310401_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20200402

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number. 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation .
O! Other Agency ,
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: (9Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 1( t2evArrival Time: Departure Time: I ` -J-0 ounty:
Farm Name: 1 Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Phone:
Facility Contact: ,� `Title:
Onsite Representative: i ( .e ` ,y
Certified Operator:
r
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Design "Current
Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean Z
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Other,
Other
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design ° Current °
Wet Poultry
Capacity : ° Pop. °
Layer
Non -Layer
. °
Design Current -�
ilry Pniilfry
Canacity Pon.'
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Region:
Design' Curxcnt:
`Cattle = " Capacity Pop,
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
4
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ N
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
ONA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
�A
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
EJONA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
To NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 00 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: J�
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes o �NA
NA, ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? [:]Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
3111
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes [:]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
❑ Yes Ea<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 2<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
[JNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
Ea"N'o
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
FlZo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
El Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
, �No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes ffNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: L
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑��N
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No �NA
N ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
LEI 1
❑ Yes EfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes L� 1` ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
xevieweritnspectorivame: V jc w riiuuc. �Iw
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412015