20030482 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20030421

wA
o rFgQ0
r
0 ` _;?
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
January 11, 2005
Islam Association, Cary
PO Box 31952
Raleigh, NC 27622-1950
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
DWQ Project # 03-0482
Wake County
Subject Property: Islamic Center of Cary
UT to Swift Creek, MacGregor Downs Lake [03-04-02, 27-43-2.2, WS-III, NSW]
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification and Authorization Certificate per the Neuse River
Buffer Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0233) with Additional Conditions
Dear Sir or Madam:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill
within or otherwise impact 0.169 acres of wetlands, 132 feet of streams and 7,349 square feet (ft) of
protected riparian buffers for the purpose of a road crossing at the subject property, as described within
your application dated April 10, 2003 and received by the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on
April 21, 2003 and all additional information submitted and received by the DWQ on March 4, 2004,
April 6, 2004, May 3, 2004, June 15, 2004, October 14, 2004, December 10, 2004, December 13, 2004
and December 17, 2004. After reviewing your application, we have decided that the impacts are covered
by General Water Quality Certification Number 3404 (GC3404). The Certification allows you to use
Nationwide Permit 14 when issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). This letter shall also
act as your approved Authorization Certificate for impacts to the protected riparian buffers per 15A
NCAC 2B .0233. In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with any other required federal,
state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Erosion and
Sediment Control, Non-discharge, and Water Supply, Watershed regulations. Also, this approval to
proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your
application shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your
project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold,
the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for
complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of
wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A
NCAC 2H .0506 (h). This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in the attached
certification and any additional conditions listed below.
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
1. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and general
conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other impacts are
approved including incidental impacts:
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: httn://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands
None Caro na
ti mally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Islam Association, Cary
Page 2 of 4
1111105
Amount Approved
Units Plan Location or Reference
Stream 132 (Feet) Sheet 4
404 Wetlands 0.169 acres Sheet 4
Buffers 7,349 (square ft. Sheet 4A
2. Erosion & Sediment Control Practices
Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications
governing the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best
Management Practices in order to protect surface waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina
Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control
measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most
recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices
shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects,
including contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project.
3. Written Stormwater Management Plan
An additional condition is that a final, written stormwater management plan (including a signed
and notarized Operation and Maintenance Agreement) shall be approved in writing by this Office
before the impacts specified in this Certification occur per Condition No. 6 in GC No. 3404. The
stormwater management plan must include worksheets, plans and specifications for stormwater
management facilities that are appropriate for surface waters classified as Class C and designed to
remove 85% TSS according to the most recent version of the NC DENR Stormwater Best
Management Practices Manual. These facilities must be designed to treat the runoff from the
entire project, unless otherwise explicitly approved by the Division of Water Quality. Also,
before any permanent building is occupied at the subject site, the facilities (as approved by this
Office) shall be constructed and operational, and the stormwater management plan (as approved
by this Office) shall be implemented. The structural stormwater practices as approved by this
Office as well as drainage patterns must be maintained in perpetuity. No changes to the structural
stormwater practices shall be made without written authorization from the Division of Water
Quality.
4. Construction Stormwater Permit NCGO10000
Upon the approval of an Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan issued by the Division of Land
Resources (DLR) or a DLR delegated local erosion and sedimentation control program, an
NPDES General stormwater permit (NCGO10000) administered by DWQ is automatically issued
to the project. This General Permit allows stormwater to be discharged during land disturbing
construction activities as stipulated by conditions in the permit. If your project is covered by this
permit [applicable to construction projects that disturb one (1) or more acres], full compliance
with permit conditions including the sedimentation control plan, self-monitoring, record keeping
and reporting requirements are required. A copy of this permit and monitoring report forms may
be found at http ://h2o enr state. nc. us/su/Forms Documents. htm.
Islam Association, Cary
Page 3 of 4
1/11/05
5. Culvert Installation
Culverts required for this project shall be installed in such a manner that the original stream profiles
are not altered. Existing stream dimensions (including the cross section dimensions, pattern, and
longitudinal profile) must be maintained above and below locations of each culvert. Culverts shall
be designed and installed to allow for aquatic life movement as well as to prevent head cutting of
the streams. If any of the existing pipes are or become perched, the appropriate stream grade shall
be re-established or, if the pipes installed in a perched manner, the pipes shall be removed and re-
installed correctly.
6. Diffuse Flow
All stormwater shall be directed as diffuse flow at non-erosive velocities through the protected
stream buffers and will not re-concentrate before discharging into the stream as identified within
15A NCAC 2B .0233(5).
7. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond
the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre-Construction Notification. All construction
activities, including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion
control Best Management Practices, shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality
standards, statutes, or rules occur.
8. No Sediment & Erosion Control Measures w/n Wetlands or Waters
Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum
extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters
is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within six months of the date
that the Division of Land Resources has released the project.
9. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable
Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached
certificate of completion to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may result in
criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct
impacts to waters as depicted in your application and as authorized by this Certification, shall expire upon
expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved wetland or
stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that
you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of
the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a
hearing.
Islam Association, Cary
Page 4 of 4
1/11/05
Any disputes over determinations regarding this Authorization Certificate (associated with the approved
buffer impacts) shall be referred in writing to the Director for a decision. The Director's decision is
subject to review as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of G.S. 150B.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act and the Neuse riparian buffer protection rule as described within 15A NCAC 2B .0233. If you have
any questions, please telephone Cyndi Karoly at 919-733-9721 or Deborah Edwards at 919-733-9502.
Sincerely,
AlarWK1imek, P.E.
AWIQdae
Enclosures: GC 3404
Certificate of Completion
cc: Waheed Haq, Associated Environmental Consultants & Engineers, Inc., 3211-B Bramer Drive,
Raleigh, NC 27604
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
DLR Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 030482IslamicCenter(Wake)40I+buffer
ASSOCIATED
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSULTANTS &
-4 ENGINEERS, INC.
October 11, 2004
Revised: December 10, 2004
• Mr. John Dorney
401 Certification Unit
NCDENR
1650 Main Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 IU?1(1 D
DEC 1 3 2004
RE: Islamic Center of Cary
• DWQ # 03-01482
• Wake County DENR - WATER QUALITY
• WETLANDS AND 3TORMWATER BRANCH
Dear Mr. Dorney:
We received your letter dated September 7, 2004 in response to our request for the referenced project determination.
In light of your report, we have revisited the planned development and revised the extent of impacts. Please note that
the only channel impact is an access road to the building. The alignment of the access road has been revised to
minimize the impact on the channelibuffer.
Attached exhibits clearly show the impact areas. There is a total impact of 132 LF on the stream channel and 11,595
SF of buffer impact.
Please note that there is no disturbance along West Chatham Street.
We accept your determination that this stream is subject to Neuse River Buffer Rules. However, please review this
application with the revised alignment of an access road and no impact along West Chatham Street. Enclosed are
following supporting determination.
1. DWQ Letter of September 7, 2004.
2. Wetland Delineation & Stream Impact Plan & Profile.
3. Stream Disturbance Area & Access Road Plan & Profile.
• 4. Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application.
5. Wetland Delineation Forms.
6. Mitigation Plan/Ecosystem Enhancement Program Concurrence.
7. Bioretention Computation.
8. Maintenance Agreement.
9. Level Spreader Detail and Calculations.
10. Town of Cary Letter.
We request your approval of 401 Wetland Certification, if applicable.
If you have any question regarding this submittal, please call me at 919.878.1295 Ext. 125.
• Sincerely,
Waheed Haq, L.G., C.E.I.
QUALITY SMVICZ AND JORODUCTS AT AN ArroRDIAHLR ZNVRsmm
•.........• .............................................................................•..............................
P, 0, Box 31952, R61leigGl, NC 27622 9191878-1295 9191878-1298 (FAX)
3 211 Bramer Drive Raleig6l NC 2 7604 GlVVIwww,aec-e,com
o?() F W A r f9
r
Y
Michael E. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
September'f, 2004
Mr. Shakil Ahmad
P.O. Box 31952
Raleigh, NC 27622-1952
Dear Mr. Ahmad:
RE: Islarnic Center of Cary
DWQ # 03-0482
Wake County
Q19 (70?k R aeR p
DEC 1 3 2004
DENR - WATER OLLALr 'Y
WETLANDS AND 8TOWOTER BRANCH
In response to our office meeting on August 2, 2004, DWQ staff have visited the site of
the proposed Islamic Center of Cary to determine if the smaller channel that enters the site from
across W. Chatham Street is subject to the Neuse River Buffer rules (15A NCAC 2B. 0233) (see
attached map). The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) has determined that the surface
water labeled as "A" on the attached map is at least an intermittent stream and is subject
to the Neuse River Buffer Rule. This stream and it's associated buffers should be identified
on any future plans for this property. The owner (or fixture owners) should notify the DWQ (and
other relevant agencies) of this decision in any future correspondences concerning this property.
This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. In the context
of your project, this determination will affect the amount of buffer mitigation required for the
project since the widening of Chatham Street will unavoidably impact this channel. Please
address this issue when you resubmit your application to address the issues raised in our August
2, 2004 meeting.
Landowners or affected parties that dispute a determination made by the DWQ or
Delegated Local Authority that a surface water exists and that it is subject to the buffer rule may
request a determination by the Director. A request for a determination by the Director shall be
referred to the Director in writing c/o John Dorney, DWQ Wetlands/401 Unit, 2321 Crabtree
Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260. Individuals that dispute a determination by the DWQ or
Delegated Local Authority that "exempts" a surface water from the buffer rule may ask for an
adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter.
Applicants are hereby notified that the 60-day statutory appeal time does not start until the
affected party (including downstream and adjacent landowners) is notified of this decision.
DWQ recommends that the applicant conduct this notification in order to be certain that third
party appeals are made in a timely manner. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which
conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative
Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This determination is final and
binding unless you ask for a hearing within 60 days.
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone]/ Internet: lillp://h2o.enr,state.ne.us/ncA,etlands
oC
N thCarolina
Naturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
?7/ ea'?
w je,
EXI TING
AS HALT
USGS (50 DRD) EXISTI G C RB
EL-422.66'
STAR
Y _.
,. -?3?5?I?UC 10
` ? \1 0 ?'` to
j LJ ` = 5. _9- Ow - -
?..? ? , . . - . ,.. a U...-. . r \ `
ION BASIN
NIC
. . , .
...... ..?..... ...... EM ANKM INT . ,. .
• ` ??'
1X3?S? ?._ r; `?.<.?.... me _ME
/ AND 0 2? SMIdIJI C??E • ,'.'.'•'•'.
.............
I G 4 ?• 3+00 2+
.p ? DRIVEWAY B /B
/ SHOULDER
1 \\??;? 15 LE EL
00.
00
?G SSW El
p` w
9? OV?R
05
q?l co
04
I NOTES
Legend > FLOW

Fire Hydrant ® Carelr.
?
D4 wale, Valve CO Clean Ol
STABUZED
ROPE l

•
FV DG Fire Prplactlon Valw DI Drop IN ? i
Dt Ca. Volvo wM Water M-LEVEL

? Ga. Mel. SPREADER
® Sanitary i
FES Flared End Seatlon ® Storm •.
RCP Reinforced Concrete Pipe Tranelol``
O Exleling Iron Pipe MB Moll Elm`
11 /•
O Iran PIP...t -D-Coe Lini •
A Existing Nall -W-Water L ?
v Sign ? Areo Inl %
Area Light Curb IN
® Caleh Baeh --SD-R.C.P.
,Fa Utility Pole O Manllorl?" ?•,•,','„' •"', ;.
? Telephwo Pedestal ® avatar rt;.:.:.: .':/. •?

SS Sanitary Sewer line • •
® Rip Re,:. \
SS N•w Sanitary Sew. Line ® Tree Pn" 1
IP Inlet Protection ?- ® Sill Fens
'.
'
:
.....
Outlet Slab. Structure .
.
:::. R
Tempar<;
. ...
.
............
:'...
' ........
........
..'..
.
?. ...
. : :.
'
'
'
'
'
O Dletinguiehed A-- - - - - Stream
•.'.'/t:::
::
'
'
'
': .. • • .. .'.'. :'.'::.'
. • .. • :.:
.'.'.
.
: .
.
.
. • .. • . .
Z] Welland Area Oullall •
.
.
•
. .
® Bufler Impacted Are* Side wo.:::.'.'.'.': ..; •'....:'. ';::. :'.': .'.'.'.'.','.'.': .',?.
.....:': :':'.... :

ROAD CROSSING IMPACT IN BUFFER: 0.1093 ACRES (47. "..:'.':::.'.':.'.'':'''• ::' • •• V.,

lgk?qLt? I IV R
nFf 7 2004
DENR - WATE
WETLANDS AND STO
BRANCH
4a PERT' ::'::':
4" PERFORATED 4° CORRUGATED DRAIN
DRAIN PIPE PIPE
BIORETENTION CROSS SECTION A-A'

2-
F •':•:':'::•:•::•:•:•::':':•::'::':•::'::•:•:':'::•:•:•
.::::.':. •::::.'.•...r.:.'..•..:::
O
M
9„ 9
4, ........... ....

N TS
RECOMMENDED SHRUB SPECIES FOR USE IN BIORETENTION:
ILEX GLA13RA (WINTER BERRY)
CLETHRA ANIFOLIA (SWEET BERRY)
BERERIS KOREANA (BAR BERRY)
RECOMMENDED PLANT SPECIES FOR USE IN BIORETENTION:
ACER RUBRUM (RED MAPLE)
BETULA POPULIFOLIA (RIVER BIRCH)
FRAXINUS PENNSYLVANIA (GREEN ASH)
RECOMMENDED GROUND COVER FOR USE IN BIORETENTION:
PANICUM VERATUM (SWITCH GRASS)
HERBACEOUS HELIX (ENGLISH IVY)
GENERAL GUIDE LINES FOR PLANTS:
A MINIMUM OF THREE SPECIES OF TREES/ SHRUBS SHOULD
BE PLANTED IN THE BIORETENTION.
GROUND COVER SHOULD BE USED TO PREVENT EROSION OF
MULCH AND SOIL
TREE SPACING SHOULD BE 15 FEET
SHRUB SPACING SHOULD BE 10 FEET
AT TIME OF INSTALLATION, TREES SHOULD BE 2.5 INCH
CALIPER, SHRUBS 3-4 FEET HIGH
PLANT MATERIAL TO CONFIRM TO CURRENT ISSUE OF THE
AMERICAN STANDARDS FOR NURSERY STOCK
FOLLOW PLANT MATERIAL GUIDELINES AND PLANTING GUIDE
LINES LISTED IN NCDENR BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE
MANUAL FOR PLANT, SHRUB AND GROUND COVER
SOIL MATERIAL FOR BIORETENTION: /
75% SAND CONDUCTIVITY 6 IN/H
15% SILT CONDUCTIVITY 2 IN/H
10% ORGANIC SOURCE CONDUCTIVITY 0.5-1 IN/H /

ZONE IMPACT MULTIPLIER .'
(SQUARE FEET)
1 2970 3
2 1790 1.5
TOTAL 4760
...
iA.
/'APHIC SCALE
ao
( IN FEET )
I, inch = 40 ft

II
I I
k?l
1
?I
I!
1
II
u
a
in
4

APPROVED
TOWN OF CARY
ARxRpxm Inn pAm
pAln

Engineer:' A.E.C.E.
I Associated Environmental
Consultants & Engineers
3211 BRAAER DR. SUITE B
RaWl NC 27804
Pnana: (lik E7B-12g3
NO. REYIBADNB. DALE
PROPOSED
ISLAMIC CENTER OF CARY
1155 W. CHATHAM ST., CARY
now TILE
WETLAND DELINEATION
AND STREAM IMPACT
,CB kUMO R wr nw?s..
5029 4
4'X4' CONCRETE WEIR
PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION (PCN)
APPLICATION FORM
Associated Environmental Consultants & Engineers
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
[ ] Section 404 Permit
[ ] Section 10 Permit
[ x ] 401 Water Quality Certification
[ x ] Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
[ ] Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 12,14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401
Certification is not requested, check here: [ ]
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is
proposed for mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCEEP prior to
submittal of PCN), complete Section VIII and check here: [ ]
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed
on page 4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal
Management Area of Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further
details), check here: [ ]
0@@LRflVR1
DEC i 3 1004
LIEN AID aj QTY
WAhM
United States Army Corp of Engineers Pg. I
M. Project Information
1. Name of Project: Islamic Center of Carv
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0753852781 (REID #0071252)
4. Location
a. County: Wake
b. Nearest Town: Cary
c. Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): 102 Trimble Ave.
d. Directions to site (including road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Downtown
Carv, Chatham St. going west. go 1/3 mile after passing SW Maynard Rd
Property on left (immediately after church).
e. Site coordinates, if available (UTM): 17 698445E 3960751N
(WGS84/NAD83)• Ca Quad
5. Property size (acres): 6.56
6. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): UT to "Kildaire
Farms Lake", MacGregor Downs Lake (Swift Creek)
7. River Basin: Neuse
8. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of
the project at the time of this application: Adjacent land with one dwelling
adjacent property: church residences fire station commercial
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Proiect consists of building a church and religious school including a parking lot
with moderate weight construction equipment
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Wetland impact required to connect
access road to the property.
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 3
IV. Prior Project History
The project originally planned for the access road to join the Site via W Chatham St
This plan required a T-intersection over wetlands and a stream on the propertv in order
to allow traffic flow on the project site would be adequate (Figure 5) After discussing
the project with the NCDENR-401 Certification Unit the project scope was then reduced
to a single access road to the Site to minimize the impact on the wetlands and stream on
the property. Additional changes included cutting back on the sidewalk along the NW
portion of the property in order to reduce stream impact The toe slope for the W
Chatham St. extension was also reduced from 3.1 to a retaining wall in order to reduce
the wetland and stream impact Further reductions were made regarding relocation of
level spreaders and bioretention ponds outside of the buffer zone Upon review by the
NCDENR-401 Certification Unit, further reductions were taken to reduce impacts on
streams and wetlands located within the SITE The addition of a turning lane on West
Chatham Street was eliminated to reduce impacts Sidewalks were removed from the
access road to minimize impacts
V. Future Project Plans
No future permits are anticipated for this project
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 4
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
Proposed impacts planned on site include a 28' access road that intersects the
perennial stream on the property and of sewer line across wetlands and
streams.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Im txet Site
p

Nu mliel
r' .

ype of:Impact* Area of

Impact
(acres) Located within

100-yefir
Floodplain**
bistance to Nea
rest
Strearh (liner feel)

type of

, *
'4?itland**
1 Drainage, Fill 0.0378 Yes Adjacent Riverine

* 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood
Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps.
Total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.2814 ac
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.0378 ac
3. Individually list all Intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Irnpact
Site NUmbmr
- - - --
Type of Impact Length of
Impart
(linear feet)
Stream Name* Average Width of
Stream Before
Impact
Stream Typc
2 Fill, Drainage 132 UT 2' Perennial

r
Uumuiative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 132 ft
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 5
4. Individually list all open water impacts below:
Open Water ftnOW
Site Nutftbe>~-L
',Type of Impact yea bf ft pAet Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
TYPFe of Waterbodi
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should
be included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed
pond should be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this
application.
Pond to be created in: [ ] uplands [ ] stream [ ] wetlands
Describe the method of construction:
Proposed use or purpose of pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond:
Expected pond surface area:
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 6
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
The project for the Islamic Center of Cary originally called for one building to spread
across 6.56 acres. This plan affects one of the UT's to Kildare Farm Lake The project
was originally designed to allow an access road on the property to connect via W
Chatham St. In order to allow adequate traffic flow on the site the plan required a T
intersection over wetlands and a stream on the property (Figure 5) After discussing the
project with the NCDENR-401 Certification Unit the project scope was then redesigned
The current design reduces the size of the road to a single access road intersecting the
stream, thus minimizing the impact of wetlands and stream on the property Additional
reductions include removing the sidewalk along the NW portion of the property to reduce
stream impact. Expansion of West Chatham Street to include a turning lane into the
property was also deleted from the Site to reduce impact to streams and wetlands within
the disturbance area on SITE.
The following changes have recently been included in the proposed project:
• Sidewalk along W. Chatham St and access road were removed
• The access road on SITE now has enters along a ridge on the
property and intersects the stream and wetland area with the least
amount of disturbance possible
• Stream impacts have been reduced from 162 liner feet to 132 linear
feet.
• Wetland impacts have been reduced from 0.0765 ac (3,332 sq ft.) to
0.039 ac (1,699 sq ft).
• Buffer impacts have been reduced from 41,759 sq ft to 11,595 sq ft
unirea gazes army Corp of engineers pg. 7
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of
impacts to freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts
to perennial streams
USA CE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of
Nationwide Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will
be required when necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are
minimal. Factors including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative
value of the impacted aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of
appropriate and practicable mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be
appropriate and practicable include, but are not limited to: reducing the size of the
project; establishing and maintaining wetland and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect
open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of aquatic resource functions and
values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar functions and values,
preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in
order for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any
application lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on
hold as incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for
stream restoration in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan:
The proposed mitigation plan for the SITE includes minimizing stream impact by
eliminating the sidewalks along W Chatham St • removing sidewalks located on
the access road, redesigning the access road in order to minimize the crossing
area, and maintaining a 50 foot vegetated buffer (Neuse River Buffer Rules) that
will remain on the property where development is not planned In addition
untted States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 8
payment will be made to the NCEEP to offset 11,595 square feet of required
buffer mitigation.
2. Mitigation payment to the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
(NCEEP)
a. Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0
b. Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 11,595
i. Road crossing, shoulder, & embankment impact
located in buffer (square feet): 11,595
c. Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
d. Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
e. Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 9
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use
of public (federal/state) land? [ ] Yes [ x ] No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document
pursuant to the requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? [ ] Yes [ ] No
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so,
please attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
[ ] Yes [ ] No
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 10
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts
to required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must
be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan (Figure
4). All buffers must be shown on a map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the
buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ Regional Office may be included as
appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B
.0233 (Meuse), 15A NCAC 213.0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 213.0250
(Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other
[x]Yes [ ] No
Zone* Impact

(square feet) Multiplier
Multiplier Required

Mitigation
1 2,970 3 8,910
2 1,790 1.5 2,685
Total 4,760 11,595
* Zone 1 extends out 30 ft perpendicular from near bank of
channel; Zone 2 extends an additional 20 feet from the edge
of Zone 1.
2. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is
proposed. Please attach all appropriate information as identified within 15A
NCAC 2B.0242 or.0260.
The proposed buffer mitigation for the Site involves payment to the Riparian
Buffer Restoration Fund. The maximum amount of mitigation that the NCEEP
will accept for this protect is 83,635.20 sq ft It has been determined that onlx
11,595 sq ft will be affected.
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. / [
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) verses total acreage on
the site. Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters
and wetlands downstream from the property.
Total site area is 6.56 acres The imperviousness after development will be 27%
which is equal to 1.8 acres including the buffer. The proposed stormwater
control is a bio-retention area in front of building The bio-retention basin will
consist of two sections: 45 ft x 20 ft and 15 ft x 60 ft. The bio-retention areas are
located in front of the building where it can receive the runoff from the arking
lots, sidewalk and rooftop of the building The runoff from the parking lots will
be collected through two trenches filled with 6-inch stone and gravel Runoff
collected on SITE will be conveyed to the bio-retention areas via piping The bio
retention area is 4.0 feet deep with a one-foot laver of sand below; this will allow
adequate drainage of stormwater. The pondin design is 9 inches above the bio
retention groundcover, allowing storms larger than 1 inch first flush to be drained
through a weir. The weir will be 4 ft x 4 ft with an elevation 9 inches above the
bio-retention ground cover. Groundcover for the bio-retention area will be set at
elevation 422.00 and the weir will be set to a elevation of 422.75. (Figure 6)
Bioretention and level spreader calculations are attached to this report. A road
drain has been added to the access road that will collect stormwater that drains
through a protected pipe outlet with a flared section and riprgp Stormwater
treatment will include a level spreader before entering the riparian buffer.
Worksheets for bioretention areas and level spreaders are attached in the back of
this report.
Maintenance guidelines for bioretention areas and level spreaders are attached
signed, and notarized. Plant selection for trees shrubs and groundcover can be
found in the Final Site Plan.
unirea arares Army corp of Engineers pg. 12
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
1. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or
discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available
capacity of the subject facility.
A sewer line will be constructed from the building on site) then run off site
across a 20' stream easement along an UT to a 20' public sewer easement
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
1. Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any
Buffer Rules? [ ] Yes [x]NO
2. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? [ ] Yes [ x ] No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional)
1. Constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules.
Inclement weather, building permits City of Cary approval
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Date
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 13
MYC. cam'. ceaz
Hr?
M'yc
r \ nr.zJ'>-. 'ti 'GLC? Ci - l4 \\ - ?? =IYS K2
l -f
G202
AsK
MYC i-" l:x LL ??-- _ '??., r.?? ?z ia?- -- • *?A51
j MYC -? Vic. G4 c y'6RD•
?^Ay0 - - ,?,. -s ?.v ?.-.? t f ?Hn; ?'CG"\?a t •?frL2 .s+,? ? G:? ' ?a?
TPD
,- •G.8 _ ?_?Gdi.? =:r -,GIL ./may v-'T?y/ ;r?--mot - ,? ?• !, I?_? -
4YC `A G`G I irC - ?,M1 ?< `P
Cr82 CdC2'•, ) GLB2
Ena2 z K:; 1 //T ?'`• . r 2 y/ ?=?t .yam
?r -N1s82 EnBZ =/?//u !?!, err f A
c / G282 '? V SAD are
S4!q-t r -mac _ ,`s5 .; 77, -fd..' % / /'+'?t? _ r? 1.;,?-S ?? ?.?..
a' `/; Xiyl A - CrtGaBZ1
Rrt«<///
r
? ? Sf ? ?'? % ? E2'E• ?.'??r+'' . / ? ?/??,?y?"Hrt,"y„`',e.^ rr _vn? -J? ? -r^rk •. ? ? _' ?... ?
( t/J /'.: \ . Y s 1 _ A
\ sC 11
NsL ?{rte c: `? s I?CLtiL? ' ?_ /
7 t;:
Hc?y:' -Ca•^CG?Ci -'?- j? 9 ?`?c Y I Y N(B2I
/•.i-` _.?NsB G :..?t• _ ?1 ..r:, -,+?, s ? -. ? '.'-` _ ?^r ?,?t,? .` ?, ?_.ar ,GLf?`_'+` C?is2('?..? ? 1i?. 1•s':
?N " ? -r* is ?;4 ?? eC2
GeD2
CaB2
1- v c• `C'°.?•?,t - ,?'?-1J4? a?_' Hfu:!- 'v_ •.1? r` !1? `? ?1 ?r/p? -r
Cry r I 1 l L ? k /Ec aC
HrC Hr r p C As82? li
1 l '.rP r o.j `r v' S i T ir'-. G2172
H, CeB2
/ .r s? ?tl: - [ ? rIrBZ ?_ •21.E a ? I
Ws &t6 0. '1Ge,32 ??/ ? ? r 1 1 -'N
A B _Y
W 'N i
sC2?
<©I' may' \ GLd2.
?Gea
?,tr HrBZ \P? ?l M GeD2I / /f `AsC2
< < - -? CrB2 .ETB2IV` I ( I \ ?Ca82
14 C2
'Tr
c- /' ?CeC F l` ASK
WSB2 »+?R Ct8 ^Y 1 ?` N? ?/ apa27 - ?S oe's ??v
OA _
-rte ,w_r a J .-.tE_\?•.(?. -l-•S .r :? /'??,iJr/?. _., iL, ^ .:rt32 ,? ,?? .'%w' /r. l"?r ? - '•+ . 'n.,at+.s?*.'"-_-?`?.
WAKE CO[.TITY SOIL SURVEY NIAP =SSCCL-kTED ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
ISLAMIC CENTER OF CARY AND ENGINEERS, INC.
CARY, NORTH CAROLINA R_AL-EIGH, NORTH CAROLINA k
I
FIGURE 3 MARCH 2-00-1 Project No. 5029
i

AH
j
, L
_ Waterflow

i
Drainage pipes with gravel envelope
Darcy's Law applied to a rain garden
cross-section. Specific discharge (q) is equal to
hydraulic conductivity (I) multiplied by the ratio of
water height (AH) divided by layer thickness (L). j
-Overland flow from parking lot into rain
arden/bio-retention area. Water flows between -
g
parking stops before spilling into the bio-retention
median.
Parking lot sheetflow
Curb stops
Stone diaphragm
V:1{ V'.. \Y Y•V.. ?.V..Y .. ??-Vii VV1VY?.VY V?.•. .
..:....i....Y...Y.....{.x......,....,. Grass filter strip
l\LiVVY'. iY4 Y4\.
a
•
..
l
? •.V. V. Y.f.Y.Y...1.i{ YV•.
'Y.V iYV i-.VV.Y.'...Vi? Y-..V VV..?V..:. Y.4-V.
•{ .4p :...i.i. Y...-h.-.i \{ •Y is Y.\ ?. \ i. Y. iY
Outlet Optional sand layer

Gravel curtain
Overflow
"catch basin" ^ drain overflow
- Berm

Plan view of a rain garden/bio-retention area. Reproduced from Stormwater Modules with permission from the
Center for Watershed Protection.
* Hunt, W.F. and Nancy White. Urban Waterways: Designing Rain Gardens (Bio-Retention Areas). NC Cooperative Extension
Service-Mid Neuse Non Point Source Team. pgs 6-9. 2001.
PROPOSED STORMWATER BMP - BIOGARDEN ASSOCIATED ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
ISLAMIC CENTER OF CARY AND ENGINEERS, INC.
CARY, NORTH CAROLINA RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
FIGURE 6 MARCH 2004 Project No. 5029
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: Islamic Center of Cary Job Number: 02-SP-156
Applicant / Owner: City: Cary
Investigator: Matthew D. Thomas State: North Carolina
[ xl Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Community ID: Floodplain
[ [ Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Transect ID:
[ I Is the area a potential problem area? Plot ID: WD-I
Remarks: Site located due south of West. Chatham St.; Site only disturbed by an ephemeral stream connecting to UT to "Kildaire Farms Lake"
VEGETATION.,
Dominant Plant Species Common Name Strahnn Indicator
Tree
:leer rubrwn Red Maple 40% FAC
Acer saccharum Sugar Maple 10% FACU-
Cornus orida Dogwood 10% FACU

Herbaceous
Toxicodendron radicans Posion Iv 50% FAC
unknown Carex Unknown sedge 20% FACW

Vine
Parlhenocissus auinanefolia Virginia Creeper 20% FAC
IPercent of Dominant Species that are OIJL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-): 100% I
Remarks:
Recorded Data (Describe in remarks)
[ [ Stream, Lake, or Tide Cage
[ I Aerial Photograph
[ ] Other (describe in remarks)
[x[ No Recorded Data Available
Primary Welland Hydrology Indicators
[ [ Inundated
[ x [ Saturation in upper 12"
[ [ Walcr Marks
[ [ Drift Lines
[ [ Sediment Deposits
[ [ Drainage Pattern in wetlands

Secondary Hydrology Indicators
( x I Oxidized Root Channels
[ [ Water-stained Leaves
[ [ local Soil Survey Data
( I FAC-Neutral Test
[ [ Other (describe in remarks)
Observations
Depth of Surface Water: 0 in.
Depth of Free Water in Pit: N/M
Depth of Saturated Soils: 4 in.
(Remarks:
SOILS
Man Unit Name (Series and Phase) Drainaee Class Confirm Manned Type
Herndon Series I I Excessively Drained [ I Yes
"Taxonomy (Subgroup); [ j Well Drained [ x I No
Fine, Kaolinitic, Thermic, Typic Kanhapludults I ] Moderately Well Drained
I j Somewhat Poorly Drained
I x ] Poorly Drained
I j Very Poorly Drained
Soil Description

Depth in.
Horizon Matrix Colors
Mansell Moist Mottle Colors
Mansell Moist Mottle
Abundance/Size/Contrast
Grade
Class
Type
1 -4 A 10YR 4/3 SL Fine Granular
4- 10 Bt1 5Y 5/2 7.5 YR 5/8 Few, Fine, Distinct SCI, Medium Suban ular Block
10 - 24 Bt2 5Y 7/1 5YR 5/8, 2.5Y 8/6 Common, Medium-Fine, Distinc t Cl, Medium Suban ular Block
24 - 38+ Bt3 2.5Y 6/3 5YR 5/8, 7.5YR 5/6 Common, Medium, Prominent CL Medium Suban ular Block

Ilydric Soil Indicators
[ ] Histosol ] x ] Reducing Conditions [ I Organic Streaking
I I Histic Epipedon I I Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors [ I Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
] J Sultidic odor ] J Concretions [ j Listed on National Ilydric Soils List
I I Aquatic Moist Regime I I lligh Organic % in Surface Layer [ I Other (explain in remarks)
Remarks: Oxidized root channels noted in Bt I

WETLAND DETERMINATION
I x I llydrophytic Vegetation Present
x J Ilydric Soils Present I x ] This Data Point is a Wetland
[ x I Wetland Hydrology Present
Remarks:
DATA FORDO
ROUTINE WETLAND DE 'ERNIINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: Islamic Center of Cary
Applicant / Owner:
Investigator: Matthew D. Thomas Job Number:
City:
State: 02-SP-156
Cary
North Carolina
I x I Do normal circumstances exist on the site?
l I Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)?
I I Is the area a potential problem area? Community ID:
Tr insect ID:
Plot ID: Floodplain

WD-2
Remarks: Site located clue south of West. Chatham St.; Site only disturbed by an ephemeral stream connecting to UT to "Kildaire Farms Lake

VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species
Trees Common Name Stratum Indicator
Acer rubrum Red Maple 40% FAC
1',a us >ranclffiblia Beech 20% FAC+
Corn us /loricla Dogwood 10% FACU
flax o aca American I loll 20% FAC-
Fraxinus americana White Ashe 10% FACU

Herbaceous
Toxicoclenclron radicans Posion Iv 30% FAC
unknown Carex Unknown sedge 10% FACW
Onoclea sensibilis L. Sensitive Fern 20% FACW
Co n nelina conrnnrni.s• Dayflower 5% FAC

Vines
Parthenocissus c uin ue olia Virginia Cree er 10%, FAC
Lonicera o ponica .la anese I lone suckle 5% FAC-

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBI,, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-): 100%
Remarks:

IIYDROLOGX
I Recorded Data (Describe in remarks
I I Stream, Lake, or Tide Gage
I I Aerial Photograph
I Other (describe in remarks)

I x I No Recorded Data Available

Field Observations
Depth of Surface Water:
Depth of Free Water in Pit:
Depth of Saturated Soils: Primary Wetland Ilydrolog;
I I Inundated
I x l Saturation in upper 12'
I I Water Marks
I I Drift Lines
I I Sediment Deposits
Drainage Pattern in Wetlands

0 in.
N/M
7 in. Secondary Hydrology Indicators
I I Oxidized Root Channels
I I Water-stained Leaves
I I Local Soil Survey Data
I I FAC-Neutral Tcst
I I Other (describe in remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Man Unit Name (Series and Phase) Drainage Class Confirm Manned Tyne
Ilerndon silt loam, 6-10% slopes, eroded I I Excessively Drained I I Yes
'T'axonomy (Subgroup): I I Well Drained I x l No
Fine, Kaolinitic, Thermic, Typic Kanhapludulls I x I Moderately Well Drained
I I Somewhat Poorly Drained
I I Poorly Drained
I I Very Poorly Drained
Soil Description

Depth in.
horizon Matrix Colors
Munsell Moist Mottle Colors
Munsell Moist Mottle
Abundance/Size/Contrast
Crade
Class
Type
1 -7 A I OYR 5/3 10YR 3/2; 5YR 5/6 Few, Fine, Paint SL Fine Granular
7-31 BtI 5Y 6/3 7.5YR 5/6; 5Y 3/1 Common, Fine, Distinct SCL Medium Suban ular Block
31 - 40 Bt2 5Y 7/2 5Y 4/4; 5YR 5/8 Common, Medium, Prominen CL Medium Suban ular Block
40 - 51+ Bt3 I OYR 6/1 5YR 8/1 Few, Fine, Distinct CL Medium Suban ular Block

Ilydric Soil Indicators
I I Ilistosol I I Reducing Conditions I I Organic Streaking
I I Ifistic Epipedon I I Cleyed or Low-Chroma Colors I I Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
I I Sulf tic Odor I I Concretions I I Listed on National Ilydric Soils List
Aquatic Moist Regime ( I Iligh Organic % in Surface Layer I I Other (explain in remarks)
Remarks: Oxidized root channels noted in Btl

WETLAND DETERMINATION
x l Ilydrophytic Vegetation Present
I llydric Soils Present I J This Data Point is a Wetland
I x I Wetland Hydrology Present
Remarks:
DATA FORM
ROUTING WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COI, Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: Islamic Center of Cary
Applicant / Owner:
Investigator: Matthew D. Thomas Job Number:
City:
State: 02-SP-156
Cary
North Carolina
I x I Do normal circumstances exist on the site?
I I Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)?
I J Is the area a potential problem area? Community ID:
Transect ID:
Plot ID: Riverine

WD-3
Remarks: Site located due south of West. Chatham St.; Site only disturbed by an ephemeral stream connecting to UT to "Kildaire Fauns Lake".

VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species
Trees Common Name Stratum Indicator
Acer ruhrum Red Maple 20% FAC
Fn us randi olio Beech 20% FAC+
Corntus orida Dogwood 5% FACU
Car)inus caroliniana Ironwood 10% FAC

Herhaceous
Toxicodendron radicans Posion Iv 20% FAC
unknown Carex Unknown sedge 10% FACW
Adwrium as )lenioides Southern Lad Fern 10% FAC

Vines
Parlhenocissus (ulnC ue olla Vir kima Creeper 10% FAC

Percent of Dominant Species that are 0111, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-): 100%
Remarks:

HYDROLOGY
I I Recorded Data (Describe in remarks)
I I Stream, Lake, or,ride Gage
I I Aerial Photograph
I J Other (describe in remarks)

I x I No Recorded Data Available

Field Observations
Depth of Surface Water:
Depth of Free Water in Pit:
Depth of Saturated Soils: Primary Wetland hydrology li
I J Inundated
I I Saturation in upper 12"
I J Water Marks
J J Drift Lines
I I Sediment Deposits
I Drainage Pattern in Wetlands

0 in.
N/M
17 in. Secondary Hydrology Indicators
I I Oxidized Root Channels
J J Water-stained Leaves
I J Local Soil Survey Data
I I FAC-Neutral Test
J I Other (describe in remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase)
Chewacla soils (0-2% slopes)
Taxonomy (Subgroup):
Fine-Loamy, Mixed, Active, Thermic,
Fluvaquentic Dystrudepts Drainage Class Confirm Mappcd Tyne
( [ Excessively Drained [ ] Yes
I I Well Drained [ x] No
[ J Moderately Well Drained
] x ] Somewhat Poorly Drained
I Poorly Drained
[ ] Very Poorly Drained
Soil Description

Depth in.
Horizon Matrix Colors
Munsell Moist Mottle Colors
Munsell Moist Mottle
Abundance/Size/Contrast
Grade
Class
Type
1 -2 A 7.5YR 4/6 SL Pine Granular
2- 16 Bt I 5Y 6/3 2.5Y 5/2; 5YR 4/6 Common, Fine Distinct SI, Fine Suban gular Block
16 - 38 Bt2 5Y 6/6 7.5YR 5/8; 7.5YR 6/8 Common, Medium, Prominent SL Medium Suban ular Block
38 - 491- 1313 5Y 6/1 5Y 4/1 Common, Medium, Prominent SL Medium Suban ular Block

Ilvdric Soil Indicators
[ [ Ilistosol [
1 llistic Epipedon [
] ] Sullidic Odor [
[ J Aquatic Moist Regime [
J Reducing Conditions [ J Organic Streaking
[ Cleyed or Low-Chroma Colors [ ] Listed on Local llydric Soils List
J Concretions [ ] Listed on National llydric Soils List
] High Organic % in Surface Layer [ [ Other (explain in remarks)
Remarks:

WETLAND DETE RM I NATI ON
[ x J Ilydrophytic Vegetation Present
[ J llydric Soils Present
[ [ Wetland Hydrology Presort
[ ] 'his Data Point is a Wetland
Remarks:
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: Islamic Center of Cary
Applicant / Owner:
Investigator: Matthew D. Thomas Job Number:
City:
State: 02-SP-156
Cary
North Carolina
x l Do normal circumstances exist on the site?
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)?
Is the area a potential problem area? Community ID:
Transect ID:
Plot ID: Floodplain

WD-4
Remarks: Site located clue south of West. Chatham St.; Site only disturbed by an ephemeral stream connecting to UT to "Kildaire Farms Lake".

VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species
Trees Common Name Stratum Indicator
Aesculus sylvalica Buckeye 5% FAC
Fa us randifolia Beech 20% FAC+
Corms /lorida Dogwood 10% FACU
uereus Alba White Oak 20% FACU
Liriodendron lull ifera Tuli Tree 5% FACU

Herbaceous
Asarum ari olia Wild Ginger 5% FACU
unknown Carex Unknown sedge 20% FACW
Onoclea sens•ibilis• L. Sensitive Fern 20% FACW
Commelina comm:uais Dayflower 5% FAC

Vines
Parlhenocissus uin uefc?lia Virginia Creeper 10% FAC
.Smilers rolundi olia Greenbrier 10% FAC

Percent of Dominant Species that are 0131, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-): 66%
Remarks:

IIVDROLOGV ;
J Recorded Data (Describe in remarks)
I Stream, Lake, or Tide Gage
I Aerial Photograph
1 l Othcr (desa•ibe in remarks)

x l No Recorded Data Available

Field Observations
Depth of Surface Water:
Depth of Free Water in Pit:
Depth of Saturated Soils: Primary Wetland Hydrology
I Inundated
x 1 Saturation in upper 12"
l l Water Marks
l Drift Lines
l Sediment Deposits
l Drainage Pattern in Wetlands

0 in.
N/M
0 in Secondary Hydrology Indicators
l x l Oxidized Root Channels
1 Water-stained Leaves
l x l Local Soil Survey Data
J FAC-Neutral Test
l Other (describe in remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS'
Man Unit Name (Series and Phase)
Chewacla soils (0-2% slopes)
Taxonomy (Suberoutl):
Pine-Loamy, Mixed, Active, Thermic,
Pluvaquentic Dystrudepts Drainaee Class Confirm Manned Type
I I Excessively Drained I I Yes
I J Well Drained I x I No
I j Moderately Well Drained
I x j Somewhat Poorly Drained
I I Poorly Drained
I I Very Poorly Drained
Soil Description

Depth in.
horizon Matrix Colors
Munsell Moist Mottle Colors
Munsell Moist Mottle
Abundance/Size/Contrast
Grade
Class
Type
0-2 A 10 YR 4/3 SL Pine Granular
2- 14 Btl 2.5Y 6/1 2.5Y 4/1 Common, Medium, Distinct S1, Pine Granular
14 - 44 Bt2 2.5Y 7/1 7.5YR 5/6; 5YR 5/8 Common, Medium, Distinct SCL Medium Suban ular Block
44 - 51+ C 2.5Y 7/1 7.5YR 5/6 Common, Medium, prominent SCL Medium Suban ular Block

Ilydric Soil Indicators
I Ilistosol I I Reducing Conditions I I Organic Streaking
j I Ilistic Epipedon I x I Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors I x J Listed on Local hydric Soils List
I I Sulfidic Odor j I Concretions I I Listed on National Ilydric Soils List
I Aquatic Moist Regime ( I High Organic % in Surface Layer I I Other (explain in remarks)
Remarks:

WETLAND DETERMINATION
J x J llydrophytic Vegetation Present
I x j Ilydric Soils Present
j x I Wetland Hydrology Present
I x I This Data Point is a Wetland
Remarks:
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: Islamic Center of Cary
Applicant / Owner:
Investigator: Matthew D. Thomas Job Number:
City:
State: 02-SP-156
Cary
North Carolina
I x I Do normal circumstances exist on the site?
I J Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)?
I I Is the area a potential problem area? Community ID:
Transect ID:
Plot ID: Upland

WD-5
Remarks: Site located due south of West. Chatham St.; Site only disturbed by an ephemeral stream connecting to UT to "Kildaire Farms Lake".

VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species
Trees Common Name Stratum Indicator
Acer rubrum Red Maple 20% FAC
Fa us randifolia Beech 10% FAC+
Cornus orida Dogwood 10% FACU
uercus Phellos Willow Oak 10% FACW-
uercus• Falcata S. Red Oak 20% FACU-

Herbaceous
Asarum ari olia Wild Ginger 20% FACU

Vines
Vilis rolundi olia Muscadine Grape 20% FAC

Percent of Dominant Species that are OIIL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-): 33%
Remarks:

HYDROLOGY ,
] ] Recorded Data (Describe in remarks)
( I Stream, Lake, or Tide Gage
I J Aerial Photograph
I ] Other (describe in remarks)

I x ] No Recorded Data Available

Field Observations
Depth of Surface Water:
Depth of Free Water in Pit:
Depth of Saturated Soils: Primary Wetland Hydrology Indicators
] ] Inundated
] ] Saturation in upper 12"
] ] Water Marks
I ] Drift Lines
I I Sediment Deposits
Drainage Pattern in Wetlands

0 in.
N/M
51+ in Secondary Hydrology Indicators
] ] Oxidized Root Channels
I J Water-stained Leaves
I J Local Soil Survey Data
( I FAC-Neutral Test
I ] Other (describe in remarks)
Remarks:
soil's
Man Unit Name (Series and Phase) Drainage Class Confirm Mapped Tyne
Georgeville silt loam, 6-10% slopes, eroded [ I Excessively Drained I I Yes
Taxonomy (Subgroup): [ [ Well Drained [ x I No
Fine, Kaolinitic, Thermic, Typic Kanhapludults [ x I Moderately Well Drained
[ I Somewhat Poorly Drained
[ ) Poorly Drained
( I Very Poorly Drained
Soil Description
Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle
Depth in. Horizon Munsell Moist Mansell Moist Abundance/Size/Contrast Grade Class Type
1 -2 A 2.5Y 4/2 SCL Pine Granular
2-31 Btl 2.5Y 7/3 5YR 5/8; 2.5YR 5/6 C Medium Suban ular block
31 - 39 Bt2 2.5Y 8/2 7.5YR 5/8; I OYR 7/6 Pew, Pine, Prominent C Medium Suban ular block
39 - 50 1313 5Y 8/3 5Y 8/I; 7.5YR 6/8 Common, Medium, Prominen Cl, Pine Suban ular block
51 -66+ C 7.5YR 5/8 2.5Y 8/4; 2.5Y 7/6 Pew, Fine, Distinct CI, Pine Suban ular block
2.5Y 7/2
llydric Soil Indicators
[ I Ilistosol ( I Reducing Conditions [ I Organic Streaking
[ I Ilistic Epipedon [ I Gleycd or Low-Chrome Colors [ I Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
I I Sulfidic Odor [ J Concretions [ J Listed on National Ilydric Soils List
[ I Aquatic Moist Regime I I Iligh Organic % in Surface Layer [ I Other (explain in remarks)
Remarks:

WETLAND DETERMINATION
I I llydrophytic Vegetation Present
I I Ilydric Soils Present [ [ This Data Point is a Wetland
[ ( Wetland Hydrology Present
Remarks:
MITIGATION PLANIECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT
PROGRAM CONCURRENCE
Associated Environmental Consultants & Engineers
PAN
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
i'+'licnact r- Easlev Gaw"c_'wol
Matthew D. Thomas
Associated Environmental Consultants & Engineers, Inc.
P.O. Box 31952
Raleigh, NC 27622
Subject: Project: Islamic Center of Cary
County: Wake
7 ""'s
R E- E
APR
? ? 2604
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to accept
payment for stream, buffer and wetlands impacts associated with the subject project. Please note that the decision by the NCEEP to
accept the mitigation requirements of this project does not assure that this payment will be approved by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers and the N.C. Division of Water Quality Wetlands/401 Unit. It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact these agencies
to determine if payment to the NCEEP for impacts associated with this project is appropriate.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401
Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire.
Based on the information supplied by you in a letter dated February 11, 2004, the stream, buffer and wetlands restoration that is
necessary to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements for this project is summarized in the following table. The maximum
amount of mitigation that the NCEEP will accept for this project is also indicated in this table.
Stream
(linear feet) Wetlands Riparian
(acres) Wetlands Non-
Riparian (acres) Riparian Buffer
(s q. ft.)
Impact 162 0.1065 41,758.79
Mitigation Max 324 0.213 83,635.20
The stream, non-riparian wetlands and buffer mitigation will be provided as specified in the 401 Water Quality Certification and/or
Section 404 Permit for impacts associated with the subject project in Cataloging Unit 03020201 of the Neuse River Basin. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N.C. Department of Environment
and Natural Resources and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Carol Shaw at [phone].
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Jennifer Burdette, USACOE-Raleigh
Steve Mitchell, DWQ Regional Office-Raleigh
File
?,hl
?, ROs? JrS
.?arr ( a. ,., t-t.?April 19, 2004
Revised letter of February 17, 2004
Sincerely,
9041v4a (L5-
Ronald E. Ferrell,
Director of Operations
i`1C DENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program One
1619 Nlail Service Center, Raleigh. Norih Carolina 27099-1619 NOT/mot/y?It1CaNrOt1111a
Phone, r 1?a rJi 52Qt Flaw. 9 19-733-552 1 I(i'.?f(,G ho r :'
rc. u pr sill?ial???/
Islamic Center of Cary
Designing Bic-Rention or Rain Garden for the subject site
Determining the Watershed size:
CN= 81 Combined CN value after development
A= 4.0 ac Contributed area of the Site
Runoff - R/O = (P-0.2S)^2/(P+0.8S)
S=(1000/CN)-10
for 1" precipitation
P= 1.0 in
S= 2.3
R/O= 0.10 in
Total Volume RIO = R/O.(A)
Total Volume R/O= 17070.4 sft-in
1422.5 cft
Determining size of Bio-Retention Area
Bio-Retention area = Vol / Depth
Considering a mounting of 9 inch above the bio-surface area
Surface Area, SA = Vlo./Depth
Depth 9 in 0.75 ft
Volume 1422.0 cft
SA= 1896.0 sft this mean: 94.8 about 20x95 feet
Bio-Retention Depth and Soil Type:
Bio-Retention area suppose to be filled with pervious soil type and drained underneath
We will use a 4 feet deep of sand mixed with soil and organic to work as pervious bed
and to allow vegetation to be grown
Underneath we will use a perforated pipe to drain the water from the bio-retention
Selecting Fill Soil
We select soil material which must be permeable enough to allow water to pass through
relatively quickly. However, it should retain water so it want quickly dry out
The recommended range of permeabilites=for the fill soil should be:
0.5 inches/hour to 6 inches/hour
From experience we choose:
type Conductivity Unit
75% Sand 6 in/h
15% Silt 2 in/h
10% Organic source 0.5-1 in/h (tree leaf compost)
Computing Water Draw through the bio-retention bed
Q=2.3^e-5 . A. K. AH/OL
DH
SA= 1896 sft K=0.5-6 in/h ?L
DH/DL= 1
K= 1 in/h
Q= 0.0441359 cfs
Q= 0.0441359 cfs This is the rate of draw into the bed
Computing Time to Drawdown:
1- Volume to drawdown the 9 inch
V,,= SAx9/12
V5-,= 1422 cft
Time to remove this volume:
Ts-,= Vol/Q
Ts-,= 322181 sec
8.95 h
Approx. 9.0 h
Time to Drawdown water in the bed for: 2 feet
Volume of water in bed
For porosity of 45%
n= 0.45
Volume of water in bed = SA.n.2
Vol= 1706.4 cft
Time to drawdown 2 feet
Ts-2= Vol./Q
Ts-2= 38662.4 sec
Ts-z= 10.7 h
Approx. 11 h
Total time to draw through soil
Total Time 20.0 hours
Sizing the Underdrain Pipes and Gravel Envelope
lets N = number of pipes
N=
Manning equation can be written:
N.D=16{Q.n./S^0.5}^3/8 D is in inches
Considering flow rate in pipes 10 times flow rate, and S=slope equal 0.005
Q'10= 0.4413589 cfs 10 is the safety factor
S= 0.005
n= 0.015 Manning coeff. For 4" corrugated plastic pipe
ND= 6.58 in
That is mean two corrugated 4" pipe
A gravel envelope to be placed around the drainage pipes. At least 2 inches of gravel
should cover the top of the pipes. The minimum thickness of the gravel layer is
dictated by the pipe diameter selected.
Islamic Center of Cary
Level Spreader Design for the Interior Road
The area contributed to the level spreader is the interior road leading to the parking lot:
A = 11250 sq-ft 0.25826446 ac
C = 0.95
1 = 1 in/h
Q= C.I.A
Q= 0.245351 cfs
Peak flow to managed by level spreader is 0.25 cfs
Flow bypass:
A grass swale employing turf reinforced matting should be considered to take the flow
from 10 year storm event. Swale to be designed for 3.9 in/h
Considering down slope ground cover is Grass, allowed velocity for level spreader will be: 1.33 fps
Weir equation:
Q= V.A= Cw.L.H3r2 -I
Cw 3
L 15 ft Gravel level
H 0.02 ft spreader
A L.(2/3).(H)
V= 1.5.Cw.H'2
Velocity allowed for level spreader is 1/3 of the down slope erosive velocity
in case of grass allowed velocity is: 1.33 fps
for 10 yr storm and I = 3.9 in
Q= (3.9)(0.258)(0.95) = 0.95 cfs
Q= V.A = V.(2/3).H.L
0.95= 1.33(2/3)(0.058)(L)
L= 18.5 ft
0.95= 1.5(2/3)(0.074)(L)
0.95= 1.33(2/3)(0.058)(L)
0.95= (0.67)(2/3)(0.015)(L)
Grass Case
Gravel Case L= 12 ft
Thicket Shrub,Grass L=18 ft
Mulch Case L=141 ft
1 46 treated wood
Simple level spreader length calculation:
L= Q / (-^.V)
X is equivalent Water Height over Level Spreader
Use table below to select Length
Flow - cfs Down Slope Cover Length of Level Spreader-ft
1 Grass 13
2 Grass 26
3 Grass 36
5 Grass 65
10 Grass 130
1 Grass 9
2 Grass 18
3 Grass 27
5 Grass 45
10 Grass 90
1 Thicket (shrubs/ grass) 13
2 Thicket (shrubs/ grass) 26
3 Thicket (shrubs/ grass) 39
5 Thicket (shrubs/ grass) 65
10 Thicket (shrubs/ grass) 130
1 Mulch (trees/shrubs) 100
2 Mulch trees/shrubs) 200
3 Mulch (trees/shrubs) 300
5 Mulch trees/shrubs) N/A
10 Mulch trees/shrubs) N/A
For the purpose of our inlet, using Level spreader with a minimum of 15 ft long should be sufficient
for the cases of Grass, Gravel or Shrub/Grass down slope cover.
BIORETENTION AREAS WETLAND OPERATION
AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
The wetland defined as the proposed building construction at 1155 W. Chatham
Street, Cary, North Carolina, (UT to "Kildaire Farms Lake", McGregor Downs Lake
(Swift Creek).
Maintenance activities shall be performed as follows:
1. After every significant runoff producing rainfall event and at least monthly:
a. Inspect the Bioretention Areas for sediment accumulation, erosion, trash
accumulation, vegetated cover, and general condition.
b. Check and clear of any obstructions such that drawdown of the temporary
pool occurs within 4 days as designed.
2. Repair eroded areas immediately, re-seed as necessary to maintain good
vegetative cover, mow vegetative cover to maintain a maximum height of six
inches, and remove trash as needed.
3. Inspect and repair the collection system (i.e. catch basins, piping, swales, riprap,
etc.) quarterly to maintain proper functioning.
4. Remove previous mulch layer before applying new layer semi-annually.
Removed mulch/sediment shall be disposed of in an appropriate manner and
shall be handled in a manner that will not adversely impact water quality (i.e.
stockpiling near the Bioretention Areas or stream, etc.).
The measuring device used to determine the sediment elevation shall be such
that it will give an accurate depth reading and not readily penetrate into
accumulated sediments.
5. Remove cattails and other indigenous wetland plants when they cover 50% of
the Bioretention Areas surface. These plants shall be encouraged to grow along
the vegetated shelf and berm.
Wetland planting densities in the marsh areas should be maintained by
replanting bare areas as needed. Wetland plants should be encouraged to grow
in the marsh areas.
6. If the basin must be drained for an emergency or to perform maintenance, the
flushing of sediment through the emergency drain shall be minimized to the
maximum extent practical.
Page I of 2
7. All components of the Bioretention Areas shall be maintained in good working
order.
8. Level spreaders or other structures that provide diffuse flow shall be maintained
every six months. All accumulated sediment and debris shall be removed from
the structure, and a level elevation shall be maintained across the entire flow
spreading structure. Any down gradient erosion must be repaired and/or
replanted as necessary.
I acknowledge and agree by my signature below that I am responsible for the
performance of the seven maintenance procedures listed above. I agree to notify
DWQ of any problems with the system or prior to any changes to the system or
responsible party.
Print name:
Title:
Address:
Phone:
Signature:-
Date:
Note: The legally responsible party should not be a homeowners association unless
more than 50% of the lots have been sold and a resident of the subdivision
has been named the president.
a Notary Public for the State of
County of , do hereby certify that
personally appeared before me this
day of , and acknowledge the due
execution of the forgoing wet [wetland] detention basin maintenance requirements.
Witness my hand and official seal,
SEAL
My commission expires
Page 2 of 2
PLAN VIEW
PERMANENT SOIL
REINFORCEMENT
MATTING (PSRM)
(SEE NOTE)
12"0 DIP OUTLET
(RIP RAP IN BASIN NOT
SHOWN FOR CLARITY) A
FLOW
SQUARE PREFORMED
SCOUR HOLE (PSH)
SEED WITH NATIVE _i 7.75 FT.
GRASSES AT INSTALLATION. 11.75 FT
SECTION A-A
INSTALL LEVEL AND FLUSH
WITH NATURAL GROUND.
LEVEL SPREADER ID: L=«2
Drainage Ares: 0.25 ac.
Impervious Area: 0.25 ac.
Max. Discharge from a 10 Year Storm: 0.9 cfs.
Max. Discharge at Level Spreader: 0.25 cfs.
Filter Strip/Buffer Vegetation: Grass + Mulch
Max. Filter Strip/Buffer Slope: 6%
Length: 15.75 ft.
12"0 DIP
S?Op 4 FT.
F 1 FT.
FLOW-- NATURAL
I I GROUND
RIP RAP LINER W/ FILTER TUCK PERMANENT SOIL
FABRIC (SEE NOTES) REINFORCEMENT
NCDOT CLASS 'A' RIP RAP
-9" THICK MATTING (PSRM)
LEVEL SPREADER APRON
(NTS)
LEVEL SPREADER/SCOUR HOLE DETAILS
NTS
'NOTES-
RIP RAP LINER SHALL BE UNDERLAIN
WITH MIRAFI FILTERWEAVE 700 OR
APPROVED EQUIVALENT.
2. PERMANENT SOIL RE-INFORCEMENT
MATTING SHALL BE LANDLOK TRM 450
OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT.
3. BOTH THE RIP RAP UNDERLINER AND
THE LANDLOK TRM 450 SHALL BE
INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER'S
SPECIFICATIONS.
PLAN VI$W
PERMANENT SOIL
REINFORCEMENT
MATTING (PSRM) INSTALL LEVEL AND FLUSH
(SEE NOTE) WITH NATURAL GROUND.
12"0 DIP OUTLET ~
LEVEL SPREADER ID: LS -3
(RIP RAP IN BASIN NOT
SHOWN FOR CLARITY) A A Drainage Ares: 0.25 ac.
Impervious Area: 0.25 ac.
FLOW
J ^ Max. Discharge from a 10 Year Storm: 0.9 cfs.
Max. Discharge at Level Spreader: 0.25 cfs.
Filter Strip/Buffer Vegetation: Grass + Mulch
SQUARE PREFORMED Max. Filter Strip/Buffer Slope: 6%
SCOUR HOLE (PSH) Length: 15.75 ft.
SEED WITH NATIVE -i 7.75 FT.
GRASSES AT INSTALLATION.
FT.
MOMON A A
F/(? 12"O DIP
S? Op 4 FT_
F 1 FT.
FLOIAL--- ?'•? NATURAL
r- =GROUND
FABRIC (SEE NOTES) RIP RAP LINER W/ FILTER 3 ?CK PERMANENT SOIL NCDOT CLASS 'A' RIP RAP REINFORCEMENT
-9° THICK MATTING (PSRM)
LEVEL SPREADER APRON
(NTS)
LEVEL SPREADER/SCOUR HOLE DETAILS
NTS
NOTES:
1. RIP RAP LINER SHALL BE UNDERLAIN
WITH MIRAFI FILTERWEAVE 700 OR
APPROVED EQUIVALENT.
2. PERMANENT SOIL RE-INFORCEMENT
MATTING SHALL BE LANDLOK TRM 450
OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT.
3. BOTH THE RIP RAP UNDERLINER AND
THE LANDLOK TRM 450 SHALL BE
INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER'S
SPECIFICATIONS.
PLAN VIEW
PERMANENT SOIL
REINFORCEMENT
MATTING (PSRM) INSTALL LEVEL AND FLUSH
(SEE NOTE) WITH NATURAL GROUND.
12"0 DIP OUTLET LEVEL SPREADER ID: LS-4
(RIP RAP IN BASIN NOT
SHOWN FOR CLARITY) A A Drainage Ares: 0.25 ac.
Impervious Area: 0.25 ac.
FLOW U
Max. Discharge from a 10 Year Storm: 0.9 cfs.
J 10 rl?
Max. Discharge at Level Spreader: 0.25 cfs.
Filter Strip/Buffer Vegetation: Grass + Mulch
SQUARE PREFORMED Max. Filter Strip/Buffer Slope: 6%
SCOUR HOLE (PSH) Length: 15.75 ft.
SEED WITH NATIVE J 7.7
GRASSES AT INSTALLATION.
FT.
>> EMON A A
F/z? 12"0 DIP
S? 4 FT_
Op F 1 FT.
FLO:". ?'•' ? NATURAL
GROUND
RIP RAP LINER W/ FILTER TUCK PERMANENT SOIL "37 5 FABRIC (SEE NOTES) REINFORCEMENT
NCDOT CLASS 'A' RIP RAP MATTING (PSRM)
-9" THICK
LEVEL SPREADER APRON
(NTS)
LEVEL SPREADER/SCOUR HOLE DETAILS
NTS
NOTES:
1. RIP RAP LINER SHALL BE UNDERLAIN
WITH MIRAFI FILTERWEAVE 700 OR
APPROVED EQUIVALENT.
2. PERMANENT SOIL RE-INFORCEMENT
MATTING SHALL BE LANDLOK TRM 450
OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT.
3. BOTH THE RIP RAP UNDERLINER AND
THE LANDLOK TRM 450 SHALL BE
INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER'S
SPECIFICATIONS.
ENGINE F RING DEPARTMENT
April 22, 2004
Kamal Essaid, P.E.
Associated Environmental Consultants and Engineers, Inc.
P.O. Box 31952
Raleigh, NC 27622-1952
Subject Property: Islamic Center of Cary - 1155 W. Chatham Street
Dear Mr. Essaid:
The Town of Cary Transportation Plan requires this portion of W. Chatham Street to have an ultimate 45' back-to-back
street section with sidewalk on both sides, within a minimum 67' right-of-way. It currently exists as an approximate 25'
wide, 2 lane road within a 60' right-of-way.
Town Ordinance requires the developer, as part of overall site development, to do the following (taken from Town of
Cary Land Development Ordinance Section 8.2.2):
Dedicate any additional right-of-way necessary to achieve the width required by the Town's Transportation
Plan for all streets adjoining the property;
Install curbs and gutters along all streets adjoining the property and to pave all streets adjoining the property,
in accordance with the requirements set out in the Town's Standard Specifications and Details Manual and the
Town's Transportation Plan.
Install sidewalks and pedestrian pathways in accordance with the requirements set out in the Town's Standard
Specifications and Details Manual where the Town Council or Planning and Zoning Board determines that
the public safety and convenience warrant in view of existing and expected pedestrian traffic
Because improvements to adjacent streets are ordinance requirements, any waiver of the above requirements must be
granted by full Town Council; however, based on our April 20, 2004 meeting regarding DWQ concerns, staff would be
willing to support the following (which will ultimately have to be approved by Town Council):
1.) Widen W. Chatham Street to the full 3 lanes (45' back-to-back) at the project driveway to allow for a separate left
turn lane into the site, then taper back down to 2-lanes towards the railroad bridge.
2.) Provide an 11' shoulder behind back-of-curb with no sidewalk.
3.) Provide a 1:1 slope beyond shoulder with geotechnical engineer seal and signature.
Please feel free to contact me regarding the above information should you have any questions. I can be reached at (919)
462-3933.
Sincerely,
Tammy . Spivey
Engineer
A I ??
TOWN Of CARY
318 North Academy Suet -Cary, NC 27513-PO Box 8005-Cary, NC 27512-8005 "'/ r
tel [phone] - fax [phone]- www.townofcary.org V'b 11 by Mv., My.oer
OtO? W A T ?9QG
65 7
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
September'}, 2004
Mr. Shakil Ahmad
P.O. Box 31952
Raleigh, NC 27622-1952
Dear Mr. Ahmad:
RE: Islamic Center of Cary
DWQ # 03-0482
Wake County
r=1 fi:z, r=
D
OCT 1 4 ?D4
DD! N, - WF; ER QUALITY
WETLANDS Al"ID 3`1 ORMWA7ER BRANCH
In response to our office meeting on August 2, 2004, DWQ staff have visited the site of
the proposed Islamic Center of Cary to determine if the smaller channel that enters the site from
across W. Chatham Street is subject to the Neuse River Buffer rules (15A NCAC 2B. 0233) (see
attached map). The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) has determined that the surface
water labeled as "A" on the attached map is at least an intermittent stream and is subject
to the Neuse River Buffer Rule. This stream and it's associated buffers should be identified
on any future plans for this property. The owner (or future owners) should notify the DWQ (and
other relevant agencies) of this decision in any future correspondences concerning this property.
This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. In the context
of your project, this determination will affect the amount of buffer mitigation required for the
project since the widening of Chatham Street will unavoidably impact this channel. Please
address this issue when you resubmit your application to address the issues raised in our August
2, 2004 meeting.
Landowners or affected parties that dispute a determination made by the DWQ or
Delegated Local Authority that a surface water exists and that it is subject to the buffer rule may
request a determination by the Director. A request for a determination by the Director shall be
referred to the Director in writing c/o John Dorney, DWQ Wetlands/401 Unit, 2321 Crabtree
Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260. Individuals that dispute a determination by the DWQ or
Delegated Local Authority that "exempts" a surface water from the buffer rule may ask for an
adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter.
Applicants are hereby notified that the 60-day statutory appeal time does not start until the
affected party (including downstream and adjacent landowners) is notified of this decision.
DWQ recommends that the applicant conduct this notification in order to be certain that third
party appeals are made in a timely manner. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which
conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative
Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This determination is final and
binding unless you ask for a hearing within 60 days.
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: httn://h 2o. en r. state. tic.us/ncwetlands
r hC
Narolina
Naturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer-50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
w
This letter only addresses the applicability to the buffer rules and does not approve any
activity within the buffers. Nor does this letter approve any activity within Waters of the United
States or Waters of the State. If you have any additional questions or require additional
information please call Mr. Ed Schwartzman at 715-3477 if you have any questions.
BZljrd
Enclosures: Attached map
cc: Mike Horan, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Ed Schwartzman
Filename: 0304821slamicCenterofCary(Wake)Streamid
17\ COX\
7
EXI TING
AS HALT
USGS (50 DRD) EXIST
EL=422.66 ...
\} 0

DN BASIN ,T dries r y ?' ... __ ...' . .
lic
.. e?i AN}tJN?NY . .
/ / ` •rf , \•' . r . . T • •i•? .' .'. . r \ r • ., y •i-.4,f`rr .•r' , fl
I11"' \ . . . .,r•. ?•r'. . •. • • . ..r? mot- _ _ '_ r • . t ;',f ?r.1 ' • • • • r i r .? .'r'r \'\\ r
. ...... `\*
/ AND \, 2,,9H60LL?? . .
3+00
DRIVEWAY 2 B /B
x\300 'SHOULDER
15'LEEL
\\ ? PREA R*
loo
\?? SSW B
O7VRF"
4.0
05
to 1
(l C T 4 2004
DFR2 - WATER QUALITY
WETL 0. OS KqD STORMWATER BVNCH
PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION (PCN)
APPLICATION FORM
Associated Environmental Consultants & Engineers
Office Use Only:
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
[ x ] Section 404 Permit
[ ] Section 10 Permit
[ x ] 401 Water Quality Certification
[ x ] Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
[ ] Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 12,14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401
Certification is not requested, check here: [ ]
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is
proposed for mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCEEP prior to
submittal of PCN), complete Section VIII and check here: [ x ]
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed
on page 4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal
Management Area of Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further
details), check here: [ ]
United States Army Corp of Engineers Pg. I
III. Project Information
1. Name of Project: Islamic Center of Cary
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0753852781 (REID #0071252)
4. Location
a. County: Wake
b. Nearest Town: Cary
c. Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): 102 Trimble Ave.
d. Directions to site (including road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Downtown
Cary, Chatham St. going west; g0 1/3 mile after passing SW Maynard Rd.,
Property on left (immediately after church)
e. Site coordinates, if available (UTM): 17 698445E 3960751N
(WGS84NAD83); CM Quad
5. Property size (acres): 4.64
6. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): UT to "Kildaire
Farms Lake", MacGregor Downs Lake (Swift Creek)
7. River Basin: Neuse
8. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of
the project at the time of this application: Adjacent land with one dwelling;
adjacent property: church, residences, fire station, commercial
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Project consists of building a church and religious school, including a parking lot,
with moderate weight construction equipment
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Wetland impact required to expand
the road as per Town of CM requirements (addition of a turning lane, sidewalk,
and road slope) and access road to the propert
y
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 3
IV. Prior Project History
The project originally planned for the access road to join the Site via W. Chatham St.
This plan required a T-intersection over wetlands and a stream on the property, in order
to allow traffic flow on the project site would be adequate Figure 5). After discussing
the project with the NCDENR-401 Certification Unit, the project scope was then reduced
to a single access road to the Site to minimize the impact on the wetlands and stream on
the property. Additional changes include cutting back on the sidewalk along the NW
portion of the property in order to reduce stream impact. The toe slope for the W.
Chatham St. extension was also reduced from 3:1 to a retaining wall in order to reduce
the wetland and stream impact. Further reductions were made regarding relocation of
level spreaders and bioretention ponds outside of the buffer zone.
V. Future Project Plans
No future permits are anticipated for this project.
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 4
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
Proposed impacts planned on site include a 28' access road that intersects the
perennial stream on the property, extension of W. Chatham from two lane to three
(includes extending side slope into wetlands), and placement of sewer line across
wetlands and streams.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:

Wetland Impact Site

Number
*
Type of Impact Area of

Impact

(acres) Located within

100-year

Floodplain**
Distance to Nearest

Stream (liner feet)
Type of

Wetland***
1 Retaining Wall 0.001 Yes Adjacent Forested
2 Drainage, Fill 0.0378 Yes Adjacent Forested
3

* 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood
Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps.
Total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.2814 ac
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.039 ae
Individually list all Intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:

Stream Impact
Site Number
Type of Impact Length of
Impact
(linear feet)'
Stream Name* Average Width of
Stream Before
Impact i
Steam Type
I Fill I UT 2' Perennial
2 Fill, Drainage 100 UT 2' Perennial

Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 101 ft
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 5
4. Individually list all open water impacts below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number
Type of Impact Area of Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Waterbody
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should
be included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed
pond should be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this
application.
Pond to be created in: [ ] uplands [ ] stream [ ] wetlands
Describe the method of construction:
Proposed use or purpose of pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond:
Expected pond surface area:
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 6
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
The project for the Islamic Center of Cary originally called for one building that spread
across 4.64 acres. This plan affects one UT's of Kildare Farm Lake. The project was
originally designed to allow an access road on the property to connect via W. Chatham
St. In order to allow adequate traffic flow on the site, the plan required a T-intersection
over wetlands and a stream on the property (Figure 5). After discussing the project with
the NCDENR-401 Certification Unit, the project scope was then redesigned. The current
design reduces the size of the road to a single access road intersecting the stream, thus
minimizing the impact of wetlands and stream on the property. Additional reductions
include cutting back on the sidewalk along the NW portion of the property to reduce
stream impact. The toe slope for the W. Chatham St. extension was also reduced from a
3:1 to a retaining wall in order to reduce stream and wetland impact.
The following changes have recently been included in the proposed project:
• Sidewalk along W. Chatham St. was removed.
• Reduction in shoulder from behind the curb to end of impacted are
was reduced from fifteen feet to eleven feet (Approved by Town of
Cary as per attached letter).
• The slope behind shoulder remains eleven feet and is approved by
the Town of Cary (attached letter).
• The access road on SITE now has the sidewalk located on the South
side and the shoulder behind the sidewalk and curb has been changed
from five feet to two feet.
• Stream impacts have been reduced from 162 liner feet to 101 linear
feet.
• Wetland impacts have been reduced from 0.0765 ac (3,332 sq. ft.) to
0.039 ac (1,699 sq ft).
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 7
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .05 00, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of
impacts to freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts
to perennial streams
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of
Nationwide Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will
be required when necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are
minimal. Factors including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative
value of the impacted aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of
appropriate and practicable mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be
appropriate and practicable include, but are not limited to: reducing the size of the
project; establishing and maintaining wetland and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect
open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of aquatic resource functions and
values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar functions and values,
preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in
order for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any
application lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on
hold as incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for
stream restoration in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan:
The proposed mitigation plan for the Site includes minimizing stream impact by
reducing the length of sidewalks, reducing the slope of W. Chatham St. extension
and redesigning the access road in order to minimize the crossing area. A 50 foot
vegetated buffer (Meuse River Buffer Rules) will remain on the property where
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 8
development is not planned. In addition, payment will be made to the NCEEP to
offset 24,701 square feet of required buffer mitigation.
2. Mitigation payment to the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
(NCEEP)
a. Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0
b. Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 9,860
i. Sidewalk impact in buffer (square feet): 690
ii. Road crossing, shoulder, & embankment impact
located in buffer (square feet): 9,170
c. Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
d. Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
e. Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 9
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use
of public (federal/state) land? [ ] Yes [ x ] No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document
pursuant to the requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? [ ] Yes [ ] No
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so,
please attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
[ ] Yes [ ] No
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 10
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts
to required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must
be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan (Figure
4). All buffers must be shown on a map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the
buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ Regional Office may be included as
appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B
.0233 (Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250
(Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other
( )? [x]Yes [ ] No
?0-
GP
Zone* Impact Multiplier Required
( eet) Mitigation
I 6 0.627'. 3 19,321.881
3,585.977 1.5 5,378.965
L Total 10,026.P& 24,700.846
* Zone 1 extends out 30 ft 01pendicular from near bank of
channel; Zone 2 extends an additional 20 feet from the edge
of Zone 1.
2. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is
proposed. Please attach all appropriate information as identified within 15A
NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
The proposed buffer mitigation for the Site involves pavment to the Riparian
Buffer Restoration Fund. The maximum amount of mitigation that the NCEEP
will accept for this vroiect is 83,635.20 sa ft. It has been determined that only
24,700.846 sq ft will be affected.
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 11
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) verses total acreage on
the site. Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters
and wetlands downstream from the property.
Total site area is 4.6 acres. The imperviousness after development will be 39 %
which is equal to 1.8 acres, including the buffer. The proposed stormwater
control is a bio-retention area in front of building. The bio-retention basin will
consist of two sections: 45 ft x 20 ft and 15 ft x 60 ft. The bio-retention areas are
located in front of the building where it can receive the runoff from the parking
lots, sidewalk, and rooftop of the building. The runoff from the parking lots will
be collected through two trenches filled with 6-inch stone and gravel. Runoff
collected on SITE will be conveyed to the bio-retention areas via piping. The bio-
retention area is 4.0 feet deems with a one-foot laver of sand below; this will allow
adequate drainage of stormwater. The ponding design is 9 inches above the bio-
retention groundcover, allowing storms larger than 1 inch first flush to be drained
through a weir. The weir will be 4 ft. x 4 ft., with an elevation 9 inches above the
bio-retention ground cover. Groundcover for the bio-retention area will be set at
elevation 422.00 and the weir will be set to a elevation of 422.75. (Fi u? re 6)
Bioretention and level spreader calculations are attached to this report. A road
drain has been added to the access road that will collect stormwater that drains
through a protected pipe outlet, with a flared section and riprap. Stormwater
treatment will include a level spreader before entering the riparian buffer.
Worksheets for bioretention areas and level spreaders are attached in the back of
this report.
Maintenance guidelines for bioretention areas and level spreaders are attached,
signed, and notarized. Plant selection for trees, shrubs, and groundcover can be
found in the Final Site Plan.
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 12
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
1. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or
discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available
capacity of the subject facility.
A sewer line will be constructed from the building (on site), then run off site
across a 20' stream easement along an UT to a 20' public sewer easement
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
1. Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any
Buffer Rules? [ ] Yes [x]NO
2. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? [ ] Yes [ x ] No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional)
1. Constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules.
Inclement weather, building permits, City of Cary approval
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Date
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 13
MYC. cam'. ceaz
Hr?
M'yc
r \ nr.zJ'>-. 'ti 'GLC? Ci - l4 \\ - ?? =IYS K2
l -f
G202
AsK
MYC i-" l:x LL ??-- _ '??., r.?? ?z ia?- -- • *?A51
j MYC -? Vic. G4 c y'6RD•
?^Ay0 - - ,?,. -s ?.v ?.-.? t f ?Hn; ?'CG"\?a t •?frL2 .s+,? ? G:? ' ?a?
TPD
,- •G.8 _ ?_?Gdi.? =:r -,GIL ./may v-'T?y/ ;r?--mot - ,? ?• !, I?_? -
4YC `A G`G I irC - ?,M1 ?< `P
Cr82 CdC2'•, ) GLB2
Ena2 z K:; 1 //T ?'`• . r 2 y/ ?=?t .yam
?r -N1s82 EnBZ =/?//u !?!, err f A
c / G282 '? V SAD are
S4!q-t r -mac _ ,`s5 .; 77, -fd..' % / /'+'?t? _ r? 1.;,?-S ?? ?.?..
a' `/; Xiyl A - CrtGaBZ1
Rrt«<///
r
? ? Sf ? ?'? % ? E2'E• ?.'??r+'' . / ? ?/??,?y?"Hrt,"y„`',e.^ rr _vn? -J? ? -r^rk •. ? ? _' ?... ?
( t/J /'.: \ . Y s 1 _ A
\ sC 11
NsL ?{rte c: `? s I?CLtiL? ' ?_ /
7 t;:
Hc?y:' -Ca•^CG?Ci -'?- j? 9 ?`?c Y I Y N(B2I
/•.i-` _.?NsB G :..?t• _ ?1 ..r:, -,+?, s ? -. ? '.'-` _ ?^r ?,?t,? .` ?, ?_.ar ,GLf?`_'+` C?is2('?..? ? 1i?. 1•s':
?N " ? -r* is ?;4 ?? eC2
GeD2
CaB2
1- v c• `C'°.?•?,t - ,?'?-1J4? a?_' Hfu:!- 'v_ •.1? r` !1? `? ?1 ?r/p? -r
Cry r I 1 l L ? k /Ec aC
HrC Hr r p C As82? li
1 l '.rP r o.j `r v' S i T ir'-. G2172
H, CeB2
/ .r s? ?tl: - [ ? rIrBZ ?_ •21.E a ? I
Ws &t6 0. '1Ge,32 ??/ ? ? r 1 1 -'N
A B _Y
W 'N i
sC2?
<©I' may' \ GLd2.
?Gea
?,tr HrBZ \P? ?l M GeD2I / /f `AsC2
< < - -? CrB2 .ETB2IV` I ( I \ ?Ca82
14 C2
'Tr
c- /' ?CeC F l` ASK
WSB2 »+?R Ct8 ^Y 1 ?` N? ?/ apa27 - ?S oe's ??v
OA _
-rte ,w_r a J .-.tE_\?•.(?. -l-•S .r :? /'??,iJr/?. _., iL, ^ .:rt32 ,? ,?? .'%w' /r. l"?r ? - '•+ . 'n.,at+.s?*.'"-_-?`?.
WAKE CO[.TITY SOIL SURVEY NIAP =SSCCL-kTED ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
ISLAMIC CENTER OF CARY AND ENGINEERS, INC.
CARY, NORTH CAROLINA R_AL-EIGH, NORTH CAROLINA k
I
FIGURE 3 MARCH 2-00-1 Project No. 5029
i
Darcy's Law applied to a rain garden
cross-section. Specific discharge (q) is equal to
hydraulic conductivity (F) multiplied by the ratio of
water height (AH) divided by layer thickness (L).
Curb stops
Outlet
Waterflow

?Y
III' "??"
?y
Overland flow from parking lot into rain
garden/bio-retention area. Water flows between
parking stops before spilling into the bio-retention
median.
Parking lot sheetflow
\'?Y •YG Y.•••'-•••1'f?•... ••-.•.'.•.Y•...:YfYGYY
`''•sY GY.?•YfiYi •Y. V. i. MI.VYYV{Gi?YYY•.•YYY?
\,`\.{•G ifY.:YGiVY•-?i+•i Yf••}???f. Y•G:•Y•GY

E.- • Rfc
v
Stone diaphragm
Grass filter strip
Optional sand layer
ipc.
g`E Gravel curtain
Overflow - drain overflow
"catch basin" \ Berm
Plan view of a rain garden/bio-retention area. Reproduced from.Stormwater Modules with permission from the
Center for Watershed Protection.
* Hunt, W.F. and Nancy White. Urban Waterways: Designing Rain Gardens (Bio-Retention Areas). NC Cooperative Extension
Service-Mid Neuse Non Point Source Team. pgs 6-9. 2001.
PROPOSED STORMWATER BMP - BIOGARDEN ASSOCIATED ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
ISLAMIC CENTER OF CARY AND ENGINEERS, INC.
CARY, NORTH CAROLINA RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
FIGURE 6 MARCH 2004 Project No. 5029
Drainage pipes with gravei envelope
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual) -
Project / Site: Islamic Center of Cary
Applicant / Owner:
Investigator: Matthew D. Thomas Job Number:
City:
State: 02-SP-156
Cary
North Carolina
[ x] Do normal circumstances exist on the site?
[ ] Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)?
[ ] Is the area a potential problem area? Community ID: Floodplain
Transect ID:
Plot ID: WD-1
Remarks: Site located due south of West. Chatham St.; Site only disturbed by an ephemeral stream connecting to UT to "Kildaire Farms Lake".

VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species
Tree Common Name Stratum Indicator
Acer rubrum Red Maple 40% FAC
Acer saccharum Sugar Maple 10% FACU-
Cornus orida Dogwood 10% FACU

Herbaceous
Toxicodendron radicans Posion Iv 50% FAC
unknown Carex Unknown sedge 20% FACW

Vine
Parthenocissus uin ue oiia Virginia Creeper 20% FAC

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-): 1000%
Remarks:

HYDROLOGY
[ ] Recorded Data (Describe in remarks)
[ ] Stream, Lake, or Tide Gage
[ J Aerial Photograph
[ ] Other (describe in remarks)

[x] No Recorded Data Available

Field Observations
Depth of Surface Water:
Depth of Free Water in Pit:
Depth of Saturated Soils: Primary Wetland Hydrology Indicators
[ ] Inundated
[ x ] Saturation in upper 12"
[ ] Water Marks
[ ] Drift Lines
[ ] Sediment Deposits
[ ] Drainage Pattern in Wetlands

0 in.
N/M
4 in. Secondary Hydrology Indicators
[ x ] Oxidized Root Channels
[ ] Water-stained Leaves
[ ] Local Soil Survey Data
[ ] FAC-Neutral Test
[ J Other (describe in remarks)
ffi77 I
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase) Drainage Class Confirm Manned Tvpe
Herndon Series ] ] Excessively Drained [ ] Yes
Taxonomy (Subgroup): [ ] Well Drained [ x ] No
Fine, Kaolinitic, Thermic, Typic Kanhapludults [ ] Moderately Well Drained
[ [ Somewhat Poorly Drained
[ x ] Poorly Drained
[ [ Very Poorly Drained
Soil Description

Depth in.
Horizon Matrix Colors
Mansell Moist Mottle Colors
Munsell Moist Mottle
Abundance/Size/Contrast
Grade
Class
Type
1-4 A I OYR 4/3 SL Fine Granular
4- 10 Btl 5Y 5/2 7.5 YR 5/8 Few, Fine, Distinct SCL Medium Suban ular Block
10 - 24 Bt2 5Y 7/1 5YR 5/8, 2.5Y 8/6 Common, Medium-Fine, Distinc t CL Medium Suban ular Block
24 - 38+ Bt3 2.5Y 6/3 5YR 5/8, 7.5YR 5/6 Common, Medium, Prominent CL Medium Suban ular Block

Hydric Soil Indicators
[ ] Histosol [ x ] Reducing Conditions [ [ Organic Streaking
[ ] Histic Epipedon [ [ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors [ [ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
[ ] Sulfidic Odor [ ] Concretions [ [ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
[ ] Aquatic Moist Regime [ J High Organic % in Surface Layer [ [ Other (explain in remarks)
Remarks: Oxidized root channels noted in BtI

WETLAND DETERMINATION
[ x ] Hydrophytic Vegetation Present
[ x ] Hydric Soils Present [ x ] This Data Point is a Wetland
[ x [ Wetland Hydrology Present
Remarks:
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: Islamic Center of Cary
Applicant / Owner:
Investigator: Matthew D. Thomas Job Number:
City:
State: 02-SP-156
Cary
North Carolina
[ x J Do normal circumstances exist on the site?
] ] Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)?
( ] Is the area a potential problem area? Community ID:
Transect ID:
Plot ID: Floodplain

WD-2
Remarks: Site located due south of West. Chatham St.; Site only disturbed by an ephemeral stream connecting to UT to "Kildaire Farms Lake

VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species
Trees Common Name Stratum Indicator
Acer rubrum Red Maple 40% FAC
Fa us randi olia Beech 20% FAC+
Cornus orida Dogwood 10% FACU
Ilax o aca American Holly 20% FAC-
Fraxinus americana White Ashe 10% FACU

Herbaceous
Toxicodendron radicans Posion Iv 30% FAC
unknown Carex Unknown sedge 10% FACW
Onoclea sensibilis L. Sensitive Fern 20% FACW
Commelina communis Dayflower 5% FAC

Vines
Parthenocissus uin ue olia Virginia Creeper 10% FAC
Lonicera o onica Japanese Honeysuckle 5% FAC-

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-): 100%
Remarks:

HYDROLOGY
[ ] Recorded Data (Describe in remarks
[ ] Stream, Lake, or Tide Gage
[ [ Aerial Photograph
[ ] Other (describe in remarks)

[ x ] No Recorded Data Available

Field Observations
Depth of Surface Water:
Depth of Free Water in Pit:
Depth of Saturated Soils: Primary Wetland Iiydrolog;
[ ] Inundated
[ x ] Saturation in upper 12'
[ ] Water Marks
[ ] Drift Lines
[ J Sediment Deposits
[ ] Drainage Pattern in Wetlands

0 in.
N/M
7 in. Secondary Hydrology Indicators
[ ] Oxidized Root Channels
[ J Water-stained Leaves
[ ] Local Soil Survey Data
[ J FAC-Neutral Test
[ ] Other (describe in remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase) Drainage Class Confirm Mapped Type
Herndon silt loam, 6-10%slopes, eroded [ ] Excessively Drained [ ] Yes
Taxonomy (Subgroup): ] Well Drained [ x ] No
Fine, Kaolinitic, Thermic, Typic Kanhapludults [ x ] Moderately Well Drained
[ ] Somewhat Poorly Drained
( ] Poorly Drained
[ ] Very Poorly Drained
Soil Description

Depth in.
Horizon Matrix Colors
Munsell Moist Mottle Colors
Munsell Moist Mottle
Abundance/Size/Contrast
Grade
Class
Type
1-7 A 10YR 5/3 1 OYR 3/2; 5YR 5/6 Few, Fine, Faint SL Fine Granular
7-31 Btl 5Y 6/3 7.5YR 5/6; 5Y 3/1 Common, Fine, Distinct SCL Medium Suban ular Block
31 - 40 Bt2 5Y 7/2 5Y 4/4; 5YR 5/8 Common, Medium, Prominen CL Medium Subanular Block
40 - 51+ Bt3 10YR 6/1 5YR 8/1 Few, Fine, Distinct CL Medium Subanular Bloc

Hydric Soil Indicators
[ ] Histosol [ ] Reducing Conditions [ ] Organic Streaking
[ ] Histic Epipedon [ ] Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors [ ] Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
[ ] Sulfidic Odor [ ] Concretions [ ] Listed on National Hydric Soils List
[ ] Aquatic Moist Regime [ j High Organic % in Surface Layer [ ] Other (explain in remarks)
Remarks: Oxidized root channels noted in Btl

WETLAND .DETERMINATION
[ x ] Hydrophytic Vegetation Present
[ ] Hydric Soils Present [ ] This Data Point is a Wetland
[ x ] Wetland Hydrology Present
Remarks:
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual):
Project / Site: Islamic Center of Cary
Applicant / Owner:
Investigator: Matthew D. Thomas Job Number:
City:
State: 02-SP-156
Cary
North Carolina
[ x ] Do normal circumstances exist on the site?
[ J Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)?
[ ] Is the area a potential problem area? Community ID:
Transect ID:
Plot 1D: Riverine

WD-3
Remarks: Site located due south of West. Chatham St.; Site only disturbed by an ephemeral stream connecting to UT to "Kildaire Farms Lake".

VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species
Trees Common Name Stratum Indicator
cer rubrum Red Maple 20% FAC
Fa us randi olia Beech 20% FAC+
Cornus orida Dogwood 5% FACU
Car inus caroliniana Ironwood 10% FAC

Herbaceous
Toxicodendron radicans Posion Iv 20% FAC
unknown Carex Unknown sedge 10% FACW
Ath rium as lenioides Southern Lad Fern 10% FAC

Vines
Parthenocissus uin ue olia Virginia Creeper 10% FAC

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-): 100%
Remarks:

HYDROLOGY
[ ] Recorded Data (Describe in remarks)
[ ] Stream, Lake, or Tide Gage
[ ] Aerial Photograph
[ [ Other (describe in remarks)

[ x ] No Recorded Data Available

Field Observations
Depth of Surface Water:
Depth of Free Water in Pit:
Depth of Saturated Soils: Primary Wetland Hydrology li
[ ] Inundated
[ J Saturation in upper 12"
[ ] Water Marks
[ ] Drift Lines
[ ] Sediment Deposits
[ J Drainage Pattern in Wetlands

0 in.
N/M
17 in. Secondary Hydrology Indicators
[ J Oxidized Root Channels
[ J Water-stained Leaves
[ ] Local Soil Survey Data
[ ] FAC-Neutral Test
[ ] Other (describe in remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Man Unit Name (Series and Phase)
Cliewacla soils (0-2% slopes)
Taxonomy (Subgroup):
Fine-Loamy, Mixed, Active, Thermic,
Fluvaquentic Dystrudepts Drainaae Class Confirm Manned Type
[ j Excessively Drained [ ] Yes
[ j Well Drained [ x j No
[ j Moderately Well Drained
[ x j Somewhat Poorly Drained
[ ] Poorly Drained
[ j Very Poorly Drained
Soil Description

Depth in.
Horizon Matrix Colors
Mansell Moist Mottle Colors
Mansell Moist Mottle
Abundance/Size/Contrast
Grade
Class
Type
1 -2 A 7.5YR 4/6 SL Fine Granular
2-16 Bt I 5Y 6/3 2.5Y 5/2; 5YR 4/6 Common, Fine Distinct SL Fine Suban ular Block
16 - 38 Bt2 5Y 6/6 7.5YR 5/8; 7.5YR 6/8 Common, Medium, Prominen SL Medium Suban ular Block
38 - 49+ Bt3 5Y 6/1 5Y 4/1 Common, Medium, Prominen SL Medium Suban ular Block

Hydric Soil Indicators
[ ] Histosol [
[ ] Histic Epipedon [
[ ] Sulfidic Odor [
[ ] Aquatic Moist Regime [
] Reducing Conditions [ j Organic Streaking
] Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors [ ] Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
] Concretions [ j Listed on National Hydric Soils List
] high Organic % in Surface Layer [ j Other (explain in remarks)
Remarks:

WETLAND DETERMINATION
[ x ] Hydrophytic Vegetation Present
[ ] Hydric Soils Present
[ ] Wetland Hydrology Present
[ j This Data Point is a Wetland
Remarks:
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: Islamic Center of Cary
Applicant / Owner:
Investigator: Matthew D. Thomas Job Number:
City:
State: 02-SP-156
Cary
North Carolina
I x I Do normal circumstances exist on the site?
] Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)?
J Is the area a potential problem area? Community ID:
Transect ID:
Plot ID: Floodplain

WD-4
Remarks: Site located due south of West. Chatham St.; Site only disturbed by an ephemeral stream connecting to UT to "Kildaire Farms Lake".

VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species
Trees Common Name Stratum Indicator
Aesculus s lvatica Buckeye 5% FAC
Fa s randi olia Beech 20% FAC+
Cornus orida Dogwood 10% FACU
uereus Alba White Oak 20% FACU
Liriodendron tuli i era Tulip Tree 5% FACU

Herbaceous
Asarum ari olia Wild Ginger 5% FACU
unknown Carex Unknown sedge 20% FACW
Onoclea sensibilis L. Sensitive Fern 20% FACW
Commelina communis Dayflower 5% FAC

Vines
Parthenocissus uin ue olia Virginia Creeper 10% FAC
Smilax rotundi olia Greenbrier 10% FAC

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-): 66%
Remarks:

HYDROLOGY
] ] Recorded Data (Describe in remarks)
( I Stream, Lake, or Tide Gage
( I Aerial Photograph
( I Other (describe in remarks)

I x ] No Recorded Data Available

Field Observations
Depth of Surface Water:
Depth of Free Water in Pit:
Depth of Saturated Soils: Primary Wetland Hydrology
( 1 Inundated
( x I Saturation in upper 12"
I Water Marks
[ I Drift Lines
I Sediment Deposits
I Drainage Pattern in Wetlands

0 in.
N/M
0 in Secondary Hydrology Indicators
I x ] Oxidized Root Channels
1 Water-stained Leaves
x ] Local Soil Survey Data
] FAC-Neutral Test
] Other (describe in remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Man Unit Name (Series and Phase)
Chewacla soils (0-2% slopes)
Taxonomy (Suberoup):
Fine-Loamy, Mixed, Active, Thermic,
Fluvaquentic Dystrudepts Drainaee Class Confirm Manned Tyne
[ ] Excessively Drained [ I Yes
[ ] Well Drained [ x I No
[ J Moderately Well Drained
[ x ] Somewhat Poorly Drained
[ ] Poorly Drained
[ J Very Poorly Drained
Soil Description

Depth in.
Horizon Matrix Colors
Munsell Moist Mottle Colors
Munsell Moist Mottle
Abundance/Size/Contrast
Grade
Class
T e
0-2 A 10 YR 4/3 SL Fine Granular
2-14 Btl 2.5Y 6/1 2.5Y 4/1 Common, Medium, Distinct SL Fine Granular
14 - 44 Bt2 2.5Y 7/1 7.5YR 5/6; 5YR 5/8 Common, Medium, Distinct SCL Medium Suban ular Block
44 - 51+ C 2.5Y 7/1 7.5YR 5/6 Common, Medium, Prominen SCL Medium Suban ular Block

Hydric Soil Indicators
[ ] Histosol [ J Reducing Conditions [ ] Organic Streaking
J ] Histic Epipedon [ x J Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors [ x ] Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
[ J Sulfidic Odor ( J Concretions [ ] Listed on National Hydric Soils List
[ ] Aquatic Moist Regime [ ] High Organic % in Surface Layer [ J Other (explain in remarks)
Remarks:

WETLAND DETERMINATION
[ x ] Hydrophytic Vegetation Present
[ x ] Hydric Soils Present
[ x ] Wetland Hydrology Present
[ x I This Data Point is a Wetland
Remarks:
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: Islamic Center of Cary
Applicant / Owner:
Investigator: Matthew D. Thomas Job Number:
City:
State: 02-SP-156
Cary
North Carolina
[ x ] Do normal circumstances exist on the site?
[ ] Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)?
[ ] Is the area a potential problem area? Community ID:
Transect ID:
Plot ID: Upland

WD-5
Remarks: Site located due south of West. Chatham St.; Site only disturbed by an ephemeral stream connecting to UT to "Kildaire Farms Lake".

VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species
Trees Common Name Stratum Indicator
Acer rubrum Red Maple 20% FAC
Fa s randi olia Beech 10% FAC+
Cornus orida Dogwood 10% FACU
uercus Phellos Willow Oak 10% FACW-
uercus Falcata S. Red Oak 20% FACU-

Herbaceous
Asarum ari olia Wild Ginger 20% FACU

Vines
Vitis rotundi olia Muscadine Grape 20% FAC

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-): 33%
Remarks:

HYDROLOGY
[ ] Recorded Data (Describe in remarks)
[ I Stream, Lake, or Tide Gage
[ I Aerial Photograph
[ I Other (describe in remarks)

[ x ] No Recorded Data Available

Field Observations
Depth of Surface Water:
Depth of Free Water in Pit:
Depth of Saturated Soils: Primary Wetland Hydrology Indicators
I ] Inundated
I ] Saturation in upper 12"
I ] Water Marks
[ ] Drift Lines
I I Sediment Deposits
I I Drainage Pattern in Wetlands

0 in.
N/M
51+ in Secondary Hydrology Indicators
[ ] Oxidized Root Channels
[ ] Water-stained Leaves
[ J Local Soil Survey Data
[ ] FAC-Neutral Test
[ I Other (describe in remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase) Drainnee Class Confirm Mapped Type
Georgeville silt loam, 6-10% slopes, eroded [ ] Excessively Drained ] I Yes
Taxonomy (Suberoup): [ ] Well Drained ] x I No
Fine, Kaolinitic, Thermic, Typic Kanhapludults [ x ] Moderately Well Drained
[ ] Somewhat Poorly Drained
[ ] Poorly Drained
[ J Very Poorly Drained
Soil Description
Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle
Depth in. Horizon Munsell Moist Mansell Moist Abundance/Size/Contrast Grade Class Type
1 -2 A 2.5Y 4/2 SCL Fine Granular
2-31 Btl 2.5Y 7/3 5YR 5/8; 2.5YR 5/6 C Medium Subanular block
31 - 39 Bt2 2.5Y 8/2 7.5YR 5/8; 10YR 7/6 Few, Fine, Prominent C Medium Suban ular block
39 - 50 Bt3 5Y 8/3 5Y 8/1; 7.5YR 6/8 Common, Medium, Prominen CL Fine Subanular block
51-66+ C 7.5YR 5/8 2.5Y 8/4; 2.5Y 7/6 Few, Fine, Distinct CL Fine Subanular block
2.5Y 7/2
Hydric Soil Indicators
[ ] Histosol [ ] Reducing Conditions [ ] Organic Streaking
[ I Histic Epipedon I ] Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors [ J Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
[ j Sulfidic Odor I ] Concretions I I Listed on National Hydric Soils List
[ j Aquatic Moist Regime [ ] High Organic % in Surface Layer [ ] Other (explain in remarks)
Remarks:

WETLAND DETERMINATION
[ ] Hydrophytic Vegetation Present
[ j Hydric Soils Present [ I This Data Point is a Wetland
[ I Wetland Hydrology Present
Remarks:
MITIGATION PLAN/ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT
PROGRAM CONCURRENCE

Associated Environmental Consultants & Engineers
FTWA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
.1i h i . = 1-:20O,v, Gc (rt";l "'Vo''I SIT G. R:'ss J
April 19, 2004
Revised letter of February 17, 2004
Matthew D. Thomas
Associated Environmental Consultants & Engineers, Inc.
P.O. Box 31952
Raleigh, NC 27622 APR 2004
Subject: Project: Islamic Center of Cary
County: Wake
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to accept
payment for stream, buffer and wetlands impacts associated with the subject project. Please note that the decision by the NCEEP to
accept the mitigation requirements of this project does not assure that this payment will be approved by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers and the N.C. Division of Water Quality Wetlands/401 Unit. It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact these agencies
to determine if payment to the NCEEP for impacts associated with this project is appropriate.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401
Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire.
Based on the information supplied by you in a letter dated February 11, 2004, the stream, buffer and wetlands restoration that is
necessary to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements for this project is summarized in the following table. The maximum
amount of mitigation that the NCEEP will accept for this project is also indicated in this table.
Stream
(linear feet) Wetlands Riparian
(acres) Wetlands Non-
Riparian (acres) Riparian Buffer
(s q. ft.)
Impact 162 0.1065 41,758.79
Mitigation Max 324 0.213 83,635.20
The stream, non-riparian wetlands and buffer mitigation will be provided as specified in the 401 Water Quality Certification and/or
Section 404 Permit for impacts associated with the subject project in Cataloging Unit 03020201 of the Neuse River Basin. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N.C. Department of Environment
and Natural Resources and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Carol Shaw at [phone].
Sincerely,
9Ro
nald E. FerrelDirector of Operations
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Jennifer Burdette, USACOE-Raleigh
Steve Mitchell, DWQ Regional Office-Raleigh
File
NC DENR Ecosystem Enhancement Prraram One
16119 Mail Service Center, Raleigh. North I ardina 27699-1619 NOI't?1Car01111a
Phone: [phone] . PAX.- 919 ?iwr0; ;Vaturally
BIORETENTION COMPUTATION

Associated Environmental Consultants & Engineers
Islamic Center of Cary
Designing Bio-Rention or Rain Garden for the subject site
Determining the Watershed size:
CN= 81 Combined CN value after development
A= 4.0 ac Contributed area of the Site
Runoff - R/O = (P-0.2S)^2/(P+0.8S)
S=(1000/CN)-10
for 1" precipitation
P= 1.0 in
S= 2.3
R/0= 0.10 in
Total Volume R/O = R/O.(A)
Total Volume R/O= 17070.4 sft-in
1422.5 cft
Determining size of Bio-Retention Area
Bio-Retention area = Vol / Depth
Considering a mounting of 9 inch above the bio-surface area
Surface Area, SA = Vlo./Depth
Depth 9 in 0.75 ft
Volume 1422.0 cft
SA= 1896.0 sft this mean: 94.8 about 20x95 feet
Bio-Retention Depth and Soil Type:
Bio-Retention area suppose to be filled with pervious soil type and drained underneath
We will use a 4 feet deep of sand mixed with soil and organic to work as pervious bed
and to allow vegetation to be grown
Underneath we will use a perforated pipe to drain the water from the bio-retention
Selecting Fill Soil
We select soil material which must be permeable enough to allow water to pass through
relatively quickly. However, it should retain water so it want quickly dry out
The recommended range of permeabilites for the fill soil should be:
0.5 inches/hour to 6 inches/hour
From experience we choose:
type Conductivity Unit
75% Sand 6 in/h
15% Silt 2 in/h
10% Organic source 0.5-1 in/h (tree leaf compost)
Computing Water Draw through the bio-retention bed
Q=2.3^e-5 . A. K. AH/OL
SA= 1896 sft
DH/DL= 1
K= 1 in/h
Q= 0.0441359 cfs
OH
I K=0.5-6 in/h ?L
Q= 0.0441359 cfs This is the rate of draw into the bed
Computing Time to Drawdown:
1- Volume to drawdown the 9 inch
Vs-,= SAx9/12
V.,= 1422 cft
Time to remove this volume:
Ts-,= Vol/Q
Ts-,= 32218.7 sec
8.95 h
Approx. 9.0 h
Time to Drawdown water in the bed for:
Volume of water in bed
For porosity of 45%
n= 0.45
Volume of water in bed = SA.n.2
Vol= 1706.4 cft
Time to drawdown 2 feet
TS-Z= VOI./Q
TS-2= 38662.4 sec
Ts-2= 10.7 h
Approx. 11 h
Total time to draw through soil
Total Time 20.0 hours
Sizing the Underdrain Pipes and Gravel Envelope
2 feet
lets N = number of pipes
N=
Manning equation can be written:
N.D=16{Q.n./S^0.5}^3/8 D is in inches
Considering flow rate in pipes 10 times flow rate, and S=slope equal 0.005
Q'10= 0.4413589 cfs 10 is the safety factor
S= 0.005
n= 0.015 Manning coeff. For 4" corrugated plastic pipe
ND= 6.58 in
That is mean two corrugated 4" pipe
A gravel envelope to be placed around the drainage pipes. At least 2 inches of gravel
should cover the top of the pipes. The minimum thickness of the gravel layer is
dictated by the pipe diameter selected.
Islamic Center of Cary
Level Spreader Design for the Interior Road
The area contributed to the level spreader is the interior road leading to the parking lot:
A = 11250 sq-ft 0.25826446 ac
C = 0.95
1 = 1 in/h
Q= C.I.A
Q= 0.245351 cfs
Peak flow to managed by level spreader is 0.25 cfs
Flow bypass:
A grass swale employing turf reinforced matting should be considered to take the flow
from 10 year storm event. Swale to be designed for 3.9 in/h
Considering down slope ground cover is Grass, allowed velocity for level spreader will be: 1.33 fps
a H"=2.3H
Weir equation:
Q= V.A= Cw.L.H3r2 4x6 treated wood
Cw 3
L 15 ft Gravel level
H 0.02 ft spreader
A L.(2/3).(H)
V= 1.5.Cw.H'r2
Velocity allowed for level spreader is 113 of the down slope erosive velocity
in case of grass allowed velocity is: 1.33 fps
for 10 yr storm and I = 3.9 in
Q= (3.9)(0.258)(0.95) = 0.95 cfs
Q= V.A = V. (2/3). H. L
0.95= 1.33(2/3)(0.058)(L)
L= 18.5 ft Grass Case
0.95= 1.5(213)(0.074)(L) Gravel Case L= 12 ft
0.95= 1.33(2/3)(0.058)(L) Thicket Shrub,Grass L=18 ft
0.95= (0.67)(2/3)(0.015)(L) Mulch Case L=141 ft
Simple level spreader length calculation:
L= Q / (X V)
X is equivalent Water Height over Level Spreader
Use table below to select Length
Flow - cfs Down Slope Cover Len th of Level Spreader-ft
1 Grass 13
2 Grass 26
3 Grass 36
5 Grass 65
10 Grass 130
1 Grass 9
2 Grass 18
3 Grass 27
5 Grass 45
10 Grass 90
1 Thicket (shrubs/grass) 13
2 Thicket (shrubs/ grass) 26
3 Thicket (shrubs/grass) 39
5 Thicket (shrubs/ grass) 65
10 Thicket (shrubs/grass) 130
1 Mulch trees/shrubs) 100
2 Mulch trees/shrubs) 200
3 Mulch trees/shrubs) 300
5 Mulch trees/shrubs) N/A
10 Mulch trees/shrubs N/A
For the purpose of our inlet, using Level spreader with a minimum of 15 ft long should be sufficient
for the cases of Grass, Gravel or Shrub/Grass down slope cover.
BIORETENTION AREAS WETLAND OPERATION
AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
The wetland defined as the proposed building construction at 1155 W. Chatham
Street, Cary, North Carolina, (UT to "Kildaire Farms Lake", McGregor Downs Lake
(Swift Creek).
Maintenance activities shall be performed as follows:
1. After every significant runoff producing rainfall event and at least monthly:
a. Inspect the Bioretention Areas for sediment accumulation, erosion, trash
accumulation, vegetated cover, and general condition.
b. Check and clear of any obstructions such that drawdown of the temporary
pool occurs within 4 days as designed.
2. Repair eroded areas immediately, re-seed as necessary to maintain good
vegetative cover, mow vegetative cover to maintain a maximum height of six
inches, and remove trash as needed.
3. Inspect and repair the collection system (i.e. catch basins, piping, swales, riprap,
etc.) quarterly to maintain proper functioning.
4. Remove previous mulch layer before applying new layer semi-annually.
Removed mulch/sediment shall be disposed of in an appropriate manner and
shall be handled in a manner that will not adversely impact water quality (i.e.
stockpiling near the Bioretention Areas or stream, etc.).
The measuring device used to determine the sediment elevation shall be such
that it will give an accurate depth reading and not readily penetrate into
accumulated sediments.
5. Remove cattails and other indigenous wetland plants when they cover 50% of
the Bioretention Areas surface. These plants shall be encouraged to grow along
the vegetated shelf and berm.
Wetland planting densities in the marsh areas should be maintained by
replanting bare areas as needed. Wetland plants should be encouraged to grow
in the marsh areas.
6. If the basin must be drained for an emergency or to perform maintenance, the
flushing of sediment through the emergency drain shall be minimized to the
maximum extent practical.
Pagel of 2
7. All components of the Bioretention Areas shall be maintained in good working
order.
8. Level spreaders or other structures that provide diffuse flow shall be maintained
every six months. All accumulated sediment and debris shall be removed from
the structure, and a level elevation shall be maintained across the entire flow
spreading structure. Any down gradient erosion must be repaired and/or
replanted as necessary.
I acknowledge and agree by my signature below that I am responsible for the
performance of the seven maintenance procedures listed above. I agree to notify
DWQ of any problems with the system or prior to any changes to the system or
responsible party.
Print name:
Title:
Address:-
Phone:
Signature:_
Date:
Note: The legally responsible party should not be a homeowners association unless
more than 50% of the lots have been sold and a resident of the subdivision
has been named the president.
a Notary Public for the State of
County of , do hereby certify that
personally appeared before me this
day of , and acknowledge the due
execution of the forgoing wet [wetland] detention basin maintenance requirements.
Witness my hand and official seal,
SEAL
My commission expires
Page 2 of 2
LEVEL SPREADER CALCULATIONS

Associated Environmental Consultants & Engineers
PERMANENT SOIL
REINFORCEMENT
MATTING (PSRM)
(SEE NOTE)
12"0 DIP OUTLET
(RIP RAP IN BASIN NOT
SHOWN FOR CLARITY) A
FLOW
SQUARE PREFORMED
SCOUR HOLE (PSH)
SEED WITH NATIVE
GRASSES AT INSTALLATION.
SECTION A-A
A
INSTALL LEVEL AND FLUSH
WITH NATURAL GROUND.
LEVEL SPREADER ID: L?-2
a
Drainage Ares: 0.25 ac.
Impervious Area: 0.25 ac.
Max. Discharge from a 10 Year Storm: 0.9 cfs.
Max. Discharge at Level Spreader: 0.25 cfs.
Filter Strip/Buffer Vegetation: Grass + Mulch
Max. Filter Strip/Buffer Slope: 6%
Length: 15.75 ft.

12"0 DIP
S? 0 4 FT.
F 1 FT.
FLOW- ?'•' ? NATURAL
?""""" GROUND
RIP RAP LINER W/ FILTER 1 PERMANENT SOIL
FABRIC SEE NOTES 3.75 TUCK
(SEE NOTES) REINFORCEMENT
NCDOT CLASS 'A' RIP RAP MATTING (PSRM)
-9" THICK LEVEL SPREADER APRON
(NTS)
LEVEL SPREADER/SCOUR HOLE DETAILS
N TS
NOTES:
1. RIP RAP LINER SHALL BE UNDERLAIN
WITH MIRAFI FILTERWEAVE 700 OR
APPROVED EQUIVALENT.
2. PERMANENT SOIL RE-INFORCEMENT
MATTING SHALL BE LANDLOK TRM 450
OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT.
3. BOTH THE RIP RAP UNDERLINER AND
THE LANDLOK TRM 450 SHALL BE
INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER'S
SPECIFICATIONS.
PERMANENT SOIL
REINFORCEMENT
MATTING (PSRM)
(SEE NOTE)
12"0 DIP OUTLET
(RIP RAP IN BASIN NOT
SHOWN FOR CLARITY) A
FLOW
SQUARE PREFORMED
SCOUR HOLE (PSH)
SEED WITH NATIVE --- 7.75 FT. -?
GRASSES AT INSTALLATION. 11.75 FT.
SECTION A-A
INSTALL LEVEL AND FLUSH
WITH NATURAL GROUND.
LEVEL SPREADER ID: LS-3
Drainage Ares: 0.25 ac.
Impervious Area: 0.25 ac.
Max. Discharge from a 10 Year Storm: 0.9 cfs.
Max. Discharge at Level Spreader: 0.25 cfs.
Filter Strip/Buffer Vegetation: Grass + Mulch
Max. Filter Strip/Buffer Slope: 6%
Length: 15.75 ft.
F/(4 12"0 DIP
S? Op I-4 F-T.?
F 1 FT. I I
FLOVIF- ?'•' `% NATURAL
I-, GROUND
RIP RAP LINER W/ FILTER 1 PERMANENT SOIL
FABRIC SEE NOTES 3.75 TUCK
(SEE NOTES) REINFORCEMENT
NCDOT CLASS 'A' RIP RAP MATTING (PSRM)
-9" THICK LEVEL SPREADER APRON
(NTS)
LEVEL SPREADER/SCOUR HOLE DETAILS
NTS
NOTES:
1. RIP RAP LINER SHALL BE UNDERLAIN
WITH MIRAFI FILTERWEAVE 700 OR
APPROVED EQUIVALENT.
2. PERMANENT SOIL RE-INFORCEMENT
MATTING SHALL BE LANDLOK TRM 450
OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT.
3. BOTH THE RIP RAP UNDERLINER AND
THE LANDLOK TRM 450 SHALL BE
INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER'S
SPECIFICATIONS.
PERMANENT SOIL -
REINFORCEMENT
MATTING (PSRM)
(SEE NOTE) ,
12"0 DIP OUTLET
(RIP RAP IN BASIN NOT
SHOWN FOR CLARITY)
FLOW
INSTALL LEVEL AND FLUSH
WITH NATURAL GROUND.
?I I LEVEL SPREADER ID: LS-4
Drainage Ares: 0.25 ac.
Impervious Area: 0.25 ac.
Max. Discharge from a 10 Year Storm: 0.9 cfs.
`r'1 Max. Discharge at Level Spreader: 0.25 cfs
SQUARE PREFORMED
SCOUR HOLE (PSH)
SEED WITH NATIVE 7.75 FT.
GRASSES AT INSTALLATION. 11.75 FT.
SBMON A -A
12"0 DIP
S
? 01 FT. 4 FT.
FLOW- 3- 1 NATURAL
GROUND
RIP RAP LINER W/ FILTER 1 PERMANENT SOIL
FABRIC (SEE NOTES) "37 5 TUCK REINFORCEMENT
NCDOT CLASS 'A' RIP RAP MATTING (PSRM)
-9" THICK LEVEL SPREADER APRON
(NITS)
LEVEL SPREADER/SCOUR HOLE DETAILS
NTS
Filter Strip/Buffer Vegetation: Grass + Mulch
Max. Filter Strip/Buffer Slope: 6%
Length: 15.75 ft.
NOTES:
1. RIP RAP LINER SHALL BE UNDERLAIN
WITH MIRAFI FILTERWEAVE 700 OR
APPROVED EQUIVALENT.
2. PERMANENT SOIL RE-INFORCEMENT
MATTING SHALL BE LANDLOK TRM 450
OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT.
3. BOTH THE RIP RAP UNDERLINER AND
THE LANDLOK TRM 450 SHALL BE
INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER'S
SPECIFICATIONS.
ENGINEF RING DEPARTMENT
April 22, 2004
Kamal Essaid, P.E.
Associated Environmental Consultants and Engineers, Inc.
P.O. Box 31952
Raleigh, NC 27622-1952
Subject Property: Islamic Center of Cary - 1155 W. Chatham Street
Dear Mr. Essaid:
The Town of Cary Transportation Plan requires this portion of W. Chatham Street to have an ultimate 45' back-to-back
street section with sidewalk on both sides, within a minimum 67' right-of-way. It currently exists as an approximate 25'
wide, 2 lane road within a 60' right-of-way.
Town Ordinance requires the developer, as part of overall site development, to do the following (taken from Town of
Cary Land Development Ordinance Section 8.2.2):
Dedicate any additional right-of-way necessary to achieve the width required by the Town's Transportation
Plan for all streets adjoining the property;
Install curbs and gutters along all streets adjoining the property and to pave all streets adjoining the property,
in accordance with the requirements set out in the Town's Standard Specifications and Details Manual and the
Town's Transportation Plan.
Install sidewalks and pedestrian pathways in accordance with the requirements set out in the Town's Standard
Specifications and Details Manual where the Town Council or Planning and Zoning Board determines that
the public safety and convenience warrant in view of existing and expected pedestrian traffic
Because improvements to adjacent streets are ordinance requirements, any waiver of the above requirements must be
granted by full Town Council; however, based on our April 20, 2004 meeting regarding DWQ concerns, staff would be
willing to support the following (which will ultimately have to be approved by Town Council):
1.) Widen W. Chatham Street to the full 3 lanes (45' back-to-back) at the project driveway to allow for a separate left
turn lane into the site, then taper back down to 2-lanes towards the railroad bridge.
2.) Provide an 11' shoulder behind back-of-curb with no sidewalk.
3.) Provide a 1:1 slope beyond shoulder with geotechnical engineer seal and signature.
Please feel free to contact me regarding the above information should you have any questions. I can be reached at (919)
462-3933.
Sincerely,
* ?t
Tammy . Spivey
Engineer
? ? Y
TOWN Of CARY
318 North Academy Street • Cary, NC 27513 • PO Box 8005 • Cary, NC 27512-8005'
tel [phone] • fax [phone]• www.townofcary.org
ASSOCIATED
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSULTANTS &
-4 ENGINEERS, INC.
April 30, 2004
:
NCDENR-DWQ
Wetlands Unit WETLANDS l401 GROUP
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650 MAY
Attn: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
WATER (QUALITY SECTION
Subject: Islamic Center of Cary
1155 W. Chatham Street
: Cary, NC
UT to "Kildaire Farms Lake", MacGregor Downs Lake (Swift Creek)
: DWQ # 03-0482
Dear Ms. Karoly:
• Enclosed is the revised permit application for the above-mentioned Site. The following
revisions have been made to the original application form:
:
• 1. Stream Impacts & Mitigation
a. Figure 4 (Final Site Plan) details the location and boundaries of
impacts that will occur on Site.
b. 121 liner feet of stream mitigation will occur on Site.
:
2. Buffer Impacts
a. 12,196.604 square feet of buffers will be impacted on Site. Sidewalk
impact in the buffer area consists of 689.165 square feet, while the
road crossing, shoulder, & embankment impact area in the buffer
contains 11,507.439 square feet.
b. Buffer mitigation required for this project totals 31,210.846 square
feet.

:
:
3. Sidewalk
: a. Due to the widening of W. Chatham Street, a sidewalk was required,
per Town of Cary rules. After discussing the issue with the Town of
Cary, the sidewalk along W. Chatham has been eliminated.
:
*QUALITY SNRVICr AND PRODUCTS AT AN A mRmaLc Xmw7mexT
......................................................................................................................
P, 0, 13ox 31952, Raleigh, NC 27622 9191878-1295 9191878-1298 (FAX)
3 211 l3ramer Drive Raleigh NC 2 7604 http://wmv,aec-e.com
4. Detailed stormwater management practices, as required by GC 3404 and
designed to meet DWQ's design standards, is included in the revised permit
application. This includes bioretention area calculations.
5. A revised EEP letter showing acceptance of mitigation requirements.
6. A letter from the Town of Cary showing the allowance of sidewalk and slope
reduction is included in the addendum.
7. A signed and notarized copy of Bioretention Maintenance Guidelines is
included.
Additional copies have been sent to USACOE-Raleigh Office and the DWQ Regional
Office-Raleigh.
If you have any additional questions or comments, please feel free to contact me at (919)
878-1295 (ext. 128).
Sincerely,

Matthew D. Thomas
Environmental Manager

n
0
n

1
C
1

P
n

Office Use Only:
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
[ x ] Section 404 Permit
[ ] Section 10 Permit
[ x ] 401 Water Quality Certification
[ x ] Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
[ ] Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 12,14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401
Certification is not requested, check here: [ ]
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is
proposed for mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to
submittal of PCN), complete Section VIII and check here: [ x ]
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed
on page 4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal
Management Area of Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further
details), check here: [ ]
WETLANDS/ 401 GROUP
MAY 0 "? ?OU4
WAi Lk QUALITY SECTION
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 1

II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information:
ISLAM ASSOCIATION, CARY
' P.O. Box 31952
Raleigh, NC 27622-1950
2. Agent/Consultant Information:
' Waheed Haa
Associated Environmental Consultants & Engineers, Inc.
3211-B Bramer Drive
Raleigh, NC 27604
[phone] (P); [phone] (f)
waheedgaec-e.com

United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 2
L I
t

III. Project Information
1. Name of Project: Islamic Center of Carv
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0753852781 (REID #0071252)
4. Location
a. County: Wake
b. Nearest Town: Cary
c. Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): 102 Trimble Ave.
d. Directions to site (including road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Downtown
Cary, Chatham St. going west; go 1/3 mile after passing SW Maynard Rd.
Property on left (immediately after church)
e. Site coordinates, if available (UTM): 17 698445E 3960751N
(WGS84/NAD83); Cary Quad
5. Property size (acres): 4.64
6. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): UT to "Kildaire
Farms Lake", MacGregor Downs Lake (Swift Creek)
7. River Basin: Neuse
8. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of
the project at the time of this application: Adjacent land with one dwelling;
adjacent property: church, residences, fire station, commercial
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Project consists of building a church and religious school, including a parking lot
with moderate weight construction equipment
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Wetland impact required to expand
the road as per Town of Cary requirements (addition of a turning lane sidewalk
and road slope) and access road to the propert
y
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 3

IV.

Prior Project History
The project originally planned for the access road to join the Site via W. Chatham St.
This plan required a T-intersection over wetlands and a stream on the property, in order
to allow traffic flow on the project site would be adequate (Figure 5). After discussing
the project with the NCDENR-401 Certification Unit, the project scope was then reduced
to a single access road to the Site to minimize the impact on the wetlands and stream on
the property. Additional changes include cutting back on the sidewalk along the NW
portion of the property in order to reduce stream impact. The toe slope for the W.
Chatham St. extension was also reduced from 3:1 to 1:1 in order to reduce the wetland
and stream impact.
Future Project Plans
No future permits are anticipated for this project.
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 4

' VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
' 1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
Proposed impacts planned on site include a 28' access road that intersects the
perennial stream on the property, extension of W. Chatham from two lane to three
(includes extending side slope into wetlands); and placement of sewer line across
' wetlands and streams.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:

Wetland Impact Site

Number
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact

(acres) Located within
100-year
**

Floodplain
Distance to Nearest

Streami(linerfeet)
Type o

Wetland*f
1 Fill 0.0100 Yes Adjacent Forested
2 Fill 0.0143 Yes Adjacent Forested
3 Fill, Drainage 0.0378 Yes Adjacent Forested

' * 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood
Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps.
Total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.2814 ac
' Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.0621 ac

3. Individually list all Intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
Type of Impact Length of
Impact
(linear feet) *
Stream Name AveragelWidth of
Stream Before
Impact
Stream TN pe
1 Fill 21 UT 2' Perennial
2 Fill, Drainage 100 UT 2' Perennial

Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 121 ft
1
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 5

4. Individually list all open water impacts below:
Open Water Impact

Site Number
Type of Impact Area of Impact

(acres) , Name of Waterbody

(if applicable)
Type of VVaterbody
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

' 5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should
be included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed
' pond should be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this
application.
' Pond to be created in: [ ] uplands [ ] stream [ ] wetlands
Describe the method of construction:
' Proposed use or purpose of pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond:
' Expected pond surface area:

'J

1
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 6

' VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
The project for the Islamic Center of Cary originally called for one building that spread
across 4.64 acres. This plan affects one UT's of Kildare Farm Lake. The project was
' originally designed to allow an access road on the property to connect via W. Chatham
St. In order to allow adequate traffic flow on the site, the plan required a T-intersection
' over wetlands and a stream on the property (Figure 5). After discussing the project with
the NCDENR-401 Certification Unit, the project scope was then redesigned. The current
' design reduces the size of the road to a single access road intersecting the stream, thus
minimizing the impact of wetlands and stream on the property. Additional reductions
' include cutting back on the sidewalk along the NW portion of the property to reduce
stream impact. The toe slope for the W. Chatham St. extension was also reduced from a
3:1 to a 1:1 slope in order to reduce stream and wetland impact.
' The following chan ges have recently been included in the proposed project:
• Sidewalk along W. Chatham St. was removed.
' • Reduction in shoulder from behind the curb to end of impacted are
was reduced from fifteen feet to eleven feet (Approved by Town of
' Cary as per attached letter).
• The slope behind shoulder remains eleven feet and is approved by
the Town of Cary (attached letter).
• The access road on SITE now has the sidewalk located on the South
' side and the shoulder behind the sidewalk and curb has been changed
from five feet to two feet.
' • Stream impacts have been reduced from 162 liner feet to 121 linear
feet.
' • Wetland impacts have been reduced from 0.0765 ac (3,332 sq. ft.) to
0.0621 ac (2,705 sq ft).

United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 7
u

VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of
impacts to freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts
to perennial streams
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of
Nationwide Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will
be required when necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are
minimal. Factors including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative
value of the impacted aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of
appropriate and practicable mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be
appropriate and practicable include, but are not limited to: reducing the size of the
project; establishing and maintaining wetland and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect
open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of aquatic resource functions and
values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar functions and values,
preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in
order for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any
application lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on
hold as incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for
stream restoration in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan:
The proposed mitigation plan for the Site includes minimizing stream impact by
reducing the length of sidewalks, reducing the slope of W. Chatham St. extension
and redesigning the access road in order to minimize the crossing area. A 50 foot
vegetated buffer (Meuse River Buffer Rules) will remain on the property where
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 8

I
I
' development is not planned. In addition, payment will be made to the NCEEP to
offset 31,211 square feet of required buffer mitigation.
' 2. Mitigation payment to the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
' (NCEEP)
a. Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0
' b. Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 12,196.604
i. Sidewalk impact in buffer (square feet): 689.165
' ii. Road crossing, shoulder, & embankment impact
located in buffer (square feet): 11,507.439
' c. Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
d. Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
' e. Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 9
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
I . Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use
of public (federal/state) land? [ ] Yes [ x ] No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document
pursuant to the requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? [ ] Yes [ ] No
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so,
please attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
[ ] Yes [ ] No
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 10
n

X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
' It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts
to required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also
' provide justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must
be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan (Figure
' 4). All buffers must be shown on a map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the
buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ Regional Office may be included as
' appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the applicant's discretion.
' 1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B
.0233 (Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250
' (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other
)? [ x ] Yes [ ] No

Zone* Impact,
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 8,610.627 3 25,831.881
2 3,585.977 1.5 .965
F Total 12,196.604
J
31,210.846
d?'

Zone 1 extends out 30'11 perpendicu"I['ar from near bank of
channel; Zone 2 extends an additional 20 feet from the edge
of Zone 1.
2. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is
' proposed. Please attach all appropriate information as identified within 15A
NCAC 213.0242 or.0260.
' The proposed buffer mitigation for the Site involves payment to the Riparian
Buffer Restoration Fund. The maximum amount of mitigation that the NCEEP
will accept for this project is 83,635.20 sq ft. It has been determined that only
31,210.846 sq ft will be affected.

United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. I I

I

' XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
1. Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) verses total acreage on
the site. Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters
' and wetlands downstream from the property.
Total site area is 4.6 acres. The imperviousness after development will be 39 %
' which is equal to 1.8 acres, including the buffer. The proposed stormwater
control is a bio-retention area in front of building. The bio-retention basin will
' consist of two sections: 45 ft x 20 ft and 15 ft x 60 ft. The bio-retention areas are
located in front of the building where it can receive the runoff from the parking
' lots, sidewalk, and rooftop of the building. The runoff from the parking lots will
be collected through two trenches filled with 6-inch stone and gravel. Runoff
' collected on SITE will be conveyed to the bio-retention areas via piping. The bio-
retention area is 4.0 feet deep, with a one-foot layer of sand below; this will allow
' adequate drainage of stormwater. The ponding design is 9 inches above the bio-
retention groundcover, allowing storms larger than 1 inch first flush to be drained
' through a weir. The weir will be 4 ft. x 4 ft., with an elevation 9 inches above the
bio-retention ground cover. Groundcover for the bio-retention area will be set at
' elevation 422.00 and the weir will be set to a elevation of 422.75. (Figure 6)
' Bioretention and level spreader calculations are attached to this report. A road
drain has been added to the access road that will collect stormwater that drains
' through a protected pipe outlet, with a flared section and riprap. Stormwater
treatment will include a level spreader before entering the riparian buffer.
' Worksheets for bioretention areas and level spreaders are attached in the back of
this report.
Maintenance guidelines for bioretention areas and level spreaders are attached,
' signed, and notarized. Plant selection for trees, shrubs, and groundcover can be
found in the Final Site Plan.
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 12
i
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
1. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or
discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available
capacity of the subject facility.
A sewer line will be constructed from the building (on site), then run off site
across a 20' stream easement aloniz an UT to a 20' public sewer easement
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
1. Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (I 5A NCAC 2H .0500) or any
Buffer Rules? [ ] Yes [x]NO
2. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? [ ] Yes [ x ] No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional)
1. Constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules.
Inclement weather, building permits, City of CM approval
Applicant/Agent',Wignature
4/ 2--Pl tl?
Date
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 13

11

MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
Assocza=D EWzRomw jm CONsmums & Vmxm ERs, Inc.
Guidelines (I?°'`?« D?
Bioretention Maintenance ,
Following the NCDNE Guidelines for Maintenance the following Schedule to be followed:
Description Method Fre uency Time of Year
Soil
Inspect and repair erosion
Or anic La er
Remulch an void area
Remove pervious mulch layer
before applying new layer
(optional)
An additional mulch added
Plants
Remove and replacement of all Per- Planting Twice a year 3/15 to 4/30 and
dead and diseased vegetation specifications 10/1 to 11/30
considered beyond treatment
Treat all diseased trees and Mechanical or by N/A Varies, but will
shrubs hand depend on insect or
disease infection
Watering plant material shall By hand Immediately after N/A
take place at the end of each completion of
day or fourteen consecutive project
days and after planting has
been completed
Replacement of support stakes By hand Once a year Only remove stakes
Re lace an deficient stakes or 13hand Whenever needed Whenever needed
' Filter Strip and Level Spreader Maintenance:
At lease once annually, remove deposit sediment, especially from upstream edge. To maintain
original contours and grading
' Repair channels that form and regrade the filter strip To insure that the flows evenly in thin sheet
over the filter strip.
Repair level spreader whose disrepair can cause the formation of channels in the filter strip.
' Reseed and regrade the filter strip To maintain a dense growth of vegetation, especially if the
strip has been used for sediment control.
Grassed filter strips shall be mowed at least twice annually to a maximum height of six inches.
W4 4AQ Ti-l-A--r /-f-G- /s TH& <14 " r
Al/6 ;.?FdaC?+?? Tom /5 4?T ?o ?'H?
«=D 4c
Subs--n 6.0 tee.
' My ?rwnl?io? Oc?l?cs ?1 z006

I

I
LEVEL SPREADER
WORKSHEET
ASSOCIATED ENVIRommw= CONSULTANTS & Emn\mm, INC.

I

DWQ Project No. C?) _ 0 4'D a
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY • LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEET
1. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following infmation):
5
Project Name : 1 ':'? c?, wt i C C ^ti e r r, C 0.??N i_ 115
Contact Person: t? n T1,_e "J y A s Phone Nu7Tiber: Z
Level Spreader ID:
Level Spreader Length 15 ft.
Drainage Area ©• ,2 5 9 ac.
Impervious Area S ac.
Maximum Filter Strip/Buffer Slope 6 %
grass
Max. Discharge from a 10 Year Storm 'n' cfs
Max. Discharge to Level Spreader :..Z 5 cf
Filter Strip/Buffer Vegetation r" raps -t- kA eA
(perpendicular to flow)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
(6% for forested, leaf littler cover, 8% for thick ground cover)*
(thick ground cover or grass, canopied forest with leaf litter
groundcover)
Pre-treatment or Bypass Method tj I ti

I

II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is attached. If a
requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan submittal includes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
Applicants Initials
14c Level spreader is at least 13 ft. per cfs for thick ground cover or grass or 100 ft per cfs in canopied forest with leaf
litter.
bz z Pre-Form Scour Holes are on flat slopes only
F 2 No structures are located in protected buffers*
If bypass method specified in the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document:
Bypass method is specified (if applicable) and plan details and calculations are provided
Discharge to'level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the bypass
discharge.
No structures are located in protected buffers.
Plan details for the bypass and outlets are provided.
The operation and maintenance agreement includes annual erosion and vegetation repair.
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
* Level spreaders in series can be used on slopes of up to 15% in forested areas with leaf littler cover or on slopes of up to 25% in areas
with thick ground cover or grass if designed according to the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document. This potentially requires a
minor variance in protected buffer areas. In any event the second level spreader cannot be located in Zone 1 of a protected buffer area.
C

1

t

BIORETENTION
WORKSHEET
AssoczATzD ExvzROlwxrAL CoNsvzTmTs & Emxxams, INc.

I
DWQ Project No. n 3_ D 4 92
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY • BIORETENTION AREA WORKSHEET
I
1. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information /+
Project Name: -I S1.amni C_ C¢-,?ker o Ccr'? _ tLh5 W- r.?a?a? CArJ_,_aC
Contact Person: Ma&P ?.,I M.1 as Phone Number. fRLq 1 7A _ 12.c15
For projects with multiple basins, specify which basin this worksheet applies to: uo u S', IQ ? -ler 136zs i
..
Permanent Pool Elevation
Temporary Pool Elevation
Bioretention Surface Area
Drainage Area
Impervious Area
Rational C Coefficient
Size %
Inlet Velocity
Inlet flow depth
Depth to Ground Water
Planting Soil Infiltration Rate
In-Situ Soil Infiltration Rate
4zz ft.
4).X•ZS ft.
l O sq. ft.
-0r . 2 ac.
(, 66 ac.
c? 6.2
%
l fps
.?, i Al in
T in./hr,
e) Z - 2 • n in./hr,
(elevation of the orifice invert out) ro U i d,? 4?
(elevation of the outlet structure invert in u W etlC 1? s Ip
- 0 cot$yvi o?cr Pto {fro
o f "e ?^ 4".-S v- rck' na .
(on-site and off-site drainage to the basin)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the basin)
(either 5% in w/sand under drain or j% in w 1o) % d
t?or d ?M? wus _ _ - der,-Of 01 tr g W,+
COVey 11A bj0 )re -CrL k' OM , 0L ot-0 OVA- =
Wet Y -}0 dro?ir oYCr"Plo ") .
(the soil layer down to 4 feet)
(the soil layer below 4 feet or below the sand bed)
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is attached. If a
requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan submittal includes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
Applicants Initials
k? No vertical sand bed is proposed
1"..0 The bioretention area is at least 40 feet by 15 feet.
Li Sheet flow is provided at inlet.
ye,4 Water table depth is greater than 6 feet.
fe d Minimum of 6" ponding is provided.
Lc 1 The ponded area will draw down in less than 4 days.
lee Planting soil infiltration rate is greater than 0.52 in/hr.
14.. The in-situ soil infiltration rate is greater than 0.2 in/hr.
?1A planting plan with species and densities is provided.
ILP Mulch layer is specified in plans.
Planting soil meets minimum soil specifications (NCDENR Stormwater Best Management
Practices Manual, April 1999)
Plan details for the bioretention area provided.
Plan details for the inlet and outlet are provided.
IrL. An operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
Please note that underdrains beneath the planting soil are acceptable in the Piedmont and Mountains

11

1

BIORETENTION
COMPUTATION
AssocrAnD EN nwim maja CoNsvzmws & LW rxmxs, INc.
Islamic Center of Cary
Designing Bio-Rention or Rain Garden for the subject site
Determining the Watershed size:
CN= 81 Combined CN value after development
A= 4.0 ac Contributed area of the Site
Runoff - R/O = (P-0.2S)^2/(P+0.8S)
S=(1000/CN)-10
for 1" precipitation
P= 1.0 in
S= 2.3
1 R/O= 0.10 in
Total Volume R/O = R/O.(A)
Total Volume R/O= 17070.4 sft-in
1422.5 cft
Determining size of Bio-Retention Area
Bio-Retention area = Vol / Depth
Considering a mounting of 9 inch above the bio-surface area
Surface Area, SA = Vlo./Depth
Depth 9 in 0.75 ft
Volume 1422.0 cft
SA= 1896.0 sft this mean: 94.8 about 20x95 feet
Bio-Retention Depth and Soil Type:
Bio-Retention area suppose to be filled with pervious soil type and drained underneath
We will use a 4 feet deep of sand mixed with soil and organic to work as pervious bed
and to allow vegetation to be grown
Underneath we will use a perforated pipe to drain the water from the bio-retention
Selecting Fill Soil
We select soil material which must be permeable enough to allow water to pass through
relatively quickly. However, it should retain water so it want quickly dry out
The recommended range of permeabilites for the fill soil should be:
0.5 inches/hour to 6 inches/hour
From experience we choose:
type Conductivity Unit
75% Sand 6 in/h
15% Silt 2 in/h
10% Organic source 0.5-1 in/h (tree leaf compost)
Computing Water Draw through the bio-retention bed
Q=2.3^e-5 . A. K. AH/AL
FAH
SA= 1896 sft K=0.5-6 in/h OL
DH/DL= 1
K= 1 in/h
Q= 0.0441359 cfs
Q= 0.0441359 cfs This is the rate of draw into the bed
Computing Time to Drawdown:
1- Volume to drawdown the 9 inch
Vg_1= SAx9/12
Vs-1 = 1422 cft
Time to remove this volume:
Ts-,= Vol/Q
Ts-1= 32218.7 sec
8.95 h
Approx. 9.0 h
Time to Drawdown water in the bed for: 2 feet
Volume of water in bed
For porosity of 45%
n= 0.45
Volume of water in bed = SA.n.2
Vol= 1706.4 cft
Time to drawdown 2 feet
TS-2= Vol./Q
TS-2= 38662.4 sec
TS-2= 10.7 h
Approx. 11 h
Total time to draw through soil
Total Time 20.0 hours
Sizing the Underdrain Pipes and Gravel Envelope
lets N = number of pipes
N=
Manning equation can be written:
N.D=16{Q.n./S^0.5}^3/8 D is in inches
Considering flow rate in pipes 10 times flow rate, and S=slope equal 0.005
Q*10= 0.4413589 cfs 10 is the safety factor
S= 0.005
n= 0.015 Manning coeff. For 4" corrugated plastic pipe
ND= 6.58 in
That is mean two corrugated 4" pipe
A gravel envelope to be placed around the drainage pipes. At least 2 inches of gravel
should cover the top of the pipes. The minimum thickness of the gravel layer is
dictated by the pipe diameter selected.
Setting Overflow:
For the purpose of letting larger storm to pass and not cause excess water to flow into the bio-retention
area, a weir or overflow device is installed to quickly remove excess runoff from the bio-retention area.
The weir equation is:
Q=Cw. L. H^312
Cw= Weir coefficient
L= Length of Weir
H= Driving Head of Weir
Most weirs will simply be 2x2 or 4x4 raised inlet of a square dimensions.
Peak Flow:
Qp(jo) for Raleigh-Durham is found using Rational Method:
Qp(,o) = CIA
C= 0.63
I(1o) 5.38 in
A= 4 ac
Q(,o)= 13.6 cfs
Total Weir length:
L=Q/Cw. HAl .5
Cw= 3
H= 0.5 ft Assumed water rise above the weir = 6"
L= 12.8 ft
Four sided Box:
3.2
Use 44 box for drainage.
Kamal Essaid PE
Islamic Center of Cary
Level Spreader Design for the Interior Road
The area contributed to the level spreader is the interior road leading to the parking lot:
A = 11250 sq-ft 0.25826446 ac
C = 0.95
1 = 1 in/h
Q= C.I.A
Q= 0.245351 cfs
Peak flow to managed by level spreader is 0.25 cfs
Flow bypass:
A grass swale employing turf reinforced matting should be considered to take the flow
from 10 year storm event. Swale to be designed for 3.9 in/h
Considering down slope ground cover is Grass, allowed velocity for level spreader will be: 1.33 fps
F;--2.3H
Weir equation:
3/2
Q= V.A= CW.L.H
Cw 3
L 15 ft Gravel level
H 0.02 ft spreader
A L.(2/3).(H)
V= 1.5.Cw.H112
Velocity allowed for level spreader is 1/3 of the down slope erosive velocity
in case of grass allowed velocity is: 1.33 fps
for 10 yr storm and I = 3.9 in
Q= (3.9)(0.258)(0.95) = 0.95 cfs
Q= V.A = V.(2/3).H.L
0.95= 1.33(2/3)(0.058)(L)
L= 18.5 ft Grass Case
0.95= 1.5(2/3)(0.074)(L) Gravel Case L= 12 ft
0.95= 1.33(2/3)(0.058)(L) Thicket Shrub,Grass L=18 ft
0.95= (0.67)(2/3)(0.015)(L) Mulgh Case L=141 ft
I 4x6 treated wood

Simple level spreader length calculation:
L= Q / (X.V)
X is equivalent Water Height over Level Spreader
Use table below to select Length
Flow - cfs Down Slope Cover Len th of Level Spreader-ft
1 Grass 13
2 Grass 26
3 Grass 36
5 Grass 65
10 Grass 130
1 Grass 9
2 Grass 18
3 Grass 27
5 Grass 45
10 Grass 90
1 Thicket (shrubs/grass) 13
2 Thicket (shrubs/grass) 26
3 Thicket (shrubs/grass) 39
5 Thicket (shrubs/grass) 65
10 Thicket (shrubs/grass) 130
1 Mulch trees/shrubs 100
2 Mulch trees/shrubs 200
3 Mulch trees/shrubs 300
5 Mulch trees/shrubs N/A
10 Mulch trees/shrubs N/A
For the purpose of our inlet, using Level spreader with a minimum of 15 ft long should be sufficient
I for the cases of Grass, Gravel or Shrub/Grass down slope cover.

TOWN OF CARP
LETTER
,USOC..ZAMD mwvzROPDamu Ccws zums & $'DICJZmmu, INC.
1
1871
April 22, 2004

Kamal Essaid, P.E.
Associated Environmental Consultants and Engineers, Inc.
P.O. Box 31952
Raleigh, NC 27622-1952
Subject Property: Islamic Center of Cary - 1155 W. Chatham Street
Dear Mr. Essaid:
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
' The Town of Cary Transportation Plan requires this portion of W. Chatham Street to have an ultimate 45' back-to-back
street section with sidewalk on both sides, within a minimum 67' right-of-way. It currently exists as an approximate 25'
wide, 2 lane road within a 60' right-of-way.
' Town Ordinance requires the developer, as part of overall site development, to do the following (taken from Town of
Cary Land Development Ordinance Section 8.2.2):
• Dedicate any additional right-of-way necessary to achieve the width required by the Town's Transportation
Plan for all streets adjoining the property;
• Install curbs and gutters along all streets adjoining the property and to pave all streets adjoining the property,
in accordance with the requirements set out in the Town's Standard Specifications and Details Manual and the
Town's Transportation Plan.
' • Install sidewalks and pedestrian pathways in accordance with the requirements set out in the Town's Standard
Specifications and Details Manual where the Town Council or Planning and Zoning Board determines that
the public safety and convenience warrant in view of existing and expected pedestrian traffic
Because improvements to adjacent streets are ordinance requirements, any waiver of the above requirements must be
granted by full Town Council; however, based on our April 20, 2004 meeting regarding DWQ concerns, staff would be
willing to support the following (which will ultimately have to be approved by Town Council):
l.) Widen W. Chatham Street to the full 3.lanes (45' back-to-back) at the project driveway to allow for a separate left
turn lane into the site, then taper back down to 2-lanes towards the railroad bridge.
' 2.) Provide an 11' shoulder behind back-of-curb with no sidewalk.
3.) Provide a 1:1 slope beyond shoulder with geotechnical engineer seal and signature.
' Please feel free to contact me regarding the above information should you have any questions. I can be reached at (919)
462-3933.
' Sincerely,
' Tammy . Spivey
Engineer
TOWN O CARY
' 318 North Academy Street -Cary, NC 17513-PO Box 8005-Cary, NC 27512-8005
tel[phone] - fax [phone]- www.townofcary.org ?°°byM°-+_U01"
ASSOCIATED
ENVIRONMENTAL \
CONSULTANTS &
ENGINEERS, INC. t,
March 29, 2004 ?-
:
Mr. Steve Mitchell
NCDENR
DWQ Regional Office-Raleigh ?yqT ,o;P 110r19
1650 Mail Service Center o,
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650 QG•?Z `?>U?
:
Subject: Islamic Center of Cary `PFC?O
1155 W. Chatham Street r'
Cary, NC
UT to "Kildaire Farms Lake", MacGregor Downs Lake (Swift Creek)
: DWQ # 03-0482
• Dear Mr. Mitchell:
:
• Enclosed is the revised permit application for the above-mentioned Site. The following
revisions have been made to the original application form:
:
1. Stream Impacts & Mitigation
a. Figure 4 (Final Site Plan) details the location and boundaries of
impacts that will occur on Site.
b. 162 liner feet of stream mitigation will occur on Site.
2. Buffer Impacts
a. 14,260.304 square feet of buffers will be impacted on Site. Sidewalk
impact in the buffer consist of 1, 683.628 square feet, while the road
crossing, shoulder, & embankment impact area in the buffer contains
12,576.676 linear feet.
b. Buffer mitigation was removed for the sewer line impact.
:
3. Sidewalk
: a. Due to the widening of W. Chatham Street, a sidewalk is required, per
Town of Cary rules. Buffer mitigation is included in the total buffer
• mitigation area.
:
4. Parking Lot
a. The north side of the southeast parking lot was redesigned to eliminate
minor impacts to Zone 2 of the buffer.
QUALITY SSRVICS AND PRODUCTS AT AN AP7DRDABLE UwsTmcwT
........................................................................................•..............................
P. 0. 130x 31952, Raleigh, NC 27622 9191878-1295 9191878-1298 (FAX)
3 211 Bramer Or1w Raleigh NC 2 7604 http?/www,aec-e,corm
Office Use Only:
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
1 I. Processing
' 1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
[ x ] Section 404 Permit
' [ ] Section 10 Permit
[ x ] 401 Water Quality Certification
[ x ] Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
[ ] Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 12,14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401
' Certification is not requested, check here: [ ]
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is
' proposed for mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to
submittal of PCN), complete Section VIII and check here: [ x ]
' 5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed
on page 4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal
' Management Area of Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further
details), check here: [ ]
United States Army Corp of Engineers Pg. I

I

III. Project Information
1. Name of Project: Islamic Center of Cary
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0753852781 (REID #0071252)
4. Location
a. County: Wake
b. Nearest Town: Cary
c. Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): 102 Trimble Ave.
d. Directions to site (including road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Downtown
Cary, Chatham St. going west; go 1/3 mile after passing SW Maynard Rd.,
Property on left (immediately after church)
e. Site coordinates, if available (UTM): 17 698445E 3960751N
(WGS84/NAD83); Cary Quad
5. Property size (acres): 4.64
6. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): UT to "Kildaire
Farms Lake", MacGregor Downs Lake (Swift Creek)
7. River Basin: Neuse
8. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of
the project at the time of this application: Adjacent land with one dwelling;
adjacent property: church, residences, fire station, commercial
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Project consists of building a church and religious school, including a parking lot,
with moderate weight construction equipment
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Wetland impact required to expand
the road as per Town of Car requirements (addition of a turning lane, sidewalk,
and road slope) and access road to the property
United States Army Corp of Engineers
pg. 3

IV. Prior Project History
The project originally planned for the access road to join the Site via W. Chatham St.
' This plan required a T-intersection over wetlands and a stream on the property, in order
to allow traffic flow on the project site would be adequate Figure 5). After discussing
' the project with the NCDENR-401 Certification Unit, the project scope was then reduced
' to a single access road to the Site to minimize the impact on the wetlands and stream on
the property. Additional changes include cutting back on the sidewalk along the NW
' portion of the property in order to reduce stream impact. The toe slope for the W.
Chatham St. extension was also reduced from 3:1 to 1:1 in order to reduce the wetland
' and stream impact.
I V. Future Project Plans
No future permits are anticipated for this project.
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 4
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
Proposed impacts planned on site include a 28' access road that intersects the
perennial stream on the property, extension of W. Chatham from two lane to three
(includes extending side slope into wetlands ; and placement of sewer line across
wetlands and streams.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:

Wetiand Impact Site

Number

Type of Impact* Area of

Impact
(acres) Located within

100-year
Floodplain**
Distance to Dearest

Stream (liner feet)
Type of
,?
Wetiand**
1 Fill 0.0185 Yes Adjacent Forested
2 Fill 0.0183 Yes Adjacent Forested
3 Fill, Drainage 0.0397 Yes Adjacent Forested
4 Trench Off Site) 0.0300 Yes Adjacent Forested

* 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood
Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps.
Total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.2814 ac
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.1065 ac
3. Individually list all Intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
Type of Impact Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name* Average Width of
Stream Before
Impact
Stream Type
1 Fill 34 UT 2' Perennial
2 Fill 15 UT 2' Perennial
3 Drainage, Fill 113 UT 2' Perennial
4 Sewer line (Offsite) 20 UT 2' Perennial

Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 162
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 5

1 4. Individually list all open water impacts below:

LI

Open Water Impact
Site Number
Type of Impact Area of Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Waterbody
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

5. Pond Creation
' If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should
be included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed
' pond should be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this
application.
' Pond to be created in: [ ] uplands [ ]stream ] wetlands
Describe the method of construction:
Proposed use or purpose of pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond:
' Expected pond surface area:

i

United States Army Corp of Engineers
pg. 6

' VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
The project for the Islamic Center of Cary originally called for one building that spread
' across 4.64 acres. This plan affects one UT's of Kildare Farm Lake. The project was
originally designed to allow an access road on the property to connect via W. Chatham
' St. In order to allow adequate traffic flow on the site, the plan required a T-intersection
' over wetlands and a stream on the property (Figure 5). After discussing the project with
the NCDENR-401 Certification Unit, the project scope was then redesigned. The current
' design reduces the size of the road to a single access road intersecting the stream, thus
minimizing the impact of wetlands and stream on the property. Additional reductions
' include cutting back on the sidewalk along the NW portion of the property to reduce
stream impact. The toe slope for the W. Chatham St. extension was also reduced from a
' 3:1 to a 1:1 slope in order to reduce stream and wetland impact.

United States Army Corp of Engineers
pg. 7

VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of
impacts to freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts
to perennial streams
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of
Nationwide Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will
be required when necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are
minimal. Factors including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative
value of the impacted aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of
appropriate and practicable mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be
appropriate and practicable include, but are not limited to: reducing the size of the
project; establishing and maintaining wetland and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect
open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of aquatic resource functions and
values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar functions and values,
preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in
order for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any
application lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on
hold as incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for
stream restoration in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan:
The proposed mitigation plan for the Site includes minimizing stream impact by
reducing the length of sidewalks, reducing the slope of W. Chatham St. extension
and redesigning the access road in order to minimize the crossing area. A 50 foot
vegetated buffer (Meuse River Buffer Rules) will remain on the property where
development is not planned. In addition, payment will be made to the NCEEP to
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 8

I
offset 12 linear feet of stream mitigation and 14,260 square feet of buffer
' mitigation.
' 2. Mitigation payment to the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
(NCEEP)
' a. Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 12

' b. Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 14,260.304
f
1
683
628
i
Sid
lk i
t i
b
ff
t
,
.
.
ewa
mpac
n
u
er (square
ee
):
' ii. Road crossing, shoulder, & embankment impact
ff
f
12
576
676
i
b
er (square
,
.
n
u
eet):
' c. Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
N/A
f N
i
i
l
i
i
i
d
d
d
. Amount o
on-r
par
an wet
an
m
gat
on requeste
(acres):
t
' e. Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A

United States Army Corp of Engineers
pg. 9

IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use
of public (federal/state) land? [ ] Yes [x]No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document
pursuant to the requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? [ ] Yes [ ] No
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so,
please attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
[ ] Yes [ ] No
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 10
CI
I

n

X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts
to required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must
be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan (Figure
4). All buffers must be shown on a map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the
buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ Regional Office may be included as
appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 213
.0233 (Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 213 .0250
(Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other
( )? [x]Yes [ ] No
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 10,118.027 3 30,354.081
2 4,142.277 1.5 6,213.416
Total 14,260.304 36,567.496
' * Zone 1 extends out 30 ft perpendicular from near bank of
channel; Zone 2 extends an additional 20 feet from the edge
of Zone 1.

2. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is
proposed. Please attach all appropriate information as identified within 15A
NCAC 213.0242 or.0260.
The proposed buffer mitigation for the Site involves payment to the Riparian
Buffer Restoration Fund. The maximum amount of mitigation that the NCEEP
will accept for this project is 43,065.77 sq ft. It has been determined that only
36,567.496 sq ft will be affected.
United States Army Corp of Engineers
pg. 11

XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
' 1. Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) verses total acreage on
the site. Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters
' and wetlands downstream from the property.
Total site area is 4.6 acres. The imperviousness after development will be 39 %
' which is equal to 1.8 acres, including the buffer. The proposed stormwater
control is a bio-garden in front of building, consisting of two areas each (45' x
' 90'). Proposed bio-garden will treat the stormwater from building and parking
lots. The biogarden section is 4.0' deep, filled with mainly sand and a small
' amount of silt and organic matter (75/15/10 % sand/silt/organic matter).
' Biogarden is designed to have a minimum mounting above bio-garden surface,
where the over flow is collected by weirs and drained to the stream. (Figure 6)

United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 12

' XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
1. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or
' discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available
capacity of the subject facility.
' A sewer line will be constructed from the building _(on site), then run off site
across a 20' stream easement along an UT to a 20' public sewer easement
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
' 1. Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any
' Buffer Rules? [ ] Yes [x]NO
2. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? [ ] Yes [ x ] No

F

XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional)
1. Constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules.
Inclement weather, building permits, City of Cary approval

ApplieantfAgent's Sigffiture
3 /3cl?j
Date
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 13

J

Office Use Only:
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
' I. Processing
' 1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
[ x ] Section 404 Permit WE1?NpS 1401 GROUP
[ ] Section 10 Permit
[ x ] 401 Water Quality Certification ?pR 0 2004
[ x ] Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules WAR OUAUTY SECTION
[ ] Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 12,14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401
Certification is not requested, check here: [ ]
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is
proposed for mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to
submittal of PCN), complete Section VIII and check here: [ x ]
1 5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed
on page 4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal
Management Area of Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further
details), check here: [ ]

r,
rl
' United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 1

III. Project Information
1. Name of Project: Islamic Center of Carv
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0753852781 (REID #0071252)
4. Location
a. County: Wake
b. Nearest Town: C r
c. Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): 102 Trimble Ave.
d. Directions to site (including road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Downtown
Cary, Chatham St. going est, go 1/3 mile after passing SW Maynard Rd.,
Property on left immediately after church)
e. Site coordinates, if available (UTM): 17 698445E 3960751N
(WGS84/NAD83); Cary Quad
5. Property size (acres): 4.64
6. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): UT to "Kildaire
Farms Lake", MacGregor Downs Lake (Swift Creek)
7. River Basin: Neuse
8. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of
the project at the time of this application: Adiacent land with one dwelling;
adjacent property: church, residences, fire station, commercial
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Project consists of building a church and religious school, including a parking lot,
with moderate weight construction equipment
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Wetland impact required to expand
the road as per Town of Cary requirements (addition of a turning lane, sidewalk,
and road slope) and access road to the propert
y
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 3
IV. Prior Project History
The project originally planned for the access road to join the Site via W. Chatham St.
' This plan required a T-intersection over wetlands and a stream on the property, in order
to allow traffic flow on the project site would be adequate (Figure 5). After discussing
' the project with the NCDENR-401 Certification Unit, the project scope was then reduced
to a single access road to the Site to minimize the impact on the wetlands and stream on
t the property. Additional changes include cutting back on the sidewalk along, the NW
portion of the property in order to reduce stream impact. The toe slope for the W.
Chatham St. extension was also reduced from 3:1 to 1:1 in order to reduce the wetland
' and stream impact.
V. Future Project Plans
No future permits are anticipated for this project.
I
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 4
' VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
' Proposed impacts planned on site include a 28' access road that intersects the
perennial stream on the property, extension of W. Chatham from two lane to three
' (includes extending side slope into wetlands ; and placement of sewer line across
' wetlands and streams.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:

Wetland Impact Site

Number
*
Type of Impact* Area of

Impact
(acres) Located within

100-year
Fooodplain**
Distance to Near6st

Stream (liner feet)
'?ype,of

Wetland'
1 Fill 0.0185 Yes Adjacent Forested
2 Fill 0.0183 Yes Adjacent Forested
3 Fill, Drainage 0.0397 Yes Adjacent Forested
4 Trench (Off Site) 0.0300 Yes Adjacent Forested

i I I I I
* 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood
' Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps.
Total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.2814 ac
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.1065 ac

3. Individually list all Intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
Type of Impact Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name's Average Width of
Stream Before
Impact
Stream Type
1 Fill 34 UT 2' Perennial
2 Fill 15 UT 2' Perennial
3 Drainage, Fill 113 UT 2' Perennial
4 Sewer line (Offsite) 20 UT 2' Perennial

1 Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 162
1
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 5

4. Individually list all open water impacts below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number Type of Impact Area of Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbndy
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

5. Pond Creation
' If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should
be included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed
' pond should be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this
application.
Pond to be created in: [ ] uplands [ ] stream [ ] wetlands
Describe the method of construction:
' Proposed use or purpose of pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond:
' Expected pond surface area:

United States Army Corp of Engineers
pg. 6

' VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
The project for the Islamic Center of Cary originally called for one building that spread
t across 4.64 acres. This plan affects one UT's of Kildare Farm Lake. The project was
originally designed to allow an access road on the property to connect via W. Chatham
St. In order to allow adequate traffic flow on the site, the plan required a T-intersection
over wetlands and a stream on the property (Figure 5). After discussing the project with
the NCDENR-401 Certification Unit, the project scope was then redesigned. The current
design reduces the size of the road to a single access road intersecting the stream, thus
' minimizing the impact of wetlands and stream on the property. Additional reductions
include cutting back on the sidewalk along the NW portion of the property to reduce
stream impact. The toe slope for the W. Chatham St. extension was also reduced from a
' 3:1 to a 1:1 slope in order to reduce stream and wetland impact.
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 7

VIII. Mitigation

1

DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of
impacts to freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts
to perennial streams
USA CE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of
Nationwide Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will
be required when necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are
minimal. Factors including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative
value of the impacted aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of
appropriate and practicable mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be
appropriate and practicable include, but are not limited to: reducing the size of the
project; establishing and maintaining wetland and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect
open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of aquatic resource functions and
values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar functions and values,
preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in
order for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any
application lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on
hold as incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for
stream restoration in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan:
The proposed mitigation plan for the Site includes minimizing stream impact by
reducing the length of sidewalks, reducin tg hype of W. Chatham St. extension
and redesigning the access road in order to minimize the crossing area. A 50 foot
vegetated buffer (Meuse River Buffer Rules) will remain on the property where
development is not planned. In addition, payment will be made to the NCEEP to
United States Army Corp of Engineers
pg. 8

offset 12 linear feet of stream mitigation and 14,260 square feet of buffer
' mitigation.
' 2. Mitigation payment to the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
(NCEEP)
' a. Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 12
b. Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 14,260.304
' i. Sidewalk impact in buffer (square feet): 1,683.628
ii. Road crossing, shoulder, & embankment impact
' in buffer (square feet): 12,576.676
' c. Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
d. Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
' e. Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 9
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use
of public (federal/state) land? [ ] Yes [ x ] No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document
pursuant to the requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? [ ] Yes [ ] No
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so,
please attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
[ ] Yes [ ] No
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 10
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts
to required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must
be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan (Figure
4). All buffers must be shown on a map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the
' buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ Regional Office may be included as
appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B
' .0233 (Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250
' (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other
( )? [ x ] Yes [ ] No

Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 10,118.027 3 30,354.081
2 4,142.277 1.5 6,213.416
Total 14,260.304 36,567.496
* Zone I extends out 30 ft perpendicular from near bank of
channel; Zone 2 extends an additional 20 feet from the edge
of Zone 1.
' 2. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is
' proposed. Please attach all appropriate information as identified within 15A
NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
The proposed buffer mitigation for the Site involves payment to the Riparian
Buffer Restoration Fund. The maximum amount of mitigation that the NCEEP
' will accept for this project is 43,065.77 sq ft. It has been determined that only
36,567.496 sq ft will be affected.

United States Army Corp of Engineers Pg. I1

XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
' 1. Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) verses total acreage on

7

the site. Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters
and wetlands downstream from the property.
Total site area is 4.6 acres. The imperviousness after development will be 39 %
which is equal to 1.8 acres, including the buffer. The proposed stormwater
control is a bio-garden in front of building, consisting of two areas each (45' x
90'). Proposed bio izarden will treat the stormwater from building and parking
lots. The biogarden section is 4.0' deep, filled with mainly sand and a small
amount of silt and organic matter (75/15/10 % sand/silt/organic matter).
Biogarden is designed to have a minimum mounting above bio-garden surface,
where the over flow is collected by weirs and drained to the stream. (Figure 6)
United States Army Corp of Engineers
pg. 12

XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
I . Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or
discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available
capacity of the subject facility.
A sewer line will be constructed from the building (on site), then run off site
across a 20' stream easement along an UT to a 20' public sewer easement
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
1. Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any
Buffer Rules? [ ] Yes [x]NO
2. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? [ ] Yes [ x ] No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional)
1. Constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules.
Inclement weather, building permits, City of Cary approval
Appliemrt/Agent's S
?3W`D(y
Date
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 13
ASSOCIATED
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSULTANTS &
-4 ENGINEERS, INC.
March 2, 2004 N01103S K Off') "3J."
Mr. Steve Mitchell b001 i TM
NCDENR
DWQ Regional Office-Raleigh
1650 Mail Service Center df1080 ?OV I SGNb 1'?3M
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Subject: Islamic Center of Cary
1155 W. Chatham Street
Cary, NC
UT to "Kildaire Farms Lake", MacGregor Downs Lake (Swift Creek)
Dear Mr. Mitchell:
Enclosed is the permit application for the above-mentioned Site. The Site will require
NWP 12 and NWP 14. AEC&E has minimized the total impact on Site by reducing the
access road across the perennial stream on Site. Additional reductions include: a
reduction in the required slope for the W. Chatham St. extension, reduction in sidewalk
area to minimize stream and wetland impacts, and the relocation of the sewer easement
so that it only intersects one stream.
Additional copies have been sent to USACOE-Raleigh Office and the Wetlands/401 Unit.
:
If you have any additional questions or comments, please feel free to contact me at (919)
878-1295 (ext. 128).
• Sincerely,
Matthew D. Thomas
Environmental Scientist
AEC&E
:
41 QUALZTY SERVICE AND PRODUCTS AT AN AFFORDABLE INVESTmwT
......................................................................................................................
P. 0, Box 31952, Raleigh, NC 27622 9191878-1295 9191878-1298 (FAX)
3 211 13ramer Chive Raleigh NC 2 7604 htt V1vm w,aec-e,com

i
C

PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION (PCrTI

1

APPLICATION FORM
I
Associated Environmental Consultants & Engineers
1
Office Use Only:
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
[ x ] Section 404 Permit
[ ] Section 10 Permit
[ x ] 401 Water Quality Certification
[ x ] Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
[ ] Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 12,14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401
Certification is not requested, check here: [ ]
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is
proposed for mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to
submittal of PCN), complete section VIII and check here: [ x ]
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed
on page 4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal
Management Area of Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further
details), check here: [ ]
United States Army Corp of Engineers Pg. I

I
III. Project Information
1. Name of Project: Islamic Center of Carv
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0753852781 (REID #0071252)
4. Location
a. County: Wake
b. Nearest Town: Cary
c. Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): 102 Trimble Ave.
d. Directions to site (including road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Downtown
Cary, Chatham St. going west; go 1/3 mile after passing SW Maynard Rd.,
Property on left (immediately after church)
e. Site coordinates, if available (UTM): 17 698445E 3960751N
(WGS84/NAD83); Cary Quad
5. Property size (acres): 4.64

6. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): UT to "Kildaire
Farms Lake", MacGregor Downs Lake (Swift Creek)
7. River Basin: Neuse
8. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of
the project at the time of this application: Adjacent land with one dwelling;
adjacent property: church, residences, fire station, commercial
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Project consists of building a church and religious school, including a parking lot,
with moderate weight construction equipment
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Wetland impact required to expand
the road as per Town of Cary requirements (addition of a turning lane, sidewalk,
and road slope) and access road to the propert
y
United States Army Corp of Engineers
pg. 3
IV.

Prior Project History
The project originally planned for the access road to join the Site via W. Chatham St.
This plan required a T-intersection over wetlands and a stream on the property, in order
to allow traffic flow on the project site would be adequate (Figure 5). After discussing
the project with the NCDENR-401 Certification Unit, the project scope was then reduced
to a single access road to the Site to minimize the impact on the wetlands and stream on
the property. Additional changes include cutting back on the sidewalk along the NW
portion of the property in order to reduce stream impact. The toe slope for the W.
Chatham St. extension was also reduced from 3:1 to 1:1 in order to reduce the wetland
and stream impact.
Future Project Plans
No future permits are anticipated for this project.
United States Army Corp of Engineers
pg. 4
I
' VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
' Proposed impacts planned on site include a 28' access road that intersects the
perennial stream on the property, extension of W. Chatham from two lane to three
' (includes extending side slope into wetlands); and placement of sewer line across
wetlands and streams.
' 2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
I
I
I

Wetland Impact Site

Number
*
Type of Impact Area of

Impact
(acres) Located within

100-year
Floodplain**
Distance to Nearest

Stream (liner feet)
Type of
***
Wetland
I Fill 0.0185 Yes Adjacent Forested
2 Fill 0.0183 Yes Adjacent Forested
3 Fill, Drainage 0.0397 Yes Adjacent Forested
4 Trench (Off Site) 0.0300 Yes Adjacent Forested

* 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood
' Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps.
Total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.2814 ac
' Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.1065 ac
I
3. Individually list all Intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
Type of Impact Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name* Average Width of
Stream Before
Impact
Stream Type
1 Fill 34 UT 2' Perennial
2 Fill 15 UT 2' Perennial
3 Drainage, Fill 113 UT 2' Perennial
4 Sewer line (Offsite) 20 UT 2' Perennial

Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 182
1 United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 5
I
4. Individually list all open water impacts below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number
Type of Impact Area of Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Waterbody
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

5. Pond Creation
' If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should
be included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed
' pond should be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this
application.
' Pond to be created in: [ ] uplands [ ] stream [ ] wetlands
Describe the method of construction:
' Proposed use or purpose of pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond:
' Expected pond surface area:
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 6
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
The project for the Islamic Center of Cary originally called for one building that spread
' across 4.64 acres. This plan affects one UT's of Kildare Farm Lake. The project was
originally designed to allow an access road on the property to connect via W. Chatham
' St. In order to allow adequate traffic flow on the site, the plan required a T-intersection
over wetlands and a stream on the property (Figure 5). After discussing the project with
' the NCDENR-401 Certification Unit, the project scope was then redesigned. The current
design reduces the size of the road to a single access road intersecting the stream, thus
' minimizing the impact of wetlands and stream on the property. Additional reductions
include cutting back on the sidewalk along the NW portion of the property to reduce
' stream impact. The toe slope for the W. Chatham St. extension was also reduced from a
' 3:1 to a 1:1 slope in order to reduce stream and wetland impact.
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 7
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of
impacts to freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts
to perennial streams
USA CE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of
Nationwide Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will
be required when necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are
minimal. Factors including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative
value of the impacted aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of
appropriate and practicable mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be
appropriate and practicable include, but are not limited to: reducing the size of the
project; establishing and maintaining wetland and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect
open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of aquatic resource functions and
values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar functions and values,
preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in
order for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any
application lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on
hold as incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for
stream restoration in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan:
The proposed mitigation plan for the Site includes minimizing stream impact by
reducing the length of sidewalks, reducing the slope of W. Chatham St. extension
and redesigning the access road in order to minimize the crossing area. A 50 foot
vegetated buffer (Meuse River Buffer Rules) will remain on the property where
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 8

development is not planned In addition payment will be made to the NCEEP to
' offset 32 linear feet of stream mitigation and 0.95865 acres of buffer mitigation.
' 2. Mitigation payment to the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
(NCEEP)
t): 32
f
li
t
d
i
i
near
ee
e
(
on reques
gat
a. Amount of stream mit
b. Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0.95865
' c. Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
d. Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
' e. Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A

1 --
United States Army Corp of Engineers Pg. 9

IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
I . Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use
of public (federal/state) land? [ ] Yes [ x ] No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document
pursuant to the requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? [ ] Yes [ ] No
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so,
please attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
[ ] Yes [ ] No
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 10
' X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts
' to required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must
' be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan (Figure
4). All buffers must be shown on a map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the
' buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ Regional Office may be included as
appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B
.0233 (Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250
(Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other
' ( )? [ x ] Yes [ ] No
Zone* lmpact
(square feet)
F Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 0.26187 3 0.78561
2 0.11536 1.5 0.17304
Total 0.35653 0.95865
* "Zone I extends out 30 tt perpendicular from near bank of
channel; Zone 2 extends an additional 20 feet horn the edge
ol'Zone 1.
' 2. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is
' proposed. Please attach all appropriate information as identified within 15A
NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
The proposed buffer mitigation for the Site involves payment to the Riparian
Buffer Restoration Fund The maximum amount of mitigation that the NCEEP
will accept for this project is 98865 sq ft. It has been determined that only
.95865 sq_ft will be affected.
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. I l
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
' 1. Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) verses total acreage on
the site. Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters
and wetlands downstream from the property.
Total site area is 4.6 acres. The imperviousness after development will be 39 %
which is equal to 1.8 acres, including the buffer. The proposed stormwater
control is a bio-garden in front of building, consisting of two areas each (45' x
90'). Proposed bio-garden will treat the stormwater from building and parking
lots. The biogarden section is 4.0' deep, filled with mainly sand and a small
amount of silt and organic matter (75/15/10 % sand/silt/organic matter).
Biogarden is designed to have a minimum mounting above bio-garden surface,
where the over flow is collected by weirs and drained to the stream. (Figure 6)
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 12
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
1. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or
discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available
capacity of the subject facility.
A sewer line will be constructed from the building (on site), then run off site
across a 20' stream easement along an UT to a 20' public sewer easement
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
1. Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any
Buffer Rules? [ ] Yes [x]NO
2. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? [ ] Yes [x I No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional)
1. Constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules.
Inclement weather, building permits, City of Cary approval
App icant/Agent's Signatu

Date
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 13

FIGURES
Associated Environmental Consultants & Engineers

1 ?? x
;• U ?a +AL ... • F..r+a {- _ 4 ' 1_ _ 51,i\,., ,y,YV _+V*,v
k!? f +.(r '!-`t'om -`? ` 'P( L ?? '? _,Ej w'•y't 4_t...
('4ls /
a• Y??? + ?t ?i r .vr I" a a
I V.
• f .?,?,? ?r ? l: rP I ? 7 ? ? : _ - ? a `fir ..,. , i Y s.
P
f'r. v 4., T _.'Y `'i A a°, u3rf{ S`rn r' s•' .e6s .7 ,4.
4""1 n
_ lA t R
Ji"
l .y d.. r! '?L• 4 ?i.? _ yam(- a ??; ?y ..?
r
_._.? y_.3 _ ?i'., ? .? ! ?,.lr , ?...4} +L\ 1-" • `{, ? ??' :M'^•^.-•} _?( ? ?_+{ . J'".•."_ •./f• ••r a 'M.+ f } ,.1 + A, A .. S.. ... ?. ' J' } V yy
/rrr
24
'e a 1' - a ti .
11,74,
,` x •y`.3o ? ?-'A ? '}? .anS tp A 13 ` J ? `l (ab L? ? _ ?- '
tm?
;Fl 'i I,r Ste, a
a?
_- --zl F? 1'_jj: 9 1 2. ai ($p??l. ? ? rr; j. Yy???'ir s,t ?ra!• 'V
1 ,.A... .N'?rQw - r'?•z7? ! {x(6'1 !c V ?s-.,9»..'`? ` 'S
1 4, J-1
1y '4 '+. ,- t .Fy rp ,Q/ tr f" ( -`4?a ?. '?{ i tf ; 'w., -... i• * •' • "°" 1 '^ f<o
e
?,+. :-.a' .y ?n? lei .`? ? Y Y?F?arRALp(; ? :T _ T t Y
rr
O"v
jk4
14,
4 i
> fir, t * , ?. ? ? n ? R r
1'.
rNote C~rrclp 1 icates
1504`Foo yRa us' and s ite
\
FIGURE # I - E TAj? ?SITE LOCATION MAP -? `°NE AE
ISLAMIC CENTER OF CARP ASSOCIATED ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
AND ENGINEERS, INC.
CARY, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA RALEIGH, NC www.aec-e.com
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I

E

'
GeD2
s ±..• t.s ?

r1 mYC ?
- , ?,? . n-r e a : s cec2 ??
'''
' 4 -o: Asa2 - . As
\
_ ?
,,?,? ?
? ? G8B2
Ws - -
?
c? e -f ? ? i _ ? ?`? gip. ? ,. ?
:?
-`1"+ ?
2 :-•a,
y
? _
- GeC

r r r
r '? GeD2. , ^
^ As82
Myc MYE7.r? _ .V-/ ;
^' 1
?z T
^ Ag
As?
MyC _
• G
? l _ a:
p
iY? s
'\ JirC2 ' w!in
., ueB2\
??Sn. HrD2 p
9 / }a•
WsB
GtB ? Y ?"_ aC2=-_ = GeD
Enc

? GeQZ ?,,
k Z
5 1
- t
?
•
i
?
•i ?
,? LdC2
', Cr82
? GeB
,(-
? ??,
/
G
?a:
?
_
.
/
Ge82 / F
4y6
CP / YG_eC2 ? ..

2' ;
16
r
r
f Ld82. _ ? GeC
,.CrE, - g2/:;:• GeC2 ?
? ' - e

tay3' Ws82 r s? HrBc ?ocZEZ Y 3
` sC c C GeC
}y ` s r yw Ge8 / } Ge82 `M t? l AbD a ter.
vyG .z CrE ;'ti GeB2 /' t : J rt 'a 1 I G.
FIrE.,f "?-? f.sr s z z G2Da ayt t n
AsC
?-•-.' My-0 G;..?.
'WSIB
rt??? 3eB2 ..,-
J .yr A.. Y
:vr \ 1 1Yy- ?Gz82' Hr87J'3- 1 r1 4y AsG A5C2 Hr?92
2 4. rv_ f z GeD2
k? Geb2
y rE`?_?? / tg. w ? ; '? ? ?: ??? "?• ? - eC2 s `ar? Y.:F Jam.- TM`eC2
o-1GeD2 ,--
?Sgt CeB2
CrG z "`a ?' 1HrD ? Ve ?' HrC
t r \ ( h. ?.? ? \ v _? H rB . F ' GeC2
As8 r
c IN ?, ?, SITE 2 _ GeD2 Esc:
?! HrD2. S GeB2 ?Ce62 `Kri
Ws8 v 4?+ GeB2 r ?$
eC2 GeD2
s j ..?
WsC2 MB Ge82 l frc HrG
GeC2
l Ws6 ?yC?'9 w ??>`1yAa -iifC CeB2 Ge Z oN=< ~ e.2 AgB
WsC2 k` r?tl/-? 3 GeBZ' Cen a _ Hr r :.?\ ?i r
y
GeB
z HrBT Cec? ?i GeD2 / ASC2
Z"lsC7 - j ' CrB2Eri62 I ?.,' CaB2 H C7 ?.
/ acs \ Ct6 ms's to , EnB 1{r8Z ,1' APCZ ?. sCeC `CeF AsB2
Ws82 `? ti.ve f x F - +?
2
' r+ I
lVSC` rt,- S"` .' CtC ?? E_ 7 r nzt2 CeB2
! iv a+'t
WAKE COUNTY SOIL SURVEY MAP ASSOCIATED ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
ISLAMIC CENTER OF CARY AND ENGINEERS, INC.
CARY, NORTH CAROLINA RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA
FIGURE 3 ?1ARCH ?004 Project No. 5029

?
I
Water-flow ?1V
'V
Ti
-
Drainage pipes with gravel envelope Vt/
Darcy's Law applied to a rain garden
cross-section. Specific discharge (q) Is equal to
hydraulic conductivity (I) multiplied by the ratio of
water height (AH) divided by layer thickness (L). Y
Overland flow from parking lot into rain
garden/bio-retention area. Water flows between .
parking stops before spilling into the blo-retention
median.
sheetflow
Parking lot
I
Curb stops
n © !
:•???:.Y.,;,Y.'«.-r: w.Y: ?.v-;,..;,,:: ?... ,;.,;f:.;;•:,;*- Stone diaphragm
VY• Y 4••••••4444.44• •• ?•r•il/M?v••OY4 •r••
•L ••4J"•4•.4444444444 ? •4.4 i••••4444.449 4'
• •44444444444.44444i• 4444••i•4.4•Y'•44• Grass filter strip
'444i 44••44.44444.4• ?•• f44.4. 4444. 4 ii i 4•
'••t•••444•i44.444•i• •Y4.4'A 4.444.4444
•1 •C :•••i ••444 ?/`?"'?`•? i••4 •i14••44 ?i4 Y•i4
•444 ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 4114'
Outlet ,* F DO Optional sand layer
a -k :33` p

Overflow ' Gravel curtain
11catch basin" Berm drain overflow
Plan view of a rain garden/bio-retention area. Reproduced from Stormwater Modules with permission from the
Center for Watershed Protection.
* Hunt, W.F. and Nancy White. Urban Waterways: Designing Rain Gardens (Bio-Retention Areas). NC Cooperative Extension
Service-Mid Neuse Non Point Source Team. pgs 6-9. 2001.
A
PROPOSED STORMWATER BMP - BIOGARDEN ASSOCIATED ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
ISLAMIC CENTER OF CARY AND ENGINEERS, INC.
CARY, NORTH CAROLINA RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
FIGURE 6 MARCH 2004 Project No. 5029

L

WETLAND DELINEATION FORMS
F

7

Associated Environmental Consultants & Engineers
E

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: Islamic Center of Cary
Applicant / Owner:
Investigator: Matthew D. Thomas Job Number:
City:
State: 02-SP-156
Cary
North Carolina
x1 Do normal circumstances exist on the site?
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)?
J Is the area a potential problem area? Community ID: Floodplain
Transect ID:
Plot ID: WD-I
Remarks: Site located due south of West. Chatham St.; Site only disturbed by an ephemeral stream connecting to UT to "Kildaire Farms Lake".

VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species
Tree Common Name Stratum Indicator
Acer rubrum Red Maple 40% FAC
Acer saccharum Sugar Maple 10% FACU-
Cornus lorida Dogwood 10% FACU

Herbaceous
Toxicodendron radicans Posion Iv 50% FAC
unknown Carex Unknown sedge 20% FACW

Vine
Parthenocissus uin ue olia Vir inia Creeper 20% IAC

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-): 100%
Remarks:

HYDROLOGY
J Recorded Data (Describe in remarks)
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gage
Aerial Photograph
Other (describe in remarks)

IxI No Recorded Data Available

Field Observations
Depth of Surface Water:
Depth of Free Water in Pit:
Depth of Saturated Soils: Primary Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Inundated
x Saturation in upper 12"
J Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Drainage Pattern in Wetlands

0 in.
N/M
4 in. Secondary Hydrology Indicators
x Oxidized Root Channels
Water-stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Other (describe in remarks)
Remarks:

SOILS
Man Unit Name (Series and Phase) Drainage Class
Herndon Series Excessively Drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Well Drained
Fine, Kaolinitic, Thennic, Typic Kanhapludults ( Moderately Well Drained
Somewhat Poorly Drained
x Poorly Drained
Very Poorly Drained Confirm Manned Tvpe
I Yes
x I No
Soil Description

Depth in.
Horizon Matrix Colors
Munsell Moist Mottle Colors
Munsell Moist Mottle
Abundance/Size/Contrast
Grade
Class
Type
1 -4 A IOYR 4/3 SL Fine Granular
4- 10 Btl 5Y 5/2 7.5 YR 5/8 Few, Fine, Distinct SCL Medium Suban ular Block
10 - 24 Bt2 5Y 7/1 5YR 5/8, 2.5Y 8/6 Common, Medium-Fine, Distinc t CL Medium Suban ular Block
_24-38+ BO 2.5Y 6/3 5YR 5/8, 7.5YR 5/6 Common, Medium, Prominent CL Medium Suban ular Block

Hydric Soil Indicators
Histosol x Reducing Conditions
Histic Epipedon Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors
Sulfidic Odor Concretions
Aquatic Moist Regime J High Organic % in Surface Layer
Organic Streaking
listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (explain in remarks)
Remarks: Oxidized root channels noted in BtI

IVETLAND.DETERMINATION
x? Hydrophytic Vegetation Present
x Hydric Soils Present x I This Data Point is a Wetland
x Wetland Hydrology Present
Remarks:

L

D

J

;DA.TA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND-DETERMINATION"
(1987 COE NVetlLnds Determination IVtenua[}.
Project / Site: Islamic Center of Cary
Applicant / Owner:
Investigator: Matthew D. Thomas Job Number:
City:
State: 02-SP-156
Cary
North Carolina
[ x ] Do normal circumstances exist on the site?
[ ] Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)?
[ ] Is the area a potential problem area? Community ID:
Transect ID:
Plot ID: Floodplain

WD-2
Remarks: Site located due south of West. Chatham St.; Site only disturbed by an ephemeral stream connecting to UT to "Kildaire Farms Lake

VEGET
Dominant Plant Species
Trees Common Name Stratum Indicator
cer rubrum Red Maple 40% FAC
Fa s and! olia Beech 20% FAC+
Cornus orida Dogwood 10% FACU
flax o aca American Holly 20% FAC-
Fraxinus americana White Ashe 10% FACU

Herbaceous
Toxicodendron radicans Posion Iv 30% FAC
unknown Carex Unknown sedge 10% FACW
Onoclea sensibilis L. Sensitive Fern 20% FACW
Commelina communis Dayflower 5% FAC

Vines
Parthenocissus uin ue olia Virginia Creeper 10% FAC
Lonicera 'o onica Japanese Honeysuckle 5% FAC-

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-): 100%
Remarks:

H MOL"OGY;
[ ] Recorded Data (Describe in remarks
[ ] Stream, Lake, or Tide Gage
[ ] Aerial Photograph
( ] Other (describe in remarks)

[ x ] No Recorded Data Available

Field Observations
Depth of Surface Water:
Depth of Free Water in Pit:
Depth of Saturated Soils: Primary Wetland Hydrolog;
[ ] Inundated
[ x ] Saturation in upper 12'
[ ] Water Marks
[ ] Drift Lines
[ ] Sediment Deposits
[ ] Drainage Pattern in Wetlands

0 in.
N/M
7 in. Secondary Hydrology Indicators
[ x ] Oxidized Root Channels
[ ] Water-stained Leaves
[ ] Local Soil Survey Data
[ ] FAC-Neutral Test
[ ] Other (describe in remarks)
Remarks:

L

n

SOILS ,. ?.:..
May Unit Name (Series and Phase) Drainaee Class Confirm Mapped Type
Herndon silt loam, 6-10% slopes, eroded [ ] Excessively Drained [ J Yes
Taxonomy (Suberoun): [ j Well Drained [ x I No
Fine, Kaolinitic, Thermic, Typic Kanhapludults [ x J Moderately Well Drained
[ ] Somewhat Poorly Drained
[ J Poorly Drained
[ j Very Poorly Drained
Soil Description

Depth in.
Horizon Matrix Colors
Munsell Moist Mottle Colors
Munsell Moist Mottle
Abundance/Size/Contrast
Grade
Class
Type
1-7 A I OYR 5/3 l OYR 3/2; 5YR 5/6 Few, Fine, Faint SL Fine Granular
7-31 Btl 5Y 6/3 7.5YR 5/6; 5Y 3/1 Common, Fine, Distinct SCL Medium Suban ular Bloc
31 - 40 Bt2 5Y 7/2 5Y 4/4; 5YR 5/8 Common, Medium, Prominen CL Medium Suban ular Block
_40-51+ Bt3 IOYR 6/1 5YR 8/1 Few, Fine, Distinct CL Medium Suban ular Bloc

Hvdric Soil Indicators
[ ] Histosol [ J Reducing Conditions [ ] Organic Streaking
[ J Histic Epipedon [ J Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors [ ] Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
[ ] Sulfidic Odor [ ] Concretions [ J Listed on National Hydric Soils List
[ ] Aquatic Moist Regime [ J High Organic % in Surface Layer [ J Other (explain in remarks)
Remarks:

WETL:AIY&D ERMINAXION
[ x ] Hydrophytic Vegetation Present
[ ] Hydric Soils Present [ J This Data Point is a Wetland
[ x J Wetland Hydrology Present
Remarks:

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: Islamic Center of Cary
Applicant / Owner:
Investigator: Matthew D. Thomas Job Number:
City:
State: 02-SP-156
Cary
North Carolina
I x ] Do normal circumstances exist on the site?
] Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)?
( ] Is the area a potential problem area? Community ID:
Transect ID:
Plot ID: Riverine

WD-3
Remarks: Site located due south of West. Chatham St.; Site only disturbed by an ephemeral stream connecting to UT to "Kildaire Farms Lake".

VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species
Trees Common Name Stratum Indicator
Acer rubrum Red Maple 20% FAC
Fa us randi olia Beech 20% FAC+
Cornus orida Dogwood 5% FACU
Car inus caroliniana Ironwood 10% FAC

Herbaceous
Toxicodendron radicans Posion Iv 20% PAC
unknown Carex Unknown sedge 10% FACW
Ath rium as lenioides Southern Lad Fern 10% FAC

Vines
Parthenocissus uin ue olia Virginia Creeper 10% I-AC

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-): 100%
Remarks:

HYDROLOGY
J Recorded Data (Describe in remarks)
J Stream, Lake, or Tide Gage
] Aerial Photograph
J Other (describe in remarks)

I x J No Recorded Data Available

Field Observations
Depth of Surface Water:
Depth of Free Water in Pit:
Depth of Saturated Soils: Primary Wetland Hydrology Ii
J J Inundated
J Saturation in upper 12"
J Water Marks
Drift Lines
J Sediment Deposits
J Drainage Pattern in Wetlands

0 in.
N/M
17 in. Secondary Hydrology Indicators
J Oxidized Root Channels
J Water-stained Leaves
J J Local Soil Survey Data
J FAC-Neutral Test
Other (describe in remarks)
Remarks:

J

soil's
Man Unit Name (Series and Phase)
Chewacla soils (0-2% slopes)
Taxonomy (Subgroup):
Fine-Loamy, Mixed, Active, Thermic,
Fluvaquentic Dystrudepts Drainage Class Confirm Manned Type
[ ] Excessively Drained [ I Yes
[ ] Well Drained [ x I No
[ ] Moderately Well Drained
[ x I Somewhat Poorly Drained
[ I Poorly Drained
[ J Very Poorly Drained
Soil Description

Depth in.
Horizon Matrix Colors
Munsell Moist Mottle Colors
Munsell Moist Mottle
Abundance/Size/Contrast
Grade
Class
Type
1 -2 A 7.5YR 4/6 SL Fine Granular
2- 16 Bt 1 5Y 6/3 2.5Y 5/2; 5YR 4/6 Common, Fine Distinct SL Fine Suban ular Block
16 - 38 Bt2 5Y 6/6 7.5YR 5/8; 7.5YR 6/8 Common, Medium, Prominent SL Medium Suban ular Blocky
_38-49+ Bt3 5Y 6/1 5Y 4/1 Common, Medium, Prominen SL Medium Suban ular Block

Hydric Soil Indicators
[ ] Histosol [
[ ] Histic Epipedon [
[ J Sulfidic Odor (
[ J Aquatic Moist Regime [
I Reducing Conditions [ J Organic Streaking
] Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors [ ] Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
J Concretions [ J Listed on National Hydric Soils List
] High Organic % in Surface Layer [ I Other (explain in remarks)
Remarks:

WETLAND DETERMINATION
[ x ] Hydrophytic Vegetation Present
] Hydric Soils Present
[ ] Wetland Hydrology Present
[ I This Data Point is a Wetland
Remarks:
J

n

1

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: Islamic Center of Cary
Applicant / Owner:
Investigator: Matthew D. Thomas Job Number:
City:
State: 02-SP-156
Cary
North Carolina
[ x Do normal circumstances exist on the site?
[ [ Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)?
[ [ Is the area a potential problem area? Community ID:
Transect ID:
Plot ID: Floodplain

WD-4
Remarks: Site located due south of West. Chatham St., Site only disturbed by an ephemeral stream connecting to UT to "Kildaire Farms Lake".

VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species
Trees Common Name Stratum Indicator
Aesculus s lvatica Buckeye 5% FAC
Fa s randi olio Beech 20% FAC+
Cornus orida Dogwood 10% FACU
uereusAlba White Oak 20% FACU
Liriodendron tuli i ern Tulip Tree 5% FACU

Herbaceous
Asarum ari olia Wild Ginger 5% FACU
unknown Carex Unknown sedge 20% FACW
Onoclea sensibilis L. Sensitive Fern 20% FACW
Commelina communis Dayflower 5% FAC

Vines
Parthenocissus uin ue olia Virginia Creeper 10% FAC
Smilax rotundi olia Greenbrier 10% FAC

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-): 66%
Remarks:

IIY'DROLOG'
[ j Recorded Data (Describe in remarks)
[ [ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gage
[ [ Aerial Photograph
[ [ Other (describe in remarks)

[ x [ No Recorded Data Available

Field Observations
Depth of Surface Water:
Depth of Free Water in Pit:
Depth of Saturated Soils: Primary Wetland Hydrology
[ [ Inundated
[ x [ Saturation in upper 12"
[ [ Water Marks
[ [ Drift Lines
[ [ Sediment Deposits
[ [ Drainage Pattern in Wetlands

0 in.
N/M
0 in Secondary Hydrology Indicators
[ x [ Oxidized Root Channels
[ Water-stained Leaves
[ x [ Local Soil Survey Data
[ j FAC-Neutral Test
[ [ Other (describe in remarks)
Remarks:

1

Solt's
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase)
Chewacla soils (0-2% slopes)
Taxonomy (Suberoup):
Fine-Loamy, Mixed, Active, Thermic,
Fluvaquentic Dystrudepts Drainaee Class Confirm Mapped Type
Excessively Drained x Yes
Well Drained No
Moderately Well Drained
x Somewhat Poorly Drained
Poorly Drained
Very Poorly Drained
Soil Description

Depth in.
Horizon Matrix Colors
Munsell Moist Mottle Colors
Munsell Moist Mottle
Abundance/Size/Contrast
Grade
Class
Type
0-2 A 10 YR 4/3 SL Fine Granular
2- 14 Btl 2.5Y 6/1 2.5Y 4/1 Common, Medium, Distinct SL Fine Granular
14 - 44 Bt2 2.5Y 7/1 7.5YR 5/6; 5YR 5/8 Common, Medium, Distinct SCL Medium Suban ular Block
44-51+ C 2.5Y 7/1 7.5YR 5/6 Common, Medium, Prominent SCL Medium Suban ular Block

Hydric Soil Indicators
Histosol Reducing Conditions Organic Streaking
Histic Epipedon x Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors x J Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Sulfidic Odor Concretions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Aquatic Moist Regime High Organic % in Surface Layer J Other (explain in remarks)
Remarks:

WETLAND DETERMINATION
x Hydrophytic Vegetation Present
x J Hydric Soils Present
x Wetland Hydrology Present
x I This Data Point is a Wetland
Remarks:
1

1

I

I
I

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: Islamic Center of Cary
Applicant / Owner:
Investigator: Matthew D. Thomas Job Number:
City:
State: 02-SP-156
Cary
North Carolina
I x j Do normal circumstances exist on the site?
J Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)?
Is the area a potential problem area? Community ID:
Transect ID:
Plot ID: Upland

WD-5
Remarks: Site located due south of West. Chatham St.; Site only disturbed by an ephemeral stream connecting to UT to "Kildaire Farms Lake".

VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species
Trees Common Name Stratum Indicator
Acer rubrum Red Maple 20% FAC
Fa s randi olia Beech 10% FAC-1-
Cornus orida Dogwood 10% FACII
uercus Phellos Willow Oak 10% FACW-
uercus Falcata S. Red Oak 20% FACU-

Herbaceous
Asarum ari olia Wild Ginger 20% FACU

Vines
Vitis rotundi olia Muscadine Grape 20% FAC

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-): 33%
Remarks:

HYDROLOGY
] Recorded Data (Describe in remarks)
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gage
I Aerial Photograph
I Other (describe in remarks)

x No Recorded Data Available

Field Observations
Depth of Surface Water:
Depth of Free Water in Pit:
Depth of Saturated Soils: Primary Wetland Hydrology Indicators
I Inundated
I Saturation in upper 12"
Water Marks
( I Drift Lines
( J Sediment Deposits
Drainage Pattern in Wetlands

0 in.
N/M
51+ in Secondary Hydrology Indicators
Oxidized Root Channels
Water-stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
J Other (describe in remarks)
Remarks:

SOILS
Man Unit Name (Series and Phase) Drainaee Class Confirm Manned Tvnc
Georgeville silt loam, 6-10%slopes, eroded [ j Excessively Drained J X [ Yes
Taxonomy (Subaroun): [ j Well Drained J j No
Fine, Kaolinitic, Thermic, Typic Kanhapludults [ x J Moderately Well Drained
J J Somewhat Poorly Drained
[ J Poorly Drained
[ J Very Poorly Drained
Soil Description
Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle
Depth in. Horizon Munsell Moist Munsell Moist Abundance/Size/Contrast Grade Class Type
1 -2 A 2.5Y 4/2 SCL Fine Granular
2-31 Bt1 2.5Y 7/3 5YR 5/8; 2.5YR 5/6 C Medium Suban ular block
31 - 39 Bt2 2.5Y 8/2 7.5YR 5/8; IOYR 7/6 Few, Fine, Prominent C Medium Suban ular block
39 - 50 Bt3 5Y 8/3 5Y 8/1; 7.5YR 6/8 Common, Medium, Prommen CL Fine Suban ular block
51 -66+ C 7.5YR 5/8 2.5Y 8/4;2.5Y 7/6 Few, Fine, Distinct CL Fine Suban ular block
2.5Y 7/2
Hydric Soil Indicators
] Histosol [ J Reducing Conditions [ j Organic Streaking
[ J Histic Epipedon [ J Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors [ j Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
[ ) Sultidic Odor [ ] Concretions [ j Listed on National Hydric Soils List
[ J Aquatic Moist Regime ( J High Organic % in Surface Layer [ J Other (explain in remarks)
Remarks:

WETLAND DETERMINATION
[ J Hydrophytic Vegetation Present
[ ] Hydric Soils Present [ J This Data Point is a Wetland
[ J Wetland Hydrology Present
Remarks:

MITIGATION PLAN/ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT

PROGRAM CONCURRENCE
Associated Environmental Consultants & Engineers

1

_Ar7,'Av
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Michael F. Easlev. Governor
' Matthew D. Thomas
Associated Environmental Consultants & Engineers, Inc.
P.O. Box 31952
Raleigh, NC 27622
Subject: Project: Islamic Center of Cary
County: Wake
February 17, 2004
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
RECEIVED
FEB 2 3 2004
' The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to accept
payment for stream and wetlands impacts associated with the subject project. Please note that the decision by the NCEEP to accept
the mitigation requirements of this project does not assure that this payment will be approved by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
and the N.C. Division of Water Quality Wetlands/401 Unit. It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact these agencies to
determine if payment to the NCEEP for impacts associated with this project is appropriate.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401
Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire.
Based on the information supplied by you in a letter dated February 11, 2004, the stream and wetlands restoration that is necessary to
satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements for this project is summarized in the following table. The maximum amount of
mitigation. that the NCEEP will accept for this project is also indicated in this table.

l

Sincerely,
9
Ronald E. Ferrell,
Director of Operations
' cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Jennifer Burdette, USACOE-Raleigh
Steve Mitchell, DWQ Regional Office-Raleigh
File
' NC DEW Ecosystem Enhan . cement Program
1619 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1619
' Phone: [phone] ; FAX: [phone] Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/
Stream
(linear feet Wetlands Riparian
(acres) Wetlands Non-
Riparian acres Riparian Buffer
(s q. ft.
Impact 182 0.1065 0.95865
Mitigation Max 364 0.213 0.98865
The stream and non-riparian wetlands mitigation will be provided as specified in the 401 Water Quality Certification and/or Section
404 Permit for impacts associated with the subject project in Cataloging Unit 03020201 of the Neuse River Basin. The mitigation will
be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural
Resources and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Carol Shaw at [phone].
None Carolina
Naturally
ASSOCIATED
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSULTANTS &
-4 ENGINEERS, INC.
March 2, 2004 401
Ms. Cyndi Karoly 11A A, • NCDENR-DWQ WATER
Wetlands Unit QUALI7Y8ECT10
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Subject: Islamic Center of Cary
1155 W. Chatham Street
Cary, NC
UT to "Kildaire Farms Lake", MacGregor Downs Lake (Swift Creek)
Dear Ms. Karoly:
:
Enclosed is the permit application for the above-mentioned Site. The Site will require
NWP 12 and NWP 14. AEC&E has minimized the total impact on Site by reducing the
access road across the perennial stream on Site. Additional reductions include: a
reduction in the required slope for the W. Chatham St. extension, reduction in sidewalk
area to minimize stream and wetland impacts, and the relocation of the sewer easement
so that it only intersects one stream.
Additional copies have been sent to USACOE-Raleigh Office and the DWQ Regional
office-Raleigh.
:
If you have any additional questions or comments, please feel free to contact me at (919)
878-1295 (ext. 128).
Sincerely,
:
Matthew D. Thomas
Environmental Scientist
AEC&E
QUALITY SNRVICE AND PRODUCTS AT ANAn'oRDABLE ZNnsTmwT
........................................................................................................ ...........
P. 0, BOX 31952, Raleigh, NC 27622 9191878-1295 9191878-1298 (FAX)
3 211 Charmer D)4w Raleigh NC 2 7604 httpvlwww.aec-e,co?m
WETLANDS/ 401 GROUP
MAR 2 2004
WATER QUALITY SECTION
PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION (PCN)
APPLICATION FORM
&OHNIA.'s
Associated Environmental Consultants & Engineers

' Office Use Only:
USACE Action ID No.

7

I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
[ x ] Section 404 Permit
[ ] Section 10 Permit
[ x ] 401 Water Quality Certification
[ x ] Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
[ ] Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 12,14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401
Certification is not requested, check here: [ ]
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is
proposed for mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to
submittal of PCN), complete section VIII and check here: [ x ]
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed
on page 4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal
Management Area of Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further
details), check here: [ ]
DWQ No.

United States Army Corp of Engineers
pg. 1

III. Project Information
1. Naive of Project: Islamic Center of Cary
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0753852781 (REID #0071252)
4. Location
a. County: Wake
b. Nearest Town: Cary
c. Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): 102 Trimble Ave.
d. Directions to site (including road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Downtown
Cary, Chatham St. going west; go 1/3 mile after passing SW Maynard Rd.,
Property on left (immediately after church)
e. Site coordinates, if available (UTM): 17 698445E 3960751N
(WGS84/NAD83); Cary Quad
5. Property size (acres): 4.64
6. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): UT to "Kildaire
Farms Lake", MacGregor Downs Lake (Swift Creek)
7. River Basin: Neuse
8. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of
the project at the time of this application: Adjacent land with one dwelling,
adjacent property: church, residences, fire station, commercial
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Project consists of building a church and religious school, including a parking lot,
with moderate weight construction equipment
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Wetland impact required to expand
the road as per Town of Cary requirements (addition of a turning lane, sidewalk,
and road slope) and access road to the property
I
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 3
I

IV. Prior Project History
The project originally planned for the access road to join the Site via W. Chatham St.
' This plan required a T-intersection over wetlands and a stream on the property, in order
to allow traffic flow on the project site would be adequate (Figure 5). After discussing
' the project with the NCDENR-401 Certification Unit, the project scope was then reduced
to a single access road to the Site to minimize the impact on the wetlands and stream on
' the property. Additional changes include cutting back on the sidewalk along the NW
portion of the property in order to reduce stream impact. The toe slope for the W.
' Chatham St. extension was also reduced from 3:1 to 1:1 in order to reduce the wetland
' and stream impact.
V. Future Project Plans
No future permits are anticipated for this project.
I

I

I

United States Army Corp of Engineers
p g- 4

VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
Proposed impacts planned on site include a 28' access road that intersects the
perennial stream on the property, extension of W. Chatham from two lane to three
(includes extending side slope into wetlands), and placement of sewer line across
wetlands and streams.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:

Wetland Impact Site

Number
*
Type of Impact* Area of

Impact

(acres) Located within

100-year

Floodplain**
Distance to Nearest

Stream (liner feet)
Type of

Wetland*"
1 Fill 0.0185 Yes Adjacent Forested
2 Fill 0.0183 Yes Adjacent Forested
3 Fill, Drainage 0.0397 Yes Adjacent Forested
4 Trench (Off Site) 0.0300 Yes Adjacent Forested

* 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood
Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps.
Total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.2814 ac
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.1065 ac
3. Individually list all Intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
Type of Impact Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name* Average Width of
Stream Before
Impact
Stream Type
1 Fill 34 UT 2' Perennial
2 Fill 15 UT 2' Perennial
3 Drainage, Fill 113 UT 2' Perennial
4 Sewer line (Offsite) 20 UT 2' Perennial

Cumulative impacts (linear distance in teet) to all streams on site: 182
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 5
1

4. Individually list all open water impacts below:
r
?I

Open Water Impact
Site Number
Type of Impact Area of Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Waterbody
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should
be included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed
' pond should be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this
application.
' Pond to be created in: [ ] uplands [ ] stream [ ] wetlands
Describe the method of construction:
' Proposed use or purpose of pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond:
' Expected pond surface area:
C

United States Army Corp of Engineers
pg. 6

' VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
The project for the Islamic Center of Cary originally called for one building that spread
' across 4.64 acres. This plan affects one UT's of Kildare Farm Lake. The project was
originally designed to allow an access road on the property to connect via W. Chatham
' St. In order to allow adequate traffic flow on the site, the plan required a T-intersection
over wetlands and a stream on the property (Figure 5). After discussing the project with
' the NCDENR-401 Certification Unit, the project scope was then redesigned. The current
' design reduces the size of the road to a single access road intersecting the stream, thus
minimizing the impact of wetlands and stream on the property. Additional reductions
' include cutting back on the sidewalk along the NW portion of the property to reduce
stream impact. The toe slope for the W. Chatham St. extension was also reduced from a
' 3:1 to a 1:1 slope in order to reduce stream and wetland impact.
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 7
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of
impacts to freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts
to perennial streams
USA CE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of
Nationwide Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will
be required when necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are
minimal. Factors including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative
value of the impacted aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of
appropriate and practicable mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be
appropriate and practicable include, but are not limited to: reducing the size of the
project; establishing and maintaining wetland and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect
open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of aquatic resource functions and
values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar functions and values,
preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in
order for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any
application lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on
hold as incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for
stream restoration in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan:
The proposed mitigation plan for the Site includes minimizing stream impact by
reducing the length of sidewalks, reducin type of W. Chatham St. extension
and redesigning the access road in order to minimize the crossing area. A 50 foot
vegetated buffer (Meuse River Buffer Rules) will remain on the property where
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 8
development is not planned. In addition, payment will be made to the NCEEP to
' offset 32 linear feet of stream mitigation and 0.95865 acres of buffer mitigation.
' 2. Mitigation payment to the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
(NCEEP)
a. Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 32
b. Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0.95865
' c. Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
' d. Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
e. Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. 9
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use
of public (federal/state) land? [ ] Yes [ x ] No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document
pursuant to the requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? [ ] Yes [ ] No
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so,
please attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
[ ] Yes [ ] No
United States Army Corp of Engineers pg. /0

t X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts
t to required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must
be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan (Figure
4). All buffers must be shown on a map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the
buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ Regional Office may be included as
appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 213
' .0233 (Meuse), 15A NCAC 213.0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 213.0250
' (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other
( )? [x]Yes [ ] No

1
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation '
1 0.26187 3 0.78561
2 0.11536 1.5 0.17304
Total 0.35653 0.95865
' * Zone I extends out 30 11 perpendicular from near bank of'
channel; 'Lone 2 extends an additional 20 fleet from the edge
of Zone 1.
2. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is
' proposed. Please attach all appropriate information as identified within 15A
NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
' The proposed buffer mitigation for the Site involves payment to the Riparian
Buffer Restoration Fund. The maximum amount of mitigation that the NCEEP
will accept for this project is .98865 sq ft. It has been determined that only
.95865 sq ft will be affected.

United States Army Corp of Engineers
pg. I I

XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
' 1. Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) verses total acreage on
the site. Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters
' and wetlands downstream from the property.
Total site area is 4.6 acres. The imperviousness after development will be 39 %
' which is equal to 1.8 acres, including the buffer. The proposed stormwater
control is a bio-garden in front of building, consisting of two areas each (45' x
' 90'). Proposed bio-garden will treat the stormwater from building and parking
lots. The biogarden section is 4.0' deep, filled with mainly sand and a small
amount of silt and organic matter (75/15/10 % sand/silt/organic matter).
' Biogarden is designed to have a minimum mounting above bio-garden surface,
where the over flow is collected by weirs and drained to the stream. (Figure 6)

United States Army Corp of Engineers
pg. 12

XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
1. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or
discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available
capacity of the subject facility.
A sewer line will be constructed from the building (on site), then run off site
across a 20' stream easement along an UT to a 20' public sewer easement

r

H

XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
1. Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any
Buffer Rules? [ ] Yes [x]NO
2. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? [ ] Yes [ x ] No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional)
1. Constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules.
Inclement weather, building permits, City of Cary approval
'Agent's Sign
Date
United States Army Corp . Engineers 13
of pg.

WETLAND DELINEATION FORMS

Associated Environmental Consultants & Engineers

7

I

7

7
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: Islamic Center of Cary
Applicant / Owner:
Investigator: Matthew D. Thomas Job Number:
City:
State: 02-SP-156
Cary
North Carolina
I xl Do normal circumstances exist on the site?
[ Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)?
Is the area a potential problem area? Community ID: Floodplain
Transect ID:
Plot ID: W D- I
Remarks: Site located due south of West. Chatham St.; Site only disturbed by an ephemeral stream connecting to UT to "Kildairc Farms Lake".

VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species
Tree Common Name Stratum Indicator
Acer rubrunt Red Maple 40% FAC
Acersaccharum Sugar Male 10% I,ACU-
Cornus orida Dogwood 10% FACU

Herbaceous
Toxicodendron radicans Posion Iv 50% FAC
unknown Carex Unknown sedge 20% FACW

Dine
Parthenocissus uin ue olia Virginia Creeper 20% FAC

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-): 100%
Remarks:

HYDROLOGY
( Recorded Data (Describe in remarks)
I I Stream, Lake, or Tide Gage
I Aerial Photograph
Other (describe in remarks)

Jxl No Recorded Data Available

Field Observations
Depth of Surface Water:
Depth of Free Water in Pit:
Depth of Saturated Soils: Primary Wetland Hydrology Indicators
I Inundated
I x I Saturation in upper 12"
I I Water Marks
I I Drift Lines
I I Sediment Deposits
I I Drainage Pattern in Wetlands

0 in.
N/M
4 in. Secondary Hydrology Indicators
I x I Oxidized Root Channels
I I Water-stained Leaves
I I Local Soil Survey Data
I I FAC-Neutral Test
I I Other (describe in remarks)
Remarks:

SOILS
Mao Unit Name (Series and Phase) Drainage Class Confirm Mapped Type
Herndon Series [ ] Excessively Drained [ I Yes
Taxonomy (Subgroup): [ ] Well Drained [ x I No
Fine, Kaolinitic, Thermic, Typic Kanhapludults [ j Moderately Well Drained
[ j Somewhat Poorly Drained
[ x j Poorly Drained
[ j Very Poorly Drained
Soil Description

Depth in.
Horizon Matrix Colors
Munsell Moist Mottle Colors
Munsell Moist Mottle
Abundance/Size/Contrast
Grade
Class
Type
1 -4 A 10YR 4/3 SL Fine Granular
4- 10 Btl 5Y 5/2 7.5 YR 5/8 few, Fine, Distinct SCL Medium Suban ular Block
10 - 24 Bt2 5Y 7/1 5YR 5/8, 2.5Y 8/6 Common, Mediu n-Fine, Distinc t CL Medium Suban ular Block
24 - 38+ Bt3 2.5Y 6/3 5YR 5/8, 7.5YR 5/6 Common, Medium, Prominent CL Medium Suban ular Block

Hydric Soil Indicators
[ [ Histosol [ x ] Reducing Conditions [ ] Organic Streaking
[ j Histic Epipedon [ ] Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors [ ] Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
[ j Sulfidic Odor [ ] Concretions [ ] Listed on National Hydric Soils List
[ j Aquatic Moist Regime [ ] High Organic % in Surface Layer [ ] Other (explain in remarks)
Remarks: Oxidized root channels noted in BtI

WETLAND DETERMINATION
[ x j Hydrophytic Vegetation Present
[ x j Hydric Soils Present [ x I This Data Point is a Wetland
( x j Wetland Hydrology Present
Remarks:

`
"
.? f 1 F DATA,,FORM
ROUTINZ ETLAND DETERNUNATION.
(1987 COE Wetlands D`eterrnination>fanual).
Project / Site: Islamic Center of Cary
Applicant / Owner:
Investigator: Matthew D. Thomas Job Number:
City:
State: 02-SP-156
Cary
North Carolina
( x ] Do normal circumstances exist on the site?
( ] Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)?
[ J Is the area a potential problem area? Community ID:
Transect ID:
Plot ID: Floodplain

WD-2
Remarks: Site located due south of West. Chatham St.; Site only disturbed by an ephemeral stream connecting to UT to "Kildaire Farms Lake

VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species
Trees Common Name Stratum Indicator
cer rubrum Red Maple 40% FAC
Fa s ands olia Beech 20% FAC+
Cornus orida Dogwood 10% FACU
flax o aca American Holly 20% FAC-
Fraxinus americana White Ashe 10% FACU

Herbaceous
Toxicodendron radicans Posion Iv 30% FAC
unknown Carex Unknown sedge 10% FACW
Onoclea sensibilis L. Sensitive Fern 20% FACW
Commelina communis Dayflower 5% FAC

Vines
Parthenocissus uin ue olia Virginia Creeper 10% FAC
Lonicera 'o onica Japanese Honeysuckle 5% FAC-

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-): 100%
Remarks:

MRVLOGV=_
[ ] Recorded Data (Describe in remarks
[ J Stream, Lake, or Tide Gage
[ I Aerial Photograph
[ I Other (describe in remarks)

[ x J No Recorded Data Available

Field Observations
Depth of Surface Water:
Depth of Free Water in Pit:
Depth of Saturated Soils: Primary Wetland Hydrolog;
[ I Inundated
[ x ] Saturation in upper 12'
[ I Water Marks
[ I Drift Lines
[ ] Sediment Deposits
[ J Drainage Pattern in Wetlands

0 in.
N/M
7 in. Secondary Hydrology Indicators
I x J Oxidized Root Channels
[ J Water-stained Leaves
[ J Local Soil Survey Data
[ J FAC-Neutral Test
[ ] Other (describe in remarks)
11. emarks:

r
LI
r

E

to
May Unit Name (Series and Phase) Drainaee Class Confirm Manned Tyne
Hemdon silt loam, 6-10% slopes; eroded [ ] Excessively Drained [ ] Yes
Taxonomy Sub rou : [ ] Well Drained [ x J No
Fine, Kaolinitic, Thermic, Typic Kanhapludults [ x ] Moderately Well Drained
[ ] Somewhat Poorly Drained
[ ] Poorly Drained
[ ] Very Poorly Drained
Soil Description

Depth in.
Horizon Matrix Colors
Munsell Moist Mottle Colors
Munsell Moist Mottle
Abundance/Size/Contrast
Grade
Class
Type
1 - 7 A I OYR 5/3 l OYR 3/2; 5YR 5/6 Few, Fine, Faint SL Fine Granular
7-31 Btl 5Y 6/3 7.5YR 5/6; 5Y 3/1 Common, Fine, Distinct SCL Medium Suban ular Bloc
31 - 40 Bt2 5Y 7/2 5Y 4/4; 5YR 5/8 Common, Medium, Prominen CL Medium Suban ular Bloc
40 - 51+ Bt3 IOYR 6/1 5YR 8/1 Few, Fine, Distinct CL Medium Suban ular Bloc

Hvdric Soil Indicators
[ ] Histosol [ ] Reducing Conditions [ ] Organic Streaking
[ ] Histic Epipedon [ J Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors [ ] Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
[ ] Sulfidic Odor [ ] Concretions [ ] Listed on National Hydric Soils List
[ J Aquatic Moist Regime [ ] High Organic % in Surface Layer [ ] Other (explain in remarks)
Remarks:

I)E?7)?II?tAtI?.aN ; «uA.
[ x ] Hydrophytic Vegetation Present
[ ) Hydric Soils Present [ ] This Data Point is a Wetland
[ x ] Wetland Hydrology Present
Remarks:

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: Islamic Center of Cary
Applicant / Owner:
Investigator: Matthew D. Thomas Job Number:
City:
State: 02-S11-156
Cary
North Carolina
[ x) Do normal circumstances exist on the site?
[ J Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)?
[ J Is the area a potential problem area? Community ID:
Transect ID:
Plot ID: Riverine

WD-3
Remarks: Site located due south of West. Chatham St.; Site only disturbed by an ephemeral stream connecting to UT to "Kildaire Farms Lake".

VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species
Trees Common Name Stratum Indicator
Acer rubrum Red Maple 20% FAC
Fa us randi olia Beech 20% FAC+
Cornus orida Dogwood 5% FACU
Car inus caroliniana Ironwood 10% FAC

Herbaceous
Toxicodendron radicans Posion Iv 20% FAC
unknown Carex Unknown sedge 10% FACW
Ath rium as lenioides Southern Lad Fern 10% FAC

Vines
Parthenocissus uin ue olia Virginia Creeper 10% 1:AC

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-): 100%
Remarks:

HYDROLOGY
[ J Recorded Data (Describe in remarks)
[ [ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gage
[ [ Aerial Photograph
[ J Other (describe in remarks)

[ x J No Recorded Data Available

Field Observations
Depth of Surface Water:
Depth of Free Water in Pit:
Depth of Saturated Soils: Primary Wetland Hydrology li
[ [ Inundated
[ [ Saturation in upper 12"
[ [ Water Marks
[ [ Drift Lines
[ [ Sediment Deposits
[ [ Drainage Pattern in Wetlands

0 in.
N/M
17 in. Secondary Hydrology Indicators
[ [ Oxidized Root Channels
[ [ Water-stained Leaves
[ [ Local Soil Survey Data
[ [ FAC-Neutral Test
[ [ Other (describe in remarks)
Remarks:

SOILS
Man Unit Name (Series and Phase)
Chewacla soils (0-2% slopes)
Taxonomy (Subarout*
Fine-Loamy, Mixed, Active, Thermic,
Fluvaquentic Dystrudepts Drainaee Class Confirm Manned Tyne
[ [ Excessively Drained [ [ Yes
[ [ Well Drained [ x [ No
[ [ Moderately Well Drained
[ x ] Somewhat Poorly Drained
[ [ Poorly Drained
[ J Very Poorly Drained
Soil Description

Depth in.
Horizon Matrix Colors
Mansell Moist Mottle Colors
Munsell Moist Mottle
Abundance/Size/Contrast
Grade
Class
1' e
1 - 2 A 7.5YR 4/6 SL Fine Granular
2- 16 Bt 1 5Y 6/3 2.5Y 5/2; 5YR 4/6 Common, Fine Distinct SL Fine Suban ular Block
16 - 38 Bt2 5Y 6/6 7.5YR 518; 7.5YR 6/8 Common, Medium, Prominent SL Medium Suban ular Block
38 - 49+ Bt3 5Y 6/1 5Y 4/1 Common, Medium, Prominen SL Medium Suban ular Block

Hydric Soil Indicators
[ [ Histosol [
[ [ Histic Epipedon [
[ [ Sulfidic Odor [
[ ] Aquatic Moist Regime [
[ Reducing Conditions [ [ Organic Streaking
[ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors [ [ Listed on Local Flydric Soils List
[ Concretions [ [ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
J High Organic % in Surface Layer [ J Other (explain in remarks)
Remarks:

WETLAND DETERMINATION
[ x J Hydrophytic Vegetation Present
[ [ Hydric Soils Present
[ ] Wetland Hydrology Present
I [ '1'his Data Point is a Wetland
Remarks:

1

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: Islamic Center of Cary
Applicant / Owner:
Investigator: Matthew D. Thomas Job Number:
City:
State: 02-SP-156
Cary
North Carolina
( x ] Do normal circumstances exist on the site?
( ] Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)?
( ] Is the area a potential problem area? Community ID:
Transect ID:
Plot ID: Floodplain

WD-4
Remarks: Site located due south of West. Chatham St.; Site only disturbed by an ephemeral stream connecting to UT to "Kildaire Farms Lake".

VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species
Trees Common Name Stratum Indicator
Aesculus s Ivatica Buckeye 5% FAC
Fa us randi olia Beech 20% FAC+
Cornus orida Dogwood 10% FACU
uereus Alba White Oak 20% FACU
Liriodendron tuli i era Tulip Tree 5% FACU

Herbaceous
Asarum ari olia Wild Ginger 5% FACU
unknown Carex Unknown sedge 20% FAC W
Onoclea sensibilis L. Sensitive Fern 20% FACW
Commelina communis Da flower 5% FAC

Vines
Parthenocissus uin ue olia Virginia Creeper 10% FAC
Smilax rotundi olio Greenbrier 10% FAC

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-): 66%
Remarks:

HYDROLOGY
[ ] Recorded Data (Describe in remarks)
( ] Stream, Lake, or Tide Gage
[ ] Aerial Photograph
( ] Other (describe in remarks)

( x ] No Recorded Data Available

Field Observations
Depth of Surface Water:
Depth of Free Water in Pit:
Depth of Saturated Soils: Primary Wetland Hydrology
( ] Inundated
( x ] Saturation in upper 12"
( ] Water Marks
( ] Drift Lines
( ] Sediment Deposits
[ ] Drainage Pattern in Wetlands

0 in.
N/M
0 in Secondary Hydrology Indicators
( x ] Oxidized Root Channels
] 1 Water-stained Leaves
( x ] Local Soil Survey Data
( ] FAC-Neutral Test
] ] Other (describe in remarks)
Remarks:
1

SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase)
Chewacla soils (0-2% slopes)
Taxonomy (Subgroup):
Fine-Loamy, Mixed, Active, Thermic,
Fluvaquentic Dystrudepts Drainaze Class Confirm Mapped Type
J J Excessively Drained J x J Yes
( J Well Drained J J No
J Moderately Well Drained
x Somewhat Poorly Drained
J Poorly Drained
J Very Poorly Drained
Soil Description

Depth in.
Horizon Matrix Colors
Munsell Moist Mottle Colors
Munsell Moist Mottle
Abundance/Size/Contrast
Grade
Class
e
0-2 A 10 YR 4/3 SL Fine Granular
2- 14 Btl 2.5Y 6/1 2.5Y 4/1 Common, Medium, Distinct SL Fine Granular
14 - 44 Bt2 2.5Y 7/I 7.5YR 5/6; 5YR 5/8 Common, Medium, Distinct SCL Medium Suban ular Block
44 - 51+ C 2.5Y 7/1 7.5YR 5/6 Common, Medium, Prominen SCL Medium Suban ular Block

Hydric Soil Indicators
J J Histosol J J Reducing Conditions J J Organic Streaking
J Histic Epipedon x J Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors x J Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
J Sulfidic Odor J Concretions J Listed on National Hydric Soils List
J Aquatic Moist Regime J J High Organic % in Surface Layer J Other (explain in remarks)
Remarks:

WETLAND DETERMINATION -
x J Hydrophytic Vegetation Present
J x J Hydric Soils Present
x J Wetland Hydrology Present
J x J This Data Point is a Wetland
Remarks:
E

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: Islamic Center of Cary
Applicant / Owner:
Investigator: Matthew D. Thomas Job Number:
City:
State: 02-SP-156
Cary
North Carolina
[ x J Do normal circumstances exist on the site?
[ J Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)?
J Is the area a potential problem area? Community ID:
Transect ID:
Plot ID: Upland

WD-5
Remarks: Site located due south of West. Chatham St.; Site only disturbed by an ephemeral stream connecting to UT to "Kildaire Farms Lake".

VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species
Trees Common Name Stratum Indicator
cer rubrum Red Maple 20% FAC
Fa us randi olio Beech 10% FAC+
Cornus orida Dogwood 10% FACU
uercus Phellos Willow Oak 10% FACW-
uercus Falcata S. Red Oak 20% FACU-

Herbaceous
Sarum ari olia Wild Ginger 20% FACU

Vines
Vitis rotundi olia Muscadine Grape 20% FAC

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-): 33%
Remarks:

HYDROLOGY
[ J Recorded Data (Describe in remarks)
[ J Stream, Lake, or Tide Gage
[ ] Aerial Photograph
[ J Other (describe in remarks)

[ x J No Recorded Data Available

Field Observations
Depth of Surface Water:
Depth of Free Water in Pit:
Depth of Saturated Soils: Primary Wetland Hydrology Indicators
[ J Inundated
J J Saturation in upper 12"
[ J Water Marks
[ J Drift Lines
[ J Sediment Deposits
[ J Drainage Pattern in Wetlands

0 in.
N/M
51+ in Secondary Hydrology Indicators
J J Oxidized Root Channels
J J Water-stained Leaves
[ [ Local Soil Survey Data
[ J FAC-Neutral Test
[ J Other (describe in remarks)
Remarks:

SOILS
Mao Unit Name (Series and Phase) Drainaee Class Confirm Mapped Type
Georgeville silt loam, 6-10% slopes, eroded I J Excessively Drained ( x J Yes
Taxonomy (Subgroup): J J Well Drained I J No
Fine, Kaolinitic, Thermic, Typic Kanhapludults J x J Moderately Well Drained
J Somewhat Poorly Drained
I I Poorly Drained
Very Poorly Drained
Soil Description
Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle
Depth in. Horizon Mansell Moist Mansell Moist Abundance/Size/Contrast Grade Class Type
1 -2 A 2.5Y 4/2 SCL Fine Granular
2-31 Btl 2.5Y 7/3 5YR 5/8; 2.5YR 5/6 C Medium Suban ular block
31 - 39 Bt2 2.5Y 8/2 7.5YR 5/8; IOYR 7/6 Few, Fine, Prominent C Medium Suban ular block
39 - 50 Bt3 5Y 8/3 5Y 8/1; 7.5YR 6/8 Common, Medium, Prominen CL Fine Suban ular block
51 -66+ C 7.5YR 5/8 2.5Y 8/4; 2.5Y 7/6 Few, Fine, Distinct CL Fine Suban ular block
2.5Y 7/2
Hydric Soil Indicators
I I Histosol I J Reducing Conditions I I Organic Streaking
I I Histic Epipedon I J Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors I I Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
J Sulfidic Odor I J Concretions I I Listed on National Hydric Soils List
J Aquatic Moist Regime J J High Organic % in Surface Layer I I Other (explain in remarks)
Remarks:

WETLAND DETERMINATION
I J Hydrophytic Vegetation Present
J J Hydric Soils Present I I This Data Point is a Wetland
I J Wetland Hydrology Present
Remarks:

1

1

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross Jr., Secretary

Matthew D. Thomas
Associated Environmental Consultants & Engineers, Inc.
P.O. Box 31952
Raleigh, NC 27622
Subject: Project: Islamic Center of Cary
County: Wake
February 17, 2004
RECEIVED
FEB 2 3 2004
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to accept
payment for stream and wetlands impacts associated with the subject project. Please note that the decision by the NCEEP to accept
the mitigation requirements of this project does not assure that this payment will be approved by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
' and the N.C. Division of Water Quality Wetlands/401 Unit. It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact these agencies to
determine if payment to the NCEEP for impacts associated with this project is appropriate.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401
Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire.
Based on the information supplied by you in a letter dated February 11, 2004, the stream and wetlands restoration that is necessary to
satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements for this project is summarized in the following table. The maximum amount of
. , mitigation that the NCEEP will accept for this project is also indicated in this table.

Sincerely,
getlx 6?
Ronald E. Ferrell,
Director of Operations
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Jennifer Burdette, USACOE-Raleigh
Steve Mitchell, DWQ Regional Office-Raleigh
File
NC DENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1619 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1619
' Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Intemet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/
Stream
linear feet Wetlands Riparian
(acres) Wetlands Non-
Riparian (acres) Riparian Buffer
(s q. ft.
Impact 182 0.1065 0.95865
Mitigation Max 364 0.213 0.98865
The stream and non-riparian wetlands mitigation will be provided as specified in the 401 Water Quality Certification and/or Section
404 Permit for impacts associated with the subject project in Cataloging Unit 03020201 of the Neuse River Basin. The mitigation will
be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural
Resources and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Carol Shaw at [phone].
One
thCarohna
Nor
Naturally
O'o- WAT -,TpG
0 r
>
? Y
CERTIFIED MAIL-RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Shakil Ahmad
Post Office Box 31952
Raleigh, NC 27622-1952
July 1, 2004
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
DWQ Project # 03-0482
Wake County
Re: 401 Water Quality Certiflcation and Neuse River Riparian Buffer - Authorization Certificate Request
Islamic Center of Cary, Chatham Street, Cary, NC, UT to "Kildaire Farms Lake; MacGregor Downs Lake (Swift
Creek) [03-04-02; 27-43-2.2); WS-III, NSW]
Dear Mr. Ahmad:
Your application for a 401 Water Quality Certification and Authorization Certificate from the Neuse River Buffer Rules
(15A NCAC 2B.0233) were received by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on March 2, 2004. Revisions to the
application were received on March 29, April 30, and June 3, 2004. The activity for which the 401 Certification is sought
to impact approximately 121 linear feet of stream impacts and 0.0621acres of wetland impact to enable a road crossing
and an separate road widening. The Authorization Certificate is sought for 31,210 square feet of buffers for the above-
referenced road crossing and road widening. The stream and wetland impacts are allowable under General Certification
# 3404. The impacts to the buffer are designated as an allowable use under the buffer rules and requires an Authorization
Certificate from the DWQ. An Authorization Certificate is a determination by the DWQ that the activity for which the
approval is sought meets all of the requirements in support of a "no practical alternatives" determination per 15A NCAC
2B .0233(8)(a).
After a thorough review of your proposed activity, DWQ staff has determined that you have not provided sufficient
information to adequately review your application. Specifically you have not provided the standard form for the stormwater
operation maintenance agreement, separate calculations for each level spreader, documentation that level spreaders will
be located outside Zone 2 of the buffer, and confirmation that rock as opposed to wooden level spreaders will be used.
Furthermore, buffer mitigation will be necessary for the impacts to Zone 1 and 2 of the Neuse River Buffer for the road
widening along Chatham Street as this impact is parallel to the buffer. A major variance to the Neuse River Buffer Rules
will be necessary in order to construct the proposed retaining wall in Zone 1 of the buffer.
The DWQ is willing to review a new application including any additional justification that you may have for the proposed
impacts that address the issues discussed above. It is advised that requests for any additional impacts associated with
this project be included in subsequent applications, such as impacts related to the proposed sewer line on the adjacent
property.
Any disputes over determinations regarding our inability to approve this Authorization Certificate shall be referred in
writing to the Director at the address below for a final decision. The Director's decision is subject to review as provided in
Articles 3 and 4 of G. S. 1508. If you have any questions concerning this inability to approve, please contact Mr. John
Domey in the Water Quality Non-Discharge Branch of thWDWQ at 919-733-9646.
Dr
Cc: Steve Mitchell, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
File copy
Central Files
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands/
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact:
Non-Discharge Branch WO Supervisor:
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Islamic center of cary
Project Number
Recvd From
Received Date
03 0482
APP
4/21/03
Recvd By Region
County Wake
County2
Project Type proposed church facility road crossing
Certificates Stream
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req.
Region Raleigh
Stream Impacts (ft.)
Feet
Req.
NBR Buffers FT-0-
Y O N F- 27-43-(2.2) WSIII NSW 30,402. 0.17 F_ F-
F- Stream O Y OO N F- ?-F-r- 30,442. F- 75.00
F- T-
F__ F__ P-7 _0N F_ r F_F_ F_- F__ F_ I-
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? 0 Y 0 N Did you request more info? 0 Y 0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? 0 Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? 0 Y 0 N Recommendation: 0 Issue 0 ISSue/COnd 0 Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss)
Comments:
Longitude (ddmmss)
April 25, 2003 still goina
March 17, 200 DENY
There are two stream shown on the soils mapand they intend to remove 182 If of perren and almost
an arce of buffer- NO WAY, side walk is widening of street. Parking lot in Zone 2
February 27, 2004
ITS BACK Now they propose 182 feet of stream impact, 0.1 acres of wetland and I cannot
determine how much buffer. (see above)
DENY
MAY 12, 04 STILL DENY Road impacts in Zone 1 at widening and road crosssing and no miti tgr
applied
m 1, DENY, and deny .... new response says stormwater plan, maintenance agreement, and level
spreader calculations will be providded when eject completed .... NOPE
RETAINING wall in Zone 1 requires EMC Maior variance. Buffer impact 0.28 A & no mitigation??
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
Facility Name Islamic center of cary
Project Number 03 0482
Comments (continued from page 1):
County Wake
Regional Contact: Steve Mitchell
Date:
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 2
ASSOCIATED
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSULTANTS & WETLANDS 401 GROUP
-4 ENGINEERS, INC. ! ?()[1.
June 3, 2004
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NCDENR-DWQ
Wetlands Unit f '
1650 Mail Services Center !Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650 rAttn: Mr. John Dorney
-
Subject: Islamic Center of Cary
1155 W. Chatham Street
Cary, NC
: UT to "Kildaire Farms Lake", MacGregor Downs Lake (Swift Creek)
DWQ # 03-0482
Dear Mr. Dorney,
• Enclosed are responses to questions DWQ has posed regarding additional information sent on
April 6, 2004 and May 3, 2004 regarding the application to fill wetlands or waters for the
purpose of road construction in Wake County.
• • Stormwater Plan
o The standard form of the stormwater operation maintenance agreement will be
submitted upon completion.
o Separate calculations were done for each level spreader on Site will be
submitted upon completion.
o Level spreaders were relocated outside of Zone 2 of the buffer (Site Map-
submitted upon completion).
o Wooden level spreaders have been replaced with rock (Site Map-submitted
upon completion).
• Mitigation
o Buffer mitigation will not be required for this Site because the total impact in
buffer will only constitute 0.28 acres (12,196 sq. ft.).
• Stream Impacts
: o The sidewalk was relocated from the northern section of the driveway to the
southern section to reduce stream impact. This reduced the stream impact in
Site Number B from 113 feet to 100 feet.
• Sewer Lines
• QUALITY SzRvicr AND PRODUCTS AT AN AFd'ORDABLN INVESTmiNT
i .......................................................................................................................
P. 0. 13ox 31952, Raleigh, NC 27622 9191878-1295 9191878-1298 (FAX)
3 211 5t mw tw Raleigh NC 2 7604 httpVlwww aec-e.co?m
• Sewer Lines
o The sewer line begins on Site and extends 220 feet off Site (Cecil Bunn Olive
Property) to an existing 20-foot public sewer easement. Stream and buffer
impacts will occur off Site. The UT to "Kildaire Farms Lake" will be
impacted in order to connect to the existing sewer line. Buffer impacts will
occur off Site, in which a 20-foot easement will be assessed along the
corridor.
Stream Destabilization
o The stream at the former impact B (revised March 29 PCN) will not be
destabilized due to the proximity of grading activities because a retaining wall
will be installed along W. Chatham Street. The retaining wall will reduce
impact along adjacent streams and wetlands.
Additional copies have been sent to DWQ Wetlands Unit and the DWQ Regional office-Raleigh.
If you have any additional questions or comments, please feel free to contact this office at (919)
878-1295.
Sincerely,

Matthew D. Thomas
Environmental Manager
?0?0? W H / ?9pG
? r
Q ?
rvitcnaei r. nasley, uovemor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
May 12, 2004
DWQ # 03-0482
Wake County
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Shakil Ahmad
Post Office Box 31952
Raleigh, NC 27622-1952
Subject Property: Islamic Center of Cary, 1155 W. Chatham Street, Cary, NC
Dear Mr. Ahmad:
The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) was notified by receipt of additional information on April 6,
2004 and May 3, 2004 regarding your application on your plan to fill wetlands or waters for the purpose
of road construction in Wake County. Approval from DWQ is required to disturb these areas. Please
provide 7 copies of the following information and refer to the DWQ # listed above in your reply. Please
show these on maps of suitable scale (for instance 1" = 100 feet) so we can begin to determine your
projects' compliance with 15A NCAC 2H.0500.
1. Stormwater plan:
a. Please provide the standard form of the stormwater operation maintenance agreement.
b. Please provide separate calculations for each level spreader.
c. Please locate level spreaders outside of Zone 2 of the buffer.
d. Please replace wooden level spreaders with rock.
2. Mitigation:
Buffer mitigation is not required for impacts of less than 1/3 acre. Please clearly indicate all
buffer impacts on a site plan. IF mitigation is needed, please provide a letter from EEP
showing acceptance of mitigation payment.
3. Stream Impacts:
Please clarify why the stream impact B was reduced from 113 to 100 feet.
4. Sewer Lines:
Please clarify the status of the sewer line on the southeast edge of the property and any
associated impacts.
NWENR
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (httQ//h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands)
Customer Service #: 1-877-623-6748
Page 2
Mr. Ahmad
May 13, 2004
5. Stream Destabilization:
This office is concerned that the stream at the former impact B from your March 29 revised
PCN will be destabilized due to the proximity of grading activities. Please indicate how the
proximity of grading activities. Please indicate how the stream will be protected and impacts
will be mitigated.
Please telephone Ed Schwartzman at 919-715-3477 if you have any questions or would require copies of
our rules or procedural materials. This project will remain on hold as incomplete in accordance with
15A NCAC 2H.0505(c). The processing time for this application will begin when this information is
received. If we do not hear from you by writing or by fax at [phone] within three (3) weeks we
will assume you no longer want to pursue the project and will consider it withdrawn.
rohR. ney
uality Certifica 'on Program
JRD/bs
cc: Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
Raleigh Corps of Engineers
Central Files
File Copy
Matthew Thomas, Associated Environmental, Post Office Box 31952, Raleigh, NC 27622
\O?OF W AT ?9QG
r7
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
May 12, 2004
DWQ # 03-0482
Wake County
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Shakil Ahmad
Post Office Box 31952
Raleigh, NC 27622-1952
Subject Property: Islamic Center of Cary, 1155 W. Chatham Street, Cary, NC
Dear Mr. Ahmad:
?he Division of Water Quality (DWQ) was notified by receipt of additional information on April 6, 2004
and May 3, 2004 regarding your application on your plan to fill wetlands or waters for the purpose of road construction in
Wake County. We are returning your application because of the failure to address our previous questions regarding this
project. Be aware that approval from DWQ is required to disturb these areas. If you wish to proceed with this application
you will need to proved 7 copies of the following information and refer to the DWQ # listed above in your reply with
additional fee for the project. Please show these on maps of suitable scale (for instance 1" = 100 feet) so we can begin to
determine your projects' compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500.
1. S mwater plan:
a. Where is stormwater flow going?
b. Replace wooden level spreaders with rock.
c. Operation Maintenance Agreement use standard form
d. Level spread must be location outside Zone 2
e. Calculation reach level spreader done s Y.
2. Mitiga an 1/3 acres buffer impact, the no mitigation needed. Show all buffer impacts on final
revised plan. If mitigation is needed you will need to provide letter from EEP.
Please telephone Ed Schwar
procedural materials. This r
processing time for this applit
fax at [phone] within
withdrawn.
JRD/bs
cc:
at 919-715-3477 if you have any questions or would require copies of our rules or
will remain on hold as incomplete in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0505(c). The
will begin when this information is received. If we do not hear from you by writing or by
(3) weeks we will assume you no longer want to pursue the project and will consider it
4, `
,,,, r" r'b
John R. Dorney
401 Water Quality Certification Program
Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
Raleigh Corps of Engineers
Central Files
File Copy
Matthew Thomas, Associated Environmental Consultants & Engineers, P
0. Box 31952, Raleigh, NC 27622
A \ Sincerely,
\*`NeT`:
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (h"p://h2o,enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands)
Customer Service #: 1-877-623-6748
ASSOCIATED
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSULTANTS &
-4 AkWiW& ENGINEERS, INC.
October 11, 2004
Mr. John Dorney
401 Certification Unit
• NCDENR ? `=b 1 s???
• 1650 Mail Service Center a?
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 04
RE: Islamic Center of Cary
• DWQ # 03-01482 Vier! ;t i;i ,c(I?s.LITy
• Wake County ?tdlTr?A1F:f?ARANCH
Dear Mr. Dorney:
We received your letter dated September 7, 2004 in response to our request for the referenced
project determination.
In light of your report, we have revisited the planned development and revised the extent of
impacts. Please note that the only channel impact at this time for access road to the building. The
alignment of the access road has been revised to minimize the impact on the channel/buffer.
Attached exhibits clearly show the impact areas. There is a total impact of 132 LF on the stream
• channel. Profile and plan view detailing this is attached.
Please note that there is no proposed disturbance along West Chatham Street with this proposal.
We accept your determination that this Stream is subject to Neuse River Buffer Rules. However,
• please re-review this application with the revised alignment of access road and no impact along
West Chatham Street. Enclosed are following supporting documentation:
1. DWQ Letter of September 7, 2004.
2. Wetland Delineation & Stream Impact Plan.
• 3. Stream Disturbance Area & Access Road Plan & Profile.
4. Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application.
5. Wetland Delineation Forms
6. Mitigation Plan/Ecosystem Enhancement Program Concurrence.
7. Bioretention Computation.
8. Maintenance Agreement.
9. Level Spreaders Detail and Calculations.
• 10. Town of Cary Letter.
We request your approval of 401 Wetland Certification, if applicable.
If you have any questions regarding this submittal, please call me at 919.878.1295 Ext. 125
Sincerely,
Waheed Haq, L.G., C.E.I
QUALITY BNRVIC6 AND PRODUCTS AT AN A roRDABLB INMSTICNT
.......................................................................................................................
P. 0, Box 31952, Raleigh, NC 21622 9191878-1295 919/878-1298 (FAX)
3 211 13ramer Drive Raleigh NC 2 7604 http,11www,aec-e,com

W AT
O?QF
F9pG Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources

Q Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
September'f, 2004
Mr. Shakil Ahmad
P.O. Box 31952
Raleigh, NC 27622-1952
Dear Mr. Ahmad:
RE: Islamic Center of Cary
DWQ # 03-0482
Wake County
In response to our office meeting on August 2, 2004, DWQ staff have visited the site of
the proposed Islamic Center of Cary to determine if the smaller channel that enters the site from
across W. Chatham Street is subject to the Neuse River Buffer rules (15A NCAC 2B. 0233) (see
attached map). The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) has determined that the surface
water labeled as "A" on the attached map is at least an`jntermittent stream and is subject
to the Neuse River Buffer Rule. This stream and it's associated buffers should be identified
on any future plans for this property. The owner (or future owners) should notify the DWQ (and
other relevant agencies) of this decision in any future correspondences concerning this property.
This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. In the context
of your project, this determination will affect the amount of buffer mitigation required for the
project since the widening of Chatham Street will unavoidably impact this channel. Please
address this issue when you resubmit your application to address the issues raised in our August
2, 2004 meeting.
Landowners or affected parties that dispute a determination made by the DWQ or
Delegated Local Authority that a surface water exists and that it is subject to the buffer rule may
request a determination by the Director. A request for a determination by the Director shall be
referred to the Director in writing c/o John Dorney, DWQ Wetlands/401 Unit, 2321 Crabtree
Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260. Individuals that dispute a determination by the DWQ or
Delegated Local Authority that "exempts" a surface water from the buffer rule may ask for an
adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter.
Applicants are hereby notified that the 60-day statutory appeal time does not start until the
affected party (including downstream and adjacent landowners) is notified of this decision.
DWQ recommends that the applicant conduct this notification in order to be certain that third
party appeals are made in a timely manner. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which
conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative
Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This determination is final and
binding unless you ask for a hearing within 60 days.
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone]/ FAX [phone]/ Internet: littp:/Ai2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlailds
None Caro ina
turallly
•- P_.- n___.?.. _:•..l?tC..?-•6._ .-:-- C...-I-..-. -1 n--..-I-JNnO/ n,.M n..--........ n--...
r
This letter only addresses the applicability to the buffer rules and does not approve any
activity within the buffers. Nor does this letter approve any activity within Waters of the United
States or Waters of the State. If you have any additional questions or require additional
information please call Mr. Ed Schwartzman at 715-3477 if you have any questions.
BZljrd
Enclosures: Attached map
cc: Mike Horan, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Ed Schwartzman
Filename: 0304821slamicCenterofCary(Wake)Streamid
teary I,Slr`Imic Center
1155 W CIrat mn St_
August 27,2004
Ed Schwartzman
The feature in question is an intermittent stream ' Stream B) that joins a perennial feature
(Stream A) on the Cary Islamic tenter site. The stream -in question is indtmted on the
Wake County soil surrey and eras readily observable in the field.
The stream enters the property -frmrr a culvert that s r -south -undue Chathm St.
The upstream portianof the feature (mnh side of Omtham St j is an e} amml drainage
way- The discharge from the culvert, hmveN cr, i'mms an ir?tenm t -M stream on tfp-- South
side of Chatham `it. on the Cary Islamic Center property,
The stream is sinuous with ra well defined bed and bank. The sires is quite sal and is
not incised, SIowty #I owing water was present in ft Ownel with an Ahtmdance of iron
oxidzzmg bacteruL No Nuahe bwta were ob rved _ the cban 1, however, wetland
veg un was pmsM aloes the banks and at the ed=ge of the stream. The- was no
vegetation in the stream and little sign of plant roots. iiydric soils were present in the
bands. A bankful bench and smaf# floodplain was evident, though not ck-mly dined. At
the bottom of the intermittent stream near its confluence with Stream A, an area of ,mask
tine was observed.

USGS (50 DRD) EXISTII?IG CgRB
ELm422.66
$ I

STING
HALT
O
ON BASIN ,? . +: 5
e ? \.'.. .... ...
• ....
/., '. ;
ARY
7z ... ;.?.: ..... y y ...
... L _ ?I ... .,
/ Ix `? '?.'.'. '.;.'.'.'.'.:... , ..... ?? '•??''' . ' '.'.. MBA. M?
/ AND 2' .6FIdUL[S

a- -c Cent She
1155. W. Chatham St.
-0 1-50 300 MO FL?
Cary Islam Center Site
1155 W Chatham St.

t
¦
F, .M
of
?.66
0 150 300 600 Feet
i
Si.
7
f
N
NCDWQ Stream Classification Form
Project Name: coa y River Basin: t\J u zD -- county: wake Evaluator:
DWQ Project Number: -C1 7? Nearest Named Steam: ? W I C4" Latitude: Signature: /0 9,-n ?/
(? C? u ?1
Date: a I (/ USGS QUAD: f` Longitude: Loauior>/Directions: ?/ , 1
*PLE , E NOTE: if evaluator and landowner agree that the fedttrr•e is a mart-mat ditch then use o this oral is not necessary.
l ? W
Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified ? atural stream-this rk( i f l1-a W5
rating system should not be used*
Primary Mield Indicators: (Circle Me Number Per Lbre)
A I uw
II Is There A Riffle-Pool Sequence? _ 0 1 2
-------- ---------------- -- ---- - --- ------- ----
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
_ Dt-I•ferent-From Surrc.un(iinb 7`err_iin'?__ o -?-2 3
3) Are Natural Levees Present?--- -- - _-- - - I _ 2
4 I) I) s,FI1g Channel Sinuous'?----------- -- - -- O- -- -- ?- 2 3 --
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic) - ---- -
S Is There A Bankfull Bench -Present? _0 _ 3
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0 1 2 3
(_.*. If BtfLA1Aw -Citutvird-B-Y-Viltllills AlldHVII10UT Ailll!ro0y.1'llett Srt-r3'=(1*)
------
10) Is A 2"`t Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated-
ndicated I--
_
On '1 OP L i----- o Ma r A?trUOr I- -n Field)-1'l escrit? Yes=3__ - / No=O
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS
It. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flsw/Discharge Present'1 ---------- - 0 - I- (?&? 3
PRIMARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: `_
111.131010 Absent Weak Mode
1) Are.Fibrous Roots Present it, Stre tntl>e?l'?-_- 3
- - - --- 1
2) Are Rooted Plants Present In-St -eanihwxlY_
3) Is I'eriplton_Ptesetlt'?_ _ 0 1 2
4) Are Bivalves Present.- ---- -- - 0 - --- - t -- 2
PRIMARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS
Secondary Field Indicator's: (Circle One Numbev Per Line)
A
1 Is There A Head Cut Present In Ch_micl'?_
11 r? •rr,,,.., n r!..-l- r......... ., ,?....-. r-- ,.,- i., _ ----
3) Does Topography Indicate A ----- - ---- --
Natural Drainage Way'? --l____-- -_ -1.5 --
SECONDARY GE031ORPHOLOG YINDICA TOR POINTS: 0 5
IL Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Stroh y
1) Is Phis Year's (Or Last's) Leatlitter
Present In S(reanibed? .5 0

2) Is Sediment On Plants Or Debris Present?_---_.__ _ _
5- 1 _
1.5
3 Are Wrack Lines Present? --_-------- --- O--- - .5 1.5 -
a) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since 0 .5 1 1.5
l_t?st Knu?vn Rain? (*N0 TL Dilch Inrlil_nrerl lli Nl ?buve J'ki , Ste, And N.5 Below*)
-
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry .5 1 1.5
;_onditions O?• In Grc?witl};.Season '?.__
-
5 Are II dy tic Soils Present Ili Sides Of Channel_t01 Ili Ileadcutj?
Yes=l„5
No=O
4ECONDARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR MINTS: r
Al
:1-&e Amp-11ibians Present? 0 .5 1.5
1 Are A(luaticTurdes Present'?__ - ---- - - - -- ;5
- - 1 1.5 ----
-
11 Are C1ufisli Present? - --------- ---- •5 _I 1.5 --- ---
i Are Macrobenthos Present? -
iZAre Iron Oxidizing .Bacteria/Fungus Present?
___
.5 -
--- 1.5 - _
'ZIs hilamentous Aloe Present'?-.___
- 0 --
5
1
.5
1) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAN' Mostly OIIL Mostly FACW _
Mostly U C Mostly NACU Mostly UI'L
NOTh: {f otal Absence O/ All Planr+ In SL,enn,bed ? 1 .75 t 0 0
4_r Nureyl Abr?1Ay71/11-% S(ep- U(Y/-t .S.S.SAV-l',_elr-nr*L
SECONDARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR MINTS:- __.
ac ? i
I.POINTS (Primyvy + secott tm-),)=_-_-(If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent)
?oF W A 1-F9o Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
?O G? North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
> _{ Alan Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
April 14, 2004
DWQ # 03-0482
Wake County
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Shakil Ahmad
Post Office Box 31952
Raleigh, NC 27622-1952
Subject Property: Islamic Center of Cary, 1155 W. Chatham Street, Cary, NC
Dear Mr. Ahmad:
On March 4, 2004 the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) was notified by receipt of additional information on April 6, 2004
regarding your application on your plan to fill wetlands or waters for the purpose of road construction in Wake County.
Approval from DWQ is required to disturb these areas. Please provide 7 copies of the following information and refer to the
DWQ # listed above in your reply. Please show these on maps of suitable scale (for instance 1" = 100 feet) so we can begin
to determine your projects' compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500.
1. Please provide a large-scale map for the project that is easier to interpret.
2. Please provide detail for the stormwater management practices as required by GC 3404 and designed to meet
DWQ's design standards.
3. Please indicate all stormwater outfalls on the site plan.
4. Please provide calculations showing that proposed biogardens can treat stormwater generated on site.
5. Please provide a letter from EEP showing acceptance of mitigation requirements for the 162 feet of
compensatory stream mitigation is required for this project or provide an alternative method of compensatory
mitigation.
6. This Office believes that the sidewalk area labeled on the plans as sidewalk and embankment can be moved or
reconfigured to avoid the impacts to the protected riparian buffers. Please revise your plans to avoid the
impacts or provide additional justification as to why these impacts can not be avoided. A letter from the Town
of Cary may be helpful.
Please telephone Ed Schwartzman at 919-715-3477 if you have any questions or would require copies of our rules or
procedural materials. This project will remain on hold as incomplete in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0505(c). The
processing time for this application will begin when this information is received. If we do not hear from you by writing or by
fax at [phone] within three (3) weeks we will assume you no longer want to pursue the project and will consider it
withdrawn.
JRD/bs
cc:
Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
Raleigh Corps of Engineers
Central Files
File Copy
Matthew Thomas, Associated Environmental Consultants & Engineers, P
0. Box 31952, Raleigh, NC 27622

vision of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
11 Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
tree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands)
Service #: 1-877-623-6748
ASSOCIATED
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSULTANTS &
-4 ENGINEERS, INC.
March 29, 2004
• 4NDS1401 GROWp
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
NCDENR-DWQ,: '?Jf1 i
Wetlands Unit
• 1650 Mail Service Center WA1RQ(J
ALITYSEC?p?
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Subject: Islamic Center of Cary
1155 W. Chatham Street
Cary, NC
UT to "Kildaire Farms Lake", MacGregor Downs Lake (Swift Creek)
DWQ # 03-0482
• Dear Ms. Karoly:
:
Enclosed is the revised permit application for the above-mentioned Site. The following
revisions have been made to the original application form:
1. Stream Impacts & Mitigation
a. Figure 4 (Final Site Plan) details the location and boundaries of
impacts that will occur on Site.
b. 162 liner feet of stream mitigation will occur on Site.
• 2. Buffer Impacts
a. 14,260.304 square feet of buffers will be impacted on Site. Sidewalk
impact in the buffer consist of 1, 683.628 square feet, while the road
crossing, shoulder, & embankment impact area in the buffer contains
12,576.676 linear feet.
b. Buffer mitigation was removed for the sewer line impact.
:
• 3. Sidewalk
a. Due to the widening of W. Chatham Street, a sidewalk is required, per
Town of Cary rules. Buffer mitigation is included in the total buffer
mitigation area.
:
4. Parking Lot
a. The north side of the southeast parking lot was redesigned to eliminate
minor impacts to Zone 2 of the buffer.
QUALITY SERVICE AND PRODUCTS AT AN AFFORDABLE INVESTMENT
.......................................................................................................................
P. 0.130x 31952, Raleigh, NC 27622 9191878-1295 9191878-1298 (FAX)
3 211 C3ramer DHw Raleigh NC 2 7604 hVVIwww aec-e,com
3. Sidewalk
Please describe the need for the buffer impacts associated with the sidewalk. It appears that
the sidewalk will not connect to any existing sidewalks. Please note that the sidewalk will
most likely be considered a widening of W. Chatham Street and may require buffer
mitigation if approved.
4. Parking Lot
The north side of the southeast parking lot is shown to have minor impacts to Zone 2 of the
buffer. Please redesign to avoid this impact.
Please telephone Bob Zarzecki at 919-733-9726 if you have any questions or would require copies of
our rules or procedural materials. This project will remain on hold as incomplete in accordance with
15A NCAC 2H .0505(c). The processing time for this application will begin when this information is
received. If we do not hear from you by writing or by fax at [phone] within three (3) weeks we
will assume you no longer want to pursue the project and will consider it withdrawn.
Sincerely,
rlWater Dorney
Quality C rtification Program
JRD/bs
cc: Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
Raleigh Corps of Engineers
Central Files
File Copy
Matthew Thomas
Associated Environmental Consultants & Engineers
Post Office Box 31952
Raleigh, NC 27622
I')(!N =23' 03 ?MON) 14:59 NCDENR RRO TEL:[phone] P. 001
FAX COVER SHEET
fflX.WA NORTH CAROLINA
A DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL. RESOURCES
NCD NR Raleigh Regional Office
NuRrm CmoomA Qempmwwras 1628 Mail Service Center
EHVMiGNMGNT AND NAruul R[baN+Gee Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
Li- Pages, including cover sheet
TO: FAX: 3 -?) : o!Rq?
Q3
(, /Za
FROM; I it p F S DATE:
SUBJECT:
MESSAGE:

If you do not receive all pages, cal 919.571.4700 or fax back to 999,571.4718.
JUN.'-23' 03(MON) 14:59 NGDENR RRO

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
Michael F. Fawley, Govemor
William G. (Bill) Ross, Secretary
TEL : [phone] P. 002
A 7=11IIIIIIIII!,
OF
-A&74 0 0 1 W
NCDENR
NCW" CARoLIN~ (JET AR'rMrW OF
F-NvmommeNf AHo N,auww4- REscuwcx,
Division of Water Quality
September 189 2002
Waheed Rana
Associated Eavirouznental Consultants & Engineers
3211 Bremer Dr., Suite B
Raleigh, NC 27604
Subject: Nam River Basin Buffer Rules
NBRRO 02-194
Proposed Islamic Center of Cary
Cary, Wake County, NC
Dear Mr. Rana:
On June 24, 2002, I conducted a site visit of the features involved in the above referenc ed
project as identified on the attached maps- It was determined that the features shown on the Wake
County Soil Survey and on the USGS Cary, NC Quad map could potentially be subject to
protection under the Neuse River Basin: Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy;
Protection and Maintenance of Existing Riparian Areas, Administrative Code T15A: 028.4233
(NCAC .0233). All features depicted on the maps are subject throughout property.
This letter only addresses the applicability of the Neuse Buffer Rules - For information
relevant to wetlands, and other impacts, please contact the Central Office at 733-1786. Thank you
for your attention to this matter and if this office can be of any assistance or if you have additional
questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
Deborah Edwards
Environmental Specialist I
cc. John Dorsey/DWQ
Wake County
1828 Mall Service Center, R91419h, NC 27899.1828 Telephone (g1a)5714700 FAX [phone]
An equal oppwtunlty AfflrmaUve Action Employer 50% nacycledI110% post-consumer paper
RN -23' 03 (SON) 14:59 NGDENR RRO TELA19 5 71 4718 P. 003
Jl N. -23' U3 (NION1 15: DD NCDENR RRO TEL. [phone]
SHEET NUMBER 56 (;p n- atreol 46)
1,\%rc-•??-?7 Gn Y
r `` 'G r H HrC ,? r I Hr5 WnE Asc
mye hY1t??i , `? r. 9rv
? i H'r8 f fiti, Me r ? •
a ?>' • \ y CCU i? iy
-myc
J -7
wsC2 ws6 .'• { `?i 'F'T r 114
PG2
c• x ' WsG. GewBJ2 / Z F p. \ r ASP2 1l
MyB sE e ht ' /r
W e ,?h s02 J GaB2' y
-wen
' ao B2 -
MY? GeG2 2 ;! r M. r' Asa'
r. MyC2 • GnC - ?` / ?, t f _ AfiC2 ` ?i?. ` /
aC2 , . Gem , / F r I Ap?
WsB :Ir?2 Gem ?rC2
GeG2 \APD / ra
a 1 5 rC' i seoa
} ?; t ?ncz
HrC2 GeB2 ASIA
- r"
c
GBB2
CAB2 `
C2 'r -
02
z D.
- f r
crE L` r GaC2 BD
Ld62 Y d?
?'` crB2 , I r.,_
Ws9' ?? \ Hr
_ 'G 7
sC? ErC G-C ?A
r-
' GeG2 A C
i NrE ?/ .t - °? ??!` :G . ?'.`~ GrP2 Ash 3Te2
crS
CIC2
CrE _ J( -.` , aeC,2-' ce9? C??? ? ?r t crii rU
v02 !rxi?: eC2 _ > Ap r)
I CrG? ?i HrE_ \•??? GaC2 __ ? a 9CC.2? ? •i' HrB2r?
I G?Gell1 1 ! - GBJJ 4 ir+Hr AsC AsC2 r
-+. x, --Z2•,
Gal
r 3f ?, Hr02.N-c hta - ti
ec,
Jr p _ ?r f .•' AsS?
rC Gjy Hr D2. GeBY \4r rVF s `
i C g r•' CaB, .
`? a. e92 ,. .. ;• - ec2 GeD2 (•• ?. 1'
t. r?.'. .?
f Nr 2 l? i HrB2 _
r i cE^ } Cecz?i? ?? c
%
W15 \G a Hr
rrB2'^ :. •?' ?' ? GeC2 , ?• r r rte'/? q
ceB_ ro 1
rY c-F .. •? != -"" . ?: ?.. ?!. ?e 2. c+ oat , \" ,? AEB 5...
+' J
I , o Hr8 r
/xr? 3+yee-?? ?? l GoB.. CBC GeB
ti NrB2 = r ??o-c T I? Ge02 I I?!
AsC4
Cr9_ En9_ Ce82
?g : ) ?' 11f82 I AaC? ?. ?2 i C•eF^ ??? `/1f AsB.
?''? 1hYEi f r CtC ? - ? ?' • •2`? _ ?`- _ ..r ° ° . '? i?z -"•',wr'
4 ?, a ; GeC2 Ce62" ?? K..
Iir82 , ?\ '' r1 CEC 1 ?" '.~ BSI
I•:
CtG
MrC2 J Mc J y G092' 1 c , \ • '
1
r A.cz ' 'AsG2 .
?r:° M7B: i AgB I `?
• ,.Grrt o / J ? Cm1 ?
/ y PC GeD2 GeB / CB- J ?.
nt,C2 Ge9 'Cgc r
Ct9 Cr9 er? 'CP \ J , 1 C? CC32? / CeF Ce
t= (crc' GeB2 orl
;Joins shoel 66;
I
P. 004
5S ?^ ?
N
? I
I ?
CCC2?
II I
II +
? III
Iill 1 Cn?
i y Q
i I CtC?
I
t II
I
i
0
r I -,
II,' ? ? f
I} Cnc_-,
II I
II
r
u
I
III - WrnE I
r.
I

A
i
Michael F. Easley, Governor
OC'O? w H rlR9-
0 7 William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
0 Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
June 2, 2003
DWQ Project No. 03-0482
Wake County
Page 1 of 2
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Shakil Ahmad
P.O. Box 31952
Raleigh, NC 27622-1952
Subject Property: Islamic Center of Cary, 1155 W. Chatham Street, Cary, NC
UT to "Kildaire Farms Lake", MacGregor Downs Lake (Swift Creek)
[03-04-02, 27-43-2.2, WS-III (water supply) NSW (nutrient sensitive)]
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
Dear Mr. Ahmad:
On April 21, 2003, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application dated April 10, 2003 to impact 0.15
acres of wetlands, 75 feet of stream and 7,500 square feet (ft) of protected riparian buffers to construct the proposed
Islamic Center of Cary. The DWQ has determined that your application was incomplete and/or provided inaccurate
information as discussed below. The DWQ will require additional information in order to process your application to
impact protected buffers on the subject property. Therefore, unless we receive the additional information requested
below, we will have to move toward denial of your application as required by 15A NCAC 2B .0233(8) and will place this
project on hold as incomplete until we receive this additional information. Please provide the following information so that
we may continue to review your project.
Additional Information:
1. Impact Calculations
Under Section VI(1) of your application you did not provide a description of the proposed impacts other than "none".
One may assume that by stating "none" you are not proposing to impact any wetlands, streams or buffers. However,
you stated in Section VI(3) that you intend to "pipe culvert" a stream and under Section X you stated that you intend to
impact 7,500 square feet of Zone 2 of the protected riparian buffers. After reviewing the plans provided within your
application it appears that you will be impacting approximately 200 feet of stream and 0.5 acres of buffers. Please
clarify the discrepancies in these numbers and clearly state the impacts within you application and plans.
2. Mitigation
You did not complete Section VIII of your application. Please complete this section.
3. Water Quality Certification
You have proposed impacts to streams, but have not stated which 404 Permit or 401 Water Quality Certification you
intend to use to impact these streams. Please state which permit and certification you intend to you. You may want to
contact the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) to determine which permit they will allow you to use. Please state
which Permit (Nationwide, Regional or General) number you intend to use.
4. Wetland Delineation
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, Wetlands/401 Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/
raycs c vi c
It does not appear that the USACE has delineated the Waters of the U.S. on your property. We recommend that you
contact the USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office (919-876-8441) and request a delineation of the Waters of the U.S.
on your property. Please provide a copy of this delineation once your receive it.
5. On-Site Determination
It does not appear that the DWQ has been to your property to confirm surface waters subject to the Neuse River Buffer
Rule [15A NCAC 02B.0233]. This office recommends that you contact the DWQ Raleigh Regional Office (919-876-
8441) to conduct an on-site determination to confirm the presence of surface waters subject to the Neuse River Buffer
Rule. Please,provide a copy of this determination once you receive it.
6. Stormwater Management
Please provide a final, written stormwater management plan in writing. The stormwater management plan must include
plans and specifications for stormwater management facilities that are appropriate for surface waters classified as "WS-
III NSW" and designed to remove 85% TSS according to the most recent version of the NC DENR Stormwater Best
Management Practices Manual. These facilities must be designed to treat the runoff from the entire project, unless
otherwise explicitly approved by the Division of Water Quality.
7. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Under Section VII of your application you did not provide a "justification" for the impacts as requested within this section.
Please describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts and discuss how impacts were minimized once the
desired site plan was developed. Also, discuss construction techniques to be followed during construction to reduce
impacts. Specifically address why a single access drive can not be used to cross the stream rather than the"T" dual
access drives as proposed.
Please respond within three weeks of the date of this letter by sending this information to me in writing and to Mr. Steve
Mitchell of the DWQ Raleigh Regional Office. If we do not hear from you within three weeks, we will assume that you no
longer want to pursue this project and we will consider the project as withdrawn.
This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands, waters or protected
buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your application are not authorized (at this time) by the DWQ.
Please call Mr. Bob Zarzecki at 919-733-9726 if you have any questions regarding or would like to set up a meeting to
discuss this matter.
Sincerely,
John Dorney,
Wetlands/401 Unit, DWQ.
cc: Waheed Haq "Rana", AEC&E, Inc., 3211-B Bramer Drive, Raleigh, NC 27604
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
DWO Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
DW O03-0482
June 2, 2003
bz
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact: Steve Mitchell
Non-Discharge Branch WQ Supervisor:
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Islamic Center of Cary County Wake
Project Number 03 0482 County2
Recvd From APP Region Raleigh
Received Date 4/21/03 Recvd By Region
Project Type proposed church facility road crossing
Certificates Stream Stream Impacts (ft.)
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req. ME
NBR BuffersO Y _0N F__ 27-33-(1) F _c_ NSW 30,402. 0.17 F_ ?- ?-
Stream P-7-0 N ?-? r ??-r- 30,402. ?- 75.00
F-7-P-770 _N Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
I F_ F F_
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? 0 Y 0 N Did you request more info? 0 Y 0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? 0 Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? 0 Y O N Recommendation: O issue 0 Issue/fond O Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) Longitude (ddmmss)
Comments:
April 25, 2003

cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
TopoZone - The Web's Topographic Map http://www.topozone.com/print.asp?z=17&n=3960535&e=698464&s=25
hnzoneao i
Target is UTM 17 698464E 3960535N - CARY quad (Quad Info]
The TopoZone is produced by Maps a la carte, Inc. - © 2000 Maps a la carte, Inc. - All rights reserved. Use of this site is governed
by our Conditions and Terms of Use. We care about your privacy - please consult our Privacy Statement for details.
1 of 1 6/2/03 3:44 PM
0 500 1000 1500 2000
meters, . i
miles Oi 0.5 1 ?0
=; A
_ --Mj 78°48'45"
9
7
012
Ell., KIAI
r
LMWINI)S
WA'
GWOO
an S
Olk HONEY
J
]3
•
LANNARK
I
B 78"48'00" 2,060,000 FT ® E G
78°47'15" Joins Map 122 78°46'30" 9 roe, nm
• Jr .
ASSOCIATED
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSULTANTS &
i? ENGINEERS, INC. ^
April 10 2003 P ,90
• R?
??
NCDENR - Division of water Quality
• 2321 Crabtree Boulevard 4z
Raleigh, NC 27604 1 ik
Re: Pre Construction Notification
Proposed Church Facility
1155 West Chatham Street
Cary, North Carolina
Dear Sir/Madam:
Enclosed please find seven (7) copies of the Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application
Form for the above referenced site.
• Due to the limitations at the site and unfavorable site layout, an access road will be built with a
54-inch RCP culvert pipe.
Based on the preliminary project conditions, the total impacted area would be approximately
0.15 acre and the less than 150-linear feet cumulative impacts to the drainage ditch.
The main access will be from the West Chatham Street to the proposed building. The impact
appears to be minimal and will not pose any significant threat of impairment to the system.
We have completed the site development plans and are awaiting your response on this submittal.
• If you have any questions, or desire additional information, please call me at 919-878-1295. I
look forward to your favorable action on this submittal.
Sincerely,
Waheed Haq "Rana"
President
• Enc. PCN-Application Form (7 copies with site plans)
Qmzzrr SXRWCS AND PROnXT8 AT Am ArroA wzx INwsTmiwT
.......................................................................................................................
P. 0. 130x 31952, Raleigh, NC 27622 9191878-1295 9191878-1298 (FAX)
3211 Dr~ DVW Raleigh NC 27604 ktp'?/Mvw,aec-e,com

Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project-
F-1 Section 404 Permit Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit K Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
? 401 Water Quality Certification ?? air o?47
?fr.>? C.dvs?lLnca? T Ru+?'t
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested:
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: X
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ? lit/It
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ? Pt 1d
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: S {'??
Mailing Address: O
c. 2_7 42.2- -19 5
Telephone Number: 419-$78 - l2 5 Fax Number: 919 S l?S- j 2..?.g
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the A ent has ignatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: or IP--Ikt4A "
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address: =1J_-5 BQ'weg- _
Telephone Number: 919-676-JZ 5 %_iZFax Number: 91:2-6-79-12.98
E-mail Address: w a A2G --e • v++?
Page 5 of 5
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: T*i.ArA V C o Wri ,2 Or CA seY
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):
4. Location
County: SNAG KI? Nearest Town: L_ 60 2 Y.
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.):
I 155 Cs??rT Ly-M ?7??? T? C.i4?L`f lit G
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long):
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres):
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): r4o
8. River Basin: F? ac(AC,-?
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of4his application:
Page 6 of 6
IV.
V.
VI.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, includin the
Cop+sTeUc-7110 t4 oC A? - Nt
w
v
of a uipment. to be used:
LP W c?H Ro 1 .KI N
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:
!fit ccesg F-rl>M A s ¢c,6*4DwaY r2aosw
Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USAGE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
r?1o N?
Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
MONO
Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 7 of 7
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
ton ma
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Located within
100-year Floodplain**
es/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
linear feet
Type of Wetland***

List each impact separately and identity temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema&Qv.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
Ace-a
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: O',4 r*
Total area of wetland impact proposed:
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
linear feet
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
leasespecify)
eU LV

* List each impoof separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usPs.90v. Several intemet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.tonozonc.com,
www.mapgtiest.coni, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 75 FEET
Page 8 of 8
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.

List each impact separately and identify mporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 9 of 9
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
littp://li2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strm.gide.htnil.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state,nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Page 10 of 10
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No >a If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 - 3 .•.
2 1.5 lb2rpo
Total 500 250
zone I extends out 3U feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 11 of 11
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0242 or .0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
TE w N O CAi2Y S c_-__K1SR
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No J<
r
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
NONE
Applicant/Agent's Signa re Date
(A?t's signature is valid only i an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
l o ca-- e_ -zoo 6_?
c) ?s
I ,y n ,
3 y_
1
C -?Vo VIA
cda?-T y F
?
y?
v 100
?11) eke
o"
Y6 f y" ? ? Vyq
DWQ# V b) - CL? Date ! ' ?11 r g' or / Who Reviewed:
Plan Detail Incomplete
? Please provide a location map for the project.
1?_S
? Please show all stream impacts including all fill slopes, dissipaters, and bank stabilization on the site plan.
? Please show all wetland impacts including fill slopes on the site plan.
? Please indicate all buffer impacts on the site plan.
? Please indicate proposed lot layout as overlays on the site plan.
? Please indicate the location of the protected buffers as overlays on the site plan.
? Please locate all isolated or non-isolated wetlands, streams and other waters of the State as overlays on the site plan.
? Please provide cross section details showing the provisions for aquatic life passage.
? Please locate any planned sewer lines on the site plan.
? Please provide the location of any proposed stormwater management practices as required by GC
? Please provide detail for the stormwater management practices as required by GC
? Please specify the percent of project imperviousness area based on the estimated built-out conditions.
? Please indicate all stormwater outfalls on the site plan.
? Please indicate the diffuse flow provision measures on the site plan.
? Please indicate whether or not the proposed impacts already been conducted.
Avoidance and/or Minimization Not Provided
? The labeled as on the plans does not appear to be necessary. Please eliminate the or provide additional
information as to why it is necessary for this project.
? This Office believes that the labeled on the plans as can be moved or reconfigured to avoid the impacts to the
. Please revise the plans to avoid the impacts.
? This Office believes that the labeled on the plans as can be moved or reconfigured to minimize the impacts to the
. Please revise the plans to minimize the impacts.
? The stormwater discharges at the location on the plans labeled will not provide diffuse flow through the buffer because
. Please revise the plans and provide calculations to show that diffuse flow will be achieved through the entire buffer. If it
is not possible to achieve diffuse flow through the entire buffer then it may be necessary to provide stormwater management
practices that remove nutrients before the stormwater can be discharged through the buffer.
Other
? The application fee was insufficient because over 150 feet of stream and/or over 1 acre of wetland impacts were requested. Please
provide $ . This additional fee must be received before your application can be reviewed.
? Please complete Section(s) on the application.
? Please provide a signed copy of the application.
? Please provide copies of the application, copies of the site plans and other supporting information.
Mitigation
? of compensatory mitigation is required for this project. Please provide a compensatory mitigation plan. The
plan must conform to the requirements in 15 A NCAC 2H .0500 and must be appropriate to the type of impacts proposed.
? Please indicate which 404 Permit the USACE would use to authorize this project.
f ?j'Ol/+ ?? S?-aY) da+-d Fv? ???? Gl 1 C21? 1n'1 1 Yl ?Ll-l O.V 1?P ?.? ?G el i'/? L-
'pl????? Quo V?d? G??Lc.& c?4-5 v? ?ac6, level ere'
nvr.r=

o, uu a
WIT
aj\vJ
staryt
?' ?? is kL?a?u1a
fv?
67D/
IVI-
o4Q ? ?E?P
*9
DWQ# Date I Who Reviewed:
Plan Detail Incomplete
? Please provide a location map for the project.
? Please show all stream impacts including all fill slopes, dissipaters, and bank stabilization on the site plan.
? Please show all wetland impacts including fill slopes on the site plan.
? Please indicate all buffer impacts on the site plan.
? Please indicate proposed lot layout as overlays on the site plan.
? Please indicate the location of the protected buffers as overlays on the site plan.
? Please locate all isolated or non-isolated wetlands, streams and other waters of the State as overlays on the site plan.
? Please provide cross section details showing the provisions for aquatic life passage.
? Please locate any planned sewer lines on the site plan.
? Please provide the location of any proposed stormwater management practices as required by GC
? Please provide detail for the stormwater management practices as required by GC
? Please specify the percent of project imperviousness area based on the estimated built-out conditions.
? Please indicate all stormwater outfalls on the site plan.
? Please indicate the diffuse flow provision measures on the site plan.
? Please indicate whether or not the proposed impacts already been conducted.
Avoidance and/or Minimization Not Provided
? The labeled as on the plans does not appear to be necessary. Please eliminate the or provide additional
information as to why it is necessary for this project.
? This Office believes that the labeled on the plans as can be moved or reconfigured to avoid the impacts to the
Please revise the plans to avoid the impacts.
? This Office believes that the labeled on the plans as can be moved or reconfigured to minimize the impacts to the
. Please revise the plans to minimize the impacts.
? The stormwater discharges at the location on the plans labeled will not provide diffuse flow through the buffer because
Please revise the plans and provide calculations to show that diffuse flow will be achieved through the entire buffer. If it
is not possible to achieve diffuse flow through the entire buffer then it may be necessary to provide stormwater management
practices that remove nutrients before the stormwater can be discharged through the buffer.
Other
? The application fee was insufficient because over 150 feet of stream and/or over 1 acre of wetland impacts were requested. Please
provide $ . This additional fee must be received before your application can be reviewed.
? Please complete Section(s) on the application.
? Please provide a signed copy of the application.
? Please provide copies of the application, copies of the site plans and other supporting information.
Mitigation
? of compensatory mitigation is required for this project. Please provide a compensatory mitigation plan. The
plan must conform to the requirements in 15 A NCAC 2H .0500 and must be appropriate to the type of impacts proposed.
? Please indicate which 404 Permit the USACE would use to authorize this project.
mDWQ# Date ??"__ Who Reviewed:
Plan Detail Incompl
10-T9 e to !5, C0.I _
Please provide amap for the project. 7"?
? Please show all stream impacts including all fill slopes, dissipaters, and bank stabilization on the site plan.
? Please show all wetland impacts including fill slopes on the site plan.
? Please indicate all buffer impacts on the site plan.
? Please indicate proposed lot layout as overlays on the site plan.
? Please indicate the location of the protected buffers as overlays on the site plan.
? Please locate all isolated or non-isolated wetlands, streams and other waters of the State as overlays on the site plan.
? Please provide cross section details showing the provisions for aquatic life passage.
? Please locate any planned sewer lines on the site plan.
Please provide the location of any proposed stormwater management practices as required by GC
Uf Please provide detail for the stormwater management practices as required by GC? 1 ao ????"""
?.Q S l cgry \ r/S
? Please specify the percent of project imperviousness area based on the estimated built-out conditions. o
Please indicate all stormwater outfalls on the site pl ako?'L'? V/ ?' 67 /?` -S
1 ?'C C7 c`? ?.7
Please indicate the diffuse flow provision measures on the site plan
cy ?f ?Cr? C?1'l)?/?'??
? Please indicate whether or not the proposed impacts already been conducted bi Cafi
Avoidance and/or Minimization Not Provided
? The labeled as on the plans does not appear to be necessary. Please eliminate the or provide additional
information as to why it is necessary for this project.
? This Office believes that the labeled on the plans as can be moved or reconfigured to avoid the impacts to the
. Please revise the plans to avoid the impacts.
? This Office believes that the labeled on the plans as can be moved or reconfigured to minimize the impacts to the
. Please revise the plans to minimize the impacts.
? The stormwater discharges at the location on the plans labeled will not provide diffuse flow through the buffer because
. Please revise the plans and provide calculations to show that diffuse flow will be achieved through the entire buffets If it
is not possible to achieve diffuse flow through the entire buffer then it may be necessary to provide stormwater management
practic that remove nutrients before the stormw/ater can be discharged through the buffer.
Other lea 60 rU U I c? CL ?0?'?? 'S h?
? The application fee was insufficieitit because over 150 feet of stream and/or over 1 acre of wetland impacts were requested. Please
provide $ . This additional fee must be received before your application can be reviewed.
? Please complete Section(s) on the application.
? Please provide a signed copy of the application.
? Please provide copies of the application, copies of the site plans and other supporting information.
Mitigation "
officomepensatory f a/"mitigation is required for this project. Please provide a compensatory mitigation plan. The
plan must cq>orln to the p: quiremegts in 15 A NCAC 2H,0500 end mgst be appropriate tp the type of impacts proposed`)
? Please indicate whiEh 40d Permit the USACI?'would use to authorize this project. t!
S
4
Ja CAA- ?)1gd.el t-v?
lbA al (Loa
5
Aj, k, 4,.?, r c
V\ C-C-A- tom,
`,nno (il ?p(Y lt+e a -r C-P - C- J ' KA'yO,
6
Zack
e Cc,55_ IAA I,?Uu? Q f?c5?6S
?-?lr?.. c?.e..? ? ,?c?,e,'?- ??. Sc? uc:wL. ?-est? • ? ? ems- sE:??Q ?
DWQ# 03-0q Date ?o , Who Reviewed
ZZ +W1
Plan Detail Incomplete
? Please provide a location map for the project.
? Please show all stream impacts including all fill slopes, dissipaters, and bank stabilization on the site plan.
? Please show all wetland impacts including fill slopes on the site plan.
? Please indicate all buffer impacts on the site plan.
? Please indicate proposed lot layout as overlays on the site plan.
? Please indicate the location of the protected buffers as overlays on the site plan.
? Please locate all isolated or non-isolated wetlands, streams and other waters of the State as overlays on the site plan.
? Please provide cross section details showing the provisions for aquatic life passage.
? Please locate any planned sewer lines on the site plan.
? Please provide the location of any proposed stormwater management practices as required by GC
? Please provide detail for the stormwater management practices as required by GC
? Please specify the percent of project imperviousness area based on the estimated built-out conditions.
? Please indicate all stormwater outfalls on the site plan.
? Please indicate the diffuse flow provision measures on the site plan.
? Please indicate whether or not the proposed impacts already been conducted.
Avoidance and/or Minimization Not Provided
? The labeled as on the plans does not appear to be necessary. Please eliminate the or provide additional
information as to why it is necessary for this project.
? This Office believes that the labeled on the plans as can be moved or reconfigured to avoid the impacts to the
. Please revise the plans to avoid the impacts.
? This Office believes that the labeled on the plans as can be moved or reconfigured to minimize the impacts to the
. Please revise the plans to minimize the impacts.
? The stormwater discharges at the location on the plans labeled will not provide diffuse flow through the buffer because
. Please revise the plans and provide calculations to show that diffuse flow will be achieved through the entire buffer. If it
is not possible to achieve diffuse flow through the entire buffer then it may be necessary to provide stormwater management
practices that remove nutrients before the stormwater can be discharged through the buffer.
Other
? The application fee was insufficient because over 150 feet of stream and/or over 1 acre of wetland impacts were requested. Please
provide $ . This additional fee must be received before your application can be reviewed.
? Please complete Section(s) on the application.
? Please provide a signed copy of the application.
? Please provide copies of the application, copies of the site plans and other supporting information.
Mitigation
? of compensatory mitigation is required for this project. Please provide a compensatory mitigation plan. The
plan must conform to the requirements in 15 A NCAC 2H .0500 and must be appropriate to the type of impacts proposed.
? Please indicate which 404 Permit the USACE would use to authorize this project.
(?)'\c CT_ -->
ab f b?? ti? ve?
/il/L /?'e tiCl CI-V35 1*

yY\? " kl- /I^e
6 u- S5? oAJ?- 54Q-,,.? . IA-
... n
?-- ?? ('64
r
DWQ# Date i Who Reviewed:
Plan Detail Incomplete
? Please provide a location map for the project.
? Please show all stream impacts including all fill slopes, dissipaters, and bank stabilization on the site plan.
? Please show all wetland impacts including fill slopes on the site plan.
? Please indicate all buffer impacts on the site plan.
? Please indicate proposed lot layout as overlays on the site plan.
? Please indicate the location of the protected buffers as overlays on the site plan.
? Please locate all isolated or non-isolated wetlands, streams and other waters of the State as overlays on the site plan.
? Please provide cross section details showing the provisions for aquatic life passage.
? Please locate any planned sewer lines on the site plan.
? Please provide the location of any proposed stormwater management practices as required by GC
? Please provide detail for the stormwater management practices as required by GC
? Please specify the percent of project imperviousness area based on the estimated built-out conditions.
? Please indicate all stormwater outfalls on the site plan.
? Please indicate the diffuse flow provision measures on the site plan.
? Please indicate whether or not the proposed impacts already been conducted.
Avoidance and/or Minimization Not Provided
? The labeled as on the plans does not appear to be necessary. Please eliminate the or provide additional
information as to why it is necessary for this project.
? This Office believes that the labeled on the plans as can be moved or reconfigured to avoid the impacts to the
. Please revise the plans to avoid the impacts.
? This Office believes that the labeled on the plans as can be moved or reconfigured to minimize the impacts to the
. Please revise the plans to minimize the impacts.
? The stormwater discharges at the location on the plans labeled will not provide diffuse flow through the buffer because
. Please revise the plans and provide calculations to show that diffuse flow will be achieved through the entire buffer. If it
is not possible to achieve diffuse flow through the entire buffer then it may be necessary to provide stormwater management
practices that remove nutrients before the stormwater can be discharged through the buffer.
Other
? The application fee was insufficient because over 150 feet of stream and/or over 1 acre of wetland impacts were requested. Please
provide $ . This additional fee must be received before your application can be reviewed.
? Please complete Section(s) on the application.
? Please provide a signed copy of the application.
? Please provide copies of the application, copies of the site plans and other supporting information.
Mitigation
? of compensatory mitigation is required for this project. Please provide a compensatory mitigation plan. The
plan must conform to the requirements in 15 A NCAC 2H .0500 and must be appropriate to the type of impacts proposed.
? Please indicate which 404 Permit the USACE would use to authorize this project.

t'q"d
w wue.. w K
A Em?nq nd
(? wan a?,n
o??y
r_) a.myew wn,
jIi--
d
FOl?
SOFA IMPACT TYPE OF rACT IE). OF MPACT SRAM MANE AVERAGE W11 OF PETEM6AL OR
SII?IAR?t QREAR FEM STEAM BEFORE rAn OERMIrTERT
?
l ? s 2 PENENWAL
® FILL i UT T FEET P
EI
(
D DRAMA". FILL 113 UT 2 FEET PEIEINAL
2 FEET P41E]NAL
OLSC IFMOW OF M PROPOSED MPACR
FLL FOR SI EET DDMEC AND SRO LDEE
FILL FOR SREET FDEN/D AID SP04Dpt
CULIERT EMBAMWW D10E TIE 91E FOR ROAD OMSSOM
Mm-
SEAAR 6 REA11011 10 08 M OF R. C1ATAM SMET.
!r
2 xoi

TOTAL rACT M BUFFER a3n, ACES (14208104 saFr.)
90EtiMK IMPACT M BUFF6[ 2276 ACES (1661128 SQ7T.)
ROAD CIOSSBD. SIOLLOER a EMBANKMENT IMPACT M BUFFER 22087 ACES (12570.76 SOFT)

ZONE NVACT MU0.I1PER IEOIR®
(SQUARE FEET) X1281108
1 1016427 3 105LOM
2 4142.271 1.5 6211415
10TAL 14280104 3567.408

IOTA E5'1MA1 D AREA OF ALL 01151M MEEAIDS ON 1 HIE PROPERTY 0.284 ACES (12280 SLnJ
wTA. AREA OF EA.IID rACT: MGM ACRES (3= SMFT)
CRRIAIYE rACTS (tREO OKTANOE) w AL SREAAAS 0.M S1E: 162 FEET
wTA.131011 NEAR 06TANCE) w AL SREAAS OM 9TE 753 FEET
EILA1D MPAL
EDAMD rACT TYPE OF IMPACT AREA OF rA4:r IDCAIFD 111IM DISTANCE w MFAEST TYPE OF EXA D
o FILL 60ACRES 08 RDA ROOOPLAM SME,YAN (?,E ACE{)
MJAt?If
Fd6ED
T fILi 0-0113 TES ADJACENT
FOESED
TA
AMAE, FILL 20.367 YES ADJACENT FOESED
STREAM MPACM
f
Y,
4..
%
GRAPHIC SCALE
?'? / ' ..a4Y I ( IN FEET )
dmw I Imc6=100 ft
f J ,y,/ q'r' a mN ? a w.nv u ex.n.ar '.

o?
r !
! / ,r r
0

dal
i

Z1

NOTES
Ate' A.E.C..
Associated EnviEronmental
Consultants & Engineers
am s DE SEE E
pRh?? 470-IM
D. REN6101R DATE
9j
3M?)I
i
p?
ML7
ISLAMIC CENTER OF CARY
1155 W. CHATHAM ST., CARY
6AS K
FINAL SITE PLAN
wom
NAM. B'BB' NEM
5029 7 4
I
NOTES
TOFAL MMMA1® AREA OF ILL 00110 WE11N10S ON 11E PROPERTY: O.=4 ACES (12290 90") i
TOTAL AREA OF EERAD RPAOT: MGM AGES (3772 SOFA.)
'Legend =Z 1PAL1S
(MEAA 0.5TAr? m lit SIIENb aR SPE: la IttT
(!E(M O6 A. m ALL S7REA16 OI SIIC 703 FEEr +" 'r
?7 wa. « ® wig GPua. 1nAro RPACM

rv DC ?.. +.pPkPm m. a o,« naP

rs Puu m-

VWXA D RPACr TYPE OF SPAOT AREA OF RPACT IOCAED Ulm O67NICE m NEAREST TPE OF WEND
N I
(U l
F LL OANSS NyMS:DT FOES10
(
j) F1 mobs YPS Aa ACBff FOES1ED
® OIAMNE FILL O.Ow YE9 ADAACERT FOESED
+
I i
c.,my um vy. 039 w. eo.« SI EA1 WPACM I I // /
A 1,mr,q x25 -+-AeP« ?t. fmw«.1
---4FF co
SIRAM r?ACr TPE OF SIACT 19bM ff 1PAOT S'REAY RAZE AVERAGE RIM OF PEIEIM/L O
> MAC (LINEAR IEE7) STREAM BEFORE SPACE RI1EWTEIIT
FIL 34 OT B
?
15
OT i
FEE
PEI
EIM
OR/MA41E. MI. 113 OT 2 FEET PEIERMAL
2 FEET PERENNIAL
(c3 v
n/
w r Q w„P.? w DESCRIPROI OF ME PROPOSED NVACR
n *- I.=..P. FILL FOR SKEET RDENM AND SMOKER
ss --y ub - - ®ec iLL PoN SNE'f PDEIrIC ND SNO.IODL
r.« o„r«w. c«. OILYQf ENbA1R5EMf 8150E TIE 91E FOR ROAD OgSS'M `
® «n a««P? -?- ®m c«?. RIDE: i
o r . p T-- ss «P T,« SIFWK 6 AMAl® ID VIDOrO OF IL 01ATN1 SI EET
PA T
n-ass?°a°l ? (Ens ? V?nrar -? i o?? ? l ? A/01r ? i d j
w
v
m
n ' l l j?a EI
WS
TAL WwRrACr r ? am4 ra (14261304
SoE1x vACr If 03256E 2525768 ACRES (rouse SM m2T) +
ROAD 0169910, SINUAM & BMIAN EMT SPACT IN EIEFER 02M ACRES (1257&671 SaFL)

ZONE RPACT Main" REOEED
(SOAVE FEET) M1GAIM
I lrb.027 3 30754,003
2 4142.277 1! 413415
IOTAL 14280304 3057.40
111334/// y \ (( f `ny'R1,
P s' sna ®
_ P ©,I
0 1
h
x a.rro Pd
,. ?_ Sew Fm.n?P
-Mkl
a
?? 5 b l 1 1
jl?
\F GRAPHIC SCALE
1'1
IN Fir
1 ieh=100 it

A.E.C.E.
Assoaated Environmental
Consultants & Engineers
OTT S2Am DA SEE a
Redo, me zm"
fiNIe (M) 0e-1716
Q RENrOS, WE
N m' ISLAMIC CENTER OF CARY
1155 w. CHATHAM ST., CARY
8190
`?
SEAL
0211$5 31 `? 14 FINAL SITE PLAN

?
E `? rrw ¦ 251 r.s
R_.F
y "MORRIS
S Nina
5029 4

NOTES
TOTAL 6MA116 AREA OF ILL DIS1N6 WETLANDS ON NE PROYBIT .. a.=4 AGES (1226 SOFT.)
TOTAL AREA OF ERND TACT: Ma765 ACRES (3= SQFT) /
CL¦¦AT11E rACTS (LOCAR DISTANCE) 70 ALL SIIEANS ON 9E 162 FEET
TOTAL LEMM (LINEAR 01STANCE) 10 ALL SIRENS CM SIM 753 FEET v
W .nr va» w„m m, tTND VACR /4/1
rv DC ?.. wp?w,? vow o pp aki
MEXAID rACT TYPE OF VACT AREA OF rAW LOCATED 16021 DISTANCE 70 NEAREST T1PE OF NERAID
9T KT¦Flt ACRES WAR FlODOPLAY
R FEM
F 00
16
TES
?T
PoRSIm
FLL 6016 YES ADJACMWT FOTEM
OTA¦AGG FTL OA=7 1ES AO,NmR FtlE31ED
1 `
J 1 a am of w m,m SREW rAM /
Wj
® m 3a --W- R CP
SREAY rACf TW E OF TACT IBGM CE TACT STREAM NNE AVERAGE MOTH OF PE E76AL OR
S1WJM6m1 (DEAR FEET) SUMM EFOE TACT M1D6111FNT
(
y FLL 34 UT 2 PST P?66AL
L

(
?
? 15 UT 2 FEET PEP13MM
(
9 RRAMNf. FLL 13 UT 2 FELT PERENNIAL
2 FEET PEIEIIUL
j
u'lly DES06na OF 8 PIIDFOSED 6/ACM
a R?uesia ? a°°aTO' '` FILL FOR STREET Em¦IG AID SODU3E)L
fLL FOR S70M MEMING AND sa6DER.
CLL1Qr O¦N60f¦T BME THE SITE FOR ROAD CROSSING a,
i
p T-- SEWN ¦ 16A10 10 MDB¦O CE W. Ou7AN STREET. //////JJJJJJ
/ EO f !{y
R r
i?5 6Q mn ? I• ? ? ? ?
/ 1 FuSmG \?---? \ '
TOGS `SO??l1) ? SDNUr / C?'? i (
44
O
1 ?
-- I J n it
TOTAL rACT RI BuiER 3274 ACMES (1426 SOFf.) ` s ,AA N I E
SOEVM" rACr M ¦IFFEIt0nose AGES (1!61626 sCn.) /, l? j/
ROAD oassMG sOUDEx a¦AraoRr rACr ¦ eurFEz 02M ACRES (12576676 sGFT.)
.?
'A L ' ? I I

ZONE VACT NIL1WLET IEp¦ED
(SWAIE FEED ¦TG47"
I talau® 3 3054,61
2 4142.277 14 6213.415
TOTAL 142E0304 3667.46
1
SN
I
/ 8?m ? ? t- ? i• ? s?
X? '11
\@)
/ p as 4 I
GRAPHIC SCALE
Asa
IN Beer ?
/ ..
,m I m au.w I inch = 100 It
/ / smmm n n?
w

-- A.E.C.E.
Associated Environmental
Consultants & Engineers
mF? CL 3UNY
im
01 RFVNK NC 017E
US?11A
??T ISLAMIC CENTER OF CARY
1155 W. CHATHAM ST., CARY
P
8/p
t Q aR¦a 116[
SEAL
021195 3 f 1/ 4 FINAL SITE PLAN

?`
t ` 6Rrw ¦ au r.r
G re
i HH? es MERIT
5029 4

NOTES
TOTAL E5111A7ED AREA OF ALL pSIM REWARDS M THE PROPMTr. 0.2104 AGES (I2205 SOFT.)
TOTAL AREA OF 1ENAID IMPACT: MOM ACRES (3332 92"..) /
Legerta C11M1A17E RPACIS NEAR ObfNIR) m Au SIIEANS d SIE 112 FEET
TOTAL UHKM NEAR mn1N1] TO ILL SREAttS M S1E 743 FEET ! / / ^ '•
4 F . p»?A CesAmrero? ceu?.
W 0.m. Raw m u.m ai "Exim VACIY
rvW in mrkAm vu.. p Pap nkA
01
TOES WM [m SHIm (? Slam 5«v AAO,Me
amio<.e Cmcrele p. wvbme
EILAAD VACT TWE OF 1VACT AREA OF VACT IOCAEO INNER DNTANCE TO REARM TYPE OF REILAND
S N1? ACRES WEAR ROf05lW
D
FILL 60
1115
IES
A0.ACBff
FORESTED
FLL now YES ADARCENT
00ARIApE FILL Maw VIES Ap ACENT FLRSED
/
J E-- Arm v- -r w STEAM VACM
A E 1- ep' -4rre.niro ??' 1 /
sm n w« kkr
p wA ?r ? u.e kkA
®rA,m oppp -m-p CV (r,rvn. wm..><em,k?
STREAM IMPACT TAPE QF IMPACT I&O1N OF VAR STREAM NAME AEERACE 11011 OF PE EMN 05
ST MIRiR NEAR FEET) SKEW BEFORE INVERWIFIENT
ALL 34 UT 2 FEET PEREMNML
FLL IS UT
DRANAAL FILL 113 UT 2 FEET PEPBNIL
2 FEET 19B05AL

n, nor v0.. Q kan>:y r (((DE9tlROI OF I NE PROPOSED VACR
FILL FOR SIREET WIDENING AM SHMADER.
ss y s? r _ _ '? •a" ^on« FLL PoM SOEEf 1NFIMC SIIORO
® vp pop CLl11Rr E10WOFllT NME TMDIE 410ER.FOR FOND CRO4N10.
T- F-
r+« a.wKAb -?- A r.k. /
®v MOE
ap. sue. serkp.. v T- SA 1 ,rep SIEWR N RELATED TO NODNa OF IL CHATAN STREET
[aN
/ PJb\ O `
?? o L 1
? EASAe14 ?` / I ? j
?s f5a xol / ? ?svrAr? _? ? , nu?? R 1r /e a
- J
TOTAL VACT N DER 0.3724 AGES 14214304 5 u I m ' I u 1111"? £
UWE)
SDEIWN VACT N DER 44705 ACRES (1SIM421 SQFT.) 'y J
ROAD ODSSNIM SIKKAMN R EMILWO ENT VACT N BUFFER 0.7007 AGES (1257467$ S%FT.) v - '?rx 1 D
b

ZONE VACT MULTIPLIER REQkARED
(SOINE FEEL) 14110ATI)M
I 1OUL027 3 34554051
2 4142271 10 6213415
TOTAL 14200.304 35567.401
\ S? i f R i
Q
?7 I
J
/ ? =0..1..10.,\ I
o .gyp ? ?? has f n
' `« I ?, r ?? a ?? ' i rpy A
I/ /x
v
o° /?
??????\. ? ` ? ?,?.,Av ? --- - - ?• \? I, gym/
GRAPHIC SCALE 2
MEN
IN FITT
I uch = 1010) (t.
I ? 1

-?? A.E.C.E.
Associated Environmental
Consultants & Engineers
an sIRE8 WL sm.
PRaR (!N) p?EL6
NQ RE301OE DATE
re ^ ISLAMIC CENTER OF CARY
1155 w. CHATHAM ST., CAR71
8?0
DOOR IrVJ[
SEAL
021195 3 f 4 FINAL SITE PLAN
AN?N?Q
?
Y
?i ESSA .... ..? ...
.? .N
a ? FEa FREED
5029 4
TOTAL AREA OF ILL EASIM DO M (M TE PROP9tT0 a2M4 AGES (122N 56FTJ
Torts AREA AREA OF of REWARD vACT- f: amES ACRES (3332 SOFT.)
-q-d aMLAWNE IMPACTS (LINEAR DISTANCE) A ILL SOEA S M SIX- 162 FEET
I0TAL LEIKM (UQAR DISTANCE) 10 ALL SIBEANS OII SITE, 743 FEET
>1 +e,. ?a. .° u? at IEXAD SPAM
;.w r.. worK,m ?a. a ww N.r
vro ?.nv<ea ,:mcrete pro. '? m.iv„?u
1EI AD IMPACT TYPE OF IMPACT AREA OF IMPACT LOCATED MRM DISTANCE TO NEAREST TYPE OF IIEIWD
REE, ACRES 1°0
AR RODORAM SWEAN
FEET)
FILL Oa
115
12
ADAACENT
FOESm
T NLL OOW TES
'b'?T
FORESTED
ORMIAOE, FILL &OW TES A6NC91f FOIESED
\
44
E..'- ?-'- ,. uti aom STREAM I PACM / / / ?/ I

0 E.-q na -Fyp?? tm ?.Pa?J
> s? ? weo .b?

e.N m aca L?.m?..x ?a ml
STREAM! IVACT T1PE (T EPACT LEMN OF IMPACT SREAN NNE ASERAW N IN Qi PEIp1AL DR
91[MRIEIt (LIEN FEET) STREAM BEFORE IMPACT MIWRIFNT
(
? ? 34 LIT 2 FEET PMRRN.
® FILL 15 UT
(
? gRN1ACE FLL 113 UT 2 FEET PERE NAL
2 FEET PERENNIAL

DES"" OF TIE PROPOSED I PAC13 ,f / % / . / ? I \ \ \?\
«' c,a..m '01v ""N01p FILL FOR STREET IIOEIMO AID SMNRDOL
ss quay ss ?.< - - ®nc « FILL FOR STREET IOEIMC AID 910LLDEEil ,,
aL
IERT EMBARKMENT INSIDE 71E S1E FOR ROAD fA05FE16
9
mom
J
t., - SS,.,i u- S1EWAX 6 RELATED 10 RIDDED OF U. ONTM SST.
a t°
PA T
0
?p o ®
VAS ?rI a,?i ?; ?V ?I
TOTAL (PACT N NRFEM 4X3214 ACRES (11216301 SOFT) v ° e I ?I
SD@WR IMPACT N REF9G GLOW ACRES (11QE2S SOFT)
ROAD uos9r, slounm R oDAr6elr INIPAa N BILIFFER, 02M ACRES (lalaea
c

IDLE IMPACT MULTIPLIER REOMRED
(SQUARE FEET) UTIGTON
1 IMIL021 3 303510E1
2 4142272 1S GM3.415
TOTAL 14206304 30541241E
r" I
/ 5' 9?OIa0 I
•` \ ? • `• ?? Vim. 1 ' r _ _ s"sY? _ ?? `
2 F r a I .«WS.;,.. i
NOTES
A.E.C.E.
Associated Environmental
Consultants & Engineers
sn saTeE DE am a
PRNN (!Ih we-I6
RID. RIBIUKM: 17A
A ?
Q _
1? ISLAMIC CENTER OF CARY
\?>A VGA
1155 w. cwAnIaM sr., GARY
- --
GRAPHIC SCALE MINN. nc RIM SEAL
021195 3 ? ?l Z+ FINAL SITE PLAN
/ :W42 12,
wsa' - ( IN FEET P4R`
I Irc5 = 100 It,
'? ??RIl4S.??
low NUN MM
t N) or ??
5029 4
NOTES
tn.K ? :rcr,?
s a1a
mr mo :
mrr 61Whp rG a Au F6NC IIIAm p M MrWli. Odr ,vKS (IjE4 Spit)
mx mix arr.'s OKU 1611x31 m? sMwb a sm ?n Rr
Wrr urum (utr mw[tl W x32 xMnb ox xrz. r1 qr
x.xo run
me a rrr ru ?oa.?an. trim a 3
s ? axwir .an
m iNn pnmw w w? ?? wumn ranio
3`.UK
SMM rKE
> ? 113 a rA:r GK?.3 ? ur sMw xxr sww em¢irecr +iw?i ?n°
m n
PTV 3+ 80 PTV 1+ 80 PTV 1+ 80
-LEV 422.60 LC = 00.00 ELEV 418.14
42 .60 4 1.40 42 0.30 41
9

.40
41
20

ELEV = 4
421.

41 .00
4
410 .00 410.
4(

STA 3+80 STA 3+00
PROFILE OF PROPOSED DRIVEWAY
20.0
0.0
0.0
STA 2+00 STA 1+00
APPROVED
TOWN OF CARY
A.E.C.E.
Associated Environmental
Consultants & Engineers
3211 BRNER W SIIIE e
8060. NC 27504
ft- (819) M-12"
N0. REVISIONS. DATE
PROPOSED
ISLAMIC CENTER OF CARY
1155 W. CHATHAM ST., CARY
omen irm
WETLAND DELINEATION
AND STREAM IMPACT
ROAD PLAN &PROFILE
NWIR pli NrBER
z;nga a o
Vn
`Do
3
STREAM DISTURBANCE AREA
Legend
A FHe Hy.'Henl
N W.I. vd..
FV 04 M Prpbctlan Mdx
M G. vex
0 Gee M.i.
FES Rand End 5.41.
POP ReInlaced Cmmete Plpe
O EEeting I- Pip.
0 hm Pa eet
D 61WHg N.1
s SIGs
tt Am Uyil
® Cad e.p,
1Q. UtIlty Poll
a Tegn- P~d
55 Smltary See. JIM
SS Nee Smh.y See. Lane
.F1 Inlet PrctaFqP,
Me Outlet Stab. Stractuce
O aeUgewed A-
® W.Umd Area
BUN. Impacted Ar.
® C-t-tbn Entrance
CO aem Out
01 pap InlN
NY W.I. Met.
® Sanltay Se.. Mmhd.
® Stain Sever Manhd.
Qd T-0-ar
MB Map BCpg
- G.. Lim. (g -) .
--4F-WMt. Line ct0ara'.)
? Am Ini.t
CLA Inlet
--31)-R.C.P. Cunt- &lh.elee Hate,,)
0 MmI1aWS WWI
®.e. mmhde
® Rip Rw
® Tree P10-tIdn F.-
® sot r.a
v TMnpmary Sed'ment Trap
. stream I npmtw
® O.tlap
® SIde edk
TOTAL ESTIMATED AREA OF ALL EXISTING WETLANDS ON THE PROPERTY: 02814 ACRES (12260 SOT-.)
TOTAL AREA OF WETLAND IMPACT: 0.03 ACRES
CUMUUTiVE IMPACTS (LINEAR DISTANCE) TO ALL STREAMS ON SITE: 120 FEET
TOTAL LENGTH (LINEAR DISTANCE) TO ALL STREAMS ON SITE: 763 FEET
WETLAND IMPACTS:
WETLAND IMPACT
SITE NUMBER TYPE OF IMPACT AREA OF IMPACT
ACRES LOCATED WITHIN DISTANCE TO NEAREST TYPE OF WE'LAND
100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN STREAM (LINEAR FEET)
Q ROAD CROSSING 0.03 'ES
ADJACENT FORESTED
STREAM IMPArTC
STREAM IMPACT TYPE OF IMPACT LENGTH OF IMPACT STREAM NAME
SITE NUMBER (LINEAR FEET)
10 ROAD CROSSING 120 UT
ROAD CROSSING IMPACT IN BUFFER: 0.096 ACRES (4200 SOFT)

ZONE IMPACT MULTIPLIER R
EOUTAED
(SQUARE FEET MITIGATION
1 2900 3 8700
2 1300 1,5 1950
TO?AL 4200 10650
I
4'X4' CONCRETE WEIR
V
4'
1.5'

EXISTING
ASPXA T
ORO) ,.EY15R?IC AB?N _VL
LAYER
OF H
Of
HARD WOOD BIORETENTION BASIN

MULCH MATERIALS:
75% SAND
15S SILT /
•
10%
ORGANIC
7 42$.75 /
I
/
YLL / /
1 '
AVERAGE WIDTH OF PERENNIAL OR
STREAM BEFORE IMPACT INTERMITTENT
2 FEET PERENNIAL

/ \1XYST
AND RA \\??
418.0 V .. ????
277
A?
*0
4- PERFORATED 4" CORRUGATED 4° PERFORATED DRAIN SAND Qa?/
DRAIN PIPE PIPE DRAIN PIPE LAYER
BIORETENTION CROSS SECTION A-A'
NTS
70
e ???\ a:.. ?., ?• . v
47
RECOMMENDED SHRUB SPECIES FOR USE IN BIORETENTION: hp y' S ?\9° 1
ILEX GLABAA (WINTER BERRY) ICaRx,iFp
CLETHRA ANIFOLIA (SWEET BERRY) 7 X
BERERIS KOREANA (BAR BERRY) p L
RECOMMENDED PUNT SPECIES FOR USE IN BIORETENTION:
ACER RUBRUM (RED MAPLE)
BETULA POPULIFOLIA (RIVER BIRCH)
FRAXINUS PENNSYLVANIA (GREEN ASH)
RECOMMENDED GROUND COVER FOR USE IN BIORETENTION: \ \
PANICUM VERATUM (SWITCH GRASS) Y t\? / `7
HERBACEOUS HELIX (ENGLISH IVY) p0:
GENERAL GUIDE LINES FOR PUNTS O ?? ?' ?•,
A MINIMUM OF 1EE SPECIES OF TREES/ SHRUBS SHOULD
BE PLANTED IN THE DRETENTION, r Q / 1 \ \ \
GROUND COVER SHOULD BE USED TO PREVENT EROSION OF CI
MULCH AND SOIL V
a TREE SPACING MOULD BE 16 FEET
SHRUB SPACING SHOULD BE 10 FEET /Q \
AT TIME OF INSTALLATION, TREES SHOULD BE 2.5 INCH T
CALIPER, SHRUBS 3-4 FEET HIGH
PUN? MATERIAL TO CONFIRM TO CURRENT ISSUE OF THE \ \
AMERICAN STANDARDS FOR NURSERY STOCK\
FOLLOW PUNT MATERIAL GUIDELINES AND PLAITING GUIDE
LINES LISTED IN NCDENR BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE
MANUAL FOR PLANT, SHRUB AND GROUND COVER ok
„ I 1 X
SOIL MATERIAL FOR BIORETENTION: l?• ?? 1,
75% SAND CONDUCTIVITY 6 IN/H
15% SILT CONDUCTIVITY 2 IN/H e?
IOX ORGANIC SOURCE CONDUCTIVITY D.5-1 IN/H
?We,t Lew,. Mew A anew, ,..
gM/w? ,'.xY.L

DIVERSION DIKE
LOST
20 OF
DIVERSION DIKE
TO D
ENC EM Ep IX iW
NOT
GRADE ROW

CMO,? eNAr
SLOPE \
J
tMOISTUREED OUTLET LEVEL
SPREADER

.SHEET FLOW ?

CHANNEL
GRADE CA .
\ ?' I I I I I I_ 1 ? ?? I l i a I° _ ? I \
II
? J I ?ItS ''= II I i 5 i . i 1
20.
'„'TOa
' SEE DETAIL GRAPHIC SCALE
\ \ GRAPHIC SCALE
???? TV A, 1 ?i I W a 51 IGG
AI. ewe -()I ( IN FEET )
NOTES
O
O

?•
N ? o-
TI ?D
C
m D C
o '; "1

Z
n
S

?i
E APPROVED
TOWN OF CARY
- A.E.C.E.
Assodated Environmental
Consultants & Engineers
3211 BRAYER DR, SUITE B
Rdeldl, NO 27804
Phmt [phone]
1155 W.PROPOSED
ISLAMIC CENTER OF CARY
CHATHAM ST., CARY
WETLAND DELINEATION
AND STREAM IMPACT

TolaQ Pem t 0 5fired ?ist<<:rb??l
J ?
3st 35 t 19 t 18 4ZS-" =132 Ft

L

Z'-o 1 ?ro'
Eno( of
asturbanu ?oigt
1
t
L V i2 - j 2 D)
A 4 ZOL04
QUALITY
WEiL l.0SAli ai;;s ,`AATERBRANCH

ISLaMIc CENTER CARY
STREAM -I)ISTURBAmcE; AP-EA
SCAL)= I _ Io
0
N
9C=
C= N
MCI '-e
W
n n?
LJ O
0:9
y?
F
a<
w
w?
o?Wg
S
Legend
a Fire HldI
D4 wotr Vd.
NNg R. RptxI Vd.
M Gw V.I.
o Gds Met.
FES Reed End Secthn
RCP Reinforced Cavete Pipe
O Existing Iran Pis
C Inn pp eet
A E.II Nel
v Sign
SY Area Light
® Cotdi Bodn
10? Utility Pop.
0 Tdephme Pedwtd
SS S." Sees Mro
SS Nw Sanitary Srer LWe
IP Inlet ProtnMm
me O t1I Sim. S,--W,.
O DletiI A-
® WOtlord And
® Buffer eigpctAd Ana
® CmeWction Ent.mce
00 Cp.an Out
N Drop INet
M/ W.I. MOt.
® Smildry Swr ManAde
® Storm Ever Mdnhok
IN Tromformr
MB MaN Boon
-nr000 Llne (oparax.)
-W-WOtr Line (dPPnx)
[3 Area Inld
ia Cum, mIN
-9D-RCP. (un- oMeMee noted)
0 Monitoring WON
® votes mmhdi.
® Rip Rap
® Tne Protecllon Force
® Silt fence
v i.npaary SAd-t Trop
. Stnam mpacled
® O ttdl
I] Side ,dk
TOTAL ESTIMATED AREA OF ALL EXISTING WETLANDS ON THE PROPERTY: 0.2814 ACRES 112260 SO.FT.)
CUMULATIVE IMPACTS (LINEAR DISTANCE) TO ALL STREAMS ON SITE: 132 FEET
TOTAL LENGTH (LINEAR )STANCE) TO ALL STREAMS ON SITE: 763 FEET
WETLAND IMPACTS:
WETLAND IMPACT TYPE OF IMPACT AREA OF IMPACT LOCATED WITHIN DISTANCE TO NEAREST TYPE OF WETLAND
SITE NUMBER ACRES 100 YEAR FLOOOPLAW STREAM (LINEAR FEET)
O ROAD CROSSING 0.169 YES ADJACENT FORESTED
I,I REVERINE
STREAM IMPACTS:
STREAM IMPACT TYPE OF IMPACT LENGTH OF IMPACT STREAM NAME AVERAGE WIDTH OF PERENNIAL OR
INIIMBEP (LINEAR FEET) SFREAM BEFC9E IMPACT INTERMITTENT
I? ROAD CROSSING 132 UT 2 FEET PERENNIAL

N

I E7d$iINC 1iM[NT ? / /'
N! -cry
eW+iaef mm?+s*.
EXISTING - ptt` /J j
usrs (w aro) Exisnuc cJRe'• ASPHALT Grpth 1 e7
EL-422.66' q1.
_ d
ROAD CROSSING IMPACT IN BUFFER

ZONE IMPACT MULTIPLIER REQUIRED
(SQUARE FEET) MITIGATION C
1 5211 3 15633
2 2138 1.5 3207
TOTAL 7349 '8840
4'X4' CONCRETE WEIR
9' a
4'
1.5'
4" PERFORATED 4" CORRUGATED
DRAIN PIPE PIPE
2-4" LAYER WI?
BIORETENiION BASIN
OF HARD WOOD MATERIALS:
r- I I 1
MULCH 757 SAND
15% SILT 7. % I ?I l
10% ORGANIC
422.7511111
I
';?7 422
s
U JX3 srohE,
AND as 't
418.0
/? - - )t l)
416.5 A? ?N .y_ ' ? ;?I ?) ?I
4" PERFORATED DRAIN SAND / ??? g p"?•, ?, ?t II .? f w.
DRAIN PIPE LAYER
BIORETENTION CROSS SECTION A-A
N TS
RECOMMENDED SHRUB SPECIES FOR USE IN BIORETENTIDN:
ILEX GLABRA (WINTER BERRY)
CLETHRA ANIFOLIA (SWEET BERRY)
BERERIS KOREANA (BAR BERRY)
RECOMMENDED PLANT SPECIES FOR USE IN BIORETENTION:.
ACER RUBRUM (RED MAPLE)
BETULA POPUUFGJA (RIVER BIRCH)
FRAXINUS PENNSYLVANIA (GREEN ASH)
RECOMMENDED GROUND COVER FOR USE IN BIORETENTION:
PANICUM VERATUM (SWITCH GRASS)
HERBACEOUS HELIX (ENGLISH IVY)
GENERAL GUIDE LINES FOR PLANTS.
A MINIMUM OF THREE SPECIES OF TREES/ SHRUBS SHOULD
BE PLANTED IN THE BIORETENTION.
GROUND COVER SHOULD BE USED TO PREVENT EROSION OF
MULCH AND SOIL
TREE SPACING SHOULD BE 15 FEET
SHRUB SPACING SHOULD BE 10 FEET
AT TIME OF INSTALLATION, TREES SHOULD BE 2.5 INCH
CALIPER, SHRUBS 3-4 FEET HIGH
PLANT MATERIAL TO CONFIRM TO CURRENT ISSUE OF THE
AMERICAN STANDARDS FOR NURSERY STOCK
FOLLOW PLANT MATERIAL GUIDELINES AND PLANTING GUIDE
LINES LISTED IN NCDENR BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE
MANUAL FOR PLANT, SHRUB AND GROUND COVER
SOIL MATERIAL FOR BIORETENIION:
757 SAND CONDUCTIVITY 6 IN/H
157 SILT CONDUCTIVITY 2 'N/H
107 ORGANIC SOURCE CONDUCTIVITY 0.5-1 IN/H
/ ? O K .` I,W? /\ F.R. S6PfflM1ti?
8/W' 0M NF7R _-
3 ! ?, "y 1 OW -
hp \ y ! e.B _ ?/ ap,'+ge _ 1 1 ?: pwv%+merv
•4. ORR 7r,
m rc 1
0 N-1
ry0 kty_, .F O?A? \llt DAQ\s\^.6 t?f ..'I
0 -Ar
?3 ? ? / \ \ / f ~. ?s 2 \ ems. +x
0 4
x V A \
SEE DEi L
O.
p .v O?, I I I ti-- 1vI\I I I I II ( I I I
aAIPs?R
20t x 0.0
0 ?I / ?? ? \ ? I I I
a - -- -- - ---?
546.68'

\
GRAPHIC SCALE
» o m Tao
( IN FEET )
I inch = 40 ft
d
00
U
OL
? II
i>
4
I_
NOTES
APPROVED
TOWN OF CARY
A.E.C.E.
Associated Environmental
Consultants & Engineers
3211 BRAMER DR SUITE B
Rdd91% NC 27604
Phan.: [phone]
PROPOSED
ISLAMIC CENTER OF CARY
1155 W. CHATHAM ST., CARY
wn. 71[
WETLAND DELINEATION
AND STREAM IMPACT
IM6 r.

W
O
:sr
e
P1
MAIN ,
BLDG

cBAP? scats
I??1
ar•?a
KEY PLAN
ROAD CROSSING IMPACT IN BUFFER
ZONE IMPACT MULTIPLIER REQUIRED
I (SQUARE FEET) MITIGATION
5211 3 15633
2 2138 - 1.5 3207
TOTAL 7349 18840
TOTAL ESTIMATED AREA OF ALL EXISTING WETLANDS ON THE PROPERTY: 0.2814 ACRES (12260 SO.FT.)
CUMULATIVE IMPACTS (LINEAR DISTANCE) TO ALL STREAMS ON SITE: 132 FEET
TOTAL LENGTH (LINEAR DISTANCE) TO ALL STREAMS ON SITE 763 FEET
WETLAND IMPACTS:
r T)'
I?pS ?IC+

P VT - 3+ 60
PYI
1+ 80 I
PVC
i+ BO
ELEV 422.60 LC .00 ELEY 41614
4 60 4 , 1.40 42 L30 41S .40 41 ELE V `
421 0
41 41 00 _
41 00 410.

STA 3+80
WcTLAND IMPACT TYPE OF IMPACT AREA OF IMPACT LOCATED WITHIN DISTANCE TO NEAREST TYPE OF WETLAND
SITE NUMBER ACRES 100 YEAR FLOOOPLAIN STREAM (LINEAR FEET)
O ROAD CROSSING 0.169 YES ADJACENT FORESTED
REVFRINE
STREAM IMPACTS:
STREAM IMPACT TYPE OF IMPACT LENGTH OF IMPACT STREAM NAME AVERAGE WIDTH OF PERENNIAL OR
SITE NUMBER (LINEAR FEET) STREAM BEFORE IMPACT INTERMITTENT
ROAD CROSSING 132 UT 2 FEET PERENNIAL '.,
i
STA 3+00 STA 2+00
PROFILE OF PROPOSED DRIVEWAY
SCALE 1" = 40'
420.0
410.0
400.0
SFA 1+00
NOTES
I APPROVED
TOWN OF CARY
A.E.C.E.
Associated Environmental
Consultants & Engineers
3111 BRA1FR DR SURE B
A ''A NC 211104
Prec (1119) X1295
PROPOSED
ISLAMIC CENTER OF CARY
1155 W. CHATHAM ST., CARY
OWL 79F
WETLAND DELINEATION
AND STREAM IMPACT
DRIVEWAY PLAN PROFILE
w w I arc ewm
?w VC lux
a ¦?
PLAN
STREAM DISTURBANCES AREA
SCALE 1" = 40'
NOTES
Legend
ti M llyd?
N wmw vdm
FVN Fl. Apt-ft Vdm
m 6_ vdm
0 r- Ydr
FES rnmtd End SoeXm
RM Rdawnd Cmorn Pp.
O EAAhq kn Pb.
0 k- PM •a
A Edakgra
T SW
( Mao aye
®Ckhsae
rib Ulwty Pd.
a Tdwh- hd.td
s swaay smr a- m •.?
SS Nan SmRwy S.- w mm.
® war Pelt.".
? WW Slab. 9mch..
® Cman.um a hmod
co arm od
DI DrW W.1:
W war war
® Sairy smr YuiW
® storm smr weed.
Tr w-
W weP emm
-i as lien (WPC)
war tl. (¢P-)
? Arm viol
WW Cab Idol
-W- R.CP. (ids as n h
0 ?w W.4
® mfr aWdo
® R4 ?
® Trm Ratndnm So-
sit P...
C7 T.Wwwy seet„mt Tip
NTS
Total Area = 297,666 SF a 6.836 Agree excluding R/R R/W
C- Tae
a.m R.O. MIS Clad
C3
GENERAL NOTES:
No changes to any aspect of this site plan, including but not
limited to, landscaping, grading, building devotions (especially
colors), lighting or utilities will be made without the approval
of the Development Review Group of the Department of
Development Services;
The site shall be stabilized and seeded prior to the issuance
of a certificate of occupancy,
All HVAC and mechanical systems will be screened from
off-site views;
All dumpster and cardboard recycling locations will be screened
from offset views;
Where existing vegetation fails to function adequately as
required, (Le. buffer type A, B, C, and 100'Thoroughfare
Corridor Buffer) the Cary Site Inspector reserves the right to
require supplemental planting in additing to those shown on
the planting plan based on actual field conditions;
Ali exterior site lighting will be design to prevent off-site
glare;
The size of the planting area and size of plant material at
maturity shall allow for a 2.5 bumper overhang from the back
of curb;
All tree protection fencing shall be maintained until all site
work is completed. The fancing shall be removed prior to the
final site inspection for the certificate of occupancy (CO).
Utility equipment and facilities associated with on-site
electric, cable, telephone, gas or other similar utility shall be
screened, to the extent possible, that is evergreen plantings.
Plantings shall allow for a minimum of a 5' deviance around
the structure to allow for access. Additionally, any side of the
structure having a door or lock, the plantings shall allow for a
10' clearance. The amount of clearance shall account for the
size of plant material at maturity.
All vehicular use areas (drives and parking areas) shall be
screened from offset views No tree shall be located within a
roadway right-of-way or 5' of a sidewalk
The trees infront of the project will be kept dean at oil tunes
or a wash station will be required.
All construction must be performed in accordance with current
Town of Cary Standard Specifications and Details.
Project number. 02-SP-156
Zoning of the trade: Odd
Area of the track: 4.6 AC
Parcel identification number 075312852761
Deed book: 4442 Deed book page: 506
Proposed denuded area 256 AC
Proposed impervious surface area 1.7 AC
Buffer type: 100' A Opaque.
DUSIM
Pi?nes?l
STWT OF

/)V/
/
3
?o
fYrl
awyy x? ?
r} f

I
f
\? 1
? ................... ..
URPKMY 20' 8A
ssn sSOULM -----
.............
MAIN
BLDG
h
R7
/
4,
Q?
U ?
Q'
l le ?` I
0
l rar i
Rr
a t
RS
V
5W4T_U* sues
:w w "°m `%w
Is 4.%A-
STORM DRAINAGE PIPES SCHEDULE - RCP
Legend
A R.lb*-
N Pot. %i"
FVN Fir. P10-11mVd-
0 0a Vdw
0 a- Ndc
FES Flared &W Sadlm
NP Nddaml Camera Plpa
O E*" M PIP.
0 V- 14mM
A D1dFp NA
a Sipr
k( A- LWA
® CaNA Bmh
atb u1Ry Pew
O Td.Ph- NYdldd
SS S db y Sena Ww ?..
S6 Na S.A y Snnr Lb.
® IrM Praseam
? 0~ sm. SNNrcM
0 ca¦6acam Fn6se
OD am art
8 Drop ad
r MA. Mb.
0 Sai.y 5nar Ya=ele
® Sam Sow YaaerM
Traw4mnr
B w a-
---O-G. Lk. (.PP-)
?9da LAw (yprm.)
? P.- Wt
Ij Oab Mat
---SD-RCP (Wirt alh -W)
0 Na N Wd
0 -W .*.I.
® RP, Ry
® Tra P- c1M Fee
® SN I-
v Ter wen" ftdiiaiiid Trap
PPE D*SOIG
INVERT SLOPE EXTENSION
LENM NEW
INVERT NYERT M INVERT OUT LEHa1H
A DISOD 417.89 - - -
B 07SINa 414,63 60068 49 41435
C EHSING 41134 OLD434 4625 406.44

Saar Dote
ENdeliiq aar, top: 413,97 Mart 405.97
MHL tap: 40&40 LagBa 319.21'
Slap= 1.46 ;
T:yaoted Mart at YdatecUm 402.27
M.- t aacad MI : 400.5 299.1 feet
THE REQUEST FOR DEVELOPER AGREEMENT ILL BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO BMW THE PROJECT OR
THE DEVELOPER FORFEITS TIER REQUEST FOR DEVELOPER AOEOENT F A DEVELOPERS
AGREIMW WILL BE PURSUED, PLEASE CONTACT TY BAILEY, ENGIEERNG DIRECTOR, AT 469-4034
FOR DETAES
PNOYDE THE PAVEMENT DESIGN FOR PARING LOTS IBMRI OF 6' ABC AND r 1-2 REQUIRED
FOR TRAVEL NOES (6- ABC AND Y 1-2 FOR PARKING STALLS).
THE 6' SEER 184E 5 A PRIVATE SEER. A PRIVATE SEER POW FROM THE STATE ELL BE
REQUIRED.
EXSMG 1
CONSTRUCTION SEW04CE FOR 54' DIA RCP CIRCULAR CULVERT =0 on) /

1. MAKE TEMPORARY DIVERSION CHANNEL AS INDICATED ON THE DRAWING N CASE
CULVERT PIPE INSTALLATION REWIRES MORE THAN TWO DAYS TO BE COMPLETED. SO
2 CULVERT PIPE MUST BE INSTALLED OVER A TWO DAY PERIOD. MALE SURE THESE
TWO DAYS ARE N GOOD WEATHER FORECAST AND DRY CONDITION EWTS.
1 AFTER TEMPORARY DIVERSION IS MADE, BEGIN GRADING/ EXCAVATION FOR

PROPOSED PPE AND INSTALL THE PPE AS SHOWN AND AS PER TOWN OF CARY ma
aR,
REQUIREMENTS.
4. AFTER THE PPE IS INSTALLED. FILL THE TEMPORARY MCH. A?rw+r
5. START BACK FILLING CULVERT PPE IMMEDIATELY AFTER INSTALLA7KK \
NOTES A
A BOND EQUAL TO 1251 OF THE ENGINEERS ESTIMATE 70 CONSTRUCT THE " . :4
PROPOSED BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE MUST BE POSTED BEFORE THE GRADING ?`....-, _ ,..yo-.
PERMIT IS ISSUED FOR THE PROJECT.
THE PROJECT WILL MEET ALL THE REQUIREMENTS RELATIVE TO BEST MANAGEMENT .=::'::.. `
PRAC71CES AND ENGINEERED STORM WATER CONTROL STRUCTURES AS CORNED N
THE TOWN OF CARY UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT OROINANCE(CHAPTER 10, PART 3, LDO).
WT AND FILL SLOPES WILL BE STABLRED WITHIN 15 DAYS OF ANY PHASE OF A
GRADING
A GRADING PERMIT WILL. NOT BE ISAIED UNTIL THE TOWN OF CARY HAS RECEIVED
NOTIFICATION FROM THE WETLANDS RESTORATION FUND (WRF) THAT A RECEIPT HAS
BEEN ISSUED TO THE DEVELOPER AND THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT STATING THE /
NITROGEN BUY DOWN HAS BEEN COMPLETED. A.
NO WETLANDS COST.
1
4?
FLOOD WAY AND IR /
FLOOD FR94GE DATA. 1. DATA WAS OBTAINED FROM TOWN OF CMY
CONSERVATION SECTION (TERN 33783C 0182F, ?I
PANEL# 48W, ZONE )w EFFECTIVE DATE 12-6-06)
WATERSHED IS SMFTCREDL
2 FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION AND THE BOTTOM
OF ANY MECHANICAL DUCTS AND/OR EQUPIE NIT
LOCATED IN A CRAW SPAS P ANY, SHALL BE xp ?C
ELEVATION 424.00 OR ABOVE:
1 CONSTRUCTION 6 NOT PERMITTED NTTFIRN THE ?
FLOOD HAZARD SOWS (ALLUVIAL SOILS) BOUNDARY
STOW WATER RUIN-OFF: _ A `
y /
RUN OFF BEFORE NPROVE EtNT : 4.7 CF 4
RUN OFF AFTER IMPROVEMENT = 13 CF/SS °
s 8::
..?,r ... .... .::::
....? .::.,:...... :::. ..::.:..:
:..
'.:::°;::: ere
.. ................ .. ?..

11AY 2ir 819 .:::..1r S/w:,`:
II
I
t
rFG
Irml?ra? ? "? ?. y `YPI. N
a4NNArN¢ maspa oaaayNn
WI1s FENCE
rcyyww -
sa
>?IIYYY ? rim?A
rr• aw,am
¦a1W

NOTES
The tree protection fencing will
be installed and inspected before
the Grading permit is issued.
Establishment of permanent
grand cover will be established
gprNw in 15 working days or 90
hi
h
l
d
d
r oys, w
c
ca
ar
ever is
en
shorter.
' Total disturbed area = 266 AC
.::.: ?:.. ': '':.:I' ::.' :::::::::::.: ':::•:.:.

?..
-.?. . . ..

y a
Vol" 1':::ps F II PA
3
W
0 r A
} r I
'a 1
0
O
h '. A.....:.
.::..
,.. ,......
1 c
II
1 J
a 7
a

o
1
1
1 ? A ? v
- --------- ------------------
t
4

, r
}
P !

E 1 ..
f ........
........
I .........
......
.......
........
.......
.......

- r
T ::
f 4
_ ..'
aA `
I ?? 11' I 11
i r
r-- 9EITETIR
rare r rer
rrrr
s aewyro
APPROVED
TOWN Of CARY
- - A.E.C.E.
Associated Environmental
Consultants & Engineers
3211 BRAIEB OR SINE 8
Ndd/A NC 2M M
PIM (919) am-1288
W. REVISpNS a4E
PROPOSED
ISLAMIC CENTER OF CARY
1155 W. CHATHAM ST., CARY
NR 1ME
SOIL EROSION
CONTROL AND STORM
WATER DRAINAGE PLAN
5029 C-4

Legend
A FY. Fly =
Fiitr¦iu
0 0-w- H.
N w.fr Vd. co a¦m Qd
FVN FY. Pfph.tl¦i V¦w Q D p WM
M G- %%*" "-`y` TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY MAP

FM Fk-d FM SaMm ® U- s- Yodtl.
FQ fiddmcd Card. PfP. ®Fa.fom.
? - . 9 am p%- tB ¦d B-
0 .m Pp •t $ca, tl. (wp-)
A EA v" ma ---w --w t. Lk. (wp-? r-*
Sir 0 Am Wt
lX /n. UBd Wj 0.b 1dd
® Qdth WN. -- D-RC?. (.M. df-M -Wd)
W. eOty Pd. 0 " N * dl r¦v
0 T.Wph- Pd.dd ® .w ?-&.y
SS S."y S- F- ® RIP RO
Total Arm 297,888 SF or 6.938 Acres axdUB¦g R/R R/W
SS N- Sdthy S- ti.
® tld Pfot tkn ® SK Fm Q.F. Tdd.
M Y¦ Odle
INsr"I O¦d
Me QMd SWL Struck- v T-"-y S.da.d Tr-p n
C3 ?Lay MW ww w wrwas-E an

n ?
nl
?
=
Iowa"
a..r
0`?
?
Q
. ...df

9 ? 88
eke ? ? ? 9 9 9e 9 ®e?
e
?9 e® eGeee 98A ?e9 98
® ee®9 9 98 8 98? 09 ®e ?' e 9
8 eeee a Qe a ??e a %t9 ®e e
®919 e89 (% 9G9 9 ®g9
A R,9 a e®Q 9 A9 e
9 ® e e 9 9
g® 999 9 ® 9 9%?eA
9 ? ®Qe
' 9A8 9? ®e 9 ?? ® 9
8 ?e 9 g 9 Goo 9 ?0 Qe 98 9
9 ? 9,? 9 ?eee ?
e?'09 9 e e? ?9 e 9 e 9 ?8 9
Oda ?9 9 G9 X 99
99 9 ® 9
S 9
9? e® 99 e9 9?8GR 9 8 9 8 8 e 9
A e 99 9 8 9 99 9 ?® 9 e 9
9 ? e® 9 9
ar..nr rrearwa ra.ir rar.. Tarr rraa.r ?,?'W'
i NQ= i s ¦a?/a.. i%w n ¦nr/as
=1211 P1001
OB 3718/=
:?

9 ? ? a
7(71 ? ? K
9 ?
?? ? e 98 ad
® Lv? v
b?? Q
F
v
9
A g
99
nwm
MW -1wr
es
GRAPHIC SCALE
a m >m
(mrffi)
1 men = m (t
e
?J
1
NOTES
01?
Y ,
%V
APPROVED
TOWN OF CARY
A.E.C.E.
Associated Environmental
Consultants & Engineers
ffiN Billet BB. S1rE B
A --go BC 27Bi4
Pim (919) BB-1715
RPASKM CP
PROPOSED
ISLAMIC CENTER OF CARY
1155 W. CHATHAM ST., CARY
NOWL >RE
TOPOGRAPHICAL
SURVEY MAP
wfar ¦
Rfa6
a swans ¦¦t ¦¦wmmf
v i
d
v
t
m a N
<
a
q \ U 1
L)
m _
10
,
\ v ,
U c J o U
•� N /N c
W N m m l.N U' /� / m U �.
E E cm�� .w' LL V m
a aUl
h
Ntl
V
N (1 = N m N�
UIJ' C7
zm
,
� -. •. \. � ° 2 fir- � _ r . N N _ `��b
C9 .� m
I �•y � x I
2 �
6L
U , fm
m A O i o �i a m chi m
yr • � N
,
W
j U _ z0a re
) C1
f 1 n C,ee�
a v
r
y
3
UTHERN
\ N W o fta
tifInf -
M i
s� T
m w
• s� _` \\ �, ° t wry} U �,l\ ff'� _
U
• !'W c
U [
-
°
m
°
Lu
Lu
t
f _
ii--jjOOOS
!G

¦ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
Item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
¦ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
¦ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
Shakil Ahrrtad
Post Office Pox 31952
Raleigh, NC 27622-1952
DWQ# 03-0482 - Wake
A. Signature
X ? Agent
? Addressee
B. Received by (Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery
D. Is delivery address different from Item 1? ? Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: Q No
3. S rvice Type Rim.
certified Mail ? Express Mail
? Registered Return Receipt for Merchandise
? Insured Mail ? C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ? Yes
2. Article Number
7003 3110 0001 3494 2057
(11a3nsfer from rom service label)
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540 I
JC DENR DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
VETLANDS/401 UNIT
650 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
3ALEIGH, NC 27699-1650
15
7003 3110 0001 3494 2057

OA ? INSUFFICIENT ADDRESS
C ? ATTEMPTEQ.NOT KNOWN 00DOT ? NO Sit'l S ? NOT N-??'ST AREETDRESSED
D
UN l .t? T1R a
5

1
I,.IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII UIIIIIIIIIIIIItIIIiIIIIIIIIII I I I I I I I
~.-r,-
~~gend NOTES
TO ~ qL ESTIMATED AREA OF ALL EXISTING W T ELANDS ON THE PROPERTY: 0.2814 Y~ • iT .0.2814 ACRES (12260 SQ.F
T01 qL AREA OF WETLAND IMPACT: 0.0621 ACRES 7 (2 05 SG•FT.)
CUP.~ULATIVE IMPACTS (LINEAR DISTANCE TO ALL STREAMS ON SITE: 121 FEET ~ Fire Hydrant ®Constructlon Entrance TOIgL LENGTH LINEAR DISTANCE T 121 FEET 424e2,
( ) 0 ALL STREAMS ON SITE, 763 FEET EET ~ .4~2.er
DQ Water Valve CO Clean Out
FV(Xj Fire Prptection Valve DI Drop Inlet
WEII_AND IMPACTS:
Kp Gas Valve WM Water Meter
WETLAND IMPACT TYPE OF IMPACT AREA OF IMPACT LOCATED WITHIP ® Gas Meter QS Sanitary Sewer Manhole ~CATED WITHIN DISTAN~'E TO NEAREST TYPE OF WETLAND
SITI NUMBER ACRES 100 YEAR FLOC 0 YEAR FLOODPLAIN STREA~~ (LINEAR FEET)
FES Flared End Section QD Storm Sewer Manhole ~ 1 FILL 0,0100 YES • (z FILL 0.0143 YES N YES Ap~i•>CENT FORESTED °
RCP Relnforoed Concrete Pipe © Transformer ( DRAINA 3 GE, FILL 0.0378 YES YES Ap~i.~CENT FORESTED YES A J-CENT FORESTED
Exlst(ng Iron Pfpe MB Mail Boxes D , ~ c _
Q Iron pipe set G-Gas Line (approx.) i/ ~ ~
STRI=AM IMPACTS: ~ Existing Nail W-Water Line (approx•
-B- Sign ? Area Inlet STRI_AM IMPACT TYPE OF IMPACT LENGTH OF IMPACT STREAM NAME SITE_ NUMBER (LINEAR FEET) REAM NAME AVERAGE WIDTH OF PERENNIAL OR
Area Light Curb Inlet ~ FILL ~ F R IMPA T INTERMITTENT ~i u~ STREAK BE 0 E C , i / j
21 UT I3 DRAINAGE, FILL 100 UT UT 2 I EET PERENNIAL UT ~-EET PERENNIAL ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t
®Catch Basin -SD- R C P . (unless otherwise noted) ~ r~~ V.' I
~ Utility Pole Monitoring Well
? Telephone Pedestal W water manhole ~ ' i/% ~ i, r,.~... % i~,~// rt.~....
iii ',i.`
SS Sanitary Sewer line - • ~ - ® Rip Rap DESCRII TION OF THE PROPOSED IMPACTS: .'.I.'....
SS New Sanitary Sewer Line © Tree Protection Fence 1 F ILL F R
0 STREET WIDENING AND SHOULDER, . , , ~ ~ ....r . .
IP Inlet Protection _ 2 f ILL FOR STREET WIDENING AND SHOULDER, S Sllt Fence 3 ~ IJLVERT EMBANKMENT INSIDE THE SITE FOR ROAD CROSSING, j ~ji . I
Outlet Stab, Structure Tem oror Sedimen T . ~9. ~
p y t rap j.i
O Distinguished Areas ¦ ¦ ¦ Stream Im acte NOTE: p d ~ ~ ~
outfall SITEWALK IS RELATED TO WIDENING OF W CHATAM STREET, ~ . . i ~ 1
~ I 'I
,~'XiS>'ING' . ~E,~~~' , r. , , . , . ' . , ' r . , ~ , ,
TOTAL IMPACT IN BUFFER: 0.28 ACRES (12196,604 SQ.FT•) ~ .~RG~, ' , . .'.'..i, XI 17 ~ j r . , . ' ' , , EDG
SIDEWALK IMPACT IN BUFFI R: 0.0158 ACRES (689,165 SQ.FT,) y a . i , .
ROAD CROSSING, 5HOULDEI•' ~ EMBANKMENT IMPACT IN ~0 , _ , , , ~ ' ~ ^ i , ' ~ y. . . . , ~ , , . ~ 1
BUFFER: 0.2642 ACRES (11507.439 SO•FT,) \1 ' ~ 1 Q „ ~ ? \ i' ,
r' Rkn413~. ,..,a. E'%ISri6~5T. 0 'Inv. T' , ! . 405.A . .
i 6 . . . . f ow~u 'a U ~ i i~ S .
ZONE IMPA~ ~ MULTIPLIER REQUIRED SQI~~aRE FEET MITIGATION EXISTING
( ) ' ' ASPHALT .rr . d . .
USGS (50 ORD) \EXISTI~IG C~RB EL=422.66' l n ~ 'fix;. o.,• ; 0.. i~ G . , . .
~ 1 861(' 027 3 25831.881 ' . a. I Fr ~ ..ti..,~ 'i' O ~ t ..,,,.....~...i . ,.i... ~
SZAR~'0~ ~UCfIOP{ ~ yr 1, .t ~ - ~ i . , ~ ~ . . .
C6` 2 358.` 977 1,5 5378.965 2 ~ ~ 1 ~ . ~ i - ~ ,Or. l A
A ~ .j., j', 1 . . ~ .1. .I. . J t i ~ .
TOTAL 1219~~604 31210.846 ; ' ~ ~ ~ i,~~, ~ ! ti. ~ 1 ~ ~ M .I. 5, 1
, ~ ? ~ ~ ~ , ~ i. ~ f ; '!%Tr' ~ q I' , , . , . . Q. ~ , , , . ,i ' I
, ~ ~ i r ~ ~ ~ ~ , p w , . , ...1 , ~ ~ I ~~I
2~-4 LAYER ~ I D] ~ ~ 1 , , , , . , i , . ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ 6ACK OF f ~ ~ Ii I j I.. .n.
! • BIORETENTION BASIN , ` , N o1 A . OF HARD WOOD 6 ~ • • , • , , . ~ • • • use sHOu ~ . 4X4 CONCRETE WEIR MATERIALS: s ~a5a ~ 5.49 ~ ' , ' ' ~ • . ' , U~B„SHOULDER ~ .f.' c , , , ~ , , i - N ~ .W. ~
. MULCH ~ ~ ~ , . • , ~ I'., ~ 'L M 26 X36 ~ i . '~f:...'!;. ..'r. I- ~ P~ ~i
75% SAND ~ a~ P ~ ~ , , , , _ i 88
S~ SILT ~ . . , w • , 'c • • ~ , . .:r, ~ yATCH sAS;~„ I ~ , . b 7, r' _ ,A . ~l _ . E ~ II I '
10% ORGANIC ~ , , , . • • • ~ . , . • : a• ET ~ .S . T. . , • , . • EMBIAI~KJ~~N go 422.75 r . , . S _ , / . . ~ ...,y, ,1. ~ .r t'1 ~ ~ , ~ , ~ , . , , 1 ~ r ~ 1195
~ • • y~ . ,
9 rT~OE N ARY ~ • • , 9 ~ 422 ~ 1• ~ ~ - .1' , . • • • r w
• • • • . • . , . • , . ~ , ~ ~ ~ 'k'i
,I • ~(1~6 I ~ ~i~ . , , ~ L' , , , , ~ i NIIININNI~ ' ' . ~ 'TREATED WO D,EEVEL ~ ~ . ...A. ~ . , I I I
\ ~ . , ~ • , ' ~ SPREADER 1 ;LONG i ~ a• • ~ ~ ~ • • ~ ~ ~ • • • • ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ I' '
' r ~ ~ I' y
4 ~ • , , , ' .'j'.' . . . . . . , .'l: . . . APPROVED . , , ~ - ' ~ I
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ AND GR . , • , • , , • , . , , 2!•~6F~~ULd~f'f~• , , ~ ' ~ G i i ~ , i i . I''
418,0 ~ ~ TOWN OF CARP . . ....n,.., ..'r:.1. ~ ~ ~ ~ I , . ;.r:~' I' . O ,r . v
• ~ _ t ~ r . .C3. i ~ , . i y' APPR0I~DBY, DATE. . ~ d• t
1.5 • ~ ~ , 416.5; ~ ..y , ~ I '1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ DATE PLANNINO~
~ I 7,y`.~ • , ' . , ~ ~ 0 w , ? • r~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . , i ~ ~ 'r.'... , . 'J. , , . I
i I ~ 4 ?ti 3+00 2+3Q ~ / ~ 'A ~4 ? DRIVEWAY 28"•, 8/B "I • ~ oq . , ~ , , .'a. ' ~ , , ENGINEERING; DATE: ' f.'.... 'i'.. , a ;t L.,..,.,, ...'l,. ~ ~
~ 1,.. ~ 1
4 PERFORATED DRAIN SAND • • i~ ' 4 PERFORATED 4 CORRUGATED ~ ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~o t ~ • • 1" En Ineers~ 1„ '~y ~
•o ! DRAIN PIPE LASER • DRAIN PIPE ~ ~ ~ sHDULDER • , ; , • , . PIPE ~ . - ; .
SI E ALT.. ~ 15 LEVEL n,, ~ ~ ~ ~ SPREADER • ' ' . . I ~ ~ . ~ ~ , , . . . . . . . i.. , . ~ Associated Environmentef ,
~C2. ~ , G , , ' ~ . . ~ ~ ns nts ees , o u a ngin r
BIORETENTI0~1 - ~ . ~ CROSS SECTION A A • ~r w a r \ ~ W IR E ~y,$~.,........,..,.,...... i. ~
S/W l~- ~ ^.A 43 .mod,, ~~~~ry OV RFLOW , . , , . . . I' ' , , , .7.'.'.. , , . 3211 BRAMER pR. SUITE B
p~ 3 Q ~ ~ `rc l , , ~l TS o t. • . • h , . , . , . , ~ , ' 'i' I' Ralef h, NC 278p4 . . ,..t..,... ~ ~ , , . , , . , , , , . , . . . . . . ...','.'.',','p4hr~',J,'$b~~9~~4~, ~ 4'~ ',t,' '
. ' , .,.....,..nna.lAelaole,J..,..','.'. Phone: (919) 87$-1295
0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r Q' Ql ~ ~ ~~C,'%'' , , ~ K M ~ a ^ 4 A ,t,,..-,~. 2/P23~ 11 I 1'
~ ~J Q' M' h~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 60 • ` ~ p ,4"CORK T~P~• ~ . ~ RECOMMENDED SHRUB SPECIES FOR USE IN BIORETENTION: ~ Np~ (rj N ~ ~ ~ ~ r. {.EVEL\• • ~ ' ~ ND. REVISIONS: DATE ~ , ~ '.WE"~'hANR'.' , . , . , . , R.~~ ' I I
~ ~ i ~ PIPE a •REA~. ~ ~ • ILEX GLABRA (WINTER BERRY ~ ~ ~ ~ , • , • , • . , . istiri~.'2p'.'P,~tilic'.'... ' . . . . . . .
~ G',q it ~ CLETHRA ANIFOLIA (SWEET BERRY) p ~ ~ A~ . .~..ti. .,....,.,..."DB•3~ 326, ' n I
• , : BERERIS KOREANA BAR BERRY ~ ~ ~ • ,Q \ ( . , I . I . . q , . . . , . . , ~ ~
. , . . , ~
,r•., • ,.,...,1 n ~ RECOMMENDED PLANT SPECIES FOR USE IN BIORETENTION: Uj ~ ~ . ~ rs, r , ~ . , . . , . , . . . A I * ~ S ~ .'r.. . s ~ i I
ACER RUBRUM (RED MAPLE) ~ ~ ~ , •o ~ o~;R, ~ • i '~4~ d', . , . ~ ~ i
S \Q ,w~ ~ • ( ) t ~ ' ~ ~ • BETULA POPULIFOLIA RIVER BIRCH a' • q ~ ~i' \ ~+a+~,~u~aa~atce+wwsw~a~. `
FR ~U,c ~ , Q F9 AXINUS PENNSYLVANIA (GREEN ASH) F~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I '
RECOMMENDED GROUND COVER FOR USE IN BIORETENTION: s~ ~ `0 • ~ re. ~ ~ ~ j ~ . ~1X3',S`TONE , , , . . ~
PANICUM VERATUM SWITCH R ~ ~ ,i;,~" ( G ASS) ; . V ~ ND GRA E 'iii' , . , Ce ' nn Ive ' . ~ ~
HERBACEOUS HELIX ENGLISH IVY ~ ~ ~ • :Ae.: E~~O D8992 80T.,,...,„ I ti y, ~I~ \
, / . 'r. ` w ear ~ ,V~~ In; ~ ~ E ~ I I e~~ti ~ P •p~ _ ~ a
i ~ GENERAL GUIDE LINES FOR PLANTS: ~ I ~ a ~ Q
A MINI X 5 Y~.,~-~ MUM OF THREE SPECIES OF TREES/ SHRUBS SHOULD q ~ ~ • ~ ~ ;t\` U-- - ~ . . . . PROJECT ~r~ ~ V
` . • . , k ~ ~ t BE PLANTED IN THE BIORETENTION Q' ~ ~ N , PROPOSED ,m _ , , . ~
GROUND COVER SHOULD BE USED TO PREVENT EROSION OF U ~s / ~ MULCH AND SOIL Q• ~ p`~ ' ~ '
1 i ~ i TREE SPA I ~ , ~ I ~ ~ C NG SHOULD BE 15 FEET ~ 0>; ~ ~ ~ ~ ISLAMIC CENTER OF GARY ~
Q- , SHRUB SPACING SHOULD BE 10 FEET ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ 1155 W. CHATHAM ST., GARY
~ o ~ o o AT TIME OF INSTALLATION, TREES SHOULD BE 2,5 INCH . ~ ' Ro Ao `'o o 0
CALIPER SHRUB5 3-4 ~ ~ O' ' ~ ~ FEET HIGH / ~ ~~i l i i i i i I~,} i t 1~ i i i~ i ~ i ~,i i I ~I I I I~ I I I ~ I i I I I I ' I 1 I
PLANT MATERIAL TO C NF ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ' ' ' ~ i ~ ~ ' ~ ' ' ' ~ ~ ' ~ ~ 0 IRM TO CURRENT ISSUE OF THE ~ i p i i ~ i15 GE ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `t75 P E' ~ ~ ~ AMR i i i i i i i l i i,• ~ ~ i i i i E ICAN STANDARDS FOR NURSERY STOCK CC I , ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ® d m o ~ ~ ~ I i~ I ~ i ~ I OUMPST~R .1 ! ~ R . T1TL I ~ I ~ DWG E I~, ~ I~I~ ~ 20.p' x X10.0 ;
FOLLOW PLANT MATERIAL GUIDELINES AND PLANTING GUIDE ~ ~ ~ ~ 1, SEES, DETAIL I,
LINES LISTED IN NCDENR BESfi MANAGEMENT PRACTICE ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ GRAPHIC SCALE ~ i
~ ~ ~ i 1A/P'TI AAIT1 1'101 IAICAT1~1A1
v 1 f 50 0 50 100 VVC:1 6.MIVLJ UC:LIINr-/"1I IVIV
i i ~ I
SOIL MATERIAL FOR BIORETENTION: AND STREAM IMPACT
75% SAND CONDUCTIVITY 6 IN/H 589.42'32"W - - - - - ` - - ~.J15% SILT CONDUCTIVITY 2 IN/H 54.53' S89'42'32"W 548.68'
10% ORGANIC SOURCE CONDUCTIVITY 0.5-1 IN/H IN FEET 1
Vincent C. Blanco Mandell R. Gilmore, Jr. rion Bankler Dwain G. Hathaway Steven H. Mochrie Theodore J. Stroder 1 inch = 40 ft. DRAWN BY IN SCALE 1 40' Theodore J. Strader Joseph W. Albietan
and Sandra D. and Wanda L. nd Jacqueline H. and Theresa A. DB 4694/452 DB 4230/841 8 6898/277 DB 8102/2778 and Jane A, and Theresa A. and Jeanine M. CHECKED BY BC DATE APRIL 2004
DB 4178/97 DB 6644/620 DB ®844/620 OB ®894/1883 JOB NUMBER DRWG, NUMBER
5029 4

NOTES
Legend TOTAL ESTIMATED AREA OF ALL EXISTING WETLANDS ON THEE PROPERTY: 0,2814 AC
Y; 0,2814 ACRE5 (12260 SQ.FT.)
TOTAL AREA OF WETLAND IMPACT; 0.0621 ACRES (2705 S~.FT.)
CUMULATIVE IMPACTS (LINEAR DISTANCE) TO ALL STREAMS ON SITE: 121 FEET 21 FEET 424.ez' :T In .412.67
TOTAL LENGTH (LINEAR DISTANCE) TO ALL STREAMS ON SI'I1~_: 763 FEET Fire Hydrant ~ Construction Entrance
l~ Water Valve CO Ciean Oui
FVpCJ Fire Prptection Valve DI Drop Inlet WETLAND IMPACTS:
Kp Gas Valve wM Water Meter WETLAND IMPACT TYPE OF IMPACT AREA OF IMPACT LOCATED WITHIN ATED WITHIN DISTANCE TO NEAREST TYPE OF WETLAND
YEAR FLOODPLAIN STREAM LINEAR FEET ( )
wer Manhole SITE NUMBER ACRES 100 YEAR FLOOD ® Gas Meter Q Sanitary Se 1 FILL 0.0100 YES DES ADJACENT FORESTED
FES Flared End Section (D Storm Sewer Manhole 2 FILL 0.0143 YES TD ~ ~'ES ADJACENT FORES E I
3 DRAINAGE, FILL 0.0378 YES FORESTED ~'ES A JACENT D
RCP Reinforced Concrete Pipe ~ Transformer ~ ,i
i Existing Iron P1pe MB Mall Boxes i ~ ~ . ~ ; ,
Iron pipe set -G-Gas Line (approx.) STREAM IMPACTS: / ~ ,
~ Existing Nail w-Water Line (approx.) TYPE OF IMPACT LENGTH OF IMPfaCT STREAM NAME STREAM IMPACT PERENNIAL OR ~ ~ ,~i .AM NAME AVERAGE WIDTH OF
-~a- Sin Area Inlet SITE NUMBER (LINEAR FEET) 9 ? INTERMITTENT / / / ~ ,I STREAM BEFORE IMPACT P R NNIAL _ ~ ~ ~
A FILL 21 UT UT 2 FEET E E ~ , /
~ Area Light Curb Inlet DRAINAGE, FILL 100 UT B UT 2 FEET PERENNIAL ~ ,rte ~ 1 ~ 3,y,' i
® Catch Basin -SD-R.C.P. (unless otherwise note3d) ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 • i ~~r.•,..•
R2, Utility Pole ~ Monitor(ng Well
? Telephone Pedestal ~ water manhole ii, . , , ,'~i... , ~ Vii... . , , • , • , • . , ~ ' ,
r Sewer line - ~ • - DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED IMPACTS: S5 Sanlta y ~ Rip Rap i 1, ;j ~
lne 1 FILL FOR STREET WIDENING AND SHOULDER. ~~,~,y,
SS New Sanitary Sewer L T~ Tree Protection Fence R 2 FILL FOR STREET WIDENING AND SHOULDE . 1 1, i ,0•. ~
lp Inlet Protection S Silt Fence 3 CULVERT EMBANKMENT INSIDE THE SITE FOR ROAD CROSiING. o . ,
Outlet Stab. Structure Temporary Sediment Trap ~ ~ +
0 i ~ i~ 1 ~ ~
i h d Areas NOTE: O Dlst(ngu s e ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ Stream Impacted SITEWALK lS RELATED TO WIDENING OF W. CHATAM STREET,
Outfall i' ~~t I •
I• , f~fIS1~NG•, •AVEMEN~' / • , , , ' ,
r 0~.' • . ~ • , r~"" . . , ~ ~ . • , , . XI TI G ~
• • ~ ' 't' ' r PA M T
TOTAL IMPACT IN BUFFER: 0.28 ACRES (12196.604 SQ.FT,) l• ~ r,. , o .y, ..•1,.•.
SIDEWALK IMPACT IN BUFFER: 0.0158 ACRES (689.165 SQ.FT.) ~ I ~ ~ • , • . • . 'y. • ' , , p ~ • ~
ROAD CROSSING, SHOULDER & EMBANKMENT IMPACT 1N b i . • , ~y,- l,. • . . , , . ' ~ ~ Q I•
BUFFER: 0.2642 ACRES (11507,439 SO.FT,) 6 ~ , •
_ ~ ~ . , S ~ I ...i... ~'.•....I,'.~'..'~'..,, I
. .
T MULTIPLIER REQUIRED ZONE 1MPAC EXISTING F T MITIGATION ~ ASPHALT ~ , i ~ 'i
SQUARE EE) ( ISTI~IG Cl,lRB EX USGS (50 DRD) ` ~ , , ~ r w, G . , ' ' '.I', , . • • , . r ~ • , ' ~ / ~ ~ ' ~ ~i
EL=422.66 ~ ~ I ` p 1 o~ , ~ , •1' , I ~ 1. . ~ ',rn . .I. , , '~f' . L' • . ~s
1 .627 3 25831.881 ~ TIER ,oF - ~ - ~ s. .T 8610 ~ f ,,.I.. I • •
~~~~uo~loN 1 2 a' • • ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ••m,,. , 'I,'.~,'.,...•. . 'a'•
2 3585.977 1.5 5378.965 N ~ N . r,..•. ~ y , M ~i, 'I' ~
o 31210, 846 ~ ' i
TOTAL 12196,604 ~ I ~ ~ ~ i ~ I".'..'..' ~ t , ' ~V Ian I ~ ~ I ~ i i i
~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ J I ~ I' F twlo ~ i • r~ ~ •..,•,..,..1.. . l' ~ i 1 I... I. •'i r
. .BACK OF n ~ ..y..` ~ .I. .BACK OF ~ i I'.• ro 1 ~ ;i ? ' .'G... ~ ~ ~o ~ m R E ULD
2-4 LAYER IN AS BIORETEN , 6 , ,1 ou , 0 00 I' •1 • • , SH Y ~L I' 'G' . ~ ~ ~ . 1 @
OF HARD WOOD " ' ~ 5~ .1 RIAL IR E 4X4 CONCRETE WE MA , 26 X •L•...,.....,. ~ I CEEB .1 P .AST ~ I.. •..',f. _ ~ Q4 '
MULCH , , . , . i. ,1,,.:~ 'i..'. 75% SAND , , . ~ • , T ~ I . . . ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ r - •:1- CAA CH BAS ~ j i •..I. ~ ~
. 15% SILT , . . ..r, ~ .~.5~~~~ E ~ ,'SC~~ - ! s ~ 02195
, . . •4 ~ N I ~ ~ ~ N
422.75 , , ~ ~ ~ .
, ~ , is , ~ , , , 9 „ 422 , ~ - , . ~ ~ • ' ~ .'~a ~ I it fgflllllUIVNM~
9 .,,r.. i ~ . ~ • ~ ~ a ~ i ~."G' ~ ~ II ~ WO D,EEVEL
• . . , „ i 'TREATED ~ I ~I• • • . , • , ~ SPREADER 1 /LONG / , • , • , , , . „ • , , • •
~ . ~ ~ is ~
. • „ ~ ~ ~ ~ PPROVED • • I
. • . ~Y A g ~ ~ WNOFC TO O I •.t , , i
4' ~ , . ~ ~ ~ % AND C~ , , . , . , 2'.'6HdULD~E~~ , , , , , , , . 1 . , ~ ~ i'
18. ~ ` , ~ ~ . , 0 . . . „ . . ~ _ / L,••,.•„~„•,• I DATE: / ,•,,..,G APPROVED 9Y.
. , - r 0 'a.',, ~ ~ . • . . ~ 1 • , . 1 .'l;' • • , • , . ~ I i ~ I DATE: 1 ~ ~ PLANNING;
. , ~ , ,I ~.l L- ~ ~ r / l l,, • • , , , • • , , • , , ..r . • , . ~ ~ I ~i ENgNEERINCti OATEt
1.5 ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ,.416.5; ~ I' I - 1` r~ A tea 3+00 2+ . ~ \ ~Q f.',.•,. •..7.'.. i.
4 I DRIVEWAY 2~• B B ~ ~Q ~ l •l,' ~ , • •
~ ~ ~ .t~ oA ~ . ^o • , ' f....•... • • ? • r , . • . I~• L~. ~ ~ Englneers~ . L•,.• I
RATED DRAIN SAND ~ 1 4 ' 4 PERFO ~ D 3 ~ , , 0 • , ~ I '....•..•i' j • ) I I .
•o R DE L OU ~ ~1~SH 4 PERFORATED 4 CORRUGATED RAIN PIPE LA ER ~ ' ' • ~ ted Environme soda ..•y.. + ,
D 15' LE ~EL ~ SI RL.. . „ DRAIN PIPE PIPE • ~ sPREA R ••i• nsu i ~ I g . . • , , , ti,. r~•a;~w.• •
•
~ V ~ I . . 3211 BRAMER DR. SUITE B
S SECTI0~1 A-A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ sew ~ , IORETE~ITION CROS 0 ~w. B , ~ ov~RFLOw , , \ 4 ~ ~ ~ 6j I . , . . . 3 ' '.1..'•.. G', ~ Raleigh, NC 2 6 i ~ ,.'.•'•,•,'•"Pah~arJ ~~q~ Phane 1 878-1295
0 ~ O , . , ~ toa • • . i 9 9 .1, ...,...,.,and,MilanliJ.
N TS ~ ~ a I • ° . • , . • , , • . , . , , , , i'~ ' DATE ,Y,'.
'F.,, ' N0. REVI910NS; • ~ ~ + • • II
6 4 CORR T):p,'`',,', r. Q M.h~ ~ .p ' ~ I.EVE~~ , ti ~ , M n ~ PIPE ~ .E l:p . ~IEVE~~ AREA ~tih~.'2'0'•'P~ifilic'. t ~ ~I , . • . , • . •Se~Ner• Easement , , , '
IN IORETENTION: ~ ~ > RECOMMENDED SHRUB SPECIES FOR USE B r , g ~ r •pg'3' •328• ~
ILEX GLABRA (WINTER BERRY) ~ ~ . . ~ j( ' 43 ~ ~ ~ i' li ~I
a . CLETHRA ANIFOLIA SWEET BERRY ~ , . ( ~ 8 ~ `1 a o . , i . • • .
0`~ . BERERIS KOREANA (BAR BERRY) ~0 Q ~ t~,.• j • S,
~ ~ . 0~ •
RECOMMENDED PLANT SPECIES FOR USE IN BIORETENTION: ~ I ~o ~ , A, r,.; .
. ACER RUBRUM (RED MAPLE) ~ Wxtilt 5'Or ~ \ "(q\ \ !4}}%BvpW~N{iiASV}AdAllsiklA+Yx~ ~ x •
BETULA POPULIFOLIA RIVER BIRCH) q ~ a ~ ( a ~ UFF ~ ~ ~~A s ~ a '
FRAXINUS PENNSYLVANIA (GREEN ASH) ER ~ o o ~ • r ~ 1X3' STf~E 'ice
RECOMMENDED GROUND COVER FOR USE IN BIORETENTION: Q . AND GRA ~ .'.~~iG' '~.aiv~, • , . , , . , I ` ~ I D8 392 or • ,
PANICUM VERATUM (SWITCH GRASS) \ , ~ ~ ~ ~ • , • `
a : HERBACEOUS HELIX (ENGLISH IVY) ' . ~ PROJECT
~w i ~~r ~ ~ ~ ~l , , . • , • , , , . , , . , a .0 ~
GENERAL GUIDE LINES FOR PLANTS: , . ~ ~ ;4;':~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~.~;:~.•:•:•:•.~:•::•:•:•;:•:~.. ~ . Y~ ~ ~ i, 4 ~ - N+ ~ ~ PROPOSED 4~, I ~,1 ~ . , •
. A MINIMUM OF THREE SPECIES OF TREES SHRUBS SHOULD p p~ ~ U'l~' ~ N "1 ~ I ~ ~ LAMIC CENTER 4F CARY
~ THE BIORETENTION. BE PLANTED IN ~s ~ \ \4... V ~ N COVER SHOULD BE USED TO PREVENT EROSION OF GROU D ~~1 v ~o IS + +
Q ~ ~ ~i~. ~i ~ MULCH AND SOIL ~ ~ \ I px , 1 5 W. CHATHAM ST., CA \ 1 5 i ~ .
TREE SPACING SHOULD BE 15 FEET Q' k, ` ; - ~ , A ~ ~ A~ ~ ~ s
~o .o .o o .o ~ , SHRUB SPACING SHOULD BE 10 FEET q ~ .o ,o " + ~ i~ ~
TREES SHOULD BE 2.5 INCH ~ ~ ~ 0~' AT TIME OF INSTALLATION, i 1 1° I I I I ~~I I I I I I I I I ~1 I i i i i i i I\ iii l 1 i I I I I d i DRWG. T1TlE
R SHRUBS 3-4 FEET HIGH ~ I y, I I I I l l l l r~_ I I I _'I 1 1 ,I CALIPE , O I I I 115 CEdd I I I I I I ~15>sP E I I I~ I N ~ `1 I I i I I Is~ ' I` i ~ i ~ i ~ 1 DUMPST~R f .i ~ ,i©~ m~~~m i~~~l' t 20.'p' x 110.0'; !I
PLANT MATERIAL TO CONFIRM TO CURRENT ISSUE OF THE ~ ©IoI 1 Ic~Ia ca m ~ co aQ o o c~ o m cis ~ ~ ~ i ~ AMERICAN STANDARDS FOR NURSERY STOCK ~ ' ~ + SEE'+DETAi~ ~ ~ I RAPHIC SCALE G
FOLLOW PLANT MATERIAL GUIDELINES AND PLANTING GUIDE \ I 'I ' 1 ! I ION I i DELINEAT WETLAND
TICE ~ ~ I LINES LISTED IN NCDENR BEST MANAGEMENT PRAC ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ; ' SO 0 50 100 i f . ~ ~ ~
~ ' MANUAL FOR PLANT, SHRUB AND GROUND COVER ~ ~ Gu ~ ~ _ ~ ~ . IMPACT D STREAM + AN ~ ~
~ ( I ~ ~I
1
SOIL MATERIAL FOR BIORETENTION: 75% SAND CONDUCTIVITY 6 IN/H ( IN FEET )
15% SILT CONDUCTIVITY 2 IN/H 54.53' S89 rDRAYN BY IN SCALE 1" ¦ 40' 1 inch = 40 ft.
10% ORGANIC SOURCE CONDUCTIVITY 0.5-1 IN H Theodore J. Strad Joseph W. Albleton D BY BC DATE A PRIL 2004 Theodore J. Strader and Jeanine M.
/ Mandell R. Gilmore, Jr. Brion Bankler Vincent C. Bianco Dwain G. Hathaway Steven H. Mochrie and Theresa A. and Sfindra D. and Wanda L. and Jacqueline H. DB 8102/2778 and Jane A. DB 8844/820 and Theresa A. MBER DRWG. NUMBER DB 8644/620 DB 8694/1983
DB 4894/452 D8 4230/841 DB 6898/277 D8 4178/97 4 5029

Legend
TOTAL ESTIMATED AREA OF ALL EXISTING WETLANDS ON THE PROPERTY; 0.2814 ACRES NOTES
TOTAL AREA OF WETLAND IMPACT: 0.0621 ACRES (2705 SQ.FT.) ).2814 ACRES (12260 SQ.FT.)
CUMULATIVE IMPACTS (LINEAR DISTANCE) TO ALL STREAMS ON SITE: 121 FEET
f~ Fire Hydrant ®Constructlon Entrance TOTAL LENGTH (LINEAR DISTANCE) TO ALL STREAMS ON SITE, 763 FEET BEET ~ 424.62, In .412.67'
~Q Water Valve CO Clean Out
FV ~ Fire Prptection Valve DI Drop Inlet
WETLAND IMPACTS. ~ Gas Valve WM Water Meter
WETLAND IMPACT TYPE OF IMPACT AREA OF IMPACT LOCATED WITHIN WITHIN DISTANCE TO NEAREST TYPE OF WETLAND
® Gas Meter Q Sanitary Sewer Manhole A R SITE NUMBER C ES 100 YEAR FLOODPLAI ;R FLOODPLAIN STREAM (LINEAR FEET)
FES Flared End Section Storm Sewer Manhole 1 FILL 0.0100 YES ADJACENT FORESTED
2 FILL 0.0143 YES FORESTED ~ ~ ADJACENT
RCP Reinforced Concrete Pipe ~ Transformer 3 DRAINAGE, FILL 0.0378 YES F R T ~ I ADJACENT 0 ES ED , ~ c
Existing Iron Pipe MB Mall Boxes ~ ,
Q Iron pipe set -G-Gas Line (approx.) i ~ I
STREAM IMPACTS: ~ ~ i I
~ Existing Nail -W---Wa{er Line (approx.)
TYPE OF IMPACT LENGTH OF IMPACT STREAM NAME -v- sin STREAM IMPACT g ? Area Inlet P ' NAME ERENNIAL OR % ~ ~ 1 AVERAGE WIDTH OF , ,
SITE NUMBER (LINEAR FEET) STREAM BEFORE IMPACT INTERMITTENT ~ ~ ~/i
Area Light Curb Inlet A FILL 21 UT g DRAINAGE, FILL 100 UT 2 FEET PERENNIAL ~ ' . 1
® Catch Basin -SD-R.C.P. unless otherwise noted ( ) 2 FEET PERENNIAL ii;/ 1~/;
~0.~ Utility Pole Monitoring Well ~ ' ~ ~ l
l ,;....;f
? Telephone Pedestal Q water manhole j i , , , ,1.'
S5 Sanitary Sewer line - ~ ~ - ® Rip Rap DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED IMPACTS; . 1., , ~ .
, . , , ..'.,r , ,
SS New Sanitary Sewer Line © Tree Protection Fence 1 FILL FOR STREET WIDENING AND SHOULDER.
Ip Inlet Protection 2 FILL FOR STREET WIDENING AND SHOULDER, S Sllt Fence ~ G, , , . I .
O 3 CULVERT EMBANKM NT IN 1 TH I ~ E S DE E S TE FOR ROAD CRO.,SING. Outlet Stab. Structure Tem orar Sediment Tra . \ . y ~ j... ...,.uy , .,,,r _ ~
v P Y P i , , , , , i
O Distinguished Areas ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ Stream Im octed NOTE; P 'f ' i 1 . , .
SITEWALK IS RELATED TO WIDENING OF W. CHATAM STREET, ® Outfall l ~ i ~
,,1 .~.I ~
, , , ; ~ ~ I , ~ ~ , y%
,f9(19TI,N,6', . ,~ME~ ti'... t ~ y % ~ y . . EDGE, a.~' XI TI
TOTAL IMPACT IN BUFFER: 0.28 ACRES (12196.604 SQ.FT,) .y.. r.. r .
SIDEWALK IMPACT IN BUFFER, 0.0158 ACRES (689.165 SQ.FT.) . . 'i' , PAV M T 0 I
ROAD CROSSING, SHOULDER & EMBANKMENT IMPACT IN r, . . , ..r.'.. , , .,,.,.~'y~ ..,,.f....',~..., I 3 i
BUFFER; 0.2642 ACRES (11507.439 SQ.FT.) .
~ ~ ~ r ~ 'R~,4~a~` , , , , , . ~ T. ~ I; ..Inv.405.99'. ~ ~R 6' 6 r tJ . . . . .
. . . . 1... I ,
ZONE IMPACT MULTIPLIER REQUIRED 5 ~ . . i ' 1.' , ,".l ~ .o t~` ~,r. .'1~ ~ , I
T MITIGATION EXISTING - (SQUARE FEE ) .P:' . , . , ,j.'.. I ~ ~r . d EXT, 0. ~ Q.
' ~ I TI G CI~RB A5PHAL USGS (50 DRD) ,EX S 1~ EL=422.66' \ ~<;7 ~ ,r I f G t I'~~ . .r. 'v',. ~
3 25831.881 1 8610.627 ~ . 1 . , I . 4
START~O~' ~ ~ . ' ~ 1. r y,, ' _ ,an. . , . , , , . i .i . . i I I t
' Ct~~lS?RUG O ' i 2 2 3585.977 1.5 5378.965 ' - ~ . , , I .7 ~ I ~ .....9f, I. ~ .'I, ~ '1 . .
O N ~ , . , . '.I , ~ ' ~
r TOTAL 1 1 4 31210.846 ; ' 1 ~ 2 96,60 ~r X , . ' . , M . , .'1,' . , 1 ~ ~ ~ . ~
~ ~ ,l.' , ' . ~ . ,t. , . ~ ~ ~ y,, I
' ~ - ~ tjER ~ u n ~ . . ~ ' I . 'i' j ~ f l ~ , I ~ J i - t
2-4 LAYER , • , . , „ , . • , . BA of CK BIORETENTION BASIN ; ~ • ~ ~ ~ • m i I I I h~.I. I .BACK OF . , w ,i I'... .....,l... .
N _ U~B,SHOULDER 4X4 CONCRETE WEIR OF HARD WOOD ' ' ' ' . , . • , MATERIALS ~ ~ ~ ~ • • 5.49• ~ ~ ~ ~ a r ~ - , ER ni ULD • i~B, SH0 00 , . .a , . . , . N ~ , , '.W . I , t. ~ ~ .f!
MULCH .A'..' , ~ . , . • 75~ SAND , . . ~ , , , . ! ~ ,...'~I~ y 'L 'r ~ 'd~ 6 { X 2 3b~ 1' • ~ r.. ~~8
15% SILT ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 P LAST I 7.' , . , ; 0~ ..h. TCHwBAS ~ ~C~ ,
i 0~ ORGANIC • , . • , , . ET. sc~ . . . . . '
422.75 ~ i ,....,e~+,A>ax~~N.,.~„ ~o.~.. r.,...~ Q i ~.J ~,r.,...~ ~ t. , ~ ~ Q21195 0 . . . t
.a, . ...x• rTOE~ARY, . • y l ~ , . ~ ~ ~ ........v. i FNq
9 . . 22 . .t 4 " • . . , q ~ ~ 'I II q ~ I ' SSA
. , . . • ~ ~ I ~ '~`~ir? ~XiB I aaauu~
• , • , ~ _ _ . . , ,~ti WO D ~EVEL L'."t' , . , 1 ' ~ ~ w ~ ' TREATED ~ o' I I 'r; . . SPREADER 1 /LONG r ~.;.I. , . , , .N..
. . ~ . , ' ~ I
~ , . , ......i'.'..... I'.'~.' ' , ~ 4 l 1 I' I . , I
1 AND OR . ~ ~ ~ APPROVED
418.0.. , , • . • . • • . . ~ ~ i TOWN OF GARY
.p ~ SL E 1..1. . • . . i ~L...,.,. 1.' .......s..... , ..',l'~ , , . ,p , , ~ ~ , , , . ~ , , . , . , , r ~ ~ ~ APPROVED BY; DATE.
y ~ 1 , , ~r 1 ~~y ~I
1.5 ~ ~ ~ , 416.5. ~ ~ ~ . , .'.'..,.1 '~'.,.,.,..ti..,, .,...f'.~.,..,..,,.~.... l~ I PLANNING. DATE; ' ~ ~ 1 ~ ~
! ..1 . ~ ~ , . , . ~ / ' , , ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ . ~ ~ ENOINEERINO~ DATE; ~ I . , , , p 1 . . . . . i
~Qr'~ 'O ? DRIVEWAY 26' B/B ' ' ~~C ~ ~ 1' f
0 / L'..... .'~'.'....,,..'t' .'i.'. I I ' ~ En Ineers~ 9 , ~ I' .:a' 'f.' I ~ I
„ 4 PERFORATED DRAIN SAND 4 ~ ' ' a 3 4 PERFORATED 4 CORRUGATED ~ oo " ~ { ~r. i ,i V` ~RS1n' .P. ~I , I'. . , ~ ~ .1. I ~ I i ~ ~ ~
D RAIN PIPE LAYER ~ 'SHOULDER ~ PIPE ~ 51 ALI DRAIN PIPE ~ t5 LE EL . I , , , , ~ , , d D. ~ , .
~ ~ ~ ~ l ~ ~3'~~ 1~ •i.' , . a . . ~ . , , . , , ' , , , . , ~ Associated Envir~nmen~tel fir'. , ~ G~ ' / ~ , , / ~ ~
i 43 w ~ 0 w, , ~ ~ \ , . „ ~ . . , . , . , , ~ 'sg , , ~ Consultants & En meers
B I 0 R E TE N TI 0 ~l C R 0 S S S E C TI 0 N A - A ~ ~ , Q ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ W. ' SSW WEIR t • ' . . . , ®re~..... , , ~ , , i . ' , . h , , , . , , , ' L'.'.'i.'.'.','.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.','.'.'.','.','.'.'.' i ~'i 3211 BRAMER DR, SUITE B
~ .mob, ,t2 9 OV~RFLOW , . • • „ , • „ ~ .,~4 / I . • . • • ~ ~ .p ~ 0 • , ~ ~ ~i
TS ~ , . , .t. , • . F I , aye 4 ~I`, i , . . . . ~ . , ~~i Raleigh, NC 27804 ..1 , , . , . , , , , . . ,'PPhibl',J,, $prl~g8tod,', Phone; [phone] ~ ~ ,and.Mdanle ~l.. , , .
e o ~ I OijT A' , . , ' . . . . . . . . , , ..'.D6 ~712a/P23~,'.~.','....
< ,I 1 ~ h NA'. , . , , , . , . , , , . , . , , , , . , ' ~ ~ N0. REVISIONS: DATE . ~ ~ / ~ i
Q M'h~ ~ ~ ~ 60 ~ 4"CORK AT~pA. RECOMMENDED SHRUB SPECIES FOR USE IN BIORETENTION; a' ~ ti ~o ~ plpE ~ . 1.EVE~• ~~•G~ 'A EA . , . „ , . Ati~~,'2d.'P~~lic'..., c`~~ i ' ,
~ a ~ . ~ , ILEX GLABRA (WINTER BERRY} I Q~, ~ ,,,r ~~y. ~ • . ~ „ ~ . ~ . ~ " ,SeV~er~ Eabement ~ . ~ ~ . ~ ~ I v a ...,D8~3~ ~~32E. ~ ~ ~
l c~~,% • ~ • a ~ ~ ; CLETHRA ANIFOLIA (SWEET BERRY) p f 4~8 ~ A~ ~ i~ ? j
I ~ 'i~~ ti ' BERERIS KOREANA BAR BERRY ` ( ) ~ ~ ,y. .p.
o ~ • . , . ~ ..,r .
RECOMMENDED PLANT SPECIES FOR USE IN BIORETENTION: ~ ~ ~ '4~ , ~ ~ ~ +s ; ~~;;1,~,~;~~••, so: , ~ i, . ' i . .
ACER RUBRUM RED MAPLE ~ ~ e ~ ~ ~ . , , ~ ~ Sp . . .I.. q A ~ i
BETULA POPULIFOLIA (RIVER BIRCH) q ~ A ~ A 'AY,~Cidni~Y11SA+;dk~{;tl' n. s~F , a ~ ~ . ~ ~F' ' ~
. FRAXINUS PENNSYLVANIA (GREEN ASH) FF O ~ R ~ A? ~ . ~ .,,Y~ ~ ".'J'....'. ' I
~ ;u , RECOMMENDED GROUND COVER FOR USE IN BIORETENTION; 3 ° ~ ~~ti ~i 1X3 STfl~lE i
a ` ~ , , PANICUM VERATUM (SWITCH GRASS) ~ • ~ ~ AND GRAVE' o , ,Cecib n.0live, , . , . . ~ I'~\ DB392 BOT........, I ~
HERBACEOUS HELIX (ENGLISH IVY) I ~ w`~` ~ ~ ~h, ~ 1,1~E~,1° ~ I G!V qa ~R N
~ ,;t;; • h ~ ~G ``P ~ 5~ ~ I I
GENERAL GUIDE LINES FOR PLANTS, ~ ~ ; .~:~.;.;.~:~~:~,y;~ ~ a ~ . ~ P T U- ~ ROJEC
y. o~ ~ A MINIMUM OF THREE SPECIES OF TREES SHRUBS SHOULD q ~ , ~ ~1 ~ N~ ~v ~
BE PLANTED IN THE BIORETENTION. 'Q' ~ ~ a a p ~ ~ ~ _ ' ~ ~ ~ PROPOSED X01 ~ Q\ ~ ~ N
N ~ ~ , GROU D COVER SHOULD BE USED TO PREVENT EROSION OF i , i c 0 Q ~ `i ~ \ MULCH AND SOIL ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~p ~ \ I vI ~ v v. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ISLAMIC CENTER OF CARY ~ v ~ 1
TREE SPACING SHOULD BE 15 FEET F` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1155 W. CHATHAM ST. CARY
SHRUB SPACING SHOULD BE 10 FEET q ~ i i~~. A ~ u•~ ~ a ° a ~ ' sy~ _ ~ ~ i ~ ~ , ~ , a ~ A
AT TIME OF INSTALLATION, TREES SHOULD BE 2.5 INCH Q' ~ _ •o ~ o o
CALIPER, SHRUBS 3-4 FEET HIGH , ~ i `~i i i i i i ~ I
PLANT MATERIAL TO CONFIRM TO CURRENT ISSUE OF THE ~ ~ ~ 0 i i ~ its CE ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~t5 P E ~ ~ ` ~ ' ~ ~ i i i i i i i i i i~ r~ i i i i i ~ i i ~ D PST~R ~ 1~v1 DRWG. TITLE I ~ ~~I 20. ' x 10.0' ' o s ~ ~ , %i
AMERICAN STANDARDS FOR NURSERY STOCK ~i' o 0 9 0 ~ _ a ~ ° ~ o FOLLOW PLANT MATERIAL GUIDELINES AND PLANTING GUIDE ~ ~ 1 1 SEE DETAIt ~ ~ I GRAPHIC SCALE
I LINES LISTED IN NCDENR BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I
MANUA F V a ~ ~ i L OR PLANT, SHRUB AND GROUND CO ER WETLAND DELINEATION j I 50 p 50 100
cw ~ ~ i I
C(111 ~d~T~Rldl ~(>A RI(1AGT~AITIMI• ~ I ~ ~ ~ AND STREAM IMPACT
vv,~ r~n,n~ , v,v u vn~ S r i v v. V ) i
75% SAND CONDUCTIVITY 6 IN /H 509'42'32'W 54.53' S89r42'32"W 548.68'
15% SILT CONDUCTIVITY 2 IN/H 10~ ORGANIC SOURCE CONDUCTIVITY 0,5-1 IN/H IN FEET )
Vlnad C. Bianco Mandell R. Gilmore, Jr. FE ri an Bankler Dwoin G. Hathoway Steven H, Mochrie Theodore J. Strader 1 inch = 40 ft, rAV N SCALE i" ¦ 40' e J. Strader
and Sondra D. and Wanda L, nd Jacqueline H. DB 8102/2778 and Jana A. and Theresa A. D8 4!94/452 DB 4230/841 B 8898/277 D8 4178 97 DB 8844/620 ireea A. and Jeonine M. Joseph W. Aibieton BCDATE APRIL 2044 4/820 DB 8894/1983 ORWG. NUMBER
029 4
F I

Legend TOTAL ESTIMATED AREA OF ALL EXISTING WETLANDS ON THE PROPERTY: 0.2814 AC! NOTES
TOTAL AREA OF WETLAND IMPACT: 0.0621 ACRES (2705 SQ,FT,) 0.2814 ACRES (12260 SQ,FT,)
CUMULATIVE IMPACTS (LINEAR DISTANCE) TO ALL STREAMS ON SITE: 121 FEET ?1 FEET
j,~ Fire Hydrant Construction Entrance TOTAL LENGTH (LINEAR DISTANCE) TO ALL STREAMS ON SITE: 763 FEET 424.42' T In .412.67'
~Q Water Valve CO Clean Out
FVp~j Fire Prptection Valve DI Drop Inlet WETLAND IMPACTS:
~ Gas Valve WM Water Meter WETLAND IMPACT TYPE OF IMPACT AREA OF IMPACT LOCATED W)THIN ,TED 4V)THIN DISTANCE TO NEAREST TYPE OF WETLAND
® Gas Meter ®Sanitary Sewer Manhole SITE NUMBER ACRES 100 YEAR FLOOD YEAR FLOODPLAIN T STREAM (LINEAR FEE
i FILL 0.0100 YES FES Flared End Section ~ Storm Sewer Manhole FILL 0.0143 YES ES A JACENT FORESTED D
2 ES ADJACENT FORESTED / ~
RCP Reinforced Concrete Pipe ~ Transformer 3 DRAINAGE, FILL 0,0378 YES ES T FORESTED ~ ADJACEN ~
Existing Iron Pipe M8 Mail Boxes
/ I ~
Iron pipe set -G-Gas Line (approx.) STREAM IMPACTS: ~ I
~ Existing Nail -W-Water Line (approx.)
STREAM IMPACT TYPE OF IMPACT LENGTH OF IMPACT STREAM NAME -o- Sign ? Area Inlet SITE NUMBER LINEAR FEET AM NAME AVERAGE WIDTH OF PERENNIAL OR ~ - ~ ~
STR AM EFORE IMPACT INTERMITTENT / ~ E B ~ ~ i~%
Area Light Curb Inlet A FILL 21 UT B DRAINAGE, FILL 100 UT UT 2 FEET / / . , . UT 2 FEET PERENNIAL ~ ~ •
®Catch Basin -SD-R.C.P, unless otherwise noted ( ) / , r
/ ; ~ r , i
~ Utility Pole ~ Monitoring Well ,,:.,,.;i l /;i~
d Telephone Pedestal ® water manhole
SS Sanitary Sewer line - • • - ® Rlp Rop DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED IMPACTS: i~,. I , , .
i~
SS New Sanitary Sewer Line © Tree Protection Fence 1 FILL FOR STREET WIDENING AND SHOULDER, ~ I '.j,..,.,,. \ „
2 FILL FOR STREET WIDENING AND SHOULDER. Ip Inlet Protection S Sllt Fence 3 CUL
O VERT EMBANKMENT INSIDE THE SITE FOR ROAD CROSSING. 1 ~%i , ' '.i , , , . , . ~q , , , I ,i~,
Outlet Stab. Structure Tem orar Sediment Tra P Y P
O Distinguished Areas ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ Stream Im acted NOTE; P ' ~ ,.F, , , , . , , , ,
SITEWALK IS RELATED TO WIDENING OF W. CHATAM STREET. ~ ~'i ~ ~ „ A
® Outfall _ ~ / r , , ( ~ ~
I ' ~ ~
.~'XI9TING' .A~~MEWf< , , . ,f . ;.~f, , y, , ' ' , , , P EDGE. , , , , ~ , , , ' : , , I
TOTAL IMPACT IN BUFFER: 0.28 ACRES (12196.604 SO.FT,) j~ I F i XI 1'I i
SIDEWALK IMPACT IN BUFFER: 0.0158 ACRES (689,165 SO.FT.) . , ~ j ' ~ . , . , . , ' PAV M 7 ~ r o t i
ROAD CROSSING, SHOULDER & EMBANKMENT IMPACT IN G y. I ~ I ~ ~
BUFFER: 0.2642 ACRES (11507.439 SQ.FT,} y „ , ~ I, „ „ ~ r Q
~ / ,r ~ Rtm4ib~9'F ~ . , , . , . , ' T I',, , . , , , ~ ..'f, , 2X18 618. V .r" 'Iny,~06,91''.' . , ',A. , , , '.FR I „
r ~ ~ w~ 'D U . 5 . , ....,1,,,..,.,/..,,
ZONE IMPACT MULTIPLIER REQUIRED , , „ , - , , „ ~ ~ ~ .LD , „
MITI ATI N ~ EXISTING - (SQUARE FEET) G 0 ,ASPHALT >L ,
~ EXISTI~JG CQR6 USGS (50 DRD) ,v ~ EL=422.66 , i ~ , ~ , , , r , , , , , , ~ 'I .r....,.... „ ~ I~
; 1 8610.627 3 25831.881 ~ ~ ~ ~ = - _ _ _ ~ 1 ' ; r i~, I ,'L . 'I' ~ Q , .,,...H... ,
r, S1~R'Y,O~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 v ' .~>JC~I N; ~ . , ~
2 3585,977 1,5 5378.965 O N . „ , , . „
~ ~ , , . ~ ~ ~ ~ I; I
TOTAL 12196.604 31210.846 ~ . X f' , , A
~ ~ j i ~ , , ' ~ Q, . ; , , , . ~ .1 , ,'.'i'. , , 1 1... , , . ~ ' , ~ ' ~ ~ .
.:t . , , ~ ~ ~ . , ,
~ ~ _ 2 ti~ - ' , , ,BACK OF 'f • . -4 LAYER , . _ BIORETENTION BASIN ~ ~ ,BACK OF. f ~
' RTE WEIR OF HARD WOOD , 5,a•9 _ ' • g 7 . 4X4 CONC E TRIALS. " ' ' MA E • • N .W. ~ ~ .,i.,.,.. ~ I. ,4,. ,
MULCH N ~ .,,.,.~v • ~ SAD 75 0 . , , 1. , . ,I ~ 98
15% SILT ~ ;:x> ; P AST ~ I, ~ r F'E , „ G~ATCH 3AS i ~ 1 . ~
10~ ORGANIC 1 ~ ~ , . . , , , , . ~~.sc~ .~.c ,1 ..c~ ~ r . .1 r~ .'",.,.i.,,,, ~ ~
422.75 ` .....,e~+Al~lt?N~N...., ~o,.I.,. t i , , , „ ~ f
~ ~ ,.r, . t~OE'~ARY , , .C,',,,,.,,.~, ~ ~ ~ ~ 1' „ . • • i r ' ~ Qif~
9 ~ ~ ~ _ . ; g 422 . , • , „
. ~ a „ , , „ ~ ~ ,
. . ~ . . ~ . . . , , . ','a L'.','. , . , , , ' ~ , , , , I~ , , , . , , ~ ~ TREATED WO D~:EVEL I , , , , . o' . , , , , , , , , , , , i li ..,N„ ,
~ i , ~ , . ~ • . l t ~ ' V'.'. r . „ „ 11 ' " ' SPREADER 1 /LONG
. . , ~ ~ t ~ ~ , • ~ 1X3~~ , , 8'.. ~C't. , j ,,,,,.,.1, I I , i .'L',,,,,,, i, 1 ~ ~~i I II , , , ~ , . ~ APPRQ ED
4 , ~ ~ ~ ~ , . ~ " . AND GR , , . '2 • SH~UID~f~ ® i ~ , . , 1 ' i
. , . , . 418.0. ~ , . •sib~E'i~:,1,• ~ ',I , • ~ , ~ ~ ~ TOWN OF GARY .i. ;pro , . '
~ ~ ` 7 xr.~~ ' ' i 1 , 3 . , , t. / I ,f•,.,,,,, p, „ ,.,~.,•.,.,,..,.a~. ~ APPROVED BY. DATE.
~ , y y , ~ , ~ , , , , , , ~,1,,, DATE;
1,5 ~ ~ ~ ~ 416,5, ~ ~ . ~ , , , v ,
~ I i br. .U A r~+ 3+OQ ~ 2+B . .,"i., ~ r i ENOINEERIN01 DATE: ` f, ~
O 'Q ? DRIVEWAY 2~ BBB ~ ~ Q . CA L,,,,,, , / I ~
3~ @ ~ .'~,~',.':a - r.',,,., , , .,,,.',r,'....,. 'k' ~ Englneers~ .,ry•~ I, ~ ~ I
~ I 1 „ 4 PERFORATED DRAIN SAND ~ ~ ~ ' ' ' • • Q 3~ 4 PERFORATED 4 CORRUGATED .o , ,A, I. N,.,.,.,., , „ ,
DRAIN PIPE LAYER ~ 2' SHOULDER ' SI AL, RAIN PIPE ~ ~ E ~ • D PIPE .v ~ ~5 LE L i,'~' 'r, ''.4'0. ~ ~ ~ I „ „ y. ~ ,
/ ~ ~ ~ SPREA ~R in , ~ ~ - „ i i t Environmental . ~ Assoc a ed . „ , i , , „
A3~, ~ `v r I~ i~. r ~ 0 ~ ~ « ~ i .l• , , nsultants & En inee s , , , , , , , s .~.~~>N, I Co
BIORETENTION CROSS SECTION A-A ~ ,v Q'~~ w ~ ~ ~ ` "'ta ~ ' S W iR ~ g , \ ~i , h ,'i',. 3211 6RAMER DR. SUITE 8
~ ~ V 4~ rti 6~ OV RFLOW I , . , , , ~ Q 4,0 . ~ `ra D ~ ~ _ , i' Ralel h, NC 27604
NTS ~ ~ o;~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ . PQhre~ 'qb . one ( 1 Ph ) 878 1295 ~ ~ .,...,.,..,,,and,Milanle~ 9
y ~ n, d~ ~ ~ v /v1~'; A' ~ . DB•7124225
h ~ ~ ~ V~ N0. REVISIONS: DATE . , i.'.'.~,' ,WE~hANR', . , . , , ' , , , . , , , , , , , , , ,
e "~"h~' ~ M n ~D ~ A ,4 CORK G,AT~p,', ~.EVE~~'•' RECOMMENDED SHRUB SPECIES FOR USE IN BIORETENTION: i ~o' ~ v~ti ~ ,v ~ v PIPE l / , I •~.EV E • AREA , , ;~ti~~.'20','Public'.
n v\~ ILEX GLABRA WINTER BERRY ~ ~ W ' L.- ' ,REA ,,.,,..,"Se~Har•Easement ~ ~ ,DB•3~ /326.
,v ~ v ,y CLETHRA ANIFOLIA SWEET BERRY 0 4`~8 ? ~ i ti ~ ~ ,.t,,,
~ ~ Q ~ •a BERERIS KOREANA (BAR BERRY) ~ ~ ~ • • • " „ Sys,
Q ~ ~ 1~ . , ~ ~ 7 , a . . S, , ' 1~' , ,
RECOMMENDED PLANT SPECIES FOR USE IN BIORETENTION: Uj ~ ~AV ~ • ~ +s 1•,' w o. ~S' , , , . , r~ , . , . 's';' , , , , , ~ , , , . ,
ACER RU RU R MAP E ~ .v B M(ED L) I
BETULA POPULIFOLIA /RIVER BIRCH ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ A ~ . ~t' ~ A ;~ww~;~,uaraw:a 'C' ,
FRAXINUS PENNSYLVANIA GREEN A H OFF ~ '~.°j~'' ~ ' ~ S) F,q A ~ r 2 a.
RECOMMENDED GROUND COVER FOR USE IN BIORETENTION: ~ A 1X3 5 E • ~ ' ~I 'r
PANICUM VERATUM (SWITCH GRASS) . ~,ND GRAV ~ .,Ceci6"nn•iklw...., ~ ~'t D8392 07,,,,.,,,., I I
~ ~:~:ti~: HERBACEOUS HELIX ENGLISH IVY ~ , ~ ) 'w'' ~ ~I~~ a \ ~ " „dR IIJ ~ ~
~ .0~ a „
GENERAL GUIDE LINES FOR PLANTS ^ , ~ ~ ' . PROJECT .M.
A MINIMUM OF THREE SPECIES OF TREES/ SHRUBS SHOULD ~ ~ ~ • . 4 p, A • ~v ~ ~ N~ - D
~ ~ BE PLANTED IN THE BIORETENTION. Q' ~ . , a ~ PROPOSE , ~ ~ ~ , N ~
C VER SHOULD E SED TO PREVENT EROSION OF ~ • • \ • • • Q ~ ~ ,.t , MULCH AND SOIL j' ~ p,~, , , ~0 X11 ~ p ~ ~ ISLAMIC CENTER OF GARY
~ ~ 0 v ~ _ TREE SPACING SHOULD BE 15 FEET ~ ~ ~ AM ST. CARY ~ 1155 W. CHATH ,
~ SHRUB SPACING SHOULD BE 10 FEET O ~ ~ ~ o v~ a ~ a~ ~ ~ ~I, ~ ~ j
AT TIME OF INSTALLATION TREES SHOULD BE 2.5 INCH Q ' ~ Q ~o 'o 'o 'o 0 'o ~ ~ ~ 1
' O CALIPER, SHRUBS 3-4 FEET HIGH ~ VQ~ , i i i i i i~ i i i i i ~,i i i i~ i i I `I I I i~ I ~~I , l i d l l i l ~I I 'i
PLANT MATERIAL TO CONFIRM TO CURRENT ISSUE OF THE ~ ~ 'V 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~5 CE ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Ti5 P ~ ~ ~ ~v' ~ I I P~ I I I X ~ D PSTE~R 1 ~ DRWG. TITLE al ' I~Ics, I .ICI ~ 20. ' K 10,0'' 'i i ~ i'i
AMERICAN STANDARDS FOR NURSERY STOCK ! a FOLLOW PLANT MATERIAL GUID LINES AND PLANTING GUIDE ~ E SEE~,DETgIL ~ GRAPHIC SCALE
~ LINES LISTED IN NCDENR BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE ~ ~ , ,
\ 0 ~ ~ . ~ v ~ ~ , MANUAL FOR PLANT, SHRUB AND GROUND COVER ~ I EATION WETLAND DELIN 1 ~ i ! ~ i 50 0 50 100 i ~ I i I
ill i i i ~ ND STREAM IMPACT A
C(111 f,A~T~AI~I ~(>A AI(1A~T~~ITI(1~I• ~
]5°y e " SAND CONDUCTIVITY 6 IN /H S89'42'32 W 54,53' 589'42'32"W 548.68' ( IN FEET )
10% ORGANIC SOURCE CONDUCTIVITY 0.5-1 IN/H IN SCALE 1" ¦ 40
FE15% SILT CONDUCTIVITY 2 IN/H Vincent C. Blanco Mondell R. Gilmore, Jr. rian Bonkler Dwain G. Hathaway Steven H. Mochrle Theodore J. Strader i inch = 40 ft. rDRA ieodore J. Strader C DATE APRIL 2004
and Sandra D. and Wanda L, nd Jacqueline H. DB 8102/2778 and Jane A. and Theresa A. DB 4894/452 DB 4230/841 B 8898/277 DB 4178/97 DB 8844/820 id Theresa A. and Jeanine M. Joseph W. Albiston B 3 8844/820 DB 88A4/198J DRWG. NUMBER
029 4

Legend NOTES
TOTAL ESTIMATED AREA OF ALL EXISTING WETLANDS ON THE PROPERTY: 0.2814 ACRE 0,2814 ACRES (12260 SQ,FT.)
TOTAL AREA OF WETLAND IMPACT: 0.0621 ACRES 2705 SQ.FT. ( )
CUMULATIVE IMPACTS (LINEAR DISTANCE) TO ALL STREAMS ON SITE; 121 FEET FEET 42a,62'
~ Fire Hydrant ®Construction Entrance TOTAL LENGTH (LINEAR DISTANCE) TO ALL STREAMS ON SITE, 763 FEET In .412.67
(xj Water Valve CO Clean Out
FV D4 Fire Prptection Valve DI Drop Inlet WETLAND IMPACTS:
q~ Gas Valve WM Water Meter
WETLAND IMPACT TYPE OF IMPACT AREA OF IMPACT LOCATED WITHIN .D WITHIN DISTANCE TQ NEAREST TYPE OF WETLAND
® Gas Meter Q Sanitary Sewer Manhole SITE NUMBER ACRES 100 YEAR FLOODPL~ :AR FLOODPLAIN STREAM (LINEAR FEET)
1 FILL 0.0100 YES FES Flared End Section ~ Storm Sewer Manhole 2 FILL 0.0143 YES ADJACENT FORESTED
RCP Reinforced Concrete Pipe ~ Transformer 3 DRAINAGE, FILL 0.0378 YES ADJACENT FORESTED FORESTED ~ C ADJACENT ~
c
. Existing Iron Pipe M8 Mail Boxes i/
Q Iron pipe set -G-Gas Line (approx,) i ~ ~ ~ ,
STREAM IMPACTS;
~ Existing Nail W-Water Line (approx,) ~ i o ~ NAME AVERAGE WIDTH OF PERENNIAL OR
STREAM IMPACT TYPE OF IMPACT LENGTH OF IMPACT STREAM NAME -o-- Sign ? Area Inlet SITE NUM R LINEAR FEET , STREAM BEFORE IMPACT INTERMITTENT , ~
BE ( ) Area Light Curb Inlet A FILL 21 UT PERENNIAL ~ i ~ ~ ~ 2 FEET ,,,Gtr, ,
B DRAINAGE, FILL 100 UT , , f 2 FEET PERENNIAL ~
®Catch Bosin -SD-R.C.P. unless otherwise noted ( ) ~q
~ Utll(ty Pola Q Monitoring Well %
I ~ .'„',l ~ ~i ,,.,,.,,~.,l; ~
? Telephone Pedestal Q water manhole ,~6 1 / '/j , , ~ , ,
SS Sanitary Sewer 11ne - • • - Ri Ra DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED IMPACTS: ® P P , , . ~~~i. , / ~~.i. 't , , , . , , , . , .....'r'
SS New Sanitary Sewer Line © Tree Protection Fence 1 FILL FOR STREET WIDENING AND SHOULDER. 't ,,~i,.,.,.,, ~
2 FILL FOR STREET WIDENING AND SHOULDER. 1 i/,~, ,j .,....j, ~ i 1 {
Ip Inlet Protection S Silt Fence 3 CULVERT EMBANKMENT INSIDE THE SITE FOR ROAD CROSSING. , ~ ~ ~ .
Outlet Stab. Structure Tem orar Sediment Tra 1 r i~ y L' r/~~. ~ ~ ~ .,n „ .....,.,r' „ ,
P Y P y ~ i W,.,, 1 . , : ~ 1 ..r.. e~ i
O Distinguished Areas ¦ ~ Stream Im acted NOTE: P i t .F: ~ I ~ „ , , . ~'1 ~ „ ,
SITEWALK IS RELATED TO WIDENING OF W. CHATAM STREET. Outfall I ,c , . . , ' , ~ ~ ~ , , . , . . , , , „ , ~ /
~ ...j it ,
~ '.'~'XISTIN~', . VE,INE , , , , , ' ~ . ,
r „ XI TI G ~ , , , „ i' EDG
TOTAL IMPACT IN BUFFER: 0.28 ACRES (12196.604 SQ.FT.) ~ A „ i ~ ~ , J,' PAV M T
SIDEWALK IMPACT IN BUFFER: 0.0158 ACRES (689.165 SQ.FT.) 0 .,,..r I „.1.,.„'j' „,,,'i,,. . l.'.... j
ROAD CROSSING, SHOULDER & EMBANKMENT IMPACT IN „ . ' % . , . ' , „ 0 ~ ,
BUFFER; 0.2642 ACRES (11507,439 SQ.FT.) P`~ ' . , ~ ~ , , ~ R~,413~ . ~ ~ , , , . , . e>ng ,m ~sr. ~
„Inv,AD5,91,,, 'r , .r' ~ ' ~
ZONE IMPACT MULTIPLIER REQUIRED ` G , ~ DNSLL ~0 .U 1 „ , 7
` EXISTING (SQUARE FEET) MITIGATION ~ , ,',r, , , , , . ' , , ~ i 6
' ~ ASPHALT USGS 50 DRD EXISTING CI~RB rd „ d .
EL=422.66 ~ ~ , „ ,'a . . ~ I li ,.ti I
1 8610.627 3 25831.881 ~OF ~ ri ..L~ ;'i:. , . + o , .o , , , r., , , ' i ~ ; ~ „ „ . ,..1 , , . , .
STAR', ~N5'~~C~ION` I ~ .r,..~, ...,a , ..~.t , „ o,.i . , ~I~ . ~ ~ , . „ ' I i I „ ~ 7 , „ ~ ~ I ,
2 3585,977 1.5 5378,965 _ ~ ~ A N . . ~ .,..o~, ' ~ . . fl+0 , ,
, cn TOTAL 12196.604 31210.846 1 " ,1, , . ~ ~ X ,'~,.,.,...M ','I,~~', ,,,~1', . , i i I„ , , ~ , . . ~ , I
i .,,I,~ i ',','i..",'.~„', ~ ~
r ~ ~ I' , , , , , , 'f 1 ~ I ,
0 -DER ~ i; l g _ . . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I, . . , , ,i , , . , ~ ~ ~ ~ I i c .,,'L' „ ,,..,.j,' ui ~ m ~ I , , , , , , , . , , , , , ~ ,
. , . r~ ~ K OF'tFl 2 4 LAYER ~ ~ ~ ' BIORE E ,^A T NTION BASIN ~ ~ ~ . , . U~B SHOULDER .BACK OF TH ~ „E, w I ~ ~ I~.. , LDER p tv ~ i~, r ~U~13 SHOO ao ( I , , , , ~ , , ,'0, , , , . , , , , , , m - i
. , . ' W IR OF HARD WOOD " ' " X4 CONCRETE ~ ~ ' ' ~ ~ ' . 4 E MATERIALS. a y' ? ' . 5 ~ \ . N W ~ b / e 'L ~ ~ /R
MULCH ~ SAND , , ~ , . ~ .1~...~ , , ~ PRE A5T ~ ~ F~
15% SILT ~ ~ ~ ~ F I ~ , ~ - ~ ~
' ~ I~ i .i, ~ pE 10~ ORGANIC , , . , . . , ~1.sc~~ , . , . T. '7RE ~ ~ ,I . ~ , ~
.....,e~ A~1~hI~N.,.. ~o. 422.75 ~.~I , . , . • ~ , , , E , ~ . rT~OE NARY , , . , . . . '~-„r . ~ ,i,,.,, ~ I of
. . . . , . . ~ ~ 9 422 , , . , . 0 1',~, ~y ~G" © ~ ~ ~ I pIN~
9 ~C. . 1, a . ~ . . ~ , ~ q~ A . , , . ~ , , ~ ~ t t ~ .
, . , . . . . . . . , ~ ~ , ~4i ~ ~ri~q ' Xt8 I ~ u?a~' : ~ ~ , , , , . , ; ~ , , ~ , , , , , , , . b.
. . . WO D 'EVEL ~ ~ ~ I ~ 'TREATED ,L I .i,,..,, 'o' .'L'. , I~ , , i...., „ N„ „ ~ ' " ' ~ . ~ " . " SPREADER 1 ;~I.ONG r „ ' ' ' . ' . , , ,
. . . . . , i, . , „ '1,,.., ~ r, , , . ,ti'r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
. i , ~ M .AN M T~, . ~ ~X~~ ~ a..~.e~.. , ,
4 ~ ~ ~ ~ AND ~GR , ~ ' . . . . ..~1 „ , ..,,,rr, ~ I I R . AY
, . , ~ ~ 418.0' , . . , ~~.S1:~OPE.~~.1.~ . . . i~ ~ , TOWN OF C , ~ 'j' ,,.,.,,..,.a~,' ~ It „ :g.,, i ~ ~ ~ pry ~ ~
. .r, ~ ~ . ~ T ~ ~ ~ w~..~ - y , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ % I , . . , , . , , r~ , . , . , t , , , , . ' ~ ~ I APPROVED BY. DATE:
, , ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ 1„ ~ 'v ~ ~ ~ ~I, ~I 1 ~ ~ ~ " i PLANNINO• DATE'
1.5 ~ ~ . ~I~~: 416 5. ~ . . ~ ; I Q w , ? _ \ ~ -fi=r' . , . , . , ~ l . . . . . . . . . .i. , , , . , . .l,' ~ I ~ / .j, '~1,~, ~ i i ENDINEERING~ DATE:
~ ~ C1 4 ~e 3+pa ~ 2+6~Q ~ ~ • J ,
~ ~ ? DRIVEWAY 28" B B ~ ~ ,'t ' ~ ; ~ i .'~','.,...,,r..'.'.' 7 ~ i .,l' ~ i j ;w' , i.... , , , , , , , . r , . , , ; , . , , , , . , , , . , ,'1', , , , , Engineers
4 PERFORATED DRAIN SAND ~ ~ ' . I l
4 PERFORATED 4 CORRUGATED II o~o ' PIPE LAYER ' sHOU~oER ~ DRAIN - ~ • • . RS1n' .P, „1, A ........r.... ,'i', e..,.,. ~ ,I, ~ ~ p , . ~'.',','V ( , , , ~ , , , . , , , . , , , , . T'
~ sl E~(JAL. DRAIN PIPE PIPE ~ 5' LE EL ' ~ \ . ~ ~ t , I' ' ~ , . , , , ' , . ' i ted Environments , . , , , , , . , Assac s ,
~ I ; ~ . ~ SPREA~~R , , a , .i. .1 ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ . , . . i „ 1 .45, ~ Consultants & n nears , ~ i
IORETENTION CROSS SECTION A-A ~ ~ Q ; w~ ` , ` ~ ~,r.,,,
~ W g~W EIR OV RFLOW , I. ~ ~ R UITE B 32 , , , i 4 „I ,
4 ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~2. 3 I ~ ~ ~ O 4 0 N TS ~ - ~ .,.f „ Raleigh, NC 27604 ~J„ „ ~ ~ ,
f F ~ i ~ , 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ 2 S' I `~r , . , 4 4 D9 c I , , ,r 1 „ o~aM t ~ , Phone. [phone] rlcn i , I ,...,,,,,,,,pB~7124/223",,.,.. I I
~ dW ~ V ~ bJy~~~ V Qj~, ~R' I. , . D ~ ~ . , ~ . . , . ~ , t, I N0. R6V1310N3; DATE
,WE'jh~NA', , i
RECOMMENDED SHRUB SPECIES FOR USE IN BIORETENTION: ^~o ~ N ~o I, ~ PIPE ~ ~tEA a a' a ~ a ~ ,~l.E~~, a .AREA, i , ~t1n~,'2G,P~~lic,'.'.',', ~ „ ; „ , , , ~ , ' i ~V a nt
ILEX GLABRA (WINTER BERRY) ~j,, I \ Q~~, ~ ` ~ ~.t. ~ i '5e <ar' E Beme I , ` ~ ~D8~3~ %328,..,.. „ I , a ~ „
CLETHRA A ~ i , 4~ 4.~,~, A NIFOLIA (SWEET BERRY) p q 8 ~ . o ~ , , ~ ~ . ' ' , , . , , . , . . . . . , . , , 'I I
BERERIS K R A A ~ ~ 0 E N (BAR BERRY) A ~'a ~ ~ ~ , a~ ~ f
a ~ ~ , ~i
RECOMMENDED PLANT SPECIES FOR USE IN BIORETENTION: ~ ~ Ao ~ , '~,y ks , ~ . . .o ( k6 , ~ , , . , . , , , , . , , . , , , , , . , ~ ~ - , 0 ~ . „ I ~ i
ACER RUBRUM RED MAPLE l Q a s p~, ,.,ri ~ o' ~ , BETULA POPULIFOLIA (RIVER BIRCH) q ~ ~ :rv • F~q 'rj',..
~ ~ ~ aLkWw11~NWW~1~'r~tik11'WS~'W4`1W3Ye%n'tiW'rWn ~ FRAXINUS PENNSYLVANIA (GREEN ASH) F ~ O ~ ~ ~ F 'I' ~ ~ S' A
~ ~1 .O \ 1 i e ,,,,r'' „ I
RECOMMENDED GROUND COVER FOR USE IN BIORETENTION: ~ ~ ~ 1X3 STONE ~ ~ j
~,l a \ , ~ PANICUM VERATUM (SWITCH GRASS) ~ ~ ~ ~ T=,;•. , ~ ~~AND GRAVE' O~ „becll,"rin•Olive,',..,,,, ~ 7,..,....., 1 DB dA2 80 ~ , ~~i , ~ ~~NE~ ~o . , . , . , , , , I
HERBACEOUS HELIX (ENGLISH IVY) ~ ; ~ ~ ~ E R ~ j ,0, _
~ i~, ~ p ~ . . b ~ „ P a t. ~ ` J1-
GENERAL GUIDE LINES FOR PLANTS: ~ ' ' ' ' PROJECT ~ U_`~_ ~
A MINIMUM OF THREE SPECIES OF TREES SHRUBS SHOULD Y~ ~ ~ '~(s O \ ~ 4 . "C~ ~ BE PLANTED IN THE BIORETENTION. ~ ~ ~ A " ~ PROPOSED
GROUND COVER SHOULD BE USED TO PREVENT EROSION OF U ~ ~ ,ti,o ' ~ ~ F GARY
Q; ~ ~ , ~ ~ MULCH AND SOIL ~ p~~ ~ p ~ ISLAMIC CENTER 4
l~~ v ~ ~ i TREE SPACING SHOULD BE 15 FEET ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , , ~ 1155 W. CHATHAM ST., CARY a ` ~ .
Q' ~ , SHRUB SPACING SHOULD BE 10 FEET q ~ \ , A~~,, ~ ~R ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ , ~ ,o ~ ~ i~~,
AT TIME OF INSTALLATION TREES SHOULD BE 2.5 INCH ' ~ ~ Via, - ~o 'o •o •o o ~ i i~ ~ I I I l i I I I~ l -J I I I'~ I I I I I i ~~,I I I I I l i l ~l 1
CALIPER, SHRUBS 3-4 FEET NIGH r A~~ i `i, i i i i i i i i r~ i i i i i i 1 i i i i~ i i PLANT MATERIAL TO CONFIRM TO CURRENT ISSUE OF THE ~ A 0 ~ ~ ~ ~t5 CE ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'~15 P E ~ ~ i~ I I I I I \I ~ ~ I I\ I I ~ I ~ DUJv1PSTER ~;A ~ 1 DRNIO. TITLE
I I I I I I I I I l V ~ I I AMERICAN STANDARDS FOR NURSERY STOCK ~1" I o ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ° ° ° ° ; sb ~I~I~ I~I©Il~, 20,~p' x 10,0' ;
i FOLLOW PLANT MATERIAL GUIDELINES AND PLANTING GUIDE ~ I SEE~DETAIL I ~ ~ ! GRAPHIC SCALE '1 i
~ ~ ` ~ LINES LISTED IN NCDENR BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE 1 I ' TLAND DELINEATION WE
t ~ y ~ ~ t MANUAL FOR PLANT, SHRUB AND GROUND COVER t i ~ I 50 0 50 100 i
i 1 ~ ~I f ~ ~ t I I I I e~in n~-ncnr?~ inennr?T
SOIL MATERIAL FOR BIORETENTION; HI 4L J I RCHIVI Ilvlrl`1lr I
5894232 w 75% SAND CONDUCTIVITY 6 IN/H
54.53 S89'42'32"W 548.68' 15% SILT CONDUCTIVITY 2 IN/H IN FEET 1
10% ORGANIC SOURCE CONDUCTIVITY 0.5-1 IN /H 1 inch = 40 ft, DRAWN BY IN SCALE 7 ¦ ao
Vincent C. Blanco Mandell R. Gilmore, Jr. Brian Bankler Dwain G. Hathaway Steven H. Mochrle Theodore J. Strader and Sandra D. and Wanda L. and Jacqueline H. DB 8102/2778 and Jane A. and Theresa A. lore J. Strader Joseph W. Albleton DATE APRIL 2004 Theresa A. and Jeonine M. CHECKED BY 8C
DB 4894/462 DB 4230/841 DB 6898/277 DB 4178/97 DB 6644/620 644/820 DB 8894/1983 JOB NUMBER DRWG. NUMBER
5029 4

Legend
TOTAL ESTIMATED AREA OF ALL EXISTING WETLANDS ON TWE PROPERTY: 0.2814 ACRES NOTES .2814 ACRES (12260 SQ.FT.)
TOTAL AREA OF WETLAND IMPACT: 0.0621 ACRES (2705 SQ•FT,)
CUMULATIVE IMPACTS (LINEAR DISTANCE) TO ALL STREAMS ON SITE: 121 FEET ~ Fire Hydrant ®Construction Entrance TOTAL LENGTH LINEAR DISTANCE TO ALL STR EET
( ) EAMS ON SITE. 763 FEET f 424,82' In .412.67
Water Valve CO Clean Out
FV Fire Prptection Valve DI Drop Inlet
WETLAND IMPACTS: Kp Gas Valve WM Water Meter
® Gas Meter S Sanitar Sew r WETLAND IMPACT TYPE OF IMPACT AREA OF IMPACT LOCATED W)THIN y e Manhole W)THIN DISTANCE TO NEAREST TYPE OF WETLAND
SITE NUMBER ACRES 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIP FES Flared End Section ~ Storm Sewer Manhole 1 FILL 0.0100 YE5 ~ F1.00DPLAIN STREAM (LINEAR FEET)
2 FILL 0.0143 YES ADJACENT FORESTED
RCP Reinforced Concrete Pipe ~ Transformer DRAINAGE FILL 7 3 0 03 8 YES ADJACENT FORESTED ADJACENT FORESTED
• Existing Iron Pipe MB Mall Boxes I I _
f ~ , ~i
Iron pipe set -G-Gas Line a rox. (PP ) j
STREAM IMPACTS: Q Existing Nail W-Water Line a rox, ( pP ) i ~ ,
Sign STREAM IMPACT TYPE OF IMPACT LENGTH OF IMPACT STREAM NAME NAME
? Area Inlet SITE NUMBER (LINEAR FEET) AVERAGE WIDTH OF PERENNIAL OR ~i ,
Area Light Curb Inlet A FILL 21 UT STREAM BEFCRE IMPACT INTERMITTENT ~ ~ ~ { 2 FEET PERENNIAL ~ ~ ,
Catch Basin B DRAINAGE, FILL 100 UT 2 FEET PERENNIAL ~ ~ ~
® -SD- R.C.P• (unless otherwise noted) ~ .
~ Utility Pole 0 Monftorin Well 9 . . ,
? Telephone Pedestal W water manhole ~ l..
l i
SS Sanitary Sewer line - • • - Rip Rap DESCRIPTION 0 ® F THE PROPOSED IMPACTS: r:..
SS New Sanitary Sewer Line ~ Tree Protection Fence 1 FILL FOR STREET WI NI DE NG AND SHOULDER.
Ip Inlet Protection 2 FILL FOR STREET WIDENING AND SHOULDER, I
S Sllt Fence 3 CULVERT EMBANKMENT INSIDE THE SITE FOR ROAD CROSSING. ' ~ j• . , , , . 'r" .
Outlet Stab. Structure Temporary Sediment Trap ~ ~ t . .
O Distinguished Areas ~ NOTE: ' ~ / ~ / _ n .
¦ ¦ Stream mpacted ~ ~ 1 ~ r ~ / .n
Outfall SITEWALK IS RELATED TO WIDENING OF W. CHATAM STREET, ~ ~ ~ .....~,1. / ' 1 ~ i ..~i ~I
. ; . •
~fl TiN~' ~ , . ,
TOTAL IMPACT IN BUFFER: 0.28 ACRES (12196.604 SQ.FT•)
SIDEWALK IMPACT IN BUFFER: 0,0158 ACRES (689.165 SQ•FT.) 0 . , EDG t. i
ROAD CROSSING, SHOULDER & EMBANKMENT IMPACT IN 0 ,.,.1....., i , 'i; . , . , .'f.'
BUFFER: 0,2642 ACRES (11507.439 SQ.FT,) •r , , . 'a','. , I 3 G ~ „ ~ ? b i .
~ 0
6 i,- ..ItlV.40b,93" ~ . , i.'...'t.. , . 6,197. ~ , 1
NE IMPACT MULTIPLIER REQUIRED , . DN~LL 4 U ii C~ , , ~ _ / . .
SQUARE FEET MITIGATION ~ ExISrINc ( ) ,~(1 j { • . I . ~ L,
' ~ ~ ASPHALT USGS (50 DRD) 1EXISTING Cl)RB r~ . , , ? ~ d~ q.' 'e7. ~.'.w' , , . ' , . , . , ' ~ ~ ! ~ . ~ ' ~ EXT. o. ~ ,E
EL=422.66' 1 81 3 ' 6 0,627 25839.881 i ~
STAR, ~ le ,1, , , , , , . . , . % ~ i I. t. i. ~
2 1.5 c~ids'I'1~~cT1oN; i _ , 3585,977 5378,965 m ' ~ " .;r. '.i ',m r .I. . . . 1,' . ~ . { . ~ . ~ - ~ ~ r ~.i ~i
o N A 7. , ? _ i r rr:c;v ~0f6 _ I ~ / , , . 4 ,
TOTAL 12196,604 31210.846 ~ - 1 ,'I'. ~ i~l i ..t' 4 , I. . , . ' ~ ~
. ~ I' , ~ ........o I 1... , ~ ~ ~
1.. , ~ _ ~ I' ~ { I ~I
11 • , r _ ~ . 2-4 LAYER ~ ~ ~ ; . ~ ~ _ , ,1 BACK OF . , LACK OF 1 ? , ~ , i ' , , . ~ ~ . . . I I
BIORETENTION BASIN ~ ~ r~ OULDER~ OF HARD WOOD N , 6 ~ , , , . . , . , ; u~asH 4X4 CONCRETE WEIR MATERIALS. s r ~ 5,4g ~ • i B~SHOULDER~ ao I I ~ ..'l'.. f W ~ ,i I, .o 'i' , i , ~
H . N .W. ~ I tl
75% SAND . , . , 26 X36 I.. . . . . . . ...'i '....'l.'. , . , , f- Q ~ ~ PRECA5T Q~ 8 ~ ~ ~ r F~ s
15% SILT , .•f,..•••.~,.•, , > ~
10% ORGANIC 1. .sc~E ~ I I . ,•!l,', ? 1 . . . .
~ L~~, 422.75 , , . , , . , • ~ tTOE_ N ~ , g _ . , • • , , , ' ~ , , yt~~.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ..............y, ~ ~ ,-t ~i ~ ~ ~ ~ 0211.95 s 0 . '~I' , , . . , ~ l ,
. , ~ ~ . . 9 422 , t ~ • ~.,.r ~ F • ~ , • 1 m~ 1' ~ i 'E ~ l~N . i pINE
r ~ ~ / ' ' . , . . ~ ~ I ~ i' . . . , ' ~ , II P .
• • • , • . ' l 'N 'i . ti I ' ~1~ ( ~ ~'NI , ~ { ~ , ~ . . , . , I w, giN11NA1NM~
• • ~ ~ , _ • TREATED WO D kEVEL , , E' ~ . , ~ Il ~ , . ' SPREADER 1 /LONG ~ , , , , , ~ ~ C
. ~ ~ ~ ,ti' I i' , ,I. ~ i I.~..,,... ~ I ~
4 ~ ~ ~ ~'t ~ 1X3, . , , . , . . , , , , , . ' MflQi~kM~NT ~ • . / ~ AND GR , • , . , , , ~ „ , . , , ~ ~ , . , ..'C'.... ~ ~ { . . , . , . , , . , APPR V
~2• SH UL • . , . . , . . . . e ~ , . , , ' ~ ' ' ~ ~ I . , , ~ TOWN Of CAGY
418.0 ~ . • . • ~ ~o • ~ ~ 1 ..1. , 'I ~I ,~r; .i. ~ ~ ~ ~ I' i . . ~
~ y • ~ ~ f........ ~ ~ ~ " . . l . , , . , '1' ; 'a' I ~ , .
1.5 ~ ~ • • , ' r APPR i 04ED BY.
416.5; ~ ~ • , , , . . c • r ~ i Qw ~ .,,,~U 1.,,.,.. 1.,.,..,.1...., .t~.' 'I• 1 ~ 1 ~ PIANNIN6, DATE; . e. I ~ i . • ,
• I ~ ~ , Q~''_~ O 4i ? ~ DRIVEWAY 2~ B/B , . . . , . , , . / ~ / ~ , a.. , , , ~ i ENRINEERINCt DATE; y 1 f.,,. .l'.....
' y l I ' . `~4 0 / , ~ ~ / A ~ L . , , , '1 p . . ,
4 PERFORATED DRAIN SAND ; ' ~ ' ' ` ' ~ . , . ,1.. ~ , , .........r,' . . . . . . ~s... ; ~ En Ineers~ . P 9 . ~
4" PERFORATED ~ `~~.,4,~ t • 4 CORRUGATED ~ ~ o.o DRAIN PIPE LAYER ~ SHOULDER 'i ~ SI ~IAC. . I , I . .~i ..r.,.~~, ? R31n' .P. 1 I . J ~ , , . , , , . , , , ~ ~ ( ~ ~ . , , , w .,c 'yi.'I' . 0: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
DRAIN PIPE PIPE ~ ~ 16' LE EL ~ .~y t' , , , ~ ' . ~ ~ . . , Associated Envirr~nmer~~tal
.1'........' . , /p ~r,~ ' . . I C n I n ~
~ A a ~ ',i• BI - ~ ORETENTIO~ CROSS S T ~ ~ . . EC IOf~ A A 71 . . ~ . ~ o su to is & n sneers a~:~~.
RF W OV LO ~ • 4 , i. 9 ~ . . I"....,. .....'.i.'.....' , . , , , , , , , , . . . . . . . . . . ~ ~ 3211 BRAMER DR, SUITE 8
3 °L i ~ 1 t N TS ~ 0 o ~o ~ • y GJ' ~ ..,g ~F ~k i~ • / ~ ~ ~ RS, , . 1 • , ,~j i .
y°' ~ ~ I , , ~ • . ~ 1... , . , . . , ' ~i , , . ~~i R efgh , , ....'P4hYg1',J~,'$~?rip'git'an.. , . • ~ ~ ~ Phone' 919 7 -1295 . .,,..,,....,.and.MelonieJ.,,..... ~ ~ ~ a ~
C1 Q• OJ ~ , ~ ~ ~,,G.~~ ~ N', Y . • . ~ ~ 1,' h~ h ~ d. 4 ~ ~ n. Y~ `~i ~ . ~ ..,,j..'~, ~ 'D6~7124/P23 ~ ~ f ~ ~ I I { ~ ~ i
l ~ ~ \ ~ . , . . M r , 6 ~ ~ ' ~ RECOMMENDED SHR ` Q ~ ~ 'o ~ A ,a coRR ,qT~p • UB SPECIES FOR USE IN BIORETENTION: Np rrj ~ ~ {.EVE\, ~ '.WE'jI,~NA'.' ' , . , . . . . . . , , , . , , ' ' I N0. REVISIONS, DATE I
e ~ a \ ~ ` ~ PIPE • • ILEX GLABRA (WINTER BERRY) ~ ~ \ ~r .gV E,A~I ~ • • • ~k ri~.'2~'.'Puksl c.'.. , . , . . . `I ~RE,A~1 ~ , ,
~ i A'v'. ~ ~ ~ ' ~ • CLETHRA ANIFOLIA SWEET BERRY ,1 s' ~ , . , 'Se+Ner' Easement t . ~ . , ~ ....DB~3~ ~~328~,.
) ~ . . , • . . BERERIS KOREA o ,Q ~a ~ ~ NA (BAR BERRY
~Q ~ ~ : ~ a ~ , • • ~ . ~ ~ . ~ l\!. ~ iii ~ ~ ~ i~ i,
. , ~ ' ~s, RECOMMENDED PLANT SPECIES FOR USE IN BIORETENTION: ~ Gj ` RA y,~ ~ ~ o , V . . ~ . . . ~ ~ ~ r,,. . ' ~
o RUBRUM RED MAPLE ~ ~ ~ o~,~,, • ~ • , ~ ~ ~ Q . . . i i ~ A ~ o,-, ~ ~
BETULA POPULIFOLIA RIVER BIRCH 50' ~ ~ ~ • ( ) ~ ~r~ ~ . • . I ~ . , . , . .
. FRAXINUS PENNSYLVANIA GREEN ASH e~FF • E ~ ~ ' ~
~ \ 5 5 .T~.•.•i RECOMMENDED GROUND COVER FOR USE IN 810RETENTION: ~ ~ ~ • ~ r • ,..'yam b' '1!~',....,, ~ :t '
0 ~ ,z, • \ ~ PANICUM VERATUM (SWITCH GRASS ~ ~ ; > .1X3 ~'TflNE I AND GRAVE'. ~ .,,.,Cecll,..nn.011ve.,,..,,
~ ~ ~ 5 HERBACEOUS HELIX (ENGLISH IVY) 4 ~ . r.' w~, , ~ ~ ~ ?a~ DB'6A2 807........., ~ { ~ ~N ~
O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ x~' s¢ V ~ ~ ~ It ~ ~ ~ ~ G~' ~ R~' IN R'~~ S~ Ury , , ~ , , P 'p' - a ~
GENERAL GUI ~ ~ a DE LINES FOR PLANTS. I 0~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ to . 0 \
A MINIMUM OF THREE SPECIES OF TREES/ SHRUBS SHOULD ~ ~ ~ ~ ~rY~a ~ ~ PROJECT Z; A ~ \
~ . Y'" Y. . . . . • BE PLANTED IN THE BIORETENTION. q' ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ p \a - N~ ~ . ~ ? Cn , ~
0 ~ . GROUND COVER SHOULD BE USED TO PREY NT R ~ U ` ~ ~s ~ ~ ~•~s•~~ ` E E OSION OF j , ~ , ~ 0 ~ ~~S ~,o \ A~ ~ ~ N PROPOSED
MULCH AND SOIL ~ ~ V ~ / ~ ~ ~ TREE SPA I ~ ~ ' ~ , C NG SHOULD BE 15 FEET k pk ti, 0 ~ I ARY SLAMIC CENTER 0~' C ~ ~
SHRUB SPACING SHOULD BE 10 FEET ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ x A a ~ 'v A i 1155 W. CHATHAM ST., GARY
0 ~ ~ ~ o ~ ' i ~0 _ ~p ~ •p ,d AT TIME OF INSTALLATION, TREES SHOULD BE 2.5 INCH , ~ Q' ~ #
CALIPER, SHRUBS 3-4 FEET HIGH ~ ~ i i i° i i i i~~ E-- i i r~ i t i'~ i i i ''~i ~ i iA o I I i I~, I ~ I i ?
PLANT MATERIAL TO CONFIRM TO CURRENT ISSUE OF THE v J 0 ~ i ~ X15 CE ~ ~ ~ i i ~ ~yt5 P E ~ ~ ~ ~V ~ i ' I I I\ I ~i ~ ~ I I i t ~ ~ Dl);MPST R
AMERICAN STAN i ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ i ~ ixr ~ ~ i i ~ ~ ' ~ i DARDS FOR NURSERY STOCK ~ p ©o ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ a ~ FOLLOW PLANT MATERIAL GUIDELINES AND PLANTING GUIDE ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I~ I ~ I I~ ~ ~ ~ , I I DRWG. TITLE ~ 20.~ x 0.0 ~ ;`i ~ 5EE DET IL
LINES LISTED IN NCDENR BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE ~ \ 1, ~ I , GRAPHIC SCALE
MANUAL FOR PLANT, SHRUB AND GROUND COVER ~ ~I. ~ 1 ~ I 1 ~
C,v ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ? ~ ~ 5D 5D WETLAND DELINEATION D ,oo I
C/1tl AAATCDIAI ~nD ?innrTr~lrlnl.,. ~ \ 1.
vvL- ivnILIVPIL. rVR OIVIZGICIVIIVIV; ANU 5 I KtAM IMFAL I
75% SAND CONDUCTIVITY 6 IN /H S89'42'32"W i
15% SILT CONDUCTIVITY 2 INN 54.53' S89'42'32 "W 548.68' ( IN FEET )
10% ORGANIC SOURCE CONDUCTIVITY 0.5-1 IN /H Vincent C. Blanco Mandell R. Gilmore, Jr, T rian Bankler Dwain G. Hathawa Theodore J. Strader 1 inch = 40 ft. DRAWN BY IN SCALE 1" = 40'
and Sondra D. and Wanda L. nd Jacqueline H. Y Steven H. Mochrle DB 4894/452 D8 4230/841 B 6 i. Strader Joseph W. Alblaton is A and Jeanine M. CNECHED BY BC DATE APRIL 2004
898/277 D8 8102/2778 and Jane A. and Theresa A. DB 4178/97 DB 8844/820 120 DB 8894/1983
T JOB NUMBER DRWG, NUMBER 5029 4

- - 1
Legend
TOTAL ESTIMATED AREA OF ALL EXISTING WETLANDS ON THE: PROPERTY; 0.2814 ACRES NOTES 2814 ACRES (12260 SQ,FT,)
TOTAL AREA OF WETLAND IMPACT: 0.0621 ACRES (2705 SQ,FT.)
CUMULATIVf~ IMPACTS (LINEAR DISTANCE) TO ALL STREAMS ON SITE: 121 FEET ~ Fire Hydrant ®Constructlon Entrance TOTAL LENGTH (LINEAR DISTANCE TO ALL STREAMS ON SITE; 763 FEET .ET
1 444,e2' In .414,67'
~ Water Valve CO Cleon Out
FV ~j Fire Prptection Valve DI Drop Inlet
WETLAND IMPACTS;
Gas Valve WM Water Meter
WETLAND IMPA T TYPE OF IMPACT AREA OF IMPACT LOCAT D WITHIN C E ® Gas Meter QS Sanitary Sewer Manhole WITHIN DISTANCE TO NEAREST TYPE OF WETLAND
SITE NUMBER ACRES 100 YEAR FLOODPLAI~ FES Flared End Section ~ Storm Sewer Manhole 1 FILL 0,0100 YES Z FLOODFLAIN STREAM LINEAR FEET r'
2 FILL 0,0143 YES ADJACENT FORESTED w
RCP Reinforced Concrete Pipe a Transformer 3 DRAINAGE FILL 0.0378 Y ES ADJACENT FORESTED `r ~ ADJACENT FORESTED ~ j~
i Existing Iron Pipe MB Mail Boxes f
'
Q Iron pipe set -G-Gas Line (approz, ~i i
5TREAM IMPACTS: ~ Existing Nail -W-Water Line a rox, (pp }
' ~ ~ 'i i
-Tr Sign STREAM IMPACT TYPE OF IMPACT LENGTH OF IMPACT STREAM NAME ? Area Inlet SITE NUMBER (LINEAR FEET) SAME AVERAGE WIDTH OF PERENNIAL OR 9 ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ , G
Area Light Curb inlet A FILL 1 2 UT STREAM BEFORE IMPACT INTERMITTENT ;
B DRAINAGE, FILL 100 UT ©B Catch Basin --SD- 2 FEET PERENNIAL ~ ~ ~ 1 2 FEET PERENNIAL , ,T • ~ •
R.C.P. (unless otherwise noted) ~ ~ j;
~0.~ Utility Pole Q Monitoring Well ~ • r i~ J ~ ~ ~.r. , , . .'l~. ~
Telephone Pedestal W water manhole
~i, i ,,/r' ~ ~~d'%'. , , .l'
SS Sanitary Sewer line - • • - Rlp Rap DESCRIPTION OF ® THE PROPOSED IMPACTS: ,1,'
5S New Sanitary Sewer Line © Tree Protection Fence 1 FILL FOR STREET WI NIN
DE G AND SHOULDER, Ip Inlet Protection 2 FILL FOR STREET WIDENING AND SHOULDER, r,
S Sllt Fence 3 CULVERT EMBANKMENT INSIDE THE SITE FOR ROAD CROSS~~~iJG.
Outlet Stab. Structure Temporary Sediment Trap ~'~i ~y' , ` I
O Distinguished Areas S r NOTE: ~~'i , , , . , „ , „
t eam Impacted ~ i ~ , 1 ~ ~ ~ „ I
Outfall SITEWALK IS RELATED TO WIDENING OF W. CHATAM STREET. . „ / ~ i ~ ~
~ h
,~XiSTINC' , ~~M~Fk~ ! , , , , , , , , . , ' , . , , ~
TOTAL IMPACT IN BUFFER: 0.28 ACRES (12196.604 SQ.FT,) p ~ ~ ~ A,, i 1 ,~QGf. , , ; ,~T•r . , . , , , , , XI T „ i„ I G
SIDEWALK IMPACT IN BUFFER: 0,0158 ACRES (689.165 SQ,FT.) ~ i `,,1 ~ EDG
ROAD CROSSING, SHOULDER & EMBANKMENT IMPACT IN 0
BUFFER: 0.2642 ACRES (11507.439 SQ.FT,) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \1G , , .;,i, ' 1
~0 j,.. 1 ~I
~ Alm4i3~ ~ ~ , . . ~ ~ , f 61ST, ~0 ' IhV,40D,o1 ~ , . , , , . , . , . ' FR ~ ,
NE IMPACT MULTIPLIER REQUIRED ~ . ~ , , . , ' DNfiLL 0 ~ f 5 ~ ~ , , , , ' ~ ,
SQUARE FEET MITIGATION ~ EXISTING - ( ) ~ , . . d ~ I i~~
ASPHALT uses (~o DRD) 1EXISTi'~c cWRB Q~' , .'.W'.. , , . , , . , . ' ` ~
EL=422.66' 1 A 1 , . _ ~ ~ r~ 4- ',~i' .I, I~
8610.627 3 25831.881 r STAR~O~' ~ , - > h,' i,.'.,.,...,.,. „ „t,. ~ ~ , , . .'~'.'.',',1'.', , ~ , ' ' , . , . , I , . . , .I , . , , a , , , A ~ ~
2 1 ~~GfION' i 3585,977 .5 5378.965 - ~ ~ ~ , r, . . , ,I. .1, i, ~ ,,,,r,,,,,,,,, ,rnr' . ~ , i„ / I . ~ ,
A N -E , , = ~ ~ ,,,,,,i,,, li „ i , , t,.., .a ~ ~ r / , , . , , , , , . , , . 'i . ~ ~I ~ it
12196,604 31210,846 ~ 1 N
_ , ~ li l 4.,,,,. • ,
_ 4- ~ .o. ~ „ ;I ~ ` ~ ~ l „ w
.~~~r _ _ OF • 2-4 LAYER ~ • C „ ~ i a , ,I ~ I i
BIORETENTION BASIN " ~ ' ~ . OF HARD WOOD N ~ . , , , , , , , ; . , , ' ~ SHOULDER m i~ ~ ,1,,,,,, ,,E.,,, .'s"~.~.,,.,,,' ~ .'I I .D „ 1 ACK OF r ~ I~„ ,,,~a ,I, .I. t W ~I 1.,. , . a~ 3. SHOULDE ~ ~ ..'.11'. , . , , , ,
4X4 CONCRETE WEIR MATERIALS: ~ _ ~ ,a , • , . , , , , , , , ; , , 97 " M LC , ~ •0 ~ , , , . , N ~ ~ N ~ „ ,W, ~ 'I ~ - ~ .<< f,. ~ ~
75% SAND ~ ~ ~ . • . ' ' ' '1 ~
5% SILT '1 ~ r • / ~ v ~ I' 1 ' i . ~ 'v , , , J
10% ORGANIC . . • I ,...~.'.~ApE. d' I, , _ _ O ~ ~j
422,75 " 'r~ • I ~ 1, ~ r 021195
• . ~ 1t0E ARY~ g ~ . ..a,.,,.. ~ ~ 42 , . , 2 1 ~ ~ o~ I! pQ , 1,~g ~ r F
. . . , . . , I~ Na ~ . i ~ ~r~ • , ~ ~ „ r, ,.,.a q ZO „ ~ ~ P
I ~'T I ~ , . . ~ ~ `4 ~ , 1 • Sc ~ ~ ~ X1.6 I ~N ~
i ~ ~ \ i • / ~ ' i i ~ ~ r ~ i ~ L'.'i', . , . , , . , . , . , , ~11 ~iu~~ . ~ TREATED WO D ~~EVEL , . ' , ~ ~ . , , . , , o, ~ SPREADER 1 '/LONG
. ~ o 1. ~ ~ ~ ~ N . ~ ~r. 1,~,,. ~ ~ r
4 ~ ~ ~ 1X3~~ , . , , , . , , • , . ' ' M1~At!kkt'MF~(1T` , • ~ , • , ~ • .I, , ( „ I , , I.t„ ~ ~ 1 ~ i / .i,.,.,.,,,~.'
~ i ~ ~ , , , . • , , , - I 11 , B I I ,
8 ~ 41 .0 ~ . ~ 'Sla~?E.'i'.,1,' I ,,,1, r L.,.,..', ~ ~ h ~ , , , , , . • . . , , . , , „ ' , , , . . , TOWN 0 F GARY r.e ~ , ~ ~ ~ . , ~iJi• „w , , , , .A.. ~ ~ ~I~
~ ~ ~ r"F`'r, V• i A r _-~-_--i-~' ,t3 • 3 ~ .,',j.l, ~ , ~
r 1.5 . 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ , , , , r ~ I'...,.,.'I,',,.,,,.~,,.. . ~ I APPROYEDBY, DATE:
416.5, . . , ~ _ ~ ; . 1 I I 0~~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ .'l,'..:. 7 ~ i I ~ PLANNINOo DATE;
~ 3+00 ~ ~ ' ~ J. , , / ~ , , ' ~ 1 , , . , 't , , , , , , , , , , , , . ENDINEERINt3, DATE; f...,.. ' ,1'„ , i
I ~4~'` ~'U ? DRIVEWAY 2t~~ 8 B "h I ,rq 'p~ ~ l~ i ~ A A , , . L.,.,.,,~ i i ti ,p, ,.a„.. „ I
~l ~ i , ~ ~ DRF IN S ND ,w. ~ . 4 PERFORATED A ~ 4 PERFORATED 4 CORRUGATED ~ ~ ~ i ~ ,4,~ , „ I...,. Englneers~
o, ~ ` ~ DRAIN PIPE LAYER ~ I o ~ - DRAIN PIPE ~ ; , * sHOULDER , , ~ I . I ~ ~ ~ , J ~ ~ ~ ~
PIPE , SI E ALT. i ~ ~ 15' LE EL ~ .Ji,1..• r'.,,.,., j.RS1n' .P. ~ ~ Y~~~ a. ~ ~ .'i.' „d~'D; ~ K~' , , , . . , . , I , . , , , , . , , . , , , , , ' , , , . , . . , , I AssOCiated En nmental
~ ~ ~ / ,I „ N ~
B I 0 _ ~ 0 ~o w . ~ ~ ' . , RETENTION CR . ~ . . , OSS SECTION A A ~ .,l SS ,T4.45,N1,,, ~ „ ns eers ' i 0 U an S ngin
~ ~ ~ ' s w WEIR . , ~ 3211 BRAMER OR. SUITE 6 ,
NTS 43 r~ OV~RF~LOW s Q 4, ~ ~ /p I 0 ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ F , ~ ' ' ' h, NC 27604 i
p; al ~ A~., , . ~ . , ~ ...A. , , y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A I Q 0~ A• i • • ~ R • ~ D 1 i~~ ,ond,Mebne~l. l Phone: [phone]
~ I , ~ , ~ „ ~ h
~ Q. ,y. ~M r. ~ ~ 1. ~ ti~ti ~ ~ , RECOMMENDED SHRUB SPECIES FOR USE IN BIORETENTION: ~o, ~ ~ o A ,a coRR ~Ar>=p. ~.EU~~, , a, , LA,NO, 'I N0. DATE • • REVISIONS: „ „ . 1
~ w ~ ILEX GLABRA WINTER BERRY ~ ~ a ~ ~ PIPE R ' ( ) ~ /~/~~~w~ , r,, , , .1. l~ , t• , , , , , , , E~• , „ , ~~4REA ;3iili~.2p,P~~lic,.,, I
CLETHRA ANIFOLIA (SWEET BERRY) b ;r ~ ~ 4 , .~eJ~~r Easement , , , , . . , . . , , , j ~ . ~ I „ ,
Q . . , . BERERIS KOREANA (BAR BERRY) n ~ o ~ ~ ' ` l • r • r 5 ~ ~ , ,,,,,..,,,~DB•3 ~328~„•. N , , „ „ „ . „
~i I H , „ 1\ ~
RECOMMEN ~ ~ ~ 4 ti` ' DED PLANT SPECIES FOR USE IN BIORETENTION: ~ ~ \ . ' , ~ , , • ~ r~.~ ,n r: , ~„d.. t.,, v ~ S ~ , , ~ , , , . , . , , , , , , . , , ;r, . , , , . , , , ~ , . , ,
~ AO ~ ~ ~ ACER RUB ~ , ~ ~ s`, . , , ~p p,, RUM (RED MAPLE) ~ .4 . , ~ r''. ~ ~ ~ a ~I ~
BETULA POPULIFOLIA (RIVER BIRCH) So ~ , . , ; q ~ N~; ~J ~ ~ . R .~a ~ ~ i '1r~ ~
wrnuhnaar~°acw Nwsov . S PENNSYLVANIA GREEN ASH) OFF \ ~,o~~ ~ • , ~ , . , , . , . , , . , q~S' , . , , „ I I
A ~ `"o ~ ~ ' yr RECOMMENDED GROUND COVER ~o r V~ li ~ y I . ,.y ~ ~ , , , . , , , , ~ , , . , , ,
FOR USE IN ~ ~ r BIORETENTION: s~ ~ ~ , ,wh~ PANICUM VERATUM SWITCH • • , 1X3' STONE „ , ,
) ~ ( GRASS z ~ HE ~ RBACEOUS HELIX (ENGLISH IVY) „ AND GRAVE 4 ~ 1 .Ceoll, nn.011ve, ~ ~ ~ DB'992 807,,,,,,..,, ~ 1 ~ A ~ O \ ~
o ~ . ' ~ ; ~ ~ P ~ 4?y~' ~ ~~1 1~N , pY E
. . GENERAL GUIDE LINES FQR PLANTS: O ' ' ` ~ S I P 'p n ~
A MINIMUM OF ~ . THREE SPECIES OF TREES SHRUBS SHOULD Q ~ ~ ' c.-~..~ '~~a ~ ~ PRO~CT
BE PLANTE 0~ ~ 'r D IN THE BIORETENTION. , ~ . .
GROUND COVER SHOULD BE USED TO PREVENT EROSION OF V ' s ~ \ ~ ~ 1 , . _ ~ N ~ ~ PROPOSED ~ ~ .o - ~ ~ ~ ,
MULCH AND S01 ~ Q' ~ ' ~ ~ . ' • ~ 'Co L ~ ~ ~ ~ TREE SPACING SHOULD BE 15 FEET " ' 1~ , ISLAMIC CENTER OF CARY
k ~ A ~ ~ Q' SHRUB SPACING SHOULD BE 10 FEET , ~ ~ ~ ' ~ 1155 W. CHATHAM ST., GARY
TIME OF INSTALLATION, TREES SHOULD BE 2,5 INCH r{' r. ~o` - Ao `'o` °o ~ . ~
' o , CALIPER S - ~ ' O ~ 0~ ~ o ~ o , HRUBS 3 4 FEET HIGH , i l i i i i i i'~ ~ ~--_a i i ~r, i i i i i i ;i i i i\ i 'o ~ \ '~.I I I I\ I '11 I
PLANT MATERIAL TO CONFIRM TO CURRENT ISSU ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ i~~~ ~ ~ i i i `•i i i i i. i ~i i' i E OF THE v ~ ~ i ~ i i i i i i i i i v i i i r, i~ i~~ 'I, I ,I I' I u ~ I~. i~ I~ 1 X D PST ~R
AMERICAN STANDARDS FOR NURSERY STOCK Q ; / , , i ,t5 ~CE~ ~ i i I i i~15 ~P E~ i i , i , i i i ~ raoo c,;~m c^amcse~ce~ c~ ~ `pzao ocpc~e'am a~ ~ i J,... FOLLOW PLANT MATERIAL GUIDELINES AND PLANTING GUIDE DRWG. 11TLE I ~ 1 ,1: I 1) ~I~I~I I~lol~ 2D.q X 1it7.D %`i
i ' LINES LISTED IN NCDENR BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE ~ 4 ~ I i t SEES DET ~IL ~ ,I ~~I ~ ~ ~ ~ I GRAPHIC SCALE
~ ~ ~ i MANUAL FOR PLANT, SHRUB AND GROUND COVER ~ i i ' i ~
~ ~d ~ ~ ~ i eo 5D ,DD WETLAND DELINEATION
C(11I ~dATCDIAI cnD oino~Tr_~iTin~~. ~ _ ~ ~ 1 I ~ i i i i
„V vin I_I Unc. I VR L)IVRC CV AVIV: \ I
75% SAND CONDUCTIVITY 6 IN/H s69'42'32-w AND STREAM IMPACT
15% SILT CONDUCTIVITY 2 IN H 54.53' S894 / 2 32 W 548.68 ( IN FEET )
10% ORGANIC SOURCE CONDUCTIVITY 0.5-1 IN/H Vincent C. Bianco Mandell R. Gilmore, Jr. TE8
rian Bankler Dwain G. Hathawa Theodore J. Strader and Sc,ndra D. and Wanda L. nd Jacqueline H. Y Stevan H. Mochrfe 1 inch. = 40 ft. DRAWN BY IN SCALE 1" ¦ 40' Strader Joseph W. Albleton i A. and Jeanine M. CHECKED BY BC DATE APRIL 2004
98/277 DB 8102/2778 and Jane A. and Theresa A. DB 4884/452 DB 4230/841 88 DB 4178/97 DB 6644/620 >0 DB 8884/1983 ORWG. NUMBER
{ J08 NUMBER
5029 4

TOTAL ESTIMATED AREA OF ALL EXISTING WETLANDS ON THE PROPERTY: 0.2814 ACRES (12260 RES (1~2so sQ.FT.) NOTE S
TOTAL AREA OF WETLAND IMPACT; 0,0765 ACRES (3332 SQ.FT.) 424.82' In .412.bT
CUMULATIVE IMPACTS (LINEAR DISTANCE) TO ALL STREAMS ON SITE; 162 FEET Legend TOTAL LENGTH (LINEAR DISTANCE) TO ALL STREAMS ON SITE: 763 FEET
Fire Hydrant ~ Construction Entrance WETLAND IMPACTS:
co Clean out TYPE OF IMPACT AREA OF IMPACT LOCATED WITHIN DID DISTANCE TO NEAREST TYPE OF WETLAND
pQ Water Valve WETLAND IMPACT 'LAIN STREAM (LINEAR FEET)
SITE NUMBER ACRES 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN STf FVOC1 Fire Prptection Valve DI Drop Inlet FILL 0.0185 YES 1 FORESTED ADJACENT
Gas Valve wM Water Meter 2 FILL 0.0183 YES Kp ADJACENT FORESTED c'
3 DRAINAGE, FILL 0.0397 YES ~ ~ ADJACENT FORESTED / '
® Gas Meter Q Sanitary Sewer Manhole j` 'I
FE5 Flared End Section Q Storm Sewer Manhole ~ ~ ' i
RCP Reinforced Concrete Pipe ~ Transformer STREAM IMPACTS:
i/ 7 r,,
Existin Iron Pipe MB Mail Boxes YP F IMPACT LENGTH OF IMPACT STREAM NAME AV ~ g STREAM IMPACT T E 0 F PERENNIAL OR i; . AVERAGE WIDTH 0 IT NT ~ ~
i e set --,-G-Gas Line (a prox.) SITE NUMBER (LINEAR FEET) STI Q Iron P P P FILL UT STREAM BEFORE IMPACT INTERM TE , / j; ~ ~ ~
A 34 2 FEET PERENNIAL ~ ' ' ' ~ ; ~ i 'a' i 2 FEET PERENNIAL ' r3r
L~ Existing Nall ---W--Water Line (approx.) B FILL 15 UT C DRAINAGE, FILL 113 UT . , r ~ PERENNIAL • ~ ~ 2 FEET ,~..,.,i ;
-a- Sign ? Area Inlet 2 FEET PERENNIAL ~ ~ • •
Areo Light ~ Curb Inlet
r. . 1
C~B Catch Basin -SD-R.C.P. (unless otherwise noted) 'f' . .
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED IMPACTS. rp, Utility Pole Q Monitoring Well 1 ~ ~.,.,,.,1.
1 FILL FOR STREET WIDENING AND SHOULDER. ? Telephone Pedestal W water manhole 2 FILL FOR STREET WIDENING AND SHOULDER.
.
SS Sanltar Sewer line - ' • - Ri Ra 3 CULVERT EMBANKMENT INSIDE THE SITE FOR ROAD CROSSING. Y ® P P
SS New Sanitary Sewer Line © Tree Protection Fence ~ , , , . . , . , , 1 1 i „ r - i l ~ i , i
NOTE: i r , ~ y, . „
Ip Inlet Protection Q Silt Fence 0 IT WA K IS RELATED TO WIDENING OF W. CHATAM STREET. S E L ,t.. i r~~' ~ ,
Outlet Stab. Structure Temporary Sediment Trap v
Distinguished Areas ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ Stream Impocted ~ ,~aG~. . , , , . 1, ~ ~-~r . , ..'i.. , , , . ~ XI TI G
' I ~ ' ~ , . , , . , . r ( PAV M T
Q , , ~ C~
\1~ ~ ~ , , , , . , , , , , , , , 1 i~ , , . 0 ~ , . i
~b i. „ „ Q , , / , ~ ~ I• ~ ~RIm493~9'f' , , , , , • 1 EXIB41 61ST.
I, ~ ~ Inv.406.0), , , ! , , , ~ ~R 6 .i„ V i p 'D _ ~
5 ..„„i' , , . . ,
EXISTING y. i'
~ ASPHALT 'C ~ , . . T .E%F.~ Q." d N 67
~,EXISTIt~G Cl~RB USGS (50 DRD) ~ ~ u, ~ ~ ~r ' , , ' I,~ , .
EL=422.66 ~v.. ~ ~ ( ~ r , , .l. , ~ ~ o , .w- ~a , ....r,..,,., ~ . ~ , ~ , . i ~ , .
OF'. ' STAN' ~ _ ~ ~ 2 ',rn, , ;~~'1~, ..'i.', , i, , i ~.,i , • ~ ~ . ,
_ ~ ~ ~ ~ A „ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ,rn. • - ~ ~ r S
, ~ I „ . ~r ~ i /r /F ~,,,..,,,.,Mi r.., It
1 ~ ~ , i ~ i 'y ~ I~ r' ~ ~ , , , . , . , ~ li 'r'. ~ I ,n.. .
B ~ ~ _ , , .'.1. 74 ACRES 14260.304 SQ•FT, IMPACT IN BUFFER: 0.32 ( ) TOTAL ~ i 1 ,,,'i.',..,,,~,.,.,,.,,,, w, ,,..,L.,.. loi ~ i~~ ~ ~ I I G, . I' . „ a - 1 c~
6 ACRES 1683,628 SQ.FT. u S1DEW 5`~ 5 ~{~ER , , . ALK IMPACT IN BUFFER; 0.038 ( ) ti I' „ r , , . , , I ~ ~ ~ ...'L' .j....., ~ ~ I .O I 1 m ~ ~
ROSS NKMENT IMPACT IN BUFFER: 0.2887 ACRES (17.576,676 SQ,FT.) ' ~ ~ ~ ING SHOULDER & EMBA ' ROAD • • ~ f., ~ I",.,,, N 1 _ ao i ~ ~ I .n rn
N 1' 8 6, ' ~ 7 , ~ ~ . , , 'E. 5' UTILITY` . A b , 1 i~ .IT~~ r ~ ~ .'t' I~ f-
, . , . . ,1~ ..STRIP ~ IP / ~ , . ~ , ~ . ' ~ , , , ~ ~ 1
; ~ t ~ I ~ 1' ~n , , . ~ ,
T MULTIPLIER REQUIRED ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ h ~ ~ E ' ZONE IMPAC . , , , , -r;.. .SC~A T MITIGATION , . , , , . , ~,~~E? , , . , . 1 i... , , , ~ Q` , . ~ ~ 1 ,Q ~ o „ {
(SQUARE FEE) ' , . , , , . .'fM~,Af~K~I~N7'. , 30. . L;.- . , . , y I ~ I . , , . . ''t , . • 1 ~ ' r :4
, : y . ~iOE ARY. ..'j , .l. . . , , / . , . , . ~ , , , = r ~ . , - - s- SEAL
ne , 1 1 U118.U27 ~ a035K.~~, . , . . , ~ , , , ~ ,~i . , , , . , , , r.}.''. I ~ f Q21195 B ~2. I ~ , . , . . " i ~ ~ w i~, ~ 1. 1
r,A~~ I ~ ~ , ~ ~ i FW E~'~ ~ I. ' , a, , i ~ ~ G , . .
1.5 6213.415 ~ ~ 1 7 7 2 4 42 2 ~ ~ , 1 . . . .M. ~ i ~ ~ ~~J . L•
36567.496 l ~ A . , , , , i~ ~ , / r { ~ I r ~ ~1~A j ,,,,,,,,r, ~ ~ u!lIIIUIIIIINIIiH11~~V l' 'l' G ~ ~ .
TOTAL 14260.304 ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ . , , , , , ...1.~'.','.'.','. , , Mt~'~~tESM~I~`:~. . •d , k 1 .,t ~ ~I
~ ~ sHOUCo~~'. , . . , ~ , • S~~ PE~~t q'. i
.7, ~ y~ A < ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ , ~ , , . , , . ~ APPROVED ~ (,,,,,,.,.'i.'...,..';, ,,,,,,,,I, I i
~ ~ ~ . I i ~ , ~ . , , ~ `i,' ~ . . . , . , , , , . TOWN OF CARY
~ \ ~ y 'f ~ V~ ~ A, ...1 i i ' y ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~I / I ~ 1
1 i ~ 1 \ ~ i ~ ~T~ . \ ~ . , . k i . ; , , , , , , , , , , , , , i ~ ~i ~,t..,. ~ ~ ~ .J. ~ ~I APPR04ED8Y. DATE;
O Lv , , ~ ~ / „ DATE;
I G DRIVEWAY 2r~ BBB ~ ~ ~1n / ~ 'i ~ I I• A . • ~ D TE• . , , . , r • ~ N IN RING, ~ ~ E D EE ' '1
0' i ,a~ ~ h i ~ ~ , , . , , ~ TdAI,' ~ ,',IJ• ~ til
4 . 3 0 .p ~ ~ , ' . „ v~ . , . R S 1n' .P. ~ 1 , ~ ~ ~A~ I - .d o: 'f' , ' ' ~ ~ . ~ . , . . , , . , . , , Engineers
E LA R' H 5S 1. I ' ~ " ~ I~~i , ~ ~I~
~ ~ ~ WEIR', ~ , . i ~ ~ ~ v, 4 ~ ~ ~ OVERFLEW I~ .1. . . ~ . r ~ ~'I G' „ ~ „ . ~ 45W ~ . . '~l' `i~, , 58 „ ~ ~ , . . . . . ' , . , . , . , . , , . ~ Associated Environmental
l • ~ e~;e~,.,,..,.
~ \ ~ a ~ s s/ ,i .fir,' ~o:. t ,1.v. v v 6j k` .......r...,, ' r .I. ~ II • ~ ~ • ~ ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ~ Consultants & En sneers 4' '.y.'., i, ~ i~~~.
V ~ :y 4, ~ k 3 i I . , , „ , , , , . , „ „ ~ p itori,,,.
w ~ , ~ ~ . , ~ , . , , . , . . ~ , , , . ~ ' I ' 4hlel J.. r"+P,rlCi9 „ ..,,,,.,,,,..and,Melanle,J......., ~ 3211 BRAMER DR. SUITE B , DB~7124/223'
F ~ ~ Q vv r , , . , , '~A ~A" i`~ Ci ri r \ ~ , 1 ~ Roldigh, NC 27604 ~I
^h ~ y. n, ~~\A V ~ y~ ~ Phone; [phone] ~Tt.>jN
p• fij ry ~V ~ . :o~'' P E I'.':~', , ~ ~ r~ •~REA , . , , . Stlti~.'20','PAtiUC',', , , , , , , , , , , , , , . , I • • ~ ~ • •Sew~•r• Easement
\ 1 I, ,i N0. REVISIONS; DATE a ..pg'3 '~,2g,' I ~ ~ „ , , „
~ 0 ~ ~ `~6, ~ ~ ~a. h. I . , , T 1 i \ ' , '
Cl ~ ~ ~ ,w , ~ ~'~t'... a. ~ ~ o, . , ;v' . . ~ ~ , t ~ f
p . ~ ~ G.~ y, „ „ i
~ ~ ~ ~a . ~ ~ ' , . a
Q ~ ~ ~ „ . , ~ ~ „ , . . , , , , . I '.N . „ ~4 ~ , \
~ ~ ~ ~~a•~~:•. w~waa~ q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , . , „ . . , s , „ , ,
~ ~~F ~ 0 ~ ~~v / ~f~. „ „ 1 ~ ~V~ .'~~C ~
1 1 ~ ~'~t . ,rte ~
\ 1 . \ ~1\, Ged6 valve,,,,.,'.'„ ~ A O ~ DB'89a BDT'
~ ` ~ `IN i ~,.G R'\ _ ~F' Ut I
~eC y~ ~ ~ v
` A 1 ~ S"Sj ~ ~ ~ ~
~ Q / r... ~ 4~ ~ ~ Q YV ~ ~ , 'fir ~ ~ Q \ ` ~
. . ~ ~ a . . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • PROJECT \ ~d~ ~ ~ x~ N I V
~ Co ~ ~ ~ p
' ~ ~ Q,`C i ~ ~ PROPOSED
~ ~ ~ k ~ I ~ ISLAMIC CENTER OF CARY ~ ~ ~ ~
F ~ \ ~ ~ / / ~ ~ ~ 0 c Q ~ 1 1 .o ~ ~ ~ 1155 W. CHATHAM ST,, CARY
v ~ i i ~ ~ , ~ I 0 ~ ~ / I I I 1 I I I I F--,1~ I I l~ I I I I I i I I v y~ / I '1~ I I i I I I I I i~ I I I~ I I I I I I I I I\ I i i n i ~,i , ~ i ~ ~ ~ i ~ I DII ``AAAAPST~R ~ \ I,
y I I I I I I ~'y ~ I~ I I I~ I vC",
~ cam coo e~ora~a~ao ca e~ as o a~ as Q 4, ~ l i v •V A ~ ~ 1 s~E o~T~~~ i I HIC SCALE ~ ~ ~ GRAP oRwc. T1Tl.E ~ ~
~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ > >
' ~ ~V A i ~ ~ ~ ~ ' \ \ I ~ I ~ 50 0 50 100 i ~ 1
V ~ ~ A ~ C~.i X ~ ~ V `y I 1 I i '
~ ` ~ ~I ~ ~ i 1 FINAL SITE PLAN i
~ S8A'42'32"W ~ \ . ~ N L..~ ....w`~...
54,83 S89'42 32 W 548.68 ( IN FEET )
1 inch 40 ft.
Stroder Joseph W. Albieton
Vincent C. Blanco Mandell R. Gilmore, Jr. Brian Bankler Dwain G. Hathaway Steven H. Mochrie Theodore J. Stroder and Sandra D. and Wanda L. and Jacqueline H. DB 8102/2778 and Jane A. and Theresa A, A and Jeanine M. a a DB 8894/1983 DRAWN BY IN SCALE 1" ¦ 40' 20 CHECKED BY SC DATE MARCH 2004
DB 4894/452 DB 4230/841 DB 8898/277 DB 4178/97 DB 8844/820
JOB NUMBER DRWG, NUMBER
5029 4

~ 6Z05
a3ewnN 'oMaa a3ervnN eor
b00S 'A3d 31V0 OB AA 03N03H0 Od9/4499 AO [6/BLIb BO (981/4698 AO 'd oes~ay~• puo •tl °uop puo cs/aur ea ccl/sees ea «a/oclti ea lsa/aseti ea 'y ouop puo BLLl/lole BO •H •u~pnboop puo ~ opuoM puo •p o~puos puo } \
,Ob = 31dOS NI AA NMtlaO suluo°p puo uepo~}S .f s~oposyl °N4~N1 'H ~°}S ~uj uo}s191V 'M 4d°aop ~xy{ •H uw5o3S J~OMD4}DH U~OMQ ~spuog uo~~g 'gyp 'uowU9 'a INP~W aouolg 3wouN
o~ u . i
(Z~~~ NI ) ,89'8tiS M~Z~,Zti.68S - - - - - ,ts'is
- y - M,lt,l4.BAS
f ~
Ndld 311S
oo~ oe o 05 I
lb'N I ~ ,9LZ I -,9LZ
~'I~~S ~IHd~~~ ll'd130 33S 31111'9Ma0 ,0'Olx,O'Ol oooc 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 eo 0 0 0 eoeoleeo
~ ~ ~ ~ I I ~ ~ I ~30~dd~ 91 a31SdWf10 i i i i i i i i i l l i i i i I I p30~'d~ Eli i i i i ~ ~ n \
( I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I iliii~~~i~~~ii p
s . I 1 / ,za / ~ ~ Iva / O ~ O
A~d~ 1S WdHl`dH~ 'M ~5 ~ ~ x
/ \ ,9L t Jl?~`d~ ~02~31N~~ ~IWdISI ,9L1 ~ ~ l~ ~l / ~ ~
,~a / S ~ ~
J ,O~a / b/
rrrr h~~ O /
. - n G! 51~:{{iquiprrra iip5~rrr,':'rf{u~'r'rq '..?.'Y •'r. v. r.•avr ~~~5vv5yy.5. •r rx;rt:: •xuv}i}Fi:•'rr ' .4. dvuuiYtu v%i .a . ~ •C~ '.vn'%'•vd•"4y1.•}}L.v"".~nwrvr: S°''rti'.4.r.r. r.H . ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ w ~ - ~ ~l \ . ~}A~r%5'r}........4(%55rt'.1:4...I'ry:rm• . ~"tlnV.S{;{Yr(}YSNAt;M„n15'T...'::::::d •I r ~ //Q `I;iL:,5~r1~}Avyr}5v,.;{.iH{45r 'i5, / Q ..N v
. . . ~ • /.{x' ~rn$~:5C4j•~y%n{~.,'rekn:}v "vunvq j{ i5ti.v~ L'r?'r.''. :'l.'.' ''£.Fk... Vr 555 r "r} ~ '1%~}.rR . . ~6vth5~,rek5x};{5x5 NN{Nq {rnwn / 0 r 5e~ rn':•J:.5v;5~/,~ :n~:::.vlv:::.r. a • \
~ {!:•:v.Ji{unlwnvv::i{•$+ruWGiit'S.li{{w•{: tih~r \5{x545 . \1 LJ \ rt. 5;rti.;...,,..:.a....;iY~%i}v .P~}..'ixi{i{r'~ '.itih%irinulni~4i%{ .ik%i;Y.,.. taxyn.~..rM ~G , . , , l0A/SZBS AO ~ ~•a 55•• r:::::.,.. "vhf;!4.ux.rr.r:::rr,ur.~~4{5}::::.v::r.•`.+ • • ' 2- , \ • Grnn•:v}}}%i;Y?tav%i{raw va.•'rdAr..ener.:v.rxurvx•x5 :vx•••xa ~~l.;Nn5fH5'int~n~VN:.{5}'rnW xf555yx5}'I.}.'M1$5~~~5 ~~1T.'::.':.':: \ ~JdOl~l {Hy'y{::}~ 5{V{}'ti~.{'tiNNtiNS.'.WNMtS{p:trr}}~,.~ \ !~n5•...!{A....,•,"'tttn.....nt::.:::n,.ww•: ~33HM ~ ''J.}k..~+:.emi}nvv'iPril,.;raxw}H}:.55•.w{r:rnwxlrli~"nviJn~~iti}• ' \ \
S..Hy I 'iivAtiti~k!1~:°uti:ii{{i'ri%ryr}:i':"+}kri{v}'iirr:}4igw.+SVCis~:i+%~ . •W IlUII •q ~ Cu .......:.......r„4Y.}li{..v..,r......,..uavt: h•t::•{• 110' 8 I. °J' O ti5::::nvrr§'•1''' vXm•• n^ v ••ur.:ar 5 . ~ ~ . ~ ~ ' %41.VR:r25458~{:~t~:5rrx5~~{A111~1~{i{l~ar.%}r:!%'rrrr: ~•y{ANSI~%V:'•5{:}1: • •{'1.'r}rr{~'!1}r}:~....rr.:..~~%'•'R'!•'!1{'..5."•{VV ••}!ti'N4'.... 5. . Yr{rr}:{{y",Q,{:}riirifv}'iirNa{•it~ 'i5 hyi~s{'{uvrvri{{:a,"11''vv:.lmmyv ~ " \ •r!{"'"'V. '''rrrP.l;rN:rN!'}}:. VrrS:rr'l;Nrr:rS}" Kr:::'rr"rf.:r:Nr~~~ \ / \ i{}.a.54ra}5;}:fvey...uxy{nx5ljxr; {;5;}}.nxrr ~Ei•~l"gly6i••v{~x ;a~.. \ O ••5•.r::.r:::.vl•'n'.v.v.::. n..,.... w• rri•:vrn \
. . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . ..1 murv. s n;..: A\t}:5^ntt5w. n.. m mm'. nv , .vmtiiii{{•Ivrii 7r':+iLrri~iiiriirnw.Vnvrni'kNnaxu{•axwr:r~r'R{}ru"m11yG:~reFw \ \ \ S N:;...
'lA. ~ r:x. i E,t51t ~ . " \ •••14 ?mFi. ...r:: ~ r~,..~...... N yNN.:::•M x{~ p ~ ~
' S ' , . , ~ . b . . ~ ' , . 1 ~ b ,0 c~ \ S
, ~ . Q F \ ':,•~?{v„ru }x{1kv%M1iS,x:. }t'fY;%{ri
. h7.mtia r~rr nn~.ls..m5.r. ri.:v} xrn•:.,.:,g.5avv:r:v.vtr........ '%ii ra
~ x; u1brx.4,•iiir:??:viri:§' Iii: ~S'ir:'~, ~ ~ \ ..Y........ ati~n.. ~~t ..........,4 •5}iRi•}%{i%h:";,iiiiiiijit4:5i;n{:}"' tti '%JA ar~~ ..J}555;}.. ~'•S,tT„r 1~~555':Y:.{'}y;•; ,2a \ \I\ 'rY5'xYSV.~r::rr:rr' \ \ ~e{~ti 5. ti {~~'~111ii{~i;. , A'., ?/.iiRn7i • • \ \ \ \ /U
. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ . . . . {'ti}}NSl.~! , t~'%.1{ti":rYrrN ~ 54~ ~ ~ • •N1VH r •••:'lt~A{'N4tyA{Y!{%'%Y H}%(j N~ .%L , , . '{vtit$:i{{vku?¢Prr.r:G:ritiyS~rwtitiv Skv,~ 'Vr~N 'S4~ "'.5'Vx.{{Jix'~'...5~1.~r \ \ •V \ V_ G'iN{AHJAIl;CN'y'~lC.~n;,."~ ~"{Nr!!.A{ti'lAy y}5,V}}A'«~Vr• \ ':vr~#tigtiyignrtim Skvr:{SjH&J,SV '{•k'r:}:'r:~ \ r8\\ \ :.5:r, nrN.•:. rr.a, nv•N:u.v:"'+ > ( \`A O E;~::. .r. ''s'i5 Nn{•kki}iti{•q,{mgvi' \
arivuC'ur!~::....5r..::.nxxv:. ' .55:.rr..~ r. ~,V„nS,.~'VV / ~ \
....}uawaso3.laMag.....,..,... .......'.'...,,.......,.'.'.lr-.'..'. "'<<' Z ~ ? 2 aVr ~ ~1 ti .O '~.4
31t/a •SNOISIn3a 'ON . ' ' 1 0~
, '.'.','.'.','.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.I ~ ~ ~ Q y
5621 8L9 (6l6) 4d / ,..,,...~.eluo)°w. puo ..,,.,,,....,.,..,,.....,.,,....,.,t....................,......,..,.....,..,........ ~ ::;;~j;:;':,'~: Yom'- ~ dJ,l Q J~ ' ;o
ti09LZ ON 46ial~a uoa~6~I~d.S, r.l°~kda.'.. , , . , . . . , . , , , , , , , , , . { `tea ,~a / ~ ~ \ . \ ~
8 311f1S 'a0 a3Wba8 11Z~ . . . . . . . , , ...,.,.,,•.,.•.,.•.,,•.,.,.•.,.,.•.•,'.T~'~,\ , , , , , , . , ....'.','.'~I a ,\\0 w ~ . \ \
. . . . . . , , , , , , . , .,I ml \ O M/S .9 ~ a~ ~
saaaui6u SUS nSUO . . . . . . . . . . . . ....ISB;LBZ•.,.•...'.'..'.'...'.,,'.'....,.+,,-...... - - ~ , , , , .......;.EI MSS •I / O ~ / v
Inu a elooss - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .M„5~•,b.1.6.85.• , . .•.•.~.~.•,~.•.'.•.~,'.':•~N, la~uauluoa. 3P ~ , d 5 \ \\Q ~ ,p ~
.pZp ......................I \ \ \ I
~suaau6u I. 'd' ~ISaa~ .'.'..'.'.'~.,"....................,.I I \.'....,...,.,......,,.,.,".'..............'1 I 3 I .~i....• .,........,......,,,....I ...............I \ \0 ~ \ o
..'................................1 w ~ ,ova ~ ~ ~ ~
}31tl0 }ONIa33NI0N3 .I ~ . , 8 B ,8Z l,'dM3nla , •L \a
_ ,r \~O
~31V0 ~l,A 03AOaddtl , . . . . . . . ~ I , . , , ...C?..... , . ,5a \ \\\O
I
...................I I \.tl. ~.'M9,L~a,•,~.~,',~.......
'I I m.'
.N.
• O \ j ..,,,,...,,.........I .........................................................1 . . 'L_
~ ~Yd I P .,.,,....,.........'l
( - I b ...3aIS ,5................
'cn.'......,..............m.1
z o ~ ~6t[~0
~ . ' ~ ~ ;'i3~.~ ~ ~ ....j ( ~ 3dcdOS y-.
.
. . ~ e W
~ .m.. ro - a. .....,...........,....I ~ 1'. . . • • • gb'SL. , . • , , ABN 3 B ,l0 N. y,~a,...r..~ . , , , .3:91 'U
M t(wD ~!•r ~ ...........,..,.,,...I (A „ I ~ ~ ~
~ ~ .3 I I ~ olr~ ao
(^riii!^::... ~I ~.,'...,..,....,...,.,,...I
.'.'.'.'.~.m..'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.','.'.'.','.',','.'.'.~ : ~ D .I
~ ~ ,0£a ~ ~ C7'' N • I N
I m 1SN00 Nou.ona
~ I d d0 1ay1S
O { ,99'ZZti=l3
V © I1SIX3 (Oa0 05) SOSn
~ . , . . . . . . . . ...'I 0 1lyHdSy 8an0 9N ONIISIX3
~ I ~
~ ~JNI1l9Ma. .',~+vas'.~,•.~.',•.',•.'.•.~.•.•.•.'.•.~,',•.•.',•.~.',•,•.•, , . . . . . . . . . . •.I 9
'1S49NI~SIX3 Q ~ . , , d
I o ~~q
~ I 'J.
1 waned , . . , ~
3903 . . . . . . . . . . . ..'.'.'J .,.,,....~0~'.'I 0 I1SIX . . . . . , . , ~ ,~F'89 3w9~,~0.1~S „bl,61.09 ~l9'6£
• ~ • • ~ ~ • • ~ ~ •1N31N3Ad ••~NI1SI~3 • ~I 19 , l9'6£ ,65' lL ,00'89 £0
, . . . , , . , ~ ~ ~~0'Lb£ 3„Ob,Z~.~SN „ti0,90.~£ ~l0'18l . , . , . , , , . ' ' ,6S'l9t 3„9S,Lti.LLN ,l0'l8l ,l6'l9~ ,Fti'609 ZO doal }uaualpaS ~(aoaoduaal Q
„~9, lb. l , I p1o40 6ulaoa o~la0 ua6uo Yl ,9Z'9L ,06'lSl ,Ob'989 l0 aan}one}S 'qo}S }a~}n0 ua6uo 6ua snlpoa anan0 aouad }I!S S
algol anan0 uol}oa}oad }a~u~ dl a o anan Iq 1 0
aouad uol}oa}o~d aa~l 1 aup ~aMaS ~lao}IuoS MaN SS 0
M ~ ~ ~ 6uipnpxa saa~b 9'ti a~ .~S 9'ti a~ .~S 068'ZOZ =oaay ~rJ~ol doa dla
® aul~ aaMaS /~o}IuoS SS
, i . a~oyuoua ~a}oM ® ~o}sapad auoyda~al ?
..........~'Q~ , paM 6uuo~luoW O clod r(}lp}n ~0.,
y . . ' ' 1. .y (pe}ou aslM~oy}o ssalun) •d'0'a-OS- ulsog yo~o0
'i
. ~ , S1N , , ddW JIlINI~I/1 }alul gan0 }y61~ oaay
~alu~ oaay ? u6lS ~
• ~i , . ~ `0 o~
. y ~ (•xaddo) aup ~a}oM-,y, IIoN 6ul}slx3 ~
i / (•xouddo) aup so0-0- }as adld uoa~ O
~yq} saxo8 lloW gW adld uo~~ 6ul}slx3 • a'~ g
.~~od ~ uaw~o}suo~l ~ adld a~a~ouo0 paoao}ulaa d0a
/ '1S 3lHHIa1 ~is a~eH~al ~ aloyuoW ~aMaS uaao}S 0 uol}oaS pu3 pauold S3~
'3S tlH1YH~ 'M SSp ~ ssn aloyuoW ~aMaS ~(ao}IuoS ~ as}aW so0
'3S NtlH1tlH~ NtlH1tlH~ ~a}aW as}oM WM anlo~ so0 K~
4S p ~snoH 'H
~a~u~ do~0 l0 anlo~ uol~oa}dad aald ~QAd
}np uoa10 p0 anlo~ as}oM pd
/ (O4 aouo~}u3 uol~on~}suo0 ® }uoap~(H aald ~f
pua6a~
S310N

NOTES
TOTAL ESTIMATED AREA OF ALL EXISTING WETLANDS ON THE PROPERTY; 0.2814 ACRES (12260 SQ.FT.) 30 SQ.FT,)
Le end TOTAL AREA OF WETLAND IMPACT: 0.0765 ACRES (3332 SQ.FT.) 9 1 424,82' In .412.57
CUMULATIVE IMPACTS (LINEAR DISTANCE) TO ALL STREAMS ON SITE: 162 FEET
CUMULATIVE IMPACTS (LINEAR DISTANCE) TO ALL STREAMS OFF SITE: 20 FEET
TOTAL LENGTH (LINEAR DISTANCE) TO ALL STREAMS ON SITE: 763 FEET
Fire Hydrant ®Construction Entrance WETLAND IMPACTS:
pQ Water Valve CO Clean Out
WETLAND IMPACT TYPE OF IMPACT AREA OF IMPACT LOCATED WITHIN DISTANCE TC DISTANCE TO NEAREST TYPE OF WETLAND
Fvp4 Fire Prptection Valve DI Drop Inlet SITE NUMBER ACRES 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN STREAM (LIN STREAM (LINEAR FEET)
Kq Gas Valve wM Water Meter 1 FILL 0.0185 YES ADJACEN ADJACENT FORESTED FORESTED
2 FILL 0.0183 YES ADJACEN ® Gas Meter Q Sanitary Sewer Manhole 3 DRAINAGE, FILL 0.0397 YES ADJACEN ADJACENT ADJACENT FORESTED ~ `
4 TRENCH (OFFSITE) 0.03 YES ADJACEN ESTED ~ ~ ADJACENT FOR
FES Flared End Section Q Storm Sewer Manhole
RCP Reinforced Concrete Pipe a Transformer
STREAM IMPACTS:
• Existing Iron Pipe MB Mail Boxes %
STREAM IMPACT TYPE OF IMPACT LENGTH OF IMPACT STREAM NAME AVERAGE WII Q Iron pipe set -G-Gas Line (approx.) AV RA WI TH F PERENNIAL OR ~ % E GE D 0 INTERMITTENT ~ ~ ~ ~ r~
SITE NUMBER (LINEAR FEET) STREAM BEF ~ Existing Nail -W-Water Line (approx.) 1 FILL 34 UT 2 FEET STREAM BEFORE IMPACT ~ ~ ~ 2 FEET PERENNIAL ~ ~ - '
2 FILL 15 UT 2 FEET ~ 2 FEET PERENNIAL ' 3q. .
~ Sign ? Area Inlet 3 DRAINAGE, FILL 113 UT 2 FEET PERENNIAL • ~ • • ' ' ' ' ' FE T ~ ~ 2 E ~ , ,
Area Li ht 4 SEWER LINE (OFFSITE) 20 UT 2 FEET 9 ~ Curb Inlet 2 FEET PERENNIAL ~ • • ~ • • •
® Catch Basin -SD-R.C.P. (unless otherwise noted) a
~ Utility Pole. ~ Monitoring. Well DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED IMPACTS:
I ? Telephone Pedestal woter manhole 1 FILL FOR STREET WIDENIN A R.
~ G ND SHOULDE ...:~y , ,
SS Sanitar Sewer line - • ' - 2 FILL FOR STREET WIDENING AND SHOULDER. Y ® Rip Rap 3 CULVERT EMBANKMENT INSIDE THE SITE FOR ROAD CROSSING.
SS New Sanitary Sewer Line ® Tree Protection Fence 4 SEWERLINE EASEMENT OFF SITE FROM BUILDING TO MANHOLE. .....,.,f.......,... , , .
i. I
Ip Inlet Protection S Silt Fence
Outlet Stab. Structure Temporary Sediment Trap
O Distinguished Areas / 1• ' f~(ISTINf' ..VE~1ElyT,~, , yr. ,
P , . fDU'f~ ~ . X19TI G r-----~~ I N
. , ~ _ . , ' . EDGE ~ . ...'r'...... . , . , .i PAVEM T
~ o ~ ~ ~ . ~ , . i 3
i ~ ~b I' ~ , o P ~ ~~i.. ~ • i Rkn4i3;9% , ' ~ , EXIS41N61ST. i
I / , .Inv.405.9T.. ..i . ~ ~tt~'. , . , . , , , 11fiWp10 U
NG ~ EXISTI rQ Q~ ~ ~
' \ ASPHALT Q~ USGS (50 DRD) EXISTING CURB ~ ~Q ~r . 'L' ~sT..~ ~w , .
EL=422.66' = `tv' Gr "
~F _ ~ t~.'. ' o ~ w•
ST ON ur ~ ~i ~I~
~ N ~ ......rn. n' i a . ~
N ~ O ~ ~ ~~i' E . M ~
~
~ . ~ ` 1 ~ I xn ti : ,a ~ ~~``~~H I I.. ~o ~ Q.,.... 4
~ SHOI~LDE~~~~.• ~E . i;~~ m
. ~ \ a0 - N '~.:~i' X5.49• , . , . ~ . i . N i ~ ~Q .p I ~ I 0~ i -
s Y .Z ..-r 'E. . , 5' UTILIT ~ ; F- ' I, . • ~ . . '•r' a 021195 ( o~+
. . ~ ' Tom./ V ~ ~ • , \ TRIP 3 ~ I , ~ ' ' i"','.' ~ , . ~ y
.y ~ W r ~ ~ ~ Q I. ~ Q ~I ~a •
E _ , , . , ET.S ~~A NT' 0 ~ q ~i gP ~ At S I i
. I
.yr... ..........r.
. A.
L' . . . .
~ a I. . '~.o ~Q I' '
I . ~ ~ ~ ~
.UIDE~,....
S' 6H0 • L• PE•'~~9~ . .S ~ I ' ' , , ~ I
1 APPROVED 1, 3
Q ~ ti;'' I a . ~ , , , , . , , , TOWN OF CARY
~~il"-,~ ~ vv ~5 ~ vv . ~ . P~ , .
~v 0>l, j ~ . . . : ~ . " - APPROVED BY: DATE:
~ >r • yV 4 3+00 2+5~ ~ • • • R •Q 29,8 B . ~ AY IVEW D F.'... ~ DATE:
Q A 1 ~Q vv ~ . . ,i. • ENGINEERING: DATE:
M :A' o A v~, 4 .v li~... ~ L, .L! ' f ~
~ ~ 3R `1 ~ I . , ' ~ I 'R S 1n .R ~ . I En Ineers~
4 v~ v. . A ~ vvv ~ vv WEIR` ~ ~ ..'.".f,'., 9 .'~,~..'V . r' .
/ v~ 43 v vv v `•v vv A~'~ OVERFLOW I`n.' , '
v t~ v ~ to , ~ ~A. . `C ,v Q vv1. ~ v.. v 6 ~ L~. . ~v v(2 v ~ . . . • Associated Environmental .,..,...r........
vvA• fQ.'~ W ~'S ~ ~ . \ \ \ \ ~ ' . . . . . . , , , , . , . , , Consultants & En ineers g
\ v ~ ~ vv vrn ~ I , , , , , . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . .'.'.'.'.'.'.'.',','Dprti'el'J,,'$'pri~gstori,. , , ,
.............and.µelanle.J.,....,,. 3211 BRAMER DR. SUITE B . , , , . 09.7124/223' , , Raleigh, NC 27604
~ ~ ~ 0 v 5 ~ r • ~ Y vvv ~ vvv ~ ' Phone: [phone]
,W~7l,A,N~R,'
~ N M ~ Xv:~'~r ~ 4 RRUGA ~-.-~e~~ ~ • ARE . H.... rr ~ i•. 4> r•:i~~r:5~v ~ s:.r::: ma:. PI J~:~ AREA 'istin~.'20''.'PAtilic.'.,. ...............Sewer Easement....., N0. DATE
\~;i~i 55v~v .....:r..:. ~ .r . . . . . .....'.DB •3~• •%326....".. , , . , , , , , REVISIONS;
8 \ \ .V.'::. r.~... r~,~ ;v}r~,M1S : •a;;• §}•W.}1555~. ~ . ~ •n::4. . . \ \ \ .......xvuvvq vx5a~'5~x"}::•~Nh • ~ '4:•%S:v.M;}.. . .
...x~.~......,~YWyrr.S 5 •,~;r;u.}~r, /p+A o
R .JlLS ;,555 . . ~ ~ , , • 0 ~
\ ..h y • 0 ~ \ W \ Y:r l M' •"MViAA55VA \ \ ~ ~ 0;
SO, 4 ~ ~ . \ •yw ' .11:IM5 'nL'S{'::}.'AtitN.tltiti~.'N... ' ::..5.. ~ \ i \ xY : Y:1 \ \ ".,,.,..~.......a~'. '.N q bz. , S , . . , , , , . , , . .
FF 0 vv ~ ~2u~ , . ....~;,~i
. FR \ I ~ v~ ~ ~ . , . . ,5 .V.S' ...f S.N'A:,S ...51.1:: ...R.... \ • ..StN%tiY... . \ \ .5....F55........
nw... r~,..', ~ • 'd{Gxrkxrun • xrrrea.x: ••.vatsw:w. n. •:esva.x i ; ~ v x:.,....... 4 , .Cecl6 n Olive , , , .
~ O DB 592 907• ~ - ~1~1E, ~o , , . , , , . , , , . ,
`::~'t~:• G try O •~.5~ ~ p % P 0'
U--~- ~
~ ~yY ~
O p, 4 Q ~ I N . , ~ N ' PROJECT
i . d• ~ ~ .O 0 S i ~ i i r ~ \ ~ ~ o I~
i ~ i m \ ~ 1 ~ PROPOSED
l~~ ~ ~ i i~ ~ ~ , ~ i
Q ~ d~ / X A % A A 1 O ~ ~ ~ AR ~ A~ ~A ~ ~ `o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~ ISLAMIC CENTER OF CARY ' ' ` i'' A
~ •o ~ 'o~ Q' ' ~ 'o 1155 W. CHATHAM ST., CARY I i
i~ i i i i i i i~ i i ~t15 P E I~ I ~ 1 DUMPSTP~R ~ ~ ,
/ o00 00 000000 0 0 0 loo oc~o cS ~ ~lo~+~ 20;p' x 10.0 ~ i~
SEE,DET~~~ ~ GRAPHIC SCALE DRWG. T1TLE
~ ~ i I V ~ ~ I ll I
~ I \ - ~V i ~I I I ~ 50 0 50 100
STREAM AND WETLAND
~ ~ i i - - ~
S89'42'32'W J ~r:.~~.~L~r. 54.53' ~ S89'42'32"W 548.68' DELINEATION ( IN FEET )
Mandell R. Gilmore, Jr. Brian Bankler Theodore J. Strader Joseph V Vincent C. Bianco Dwain G. Hathaway Steven H. Mochrle and Jeor Joseph W. Alblaton 1 inch = 40 ft. and Jeonln0 M.
and Sandra D. and Wanda L and Jacqueline H. DB 8102/2778 and Jane A. and Theresa A. DB8694 DB 4894/452 DB 4230/841 DB 6898/277 DB 4178/97 DB 6644/620 DB 8694/1983 DRAWN BY IN SCALE 1' = 40'
CHECKED BY BC DATE FEB. 2004
JOB NUMBER DRWG. NUMBER
5029 7