20030669 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20030605

OF WATER Michael F. Easley, Governor
Q William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
y North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
r
-,i Alan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
.? Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
August 19, 2003
Brier Creek Associates, LP
Attn: Barry James
3800 ARCO Corporate Drive
Charlotte, NC 28273
Subject Property: Brier Creek Parcel H West, Aviation Parkway, Raleigh, NC
S&EC, Inc. Project No. 97-3165.07
Brier Creek [03-04-02, 27-33-4, C NSW]
DWQ Project No. 03-0669
Wake County
Page 1 of 2
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATE per the Neuse River Buffer
Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0233) with ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Dear Mr. James:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill within or
otherwise impact streams and protected riparian buffers as outlined in the "Impact Table" below for the purpose of
constructing an access road at the subject property, as described within your application dated June 5, 2003. After
reviewing your application, we have decided that the impacts are covered by the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
General Water Quality Certification Number(s) 3402 and 3404 (GC3402 & GC3404). The Certification (s) allows you to
use Nationwide Permit(s) 14 and 39 when issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). This letter shall also
act as your approved Authorization Certificate for impacts to the protected riparian buffers per 15A NCAC 2B .0233. In
addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with any other required federal, state or local permits before you go
ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control and Non-discharge regulations.
Also, this approval will expire when the accompanying 404 permit expires unless otherwise specified in the General
Certification.
Impact Table:
Impact No. Stream Length
Im acted Feet Buffer Area Impacted
(Square Feet Impact Type General Certification
No.
1 128 12,632 Road 3402
2 148 11,761 Road 3402
3 112 10,454 Road 3402
4 195 17,424 Road 3404
5 98 10,454 Road 3402
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your
project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold, the new owner
must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions.
If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory
mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the
conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below.
Conditions:
1. Buffer Mitigation (WRP)
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, WETLANDS / 401 UNIT
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
Page 2 of 3
DWQ Project No. 03-0669
August 19, 2003
You are required to mitigate for impacts to the protected riparian buffers. The required area of mitigation to
compensate for impacts to the protected riparian buffers is 44,432 square feet as required under this
Authorization Certificate and 15A NCAC 2B.0242. We understand that you wish to make a payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund administered by the NC Wetlands Restoration Program (WRP) to meet this
mitigation requirement. This has been determined by the DWQ to be a suitable method to meet the mitigation
requirement. In accordance with 15A NCAC 213 .0242(7), this contribution will satisfy our compensatory
mitigation requirements under 15A NCAC 213 .0233(9)(C). Until the WRP receives and clears your check
(made payable to: DENR - Wetlands Restoration Program Office), no impacts specified in this Authorization
Certificate shall occur. Mr. Ron Ferrell should be contacted at [phone] if you have any questions
concerning payment into the WRP. You have one month from the date of this approval to make this payment.
For accounting purposes, this Authorization Certificate authorizes payment Into the Riparian Buffer
Restoration Fund to compensate for 44.432 ft2 of required riparian buffer mitigation for Impacts to
17,424 ft2 (and 195 linear feet) of protected riparian buffers; 03-04-02 river and subbasin and 27-33-4
stream Index number."
2. Stream Mitigation (WRP)
You are required to mitigate for permanent impacts to the streams. The required length of stream mitigation to
compensate for impacts to the streams is 195 feet as required under GC3404 and 15A NCAC 02H .0506. We
understand that you wish to make a payment into the Wetland Restoration Fund administered by the NC Wetlands
Restoration Program (WRP) to meet this mitigation requirement. This has been determined by the DWQ to be a
suitable method to meet the mitigation requirement. In accordance with 15A NCAC 02H .0506, this contribution
will satisfy our compensatory mitigation requirements under this certification. Until the WRP receives and clears
your check (made payable to: DENR - Wetlands Restoration Program Office), no impacts specified in this
certification shall occur. Mr. Ron Ferrell should be contacted at [phone] if you have any questions
concerning payment into the WRP. You have one month from the date of this approval to make this payment.
For accounting purposes, this certification authorizes payment Into the Wetland Restoration Fund to
compensate for 195 feet of required stream mitigation for Impacts to 195 feet of perennial streams; 03-04-
02 river and subbasin and 27-33-4 stream Index number.
3. Diffuse Flow (Review)
An additional condition is that all constructed stormwater conveyance outlets from the proposed roadways shall
be directed to flow in a diffuse manner at non-erosive velocities through the entire protected stream buffers
without re-concentrating. If this is not possible it may be necessary to provide stormwater facilities that are
considered to remove nitrogen. Additionally, a stormwater management plan for this project shall be provided to
this Office before any of the impacts approved herein are conducted. The plan shall specify all stormwater
discharge points, plan details, and calculations to indicate that diffuse flow through the protected buffers or
nitrogen removal as described above will be achieved.
4. Written Stormwater Management Plan
An additional condition is that a general, written stormwater management plan shall be approved in writing by
this Office before the impacts specified in this Certification occur per Condition No. 4 in GC No. 3402. The final
stormwater management plan must include plans and specifications for stormwater management facilities that
are appropriate for surface waters classified as NSW and designed to remove 85% TSS according to the most
recent version of the NC DENR Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual. These facilities must be
designed, and approved in writing by this Office before development begins on each lot, to treat the runoff from
the entire project, unless otherwise explicitly approved by the Division of Water Quality. Also, before any
permanent building is occupied on each lot, the facilities (as approved by this Office) shall be constructed and
operational, and the stormwater management plan (as approved by this Office) shall be implemented. The
structural stormwater practices as approved by this Office as well as drainage patterns must be maintained in
perpetuity. No changes to the structural stormwater practices shall be made without written authorization from
the Division of Water Quality. The plan should be coordinated with the City of Raleigh's nitrogen removal
stormwater requirements to ensure the above condition is incorporated into the City's requirements.
The above condition shall apply unless it is demonstrated in writing to the satisfaction of this Office that the
impervious area of the entire, built-out project shall be less than 30% and that there are no areas of
concentrated impervious area over 30% within the project such as, but not limited to, commercial areas, multi-
family, clubhouses, maintenance areas, etc. A State Stormwater Permit (15 A NCAC 2H .1000) can be
considered to meet this condition.
Page 3 of 3
DWQ Project No. 03-0669
August 19, 2003
Please contact Mr. Todd St. John at [phone] if you have any questions or require additional information
regarding this condition.
5. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer Rules, and
any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached certificate of completion to the
401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-
1650.
6. Deed Notifications
Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all properties and lots with retained jurisdictional
wetlands, waters and protective buffers in order to assure compliance for future wetland, water and buffer
impact. These mechanisms shall be put in place prior to impacting any wetlands, waters and/or buffers
approved for impact under this Certification Approval and Authorization Certificate. You can obtain a copy of a
sample deed notification from our web site or by contacting the DWQ.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may result in criminal and/or
civil penalties. This Certification shall become null and void unless the above conditions are made conditions of the
Federal 404 and/or coastal Area Management Act Permit. This Certification shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or
CAMA permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved wetland or stream impacts),
you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for
a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office
of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its conditions are final
and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
Any disputes over determinations regarding this Authorization Certificate (associated with the approved buffer impacts)
shall be referred in writing to the Director for a decision. The Director's decision is subject to review as provided in
Articles 3 and 4 of G.S. 150B.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act and the
Neuse riparian buffer protection rule as described within 15A NCAC 26.0233. If you have any questions, please
telephone John Dorney at 919-733-9646 or Bob Zarzecki at 919-733-9726.
Sincerely,
Ian W. Klimek, P. E.,
NC DWQ, Director
Attachments: Certificate of Completion
GC 3402 & 3404
Cc: Kevin Martin, S&EC, Inc., 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, NC 27614
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
DWQ # 03-0669
Date: August 19, 2003
bz
OF WgTFR Michael F. Easley, Governor
?? QG William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
? y North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
_ r
.I Alan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
a Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION & AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATE
SUMMARY OF PERMITTED IMPACTS AND MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS
In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500 and 2B .0233, Brier Creek Associates, LP has permission as outlined below
and within the General Water Quality Certification (WQC) Number 3404 & 3402 w/ additional conditions for the purpose(s)
of constructing the proposed road. All activities associated with these authorized impacts must be conducted with the
conditions listed in the attached certification transmittal letter. THIS CERTIFICATION AND AUTHORIZATION
CERTIFICATE ARE NOT VALID WITHOUT THE ATTACHMENTS.
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION REQUIREMENT WETLAND RESTORATION PROGRAM (WRP)
DWQ Project No.: 03-0669
Date: August 19, 2003
LOCATION: Raleigh
COUNTY: Wake
BASIN/SUBBASIN: 03-04-02 (river/subbasin); 27-33-4 (stream index no.)
As required by 15A NCAC 2H .0506 and 2B .0233 and the conditions of WQC No. 3404 & 3402 w/ additional conditions,
you are required to compensate for the above impacts through the restoration, creation, enhancement or preservation of
wetlands, surface waters and/or buffers as outlined below prior to conducting any activities that impact or degrade the
waters of the state.
[Note: Acreage requirements proposed to be mitigated through the WRP must be rounded up to one-quarter acre
increments according to 15A NCAC 2R .0503(b).]
0 acres of Class WL wetlands
0 acres of riparian wetland
0 acres of non-riparian wetland
195 feet of stream channel
44,432 square feet of stream buffers
One of the options you have available to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements is through the payment of a fee
to the Wetlands Restoration Fund per 15A NCAC 213 .0503 and to the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund per 15A NCAC
2B .0233. If you choose this option, please sign this form and mail it to the WRP at the address listed below. An invoice
for the appropriate amount of payment will be sent to you upon receipt of this form. PLEASE NOTE, THE ABOVE
IMPACTS ARE NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL YOU HAVE RECEIVED NOTIFICATION THAT YOUR PAYMENT HAS BEEN
PROCESSED BY THE WRP.
Signature
WETLANDS RESTORATION PROGRAM (WRP)
NC DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
1619 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1619
[phone]
Date
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact: Steve Mitchell
Non-Discharge Branch WQ Supervisor:
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Brier Creek Parcel H - West County Wake
Project Number 03 0669 County2
Recvd From APP Region Raleigh
Received Date 6/5/03 Recvd By Region
Project Type road to access property
Certificates Stream Stream Impacts (ft.)
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req. ME
14 Stream O YO N F- 27-33-4 ? NSW 30,402. F- 681. 195.00 ?-
9 O Y N 30,402. FF-7`-?- F _'
......
NBR Buffers WT O N ?-???- 30,402. 1.44 1 r- r-
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Stream WRP Stream ?- 195.00
Buffer WRP' Buffers 7,02 F-
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? 0 Y 0 N Did you request more info? 0 Y 0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? 0 Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? 0 Y O N Recommendation: 0 Issue 0 Issue/fond 0 Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) Longitude (ddmmss)
Comments:
July 24, 2003
Danny did buffer call for eject NBR-020 and RRO does not have a file copy to check on the
delineation. Should be OK but we should check with him to make sure. See Todd's comments on
Stormwater control. RRO Os OK w/ACOE I/P calls,
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
imap://todd.st.john%40dwq.denr.ncmaiLnet@nplex I mcmail.net:143/f...

Subject: Brier Creek Parcel H West
From: "Jennifer Burdette" <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 11:01:08 -0400
To: <[e-mail]>
? `?
CC: Mike Munn" <Munn@'ohnrmcadams.com>, "Barry James" <bjames re yom>, "Furman"
<Furman @ johnrmcadams.com>
Todd
As requested, listed below is the City of Raleigh contact that Jeff Furman
and Mike Munn of The John R. McAdams Company have been dealing with
regarding the city's stormwater requirements for the project.
I think it is a great idea to tie DWQ stormwater compliance in some way with
individual site plan approvals by the City of Raleigh. This will allow
stormwater management plan design to occur along with site plan development
on the individual lots, which may not occur on some lots for possibly years
ter the roa constructed.
Ben Brown
y of Raleigh
222 W. Hargett Street
Raleigh, NC 27602
[phone]
Please ow if there is anything else you need to process the
application.
- Jennifer
Jennifer Burdette
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
[phone]
This electronic communication, including all attachments, is intended only
for the named addressee (s) and may contain confidential information. This
electronic communication may not have passed through our standard
review/quality control process. Design data and recommendations included
herein are provided as a matter of convenience and should not be used for
final design. Rely only on final, hardcopy materials bearing the
consultant's original signature and seal. If you are not the named
addressee (s), any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this
communication is prohibited. If you have received this electronic
communication in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete
the original communication from your system. Thank you.
4;?A, cOM04 CGZt d1141.4.)??'1
rolgu. AwIlew as
Oq S?vrrN ov? Ln
I of 1
6 2- 02
/24/03 11:08 AM

The following conditions can be used in any situation where diffuse flow is required through protected
buffers. The first condition can be used for projects that have adequately addressed this issue as part
of the application process. The second can be used when the issue is not well addressed.
$$) Diffuse Flow (No Review)
An additional condition is that all constructed stormwater conveyance outlets shall be directed
as diffuse flow at non-erosive velocities through the protected stream buffers such that it will not
re-concentrate before discharging into a stream as identified within 15A NCAC 2B .02 (5).
If this is not possible it may be necessary to provide stormwater facilities that are considered to
remove nitrogen. This may require additional approval from this Office. $$) Diffuse Flow (Review) Zfvto?j
g
An additional condition is that all constructed stormwater conveyance outlet shall be directed
to flow in a diffuse manner at non-erosive velocities through the entire protedfed stream buffers
without re-concentrating. If this is not possible it may be necessary to provide stormwater
facilities that are considered to remove nitrogen. Additionally, a stormwater management plan
for this project shall be provided to this Office before any of the impacts approved herein are
conducted. The plan shall specify all stormwater discharge points, plan details, and calculations
to indicate that diffuse flow through the protected buffers or nitrogen removal as described
above will be achieved.
The following are typical conditions added to all approvals unless it does not make sense to add it:
$$) Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable
Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached
certificate of completion to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
$$) Deed Notifications
Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all retained jurisdictional wetlands,
waters and protective buffers in order to assure compliance for future wetland, water and buffer
impact. These mechanisms shall be put in place prior to impacting any wetlands, waters and/or
buffers approved for impact under this Certification Approval and Authorization Certificate. A
sample deed notification can be downloaded from the 401/Wetlands Unit web site at
http://h2o.enr.state. nc. us/ncwetlands.
$$) Temporary Fills
All temporary fill and culverts shall be removed and the impacted area returned to the original
grade, including each stream's original cross sectional dimensions, planform pattern, and
longitudinal bed and bed profile after construction is complete or within 6 months of the
establishment of the crossing, which ever is sooner, and the various sites shall be stabilized
with natural woody vegetation (except for the maintenance areas of permanent utility crossings)
and restored to prevent erosion; If the crossings are not completely removed and restored as
described above within the specified time above, additional written approval from this Office
must be obtained to modify this condition.
The following are conditions to place specific requirements in areas with protected buffers:

Waters acres
Buffers (square feet)
The following condition is recommended when a stormwater management plan is required. This
typically applies to projects that are over 30% impervious or have concentrated areas of development
within a project that are over 30% impervious. It is recommended that the need for a stormwater
management plan be established prior to issuing any approvals. The applicant should also demonstrate
that there is adequate space allotted for the proposed BMP and that an the BMP appropriate to the
stream classification is used (i.e. wetlands, pond with forested filter strip, or bioretention in sensitive
watersheds per the GC's).
$$) W itten Stormwater Management Plan ( w
?Voiyj
`'`A
An additional condition is that a fi?* written stormwater management plan (including a signed
and notarized Operation and Maintenance Agreement) shall be approved in writing by this
Office before tf?e impacts specified in this Certification occur per Condition Noin GC No. R
The rmwater management plan must include plans and specifications for stormwater
management facilities that are appropriate for surface waters classified as X15W and designed °
to remove 85% TSS according to the most recent version of the NC DENR Stormwater Best
_alp _J 'A
Management Practices Manual. These facilities must be designed o treat the runoff from
entire project, unless otherwise explioi I?ro)p d by the Division of Water Quality. Also, before
any permanent building is occupied , the facilities (as approved by this Office)
shall be constructed and operational, and the stormwater management plan (as approved by
this Office) shall be implemented. The structural stormwater practices as approved by this Office
as well as drainage patterns must be maintained in perpetuity. No changes to the structural
stormwater practices shall be made without written authorization from the Division of Water
Quality. ) s?oul? Copl Div d.'llW ?C/ 41 ?ii?A
ptionPlf rC'w? * S4or?nw rCr? vv enoaw, ?./_ _ ?? -
( ptiona arasrap? pq?k,e ? 0¢. C'1? 3 lgr C4 LV e
The above condition shall apply unless it is demonstrated in writing to the satisfaction of this
Office that the impervious area of the entire, built-out project shall be less than 30% and that
there are no areas of concentrated impervious area over 30% within the project such as, but not
limited to, commercial areas, multi-family, clubhouses, maintenance areas, etc.e
There shall be no direct discharges to streams from fairways, tee areas, or greens.
A State Stormwater Permit (15 A NCAC 2H .1000) can be considered to meet this condition
Note: The sentence that discusses the 85% TSS removal design standard can be eliminated or
modified to reflect a plan not designed to meet 85% TSS removal, etc.
$$) Written Stormwater Management Plan (No Further Approval Needed)
The final, written stormwater management plans (including a signed and notarized Operation
and Maintenance Agreement) dated , must be implemented and the stormwater
management facilities shall be constructed and operational before any permanent building is
occupied at the subject site. The structural stormwater practices as approved by this Office as
well as drainage patterns must be maintained in perpetuity. No changes to the structural
stormwater practices shall be made without written authorization from the Division of Water
Quality.

co
mai Ibox:///Cl/Documents%20and%20Setti ngs/bob_zarzecki/Appl icat...
Subject: Re: Brier Creek Parcel H West. DWQ# 03-0669 Wake County.
From: Bob Zarzecki <bob.zarzecki @ncmail.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 09:33:07 -0400
To: Kevin Martin <[e-mail]>
Kevin:
So, I guess that means that we have until 4:41 pm today to sign the letter (kidding). I don't know what
happened. The latest information was dated June 20, 2003, but it's stamped received June 23, 2003.
Therefore, I assume that Cyndi was using the June 23, 2003 date when calculating the 60 day clock.
Regardless, John reviewed the file last night and I plan to write the authorization today per his
guidance. I'll fax you a copy.
- Bob
Kevin Martin wrote:
The courier picked up here on Friday 6/20 and according to them B. Strickland at your office signed for
it at 4:41 pm that day,so the 60th day is 8/19 by my calculations. No big deal either way just wanted you
to know the clients position since they are freaked out is that we should get something by 8/19. So if you
get to it send me an email or a fax otherwise I will assume it is either OK or you decided to let it go
statutory. Thanks for checking and let me know if you have questions once it is reviewed. Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Zarzecki [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 3:19 PM
To: Kevin Martin
Cc: Todd St. John; john.dorney
Subject: Re: Brier Creek Parcel H West. DWQ# 03-0669 Wake County.
Kevin:
We have it as received on 8/24/03 and the file lists 8/23/03 as the 60th day. The project
is currently in John's box for review. Hopefully we can it resolved tomorrow (8/19/03).
- Bob
Kevin Martin wrote:
Thanks, Todd. Bob could you verify that my 60 day calculation is
correct and
that 8/19 is the 60th day. The engineer has now told me he had a
discussion
with you folks and was told that everything was ok and would be signed
an
out by the 23rd. Is that correct? Sorry for the confusion. Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: Todd St. John [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 7:42 AM
To: Kevin Martin
Cc: Bob Zarzecki; john.dorney
Subject: Re: Brier Creek Parcel H West. DWQ# 03-0669 Wake County.
Je ne sais pas...
It's on Bob's "board o' buffer things to do"... i asked him and he told
me that Dorney was looking at it but couldn't remember why...
1 of 3 8/19/2003 9:33 AM
mailbox:///C /Documents%20and%20Settings/bob_zarzecki/Applicat...
It would be my recommendation that you make your follow up requests to
Bob instead of John...
Kevin Martin wrote:
Todd, can you please check on the status of your review of the
diffuse flow
and stormwater calculations for this project? They were submitted on
6/20/03
in response to your 6/11/03 letter. The client is freaking out
because he
just discovered that Jennifer Burdette no longer works here and
believes we
have dropped the ball because of that. In reality, everything was
submitted
and we are just awaiting you response. Please verify that you have
the info
and your schedule for review. I assume since we responded on 6/20/03
the 60
day review expires on 8/19/03 so if you have already sent a response
we do
not have it, please email or fax it if not please advise on schedule.
Thanks
Kevin
Kevin Martin
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
919-846-5900
This electronic communication, including all attachments, is intended
only
for the named addressee (s) and may contain confidential information.
This
electronic communication may not have passed through our standard
review/quality control process. Design data and recommendations
included
herein are provided as a matter of convenience and should not be used
for
final design. Rely only on final, hardcopy materials bearing the
consultant's original signature and seal. If you are not the named
addressee (s), any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of
this
communication is prohibited. If you have received this electronic
communication in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and
delete
the original communication from your system. Thank you.
2 of 3 8/19/2003 9:33 AM
`p?QF vv n I rgpG
co
r
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Brier Creek Associates, LP
Attn: Barry James
3800 ARCO Corporate Drive
Charlotte, NC 28273
Dear Mr. James:
IvOWICIVI F. ?MWVy, Vuvoii iul
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Dnvironment and Natural Resources
AI P. ., Director Division of Water Quality
June 11, 2003
DWQ # 03-0669
Wake County
Project Name: Brier Creek Parcel H West
On June 5, 2003 the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) was notified by receipt of your
application regarding your plan to fill waters for the purpose of constructing an access road in Wake
County. Approval from DWQ is required to disturb these areas. Please provide 7 copies of the
following information and refer to the DWQ # listed above in your reply. Please show these on maps of
suitable scale (for instance 1" = 100 feet) so we can begin to determine your projects' compliance with
15A NCAC 211.0500.
1. Please provide detail for the stormwater management practices for the eventual development.
Why cannot stormwater management be provided (or reserved) for the entire site up-front?
2. Please indicate the diffuse flow provision measures on the site plan.
3. What criteria were used to determine perennial vs. intermittent streams?
Please telephone John Dorney at 919-733-9646 if you have any questions or would require
copies of our rules or procedural materials. This project will remain on hold as incomplete in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0505(c). The processing time for this application will begin when
this information is received. If we do not hear from you by writing or by fax at [phone] within
three (3) weeks we will assume you no longer want to pursue the project and will consider it
withdrawn.
Program
JRD/bs
cc: Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
Raleigh Corps of Engineers
Central Files
File Copy
Jennifer Burdette, S&EC
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands

Environmental Consultants, PA
Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
The proposed project will impact 195 linear feet of important stream channel, 486 linear
feet of unimportant stream channel, and riparian buffers. Therefore, a check in amount of
$475 to cover the processing fee for the 401 Water Quality Certification approval is
enclosed.
'VVLE Tt? NPS/ p0Up
June 5, 2003
JON
? t3 '!Jtlit y,
g?k?
l.ITY SECTION
US Army Corps of Engineers NCDENR - DWQ
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Parkview Building
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Ste. 120 2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615 Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Attn: Ms. Andrea Wade
Attn: Mr. John Dorney
RE: Nationwide Permit 14 & 39, 401 Water Quality Certification,
& Neuse River Buffer Compliance Request
Brier Creek - Parcel H West
Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina
S&EC Project #: 97-3165.07
Dear Ms. Wade and Mr. Dorney:
On behalf of Brier Creek Associates, L.P., we request authorization from the US Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE) to use Nationwide Permit (NWP) 14 for the proposed project to cover
permanent impacts to a perennial stream channel and to use NWP 39 to cover permanent impacts
to four intermittent stream channels. We also request written concurrence from the NC Division
of Water Quality (NCDWQ) that the project complies with the associated 401 Water Quality
Certification and Neuse River Basin (NRB) Buffer Rules. A Pre-construction Notification
Application (PCN) including an agent authorization form is attached.
As indicated in the application, the project site is located in the northeast quadrant of the
Interstate 540 and Aviation Parkway intersection. It is bounded to the northeast by Globe Road
(SR 1644), I-540 to the south, and Aviation Parkway to the west. Attached is an excerpt from
the Southeast Durham, NC USGS topographic quadrangle showing the location of the site
(Figure 1).
Charlotte 0117ce: Greensboro Office: Hickory Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive 622 Coon Mountain Lane
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455 Taylorsville, NC 28681
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone] Phone [phone]
1"nV- (704) 7?0-9406 Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
June 5, 2003
S&EC Project #: 97-3165.07
Page 2 of 4
The project consists of the construction of the proposed Loop Road and an individual access
across Brier Creek and its tributaries to provide access to all areas of the property. The attached
PCN form and its attachments detail the impacts, justification, and mitigation requirements of the
project.
If you have any questions while reviewing this application, please do not hesitate to call Jennifer
Burdette at [phone].
Sincerely,
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Jenni r A. Burdette
Environmental Scientist
Attachments:
Pre-construction (PCN) notification form
USGS Location Map (Figure 1)
Impact Map Exhibits (4 sheets)
Attachment I - Latitude & Longitude Table
JRM Justification Letter (6/4/03)
NCWRP Preliminary Mitigation Acceptance
Agent Authorization Form
Check for WQC Processing Fee (NCDWQ Only)
c: Barry James - AAC Real Estate Services
Jeff Furman - The John R. McAdams Company
Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(if any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 14 & 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here:
If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Brier Creek Associates LP
Mailing Address: 3800 ARCO Corporate Drive
Charlotte North Carolina 28273
Contact: Barry James
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Jennifer A. Burdette
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh NC 27614
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Page 5 of 14
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Brier Creek Parcel H West
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): NA
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0758927623 (portion) & 0758719121
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Raleigh
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): NA
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): The project site is located in the
northeast quadrant of the Interstate 540 and Aviation Parkway intersection. It is bounded to
the northeast by Globe Road (SR 1644). I-540 to the south, and Aviation Parkway to the
west. Attached is an excerpt from the Southeast Durham, NC USGS topographic quadrangle
showing the location of the site (Figure 1).
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): See Attachment I
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres):
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Brier Creek
8. River Basin: Neuse
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http//h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site is largely undeveloped except for sanitary sewer
and powerline easements and a small office located in the southeast corner of the site. The
Page 6 of 14
area in the vicinity of the project is mixed use, which includes residential subdivisions, a golf
course and retail centers.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
proposed project involves dividing the property into separate parcels and constructing a loop
road off of Globe Road. Heavy equipment typical of road construction will be used to
complete the proposed project.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the project is to provide road
access to land separated from Globe Road by Brier Creek and its tributaries.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
S&EC delineated the wetlands on this property in 1997 and 1998. Eric Alsmeyer of the USACE
verified the wetland boundaries on October 16, 1998 (Action ID # 199506078). S&EC also
conducted Neuse River Basin QM) buffer determinations on the property, which were
confirmed by Danny Smith of the NCDWO in a 6/12/98 letter MR-RRO-20). S&EC consulted
with Andrea Wade of the USACE on March 26, 2003. After reviewing the project plans, Ms.
Wade determined that the project would be processed as a single and complete project separate
from the remaining Brier Creek property due its independent utility. Ms. Wade also conducted
importance calls on the stream channels. The crossing identified as Impact #1 is the only stream
channel that Ms. Wade found to be important.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
Additional permit requests are not anticipated for this project.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
Page 7 of 14
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Impacts 1 through 5 are
proposed Impact #1 involves stream channel impact associated with widening the existing
Globe Road Impacts 2 through 4 are stream crossings associated with the loop road. Impact
#5 is a road crossing of a tributM to Brier Creek.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(es/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***
NA

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.17
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact Length of Average Width Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent?
(indicate on ma) (linear feet) Before Impact leasespecify)
permanent

1 culvert & rip rap
128
UT to Brier Creek
4
Intermittent
unimportant
channel
permanent

2 culvert & rip rap
148
Brier Creek
4
Intermittent
unimportant
channel
permanent

3 culvert & rip rap
112
UT to Brier Creek
7
Intermittent
unimportant
channel
Page 8 of 14
permanent
4 culvert & rip rap 195 Brier Creek 18 Perennial
important
channel
permanent

5 culvert & rip rap
98
UT to Brier Creek
10
Intermittent
unimportant
channel
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several intemet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone. coin
www.map(iuest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 195 imp + 486 unimp=681
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact Area of Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact (if applicable) (lake, pond, estuary, sound,
(indicate on ma (acres) bay, ocean, etc.)
NA

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): NA
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): NA
Size of watershed draining to pond: NA Expected pond surface area: NA
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
Page 9 of 14
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Construction of the proposed loop road is necessary in order to provide access to high ground
located across Brier Creek from Globe Road. It is important to note that access could not be
provided from I-540 because it is a controlled access highway. In addition, Aviation Parkway
and Brier Creek Parkway could also not be used to access the property due to the property's
location near existing intersections that would not allow the minimum separation between
intersections The City of Raleigh requires the gpplicant to upgrade Globe Road as part of this
project Please refer to the attached letter written by he applicant's engineer, John R. McAdams
Company for more information regarding the necessity of this widening and the other proposed
road crossings
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwettands/strmgide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The applicant has avoided impacts to jurisdictional wetlands, minimized impacts to stream
channels to the maximum extent practicable, and will maintain the riparian buffers on the
Page 10 of 14
property as required by the NRB Riparian Buffer Rule. However, Impact #4 1195 L.F.
exceeds 150 linear feet of important stream channel impact. Therefore, strearn channel
mitigation is required by the USAGE. Andrea Wade of the USACE agreed that a 1:1
mitigation ratio would satisfy this requirement. This proposed compensatory mitigation will
also serve to meet the requirements for mitigation by the NCDWQ. The remaining.` stream
channel impacts (#1 #2 #3 and #5) are to unimportant channels and each crossing does not
exceed 150 linear feet, therefore S&EC believes mitigation should not be required by
NCDWQ for these crossings. It is very important to note that each crossing has been
designed in accordance with the Wilmington District's Regional Conditions for linear
transportation projects and NCDWQ's WQC #3375 that require maintaining the existing
bank-full channel and allowing low flow passage of water and aquatic life.
Because the buffer impacts for Impacts 1 2 3 and 5 are perpendicular road crossings
impacting less than 1/3 acre of riparian buffer and 150 linear feet of stream channel, S&EC
believes buffer mitigation should not be required for these impacts However, riparian buffer
mitigation is required for Impact #4 because it exceeds 150 linear feet of stream channel and
1 /3 acre of riparian buffer.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.u5/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 195
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 44,432
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
Page t 1 of 14
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
*
Zone Impact
(s uare feet)
Multiplier Required
Mitigation
Impact #I
1 8,276 3 NA
2 4,356 1.5 NA
Subtotal 12,632 NA
Impact #2
1 7,841 3 NA
2 3,920 1.5 NA
Subtotal 11,761 NA
Impact #3
1 6,534 3 NA
2 3,920 1.5 NA
Subtotal 10,454 NA
Impact #4
1 12,197 3 36,591
2 5,227 1.5 7,841
Subtotal 17,424 44,432
Page 12 of 14
Impact #5
1 6,098 3 NA
2 4,356 1.5 NA
Subtotal 10,454 NA
Total 62,725 44,432
• Zone 1 extends out 30 feel perpendicular from near bank of channel; Gone z extenos an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
It is important to note that fill material left in place after the relocation of Globe Road will also
be removed from the floodplain and the riparian buffer. The stream channel will not be impacted
in this process Please refer to the attached Impact Maps for the location of this fill removal.
The area within the riparian buffer is currently vegetated with grasses. Diffuse flow will be
maintained and the riparian area will be restored; therefore this activity is exempt from the
Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
The applicant proposed payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund, which has been
preliminarily accepted by the NC Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP). See the attached
letter from NCWRP Please note NCWRP granted the applicant more mitigation than requested
in the permit because the applicant further minimized impacts after requesting preliminary
acceptance of the proposed compensator mitigation.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Most of the property is currently undeveloped forestland. The proposed lots shown on the
attached Impact Maps will be sold and developed by other individuals. Due to the mixed use
zoning of the property, we anticipate that impervious area on the property will exceed 30% upon
completion of development. Individual lot developers will be required to comply with the City
of Ralei hg Nitrogen Control Rules thereby protecting surface waters and wetlands downstream
from the property.
X11. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater generated on the site will be discharged to the existing, municipal sanitary sewer
lines present on the property and shown on the attached Impact Maps.
Page 13 of 14
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No N
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No N
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
It is imWrtant to note that submission of this permit application has been delayed in an effort to
ensure the design of each crossing complied with conditions and requirements for maintaining
the existing bank-full channel and allowing low flow paste of water and aquatic life. Because
the project team would like to construct the road crossings _ during the summer to reduce impacts
to water quality and the City of Raleigh requires NCDWO's 401 Water Quality Certification
approval prior to their Design Approval anything the agency can do to expedite the review
process would be appreciated Please call Jennifer Burdette at [phone] if any additional
information is required for the review process
Qz?
616103
A?(ilicant gent' ? Signature Dste
(Agent's signature is va id only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 14 of 14
(\ 400

i
f U,

350
..?
?i. _

SOUTHEAST DURHAM, NC
1993
NIMA 5255 IV NE-SERIES V842
1" = 2000'
Mgr.: JAB 512103
Figure 1
Location Map
Brier Creek Parcel H West
Raleigh, Wake Co., NC
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] • [phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com
\\
\•?'\•\• r• -?
%
OD NN
It N
---r
-
It
o
Fol
/ / I I J
I' / I 1 I NN
`V A
i 4V
if d ? ? / I I •..? ? \ ?,
mov)
c?o ;' ?` I 1 1 I ` '?O r
;' qll
j f
V,V ;I ii? \ `? 1'111 ° \•`?;`\
\ \
r \
V? lit
----------- - -
I:,,- ,\ m IS ?'" `` 1
_ rr'...a.rw.rn..w•.rrww..rwr•.w?a _
_,,.. ..................... ..ivrrrrrrrr...... '•"r .,, .- ?...?:.^':`..'".???=Mww?_www...«-'" ?J.. •'7 - m. == _= ..,.....,«_ = .-_ -_
......
?',.._-_.............. ;..__-..__
rrr Jr
rr rrrr
rri? N•"r Yw"'r
r" rY
rY
.,//r ?r,Y"Y? fr,, err rrY,r
r"'r rrr ??r`? rr
r+r r:?r f+," r:%r
rrrr ri"'r+ rrrr rr,.
rA" ;err
.Irl"r,.rr
irr rrr r'?
® PR07ECT N0.
OK >?, A CA02 -DWG BRIER CREEK -PARCEL "H-WEST" 11COMPANY. INMcADAMS
SCMX; 1ll-300' DAPACT KEY MAP ENGVRM/PL1VM4 R/SURVEYORS PARX, NC
DATS, RAIMOH, NOMH CAROUNA PP0 BOXHWOO G? MOO-4005
04-14-03 (919) 381_6000
EXISTING R/W /
t /
(VARIABLE WIDTH)
i
t 5
l EXISTING EDGE OF
1 } ` PAVEMENAND
SHOULD TYP.)
I ? 1 1 r
EXISTI GLO ,R I! D
\ WITHIN N SE BbFFER \ I / 1
1` N
J , ? 1 \ EXISTING STORM
\ 1 1 .. DRAINAGE (TYP.) /
IXISTI 2 ' CB OF7 RALEIGH r-
1 \ SANITAf Y S E? EA EM
PB 2000, PB1185
1 ?, \...
50' NEUSE RIPAR BU R
J ( 1 1 ` (TYP., MEASURED FRO
l ;1 T OF BANK, H SIDE) \
1
...... .. ..
NEUS BUFFJER D CE: 1
1 ZONE 1?DISTIJRB = 0.19 AC.
J ' ZONE 2 D ED AREA= 0.10 AC. l
\ BASIN RIPARIAN `
SURBANCE = 0.29 AC.
I f /? \ //
LENGTH ACTED CHANNEL = 128'I?
P OPERTY UNE ! \
/ ?--- \ ExISTINC 0' CITY of IGH A MlA dE WIDTH = 4 FT. (APPROX.)
( SANITARY?ER EASEMENT ?l
/ BOM 2003, pG 331 ?\ ?Xt3TI'NG ED?E
/ OF PAVEMEa /
(TYP.)
FUTIJU 80' R/W
1:4z
i z I
x w 0.?
a
x 0
H U gos
a
ao
F+y
f?
W?
9-4 v
I ?o
w?
W
w
o ?
fV O
O N
I
V N
p ? I
0
IwMcADAMS
I 1\ \ \
/ \ I \ \ E B UFFER DISTURB CE:
`PROPERTY LINE NE US
? /
(TYP.) NE 1 ISTURBED = 0.1? C.
\ I , \ \ Z1E 2ISTt1RBED = 0.0 C.
EXISTING 20' CITY OF RALEIGH TOT NE SE BASIN
SA TARY SEWER EAS ENT \ BUF R D 5'TtJRBANC 0.27
f I PB(l PG 1185 tF?N 0 IMPACCE L 140 LF
\ I 0\ A E , = 4 . (APIROx)
I \ \ I... .... .' ....
/ I \ \
EXISTING 30' \ / C 1 :.'.: •
CP&L EASEMENT """' """'?"""'
::.:'::'::. N
MlfACT #3
NEUSE B ER DISTURBANCE.-
........ / ?
ZONE 1 STURBED AREA = 0.15 C. FT
ZONE DISTURBED ?&FA = O.OC. \
RIPARIAN f ::.:' :::
TOTNEUSE BV / \ "'
BUFFER DI ??ANCE = 0.24 AC. .. .. LEN
GTH OFD IlVIPA1AVERAGE WIDTH 7 FT. (AP
ZONI :::::.: I
-? \ I
::• • \ \ \ EXISTING R D JD 0 BE
REMOVED.XISTING CHA EL
TO REMAIN UNDIS URBED.\
\ \
:?:.::.......
\ •.• EXIS G \\ ( I
Z CHAN L tS I
EXI TING
RO BED
? \ I
? II \
6 50 NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER
I /W ,M ASURED 50' FROM I
\ OP OF ANK, E CH SIDE) 1,
I T V\/ ?

l rl
;
d
a
?U a o
-I:., oz
x : <N
?a z zN
w? a aoo
x CD
E-? U k m
w ?oc?
W
0
w ad°
N
P-4 * °z
I ?x
V
w
F+1
o ?
N e?
N X ?
O N ? ?
N _
C)
a Q o
o a
z
w
cc N A
MCADAMS
-\
J / / / / 1 I \ ?FPR RTY IJN? \ i(ISTING 0' CliY OF
)
RALEIGH ITARY
SEWER BB 2000, E 1T
P
000, G
- NEW BUFFER •- - / [ I1
ZONE- = 0:28 AC, /? I l
AREIIV-
/ I t I
ZONE AREA= 12 AC,----- ..... ...
TOTAL NEU
= 0.40 AC. \ I
i BU'ER
UWNE
LENGTH OF IMP CHANNEL =195 LF
AVERAGE wIDTxr48-IT, (APPROX) 7.7 \ ...
TbcRJRE DRIVE
_ PROPERTY LINE
I a \...... ......
........... ... .
I Ir
_ EXISTING 20' CITY OF RALDGW /
'.:: ... : ' .... SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT
BO` 00, PG 453
- 1'
::'::.::.:rte.. \
EN USE RIPARIAN BUFFER I
'.' / \ \ (TYP., h URED 50!-,FROM
. :......' , t \ TOP OF BANK, EACH SIDE u)
.'..:....?.'
- IlV[PACr 4#5 \ \ \ 1 ?-- - - \
/ NEU?E BUFFER DISTURBANCE: \ \ /
ZO DISNRBED AREA = 0.14 AC. \ \ ?{
\ ZONE E1 2 llIS1URBED AREA = 0.10 AC. \ \\ !I
1 TOTAL NEtrSE BASIN RIPARIAN \ \ 1 4
\ I I BUFFER DISTURBANCE -24 A.C. \ \ -lENGI OF DVAMD CHANNEL =,98 LF_ ???\\ I \ I 1 I rr
AVERAGE STREAM WIDTH =10 Ff. (APPROX.)
?Ug n
0
fZ'i Z -
a gg
gS
W4 0
E-Q goi
as °:
I
x
I??Iu-j
09
a °z
W?
a
w
0
N ? O
O N ao: I
? N • ?
a o ? ?
aQ o
°z Q
F
Brier Creek Parcel H West
Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina
ATTACHMENT I
Impact #1 35° 53' 58" N
78° 48' 29" W
Impact #2 35° 54' 03" N
78° 48' 32" W
Impact #3 35° 54' 00" N
78° 48' 34" W
Impact #4 35° 53' 47" N
78° 48' 32" W
Impact #5 35° 53' 46" N
78° 48' 35"W
Since 7979
TIM JOHN R McADAMS COMPANY, INC.
June 2, 2003
Mr. John Dorney
North Carolina Division of Environmental and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
RE: Brier Creek Parcel "H-West" Stream Impacts
AAC-02020
Dear Mr. Dorney:
This letter is the engineer explanation for the following three impacts located on
the attached Impact Key Map; Impact #1; Impact #2, and Impact #4.
Impact # 1 is due to widening Globe Road as required by the city of Raleigh
dunng the Subdivision appproval process. Globe Road has been designated as a
minor thoroughfare by Raleigh and therefore will go from existing 37 road with
ditches to the minor thoroughfare standard of 60' back of curb to back of curb
with an 80' right of way. The present, undersized 18" culvert will be replaced
with two 54"x88" concrete arch culverts or the equivalent box culvert.
Impact#2 and Impact #4 are crossings on the Loop Road that has been designed to
the Commercial Collector standard as set by City of Raleigh. Dunng the
subdivision approval process the City of Raleigh required a flood study to
analyze each crossing for creeks that drain more than 100 acres. Both Impact #2
and #4 consist of box culverts required to pass the 100-year storm with a
maximum of 1' of water overtopping the road.
As a result of the flood study, the culverts required to pass the design flood are 2
11'x4' box culverts for Impact #2 and 2 9'x9' culverts for Impact #4. In both
crossings, one culvert has been centered on the channel and the other culvert has
been raised to maintain the original channel.
In summary, all crossings have been designed to minimize the impact to the
stream channels and associated buffers. If you have any further questions or
comments, please feel free to give me a call at [phone].
Sincerely,
THE JOHN R. McADAMS COMPANY, INC.
A, - 0?
JF/maf
CIVIL ENGINEERING • LAND PLANNING • SURVEYING
PO Box 14005 • Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 • [phone] • fax[phone]
www.johnrmcadams.com
North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
May 30, 2003
ern
NCDENR
Jennifer Burdette
Soil Environmental Consultants, PA
I!i ,
1 101 0 Raven Ridge Road JUN - 3 2003
Raleigh, NC 27614
Subject: Project: Brier Creek Parcel H West __-___J
County: Wake
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is
willing to accept payment for stream and buffer impacts associated with the subject project. Please note that the
decision by the NCWRP to accept the mitigation requirements of this project does not assure that this payment
will be approved by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the N.C. Division of Water Quality Wetlands/401
Unit. It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCWRP for
impacts associated with this project is appropriate.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued
404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire.
Based on the information supplied by you in a letter dated May 29, 2003, the stream and buffer restoration that is
necessary to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements for this project is summarized in the following
table. The maximum amount of mitigation that the NCWRP will accept for this project is also indicated in this
table.
Stream
(linear feet) Wetlands Riparian
(acres) Wetlands Non-
Riparian (acres) Buffer
(Sq. Ft.)
Impact 195 _ 73,835
Mitigation Max _
390 73,835
The NCWRP will provide mitigation with an approved combination of stream and buffer restoration,
enhancement or preservation. The stream and buffer mitigation will be provided as specified in the 401 Water
Quality Certification and/or Section 404 Permit for impacts associated with the subject project in Cataloging Unit
03020201 of the Neuse River Basin. The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of
Understanding between the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Carol Shaw at [phone].
Since ely,
? Ad
Ronald E. Ferrell,
Program Manager
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Andrea Wade, USACOE-Raleigh
Steve Mitchell, Raleigh DENR Regional Office
Wetlands Restoration Program 1619 Mail Service Center
[phone]
Raleigh, NC 27699-1619
Fax: [phone]
??71 14:08 919 755 2200 AAC REAL ESTATE SERVICES #4650 P.001/001
ll ,n
' Snail & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Rid,6c Rood • ttAigh. Notts Chrohna 27614 o Phone: [phone] Pax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
f AGENT AUT 4ORIZATION FORM
s AU Nanks To Be Filled In By The Current Landow, s
Wa Creek Associates, l-Z
i=?F.ess: C/o AAC Real Estate Services, 3800 ARCO Corporate Dr., Ste.200
Charlotte, NC 28273
[phone]
??/ criptidri Bxfer G =el /S&EC Proj%t No, 97 3165
:..._. 6/15101
•,-batent of the Amy
.::?: v Corp` of Engineers, WO= ngton District
:a gton, NC 2W2
Amanda Tones
Mated Consuttng and Perutitting
,,`f-,6m it may Comm:
°:* U.aX owner, hereby designate and authorize Soil & Enviro nmentW Comdtants, Inc. to
n A?y behalf as my agent In the processing of perai,it applications, to bxadsh upon request
w-vapkinen sl vaforuwfion in support of applications, etc. from this day forward, The 15!b _ day of
;-ar supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for taus project.
'Thus authorintion, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, its valid only, for
K:-• W -'?'M Cnt officials to enter the property wben accompanied by S&EC staff. You should can S&EC
". " .F _r?ge a site meeting pdo'r to visiting the site.
Cti eesoocia , L.P. /-Paul Herndon, V.P.
Pioperty Own&6 Name
Property Owner's Signature
fir.. iohn Domey c: Ms. f era fifer X Burdette
DWQ Soil & Environmental Consultants, Im
-78t?ttw Boulevard
^'l i4TeI-- 27(M b1Ank ageF4 auth foraxdoc
---.--+?r-^ri to ra .w?wui ¦• tm - -
-Qmwahoro D yr, Nick, or?v_bi7leet
:"020.1 pzmspedty Church Rood 3S;7-E Lawndate Drive 91013osWn Road
?- °z5?-7197 O=nsboto. NC 27455 Taylor®vill4, NC 28681
Phoaa: [phone] Phom6 [phone]
-;Zp_e406 Fax: [phone] Fxx: [phone]
Triage Check List
x-
Date: 4? 12-4103 Project Name. d/11 ?
DWQ#: O 3 D?
i r County: 9
To: ? ARO Mike Parker ? WaRO Tom Steffens
? FRO Ken Averitte ? WiRO Noelle Lutheran
? MRO Alan Johnson ? WSRO Cyn ' Karoly (Central Office)
O Steve Mitchell 4 ' 41 '&
From: Telephone : (919) 7*3 9 S ey
The file attached is being forwarded to your for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
? Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
? Minimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Neuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
? Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
? Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
,?ct1??G??S f?1D1?k., ?o vkr
SM ?44tl'ik
Cur?l? L S?? So??i
Comments. --?
90rrn

s.

V
ryl
?a S

Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
FILE cup
June 20, 2003
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Ste. 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
NCDENR - DWQ
Parkview Building
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Attn: Ms. Andrea Wade Attn: Mr. John Dorney
RE: NWP 14 & 39,401 WQC, & NRB Compliance Request Addendum
Brier Creek - Parcel H West
Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina
S&EC Project #: 97-3165.07
DWQ Project #: 03-0669
Dear Ms. Wade and Mr. Dorney:
On behalf of Brier Creek Associates, L.P., Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC)
submits the enclosed additional information and revision to Impact #5 of the original permit
application dated June 5, 2003 for the subject project. The NC Division of Water Quality
(NCDWQ) requested the additional information in a letter dated June 11, 2003.
The results of a flood study required for Impact #5 necessitated raising the height of this
crossing, which in turn increased the amount of impact required for construction of the crossing.
Please refer to the letter provided by Jeff Furman of The John R. McAdams Company explaining
the necessity of these changes. It is important to note that the engineer also re-designed the
alignment to cross the stream channel at a more perpendicular angle to minimize these impacts to
the stream channel and riparian buffer. We have enclosed revised pages 9 and 13 of the PCN to
reflect the change in impact quantities for this crossing. The revised crossing now impacts 120
linear feet of stream channel and 0.29 acre of riparian buffer. Because Impact #5 is still less than
150 linear feet of stream channel and 1/3 acre of riparian buffer and is an intermittent stream
channel, S&EC believes riparian buffer mitigation should not be required by NCDWQ or the US
Army Corps of Engineers (USACE).
NCDWQ requested three items of additional information in their aforementioned letter. The
items and their associated responses are provided in an itemized list below.
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
Hickory Office:
PMB 291, 3020-I Prosperity Church Road 3817-E Lawndale Drive 910 Boston Road
Charlotte, NC 28269-7197 Greensboro, NC 27455 Taylorsville, NC 28681
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone] Phone [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]

June 20, 2003
S&EC Project #: 97-3165.07
Page 2 of 3
1. Please provide detail for the stormwater management practices for the eventual
development. Why cannot stormwater management be provided (or reserved) for the
entire site up-front?
The subdivision plan for this 81-acre site creates 14 lots. Currently, these lots will be
sold individually and developed by different entities. The stormwater management for
the entire site cannot be provided at this time because the development details of each lot
are unknown; however, any development on the site will comply with applicable
stormwater management regulations. The City of Raleigh has stated in the subdivision
approval that the lots are subject to Part 10 Chapter 9 of Raleigh City Code. Part 10
Chapter 9 is the Neuse River Nutrient Sensitive Stormwater Regulations that will require
nitrogen reduction and control of the 2-year storm. Deed notifications will be provided
for each individual lot indicating that the development must comply with the City of
Raleigh's Neuse River Nutrient Sensitive Stormwater Regulations and condition #8 of
NCDWQ's Water Quality Certification #3364.
2. Please indicate the diffuse flow provision measures on the site plan.
An overall plan showing the storm drainage infrastructure for the roads is enclosed.
Calculations and details are also enclosed that show that the level spreaders have been
properly sized for the 10-year storm and discharge velocities, which are less than 2 ft/s.
3. What criteria were used to determine perennial vs. intermittent streams?
The intermittent vs. perennial stream determinations were based on an evaluation
conducted by Andrea Wade of the USACE. Ms. Wade did not find any EPT taxa of
macro invertebrates indiciative of a perennial stream associated with Impacts 1, 2, 3, & 5.
Please contact me if NCDWQ would like to conduct a field visit to make a separate
determination.
If you have any questions about the additional information or revision provided, please do not
hesitate to call Jennifer Burdette at [phone].
Sincerely,
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Jennif A. Burdette
Environmental Scientist
1.
June 20, 2003
S&EC Project #: 97-3165.07
Page 3 of 3
Attachments:
Pre-construction (PCN) notification form (pages 9 & 13)
Impact Map Exhibit (Sheet 4 of 4)
JRM Impact #5 Justification Letter (6/20/03)
Stormwater Management Plan (NCDWQ copy only)
Stormwater Outlet Calculations & Details - 5 pgs (NCDWQ copy only)
c: Barry James - AAC Real Estate Services
Jeff Furman - The John R. McAdams Company
permanent
4 culvert & rip rap

important 195 Brier Creek 18 Perennial
channel
permanent
5 culvert & rip rap

unimportant 120 UT to Brier Creek 8 Intermittent
channel

i-p-A wpwnuciy tutu mcnnry tcmporary impacts. unpacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loWgain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usas.aov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., wwwUMone,
www.mavduest.wn etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 195 imp + 486 unimp=681
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres
(if Name applicable) ) Wat Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.
NA

List each impact separately and identity temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): NA
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): _NA
Size of watershed draining to pond: NA Expected pond surface area: NA
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
Page 9 of 14
Impact #5
1 8,712 3 NA
2 3,920 1.5 NA
Subtotal 12,632 NA
Total 64,903 44,432
Lone I extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
It is important to note that fill material left in place after the relocation of Globe Road will also
be removed from the floodplain and the riparian buffer The stream channel will not be impacted
in this process. Please refer to the attached Impact Maps for the location of this fill removal
The area within the riparian buffer is currently vegetated with grasses Diffuse flow will be
maintained and the riparian area will be restored. therefore this activity is exempt from the
Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules,
if buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15 A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
The applicant propQsed payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund which has been
preliminarily accepted by the NC Wetlands Restoration Progrm (NCWRP) See the attached
letter from NCWRP Please note NCWMgranted the applicant more mitigation than requested
in the permit because the applicant further minimized impacts after requesting preliminary
acceptance of the proposed compensatory mitigation
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Most of the propg y is currently undeveloped forestland The proposed lots shown on the
attached Impact Maps will be sold and developgd by other individuals Due to the mixed use
zoning Qf the property, we anticipate that impervious area on the property will exceed 30% upon
completion of development Individual lot developers will be required to comply with the Cily
of Raleigh Nitrogen Control Rules thereby protecti surface waters and wetlands downstream
from the property.
XH. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater generated on the site will be discharged to the existing municipal sanitary sewer
lines present on the proM y and shown on the attached Impact Maps
Page 13 of 14
PR LIN?' \ \ -/X TY
Rq EISING 0'
TGH ANITAI
TY RY OF A
?) d
/ / 1\ \ SEWER E EMENT
_ \ \ \ 2000, , G 1185 ?
PB
/ / \ \U o
Ls
1 z
4-r4 IN
\ v> OY?<aZZN
• 4 foQ
\ W O \ Frn
??//??*??7?. TIS"1'i?I?B ?,? ?y p AREA .
[.V1YL' 1 D AREA = U.28?C?j J I' V
a m x
?( 1 m ?o °n
ZONE 2 DISf?iRBE A &N = 0.12-A-C.
T-UrI L-NE S HIP RI N- I l
1 V lAL IYU?7E Ii?liLli?iLll? ::':: ' w ai
--BbTFER-DI ANCE = O.40 - / /
LE GTH OF A CHANNEL =195 IF
AVERAGE STJR1F?l =18 FT.WPROX.) .... :..... 1
/-- FUTURE Riot
100, 1-1 0-1
PROPERTY LINE
(TYP.) 100,
i a ........
\ ....:...... a
::':..':..
r ............ U
- EXISTING 20' CITY OF RALEIG"
\ SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT
• ? .., S BQM 2000, PG 453 ....... ... .... +,
x
. . .
:.::z':'::'........'- . .:::::::::
1 .'.'.•.':.'.' ?"::.':.':.'.'::.'.•: ::.'.•::.'.':.:•:.' o' NEUSE 'RI;\RIAN BUFFER h?l
1 \ ?C ?TYP., M SURED FROM l 1 ?'?
' '.':.':...'.'.:
;...'. '.'.....'::.'::.:. .........
(OP OF BANK. EACH SIDE ?? I v
.......... \ \ X
.. 1 \ \
{
.... ...... .
s 04
/ S °
0 o
\ \ / ?? N X O
\ IMPACT #5 \ \? ?- 0 04
IMPACT 1
NEU;3/E BUFFER DISTURBANCE: \ °
i ZON 1 DISTURBED AREA = 0.20.AC. \ \ ?/
ZONE 2-DISTURBED AREA = 0.09 AC \\ \
Z
\ TOTAL NEi?E BASIN RIPARIAN \ 1 /
\ 1 F z
BUFFER DISTURBANCE =-"9 AC. \
\? \ -l ENGgI OF IMPACTED CHANN&L ,120 LF
AVERAGE STREAMS WIDTH = 8 FT. (APPROX.) ®McADAMS
THE JOHN
June 19, 2003
Since 1979
R. McADAMS COMPANY, INC.
Mr. John Dorney
North Carolina Division of Environmental and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
RE: Brier Creek Parcel "H-West" Stream Impacts
AAC-02020
Dear Mr. Dorney:
This letter is the engineer's explanation for Impact #5.
Impact #5 is the driveway to access the Southwest parcel. Since it is the only
access, the driveway is 36' wide. The crossing has been horizontally aligned
to be perpendicular to the creek. The road height has been set by the culvert
height and minimum crossing for utilities. The culvert sizing is based upon
the Flood Study that is required by the City of Raleigh since the area drains
more than 100 acres. The culverts needed to pass the 100 year flood with a
maximum of 1 foot overtopping the road are 2 13'x5' aluminum box culverts.
As with the other impacts, this crossing has been designed to minimize the
impact to the stream channels and associated buffers. If you have any further
questions or comments, please feel free to give me a call at [phone].
Sincerely,
THE JOHN R. M ADAMS COMPANY, INC.
jfi4Fan
1-4
esearch Triangle Park, NC Land Development Group
R
Post Office Box 14005
Research Triangle Park,
North Carolina 27709 JF/maf
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, North Carolina 27713
800-733.5646
919-361.5000
919-361-2269 Fax
Charlotte, NC
5311 Seventy-Seven Center Drive,
Suite 66
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
800.733.5646
704.527.0800 Comprehensive Land Development Design Services
704.527-2003 Fax I We help our clrems succeed.
i
THE JOHN R. McADAMS COMPANY, INC.
P.O. Box 14005
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709
[phone] Fax [phone]
J R McA JOB NO. QAc--Oz6 z.6 DATE Od 17-03 BY Z p CHECKED BY
CLIENT M& CRP.EK /1?W-1 fs, G P PROJECT PARP-& N- w4
SUBJECT LE44- _94?9AAffX ?LLdc?TiES
LEve1. SAW AIAA0. *61
Q,o (FES J\ = 3.00 CrS
CA, >C 0e*AtC2FSTf_D WEIR Mt4# W10-J 7Z DeMaftwf 14"A:
Cw ?M z Q'o= 3.q5 CFS
C / - 3.6 (FREE 0wERP4U:)I
y- ` 13 L-= jv Fr.
?•8 c _f5 Z3 = Q ZSZZZ. Fr
3.axmor

Q= vA
PAGE I- OF
V? Cam, ; 3.80 CPS I.51 Fr S
A (o.7.5zA(io Fr> ^
THE JOHN R. McADAMS COMPANY, INC.
P.O. Box 14005
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709
[phone] Fax [phone]
PAGE
J R McA JOB NO. AAC^'OZdZ0 DATE 40 - 1? -63 BY _ 1S CHECKED BY _
CLIENT RRIER- CReEK As-sa A-m, L A PROJECT 049tPL H-V Sr
SUBJECT leR-CML .SFIELAMIX VeCAWIAS
LEvec. SFa'?AOea ? Z
0.0 LP£S3?=S.8a CPS
m 4o [3¢ortceargh ive/R "t4*T)o•4 7v DRrF -0_w._L tdW;
Q,. = e" L H 3/z 0"'='5-89 cps
Cw=3oLAew ow F*t?
CAL
0- .5:88 cFS Z13 _ 0.337 y2 Fr
G. O X /O P7"
%SE Flow Xl lh-r/4r To P&TORH//? 0 Vf105171
o-- LIA
OF
v Gt _ ?: 88 cFS F-L.7-s pr/s
THE JOHN R. McADAMS COMPANY, INC.
P.O. Box 14005
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709
[phone] Fax [phone]
' PAGE ? OF
J R McA JOB NO. Ate= oZOZo DATE od- X7-03 BY CHECKED BY
?7'tf (Date)
CLIENT SQIER "VW- ASSuGr LP PROJECT PASSEL "W951: (Pd.ZfJ)
SUBJECT SMR-Ab R VF_c.oc-ME.S
C.>~VK1- S PA SA 6 &3
O,e CFSS S? = 7-8.sy CFS
WE Ra OA& C- I 70h walk EcU*1164 70 00 7t?.?urvlL d rAh
CwL94z &,o 2a.oy ors
C".0 = 3.0 ?F CW?«)
? - Q,o ?3 l- ? 35 Fr.
N= 28,Oy cis z13= D•?
3o x 35Fr-
k5F_ Fr-ow F-Q%*r/ON rn D9:M#+v yA V944--47-, %
Ct =vA
L/= 0 - 28.oq cF5 _ DiiiL]
A (O-VI Pp 05A-

L.?•v?L. SPR?a??•t?
(N.T.5. k-- A
d lot , ;',??•1. ?? Transition
- , „??
"' •%f %?? / \to 0 grade
Vegetated
diversion ''~:`' ?• :? -- `?
WIN
+=:);•»• Stabilized
.vim ~"" /? ?•... slope
Stable ,.,,• ??,?1: 1...?.?.
undisturbed
outlet
M1#4IMt*A -
NkMiV, PWNWAL ENTRANGL-• w1V'rN
%fA 1h IN.
jig I
Its ?
1 - 1 3•l 6LAM -AX Wvk*%
of SfRfae.o60.
0V W1:9
6~ Mt?J .
?Ra? ????-?oN cN.rs?
??.,C?N?JT1Zl?GTlot.>, SPrG?t lcA-noNS .
j. ?1Y lit ASS /?1A?T'r1046, WlDE 1 SF1p()t,A '?XT?ND 6 " 01/?-?- 'TES 1=
l vEl SIP AND 15E 1509iED 6" Vr--Zt? AT' `TetE LDWW-
2. FNSI-E. `Tow- -1'{j1E:- gPi?EnvFR l..l!' v5 i.-F-vE-t_. -(}}? ?tOl7s rt'S
3. Got?,-t1?VG? t/E?. SYRDBQ vN t?N?S"tU=D 50??. ?t oN
f't t..t... •)
`?} "D1VS i? S?Ot?I "Tb
6ONS1R.UY-1- A ?TRA N 51T1Dt 4 SGT I o N r-fZ'DtA
E5t.FNO ?t . -rH LY TO -jjW W I PVVJ A1`lfl DEPTI+ GF "T}}E
(MMEDI6TEL-f A-Tr-1, 6c"-fr .JCT1o" ) ATMoPr-I A-TeLY QED AN9
Mth.LN 'TNv- NTIR? TMTV2P??17 AQeA OF -Tl S?iZEa ? .
C.";

7.16
LEVEL SPREADER DESIGN SC HEDULE

LEVEL SPREADER
OUTLET PIPE PIPE
Q10 CFS SPREADER
V10 FT/S DIMENSION "A"
FEE DIMENSION "B"
(FEET) DIMENSION "C"
FEE DIMENSION "D"
INCHES
#1 FES 1 3.80 1.58 5 10 10 6
#2 FES 3 5.88 1.94 5 10 10 6
#3 FES 5 28.04 1.81 9 24 35 9
VQ# CU - y.lp `1 Triage Ott-Hold Letter Z.u 3carr tron«xoL
plan Detail Incomplete "
? Please provide a location map for the project.
? Please show all stream impacts including all fill slopes, dissipators, and bank stabilization on the site plan.
? Please show all wetland impacts including fill slopes on the site plan.
? Please Indicate all butter impacts on the site plan,
? Please indicate proposed lot layout as overlays on the site plan.
? 'Please indicate the location of the protected buffers as overlays on the site plan.
1luLC. _ UL '?-'
? Please locate all Isolated or non-Isolated wetlands, streams and other waters of the State as overlays on the site plan.
? Please provide cross section details showing the provisions for aquatic life passage.
? Please locate any planned sewer lines on the site plan.
? Please provide the location of any proposed stormwater management practices as required by QC
9 Please provide detail for the stormwater management practices aa-requ!Fa-4 c QC -fV,,JL
Please specify the percent of project Imperviousness area based on the estimated built-out conditions. C o Vkoo
? Please indicate all stormwater ouffalls on the site plan.
Please Indicate the diffuse flow provision measures on the site plan. /'? r?
? Please Indicate whether or not the proposed impacts already been conducted, l 1rC. C 'A v-
Avoidance and/or Minimization Not Provided
o The. on the plane does not appear to be necessary. Please eliminate the or provide additional Information as to r
It Is necessary-for this project
? This Office belleves that the labeled on the plans as - can be moved or reconfigured to avoid the Impacts to the Please
revise the plans to avoid the Impacts,
5f
?Iro I., ?;n
This Office be that the `faliaW on the piano ar can be moved or reconfigured to minimize the impacts to the Please
revise the plans to minimize the impacts
? The stormwater discharges at the location on the plans labeled will not provide diffuse flow through the buffer because . Please
revise the plans and provide calculations to show that diffuse flow will be achieved through the entire buffer. If It Is not possible to achieve diffuse
flow through the entire buffer then. it may be necessary to provide stormwater management practices that remove nutrients before the stomnwater
can be discharged through the buffer.
Other
? The applicaton fee was Insufficient because over 150 feet of stream and/or over 1 acre of wetland impact was requested. Please provide $
This additional fee must be received before your application can be reviewed:
? Please complete Section(s) on the application.
Q Please provide a signed copy of the applicafion.
? Please provide copies of the appileatton, copies of the site plans and other supporting Information.
Mitigation
O of compensatory mitigation Is required for this project. Please provide a compensatory mitigation plan, The plan must conform .
to the requirements in 15 A NCAC 2H.0500 and must be appropriate to the type of Impacts proposed.
? Please Indicate which 404 Permit the USACE would use to authorize this project.

Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
Item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
Attach this card to the back of the. mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
Article Addressed to:
Brier Creek Associates
3800 ARCO Corporate Drive
?'harlotte, NC 28273
I)WQ# 03-0669 - Wake
A. S7gnae yy/?? DD
X ? Agent
? Addre
B. "eived by Wrlnteq Name) i f CAD f+ of Del
D. Is delivery address dirt
om Item 1*
If YES, enter del r P Ipw: ? No
LjT'
[-]'yes
I J 1.1 N
Icy: 3. SeS a Type !
LJ Certified Mall xppwSAAaiI
? Registered 13' ieturn Receipt for Merchandise
? Insured Mail ? C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ? Yes
!. Article Number
(Transfer from service label)
'S Form 3811, August 2001
7002 2410 0003 0275 1062
Domestic Return Receipt
2ACPRI-03-Z-09E
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE

• Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box •
NC DF.NR Division of ?atfu Quality
Wetlands/401 Certificattlln Unit
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
First-Class Mail
Postage 8 Fees Paid
USPS
Permit No. G-10

~ i I I ~f~ ~
v .,fi I , I ~-h', \ ~ V ~ 1 i ~ ~i ~ i~ I ~ ~ ! I I
I I v~ 1 ~ ~ v ~ - - I~ ~f \ t ~ - l y ~ I 1 v I -1 ~ r w ~ I~ I
ADDITIONAL NOTES: CONSTRUCTION SE UENCE ION CONTROL LEGEND EROS 1 X / 825
L GBTAIN GRADING PERMIT. 1. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST CITY OF RALEIGH STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. l/ I 11 ti ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r 1 I~' I
2. SCHEDULE PRE-CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE WITH 2. ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON SITE PLAN ARE TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ~IIIIIIIip SILT FENCE OUTLET l I ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 v- ~ / Q 1 1 ~ i ~ / .I / BRIER CREEK EXCHANGE, LLC DOUBLE HANDICA I / ~ , - ~ ~ I I II 1 ~ - /
CONSERVATION INSPECTOR. BRIER CR I ~ ~ ' J I ~ 1~ ~'I C 0 AAC REAL EST~T t RAMPI TYP,) ~ ~ III II ~ /
RY TO GAIN ACI ESS TO AND 3, SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DETAILS OF BUILDINGS, BUILDING DIMENSIONS, MECHANICAL & PLUMBING DETAILS, AND Q/Q ~ 3. CLEAR ONLY THOSE AREAS NECESSA EXISTING EROSION LOCATION OF ALL APPURTENANCES. INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, MAINTAIN INLET PROn:cnoN SE ~ F~24 I i r ~ ~I 7 \ ~ V ,,r 1 I / / , ~ . ~ SERVICES, INC1 I 1 ~ ~ " I ~ I /
CONTROL DEVICES. 4. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION (OSHA) STANDARDS FOR EXCAVATIONS; FINAL RULE 29CFR PART 1926, PIS / ~ I ~ ~ li I 1 PIN 0758719121 i / , I y I / ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ , , ~ Sµ.T FENC I , - I I Ix O
NG REMAINDER OF EROSION CONTROL SUBPART "P" APPLIES TO ALL EXCAVATIONS EXCEEDING FIVE (5) FEET IN DEPTH. EXCAVATION EXCEEDING TWENTY (20) FEET IN FILTER BERM DB I 4. CONTINUE INSTALLI I / ~ DB 8343, G 2786 I / / ~ ouT n . I /l/~ I , 0 0
S CLEARING ONLY AS NECESSARY TO INSTALL MEASURES. DEPTH REQUIRES THE DESIGN OF A TRENCH SAFETY SYSTEM BY A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, PROVIDED BY DEVICE , ~ , I rt ~ 1 - - ~ ~ ~ ~ I~ / ~ I I I _ - ~ r-~ z I
CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EXCAVATION. NOTE; CONTRACTOR MAY BE REQUIRED TO INSTALL ADDITIONAL CHECK DAM N F i tREE ROTECTI N/ I J ~ I I / i.~'' I , , ~ ~ _ ~ O ~ ~ P ~ I_ ~ ~ ~ FE CE TYP.) - I I I ~ ~ ~ ~ , _ ~ I I ~ „ ~ • O
FLAGGING FENCING ALONG AREAS DESIGNATED AS UNDISTURBED 5. EQUIPMENT AND PRODUCTS OTHER THAN 1HOSE SPECIFIED MAY BE USED PROVIDED APPROVAL HAS BEEN OBTAINED FROM THE BRIER BRIER_.CR EK ASSOCIATES , ~ ~ \ K .t , I -i-I IvI ~ x I 1 ~ ~ ~ I _ ~ \ y I ~ ~
/ R WETLANDS. OWNER IN WRITING PRIOR TO ORDERING OR INSTALLAl10N. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL WAIVE ANY CLAIM FOR ADDITIONAL COST _~-sF-SF- SILT FENCE BUFFERS, STREAM BUFFERS 0 LIM ARTNERSHIP ~ ~ ? V ~ i 1 I ~ _ I I ~I ~ ~fASTE MANAGEMENT OF ~ ~ LIMITED ~ l ~ ICI` ~ / I I I ~ I - ~ v I I~ ~ ~ ~ r''~ ~ _ A I 1 I` ~ 1 CAROLINAS, INC. a
N Y CONSERVATION RELATED TO 1HE SUBSTITUTION OF ALTERNATE EQUIPMENT. -TP-TP-TP- TREE PROn:cnON ~ - 5. CALL 890-3500 FOR ON-SITE INSPECTIO B ~Q INSPECTOR AND OBTAIN CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE. N AN "AS-BUILT" SET OF DRAWINGS TO RECORD THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL PIPING PRIOR TO -lD-tfl- LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE ~/0 AAC R L ESTATE / / , PROPERTY.. LIN TO / ( ~ I ` ~ ~ / ~ I~ \ I v v vI I 1~ 7 9100 x a ~ I ~ ~ - -1-I_ 1 'PIN 0758 0 Q
6. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAI ~ ~ IrISTALL BYPASS STORM DRAINAGE NETWORKS OI 16A TO FES 12, CONCEALMENT. DRAWINGS SHALL BE GIVEN TO 1HE OWNER UPON COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT WITH A COPY OF THE yp00Ep AREA ~ ~ 6. SERVICES, INC. ~ ~ 23 - - OE ABAND NED I _ I ~ ~ - ~1, w N ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ /`t \ ~ _ 1\ , ~~I_ _ 48 PG 0261
FES 14A TO FES 12, DI 7A TO FES 5 AND ASSOCIATED BYPASS TRANSMITTAL LETTER TO THE ENGINEER. PtN~ 892`x623 / t 1~ 1 \ ~ 11 _ I ~I_ D 59 z ~ / ~ ~ ~ / t I ,I -
A DITCHES PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUC110N ACTIVITY. BEGIN C „RAIN GE DIVERSION DITCH ~ °QL BLEARING AND GRUBBING. MAINTAIN DEVICES AS NtEDED. ROUGH 7, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REPLACED/RESTORED TO THEIR ORIGINAL CONDITION OR -Q 8770 X24 / / I ~ I , ~ ~-I_ T ~ ~ _ ~ o I - „M ~ ~ \ I TEMPORARY 1 I r I I 1~ W B O O
GRADE SITE. TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER BY THE CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DAMAGE. j/ ~ I CONSTRUCTION 1 1 I I I a s O ~ i~ I I I I ~ H~ i ( / ~ ~ 1 ENTRANCE , \ I I Q
NTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT AND REPAIR All. ~ CO CONSTRUCnON ENTRANCE / I idOTE I ~ I ~ I I l ~ I - ~ ~ 4~ I I t l II I I i ~ o ~ I~~ 11 r~ x x
LROSIUN CONTROL DEVICES AFTER EVERY RAINFALL. GRADING 8. SOIL UNDER BUILDINGS, PAVED AREAS AND WITHIN SLOPES GREATER THAN 3.1 (H: V) SHALL BE APPROVED, PLACED AND I TVITY SHALL BE PROHIBITED IN THE AREAS OF 111E COMPACTED AS RECOMMENDED BY TH4 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. THESE SOILS SHALL BE COMPACTED TO THE STANDARD AC I ~ ~ { I E...I ~ ~ o I v o! ~ 1/- ~ _ s~LT FENCE I I I I l I l w" o c~ ~ i
VICES SEDIMENT TRAPS UNTIL THE PROCTOR MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY UNLESS OTHERWISE RECOMMENDED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. / SEDIMENT CONTROL DE / IABILIZED / / TYP. 111 ~ w x ~ G / ( I l ~ as / ~ ( ) I ~ l II ~ z ~ ~ ~ I ~ £822 / A G~~ / ~ I I I II} w
AREAS UPSTREAM OF THESE DEVICES HAVE BEEN S ~ 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTE THAT THE DRAWINGS MAY NOT SHOW EVERY OFFSET, TRANSITION, FITTING, ETC. THAT MAY BE AND APPROVED. ~ ~ ' / ~ 0 ! / ~ / 1 • o I~ ~ I y f- I I I 4 I - ~ p
NTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL SUCH STANDARD APPURTENANCES AS REQUIRED TO CLOSELY FOLLOW THE GRADES \ WER AND PROTECT INLETS WITH REQUIRED. THE CO TALL REMAINDER OF STORM SE AND ALIGNMENTS DEPICTED ON THE PLANS SEDIMENT BASIN \ 7. NS - - / ~ ~ ` ~
APPRUVED MEASURES AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN. HALL NO11FY 'NORTH CAROLINA ONE CALL" (1-800-632-4949) AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO BEGINNING , ~ ~ ~ \ I t/ t e, III ~ l ~ I ~ s / I ~ l I / I a ~ ~ I I Il ~ 1 I
STABILIZE SITE AS AREAS ARE BROUGHT UP TO FINISH GRADE WI1H 10. CONTRACTOR S 8. CONSTRUCTION OR EXCAVATION TO HAVE EXISTING UTILITIES LOCATED. CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT ANY LOCAL UTILITIES THAT r ~ , - _ ~ ~ / ~ t > r I I - , _ / / 9~ ~ ,-I~ ~ ~I ~ l 1 I 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ I I ~ ~ ~
VEGETATION, PAVING, DITCH LININGS, ETC. R11CES INDEPENDENT OF "NOR1H CAROLINA ONE CALL". REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO THE ~ PROVIDE THEIR OWN LOCATOR SE ~ / OPO ED \ / N N I I ~ I~ ~ 11 11 1~
ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY. FUTURE ROAD- - ' ~ \ NOTE: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT THE EROSION \ ~ ~ ~ - ~ / Il_ 4 \ / / ~ \ ~ IN LIMITS \ ~ , - C 18 ~ h ~ - ~ ~ I ~ 1 I
DEVICES REMAIN UNDISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION RIATE UTILITY COMPANIES FOR WIDENING~BY ~ CONTROL OCIATED PARKING DRIVE AREAS 11, CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINAl1NG CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES WITH THE APPR \ _ OF THE BUILDING PADS AND ASS / P RELOCATION I.E. POWER POLES, TELEPHONE PEDESTALS, WATER METERS, ETC.). OTHERS (TYPE' i v II ~ ' 4I l~-+-, I ~ rim\\ v ~ II k
ADJACENT TO THESE DEVICES UNTIL THE CONTRIBUTING U ANY REQUIRED ( ~ ~ v ~ v~v/ 1 ~ ~1 II _4i I v \ ~ t- I I ~ ~1
STREAM AREAS HAVE BEEN STABILIZED AND APPROVED. T AVAILABLE RECORD DRAWINGS. 1HE CONTRACTOR ~ 12. EXISTING U1ILITIES SHOWN ARE BASED ON FIELD SURVEYS AND THE BES I S BETWEEN ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS AND i • 1 t v ~ ~ E LINE TO I ~ ~ ~ i ! ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ I to i 1 ~ ~ I i1 - ~ I~ 1 ~ , I- ~ ~ 1
ALL AREAS ARE STABILIZED SHALL VERIFY CONDITIONS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSIRUC110N• ANY DISCREPANC E ~ \ 9. WHEN CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE AND NTAL INSPECTOR. THE PLANS SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY. ~ • ~ / \ ~ BE ABAN NED J I .I ~ B§ t , , ~ _ II s I~ h^I ~ I ~ , , I \ .I I ~ _,I
COMPLETELY, CALL FOR INSPECTION BY ENNRONME _ - _ ~ SILT FENCING \ ~ - t \ ~ I 11 ~ v v ~ / II 1~ 1 1 v v I ~ h
REMOVE TEMPORARY DIVERSI~INS~ ~ NTRACTOR SHALL HOLD A 10. iF SITE IS APPROVED, NY RESULTING 13. PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION, THE GENERAL CO I SEDIMENT BASINS, ETC., ANO SEED OUT OR PAVE A PRE-CONSTRUC110N CONFERENCE• ~ ~ I NCE I I v P rECTION ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ / SILT FE I 1 TREE RO ~ / I I ~ I~ ~ I I \ I _ ~ / I P. I I FEN E TYP. ' i ~ / ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ \
BARE AREAS. CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO ~ ~ i
R SIQN CONTROL DENuES (SUCH AS 14. ALL DIMENSIONS AND GRADES SHONN ON THE PLANS SHAII BE FIELD VERIFIED BY THE TRUC110N ~ ALL REMAINING PERMANENT E 0 CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER IF ANY DISCREPANCIES EXIST PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONS v / ~ / Q
VELOCITY DISSIPATERS) SHOULD BE INSTALLED NOW TRA COMPENSATION SHALL BE PAID TO CONTRACTOR FOR ANY WORK GONE ~ ~ ~ ~ FOR FINAL SITE FOR NECESSARY PLAN OR GRADE .RANGES. NO EX UCH NOTIFICATION HAS NOT BEEN GIVEN. - - 1 / 1 I l ~ I I II ~ I i~` ~ I \ ~ ~ ~ 1 I I'! -
11. WHEN VEGETATION HAS BECOME ESTABLISHED, CAU DUE TO DIMENSIONS OR GRADES SIiOWN INCORRECTLY ON THESE PLANS IFS r ~ ~ C110N BY ENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTOR. / v~ INSPE v I I SILT FENCE / \ ~ - - / / I I 1 1 I II C ~ I / I \ ~ PROPOSED ` I 1 / ~ ~ l ~
~ ~ ~ OUTLET (TYP.) I \ CLEARING Mff ~ 17 I ~ ~ ~ _ I ~ ~I r I X I 1,rp. XISTING 40 CI OF ~ JI X I
12. OBTAIN A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION. ~ ~ L / G~./ - u I 1~( ) , ~ 1 3 I v II I I II TREE PROTECTION / ~ ~ RALEIGH., SANITAR't I \ M I i I I I,
1 WITH THE NOTE: / ~ FENCE TYP. / / ~ - - _ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ I ~ 1 ~ \ ~ II ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ) ~ SEWER.. ANQ- WATEfZ l I I 4
ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TH R W. EXISTING CONTOURS SHOWN SIGH AND ROAD PROFILES WERE DESIGNED FROM FIELD SURVEY OF E / / ~ / i PRIVATE DRAINAGE / I ~.INE EASEMENT ~ I I \ 1 1 I
LATEST VERSION OF THE CITY OF RAL SHALL BE FIELD VERIFIED BY THE I / C~21 WERE OBTAINED FROM GIS MAPPING. ALL EXISTING CONTOURS - _'g _ zo v~` ~ v l ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ 1 \ l ~Ir~ _ EMEN\ } _ ~ , 1
NCDOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. ~ ~ - CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. / 0 ~t - / ~ \ ~ 1~ ~ , _ , ~ II ~ ~ tl I~
- FE 19 UTILITY INSTALLATIONS AND OTHER PUBWC O v v ~v II / , ; 1 II ~ ~ I 1 ' ~ 19 \ \11 I I l / ~ 0 THOROU I~~ARE F I ~ ~ 1 1 0 1 / ~ i I~ ~5 ~ A 1 11 1\I z
G SIDEIIALKS AND HANDICAP $$IPATOR SCHEDULE ~ ~ h FACILITIES INCLUDIN VELOCITY DI {b y 1} V A \ I~ ~ / Y r 1 A II EI I 1 \ v A\ V V I I I / i YARD TYP• ~ \ I I ~ I o _ v I ~ ~ / ( ~ 1 1111
RNMPS ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED ON ALL STREETS ' ~ / RIP RAP RIP RAP I y ~ - AS SPECIFIED BY CITY CODE. THESE FACILITIES QUTLET STRUCTURE RIP RAP APRON DIMENSIONS G~ _ v v v l/ ~ l / - 1 11 ~ 14 ~ 11 1 I\ I I ~ \ v v Iv v v it Ilt_ / / ` I i 1 1 \ ,1 11
EN APPROVED BY THE CITY OF RALEIGH WIDTH THICK. AVG. DIAMETER CIASSIFlCA110N Q y HAVE BE a NUMBER LENGTH ~ Sll \ ~ ~-~/i / / ~ i 1 11 b~ I 11 / SILT NCir A A \ \ ~ _ , A ~ _ - / ~ \ CB 5 ~ ~ 1 , 1 I I 111 1 I I I. ~ 1 ~
AND SHALL HE SO INSTALLED UNLESS A CHANGE 1 ~ IH, IN. 'Q ~ / / / VAL. PUBLIC SANTfARY (FT•~ ( ) ( ~ '0 / ~ COL ALTHORIZED BY 1fkITTEN APPRO u / / \ i ~ iDl 6A ' 1 _ _ ~ I G ~ w ounE~ P.) v v v ` _ _ _ ~ ~ / ) / ~ I 1 ~Il I 4 I v v o// / I ,1 I I II 11
E TO HE RECORDED PRIOR T / //I ~ r S['NER EASEMENTS AR ANCE. 6 CLASS '8' ~ a, y / / F'i,~AL ACCEPT TES 3 8 5 22 / I I \ v ~ ~ - , ~ ` , , / ,cep s / , I ~ ~ 1 / 1 ~ 1 1 ,1
CLASS 'B' ~ / ~ / ~ I TES 5 15 9 22 6 ~ _ ~ ~ - ~ ~ I i ~ ~ _ ~ ~ / i '1 ~ _ _l~n _ . ~ 11 i ~ , I a / ate, ~ I / 1 t v ~ \ v i eb ~ i I ~ 1 1 a
13 CLASS 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ y ~ ~ FES 12 24 13 22 ~ ~ ~ ~ / fi I v ~ / / - ~ / / ~ v- ~ 1 I I/ ~ I ~ , t / I 11~ ~ / 1 ~ ~ i 1 1 ~ II i/ ~ I~ I 1 1
E~~GINEdR1NG: ~ F ~ ~ ~ / / J I / 1 / \ I~ ~ I ~ „ ~ i W~'~' / I t~, yt I v ~ / 1 _ , ~ 1v 11 ~ I ~ , ~ , i .II ~ I , 1 I I ~
~ ~A OCIATES~ ~ \ ~ 1 Es: BRIER EK S.~ ~ ~ ,1/ PUBLIC UTILI7T ~ N RS IP' , ' / I I , . ~ 1 1 1 i,a w I _ a ~ d, 1 i ~ ~ I 1~;~\1i`" z`
LIM D PART E \vy , I I ,II ~ ~
9'l~.+FFIc ENGINEER: /PIN 075872428 ~ / ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ / ~ / i
DB 8996,, PG 1 26 _ ~ / ~ 2iATI0N ENGINEER: / ~ ~ ~ ~ Cui~SEI ~ ~ y ~ / ~ r ~ V 1 1 1 1 1 I Il ~ 1, ~ ~ ~o~
1 ' ~ i ~ ~ A~ \\11 ~ I I , i ~ o ~ , . ~ i ~ t 1 ~ ` ~ PROPOSEO`i r ~ ~ i ~ ti , , i, U) ~
~ ~ / 1 / / , ~ ~ ~ j ~ ~ \ ~ 1 1 1 3 ~ G'UM $ l l l I~ ~ I, ~ ~i~ ~w a / \ \ \ . FES12 TyQ, 1 t 1 { _ i I _.._y i--- i, ; ti. l 1 ~ G
I ~ / - ~l I ~ 1 _ r v 1 1- / r ~ ~ / ~ / .~v v ~ 'I ~ i i~ a
' ~ ~ / ~ - TREE PROTECTION ~ ~ j ' I ~ _ -~I~_ - 1 I I 1 1ti ! ~ ~ O
( ~ I 1 ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ I, ~ 1 - - / ~ - / fi ~ / , ~ FENCE TYP. ~ i - I ~ I 1 1 W i z I v ~ ( i T ~I ~ ~1 1
~ , ~p ~ ~ 1 ~ J , ~ / ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ 24 Lx13 wx22 THK ~ ~ I , W o . / l 1 ~ , I I I, , 1 ~ x
~ ~ ~ ~ r y; ~ , -A~ ~ 1 L~ ~ ~I G 30 ~ I ~ ~ LASS 1 RIP RA~ I , / \ ~ ~ I ~ I ~ ~ 1 , c~ i/1 I ~ i t NF/ / I APRON ~ I I }I ~ U
\ / ~ C JCL ,EAS~M / / I ~ ~ ~ I I ~ I I I I / / _ ~ i I ~ 1 BE ASSO IATES, LLC ~ ~EE~ PROTE£ ON / 1 ? 1~ ~ 1i 1 ~ ~ E
/ I ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ 1 ~ 7 1819 ..a ~ ~ ~ / FENCE (TYP,) ~ I Il _ ~ . _ ,PIN 075 9 ~ ~ 1 _ ~ 1// I I ~ ai W
~ ~ ~ ~ 1 _ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ i" ~ ~ ~ DI5 RI T 1 --esc~ ~ ~ , ~ - - _ ~ ~ ~ / / ~ I' l~- 8868, PG 2442 w ` TEMRDRARI~DIVEIi-SIGN _ ` - _ ~ i ~ ~ I (~-1 ti
~ ~ 1 ~ r ~ ~ \ \ ~ ~ RYA E~ CITY D CH B M (TYP>) _ - ' _ _ ~I~T_FENCE ~ ~ / j I , I ~
` - - _ ~ ~ ~ / _ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ OF R^ALEIGH~ 4NII~G/IAAP~ - - - i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - ~ ~ II 11 1 , ~ 1 ~ Ra
a~ _~0 T~.OR~UGHFARE I , = ~ ~ - ~ II II 11 ~ i \ A ~ - ~ , - / ~ J S , ~ I ~ --,1_ - _ ti
' I YARD TYP ~ ~ ~ A I ~i ~ ~ r ~ / - ( ~ i ~ i ~ ~ l ~ \ ~ / i ~ ~ ~ i - l ~ ( ~ \ THE IOA S AT gQIER'CREEK
~ 1 ~ NCDOT RAINAGE~ / ; THdR0U8r-(FARE ~ ~ \ ~ 1 1 _ , , I ,11 _ - ~ , PRI LIMIT ARTNERS+~1P ~ ~ ~ J / i I , \ 1 ~1 - NT DATE
~ ~ 1 ~ 1, - EASEM NT (TYP.) i \ ~ _ _ ~ , I \ ~ ~ ~ l 1 ~ ~ ~ YARD-(TYP,)~ I I ) \ ~ ~ I i ~I1 1 t - . - - TE DRAINAGE ~ ~ ~ _ 1- _ _ l OM 2002~PG~1686 ~ ~ - ~0- P~IVA I J ; I _ 1~ ~t ,
~ ~ ~ - ~ SEMENT TYP. ~ ~ ' C - _ JUN - ~ _ 758927623 ~ ~ ( ) I" I 1 _ 1 8 200 _ PIN 0 ~ ~ 3
- _ _ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ 20 CITY OF ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ rt - i 1 t ~ eJohn R. M
ams Co., I ~ , - ~ ~ _ ,p17 -WER - ~ ~ ~ I , ~ , ki- ~ - ~ 1 t _
`,r~ - / ~ ~ A \ 1 r i ~ ~ / ~ ~ \ - RALEI~'f•I SANI~RY SE • _ ~ fi ~ , i ~
1 ~ - ~ ` ~ I ~ V ~I TING 20 CI OF RALEIGH" - = ~ :IGH~" - ~ ~ S5 - I ~ ~ ~ + 1 ~ _ i ~ ~ PROPOSED ~ ~ ~ ' f ~ 1
~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ \ ~ ITARY SE ER EASE N~ ~ ~ 24 x30 LEVEL SPREADER - , ~ i- ' _ - G~ i - - ~ CLEARING LIMITS- ~ ~ - • i ~ ~ - - ~ ~
~ I ~ i J / r \ i ~ _ ~ r ` I' / \ ~ 3 % fem. ~ \ l ~ ~ ~i~ ~ / ~ ' 1 TYP. ' ~ ~ (SEE QETAiI) _ - i~ ~ ~ _ ~ , ~ ~ ti \ . j - - - ~1
- ~ > - - ~ - I s , . / / ~ ~ ~ SILT FENCE _ ~ ss ~ ~j ~ / l / i. ~ III 11 i~ 1 t ~ ~
~ TE oRAa~ , _ _ ~ ~ ~ , F R _ ~ ~ ~0 CITY-0 , ~ (TY2) ~ ~ ~ _ _ - .__J / --1 _ I I t l ,tit , 1 _ \ I 0 CITY-OF ~ ~
N TRUCTION ~ - _ ~.°w: _ _ =-~-'....'_.-a- ~ / y ~ I ~ L''~TSTING~ ~ ~ c0 ~ - . , _ ; , ; , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ , ` _ -NITARY EWER_EAS Y ~ ~ ENTRANGGI: _ - 8 L~5-Wx?~?---T41f~` ~ ~ 1 / ~A ~ ~ ,EWER_EAS - ~ , - _
~ I ~ ~ - J LASS.."8' RIP RAP ~ r , ~ ~ r - _ 'PB X1000; P~ 1185 t_ - _ P~ 1185 ~ ~ _ - I ~ 11 l' ~ I ~ ter.. ~ I , ~ ~ ~ ;
~ RON i ~ ~1~ ~ ~i y' ~ ~ -9t' ~ ~ / ~ / / ?.1 ~ ~ SILIT FENCE ._f ~ ~ TOP OF
~ 1 'x10 LEVEL SPR Eg'~r / I ~ ~ P. ~ (T~~) F Q ~ ~ BANK (TY ) / ~ _ _ _ - I ES ~ ~ " / L - 1 1 I y~ ~ t ~
t*~ ?'+~'r~ ~ \ 1 - TAI ! ( 1' - ~ ~ - ~ - - - / o /TREE pRd . ~ (SFE. DE L) r ~ ~ , ; - ~ / . ss --~-=n ss ss; _ , ~ i. - _ 1 ~ , , ~ 1 , ~ ~ ss _ ~ , , _ _ 1 1 I_ I ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ti 1~'I ~ ' \ 1
cu I I FENCE ( P.) r I ~ 1 ~ / ~ 1.~, ~ ~ r,l I ~ ~ ,~~,t-~-~~~ r ,v ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~,j /i 15Lx9W K. - I I ~ -,t S ~ t 0
- ~ ~ f +ii t ~ / RACING D TES" I ~ \ r, ,
m _ _ ~ ~ ~ REEN TYP, SEE ~ 1 ~ 1 t -1 Z ai
~ F RALEIG _ _ :~I ~r i I 40 C 0 - 1 1 - XISTING _
i / : ~Iy~ l ~ ~ ~ O I 1 ' , ANITARY SEWE!~-AND. WAT , ~ ~ ~t , ~ 11
- - - - i h / ~ ~ LINE EASE ~ 1 ~ \ 1
~ - xs _ r \ ~ _ - SIP H ~ _ --~..a,,.....- l~ ~ .f ~ ~ -5Q ,NEUSE ~{~IN ~ / 1 / / , ~ ~ ~ , , - . - _i , _ I t ~y IN ~RIPARJAN ~ / I / 1, ~ ~ _ I, _ 1~ ~ , ~
D ~ ! ~
~ ~ _ _ ~ - BU ER 'GYP,, EASU m ~ ~ \ ~ I I ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~.l ~ r , 8'Lx'SWx 2" K. A J r " . ~ _I ;1 ~ r _ ~ FROM P 0 ~ J ~ ~ ~ 5 ~ i i 4/ ~ / / ~ ~y~ II ~ ~ ~ _ _ - I t t , vI~P 0 `BAN N000T TYPE III I/ / ~I( ~ , I - _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~t
. ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ /r - _CLASS B RI RAP \ / I . / r _ ~ I ~ ~ ' r ~ 7 %WETIANDS ~ ;1 _ ~H, .C~- - - - ~ ~ ~ I BARRICADE / / I _ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ,y ~ ~
o, ' _ ~ APRON _ ~ _;I ~ ~ ~ - - / / ~ -'j I ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ - tit t \ V
o _ . ~ ? ) ~ i ~ SIFT FENCE ~ V I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ - - _ /
r /i T PE Ifl ~ ~ ~ - - ~ ~ - _ - ~ NCDO TY ~ ~ _ ~ ~S - - `~j~ ~ v 1 IqT CEl 11 ( I I ~ ~ ~ - 5Q_.T OROUGHFARE I ~ _ , II 1 \ A , r, G• ~ ~ ~ V A I _ I I I ~ / -YARD ~(T`(P.) I I ~I ~
ro \ , ~ ~ ~ I i i ~ ~ BARRIQ~DE ~ I , ~ _ ~ I I - r v,v I r I , , I I vy
/ ~ _ ~ \ I I I i ~ ! ~ \ ~ mix= ~ / _ ~ ~ ~...G~s~. - - - - - . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ tEC,~a~ I l ~ ~ -r-- ~ II . , i ~ ~ II I _ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ' I RIPARIAN ? I I ~ ~ t
- - J ~ I I ~ - BUF~~'ff TYp~'; EASURED I / \
- ' - III I I ~ ~,11 ~ i- ~ ~ /i ~ t ! I - 1 I I 50 I~ OM T4R ',0 BANK, 1 t 1
i r~~ _ / _ _ ~ v ~ ~ / _ ~ ~ I I ~ \ ' I III I / /IY t _ 1 ~ 1 I , I t / _ I 1/ 1 1~ V A v I I I I ;EACH ID) I~ ~ ~ ~v// y E
o ~ , ~ ~ EXISTING 30 ? I . ~ ~ - / _ \ 7~/ >fst / ~ , _ _ - - _ ' - ~ _ ~ \ \ \ \ \ ~ III ~ ~ ! ~ )I I 1, ~ ~ PROJECT N0. AAC-02020 _ \ \ 11 it I I I 1( ~li, / ~ 1 A 1 ~ V I ,I I / / 1 I I i ~ 1 I'~ t P[LENAl1E: AAC02020-Ut
CP&L EAS ~ ? ) , ~ ~ / / ~ - r`71 / ~ v ~ R - - ~ i ~ I v l / ~ ~ 1 1 1 I I ~ I I I I , I ,r / 1 ~ J 11 I l f I I l 1 I ~ 3~ ! I: 1~ I ~
~ 1 / i~ t ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~s0 ~ i . C 1 ~ ~ t TREE PROTECTION ~ ~ I ( ~ / _ - ~ ~ I I I ll ~ ~ I v ~ B~ ~ / ~ I I I I 1 \ I t I I I ~ ~ ~i , ~ ~ / nESicxEU eY, JB / - I t ~ ~ ~ I 1 I I I I i l l I /~1 II 1
• ~ FENCE ~ ~ - T o ~t~r r/r ~ \ ~ A ~ ( ~ ll 1 I ~ \ \ / ~ J , - SNOb~ ~ OIStRIC v / ~ ~ ~ 1 I `I ~ ~I ~ ~ ~ A ~n,. 1 I 1 1 1 , / V ~ ~ , ~ _ ~ 1 nniuinAD1I~AC DCD !`I I 1 I I I I I ~ ~ I, t III i I I I I f ~ , ~ I I I I ( Ill ~ ~ _
I i A i r (I i 1 ~ 1 I , I ~ 1~~~ / ~ i I ~ ~ / I ~ 1 I~ 6 I Ali r-~ ~ nw+x>v er, SRW
7 If NKVYVJCU I , '~C3VVIYVMfCI /a-I_uN v,, \ 1 h CLEARING LIMITS / I NINO I SCALE,
i 1 1 1 l I I I i OF RACEIQH ZO / i~ I I I I 1 1 ,MAV -i ! 11! I) , nP. 1 I 1 AMA I , i 3 f J 1-100
CD /r~~ I I 1\ \ \ / i ~ Tr- EXIS ING ~ ARY S AS ? E 1 q r - _ GRAPHIC SCALE SHEET N0.
SAN 2 ~F IG~ nATE: 05-07-03
- 1 \ V ~ I QO 200 P W C 2 I t 0 100
loo
50', NEUSE BASIN RIPARJN a r 1 / / \ \ 1 BUFFER TYP., MEASURED l I 100 rt. ZAWING NOT REI.EASED FOR CONSTRU1~IN A I. DI
- _ (J 50 FROM OP OF incn HOWADAMS
r 1 l l ! ~l~ / , K - - - EACH SIDE
0 L a
X