20200503 Ver 1_USACE Notice of Incomplete PCN_20200428

Strickland, Bev
From: Heath Caldwell <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 12:36 PM
To: Roden Reynolds, Bryan K CIV (US)
Cc: Johnson, Alan; Len Rindner
Subject: [External] Re: SAW-2019-00104_Hopper Communities (Notice of Incomplete Pre -
Construction Notification)
Attachments: 4. PCN Fillable_signed_print.pdf; Oak Spring Impact 2020-04-27 (1).pdf
External email_ links or o en attachments unless you verif . n attachment to
[e-mail]
L
Bryan -
Reworked this one and have come back with much improved impact numbers. Reduced the permanent stream
impacts at Stream E from 66LF to 8LF. Overall permanent impacts have been reduced from 196LF to 138LF
and total loss from 119LF to 88LF. I've included an updated impact table within the application attached and
also an updated planset showing the proposed impacts. Please let me know if you have any questions or need
any additional information to get this processed. Thanks -
Heath
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 12:34 PM Roden Reynolds, Bryan K CIV (US)
<Bryan.K.RodenReynolds o,usace.army.mil> wrote:
Mr. Caldwell,
On April 13, 2020, we received the Pre -Construction Notification you submitted on behalf of JBH
Development, LLC on a property located in Union County, North Carolina. I have completed my initial review
of the report and I have determined that it is incomplete. The following information is necessary before I will
issue a determination:
a. The PCN requests the use of two different Nationwide Permits to construct a residential
development. However, the PCN did not clearly describe which impacts would be associated with
NWP 29 and which would be with NWP 18. Therefore, please quantity the impacts associated with
each NWP requested.
b. The majority of impacts are proposed under Nationwide Permit 29 and 66 linear feet of stream
impacts are potentially proposed under Nationwide Permit 18. The stream impacts (66 linear feet)
are associated with the development of stormwater facility FOR THE RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT. The Corps considers all impacts proposed as associated with the construction of
the residential development and would then be permitted under Nationwide Permit 29. Please

explain why they stream impacts (66 linear feet) are associated with Nationwide Permit 18 and not
included with the other permanent wetland impacts associated with Nationwide Permit 29.
c. Avoidance and minimization has not clearly be demonstrated for this project. General Condition
23(a) of Nationwide Permit 29 states "The activity must be designed and constructed to avoid and
minimize adverse effects, both temporary and permanent, to waters of the United States to the
maximum extent practicable at the project site." The term practicable means available and capable
of being done after taking into consideration cost, existing technology, and logistics in light of the
overall project purposes (see 40 CFR 230.3(I)). The Corps is concerned that the applicant has not
avoided and minimized impacts to waters of the United States to the maximum extent practicable as
required by regulation. After further review of the proposed site configuration, it seems the
proposed stormwater facility could be reconfigured/resized and/or moved to a new location within
the proposed project boundary to allow for a different site configuration which may have less
impacts to waters of the United States. The project as proposed has not demonstrated that it will
have no more than minimal impacts to the environment.
d. Please remove the nomenclature "marginal" on any figures included in the PCN (i.e., Figures 7-8).
e. As currently proposed, the cumulative impacts for the proposed project is over 0.5 acres of impacts
to waters of the United States. In NWP 29, it states "For residential subdivisions, the aggregate total
loss of waters of United States authorized by this NWP cannot exceed 0.5 acre." As currently
proposed, this project cannot be verified under the Nationwide Permit Program and would need to
be analyzed/issued under a Standard Permit (i.e., Individual Permit).
f. Please provide a detailed cross -sectional drawings depicting the embedded riprap proposed for
placement in Stream E. If riprap is not embedded and does not provide enhancement function, such
sediment deposition, then the linear feet associated with embedded riprap (i.e., 35 linear feet) may
be considered a permanent impacts which results in loss of waters of the United States.
g. In the PCN it states the proposed project will permanently impact 154 linear feet of stream channel.
Of those 154 linear feet, 35 linear feet are proposed as embedded riprap and you are not considering
that a loss of waters. In addition, you provided no compensatory mitigation for the remaining 119
linear feet of permanent, loss of water stream impacts. However, the Corps views these permanent
impacts cumulatively, and since cumulatively these impacts are over the threshold, the Corps will
likely require mitigation for stream impacts. Therefore, the Corps will likely require compensatory
mitigation for 119 linear feet of permanent stream impacts.
h. In the PCN, the project is proposing to impact 0.237 acres of open waters. In addition, no
compensatory mitigation was proposed for these open water impacts. However, if you review
photographs and aerial imagery of the open water it shows this area as very swallow, with a
mature/growing vegetated buffer (20+ years of vegetated growth), and a large fringe/adjacent
wetland system which may act like a freshwater marsh system. If you reference NCWAM,
specifically question 21 (Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion) this system (i.e., 0.237 acres of open
water and 0.236 acres of fringe wetland) is best described as either an "b" or "c" type. Based on the
nature of the system and the proposed impacts on this system, compensatory mitigation is
warranted for both the wetlands and open waters. The Corps is willing to consider a reduced ratio
for the open water impacts compared to the proposed 2:1 ratio for the wetland impacts.
PLEASE NOTE:
• Nationwide Permit 29, Regional Condition 4.1.1 states "Discharges in perennial stream, intermittent
streams, and wetlands for stormwater management facilities are prohibited under this NWP."

The impacts you proposed for Nationwide Permit 18 are related to the development of the subdivision
and would not occur if the subdivision was not developed. You cannot circumvent the regional
conditions of one Nationwide Permit (i.e., Nationwide Permit 29) by parsing out those impacts not
allowed (i.e., 0.1 acre) and trying to permit them under a different Nationwide Permit (i.e., Nationwide
Permit 18). All impacts related to the development of a residential community within the proposed
project area will be considered under Nationwide Permit 29.
Regional conditions are established by the District and approved by the Corps Division, to ensure that
the implementation of the nationwide permit program in waters and wetlands of North Carolina are
consistent with meeting the program's goals of streamlining the permit process for those activities that
have no more than minimal impacts to the environment.
General Condition 28 in Nationwide Permit 29 states the use of multiple Nationwide Permits if the loss
of waters of the U.S. authorized by those permits does not exceed the acreage limit of the Nationwide
Permit with the highest specified acreage limit. However, AND MOST IMPORTANTLY, as
previously stated you cannot circumvent the regional condition of one Nationwide Permit by parsing
out those impacts not allowed and trying to permit them under a different Nationwide Permit.
Refer to NWP 29 Regional Condition 3.2 which states "For stream losses of 150 linear feet or less that
require a PCN, the DE may determine, on a case -by -case basis, that compensatory mitigation is
required to ensure that the activity results in minimal adverse effects on the aquatic environment.
Please provide the information requested above in ONE consolidated response within 30-days of the date of
this correspondence. If you do not respond within 30-days, the request will be administratively canceled.
Please contact me via telephone or e-mail if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Bryan Roden -Reynolds, WPIT
Regulatory Project Manager
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District
Charlotte Regulatory Field Office
8430 University Executive Park Drive
Charlotte, NC 28262

Office: [phone]
Heath Caldwell
Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC
www.wetlands-epg.com [wetlands-ePg com]
704.999.5279

a`'�F wArEgQ�
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no. 2019-00104
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
X❑ Yes ❑ No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Oak Springs Road Subdivision
2b.
County:
Union
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Indian Trail
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
David Duke
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
7203 Oak Spring Road
3e.
City, state, zip:
Indian Trail, NC 28079
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑X Other, specify: Developer
4b.
Name:
Bart Hopper
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
Hopper Communities
4d.
Street address:
1616 Cleveland Ave
4e.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28203
4f.
Telephone no.:
704.805.4801
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Heath Caldwell
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC - Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group
5c.
Street address:
10612-D Providence Road, PMB 550
5d.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28227
5e.
Telephone no.:
336-554-2728
5f.
Fax no.:
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
Multiple Parcels - see attached Parcel Map
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.0964 Longitude:-80.6574
1 c.
Property size:
61.8 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
North Fork Crooked Creek
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C
2c.
River basin:
03040105
3.
Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site is a mosaic of disturbed forest cover, cropland, large cow pastures, farm roads, fencerows, farm buildings, and residential property with typical
landscaping. The wooded areas are associated with upland slopes in the southern portion of the site, and the floodplain woodlands along North Fork
Crooked Creek which runs through the northern portion of the site.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.49
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 2,172
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The project consists of grading, fill & BMP for a residential development.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Excavation and grading of the site will use standard equipment - excavator, dump trucks, track hoe, etc.
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (includingall prior phases in the past?
❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments: Verification received 3/28/2020 SAW-2019-00104
( )
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
Preliminary ❑ Final
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Nic Nelson
Agency/Consultant Company: WEPG
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination request was submitted on 1/15/2019 (SAW-2019-00104) and was field verified by Bryan Roden Reynolds
on 2/26/2019. The site verification has been included in the Jurisdictional Determination Section.
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑X Wetlands ❑X Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑X Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 P
Fill
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0.236
W2 T
Excavation
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0.002
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.238
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Fill
Stream C
INT
Corps
6
49
S2 P
Fill
Stream D
INT
Corps
6
39
S3 P
Stabilization
Stream E
PER
Corps
6
8
S4 T
Excavation
Stream G
PER
Corps
6
42
S5 -
Choose one
S6
Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
138
3i. Comments:
42LF of impacts for a sewerline installation will be temporary in nature and be restored per Enhancement Plan (See Figures 13 and 14). Overall Loss to
Waters of the US will total 88LF.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 P
Pond A
Fill
Pond
0.237
O2 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
0.237
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet)
B 1
Yes/No
B2 -
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Due to the location of the on site pond, streams and wetlands, opportunities to completely avoid these areas were limited. Impacts to site surface
waters associated with the proposed development were limited through site selection location, design, location/orientation of the proposed lots, access
routes and stormwater facilities. 2:1 slopes have been implemented to limit impacts to site surface waters. The applicant has demonstrated substantial
avoidance and minimization efforts in which 96% of the total linear footage of onsite streams will be avoided.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Construction techniques will implement approved erosion control methods to avoid/minimize impacts to onsite/adjacent offsite receiving conveyances.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑X Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑X Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑X Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0.473 acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments: Mitigation is proposed at a 2:1 ratio for all wetland impacts. 0.5:1 mitigation is proposed for impacts to Open Water Pond A.
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ❑X No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes X❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
35.8 %
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
Storm water on the site will be handled by the facilities shown on the attached plans. The stormwater plan
has not yet been approved by the Town of
Indian
Trail but has been designed to meet their criteria.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
Indian Trail
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
Indian Trail
❑X Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ❑X No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
No
additional phases are proposed as part to this project.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater
generated on the site will be transported to the nearest treatment facility via sewer lines.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ❑X No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ❑X No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
A Threatened/Endangered species assessment was conducted in which no species were identified. Please refer to the Threatened and Endangered
Species Report for additional information on listed, protected species.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
No essential fish habitat in this region.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
SHPO's website: http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑X Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
An application for floodplain development will be submitted to local floodplain coordinator (LUESA) for approval of proposed fill within the floodplain.
Final approval will be provided upon receipt.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
http://gis-web.co.union.nc.us/gomaps/# ; www.fema.gov;
Heath Caldwell
Digitally signed by Heath Caldwell
Heath Caldwell - -Heath Caldwell, wetla ds- ou,
email=heat h.caldwell@wellands-
c=US
O4-28-2020
Date: 0
Date: 2020.04.28 09:33:08-04'00'
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.
Page 10 of 10

I;Aa�N-PAtdJ�� — —4—I
—�676 6�'� _—�' _ 1� \I
)J�
'0
0'
\\\��yl\\ n✓f 7 �n(ti col
1 � N4.1Amon v V�
�- o6
�� � I l O
�a�s
�6���/�7<1��� �VA V l / A ( \� \� oI \ r - v v ��� I I ✓ 5 r < I °gyp
%�� vA�YO IPJ�I
1/(I( �/ �o \\\ �\ ma t/rt \\\ \\\ (IIII\\ I°• -- %5-\ \� I l 1_A� -S
/
S) J.- ? (1 / J i\ o
�I' I 5'�-- -
WETLAND \ � / � � ✓� ° J\ \ � .. I
80�
✓��/ // 6 / I ( /J l 1I J o°l!) �P11 n 1 1� =0.069 AC. w _ - _ -_
1/t J Q- - _--_670-^ \\\ \�_ J I \✓-J�f i \�
'��° �1\ \� N�78- 1
\ \ --670— / = 2 — ' �6 /
PERENNIAL _!�-� \= _/�L 1�s�� o I� RJ
// l NORTH FORK x _ r ` �s7o �`
STREAM „E„ 2- - _-s67-
< J 6 CROOKED CREEK ( ) t �\ \ \\ \ _ =460 LF = _ sir- �! s` 6 v - _ ' a �� �✓ a z f ` �]
=810 LF
_So ��
/ S 1 /J . A �� n
���✓ � � o `( \ \ � _\6SS� ` 656� y� � � � ' � C 6 �✓l r� ��� �<06 i % / / / c/o / � � ( 1
II 10655%/ // � 65/�i/�� —673
/ / �� i k l l 1 I I l l /� � ��. k s l/
o=1.. � '.� / 6750
olQ l _
CO
INTERMITTENT
///-;��A A VA A t\\v�ov �v �/ v ; of A 6
-WETLAND F MF" . \ _ \ 1 N f " a STREAM » D» I [
✓ / s a ✓ I I / (=0.183 AC. Y66 ? I( ) s=155 LF
s7o��� ! l z
✓� c ..� » �1 �� I f l \ \\ 1 \ \ \ \ - __� ��� �� \�' \ 0� 662\� a - /`/(� 4 ` INTERMITTENT
ODPLAIN \ 1 \ �` t �° I STREAM »C"
100 YR. FLO
\II/ ✓ � ^^S i
=79 LF
\ z l 1 (S I 500 YR. FLOODPLAIN \ \\\ \� �6 �^ all10
PERENNIAL j \ rn
\ 1 1 671—� �Q,7-0 1 � — _ ��
\ / STREAM » G" `o \ x x—x-� ( \ 1 - Jr = 0'
( =626 LF
1 I \ s j e v� 1 t ✓ �� d �6� �� A ����� �� = _ (� VA v�s� I II
\ f _ \10
.g• m\ t\ PERENNIAL
\� <STREAM ..L.�\ �`s
1 S - - - - - - - =42 LF - - ------ \ \\� \ \���\\\ \ \ \ \ L \ \\A �`\ \
�-' WETLAND "MW" ` / -� \\ \ 68
\ \ \ \ > IOU
14
\\ u 002
1 \\ ,Lag
«680
-68
dl
0 � �
PRELIMINARY
DO NOT USF FOR CONSTRUCTION
I CINITY MAP
/
I /
I /
I \ /
I v \
I / \
\
I I v
g I \
� I /
OPEN WATER
POND "A"
=0.237 AC.
-.
WETLAND "B" ...... - - - - . -
=0.236 AC. : I
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 100 200 400
1 INCH = 200 FEET
E:\Project Folders\Hopper Communities\Oak Springs Road Subdivision 18221\Engineering\Design Drawings\Current\SHEETS\18221-S-WETLANDS.dwg, WI 1.0, 4/27/2020 9:48:10 AM, anewsome, 1:1

��. O. � � . � � - � �,i ram'-�_� <• ��� • � ����'� ��
� i •dam. �, �� � C��°�_�•- r� i �� ��i� Jwlill�,��. � � • � • � �� � I
/+� •1• � Vt 'I Ii �-�����. P � wL • ! .�, �U��°— .fir ���"'� • � a .•Ai
Lw
i
w VAA1A�� • ���r Akln
kll- I IM--mil
iillie 411 ! s • ��� VAS i ■Il��l�� ' I �� ��������Y.� •� �1
• 1, �, � •��04w�y �. • ••• ' • `: •-'S?(� .�i��y•��j � • si����� ����: • � ' rl .�,�r���., ��•�y%��••�� •��'1 • � I � I
Vill
ANIVIr-1121V Will
! ��C`3 °�� .��� �u� ,✓ ;��_. ,�; . ,i \\ \,_ e' %ff
\�
jwz
MAT
u
jam. � � . < _\� � � • • u/ ��� /./�j/j/fir �
�j�l!•"lei •—\<
i��\• •• • //.��;'I 1 11 • ■ I
ll
v 1PERMANENT STREAM "C"
y
�. �� A�? •� �� I i �� doll �•I ���1r+ • • • .� •„ �. ���// 'IMPACT NO.
�Iiie�`•��� s► 1i ��p .��A
GRAPHIC SCAL
/ pC•lG�V�•>•�,Y�i \� !y—ij�10 `��?`�.:ii��l�a ��I\ ' • ��.�•y �/\' `�
l • a�
• •fie � `.r .. L�—_jJ 1 ����';,�-c� •r• o
• • � • • • G • • d � • E`er v��A� � : `• �4::i. 1
Y STREAM "I"
• • • ujlII _ . V•� •
�
CREEK IMPACT FOR OPEN CUT
UTILITY INSTALLATION & TEMP.
CREEK CROSSINGrj.� •��
OAK SPRING ROAD SUBDIVISION
INDIAN TRAIL, NORTH CAROLINA
v+.0
OVERALL WETLANDS IMPACT MAP
. . , .
. ■ .8720 RED OAK BLVD., STE. 420
�• • •• • • CHARLOTTE,
E:\Project Folders\Hopper Communities\Oak Springs Road Subdivision 18221\Engineering\Design Drawings\Current\SHEETS\18221-S-WETLANDS.dwg, WI 2.0, 4/27/2020 9:48:29 AM, anewsome, 1:1

�- — X 'E— �. x x x \- ' x x — x n x �• I \ \ I I �w
COS I ` PERMANENT STREAM C I : \ �l ,
�> \ I \ / IMPACT NO. 3 I 1 I \ \ ^\ I I'I I I
x x X_ x x X r•.. \ I I l 49 L.F. AREA=49x6
x x x x— — x �•91 ` —0.007 AC. \EXTERIOR PRO ERTY LINE — III + II III
�\ TAIL OUT RIP RAP<� x\x' x X x x � — • � —:�;� \ X I x x x
`—� --- ��-x. x x x x x x x\ I x x! x \x x x\ x x x \
CHANNEL FROM FES 19. �x x_��x — X x X A\ rat\ x x x x� xlx xl x x xxx x\ x\ x \x x �\ x sx xxxx x x�,x x x Illliil lil �ll
\ NO IMPACT TO STREAM x x -- X x � . 638 �x x xl x x (x -A -A ( x xl -A x x lx x x l x x \x X x x \x x x \x x� x x
\ x x_--�� x I x L— x X x X \x x\x \ x x \\ �'685 x x x x` III I III
C PROPOSED. NO FILL x X �2� x j x x Xj x /x x \ x x x I x x x\ \
OR RIP RAP ALLOWED— B3-2 X> xvx x Ix x -A<x X x
IN STREAM C 'Ax v x x 'Avx 'A
/ �'� — x x — 68 x x I I I I I I
680
,T 107 �3 vv B4 I --_L - \--�-- x x
B3o 5 ___--I— v I 679 --v �� x II I �I
\ k / \ \I x I \ IIII
\ \ \—\ I 674 I 'A X�x i \\
i
\\\6P8 ` \ 67�\ \\ \\\ \ �114
/ L0TV`s �29
108 v ! \ I v I \ IV LOT 111
LOT 1)09 �r I I �\ IV \ AV LOT 112V
— LOT 110 ' ` I \ _\LOT 1'11 � x
PERMANENT WETLAND » B" \ B A 1\ �v� v�) \v v — — v �\ / I X X x II j o �� II
1 ., , A
IMPACT NO. 2 =0.236 AC. �v vv � ' \ I s I I PERMANENT
\ v CN
'OPEN WATER POND A vv x Cn ,� 11
IMPACT NO. 1=0.237 AC.
)02 Iv _ 7 79 1 &�910
btu 3\� A A A624 Q
UCo
III
x \
emsv s+� - �'' \ I ��+00 622 °` �" _ 5O pUgLv1C �W 2fo° A
IN
�4o i X t7��,, a
124
l
LOT 123 \ \ \
\
1 \ \
\
\
C
/ I
\
\
J
a
LOT, 122-2
I
- 8 ,(
/
x
,
i SO`—
PRELIMINARY
I
M
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
0
-B�
�)
\I
B15
A L�QT 116
LOT 115
OT 11 ( (,
\
I
\ LOT 11,8 I 18
Bco ,� o
I _
I�\ 11—� \
/ I
GRAPHIC SCALE
\ 0- I � \
\CD B-16
40 0 20 40 80
/6 J
1 INCH = 40 FEET
8
Project
OAK SPRING ROAD SUBDIVISION
INDIAN TRAIL, NORTH CAROLINA
l�
Title
6
�80s
WETLANDS IMPACT
MAP
\1 I
679 a
— — —
678_ f
Q
File: 18221—S—WEILANDS.dwg I Date: 4/27/2020
Project Egr. ABC
�1
/
0
LuISAACS O
Design By ABC
\ L I
\
\ •\
X `x u
X
XTREE
CIVIL ENGINEERING DESIGN AND SURVEYING C
Drawn By. ABC
Scale:
xp �AVE
kRE* .0-
872CHARDLOTTE, N.C. OAK 282E7 420
�I O
6
X \
\ s I '•
n x x
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
•
EAProject Folders\Hopper Communities\Oak Springs Road Subdivision 18221\Engineering\Design Drawings\Current\SHEETS\18221-S-WETLANDS.dwg, WI 3.0, 4/27/2020 9:48:54 AM, anewsome, 1:1

LOT 97
LOT 95
`\ PERMANENT STREAM "D"
�� IMPACT NO. 4
39 L.F. AREA=39x6
=234 S.F./O.005 AC.
Q�
/ I /
.� .• X� X I I \ \ PROP. RIP RAP TO
668 �� X _ I PROTECT SLOPE FROM
----6 / \ �__s X x x x_ X r X X\ I \ EROSION. NO RIP RAP TO
BE PLACED IN STREAM BED
LOT10slx�-
-
X TREEXSAVE
— —670 _ ` �� _ _ — 6) \ — _ _ x s x X _ X AR€A 6�0 59 AC o I
s _ _ X _ x_ x x x X x PERMANENT STREAM C» 0
xC��` > \ I \ I I / IMPACT N0. 3
—SLOT 105 49 L.F. AREA=49x6 I \
.� Q1 \ \ =0.007 AC. EXTERIOR PRC
XTAIL OUT RIP RAPr� XXx X X x � •_ . � - ;_ �\ � X I x X '� X X � � X % X � X X X X x lX x
\ _675_ CHANNEL FROM FES 19. x
— — — — \ NO IMPACT TO STREAM x x x— _ X x. B3
C PROPOSED. NO FILL
\ \
4 OR RIP RAP ALLOWED
IN STREAM C
31
6 \
674
J
\ 679 \
L0TV108 `s 9 I \ I 6P8 v \
v � / LOT
f 128 LOT tO9 ! 1\ I\ \\ LOT 112\ l
X
LOT 110 \ I _\ OT 1�11 \ \
\V I v 1 \ �� v� PERMANENT WETLAND "B" A B �
v \ \ � �1�-
\ x2 IMPACT NO. 2 =0.236 AC I�s
`° PRELIMINARY
A\ V DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
Project
v OT r2T ` —7 v vv OAK SPRING ROAD SUBDIVISION
I \� v v �� INDIAN TRAIL, NORTH CAROLINA
Title: e*06�3 ,vim `v Iv vB24 'v WETLANDS IMPACT MAP
v
File f. 18221—S—WETANDS.dwg I Date: 4/27/2020 Project Egr. ABC
GRAPHIC SCALE
tOT 126
40 0 20 40
00
5+00 1 INCH = 40 FEET
E:\Project Folders\Hopper Communities\Oak Springs Road Subdivision 18221\Engineering\Design Drawings\Current\SHEETS\18221-S-WETLANDS.dwg, WI 4.0, 4/27/2020 9:49:14 AM, anewsome, 1:1

x x X x/\V V V A\ \\V 660 Ah — �i
658
--
656
v
14
654
665
4 x �\ V A 652
K� 1 x 650
x � IIJ� WLF1\��� \� \ \V �52� LOT i � �� 665 — -
P h? DF MA DAA T NDARYBASE V10/ \ \ \ \ � \ \ 648
FIRM PANEL / l F9 / 8,1
-V7105409000J)' x x �� v ��� ss — 647
PROP. FOOT BRIDGE 8/f l �V�A\\ �� � C
r
(DESIGNED BY OTHERS / \ \ \ LOT 16
NO WETLANDS IMPACT ( \ 6s
J J I 30' STREAM
CbS / l WLF�O BUFFER
\\ l I / \ \i'-\�
WLF6 WLF21 v�✓\\ \���� V A\ O+OO
660
PROP. IMPACT NO. 5
CHANNEL X—SECTION
658 HORIZONTAL SCALE: 40 FEET PER INCH
EXIST. GROUND AT CL
656 PROP. PROFILE AT CL
E_
O
654 -J
(D
652 W
650PERMANENT STREAM "E"
IMPACT NO. 5
8 L.F. = 8x6
64 =48 S.F./O.001 AC.
8 L.F. OF RIP RAP APRON
647 AT GRADE IN CHANNEL
FOR CHANNEL STABILIZATION.
Ln I�
Ln Ln U-) 0
1 (T0 19- 1':6
VVLFS�
\ \ _ fNLF4 WLF22
VLMF�911%1�1'tF3\ - WLMF17/WLF1
\ "�" WLMF16 // PROP.
WLMF1-& LF2 PROP. NATURE TRAIL 0'7�WETPOND /
WF21 WLMF15 / / TO B-E-FIELD ADJUSTED / /
/ INV: 649. / �ti SCM 1 /
TO MINIMIZE tREE-IMPKCT
---- _ f
i WLMF14 / 10
i 500 Ya FEiVt
— —
i
WLMF11/WLMF12 �FLOODPLAIN 652 / T / — — _ — \ \ \ �✓ ` /
WLMF>0 / i _ — —
WLMF9 J �/ s�2 _ --- — -- — i� --------- 11010
/ PERMANENT STREAM "E" IMPACT NO. 5 ° % — 64 =_•.. \ \
WLMFS / 8 L.F. = 8x6 =48 S.F./0.001 AC. -
/ 8 L.F. OF RIP RAP APRON AT GRADE IN 652
y / CHANNEL FOR CHANNEL STABILIZATION. '
F7 / / \� / �9 ,! / / / _ Project
WL
`° — — _ — — _ , _ �, — — — _ - OAK SPRING ROAD SUBDIVISION
/LOT a4�/ —sue INDIAN TRAIL, NORTH CAROLINA
PRELIMINARY
Title:
WETLANDS IMPACT MAP
— W — > DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION �p Q File f. 18221—S—WEILANDS.dwg I Date: 4/27/2020 Project Egr. ABC
_ _ GRAPHIC SCALE
/ / / L''/ I ',/ -LOT-T44_ =ISAACSA DesinB. ABC
WLM / / / / / / �i / / / / 40 0 20 40 80 o Drawn By. ABC
\ /
MF3 / \ / / / / �� / / / / / — CIVIL ENGINEERING DESIGN AND SURVEYING Scale:
/LOT /' 42 / / / � / � � / / � 8720 RED OAK BLVD., STE. 420
1 INCH = 40 FEET70 CHARLOTTE, N.C... W15.01
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
EAProject Folders\Hopper Communities\Oak Springs Road Subdivision 18221\Engineering\Design Drawings\Current\SHEETS\18221-S-WETLANDS.dwg, WI 5.0, 4/27/2020 9:49:34 AM, anewsome, 1:1

+x x x X� x�<. I� LOT \141 A i
�l x� x x I ) I I 1, I I �
x+ x 1\�I \• x x / o0
oU')
i+cow
aow—
< m >
a V) ?
� �- %1/
660 / 652
I �
✓ \\ \ \�\ 111. x x x xi�—x-7xrt—x�— \ ��x—x 648
\ �AAVA T �0
vvy.�
� � ., � \ �� '9], F� �-9\ \VAA \�\V• r � � � X AA
TREE'`�/�VE
\�A\ \V ' . J Yv x yl x �SAKEA 124 .05 yAC x
v o v\\ /x x v,6 x x s, 646
/BOA\�� ��� x x
AREA 1'57—�605xACx-
1_657-
��A A / \•V A VA\ ��� '� x — ��> ��� 1� x 644
N/
0 ���� �iviF•� v vi / / ! �, v I , I 642
644.27 AA
\ fP \l I
l n OUT: 644.07A
o�
(V O M -t
0Lto
2 c0 to
a±wzo
�i!sm»
dVld' Z Z
EXISTING
_ 100 YR.-FEMA FLOOD ELEV.,= 652.00
(SEE ENHANCEMENT
TREEK
FIGURES T3 AND 14)
PROP. 170.00 LF (OTAL)
OF 8" SS ®0.
0% -------------
PROP. 20 LF
OF 8" DIP SS
0O
c
nu
c� o
001
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT NO.
FOR OPEN CUT UTILITY INSTALLATION
92 S.F./O.002 AC.�
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT NO. 2 fop �� x9° _ ,-r' -J, 1 /
REMOVE 6"-12" OF TOP SOIL IN wl MW3p
DISTURBED AREA. TOP SOIL TO BE Zo Sc__r R°P. °F 8 TEMPORARY STREAM "I" IMPACT NO. 1
PLACED ON FABRIC AND REPLACED p�L� P 42 L.F.=42X6=252 SF/0.006 AC. CREEK
I , UPON COMPLETION.r-- — -- \ma's GSM —oNs� ���'' UTILIT
INSTALLATOIONO& PENEMPT CREEKY CROSSING.
W2 s C
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT NO. 2 -�pR P' Po �o �EMp (SEE ENHANCEMENT FIGURES 13 AND 14)
i
TEMPORARY ACCESS CORRIDOR TO � p .•.• j� ;
BE REESTABLISHED WITH NATIVE 7 \
SPECIES. WOODED CORRIDOR TO BE l l l
REPLANTED. PERMANENT
MAINTENANCE EASEMENT TO BE TEMPORARY WETLAND MW IMPACT NO. 2
RESEEDED WITH NATIVE \� PROPOSED ANTI —SEEP COLLAR TO BE
STABILIZATION MIX. _ _ _ _l_ _ � INSTALLED AT THE DOWNSTREAM AND
UPSTREAM SIDE OF THE WETLAND
CROSSING. COLLARS SHALL BE INSTALLED GRAPHIC SCALE
\7 PER STATE STANDARDS. 40 0 20 40
/ \ ' 1 INCH = 40 FEET
1 +00
652
650
648
646
644
L� =A
2+00
PRELIMINARY
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
OAK SPRING ROAD SUBDIVISION
INDIAN TRAIL, NORTH CAROLINA
Title:
WETLANDS IMPACT MAP
Q�
File #: 18221-S-WETLANDS.dwg Date: 4/27/2020
Project Egr: ABC
ISAACS O
GAL ENGINEERING DESIGN AND SURVEYING C 5
Dsign By ABC
Drawn By. ABC
Scale:
8720 RED OAK B STE. 420
CHARLOTTE, N.C..C. 28217
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
W16.0
EAProject Folders\Hopper Communities\Oak Springs Road Subdivision 18221\Engineering\Design Drawings\Current\SHEETS\18221-S-WETLANDS.dwg, WI 6.0, 4/27/2020 9:50:01 AM, anewsome, 1:1