20200524 Ver 1_EA-FONSI signed_20200416

Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact

Bear Creek Public Safety Training Center
Coastal Carolina Community College
Onslow County, North Carolina

January 2018

Prepared for:
Carol Lurz
Director of Physical Plant and Auxiliary Services
Coastal Carolina Community College
444 Western Boulevard
Jacksonville, NC 28546
910-938-6343

Prepared By:

Mark S. Davis and Lisa Feller, PE
Vaughn & Melton Consulting Engineers, Inc.
3115 Trent Road
New Bern, NC 28562
[phone]

i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ………………………………………………......................................1
A.1. Introduction………………………………………………………………………………......1
A.2. Proposed Access Road and Site Development……………………………………................1
A.3. Project Limits of Disturbance and Location………………………………………................1

B. PURPOSE AND NEED...………………………………………………………………………….2

C. ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS…………………………………………………………………....2
C.1. No Build Alternative………...……………………………………………………………….2
C.2. Build Alternative.............…………………………………………………………………….2

D. EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PROJECT AREA…..…..…..2
D.1. Topography and Geology....................................................................................................... 2
D.2. Soils……….………………………………………………………………………………... 2
D.3. Land Use…………………………………………………………………………………… 3
D.4. Wetlands……………………………………………………………………………………. 3
D.5. Prime and Unique Farmland.................................................................................................. 4
D.6. Public Lands and Scenic, Recreational, and State Natural Areas.......................................... 4
D.7. Historic Architecture and Archaeology……………………………………………………. 4
D.8. Air Quality…………………………………………………………………………………. 4
D.9. Noise Levels………………………………………………………………………………... 5
D.10. Water Resources………………………………………………………………………...... 5
D.10.1. Surface Water Resources.......................................................................................... 5
D.10.2. Groundwater Resources……...…………………………………………………… 5
D.11. Forest Resources………………………………………………………………………….. 6
D.12. Shellfish or Fish and their Habitats……………………………………………………….. 7
D.13. Wildlife and Protected Species............................................................................................. 7
D.13.1 Wildlife……………………………………………………………………………… 7
D.13.2 Federally Threatened and Endangered Species........................................................... 8
D.14. Introduction of Toxic Substances………………………………………………………… 11
D.15. Socio-Economics and Environmental Justice. …………………………………………….11

E. PREDICTED ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF THE PROJECT…………………………… 11
E.1. Topography and Geology……….……………...................................................................... 11
E.2. Soils……….………………………………………………………………………………... 11
E.3. Land Use…………………………………………………………………………………… 11
E.4. Wetlands……………………………………………………………………………………. 12
E.5. Prime and Unique Farmland.................................................................................................. 12
E.6. Public Lands and Scenic, Recreational, and State Natural Areas.......................................... 12
E.7. Historic Architecture and Archaeology……………………………………………………. 12
E.8. Air Quality…………………………………………………………………………………. 13
E.9. Noise Levels………………………………………………………………………………... 13
E.10. Water Resources………………………………………………………………………...... 13
E.10.1. Surface Water Resources…………………………………………………………. 13
E.10.2. Groundwater Resources…………………………………………………………… 13
E.11. Forest Resources………………………………………………………………………….. 13
E.12. Shellfish or Fish and their Habitats……………………………………………………….. 13
E.13. Wildlife and Protected Species…………………….……………………………………… 14
E.13.1 Wildlife.……………………………………………………………………………. 14
ii

E.13.2 Federally Threatened and Endangered Species.…………………………………… 14
E.14. Introduction of Toxic Substances…………………………………………………………. 14
E.15. Socio-Economics and Environmental Justice. …………………………………………….14

F. MITIGATIVE MEASURES…………………………………………………………………….. 14

G. STATE AND FEDERAL PERMITS REQUIRED……………………………………………… 15

H. CONCLUSION STATEMENT…………………………………………………………………..16

I. REFERENCES…………………………………………………………………………………... 17

TABLES

Table 1. Soils in the Project Area……………………………………………………………………… 3
Table 2. Jurisdictional Wetlands in the Project Area………………………………………………….. 3
Table 3. DAQ 2017 Air Quality Data for New Hanover County – Castle Hayne Site………………... 5
Table 4. Surface Water Resources in the Project Area………………………………………………… 5
Table 5. Coverage of Terrestrial Communities in the Project Area………………………………….... 6
Table 6. Federally Listed Threatened and Endangered Species for Onslow County………………….. 8
Table 7. Wetland Impacts in the Project Area………………………………………………………...12

FIGURES

Figure 1. Bear Creek Public Safety Training Center Master Plan
Figure 2. USGS Topographical Quadrangle Map
Figure 3. Wetlands and Streams Delineation Map
Figure 4. Phase 1 Bear Creek Public Safety Training Center Overall Site Plan

APPENDICES

Appendix A. Resource Agency Coordination
 SHPO Concurrence Letter
 US Army Corps of Engineers Approved Jurisdictional Determination Document

1

A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

A.1 Introduction

Coastal Carolina Community College (the College) is in the City of Jacksonville at 444 Western
Boulevard, approximately 0.5 mile south of North Marine Boulevard (US 17) in Onslow County, North
Carolina. The College is a two-year public institution of higher learning and is a member of the North
Carolina Community College System, which serves the needs of Onslow County and surrounding areas.
The College maintains vital partnerships with the US Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune and related
bases of Camp Johnson, Camp Geiger and New River Air Station. This partnership enables members of
the military and their families to enroll in various courses or curriculums while stationed in the area.
Active military personnel and their families make up 40 to 50 percent of the student population at the
college. The combined curriculum/continuing education enrollment is estimated at over 11,600 students.

Projected increases in enrollment projections will require the college to expand its infrastructure and
programs in the future. In 2008, a Facilities Master Plan (FMP) was completed to document the college’s
planning efforts and vision for the next 20 years. In 2013, the FMP was updated; however, due to lack of
funding, the Public Safety Training Center was not included in the update. In 2018, the FMP will be
revised again and one program that generates great interest is the development of the Public Safety
Training Center to complement the college’s curriculum offerings and continuing educations courses in
emergency services and related fields. The college retained Stewart Cooper Newell Architects to develop
a master plan for the Bear Creek Public Safety Training Center (Figure 1) on a 70-acre site located off NC
172, approximately 14 miles southeast of the college. The site is located on the Hubert USGS
Topographical Quadrangle Map (Figure 2).

A.2 Proposed Access Road and Site Development

The proposed project will involve the upgrade and relocation of the main access road into the property
and will create access points for future development of the site. The improved roadway typical section
will be a 28 foot back-of-curb to back-of-curb section with 2 @ 12-foot travel lanes, curb and gutter with
an additional 2-foot grass strip and 5-foot sidewalk. The site will be developed in phases based upon
available funding in accordance with the master plan. Phase 1 will include the construction of the
roadway and grading for a 600-foot by 600-foot concrete driving range. Phase 2 will complete the
concrete pad for driver training. Phase 3 will include a firing range with berms, classroom building, EMS
building, maintenance building, burn building, and parking lots. Phase 4 will include additional outside
training areas and a running track. The project will include drainage structures, stormwater detention
ponds, new water lines, sewage treatment, landscaping, lighting, pavement markings, and signage.

The proposed water line will connect with an existing water line adjacent to NC 172 near its intersection
with the improved training center roadway connector. Sewer connections are not available in or near the
project area and other options are being investigated, such as an onsite septic system with drain fields or a
package wastewater treatment plant.

A.3 Project Limits of Disturbance and Location

The limits of disturbance for the proposed project will be approximately 40 acres of the 70-acre site.
Much of the project area was previously disturbed from the maintenance of the open fields, roadway,
utility right of way and past logging activities. There are 17.6 acres of jurisdictional wetlands in the
project area, which will be avoided to the maximum extent practicable. The master plan features a 2-acre
stormwater retention basin/drafting pond in the northwest quadrant of the property. Additional

2

stormwater retention basins may also be incorporated as the site is developed. The remaining 11 acres is
comprised of stream buffers, wetland buffers, and common areas.

B. PURPOSE AND NEED

The proposed project addresses the need for a Public Safety Training Center to complement the
curriculum offered by the College in Criminal Justice/Basic Law Enforcement, Emergency Management
Services, Hazard Analysis/Risk Management, Fire Protection Technology, and Emergency Medical
Services. Specialized training is required to maintain state and federal certifications. The proposed
center will provide a training facility for local law enforcement, fire and rescue, and emergency
management since the closest facility is in Wilmington (approximately 85 miles away). At present,
vacant parking lots on the College main campus are used for driver training exercises. The completion of
the Center will provide a state of the art training facility for the College and regional Emergency Services
personnel well into the future.

C. ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS

C.1 No Build Alternative

The no build alternative would avoid any potential environmental impacts associated with the
development of the project site; however, it would not meet the college’s goals and future needs, nor the
need for a state of the art Public Safety Training Center in southeastern North Carolina. Therefore, the
No-Build Alternative has been eliminated from further consideration.

C.2 Build Alternative

The Build Alternative would meet the purpose and need statement for the project. Completion of the
project would meet set goals in the college’s master plan, as well as, improve curriculum offerings in the
public safety sector well into the future.

D. EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PROJECT AREA

D.1 Topography and Geology

The project area lies in the Coastal Plain Physiographic Province of North Carolina. Topography in the
project area is moderately flat to flat with a well-defined stream channel (Bear Creek) bordering the
northern and eastern boundary. The elevation ranges from a topographic low of approximately 5 feet
above mean sea level (MSL) along Bear Creek to a topographic high of approximately 30 feet above
MSL near the center of the project area, which is proposed for development of the training center.

D.2 Soils

The process of soil development depends on both biotic and abiotic factors. These factors include past
geologic activities, nature of parent materials, environmental and human influences, plant and animal
activity, time, climate and topographical position. The USDA-Natural Resource Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey for Onslow County identifies 4 soil mapping units in the project area that includes
Baymeade fine sand, Craven fine sandy loam, Muckalee loam, and Onslow loamy fine sand. Of the four
soil series, Onslow loamy fine sand comprises the greatest proportion of the project area (41.3%), while
Muckalee loam, Craven fine sandy loam, and Baymeade fine sand occupy 26.1 %, 20.5%, and 12.1%,
respectively (Table 1).

3

Table 1. Soils in the Project Area
Soil Series Mapping
Unit
Drainage Class Hydric Status
Baymeade fine sand, 0 to 6
percent slope BaB Well drained Hydric
Craven fine sandy loam, 1 to 4
percent slope CrB Moderately well drained Hydric
Muckalee loam, 1 to 4 percent
slope Mk Poorly drained Hydric
Onslow loamy fine sand, nearly
level On Moderately well and somewhat
poorly drained Hydric

D.3 Land Use

The project area is rural in nature and located in an unincorporated area in southeast Onslow County.
Onslow County has zoned the area as Rural Agriculture (RA). The purpose of this zoning district is to
maintain a rural development pattern where low density single-family, multi-family, modular, or frame
modular and manufactured homes are intermingled with agricultural uses. This district is also designed to
protect rural areas from the intrusion of non-agricultural land uses that could create a nuisance, detract
from the quality of life, and/or present a danger to the natural environment.

The project area was once part of the Camp Lejeune military complex; however, in the early 1970’s,
some area properties were classified as surplus land and put up for sale by the General Services
Administration (GSA). The College acquired the land in 1973 under GSA’s surplus property rules. The
project area has been managed and maintained by the College since its purchase in 1973. It appears the
area was logged in the mid-to-late 1990’s (1998 aerial orthoimagery) and the large field has been
consistently maintained by routine mowing. The college has allowed local fire and law enforcement
agencies to use the project area for various training activities including SWAT, Sniper 1 and 2, patrol
techniques, riot control, and search and rescue training.

D.4 Wetlands

Jurisdictional wetlands in the project area consist primarily of Palustrine forested wetlands. The US Fish
and Wildlife Service National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) mapper identified wetlands, which border the
northern and eastern boundaries of the project area adjacent to Bear Creek. All wetlands in the project
area are located within the White Oak River Basin (USGS Hydrologic Unit 03020301).

Personnel with Environmental Services, Inc., and Bartlett Engineering and Surveying, PC, delineated and
surveyed jurisdictional wetlands within the project area in 2015 using the US Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) Wetlands Delineation Manual (1987) and subsequent regulatory guidance (Figure 3). An
approved Jurisdictional Determination was provided by the USACE on May 14, 2015 (Appendix A).
There are 17.6 acres of wetlands within the project area.

There are three main wetland types in the project area (Table 2).

Table 2. Jurisdictional Wetlands in the Project Area
Map ID NCWAM Classification Hydrologic Classification
WA Riverine Swamp Forest Riparian
WB Headwater Forest Non-Riparian
WC Pine Flat Non-Riparian

4

Riverine Swamp Forest is the dominant wetland type and occurs along the floodplain of Bear Creek. This
area contains mature bottomland hardwood vegetation including red maple, water oak, sweetgum, tulip
poplar, and iron wood.

Headwater Forest is the next dominant wetland type and occurs along the western boundary of the project
area. This area is dominated by loblolly pine with a few scattered hardwood species such as southern red
oak, white oak, and water oak.

Pine Flat is the third wetland type and stretches across the maintained open area (field) in the center of the
project area. This area is dominated by various grasses and includes large expanses of sedges, soft rush,
milkweed, and thistles with a few scattered sweetgum and persimmon seedlings.

D.5 Prime and Unique Farmland

The Farmland Protection Policy Act of 1981 (Public Law 97-98) requires entities to consider the impact
of their activities on prime, unique, and statewide farmland soils as defined by the US Department of
Agriculture Natural - Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) (Public Law 97-98, Subtitle 1 Section
1540). Prime farmland are lands that have the best combination of physical and chemical characteristics
for crop production. These lands could be cultivated land, pastureland, forestland, or other lands where
the soil quality, growing season, and moisture supply are present to economically produce high yield
crops with proper management techniques, including water management for irrigation. Baymeade fine
sand is classified as farmland of statewide importance and occupies approximately 12.9% of the project
area. Craven fine sandy loam and Onslow loamy fine sand are classified as prime farmland. Of these two
soil series, Onslow loamy fine sand comprises the greatest proportion of the project area at 42.3%, while
Craven fine sandy loam occupies 18.2%. Prime farmland soils make up approximately 60.5 percent of
the project area.

D.6 Public Lands and Scenic, Recreational, and State Natural Areas

Coastal Carolina Community College is a member of the North Carolina Community College System and
governed by a local board of trustees. The properties owned by the college are considered public lands.
There are no additional public or scenic lands, recreational, or Significant Natural Heritage Areas located
in the Bear Creek project area. The Camp Lejeune Spring Branch Limesinks, an exceptional rated natural
area lies within one mile southwest of the project area; however, this site will not be impacted by the
project.

D.7 Historic Architecture and Archaeology

The North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) GIS database indicates there are no
properties on the National Register of Historic Places within 5 miles of the project area. There are four
study listed properties (Sanders Farm Rural Historic District 1988, William David Sanders House 1988,
David John Sanders House 1988 and the Fennison House 1988), which are 2.0 to 2.5 miles east of the
project area. A project scoping request was forwarded to the SHPO on July 31, 2017 seeking comments.

D.8 Air Quality

The Jacksonville Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) consists of Onslow County and is a part of the
Wilmington Monitoring Region of the North Carolina Division of Air Quality (DAQ). At present, the
DAQ does not operate any ambient air quality monitoring stations in Onslow County. The Jacksonville
particle monitoring site was closed on December 31, 2007, because the measured concentrations were less
than 80 percent of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). Onslow County has not been

5

designated as a non-attainment area; however, it does require annual emission testing for automobiles.
Land use near the project area is generally rural in nature with some agricultural fields, forestlands, a few
scattered residential subdivisions and the Onslow County Learning Center. The closest DAQ monitoring
station is the Castle Hayne site (ID No. 37-129-0002) in nearby New Hanover County (Table 3). The
DAQ NAAQS for ozone is 0.070 ppm and PM 2.5 is 12.0 ug/m3. All current values and statistics are
averages for one-hour durations unless indicated otherwise. Based on new measures from the EPA on
hazardous air pollutants, Onslow County is rated a 78 on a scale of 100. Onslow County and the
proposed project site are in compliance with the NAAQS.

Table 3. DAQ 2017 Air Quality Data for New Hanover County – Castle Hayne Site
Air Pollutant Minimum Maximum Average Total/Unit Status
Ozone (O3) 9 34 N/A - ppb Normal
Ozone (8 Hr Avg) 11 31 N/A - ppb Normal
PM 2.5 – Local Conditions 62.0 11 6.0 ug/m3 Normal
Note: Data collected on 08/28/2017 and is in raw format and has not been validated. (DAQ Website)

D.9 Noise Levels

Noise is subject to the federal Noise Control Act of 1972 (PL-92-574) and Quiet Communities Act of
1978 (PL-95-6009) which require standards of compliance and recommend approaches to abatement for
stationary sources such as airports, highways, and industrial facilities. Noise is defined as unwanted
sound, particularly sounds without agreeable musical qualities. Sound is emitted from many sources
including motor vehicles, heavy equipment, airplanes, railroads, power generation plants, and factories.
The sounds generated by these entities constitute noise to people, and can disrupt normal activities when
they reach a certain level. Much of the area surrounding the proposed site is rural in nature with an
adjacent highway (NC 172), forest land, agricultural fields, scattered residential housing and a school.

D.10. WATER RESOURCES

D.10.1 Surface Water Resources

The project area is located in the White Oak River Basin in USGS Hydrologic Unit 03020301; DWR
Stream Index No. 19-41-11. Bear Creek (DWR Class: SA, HQW) is a tributary to the Intercoastal
Waterway. The SA classification represents tidal salt waters which are used for commercial shellfishing
or marketing purposes and are also protected for all Class SC and Class SB uses. All SA waters are also
High Quality Waters by supplemental classification. There are no waters in or near the project area listed
as impaired on the NC Division of Water Resources 2014 303(d) list for the White Oak River Basin
(Table 4).

Table 4. Surface Water Resources in the Project Area
Map ID Stream Name DWR Stream Classification
S1 Bear Creek SA, HQW
S2 Unnamed Tributary to Bear Creek SA, HQW (By Default)

D.10.2 Groundwater Resources

The project area lies within the Coastal Plain Physiographic Province of North Carolina. Three water
supply aquifers (surficial sands, Cretaceous, and Castle Hayne) are in Onslow County. Permeability of
the geologic formations surrounding these aquifers varies greatly based on location and each has varying
yields. The most significant problem facing these aquifers is the threat of saltwater intrusion.

6

D.11 Forest Resources

The natural communities are described according to the NC Natural Heritage Programs (NHP) Guide to
the Natural Communities of North Carolina Third Approximation (Schafale & Weakley 1990). Two
terrestrial community types were identified in the project area; Maintained/Disturbed and Blackwater
Bottomland Hardwoods – High Subtype (Table 5).

Maintained/Disturbed habitat is present throughout the project area in places such as roadside shoulders,
utility easements, and two maintained fields. The utility easement makes up approximately 1.4 acres of
disturbed/maintained right-of-way on the property. The two maintained fields comprise approximately
0.5 acre and 13.5 acres, respectively. Approximately 40 acres of the site was previously logged (clearcut)
in the late 1990’s (1998 aerial imagery). The vegetation in this community is comprised of early
successional species including various grasses, sedges (Carex spp.), thistle (Cirsium spp.), soft rush
(Juncus effusus), milkweed (Asclepias spp.), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), saw greenbrier
(Smilax bona-nox) and scattered seedlings of persimmon (Diospyros virginiana) and sweetgum
(Liquidambar styraciflua). These areas are managed and maintained by the Jones-Onslow EMC and the
college through herbicide application and a routine mowing regime.

The Blackwater Bottomland Hardwood Forest community occurs along the hummocky floodplain
adjacent to Bear Creek, which forms the northern and eastern boundary of the project area. Mature red
maple (Acer rubrum), water oak (Quercus nigra), sweetgum, Tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera) and
ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana) dominate the canopy. A few large loblolly pine trees (Pinus taeda) are
also present in the area. Midstory vegetation consists of red bay (Persea palustris), American holly (Ilex
opaca), red maple, ironwood, and sweetbay (Magnolia virginiana). Understory vegetation consists of
patches of saw palmetto (Serenoa repens), various sedges, netted chain fern (Woodwardia areolata), and
Christmas fern (Polystichum acrostichoides). In the wettest areas, royal fern (Osmunda reglis) and
lizard’s tail (Saururus cernuus) are present. Dense patches of vines are present throughout the project
area, including common greenbrier (Similax rotundifolia), trumpet vine (Campsis radicans), poison ivy
(Toxicodendron radicans), and coastal doghobble (Leucothoe axillaris).

Loblolly pine dominates the rest of the project area. Two age classes are present, with the youngest pine
ranging between 2 and 6 inches in diameter breast height (DBH), with scattered individuals up to 8 inches
DBH. Very little clear pine bole is present in the interior of these stands. Midstory vegetation is thick,
consisting of American holly, sweetgum, eastern red cedar (Juniperus virginiana), and flowering
dogwood (Cornus florida). In the wetter areas, a dense hardwood midstory is present including tulip
poplar, bayberry (Myrica cerifera) and red maple.

In the larger pine area, size classes range between 4 and 8 inches DBH, with scattered individuals of 10
inches DBH. Little to no clear pine bole is present. Hardwood trees are scattered including southern red
oak (Quercus falcata), water oak, and white oak (Quercus alba). Midstory vegetation includes
sweetgum, sweetbay, American holly, inkberry (Ilex glabra), black cherry (Prunus serotina) and
mockernut hickory (Carya tomentosa). Bracken fern (Pteridium aqulinum) is also present at the forest
edge.

Table 5. Coverage of Terrestrial Communities in the Project Area
Community Type Acreage in Study
Area (acres)
Maintained/Disturbed 54.5
Blackwater Bottomland Hardwood Forest 15.5

7

D.12 Shellfish or Fish and Their Habitats

Aquatic communities in the project area consists of Bear Creek, an unnamed tributary to Bear Creek and
associated wetlands. Bear Creek is a tributary to the Intracoastal Waterway which lies approximately 3.5
miles south of the project area. The Bear Creek Watershed is designated by the NC Division of Marine
Fisheries as a Primary Nursery Area. Primary Nursery Areas are areas in the estuarine system where
initial post-larval development takes place and is comprised of uniformly sized juvenile populations. The
Primary Nursery Area provides habitat for various species of fish, including important game fish such as
red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus), southern flounder (Paralichthys lethostigma), speckled trout (Cynoscion
nebulosus), Spot (Leiostomus xanthurus), Atlantic croaker (Micropogonias undulates), and possibly
American eel (Anguilla rostrate). These species can occupy the lower reaches of Bear Creek where the
salt/fresh water interface occurs. The headwater areas may support various species of freshwater fish
such as largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides), bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus), pumpkinseed
(Lepomis gibbosus), redbreast sunfish (Lepomis auritus), redear sunfish (Lepomis microlophus), banded
sunfish (Enneacanthus obesus), black crappy (Pomoxis nigromaculatus), yellow perch (Perca
flavescens), warmouth (Lepomis gulosus), chain pickerel (Esox niger), redfin pickerel (Esox americanus
americanus), eastern mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki), marsh killifish (Fundulus confluentus), spotfin
killifish (Fundulus luciae), swamp darter (Etheostoma fusiforme), and white catfish (Ameiurus catus).
Recreational fishing opportunities are limited in the project area due to limited access. Shellfish beds are
not present in or near the project area; however, the lower reaches of Bear Creek are a popular
shellfishing area for both clams and oysters, when not under State quarantine due to water quality
concerns. The unnamed tributary and associated wetlands provide riparian and benthic habitat for a
variety of amphibians and reptiles such as common snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentine), spring peeper
(Pseudacris crucifer), Mabee’s salamander (Ambystome mabeei), ornate chorus frog (Pseudacris ornate),
Carolina gopher frog (Rana capito), and various water snakes (Nerodia spp.). These areas would also
support crayfish (Cambaridae) and various benthic macroinvertebrates, such as amphipods and isopods.

D.13 WILDLIFE AND PROTECTED SPECIES

D.13.1 Wildlife

Terrestrial communities in the project area are comprised of both disturbed and natural habitats that may
support a diversity of wildlife species. Mammal species that commonly exploit forested habitats and
stream corridors found within the project area include various mice species, eastern gray squirrel (Sciurus
carolinensis), eastern cottontail (Sylvilagus floridanus), raccoon (Procyon lotor), Virginia opossum
(Didelphis virginiana), gray fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus), North American beaver (Castor
canadensis), black bear (Ursus americanus), bobcat (Felis fufus), and white-tailed deer (Odocoileus
virginianus). Birds that commonly use forest and forest edge habitats include red-shouldered hawk
(Buteo lineatus), American crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos), eastern meadowlark (Sturnella magna),
yellow-bellied sapsucker (Sphyrapicus varius), pileated woodpecker (Dryocopus pileatus), Carolina
chickadee (Poecile carolinensis), tufted titmouse (Baeolophus bicolor), and wild turkey (Meleagris
gallopavo). Birds that may use the open habitat or water bodies within the project area include mourning
dove (Zenaida macroura), American kestrel (Falco sparverius), belted kingfisher (Megaceryle alcyon),
great blue heron (Ardea herodias), wood duck (Aix sponsa), and great egret (Ardea alba).

Reptile and amphibian species that may use terrestrial communities located in the project area include the
timber rattlesnake (Crotalus horridus), eastern diamondback rattlesnake (Crotalus adamanteus),
cottonmouth (Agkistrodon piscivorus), copperhead (Askistrodon contortrix), eastern ribbon snake
(Thamnophis sauritus sauritus), corn snake (Pantherophis guttatus), black rat snake (Pantherophis
obsoletus), black racer (Coluber constrictor priapus), eastern hognose snake (Heterodon platirhinos),
eastern box turtle (Terrapene carolina carolina), snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentine), spring peeper

8

(Pseudacris crucifer), eastern fence lizard (Sceloporus undulatus) and five-lined skink (Plestiodon
fasciatus).

D.13.2 Federally Threatened and Endangered Species

The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) lists 112 species for Onslow County that have
state and/or federal status that are known from current records or were known to occur in the County
historically. As of March 25, 2015, the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) lists nineteen federally-
protected species for Onslow County (Table 6). Additionally, the bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus)
retains special protection under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act and the American alligator
(Alligator mississippiensis) is listed as threatened due to similarity of appearance (T S/A) to the American
crocodile.

A review of the NCNHP database on July 26, 2017, does not list any threatened or endangered species in
the proposed project area; however, habitat for the Red-cockaded woodpecker and West Indian manatee
does occur within one mile of the project area. Habitat requirements for each species are based on the
current best available information from the NCNHP and/or USFWS as well as an onsite investigation
conducted by Jan Gay, Environmental Scientist with Vaughn and Melton, on May 30, 2017.

Table 6. Federally Listed Threatened and Endangered Species for Onslow County
Common Name Scientific Name Federal
Status
Habitat
Present
Biological
Conclusion
American alligator Alligator mississippiensis T (S/A) Yes Not Required
Bald eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus BGPA Yes No Effect
Green sea turtle Chelonia mydas T No No Effect
Hawksbill sea turtle Eretmochelys imbricata E (H) No No Effect
Kemp’s ridley sea turtle Lepidochelys kempii E No No Effect
Leatherback sea turtle Dermochelys coriacea E No No Effect
Loggerhead sea turtle Caretta T No No Effect
Piping plover Charadrius melodus T No No Effect
Red-cockaded woodpecker Picoides borealis E Yes MA, NLAA
Red knot Calidris canutus rufa T No No Effect
Shortnose sturgeon Acipenser brevirostrum E (H) No No Effect
Atlantic sturgeon Acipenser oxyrinchus E No No Effect
West Indian manatee Trichechus manatus T No No Effect
Cooley’s meadowrue Thalictrum cooleyi E No No Effect
Golden sedge Carex lutea E No No Effect
Hirst’s panic grass Dichanthelium hirstii C No No Effect
Pondberry Lindera melissifolia E No No Effect
Rough-leaf loosestrife Lysimachia asperulaefolia E No No Effect
Seabeach amaranth Amaranthus pumilus T No No Effect
E = Endangered C = Candidate Species T (S/A) = Threatened due to similarity of appearance
T = Threatened H = Historic Record BGPA = Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
MA,NLAA = May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect

Red-cockaded Woodpecker
Status: Federally Endangered

Habitat Description: Red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW) requires roosting and nesting habitat in “open”
stands of pine containing trees 60 years and older. Longleaf pines are preferred, but other species of
southern pines are acceptable. RCW’s need live, larger, older pines typically infected with a fungus

9

known as red-heart disease in which to excavate their cavities for nesting. Foraging habitat is provided in
pine and pine hardwood stands 30 years old or older with foraging preference for pine trees 10 inches or
larger in diameter. Sufficient foraging habitat can be provided on 80 to 125 acres in good to moderately
stocked pine habitat. An aggregate of cavity trees is called a cluster and may include 1 to 20 or more
cavity trees on 3 to 60 acres. The average cluster is about 10 acres in size. Completed cavities that are
actively used have numerous small resin wells that exude sap, which acts as a defense mechanism against
tree climbing predators. Encroachment of midstory hardwoods will result in the abandonment of a
cluster. Control of these hardwoods is critical and prescribed burning is the most efficient way to provide
control.

Biological Conclusion: May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect
Suitable nesting habitat for the red-cockaded woodpecker does not exist within the project area. The area
was clearcut in the late 1990’s (1998 Aerial Imagery). Suitable foraging habitat is marginal within the
project area in the Pine Hardwood Forest community in the southern portion of the property. This
community is dominated by loblolly pine, size classes ranging between 4 and 8 inches DBH, with a few
individuals of 10 inches, but is not contiguous to suitable nesting habitat. No relic cavity holes were
observed within the project area. A review of the NCNHP records on July 26, 2017, indicates a known
occurrence within 1.0 mile of the PSA, which is on the Camp Lejeune military base. Due to the lack of
suitable nesting habitat and known occurrences within the project area, it has been determined this project
may affect but not likely to adversely affect the red-cockaded woodpecker.

West Indian Manatee
Status: Federally Threatened (Reclassified from Endangered May, 5, 2017)

Habitat Description: The manatee is a large mammal that moves between freshwater, brackish and
saltwater habitats. They prefer large, slow moving rivers, river mouths, and shallow coastal areas such as
coves and bays. The animals may travel great distances as they migrate between winter and summer
grounds. During winter, manatees congregate around warm springs and around power plants that
discharge warm water. In summer, they have been seen as far north as Virginia and Maryland. The
greatest threats to manatee survival are collisions with boats and loss of warm water habitats, especially in
Florida.

Biological Conclusion: No Effect
This project will not impact the West Indian Manatee or its habitats since there will be no direct impacts
to Bear Creek. A review of NCNHP records, on July 26, 2017, indicates known occurrences within one
mile of the project area. Habitat is limited in the project area and the nearest occurrence of manatee is
over 1.0 mile downstream of the project area in Bear Creek.

Cooley’s Meadowrue
Status: Federally Endangered

Habitat Description: Cooley's meadowrue occurs on circumneutral soils in grass-sedge bogs and wet
pine savannahs and savannah like areas. It may also grow along fire plow lines, in roadside ditches,
woodland clearings, and powerline rights-of-way, and needs some type of disturbance such as fire or
mowing to maintain its open habitat. Plants often found growing with Cooley’s meadowrue include tulip
poplar growing with bald cypress and/or Atlantic white cedar.

Biological Conclusion: No Effect
The project will not impact Cooley’s meadowrue, due to a lack of potentially suitable habitat. All open
areas within the project area have been highly disturbed, with surface soil layers apparently removed as
part of a clearing/grading process that allowed for the initial building within the area.

10

Golden sedge
Status: Federally Endangered

Habitat Description Golden sedge grows in sandy soils overlying coquina limestone deposits, where the
soil pH is unusually high for this region, typically between 5.5 and 7.2. Soils supporting the species are
very wet to periodically shallowly inundated. The species prefers the ecotone (narrow transition zone
between two diverse ecological communities) between the pine savanna and adjacent wet hardwood or
hardwood/conifer forest. Most plants occur in the partially shaded savanna/swamp where occasional to
frequent fires favor an herbaceous ground layer and suppress shrub dominance. Other species with which
this sedge grows include tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), pond cypress (Taxodium ascendens), red
maple (Acer rubrum var. trilobum), wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera var. cerifera), colic root (Aletris
farinosa), and several species of beakrush (Rhynchospora spp.). At most sites, Golden sedge shares its
habitat with Cooley's meadowrue (Thalictrum cooleyi), another federally endangered plant species, and
with Thorne's beakrush (Rhynchospora thornei), a species of concern.

Biological Conclusion: No Effect
The project will not impact Golden sedge, due to a lack of potentially suitable habitat. This species has a
very specific habitat requirement, as outlined above, which is not present within the project area.

Pondberry
Status: Federally Endangered

Habitat Description: Pondberry, for the most part, is associated with wetland habitats such as bottomland
and hardwoods in the interior areas, and the margins of sinks, ponds and other depressions in the more
coastal sites. The plants generally grow in shaded areas but may also be found in full sun.

Biological Conclusion: No Effect
The project will not impact pondberry. The project area occurs within the Coastal Plain of North
Carolina, where potentially suitable habitat is described as the margins of sinks, ponds, and other
depressions, habitats which are not present within the project area.

Rough-leaf Loosestrife
Status: Federally Endangered

Habitat Description: This species generally occurs in the ecotones or edges between longleaf pine
uplands and pond pine pocosins (areas of dense shrub and vine growth usually on a wet, peaty, poorly
drained soil) on moist to seasonally saturated sands and on shallow organic soils overlaying sand. Rough-
leaf loosestrife has also been found on deep peat in the low shrub community of large Carolina bays
(shallow, elliptical, poorly drained depressions of unknown origin). The grass-shrub ecotone, where
rough-leaf loosestrife is found, is fire-maintained, as are the adjacent plant communities (longleaf pine -
scrub oak, savanna, flatwoods, and pocosin). Suppression of naturally-occurring fire in these ecotones
results in shrubs increasing in density and height and expanding to eliminate the open edges required by
this plant. Several populations are known from roadsides and power line rights of way where regular
maintenance mimics fire and maintains vegetation so that herbaceous species are open to sunlight.

Biological Conclusion: No Effect
The project will not impact rough-leaved loosestrife, due to a lack of potentially suitable habitat. All
open areas within the project area have been highly disturbed, with surface soil layers apparently removed
as part of a clearing/grading process that allowed for the initial building within the area.

11

Bald Eagle and Golden Eagle Protection Act

Habitat for Bald eagle primarily consist of mature forest in proximity to large bodies of open water for
foraging. Large dominant trees are utilized for nesting sites typically within 1.0 mile of open water. A
review of the NCNHP records on July 26, 2017, indicates no known occurrences within 1.0 mile of the
PSA. No mature forest or water bodies large enough or sufficiently open to be considered potential
feeding sources were identified in or near the PSA. Due to limited habitat, it has been determined that
this project will not affect this species.

D.14 Introduction to Toxic Substances

Development of the training center has the potential to introduce toxic substances into the environment.
Potential sources include exhaust emissions, oils, fuels, and lubricants generated by heavy equipment
during site preparation and construction. Other potential sources include, oils, fuels, lubricants, heavy
metals, lead, solvents, and detergents, associated with stormwater runoff from the driving course, fire
training facility, shooting range and other facility amenities once the site is fully developed.

D.15 Socio-Economics and Environmental Justice

Onslow County has a population of approximately 199,025 people based on projected populations for
July 2017 from the NC Office of Management and Budget. Of the overall population, 35.28 percent are
minorities. This minority population is comprised of approximately 14.09 percent African-American,
12.57 percent Hispanic-Origin, 2.49 percent Asian/Pacific Islander, 0.82 percent American Indian, 4.55
percent multiracial, and 0.76 percent another race. Approximately 14.60 percent of the population is
below the federal poverty level with a per capita income of $24,916 (NC Department of Commerce
2015).

E. PREDICTED ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF THE PROJECT

E.1 Topography and Geology

The development of the training center will require minor modifications to the existing topographies and
landscapes to establish proper grading and slope requirements. A final grading plan will be developed to
provide for erosion control and appropriate stormwater drainage systems and treatments.

E.2 Soils

Soils within the project area will be graded to accommodate site development and placement of
associated structures. The site will be engineered to optimize cut and fill grading plans. Geotechnical
analysis will be conducted to determine if existing soils are satisfactory for construction and a grading
plan will be developed to amend or improve existing soil conditions if necessary.

E.3 Land Use

The development of the Public Safety Training Center is consistent with the revised Coastal Carolina
Community College Master Plan; however, it is not consistent with current land uses and zoning of this
unincorporated area of southeast Onslow County. The area is currently zoned as Rural Agriculture (RA)
where low density development is intermingled with agricultural uses. Development of the project site
could potentially impact the rural nature of the area, but would provide valuable educational opportunities
for the public in addition to much needed training facilities for area emergency management personnel in
southeastern North Carolina. There will be direct impacts associated with the development of the training

12

center by converting open and forested landscapes to roadways, classroom and maintenance buildings,
various training stations, parking facilities, and a vehicular driving range.

E.4 Wetlands

There are no anticipated impacts to Bear Creek and its associated wetlands with the development of the
project site. There is a small unnamed tributary to Bear Creek and associated wetlands (Figure 3) that
may be impacted by the improved access road (Figure 4). These two areas were previously impacted by
the existing roadway and will require approximately 0.11 acres of additional surface water/wetland
impacts to accommodate the improved roadway design. The improved roadway typical section will be a
28 foot back-of-curb to back-of-curb section with 2 @ 12-foot travel lanes with curb and gutter and a
sidewalk berm which will reduce the overall roadway cross section. There are 17.6 acres of wetlands
located within the project boundaries. All wetlands have been avoided to develop this site, except for the
existing road crossings.

Table 7. Wetland Impacts in the Project Area
Map ID Preliminary Wetland Impacts (Acres)
WB 0.03
WC 0.08
TOTAL 0.11
NOTE: Estimated impacts are based on an 80-foot construction width.

E.5 Prime and Unique Farmland

The development of the training center will impact prime and unique farmland soils; however, review of
past orthoimagery indicates that no agricultural activities have taken place in the project area. The
property was formerly part of the Camp Lejeune military complex until it was sold to the college as
surplus property in 1973. The college has maintained the open areas in the project area through routine
maintenance activities such as mowing and herbicide application since its purchase.

E.6 Public Lands and Scenic, Recreational, and State Natural Areas

The development of the training center will impact public lands. Previously disturbed open and forested
landscapes will be impacted by the project; however, the project will meet the future needs and goals of
the college by providing nearby training facilities to complement its various curriculums and provide a
public service to the various emergency services organizations/personnel throughout southeastern North
Carolina. No scenic or recreational areas will be impacted by the project. The Camp Lejeune Spring
Branch Limesinks, an exceptional rated natural area, lies within a mile of the project area; however, this
site will not be impacted by the project.

E.7 Historic Architecture and Archaeology

The NC State Historic Preservation Office has reviewed the proposed project and provided a “No
Comment” letter dated August 23, 2017 (Appendix A), which states that there are no known
archaeological or historic sites within the project area; therefore, the development of the proposed project
site will not impact any cultural resources.

13

E.8 Air Quality

The development of the training center is not expected to create any adverse effects on air quality in this
attainment area.

E.9 Noise Levels

The development of the training center could increase noise levels in the surrounding area. The use of the
driving course and shooting range will increase noise levels during training activities; however, these
increases should be insignificant if appropriate mitigative measures are implemented. We anticipate that
the shooting range will be designed and constructed according to EPA guidelines. The distance between
the driving course/shooting range is over 0.25 mile to the nearest neighbor to the east and is buffered by
Bear Creek and associated wetlands. The Onslow County Learning Center is approximately 0.50 mile
south of the training center and is buffered by undisturbed forest land.

E.10 WATER RESOURCES

E.10.1 Surface Water Resources

There are no anticipated direct impacts to Bear Creek associated with the development of the training
center. There is a small unnamed tributary to Bear Creek and associated wetlands that may be impacted
by the improved access road (Figure 4). These two areas were previously impacted by the existing
roadway and may require additional surface water impacts to accommodate the improved roadway
design; however, these additional impacts are considered minor. The improved roadway typical section
will be a 28 foot back-of-curb to back-of-curb section with 2 @ 12-foot travel lanes with curb and gutter
and a sidewalk berm which will reduce the overall roadway cross section. Impacts to water quality may
occur when fields and forest lands are converted to impervious surfaces resulting in a decrease in rainfall
infiltration rates, especially during peak storm events. Typical pollutants associated with stormwater
runoff include eroded soils, fuels, oils, lubricants, heavy metals, solvents, detergents, pesticides,
fertilizers, and trash. Permanent impacts to water quality are not expected due to the implementation of
appropriate Best Management Practices (BMP’s) to avoid and minimize potential impacts to downstream
aquatic resources associated with stormwater runoff.

E.10.2 Groundwater Resources

No direct impacts to groundwater resources will result from the development of the training center. All
stormwater runoff will be directed to detention basins placed at strategic locations throughout the project
site.

E.11 Forest Resources

The development of the training center will impact forest resources. Approximately 40 acres of young
pine and hardwood forest will be cleared to develop the project site. These stands were previously logged
(clearcut) in the late 1990’s (1998 aerial imagery). Loss of these forested areas will result in the loss of
early successional wildlife habitats; however, suitable habitats are still available in the nearby Camp
Lejeune Spring Branch Limesinks natural area and other adjacent forest lands.

E.12 Shellfish or Fish and Their Habitats

Shellfish beds are not present in the project area; however, Bear Creek and associated wetlands does
support various species of fish. The additional increase in impervious surfaces and stormwater runoff

14

related to site development has the potential to impact water quality, fish, and their habitats. Direct
impacts to fisheries and their habitats are not anticipated due to the filtering capacity of the wetland buffer
along Bear Creek and the implementation and maintenance of appropriate sedimentation and erosion
control measures during construction. In addition, appropriate stormwater control measures will be
incorporated in the final design of the training center to reduce potential impacts to surface waters and
downstream aquatic resources.

E.13 WILDLIFE AND PROTECTED SPECIES

E.13.1 Wildlife

Terrestrial communities in the project area may be impacted by project construction because of clearing
and grading activities and the creation of impervious surfaces in association with site development at full
build-out. Much of the project area is a maintained field with some fringed forested areas adjacent to the
wetlands associated with Bear Creek. Loss of the forested areas could reduce available habitat; however,
the riparian wetland habitats will not be impacted and are still available, as well as, the nearby habitats of
the Camp Lejeune Spring Branch Limesinks natural area to the west.

E.13.2 Federally Threatened and Endangered Species

Due to the lack of suitable habitat and known occurrences within the project area, it has been determined
this project may affect but not likely to adversely affect the red-cockaded woodpecker and will not affect
other federally listed threatened and endangered species.

E.14 Introduction of Toxic Substances

The development of the training center has the potential to introduce toxic substances into the
environment based upon the increase in impervious surfaces, and stormwater runoff, once the site is fully
developed. Potential source inputs, as stated in Section D.14, can contribute to stormwater toxicity,
which can be minimized by proper operation and maintenance of vehicles, equipment, stormwater
management devices and various other onsite training amenities to reduce site and offsite contamination.

E.15 Socio-Economics and Environmental Justice
The development of the training center will not adversely impact any minority populations, housing, or
other environmental justice issues in or near the project area. The development of the site will create job
and educational opportunities for the public in the southeast region of North Carolina.

F. MITIGATIVE MEASURES

 Appropriate erosion and sedimentation control measures will be implemented and maintained
during the construction phase of the project.
 Permanent stormwater BMP’s such as grassed swales and stormwater detention basins will be
installed at various locations on the site to treat stormwater runoff and reduce potential impacts to
nearby surface waters and aquatic habitats.
 Vegetated riparian buffers will be utilized to decrease pollutant inputs into nearby surface waters
and wetlands.
 An earthen berm will be constructed around the shooting range to dampen the noise generated
during training activities. In addition, trees and shrubs can be planted along the top of the berm to
further dampen noise levels.

15

 Lead abatement at the shooting range will follow EPA best management practices guidelines for
shooting ranges.

G. STATE AND FEDERAL PERMITS REQUIRED

This project may require a 404 Nationwide Permit from the US Army Corps of Engineers, a 401 General
Water Quality Certification from the North Carolina Division of Water Resources, as well as, a CAMA
permit for potential impacts to streams and wetlands. An approved Erosion and Sedimentation Control
Plan/National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Construction Permit, and a Stormwater
Management Plan approved and issued by the North Department of Environmental Quality, Division of
Energy, Mineral and Land Resources will likely be required.

H. CONCLUSION STATEMENT
Select the appropriate statement below:
After preparation / review of this EA, the responsible state agency has concluded
there is a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) and will not be preparing an Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS).
The agency has completed this EA and is hereby submitting it for review and
comment. After a consideration of the comments received, the agency will proceed with a
FONSI or prepare an EIS.
-Da,,ocz4,

Signed

Agency
16

17

I. REFERENCES

Conant, Roger., and J.T. Collins, 1998. A Field Guide to Reptiles and Amphibians
Eastern/Central North America, 3rd ed. Expanded. Houghton Mifflin. 616 pp.

Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Technical
Report Y-87-1, U. S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station. Vicksburg, Mississippi.

Jones, Brena, Eastern Non-Game Biologist, North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission,
Personal Communication and email, August 16, 2017, V&M North Carolina, Inc.

Martof, B.S., W.M. Palmer, J.R. Bailey, and J.R. Harrison III. 1980. Amphibians and Reptiles
of the Carolinas and Virginia. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press. 264 pp.
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Groundwater Databases website,
https://www.nc.gov/services/groundwater-databases

North Carolina Division of Environmental Quality Native and Nonindigenous Freshwater Fish
website,
https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/water-resources-data/water-sciences-home-
page/ecosystems-branch/native-nonindigenous-fish

North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Primary Nursery Areas website,
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/mf/primary-nursery-areas

North Carolina Division of Air Quality – Monitoring Data by Site website,
https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/air-quality/air-quality-data/current-monitoring-data-by-
site/wilmington-region

North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Water Resources.
2014 North Carolina 303(d) List-Category 5.
North Carolina Division of Water Resources Surfaces Waters Classification website,
https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/planning/classification-
standards/classifications

North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Natural and Cultural Resources website,
https://ncnhde.natureserve.org

North Carolina Office of Management and Budget Demographics website,
https://www.osbm.nc.gov/demog/county-projections

North Carolina One Map website, www.nconemap.com

Onslow County GIS data website, https://maps.onslowcountync.gov/

Peterson, R.T., editor. 2010. A Field Guide to the Birds of Eastern and Central North America.
6th ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. 445 pp.

18

Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North
Carolina - Third Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks
and Recreation, NCDEQ, Raleigh, NC, 326 pp.
https://www.ncnhp.org/references/publications/classification-natural-communities-north-
carolina-3rd-approximation

United States Army Corps of Engineers. 2012. Regional Supplement to the Corps of
Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
(Version 2.0). ERDC/EL TR-12-9. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Research
and Development Center. http://el.erdc.usace.army.mil/elpubs/pdf/trel10-9.pdf

United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. Web
Soil Survey of Onslow County, North Carolina.
http://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm

United States Environmental Protection Agency Environmental Justice Viewer Mapper
https://ejscreen.epa.gov/mapper/ejscreen_SOE.aspx

United States Fish and Wildlife Service Endangered and Threatened Species by County in North
Carolina website, https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/onslow.html

FIGURES

Figure 1. Bear Creek Public Safety Training Center Master Plan
Figure 2. USGS Topographical Quadrangle Map
Figure 3. Wetlands and Streams Delineation Map
Figure 4. Phase 1 Bear Creek Public Safety Training Center Overall Site Plan

),*85(
)),*85(66:%:&:$
),*85('HF

APPENDICES

Appendix A. Resource Agency Coordination

• SHPO Concurrence Letter
• US Army Corps of Engineers Approved Jurisdictional Determination Document

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona 141. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper
Secretary Susi H. Hamilton
August 23, 2017
Mark Davis
Environmental Specialist
Vaughn & McIton Consulting Engineers
40 Colonial Square
Sylva, NC 28779
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
[e-mail]
Re: Proposed Coastal Carolina Community College Public Safety Training Center, Onslow County,
GS 17-1473
Dear Mr. Davis:
Thank you for your letter of July 31, 2017, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by the
project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment, please
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579 or renee. leg dhill-
[e-mail]. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above -referenced
tracking number.
Sincerely,
D14kz_-&x
Ramona M. Bartos
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mai] Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6599

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2015-00487 County: Onslow U.S.G.S. Quad: NC-HUBERT
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner: Coastal Carolina Community College Agent: Environmental Services Inc.
Mr: David Heatherly Mr. Robert Turnbull
Address: 444 Western Blvd. 4901 Trademark Drive
Jacksonville, NC 28540 Raleigh, NC 27610
Size (acres) 70 Nearest Town Jacksonville
Nearest Waterway Mill Creek River Basin Bowe -Core Sounds. North Carolina.
USGS HUC 3020106 Coordinates Latitude: 34.6633061340178
Longitude:-77.2297684251998
Location description: The site is located alone NC 1.72 just north of the Camp Leieune entrance at 805 Hwv 172
�adiacent to Bear Creed, Unslow-Coun#y — -
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
Based on preliminary information, there may be waters of the U.S. including wetlands on the above described project area
. We strongly suggest you have this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA)
jurisdiction. To be considered final, ajurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary
determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33
�.., CFRi part 33I) If-yS)y.wish :you may;reque.st an,apprpved,JD (which may ,be appealed), by contacting. the Corps district
f for ,firrther instruction -Alsq, you may provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the
JD.
B. Approved,Determination•...=
There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements
of Section 10;of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is achange in the law
or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of
this notification.
X There are waters of the U.S. including wetlands on the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1.344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ We strongly suggest you have the waters of the U.S. including wetlands on your project area delineated. Due to the
size of your, property and/or our present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a
timely manner. For more timely delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any
delineation must be verified by the Corps.
X The 'waters of the U.S.; including wetlands on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been
verified by the Corps. We strongly, suggest you=have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be
reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once veriti -d, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to
CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
The waters of the U.S, including wetlands hav been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by -the Corps. Regulatory, OfFt vial identi fie, below on - . Unless there is,a,change_in the law�or_our published
regulations;, this determination may: be relied upo for a period not to exceed -five years from the date of this notification.
There are no waters of the'U.S., to include wetlar is, present on the above described project area which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean ' 'later Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
Page 1 of 2

e
0
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. if you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeAt co erenee-ori ieeting; and any supplemental--infemation-that-the-review offre�has _detennn-ined s-needed-to_.
clarify the administrative record. Neither, the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may .provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact:
also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division,
Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Attn: Brad Shaver
CESAD-PDO
69 Darlington Ave
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
Wilmington, NC 28403
60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investi ations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Brad Shaver, 69 Darlington Ave
Wilmington, NC 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
_ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(LAMA), You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to
determine their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this
determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Brad Shaver at 910-251-4611 or
Brad.E.Shaver(a)usace.army.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: The subject areas exhibit wetland characteristics as described in the 1987 Corps
Delineation Manual and appropriate regional supplement The wetlands in question are abutting Bear Creek and its
tributaries, Bear Creek transitions into t a TNW with tidal influence further down slope.
D. Remarks: The site was field verified on 3/3/2015. During the field review changes to the line were requested
before a final survey should be prepared.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This del ineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the
particular site identified in this request. The del ineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation
provisions of the Food Security ,Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation
in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources
Conservation Service; prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B. above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an Rr A to, he accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP.
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by .5/11/2015.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Digitally
O9 ffice if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence." 56
SHAVER.BRAD.E. 127660 I 'DN'c=1US,'o SbGovernment,,ou=DoD,000 PKI;
ou=USA, cn=SHAVER.BRAD.E.12766ot 756
Corps Regulatory Official: 756 Date: 201 S.03.1111,03:32-04'00'
Date: 3/11/2015 Expiration Date: 3/11/2020
cc: Ms. Joanne Steenhuis,NCDENR-DWR
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to' do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at
http:,'/'reL-ulatoiN.LiSaCeSLirvey.com/

a
Applicant: Coastal Car Comm College File Number: SAW-2015-00487 Date: 3/11/2015
Attached is: D See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission) A
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission) B
PERMIT DENIAL C
® APPROVEDJURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
�� �PJtnrugdtritatrtt aei c�the liiv deeatort
<c�tc�rr�I i��i�m mny be~���� ��w naee a�v rmlri�s� C�v I"ur.�II.c uiattorvP turmxatzilPc�rts as � rx ,A
Cp.v" a r� �ila�rts,af � CAR P� .r
A.-INITIAL-,PR_OFEERED PERMIT. You may acceptor object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a'Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section lI of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may`. (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a StandardPermit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you. may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal, the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the; division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form.
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

51.01'�f
52tl'25'�2"►`
14 4. 16'---A. Q
WPa-i
R
4
N
F � DIANNE u S UMODS f � N/r
NAfiBARA pECO REFERE"m NOT FOUND 1 ALT01! DAyi5 dr
CNx60 I I N 5 '01602 ± (,41WK NARWW"
77293 aH 2771 PI: 605
IC ZORDQ►1 L MAiIDGR4111 1 PD 33 FIC 205
DD 7G1 PC 249 PARIDl O23229
I ORYAN NOOLC FAMMONS II PARID:O4050
Ott 40 PC 25 y
' PARIQ: 034520 I
111 �
V1V1 -
4 t•� ' WXa-74/
CERf1FICATE, NOTES, &
[ r
SITE DATA
11
ARE ON SHEET 4
�. +
N'Ph-I� 1hPA-yJ
`dl„unllrgy
CAR
MPA-117 DATA P0I111
',FSSlQr:'ti'fF�.
�c99r
LCIGATIaN-
- SEAL
-
qL-4741
1
( IN FEET )
I Smh = E00 Et
N: \_CADWO. ANDPRWEC I S\CCCC/14265\1115C\M 286WL1
wo-93 WXG-75/ r IOCATION MAP
I scuE: Irrs
sxa-I
vra-7s/
SX13 xa-lus 7D D (t3 ACRES
M> N
SLOW twNly
De 2633
a� 51Pa-fib PC 7PO
PM10: O+
wP0
/1 rpnn�oL rm/! i A-13A !
iINOH NE9AR! yipa_5 mrtfl9e pant F !t 4wxa-20
Q srYu9.w
E:sulo,o.a: 1Ippee� 9Ee.N1 DATA PMRT
HC 9RO Hw 6] p911 WSJ 14P[i-1 11�1}YJPY 9P LOCATION"
W CAR
f
AMil.9i
, arP (uw ea (3011 AN I
VIPs
PI
WxA-IA N/F
._y OI ANNE M. SIYMQNS
YAfA-14 I PEEDT F R D
IL NOT F 160
�1 YR9��-1 � 7ACA-1Q �a`e 95.+9' '+V PAR+D10166N
"DATA POINT I
WAA-I ,LOCATION' %iEA DS CONTINUE 1`
F
COUNTIY
,;Whr,5
ONSLOW
CB 7633 PC 720
PAIM17=PIp673
VrETLAND DELINEATION MAP
r
WETLANOS CONTINUE
LFT
BARTLETT
PROPERTY OF
7R(�Y2
QFFSIYF
ART
J,
ENGINEERING & SUR4EY1% PC
19f1e HASH 51HEEI HORIH 11[1: 3. ]9s-p]o�
w �L� �p/�E �I�'A
COASTAL CI'1RCH JNA
LEGEND
33.25'
-Lsw lN.C. rags -Ilia W rAx Asa)) sss-mw
�■ ■�
COZY MUNCOLLEGErTYCOLLEGER
,I
EXISTING CONCRETE MONUMENT
�;
wlr. wro� 7L15
wHe[r sn a oe
aROxcl: 111H6
•
EXSTING MAGNETIC NAIL
IRON PIPE SET
'
&CALF I- " 2W
I or."
z76
CITY OF NISON ONSLOW COUNTY
f I
IRON REOAR SET (CONTROL POINT)
NVAvrn �ouncrn
oo
- °
NORTH CAiCLNA ZONE:
nos 2'19NI EST

LINE TABLE - A THROUGH
A-8 - 0-06, 9-C - L67-170.
C-13 - L71-1-254
0ria Y
Length
Direcifon
1-3
14.29
N68'52'24"E
L4
22.47
N81'5O'26"E
L5
7552
S8M9'29"E
L6
1743
552*15,321
L7
13.48
N82'51'42"E
L8
2267
N89'26'20"E
L9
2149
! 74'08'52"E
L10
10.20
S87"15'49'E
L11
22.78
S8218'20"E
112
19.29
S35'52'127
L13
38.93
N89'Q6'14"E
L14
37.28
S823944°E
L15
37AI
S53'34'29"E
116
22.81
571'15'02"E
L17
16,15
S13'3i"03"E
08
24.34
S76'44'00"E
L19
7.95
N471510"E
L20
24.13
N76'25'57"E
L21
18464
N50'42'08"E
L22
22.93
S38'2337"E
L23
37.18
S38'32'57"W
1.24
9,66
S33'I6'13"E
L25
19.94
S20'22'06"E
L26
23UO
N79'05'17"E
L27
25.15
S43'14'27"E
L28
18-64
S41'54'04"E
L29
20.30
549'48'04'E
L30
15.46
N56'12'15"E
1.31
21.63
N79`51'34"E
L32
13.31
N79'39'67"E
L33
14.53
N TIN23t
L34
15.12
1439'51'01 "E
Line Y
Length
pirecllon
L35
17.8A
NI5114110"W
L36
15.22
N4944'28"E
L37
19.91
N72,30431"E
L38
19.36
N59'52'55"E
L39
20.OB
S83'50'461
L40
28.26
N71'27'38"E
L41
24.39
N76'5620"E
L42
33,18
S27'44'06"E
L43
17.04
S56'37561
L44
8.06
N6114'35°E
L45
21.36
N79'50'32"E
L46
19.16
N33'381294lE
L47
16.90
449'38'57"E
L48
16-93
N67'51'371
L49
2.19
S01'02140" W
L50
14.35
S67'19'27"E
L51
3C24
S52'14445"E
L52
29.03
S60'Ol'52"E
L53
27.88
S42'S9'09"E
L54
5.54
S57'5413"E
L55
19,98
N85't SSWE
L56
17.04
N36'S5'30"E
L57
12.03
N38108'26`1:
L50
23.46
N06'17'421
L59
12.48
N73'52'50"E
LBO
19.19
S53'0l'52'E
L61
22.17
N81'25'02'E
L62
27,33
556"04'Il"E
L63
20AS
N53'45'00"E
L64
38,07
5551151091E
L65
26.07
S11"55'58"E
166
16.50
S52.35'36"E
Line Y
length
t}lrestivn
S72133'30"E
571133,081E
N28'531031
N28"41'58'E
NIMS421
N18'25'14"W
N38'44'15"E
N02132443"W
N06'49'20"W
N30'47'34"W
N42'3443511W
N52'39'43"W
NO3'2VOUT
N09'46'34"W
N67'304"E
S6537'54"E
S48'20'22'E
S70'36'29"E
S58'54'4IT
S721715"E
584'O6"27"E
N55'4633'E
N5544'29'E
N62'18'52"E
N74'28'13"E
N76'38'06'E
N60'40111
N50'40'161
N63'25'00"E
N76'42'52"E
N58'26'36"E
N63-57.02"E
Line Y
L99
1-100
1.101
L102
LJ03
L104
L165
1-106
1.107
LI08
009
L.IJO
L111
L112
L113
L114
L115
L116
017
018
Ll19
L120
L121
1122
L123
L124
L125
L126
027
L128
L}29
L130
Length
22.77
18.06
15.69
21.50
12,93
22.51
19,95
16.63
13,34
38,29
27.36
16.00
8.67
5.81
2868
7.36
16.40
19.87
16,34
8.88
24.87
31.28
25.06
21.74
21.10
22.17
10.05
6.40
14.18
30-20
25.90
16.05
Peelion
N87"43'021E
N55'53'31"E
N554T30'E
N09'37'04"E
NO3'47'33"E
N21'24'07"W
N00'25'20"W
N34'44'23"E
N59'49'381
S6011'58"E
SOTWOB"E
N47'59'33"E
N52'R9'40"F.
N72'36'02"W
N16'DO'51"W
N60102'38"W
S5741'06"W
N61'27'54"W
N51105'58"E
N30'33'47"£
N8218'537
N82'40'20"E
S69'30'05"E
N73'00'20"E
N65-46.05"E
N48'50'08"f
N54'56'05"E
S4225'21"E
S23'42'53"W
51233,311E
SITIN57"E
S06103'03"E
Line 0
L131
L132
L133
L134
L135
L136
L137
L130
L139
L140
1141
L142
L143
L144
L145
L145
L147
L148
L149
L150
L151
L152
L153
054
L155
L156
L157
L758
059
L180
061
L 167
Length
2%30
17,65
19.07
6.77
23.29
18.2Y
20.79
13.11
1840
19.59
7.75
15-47
74.93
18.45
lk25
22.04
13,40
18.40
30,06
22.66
33.55
9.97
17.61
10,00
24.07
$3,45
3LI3
20.52
17,51
2031
23 75
14,34
Qirectiorr
S36"40'47"E
1 552'49'39"E
577.50'41"f
N'S1'20'53"E
N35'32'09'E
N2TOO 7"E
NOS'25'44"E
N48'27'34"E
S3814'04"E
1 S33'49'44%
S74'17'10'E
N61'58'48"E
N13'17'57"E
N15'31'61"E
N49'24'27"E
S69'17'13"E
S52r07'341
S50'46'15"E
SOS'}1'24"E
S14'44'45"W
S00'5006"W
533'51'S6"E
$59'57-WE
N64'44'10"E
N23100'46'E
S5215'08"E
N83'44'16"E
N78'26'37"E
N28'50'28"W
N31Y75'49"E
N21'35'11"
N14'0!'29"W
Llne N
063
L164
L165
L160
L167
L165
069
L170
L171
L172
L173
L174
075
L176
L177
078
L179
L180
L181
082
083
084
085
086
L187
L188
Ll%
Ll90
091
L192
LL193
L194
Length
17.48
19,34
21.18
16.53
1098
6.67
22,25
13.79
16.75
17,33
7.94
40,40
20.73
31+24
26.15
16,56
21,46
33.50
15.89
28.90
19.48
18,01
$0.41
28.27
33.95
1690
19.33
31.45
19.54
23.67
R 12
11.33
Direction
N08'23'0441E
501'29'38"£
S85'094301E
567'Of'53"E
589V'521E
N3534'18"E
N3037'54"E
NO3'4I'OS"W
N75'57397
NO64611"E
N83.13'10"E
S76'49'46"E
N88'36'34"E
S87'40'201
N8319'31"E
S80'42'48"E
N90-00.00"E
S22106'1I -E
S88'S2'Q5"E
SQTl9'57"W
S1TtYd O E
512"32'04'E
S50'01'52"W
S501QI't37W
S12141'59"W
SOH'37'58"W
S15'19'54"E
S1327'49"E
S59'02'16"£
580331571E
S70'35'25"E
54975'46"E
L67
16.12
LBO
9.80
LBO
15.51
L70
21.22
L71
23.02
L72
12.67
L73
20.49
L74
26,48
L75
22,42
L7B
17.14
L77
16,84
L78
21.17
L79
20,96
L80
12.60
L81
7.98
1.82
19.66
L83
27.36
L84
28.10
L85
22.88
L85
14.09
L87
19.16
L88
20.20
L69
13.87
L90
ID-91
L91
27.09
L92
2099.
L93
21.05
L94
14.40
L95
7,03
L96
28.67
L97
28.16
L98
17.09
- SEAL
e L-4741 ? -
9Cm .per,-`
poi'.
AELINEAWN MAP

LINE TABLE - A THROUGH 0
CONTINUED
A--6 - L3-L66, B-C L97-L70,
r_n : ,71-174a
L111e
Lmgtl+ 0lrectlon
Una #
Length
D[metlon
L195
41.49 S6748'23"£
L227
2057
N85'21'26%
LT96
25.82 583'09'52"ll
L228
25.93
549'09'40"E
L197
44.55 S83'49'361
L229
29.56
51759'42"E
LI98
45.36 S64'OS'15"E
L230
17.09
SS]32'52"W
L199
18,52 S59'40'52"E
1.231
35,43
508'40144"W
1-200
24.70 S15'48'301
1.232
14,08
S01'60'22"W
L201
20.52 S17'09'41"E
L233
24.63
S53'35"56"W
L202
26.50 SOY3W281
L234
29,22
S44'14'W'W
L203
19-59 S57'2642"E
L235
1356
S27'I1'12"W
L204
2859 S78'4550"E
L236
31.40
S22'44'43"E
L205
21-96 N87'5503"E
L237
27-55
S02'04'OW'E
1.206
13.19 S74'1094"E
L236
1111
S7538'55"W
L207
24.02 SL8'13'141
L239
35.44
S42130'26"W
L208
24.47 S09'13'46"'W
L240
21.15
S13'06'45"E
L209
18,43 S03'22'55"W
L24T
17M
SO4'40'16"W
L210
8.72 516'12'38"W
L242
10.96
N36441'43"E
L211
3534 S69'I7'S9"W
L243
29.42
S55'59'50"E
L212
24.00 S07'44'27"W
1.244
21 16
S58'49'05"E
M3
15,05 S53'53"56"E
L245
26-88
S32'06'41`E
L214
2&36 556107'23"E
L246
23.31
555'22'42"E
L215
34.53 555'54, 14"E
L247
21.88
S57"43'17"W
L210
15,09 S44'21'30"E
L248
29,52
S43-54'57"W
1-217
22.20 S6613'25"E
L249
19.99
N48-44-11"W
L218
37A6 S63'25'22"E
L250
20,00
N61'33'54"W
L210
25.60 S51'15'29"E
L2$t
25.10
S83'56'16"W
L220
32.52 525'37'35-E
L252
23-90
S50'36'13"W
L221
28.94 S34'41'54'E
L253
9.19
N79'1O'26"W
L222
10.93 S68'40143"E
L254
20.90 I
S30-11'42"W
L223
1 2t48 1 551-33'49"E
N44'58'22"E
�L221419.39
24,31
N84'59'27"E
30.47
N63'19'44"E
LINE 7ABLE - E 70 C
E--C - L505-069
Line
L505
l.engln
�16,35
I 0lrectivn
N28'04'02"W
L506
SLUZ
N72'28'32"W
L507
51,11
N16'55'17"W
L509
49-70
NI3'40'39"E
L509
42-29
N09-22.54"W
1,510
1 48.36
40219101
1,511
52.54
NI1'54'16"E
L512
54,04
NDX05'28"W
L513
52.20
427107'47"W
L514
35.00
N51'52'25"W
L515
11.12
N37'31'10"W
LS16
43.90
049'41'49"W
1517
56.43 1
N72'52'28"W
L518
38.88
N74'34'13"W
L519
34.92
U59'18'32"W
L520
48.64
N31'59'57-W
L521
32.88
N34'33'24"W
L522
29.77
N63'19'04"W
L523
43,90
N85'04'49"W
L524
63.38
S88'53'l4"W
L525
W. 45
$6934'22" W
1526
26,96
N60'57'14"W
L527
63-05
N05'42'14'W
L528
23.01
N50'21'48"W
L529
4EL49
N3➢'14'39"W
L530
28.97
Nall1'38'W
L531
24,17
N86'58'S1"W
L532
22,80
N1531'191
L533
38.22
N43'43'06"E
L534
22-58
N73'➢8'59"C
......"
' nIIIIIIIr'
OA �,s, o'.,
35 13
L5-84 N15'01'39"E
��`:• E55 %.L_'L
•`�'
L536 45.64 N13'53'58"W
_ SEAL :
L537 34.31 N47'5W56"W
_
i L-4741
;�����{�
Q�"❑ice•,
Line A
Length Direcllon
L538
34M
M53'21'05"W
L539
46.62
S8620'38"W
L540
44.42
584'28'28"W
L541
41.45
S77'53.O1"W
L542
41.47
581.34.09'W
L543
18,91
S62'57'48"W
L544
21.68
N86'1859"W
L545
22,39
557.'10'01"W
L546
30-35
N28'41'13"W
L547
21.31
N22'04'19"W
L548
2687
N55"22'42"W
L549
34.96
S73'42'20"W
L550
39,7t
N89'17'09"W
L551
43.12
S69'S1'15'W
L552
39,13
$73'29'33"W
L553
15,75 i
S53'4WBO'W
L554
19.113
S65'48'55"W
L555
$9.16
S47'35'41"W
1.556
4710
S88'40'48"W
L557
40.38
S47'35'54"W
L558
23.13
S61"37'28'W
L559
34.57
N50'49'46"W
L560
41,40
N79'00'37"W
L551
39.09
S75'06'57"W
L552
43.54
S61'26'58"W
L563
35.6t
S53'47'S4"W
L564
56,98
S72'51'37'W
L565
2776
546'16'38"W
L566
44.03
S71'40'55"W
L567
2601
575'16'59"W
L568
36.21
S72'11'01"W
L569
M57
S8501'17"W
Linz I^ILI sr f I s.
V 0 - L256-L358
Lone,
Len 1h
9
Olrect4on
LIne ✓M
Length
9
0lrect4an
Ole I
Lenolh
0ifeellon
L288
27-43
NIT44-WE
L320
3159
N20'08'23"W
L258
40.10
1424'16'37"W
089
25,91
N47'38'55"E
L321
22,83
N39'33'57"W
L257
29.61
N33'08'58"W
L200
24.31
N86'52'521
L.322
39.38
N71434'14"W
L258
30-70
N49'47'20"W
L791
33.24
1466'38'441
L323
24.69
560r00'31"W
L259
29-11
N32'06"46"W
L292
3t.92
562'291WE
L324
79 75
S62'25'45"W
L260
29.99
N80'27'22"W
1.293
19.66
N4; 25'54"E
L325
6622
S23'55'36"E
L261
L262
2"1
24.22
N66118'34"W
N763532'W
1-294
37-69
N08'57'47"E
1-326
25-17
S59'54'1YE
L295 28,65 N63'36'07'W 027 67M
S8251'24"E
L263
26AI
N30'48'13"W
096
25-35
S61'29'05"W
1..328
N.25
S72'07'36"E
L264
25.78
466'17Y7-W
L297
36A4
S82'03'39"W
L329
19,9t
N47'04'25"E
1.265
23.12
N32'58'41'W
L298
L299
4201
27.48
S80'20'08"W
S67'20'40"W
L330
L331
32,91
19-69
N63'45'26"E
114130'29"E
L266 ZIA3 468'305"W
L267
31,57
N22'00'53"W
L.300
L301
L302
L303
23.45
36.89
18,52
21.74
S75'54'18"W
S69'48'16"W
S08'41'27"W
S60'59'36"E
L332
0,13
L334
L335
44..73
19-82
29-90
29-60
560'49'44"E
S75'36'40"E
507'46'W'W
S0t'29'20" E
L268 31.09 N16'41'68"W
L269 33,07 N271051001.w
L270 27,58 N25'56'03"W
L271
19,57
N27'46'06'W
L304
L305
23.08
3B•24
545'41'491
S1239'42"E
L33B
L337
31-54
33-14
S28'49'57E
$10'10'42"E
L272 70,77 N0711'43"'W
L273
19.06
N61'25'02"E
L306
37.52
S01'10'50"W
L338
29A t
950'53'22"W
L274
20.91
N75'22'46"E
L307
42.86
504'15'10"E
L339
22.21
S29'29'37"W
L275
27,39
N73r09'12"E
L306
15.97
S35"44'52'W
L340
M-91
S19'52'46"E
L27G
33-46
N77'22'56"E
L359
27.55
SO4'07'33"W
L341
34.66
Sao '11'30"E
L277
39.72
N50'2➢'29'w
L310
L311
012
LJ13
L314
L315
37.19
29.80
29.41
M72
31-3t
14,82
SO6'50'12-E
S15'34'25"'W
S09'36't9"W
S5556'35"W
S87'S0'31"W
N60'43'26"W
L342
L343
L344
L345
L346
L347
19.04
3a59
19.65
27,76
20,43
40-40
N79'25'51"E
525"28'19"E
528-27'T3"E
S49'2WO21
S18'50'12"E
S45'2343'E
L278 25.W N51'16157"W
L279 49,09 M12'38'08-W
L28O 41.93 NI4'Io'54"W
L281 25,85 N07'01'31"W
L282 34,13 N00'05'32"E
L283
35.153
N➢3'42'28"w
1-316
L3I7
31,70
18.99
N70'55'11"W
N83"18'Op"W
L348
L349
25,98
2149
S26'04'19"E
S45.43'53"E
L284 31.73 NIITOS'07'E
1-285
18.40
N05'05'50E
L318
1319
22.40
11.23
N69'12'27"W L350 2AG7 S54'40'03"t
M26-02.26"W L351 36,34 542'37'48"E
WETLAND DELINEATION MAP
ME 29.0a N01'37'32"W
L2a7 26.a0 NO3.50.51"w I
PRT + BARTLETT PROPERTY OF SHEET 3 IF .
MFF NEERINa & SllRYEmm, PC COASTAL
CRM NA
soe N. N s2 FD? -17e 1:r . [752y 39o-o7a4 Ii�! M1.. Mfl:.IL.114'1
risen. NC. are�3_i �zn ra e: zex asu-OEtl4
-
' CXMMUNRY c x LLEQE
�' avL: u+nie, xws s.muer m MOB pawmr: 14M
scut I' - s4C� OMWM Cr un IM k »e CITY OF HLSON ONSLOW COUNTY
A _s�• RML►x14 ccm- act
5�' M mL: w.,..I N0RTH CAROLINA ZONE:

LINE TABLE - F TO G
CONTINUED
F-G - L256-058
Line N
Lenglli
OIrac?lan
L352
19.79
S72'42'54"E
L353
22.62
N58'48'28"E
L354
22.82
S61'08'44"E
055
19.36
512'3211"W
L356
31.39
S53'47'43"E
L357
27,50
S63'24'32"E
L358
22.47
S24'28'42"E
0. e d
Lao9th
Direction
L495
43,43
N66'O9'31'E
L496
32,65
N$7'55'34"E
L497
30.19
S51'19'22'E
1-498
31.33
50632'42'W
L499
19.37
S37^56108" E
L500
17,07
N38'30'45'E
L501
23,00
N10105'41'W
L502
31.84
N12'46'75"E
L503
19.73
N43103'12"E
L5O4
15.61
S74'02'53"E
LINE TABLE - H TO B Lip LerlgUl piracUwl Line p Leng}N kleaDNun Llne # Laaglll Direction } S T!E
H-L - t360ffectl L393 31,69 S16-32.52-E 120 5732 522'fA'Ol"E
L459 100.15 N82'13'10"W ALL BEARINGS, DISTANCF�, AND COOHpMAfES SNDWN HEREON ARE
Line M Lenglh DFre[lfon LOCAIAZED (GROUND] HAD 83 (2PIl ADJUSTMENT) HORI20NtAt
L394 117 27 5tl9'34'28"W 42,22 Sol L46U 73.95 N59'44'19"W INFORT,[AAtlN (UNL£55 NOTED QTHERWcSE), BASED UPON THE NORTH
L36Q 7821 523'24'01°E L395 30-92 5l6'32'37"W FIC98 S71'27'42"E L461 49-55 N50'55'48"W CAROLINA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, WTIS NAYO 88
ELEVATIONS THE N.C- STATE PLANE COORDINATES FOR CONTROL
L361 58.85 527'30'O9"E L462 T3.73 N40'33'36"W POINTS 4 AND s SHOWN HEREON WERE ESTABOSHEO U11LI21NC GLOBAL
L396 20,R5 549'7d'16"W 87.94 53933'89"E AOSIIiOFR14C SYSTEMS (CPS) IN CONJUNCTION 1NTI1 THE NORTH
L362 6D.fi9 526'28'25"f L463 49.87 HD4'27'19"E CAROLINA GEODETIC SURVEY'S VIRTUAL REFERENCE SYSTEM L397 2$-87 556'S1'20''W 67.78 546'56'4S"E y1ry{I IS BASED UPON THE CONTINUALLY OPERATING REFERENCE
L363 39.35 N89'S8'31"✓- L398 27.37 SO5'OS'03"E 90.59 S77'04'46"W L464 15.60 N.33'44'09"W STATIONS (COBS). THE VQS SURVEY TIE WAS PERFORMED ON JANUARY
L364 41 22 N35'07'31"E 8. 2015. ALL MEASUREMENTS SHOWN HEREON ARE REPORTED IN U-S.
L399 36.95 S70'49'57"E 60.63 546`02'45"W L465 3235 N76-t7'24"W SURREY FEET UNLE55 NOTED OTHERWISE
L355 28-57 1109'S7'31"EL400 45.85 N77'47'34"E 91.23 533'44'22"E L465 21.99 S70'35'40`Wr�-�DA�fA1
L386 31.65 N70'35'53"E L404 28-82 55D'24'19"E 40.97 SOO'39'56"E L467 32I3 SO531'22"WTOTAL AREA: 70.0 AC.k
L367 4..79 N57'01'27"E I402 25-50 S30'O8'31"E 38-61 S65'S6'43't L468 21.32 N8352'13"WTOTAL WETLANDS AREA: T7.7 AC.3
L368 3d,79 568'g0'Q3"E L403 2413 53779'10"E 46.70 S53'}2'43"E L469 38.94 N$4.42'26"W AREA OF WETLANDS WITHIN
L360 16,04 520'21'57"E PROPERTY BOUNDARY. 17.6 AC.t
L404 37.57 S09'IS'09"E L437 32.28 545'I1'09"E L470 39.99 577'59'24"W
LS70 43.25 549'41'26"W OWNER/DEVELOPER: COASTAL CAR"A
L371 26.22 500'59'24'W 444 WESTERN BLVD.
t405 31 88 532'50'48"17 L436 28.97 S47'53'41"E L471 43.61 S66-03'41"W COMMUNITY COLLEGE
L406 34.73 N88'S7'14"E L439 32.36 559'34'00'1E L472 31.79 S$431'48`W JACKSONVILLE, NC. 28546
L372 42.20 576'20'}5`E L407 2307 NOOV42'49"W L440 10.31 N65'06'12"E 1473 34,45 S6417'33"W WETLANDS WERE DELINEATED BY
L373 4-2,19 N01'37'257 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. INC., RALEIGH. NC
L408 20-97 NO3'1243"W L441 2$.15 N15'10'291LE'. t474 37,57 S83'26'41"W
1.374 31,21 N72'IS'47"E pn+n, 0"",
L409 31-84 N19'12'57"E L442 22.08 NO1f06'42"W L47S 23.f8 581106'3$"W
L375 33.33 519'05'40`E �H./ ��'�.
L410 70.90 N28'57'48"W L443 19,05 N67'46'49"W L476 39.63 588'IW32"W �,'••' ESiI y'-' 's
L378 34.32 S70'47'SI"E 4YA `{�,
L411 31.93 N1O'36'24"E L444 22-10 N44'31'38"W L477 37,31 N60'18'13"W
1.377 38.57 S86'14'57" E L-4741 = 'E
L412 33.88 N46'01'4a'E L4A5 23.51 H22T30'43"W L478 31.26 N49'45'11"W _ :.
L370 28.04 N01'22'D1"E
L413 29-76 N6q'W'IS"E L446 26.03 N33'37'23"W L479 31.63 N0522'18`W ':;%xap
1-379 34,74 NII'09'55"W L414 30-70 N72'42'24"E L447 34.11 N2344'I1"W L480 35.47 N04'28'27"W ,/•�'��•„I�p,n���',,`
L380 35.74 N20'46'00"W L415 33.89 579'I3'26"E L448 5CSS N42'54'44"W L461 32.20 N53'15'23"W
L381 31,32 N32'52'12"E L485 92.29 N21'27NOTE--
L416 24.72 N56'43'47"E L449 79,55 N26"14'27" E '1B"W THIS PLAI 15 A Wt TLANFl aELWEAIION PLA1 AND IS NOT FOR RECORDATION,
1.382 23.34 N29'45'37"E SALES, OR CONVEYANCES.
L4$7 59.011 NSW44'54'E L450 55,42 1410'38'07"E L486 38-88 N26'12'59"E TINS CERTPnB THAT THIS COPY OF TH15 PLAT ACCURATEtY ftER NS THE
L383 27.49 N45"39'2T"E L4I8 52.07 S781331"E L451 46.05 N87-56.56-C L487 49,87 N30'32'07"E SOUNI]ARY OF ME JURISDICTION Or SECTION 404 OF THE tLEAN WATER ACT AS
DETERMINED BY THE MNDERSCHED ON TNtS DATE, LIKESS MERE IS A CHANCE
L384 34-60 585'19'57"E IN THE LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED REDLA.ATIORS, THY$ OETErmNATION OF SECTION
L419 42,38 S64'54'0S"E L452 78.41 NO2'10'30"E L488 46.24 N1434'13"E 404 JURISa CTPON MAY BE RELIED UPON FOR A PE MOO NOT TO eXCEED FIVE
L385 50.43 S06'49'49"E YEARS FROM THIS DAIS. TITS "IERMINATIOH WAS MADE UTILIZING 111E
L420 35.29 S83'49'04"E 1,453 49.54 N7812310411W L439 44,15 S82'29'06'E APPROPRIATE REMONAt SUPPLEMENT TO ME 1987 CORPS OF ERCINEERS
086 49.58 SO 1'45'5D"W EVE TLAHDS DELINEATION MANUAL-
L421 32,50 S49'32'23"E L454 111.36 N12'27'41"W 1490 36,31 SUG'04'02"E
t387 47.53 SOO'55'20'W NAME: _ _
L422 22.50 S37415'09"E L455 56.96 bL491 3$�3 S63'13'A3"E187'47'07"W TITLE. �dde� I�ktiT�
L388 34.07 S17'24'10"W
L423 49.78 N89'43'13"E L456 52-85 NBS'20'51`W L492 23.13 S65'55'28"E OATE, -1 •r�l
L389 36.32 563'15'56"E
L424 40.47 S82'26'45`E L457 40.02 N25'28'29-W L493 4337 N69'25'17" E TAN- IS • a=Y$
L39O 31.42 S53101'29"E
L475 81,40 562'OT'16"E 1-450 60.62 N711D0'21"W L494 4269 N7648'42"E WETLANDlJELINEATION MAP
L391 26.81 Sm,I9'15"E
T L PROPERTY OF
sNEET F OF i
L392 32,26 S34.34'34"E �p'R �T�, ENCINEEATR & SUREVEY1HC, PG �pq�� C.latfi�li�A
1405 lll9, STRCC7 HORN TELI: (25Yjj !9i-O7Ci
NETAN, �.0 F 9f-1T7d LYA LFIL (a5f] l99-Oe44 COMMON"
COLLEGE
"� � GATE'- APNlI. Y01! SIRNEY Or: iq 6B PAOiECIIlie6�
srxc r . xao' DIGM1 er: cEP 1: !Ts CITY OF WILSON ONSLOW COUNTY
I R RMSGHS CODE. CCC[
Wm TILE- rK NORTH CAROUNA ZONE,