20030474 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20030416

?0? WATF9P
'0 y
? r
> y
May 13, 2003
DWQ# 03-0474
Mecklenburg County
Mr. Daniel Fisher
James II Developers, LLC
5605 77 Center Drive, Suite 270
Charlotte, NC, 28217-2743
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Fisher:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions, to place permanent fill in 0.054 acre of wetlands and 134 linear
feet of perennial streams in order to construct a road crossing associated with the Delta Grove Phase II Subdivision in Mecklenburg
County, as described in your application received complete by the Division of Water Quality on April 16, 2003, and in additional
correspondence received May 1, 2003. After reviewing your application, we have determined that this fill is covered by General Water
Quality Certification Number 3404, which can be viewed on our web site at htto://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. This Certification allows
you to use Nationwide Permit Number 14 when it is issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.. This approval is also valid for the
Neuse River Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 213 .0233). In addition, you should get any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead
with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations.
Also this approval will expire when the accompanying 404 permit expires unless otherwise specified in the General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your project, you must
notify us in writing and you may be required to send us a new application for a new certification. If the property is sold, the new owner
must be given a copy of the Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total wetland
and/or stream fills for this project (now or in the future) including future phases of this subdivision exceed one acre or 150 linear feet of
perennial streams, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). For this approval to be valid, you
must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification, as well as the additional conditions listed below:
1. You are required to return the attached Certification of Completion form to notify DWQ when all work included in the 401 Certification
has been completed;
2. Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all retained jurisdictional wetlands, waters and protective buffers in order
to assure compliance for future wetland, water and buffer impact. These mechanisms shall be put in place prior to impacting any
wetlands, waters and/or buffers approved for impact under this Certification Approval and Authorization Certificate. A sample deed
notification can be downloaded from the 401/Wetlands Unit web site at httpJ/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands.
3. The culvert required for this project shall be installed in such a manner that the original stream profiles are not altered (i.e. the depth
of the channel must not be reduced by a widening of the streambed). Existing stream dimensions (including the pattern and profile)
are to be maintained above and below locations of each culvert. The culverts shall be designed and installed to allow for aquatic life
movement as well as to prevent head cutting of the streams. If any of the existing pipes are or become perched, the appropriate
stream grade shall be re-established or, if the pipes installed in a perched manner, the pipes shall be removed and re-installed
correctly.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days
of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina
General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, Mail Service Center 6714, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its
conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you have any
questions, please telephone Mike Parker in DWQ's Mooresville Regional Office at 704-663-1699 or Cyndi Karoly in the Central Office in
Raleigh 919-733-9721.
Si cerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 [phone]
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748
Delta Grove Phase II - Meek. County - NCDWQ# 03-0474
Subject: Delta Grove Phase II - Meck. County - NCDWQ# 03-0474
y
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 17:57:43 EDT .40
From: [e-mail] A 49.
To: [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail] &k®
Mr. Horan (or Mike if you prefer),
In response to your letter dated April 24, 2003 for a request for more
detailed road crossing information for the Delta Grove Phase II Subdivision
project in Mecklenburg County, please find attached a two page PDF of a
drawing prepared at a larger scale. Several notes and dimensions have been
added to benefit you in your review of this project.
Your letter had requested seven copies be mailed to your attention. I checked
with John Dorney today and he said that the PDF would be acceptable.
You may note that the applicant has been able to reduce the actual impacts
proposed for the project through local approval of the use of less rip rap
and other design modifications.
The Corps has already sent the verification letter for use of NWP 14 on this
project.
Could you please review the attached to ensure that you are satisfied with
the additional information presented in pursuit of a complete application.
Thank you very much for your assistance.
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you should have questions or if there
is any way in which I can be of assistanco"ktacL you.
Respectfully, e?+ Iff
Craig R. Wyant RLA/SWS
A Fine Line Design
1960 Chapman-Wyant Lane
Lincolnton NC 28092
Name: delta road.pdf
Rdeltaroad.pdf Type: Acrobat (application/pdf)
Encoding: base64
Download Status: Not downloaded with message!
1 of 1 5/2/2003 7:56 AM
Perennial Channel
at Upstream End
Rip Rap Apron

W 12

2
J 1 1 '? ?

3 ,. ,.

744.73
3/8'/FT.

Filled Area Over Pipe
U' U
2
? 1/4'
1 L .
3

W 11

Zf o
BLEND INTO DOWNSTREAM DUAL 66' CMP W
CHANNEL & ARMOR AT { M
NEW BEND IN CHANNEL \I V I
INVERT OUT 735.03 INVERT IN = 735.76
NCDOT STD # 838.34
734.04 66" CMP 2 FOR CONC. ENDWALLS
NCDOT STD # 838.64 FOR
with Headwalls BRICK MASONRY ENDWALLS
- Perennial Channel
at Downstream End
1"=10'
Road Crossing Longitudinal Section
Delta Grove Phase II
DWQ Project Number: 03-0474
\o??? warF,? pG

4®y ISSd
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
James II Developers
Attn: Daniel Fisher
5605 77 Center Drive, Suite 270
Charlotte, NC 28217-2743
Dear Mr. Fisher:

April 24, 2003
DWQ # 03-0474
Mecklenburg County
On April 16, 2003 the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) was notified by receipt of your
application regarding your plan to fill waters for the purpose of constructing Delta Grove Phase II
Subdivision in Mecklenburg County. Approval from DWQ is required to disturb these areas. Please
provide 7 copies of the following information and refer to the DWQ # listed above in your reply. Please
show these on maps of suitable scale (for instance 1" = 100 feet) so we can begin to determine your
projects' compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500.
1. Please provide a more detailed site plan showing placement of pipe (including rip-
rap/headwall) with construction corridors.
Please telephone Mike Horan at 919-733-3575 if you have any questions or would require copies
of our rules or procedural materials. This project will remain on hold as incomplete in accordance with
15A NCAC 2H .0505(c). The processing time for this application will begin when this information is
received. If we do not hear from you by writing within three (3) weeks we will assume you no longer
want to pursue the project and will consider it withdrawn.
Sincerely,
ar..,4, lc/vy
JRD/bs
cc: Mooresville DWQ Regional Office
Asheville Corps of Engineers
Central Files
File Copy
John R. Dorney
401 Water Quality Certification Program
N NNR
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (http://h2o.enr.state.nc.uslncwetlands
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan Klimek, P.E., Director Division of Water Quality

FILE COPT 401 ISSUED .
04 F%
Office Use Only:
• V-d-04',yi4 April 2001
USA.C.E Action ID No. 200330369 DNVQ No.
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit
? Section 10 Permit
® 401 Water Quality Certification
? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration.Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ?
' 11. Applicant Information
' 1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: James II Developers, LLC, attn: Daniel H. Fisher
Mailing Address: 5605 77 Center Drive. Suite 270
Charlotte, NC 28217-2.743
Telephone Number: 704-295-1500 Fax Number: 704-295-1501
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: N/A
Company Affiliation: N/A
Mailing Address: N/A
t
' Telephone Number: N/A Fax Number: N/A
E-mail Address: N/A

1 Page 3 of 12

IIl. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan. must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
' boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than I I by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applican. t will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Delta Grove Phase II Subdivision
2. T.I.P. Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): Tax Parcel ID # 107-111-07,
107-111-05,107-111-12
' 4. Location
County: Mecklenburg Nearest Town: Charlotte, NC
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Delta rove Phase 11
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): .
The site is located on the west side of James Road approximately 2500' soutf.
..C at- - tea ---a___ _r Tl_ _ Tl _-- 1 T T 1 t
with The Plaza to the northwest. 35-15-00 Lat/ 80-43-45 Lon
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): Long
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application:
' Single family residence, outbuildings, existing sanitary sewer line, for-
est, old field successional area, small breached earthen dam
7. Property size (acres): 9.66 acres - from plat survey
' 8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): UT - Reedy Creek
(NC Stream Index 13-17-8)
9. River Basin: Yadkin River Basin
(Note ... this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at littt)://h2o.enr.stite.nc.us/,tdiiiin/mat.)s/.)
Page 4 of 12

C
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work:
Construcion of one minor road <
access
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project:
Typical site construction equipment. Graders, loaders, trucks, etc
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this
Surrounding land uses are resides
IV. Prior Project History
' If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USAGE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and. date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn.. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other. useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated. mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
' construction schedules.
U.S. Army Corps jurisdictional determination Action ID 200330369.

' V. Future Project Plans
Are any additional permit requests anticipated for this project in the future? If so, describe the
anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current
g a )plication:
l o additional permit requests are anticipated for the project in the future

VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs, may be.
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 5 of 12

u

C

l . Wetland Impacts
Wetland Impact
Site Number
indicate: on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
104-year Floodplain**
esino) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of wetland***
1 fill/pipe .057 no W linear/channel

° List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
tOO-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FL•MA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved heal floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at htrn:flcVvw.fem,?.gnv,
*"* List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Say, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: 0.494 acres
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.057 acres
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
Teasespecify)
Site 1. i e/Ri -Ra 148.91f UT Reed Creek 5' OHWM Perennial
(road)

r.ut cacu uupacc xparatety and wenury temporary impacts. impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and alter, and net loss/gain).
srabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditchingfstraightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
. aril names can be bun on USU topographic maps. a stream has no name, list as UT (untamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
wvAvw,usas.go?. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www to2o7one coin,
%Vww..mene ueM.cb" etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in. feet) to all streams on site.. 148.9 Lf.
Page 6 of 12

i

fl

3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S.
Open Water Impact
Site Number

("indicate on ma)
N/A
Type of Impact*

N/A Area of
Impact

(acres)
N/A
Name of Waterbody
tf applicable)

N/A Type of Waterbody
(take, pond, estua
ry> sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)
N/A

List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: till, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc. .
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland. and stream impacts should be
included above in the wctland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/einbankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
VII.
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed durin construction to reduce im acts.
The only road frontage for the site is alon James Road and at a stub out
from a acent property to the Bout (Whitley Lane). The site contains one
OLicaiii a3141111VI WHICH 111USL lie crossea at some point in order to aeess the
te.
Page 7 of 12

7

VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE -- In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
' in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
littp:.,Ili2o,enr.state.ne.us/newettands/stnngi(le,html.
' 1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.

n

Page 8 of 12

acre.

u

I

2. Mitigation. may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 40I/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at bttp:r,'h2o c_nr stite nc us/ti /index htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
' IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land? Yes ? No
' If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at. [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
' Yes ? No ? N/A
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ? N/A
' X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
' justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
' Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A. NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
' Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
' Page 9 of 12

Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. I_f buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the-
he buffer
multipliers.

L
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
N/A 3 N/A
2 N/A 1.5 N/A
Total N/A N/A
4.vuv l cctunus our -u rccr perpenotcutar tram near Dank of channel; zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone t.
' If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 213.0242 or .0250. N/A
' XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
o a area o site = 9.66 acres. o a propose impervious area = ac.
' pprox><mate propose impervious = 28.7 o.
XI1. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
' Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
' Existing Public Sanitary Sewer is present on-site
' X1II. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
' Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
t
Page 10 of 12

11

1IV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
' work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
L
r

US Army Corp§ Of Engineers Field Offices and County Coverage
Asheville Regulatory Field Office Alexander Cherokee Iredell Mitchell Union
US Army Corps of Engineers Avery Clay Jackson Polk Watauga
151 Patton Avenue Buncombe Cleveland Lincoln Rowan Yancey
Room 208 Burke Gaston Macon Rutherford
Asheville, NC 28801-5006 Cabarrus Graham Madison Stanley
Telephone: [phone] Caldwell Maywood McDowell Swain
Fax: [phone] Catawba Henderson Mecklenburg Transylvania
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office: Alamance Durham Johnston Rockingham Wilson
' US Army Corps Of Engineers Allcghany Edgecombe Lee Stokes Yadkin
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road Ashe Franklin Nash Surry
Suite 120 Caswell Forsyth Northampton Vance
Raleigh, NC 27615 Chatham Granville Orange Wake
' Telephone: [phone] Davidson Guilford Person Warren
Fax: [phone] Davie Halifax Randolph Wilkes
Washington Regulatory Field Office Beaufort Currituck Jones Pitt
' US Army Corps Of Engineers Bertie Dare Lenoir Tyrrell
Post Office Box 1000 Camden Gates Martin Washington
Washington. NC 27889-1000 Carteret* Green Pamlico Wayne
Telephone: [phone] Chowan Hertford Pasquotank
' Fax: [phone] Craven Hyde Perquimans *Croatan National Forest Only
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office Anson Duplin Onslow
US Army Corps Of Engineers Bladen Harnett Pender
' Post Office Box 1890 Brunswick Hoke Richmond
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890 Carteret Montgomery Robeson
Telephone: [phone] Columbus Moore Sampson
' Fax: [phone] Cumberland New Hanover Scotland

Page I I of 12
L
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)

Exhibits
Project Location - USGS
NC-DWQ Stream Classification
' National Wetlands Inventory
USDA-NRCS Soils Survey
' Hydric Soils List
Site Aerial Photography
' Letter to USFWS
Letter to NC-SHPO
' Wetland Survey
Wetland Delineation Map / Site I Location
' Stream Evaluation Forms / Photography
Wetland Data Forms / Photography

C
C
C
r
f• `¦ • 7, Lase ew ! l -A AL -
?? .?-•??.'_' iF 1 - -1/? ? ? ? ? `\? '? - ? ? ti`p'--?? ? ?.` .
4/ Boo
R?
Tom; 292
r • ?0. ?' 1I. 1 f i l J?r ? . ¦ 6
• yK53) E w Z r I tr, f
fiJY r" ? - ? r i I.' . t'?l J ! I ? ?? • 'J,.'•? ?r_ ? .g?
T.- t f Ir ¦',14? • I ?`? , 4 1?..?? ?? -. ``? 1 r; 1 _ ?' ` .. 5" .?._.. 1 :1
1¦ j? ?? *??4` t •?.Jl?, tt ;T' -*` '?" =c:; w • ?iI ?A ?` r ,? i+??. `t` ?4_ '} R ,I(•
• - •' ' ? •
r r • • •. ``fit// • ?'?i; . /i IV 3 s '.?• ¦ l4 It 9 AV
311
Source: USGS 7.5 minute quads, Harrisburg (1993) and Mint Hill (1993), NC
Delta Grove Phase 2 Site
James 11 Developers LLC Scale: F=1000'
Mecklenburg County, NC NORTH Project Location
NC DENR - DIVISON' OF WATER QUALITY
28 .0300
I . 03E35 YA7K1N RI;JRTt BASIN
Classification
Name of Stream Description Class Late Index No.
I Turk Creek From source to a point 0.1 WS-11 08103/92 13_17-6-3 41)
mile upstream of Cabarrus
County SR 1615
I Turk Creek From a point 0.1 mile W$-11 CA 08/03/92 33417-6-3-(2)
upstream of Cabarrus County
SR 1615 to Coddle Cr.
I Emerson Branch From source to a point 1.2 WS-11 08103/92 13-17-6-4-(1) .
miles upstream of mount
B"merson Branch From a point 1.2 miles WS-11 CA 03103/92 13-17-6.4-(2)
upstream of mouth to Coddle
Creek
Mill Creek. From source to a point 0.3 WS-11 08/03/92 13_17_6-5-(1)
mile downstream of Cabarrus
' County SR 1609
Mill Creek Fromm a point 0.3 mile WS-11 CA 08103/92 13'17-6_5-(2)
downstream of Catarrss
county SA 1609 to Coddle
' Creek
Coddle Creek From a paint 0,2 mile C 08/03/9 23-17-6-;a.51
upstream of N.C. 14wy. 73 to
' Rocky Rider
Afton Run From source to Coddle Creek C 08/03/92 13-17_6-6
:wolf Meadow Branch From source to Coddle Creek C 08/03/92 13-17-6-7
' Lady Branch From source to Coddle Creek C 08103/93 13-17-6-8
Back Creek From source to Rocky River C 04106/55 13-17-7
Fuda Creek From sources to Back. Creek C 04/C6/55 1,3-17.7-1
Reedy Creek From source to Rocky River C 04/06/55 ,3.L17-8
Delta Lake Entire lake and connecting C b " 3.17-8.1
Stream to Reedy Creek
Crozier Branch From source to Reedy Creek C 04/06/5$ 13-17-8-2
Wallace Creek From source to Reedy Creek C 04/06/55 13-17-8-3
'
tmcKee Creek From source to Reedy Creek C 04/06155 13-17-8-4
Clear Creek From source to McKee Creek C 04/06/55 13-17-8-4-1
Caldwell Creek From source to Reedy Creek C 04/06/55 13_17_8-5
' Irish Buffalo Creek From :source to a point 0.5 WS-Iii 08/03/92
mile upstream of Rowan
County SR 1197
Irish Buffalo Creek Froni a point 0.5 mile WS-111 CA 08103/92 13-17.9-(1'
'
(Fannapolic Lake upstream of Rowan County 5R
(Cannon Lake)] 1137 to Kannapolis Water
supply Dam
Irish Buffalo Creek From Kannapolis Water C 09/01/74 13-17-9-t2?
Supply Dam to Rocky River
Punderburka Lake Entire Lake and connecting C 09/01174 13-17-9-3
streams to Irish Buffalo
' Creek
Source: Classifications and Water Quality
Standards Assigned to the Waters of the
Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin (NCDENR)

3 _
le W
E?
1 _
? $t
A:Z1 _Z,
# i a
, j
r
Ilk.
r -
f
°- lY 1 s F r. ? ? a
}
TF
s¢
PsSich
1, 7?
is a{ : 1
t
s (
i r
.. .?2
AA)
' a
s s '" N?s - 1 . ti
. iF F? s_? a .. i f ?s ` • jj _
3 . c
jA.
.
i F M
- t - ? s R i s f a a
Source: USFWS NWI maps, Harrisburg and Mint Hill, NC, Quads, 1991
Delta Grove Phase 2 Site
James II Developers LLC. Scale: 1"=1000'
Mecklenburg County, NC NORTH N.W.I. Map
f - V a B
Source: USDA-NRCS Soil Survey for Mecklenburg County, Sheets 5 and 8
Delta Grove Phase 2 Site
James II Developers LLC Scale: F=1000'
Mecklenburg County, NC NORTH Soils Survey
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Technical Guide
Soil Conservation Service Section II-A-2
March 1990
HYDRIC SOILS
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Hydric codes (HC): 1 -.hydric soils, only because of saturation for
a significant period during the growing season;
' 2 - hydric soils that are frequently flooded for
long or very long periods during the growing
seasca; and
3 - hydric soils that are ponded for long or very
long periods during the growing season.
Vegetation codes (VC): 1 - hydric soils that support woody vegetation under
' natural conditions; and
2 - hydric soils thaLt donot support woody vegetation
under natural conditions.
' Hydric soils in this county cannot be farmed under natural conditions without
removing woody vegetation or hydrology manipulation.
A. Map units that are all hydric soils or have hydric soils as a major component.
Map Unit
__Symbol HC VC Map Unit Name
NONE
' B. Map units with inclusions of hydric soils or have wet spots.
' Map Unit Hydric Normal location
Symbol Map Unit Name Inclusion HC VC of Inclusion
HeB Helena sandy loam, 2 to poorly 1 1 depressions
' 8?percent slopes drained along drainageways
soils
' IrA Iredell fine sandy loam, poorly 1 1 depressions
0 to 1 percent slopes drained
soils
' Mo Monacan loam poorly 1 1 depressions
drained adjoining upland
soils sideslopes
Hydric Soils List, USDA NRCS,
1 Mecklenburg County, NC
Source: USGS Orthophoto Quads, Images 03508043.SWC Harrisburg SW
and 03508051.NWC Mint Hill NW, 1994
Delta Grove Phase 2 Site
James II Developers LLC Scale: 1 "=±500'
Mecklenburg County, NC NORTH Site Aerial Photo
I April 14, 2003
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville ; NC" 28801
[phone]
Re: Project Review for Protected Species
Delta Grove Phase II Subdivision, 9.66 acres, Mecklenburg. County, NC
Applicant: James II Developers, LLC, attn: Daniel H. Fisher
5605 77 Center Drive, Suite 270
' Charlotte, NC 28217-2743
704-295-1500 [e-mail]
' Dear Sir or Madam:
Please find enclosed for your review a project location map for a 9.66 acre site in Mecklenburg
County, NC. Could you please compare the location of this project with your database of known Pro-
tected Species Resources to determine if they would be present at this location. The site is located
within the Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin within the headwaters of an un-named tributary to Reedy Creek
(NC Stream Index 13-17-8). The site is located on the Harrisburg (1993) and Mint Hill (1993), NC,
' USGS 7.5 minute quads.
This project is being forwarded to your attention as a part of the Clean Water Act 404/401'(PCN)
permitting process. The applicant proposes to construct one minor road crossing as part of a single
' family subdivision. The proposed activities will be performed under the conditions and authorizations
of Corps Nationwide Permit 14 and the accociated State DWQ Water Quality Certifications.
All wetlands and waters have been delineated on this site and have been surveyed and verified by
the U. S. Army Corps. (Corps Action ID #200330369). The site contains a total area of 0.494 acres of
wetlands and waters. This includes 'a downstream segment of a single important perennial channel and
an upstream segment of freshwater wetland containing multiple braided perennial channel segments.
A single minor road crossing is proposed in a manner which avoids and minimizes impacts to
wetlands and waters. The crossing has been located upstream of highest quality perennial channel and
' downstream of the area of the site containing wetland and braided channels.
A total of 148.9 linear feet of single perennial stream channel will be impacted by this proposal. A
total area of 2470.6 square feet or 0.057 acre impacts below the OHWM will occur to wetlands and
waters for the entire project. Impacts to other channels and wetlands will be avoided and stream buffers
will be provided wherever possible.
Thank you very much for your review of the enclosed. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you
should have questions or if there is any way in which I can be of assistance to you.
Respectfully, 1
' Craig R. WYant RLA/SWS
A Fine Line Design
1960 Chapman-Wyant Lane
Lincolnton NC 28092
704-735-1084
[e-mail]
cc: James H Developers LLC
' Steve Chapin, U.S. Army Corps
John Dorney, NC Division of Water Quality
April 14, 2003
' Department of Cultural Resources/Division of Archives
Attn: Renee Gledhill-Earley
4617 Mail Service Center
' Raleigh NC 27699-4617
919-733-4763,
Renee. Glendhill-Earley @ ncmail.net,
Re: Project Review for Historic or Cultural Resources
Delta Grove Phase II Subdivision, 9.66 acres, Mecklenburg County, NC
' Applicant: James II Developers, LLC, attn: Daniel H. Fisher
5605 77 Center Drive, Suite 270
Charlotte, NC 28217-2743
704-295-1500 [e-mail]
' Dear Ms. Gledhill-Earley:
Please find enclosed for your review a project location map for a 9.66 acre site in Mecklenburg
County, NC. Could you please compare the location of this project with your database of known Cul-
tural or Historic Resources to determine if they would be present at this location. The site is located
within the Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin within the headwaters of an un-named tributary to Reedy Creek
' (NC Stream Index 13-17-8). The site is located on the Harrisburg (1993) and Mint Hill (1993), NC,
USGS 7.5 minute quads.
This project is being forwarded to your attention as a part of the Clean Water Act 404/401 (PCN)
permitting process. The applicant proposes to construct one minor road crossing as part of a single
family subdivision. The proposed activities will be performed under the conditions and authorizations
of Corps Nationwide Permit 14 and the accociated State DWQ Water Quality Certifications.
All wetlands and waters have been delineated on this site and have been surveyed and verified by
the U. S. Army Corps. (Corps Action ID #200330369).
A pedestrian survey of the site was conducted to note the presence of potential historical, archaeo-
logical or cultural, resources. One single family residence and outbildings were observed. The date of
' construction of the buildings is not known but they appear to be less than fifty to seventy-five years
old. No cemeteries or other structures or other resources were observed on this site at the time of
observation. The entire site appears to have been previously used for agriculture and has regrown into
' young and medium aged forest.
Thank you very much for your review of the enclosed. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you
should have questions or if there is any way in which I can be of assistance to you.
' Respectfully,
' Craig R. Wyant RLA/SWS
A Fine Line Design
1960 Chapman-Wyant Lane
' Lincolnton NC 28092
704-735-1084
[e-mail]
' cc: James II Developers LLC
Steve Chapin, U.S. Army Corps
John Dorney, NC Division of Water Quality

u

VICINITY MAP
ROAD
WETLANDS DATA
'OTAL WETLANDS ACREAGE: 0.494 ACRES
APPLICANT : JAMES 0 DEVELOPERS, '_C.
5605 n CENTER DR.. SUITE 270
CHARLOTTE NC 28217-274,7
PHONE [phone]
WETLAND DELINEATION PERFORMED BY.
CRAG R 'NYANT RLA/SWS
1960 CHAPMAN-WYANT LANE
UNCOLNTON. NC 28092
aHOME'. [phone]
X81 i
I

TOTAL AC TRACT 1: 8.68 ACRES
\
TOTAL AC TRACT 2: 0.98 ACRES ?\
\\ 1

TOTAL AC TRACT 3: 0.24 ACRES `

MINUS R/W AREA #1: 0.07 ACRES
MINUS R/W AREA #2: 0.11 ACRES
MINUS R/W AREA #3: 0.03 ACRES o 1
MINUS R/'N AREA #4: 0.03 ACRES

9.66 ACRES

460
m
?.,
200.6
lS•
' r e[
I4
E -
`` ?
WO
69.80' SW15'25'N ?
AF
1WAO \
r
?FOY
164.37 ?? ,
w
ter a RM?
M OOIb-Ne \
g ? ew $
NW

TRACT 2
x9v a r0eA9

Nr I?
i'1A2E .S.
ua Q
51?

y
b
q J

Ma OA rSeRr
I? V 9GIAC WWOfd
}}
Aql
I
I NI1
I
:,II RI
x13 u ryl O-
IrvR ?
)NM
31 ??
s) V N-
I' 1
PoMO i vrry $1SYr 1 ??? $I / b?. ? w
\AkA M 46,77' I / dl wF w r9RlAW1 U
w.04
_ °hirty`? ?h *L u : 97.E nx?io-mnLi nun w ?a rmela. r
R b61? 1?? 9 W ` au
Y Z.
` ` `tA'l terry 1(r . i,P 50292'02"M , lr
./A \
? _ e9 x/IY _ - ;arzs`vrr -' --- N i nn -A P
- -_---------___.,.,e =r«
NOTES
• NO NCGS TRAVERSE STATION WTH* 2000'.
4 9E10NGS BASED ON SUBJECT DEED W 01589 PG 592
. AREA CALCULATED BY COORDINATE MEMW
. ERROR OF CLOSURE • 1:10.WOF
. TAN PARCEL NUMBER 107-111-07, 101-111-05, 101-n1-12
. PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO ALL EASEMENTS AND R\WS OF RECORD NOT SHOWN HEREON
. NO PORTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY LIES MT14IN A SPECIAL FLOW
NA7ARIlAREA PERFIRM MAP 90165 0090 B DATED 03/02/96-
• MEDLAR' RARILYMC CO. DID NOT PERFORM A TITLE SEARCH
OR AN ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY ON SUBJECT PROPERTY,
• PLAT NOT FOR RECORDATION
I, DaMd M. M4a cn0fy Nat t 81 plat we Yom we. mYYWmlaWA MelanOsNon m ccWa mo detpyNMWb
mY wpelWlpn : thot 11< balndn th nOt eurwyed a40NW 4 1: hom nlarmotlot nd
OoOk SM on, _ »? toot tM .aMp of prSFy' CapppGG ie I: 10.900 .: Nat uN dot
ne pnpaed 'n oc donor uth G.S. 47-30 oe I-wded Wit- my cwlgE.. vy?otun,'.gh,"tbn
n-l- -4 eea thl. _ JIM wy of 0- .. A.D. 20-M
Pmlasbna IoM 9uwlor - 1-1286
= S,se
.JRI
Dq.. .DM
GRAPHIC SCALE
w u M .m 9?
lN FEw)
I mch = 80 N.
?\ A9x
mm
.MMF? L24
LL
22
Ya0
a
a m6car

V? %IvIll 1 1
Fo?nO
AL CHANNEL
SIte'Nlq\ WELD . LOCATED
1 \/ WETLANDS AND WATERS
- YEND PERENNIAL CHANNEL
\\L36
Om oWAW
(y
\`.

YeO \.
W14Alf
xx
\
is LA Htt
\
`

J
\
TRACT L ,\
e9. a rSAaWY ?
141 I{l 1D{!IY di4L1j
99 WeFn
>w
D9 1589-592 I
adw a n?Nnr.
99Apmr Lwx caM
OI4A1-N7
rMWb SD8'O)00-
8019' oaa
f
gPAIO Y
a ose6.ne
I'I
Corps. Action ID: 200330369
'TWS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT ACCURATELY DEPICTS ME
BCUNDARY OF THE JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER
ACT UNDER THE PRESENT LAW AND REGULATIONS AS OEIERYMED BY THE
UNDERSIGNED ON INK DATE. UNLESS THERE IS A CHANGE IN THE LAW OR
OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, TARS BETMMA71ON OF SECTION 404
JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED UPON AS ACCURATE FOR A PERIOD NOT TO
E%OID FIVE LEAK FROM THIS DAC,OWS MANUAL WAS UTILIZED.
NAIE_y?4^a3e_
TITLE I./. C-1 Sp?ela?i S>~
DATE 3 L9 X03
NOTE: SURVEYED UNE REPRESENTS MEASURED WETLANDS BONDARY
AS DELINEATED BY CRAG R. WYANT RLA/SWS, A NNE LNE DESIGN.
N
a
n
U i
N n
,! vo
OU
0
O
v
•J Y
.r;
n w
N ?
J Z
'>UZn2
w ?
^ '_o
N?a w
an
On
J 3 In o
1 K J
NxaI I
0
0
G
? o
n
C 0
? ry
O p p o
m 5
2 N
N \ I F
m o
i
i m R
nl E i
01
r_ oo
WO ti U
Z
I1??,,?O o 0
F+i Q U
5
O
Z
?C? v
? O
rr^^ U '
vl 1 C,
N 0 O
a
oz v
?r*z O Y v
U
L 1
Qq? f n
C)
O
.a 0. o u10
W
z?
E,
0
Q U O
E- >
c

x?

4d(j ac.
t Perennial
s
MARY JO HELMS DRIVE
t\
-A • Sample Plot Locations
Wetland
T-2 • Stream Transects
n/ Perennial Channel (JD)

0
n

r
US ARMY CORPS/ENGRS ID:18282714858
OCT 09'98 9:23 No -002 P
INTERMITTENT CHANNE>I,
EVALUATION FORM `?= I
i!? e14T?1-512-' Pwscs WL-3.4 wt_ Ila
AC110N in APPLICANT'NAMN. Ikk PPS Pn4l.-a LidSE Z DATF_ 1_-Gi - O Z
1'ROPOSYD C111ANNE1. WORK (14, clCivcM rnincntion, ctc.) . !-IC r t?1
T'2(9 Ta -----
WATERBUnY/uivl;R BASIN _ i?-ga?y Y -*4 1t Sig [AUNTYIC1TY„ lam[ r igl cum; I?? ?_
IiKCENTWFATl"-1 CONn1VONS 1110 _.124L1?( FAl A , I &t. Pe--.f din iS _ _ 4 (.}ri=5
Does Channel Appear On A Quad Or Sons Map? ®/ N Approx. Drainage Area: ?_3 AC--.
ui?nnannu??/unliniininm?i?irni? nu?imui?i?ii?iiur??liunru?niunniuuniinnuiniumuu?nuiui?r?urruuruiriirrarii?iuinurmiui?ruumiiiinainanniiiiiai?ui?aiai?inu
Determinatinn:
Perennial Channel (9160) Important Channel: Lt: FROJXCT MGR lultlals..
intelmlittent Channel (Pm=Q Unimportant Chalinc): LP
Ephemeral Channel (,16 jd) (ulluch map indicating 1=11on of impnrlant/unin,ltonaat chennd)
Ditch Through Upland ("01d)
P:Vntnptor'm ?I?Gnartart: c?g
(if o(hrr Ihaa C.O.P. projrcl mctoatSar)
? 12
P=11resen4 SP- Present NP=Not present z r,? 4
?r
4
Important To Domestic Water Supply? Y/(9)
I NCDWO Stream Classification Form
' Project Name: JAMS RoAb 1F AMz Z
DWQ Project Number: µ/q
Nearest Named Stream: RseDY ezusK
USGS QUAD: H4-?c auacl /MisiT WU_ . W_
' Latitude: 3S -(S-oo
Longitude:
Moderate
' *PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary.
Also, if in the best professional judgement of the a valuator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-
this rating system should not be used*
' Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
' I. Geomorphology
1) Is There A Riffle-Pool Sequence
' 2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
Different From Surrounding Terrain?
3) Are Natural Levees Present?
Absent Weak Moderate
® 1 2
0 2
0 1 2
4) Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 1
' 5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
Floodplain Present? 0 2
e 6) Is The Channel Braided? a 1 2
7) Are Recent Alluvial Deposits Present? 0 1
8) Is There A Bankfull Bench Present? 0 1
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0 1 2
f_*NOTE: If Bed & Bank Car ed By Ditching And WITHOUT Sinuosity Then Score-O* )
10
°
)
Is A 2nd Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Topo Map And/Or In Field) Present? Yes--3 N( n_?O
' PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: L1_
H. Hydrology Absent Weak
' 1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharge Present? 0
PRIMARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: ?
III. Biology Absent
'1) Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? 3
t 2) Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? 3
) Is Periphyton Present? 0
r ) Are Bivalves Present? 00
PRIMARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:
River Basin: YAW t4 _ W_GL*Dt:.
County: M6ceLPm&ie_ck
Evaluator: 4?4 P_. WyA,_tr PWSWS
Signature: C??21 J ?9F
Date: 1 -- a- 03
Location/Directions: Lrx T1ctA KAp A-I Ac eb
-rI
Strong
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
C
Strong
1 d) 3
Weak Moderate Strong
® 1 0
2 C? 0
10 2 3
1 2 3
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
1. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate
1) Is There A Head Cut Present In Channel? 0 .5 1
2) Is There A Grade Control Point In Channel? 0 1
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainage Way? 0 .5
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 1.5-
11. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
Present In Streambed? 1.5 1 O
' 2) Is Sediment On Plants (Or Debris) Present? 0 .5
' 3) Are Wrack Lines Present? 0
4
I
W
I .5 1
)
s
ater
n Channel And >48 Hrs. Since 0 .5 1
Last Known Rain?
(*NOTE: If Ditch Indicated In #9 Above Skip This Step And #5 Below*)
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry 0 .5 6
Conditions Or In Growing Season)?
' 6) Are Hydric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut)? es=1.5

' SECONDARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 7
III. Biology Absent Weak Moderate
' 1) Are Fish Present? .5 1
2) Are Amphibians Present? .5 1
e 3) Are AquaticTurtles Present? ® .5 1
4) Are Crayfish Present? 0 (f5) 1
' 5) Are Macrobenthos Present? ® .5 1
6) Are Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Fungus Present? 0 .5
' 7) Is Filamentous Algae Present? 0 6) 1
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed?
' SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Mostl y FACU
2 1 .75 G 0 0
( NOTE. If Total Absence Of All Plants In Streambed As Noted Above Skip This Step UNLESS SAV Present#).
'
S*
SECONDARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: --•

No=O
T-
Strong
1.5
1.5
1.5
Strong
0
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
Strong
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
Mostly UPL

12'
Upland
2.5' Bank
0"-6" Flow Evident
Pools Observed
Top of Bank
9'
4' OHWM
4' Bed
Upland
1' Bank
6" Bench
Section looking upstream
Not to scale
James Road Phase 2 Site
Reed Enterprises of Charlotte, Inc.
Mecklenburg County, NC
Channel T-1 (Sta. 0+50)
Perennial/Important
(Jurisdictional)
960 Chopmon-Wyont L ,.'- ncolnte, 'N) 7351084
James Road Phase 2 Site
Reed Enterprises of Charlotte, Inc.
Mecklenburg County, NC
Channel T-1 (Sta. 0+50)
Perennial/Important
(Jurisdictional)
nC/7- rra L (/i& ! DESIGN 1960 Chopmon Wyont Lone Ltncolnton N'. 2K7=.' '04) 735-1084
JS ARMY CORPS/ENGRS ID:18282714858
OCT 09'98 9:23 No.002 P.
' INTERMITTENT CHANNEL
EVAL,UA?TI0N EQRM T-z
?? E1?t77=I'P?tsEs wC 6 - trtlt.LLQ
' ACI10NID APPI,ICANTNAMrs -. t4 r Ko.M RAkSl? RATE t -af -C?
1'110POSa D CIIANNF:r. WORK (l.t,, 0111veM rnlncotion, etc.) . ?t?d
rin a To
WATERBODWRIVERBASIN ,gp? G? f YAb%Uq 86,sui COTINTVICI `Y
1tH:C1:NT WP.A'17lER CONDMONS ?4? t 1-t ALL- 1 i-1 P14A Q10L L< 45:?', HOES.
Does Cbannet Appear On A Quad Ur Soils Map? ®/ N Approy-Dral/lage Area: S7 . G 4r,
Dc;ternlination_
Perennial Channel (stop) Important Channel: Lt: PROJI'.r-T MGR. Initials .._
lntemlittent Channel (Promd) Unimportant Chanel: LP
Ephemeral Channel (n(,jd) (munch nap indicating lucatlon of imporinni/unimportant ohannd)
Ditch Through Upland (nold)
C", L
P:vnlnator'p tilguuturt: ??.. _
(itothrr than C.O.n?. projoct mttt?r)-
///!I//l/!/111J///!1!lJllllll/J/Illlll!/I1J1/Iil1/1//1l/1/1l/1J!/IU!/!!11///lull/rrlllil!//1/!J///////J!/llrlrl1l11r1/%ll/!1/I!///ll/1!I/I//ll/11//I/!l/l1/1%I!/1r///I/I/II/1l/1///I/llrl/
P=f'resent SPA Present NP=Not Present
OIL
Important To Domestic Water Supply? Y 4D
NCDWO Stream Classification Form
,
Project Name: ?A.Ml;S p-o4j>
DWQ Project Number. NSA
Nearest Named Stream:
p,? .
USGS QUAD: le??st?u, /ht?r? ?Itw t?tL
' Latitude: 3 S_ t S-_ op r
Longitude: _ ci3 _9
T- Z
River Basin: ??pktµ-gyp
County: MEcx_Ls (ice j-(:t
t
Evaluator: G l??tC? t ` yAkr P_nLALSWS
Signature:
Date: t -q - o3
Location/Directions: t..DC-4 toq
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary.
Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-
I this rating system should not be used*
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
I. Geomorphology
1) Is There A Riffle-Pool Sequence
' 2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
Different From Surrounding Terrain?
3) Are Natural Levees Present?
4) Is The Channel Sinuous?
' 5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
Floodplain Present?
' 6) Is The Channel Braided?
7) Are Recent Alluvial Deposits Present?
' 8) Is There A Bankfull Bench Present?
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present?
/*A711)7'J7 lF'D.. 14 P_ D.....J_-
Absent Weak Moderate Strong
a 1 2 3
0 2 3
1 2 3
0 1 0 3
0 2 3
3 1 2 3
0 1 d) 3
0 1 © 3
0 1 2 m
Kati ?. uasocu a? LJµ{,/L!/L n/[U ?'Ill IIVC/l JInUOSI tnen J?core=
lU) Is A 2nd Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Topo Map And/Or In Field) Present? Yes=3
' PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:
II. Hydrology Absent Weak
' 1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharge Present? 0 1
t PRIMARY HYDROLOGY INDICATORPOINTS:___Z`
IH. Biology Absent Weak
,1) Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? 3 2
Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? 3
Is Periphyton Present? ® 1
r) Are Bivalves Present? 1
PRIMARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS.
RE
Moderate Strong
6 3
Moderate Strong
m 0
1 0
2 3
2 3
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line) T -L
1. Geomorphology Absent Weak
1
I
T Moderate Strong
)
s
here A Head Cut Present In Channel? CO) .5 1 1.5
2) Is There A Grade Control Point In Channel? .5 1 1.5
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainage Way? 0 .5 1
5
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: _I .
II. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate
' 1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
Present In Streambed? 1.5 1 Q
2) Is Sedim
t O
Pl
O
D
en
n
ants (
r
ebris) Present? 0 .5
3) Are Wrack Lines Present? 0

4 0
1
) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since 0 .5 1
Last Known Rain?
(*NOTE: If Ditch Indicated In #9 Above Skip This Step And #5 Below)
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry 0 .5 d
Conditions Or In Growing Season)?
' 6) Are Hydric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut)? es=1 S
SECONDARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:--6?_
III. Biology Absent Weak Moderate
1) Are Fish Present? V .5 1
2) Are Amphibians Present? Q .5 1
3) Are AquaticTurtles Present? ® .5 1
4) Are Crayfish Present? 0 a 1
' 5) Are Macrobenthos Present? 6) .5 1
6) Are Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Fungus Present? 0 .5
' 7) Is Filamentous Algae Present? .5 1
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed?
' SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU
2 1 .75 C:> 0 0
(* NOTE. If Total Absence Of All Plants In Streambed As Noted Above Skip This Step UNLESS SAV Present*).
SECONDARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:
No=O
Strong
0
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
Strong
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
Mostly UPL
TOTAL POINTS Prim + Secondary)= ?W' If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermi tent

F
Upland
2' Bank
4'
Top of Bank ,
Upland
3'
OHWM 2' Bank
Bed
0" to 6" Flow Evident
Pools Observed
Section looking upstream
Not to scale
James Road Phase 2 Site
Reed Enterprises of Charlotte, Inc.
Mecklenburg County, NC
/I?-It. DESh?fl ?00 ChapmanWuont Lone
Channel T-2 (Sta. 3+50)
Perennial/Important
(Jurisdictional)
James Road Phase 2 Site
Reed Enterprises of Charlotte, Inc.
Mecklenbur- County, NC
ur it//V DESIC?F 1960 Chopmon-Wyont Lone
Channel T-2 (Sta. 3+50)
Perennial/Important
(Jurisdictional)

L9
t0
Lb
to
to
I&
ro
'

11

C
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION yvt, ros -Fri
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: wee ?-QAZ:? Z Date: I -?El -r-) 3_
Applicant/Owner: - c-AA County:
Investigator: GJZoIC4 WrAbq- , i sw? ` State: NL
Do normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID: I
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation) Yes N® Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
-k?
?f-
I e FALL.1
Qtl W'% Rut321' Pt. KALIA
GLtekwe'. A& SAPL PAW
Cnymy. Ac*,?. WL' FA.cc]
Lt4LJJb1AM1AL+ „ .&jPuAA SAft_ 4:4.r-+
JtLAG LdticS k'rtZ S Arc 4r "a
S`(A oy, .& 4APL, X10
i Lac DPI?c,A. ?e !?$
. ,lams LWS yLff a ?11R[18
EIa[XJ-?(Mrl? .lWt???[sU•6tls Si(?4aA E?k? -' S
t nm1 &AA J / Nab _FAe_- 5-
14.
15.
16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
(excludine FAC).
Remarks: WFl.L P9A1t1JED ScM SLOpE-
HYnR01 CMY

Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indications: NcI,I5
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs Inundated
X Other USC?S, t?vtt titi`c.? _ Saturated in upper 12 inches
No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
_
_ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indications (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: EJ/A (in.) Oxidized Root Channels in upper 12 in
= Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: RIBA (in.) Local Soil Survey Data

Depth to Saturated Soil: > t8" (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

SOILS
Map Unit Name :9-15-6-LOW, eXODG15
(Series and Phase): - tsl -:A" rLAy I _? Drainage Class: Wee D?/?h
?"T?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): TY{)L 1 ,A?1 1 _
Confirm Mapped Type? es No
Profile Description:
Mottle
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Abundance/ Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon IMunsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Contrast Structure, etc.

I-S t Y? `fly ! t5 Y 4ib-- fi2kIZEAL L-QLt--1

qt (v ___,_ to YZ 41!G 10 Yi. S-/efl Fir ?.? r T ?.4/??Y L c?4M
Hydric Soil Indicators: MC*J.F.
Histosol _ Concretions
- Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Condi tions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

Wt 1 LANU Ut 1 tKMINA 1 IUN
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Is this sampling point within a wetland? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No 1 11
11 Remarks:

James Road Phase 2 Site
Reed Enterprises of Charlotte, Inc.
Mecklenburg, County, NC
Sample Plot 1-A
Upland
(Not Jurisdictional)
r:J .,C 'il H e DESF,fi 1960 Chopmon-Wuont Lone
i
i
James Road Phase 2 Site
Reed Enterprises of Charlotte, Inc.
Mecklenburg County, NC
-C/c-7 1?r YtIl' DESIGN 1960 Chopmon Wyont to
Sample Plot 1-A
Upland
(Not Jurisdictional)
ncointon

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION WL-17
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) I
nt/Owner: ZEP_C? Est:P!Z P2tSF_c. e?P ,tc&e, County: (Fetcr r-.titi2 LLj
[FDonormal /Site: M s P+td?. Z Date: 1 -- °t - 63
ator: e_r24rG ? Wy r -_4sw'* State: t-[L
Circumstances exist on the site? ® No Community ID: te significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation) Yes Transect ID: rea a potential problem area? Yes Plot ID: eeded, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
7,0 hrr. gc
to Q?LaG2c! .n bt? ?ukr T1P?
r2 wi,Fulb FdC.'?- Lol4i ? fkxtt a EII;> - ?_!S"
10.
2.S ®?tf3t!,D?.MQ d? S-(?(?!td1A SdPL FdtG•F- 11.
Lo ®b, ????tlb Qtt?-t SAPL FAc, 12.
©A? u 1 ?,
J ?? T? ?i1Rit1? FAc?t!'t' 13.
ao ® SAMgtlcy'T, CAMAO 'Albts SueLR PAC-A&L 14.
to
(0) C4=L c, A
I
P M n Mum S6trttdtysL 15.
_ C EASr_
_1L
1 t ctµ J" St1ELt1; 4C- 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC 8 r _ 83?3°yol
(excluding FAQ. /9-V "`?•? ` ?? "" J
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indications:
Stream, Lake, or-Tide Gauge Prim ary Indicators:
LC Aerial Photographs _X_ Inundated
X Other asc,& , Nutt wr_cs _X Saturated in upper 12 inches
No Recorded Data Available X Water Marks
_X_ Drift Lines
x Sediment Deposits
X Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indications (2 or more required):
)
Depth of Surface Water: da^?q (in A Oxidized Root Channels in upper 12 in
. Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: Ou (in.) .? Local Soil Survey Data
(trycc-us?
Depth to Saturated Soil: O (in.)
x FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: C_ ?-Tfteg 44o4:6S

Ll

C

bUIL5 I -P,
Map Unit Name
i
( Z--8-7. SLoPer, MoceMmLy
H
y
Ser
es and Phase): tr ga S
-- AAt>y Ladd Drainage Class: -eL?,ZzAtm,qb
Taxonomy (Subgroup): _ QL11r P-4P t ..tt>U -r-5' Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Mottle
Depth
(inches) Horizon Matrix Colors
(Munsell Moist) Mottle Colors Abundance/ Texture, Concretions,
(Munsell Moist) Contrast Structure, etc.

Z.5 YK K-W /epTolegq -Aya- L??uc
_1C)_?P toy?- q fq e S tsC1 SAct?YUA?r t?M
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
T
Sulfidic Odor _
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime _;!5* Listed on Local Hydric Soils List OW-4-UStev1S)
_ Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List -
X_ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? es No
II Remarks:
Is this sampling point within a wetland?Q No

7
James Road Phase 2 Site
Reed Enterprises of Charlotte, Inc.
Mecklenburg County, NC
Sample Plot 1-B
Wetland
(Jurisdictional)
-V%^X, , Y n, DES? b."P. 1960 '?,oomon Miont Lone Lincolnton

James Road Phase 2 Site
Reed Enterprises of Charlotte, Inc.
Mecklenburg County, NC
??/ ip.• rpr / DH _'! ^bQ Chopmon-Wyont Lone L ncolnton
Sample Plot 1-B
Wetland
(Jurisdictional)
NC 28 "4) 781084

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION vet, tt"
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
l ?G
Project/Site: dAMF5 ROAD -PAAs;'E L Date:
Applicant/Owner: _lz-P.p-p_ e>f= P_Lzr ; F County: kagLi,:l.tgut? c
Investigator: e_z6.tc; e • wY ?-r zt1s, /?uc? State: r_?
Do normal Circumstances exist on the site? Vii- No Community ID: I
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation) Yes <a Transect ID: i
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes o Plot ID: ?.
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
'ATION
blo
ZA
Zb
to
10
Z.O
IS
tt
Trte
?_C??? i roc Ru?,,tA 't'Wt - =-,r.
??11=1 LL'-? "-" T u '"i=Cl'A 'T1?F6
LL t Q LA t tar..> RAID sr?rza -, t-Ae_t-
Isa saPL-
tc??,c„ti eut?? Sd.Pt. -AciA
0 FA40S 6_tb1"FC>LA S&PL F?L+-E 10
_LeFttPE?ttS VtRGINt4?•t+?? Si(R FA S
I ts-Sr e5PAL-A SEtre Fold ,r
14.
15.
16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC Z. l
(excluding FAC). lS $•4(
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indications: KottE
Stream, Lake, or. Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs _ Inundated
Other usc, <. • ta,nct 1 1yrZ6 _ Saturated in upper 12 inches
No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
_ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indications (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: l.4/A (in.) - Oxidized Root Channels in upper 12 in
_ Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >lgtl (in.) - Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: > IF3 (in.) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

F

SOILS
Map Unit Name $-IS"C?b S.Oea?=,
(Series and Phase): LN p- r LOt? cD?' L_,C A Drainage Class: Wtn_L-. Dtr?txc?A
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Clt?? AAPt_t x:'A<L -s Confirm Mapped Type? es No
Profile-Des cription:

Depth
(inches) Horizon
Matrix Colors
LMunsell Moist)
Mottle Colors
(Munsell Moist) Mottle
Abundance/ Texture, Concretions,
Contrast Structure
etc
,
.
1 F LT 4 t JnAM
-2 S! YK -%C2
t6)[T FEW

Hydric Soil Indicators: NOjyE
' Histosol
Histic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor
= Aquic Moisture Regime
Reducing Conditions
Gleycd or Low-Chroma Colors

C

Remarks:
Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
- Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (Explain in Remarks)
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes (va
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Is this sampling point within a wetland? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
II Remarks:
1

James Road Phase 2 Site
Reed Enterprises of Charlotte, Inc.
Mecklenburg County, NC
?????rnrtiir DESP-jPd 1960 Choomon Wuont Lone
Sample Plot 1-C
Upland
(Not Jurisdictional)

James Road Phase 2 Site Sample Plot 1-C
Reed Enterprises of Charlotte, Inc. Upland
Mecklenburg County, NC (Not Jurisdictional)
Wy-?nt L:;-=,,_olntnn
April 14, 2003 401 is
John DomeY, Director
NC Division of Water Quality I(, A
401 Wetlands Unit R s?/
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh NC 27699-1650 ?Y .
[phone]
Re: Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) - Corps Action ID #200330369
Delta Grove Phase II Subdivision, 9.66 acres, Mecklenburg County, NC
Applicant: James II Developers, LLC, attn: Daniel H. Fisher
5605 77 Center Drive, Suite 270
Charlotte, NC 28217-2743
704-295-1500 [e-mail]
Dear John,
Please find enclosed for your review a completed PCN application for a 9.66 acre site in Mecklenburg
County, NC. The site is located within the Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin within the headwaters of an un-
named tributary to Reedy Creek (NC Stream Index 13-17-8). The site is located on the Harrisburg
(1993) and Mint Hill (1993), NC, USGS 7.5 minute quads.
This PCN is being forwarded to your attention as a part of the Clean Water Act 404/401 (PCN)
permitting process. The applicant proposes to construct one minor road crossing as part of a single
family subdivision. The proposed activities will be performed under the conditions and authorizations
of Corps Nationwide Permit 14 and the associated State DWQ Water Quality Certifications.
All wetlands and waters have been delineated on this site and have been surveyed and verified by
the U. S. Army Corps. (Corps Action ID #200330369). The site contains a total area of 0.494 acres of
wetlands and waters. This includes a downstream segment of a single important perennial channel and
an upstream segment of freshwater wetland containing multiple braided perennial channel segments.
A single minor road crossing is proposed in a manner which avoids and minimizes impacts to
wetlands and waters. The crossing has been located upstream of highest quality perennial channel and
downstream of the area of the site containing wetland and braided channels.
A total of 148.9 linear feet of single perennial stream channel will be impacted by this proposal. A
total area of 2470.6 square feet or 0.057 acre impacts below the OHWM will occur to wetlands and
waters for the entire project. Impacts to other channels and wetlands will be avoided and stream buffers
will be provided wherever possible.
Thank you very much for your review of the enclosed. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you
should have questions or if there is any way in which I can be of assistance to you.
Respectfully,
Craig R. Wyant RLA/SWS
A Fine Line Design
1960 Chapman-Wyant Lane
Lincolnton NC 28092
704-735-1084
[e-mail]
cc: James II Developers, LLC, attn: Daniel H. Fisher
Steve Chapin, U.S. Army Corps
April 14, 2003
Steve Chapin
U.S. Army Corps, Asheville Office
151 Patton Avenue Room 208
Asheville NC 28801-5006
[phone]
Re Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) - Corps Action ID #200330369
Delta Grove Phase II Subdivision, 9.66 acres, Mecklenburg County, NC
Applicant: 'James II Developers, LLC, attn: Daniel H. Fisher
5605 77 Center Drive, Suite 270
Charlotte, NC 28217-2743
704-295-1500 [e-mail]
Dear Steve,
Please find enclosed for your review a completed PCN application for a 9.66 acre site in Mecklenburg
County, NC. The site is located within the Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin within the headwaters of an un-
named tributary to Reedy Creek (NC Stream Index 13-17-8). The site is located on the Harrisburg
(1993) and Mint Hill (1993), NC, USGS 7.5 minute quads:
This PCN is being forwarded to your attention as a part of the Clean Water Act 404/401 (PCN)
permitting process. The applicant proposes to construct one minor road crossing as part of a single
family subdivision. The proposed activities will be performed under the conditions and authorizations
of Corps Nationwide Permit 14 and the associated State DWQ Water Quality Certifications.
All wetlands and waters have been delineated on:this site and have been surveyed and verified by
the U. S. Army Corps. (Corps Action ID #200330369). The site contains a total area of 0.494 acres of
wetlands and waters. This includes a downstream segment of a single important perennial channel and
an upstream segment of freshwater wetland containing multiple braided perennial channel segments.
A single minor road crossing is proposed in a manner which avoids and minimizes impacts to
wetlands and waters. The crossing has been located upstream of highest quality perennial channel and
downstream of the area of the site containing wetland and braided channels.
A.total of 148.9 linear feet of single perennial stream channel will be impacted by this proposal. A
total area of 2470.6 square feet or 0.057 acre impacts below the OHWM will occur to wetlands and
waters for the entire project. Impacts to other channels and wetlands will be avoided and stream buffers
will be provided wherever possible.
Thank you very much for your review of the enclosed. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you
should have questions or if there is any way in which I can be of assistance to you.
Respectfully,
c
Craig R. Wyant RLA/SWS
A Fine Line Design
1960 Chapman-Wyant Lane
Lincolnton NC 28092
704-735-1084
[e-mail]
cc: James II Developers, LLC, attn: Daniel. H. Fisher
John Dorney, NC-DWQ (seven copies)
,_,
¦ Complete iterni 1
?I A
1? % hestricted Delivery is desired.
¦ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
¦ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
.i SS 1,
A
James II Developers
5605 77 Center Drive, Suite 270
Charlotte, NC 28217-2743
03-0474 - Mecklenburg
A.iSjgnature
n
? Agent
A.
Add ssee
B. Receive y (Prin
ted Name) C
`
vc,
D. Is delivery address different from Rem 1? Y
If YES, enter ?N !? s below: No

3. Se ce ?f
ICertifie p! ait
? Registen n Receipt for Merchandise
? Insured Mail ? C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ? Yes
2. Article Number 7002 3150 0004 9315 3025
(transfer from service labs,,. --
PS Form 3811, August 2001 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
LISPS
• Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box •
NC DENR Division of Water Quality
Wetlands/401 Certification Unit
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
114 1?C X11700
First-Class Mail
Postage & Fees Paid
Permit No. G-10
I$111III If IIIit III III IIII IIIII IIIIIIII IIIt 111iIIiIII It IIIIII