HomeMy WebLinkAboutClosure Plan Receipt Letter FINAL 2-15-17Water Resources
Environmental Quality
February 15, 2017
Paul Draovitch
Senior Vice President
Environmental, Health & Safety
Duke Energy
526 South Church Street
Mail Code EC3XP
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Director
Subject: Asheville Steam Electric Plant — NPDES No. NC0000396 — Buncombe County
Dan River Combined Cycle Station — NPDES No. NC0003468 — Rockingham
County
Riverbend Steam Station — NPDES No. NC0004961 - Gaston County
L. V. Sutton Energy Complex — NPDES No. NC0001422 — New Hanover County
Dear Mr. Draovitch:
Attached is a corrected version of the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality's
letter that acknowledged receipt of the Closure Plans. This corrected letter supersedes the
version sent to your attention on February 7, 2016, addressing an error concerning the date for
submittal of revised Closure Plans in the first sentence of the second paragraph in page 4.
If you have any questions regarding any information provided, please feel free to contact Steve
Lanter (Central Office) at 919-807-6444.
Sincerely,
S. Ly)'Zinmerman, Y.G., Director
Division of Water Resources
cc: WQROS Asheville, Winston-Salem, and Wilmington Regional Office Supervisors
WQROS Central File Copy
<_^ Nothing Compares-,,
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
1636 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
919-707-9129
K11
:
Water Resources
Environmental Quality
February 15, 2017
Paul Draovitch
Senior Vice President
Environmental, Health & Safety
Duke Energy
526 South Church Street
Mail Code EC3XP
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Director
Subject: Asheville Steam Electric Plant — NPDES No. NC0000396 — Buncombe County
Dan River Combined Cycle Station — NPDES No. NC0003468 — Rockingham
County
Riverbend Steam Station —NPDES No. NC0004961— Gaston County
L. V. Sutton Energy Complex — NPDES No. NC0001422 —New Hanover County
Dear Mr. Draovitch:
Thank you for your submission of Site Analysis and Removal Plans ("SARPs") for the above -
referenced facilities in compliance with the Order Granting Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
signed by Superior Court Judge Paul C. Ridgeway on June 1, 2016. The Department of
Environmental Quality (DEQ) has determined your submissions also satisfy the requirement that
Duke Energy submit proposed Closure Plans under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 130A -309.214(a).
The proposed Closure Plans are not yet complete. Based on a preliminary review, the Division of
Water Resources ("DWR") has identified certain deficiencies. Additional review is underway and
Duke Energy will be notified of other deficiencies and additional information needed by the
Department to conduct a full review and make a decision to approve or deny the Closure Plans.
Correction of the deficiencies in the Closure Plans will also correct similar deficiencies in the
SARPs, thus satisfying Duke Energy's obligations under Judge Ridgeway's Order.
A summary of the deficiencies noted in the preliminary review are shown below. Deficiencies
identified include those that relate to all subject facilities as well as those that are specific to a
facility. Additional details will be provided to Duke Energy, and other deficiencies may be
identified, as DEQ continues with its on-going review.
All Facilities
Information related to site conditions at all four subject facilities is incomplete, due in part to data
gaps and deficiencies in the Comprehensive Site Assessments (CSAs) and Corrective Action Plans
(CAPS). A summary of required information that is not complete because of gaps or deficiencies
in the CSAs and CAPS includes:
- Nothing Comparesti,..
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
1636 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
919-707-9129
All data collected at the facilities have not been integrated into a comprehensive
interpretation of site conditions in order to complete the site assessments and evaluate
corrective action:
■ Background determinations for soil and groundwater have not been developed.
■ The assessment of the horizontal and vertical extent of contaminated groundwater
and soil is not complete.
■ Identification of other primary and secondary sources has not been completed and
incorporated into an understanding of site conditions.
■ All groundwater data have not been presented and incorporated as part of a
comprehensive trend analysis to demonstrate compliance with 2L Standards.
■ The potential impact of contaminated groundwater discharging into surface water
has not been determined.
Flow, transport, and geochemical modeling submitted to date do not accurately address technical
issues raised by the DWR:
■ Boundary conditions incorporated into the models submitted to date do not allow
evaluation of potential impacts to surface water bodies immediately adjacent to the
CCR impoundments, which are potential receptors.
■ Quantitative sensitivity analyses have not been incorporated in models submitted
to date.
■ In some cases, the models submitted to date do not simulate potential groundwater
remedial alternatives.
Facility Specific
Riverbend Steam Station
Post -closure monitoring plan
■ The submission states that groundwater monitoring portion of the post -closure plan
will be submitted later.
• An estimate of the milestone dates for all activities related to closure and post -closure.
■ Milestones are identified for closure and post -closure activities, but no dates are
provided.
• Projected costs of assessment, corrective action, closure, and post -closure care for each
coal combustion residuals surface impoundment.
■ Document states the projected costs for the assessment, corrective action, closure,
and post -closure care for each coal combustion residuals surface impoundment will
be submitted later.
L. V. Sutton Energy Complex
• Modeling
■ The executive summary states a site groundwater flow and contaminant transport
model is being prepared by an independent consultant that will be submitted under
a separate cover at a later date, omitting the requirements of this section. h► addition,
Page 2 of 4
the modeling results referenced as part of the Corrective Action Plan (CAP) do not
address technical issues or deficiencies raised by the DWR.
• Post -closure monitoring plan
■ The submission states the post -closure monitoring plan will be submitted at a later
date.
• An estimate of the milestone dates for all activities related to closure and post -closure.
■ The submission states the closure and post -closure activities milestone dates were
submitted in the 2016 Updated L.V. Sutton Electric Plant Coal Ash Excavation
Plan. This information is expected to be provided in the Closure Plan.
Projected costs of assessment, corrective action, closure, and post -closure care for each
coal combustion residuals surface impoundment.
■ The submission states the projected costs for the assessment, corrective action,
closure, and post -closure care for each coal combustion residuals surface
impoundment will be submitted at a later date.
Dan River Combined Cycle Station
• Post -closure monitoring plan
■ The submission states the post -closure plan monitoring plan will be submitted at a
later date.
An estimate of the milestone dates for all activities related to closure and post -closure.
■ The submission states that the closure and post -closure activities milestone dates
are unknown at this time.
Projected costs of assessment, corrective action, closure, and post -closure care for each
coal combustion residuals surface impoundment.
■ The submission states the projected costs for the assessment, corrective action,
closure, and post -closure care for each coal combustion residuals surface
impoundment will be submitted at a later date.
Asheville Steam Electric Plant
• All sources of discharge into the impoundment, including volume and characteristics of
each discharge.
■ The text refers to the facility's NPDES permit. The actual volumes and
characteristics related to discharge into the impoundments are not provided in the
text. This information is expected to be provided.
An estimate of the milestone dates for all activities related to closure and post -closure.
■ Milestones are identified for closure and post -closure activities, but no dates are
provided.
Page 3of4
Projected costs of assessment, corrective action, closure, and post -closure care for each
coal combustion residuals surface impoundment.
■ The submission states the projected costs for the assessment, corrective action,
closure, and post -closure care for each coal combustion residuals surface
impoundment will be submitted at a later date.
By April 10, 2017, DEQ requests that the deficiencies noted above be addressed in revised and
supplemented Closure Plans. In addition to addressing these deficiencies, the revised Closure Plans
should include all reports and other materials that were referenced in, but not provided with, your
initial submissions. For any deficiencies that cannot be addressed within this timeframe, and for
any additional deficiencies later identified by DEQ, Duke Energy should provide a reasonable
schedule for completion. The revised Closure Plans should include all up-to-date sample analytical
results, background determinations for soil and groundwater, and delineation of horizontal and
vertical extent of soil and groundwater contamination. In the meantime, DEQ will be moving
forward with the public participation process required by N.C. Gen. Stat. § 130A-309.214.
If you have any questions regarding any information provided, please feel free to contact Steve
Lanter (Central Office) at 919-807-6444.
Sincerely,
S. Jay Zimmerman, P.G., Director
Division of Water Resources
cc: WQROS Asheville, Winston-Salem, and Wilmington Regional Office Supervisors
WQROS Central File Copy
Page 4 of 4