760012_Inspection_20190927

,s ° - - I mod$ t Pt v.i t -w,a k r*K s 4 a--
-, �' € 6 �� tr. ram ; a: i ' � r ,•
3
Type of Visit: `Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral Emergency Other Denied Access
Date of Visit: a. lq Arrival Time: a". p Departure Time:( \�'lj 0� County:�� pl n� Region:��
Farm Name: Ny'►1"' tj Y1 En-I-i°rrYjS2 S Owner Email:
Owner Name: ln T isis Wy,IN 1 Phone: 7jS l r I�j9
Mailing Address: 5 191 VI V\)01/4.1 VAC ( I , , godra.Qrr c II C 9131 7
Physical Address: W 0-2- wit der Alt 4-3 12alcllL1110n WC -'T311
Facility Contact: ,rd V-•()OrY\0...Y\ Title: Phone:104 q q-Uc S I
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: TN,nt Sl, ,l-1 -1�- b��— 0► bS- Certification Number:
� ortric V ► tt
Location of Farm: Latitude: i j Longitude: 11 � '5b
US N'w K 3l 1 CS) �v 1(La►�d lst mopn '(i fur r� .(.0 1)c&1 G',/1�t-i 1 1 led -
_ :. to - €. -& l� rt a �•¢: 3 .n� , a
_ �x t� a �- � � � a-�3
r, r '� f b %� . , '4'' w s. _-,g : a a 5 , i # �rs4 z�_ ....,�ue, w [ `,� '�
Wean to Finish La er Dairy Cow,
Wean to Feeder _.Non-La er Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish �_
r � Dairy Heifer
r z
Farrow to Wean _ I i. Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder j _ .>.. ;£ i �' a y- ` Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers 3 Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
.+, 1aTurke s a' 5,. f gig Turkey Poults ,� '3,
Other l '
i Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes cig\No El NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes D No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes El No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes '.No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

IFacility Number: '16 - 11 (Date of Inspection: q Ia1 I `GI I
Waste Collection&Treatment 1
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes 111 No ❑ NA 0 NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 /�S`tr�ucture 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: Lj 5td.e C1 1CYQke_,Srv, . c j d&
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes V No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? [A Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes I No ❑ NA El NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks) T
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 5l No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift
❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): Colrvv �1�uac ErlwoJi VC n
13. Soil Type(s): +J uU
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes NI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes risiNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 11A No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records& Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ['Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?Ifyr 7rt ec ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Application XWeekly Freeboard N5t1Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis 14 Weather Code
Rainfall Stocking Crop Yield I a.,ain„tP Inc Pp ctinns Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections I I° ;e-Suagr
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes INo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No IA NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

(Facility Number: 11 IDate of Inspection: q l a-7I J 1
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No IN1NA El NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes vi No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes 54 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes cgi No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes (t7No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes No El NA El NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application) T
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes Ig1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes [4No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes L-lU No ❑ NA ❑ NE
CrAdt bthww �, Pc" bi r ? p vQ y1 Q\G�-, V CSC' 4b66
c rn,,ct , - e �-; a,,I s `! 'cr t c S CO ► CAMN ax 4) Ynna ex CV% S mast II
`L rrm \ 1-1 �'t d. � Y\ ce^ CJIS
o t^ ,r.A, 6boto\ eci
w . Cc YLt y..t C1?
u.) P VVd s nrtr� ►
3 01,r, fAsty f t* r ,r ve_ok I Nok Yr me\te e lrvvk COActA t c.MQ i C
'Wc3 rt vt_ e kvarsk 64)-ids_ 1 p.
Reviewer/Inspector Name: r I . # We- „t,— i 105
Reviewer/Inspector Sign1111wr10 Date: 1fill 11
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015