20191760 Ver 1_More Information Received_20200420

Staff Review
Does this application have all the attachments needed to accept it into the review process?*
r Yes r No
ID#* Version*
20191760
Is this project a public transportation project?* r Yes
r No
Is this a DOT r Yes r No
project?*
Reviewer List:* Donna Hood:eads\drhood
Select Reviewing Office:* Mooresville Regional Office - [phone]
Does this project require a request for payment to be sent?*
r
Yes
r
No

Project Submittal Form
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all
mandatory questions are answered.
Project Type: r
New Project
r
New Project w Existing ID
r
Pre -Application Submittal
r
More Information Response
r
Other Agency Comments
r
For the Record Only (Courtesy Copy)
r
Stream or Buffer Appeal
New Project - Please check the new project type if you are trying to submit a new project that needs an official approval
decision.
Pre -Application Submittal - Please check the pre -application submittal if you just want feedback on your submittal and
do not have the expectation that your submittal will be considered a complete application requiring a formal decision.
More Information Response - Please check this type if you are responding to a request for information from staff and
you have and ID# and version for this response.
Other Agency Comments - Please check this if you are submitting comments on an existing project.
Is this supplemental information that needs to be sent to the Corps?*
r Yes r No
Project Contact Information
Name: Joel. M. Howard
VVAio is subaitting the inforrration?
Email Address: [e-mail]
Project Information
Existing ID #: Existing Version:
20191760 1
20170001(no dashes)
Project Name: C-5621
Is this a public transportation project?
r Yes
r No
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
r Yes r No r Unknown
TIP#: WBS#:
C-5621 50146.3.1
(Applies to DOT projects only)
County (ies)
Mecklenburg
Please upload all files that need to be submited.

aick the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
C-5621 Response to DWR_20200420.pdf 853.13KB
C-5621 Permit Site 4 Wetland.pdf 3.02MB
Only pdf or krm files are accepted.
Describe the attachments:
Attached you will find the additional information that was requested by the USACE and NCDWR for project C-
5621.
On March 12th, 2020 during a field review Ms. Nicholle Braspennickx (USACE) requested that NCDOT
provide additional avoidance and minimization for the southern round -a -bout on C-5621. Ms. Braspennickx
also requested that we delineate an additional wetland that had the potential of being within our projects
limits. In addition to these requests Ms. Braspennickx suggested that we distinguish our permanent and
temporary impacts with different colors on our plan sheets and that we change our impact summary sheet to
denote a permanent impact vs channel relocation for our surface water impacts.
You will find that all of Ms Brasspennickx's requests have been meet with the provided documentation. The
avoidance and minimization has been explained in the response to DWR's On Hold Letter dated 3/31/2020.
The Wetland has been delineated and mapped to showthat we will be filling .01 acres of wetland and
mechanized clearing .01 acres of wetland. This wetland is shown as permit site 4 and is included on the
impact summary sheet. (Please see Permit Site 4 Wetland.pdf). The last two of Ms. Brasspennickxs requests
can also be seen on the Permit Site 4 plan sheet and the impact summary sheet shown.
On March 31, 2020 NCDOT Division 10 received an On Hold Letter from Ms. Donna Hood (NCDWR)
requesting more information for project C-5621. Ms. Hood asked that we provide additional information on
avoidance and minimization for the projects southern round -a -bout, research the need for Hazardous Spill
Basins (HSB) on the northern round -a -bout and account for an additional jurisdictional impact (a linear
wetland).
You will find in our attached response to NCDWR the justification as to why the southern rournd-a-bout site
was chosen and the reasoning for impacting the two jurisdictional streams, (Site 2a and Site 3). We have
provided a response to the HSB requirements specifically with reqard to requirements based on project scope
and functional classification. We have further evaluated feasibility of a basin at the site by investigating
highway volume, traffic type, accident potential, receiving water quality and feasibility of construction and
have determined a HSB is not required as outlined in Appendix O of the Hydraulic Guidelines. You will also
find attached the plan sheet showing the additional impacted linear wetland and impact summary sheet for the
newly added Permit Site 4.
Sign and Submit
W By checking the box and signing box below, I certify that:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the
"Uniform Electronic Transactions Act")
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes
(the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
o I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written
signature; AND
o I intend to electronically sign and submit the online form."
Signature:
14q �-*ww
Submittal Date: 4/20/2020
Is filled in automatically.