20190749 Ver 2_RE_ _External_ RE_ Brown Road pipe replacement Stokes_Plans_20200417

Wanucha, Dave
From:Euliss, Amy
Sent:Friday, April 17, 2020 10:40 AM
To:Wanucha, Dave; Matthews, Monte K SAW
Cc:White, Chuck; Dagenhart, Daniel R
Subject:RE: \[External\] RE: Brown Road pipe replacement Stokes_Plans
Attachments:840290_Permit Drawings_REV_April2020.pdf
Dave and Monte,

Once the permit drawings were revised (see attached), the impacts changed. See below for changes. Can you use this
email and the attached plans to modify the 404 and 401 permits? Also, do you have any objections with the work
proceeding while the permits are being modified?

Impact type Permitted Revised
Bank stabilization 25 0
Rip rap in channel and on
banks 64 60
Culvert 7 32
Dewatering 38 19

Monte,

Please review the emails below. Let me know if you need anything that you might not have access to.

From: Euliss, Amy <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2020 7:47 AM
To: Wanucha, Dave <[e-mail]>; Braspennickx, Nicholle M CIV USARMY CESAW (US)
<[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: \[External\] RE: Brown Road pipe replacement Stokes

I wanted to say thank you for getting back to us so quickly especially as we are all home bound! Everybody stay safe!

Amy

Get Outlook for iOS

From: Euliss, Amy <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2020 7:42:56 AM
To: Braspennickx, Nicholle M CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>; Wanucha, Dave
<[e-mail]>
Cc: White, Chuck <[e-mail]>; Braquet, Stephanie <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: \[External\] RE: Brown Road pipe replacement Stokes

Thanks Nicholle! We’ll proceed with submitting final plans once they are ready.

Chuck,
You are safe to proceed with fabrication.
1

Get Outlook for iOS

From: Braspennickx, Nicholle M CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2020 6:16:18 AM
To: Euliss, Amy <[e-mail]>; Wanucha, Dave <[e-mail]>
Cc: White, Chuck <[e-mail]>; Braquet, Stephanie <[e-mail]>
Subject: \[External\] RE: Brown Road pipe replacement Stokes

CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>

Hello !

I read the email and re-read it - looked the file up in our data base - received a NWP 14 on July 9, 2019.

As proposed, the replacement of the washed out crossing w/ a 20'6" span x 7'3" rise Aluminum Box Culvert w/ baffles
for low flow, qualifies for a NWP 3.

See attached NWP 3 Conditions:

Page 1 (a) -- towards the bottom of first paragraph - NWP 3 -- includes the replacement of crossings damaged by storm
events (provided the replacement occurs w/in the first 2 years of the event).

Page 1 (b) -- NWP 3 -- covers the removal of accumulated sediments w/in 200' of the crossing... the removal of
accumulated sediments is a reporting activity. The Corps would want plan views and cross sections to demonstrate
what areas would be excavated. Preferably in the dry.. etc.. bmps are expected to minimize turbidity in the creek. We
can discuss more if need be.

Paragraph (c) -- NWP covers all temporary dewatering devices that are necessary to perform the pipe replacement.

Special Conditions related to culvert replacement are on pgs. 29 - 36. W/ the inclusion of baffles - NCDOT has designed
to comply w/ Special condition 3.6.2 (pg. 36).

Sincerely,

Nicholle Braspennickx
Regulatory Project Manager
Cell: 704-774-7551

-----Original Message-----
From: Euliss, Amy \[mailto:[e-mail]\]
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2020 8:27 AM
To: Wanucha, Dave <[e-mail]>; Braspennickx, Nicholle M CIV USARMY CESAW (US)
<[e-mail]>
Cc: White, Chuck <[e-mail]>; Braquet, Stephanie <[e-mail]>
Subject: \[Non-DoD Source\] Brown Road pipe replacement Stokes

Dave and Nicholle,
2

We have written 404 and 401 permits for the replacement of 2 lines of 98"x72" CMPA with 4' in between the pipe (Total
of 192"). We have had the road closed since flooding damages caused a pipe failure on February 6, 2020. Prior to the
failure of the pipe, the plan was to replace with a 2 barrel 8'X7' reinforced concrete box culvert that was going to be let
to contract. However, now our Bridge Maintenance forces are going to handle the replacement. Our Bridge
Maintenance Engineer has found that switching to a 20'-6" span x 7'-3" rise Aluminum Box Culvert will be more
economical and quicker to install. He is in discussions with the pipe company to have the pipe fabricated with one foot
baffles on a single side to maintain a low flow channel inside the pipe. Prior to giving him the ok to proceed with the
cost, I wanted to run it by you and see if you had any objections. Page 5 and 6 of the attached quote are shop drawings
of what the pipe will look like. Also attached is a picture of the flooding that damaged the pipe. The last pdf is a copy of
pipe inspection report which has pictures of what the pipe looked like under normal conditions.

This is a time sensitive matter, so please respond as soon as possible. Thanks so much!

For reference the DWR permit number is 2019-0749 and the USACE Action ID is 2019-01013.

Amy Euliss

NCDOT Division 9 Environmental Officer

375 Silas Creek Parkway

Winston Salem, NC 27127

[phone]

________________________________

Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third
parties.
3