Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0000108_WASTELOAD ALLOCATION_19950915NPDES DOCUWKNT SCANNIN& COVER SHEET NPDES Permit: NC0000108 Document Type: Permit Issuance Wasteload Allocation Authorization to Construct (AtC) Permit Modification Complete File - Historical Monitoring Report Instream Assessment (67B) Environmental Assessment (EA) Permit History Document Date: September 15, 1995 Thim doanment I" printed on reume paper - ignore any ooaMtent on the :-eYe Me Aide • 0 0 Page 1 Note for Jackie Nowell From: Carla Sanderson Date: Fri, Sep 15, 1995 10:47 AM Subject: RE: COATS AMERICAN To: Jackie Nowell; Jay Lucas OK, I will assume this is the final word Thanks! From: Jay Lucas on Fri, Sep 15, 1995 10:45 AM Subject: RE: COATS AMERICAN To: Carla Sanderson; Jackie Nowell I agree. I think we should at least give them the limit of 0.1 mg/l. Because they were discharging the chlorinated water illegally and didn't get caught until recently, I think we can treat it as a new discharge. From: Carla Sanderson on Fri, Sep Subject: FW: COATS AMERIC_AI To: Jackie Nowell; Jay Lucas F1�3 1 Actually - I would not mind seeing a limit on chlorine at 0.1 mg/l as asked by the facility. We cannot justify giving one based on our chlorine SOP, but since they may be willing to accept one, the 0.1 mg/l would be better than monitoring (they have values in the 300s ug/1). Jay - what do you think? If we go by SOP - we cannot really support applying a limit at this time. Hope we are not confusing you! From: Jackie Nowell on Fri, Sep 15, 1995 10:15 AM Subject: FW: COATS AMERICAN To: Jay Lucas Cc: Carla Sanderson; Dave Goodrich Per this last message on 6/26, it was our recommendation that chlorine monitoring only be placed in the renewed permit for Coats American's outfalls 001 and 002. Per the facility's request for a C1 limit of 0.1 mg/1 in the September 6th letter, we recommend that they be notified that Cl monitoring (with no numerical limit) will be sufficient. From: Jackie Nowell on Mon, Jun 26, 1995 10:41 AM Subject: RE: COATS AMERICAN To: Jay Lucas I've talked with Carla and she says that adding chlorine monitoring to the permit for 001 and 002, should be sufficient and letting them know that a chlorine limit may be added in the future. Since this is an existing facility and chlorine has been added all along, just because we're now finding out about it, -we may not be able to place a limit on them. So if you would just add chlorine monitoring and the frequency, that should take care of Coats American. I will' ask Marcia to delete the WLAs you requested (#8311, #8312, # 8313 on 6/16/95) From: Jay Lucas on Mon, Jun 26, 1995 8:08 AM Subject: RE: COATS AMERICAN Page 2 To: Jackie Nowell ` If you think we don't need a WLA, that's fine. I can use the streamline package to develop the permit and add a chlorine limit to outfalls 001 and 002. From: Jackie Nowell on Fri, Jun 23, 1995 1:28 PM Subject: COATS AMERICAN To: Jay Lucas Cc: Carla Sanderson; Dave Goodrich I HAVE REVIEWED THESE WLAS, UNLESS THERE IS SOME NEW ADDITIVE TO WETTING THESE STOOLS, IS A WLA NECESSARY? JUDGING BY THE SCHEMATIC, ONLY CHLORINE IS DESIGNATED AS AN ADDTIZVE, IF A CHLORINE LM41T IS ADDED TO PIPE 001 AND 002, IT WOULD BE @ 28 µg/1 AND WE MAY NOT NEED A WLA FOR THAT ADDITION. PLEASE LET ME KNOW IF YOU THINK MORE IS NEEDED. 4i9._� Coats North America Engineering SUBJECT: DATE: SCHEMATIC OF WASTE WATER FLOW SYLVAN PLANT — TRANSYLVANIA COUNTY ROSMAN, NORTH CAROLINA POTABLE WATER CHLORINATION FOR DISINFECTION PROCESS/COOLING WATER CHLORINATION AS BIOCIDE CQTTMPROVE.TWON THREAD�I_S-WETTED_=TO IIS�TING.B.Y,..RLINNIN LT,HROUGHt:TROUGHS.OF..RROEESS WATER CONTINUOUS�MAKE-UP/ OVERr2ow 1S MAII,�fTA�NBD*TO PREVEhR-AL•`GAE GROWTH. PACKAGE TREATMENT PLANT (AERATION) NON -CONTACT COOLING WATER -AIR COMPRESSOR AFTERCOOLER • AIR DRYER CONDENSER COOLING TOWER WET' twis ISIG-7 BLOWDOWN OUTFALL 003 OUTFALL 002 _„ OUTFALL 001 MEMORANDUM North Carolina Division of Environmental Management Water Quality Section, Permits and Engineering Unit TO: Forrest Westall, ARO CCarla Sanderson, IAU FROM: Jay Lucav -&- SUBJECT: Coats American, NC0000108 DATE: Sept. 14, 1995 Please let me know your comments on this letter by Sept. 29 and call me if you have any questions. cc: Project File MOORE & VAN ALLEN A PROFESSIONAL Lim= LIABILr[7 ComPANY ATTORNEYS AT LAW PETER J. MCCRATH JR. NATTONSBANK CORPORATE CENTER TELEPHONE 704.331.1000 DIRECT DIAL 704.331-1081 100 NORTH TRYON STREET FLOOR 47 FACSIMILE 704.331-1159 CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA 28202.4003 September 6, 1995 VIA FACSIMILE 9191733-0719 AND U. S. MAIL Mr. Jay B, Lucas, P. E. ' Environmental Engineer , North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources Division of Environmental Management Post Office Box 29535 Raleigh, North Carolina 27636 , RE: NPDES Draft Permit No. NC0000108/Coats American, Inc./Sylvan Plant WWTP/Transylvania County Dear Mr. Lucas: This firm represents Coats American, Inc., holder of the NPDES Permit which you propose to renew by issuance of a new permit in the form of the referenced draft permit. The terms, conditions and limitations of the draft permit are, in general, acceptable to Coats American, Inc. Coats American, Inc. though makes the following specific objections and comments with respect to the draft permit. 1. The name of the permittee should be Coats American, Inc., not Coats North American as currently listed in the draft permit. 2. Coats American, Inc. objects to the total residual chlorine limit in the draft permit effective May 1, 1996, for outfalls 001 and 002. Coats American, Inc. does not object in principle to the imposition of a total residual chlorine limit on those outfalls. Coats American, Inc., however, adds chlorine to wastewater at the subject facility to control algae growth in the wastewater treatment system. If chlorine concentrations fall below .10 mgll, algae growth becomes a problem which interferes with the operation of the wastewater treatment system. Coats American, Inc. believes that the draft'permit's toxicity testing requirements are adequate to address any toxicity concerns relating to chlorine. If the Division CHAR 2\f:\ROCS\PJM\LETTER\140114_1 Mr. Jay B. Lucas September 6, 1995 Page 2 of Environmental Management is concerned over chlorine concentrations for other reasons, Coats American, Inc. would like to discuss the Division's concerns to determine whether alternate limits or operational procedures are appropriate to address those concerns, while allowing the facility to control algae growth and operate its wastewater treatment system effectively. Coats American, Inc. therefore proposes a residual chlorine limit effective May 1, 1996, of .10 mg/l. Coats American, Inc. does not intend these comments to be controversial, but to only assure the permit is properly protective of water quality in North Carolina. We look forward to discussing these comments with you. Please feel free to contact me at your convenience. We will be happy to meet with you to discuss our concerns. Yours truly, MOORE & VAN ALLEN, PLLC Peter J. Mc6ra , Jr. �-- PJM/fww cc: W. Rex Stuckey A. Mark Adcock CHAR_2\F:\DOCS\PJM\LETTER\140114_1 t SOC PRIORITY PROJECT: Yes No XX IF,YES, SOC NUMBER TO: PERMITS AND ENGINEERING UNIT WATER QUALITY SECTION ATTENTION: Jay Lucas DATE: July 10, 1995 NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION COUNTY Transylvania PERMIT NUMBER NCO000108 PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Facility and Address: Coats North American Mailing: W. R. Stuckey POB 670 Toccoa, Georgia 30577 2. Date of Investigation: March 2, 1995 3. Report Prepared By: Kerry Becker 4. Persons Contacted and Telephone Number: Eddie Briscoe 704-862-4215 5. Directions to Site: Coats America is located on old U.s. Hwy 64 approximately 3 mile east of Rosman, NC. 6. Discharge Point s), List for all discharge points: Latitude: 350 10, 001, Longitude: 820 48' 3011 Attach a USGS map extract and indicate treatment facility site and discharge point on map, U.S.G.S. Quad No. 185»NE U.S.G.S. Quad Name Rosman, NC 7. Site size and expansion area consistent with application? x_ Yes No If No, explain: Page 1 8. Topography (relationship to flood plain included): Flat, located within the flood plain. 9. Location of nearest dwelling: >500 ft. 10. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: Galloway Creek a.. Classification:�C b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: 04-03-01 C. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses: Aquatic and wildlife habitat and propagation PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS 1. a. Volume of wastewater to be permitted Pipe 001 (Non -contact cooling water) >0.050 MGD Pipe 002 (Wet Twisting Operation) 0.010 - 0.050 MGD Pipe 003 (Domestic plant) 0.015 MGD (Ultimate Design Capacity) b. What is the current permitted capacity of the Wastewater Treatment facility? Pipe 001: No limit Pipe 002: No limit Pipe 003: 0.015 MGD C. Actual treatment capacity of the current facility (current design capacity Pipe 001: N/A Pipe 002: N/A Pipe 003: 0.015 MGD d. Date(s) and construction activities allowed by previous Authorizations to Construct issued in the previous two years: None within the past two years. e. Please provide a description of existing or substantially constructed wastewater treatment facilities: Pipe 003: The existing facility consists of an extended aeration package plant followed by effluent chlorination. f. Please provide a description of proposed wastewater treatment facilities: None proposed. g. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: Pipe 002 effluent bioassay has shown some toxicity; cause is unknown. Page 2 2. Residuals handling and utilization/disposal scheme:The residuals will be pumped and hauled by a commercial septage hauler to the City of Brevard's sludge handling facilities. 3. Treatment plant classification.(attach completed rating sheet): Class II 4. SIC Codes (s) : 2284' 5. Wastewater Code Primary 02 Secondary 14, 55 Main Treatment Unit Code:pipe 003 060-7 PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION 1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grant Funds or are any public monies involved. (municipals only)? 2. Special monitoring or limitations (including toxicity) requests: Include toxicity monitoring requirement 3. Important SOC, JOC, or Compliance Schedule dates: (Please indicate) N/A Date Submission of Plans and Specifications Begin Construction Complete Construction 4. Alternative Analysis Evaluation: Has the facility evaluated all of the non -discharge options available. Please provide regional perspective for each option evaluated. Spray irrigation could be a possibility. Spray Irrigation: Connection to Regional Sewer System: Subsurface: Other disposal options: 5. Other Special Items: None Page 3 PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS The permit should be renewed noting pipe 002 as wet twisting instead of noncontact cooling water. Acute toxicity tests have shown this effluent to be extremely toxic at times. Toxicity monitoring should be added to the permit (fa,"?,JiA,V0;L), Signatufib of Report Preparer r- Writer Quality Regional Supervisor 741 Date Page 4 A (} EFFLUENTT THAT ATTONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS SUMVLCR (A n 1 1 - Octo b r 3I) Perini€ Na NC0-V)OM8 e a , p During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall(s) serial number 003. Such discharges shall be Iimited and monitored by the permittee as specified below: Effluent Characterlstics Flow BOD, 5 day, 20°C Total Suspended Residue NH3 asN Fecal Coliform (geometric mean) Total Residual Chlorine Tomperature Discharge Limitations ManitorIng Re ulrements Measurement Sample "Sample Monthly Ava, Weekly Avg, Daily Max FtgAuengy I-Y-" LOCation 0.01 5 MGD Weekly Instantaneous I or E 30.0 mg/l 45.0 mg/l 2/Month Grab E 30.0 mg/l 45.0 mg/I 2/Month Grab E 21.0 mg/I 2/Month Grab E 200.01100 ml 400.0 /100 ml 2/Month Grab E Daily Grab E Weekly Grab E * Sample locations: f:; - Effluent, i - influent The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units and shall be monitored 2/month at the effluent by grab sample. There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts. e(,� AnAQ� co—, - - c�Atlowp+( C.>rtr�l� � APPIcc�}�as�l LUCP*-5 No aaCA �a� P'P� 001 Nr'M o0 Z,