 27027
11:30 AM 11/08/25
12/05/31
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)rritles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
Jamie C. Whitten/ORC/336-427-5733/
Name, Address of Responsible Officialrritle/Phone and Fax Number
Debra E Cardwell,210 W Main St Mayodan NC 27027/Town Contacted
No
Manager/336-427-0241/3364277592
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection Check only those areas evaluated
Permit Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Program Sludge Handling Disposal Facility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Waters
Laboratory
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Michael S Thomas WSRO WQ///
'�w
Signatur of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
k't/Vlr "� `- 0>�o 2-�' Aw' & V L
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page # 1

NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type
3I NCO021873 I11 12I 11/08/25 1 17 18' _'
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
Page # 2

ppppppr,
Permit: NC0021873 Owner- Facility: Mayodan WNlrP
Inspection Date: 08/25/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Pump Station - Influent Yes No NA NE
Is the pump wet well free of bypass lines or structures? ■ I] ❑ 0
Is the wet well free of excessive grease? ■ n n ❑
Are all pumps present? ■ ❑ n Cl
Are all pumps operable? ■ Cl n n
Are float controls operable? ■ n n n
Is SCADA telemetry available and operational? ■ n n 0
Is audible and visual alarm available and operational? ■ n ❑ n
Comment:
Flow Measurement - Influent
Yes
No
NA
NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
❑
■
❑
Q
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
n
Cl
■
n
Is the flow meter operational?
n
■
Q
0
(if units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
n
■
n
n
Comment: Influent flow meter functions only to show peaks of flow. Flow meter is not
used for reporting or composite samples.
Bar Screens
Yes
No
NA
NE
Type of bar screen
a.Manual
n
b. Mechanical
■
Are the bars adequately screening debris?
■
❑
❑
n
Is the screen free of excessive debris?
■
O
0
0
Is disposal of screening in compliance?
■
Q
❑
O
Is the unit in good condition?
n
C1
0
n
Comment:
„ :. „___„_,
Yes
No
NA NE
Type of grit removal
a.Manual n
b. Mechanical Q
Is the grit free of excessive organic matter? n n ■
Is the grit free of excessive odor? ❑ ❑ ■ n
Page # 3

Permit: NCO021873 Owner -Facility: Mayodan VW TP
Inspection Date: 08/25/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Grit Removal
Yes No
NA
NE
# Is disposal of grit in compliance?
❑ ❑
■
❑
Comment:
Equalization Basins
Yes No
NA
NE
Is the basin aerated?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Is the basin free of bypass lines or structures to the natural environment?
■ ❑
❑
❑
Is the basin free of excessive grease?
■ ❑
❑
❑
Are all pumps present?
■ ❑
❑
❑
Are all pumps operable?
■ ❑
❑
Cl
Are float controls operable?
❑ ❑
■
❑
Are audible and visual alarms operable?
❑ ❑
■
❑
# Is basin size/volume adequate?
■ ❑
❑
❑
Comment: See attached report.
Aeration Basins
Yes No
NA
NE
Mode of operation
Ext. Air
Type of aeration system
Surface
Is the basin free of dead spots?
■ ❑
❑
❑
Are surface aerators and mixers operational?
■ ❑
❑
❑
Are the diffusers operational?
❑ ❑
■
❑
Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process?
■ ❑
❑
❑
Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface?
■ ❑
❑
❑
Is the DO level acceptable?
❑ ❑
❑
■
Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/1)
❑ ❑
❑
■
Comment:
Secondary Clarifier
Yes No
NA
NE
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater?
■ ❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier?
■ Cl
❑
❑
Are weirs level?
■ ❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of weir blockage?
■ ❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting?
■ ❑
❑
❑
Is scum removal adequate?
■ ❑
❑
❑
Page # 4

Permit: NCO021873 Owner -Facility: Mayodan VVVVTP
Inspection Date: 08/25/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Secondary Clarifier
Yes No
NA
NE
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the drive unit operational?
■
❑
Cl
❑
Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc?
■
Cl
❑
❑
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately '/. of the sidewall depth)
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Disinfection -Gas
Yes
No
NA
NE
Are cylinders secured adequately?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are cylinders protected from direct sunlight?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is there adequate reserve supply of disinfectant?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the level of chlorine residual acceptable?
❑
❑
❑
■
Is the contact chamber free of growth, or sludge buildup?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is there chlorine residual prior to de -chlorination?
❑
❑
❑.
■
Does the Stationary Source have more than 2500 Ibs of Chlorine (CAS No. 7782-50-5)?
❑
❑
❑
■
If yes, then is there a Risk Management Plan on site?
❑
❑
❑
■
If yes, then what is the EPA twelve digit ID Number? (1000- -_)
If yes, then when was the RMP last updated?
Comment:
De -chlorination
Yes
No
NA
NE
Type of system ?
Gas
Is the feed ratio proportional to chlorine amount (1 to 1)?
❑
❑
❑
■
Is storage appropriate for cylinders?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Is de -chlorination substance stored away from chlorine containers?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Are the tablets the proper size and type?
❑
❑
■
❑
Are tablet de -chlorinators operational?
❑
❑
■
❑
Number of tubes in use?
Comment:
Flow Measurement - Effluent Yes No NA NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting? ■ ❑ ❑ Cl
Page # 5

"qq
Permit: NC0021873 Owner -Facility: Mayodan VWV rP
Inspection Date: 08/25/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Flow Measurement - Effluent Yes No NA NE
Is flow meter calibrated annually? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the flow meter operational? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Effluent Pipe Yes No NA NE
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Comment:
Pumps-RAS-WAS Yes No NA NE
Are pumps in place? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are pumps operational? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are there adequate spare parts and supplies on site? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Aerobic Digester Yes No NA NE
Is the capacity adequate? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the mixing adequate? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the site free of excessive foaming in the tank? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Is the odor acceptable? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Is tankage available for properly waste sludge? ■ ❑ n ❑
Comment:
Drying Beds
Yes No
NA NE
Is there adequate drying bed space?
❑ ❑
■ ❑
Is the sludge distribution on drying beds appropriate?
❑ n
■ ❑
Are the drying beds free of vegetation?
❑ ❑
■ ❑
# Is the site free of dry sludge remaining in beds?
❑ ❑
■ ❑
Is the site free of stockpiled sludge?
❑ n
■ ❑
Is the filtrate from sludge drying beds returned to the front of the plant?
❑ ❑
■ ❑
# Is the sludge disposed of through county landfill?
❑ ❑
■ ❑
# Is the sludge land applied?
❑ ❑
■ ❑
Page # 6

FPPPPPP'
Permit: NCO021873 Owner - Facility: Mayodan WW rP
Inspection Date: 08/25/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Drying Beds
Yes No
NA
NE
(Vacuum filters) Is polymer mixing adequate?
n
❑
0
❑
Comment:
Standby Power
Yes No
NA
NE
Is automatically activated standby power available?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the generator tested by interrupting primary power source?
n
❑
n
Is the generator tested under load?
n
n
Q
Was generator tested & operational during the inspection?
❑
0
n
n
Do the generator(s) have adequate capacity to operate the entire wastewater site?
❑
❑
❑
Is there an emergency agreement with a fuel vendor for extended run on back-up power?
n
n
n
Is the generator fuel level monitored?
n
❑
n
Comment: Back up generator is tested weekly and is serviced quarterly by an outside
contractor.
Laboratory
Yes
No
NA
NE
Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory'?
0
❑
❑
❑
Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters) performed by a certified lab?
n
n
n
# Is the facility using a contract lab?
n
❑
❑
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)?
■
❑
❑
n
Incubator (Fecal Coliform) set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/- 0.2 degrees?
n
n
n
N
Incubator (BOD) set to 20.0 degrees Celsius +/- 1.0 degrees?
n
n
❑
m
Comment:
Effluent Sampling
yes
No
NA
NE
Is composite sampling flow proportional?
M
n
n
n
Is sample collected below all treatment units?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is proper volume collected?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the tubing clean?
■
❑
n
❑
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)?
■
n
❑
❑
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type representative)?
■
❑
13
❑
Comment:
Upstream / Downstream Sampling
Yes
No
NA NE
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type, and sampling location)? ■
❑
❑
❑
Page # 7

Permit: NCO021873 Owner - Facility: Mayodan WWTP
Inspection Date: 08/25/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Upstream ! Downstream Sampling
Yes No
NA
NE
Comment:
Permit
Yes No
NA
NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new application?
■ ❑
❑
0
Is the facility as described in the permit?
■ 0
n
0
# Are there any special conditions for the permit?
0 ■
❑
Q
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
■ ❑
❑
❑
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
■
Comment:
Record Keeping
Yes No
NA
NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
■ Q
❑
❑
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
■ 0
0
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)?
■ Q
0
Q
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
■ fl
Q
❑
Is the chain -of -custody complete?
■
Dates, times and location of sampling
■
Name of individual performing the sampling
■
Results of analysis and calibration
■
Dates of analysis
■
Name of person performing analyses
■
Transported COCs
■
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters?
■ ❑
Q
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ?
■ ❑
❑
Q
(If the facility is = or> 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator on each shift?
■ 0
Cl
0
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
■ n
Q
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
■11
0
0
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification?
■ n
n
Q
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site?
■ ❑
❑
❑
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review?
■ n
❑
n
Comment:
Operations & Maintenance
Yes No
NA NE
Page # 8

Permit: NC0021873
Inspection Date: 08/25/2011
Operations & Maintenance
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping?
owner - Facility: Mayodan VVNlrP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
V-- Ll- W A MT:
■ooa
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable Solids, pH, DO, Sludge C1 ❑ ■ ❑
Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment:
Page # 9

Permit: NCG110142
SOC:
County: Rockingham
Region: Winston-Salem
Compliance Inspection Report
Effective: 02/13/09 Expiration: 05/31/13 Owner: Town of Mayodan
Effective: Expiration: Facility: Mayodan Wastewater Treatment Plant
293 Cardwell Rd
Contact Person: Debra E Cardwell
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 08/25/2011
Primary Inspector: Michael S Thomas
Secondary Inspector(s):
Mayodan NC 27027
Title: Phone: [phone]
Certification: Phone:
Entry Time: 10:00 AM Exit Time: 11:30 AM
Phone:
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Municipal WWTP > 1 MGD, Stormwater Discharge, COC
Facility Status: ■ Compliant Q Not Compliant
Question Areas:
0 Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCG110142 Owner - Facility: Town of Mayodan
Inspection Date: 08/25/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Page: 2

Permit: NCG110142 Owner - Facility: Town of Mayodan
Inspection Date: 08/25/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes No
NA
NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
■ Cl
n
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
■ n
o
n
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
■ n
0
n
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
■ Q
O
n
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
■ n
p
n
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
■ n
p
n
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
■ n
Cl
n
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
■ n
❑
n
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
■ n
❑
n
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
■ ❑
❑
❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
■ ❑
fl
Q
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
■ ❑
Q
Q
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
■ n
0
Q
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
■
n
❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
■ n
n
n
Comment:
Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? ■ Q ❑ 0
Comment:
Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? n n ■ n
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? n ❑ ■ n
Comment:
Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? ■ n ❑ Q
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? ■ 0 Q 0
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? Q Q ■
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? ■ n n n
Comment:
Page: 3

Permit: NC0021873
nspection Date: 02/18/2010
Pump Station - Influent
Is the pump wet well free of bypass lines or structures?
Is the wet well free of excessive grease?
Are all pumps present?
Are all pumps operable?
Are float controls operable?
Owner - Facility: Mayodan WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Is SCADA telemetry available and operational?
i
Is audible and visual alarm available and operational?
omment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Flow Measurement - Influent
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
u Is flow meter calibrated annually?
�\ Is the flow meter operational?
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
V� Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
ar Screens
Type of bar screen
a.Manual
b.Mechanical
Are the bars adequately screening debris?
Is the screen free of excessive debris?
Is disposal of screening in compliance?
Is the unit in good condition?
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Grit Removal
Type of grit removal
a.Manual
b.Mechanical
Is the grit free of excessive organic matter?
Is the grit free of excessive odor?
.� # Is disposal of grit in compliance?
■nnn
■nnn
n■nn
Yes No NA NE
n

Permit: NCO021873 Owner - Facility: Mayodan WWTP
Inspection Date: 02/18/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
,/Grit Removal
Yes
No
NA
NE
Comment: There is no grit removal. Please refer to attached inspection summary
�tter.
Equalization Basins
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is the basin aerated?
n
■
n
0
Is the basin free of bypass lines or structures to the natural environment?
■
n
n
n
Is the basin free of excessive grease?
■
n
n
n
Are all pumps present?
■
n
Cl
n
Are all pumps operable?
■
n
n
n
Are float controls operable?
n
❑
■
n
Are audible and visual alarms operable?
n
n
■
n
# Is basin size/volume adequate?
■
n
n
n
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
/AerationBasins
Yes
No
NA
NE
Mode of operation
Ext. Air
Type of aeration system
Surface
Is the basin free of dead spots?
■
n
n
n
Are surface aerators and mixers operational?
■
n
n
n
Are the diffusers operational?
n
n
■
n
Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process?
■
n
n
n
Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface?
n
■
n
n
Is the DO level acceptable?
n
n
n
■
Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/1)
n
n
n
■
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
JSecondary Clarifier
Yes
No
NA NE
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater?
■
n
n
n
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier?
■
n
n
n
Are weirs level?
■
n
n
n
Is the site free of weir blockage?
■
n
n
n
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting?
■
n
n
n
Is scum removal adequate?
■
n
n
n
Page # 4

Permit: NC0021873 Owner - Facility: Mayodan WWTP
Inspection Date: 02/18/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Secondary Clarifier Yes No NA NE
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge? ■ n n n
Is the drive unit operational? ■ n n n
Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)? ■ n n n
Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc? ■ n n n
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately % of the sidewall depth) ■ 0 0 n
omment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Disinfection -Gas Yes No NA NE
Are cylinders secured adequately? ■ n n ❑
Are cylinders protected from direct sunlight? ■ n n n
Is there adequate reserve supply of disinfectant? ■ n n
Is the level of chlorine residual acceptable? n n n ■
Is the contact chamber free of growth, or sludge buildup? ■ n n n
Is there chlorine residual prior to de -chlorination? n n n ■
Does the Stationary Source have more than 2500 Ibs of Chlorine (CAS No. 7782-50-5)? n n n ■
If yes, then is there a Risk Management Plan on site? n n n ■
If yes, then what is the EPA twelve digit ID Number? (1000- - )
If yes, then when was the RMP last updated?
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
e-chlorination Yes No NA NE
Type of system ? Gas
Is the feed ratio proportional to chlorine amount (1 to 1)? n n n ■
Is storage appropriate for cylinders? ■ n n n
# Is de -chlorination substance stored away from chlorine containers? ■ n n n
Are the tablets the proper size and type?
nn■n
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Are tablet de -chlorinators operational? ❑ ❑ ■
Number of tubes in use?
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Flow Measurement - Effluent Yes No NA NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting? ■ ❑ n n
Page # 5

Permit: NC0021873
Inspection Date: 02/18/2010
low Measurement - Effluent
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
Is the flow meter operational?
Owner - Facility: Mayodan WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
Zfflu
mment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
ent Pipe
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained?
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris?
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly?
/Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
✓Pumps-RAS-WAS
Are pumps in place?
Are pumps operational?
Are there adequate spare parts and supplies on site?
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
,Aerobic Digester
Is the capacity adequate?
Is the mixing adequate?
Is the site free of excessive foaming in the tank?
# Is the odor acceptable?
# Is tankage available for properly waste sludge?
omment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
tying Beds
Is there adequate drying bed space?
Is the sludge distribution on drying beds appropriate?
Are the drying beds free of vegetation?
# Is the site free of dry sludge remaining in beds?
Is the site free of stockpiled sludge?
Is the filtrate from sludge drying beds returned to the front of the plant?
# Is the sludge disposed of through county landfill?
# Is the sludge land applied?
Yes No NA NE
■nnn
■nnn
■nnn
Page # 6

Permit: NCO021873 Owner -Facility: Mayodan WWTP
pection Date: 02/18/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
yi�tying Beds
Yes
No
NA
NE
(Vacuum filters) Is polymer mixing adequate?
n
n
■
n
Co ent: Beds not used for years. Please refer to attached inspection summary
le 7er.It
Power
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is automatically activated standby power available?
■
n
n
n
Is the generator tested by interrupting primary power source?
■
n
n
n
Is the generator tested under load?
■
n
n
n
Was generator tested & operational during the inspection?
❑
■
n
n
Do the generator(s) have adequate capacity to operate the entire wastewater site?
■
n
n
n
Is there an emergency agreement with a fuel vendor for extended run on back-up power?
n
n
n
■
Is tho generator fuel level monitored?
■
n
n
n
omment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Laboratory
Yes
No
NA
NE
Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory?
■
n
n
❑
Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters) performed by a certified lab?
■
n
n
n
# Is the facility using a contract lab?
■
n
n
n
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)?
n
n
n
■
Incubator (Fecal Coliform) set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/- 0.2 degrees?
n
n
■
n
Incubator (BOD) set to 20.0 degrees Celsius +/- 1.0 degrees?
n
n
■
n
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Influent Sampling
Yes
No
NA
NE
# Is composite sampling flow proportional?
n
■
n
n
Is sample collected above side streams?
■
n
n
n
Is proper volume collected?
■
n
n
n
Is the tubing clean?
■
Cl
n
n
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)?
■
n
n
n
Is sampling performed according to the permit?
■
n
n
n
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Effluent Sampling
Yes
No
NA NE
Is composite sampling flow proportional?
■
n
n
n
Page # 7

Permit: NCO021873 Owner - Facility: Mayodan WWTP
Inspection Date: 02/18/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Effluent Sampling Yes No NA NE
Is sample collected below all treatment units? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is proper volume collected? ■ ❑ ❑ Cl
Is the tubing clean? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type representative)? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Upstream / Downstream Sampling Yes No NA NE
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type, and sampling location)? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Permit Yes No NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new application? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Is the facility as described in the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
# Are there any special conditions for the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Record Keeping
Yes No NA NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)?
❑ ❑ ❑
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the chain -of -custody complete?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Dates, times and location of sampling
■
Name of individual performing the sampling
■
Results of analysis and calibration
■
Dates of analysis
■
Name of person performing analyses
■
Transported COCs
■
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Page # 8

Permit: NCO021873 Owner - Facility: Mayodan WWTP
Inspection Date: 02/18/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Record Keeping
Yes No
NA
NE
(If the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator on each shift?
❑ ❑
N
❑
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
■ ❑
❑
❑
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
■ ❑
❑
❑
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification?
0 ❑
❑
❑
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site?
0 ❑
❑
❑
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review?
■ ❑
❑
❑
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable Solids, pH, DO, Sludge ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Page # 9

Permit: NCG110142
SOC:
County: Rockingham
Region: Winston-Salem
Compliance Inspection Report
Effective: 02/13/09 Expiration: 05/31/13 Owner: Town of Mayodan
Effective: Expiration: Facility: Mayodan Wastewater Treatment Plant
293 Cardwell Rd
Contact Person: Debra E Cardwell
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
24 hour contact name
On -site representative
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 02118/2010
Primary Inspector: Ron Boone
Secondary Inspector(s):
Title:
Jamie A Whitten
Jamie A Whitten
Certification:
Entry Time: 09:00 AM
i
Mayodan NC 27027
Phone: [phone]
Exit Time: 12;00 PM
Phone:
Phone:
Phone:
Phone: [phone]
Ext.2202
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Municipal WWTP > 1 MGD, Stormwater Discharge, COC
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
0 Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCG110142 Owner - Facility: Town of Mayodan
Inspection Date: 02/18/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Page: 2

Permit: NCG110142 Owner - Facility: Town of Mayodan
Inspection Date: 02/18/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
Yes No NA NE
Lii n n n
nrn n n
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
,,
"Narrative
n n n
# Does the Plan include a Description of Practices"?
,4
Aiii o n n
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
n n
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
„in
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
!� n n n
n In
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
L*n
Vi n n n
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
g n n In
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
n n n
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
t/■
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
t-■--n ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
x1h n n
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
.fin ❑ ■
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
Lfin n n
c■ n In n
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes No A NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
■ n n n
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Analytical Monitoring
Yes No NA NE
■ n
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?n
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
fi l fl ■
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Permit and Outfalls
Yes No NA NE
In n
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
LArT1 ❑ n
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
l.Or n ■ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
S n n
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Page: 3

XPly -WA
j'A'
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Debra E Cardwell, Manager Town
Town of Mayodan
210 W Main St
Mayodan NC 27027
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Permit No. NCO021873
Mayodan WWTP
Rockingham County
Dear Ms Cardwell, Manager Town:
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
August 15, 2011
Dee Freeman
Secretary
A review of Mayodan WWTP's monitoring report for May 2011 showed the following violations:
Parameter
Date
Limit Value
Reported Value
Limit Type
Solids, Total Suspended -
05/07/11
45 mg/1
83.33 mg/1
Weekly Average
Concentration
Exceeded
Coliform, Fecal MF, M-FC
05/21/11
400 41100ml
600 #/100ml
Weekly
Broth,44.5C
Geometric Mean
Exceeded
Remedial actions, if not already implemented, should be taken to correct the above noncompliance
problem. Please be aware that violations of your NPDES permit could result in enforcement action for this
by the Division of Water Quality for this and any additional violations of State law.
If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Mike Thomas at [phone].
cc: SWP — Central Files
WSRO Files
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, Winston-Salem Regional Office
Location: 585 Waughtown St. Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service. 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
Sincerely, 2
W. Corey Basinger U
Surface Water Regional Supervisor
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
NorthCarolina
Natumlly
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

Cover Sheet from
Staff Member to
Regional Supervisor
DMR Review Record
Facility: Permit/Pipe No.: A.[4cozi W3 Month/Year
Monthly Average Violations
Parameter Permit Limit DMR Value % Over Limit
Date Parameter
5 2t Fec&A
DMR Value % Over Limit
�1 L gam. / B
Monitoring Frequency Violations
Week] /Daily Violations
Permit LimiuType
415 tim L
400 / A L
Date Parameter Permit Frequency
nthar Vinlatinnc
4z 7'SS — ,JoV
Values Reported # of Violations
Completed by: Date:-40�z�
i
Regional Water Quality .i�
Super%visor Sianoff: Date:

EFFLUENT RECEIVED
J U N c� i 2.011
NPDES PERMIT NO. NCO021873 DISCHARGE N 001 MONTH May YEAR 2011
FACILITY NAME Mayodan WWTP CLASS III COUNTY Rockingham,
FILES
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE (ORC) Jamie Whitten GRADE IV PHONE 336-427"- ��, 100
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES (1) Environement One (2)
CHECK BOX IF ORC HAS CHANGED PERSON(S) COLLECTIN:
Mail ORIGINAL and ONE COPY to:
ATTN: CENTRAL FILES
RECEIVED
N.C. Dept. of ENN}R
UL 1 1 ZOt1
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY `' ' ` " ` I
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER NATURE OF OPEATO_R_ IN RESPONMLE CHA E) DATE
RALEIGH, NC 27626 BY THIS SIGNATURE I CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT IS
-r.� �-uc Qeer nG nnv KNnWLEDGE
50050
00010
00400
50060
00310
00530
31616
00300
00600
00665
00095
D
A
T
E
Oper
Arrival
Time
Oper
Time
On
Site
ORC
On
Site
FLOW
.q
Temp
pH
Resd
CL
BOD5
20 C
NH3
TSS
FECAL
COLI
(geo
mean)
D.O.
Total
Nitrogen
Total
P
Rainfall
7TKN
Cond
Eff _x
Inf _
Daily
Rate
Hrs
Hrs
Y/N
MGD
C
SU
UG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
#/100ML
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
Inches
MG/L
umhos/cm
1
'1,100
3.0
Y
-0.700
2
700.
8.0
Y
0.700
3
700-'
8.0
Y
0.705 `'
13.0 ,
6.8
<10.0
<2.0,
0.17
<2.5
3.0
6.9
7.05
2.36
1.64
375.0
4
700
8.0
Y
1.699
13.0
6.7
<10.0
33.0
1.24
240.0
,000.0
6.9
1.50
353.0
5
700
8.0
Y
1.592,
13.0
6.7 .
<10.0
`-15.0
4.02
10.0
<1.0
6.8
349.0
6
700
8.0
Y
1.009
7
1,000
3.0
Y
0.935 ,
8
1,300
3.0
Y
0.935
9
700
8.0
_N
0.935
10
700
8.0
Y
0.817
13.0
6.8
<10.0
<2.0
0.11
<2.5
<1.0
6.9
359.0
11
700
8.0
Y
- 1.030
13.0
6.7
1 <10.0
<2.0
0.11
5.0
2.0
6.9
0.25
357.0
12
700
8.0 .
Y
0.850
13.0
6.7
<10.0
<2.0
1.27
5.1
5.0
6.8
356.0
13
14
15
700
1,000
1,400
8.0
4.0
3.0
Y
Y
Y
1.010
0.928
0.928--�-_�_
_
--
16
700
8.0
Y
0.928
j
17
700
8.0
Y
1.726
13.0
6.7
<10.0
0
0.82
<3.6
G ,000.0
6.9
350.0
18
700
8.0
Y
2.325
13.0
6.8
<10.0
3.1
0.88
7.1
6,000.0
6.9
0.50
354.0
19
700
8.0
Y
1.483
13.0
6.7
<10.0
20.0_
5.72
15.0
6.0
6.7
1.50
3,256.0
20
700
8.0
Y
0.997
<5.3
0.10
21
1,000
3.0
Y
1.022
<5.4
22
1,100
4.0
Y
1.022
23
700'
8.0
Y
1.022 ,
0.40
24
700
8.0
Y
1.130
14.0
6.7
<10.0
3.8
0.24
2.7
1 14.0
6.9
343.0
25
- 700
8.0
Y
1.434
15.0
6.6 :
: <10.0
3.9 `
0.34
9.8
<1.0
6.8
1.00
370.0
26
700
8.0
Y
1.155
15.0
6.7
<10.0
3.3
2.52
6.7
33.0
6.8
344.0
27
700
8.0
Y _
1.043
28
1,000
3.0
Y
0.950
29
1,200
3.0
Y
0.950
30
1,300
3.0
Y/H
0.950
31
700
1 8.0
Y
0.950
15.0 .
6.8
<10.0
4.8:
0.11 '
.4.8
3.0
6.9
400.0
AVERAGE
1.092
13.5
0.0
7.1
1.35
21.1
19.4
6.9
7.05
2.36
0.75
1.64
582.0
MAXIMUM
2.325
15.0
6.8
<10.0
33.0`
5.72
240.0
,000.0
6.9
7.05:
2.36
1.50
1.64
3256.0
MINIMUM
0.700
13.0
6.6
<10.0
<2:0
0.11
<2.5
<1.0
6.7
7.05
2.36
0.10
1.64
343.0
Comp(C)/Grab (G)
G
G
G
C
C
C"
G
G
C',';
C
C
C
G
Monthly Limit
2.5
30.001
16.101
30.001
200.00
DEM Form MR-1 (01/00)

Facility Status: (Please check one of the following)
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies meet permit requirements El
Compliant
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies do NOT meet permit requirements Fz;l
Noncompliant
f the facility is noncompliant, please comment on corrective actions being taken in respect to equipment, operation, maintenance, etc.,
nd a time -table for improvements to be made. ,,"" jJ
Ar"'Jo 4APY17-
I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
vith a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. B ased on my inquiry
if the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information
ubmitted ig, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aAare that there are significant penalties for
ubmitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonm violations."
Gary0o'S tainbAck
m
Town of Mayodan
336-427-5733
v
05-31-2012
'ermittee Address
Phone Number
Permit Exp. Date
210 W. Main Street Mayodan, NC 27027
PARAMETER CODES
)0010 Temperature
00556 Oil & Grease 00951
Total Fluoride
01067 Nickel
50060 Total
)0076 Turbidity
00600 Total Nitrogen 01002
Total Arsenic
01077 Silver
Residual
)0080 Color (Pt -Co)
00610 Ammonia Nitrogen
01092 Zinc
Chlorine
)0082 Color (ADW
00625 Total Kjeldhal 01027
Cadmium
01105 Aluminum
b095 Conductivity
Nitrogen
00630 Nitrates/Nitrites 01032
Hexavalent Chromium
01147 Total Selenium
71880 Formaldehyde
)0300 Dissolved Oxygen
01034
Chromium
31616 Fecal Coliform
71900 Mercury
)0310 BOD5
00665 Total Phosphorous
32730 . Total Phenolics
81551 Xylene
)0340 COD
00720 Cyanide 01037
Total Cobalt
34235 Benzene
)0400 pH
00745 Total 'Sulfide 01042
Copper
34481 Toluene
)0530 Total Suspended
00927 Total Magnesium 01045
Iron
38260 MBAS
Residue
00929 Total Sodium 01051
Lead
39516 PCBs
)0545 Settleable Matter
00940 Total Chloride 01062
Molybdenum
50050 Flow
'arameter Code assistance may obtained by calling the Point
Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit at [phone] or by visiting
he Water Quality Section's web site at h2o.enr.state.nc.us/was and linking to the Unit's information pages.
Jse only units designated in the reporting facility's permit for reporting data.
ORC must visit facility and document visitation of facility as required per 15A NCAC 8G .0204.
* If signed by other than the permittee, delegation of signatory authority must be on file with the state per 15A NCAC 2B .0506 (b)
2) (D).

EFFLUENT SUPPLEMENT
NPDES PERMIT NO. NC0021873 DISCHARGE N 001 MONTH May YEAR 2011
FACILITY NAME Mayodan WWTP CLASS III COUNTY Rockingham
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE (ORC Jamie Whitten GRADEIV PHONE[phone]
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES (1) Environment One (2)
CHECK BOX IF ORC HAS CHANGED PERSON(S) COLLECTING SAMPLES Jamie Whitten
Mail ORIGINAL and ONE COPY to:
ATTN: CENTRAL FILES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NC 27626
(92 -f
ATURE OF OPEATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE) DATE
BY THIS SIGNATURE I CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT IS
ffr,I-r-
THP6C
TGP3B
THP36
00720
01027
01034
01042
01
1
9
01077
01002
01062
01147
00556
D
A
T
E
Fathead
Minnow
Toxicity
Chroic
Toxicity
Serial
Chronic
Tox
Cn
Cd
Cr
Cu
Ni
Pb
Hg
Zn
Ag
As
Mo
Se
O& G
%
P/F
%
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG?L
MG/L
�' P
V,-
,UG/L
23
4
'6J
'•w'
.�`.+d u
gT
'+ �+.K
"Y` i
y< ���
..�. ,F
•�.. }
�f.:;..
ac
:5 x``-_
1
''qb
�h
v`c" -,;:
8
CUT
10
<5.0
<10.0
IM
NO
12
,13
14
NEER
16
17v
��
t`WH
0
s
NOR
660<5
O
z==
18
o
,
r
20
4
;,
22
23x
24
<5.0
<10.0
26
27
28
29
l:ii'an�
^r'•�� r
ryK:
30
AVERAGE
9.5
3.0
63.0
2.5
5.0
y,.MAXIMUM'
,
:..
.
MINIMUM
<10.0
<5.0
60.0
<5.0
<10.0
:. Comp(C)1Grab (G),
C
C; r,
Monthly Limit
DEM Form MR-1 (01/00)

Facility Status: (Please check one of the following)
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies meet permit requirements
Compliant
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies do NOT meet permit requirements
Noncompliant
f the facility is noncompliant, please comment on corrective actions being taken in respect to equipment, operation, maintenance, etc.,
I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
vith a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. B ased on my inquiry
if the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information
ubmitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
ubmitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for ' lctions. "
to Gary nback
PerrAttee MAP print o f A , J
Town of Mayodan
'ermittee Address
210 W. Main Street
336-427-5733
Phone Number
dan. NC 27027
PARAMb'I'F.R CODES
►0010
Temperature
00556
Oil & Grease
00951
Total Fluoride
)0076
Turbidity
00600
Total Nitrogen
01002
Total Arsenic
)0080
Color (Pt -Co)
00610
Ammonia Nitrogen
)0082
Color (ADMI)
00625
Total Kjeldbal
01027
Cadmium
Nitrogen
)0095
Conductivity
00630
Nitrates/Nitrites
01032
Hexavalent Chromium
000
Dissolved Oxygen
01034
Cbromium
)0310
BOD5
00665
Total Phosphorous
)0340
COD
00720
Cyanide
01037
Total Cobalt
)0400
pH
00745
Total Sulfide
01042
Copper
)0530
Total Suspended
00927
Total Magnesium
01045
Iron
Residue
00929
Total Sodium
01051
Lead
)0545
Settleable Matter
00940
Total Chloride
01062
Molybdenum
Date
05-31-2012
Permit Exp. Date
01067 Nickel
01077 Silver
01092 Zinc
01105 Aluminum
50060 Total
Residual
Chlorine
01147 Total Selenium 71880 Formaldehyde
31616 Fecal Coliform 71900 Mercury
32730 . Total Phenolics 81551 Xylene
34235 Benzene
34481 Toluene
38260 MBAS
39516 PCBs
50050 Flow
'arameter Code assistance may obtained by calling the Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit at [phone] or by visiting
be Water Quality Section's web site at h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wqs and linking to the Unit's information pages.
Ise only units designated in the reporting facility's permit for reporting data.
ORC must visit facility and document visitation of facility as required per 15A NCAC 8G .0204.
* If signed by other than the permittee, delegation of signatory authority must be on file with the state per 15A NCAC 2B .0506 (b)
2) (D).

INFLUENT
NPDES PERMIT NO. NCO021873 CHARGE No. 001
FACILITY NAMEMayodan WWTP
MONTH May YEAR 2011
COUNTY Rockingham
85852
00400
00010
00310
00610
00530
00300
00600
00665 1
00625
71900
01042
01034
01067
01027
01051
01092
D
A
T
E
Time
COMP
pH
Temp
BOD-5
NH3-N
TSS
DO
T. Nitr
T.
Phos
TKN
Hg
Cu
Cr
Ni
Cd
Pb
Zn
TIME
TIME
UNITS
Deg C
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
2
3a"t
-
4
5,.
900
900 s
24
y247.2
7.1
14.0
14.0
86.0
`� 85.0.
.r
182.0
52.0
2.0
1 8
.w
;L4�
µ
6
71,
y.""'C�
;y3%
`'r7F
w-c,"+$i
{�' ���
� Y#'4�'
ra'N 9. ,�t++�'
a" `A
i ��fi�"
"['4 �'%�, t�
ZaaxA'�
i3!'J+rc
�£Ak�£x
'£.p'-t�y-.^•
F
�x:''A1'`
yY �.�.
8
10
900
24
7.1
14.0
60.0
123.0
1.5
11
�;9�0
24
'72�.
��4��
• 55,0
,..:=.
�6��0:
1 �:
•*,,
y
Y
12
930
24
7.1
14.0
125.0
117.0
1.4
ME
14
15
r,r
.Y
Fr
kI
m1w,"
16
iM
18
930
24
7.2
15.0
72.0
48.0
1.8
1,9
24�.-t1
14bj
20
22
47.0
24
1,000
24
7.2
15.0
39.0
1.5
HMO`
26
1,100
24
7.0
16.0
105.0
103.0
1.5
28
29
30
,
>, f <..
v .... .
„tir..l..
.a. s ,... %
• . ..
?' .
, k . ,, ..
_
isn �".
� d",�
ggrr.
..�"�.a.
AVERAGE
14.6
77.5
84.3
1.6
MAXIMUM
Y 7;2
:16;0
125.0
MINIMUM
7.0
114.0147.0
1
39.0
1.2
Comp(C)/Grab (G)
G¢
G=
C'
C'
DEM Form MR-1 01/00)

IESNo. NC0021873
DISCHARGE No. 001
MONTH May YEAR 2011
FACILITY NAM Mayodan WWTP COUNTY Rockingham
STREAM Mayo River STREAM Mayo River
LOCATION Upstream at NC 134
Upstream
LOCATION Downstream t NCSR 2177
Downstream
00010
00400
00310
00300
31616
00095
00010
00400
00310
00300
31616
00095
D
A
T
E
Time
24 hr.
clock
Temp
°C
pH
BOD
20 °C
D.O.
Fecal
Coli
(Geo
mean)
Con-
ductiv-
ity
umhos/
Time
24 hr.
clock
Temp
°C
pH
BOD
20 °C
D.O.
Fecal
Coli
(Geo
mean
Con -
ductiv-
ity
umhos/
Hrs
°C
Units
mg/I
mg/I
P/100mi
cm
Hrs
°C I
Units
mg/I I
mg/l
W100ml
1 icy;
cm
x -
��
4
5
100
100'st74,.t
�:$
�U0
t'a
r�30=,°
Oy.,.2r
ea'.7;6�
8
10
12
200
11.0
7.2
8.0
72.0
230
1 10.01
7.0
1 7.8
1
70.0
14
:
�WOR
c
is
.
Im
18.
20
22
r
r
+
. 4
.
q
.h
3
24
26
100
12.0
6.9
7.8
70.0
130
12.0
6.7
8.0
68.0
28
29
30
1"`ts.-.t`iT
�y
P�.-f
y
-F1 .'.�
_n*
`,s
4
"4'f.MM•:
.i4•t,.
1.ai`,R414
'i-
.;C
4v'
4-
Average
11.0
7.9
70.5
173
10.3
7.8
68.5
8 0
„72 0
y
.
. 230 ,
12
Minimum
10.0
70.0
130
9.0
6.7
7.6
68.0
DEM Form MR-3 (01/00)

PO Box 7565
•
RECEIVED Asheville, NC 28802
N.C.Deot. of ENR Phone: [phone]
JAN U 3 2012 Fax: [phone]
E-mail: Jimr))etsnclab.com
Winston-Salem
,i Environmental Testing solutions, Inc. Re ional Office Date: July 01, 2011
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Fathead Minnow Multi -Concentration Test
Facility: United Water Hydro Management NPDES #: NC-0021873 Pipe #: 001 County: Rockingham
Mayodan WWTP
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Testi 1 S01L ions, c., Comments:
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge: /
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor. roject: 7133
amnles: _ 1 10607.08 1,10609.0 110611.07
�IV Original To: North Carolina Department of EnAronment and Na tu al �e�gyrces
((��66�F DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch AUG Q UU 11 �l
1621 Mail Service Center start
DEC 1 ,1 Zfl�1 Raleigh, NC 27699-1621 r 6'(
i 5t {J 1 Rep, wim, "� e
t � t a f
Control
Organisms
% Effluent
1.25 %
% Effluent
2.5
% Effluent
5.0
% Effluent
l0%
% Effluent
20
Surviving number of larvae
1 10
1 10
1 9
9
Original number of larvae
10
1 10
1 10
10
Weight/mi final (mg/larvae)
0.841
1 0.851
1 0.739
0.862
Surviving number of larvae
10
1 10
1 10
")
Original number of larvae
10
1 10
1 10
1 10
Weight/original (mg/larvae)
1 0.874
1 0.806
1 0.829
1 0.928
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Original number of larvae
t0
10
1 10
1 10
Weightioriinal (m arvae)
0.740
1 0.790
1 0.722
1 0.739
Surviving number of larvae
10
1 10
1 10
10
Original number of larvae
10
1 10
1 10
10
Wei ht/original (mg/larvae)
0.834
1 0.802
1 0.816
1 0.821
Survivin g number of larvae 1
10
10
10
10
Original number of larvae
1 10
10
1 l0
1 10
weiglivori inal (mg/larvae)
1 0.851
1 0.863
1 0.859
1 0.849
ISurviving number of larvae
10
1 10
1 9
11 10
Original number of larvae
10
1 t0
I 10
10
weight/original (mg/larvae)
1 0.795
1 0.780
1 0.632
0.748
Water Quality
Control
pH (SU):
DO (mg/L):
Temp. ("C):
High Concen
pH (SU):
DO (mg/L):
Temp. (°C):
Survival (9/6) 95.11)
Average wt (mg) 0.823
Average wt i 0.868
surviving (mg)
Survival (%) 100.0
Average wt (mg) 1 0.859
End time.
I110
Outside supplier:
Aqu x, Inc.
Hatch date: 06-06-t I
Hatch time: I 1600 �T
Survival (%)1 100.0 1 i`GV D,..,.w 1ieby A U
Average wt (mg) 0.748 �1tlf
Survival (4/o) 100.0 -°
Average wt (mg) 0.818 RECEIVED
Survival (%) 100.0
Average wt (mg) 1 0.856
Survival (%) 97.5
Average wt (mg) 1 0.739
DEC 0 7 2011
CENTRAL FILES
DWQ/BOQ
7.66
1 7.62
1 7.72
1 7,51
1 7.76
1 7.56
1 7.79
1 7.52
1 7.76
1 7.60
1 7.72 1
7.60
1 7.74 1
7.61
7.8
8.1
8.2
7.3
8.2
7.4
7.7
7.6
7.7
7.9
8.2
8.0
8.0
7.8
24.8
24.5
24.8
24.7__[_24.8
24.6
24.8
24.6
24.8
24.5
24.8
24.6
24.8
24.3
1 7.49
1 7.53
1 7.58
1 7.36
1 7.42
7.36
1 7.59
1 7.52
1 7.59
1 7.50
1 7.54
1 7.48
1 7.59
1 7.37
8.0
1 8.0
1 8.3
1 7.3
1 7.6
1 7.1
1 7.6
1 T6
7.7
T7
1 8.3
1 7.8
1 8.2
1 7.6
24.9
1 24.6
24.8
1 24.6
1 24.9
1 24.3
1 24.7
1 24.7
24.8
24.4
25.0
1 24.2
1 25.1
1 24.4
Sample Information
Collection start date.
Grab:
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO3):
Hardness (mg/L CaCOt):
Conductivity (µmhos/cm):
Total residual chlorine (mg/L):
Sample Temp. at Receipt (°C):
Analyses
Normal:
Hom. Var.
NOEC:
LOEC:
Chv:
Method:
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: 20% NOEC: 10% ChV: 14.1%
DWQ form AT-5 (8103)
Survival
Growth
NA
Yes
NA
Yes
20%
10%
>20%
20%
>20%
14.1%
Visuallnsp.
Dunnen's
Survival
Growth
% Effluent
Critical
Calculated
Critical
Calculated
1.25%
2.410
-1.109
2.5%
2.410
2.325
5.0%
2.410
0.154
10%
2.410
0.993
20%
2.410
2.602

Effluent Toxicity Report Form -Chronic Fathead Minnow Multi -Concentration Test 411,_-r Date:7/27/2011
Facility: City of Eden Mebane Bridge WWTP NPDES # NC00 25071 Pipe #: 001 Countf: Rockingham
_ L oratory: Tritest, Inc. ^I tv Comments WO# 1107-02237
x 1 '_14 Pace - 9297925001
Signature of Optator R ' nsible Charge
Winston-Salem
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor
MAIL ORIGINAL TO: Environmental Sciences Branch
Division of Water Quality aview�DV ATJ 1i----1
DEC 4 7 2011 DENR � 4a.1w.r�
1621 Mail Service Center 17 �/ 1
16 (
TRAL Ffi r Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
Test Initiation Date/Time
% Eff. Repl.
Control Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
1.35 Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
2.7 Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
5.4 Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
8.1 Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
10.8 Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
Water Quality Data
Control
pH (SU) Init/Fin
DO (mg/L) [nit/Fin
Temp (C) Init/Fin
High Concentration
pH (SU) Init/Fin
DO (mg/L) Init/Fin
Temp (C) Init/Fin
Sample
Collection Start Date
Grab
Composite (Duration)
Hardness (mg/L)
Alkalinity (mg/L)
Conductivity (umhos/cm)
Chlorine(mg/L)
Temp. at Receipt (°C)
7/12/2011 / 2:46pm Avg Wt/Surv. Control 0.869
1 2 3 4
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0.826
0.939
0.891
0.820
9
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0.757
0.727
0.669
0.807
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0.725
0.833
1.051
0.820
9
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0.479
0.771
0.872
0.766
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0.655
0.788
0.805
0.819
% Survival F 100.0
Avg Wt (mg) 0.869
% Survival 97.5
Avg Wt (mg) 0.740
% Survival 100.0
Avg Wt (mg) 0.857
% Survival 97.5
Avg Wt (mg) 0.722
% Survival 100.0
Avg Wt (mg) 0.767
% Survival 100.0
Avg Wt (mg) 0.744
Day
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Test Organisms
Cultured In -House
Outside Supplier
Hatch Date: -4)11 k
Hatch Time:
RECEIVE
8.0 / 7.7
7.5 / 7.7
8.0 / 7.8
7.9 / 8.0
8.1 / 8.0
8.3 / 7.9
8.3 / 8.1
7.1 / 7.0
7.6 / 6.3
7.3 / 6.9
7.2 / 7.0
6.9 / 6.2
6.9 / 6.5
7.4 / 6.9
25.1 / 24.9
25.1 / 24.8
25.0 / 24.8
25.2 / 24.8
25.0 / 24.8
25.1 / 55.0
25.2 / 24.3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
7.8 / 7.7
7.7 / 7.6
8.0 / 7.8
7.7 / 7.9
8.1 / 8.0
8.0 / 7.8
8.1 / 8.0
7.4 / 7.1
7.6 / 6.3
7.5 / 6.4
6.7 / 6.3
7.0 / 6.7
6.7 / 6.1
7.2 / 6.4
25.0 / 25.0
24.6 / 24.7
25.1 / 24.8
24.9 / 24.7
24.8 / 24.7
25.3 / 24.9
25.4 / 24.3
1 2 3
7/11 /2011
7/12/2011
7/14/2011
23.67
24.00
23.00
67.80
69.00
72.00
35.50
38.20
33.50
284.1
309
353
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
3.3
4.6
4.4
Dilution H2O
Hardness (mg/L)
37.00
Alkalinity (mg/L)
29.30
Conductivity (umhos/cm)
196
Normal
Hom. Var
NOEC
LOEC
ChV
Method
Slats
Conc.
1 2 r,
5.4
8.1
10.8
Survival
171
ri
10.8
>10.8
>10.8
Steel's
Survival
Critical
10
Growth
r__I
FI
10.8
>10.8
>10.8
Dunnett's
AUrG 1 6 2011
L
►FCA4M1
Overall Result
ChV
Growth
Calculated
Critical
Calculated
16
2.41
1.795
18
2.41
0.164
16
2.41
2.046
18
2.41
1.423
18
2.41
1.736
DWQ Form AT-5 (1104)

uent Toxicity Report Form -Chronic Fathead Minnow Multi -Concentration Test / fj Date:9/29/2011
Facility: City of Eden Mebane Bridge WWTP
Tri
x
S
in Responsible Charge
NPDES # NC00 25071
Pipe #: 001 Count Rockin(
Comments WO# 1109-01458
Pace PO# 92102618
X n-"r II-Lw,^J- -
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor
E MAIL ORIGINAL TO: Environmental Sciences Branch v
T%_ tiAt'te .i L... A Tr t
Division o' Aster Quality ewi .e vV I11 V
NC DENR
DEC 0 7 Nii r '
1621 Mail Service Center 4 (� � ,�
L�j
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
Test Initiation Date/Time 9/2012011
% Eff. Repl.
Control Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
1.35 Surviving #
Original #
WUoriginal (mg)
2.7 Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
5.4 Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
8.1 Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
10.8 Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
Water Quality Data
Control
pH (SU) Init/Fin
DO (mg/L) Init/Fin
Temp (C) Init/Fin
High Concentration
pH (SU) Init/Fin
DO (mg/L) Init/Fin
Temp (C) Init/Fin
Sample
Collection Start Date
Grab
Composite (Duration)
Hardness (mg/L)
Alkalinity (mg/L)
Conductivity (umhos/cm)
Chlorine(mg/L)
Temp. at Receipt (°C)
Dilution H2O
Hardness (mg/L)
Alkalinity (mg/L)
Conductivity (umhos/cm)
1
/ 3:15pm Avg WUSurv. Control 0.798
3 4
10
9
9
9
10
10
10
10
0.760
0.821
0.596
1 0.773
7
10
1 9
10
10
10
10
10
0.610
0.788
0.736
1 0.761
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0.854
0.604
0.757
0.696
10
10
1 10
10
10
10
10
10
0.692
0.718
0.644
0.860
9
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0.556
0.714
0.650
0.612
10
7
10
9
10
10
10
10
0.621
0.622
0.754
0.614
% Survival 92.5
Avg Wt (mg)F.0.738
% Survival 90.0
Avg Wt (mg) 0.724
% Survival 100.0
Avg Wt (mg) 0.728
% Survival 100.0
Avg Wt (mg) 0.729
% Survival 97.5
Avg Wt (mg) 0.633
% SurvivalF 90.0
Avg Wt (mg) 0.653
Day
'A A 5 6
Test Organisms
Cultured In -House
Outside Supplier
Hatch Date:
Hatch Time:
tii'r�4i3
8.1 / 7.3
17.4 / 7.5
8.1 / 7.7
7.9 / 7.6
8.0 / 7.5
8.0 / 7.6
7.9 / 7.5
7.5 / 6.6
17.3 / 6.8
7.3 / 7.2
7.3 / 6.3
7.2 / 6.1
7.2 / 6.5
7.1
25.0 / 24.4
24.9 / 24.8
25.3 / 24.5
25.1 / ')A 01
25.0 / 24.8
z A r 6
7.9 / 7.2
7.4 / 7.5
17.8 / 7.6
7.7 / 7.6
7.9 / 7.5
1 7.9 / 7.5
I 7.6 / 1.4
7.7 / 6.8
7.4 / 6.9
1 7.3 / 6.6
7.4 / 6.0
7.3 / 5.6
I 6.9 / 6.9
j 6.9
25.1 / 24.3
25.2 / 24.8
25.1 / 24.4
25.3 / 24.9
25.0 / 24.6
25.0 / 24.8
24.9 ! 24.7
1 2 3
9/19/2011
9/20/2011
9/22/2011
-24
-24
-24
81.00
81.20
80.20
24.00
23.40
30.20
413
425
442
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.2
1.8
2.1
M
ELC
DEC 14 20H
Survival
Growth Overall Result
Normal
ri
ChV >10.8
Hom. Var.
R-1
NOEC
10.8
10.8
LOEC
>10.8
>10.8
ChV
>10.8
>10.8
Method
Steel's
Dunnett's
Slats
Survival
Growth
Conc.
Critical
Calculated
Critical
Calculated
1.35
10
18.5
2.41
0.226
2.7
10
24
2.41
0.16
5.4
10
24
2.41
0.148
8.1
10
22
2.41
1.717
10.8
10
18.5
2.41
1.393
DWQ Form AT-5 (1104)

RECEIVED PO Box 7565
41 Asheville, NC 28802
® DEC 0 7 2011 Phone: [phone]
' Fax: [phone]
CENTRAL FILES E-mail: [e-mail]
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc. DWQ/BQQ
Date: September 29, 2011
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Fathead Minno�, Multi -Concentration Test
Facility: United Water
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge:
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor: ��u
Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment
Effluent
% Effluent
2.5
� % Effluent
s.o
% Effluent
tor.
% Effluent
20 %
#: NC-0021873 Pipe#: 001 County: Rockingham
7336
1 Satftnih'sG 1409I3.05, 110915.05, 110917.05 1
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch a ` Pr a t
1621 Mail Service Center p (' j % I'3ti date: End date: Starttime: End time:
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621 j �' 09-13-11 09-20-11 1254 1200
Replicate number
1 2 3 n�1(F°1$"+� Test Organisms
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Survival (%)
100.0
Outside supplier:
Ori 'nal number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Average wt (mg)
0.760
A uatox Inc.
Wei tloriginal (m arvae)
0.820
0.696
0.809
0.713
Average wt /
0.760
surviving (mg)
Hatch date:
09-12-11
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Hatch time:
1600 ET
Ori inal number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Survival (%
Wei t/original (mg/larvae)
0.757
0.727
0.730
0.741
Average wt (mg)
0.739
Sttrvival (%)
100.0
�
�l
Reviewed by A'TU
�- w�
Survivin number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Off ' al number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Wei t/original (m arvae)
0.894
0.718
0.756
0.656
Average wt (mg)
0.756
Survivin number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Off inal number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Survival (%)
100.0
Wei t/original (mgAwvae)
0.767
0.751
0.721
0.725
Average wt (mg)
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Ori 'nal number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Survival (%)
100.0
wei t/original (mg/larvae)
0.715
0.666
0.700
0.717
Average wt (mg)
0.700
Surviving number of larvae
10
10
10
10
�a
Original number of larvae
10
10
10
10
Survival (%)
100.0
DEC
weight/original (mg/larvae)
0.626
0.717
0.685
0.684
Average wt (mg)
0.678
Water Quality Data
Day 0 Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Da 6
Initial Final Initial Final Initial Final Initial Final Initial Final Initial Final Initial Final
Control
pH (SU):
DO (mg/L):
Temp. CC):
High Concentration
pH (SU):
DO (mg/L):
Temp. (°C):
7.70
7.59
7.83
7.47
7.75
7.56
7.76
7.46
7.72
7.64
7.83
7.60
7.77
7.69
7.9
7.9
8.1
7.7
8.1
7.7
7.8
7.7
7.7
7.6
8.1
7.7
7.9
7.8
24.7
24.7
24.7
24.5
24.8
24.5
24.8
24.8
24.8
24.5
24.7
24.8
24.8
24.7
7.44
7.46
7.58
7.35
7.37
7.48 7.60
7.46
7.49
7.50
7.59
7.52
7.62
7,57
8.0
7.7
7.8
7.7
8.1
7.7 7.8
7.7
7.8
7.7
7.8
7.8
7.8
80
24.81
24.6
1 24.6
1 24.5
1 25.0
1 24.4 1 25.0
1 24.8
1 24.9
1 24.6
1 24.6
1 24.7
1 24.9
1 24 7
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Grab:
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO3):
Hardness (mg/L CaCO3):
Conductivity (µmhos/cm):
Total residual chlorine (mg/L):
Sample Temp. at Receipt (°C):
Analyses
Normal:
Hom. Var.
NOEL:
LOEC:
Chv:
Method:
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >20% NOEC: 20"% ChV: >20�„
Survival
Growth
NA
Yes
NA
Yes
20%
20%
>20%
>20%
>20%
>20%
Visuallnsp.
Dunnett's
Survival
Growth
%Effluent
Critical
Calculated
Critical
Calculated
1.25 %
2.410
0.553
2.5%
2.410
0.093
5.0 %
2.410
0.493
10%
2.410
1.598
20%
2.410
2.17�
DWQ form AT-5 (8103)

P-=ffluent Toxicity Report Form -Chronic Fathead Minnow Multi -Concentration Test Date:5119/2011
Facility: City of Eden Mebane Bridge WWTP NPDES # NC00 25071 Pipe #: 001 County: Rockingham
L bor tory: Tritest, Inc. Comments WO# 1105-00635
x �� ; l �I Pace - 9293738001
Signature of Operator in Re pon ' Charge I
x Winston-Salem
1Un t iv`: i ;kG+
Signature of Laboratory Sup2s6r
MAIL ORIGINAL TO: Environmental Sciences Branch
mot- ''' T - '
Division of Water Quality
,---F
ft',-- ---1
� by ATU 1
NC DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
t2-4
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
Test Initiation Date/Time
5/10/2011
/ 3:48pm
Avg WUSurv. Control 0.749
% Eff. Repl.
1
2
3
4
FC-o-n-t-ro-il Surviving #
10
9
10
10
% Survival 100.0
10 9 10 10
IT
10 9 10 10
10 10 10 10
0.714 0.738 0.736
2.7 Surviving # 10 10 8 10 %Survival 95.0
Original #
(mg) 0.763 0.751 0.597 0.825 Avg Wt (mg) 0.734
5.4 Surviving # 8 10 10 9 %Survival 92.5
Original #
i Wt/original (mg) 0.604 0.734 0.739 0.756 Avg Wt (mg) 0.708
8.1 Surviving # 10 10 10 10 %Survival 100.0
Original #
(mg) 0.682 0.838 0.785 0.634 Avg Wt (mg) 0.735
10.8 Surviving # 10 10 10 7 %Survival 94.9
Original #
(mg) 0.666 0.791 0.751 0.684 Avg Wt (mg) 0.723
Water Quality Data Day
Control 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
pH (SU) IniUFin
DO (mg/L) IniUFin
Temp (C) [nit/Fin24.7 / 24.7 24.9 / 24.6 25.0 / 24.5 25.1 / 24.6 25.0 / 24.5 25.0 / 24.4 25.0 / 24.2
High Concentration
pH (SU) Init/Fin
DO (mg/L) IniUFin
Temp (C) IniUFin
Sample
Collection Start Date
Grab
Composite (Duration)
Hardness (mg/L)
Alkalinity (mg/L)
Conductivity (umhos/cm)
Chlorine(mg/L)
Temp. at Receipt (°C)
10 10 10 10
10 10 10 10
10 10 10 9
8.1 / 7.8 8.0 / 7.9 8.2 / 7.7 7.9 / 7.7 8.1 / 8.1 8.0 / 7.7 7.7 / 7.7
6.9 / 6.1 6.6 / 6.0 7.1 / 5.7 7.1 / 6.1 7.2 / 7.0 6.3 / 7.2 7.5 / 5.6
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
8.1 / 7.8 8.0 / 7.9 8.1 / 7.5 7.7 / 7.7 8.1 / 7.8 7.8 / 7.6 7.7 / 7.6
6.9 / 6.1 7.0 / 6.4 7.1 / 6.6 6.8 / 5.9 7.4 / 6.5 6.3 / 7.0 7.4 / 5.9
24.6 / 24.6 24.9 / 24.5 25.1 / 24.6 25.0 / 24.6 25.0 / 24.4 24.9 / 24.6 25.1 / 24.2
1 2 3
5/9/2011 5/10/2011 5/12/2011
24.00 24.00 24.00
63.00 63.00 62.00
51.00 51.00 51.50
358 346 347
0.21 <0.1 <0.1
1.0 0.7 1.3
CENTRALFILES
Dilution H2O
Hardness (mg/L) 44.80
Alkalinity (mg/L) 41.30
Conductivity (umhos/cm) 222.5
Test Organisms
Cultured In -House
Outside Supplier
Hatch Date: S �`
Hatch Time: i
Wt/original
Wt/original
Wt/original
DEC 0 7 2011
Survival Growth Overall Result
Normal n Fj ChV
Hom. Var. n r_ 1
NOEC 10.8 10.8
LOEC >10.8 >10.8
ChV >10.8 >10.8
Method Steel's Dunnett's
Slats Survival Growth
Conc. Critical Calculated Critical Calculated
1.35 10 16 2.41 0.181
2.7 10 16 2.41 0.315
5.4 10 14 2.41 0.848
8.1 10 18 2.41 0.3
10.8 10 16 2.41 0.543
10 10 10 10
DWQ Form AT-5 (1/04)
IT
10 9 10 10
10 10 10 10
0.714 0.738 0.736
2.7 Surviving # 10 10 8 10 %Survival 95.0
Original #
(mg) 0.763 0.751 0.597 0.825 Avg Wt (mg) 0.734
5.4 Surviving # 8 10 10 9 %Survival 92.5
Original #
i Wt/original (mg) 0.604 0.734 0.739 0.756 Avg Wt (mg) 0.708
8.1 Surviving # 10 10 10 10 %Survival 100.0
Original #
(mg) 0.682 0.838 0.785 0.634 Avg Wt (mg) 0.735
10.8 Surviving # 10 10 10 7 %Survival 94.9
Original #
(mg) 0.666 0.791 0.751 0.684 Avg Wt (mg) 0.723
Water Quality Data Day
Control 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
pH (SU) IniUFin
DO (mg/L) IniUFin
Temp (C) [nit/Fin24.7 / 24.7 24.9 / 24.6 25.0 / 24.5 25.1 / 24.6 25.0 / 24.5 25.0 / 24.4 25.0 / 24.2
High Concentration
pH (SU) Init/Fin
DO (mg/L) IniUFin
Temp (C) IniUFin
Sample
Collection Start Date
Grab
Composite (Duration)
Hardness (mg/L)
Alkalinity (mg/L)
Conductivity (umhos/cm)
Chlorine(mg/L)
Temp. at Receipt (°C)
10 10 10 10
10 10 10 10
10 10 10 9
8.1 / 7.8 8.0 / 7.9 8.2 / 7.7 7.9 / 7.7 8.1 / 8.1 8.0 / 7.7 7.7 / 7.7
6.9 / 6.1 6.6 / 6.0 7.1 / 5.7 7.1 / 6.1 7.2 / 7.0 6.3 / 7.2 7.5 / 5.6
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
8.1 / 7.8 8.0 / 7.9 8.1 / 7.5 7.7 / 7.7 8.1 / 7.8 7.8 / 7.6 7.7 / 7.6
6.9 / 6.1 7.0 / 6.4 7.1 / 6.6 6.8 / 5.9 7.4 / 6.5 6.3 / 7.0 7.4 / 5.9
24.6 / 24.6 24.9 / 24.5 25.1 / 24.6 25.0 / 24.6 25.0 / 24.4 24.9 / 24.6 25.1 / 24.2
1 2 3
5/9/2011 5/10/2011 5/12/2011
24.00 24.00 24.00
63.00 63.00 62.00
51.00 51.00 51.50
358 346 347
0.21 <0.1 <0.1
1.0 0.7 1.3
CENTRALFILES
Dilution H2O
Hardness (mg/L) 44.80
Alkalinity (mg/L) 41.30
Conductivity (umhos/cm) 222.5
Test Organisms
Cultured In -House
Outside Supplier
Hatch Date: S �`
Hatch Time: i
Wt/original
Wt/original
Wt/original
DEC 0 7 2011
Survival Growth Overall Result
Normal n Fj ChV
Hom. Var. n r_ 1
NOEC 10.8 10.8
LOEC >10.8 >10.8
ChV >10.8 >10.8
Method Steel's Dunnett's
Slats Survival Growth
Conc. Critical Calculated Critical Calculated
1.35 10 16 2.41 0.181
2.7 10 16 2.41 0.315
5.4 10 14 2.41 0.848
8.1 10 18 2.41 0.3
10.8 10 16 2.41 0.543
10 10 10 10
DWQ Form AT-5 (1/04)
2.7 Surviving # 10 10 8 10 %Survival 95.0
Original #
(mg) 0.763 0.751 0.597 0.825 Avg Wt (mg) 0.734
5.4 Surviving # 8 10 10 9 %Survival 92.5
Original #
i Wt/original (mg) 0.604 0.734 0.739 0.756 Avg Wt (mg) 0.708
8.1 Surviving # 10 10 10 10 %Survival 100.0
Original #
(mg) 0.682 0.838 0.785 0.634 Avg Wt (mg) 0.735
10.8 Surviving # 10 10 10 7 %Survival 94.9
Original #
(mg) 0.666 0.791 0.751 0.684 Avg Wt (mg) 0.723
Water Quality Data Day
Control 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
pH (SU) IniUFin
DO (mg/L) IniUFin
Temp (C) [nit/Fin24.7 / 24.7 24.9 / 24.6 25.0 / 24.5 25.1 / 24.6 25.0 / 24.5 25.0 / 24.4 25.0 / 24.2
High Concentration
pH (SU) Init/Fin
DO (mg/L) IniUFin
Temp (C) IniUFin
Sample
Collection Start Date
Grab
Composite (Duration)
Hardness (mg/L)
Alkalinity (mg/L)
Conductivity (umhos/cm)
Chlorine(mg/L)
Temp. at Receipt (°C)
10 10 10 10
10 10 10 10
10 10 10 9
8.1 / 7.8 8.0 / 7.9 8.2 / 7.7 7.9 / 7.7 8.1 / 8.1 8.0 / 7.7 7.7 / 7.7
6.9 / 6.1 6.6 / 6.0 7.1 / 5.7 7.1 / 6.1 7.2 / 7.0 6.3 / 7.2 7.5 / 5.6
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
8.1 / 7.8 8.0 / 7.9 8.1 / 7.5 7.7 / 7.7 8.1 / 7.8 7.8 / 7.6 7.7 / 7.6
6.9 / 6.1 7.0 / 6.4 7.1 / 6.6 6.8 / 5.9 7.4 / 6.5 6.3 / 7.0 7.4 / 5.9
24.6 / 24.6 24.9 / 24.5 25.1 / 24.6 25.0 / 24.6 25.0 / 24.4 24.9 / 24.6 25.1 / 24.2
1 2 3
5/9/2011 5/10/2011 5/12/2011
24.00 24.00 24.00
63.00 63.00 62.00
51.00 51.00 51.50
358 346 347
0.21 <0.1 <0.1
1.0 0.7 1.3
CENTRALFILES
Dilution H2O
Hardness (mg/L) 44.80
Alkalinity (mg/L) 41.30
Conductivity (umhos/cm) 222.5
Test Organisms
Cultured In -House
Outside Supplier
Hatch Date: S �`
Hatch Time: i
Wt/original
Wt/original
Wt/original
DEC 0 7 2011
Survival Growth Overall Result
Normal n Fj ChV
Hom. Var. n r_ 1
NOEC 10.8 10.8
LOEC >10.8 >10.8
ChV >10.8 >10.8
Method Steel's Dunnett's
Slats Survival Growth
Conc. Critical Calculated Critical Calculated
1.35 10 16 2.41 0.181
2.7 10 16 2.41 0.315
5.4 10 14 2.41 0.848
8.1 10 18 2.41 0.3
10.8 10 16 2.41 0.543
10 10 10 10
DWQ Form AT-5 (1/04)
High Concentration
pH (SU) Init/Fin
DO (mg/L) IniUFin
Temp (C) IniUFin
Sample
Collection Start Date
Grab
Composite (Duration)
Hardness (mg/L)
Alkalinity (mg/L)
Conductivity (umhos/cm)
Chlorine(mg/L)
Temp. at Receipt (°C)
10 10 10 10
10 10 10 10
10 10 10 9
8.1 / 7.8 8.0 / 7.9 8.2 / 7.7 7.9 / 7.7 8.1 / 8.1 8.0 / 7.7 7.7 / 7.7
6.9 / 6.1 6.6 / 6.0 7.1 / 5.7 7.1 / 6.1 7.2 / 7.0 6.3 / 7.2 7.5 / 5.6
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
8.1 / 7.8 8.0 / 7.9 8.1 / 7.5 7.7 / 7.7 8.1 / 7.8 7.8 / 7.6 7.7 / 7.6
6.9 / 6.1 7.0 / 6.4 7.1 / 6.6 6.8 / 5.9 7.4 / 6.5 6.3 / 7.0 7.4 / 5.9
24.6 / 24.6 24.9 / 24.5 25.1 / 24.6 25.0 / 24.6 25.0 / 24.4 24.9 / 24.6 25.1 / 24.2
1 2 3
5/9/2011 5/10/2011 5/12/2011
24.00 24.00 24.00
63.00 63.00 62.00
51.00 51.00 51.50
358 346 347
0.21 <0.1 <0.1
1.0 0.7 1.3
CENTRALFILES
Dilution H2O
Hardness (mg/L) 44.80
Alkalinity (mg/L) 41.30
Conductivity (umhos/cm) 222.5
Test Organisms
Cultured In -House
Outside Supplier
Hatch Date: S �`
Hatch Time: i
Wt/original
Wt/original
Wt/original
DEC 0 7 2011
Survival Growth Overall Result
Normal n Fj ChV
Hom. Var. n r_ 1
NOEC 10.8 10.8
LOEC >10.8 >10.8
ChV >10.8 >10.8
Method Steel's Dunnett's
Slats Survival Growth
Conc. Critical Calculated Critical Calculated
1.35 10 16 2.41 0.181
2.7 10 16 2.41 0.315
5.4 10 14 2.41 0.848
8.1 10 18 2.41 0.3
10.8 10 16 2.41 0.543
10 10 10 10
DWQ Form AT-5 (1/04)
10 10 10 10
10 10 10 9
8.1 / 7.8 8.0 / 7.9 8.2 / 7.7 7.9 / 7.7 8.1 / 8.1 8.0 / 7.7 7.7 / 7.7
6.9 / 6.1 6.6 / 6.0 7.1 / 5.7 7.1 / 6.1 7.2 / 7.0 6.3 / 7.2 7.5 / 5.6
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
8.1 / 7.8 8.0 / 7.9 8.1 / 7.5 7.7 / 7.7 8.1 / 7.8 7.8 / 7.6 7.7 / 7.6
6.9 / 6.1 7.0 / 6.4 7.1 / 6.6 6.8 / 5.9 7.4 / 6.5 6.3 / 7.0 7.4 / 5.9
24.6 / 24.6 24.9 / 24.5 25.1 / 24.6 25.0 / 24.6 25.0 / 24.4 24.9 / 24.6 25.1 / 24.2
1 2 3
5/9/2011 5/10/2011 5/12/2011
24.00 24.00 24.00
63.00 63.00 62.00
51.00 51.00 51.50
358 346 347
0.21 <0.1 <0.1
1.0 0.7 1.3
CENTRALFILES
Dilution H2O
Hardness (mg/L) 44.80
Alkalinity (mg/L) 41.30
Conductivity (umhos/cm) 222.5
Test Organisms
Cultured In -House
Outside Supplier
Hatch Date: S �`
Hatch Time: i
Wt/original
Wt/original
Wt/original
DEC 0 7 2011
Survival Growth Overall Result
Normal n Fj ChV
Hom. Var. n r_ 1
NOEC 10.8 10.8
LOEC >10.8 >10.8
ChV >10.8 >10.8
Method Steel's Dunnett's
Slats Survival Growth
Conc. Critical Calculated Critical Calculated
1.35 10 16 2.41 0.181
2.7 10 16 2.41 0.315
5.4 10 14 2.41 0.848
8.1 10 18 2.41 0.3
10.8 10 16 2.41 0.543
10 10 10 10
DWQ Form AT-5 (1/04)
10 10 10 9
8.1 / 7.8 8.0 / 7.9 8.2 / 7.7 7.9 / 7.7 8.1 / 8.1 8.0 / 7.7 7.7 / 7.7
6.9 / 6.1 6.6 / 6.0 7.1 / 5.7 7.1 / 6.1 7.2 / 7.0 6.3 / 7.2 7.5 / 5.6
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
8.1 / 7.8 8.0 / 7.9 8.1 / 7.5 7.7 / 7.7 8.1 / 7.8 7.8 / 7.6 7.7 / 7.6
6.9 / 6.1 7.0 / 6.4 7.1 / 6.6 6.8 / 5.9 7.4 / 6.5 6.3 / 7.0 7.4 / 5.9
24.6 / 24.6 24.9 / 24.5 25.1 / 24.6 25.0 / 24.6 25.0 / 24.4 24.9 / 24.6 25.1 / 24.2
1 2 3
5/9/2011 5/10/2011 5/12/2011
24.00 24.00 24.00
63.00 63.00 62.00
51.00 51.00 51.50
358 346 347
0.21 <0.1 <0.1
1.0 0.7 1.3
CENTRALFILES
Dilution H2O
Hardness (mg/L) 44.80
Alkalinity (mg/L) 41.30
Conductivity (umhos/cm) 222.5
Test Organisms
Cultured In -House
Outside Supplier
Hatch Date: S �`
Hatch Time: i
Wt/original
Wt/original
Wt/original
DEC 0 7 2011
Survival Growth Overall Result
Normal n Fj ChV
Hom. Var. n r_ 1
NOEC 10.8 10.8
LOEC >10.8 >10.8
ChV >10.8 >10.8
Method Steel's Dunnett's
Slats Survival Growth
Conc. Critical Calculated Critical Calculated
1.35 10 16 2.41 0.181
2.7 10 16 2.41 0.315
5.4 10 14 2.41 0.848
8.1 10 18 2.41 0.3
10.8 10 16 2.41 0.543
10 10 10 10
DWQ Form AT-5 (1/04)
8.1 / 7.8 8.0 / 7.9 8.2 / 7.7 7.9 / 7.7 8.1 / 8.1 8.0 / 7.7 7.7 / 7.7
6.9 / 6.1 6.6 / 6.0 7.1 / 5.7 7.1 / 6.1 7.2 / 7.0 6.3 / 7.2 7.5 / 5.6
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
8.1 / 7.8 8.0 / 7.9 8.1 / 7.5 7.7 / 7.7 8.1 / 7.8 7.8 / 7.6 7.7 / 7.6
6.9 / 6.1 7.0 / 6.4 7.1 / 6.6 6.8 / 5.9 7.4 / 6.5 6.3 / 7.0 7.4 / 5.9
24.6 / 24.6 24.9 / 24.5 25.1 / 24.6 25.0 / 24.6 25.0 / 24.4 24.9 / 24.6 25.1 / 24.2
1 2 3
5/9/2011 5/10/2011 5/12/2011
24.00 24.00 24.00
63.00 63.00 62.00
51.00 51.00 51.50
358 346 347
0.21 <0.1 <0.1
1.0 0.7 1.3
CENTRALFILES
Dilution H2O
Hardness (mg/L) 44.80
Alkalinity (mg/L) 41.30
Conductivity (umhos/cm) 222.5
Test Organisms
Cultured In -House
Outside Supplier
Hatch Date: S �`
Hatch Time: i
Wt/original
Wt/original
Wt/original
DEC 0 7 2011
Survival Growth Overall Result
Normal n Fj ChV
Hom. Var. n r_ 1
NOEC 10.8 10.8
LOEC >10.8 >10.8
ChV >10.8 >10.8
Method Steel's Dunnett's
Slats Survival Growth
Conc. Critical Calculated Critical Calculated
1.35 10 16 2.41 0.181
2.7 10 16 2.41 0.315
5.4 10 14 2.41 0.848
8.1 10 18 2.41 0.3
10.8 10 16 2.41 0.543
10 10 10 10
DWQ Form AT-5 (1/04)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
8.1 / 7.8 8.0 / 7.9 8.1 / 7.5 7.7 / 7.7 8.1 / 7.8 7.8 / 7.6 7.7 / 7.6
6.9 / 6.1 7.0 / 6.4 7.1 / 6.6 6.8 / 5.9 7.4 / 6.5 6.3 / 7.0 7.4 / 5.9
24.6 / 24.6 24.9 / 24.5 25.1 / 24.6 25.0 / 24.6 25.0 / 24.4 24.9 / 24.6 25.1 / 24.2
1 2 3
5/9/2011 5/10/2011 5/12/2011
24.00 24.00 24.00
63.00 63.00 62.00
51.00 51.00 51.50
358 346 347
0.21 <0.1 <0.1
1.0 0.7 1.3
CENTRALFILES
Dilution H2O
Hardness (mg/L) 44.80
Alkalinity (mg/L) 41.30
Conductivity (umhos/cm) 222.5
Test Organisms
Cultured In -House
Outside Supplier
Hatch Date: S �`
Hatch Time: i
Wt/original
Wt/original
Wt/original
DEC 0 7 2011
Survival Growth Overall Result
Normal n Fj ChV
Hom. Var. n r_ 1
NOEC 10.8 10.8
LOEC >10.8 >10.8
ChV >10.8 >10.8
Method Steel's Dunnett's
Slats Survival Growth
Conc. Critical Calculated Critical Calculated
1.35 10 16 2.41 0.181
2.7 10 16 2.41 0.315
5.4 10 14 2.41 0.848
8.1 10 18 2.41 0.3
10.8 10 16 2.41 0.543
10 10 10 10
DWQ Form AT-5 (1/04)
1 2 3
5/9/2011 5/10/2011 5/12/2011
24.00 24.00 24.00
63.00 63.00 62.00
51.00 51.00 51.50
358 346 347
0.21 <0.1 <0.1
1.0 0.7 1.3
CENTRALFILES
Dilution H2O
Hardness (mg/L) 44.80
Alkalinity (mg/L) 41.30
Conductivity (umhos/cm) 222.5
Test Organisms
Cultured In -House
Outside Supplier
Hatch Date: S �`
Hatch Time: i
Wt/original
Wt/original
Wt/original
DEC 0 7 2011
Survival Growth Overall Result
Normal n Fj ChV
Hom. Var. n r_ 1
NOEC 10.8 10.8
LOEC >10.8 >10.8
ChV >10.8 >10.8
Method Steel's Dunnett's
Slats Survival Growth
Conc. Critical Calculated Critical Calculated
1.35 10 16 2.41 0.181
2.7 10 16 2.41 0.315
5.4 10 14 2.41 0.848
8.1 10 18 2.41 0.3
10.8 10 16 2.41 0.543
10 10 10 10
DWQ Form AT-5 (1/04)
Dilution H2O
Hardness (mg/L) 44.80
Alkalinity (mg/L) 41.30
Conductivity (umhos/cm) 222.5
Test Organisms
Cultured In -House
Outside Supplier
Hatch Date: S �`
Hatch Time: i
Wt/original
Wt/original
Wt/original
DEC 0 7 2011
Survival Growth Overall Result
Normal n Fj ChV
Hom. Var. n r_ 1
NOEC 10.8 10.8
LOEC >10.8 >10.8
ChV >10.8 >10.8
Method Steel's Dunnett's
Slats Survival Growth
Conc. Critical Calculated Critical Calculated
1.35 10 16 2.41 0.181
2.7 10 16 2.41 0.315
5.4 10 14 2.41 0.848
8.1 10 18 2.41 0.3
10.8 10 16 2.41 0.543
10 10 10 10
DWQ Form AT-5 (1/04)
Test Organisms
Cultured In -House
Outside Supplier
Hatch Date: S �`
Hatch Time: i
Wt/original
Wt/original
Wt/original
DEC 0 7 2011
Survival Growth Overall Result
Normal n Fj ChV
Hom. Var. n r_ 1
NOEC 10.8 10.8
LOEC >10.8 >10.8
ChV >10.8 >10.8
Method Steel's Dunnett's
Slats Survival Growth
Conc. Critical Calculated Critical Calculated
1.35 10 16 2.41 0.181
2.7 10 16 2.41 0.315
5.4 10 14 2.41 0.848
8.1 10 18 2.41 0.3
10.8 10 16 2.41 0.543
10 10 10 10
DWQ Form AT-5 (1/04)
10 10 10 10
DWQ Form AT-5 (1/04)
DWQ Form AT-5 (1/04)

Toxicity Report Form -Chronic Fathead Minnow Multi -Concentration Test 1-T Date:3/31/2011
Facility: City of Eden Mebane Bridge WWTP
Laborato7: Tritest, l,nc. �
X
Signature of Operator in Responsible Chi
NPDES # NC00 25071 Pipe #: 001 County: Rockingham
Comments WO# 1103-01651
Pace - 9290260-001
X
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor
i
C MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
/ DEC 0 7 2011
fl1
O ��h O-ZF
CENTRAL FILES
NOIR, ,
Environmental Sciences Branch Division of Water Quality
NC DENR�
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
a L. A T
Diu v`r �.0
mol�l, 4",
' _...
Test Initiation DatefTime
3/22/2011
/ 3:52pm
Avg Wt/Surv. Control 0.865
Test Organisms
% Eff. Repl.
1
2
3
4
7 Cultured In -House
Control I Surviving #
%Survival 97.5
)✓ Outside Supplier
Original #
_0
WUoriginal (mg)
Avg Wt (mg) 843
Hatch Date: S
1.35 Surviving #
% Survival 97.5
Hatch Time:
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
Avg Wt (mg) 0.742
2.7 Surviving #
% Survival 97.5
Original #
WUoriginal (mg)
Avg Wt (mg) 0.800
5.4 Surviving #
% Survival 97.5
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
Avg Wt (mg) 0.786
8.1 Surviving #
% Survival 90.0
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
Avg Wt (mg) 0.786
10.8 Surviving #
% Survival 92.3
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
Avg Wt (mg) 0.762
Water Quality Data
Day
Control
0
1
2
3
4 5 6
pH (SU) Init/Fin
DO (mg/L) Init/Fin
Temp (C) Init/Fin
High Concentration
0
1
2
3
4 5 6
pH (SU) Init/Fin
DO (mg/L) Init/Fin
Temp (C) Init/Fin
Sample
1
2
3
Survival Growth
Overall Result
Collection Start Date
Normal
rI FI
ChV >10.8
Grab
Hom. Var. r F1
Composite (Duration)
NOEC
10.8 10.8
Hardness (mg/L)
LOEC
>10.8 >10.8
Alkalinity (mg/L)
ChV
>10.8 >10.8
Conductivity (umhos/cm)
Method
Steel's Dunnett's
Chlorine(mg/L)
Temp. at Receipt (°C)
Slats
Survival
Growth
Conc.
Critical Calculated Critical Calculated
Dilution H2O
1.35
10 18
2.41 2.176
Hardness (mg/L)
40.80
2.7
10 20
2.41 0.922
Alkalinity (mg/L)
29.00
5.4
10 18
2.41 1.2338
Conductivity (umhos/cm)
207.7
8.1
10 20
2.41 1.227
10.8
10 20
2.41 1.742
10
10
9
10
10
10
10
10
0.863
0.867
0.788
0.855
10
9
10
10
10
10
10
10
0.727
0.752
0.750
0.738
9
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0.820
0.769
0.736
0.876
10
9
10
10
10
10
10
10
0.840
0.616
0.814
0.872
10
6
10
10
10
10
10
10
0.825
0.720
0.847
0.752
10
10
10
6
10
10
10
9
0.742
0.838
0.779
0.689
7.6 / 7.6
7.8 / 7.4
7.8 / 7.5
7.9 / 7.7
7.8 / 7.7
7.8 / 7.5
7.8 / 7.5
6.9 / 5.9
7.2 / 6.2
7.4 / 6.1
8.2 / 8.0
7.8 / 7.4
7.8 / 5.0
7.6 / 6.5
25.1 / 25.6
25.0 / 24.8
25.1 / 24.4
25.0 / 24.6
25.0 / 24.5
25.0 / 24.6
25.0 / 24.4
7.7 / 7.6
7.8 / 7.5
7.8 / 7.6
8.1 / 7.7
7.7 / 7.7
7.8
7.3 / 5.6
7.1 / 6.4
7.1 / 6.2
7.4 / 7.6
7.7 / 7.6
7.7 / 4.2
7.9 / 6.3
24.9 / 25.6
24.7 / 24.9
24.8 / 24.5
24.7 / 24.6
25.0 / 24.4
24.9 / 24.4
25.0 / 24.6
3/21 /2011
3/22/2011
3/24/2011
24.00
24.00
24.00
65.00
64.00
62.00
74.60
66.60
180.60
308
319
309
<0.1
<0.1
0.86
6.0
3.5
1.0
DWQ Form AT-5 (1/04)

SANITARY SEWER OV RFL W (SSO) 24 HOUR REPORT
FACILITY NAME:
PERMIT #:
FACILITY OWNER.
CITY:
COUNTY:
SSO START DATE: 16 '
SSO START TIME: d Lj
A
PM
SSO END DATE: Io 2 C5
SSO END TIME:
PM
LOCATION OF SSO:
TOTAL VOLUME:
IDID SSO REACH SURFACE WATERS?
YES
< 5O
VOLUME REACHING S RFACE WATERS:
IFISH KILL?
YES
NO
ESTIMATED FISH KILL:
IWATER BODY:
CONVEYANCE:
CAUSE OF SSO:
SEVERE NATURAL CONDITION
1&1
VANDALISM
ONE)
PUMP ST. EQUIPMENT FAILURE
GREASE
DEBRI IN LINE
(CIRCLE
POWER OU AGE
ROOTS
OTHER
SSO REPORTED BY:
t, tj
lq I ±jjn
PHONE #: '�;�3
DATE REPORTED:
ITIME REPORTED:
I AM
I PM
REPORT RECEIVED BY:
DATE RECEIVED:
ITIME RECEIVED:
I AM
I PM
REGIONAL CONTACT:
DATE RECEIVED:
ITIME RECEIVED:
pAM
PM
REMARKS:

2010 10:01AM
UNITED WATER
PO Box 1279
Clemmons, NC 27012
TEL [phone]
FAX [phone]
WWW.UNITEDWATER.COM
FAX
TO: P o
DATE: 1
PAGES:
3
UNIIEU WAIEK No.2�82 N. 1
60e'l,Cl7411rj
MJECT: '(� d�✓� S c
FROM: L t 5 a (—N"t tj r r� T
FAXNO:

oC-Oct, 28, 20101;10:01AKHYDFUNITED WATER- 42�733 ro;76604,No. 2582 P.
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
WWTP Upset . Spill, or @vage 5-Day Rego ina Form
ro A., (Please Print or Type Use Attachments If Needed)
% 0 f x
pC�crr - f t�l c�T10
Permitter; _0-f g'") 3 Permit Number. Ak,00A/8`)
Fadllty Name; M&va &1w►. Luo p
Incident Started: Date:
Incident Ended: Date: A - 27 -I D
Time: 6/: SDA•w
Time: S": D SA64,
Level of Treatment:
_None Primary Treatment V Sehondary Treatment Chlodnatlon/Disinfection Only
Estimated Volume of Spill/Bypass: z SO O as /s (must be given even If it Is a rough estimate)
Did the Splll/Bypass reach the Surface Waters? Yes 1"60
If yes, please list the following:
Volume Reaching Surface Waters: Surface Water Name:
Did the Spill/Bypass result in a Fish Kill? Yes `two
Was WWTP compliant with permit requirements? 'Ye s No
Were samples taken during event? es No
rNHuc--77- o Row s pl#Yte- 166K cf- No. q 4erar%or.. Rar.'.t.,
Cause or ReAson for the Upset/SpllllBwass: , 1-beut/y PAi r 5 4- pvv' %wt.5
Describe the Repairs Made or Actlons Taken:
,ziP ,�jasr'� C"7 a erryors
r1� a e

2010i,,10:01A9HYbFUNITED WATER' 1275733 -ro:76604iNo. 2582 P. 3 P.3
WWTP Upset, Spill, or Bypass 5-Day Reporting Form
Page 2
Action Taken to Contaln Spill, Clean Up end Remed a e thl SIte If a Ilcab e
Apoli'eA L,; me ' - srmw .
rivvo�i■ VYNYIIOIIVGO�
'OCA3S w ; y r cSer� �a si n.
Additional Comments About the_F.ya�
24-Hour Report Made To: Division of Water QualityZEmergency Management
Contact Name 26& &AeDate: JD .2') --)Q Tme: /0 ;.X0A"-%.
7oc4in. 01� /i1 ao�q•ti,
Other Agencles Notlfled (Health Dept, etc): Unites a ��--
Person Reporting Event; rv► io Jw'A%'rL Phone Number,
Did DWQ Request an Additional Written Report? Aires
If Yes, What Additlonal Infbrmatlon Is Needed:
SpIIIIBypasa Reporting Form (August 1997)

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
March 17, 2010
Debra E. Cardwell, Manager Town
Town of Mayodan
210 W. Main St
Mayodan, NC 27027
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
NOV-2010-LV-0084
Permit No. NCO021873
Mayodan WWTP
Rockingham County
Dear Ms. Cardwell,:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
A review of Mayodan WWTP's monitoring report for December 2009 showed the following
violations:
Parameter
Date
Limit Value
Reported Value
Limit Type
Solids, Total Suspended -
12/19/09
45 mg/1
87.23 mg/1
Weekly
Concentration
Average
Exceeded
Remedial actions, if not already implemented, should be taken to correct the above
noncompliance problem. Please be aware that violations of your NPDES permit could result in
enforcement action by the Division of Water Quality for this and any additional violations of
State law.
If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Ron Boone at [phone].
Sincerely,
Steve W. Tedder
Surface Water Regional Supervisor
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
cc: SWP - Central Files
WSRO Files
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, Winston-Salem Regional Office one
Location 585 Waughtown St, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107 NorthCarolina
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 /
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org Naturally
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

Cover Sheet from
Staff Member to
Regional Supervisor
DMR Review Record
Facility: i ,970 Permit/Pipe No.: �'7�3 d�1 Month/Year*-6j
Monthly Average Violations
Parameter Permit Limit DMR Value % Over Limit
Weekly/Daily Violations
Date Parameter 2;;4ilf
DMR Value % Over Limit
S 7 gg3 93. 9-k
Monitoring Frequency Violations
Date Parameter Permit Frequency Values Reported # of Violations
I al - wo, W -
Completed by: °=
Regional Water Quality
Supervisor Signoff:
,
al,��
Date:
_t'�.�d
Date:
1. V
NUU �

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
2 March 2010
Town of Mayodan
Attn: Ms. Debra E. Cardwell, Town Manager
210 West Main Street
Mayodan, NC 27027
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspections
NPDES Individual Wastewater Permit NCO021873 &
NPDES General Stormwater Permit NCG110142
Mayodan Wastewater Treatment Plant
Rockingham County
Dear Ms. Cardwell:
Ron Boone, of the Winston-Salem Regional Office (WSRO) of the NC Division of Water Quality (DWQ or the
Division), conducted compliance evaluation inspections (CEI) of the Mayodan Wastewater Treatment Plant
for the subject permits on 18 February 2010. The plant Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC), Mr. Jamie
Whitten, and his back-up ORC, Mr. Corey Brannock, were present for the inspection. Their assistance and
cooperation in setting up and facilitating the inspection is greatly appreciated. Inspection checklists are
attached for the town's records.
NCO021873
General Information
2. The plant is located at the south end of Cardwell Road, approximately % of a mile south of the intersection
of Cardwell Road and NC Highway 135. The permit authorizes the city to operate this 2.5 MGD plant,
which, according to the permit, consists of a mechanical bar screen, grit removal, dual path aeration basins,
secondary clarifiers, chlorination, dechlorination, sludge thickener, aerobic digester, and sludge drying beds.
Some changes have taken place at the plant however and this description should be updated during the
next permit renewal cycle. The permit authorizes the city to discharge treated effluent from the plant to the
Mayo River, this section of which is currently classified as Class C waters in the Roanoke River Basin.
Site Review
3. The plant is well operated and managed; it was very clean and well maintained at the time of the inspection.
The following items were noted:
a. The composite influent samples do not fully meet permit requirements (i.e. constant time/constant
volume), but are considered sufficient at this time.
b. The bar screen was down for repairs during the inspection but Mr. Whitten planned to have it back in
operation within two weeks.
C. There is no specific grit removal unit/process. This is one of the necessary changes for the plant
description in the permit.
d. The plant actually has two older aeration basins and two new ones. Only one of the two new
aeration basins is currently in use. The rest of the basins are all used for flow equalization. The
mixed liquor appeared healthy and well managed at the time of the inspection; Mr. Whitten stated
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, Winston-Salem Regional Office
Location: 585 Waughtown St. Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107 One
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 NorthCarofina
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org �ftu`
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer Ky+ ����

Town of Mayodan
Attn: Ms.Debra E. Cardwell, Town Manager
Compliance Evaluation Inspections
Mayodan Wastewater Treatment Plant, NCO021873 & NCG110142
2 March 2010
Page 2 of 3
"IN
that dissolved oxygen is maintained around 2.0 milligrams per liter (mg/1) and mixed liquor
suspended solids is kept around 3,000 mg/I.
e. Mr. Whitten and Mr. Boone discussed inflow/infiltration (1&1) at length. This is an ongoing problem
for Mayodan, as it was also discussed at length during last year's inspection. All equalization basins
were full during the inspection, a result of the significant wet weather that North Carolina has been
experiencing. Mr. Whitten discussed how he must shut off the aerators during these rain events to
help prevent solids washout. The Town continues to address (I&I) problems.
f. The secondary clarifiers were well maintained and operated. Sludge depth was about three feet
during the inspection. Flow over the weirs was clear and even and scum removal was effective.
g. The plant effluent was very clear and of high quality at the time of the inspection. The effluent flow is
used for reporting and the meter matched the chart recorder. The meter is calibrated at least
annually and was last calibrated in February 2010. Effluent samples are flow proportional.
h. The actual outfall could not be reached due to extremely damp and muddy conditions. However, a
distant visual observation showed the right-of-way to the outfall to be clear and accessible.
i. The aerated digester was inspected and found to be in good condition. Mr. Whitten stated that it is
pumped approximately once per year and is land applied by Southern Soil Builders.
j. The plant has a generator that can run the entire plant. According to Mr. Whitten, they test it twice
per month, once under load.
Documentation Review
4. The following documentation was reviewed:
a. Laboratory records, both in-house and contract, were reviewed. All records were complete,
accurate, well organized and available for review. At least five years worth of records are kept on
file. Laboratory records matched discharge monitoring reports and no transcription or other errors
were noted. The plant has a current field laboratory certification for residual chlorine, conductivity,
dissolved oxygen, pH and temperature. All laboratory chains of custody were also complete, well
organized and available for review.
b. Operation and maintenance records were also complete, current well organized and available for
review.
C. An operator visitation log is also kept. It is complete and current.
d. An annual compliance report for 2008 was received by the Division on 9 February 2009 and is on
file.
e. Mr. Whitten and Mr. Brannock have current appropriate certifications to enable them to operate the
plant.
f. The plant had four limit violations over the previous twelve months. These violations, along with
DWQ's responses to each, are detailed in the below table:
MONTH/YEAR
PARAMETER
LIMIT
REPORTED
VALUE
DWQ ACTION
02/2009
Biochemical Oxygen Demand,
45 mg/I
83.25 mg/I
Notice of Violation
Weekly Average
02/2009
Fecal Coliform, Weekly
400/100 ml
6,000/100 ml
Notice of Violation
Geometric Mean
03/2009
Total Suspended Solid, Weekly
45 mg/I
67 mg/I
Notice of Violation
Average
12/2009
Total Suspended Solids, Weekly
45 mg/I
87.23 mg/I
None Yet
Average

ENV
wn of Mayodan
Attn: Ms.Debra E. Cardwell, Town Manager
Compliance Evaluation Inspections
Mayodan Wastewater Treatment Plant, NCO021873 & NCG110142
2 March 2010
Page 3 of 3
NCG110142
General Information
5. This permit/certificate of coverage became effective in February 2009. It allows the town to discharge
stormwater related to industrial activity from the WWTP to the Mayo River; the same as for the WWTP
discharge discussed above.
Site Review
6. The site seemed to be quite clean and well maintained. Mr. Boone noted no issues or discrepancies.
Documentation Review
7. The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan was reviewed and found to be complete, comprehensive and
current. All required monitoring and inspections have been completed and documented. No issues or
discrepancies were noted.
8. No written reply to this letter is required. Please continue to help the Division to protect waters of the State
through your continued efforts to comply with all conditions of NCO021873 and NCG110142. If you have
any questions or concerns regarding the inspection or this letter, please contact me or Mr. Boone at 336-
771-5000.
Since r ly,
f�=
Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Winston-Salem Region
Division of Water Quality
Attachments:
1. Inspection Checklists for NCO021873 & NCG110142
Cc: j
NPDES West Unit
Central Files
Stormwater Permitting Unit

United States Environmental Protection Agency
Form Approved.
EPA Washington, D.C. 20460
OMB No. 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 INI 2 L 5I 31 NCO021873 111 121 10/02/18 117 181 CI 19I sl 201 +-
Remarks
21111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111116
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA ------------------------ -- Reserved ----------------------
67I 169 70 LI 71 IJ 721 NJ 73IWI 174 751 I I I I I I 180
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
Entry Time/Date
Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
09:00 AM 10/02/18
07/11/01
Mayodan WWTP
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
210 w Main St
Mayodan NC 27027
12:00 PM 10/02/18
12/05/31
Name(s) of Onsite Rep resentative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
Jamie C. Whitten//336-427-5733
Jamie C. Whitten/ORC/336-427-5733/
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Debra E Cardwell,210 W Main St Mayodan NC 27027/Town Contacted
Manager/336-427-0241/3364277592 No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Program Sludge Handling Disposal Facility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Waters
Laboratory Storm Water
Section D: Summary of Find in /Comments Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Ron Boo WSRO WQ//704-663-1699 Ext.2202/
,j
Signature of anignent Q A Rev er Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page # 1

NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type J.
3I N00021873 I11 12I 10/02/18 I17 18UI
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Page # 2

Permit: NC0021873
Owner - Facility: Mayodan WWTP
Inspection Date: 02/18/2010
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Pump Station - Influent
Yes
No NA
NE
Is the pump wet well free of bypass lines or structures?
■
n ❑
n
Is the wet well free of excessive grease?
■
n n
n
Are all pumps present?
■
n n
n
Are all pumps operable?
■
n n
n
Are float controls operable?
■
n n
n
Is SCADA telemetry available and operational?
■
n n
n
Is audible and visual alarm available and operational?
■
n n
n
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Flow Measurement - Influent
Yes
No
NA
NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
n
■
n
n
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
n
n
■
o
Is the flow meter operational?
n
■
n
n
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
n
■
n
n
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Bar Screens
Yes
No
NA
NE
Type of bar screen
a.Manual
Cl
b.Mechanical
■
Are the bars adequately screening debris?
n
n
■
n
Is the screen free of excessive debris?
nn■n
Is disposal of screening in compliance?
■
❑
❑
n
Is the unit in good condition?
■
n
n
n
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Grit Removal
Yes
No
NA
NE
Type of grit removal
a.Manual 11
b.Mechanical n
Is the grit free of excessive organic matter? n n ■ ❑
Is the grit free of excessive odor? n n ■ n
# Is disposal of grit in compliance? n n ■ Cl
Page # 3

Permit: NCO021873 Owner - Facility: Mayodan WWTP
Inspection Date: 02/18/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Comment: There is no grit removal. Please refer to attached inspection summary
letter.
Equalization Basins
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is the basin aerated?
❑
■
❑
❑
Is the basin free of bypass lines or structures to the natural environment?
■
n
❑
n
Is the basin free of excessive grease?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are all pumps present?
■
n
n
n
Are all pumps operable?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are float controls operable?
❑
❑
■
❑
Are audible and visual alarms operable?
❑
❑
■
❑
# Is basin size/volume adequate?
■
n
n
❑
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Aeration Basins
Yes
No
NA
NE
Mode of operation
Ext. Air
Type of aeration system
Surface
Is the basin free of dead spots?
■
n
n
n
Are surface aerators and mixers operational?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are the diffusers operational?
n
n
■
n
Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process?
■
n
❑
❑
Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface?
n
■
n
n
Is the DO level acceptable?
❑
n
❑
■
Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/1)
n
n
n
■
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Secondary Clarifier
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater?
■
n
n
n
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier?
■
n
n
n
Are weirs level?
■
n
❑
n
Is the site free of weir blockage?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting?
■
n
n
n
Is scum removal adequate?
■
n
❑
n
Page # 4

Permit: NCO021873 owner -Facility: Mayodan WWTP
Inspection Date: 02/18/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Secondary Clarifier Yes No NA NE
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge? ■ Q 0 ❑
Is the drive unit operational?
■
n
n
Q
Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)?
■
n
n
n
Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc?
■
n
n
Q
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately'/d of the sidewall depth)
■
n
n
p
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Disinfection -Gas
Yes
No
NA
NE
Are cylinders secured adequately?
■
n
n
n
Are cylinders protected from direct sunlight?
■
n
n
n
Is there adequate reserve supply of disinfectant?
■
O
n
n
Is the level of chlorine residual acceptable?
n
n
n
■
Is the contact chamber free of growth, or sludge buildup?
■
0
❑
0
Is there chlorine residual prior to de -chlorination?
❑
❑
n
■
Does the Stationary Source have more than 2500 Ibs of Chlorine (CAS No. 7782-50-5)?
n
n
n
■
If yes, then is there a Risk Management Plan on site?
n
n
n
■
If yes, then what is the EPA twelve digit ID Number? (1000 - )
If yes, then when was the RMP last updated?
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Type of system ?
Gas
Is the feed ratio proportional to chlorine amount (1 to 1)?
0
❑
❑
■
Is storage appropriate for cylinders?
■
n
n
n
# Is de -chlorination substance stored away from chlorine containers?
■
n
n
n
Are the tablets the proper size and type?
n
n
■
L�
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Are tablet de -chlorinators operational?
n
n
■
n
Number of tubes in use?
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Flow Measurement - Effluent Yes No NA NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting? ■ 0 n n
Page # 5

"Nq
Permit: NC0021873 Owner - Facility: Mayodan WWTP
Inspection Date: 02/18/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Flow Measurement - Effluent Yes No NA NE
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
■
❑
Q
❑
Is the flow meter operational?
■
n
n
❑
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
■
0
n
n
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Effluent Pipe
Yes No
NA
NE
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained?
■
0
Cl
Q
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris?
n
n
n
■
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly?
Q
Q
■
Q
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Pumps-RAS-WAS
Yes No
NA
NE
Are pumps in place?
■
n
Q
n
Are pumps operational?
■
n
n
0
Are there adequate spare parts and supplies on site?
■
n
n
n
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Aerobic Digester
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is the capacity adequate?
■
n
n
n
Is the mixing adequate?
■
n
n
0
Is the site free of excessive foaming in the tank?
■
n
n
n
# Is the odor acceptable?
■
n
n
n
# Is tankage available for properly waste sludge?
■
n
n
n
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Drying Beds
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is there adequate drying bed space?
❑
❑
■
0
Is the sludge distribution on drying beds appropriate?
n
n
■
Q
Are the drying beds free of vegetation?
n
n
■
n
# Is the site free of dry sludge remaining in beds?
n
n
■
n
Is the site free of stockpiled sludge?
n
n
■
Q
Is the filtrate from sludge drying beds returned to the front of the plant?
n
n
■
Q
# Is the sludge disposed of through county landfill?
❑
Q
■
0
# Is the sludge land applied?
n
n
■
0
Page # 6

Permit: NCO021873 Owner -Facility: Mayodan WWTP
Inspection Date: 02/18/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Drying Beds
Yes
No
NA
NE
n
(Vacuum filters) Is polymer mixing adequate?
r l
n
■
Comment: Beds not used for years. Please refer to attached inspection summary
letter.
Standby Power
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is automatically activated standby power available?
■
n
n
n
Is the generator tested by interrupting primary power source?
■
❑
❑
n
Is the generator tested under load?
■
n
n
n
Was generator tested & operational during the inspection?
❑
■
n
n
Do the generator(s) have adequate capacity to operate the entire wastewater site?
■
n
n
n
Is there an emergency agreement with a fuel vendor for extended run on back-up power?
Cl
n
❑
■
Is the generator fuel level monitored?
■
n
n
n
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Laboratory
Yes
No
NA
NE
Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory?
■
n
n
n
Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters) performed by a certified lab?
■
n
n
n
# Is the facility using a contract lab?
■
n
n
n
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)?
❑
❑
n
■
Incubator (Fecal Coliform) set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/- 0.2 degrees?
n
n
■
n
Incubator (BOD) set to 20.0 degrees Celsius +/- 1.0 degrees?
n
n
■
n
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Influent Sampling
Yes
No
NA
NE
# Is composite sampling flow proportional?
n
■
n
n
Is sample collected above side streams?
■
n
n
n
Is proper volume collected?
■
n
n
n
Is the tubing clean?
■
n
n
n
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)?
■
n
n
n
Is sampling performed according to the permit?
■
n
n
n
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Effluent Sampling
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is composite sampling flow proportional?
■
n
n
n
Page # 7

Permit: NCO021873
Inspection Date: 02/18/2010
Owner - Facility: Mayodan WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Effluent Sampling
Yes
No NA
NE
Is sample collected below all treatment units?
■
❑ Q
0
Is proper volume collected?
■
❑ ❑
Q
Is the tubing clean?
■
❑ C1
❑
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)?
■
n n
n
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type representative)?
■
❑ fl
O
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Upstream / Downstream Sampling
Yes
No NA
NE
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type, and sampling location)?
■
❑ ❑
Q
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Yes
No NA
NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new application?
❑
0
■
❑
Is the facility as described in the permit?
n
■
n
n
# Are there any special conditions for the permit?
n
■
n
n
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
■
❑
❑
0
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
■
n
n
n
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Record Keeping
Yes
No
NA
NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
■
n
Q
n
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
■
❑
❑
0
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)?
■
n
n
n
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
■
Q
Q
Q
Is the chain -of -custody complete?
■
n
n
n
Dates, times and location of sampling
■
Name of individual performing the sampling
■
Results of analysis and calibration
■
Dates of analysis
■
Name of person performing analyses
■
Transported COCs
■
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters?
■
❑
Q
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ?
■
n
n
n
Page # 8

VIV
Permit: NCO021873 Owner -Facility: Mayodan WWTP
Inspection Date: 02/18/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Record Keeping Yes No NA NE
(If the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator on each shift? Q ❑ ■ Cl
Is the ORC visitation log available and current? ■ ❑ n
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification? ■ Q 0
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification? ■ Cl ❑ Q
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site? ■ ❑ ❑ Q
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review? ■ 0 0 Q
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? ■ Q ❑ Q
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable Solids, pH, DO, Sludge ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Page # 9

Permit: NCG110142
SOC:
County: Rockingham
Region: Winston-Salem
Compliance Inspection Report
Effective: 02/13/09 Expiration: 05/31/13 Owner: Town of Mayodan
Effective: Expiration: Facility: Mayodan Wastewater Treatment Plant
293 Cardwell Rd
Contact Person: Debra E Cardwell
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
24 hour contact name
On -site representative
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 02/18/2010
Primary Inspector: Ron Boone
Secondary Inspector(s):
Title:
Jamie A Whitten
Jamie A Whitten
Certification:
Entry Time: 09:00 AM
Mayodan NC 27027
Phone: [phone]
Exit Time: 12;00 PM
Phone:
Phone:
Phone:
Phone: [phone]
Ext.2202
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Municipal WWTP > 1 MGD, Stormwater Discharge, COC
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
E Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Ki
Permit: NCG110142 Owner - Facility: Town of Mayodan
Inspection Date: 02/18/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Page: 2

rry
Permit: NCG110142 Owner - Facility: Town of Mayodan
Inspection Date: 02/18/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
■
n
n
n
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
■
❑
n
n
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
■
❑
Q
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
■
n
n
n
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
■
n
n
n
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
■
n
n
n
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
■
n
n
n
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
■
n n
n
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
■
n
n
n
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
■
n
n
n
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
■
n
n
n
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
■
n
n
n
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
❑
❑
❑
■
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
■
n
n
n
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
■
Q
Q
0
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes
No
NA
NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
■
n
00
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Analytical Monitoring
Yes
No
NA
NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
❑
❑
■
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
n
n
■
n
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Permit and Outfalls
Yes
No
NA
NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
■
n
O
n
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? ■ Cl Cl
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ ■
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? ■ ❑ ❑ Cl
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Page: 3

PPV 4
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
February 8, 2010 RECEIVED
FEB 19 2010
5046 -m _
Mr. Jamie Whitten
Town of Mayodan Wastewater Treatment Plant
P.O. Box 243
Mayodan, NC 27027-
SUBJECT: North Carolina Wastewater/Groundwater Laboratory Certification Renewal
FIELD PARAMETERS ONLY
Dear Mr. Whitten:
The Department of Environment and Natural Resources, in accordance with the provisions of NC GS 143-
215-3 (a) (10), 15 NCAC 2H .0800, is pleased to renew certification for your laboratory to perform
specified environmental analyses required by EMC monitoring and reporting regulations 15 NCAC 2B
.0500, 2H .0900 and 2L .0100, .0200, .0300, and 2N .0100 through .0800.
Enclosed for your use is a certificate describing the requirements and limits of your certification. Please
review this certificate to insure that your laboratory is certified for all parameters required to properly meet
your certification needs.
Please contact us at 919-733-3908 if you have questions or need additional information.
Sincerely,
Pat Donnelly
Certification Branch Manager
Laboratory Section
Enclosure
cc: Ramon L. Cook
Dana Satterwhite
Winston-Salem Regional Office
DENR DWQ Laboratory Section NC Wastewater/Groundwater Laboratory Certification Branch
1623 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1623
Location: 4405 Reedy Creek Road. Raleigh, North Carolina 27607-6445
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone]
Internet: www,dwglab.org
None
rthCarolina
Aaturally
An Equal opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 www.ncwaterquality.org

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF THE
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
LABORATORY CERTIFICATION PROGRAM
In accordance with the provisions of N.C.G.S. 143-215.3 (a) (1), 143-215.3 (a)(10) and NCAC 2H.0800:
TOWN OF MAYODAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
Is hereby certified to perform environmental analysis as listed on Attachment I and report monitoring data to DWQ for
compliance with NPDES effluent, surface water, groundwater, and pretreatment regulations.
By reference 15A NCAC 2H .0800 is made a part of this certificate.
This certificate does not guarantee validity of data generated, but indicates the methodology, equipment, quality control procedures,
records, and proficiency of the laboratory have been examined and found to be acceptable.
This certificate shall be valid until December 31, 2010
Certificate No 5046
t�V
Pat Donnelly
LLI

PV
Attachment I
North Carolina Wastewater/Groundwater Laboratory Certification
Certified Parameters Listing
Lab Name: Town of Mayodan Wastewater Treatment Plant Certificate Number: 5046
Address: P.O. Box 243 Effective Date: 01/01/2010
Mayodan, NC 27027- Expiration Date: 12/31/2010
Date of Last Amendment:
The above named laboratory, having duly met the requirements of 15A NCAC 21-1.0800, is hereby certified for the measurement of the parameters listed below.
CERTIFIED PARAMETERS
INORGANICS
RESIDUAL CHLORINE
Sid Method 4500 Cl G
CONDUCTIVITY
Std Method 2510E
DISSOLVED OXYGEN
Std Method 4500 0 G
pH
Std Method 4500 H B
TEMPERATURE
Std Method 2550E
This certification requires maintance of an acceptable quality assurance program, use of approved methodology, and satisfactory performance on evaluation samples. Laboratories are
subject to civil penalties and/or decertification for infractions as set forth in 15A NCAC 21-1.0807.

nv rh
SANITARY SEWER OVERFLOW (SSO) 24 HOUR REPORT
FACILITYNAME:
PERM IT#: /liC Uo, /2 3
FACILITY OWNER:
CITY: IqCOUNTY:
La
SSO START DATE: Z 3 e �
SSO START TIME: 0 3c)
PM
SSO END DATE: 2 3
SSO END TIME: I
M I
PM
LOCATION OF SSO:/,fM ,,,/, ke.J7'p Q ek-r.-A Ll, Le, SiL, 04�-
TOTAL VOLUME: ti (,,.o tl-?, 5 �_
DID SSO REACH SURFACE WATERS? I
YES
CO
VOLUME REACHING SURFACE WATERS:
I FISH KILL?
YES
NO
ESTIMATED FISH KILL: Ali 1A
IWATER BODY:
CONVEYANCE:
CAUSE OF SSO:
(CIRCLE ONE)
SEVERE NATURAL CONDITION
I&I
VANDALISM
PUMP ST. T3jUJ IP AI
GREASE
DEBRI IN LINE
POWER OUTAGE
ROOTS
OTHER
SSO REPORTED BY: �„�; Q, j,-
PHONE #:
DATE REPORTED: Z
ITIME REPORTED: / /
A q
I PM
REPORT RECEIVED BY: r
DATE RECEIVED: 3
TIME RECEIVED:
1 A 9
1 PM
REGIONAL CONTACT:
DATE RECEIVED: % j
TIME RECEIVED:
AM
PM
REMARKS: /(y �� "�C4_/1 cave r- 7/%�
d al T b 3 t �-, G��c S �'� rn' x C J /r (,-c, v &11 �
5 sti. ,L r. � W r 144 c� r
u

�0F WATE90 Form WWTP-BYPASS/UPSET
\p v Treatment Plant (WWTP) Bypass/Upset Reporting Form 5-Day Report
DEC 1 U 2009
o
M.:alcn-Salem
Regional Office
This form shall be submitted to the appropriate DWQ Regional Office within five days of the first knowledge of
the unanticipated bypass or upset.
Permittee: Town of Mavodan
Facility Name: Mavodan WWTP
Incident Started: Date: 12/3/09
Incident Ended: Date: 12/3/09
Permit Number. NCO021873
County: Rockingham
Time: 10:15 AM
Time: 10:30 AM
Weather Conditions during Bypass/Upset event: Clear/Sunny
Level of Treatment:
_None X Primary Treatment _Secondary Treatment _Chlorination/Disinfection Only
Estimated Volume of Spill/Bypass: 500 — 600 gallons (must be given even if it is a rough estimate)
Describe how the volume was determined: Estimated by what was on the ground
Did the Spill/Bypass reach the Surface Waters? _Yes X No
If yes, please list the following:
Volume Reaching Surface Waters: None Surface Water Name:
Did the Spill/Bypass result in a Fish Kill? Yes X No
Was WWTP compliant with permit requirements? X
Were samples taken during event? Yes X No
Source of the Upset/Spill/Bypass (Location or Treatment Unit):
Yes No

Form WWTP-BYPASS/UPSET
Page 2
Cause or reason for the Upset/Spill/Bypass:
Aerator cable broke in aeration basin #4 causing the aeratoar to float over to the wall and surge into the yard.
Describe the repairs made or actions taken:
Repair cable on the aerator and tied it back out.
Action taken to contain, lessen the impact, clean up, and remediate the site (if applicable) due to the bypass:
Put lime and straw on liquid in yard.
Action taken or proposed to be taken to prevent occurrences:
Check aerator cables on a regular basis.
Were adequate equipment and resources available to fix the problem? ® Yes ❑ No
Additional comments about the event:

Form WWTP-BYPASS/UPSET
Page 3
24-Hour Report Made To: Division of Water Quality X Emergency Management
Contact Name: Ron Boone Date
Other Agencies Notified (Health Dept, etc):
12/3/09
Time: approximately 12:00 PM
Person Reporting Event: Jamie Whitten Phone Number: 336-427-5733
Did DWQ request an additional written report? X Yes No
If Yes, what additional information is needed: overflow report
As a representative for the responsible party, I certify that the information contained in this
report is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
Person Submitting Claim: Jamie Whitten
Signature:
Title:
Date: 12/7/09
ORC
Telephone Number: 336-427-5733
Any additional information to be submitted should be sent to the appropriate Division Regional
Office within five days of first knowledge of the Bypass with reference to the incident number
(the incident number is only generated when electronic entry of this form is completed, if used).

A'L4�'v,2'h
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Debra E.Cardwell, Town Manager
Town of Mayodan
210 W Main St
Mayodan NC 27027
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
June 16, 2009
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION, NOV-2009-LV-0263
Permit No. NCO021873
Mayodan WWTP
Rockingham County
Dear Ms. Cardwell:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
A review of Mayodan WWTP's monitoring report for March 2009 showed the following violations:
Parameter
Date
Limit Value
Reported Value
Limit Type
Total Suspended Solids
03/07/2009
45 mg/1
67 mg/1
Weekly Average
Exceeded
Remedial actions, if not already implemented, should be taken to correct the above noncompliance
problem. Please be aware that violations of your NPDES permit could result in enforcement action by the
Division of Water Quality for this and any additional violations of.State law.
If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Ron Boone at [phone].
cc: SWP — Central Files
WSRO Files
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, Winston-Salem Regional Office
Location: 585 Waughtown St. Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] \ Customer Selvice:1.877-623-6748
Internet www.ncwaterquality.org
X
Tedder
Surface Water Regional Supervisor
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
NorthCarolina
Naturatt,ff
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer

1
Cover Sheet from
Staff Member to
Regional Supervisor
DMR Review Record
Facility: Mo J6\,w P�'-rP Permit/Pipe No.: 41 b?3 00! Month/Year 43 D
Monthly Average Violations
Parameter Permit Limit DMR Value % Over Limit
Weekly/Daily Violations
Date Parameter Permit Lire tuTvpe DMR Value % OverLimit
0 3 07 oy 1 5S %-1 `f�• I
Monitoring Frequency Violations
Date Parameter Pen -nit Frequency Values Reported # of Violations
7v
Other Violations
n/ �r
I� /� t�3 uc / / oD�✓ tl� e--� ov¢rsi zec�.. �espi7a s i1, 11"e s me
YDr{��¢rv15 CJ 1 aC/'GIL�IG 0�4-✓IOAfJc Y/M�a r! , ���`` •lf�. �LrM,TTYE
SQL A1,41 c-` *1 eYlt u� ✓1 a /�•--T /�-f S G�-C-[ /!fY QNT77Y CL MLc✓'•S ,
Completed by: /\ - (.bow �- Date:
Regional Water Quality
Supervisor Signoff: Date: al
�6U-�'i-GY-a2G3 6G�lG14

EFFLUENT
1
NPDES PERMIT NO. NCO021873 DISCHARGE N 001 MONTH Mar YEAR 2009
FACILITY NAME Mayodan WWTP CLASS III COUNTY Rockingham KI11
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE (ORC) Jamie Whitten GRADE IV PHONE[phone]
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES (1) Environement One (2) MAY
CHECK BOX IF ORC HAS CHANGED PERSON(S) COLLECTING SAMPLES Jamie Whitten
RECEIVED
Mail ORIGINAL and ONE COPY o: N C. Dept of ENR
ATTN: CENTRAL FILES MAY
� � y�y
DIVISION OF WATER QUALIT
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER inston•Salq'm
RALF,IGH. NC 27626 egional Office
TURE OF OPEATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHAR c ) DATE
THIS SIGNATURE I CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT 4AY J 5 ?0o9
: URATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
50050
00010
00400
50060
00310
00610
00530
31616
00300
00600
00665
00625
00095
D
A
T
E
Oper
Arrival
Time
Oper
Time
On
Site
ORC
On
Site
FLOW
Temp
pH
Resd
CL
BOD5
20 C
NH3
TSS
FECAL
COLI
(geo
mean)
D.O.
Total
Nitrogen
Total
P
Rainfall
TKN
Cond
Eff _x_
Inf _
Daily
Rate
Hrs
Hrs
Y/N
MGD
C
SU
UG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
#/100ML
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
Inches
MGIL
umhos/cm
1
1,400
4.0
Y
1.782
2
700
8.0
Y
1.782
8.0
6.9
<10.0
6.8
398.0
3
700
8.0
Y
2.058
8.0
7.0
<10.0
12.0
5.00
15.0
1.0
6.9
9.71
2.70
1.90
9.57
- 369.0
4
700
8.0
Y
1.164
9.0
6.8
<10.0
35.0
2.67
174.01,
r6,000.d.17.0
244.0
5
700
8.0
Y
1.082
11.0
6.7
1
23.0
1.86
12.0
,000.
6.9
6
700
8.0
Y
1.463
7
1,100
3.0
Y :
1.238
8
1,400
2.0
Y
1.238
9
700 '
8.0
Y
1.238
11.0
6.8
<10.0
6.8
10
700
8.0
Y
1.078
2.3
0.33
2.4
<1.0
323.0
Ill
700
1 8.0
Y
0.835
12.0
6.1
<10.0
5.8
0.08
6.3
1.0
7.0
362.0
12
700
1 8.0
Y
1.238
4.4
0.16
7.7
3.0
365.0
131
700
1"8.0
Y
1.204;
. 10.0
6.2
<10.0
6.8
141
1,000
1 3.0
Y
2.136
151
1,000
1 3.0
Y
2.136
----
16
700
8.0
Y
2.136
2.00
17
700
8.0
Y
1.942
11.0
6.0
<10.0
15.0
3.37
8.4
<1.0
6.9
247.0-
18
700
8.0
Y
2.448
10.0
6.0
1 <10.0
1 8.3
4.03
8.4
1.0
7.0
279.0
19
700
8.0
Y
1.358
10.0
6.8
<10.0
<2.0
0.14
3.1
3.0
6.8
259.0
20
700
8.0
Y
1.178
4.7
3.5
2.0
211
1,000 1
3.0
Y
0.889
---
221
1,300 1
3.0
Y
0.889
231
700 1
8.0
Y
0.889
10.0
6.4
<10.0
7.0
241
700 1
8.0
Y
0.800
11.0
6.2
<10.0
3.7
0.06
3.0
<1.0
6.8
357.0
25
700
8.0
Y
0.764
11.0
6.2
<10.0
2.9
0.08
3.0
<1.0
6.9
383.0
261
700 1
8.0
Y
0.971
3.8
0.30
2.2
1.0
0.25
**
271
700 1
8.0
Y
1.023
11.0
6.3
<10.0
6.8
0.10
281
1,500 1
4.0
Y
1.757
29
1,400
4.0
Y
1.757
30
700
8.0
Y
1.757
1.00
31
700
8.0
Y
1.132
11.0
6.2
<10.0
<2.0
0.20
2.6
1.0
6.9
268.0
AVERAGE
1.399
10.3
0.0
8.8
1.41
18.0
4.3
6.9
9.71
2.70
1.05
9.57
321.2
MAXIMUM
2,448
12.0
7.0
<10.0
35.0
5.00
174.0
6,000.0
7.0
9.71
2.70
2.00
9.57
398.0
MINIMUM
0.764
8.0
6.0
<10.0
<2.0
0.06
2.2
<1.0
6.8
9.71
2.70
0.10
9.57
244.0
Comp(C)/Grab (G)
G
G
G
C
C I
C
G
G
C
C
C
C
G
Monthly Limit
4.5
30.00
1
30.001
200.00
DEM Form MR-1 (01/00)
*Estimated dilutions analyzed to obtain counts not in the ideal range (20-60).
**No.sample due to lab error, see attached certificate of analysis.

Facility Status: (Please check one of the following)
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies meet permit requirements
Compliant
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies do NOT meet permit requirements
Noncompliant
facility is noncompliant, please comment on corrective actions being taken in respect to equipment, operation, maintenance, etc.,
3 time -table for improvements to be made. N _ I % i
•rtify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. B ased on my inquiry
e person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information
fitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
sitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
.own of Mavodan 336-427-
b
t4r
riay -31, 2007
iittee Address Phone Num er Permit Exp. Date
'10 W. Main Street Mayodan NC 27027
PARAMETER CODES
0 Temperature
00556
Oil & Grease
00951
Total Fluoride
'6 Turbidity
00600
Total Nitrogen
01002
Total Arsenic
;0 Color (Pt -Co)
00610
Ammonia Nitrogen
;2 Color (ADMI)
00625
Total Kjeldhal
01027
Cadmium
Nitrogen
15 Conductivity
00630
Nitrates/Nitrites
01032
Hexavalent Chromium
0 Dissolved Oxygen
01034
Chromium
.0 BOD5
00665
Total Phosphorous
'r0 COD
00720
Cyanide
01037
Total Cobalt
)0 pH
00745
Totai'Sulfide
01042
Copper
;0 Total Suspended
00927
Total Magnesium
01045
Iron
Residue
00929
Total Sodium
01051
Lead
-5 Settleable Matter
00940
Total Chloride
01062
Molybdenum
01067
Nickel 50060 Total
01077
Silver Residual
01092
Zinc Chlorine
01105
Aluminum
01147
Total Selenium
71880 Formaldehyde
31616
Fecal Coliform
71900 Mercury
32730
. Total Phenolics
81551 Xylene
34235
Benzene
34481
Toluene
38260
MBAS
39516
PCBs
50050
Flow
meter Code assistance may obtained by calling the point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit at [phone] or by visiting
Vater Quality Section's web site at h2o.enr.stat6.nc.us/wqs and linking to the Unit's information pages.
only units designated in the reporting facility's permit for reporting data. 60. 6Z Z81
:C must visit facility and document visitation of facility as required per 15A NCAC SG .02(?,.
signed by other than the permittee, delegation of signatory authoritymust be on file with the state per 15A NCAC 2B .0506 (b)
D).

Permit Enforcement History by Owner
Owner: Town of Mayodan
Facility: Mayodan VVVVfP
Permit: NCO021873
Region: Winston-Salem County: Rockingham
Penalty
Assessment Penalty Enforcemen
Case Number MR Approved Amount t Costs Damages
Remission
Request
Received
Enf Conf
Held
Enf
Remission
Amount
EMC EMC
Hearing Remission
Held Amount
OAH Collection
Remission Memo Sent
Amount to AGO Total Paid
06/15/09
1
Has
Pmt
Balance Due Plan
Case
Closed
LV-1998-0179 10/19/98
$250.00
$49.00
$.00
11/02/98
12/08/98
$.00
$299.00
$.00
No
02/01/99
LV-1999-0060 02/11/99
$750.00
$76.00
$.00
03/05/99
03/31/99
$.00
$826.00
$.00
No
05/07/99
LV-2000-0045 02/18/00
$1,500.00
$73.00
$.00
03/17/00
01/23/01
$.00
$1.573.00
$.00
No
03/13/01
LV-2000-0179 06/02/00
$250.00
$73.00
$.00
05/10/01
$323.00
$.00
No
07/02/01
LV-2000-0343 08/28/00
$2,000.00
$73.00
$.00
09/12/00
10/04/00
$.00
05/10/01
$2,073.00
$.00
No
06/29/01
LV-2002-0552 11/14/02
$250.00
$99.00
12/09/02
02/05/03
$.00
$349.00
$.00
No
05/02/03
LV-2003-0021 01/15/03
$250.00
$99.00
02/05/03
04/02/03
$.00
$349.00
$.00
No
05/02/03
LV-2003-0051 01/29/03
$250.00
$99.00
02/26/03
04/02/03
$.00
$349.00
$.00
No
05/02/03
LV-2004-0004 9-2003 01/07/04
$3,000.00
$97.00
01/29/04
03/31/04
$.00
$3,097.00
$.00
No
04/23/04
LV-2004-0067 10-2003 05/12/04
$1,000.00
$97.00
$1,097.00
$.00
No
05/27/04
LV-2004-0594 9-2004 12/08/04
$500.00
$97.00
$597.00
$.00
No
01/18/05
LV-2005-0025 10-2004 01/10/05
$500.00
$97.00
$597.00
$.00
No
01/24/05
LV-2005-0128 1-2005 03/29/05
$3,000.00
$97.00
$3.097.00
$.00
No
04/20/05
LV-2005-0167 2-2005 05/03/05
$500.00
$97.00
$597.00
$.00
No
05/24/05
LV-2005-0199 3-2005 06/01/05
$625.00
$97.00
$722.00
$.00
No
06/27/05
LV-2006-0325 6-2006 08/25/06
$350.00
$104.00
$454.00
$.00
No
09/26/06
LV-2006-0373 7-2006 10/03/06
$350.00
$104.00
$454.00
$.00
No
11/09/06
Total Cases: 17 $15,325.00 $1,528.00
Total Penalties: $16,863.00
+�' ) G
V
1
$16,853.00
Total Penalties after remission(s):
$.00
$16,853.00

MONITORING REPORT(MR) VIOLATIONS for: Report Date: 06/15/09 Page: 1 of 1
PERMIT: NCO021873 FACILITY: Town of Mayodan - Mayodan WWTP COUNTY: Rockingham REGION: Winston-Salem
Limit Violation
MONITORING OUTFALL /
VIOLATION
UNIT OF
CALCULATED
REPORT PPI LOCATION
PARAMETER
DATE FREQUENCY
MEASURE
LIMIT VALUE
VIOLATION TYPE VIOLATION ACTION
02 -2009 001 Effluent
BOD, 5-Day (20 Deg. C)
02/14/09 3 X week
mg/I
45 83.25
Weekly Average Exceeded Proceed to NOV
02 -2009 001 Effluent
Coliform, Fecal MF, M-FC
02/14/09 3 X week
#/loom[
400 6,000 .
Weekly Geometric Mean Proceed to NOV
Broth,44.5C
Exceeded
'AA

AF��
NCDENR
PPFVNorth Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Debra E.Cardwell, Town Manager
Town of Mayodan
210 W Main St
Mayodan NC 27027
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Director Secretary
May 13, 2009
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION, NOV-2009-LV-0228
Permit No. NCO021873
Mayodan WWTP
Rockingham County
Dear Ms. Cardwell:
A review of Mayodan WWTP's monitoring report for February 2009 showed the following violations:
Parameter
Date
Limit Value
Reported Value
Limit Type
BOD, 5-Day (20 Deg. C)
02/14/09
45 mg/1
83.25 mg/l
Weekly Average
Exceeded
Coliform, Fecal MF, M-FC
02/14/09
400 #/100ml
6,000 #/100ml
Weekly
Broth,44.5C
Geometric Mean
Exceeded
Remedial actions, if not already implemented, should be taken to correct the above noncompliance
problem. Please be aware that violations of your NPDES permit could result in enforcement action by the
Division of Water Quality for this and any additional violations of State law.
If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Ron Boone at [phone].
cc: SWP — Central Files
WSRO Files
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, Winston-Salem Regional Office
Location: 585 Waughtown St. Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
Sincerely,
Steve W. Tedder
Surface Water Regional Supervisor
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
NorthCarolina
;Vaturall,ff
An Equal Opportunity1 Affirmative Action Employer

Cover Sheet from
Staff Member to
Regional Supervisor
DMR Review Record
Facility: I Permit/Pipe No.: a/,9-73 110 Month/Year oa d 9
Monthly Average Violations
Parameter Permit Limit DMR Value % Over Limit
Weekly/Daily Violations
Date
Parameter
Permit Limit/Type DMR Value
% Over Limit
W 3, 2S
$5 G/
i�,.,Q L
Date Parameter
Other Violations
Monitoring Frequency Violations
Permit Frequency Values Reported # of Violations
Completed by: /`-' o Date:y5/12%a i
Regional Water Quality
Supervisor SiQnoff: Date:
Allv
- ),�v9 - //V - c��a
/ M9 � (:: E/;/, � �
rC-C

PP
DES PERMIT NO. NC0021873
b
ENT APR it zu,
DISCHARGE N 001 MONTH Feb YEAR 2009
FACILITY NAME Mayodan VWVTP CLASS III COUNTY Rockingham
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE (ORC) Jamie W tten GRADE IV PHONE[phone]
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES (1) Environement One (2) 0_fi
CHECK BOX IF ORC HAS CHANGED PERSON(S) WLLECTING SAMPLES Jamie Whitten
RECEIVED
3 'Z Ca -UZ
3OATURE OF OPEATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE) DA I L
THIS SIGNATURE I CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT IS
CURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
50050
00010
00400
50060
00310
00610
00530
31616
00300
00600
00665
00625
00095
D
A
T
E
Oper
Arrival
Time
Oper
Time
On
Site
ORC
On
Site
FLOW
Temp
pH
Resd
CL
BOD5
20 C
NH3
TSS
FECAL
COLI
(geo
mean)
D.O.
Total
Nitrogen
Total
P
Rainfall
TKN
Cond
Eff _x
Inf _
Daily
Rate.
Hrs
Hrs
Y/N
MGD
C
SU
UG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
#/100ML
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
Inches
MG/L
umhos/cm
1
1,100
2.0
Y'
0.899
2
700
8.0
Y
0.899
9.0
6.7
<10.0
6.8
3
', 700
8.0
Y
0.878
10.0
6.5
<10.0
4.7
3.08
5.8 '
3.0
7.0
9.04
2.23
0.20
4.82
360.0
4
700
8.0
Y
1.305
8.0
6.4
<10.0
<2.0
0.21
3.3
4.0
6.8
401.0
5
700
8.0
Y
0.582
8.0
6.1
<10.0
<2.0
0.18
4.4
2.0
6.9
366.0
6
700
8.0
Y
0.630
71,300
2.0'>
Y
0.780
8
1,500
2.0
Y
0.780
9
700
8.0
B
0.780
9.0 ,
6.3
<10.0
6.8
10
700
8.0
B
0.792
12.0
6.6
<10.0
€. 82.0
2.01
8.0
6,000.0
` 7.2
442.0
11
700
8.0
Y
0.577`
=
1.55
4.7 .
469.0
12
700
8.0
Y
0.856
11.0
6.0
<10.0
:87.0
0.23
,000.0
7.0
23.82
10.70
476.0
13
700
.8.0
Y
0.787
12.0
6.4
<10.0
0.16
42.0
6.9
451.0
14
1,500
2.0
Y
0.676
.7
15
1,000
2.0,
Y
0.676
3.3
16
1,300
3.0
Y/H
0.676
17
700
8.0
Y
0,676
9.0
6.3
<10.0
4.8
019
2.2-
1.0
7.0
410.0
18
700
8.0
Y
0.762
3.4
.10
4.7
2.0
0.50
421.0
19
700
8.0
Y
1,272
11.0
6.9
<10.0
12.0
1.81
11.0
415
6.8
415.0
20
700
8.0
Y
0.880
11.0
6.8
<10.0
6.8
21
1,100
2.0
1Y
0,725
22
1,400
2.0
Y
0.725
23
700
8.0
Y
0.725
8.0
6.4
<10.0
8.0
24
700
8.0
Y
0.746
<2.0
0.05
2.7
1.0
379.0
25
700
8.0
Y
0.578
<2.0
0.10
3.8
2.0
405.0
26
700
8.0
Y
0.798
8.0
6.1
<10.0
4.0
<0.04
3.3
1.0
7.2
406.0
27
700
8.0
Y'
0.736
10.0
6.3
<10.0
6.9
28
1,700
2.0
Y
1.782
29
30
31
_
AVERAGE
0.821
9.7
0.0
28.1
0.75
12.4
32.8
7.0
16.43
2.23
0.35
7.76
415.5
MAXIMUM
1.782
12.0
6.9
<10.0
87.0
3.08
82.0
6,000.0
8.0
23.82
2.23`'
0.50
10.70
476.0
MINIMUM
0.577
8.0
6.0
<10.0
<2.0
<0.04
2.2
1.0
6.8
9.04
2.23
0.20
4.82
360.0
Comp(C)/Grab (G)
G
G
G
C
C
C
G
G
C
C
C
C
G
Monthly Limit
4.5
30.0
16.1
30.0
200.0
DEM Form MR-1 (01/00)

Facility Status: (Please check one of the following)
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies meet permit requirements
Compliant
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies do NOT meet permit requirements
Noncompliant
facility is noncompliant, please comment on corrective actions being taken in respect to equipment, operation, maintenance, etc.,
i time -table for improvements to be made. A-P% 1r d _ J 1
M
LSI
rtify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry
e person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information
iitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
sitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowiy violations."
�7
I 'v May 31, 2007
.own of Mayodan 336 427-5733
uttee Address - Phone Number Permit Exp. Date
110 W. Main Street Ma odan NC 27027
PARAMETER CODES
0 Temperature
00556
Oil & Grease
00951
Total Fluoride
'6 Turbidity
00600
Total Nitrogen
01002
Total Arsenic
;0 Color (Pt -Co)
00610
Ammonia Nitrogen
;2 Color (ADMI)
00625
Total Kjeldhal
01027
Cadmium
Nitrogen
15 Conductivity
00630
Nitrates/Nitrites
01032
Hexavalent Chromium
)0 Dissolved Oxygen
01034
Chromium
.0 BODS
00665
Total Phosphorous
�0 COD
00720
Cyanide
01037
Total Cobalt
)0 pH
00745
Total Sulfide
01042
Copper
;0 Total Suspended
00927
Total Magnesium
01045
Iron
Residue
00929
Total Sodium
01051
Lead
-5 Settleable Matter
00940
Total Chloride
01062
Molybdenum
01067
Nickel 50060 Total
01077
Silver Residual
01092
Zinc Chlorine
01105
Aluminum
01147 Total Selenium 71880 Formaldehyde
31616 Fecal Coliform 71900 Mercury
32730.Total Phenolics 81551 Xylene
34235 Benzene
34481 Toluene
38260 MBAS•
39516 PCBs
50050 Flow
meter Code assistance may obtained by calling the point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit at [phone] or by visiting
Vater Quality Section's web site at h2o enr state.nc.us/wqs and linking to the Unit's information pages. —
only units designated in the reporting facility's permit for reporting data. 60
:C must visit facility and document visitation of facility as required per 15A NCAC 8G .0204.
signed by other than the permittee, delegation of signatory authority must be on file with tSe state p6r 15A 1`ICAC 2B .0506 (b)
D).

MONITORING REPORT(MR) VIOLATIONS for: Report Date: 05/12/09 Page: 1 of 1
PERMIT: NCO021873 FACILITY: Town of Mayodan - Mayodan WWTP COUNTY: Rockingham REGION: Winston-Salem
Monitoring Violation
MONITORING OUTFALL /
VIOLATION
UNIT OF CALCULATED
REPORT
PPI
LOCATION
PARAMETER
DATE
FREQUENCY
MEASURE LIMIT VALUE
VIOLATION TYPE
VIOLATION ACTION
05 -2008
001
Effluent
Flow, in conduit or thru
05/22/08
Continuous
mgd
Frequency Violation
None
treatment plant
05 -2008
001
Effluent
Flow, in conduit or thru
05/23/08
Continuous
mgd
Frequency Violation
None
treatment plant
05 -2008
001
Effluent
Flow, in conduit or thru
05/25/08
Continuous
mgd
Frequency Violation
None
treatment plant
05 -2008
001
Effluent
Flow, in conduit or thru
05/26/08
Continuous
mgd
Frequency Violation
None
treatment plant
08 -2008
001
Effluent
Flow, in conduit or thru
08/30/08
Continuous
mgd
Frequency Violation
None
treatment plant
08 -2008
001
Effluent
Flow, in conduit or thru
08/31/08
Continuous
mgd
Frequency Violation
None
treatment plant
09 -2008
001
Effluent
Flow, in conduit or thru
09/16/08
Continuous
mgd
Frequency Violation
None
treatment plant
07 -2008
001
Effluent
Lead, Total (as Pb)
07/05/08
Weekly
ug/I
Frequency Violation
None
05 -2008
001
Effluent
Selenium, Total (as Se)
05/17/08
Weekly
ug/I
Frequency Violation
None
07 -2008
001
Effluent
Selenium, Total (as Se)
07/05/08
Weekly
ug/I
Frequency Violation
None

Owner: Town of Mayodan
Facility: Mayodan WWTP
Permit: NCO021873
Region: Winston-Salem County: Rockingham
Penalty
Assessment Penalty Enforcemen
Case Number MR Approved Amount t Costs Damages
Permit Enforcement History by Owner
Remission Enf EMC EMC
Request Enf Conf Remission Hearing Remission
Received Held Amount Held Amount
OAH Collection
Remission Memo Sent
Amount to AGO Total Paid
05/12/09
1
Has
Pmt
Balance Due Plan
Case
Closed
LV-1998-0179
10/19/98
$250.00
$49.00
$.00
11/02/98
12/08/98
$.00
$299.00
$.00
No
02/01/99
LV-1999-0060
02/11/99
$750.00
$76,00
$.00
03/05/99
03/31/99
$.00
$826.00
$.00
No
05/07/99
LV-2000-0045
02/18/00
$1,500.00
$73.00
$.00
03/17/00
01/23/01
$.00
$1,573.00
$.00
No
03/13/01
LV-2000-0179
06/02/00
$250.00
$73.00
$.00
05/10/01
$323.00
$.00
No
07/02/01
LV-2000-0343
08/28/00
$2,000.00
$73.00
$.00
09/12/00
10/04/00
$.00 05/10/01
$2.073.00
$.00
No
06/29/01
LV-2002-0552
11/14/02
$250.00
$99.00
12/09/02
02/05/03
$.00
$349.00
$.00
No
05/02/03
LV-2003-0021
01/15/03
$250.00
$99.00
02/05/03
04/02/03
$.00
$349.00
$.00
No
05/02/03
LV-2003-0051
01/29/03
$250.00
$99.00
02/26/03
04/02/03
$.00
$349.00
$.00
No
05/02/03
LV-2004-0004
9-2003 01/07/04
$3,000.00
$97.00
01/29/04
03/31/04
$.00
$3,097.00
$.00
No
04/23/04
LV-2004-0067
10-2003 05/12/04
$1,000.00
$97.00
$1,097.00
$.00
No
05/27/04
LV-2004-0594
9-2004 12/08/04
$500.00
$97.00
$597.00
$.00
No
01/18/05
LV-2005-0025
10-2004 01/10/05
$500.00
$97.00
$597.00
$.00
No
01/24/05
LV-2005-0128
1-2005 03/29/05
$3,000.00
$97.00
$3,097.00
$.00
No
04/20/05
LV-2005-0167
2-2005 05/03/05
$500.00
$97.00
$597.00
$.00
No
05/24/05
LV-2005-0199
3-2005 06/01/05
$625.00
$97.00
$722.00
$.00
No
06/27/05
LV-2006-0325
6-2006 08/25/06
$350.00
$104.00
$454.00
$.00
No
09/26/06
LV-2006-0373
7-2006 10/03/06
$350.00
$104.00
$454.00
$.00
No
11/09/06
Total Cases: 17
Total Penalties:
$16,326.00 $1,528.00
$16,853.00
D �J
$16,863.00
Total Penalties after remission(s):
$.00
$16,853.00

TOWN OF MAYODAN OFFICE OF THE TOWN MANAGER
210 W. MAIN STREET • MAYODAN, N.C. 27027 • [phone]
FAX [phone]
[e-mail]
March 10, 2009
Mr. Steve Tedder
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
DWQ/Winston Salem Regional Office
585 Waughtown Street
Winston Salem, NC 27107
Re: NPDES Permit No. NCO021873
Town of Mayodan
Dear Mr. Tedder,
RECEIVED
N.C. Deot. of ENR
MAR 1 1 2009
Winston-Salem
Regional Office
This correspondence is in reply to your letter dated January 22, 2008 concerning the
Compliance Evaluation Inspection conducted on January 8, 2009 at the Mayodan
Wastewater Treatment Plant. We are responding to the comments as they are noted in
the letter.
2. The NPDES Permit is scheduled to expire on May 31, 2012 and the Town will be
submitting an application for reissuance in December, 2011. At that time we will
request the facility description be corrected to reflect a separate grit removal unit.
3. The Town received grant monies from the NC Rural Center in the amount of
$40,000.00 to complete an Inflow/Infiltration Study and related actives. Town of
Mayodan treats the wastewater from the Town of Madison and the Town of Stoneville.
A meeting is scheduled on March 25th for all three towns to develop an action plan to
resolve the 1/1 problems.
4. On March 9, 2009 Duke Energy confirmed the incoming voltage to the
wastewater plant was sufficient to meet the power demands at the WWTP. The
electrical professionals that have evaluated the power have indicated that the cause
of the "brown out" is difficulty to identify when the problem is not occurring. The auto -
dialer is tested weekly by manually causing a false alarm to ensure that the wastewater
staff is notified in the event of a power failure.
7. The Permit Application was submitted to the Division on January 15, 2009. The
Town received a Certificate of Cover, Permit No. NCGI 10142, regulating the
stormwater at the wastewater treatment plant. The Permit is effective February 13,
2009. The Town is in the process of preparing the Site Plan in accordance with the
Permit.

Mr. Steve Tedder
March 10, 2009
Page 2
We appreciate the continued assistance and advice provided by you and the staff of
the Winston Salem Regional Office. If you require additional information, please feel
free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Q�-L � - coLA�
Debra E. Cardwell
Town Manager
Cc: Jamie Whitten, WWTP ORC
Nadine Blackwell, United Water

OD- TOWN OF MAYODAN /
210 W. MAIN STREET • MAYODAN, N.C. 27027 • [phone] ��-��
CHURCH FAX [phone]
C:
RECEIVED
N.C. DeoL of ENR
a
. _ FEB 1 1 2009
Winston-Salem
Regional ice
February 1, 2009
System Performance Annual Report
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
RE: Mayodan Wastewater Plant
NPDES Permit No.: NCO021873
Rockingham County
Dear Sirs,
RECEIVED
FEB - 9 2009
DENR - WATER QUALITY
POINT SOURCE BRANCH
Enclosed you will find the Annual Performance Report for the year of 2008 for the Town of
Mayodan, North Carolina Wastewater Treatment Plant. We believe the report to be complete and
accurate. The customers will be notified of the availability of the report through the local
newspaper or sewer bills.
If you have any questions, please advise.
Sincerely,
Town of Mayodan
Debra Cardwell
Town Manager

TOWN OF MAYODAN
WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY
ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
For the Calendar Year 2008
DE1,!R -'�-.
". ! 'N 1 `
prepared: February 2009

2008 Annual Performance R(Rt C
for the
Town of Mayodan K EIVED
Wastewater Treatment Facility
F E B - c, 20f,00
General Information
Facility/System Name: Town of Mayodan WastewaiQPZtm6V P R QUALITY
POINT SOURCE BRANCH
Responsible Entity: Town of Mayodan
Person in Charge/Contact: Debra Cardwell
Town Manager
210 W. Main Street
Mayodan, NC 27027
[phone]
Description of Collection System or Treatment Process:
The Mayodan Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) is an extended aeration
activated sludge treatment plant, processing a combination of industrial and
domestic wastewater. The treatment scheme includes influent bar screens, an
influent lift station, three aeration basins and secondary clarifiers. The treated
water is chlorinated and dechlorinated, prior to discharge to the Mayo River.
Excess biological sludge is thickened in one of two gravity thickeners and
subsequently digested in an aerobic digester. The stabilized sludge is then land
applied (on permitted sites) either as a liquid directly from the digester or it may be
dewatered (prior to land application) on the sand drying beds and then land applied.
Figure I presents a schematic layout of the wastewater treatment plant.
II. Compliance Performance
The North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
(NCDENR) regulates the Town of Mayodan effluent discharge under the National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). The NCDENR issued to the
Town a NPDES Permit, which includes water quality limits and sampling and
monitoring requirements. The NPDES Permit requires the Town to test more
than 19 different constituents in the treated water. The monitoring frequency for
these constituents are set at various intervals such as continuous, daily, weekly,
monthly, and quarterly. During the reporting period, the Town conducted 3,666
tests of the treated water before it was discharged to the creek. The WWTP
achieved a compliance level of 100% with the NPDES Permit requirements.
Following is a summary of the testing for the parameters, which are, assigned
Water Quality standards by the NPDES Permit. Please note the summary does
not include parameters, which incorporates a monitoring requirement only, nor
does it include daily process control testing.

Constituent
Number of Test
Required
Number of Test
Conducted*
Flow
Continuous
Continuous
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD)
312
Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
312
475*
Ammonia
156
224*
Fecal Coliform
156
235*
Conductivity
156
235*
Chlorine
156
250*
Total Nitrogen
12
14
Total Phosphorus
12
14
Copper
24
50
Zinc
24
50
Toxicity
14
14
*Testing is not required on holidays or during inclement weather.
In addition to the required testing, the Town conducted over 2496 in-house test to
ensure the proper operation of the wastewater treatment plant.
Following is a summary of permit violations, which occurred during the year:
There were no permit violations during the reporting period.

III. Certification
I have personally examined and am familiar with the information submitted in this
document and attachments. Based upon my inquiry of those individuals
immediately responsible for obtaining the information reported herein, I believe
that the submitted information is true, accurate and complete. I am aware that
there are significant penalties for submitting false information.
Signed this rd day of , 2009.
Debra Cardwell
(Name) Town Manager
(Signature)

�OF W A TFq Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor
�O G Dee Freeman, Secretary
r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
>
O Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
22 January 2009
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
7008-0150-0002-7876-8836
Town of Mayodan
Attention: Ms. Debra E. Cardwell
Town Manager
210 West Main Street
Mayodan, NC 27027
SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Individual NPDES Wastewater Discharge Permit: NCO021873
Mayodan Wastewater Treatment Plant
Rockingham County
Dear Ms. Cardwell:
Mr. Ron Boone of the Winston-Salem Regional Office (WSRO) of the NC Division of
Water Quality (DWQ or the Division) conducted a compliance evaluation inspection
(CEI) of the Town of Mayodan's wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) on 8 January
2009. The assistance and cooperation during the inspection, of Mr. Jamie Whitten,
Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC) and Mr. Corey Brannock, backup ORC, was
greatly appreciated. Inspection findings are summarized below and an inspection report
is attached for your records.
2. The WWTP is located at the south end of Cardwell Road, approximately 3/4 mile south
of the intersection of Cardwell Road and NC Highway 135, in Mayodan, Rockingham
County, North Carolina. The WWTP discharges to the Mayo River, this section of which
is currently classified as Class C waters in the Roanoke River basin. The WWTP
consists of a mechanical bar screen, influent pump station, four aeration basins, four
secondary clarifiers, gas chlorination, gas dechlorination (sulfur dioxide), one aerobic
digester and one sludge thickener and drying beds, which are rarely used. The WWTP
description in the current permit indicates that there is a separate grit removal unit, but
this is not the case. Please ensure the description is updated during the next permit
renewal cycle to show that there is no dedicated grit removal unit.
SITE REVIEW
3. The facility was very clean and well maintained. The facility had just experienced
significant rainfall over the two days previous to the inspection, which resulted in a great
deal of inflow/infiltration (1&1) at the plant. Significant rainfall fell on both the 6th and 7th
�One Carolina
tura!!y
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Winston-Salem Regional Office Ph: [phone]
Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 Surface Water Protection Section Fax: [phone]
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org 585 Waughtown Steet, Winston-Salem, NC 27107
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

•
Ms. Debra E. Cardwell
' NCO021873
Town of Mayodan WWTP
22 January 2009
Page 2 of 3
of January. The average daily flows (ADF) at the plant from the 1st through the 5th of
January ranged from 700,000 to 750,000 gallons per day. The flows for the 6th through
the 9th of January were 1.2 million gallons per day (MGD), 2.4 MGD, 3.9 MGD and 2.2
MGD, respectively. This resulted in a net maximum increase of 457 percent of the
normal ADF on the 8th of January. It is noted, through several past inspection reports,
as well as by the statements of Mr. Whitten during the inspection, that the town did not
experience this significant I&I prior to taking on additional flows from the Town of
Stoneville, City of Madison and Rockingham County. It is further noted that this issue
has been addressed in several past inspection reports for both the wastewater
collection system (WWCS) and the WWTP. Please provide, along with your response
to this letter, the latest information regarding the I&I issues the town faces and what
actions it has taken to date to address the problem. We also wanted to acknowledge
that Mr. Whitten and Mr. Brannock did an excellent job of managing the additional flow.
Although the extra flow filled every plant basin to capacity and then increased the flow
to a maximum of 457 percent of normal ADF, the plant was still running efficiently during
the inspection and was producing a clear, yet very slight turbid effluent.
4. The plant experienced an electrical brown out at the influent pump station on 27
October 2008, which resulted in the failure of the station's pumps and a sanitary sewer
overflow (SSO) of an estimated 530,000 gallons from the manhole just upstream of the
plant headworks. Unfortunately, the station's telemetry system subsequently failed and
the operators did become aware of the problem until Mr. Brannock came to work on the
morning of 28 October. Mr. Whitten stated during the inspection that the problems with
the station's telemetry system have been repaired and that it should no longer be a
problem. However, Mr. Whitten also indicated that a definite cause of the brown out
has yet to be determined. The town must find the cause of the brown out and repair it
as soon as possible. Failure to do so may result in future SSOs, for which DWQ would
have little choice but to issue fines based on the town's failure to correct a known
problem. Please also submit, along with your response to this letter, a detailed
explanation of the steps the town has taken to date to find and fix the problem.
DOCUMENTATION REVIEW
5. DMRs were compared with laboratory data and no errors were noted. Chains of
custody were complete. All lab related records were complete and current. Operator
visitation and operation/maintenance logs were also reviewed and found to be complete
and current.
6. We have a copy of the town's Annual Compliance/Performance Report for the WWTP
for 2007 in our files. It is dated February 2008; we therefore expect the next report for
2008 around February 2009.
7. The town does not currently have a general stormwater permit, NCG110000, for the
WWTP as required. This was addressed via separate correspondence sent from this

Ms. Debra E. Cardwell
NCO021873
Town of Mayodan WWTP
22 January 2009
Page 3 of 3
office dated 31 December 2008. That correspondence requested that the town submit
the appropriate application along with the required fees no later than 16 January 2009.
If you haven't already done so, please submit the application as directed in the
December correspondence. Please also tell us when the application was submitted in
your reply to this letter.
8. Please reply to this letter in writing within 30 days of receiving it. Your reply should
include a corrective action with implementation schedule for each of the deficiencies
noted above in paragraphs 2 through 4 and 7.
9. If you have any questions regarding the inspection or this letter, please do not hesitate
to contact Mr. Boone or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Winston-Salem Region
Division of Water Quality
Attachments:
1. BIMS Inspection Checklist
CC: Central Files w/ attachments
NPDES West Unit w/ attachments
WSRO - SWP Files w/ attachments
Mr. Jamie C. Whitten
P.O. Box 323
Mayodan, NC 27027-

United States Environmental Protection Agency
Form Approved.
EPA Washington, D.C. 20460
OMB No. 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 UN 2 151 31 NCO021873 L
111 121 09/01/08 117 18I CI I GI 1920LI
L--�
Remarks
2111111111Jill 111111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII16
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating 131 QA ------------------------Reserved-------------------
6769 701 I 71 I I 72 ) N) 731 I 174 751 1 1 1 1 1 Li 80
1 1 J t--t LJJ
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
Entry Time/Date
Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
Mayodan WWTP
08:30 AM 09/01/08
07/11/01
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
210 W Main St
Mayodan NC 27027
10:30 AM 09/01/08
12/05/31
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
Jamie C. Whitten//336-427-5733 /
Jamie C. Whitten/ORC/336-427-5733/
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Debra E Cardwell,210 W Main St Mayodan NC 27027/Town Contacted
Manager/336-427-0241/3364277592 No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Program Sludge Handling Disposal Facility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Waters
Laboratory Storm Water
Section D: Summary of Find in/Comments Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Ron Boone - WSRO WQ//704-663-1699 Ext.2202/ C�
Signature of Man ement Q A Reverie 'er Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
-a9
f
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
C
Page # 1

NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type 1
3I N00021873 I11 12I 09/01/08 I17 18'_'
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additionalsheetsof narrative and checklists as necessary)
Please see attached inspection summary letter.
Inflow/Infiltration
General Stormwater Permit NCG110000
Page # 2

Permit: NCO021873 Owner - Facility: Mayodan WWTP
Inspection Date: 01/08/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Yes No NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new application? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Is the facility as described in the permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
# Are there any special conditions for the permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: There is no grit removal unit.
Record Keeping
Yes
No
NA
NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the chain -of -custody complete?
■
❑
❑
❑
Dates, times and location of sampling
■
Name of individual performing the sampling
■
Results of analysis and calibration
■
Dates of analysis
■
Name of person performing analyses
■
Transported COCs
■
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters?
■
❑
❑
❑
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ?
■
❑
❑
❑
(If the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator on each shift?
❑
❑
■
❑
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site?
■
❑
❑
❑
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment: '07 ACR prepared Feb '08. Division should receive '08 report soon.
Laboratory
Yes
No
NA
NE
Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory?
■
❑
❑
❑
Page # 3

Permit: NCO021873 Owner - Facility: Mayodan WWTP
Inspection Date: 01/08/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Laboratory Yes No NA NE
Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters) performed by a certified lab? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Is the facility using a contract lab? ■ Cl ❑ ❑
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)?
■
❑ ❑
❑
Incubator (Fecal Coliform) set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/- 0.2 degrees?
OOOM
Incubator (BOD) set to 20.0 degrees Celsius +/- 1.0 degrees?
❑
❑
❑
■
Comment:
Influent Sampling
Yes
No
NA
NE
# Is composite sampling flow proportional?
❑
❑
❑
■
Is sample collected above side streams?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is proper volume collected?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the tubing clean?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is sampling performed according to the permit?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Effluent Sampling
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is composite sampling flow proportional?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is sample collected below all treatment units?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is proper volume collected?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the tubing clean?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type representative)?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Upstream / Downstream Sampling Yes No NA NE
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type, and sampling location)? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Pump Station - Influent Yes No NA NE
Is the pump wet well free of bypass lines or structures? ■ ❑ ❑ Cl
Is the wet well free of excessive grease? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are all pumps present? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are all pumps operable? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Page # 4

-I
Permit: NCO021873 Owner - Facility: Mayodan WWTP
Inspection Date: 01/08/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Pump Station - Influent Yes No NA NE
Are float controls operable? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is SCADA telemetry available and operational? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is audible and visual alarm available and operational? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: A power brown out at the infulent pump station on 10/27/08, caused a
significant sanitary sewer overflow (SSO) from the manhole upstream of the plant
headworks. The root cause of the SSO was the power brown out, although the brown
out, as well as other factors, also caused other malfunctions in the telemetry system for
the pump station. According to Mr. Whitten, the issues with the telemetry system have
been fixed. However, no positive cause of the power brown out has been identified. The
town is urged to continue working to find the cause of the brown out and repair the
problem, to prevent future similar SSOs.
Type of bar screen
a.Manual ❑
b.Mechanical
■
Are the bars adequately screening debris?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Is the screen free of excessive debris?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Is disposal of screening in compliance?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Is the unit in good condition?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Comment:
Aeration Basins
Yes
No
NA NE
Mode of operation
Ext. Air
Type of aeration system
Surface
Is the basin free of dead spots?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Are surface aerators and mixers operational?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Are the diffusers operational?
❑
❑
■ ❑
Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Is the DO level acceptable?
❑
❑
❑ ■
Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/I)
❑
❑
❑ ■
Comment: One mixer was down for maintenance during the inspection.
Secondary Clarifier
Yes
No
NA NE
Page # 5

Permit: NC0021873 Owner - Facility: Mayodan WWTP
Inspection Date: 01/08/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Secondary Clarifier
Yes
No
NA NE
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are weirs level?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of weir blockage?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is scum removal adequate?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the drive unit operational?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately'/. of the sidewall depth)
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Pumps-RAS-WAS
Yes
No
NA
NE
Are pumps in place?
■
❑
110
Are pumps operational?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are there adequate spare parts and supplies on site?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Disinfection -Gas
Yes
No
NA
NE
Are cylinders secured adequately?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are cylinders protected from direct sunlight?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is there adequate reserve supply of disinfectant?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the level of chlorine residual acceptable?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the contact chamber free of growth, or sludge buildup?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is there chlorine residual prior to de -chlorination?
❑
❑
❑
■
Does the Stationary Source have more than 2500 Ibs of Chlorine (CAS No. 7782-50-5)?
❑
❑
❑
■
If yes, then is there a Risk Management Plan on site?
❑ ❑
❑
■
If yes, then what is the EPA twelve digit ID Number? (1000-
If yes, then when was the RMP last updated?
Comment:
Page # 6

Permit: NC0021873 Owner - Facility: Mayodan WWTP
Inspection Date: 01/08/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
De -chlorination
Yes
No
NA NE
Type of system ?
Gas
Is the feed ratio proportional to chlorine amount (1 to 1)?
❑
❑
❑ ■
Is storage appropriate for cylinders?
■
❑
❑ ❑
# Is de -chlorination substance stored away from chlorine containers?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Comment:
Are the tablets the proper size and type?
❑
❑
■ ❑
Are tablet de -chlorinators operational?
❑
❑
■ ❑
Number of tubes in use?
Comment:
Effluent Pipe
Yes
No
NA NE
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained?
❑
❑
❑ ■
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris?
❑
❑
❑ ■
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly?
❑
❑
❑ ■
Comment:
Flow Measurement - Effluent
Yes
No
NA NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Is the flow meter operational?
■
❑
❑ ❑
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Comment:
Aerobic Digester
Yes
No
NA NE
Is the capacity adequate?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Is the mixing adequate?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Is the site free of excessive foaming in the tank?
■
❑
❑ ❑
# Is the odor acceptable?
■
❑
❑ ❑
# Is tankage available for properly waste sludge?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Comment:
Standby Power
Yes
No
NA NE
Is automatically activated standby power available?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Is the generator tested by interrupting primary power source?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Page # 7

Permit: NCO021873 Owner - Facility: Mayodan WWTP
Inspection Date: 01/08/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Standby Power
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is the generator tested under load?
■
❑
❑
❑
Was generator tested & operational during the inspection?
❑
■
❑
❑
Do the generator(s) have adequate capacity to operate the entire wastewater site?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is there an emergency agreement with a fuel vendor for extended run on back-up power?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the generator fuel level monitored?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
)perations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable Solids, pH, DO, Sludge ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment:
Page # 8

7�
pppppQFwN.C. 000L of EMR ; State of North Carolina
3 )cpai-tment of Environment and Natural Resources
JAH 2 - 20�
co i Division of Water Quality
DO.
al. owes
-achvl , cccl)t-ance for Sewer Extension Permit Applications
-S El 10/07)
Project ApplicatitName:
Project Name for which 11WX IS b0lilg l'CClLlCStcd:.—
More than one FTSF-10107may be required-fi)r a single project if the owner uf the 1VIVTP is not responsihIc-fin- all
pump stations along the route of the proposed wastelvaler flow.
L Complete this Section only If you are [lie owner oftlic wastewater treatment pfant.
a. WWTP Facility Name:
b. WW'rp Facility Permit U: N C 00 213
All flows are III MGD
c. WWTP facility's purnilitcd Ilow
d. ["Istilmaccl obligated flow not yet tributary to the W%VTP
G, WWTP 1"1ICIlItV'S ilCtLlill ova. flow
t. Total flow lot' this specific request
Total actual and obligated flows to the facility
11. Percent of permitted llo--� 5v—
Collipletc tllls. Scctloli for each I)IIIIII) station VOILI Ill'o respoll"101c 661- alon", )[11,
proposed wastewater flow.
l'Ist 11111111) ;'-Illcllls located between die prql'_ct cuillicchull and flic WWTP
Pm!m Station Name Approx, ('opacity, MIU) Apprc-s. ("urivill A 1'.
Dally Hm\ .
I I I C(Alt Icatioll 'St it ne it -
certify that, to the hest of my knowlcd-c. the addition of the
V0111111c. of \vastc\salcr to he permitted III this pro ' icct has been cval,lzllu'd alone;!ht: polite. to ilic rcccmng
%%;I'Slc%%'alcI' treatment facility and that the Clow hone tills project. Is not uIlUcIpilick! to CaU\C .1M
related sallitai-N! wwci'ovcj'no%vs or ovol-hurdt'n dmvllstivalm ;t"llioll en route to the recei
Ircatillc1:1 1!.ml Ilndcl normal I 1w, !I:!" !,cc:1 p-cl-l'Ot-l-Iled 111 11;1 i0"Al
1:11)11r-hod oolicles :111d 1VOCC(IIII-C.S LiSil]L,' the; I)CM ;I\,IdiibJ:C ditd. HW, CV11111clitioli apphc> to it�Oy�c
listed above III I and 11 t'O: :I-11 111�-
atxeptance of this wastewater fit)
Dater

r-
December 19, 2008
5046
Mr. Jamie Whitten
Town of Mayodan Wastewater Treatment Plant
P.O. Box 243
Mayodan, NC 27027-
6 � Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
SUBJECT: Wastewater/Groundwater Laboratory Certification Renewal
FIELD PARAMETERS ONLY
Dear: Mr. Whitten
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
REC— E 8C
N.C. Dept of ENR
JAN 0 6 2009
Winston-Salem
Regional Offce
The Department of Environment and Natural Resources, in accordance with the provisions of NC GS 143-215-.3
(a) (10), 15 NCAC 2H .0800, is pleased to renew certification for your laboratory to perform specified
environmental analyses required by EMC monitoring and reporting regulations 15 NCAC 2B .0500, 2H .0900 and
2L .0100, .0200, .0300, and 2N .0100 through .0800.
Enclosed for your use is a certificate describing the requirements and limits of your certification. Please review
this certificate to insure that your laboratory is certified for all parameters required to properly meet your
certification needs.
Please contact us at 919-733-3908 if you have questions or need additional information.
Sincerely,
Pat Donnelly
Certification Branch Manager
Laboratory Section
Enclosure
cc: Ramon L. Cook
Dana Satterwhite
Winston-Salem Regional Office
No�rthCarolina
Naturally
Laboratory Section 1623 Mail Service Center; Raleigh, NC 27699-1623 Phone [phone]
Location: 4405 Reedy Creek Road; Raleigh, NC 27607 FAX [phone]
Internet: www.dwglab.org/Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycledl10% Post Consumer Paper

Certificate No. 5046
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF THE
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
LABORATORY CERTIFICATION PROGRAM
In accordance with the provisions ofN.C.G.S. 143-215.3 (a) M 143-215.3 (a)(10) and NCAC 2H.0800:
Field Parameter Only
TOWN OF MAYODAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
Is hereby certified to perform environmental analysis as listed on Attachment I and report monitoring data to DWQ for
compliance with NPDES effluent, surface water, groundwater, and pretreatment regulations.
By reference 15A NCAC 2H .0800 is made a part of this certificate.
This certificate does not guarantee validity of data generated, but indicates the methodology, equipment, quality control procedures,
records, and proficiency of the laboratory have been examined and found to be acceptable.
This certificate shall be valid until December 31, 2009
SO,
Pat Donnelly

Address:
Attachment
North Carolina Wastewater/Groundwater Laboratory Certification
Certified Parameters Listing
FIELD PARAMETERS ONLY
m of Mayodan Wastewater Treatment Plant
P.O. Box 243
Mayodan, NC 27027-
Certificate Number: 5046
Effective Date: 01/01/2009
Expiration Date: 12/31/2009
Date of Last Amendment:
The above named laboratory, having duly met the requirements of 15A NCAC 21-1.0800, is hereby certified for the measurement of the parameters listed below.
CERTIFIED PARAMETERS
INORGANICS
RESIDUAL CHLORINE
Std Method 4500 Cl G
CONDUCTIVITY
Std Method 2510E
DISSOLVED OXYGEN
Std Method 4500 O G
pH
Std Method 4500 H B
TEMPERATURE
Std Method 2550B
This certification requires maintance of an acceptable quality assurance program, use of approved methodology, and satisfactory performance on evaluation samples. Laboratories are
subject to civil penalties and/or decertification for infractions as set forth in 15A NCAC 2H.0807.

V,
CHURCH
O u�
N o
z
HOME
November 10, 2008
TOWN OF MAYODAN
210 W. MAIN STREET • MAYODAN, N.C. 27027 • (336)
FAX [phone]
Mr. Steve Tedder
Water Quality Supervisor
Division of Water Quality
585 Waughtown Street
Winston Salem, NC 27107
Re: Discharge of Wastewater Without a Permit
Influent Pump Station
Dear Mr. Tedder,
RECEIVED
N.C. Dept of ENR
NOV 13 2=
Winston-Salem
I1 Regional Office
I am writing in response to the Notice of Violation dated October 29, 2008
which was received on October 31, 2008. As you are aware, an overflow
occurred at the manhole prior to the influent pump station at the Mayodan
Wastewater Treatment Plant. The overflow occurred from approximately 8:00
pm on October 27, 2008 to 7:00 AM on October 28, 2008. An estimated volume
of 530,00 gallons was calculated as being unaccounted for entering the
wastewater treatment plant based on average flows for the day before and the
day after the incident. We believe the overflow occurred as a result of electrical
power variations and equipment failure. Upon investigation of the cause of the
overflow, we have discovered that the influent pumps failed due to an electrical
"brown -out" which caused the pump controls to shut down and the auto dialer
failed as a result of the phone line being grounded due to moisture in the phone
line. While these events were unfortunate and contributed to subsequent
problems, the circumstances were beyond the control of the Town. However, as
you will note once the overflow was identified, it was resolved as quickly as
possible. Following is a detailed summary of the incident.
On October 28, 2008, the back-up ORC, Corey Brannock, arrived at the
Mayodan WWTP at 7:00 AM and found the influent pump station alarm (red
light and buzzer) going off. Mr. Brannock immediately investigated the cause of
the alarm and found the influent pumps were not working and could see the
manhole in the bottoms below the pump station overflowing. The overflow
traveled about 600 to 700 feet through low area into a small stream and then
about 200 to 300 feet to the Mayo River. Mr. Brannock had to reset the
influent pumps by shutting off the breakers and resetting them a couple of
times before the pumps started -up and began working. Mr. Brannock checked

the pump floats and found them working. Mr. Bannock called Public Works
Director, Mr. David Baker and informed him of this problem and Mr. Baker
immediately dispatched a crew to the plant to cleanup, lime and apply straw to
the affected area. In addition, a dike was formed around the stream to prevent
the discharge from running into the stream. Mr. Brannock called the plant
manager/ORC, Mr. Jamie Whitten, who was on his way to Greensboro to a
doctor's appointment and informed him of this at about 7:15 AM. Mr.
Brannock also found the auto dialer trying to call out but was not going
through. After getting the influent pumps to start, the Mayodan Police
Department called and informed him that they had received a call from the auto
dialer at about 7:50 AM with a pump station alarm. Mr. Whitten instructed Mr.
Brannock to collect a sample from the small stream and the Mayo River (see
Attachment I for results). Mr. Jamie Whitten called and spoke with Mr. Steve
Mauney with the Division of Water Quality in Winston-Salem at approximately
9:20 AM and informed him of the incident. Mr. Whitten instructed Mr.
Brannock to call the company who installed the controls at the influent pump
station and to have them send a service person to check out the controls. At
1:00 PM, Mr. Mauney arrived at the plant to investigate the overflow. Mr.
Whitten, Mr. Baker, and Mr. Mauney looked at the pump station and control
panel and walked down and looked at the overflow and the path it traveled.
The ground had been cleaned, limed and straw applied. The small stream had
been diked with sandbags and straw applied. Mr. Mauney asked for an
estimated flow volume and was told it was about 530,000 gallons. This was
based on effluent flow from October 27 at 8:00 AM to October 28 at 8:00 AM of
257,000 gallons/day and the day before of 790,000 gpd. The effluent flow chart
was used to determine the duration, which on the chart showed from 8:00 PM
October 27th until 7:00 AM October 28th. Mr. Whitten informed Mr. Mauney
that the influent pump station was checked daily, the control panel was
checked three times a week, and auto dialer was tested once a month. Mr.
Mauney wanted to know if this was recorded somewhere and was told that it
was not in detail but was recorded in the log book each day that the pump
stations were checked (see Attachment II for log book entries). Mr. Whitten also
informed Mr. Mauney of the stream sampling results and told him that fecal
coliform samples were taken to the laboratory and that a service representative
would be on -site around 4:00 PM to check out the pump station controls. The
service representative came around 4:00 PM and checked the control system at
the influent pumps. He checked the bubbler system, the back up float switch
system, the pump amperages, and the wiring. The service man said the only
explanation he had for the pump failure was an electrical "brown out" of
components in the control center. The "brown out" causes a slight variation in
power but not a complete power failure. The company who installed the auto
dialer was called with questions about this because it has a battery back up
and they said if the power went off and the dialer had not sensed an alarm it
may not have worked. While Mr. Mauney was on -site Mr. Whitten and Mr.
Baker pulled the high water level float to give a false alarm to the auto dialer
and it took 30 minuets to call Mr. Whitten's home and an additional 10 minutes
to call Mr. Whitten's cell phone. The auto dialer was reprogrammed to call out
after 5 minutes from alarm notification. Effective October 28, 2008, the alarm
testing/checks are being recorded in a log book (See Attachment III).

V.
On November 5, 2008, the influent high water alarm system was tested and
failed. The main breaker to the plant was shut down to indicate a power
outage. The auto dialer did not call out. Upon investigate, the telephone line
for the auto dialer was called and a busy sign was registering. The telephone
company, EMBARQ, was contacted to come to the plant to determine the
problem. EMBARQ found that the phone line for the auto dialer was shared by
a line to the generator which was not connected to a phone. As a result the line
to the generator was causing the phone line which services the generator and
the auto dialer to be grounded. The phone line to the generator was
disconnected and the line to the auto dialer began working. The service
representative from EMBARQ stated that there was moisture in the line to the
generator which was causing the line to the auto dialer not to work. He also
indicated that this would be an intermittent problem depending on how much
moisture was on the line to the generator. A heavy dew or rainfall could cause
the line to have moisture in it because the line to the generator was exposed
and not connected to a phone.
The Town took immediate action to abate the overflow when it was discovered,
to stop the overflow from reaching the stream, and clean-up the affected area.
The overflow was unintentional and due to circumstances beyond the Town's
control. The Town request that this information be considered when
determining any enforcement actions.
Sincerely,
Debra Cardwell
Town Manager
Cc: Jamie Whitten, ORC
Gary Stainback, United Water
Sent Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested

ATTACI IlMIENT I
The results for stream and fecal coliform testing are as listed:
October 28, 2008 Small stream that flows into the Mayo River
Upstream
Time
10:00 AM
pH-
7.58 SU
DO-
0.44 mg/l
Temp-
15.1 °C
October 28, 2008 Mayo River
Upstream
Time 10:50 AM
pH- 7.50 SU
DO- 11.52 mg/1
Temp- 9.8°C
Fecal Coliform 1000/100 ml
Downstream
Time 10:00 AM
pH- 7.41 SU
DO- 0.38 mg/l
Temp- 14.7°C
Downstream
Time 11:00 AM
pH- 6.82 SU
DO- 8.89 mg/l
Temp- 10.0°C
Fecal Coliform- 43/100 ml
October 28, 2008 Downstream Dan River Bridge
Time
2:00 PM
pH-
6.82 SU
DO-
9.87 mg/l
Temp- 11.0°C
Cond-
163.8
October 29, 2008 Mayo River
Downstream
Time 10:50 AM
pH- 6.57 SU
DO- 10.16 mg/1
Temp- 9.0°C
Fecal Coliform - 5100/100 ml
October 29, 2008 Dan River Bridge
Downstream

V.
Time 11:10 AM
pH- 6.14 SU
DO- 9.84 mg/l
Temp- 8.0°C
Fecal Coliform- 1100/100 ml
October 31, 2008 Mayo River
Downstream
Time 7:20 AM
pH- 6.13 SU
DO- 11.62 mg/1
Temp- 8.0°C
Fecal Coliform- 260/100 ml
October 31, 2008 Dan River Bridge
Downstream
Time 7:45 AM
pH- 6.47 SU
DO- 11.35 mg/l
Temp- 7.0°C
Fecal Coliform- 1501100 ml

ATTACHMENT II
WWTP LOG BOOK ENTRIES

ATTACHMENT III
LOG BOOK ENTRIES FROM DEDICATED LOG
BOOK FOR INFLUENT PUMP STATION

VNOV-.Ii-2008 10'32A FROM:HYDRO MHNHGEMENT 4275733 TO'7660469
P.3
Woe
-'-- -�__---

NOV-11-2008 10:31A FROM:HYDRO MANAGEMENT 4275733
TO:7660469 P.2
10.5
Cez� l
G'o/lecT San��(es. ReaA el+/,.ce,)r4X.own�ere, Row �cuy
P/anT Ves7 - M o tje_j- q- I.ve&O& L z�ss.• Cti ��.
dump S7'u7; oyts, J' rcArue_ j a /egf,61o6ae,1- bl'ooe-OL
;Le
eays Y c/,P , 1; OAP `f' �iO��^ Glro�`d�..,brci(�d�s
ld e� . P/oco n:eler 4,A cAv-ei p1- ,T.,7eir. eal%r 1
�ec4aoe, //�G °..oA R,
%c fCer pu v srra,f. �,;ifaedt . /va4j-:n
$we�o%" 1R �►to/�%on. Gfjrec�i�ecC our C/%4/.
d' !C�eclle c�_ Pcc,r,Y s �T, cis . l-tic��eo� e •,, re� orTs, /�i e�t'P�[ --
�a/I o�erar` e(XL;,p7rrne,)'r a/( c, c runnier .o
�► a -os
;C/e4E'ed oar l o,n7— r pu nil) SIaJ,'ons. a// L-JOLS OTC'.
aac" oc- Tp1c ,fr q �u,�,/� spur a,,s, �/ w ok
Se7� c.V ecjusT;'c. !,. , Aeo(
P�, 1 �7" r.1�,. end Gj�'rgrcn, pc�i.�,. Poor
ruT-e Lv0.5 se`/� a7f- 6o s%ro%er'per /rii1z, G% Locked
o u'_p,,c)v1p I-raF1, o f 1-S.
Read e�� wer►% Pot. Ra,� c�a�'Iy �ia•,ir' i�s7"
Llaci ?"o se7- 4'eeJ raze CO-' /00 sTrd/�e�Mh• ai••
Cl�e.�. �eea Pu,�p Ta oe`- 1"'ni-e- C044sji'c ,'n A)6, q
6o,sl�. t /e� , f-. �..,",. /.ice 7f,ir -�r eU V. 71e-*,
SO— baLx 70 60 S);•�c�-r
Tal"'ons, Worre�1 pn ► ou oY�er Spale*- o��
:C�o�%c7ed Sant��PS, %,feat( e9Jc4en7--P1oiz mpate- PA
G�aiy pJw,T" neesr: ar,
cuusr� / AAl1 Srda ,,�,ti, >r'1,. GaAs
baSrn • /)&YA� 76- 1-;SA-
all old'• _ . --

-11-2008 10:31A FROM:HYDRO MANAGEMENT 4275733
TO:7660469 P.1
l illy - ?-0$
Jr_ -t-
LL� Aeoo e-9),wmT' flow meter• Rur� cIw'1y PJwn?";er7
' %lrAeoL. -r-AeA Rater '-"l
� � 36o s r okes�/ n �n , Ir � ►r �-' �7'�a/r/�± Cn crs7%'c ; n7a ,La�;.�
/lio . q.
-- a
�s„ue�,7` �/oars. C/eclfCcL iow�,10 s%aY�s.
-� w ate.- Aan oe vY Test
,l' !lecTec1 sa.,�/ea: R� �/uehi�o •� y ..
+ !G Ga/y GL� aIC�C ed 1-a a ,ha recJ or
ha)� CraW4, (dn%Vad ocr �26af Li. AbW�,'na Sa; d-
O�c1ej' AnW/rer Cl�P�t . �eec� lour�0 a,4e 74e .One•
/,ae /ia✓e is T Sinai/. ���ec,�lec� Pam.+ Sjdns
�' ec,�'ecQ- o a(,Y� �►� sfi Pion S 9��,Etr�Y' a-/� r,+Jas o� % r"".
/a •.26.09
- fi,
i/ U►eo6i dcc��a� `iF' �Jum� S%a�i���r/ All INaS d t:
-' � fD-,'l� •08' 'f
Co/%�cQ Sabo% iP
�%� C�euEec4r u Xr
pass foynamo'cs
rri+morvbw o�)cwc,ci� Co<usrc F :.
i�D�Br Came- ire. a7~ 7:06arti. 0.laro'+•v Qvf/1
A►1� �o�u•d ;nF, um c.oe�-e O1D f.�arfC�'ng �- Ae..
�, �o�.� WaS 1
o% ai %c2 in l�nF irk
o verflo �a ;ny , C,'o,-ey w0.s AI)e- 74 �e7� e ;n�•
tptoy►u g011 �Gir/ i)�( R.�%C�' I'PSe�lirlG) �e- cC
�l- �- h e- Ga /le� bav/IL Ba K'eOr
:'O;reaor d•- in-Formea- h;nL of ) e Sill. �AvrvL
had 1 t -s creLD �o dewr-
ever�toc.,� c���7" 7A�5 %loco g07' c+(�o
ery u�e►�7� InT—o 7,e
Gi SMot/� S7rPolv�- 'r � ' r T
r;v er
�G'o rey c6 AS •) retnf .� A 0 . On %� letS//xt / � S7"n� 0. f'h- '-�'
�P S%reur►� n�i � `l~ bower sq�grL ri-4$e O n
rie /�, o r; verb all were o{G lfe 4150 �Jce 1l e c %
�e5 9f' GGl rv'� / n Pert l d

I
m
m
m
00
1 m
•
.. •
r� - � �
. i i ,L •
Lam. lT iL � . L � �r�
r
t.
—
/
i •
Imo• to-' ♦
C
�► i
CSL
i %
J i L -
i
//�
/ ►•
�I
'
e
9.
MY r
1
a►
i
080
i�
c
/ J S
!. ! �}• ! •
.sitI .
• ekYr
sh
IWel
Fit
wed W961r
C I r
-
AA

�OF W ATF9
\off PG
o �
August 28, 2008
5046
Mr. Jamie Whitten
Town of Mayodan Wastewater Treatment Plant
P.O. Box 243
Mayodan, NC 27027-
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
RECEIVED
N.C. Dent o` ww
SEP 0 4 2008 t
Winston•5awe-
Regional C3Kes
SUBJECT: North Carolina Wastewater/Groundwater Laboratory Certification (NC WW/GW LC)
Laboratory Certification Maintenance Inspection
Dear Mr. Whitten :
Enclosed is a report for the inspection performed on August 7, 2008 by Mr. Ramon
Cook . Where finding(s) are cited in this report, a response is required. Within thirty days of
receipt, please supply this office with a written item for item description of how these finding(s)
were corrected. If the finding(s) cited in the enclosed report are not corrected, enforcement
actions may be recommended. For certification maintenance, your laboratory must continue to
carry out the requirements set forth in 15A NCAC 2H .0800.
Copies of the checklists completed during the inspection may be requested from this
office. Thank you for your cooperation during the inspection. If you wish to obtain an electronic
copy of this report by email or if you have questions or need additional information, please
contact us at 919-733-3908.
Sincerely,
r-;, )7//��:)
Dana Satterwhite
Certification Unit Supervisor
Laboratory Section
Enclosure
Cc: Ramon Cook
Winston- Salem Regional Office one
No Carolina
atunally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1623 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1623 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www.dwqlab.org Location: 4405 Reedy Creek Rd Raleigh, NC 27607 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

LABORATORY NAME:
NPDES PERMIT #:
ADDRESS:
CERTIFICATE #:
DATE OF INSPECTION:
TYPE OF INSPECTION:
AUDITOR(S):
On -Site Inspection Report
Town of Mayodan WWTP
NCO021873
P.O. Box 243,
Mayodan, NC 27027
5046
August 7, 2008
Field Maintenance Inspection
Ramon L. Cook
LOCAL PERSON(S) CONTACTED: Jamie Whitten
I. INTRODUCTION:
This laboratory was inspected to verify its compliance with the requirements of 15A NCAC 2H .0800 for the
analysis of environmental samples.
GENERAL COMMENTS:
The laboratory is spacious and well equipped. All facilities and instrumentation are well maintained.
Some further quality control procedures are needed.
The lab had been using an example field bench sheet provided by this unit during a past inspection. This
document no longer adequately provides required pertinent information.
Note: Please be reminded that example documents are provided for technical assistance. It is the
laboratory's responsibility to modify and update documentation as needed to meet program requirements.
Technical assistance procedure documents are attached for The Verification of the Cell Constant
Adjustment of the Conductivity Meter, and Technical Assistance for Field Analysis of
Conductivity Samples.
Ill. FINDINGS. REQUIREMENTS, COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
A. PH — Standard Methods, 18th Edition, 4500 H+ B
Finding: The sample temperature is not noted on the bench sheet.
Requirement: Always report temperature at which pH is measured. Ref: Standard Methods, Method
4500-H+ B, 1.b, page 4-66.
Requirement: Data pertinent to each analysis must be maintained for five years. Certified data must
consist of date collected, time collected, samples site, sample collector, and sample analysis time. The
field bench sheets must provide a space for the signature of the analyst, and proper units of measure
for all analyses. Ref: 15A NCAC 2H .0805 (g) (1).

3f Mayodan WWTP
Comment: "Certified data" shall be defined as any analytical result, including the supporting
documentation, obtained through the use of a method or procedure which has been deemed
acceptable by the State of North Carolina for Laboratory Certification purposes pursuant to these
Rules. Ref: 15A NCAC 02H .0803
Comment: Laboratories may be required to defend their analytical procedures and practices to
government agencies and private individuals. These data challenges redefine the term "supporting
records". These updated requirements and recommendations are not only useful in verifying
compliance, but may assist the laboratory in producing defensible analytical results.
B. Conductivity —Standard Methods, 18th Edition 2510B
Finding: The meter does not have an internal cell constant and a cell constant is not manually
calculated and factored into the final result.
Requirement: If the meter does not adjust for the cell constant, a cell constant must be calculated and
factored into the final result daily. Ref: TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR FIELD ANALYSIS OF
CONDUCTIVITY (See attachment for Procedure).
Finding: The laboratory is not analyzing and documenting the daily calibration standard. The laboratory is
also not analyzing a calibration verification check standard.
Requirement: The laboratory must analyze and document the value of a daily calibration standard. It
is recommended that the calibration standard be in the range of 1413 pmhos/cm. The laboratory must
analyze and document a calibration verification check standard. It is recommended that this standard
be at a lower range. Ref: Technical Assistance for Field Analysis of Conductivity Samples
Comment: The Oakton meter being used does not have an Automatic Temperature Compensation or
Cell Constant applications associated with this instrument.
Recommendation: Purchase a new meter/instrument with an Automatic Temperature Compensator and
an automatic internal cell constant application, as a replacement, and use the old meter as a backup.
IV. PAPER TRAIL INVESTIGATION:
The paper trail consisted of comparing field testing records to Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs)
submitted to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality. Data were reviewed for Town of Mayodan
WWTP for April, May, and June 2008. No transcription errors were detected. The facility appears to be
doing a good job of accurately transcribing data.
V. CONCLUSIONS:
Correcting the above cited findings and implementing the recommendations will help this lab to produce
quality data and meet certification requirements. The inspector would like to thank the staff for its
assistance during the inspection and data review process. Please respond to all findings.
Report prepared by: Ramon L. Cook Date: August 15, 2008
Report reviewed by: Tony Hatcher Date: August 19, 2008

Verification of the Cell Constant Adjustment of the Conductivity Meter
Dilute the 0.01 M (1413 µmhos/cm) standard to 0.005M (50% dilution). This should read 718
µmhos/cm.
1. Read the 0.01 M (1413 µmhos/cm) standard and record the results. Set the temperature
compensation dial at 0.0191 C-' (if you have one). With the probe in the 1413 µmhos/cm
standard, adjust the meter to read 1413 µmhos/cm.
Example: Unadjusted initial reading of the standard read: 1359 µhmos/cm.
2. Read the 718 µmhos/cm standard without adjusting the cell constant. Calculate the cell
constant.
Cell Constant = Specific conductance standard value, µmhos/cm
Conductance Reading, µmhos/cm
Example:
Cell Constant = 718 = 1.04 pmhos/cm
689
3. Using the unadjusted reading for the 0.01 M standard (1413 µmhos/cm), apply the cell
constant.
Example:
1359 X 1.04 = 1413 µmhos/cm
Standard is really reading 1413 µmhos/cm
If the calculated cell constant produces a real reading at, or very near, the adjusted cell constant,
the cell constant is adjusting properly.

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR FIELD ANALYSIS OF CONDUCTIVITY SAMPLES
This document is intended to provide technical assistance and guidance for the measurement of Conductivity. This is not meant
to be a substitute for the method, but is offered as a guide to the method.
Holdinq Time:
• Samples must be analyzed within 28 days of collection. If samples are not analyzed immediately, all samples are to
be stored at above freezing to 6°C.
Conductivity:
• In water analysis, the measurement is expressed in µmhos/cm. Some meters display units in µS/cm. (1 µmho/cm =
1 AS/cm)
Meters
• For routine work, a conductivity meter must produce results that are accurate and reproducible. Most meters
automatically adjust for temperature. Meters that adjust for temperature will automatically adjust for the cell constant.
• If the meter does not adjust for the cell constant, a cell constant must be calculated and factored into the final result
daily.
Probes:
• Conductivity probes must be constructed from durable common metals (i.e., stainless steel among others) for
continuous and field studies. The electrode should be kept very clean. Make sure the electrode is submerged for
each standard and sample and that the electrode chamber contains no air or bubbles.
NOTE: If the electrode is stored dry, it should be soaked in distilled or deionized water for at least 10 minutes before use
to thoroughly wet the electrode.
Standards:
Conductivity standards may be purchased in the ranges desired, or they may be prepared using Potassium Chloride (KCI).
KCI standards can be prepared according to Table 2510:1 found on page 2-43 of Standard Methods, 18th Edition — Method
2510 A. Standards must be clean. A portion of the standard should not be used for more than one calibration. Discard any
used standard portions.
Procedures for calibration:
1. Analyze and document the value of a daily calibration standard. It is recommended that the calibration standard be in
the range of 1413 µmhos/cm.
2. Rinse the conductivity cell with conductivity -free water between standards.
• Analyze and document a calibration verification check standard. It is recommended that this standard be at a lower
range.
• The value obtained from the calibration check standard must read within 10% of the true value of the check standard.
If the obtained value is outside of the t10% range, corrective action must be taken.
NOTE: Conductivity samples and standards should not be diluted.
Temperature:
The temperature sensor in the meter must be checked every 12 months against an NIST certified or NIST traceable
thermometer and the process documented. (NOTE: Other certified laboratories may provide assistance in meeting this
requirement.)
The meter temperature reading must be less than 10C from the NIST thermometer reading. REQUIRED for certified data. (NC
WW/GW LC Policy).

he temperature correction or compensation:
The Automatic Temperature Compensator (ATC) must be verified by analyzing a buffer at 25° C (the temperature that
conductivity values are compensated to) and a temperature(s) that bracket the temperature ranges of the samples to be
analyzed. This may require the analysis of a third temperature reading that is > 25' C. The following must be performed on an
annual (i.e., 12 month) basis:
1. Pour an adequate amount of conductivity standard into a beaker or other container and analyze at 25' C.
Document the temperature and conductivity value.
2. Lower the temperature of the standard by placing the container in cool water or a refrigerator to less than the
lowest anticipated sample temperature and analyze. Document the temperature and conductivity value.
3. If samples greater than 25' C are to be analyzed, perform the following additional step: Place the container in
warm water or a water bath and raise the temperature above 25° C to greater than the highest anticipated
sample temperature and analyze. Document the temperature and conductivity value.
As the temperature increases or decreases, the value of the conductivity standard must be within ± 10% of the true
value of the standard.
Comment: Anticipated temperatures can be obtained from a review of the Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) from
the peak summer and winter months. Historical data should provide a reasonably accurate estimation of ranges that will
bracket the expected sample temperatures.
Ref: North Carolina Wastewater/Groundwater Laboratory Certification (NC WW/GW LC) Policy Statement February
2006.
Other certified laboratories may provide assistance in meeting this requirement.
Documentation requirements:
The following criteria must be documented whenever sample analysis is performed.
1). Date and time of sample collection.
2). Date and time of sample analysis.
3). Collector/analyst's name.
4). Sample Site/ Sample identification.
5). Value of standard used for calibration.
6). Instrument calibration time.
7). Concentration and obtained value of the check standard.
8). Reported values for all samples in pmhos/cm at 25° C or corrected to 250 C.
9). The temperature correction (even if it is zero) must be posted on the meter as well as in hard copy format (to be retained
for 5 years).
Recommendation: Maintain a log of all chemicals, reagents and standards to include vendor, lot numbers, and expiration date.
Ref: Standard Methods, 18th Edition - Method 2510 A and B and Method 2550 B.

N.NR
M!7nston-safe'r,
08
Re
TOWN OF MAYODAN
WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY
rE"2 8 U �U
"
ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
For the Calendar Year 2007
Prepared: February 2008

2007 Annual Performance Report
for the
Town of Mayodan
Wastewater Treatment Facility
General Information
Facility/System Name: Town of Mayodan Wastewater Treatment Plant
Responsible Entity: Town of Mayodan
Person in Charge/Contact: Debra Cardwell
Town Manager
210 W. Main Street
Mavodan. NC 27027
[phone]
Description of Collection System or Treatment Process:
The Mayodan Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) is an extended aeration
activated sludge treatment plant, processing a combination of industrial and
domestic wastewater. The treatment scheme includes influent bar screens, an
influent lift station, three aeration basins and secondary clarifiers. The treated
water is chlorinated and dechlorinated, prior to discharge to the Mayo River.
Excess biological sludge is thickened in one of two gravity thickeners and
subsequently digested in an aerobic digester. The stabilized sludge is then land
applied (on permitted sites) either as a liquid directly from the digester or it may be
dewatered (prior to land application) on the sand drying beds and then land applied.
Figure I presents a schematic layout of the wastewater treatment plant.
II. Compliance Performance
The North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
(NCDENR) regulates the Town of Mayodan effluent discharge under the National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). The NCDENR issued to the
Town a NPDES Permit, which includes water quality limits and sampling and
monitoring requirements. The NPDES Permit requires the Town to test more
than 19 different constituents in the treated water. The monitoring frequency for
these constituents are set at various intervals such as continuous, daily, weekly,
monthly, and quarterly. During the reporting period, the Town conducted 4,827
tests of the treated water before it was discharged to the creek. The WWTP
achieved a compliance level of 100% with the NPDES Permit requirements.
Following is a summary of the testing for the parameters, which are, assigned
Water Quality standards by the NPDES Permit. Please note the summary does
not include parameters, which incorporates a monitoring requirement only, nor
does it include daily process control testing.

Constituent
Number of Test
Required
Number of Test
Conducted*
Flow
Continuous
Continuous
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD)
488
475*
Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
488
475*
Ammonia
228
224*
Fecal Coliform
244
235*
Conductivity
244
235*
Chlorine
244
250*
Total Nitrogen
12
14
Total Phosphorus
12
14
Copper
48
50
Mercury
44
44
Zinc
48
50
Toxicity
4
4
*Testing is not required on holidays or during inclement weather.
In addition to the required testing, the Town conducted over 2496 in-house test to
ensure the proper operation of the wastewater treatment plant.
Following is a summary of permit violations, which occurred during the year:
There were no permit violations during the reporting period.

III. Certification
I have personally examined and am familiar with the information submitted in this
document and attachments. Based upon my inquiry of those individuals
immediately responsible for obtaining the information reported herein, I believe
that the submitted information is true, accurate and complete. I am aware that
there are significant penalties for submitting false information.
Signed this day of , 2008.
Debra Cardwell
(Name) Town Manager
(Signature)

TOWN OF MAYODAN
System Performance Annual Report
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Dear Sirs:
OFFICE OF THE TOWN MANAGER
210 W. MAIN STREET • MAYODAN, N.C. 27027 . [phone]
FAX [phone]
[e-mail]
February 27, 2008
FEB 2 8 1 w
RE: Mayodan Wastewater Plant
NPDES Permit No.: NCO021873
Rockingham County
Enclosed you will find the Annual Performance Report for the year 2007 for the Town of
Mayodan Wastewater Treatment Plant. We believe the report to be complete and accurate. The
customers will be notified of the availability of the report through the local newspaper r sewer
bills.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
QXL" A c�LtL
Debra E. Cardwell
Town Manager

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
January 10, 2008
Ms. Debra Cardwell, Town Manager
Town of Mayodan
210 West Main Street
Mayodan, NC 27027
SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Town of Mayodan Wastewater Treatment Plant
NPDES Permit No. NCO021873
Rockingham County
Dear Ms. Cardwell:
The subject inspection was performed on December 4, 2007, by Mr. David Russell, Environmental
Specialist, with our Winston-Salem Regional Office. Mr. Jamie Whitten, Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC)
was present during the inspection.
This plant is permitted for a flow of 3.0 mgd. The last upgrade to the 4.5 mgd capacity was
completed in July 2004. During the spring of 2005, the wastewater flows from the Towns of Madison
and Stoneville became tributary to the system. Even with the additional flow, the plant averages less than
1 mgd.
Since Madison and Stoneville became tributary to the Mayodan collection system there have been
inflow/infiltration(I&I) problems. The dry weather flow averages less than 1 mgd, but after. a sufficient
rain the flow will approach or reach 5 mgd. Prior to the Madison and Stoneville connections such drastic
increases in flow were not noticed. Since only one of the four aeration basins is needed to treat the flow
on most days, the other basins are used as surge basins. Efforts need to be made to identify and reduce
the I&I problems to insure more of the plant's capacity can be used. In the future our office will perform
a collection system inspection to better evaluate the system.
For the period of December 2006 through September 2007, the plant met all effluent limits For
that period, self -monitoring data showed the following averages: BOD-2.5 mg/l; TSS-9.0 mg/l; NH3-1.1
mg/l and fecal coliform- 3.3 colonies/100ml. The flow averaged only 0.72 mgd.
Composite effluent samples were collected, split and analyzed with results as follows: BOD- 56
mg/l ; TSS-12 mg/1 :NH3- 0.06 mg/l; lead- less than 10 ug/l; selenium- less than 5.0 ug/1 and fecal
coliform- 1/100ml. The fecal coliform sample was a grab.
It is understood the BOD sample analyzed by the Town got a result of 4.0 mg/l. compared to the
State's value of 56 mg/l. The State's lab value was an estimate based on a dilution down to 1%. State lab
personnel suggested this could have been due to effluent toxicity. It is also understood that a bioassay
performed on the same sample by the Town passed the test. What these results mean is unclear.
At the time of this visit, the plant was producing a very clear effluent. The operator keeps veryNo ` Carolina
�taally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 585 Waughtown Street Winston-Salem, NC 27107 Phone [phone] Fax [phone]
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

P7
complete logs on daily plant operations, meter calibrations and sampling collection. Effluent sampling
is being performed at the required frequencies with all samples taken after chlorination and
dechlorination. Composite effluent samples are collected flow proportionally as required by the permit.
Should you have any questions please contact Mr. David Russell in our Winston-Salem Regional
Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
i ra_
Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Mr. Jamie Whitten (PO Box 243 Mayodan 27027)
Rockingham Co. Health Dept.
Central Files
V(VSRO

United States Environmental Protection Agency
Form Approved.
EPA Washington, D.C. 20460
OMB No. 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 I NI 2 15I 3I NCO021873 11 121 07/12/04 117 18I CI 191 SI 20I II
Remarks
211111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111l6
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 CIA --------- ----------------- Reserved ----------------------
67I 169 70I 4 I 71 I_I 721 NJ 73 I _u I 174 751 I I I I I I 180
l
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
Entry Time/Date
Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
10:15 AM 07/12/09
07/11/01
Mayodan WWTP
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
210 W Main St
Mayodan NC 27027
11:55 AM 07/12/04
12/05/31
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
Jamie C. Whitten/ORC/336-427-5733/
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Debra E Cardwell,210 W Main St Mayodan NC 27027/Town Contacted
Manager/336-427-0241/3364277592 No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit N Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Program 0 Sludge Handling Disposal Facility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Waters
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
David C Russell WSRO WQ//336-771-5000/
Signature of Ma agement Q A fewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
, _ / - / al
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page # 1

Permit: NCO021873
Inspection Date: 12/04/2007
Owner - Facility: Mayodan WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? ■ n n n
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable Solids, pH, DO, Sludge ■ n n 0—
Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment:
Permit
Yes
No
NA
NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new application?
n
F1
■
n
Is the facility as described in the permit?
■
n
n
n
# Are there any special conditions for the permit?
■
n
n
n
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
■
n
n
n
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
■
n
n
n
Comment: Limits change depending on flow totals.
Flow Measurement - Effluent
Yes
No
NA
NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
■
n
n
n
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
■
n
n
n
Is the flow meter operational?
■
❑
n
❑
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
■
n
n
n
Comment: Meter calibrated 5/07. Only part of this 4.5 mgd plant is used(one aeration
basin and one clarifier) is being used. Plant flow averages less tham 1 mgd.
Aerobic Digester
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is the capacity adequate?
■
n
n
rl
Is the mixing adequate?
■
n
n
n
Is the site free of excessive foaming in the tank?
■
n
n
n
# Is the odor acceptable?
■
❑
❑
n
# Is tankage available for properly waste sludge?
■
n
n
n
Comment:
Pump Station - Influent
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is the pump wet well free of bypass lines or structures?
■
Q
D
n
Is the wet well free of excessive grease?
■
❑
n
❑
Are all pumps present?
■
n
n
n
Are all pumps operable?
■
n
n
n
Are float controls operable?
■
❑
O
Q
Page # 3

pppppp,-
Permit: NC0021873
Inspection Date: 12/04/2007
Owner - Facility: Mayodan VVVVfP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Pump Station - Influent
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is SCADA telemetry available and operational?
■
n
n
n
Is audible and visual alarm available and operational?
■
n
n
n
Comment: 3 pumps.
Bar Screens
Yes
No
NA
NE
Type of bar screen
n
a.Manual
b.Mechanical
■
Are the bars adequately screening debris?
■
n
n
n
Is the screen free of excessive debris?
■
n
n
n
Is disposal of screening in compliance?
■
n
n
n
Is the unit in good condition?
■
n
n
n
Comment:
Yes
No
NA
NE
Type of grit removal
n
a.Manual
b.Mechanical
■
Is the grit free of excessive organic matter?
■
n
n
n
Is the grit free of excessive odor?
■
n
n
n
# Is disposal of grit in compliance?
■
n
n
n
Comment:
Secondary Clarifier
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater?
■
n
n
n
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier?
■
n
n
n
■
❑
❑
❑
Are weirs level?
Is the site free of weir blockage?
■
o
o
n
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting?
■
n
n
n
Is scum removal adequate?
■
n
a
n
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge?
■
n
n
n
Is the drive unit operational?
■
n
n
n
Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)?
■
n
n
n
Page # 4

Permit: NCO021873 Owner - Facility: Mayodan VW TP
Inspection Date: 12/04/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Secondary Clarifier Yes No NA NE
Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc? ■ ❑ n
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately'/4 of the sidewall depth) ■ n n n
Comment: Effluent very clear.
Yes No NA NE
Mode of operation
Ext. Air
Type of aeration system
Is the basin free of dead spots?
■
n
Cl
n
Are surface aerators and mixers operational?
■
n
n
n
Are the diffusers operational?
n
n
■
n
Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process?
■
n
n
n
Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface?
■
n
n
n
Is the DO level acceptable?
■
n
n
n
Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/1)
■
n
n
n
Comment:
Disinfection -Gas
Yes
No
NA
NE
Are cylinders secured adequately?
■
n
n
n
Are cylinders protected from direct sunlight?
■
n
❑
n
Is there adequate reserve supply of disinfectant?
■
n
n
❑
Is the level of chlorine residual acceptable?
■
n
n
n
Is the contact chamber free of growth, or sludge buildup?
■
[1
n
n
Is there chlorine residual prior to de -chlorination?
■
n
n
n
Does the Stationary Source have more than 2500 Ibs of Chlorine (CAS No. 7782-50-5)?
■
n
n
n
If yes, then is there a Risk Management Plan on site?
n
n
■
n
If yes, then what is the EPA twelve digit ID Number? (1000-= _)
If yes, then when was the RMP last updated?
Comment:
Yes
No
NA
NE
Type of system ? Gas
Is the feed ratio proportional to chlorine amount (1 to 1)? ■ n n n
Is storage appropriate for cylinders? ■ n n n
Page # 5

ppppppp,-
Permit: NCO021873
Inspection Date: 12/04/2007
Owner - Facility: Mayodan WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
# Is de -chlorination substance stored away from chlorine containers?
Are the tablets the proper size and type?
Comment: Sulfur dioxide is used.
Are tablet de -chlorinators operational?
Number of tubes in use?
Comment:
Standby Power
Is automatically activated standby power available?
Is the generator tested by interrupting primary power source?
Is the generator tested under load?
Was generator tested & operational during the inspection?
Do the generator(s) have adequate capacity to operate the entire wastewater site?
Is there an emergency agreement with a fuel vendor for extended run on back-up power?
Is the generator fuel level monitored?
Comment: Maintenance and testing generator is contracted.
Effluent Sampling
Is composite sampling flow proportional?
Is sample collected below all treatment units?
Is proper volume collected?
Is the tubing clean?
Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at 1.0 to 4.4 degrees Celsius)?
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type representative)?
Comment:
■nnn
nn■n
Page # 6

BER: NCO021873
IPFrACILITYME: Town of Mayodan -Mayodan WWTP
CITY: Mayodan
OUTFALL: 001 EFFLUENT
PERIOD ENDING MONTH: 9 - 2007
COUNTY: Rockingham REGION: Winston-Salem
DMR 12 Month Calculated
PAGE $ OF 6
00010
00095
00300
00310
00400
00530
00600
00610
deg c
umhos/cm
mg/I
mg/I
su
mg/I
mgA
mg/I
Temperature,
Specific
DO, Oxygen,
BOD, 5-Day (20
pH
Solids, Total
Suspended
Nitro� yen, Total
Nitrogen,
Ammonia Total
Water De
Centigrade
Conductance
Dissolved
Deg. C)
(as N)
(as N)
30
30
15.809524
468.05
7.514286
1.55
6.4 - 6.8
7.15
3.59
0.94
30
30
13.210526
468.352632
7.555556
1.684211
6.4 - 6.8
6.947368
5.39
1.489474
30
30
15.181818
627.659091
7.490909
2.772727
6.4 - 6.7
7.318182
8.46
0.390909
30
30
14
16.8
361.65
7.465
1.05
6.2 - 6.7
7.35
3.33
0.86
30
30
9 3
18.181818
408.454545
7.486364
4.045455
6.4 - 6.7
7.227273
22.9
0.137273
30
30
9.3
22.52381
448.809524
7.480952
3.47619
6.3 - 6.7
9.761905
10.73
0.33381
30
30
9.3
29.285714
426.404762
7.4
1.47619
6.2 - 6.6
10.047619
5.86
0.228571
30
30
9.3
28.956522
478.030435
10.13913
0.391304
6.2 - 6.5
15.086957
16.5
0.717391
30
30
9.3
23.388889
460.338889
6.444444
3.65
6 - 6.7
11.333333
14.82
2.657143
30
30
14
413.681818
7.540909
1.863636
6.6 - 7
5.181818
30
30
18.8
470.7
7.505
6.6
6.5 - 6.8
13.4
2.67
0.405
30
30
17.8
1 595.45
1 7.525
4.9
6.4 - 7
8.1
3.83
0.345
' Jeep l ;LS
,0� - _ 0, 7
�G

1p RMIT NUMBER: NC0021873
FACILITY NAME: Town of Mayodan - Mayodan WWTP
CITY: Mayodan
PERIOD ENDING MONTH: 9 - 2007
COUNTY: Rockingham REGION: Winston-Salem
DMR 12 Month Calculated
PAGE 6 OF 6
00665
01042
01092
31616
50050
50060
71900
TGP3B
mg/I
ug/I
ug/I
W100ml
mgd
ug/I
ug/I
pass/fail
Phosphorus,
Total P)
Copper, Total
Cu)
Zinc, Total (as
Zn)
Coliform, Fecal
MF, M-FC
Flow, in
thru
Chlorine Total
Residual
Mercu ,Total
Hg�
P/F STATRE 7Day
Chr Ceriodaphnia
(as
(as
Broth,44.5C
conduit or
treatment plant
(as
3
1 - 07
2.7
9.75
34.25
3.590021
1.331387
0
0.008626
3
2-07
2.8
13.4
51
2.654673
0.820321
0
0.004385
3
3-07
0.75
12.75
57.25
3.690196
1.082806
0
0.003785
1
3
4-07
4
15
63.75
1.280284
0.700667
0
0.003022
45
5-07
5
18.6
83.6
1.641595
0.439484
0
0.008048
4.5
6-07
5.3
31
99
1.616522
0.564167
0
0.004223
1
4.5
7-07
5.1
36.6
137.6
3.138568
0.499484
0
0.006514
4.5
8-07
4.9
44.75
196.5
2.337335
0.434774
0
0.011122
4.5
9-07
4.9
32.25
77
5.588348
0.391467
0
0.006585
1
3
4.46
0.952871
3
1 -
1.7
42
67.4
11.883232
1.358733
0
0.029644
3
12-06
3.06
19
49.5
7.866524
0.994097
0
0.008684
3,3 0.7..-I

I
AI
Jk7�d� )j)-;� / 1-73
t I ia
INDIVIDUAL NPDES WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT PRE -INSPECTION CHECKLIST
........................ ............ ........... ... ........ . ......... ..... . ....
........................... ........... ............ ............ .. ... ..... ...
............................ ............ ........... ..... I .... I. ......... ..... . .... ..... ........ .... ...... .... I ... ............ ............ ........ ..... ...
.... ........... ........
........................... ........ .. ............ ........ .....
....................... ........ .......... ........ .....
.. ........... ........... . .. ....
All information/documentation listed below must be available to the DWQ inspector at the scheduled inspection.
...
................................
.............................
........................... ............
........ .......
........ ...
........................... .....................
.......... ..
.... ....
..... ......
..... ............
.................
.....
...............
............
............
..............
.... . ............
...... I ....
. .. ..........
..............
...... .............
1
.
Discharg; Monitoring Reports
Dates:
Through:
2
Lab Data, field and non -field
Dates:
Through:
3
Chain of Custody Forms
Dates:
Through:
4
Copies of current field lab certifications and lab certification
5
If outside lab is used to conduct non -field parameters, lab's name and certification number.
6
Complete copy of the NPDES permit
7
IStatus of SOC or moratorium issuance and ongoing related issues if applicable)
8
1 ORC and BORC current certifications
9
Wastewater annual report if applicable)
10
1 Daily Operator's Log/ORC Visitation Log
111
Plant operations/maintenance to
121
Process control data, which includes field parameters tested and equipment calibrations
131
Flow meter calibration records
141
Flow Charts
15
Influent and effluent samplers
16
Generator inspection and test run records (may ask to run generator under load)
17
Spill response plan with current emergency contacts
18
Sludge/residuals hauling records
19,Visual
inspection of plant and treatment units
201Stream
must be accessible for insRection at discharge point
...... ..... ...... . .... .... ...
................................
................ .... ...
................ . ............. ...... ....
Call
with Questions:
Ron Boone
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Winston-Salem Regional Office
,(336) 771-5 00
I Fax: [phone]

ppppppp,
Regional Field Inspectors Check List for Field Parameters
Name of site to be Inspected: 14AJTr AJ C,�) P-1�-7j Date:
Field certification # (if applicable): Inspector: -e
NPDES #: AC 00 �10 3 Region: p
I. Circle the parameter or parameters performed at this site.
Residual Chlorine, Settleable Solids, pH, DO, Conductivity, Temperature
II. Instrumentation:
A. Does the facility have the equipment necessary to analyze field parameters as circled above?
1. A pH meter Yes No
2.
A Residual Chlorine meter
Yes
No
3.
DO meter
Yes
No
4.
A Cone for settleable solids
Yes
No
5.
A thermometer or meter that measures temperature.
Yes
No
6.
Conductivity meter
Yes
No
III. Calibration/Analysis:
1. Is the pH meter calibrated with 2 buffers and
checked with a third buffer each day of use? Yes No
2. For Total Residual Chlorine, is a check standard
analyzed each day of use? Yes No
3. Is the air calibration of the DO meter performed
each day of use? Yes No
4. For Settleable Solids, is 1 liter of sample
settled for 1 hour? Yes No
5. Is the temperature measuring device calibrated
annually against a certified thermometer? Yes No
6. For Conductivity, is a calibration standard
analyzed each day of use? Yes No

pp-
PV. Documentation:
1.
Is the date and time that the sample was collected documented?
Yes
No
2.
Is the sample site documented?
Yes
No
3.
Is the sample collector documented?
Yes
No
4.
Is the analysis date and time documented?
Yes
No
5.
Did the analyst sign the documentation?
Yes
No
6.
Is record of calibration documented?
Yes
No
7. For Settleable Solids, is sample volume and
1 hour time settling time documented? Yes No
8. For Temperature, is the annual calibration of
the measuring device documented? Yes No
Comments:
Please submit a copy of this completed form to the Laboratory Certification Program.
DWQ Lab Certification
Chemistry Lab
Courier# 52-01-01
FIELD INSPECTOR CHECKLIST REV. 04/23/2002

MONITORING REPORT(MR) VIOLATIONS for: Report Date: 01/08/09 Page: 1 of 1
Permit: nc0021873 MRs Between: 1-2008 and 12-2008 Region: Winston-Salem Violation Category: Limit Violation Program Category: %
Facility Name: % Param Name: % County: Rockingham Subbasin: % Violation Action: %
Major Minor: %
PERMIT: FACILITY: COUNTY: REGION:
MONITORING OUTFALL / VIOLATION UNIT OF CALCULATED
REPORT PPI LOCATION PARAMETER DATE FREQUENCY MEASURE LIMIT VALUE VIOLATION TYPE VIOLATION ACTION
12/31 /69

■, Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
IN Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
Article Addressed to:
Ms. Debra Cardwell, Manager
Town of Mayodan
210 West Main Street
Mayodan, NC 27027
A. f�S''Q\n\at\nu� re
X
B. Received by ( Printed Name)
❑ Agent
❑ Addressee
C. Date of Delivery
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3. S rvice Type
Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail
Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
7008 0150 0002 7876 8836 ✓ ') F"�=
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt / _ / _ 102595-02-M-154

UNITED tiST ��v •P.pQ�STi4k . sER��+� `„ ;r'�'
.',' ��: i:. S' 19_�`•: S ., �'1� �._9.:!�h�L�4 �.�i'..'.. �� n . . vy� ".,a��aw
• Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box •
NCDENR- Water Quality Section
585 Woughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107