Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20021454 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20020909 r too , pew" St wo*w, ?t. e. 28112 Poore. (704) 293-4500 Hand-Delivered N.C. Division of Water Quality Attn: Mr. John Dorney 2321 Crabtree Blvd. Raleigh, NC 27604 Re: Zew 0#&e 4 Pawed q, fix opal j?4 qa& WgCax@e4W&ea, W, eom WETLANDS 1401 GROUP MAR 0 3 2003 WATER QUALITY SECTION ;Due O#ze Sax 683 w4ww, ?2. & 28111-0683 ?7axr (704) 226-1104 March 3, 2003 o04 DWQ # 02-1454 Mecklenburg County r / Application for 401 certification, Scott Clark's Toyota City v Dear Mr. Dorney: This letter specifically addresses the items raised in your letter dated Feb. 10, 2003. In your letter, you requested the following items: 1. A site specific stormwater management plan (see attached Wet 1 and Wet 2); 2. A more detailed discussion of the minimization possibilities on the site; 3. A set of larger site plans (see attached SW-2, Grading - Utilities plan); 4. A statement of clarification related to the Wetland Restoration Program's acceptance of mitigation (see attached letter from NCDENR, dated Feb. 12, 2003). Stormwater Management Plan The site incorporates a stormwater detention facility as a mitigative measure. This facility treats all of the site-generated run-off. The total acreage dedicated to detention facilities is as shown on the documents designated Wet 1 and Wet 2. Targeted pollutant removal is consistent with the published effectiveness of stormwater wetlands. In keeping with our earlier commitment, the plan incorporates stormwater wetlands that treat all site-generated stormwater. The design is consistent with the BMP manual and is therefore expected to meet required treatment efficiencies. Minimization of Impacts Keystone walls were considered as a means of reducing fill along the 165 linear feet specified in your letter, but this idea was abandoned when it was determined that to comply with development objectives, the remaining channel impacts would essentially become a scour-pool and would likely not be stable without riprap or other fortification. The additional fortification was assessed to be at least as impactive as the proposed pipe and would result in the further degradation of the already incised channel. Additionally, the site could not incorporate buffers to the open channel without a significant loss of parking for the inventory of the proposed automobile dealership. Ecologically and hydrologically, this solution was determined to be unacceptable because it would result in a scour-pool. Additionally, this island of channel would be constantly subject to non-point discharges contaminated with automotive fluids and other household and residential pollutants from the upstream, off-site drainage areas. A discussion of minimization and avoidance with respect to this proposed project is contained in the Public Notice previously submitted to DWQ. Please reference the Public Notice for a more detailed narrative of these issues. Larger Plans Please reference the documents designated SW-2, Grading - Utilities plan, and the Stormwater Management Plan (Wet 1 and Wet 2). Wetland Restoration Program Please reference the attached letter from NCDENR, dated Feb. 12, 2003. We appreciate your attention to this matter, and particularly your willingness to meet with us this date. If we can provide any further information in support of our application, please advise ...we are most interested in bringing this process to a conclusion, so we can get underway with the construction of our project. qal ely , d H. Cox 1 i No Carolina T)ep rtMertt of Environment and Natural Resources t i?ti 1hdel F. Easley, Governor Wil iant G. Ross Jr., Secretary Tamp Bandy Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants, Inc. P.O. Box 224 Newton, NC 28658 j SAW: Project: Scatt Clark Toyoto j County: Mecklenburg 828465.SO50 M n NCDENR February 12, 2003 The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCW RP) is willing to accept payment for stream impacts associated with the subject project. Please note that the decision by the NCWRP to accept the rrutigation requirements of this project does not assure that this payment will be approved by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the N.C. Division of Water Quality Wetlands/401 Unit. It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCWRP for impacts associated with this project is appropriate. This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire, Based on the information supplied by you in a letter dated October 16, 2002 the stream restoration that is necessary to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements for this project is summarized in the following table. The maximum amount of mitigation that the NCWRP will accept for this project is also indicated in this table. Stream ' Wetland Riparian Buffer _ till actg 465 - c _Mitixation?Maximum 930 - - The stream mitigation will be provided as specified in the 401 Water Quality Certification and/or Section 404 Permit for impacts associated with the subject project in Cataloging Unit 03050103 of the Catawba River Basin, The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N,C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998, if you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Carol Shaw at (919) 733-5208. Sincerely, cc: Cyndi KaroIy, Wetlands,401 Unit Steve Chapin, USACOE-Asheville Mike Parker. Islooresville, DF.NR Regional Office file Ronald E. Ferrell, Program Manager Re,., P,05 Wettands Restoration Program 1619 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1619 (919) 733-5208 Fax: (919) 733-5321 100 W. f #ezdm St. wto*w, 71, e 28112 ;D4w,, (704) 283-4900 Hand-Delivered N.C. Division of Water Quality Attn: Mr. John Dorney 2321 Crabtree Blvd. Raleigh, NC 27604 Z41W 0#1kc 4 , e"u q. &Z ou &V gaee wacax@e4wa ra, ", cock WETLANDS 1401 GROUP MAR 0 3 2003 WATER QUALITY SECTION peat 6#ece Fax 68,3 March 3, 2003 Um w, 72. &. 28111- 0683 9axr (704) 226-1104 Re: DWQ # 02-1454 Mecklenburg County Application for 401 certification, Scott Clark's Toyota City Dear Mr. Dorney: This letter specifically addresses the items raised in your letter dated Feb. 10, 2003. In your letter, you requested the following items: I . A site specific stormwater management plan (see attached Wet 1 and Wet 2); 2. A more detailed discussion of the minimization possibilities on the site; 3. A set of larger site plans (see attached SW-2, Grading - Utilities plan); 4. A statement of clarification related to the Wetland Restoration Program's acceptance of mitigation (see attached letter from NCDENR, dated Feb. 12, 2003). Stormwater Management Plan The site incorporates a stormwater detention facility as a mitigative measure. This facility treats all of the site-generated run-off. The total acreage dedicated to detention facilities is as shown on the documents designated Wet 1 and Wet 2. Targeted pollutant removal is consistent with the published effectiveness of stormwater wetlands. In keeping with our earlier commitment, the plan incorporates stormwater wetlands that treat all site-generated stormwater. The design is consistent with the BMP manual and is therefore expected to meet required treatment efficiencies. Minimization of Impacts Keystone walls were considered as a means of reducing fill along the 165 linear feet specified in your letter, but this idea was abandoned when it was determined that to comply with development objectives, the remaining channel impacts would essentially become a scour-pool and would likely not be stable without riprap or other fortification. The additional fortification was assessed to be at least as impactive as the proposed pipe and would result in the further degradation of the already incised channel. Additionally, the site could not incorporate buffers to the open channel without a significant loss of parking for the inventory of the proposed automobile dealership. Ecologically and hydrologically, this solution was determined to be unacceptable because it would result in a scour-pool. Additionally, this island of channel would be constantly subject to non-point discharges contaminated with automotive fluids and other household and residential pollutants from the upstream, off-site drainage areas. A discussion of minimization and avoidance with respect to this proposed project is contained in the Public Notice previously submitted to DWQ. Please reference the Public Notice for a more detailed narrative of these issues. Larger Plans Please reference the documents designated SW-2, Grading - Utilities plan, and the Stormwater Management Plan (Wet 1 and Wet 2). Wetland Restoration Program Please reference the attached letter from NCDENR, dated Feb. 12, 2003. We appreciate your attention to this matter, and particularly your willingness to meet with us this date. If we can provide any further information in support of our application, please advise ...we are most interested in bringing this process to a conclusion, so we can get underway with the construction of our project. Si ely, d H. Co x OF WAT?c9 Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross Jr., Secretary North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources r Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director Division of Water Quality April 14, 2003 Mr. Scott Clark 6801 Independence Blvd/ Charlotte, NC 28227 Dear Mr. Clark: Re: Certification Pursuant to Section 401 of the Federal Clean Water Act, Proposed Scott Clark Toyota site WQC Project #02-1454; COE # 200330057 Mecklenburg County Attached hereto is a copy of Certification No.3417 issued to the Scott Clark dated April 14, 2003. _ ,This_.Certificati_-on.replaces the one.issued,March 31,.2001. Jf. we can. be-of further.. assistance, do-not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director Attachments cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers Steve Chapin, Corps of Engineers Asheville Field Office Mike Parker, Mooresville DWQ Regional Office Doug Huggett, Division of Coastal Management Ron Ferrell, Wetland Restoration Program Chris Huysman; Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants Ronald Cox File Copy Central Files N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address) 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location) (919) 733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands ,.. NORTH CAROLINA 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION THIS CERTIFICATION is issued in conformity with the requirements of Section 401 Public Laws 92- 500 and 95-217 of the United States and subject to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Regulations in 15 NCAC 2H, Section .0500. It is issued to Scott Clark resulting in 465 linear feet of stream impact in Mecklenburg County pursuant to an application filed on the i t day of November 2002 and modified via the March 3, 2003 letter from Ronald Cox to construct the Scott Clark Toyota dealership at Independence Blvd. in Charlotte, NC. The application provides adequate assurance that the discharge of fill material into the waters of tributaries of Irwins Creek in conjunction with the proposed development will not result in a violation of applicable Water Quality Standards and discharge guidelines. Therefore, the State of North Carolina certifies that this activity will not violate the applicable portions of Sections 301, 302, 303, 306, 307 of PL 92-500 and PL 95-217 if conducted in accordance with the application and conditions hereinafter set forth. This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you submitted in your application, as described in the Public Notice. If you change your project, you must notify us and send us a new application for a new certification. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total .• - -•. -wetland fills for this project-(now• or in-the future) exceed one acre or additional perennial stream impact occurs, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed below. In addition, you should get any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion control, Coastal Stormwater, Non-discharge and Water Supply watershed regulations. Condition(s) of Certification: 2. 3. 4. 5. Appropriate sediment and erosion control practices which equal or exceed those outlined in the most recent version of two manuals, either the "North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual" or the "North Carolina Surface Mining Manual" (available from the Division of Land Resources in the DEHNR Regional or Central Offices). The control practices shall be utilized to prevent exceedances of the appropriate turbidity water quality standard (50 NTUs in all fresh water streams and rivers not designated as trout waters; 25 NTUs in all lakes and reservoirs, and all saltwater classes; and 10 NTUs in trout waters); All sediment and erosion control measures placed in wetlands or waters shall be removed and the natural grade restored after the Division of Land Resources has released the project; Measures shall be taken to prevent live or fresh concrete from coming into contact with waters of the state until the concrete has hardened; Should waste or borrow sites be located in wetlands or other waters, compensatory mitigation will be required since it is a direct impact from this activity; Compensatory Mitigation Using the Wetlands Restoration Program (W RP): Mitigation must be provided for the. proposed impacts as specified in the table below. We understand that you wish to make a payment to a fund administered by the NC Wetlands Restoration Program (WRP) to meet this mitigation requirement. This has been determined by the DWQ to be a suitable method to meet the mitigation requirement. This contribution will satisfy our compensatory mitigation requirements. Until the WRP receives and clears your check (made payable to: DENR -Wetlands Restoration Program Office), no impacts specified in this Authorization Certificate shall occur. Mr. Ron Ferrell should be contacted at (919) 733-5208 if you have any questions concerning payment into the WRP. You have one month from the date of this approval to make this payment. For accounting purposes, this Authorization Certificate authorizes payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund to meet the following compensatory mitigation requirement: Compensatory Mitigation Required River and Subbasin Number Stream 465 feet 030834 6. Written Stormwater Management Plan: An additional condition is that the final stormwater management plan dated February 25, 2003 shall be implemented. Before any permanent building is occupied at the subject site, the facilities (as approved by this Office) shall be constructed and operational, and the stormwater management plan (as approved by this Office) shall be implemented. The structural stormwater practices as approved by this Office as well as drainage patterns must be maintained in perpetuity. No changes to the structural stormwater practices shall be made without written authorization from the Division of Water Quality. An Operation and Maintenance Plan must be provided to DWQ within 30 days of the date of this Certification. An example agreement is available at h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. 7. Certificate of Completion: Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached certificate of completion to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650. 8. Deed Notifications: Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all retained jurisdictional wetlands, waters and protective buffers in order to assure compliance for future wetland, water and buffer impact. These mechanisms shall be put in place prior to impacting any wetlands, waters and/or buffers approved for impact under this Certification Approval and Authorization Certificate. A sample deed notification can be downloaded from the 401 /Wetlands Unit web site at http://h2o.enr.state.no.us/ncwetlands. ...,_ ,._ -,..Violations gf. any_cQnditi-Q??_herein set. forth shall result in. revocation- of.this .Certification and may result in criminal and/or civil penalties. This Certification shall become null and void unless the above conditions are made conditions of the Federal 404 and/or coastal Area Management Act Permit. This Certification shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA permit. If this Certification is unacceptable to you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within sixty (60) days following receipt of this Certification. This request must be in the form of a written petition conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. If modifications are made to an original Certification, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing on the modifications upon written request within sixty (60) days following receipt of the Certification. Unless such demands are made, this Certification shall be final and binding. This the 14th day of April 2003 DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY Alan Klimek, P.E., Director w DWQ Project No.: County: Applicant: Project Name: Date of Issuance of 401 Water Quality Certification: Certificate of Completion Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return this certificate to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1621 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1621.This form may be returned to DWQ by the.applicant, the applicant's authorized agent, or the project engineer. It is not necessary to send certificates from all of these. Applicant's Certification 1, . , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was,used in the observatimof the construction such that ttie "construction Was obseived'to be°builf within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials. Signature: Date: Agent's Certification I, , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials. Signature: Date: if this project was designed by a Certified Professional I, , as a duly registered Professional . (i.e., Engineer, Landscape Architect, Surveyor, etc) in the State of North Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically, weekly, full time) the construction of the project, for the Permittee hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials. Signature: Registration No. Date ? W AlF O?0 RpG Michael F. Easley Governor f j 7 t William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary Department of Environment and Natural Resources Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director Division of Water Quality NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION & AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATE SUMMARY OF PERMITTED IMPACTS AND MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS Replaces the Authorization Certificate issued March 31, 2003 In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .050, Scott Clark has permission as outlined below and within the Water Quality Certification (WQC) Number 3417 with additional conditions for the purpose(s) of constructing the proposed Scott Clark Toyota. All activities associated with these authorized impacts must be conducted with the conditions listed in the attached certification transmittal letter. THIS CERTIFICATION AND AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATE ARE NOT VALID WITHOUT THE ATTACHMENTS. COMPENSATORY MITIGATION REQUIREMENT WETLAND RESTORATION PROGRAM (WRP) DWQ Project No.: 02-1454 Date: April 14, 2003 LOCATION: Independence Blvd., Charlotte, NC COUNTY: Mecklenburg BASIN/SUBBASIN: 030834(river/subbasin); 11-137-9-2(stream in no.) As required by 15A NCAC 2H .0506 and the conditions of WQC No. 3417 with additional conditions, you are required to compensate for the above impacts through the restoration, creation, enhancement or preservation of wetlands, surface waters and/or buffers as outlined below prior to conducting any activities that impact or degrade the waters of the state. [Note: Acreage requirements proposed to be mitigated through the WRP must be rounded up to one-quarter acre increments according to 15A NCAC 2R .0503(b).] 465 . feet of restored stream channel One of the options you have available to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements is through the payment of a fee to the Wetlands Restoration Fund per 15A NCAC 213 .0503. If you choose this option, please sign this form and mail it to the WRP at the address listed below. An invoice for the appropriate amount of payment will be sent to you upon receipt of this form. PLEASE NOTE, THE ABOVE IMPACTS ARE NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL YOU HAVE RECEIVED NOTIFICATION THAT YOUR PAYMENT HAS BEEN PROCESSED BY THE WRP. Signature WETLANDS RESTORATION PROGRAM (WRP) NC DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY 1619 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1619 (919) 733-5208 Date North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address) 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location) 919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/ 1of1 imap://todd.st.john%40dwq.denr.ncmail.net@nplex l.ncmail.net:143/f... Subject: Re: Scott Clark Toyota, NCDWQ #02-1454 From: John Dorney <john.dorney@ncmail.net> Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 14:26:23 -0400 To: "Todd St. John" <todd.stJohn@ncmail.net> CC: Huysman@aol.com please handle. thankx Huysman@aol.com wrote: John, we received DWQ's Certification No. 3417, issued on March 31, 2003. We accept the conditions, but we need clarification on one point concerning the amount of impacts. The Nov. 1, 2002 application and all supporting documentation since then contemplated 465 linear feet of stream; yet, the Certification appears to require that we pay for 930 feet of impacts. It appears that the error stems from the inclusion of the larger figure in the Feb. 12th letter from NCDENR Wetland Restoration Program, in which the "Mitigation Maximum" for this project that would be allowed is 930 feet. We would like to go ahead and pay the mitigation payment as soon as we can determine the correct amount. Should our payment be based upon 465 feet, or on 930 feet? We await your response. ?/? 7dM? we. de?,wra? C/30?r? k(wp Additionally, the Certification authorizes "a€;payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Funda€" to meet the compensatory mitigation requirement of 930 linear feet of stream. We believe that this should be revised to target the Stream Restoration Fund for the appropriate fee. Please advise. Chris Huysman LII ?? f 03 828 465 3035 II V6 .? .. i f ? 4114/03 7:41 AM ?F WATF?O Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross Jr., Secretary North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources r Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director Q Division of Water Quality Mr. Scott Clark 6801 Independence Blvd/ Charlotte, NC 28227 Dear Mr. Clark: March 31, 2003 Re: Certification Pursuant to Section 401 of the Federal Clean Water Act, Proposed Scott Clark Toyota site WQC Project #02-1454; COE # 200330057 Mecklenburg County Attached hereto is a copy _ of Certification No.3417._iss.ued to the_ Scott Clark. dated March. 31, 2003. If we can be of further assistance, do not hesitate to contact us. Attachments incerely, r E., Dire or cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers Steve Chapin, Corps of Engineers Asheville Field Office Mike Parker, Mooresville DWQ Regional Office Doug Huggett, Division of Coastal Management Ron Ferrell, Wetland Restoration Program Chris Huysman; Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants Ronald Cox File Copy Central Files N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address) 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location) (919) 733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands t?l ?[ NORTH CAROLINA 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION THIS CERTIFICATION is issued in conformity with the requirements of Section 401 Public Laws 92- 500 and 95-217 of the United States and subject to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Regulations in 15 NCAC 2H, Section .0500. It is issued to Scott Clark resulting in 465 linear feet of stream impact in Mecklenburg County pursuant to an application filed on the V t day of November 2002 and modified via the March 3, 2003 letter from Ronald Cox to construct the Scott Clark Toyota dealership at Independence Blvd. in Charlotte, NC. The application provides adequate assurance that the discharge of fill material into the waters of tributaries of Irwins Creek in conjunction with the proposed development will not result in a violation of applicable Water Quality Standards and discharge guidelines. Therefore, the State of North Carolina certifies that this activity will not violate the applicable portions of Sections 301, 302, 303, 306, 307 of PL 92-500 and PL 95-217 if conducted in accordance with the application and conditions hereinafter set forth. This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you submitted in your application, as described in the Public Notice. If you change your project, you must notify us and send us a new application for a new certification. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total -wetland fills-for this -project.(now-or.in-the future) exceed one acre or additional, perennial stream-impact - - - - occurs, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed below. In addition, you should get any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion control, Coastal Stormwater, Non-discharge and Water Supply watershed regulations. Condition(s) of Certification: 1. Appropriate sediment and erosion control practices which equal or exceed those outlined in the most recent version of two manuals, either the "North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual" or the "North Carolina Surface Mining Manual" (available from the Division of Land Resources in the DEHNR Regional or Central Offices). The control practices shall be utilized to prevent exceedances of the appropriate turbidity water quality standard (50 NTUs in all fresh water streams and rivers not designated as trout waters; 25 NTUs in all lakes and reservoirs, and all saltwater classes; and 10 NTUs in trout waters); 2. All sediment and erosion control measures placed in wetlands or waters shall be removed and the natural grade restored after the Division of Land Resources has released the project; 3. Measures shall be taken to prevent live or fresh concrete from coming into contact with waters of the state until the concrete has hardened; 4. Should waste or borrow sites be located in wetlands or other waters, compensatory mitigation will be required since it is a direct impact from this activity; 5. Compensatory Mitigation Using the Wetlands Restoration Program (W R P): Mitigation must be provided for the proposed impacts as specified in the table below. We understand that you wish to make a payment to a fund administered by the NC Wetlands Restoration Program (WRP) to meet this mitigation requirement. This has been determined by the DWQ to be a suitable method to meet the mitigation requirement. This contribution will satisfy our compensatory mitigation requirements. Until the WRP receives and clears your check (made payable to: DENR -Wetlands Restoration Program Office), no impacts specified in this Authorization Certificate shall occur. Mr. Ron Ferrell should be contacted at (919) 733-5208 if you have any questions concerning payment into the WRP. You have one month from the date of this approval to make this payment. For accounting purposes, this Authorization Certificate authorizes payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund to meet the following compensatory mitigation requirement: Compensatory Mitigation River and Subbasin Required Number Stream 930 feet 030834 r ?O? WATFgQ Michael F. Easley 10 G Governor C/j r William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary Department of Environment and Natural Resources a Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director Division of Water Quality NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION & AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATE SUMMARY OF PERMITTED IMPACTS AND MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .050, Scott Clark has permission as outlined below and within the Water Quality Certification (WQC) Number 3417 with additional conditions for the purpose(s) of constructing the proposed Scott Clark Toyota. All activities associated with these authorized impacts must be conducted with the conditions listed in the attached certification transmittal letter. THIS CERTIFICATION AND AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATE ARE NOT VALID WITHOUT THE ATTACHMENTS. COMPENSATORY MITIGATION REQUIREMENT WETLAND RESTORATION PROGRAM (WRP) DWQ Project No.: 02-1454 Date: March 31, 2003 LOCATION: Independence Blvd., Charlotte, NC COUNTY: Mecklenburg BASIN/SUBBASIN: 030834(river/subbasin); 11 -1 37-9-2(stream index no.) _ __ 4p?T_?Ra z T As required by 15A NCAC 2H .0506 and the conditions of WQC No. 3417 with additional conditions, you are required to compensate for the above impacts through the restoration, creation, enhancement or preservation of wetlands, surface waters and/or buffers as outlined below prior to conducting any activities that impact or degrade the waters of the state. [Note: Acreage requirements proposed to be mitigated through the WRP must be rounded up to one-quarter acre increments according to 15A NCAC 2R .0503(b).] 930 feet of restored stream channel One of the options you have available to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements is through the payment of a fee to the Wetlands Restoration Fund per 15A NCAC 2R .0503. If you choose this option, please sign this form and mail it to the WRP at the address listed below. An invoice for the appropriate amount of payment will be sent to you upon receipt of this form. PLEASE NOTE, THE ABOVE IMPACTS ARE NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL YOU HAVE RECEIVED NOTIFICATION THAT YOUR PAYMENT HAS BEEN PROCESSED BY THE WRP. Signature WETLANDS RESTORATION PROGRAM (WRP) NC DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY 1619 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1619 (919) 733-5208 Date North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address) 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location) 919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands/ 6. Written Stormwater Management Plan: An additional condition is that the final stormwater management plan dated February 25, 2003 shall be implemented. Before any permanent building is occupied at the subject site, the facilities (as approved by this Office) shall be constructed and operational, and the stormwater management plan (as approved by this Office) shall be implemented. The structural stormwater practices as approved by this Office as well as drainage patterns must be maintained in perpetuity. No changes to the structural stormwater practices shall be made without written authorization from the Division of Water Quality. An Operation and Maintenance Plan must be provided to DWQ within 30 days of the date of this Certification. An example agreement is available at h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. 7. Certificate of Completion: Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached certificate of completion to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650. 8. Deed Notifications: Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all retained jurisdictional wetlands, waters and protective buffers in order to assure compliance for future wetland, water and buffer impact. These mechanisms shall be put in place prior to impacting any wetlands, waters and/or buffers approved for impact under this Certification Approval and Authorization Certificate. A sample deed notification can be downloaded from the 401 /Wetlands Unit web site at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. ._ . -Violations of..any.condition_herein set forth shall result in revocation of this Certification and may result in criminal and/or civil penalties. This Certification shall become null and void unless the above conditions are made conditions of the Federal 404 and/or coastal Area Management Act Permit. This Certification shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA permit. If this Certification is unacceptable to you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within sixty (60) days following receipt of this Certification. This request must be in the form of a written petition conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. If modifications are made to an original Certification, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing on the modifications upon written request within sixty (60) days following receipt of the Certification. Unless such demands are made, this Certification shall be final and binding. DI the 31 st day of March 2003 ;40N OE1AATER QUALITY , Director 0? W AT ?RQG r Michael F. Easley Governor William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary Department of Environment and Natural Resources Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director Division of Water Quality March 10, 2003 To: File From: Todd St. John Re: Scott Clark Toyot DWQ# 021454 Mecklenburg County They are providing an extended detention wetland. The plans look good. Here's some lingo for a condition: 1 An additional condition is that the final stormwater management plan dated February 25, 2003 shall be implemented. \Before any permanent building is occupied at the subject site, the facilities (as approved by this Office) shall be constructed and operational, and the stormwater management plan (as approved by this Office) shall be implemented. The structural stormwater practices as approved by this Office as well as drainage patterns must be maintained in perpetuity. No changes to the structural stormwater practices shall be made without written authorization from the Division of Water Quality. An Operation and Maintenance Agreement must be provided within 30 days of the date of this Certification. An example agreement is available at http://h2o.ehnr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands/oandm.doc. w2o Cam"""'"' ` North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address) 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location) 919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/ Project Name: Toyota Project No. DW Q 021454 5 SUBMITTED DESIGN. REQUIRED DESIGN: elevations Permanent Pool (ft) 640 640 ft. depth check depth Temporary Pool (ft) 642 2 ft. depth ok areas Permanent Pool SA (sq ft) 23420 23378 sq. ft. ok Drainage Area (ac) 14.35 Impervious Area (ac) 12.915 90.0% - Forebay (ft2) 3510 14.98719% ok High Marsh (ft2) 8200 35.0% ok Low Marsh (ft2) 8200 35.0% ok Micropool (ft2) 3510 14.98719% ok 100% volumes Temporary Pool (cu ft) 44800 44798 cu. ft. ok other parameters SA/DA 3.74 - Orifice Diameter (in) 3 0.24 cfs drawdown - Design Rainfall (in) 1 2.2 day drawdown ok Linear Interpolation of Correct SAIDA *** 640 ft. Permanent Pool Depth % Impervious SA/DA from Table Next Lowest 80 3.36 Project Impervious 90.0 3.74 Next Highest 90 3.74 -z- (*5q ANDS1401 G80Uf? OAR 1 7 2003 QUALITY SECTION ® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director MEMORANDUM TO: John R. Dorney, Division of Water Quality Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources FROM: Ron Linville, Regional Coordinato, Habitat Conservation Program `?? DATE: March 12, 2003 SUBJECT: Review of 401 Application, Scott Clark's Toyota City, Mecklenburg County The applicant is requesting 401 Water Quality Certification from the North Carolina Division of Water Quality. The NCWRC has reviewed information provided by the applicant, and field biologists on our staff are familiar with habitat values of the project area. These comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (33 U.S.C. 466 et. seq.) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d). The Toyota dealership proposes to build a dealership with vehicle parking and other facilities. The submittal indicates that detention will be provided through a constructed "marsh" area with forebays. It appears that stream waters will be piped and discharge through the constructed "marsh" which may receive onsite stormwater. Although these waters may not be significant, we are concerned about the direct loss of perennial waters from piping and indirect impacts associated with stormwater runoff from increasing imperviousness and automotive chemical pollutants. The affected stream could qualify for Mecklenburg County SWIM buffer protection measures. Based on our review of the submittal and our knowledge of the area, we recommend the following for project planning and 401 Certification: 1. If practicable and feasible, the stream should be rerouted around the project perimeter using bioengineering techniques to restore aquatic and terrestrial stream habitats. The stream relocation should include an average 50' (25' minimum) Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1721 Telephone: (919) 733-3633 ext. 281 • Fax: (919) 715-7643 Scott Clark's Toyota 2 March 12, 2003 naturally vegetated buffer to enhance water quality and stream functions. Stream relocation should provide an aesthetically pleasing amenity for the dealership site. Preservation of a naturally vegetated stream should be more desirable environmentally than parking lot tree islands. 2. If tree islands must be included in the site, they should be inverted tree islands with sand filters that discharge to the "marsh" area or to the relocated stream channel. These measures would filter stormwater and help mimic preconstruction hydrographs. Low Impact Development (LID) techniques provide improved aquatic environments. Additional information on LIDs may be obtained from www.lowimpactdevelpment.com. 3. If relocated, the stream should be revegetated with native riparian plant species to provide shade and stability. Tree or shrub height should be managed to ensure healthy root mass and streambank stability. 4. As it appears that perennial waters will be used as part of a stormwater treatment constructed "marsh" facility, the USEPA should also concur with the project. If our understanding of this project is incorrect, please let us know. We will reevaluate our comments and recommendations upon receiving clarification. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. If you have any questions regarding these comments, please contact me at 336/769-9453. Cc: Kathy Matthews, EPA Mark Cantrell, USFWS Mark Fowlkes, NCWRC 40A 41Y4 ?s a I S - ?aQQ (6jt rat- aA,o 4L- l'7 s? ?pF y4ATF9Q Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross Jr., Secretary `p G North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources 69 r Alan Klimek, P.E., Director > Division of Water Quality O 'C February 10, 2003 DWQ # 02-1454 Mecklenburg County CERTIFIED MAIL-RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Mr. Scott Clark 6801 East Independence Blvd Charlotte, NC 28227 Dear Mr. Scott: The Division of Water Quality has reviewed your plans for the discharge of fill material into 465 linear feet of streams located at Independence Blvd near Sam Newell Road in Mecklenburg County for construction of an automobile dealership. As discussed in our September 23, 2002 letter, insufficient evidence is present in our files to conclude that your project must be built as planned in waters and/or wetlands in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0506. Therefore, unless modifications of the proposal are made as described below, we will have to move toward denial of your 401 Certification as required by 15A NCAC 2H .0507(e) and will place this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this additional information, we are requesting (by copy of this letter) that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers place your project on administrative hold. Please provide us with information supporting your position that states your project must be constructed as planned and that you have no practicable alternative to placing fill in these waters and/or wetlands. Specifically as requested in our September 23, 2002 letter, please provide a stormwater management plan for this project. Specifically what type of permanent stormwater management devices are planned, are they designed to achieve 85% TSS removal, will they treat runoff from the entire site, and where are they located on the site? Finally as discussed in our September 23, 2002 letter, please address minimization possibilities on site. Specifically, can impact number 2 (165 feet of perennial stream impact) be minimized by crossing this channel with a bridge rather than fill? Large scale maps may be useful to address the above points since the 8 1/2 by 11 inch maps in the Public Notice are basically illegible. Any documentation such as maps and narrative that you can supply to address alternative designs for your project may be helpful in our review of your 401 Certification. Also this project will require compensatory mitigation as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506(h). Your mitigation proposal is insufficient because it is not clear whether the NC Wetlands Restoration Program is willing to accept the money for the stream mitigation. Please respond within three weeks of the date of this letter by sending a copy of this information to me and, one copy to Mooresville Regional Office. If we do not hear from you in three weeks, we will assume that you no longer want to pursue this project and we will consider the project as withdrawn. If you have any questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919-733-1786 or Mike Parker in our Mooresville Regional Office at 704-663-1699. 1-1 y Ce ification Program cc: Mooresville DWQ Regional Office rngineers Steve Chapin, Asheville Field Office Corps Central Files File Cop y Chris Huysman, Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants, Inc." t N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address) 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location) (919) 733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands [Fwd: [Fwd: Scott Clark Toyota, Mecklenburg County, DWQ#02-1454]] Subject: [Fwd: [Fwd: Scott Clark Toyota, Mecklenburg County, DWQ#02-1454]] Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 16:54:13 -0500 From: Ron Ferrell <ron.ferrell@ncmail.net> \ Organization: NC DENR DWQ `D To: Cyndi Karoly <Cyndi.Karoly@NCMail.Net> ? 1 FYI, apparently we have not been contacted. Subject: Re: [Fwd: Scott Clark Toyota, Mecklenburg County, DWQ#02-14541 Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 16:52:09 -0500 From: Carol Shaw <carol.shaw@ncmail.net> Organization: NC DENR WRP To: Ron Ferrell <ron.ferrell@ncmail.net> Ron, I don't find an acceptance letter, invoice, or permits for this project. Carol Ron Ferrell wrote: > Have we received payment for this project? > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Subject: Scott Clark Toyota, Mecklenburg County, DWQ#02-1454 > Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003,11:31:32 -0500 > From: Cyndi Karoly <cyndi.karoly@ncmail.net> > To: ron.ferrell@ncmail.net > > My apologies in advance for asking you to take time to check into this. > In their Aug 16, 2002 application to us, Chris Huysman and the applicant > Scott Clark proposed use of WRP for 465 linear feet of perennial stream > impacts, but provided no evidence that they had ever even requested use > of WRP from you. I have not received any letters from you guys > indicating that you will accept this project. > Please advise whether you have been approached by Scott Clark, Chris > Huysman or anyone else to do mitigation for this project, and if you > have approved it. > thanks. 1 of 1 2/10/03 9:I0 AM Re: [Fwd: Scott Clark Toyota, Mecklenburg County, DWQ#02-1454] Subject: Re: [Fwd: Scott Clark Toyota, Mecklenburg County, DWQ#02-1454] Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 07:28:48 -0500 From: Jeff Jurek <jeffjurek@ncmail.net> To: Cyndi Karoly <cyndi.karoly@ncmail.net> CC: Ron Ferrell <ron.ferrell@ncmail.net> We have not received anything on this project. Ron Ferrell wrote: > Do you know anything about this project? > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Subject: Scott Clark Toyota, Mecklenburg County, DWQ#02-1454 > Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 11:31:32 -0500 > From. Cyndi Karoly <cyndi.karoly@ncmail.net> > To: ron.ferrell@ncmail.net > My apologies in advance for asking you to take time to check into this. > In their Aug 16, 2002 application to us, Chris Huysman and the applicant > Scott Clark proposed use of WRP for 465 linear feet of perennial stream > impacts, but provided no evidence that they had ever even requested use > of WRP from you. I have not received any letters from you guys > indicating that you will accept this project. > Please advise whether you have been approached by Scott Clark, Chris - - >-Huysman or anyone else to do mitigation for this project., and if you >`have approved it. thanks. Jeff Jurek <jeffJurek@ncmail.net> 1 of 1 2/10/03 9:17 AM DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS 151 PATTON AVENUE ROOM 208 ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28801-5006 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF: Regulatory Division Action ID. 200330057 Mr. John Dorney Division of Water Quality North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources 1621 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621 Dear Mr. Dorney: February 3, 2003 Reference is made to our letter dated October 29, 2002, in which we forwarded a copy of a permit application from Mr. Scott Clark to discharge fill material into unnamed tributaries to Irvins Creek to construct an automobile dealership, in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. We have completed our review of the project and have determined that the applicant has satisfied our administrative requirements pursuant to the 404(b)(1) Guidelines and has selected the least environmentally damaging practicable alternative. In addition, the applicant has proposed to compensate for 425 linear feet of unavoidable impacts to stream channel by payment into the North Carolina Wetland Restoration Program in an amount sufficient to restore 425 linear feet of stream in the lower Catawba River Basin. Over 60 days have elapsed since the request for a 401 certification and we are not aware of any additional information needed to process that request. Accordingly, we will assume that the Section 401 Water Quality Certification for this project has been waived unless you inform us within 15 days of your receipt of this letter that you are actively considering this matter. If you have any questions or comments regarding this correspondence, I may be contacted in Asheville Regulatory Field Office, Regulatory Division, (828) 271-7980, Extension 5. Sincerely, Stephen D. Chapin Regulatory Specialist COP Rocket REPROGRAPHICS 1224 Commerce St. Conover, NC 28613 CEP - 828-465-5757 2-11 2 fox 465-6658 --- d... ?? 41f i?'lt M1l? ''Lf L< 41 MMA tCI iu Letter of Transmittal Project aCA .rA,?- To; ' \c f Date; ?J ?,;-) Z We Transmit: Herewith; Under Separate Cover.: As Requested By; WAc A. , rRe-11cXa?z- The Following: Prints Specifications 1-1 Addendum #'s N Other ,,-,.\c \c Ll Remarks: a 99(??? By: ? Izl Thank you for using Rocket Reprographics! v v v. .e,o r,? wr?rc? b'234E5305t1 P.05 na :'of Environment and Natural Resources F. Easley, Governor ;. Ross Jr., Secretary np Bandy ,land and Natural Resource Consultants, Inc. Box 224 ,ton, NC 28658 ct: Project: Scott Clark Toyoto County: Mecklenburg min NCDENR February 12, 2c;03 rpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program RP) is willing to accept payment for stream impacts associated with the subject project. Please it the decision by the NCWRP to accept the mitigation requirements of this project does not aat this payment will be approved by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the N.C. Division r Quality Wctlandsr'401 Unit. It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact these agencies to ne if payment to the NCWRP for impacts associated with this project is appropriate. ceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of 4ed 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire, on the information supplied by you in a Itter dated October 16, 2002 the stream restoration that cssary to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements for this project is summarized in the ving table. The maxitrurn amount of mitigation that the NCWRP will accept for this project is ndicated in this table. - Stream Wetland Riparian Buffer lincar feet) acres ?ft?? 1 - _ Inlpacty 465 __ ?_ ?w tiEtion Maximum 930 - stream nitigation wi1 _ 1 be provided as specified in the 401_ Water Qual ity Certification and/ot- Lion 4u4 rennit for impacts associated with the subject project in Cataloging Unit 03050103 of the awba River Basin. The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of derstanding between the N,C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the U.S. Array rps of Engineers dated November 4, 1995. you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Carol Shaw at (919) 733-5208. Sincerely, cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit Steve Chapin, USACOE-Asheville Mike Parker, Mooresville, DENR Regional Office file Ronald E. Ferrell, Program Manager Wetian:is Restoration Program 1619 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1619 (919) 733-5208 Frax: (919) 733-5321 OF vvntF9 Michael F. Easley, Governor ' Q William G. Ross Jr., Secretary 0 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources > Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director p Y Division of Water Quality September 23, 2002 DWQ # 02-1454 Mecklenburg County CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Scott Clark Toyota City 6801 East Independence Boulevard Charlotte, NC 28227 Dear Mr. Clark: On September 9, 2002 the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) was notified by receipt of your application regarding your plan to fill wetland for the purpose of a commercial road crossing in Mecklenburg County. Approval from DWQ is required to disturb these streams. Please provide seven copies of the following. information and refer to the DWQ# listed above in your reply. In particular as described in 15A NCAC 2B .0502, we will require you to locate all streams and ponds on the property. Please show these on maps of suitable scale (for instance 1" = 100 feet) so we can begin to determine your projects' compliance with 15A NCAC 211.0500. 1. Please provide information on why this project cannot minimize or avoid some of the impacts proposed for this project. 2. Please provide a stormwater management plan for this project. - 3. Also, you will need to provide an "agent authorization" letter granting your consultant authorization to submit your application on your behalf. Please telephone me at 919-733-1786 if you have any questions or would require copies of r-r our rules or procedural materials. This project will remain on hold as incomplete in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0505(c). The processing time for this application will begin when this information is received. If we do not hear from you by writing within three (3) weeks we will assume you no longer want to pursue the project and will consider it withdrawn. i R. ey Water Quali zlfcation Program cc: Mooresville DWQ Regional Office Asheville Corps of Engineers Central Files File Copy Chris Huysman, Wetland & Natural Resources Consultants, Inc. VAT, tip N N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address) 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location) (919) 733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands Sent By: Cox Land Company; 704-243-2003; December 9, 2002 Mr. Steve Chapin US Army Corps of Engineers 151 Patton Ave, RM 208 Asheville, NC 28801 Re: Scott Clark's Toyota City Site (Proposed), in Matthews, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Dear Mr. Chapin: Dec-10-02 5:06PM; Page 1 C.'?>wx Wy: Land C.?cs n7a E>t sa ny Professional Slle Selection serwres fox Land Company Office (703) 243-2002 16:1 Woki'mPondt..mc Cd1(70-1)577•1200 %hvdia+. Nath Comfina :8173 lot (7,)31243-2003 On behalf of Scott Clark, thank you for your prompt review of his application to impact channels at his proposed dealership on Independence Boulevard in Charlotte. In my August 21, 2002 letter and attached map (copy enclosed) to Chris Huysman, Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants, Inc., I showed perhaps an over simplification of our exhaustive site elimination process. On the map I identified seven sites as 'vacant and under developed'. Mr. Huysman has asked me to provide additional information for your review under what he termed as my "Alternatives Analysis". I have worked as Mr. Clark's land broker on this project for about two years. We have pursued every strategy we could think of to discover and perhaps even to create all potentially workable sites. Those strategies included: ¦ Buying sites that were not for sale; ¦ Rezoning improperly zoned sites; • Subdividing tracts that were too large; ¦ Assembling multiple parcels that were too small; ¦ Redevelopment of under-developed sites; ¦ Renovation of a vacant retail center; • Relocation of an existing business; • And various combinations of two or more of the above. I labeled seven potential sites as "& vacant or under developed' on my August 21 map. One of those sites is Scott Clark's proposed site currently under your review. The other six were either improperly zoned with no rezoning potential, not for sale, or both. Even if we could have bought and rezoned the six sites that were not for sale and/or not zoned, additional problems with those sites included poor access, rough topography, excessive floodplain, etc. By elimination, the subject site is the only site an Independence that we could make work for Scott Clark's Toyota City. To say it another way, there are no workable alternate sites that we could discover or create with two years' exhaustive efforts. Sincerely, 41--- x4x' Greg Cox GT?tn i L4 C.?-E G t? r? ?c ...., ?t?1?{JIY 4,16 /k 4cb?w / b Flo . a'©033005'I, Cscoft Clark -7-.yof-6?? L yf l! J ?._ (J? ? -IL C? +) 0",tl 0-tt SIC l;? / t"!? G? t2 ltd U ?C ?l l 41t Q Q cc ; 6?4M dl Utt car ?ti- cecc l // Id Ake PC r , Je J r T?:?r r'c CLt??? E2C?lL??C ?i?s i?, 'f?ccC LAC Lt LgrrC l`?i I `/-F Ct ?rcJ ? ??f-es `?? ?L?ccs.?. ??? ©1UC7?LEcn1 c?ZZcj c ?cL?? f /L2 /t/Lc All ccf- tL, C? tcL- /u-c-a? ,c/ S L M)V &4wv ?', t*wlE,: -C/- JGC.dC. -ct,-! ec,_ ,f llct- COIL C--c k"Itet CCtL ??e.C??r-?ic-p5 ?LcrC 4acc, fit N(Ja- _ &,It C?IGd- ??lll2 l 1`S-LtL?fc?C Cc EZCf ?j__'L?? <Lf??Q_cl, (,od&s veLL a, CA-c UL(-4-(O&. ?-f /?j ??LU L eel d ?-f?,??? ?o > XL / r 7. boL- /aA uc, Orn?Cf Co /0 V-ya 3q -f"jl Wv ?f ??r Iti-p- Z11- Ito l.t f& jz ? s 0 r ` to e S 7r "I'a ua Ic 4c e?i?" ?f?LcPt- ttg, t ' 6 wtaLttSS??? j iti-fel gill, 4?,tjd zliodol 1-l-e o&-,dodp-cl Jb &hrr?u,3 1 ;? ?l -=?UYI^t?lt Cv??s , ?,?- CcC/r2S? acs C?t 4 cu- tue-[f;js (t4L `'Llc(q?C1_ '"2??eLtts/ ?p ?`la. le tc_ `?t1 ?c?,? Ir 1'l1Z C/ (2 )L A-C o-1-6 L/m C-C 6-tt ?} (-(- ?-Jt-c d C? ?? 2 - - _ _. _ _\_J-, v'?A$ed'? a?urcy2'IPCIO+' " I ?Y?: ? u/ttv/1 4D4 \ 6-- -?Oj U' North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross Jr., Secretary Tamp Bandy Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants, Inc. P.O. Box 224 Newton, NC 28658 Subject: Project: Scott Clark Toyoto County: MecklenburgQ n NCDENR February 12, 2003-- •--.-__.,..- _?a F? ?# r x , r FfB 18 {0???, ? 'k Nd?T1;,Jr,1 °'j 4 1 .,s . _ Sr'ai Frt 0 QAU Gil'0!!P iTY SF ' CT,p„,,j The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is willing to accept payment for stream impacts associated with the subject project. Please note that the decision by the NCWRP to accept the mitigation requirements of this project does not assure that this payment will be approved by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the N.C. Division of Water Quality Wetlands/401 Unit. It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCWRP for impacts associated with this project is appropriate. This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. Based on the information supplied by you in a letter dated October 16, 2002 the stream restoration that is necessary to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements for this project is summarized in the following table. The maximum amount of mitigation that the NCWRP will accept for this project is also indicated in this table. Stream (linear feet) Wetland (acres) Riparian Buffer (ft2) Impacts 465 Mitigation Maximum 930 The stream mitigation will be provided as specified in the 401 Water Quality Certification and/or Section 404 Permit for impacts associated with the subject project in Cataloging Unit 03050103 of the Catawba River Basin. The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Carol Shaw at (919) 733-5208. Sincerely, Ronald E. Ferrell, Program Manager cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit Steve Chapin, USACOE-Asheville Mike Parker, Mooresville, DENR Regional Office file Wetlands Restoration Program 1619 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1619 (919) 733-5208 Fax: (919) 733-5321 T - WIMMk. Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants, Inc. ' U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Asheville Regulatory Field Office Attn: Mr. Steve Chapin ' 151 Patton Avenue, Rm. 208 Asheville, North Carolina 28801 Re: l v2' ?l a?l`r+'?`??s^sro 0 U, t-4- August 16, 200 l JII' 'SEi? ` 9X002 ? !' pf _ d c- ? i _ iR i';TLIriTLI''! 'rJ'S ,f.?^il?tJN N.C. Division of Water QuaTitji Attn: Mr. John Dorney 4401 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27606 Section 404 Permit / 401 Water Quality Certification Request Scott Clark Toyota Site, Matthews, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina 4 Dear Mr. Chapin and Mr. Dorney: 1 On the behalf of Scott Clark Toyota, we request authorization for proposed impacts to t r jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. for their proposed auto dealership site located in Matthews, NC. The attached USGS Topo Quad and Mecklenburg County Soil Survey depict the location of the site. In its current state the site contains some 465 linear feet of urban channels and no wetlands. Attachment 1. The on-site channel is assessed to be a low quality urban channel with high peaks in its hydrograph resulting from the 30 plus acre urban watershed impervious estimated at 60%. Severe down-cutting and bank failure are evident along the entire reach. Vertical banks and low sinuosity indicate that the stable natural morphology of the channel has been lost and that the channel is contributing excess bed-load (sediment) to down stream reaches. The floodplain, though present, does not appear to function on a regular basis; the channel is deeply entrenched and the floodplain contains no regulated wetlands. Trash, including household and automotive debris, is also present along the entire reach. Even considering Newton Office PO Box 224 Newton, NC 28658 828."465-3035 828&465,"3050 Fax www.wndnc.com Clyde Office 217 Paragon Parkway, # 142 C de, NC, 28721 828."627 ,"0051 828,"627j- 0052 Fax www.wn6nc.com r L f C i L all the items listed above, crayfish inhabit portions of the channel. We have conducted a field review with DWQ agent from the Mooresville and have gotten an "importance" determination. All channels are assessed to be non-important intermittent to weakly perennial in nature. Attachment 2. Immediately down stream of the project this same channel is piped through the adjacent property before discharging into a beaver impoundment. Immediately up-stream of the project a large box culvert conveys water from the upstream of the site under Highway 74 and through the property. The box culvert is approximately 100 feet in length and discharges into an ephemeral / storm water channel. No regulated channels are upstream of the site. The development envelope on the proposed site is limited by required set-backs and by required public roads. These encumbrances include a 75 foot transitional right of way from Highway 74 and an additional 40 foot setback from this future right of way. There are additional setbacks from the side property lines. The result of these requirements is a site that contains the minimal area necessary for development of the automobile dealership. It is important to note that the future widening of highway 74 will result in the loss of stock area for the dealership; Scott Clark refers to this fact in his letter. Attachment 3. Site development requires piping impacts to the entire channel. Four hundred and twenty five linear feet of channel will be impacted under Nationwide Permit 39 for the construction of building pads. An additional forty linear feet of impacts under Nationwide 14 will be required for a public collector/ access road. The site and the proposed impacts are depicted on attached site development drawing. We believe that it is appropriate to account for the impacts as two separate projects based on Army Corps guidance. The frontage access road, located south of the development site, is slated to become the service road for Highway 74 when it is becomes limited access highway. The road and existing channel are on a skew from each other that precludes a perpendicular crossing. Ie for a dealership a property must be clearly visible from major travel corridors. To be suitable ' Additionally, the property must be in close proximity to other dealerships. More than three quarters of all car purchases are impulse buys, meaning that the desired car must be ' available from the stock. The dealership must be considered to be a "display window" and the parking areas need to be considered to be a "stock room". The loss of display area ' translates into significant economic losses. The applicant has addressed these issues in Attachment 3. No other alternative dealership sites exist in the vicinity of the proposed project. To be ' viable the site must be located within 4 miles of existing dealerships and should contain 15 to 20 acres of land and needs to be zoned appropriately for a dealership. A land broker ' committed significant resources to locate alternative sites for the proposed auto dealership. His review of properties found no other suitable sites. The results of his findings are ' presented as Attachment 4. ' During the extensive alternative site plan analysis, open relocation was assessed to be inappropriate because it would be contained by two fill slopes and would conflict with utility ' infrastructure, or because if relocated within the property it would result in significant loss of property. Relocation within the property, with an adequate belt width would require extensive cuts (up to 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide) and the relocation of some utilities. Relocation that would require up to a 50 foot riparian buffer on either side of the relocated ' channel which would equate to the loss of up to 1 acre of developable land. Reduction in size and configuration cannot be practically accomplished in a manner that would result in ' less adverse impacts and maintain a viable dealership development. ' Keystone walls were considered as a tool to reduce fills but were abandoned when it was determined that to comply with development objectives the channel impacts would be reduced by only few linear feet. Additionally, any open area within the channel would essentially become a scour-pool and would likely not be stable. Ecologically and ' hydrologically this solution was determined to be not acceptable because it would result in a scour pool. Additionally, this island of channel would be constantly subject to non-point 0 discharges contaminated with automotive fluids and other household and residential pollutants derived from the upstream drainage area. Impacts to the channels are proposed under a combination of Nationwide 14 and Nationwide 39 for the purpose of constructing a road crossing and attendant parking and building pads. The impacts associated with the road and building facilities are based on the vertical separation between the two fills thus assigning a larger portion of the fill to Nationwide 39. As calculated, the road crossing commits approximately 40 linear feet of the impact. If constructed without the dealership the proposed access road would commit some of the proposed impacts based on the topography and filling requirements for safe construction. If the road were constructed without the dealership it would commit approximately 75 linear feet. Impacts to 425 linear feet of channels are proposed under Nationwide 39 for the construction of the site. Impacts under NW 39 are necessary for site development that allows utilization as a dealership. Site constraints resulting from topography and building set-backs dictate the development illustrated on the site plan. The current development plan utilizes existing and proposed topography to drain storm water flow to a detention pond. Permitting under a combination of Nationwide Permits 39 and 14 is consistent with Army Corps released Draft Questions and Answers (Draft 04/28/2000) and with Nationwide Permit General Condition 15 (Fed. Reg. Vol. 65,No. 47. pp. 12868 and 12896). Both the guidance and the condition allow for the proposed impacts by 1) separating the project into two distinct permits (public road and private development) and by 2) allowing impacts which are not more than minimal when viewed in terms of cumulative impact acreage. Combined impact acreage for the proposed Nationwide 14 and 39 does not exceed the maximum acreage of loss for either permit. In fact, the combined acreage does not exceed the Notification threshold for either impact acreage. The combined impacts, do however, exceed the linear threshold for channels under Nationwide 39. As a mitigative measure the site incorporates a storm water detention facility. This facility treats all of the site generated run-off. The total acreage dedicated to detention facilities totals approximately 1.7 acres. A storm water management plan will be submitted for approval. Targeted pollutant removal will be consistent with the published effectiveness of storm water wetlands. Storm water from the upstream drainage area will bypass the site ' specific stormwater wetland. We expect that the issued permit will be conditional a stormwater plan prior to commencement of activities within wetlands Mitigation for channels impacted by this activity is proposed through the NC Wetland Restoration Program (NC WRP) at a 1:1 ratio because of the channels low quality. An evaluation of the channel downstream of the site identified suitable reaches for mitigation but design constraints dictated by an existing quarry make mitigation unlikely. Additionally, all land within the drainage basin and the adjacent basins falls within city limits and the cost per acre is assessed to be too high when coupled with the lack of willing participants, high construction and utility cost and design costs. Onsite channel mitigation is not possible and local offsite mitigation is not practicable. Authorized impacts will not more than minimally impact downstream water quality and potential adverse impacts are ameliorated through storm water best management practices and a contribution to the NC Wetland Restoration Program. Water quality, based on the channels urbane situation as described above, is not high quality and its loss will not likely ' alter downstream water quality. Water entering the water ways after treatment within the storm water treatment facility will be of higher quality and will be at a reduced rate therefore 1 compensating for the loss of subject channel. Those impacts not mitigated through the storm water facilities will be satisfied through the NC WRP. ' "Important" channel impacts are below the 300 linear foot maximum allowed for Corps important channels under Nationwide Permit 39 and 14. We believe that the channel is not biologically or physically important because it supports only few organisms with little ' diversity and because it is down cut and contributing sediment to down stream reaches. If permitted the loss of the channel will be traded for storm water control and a contribution to ' the NC WRP. 1 Please call with any questions or concerns that you may have. Sincerely, avk?hp?? Chris Huysman J 1 Office Use Only: Form Version April 2001 USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. I If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than leaving the space blank. 1 I. Processing 1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project: ® Section 404 Permit ? Section 10 Permit ® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules 2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 14 3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification is not required, check here: ? 4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: II. Applicant Information 1. Owner/Applicant Information Name: Scott L. Clark Mailing Address: Scott Clark Toyota City 6801 E. Independence Blvd Charlotte NC 28227 Telephone Number: 1-704-535-1972 Fax Number: E-mail Address: 2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.) Name: Chris Huysman Company Affiliation: Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants Inc. Mailing Address: P.O. Box 224 11 South College Avenue, Suite 206 Newton, North Carolina 28658 Telephone Number: 828-312-9206 Fax Number: 828-465-3050 E-mail Address: wnrinc(@aol.com t ' Ill. Project Information Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings, impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be ' included. If possible, the maps and plans should include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and MRCS Soil Survey with the property boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion, so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than I 1 by 17- inch format; however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided. ' I. 2. Name of project: Scott Clark Toyota site T.I.P. Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A 3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 19322109 4. Location 1 County: Mecklenburg Nearest Town: Matthews Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): See attached USGS Topo quad may. ' 5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 035D 08' 16.4" N 080D 43101.311 W (Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.) ' Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application: Forested 6, Property size (acres): 39 7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Irvin Creek 8. River Basin: Catawba Describe the purpose of the proposed work: Road crossing for purpose of constructing a public frontage access Road. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project: Bulldozers Dump trucks etc. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: Commercial ' IV. Prior Project History If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and certifications were ' issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits, certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project, list and describe permits issued for prior ' segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with construction schedules. N/A ' V. Future Project Plans Are any additional permit requests anticipated for this project in the future? If so, describe the anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application: No future impacts expected. VI. Proposed fin pacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also provide justification ?I ' for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent and temporary, must be fisted herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly ' for wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet. 1. Wetland Impacts Wetland Impact Site Number (indicate on ma Type of impact* Area of Impact (acres) Located within 100-year FIoodplain** (es/no Distance to Nearest Stream (linear feet Type of Wetland*** N/A List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: ' mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding. * * 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood ' Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or online at http://www.fema.gov. ***List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond, Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: N/A Total area of wetland impact proposed: NIA 2. Stream Impacts, includin all intermittent and erennial streams I Stream Impact Site Number (indicate on m Type of Impact* Length of Impact (linear feet Stream Name** Average Width of Stream Before Impact Perennial or Intermittent? lease ec ') 1 Pipe 40 UT 3 P u * List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap, dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain), stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included. ** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at www.usas.aov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com, www.mapguest.com, etc.). Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any other Water of the U.S. Open Water Impact Site Number indicate on ma * Type of Impact Area of Impact (acres) Name of Waterbody (if applicable) Type of Waterbody (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, ocean, etc.) * List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc. 4. Pond Creation If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application. Pond to.be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands (1 stream ? wetlands Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): NA Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond, local stormwater requirement, etc.): NA Size of watershed draining to pond: NA Expected pond surface area: VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization) Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. (See attached cover letter), Due to local zoning requirements it will be necessary to construct a road crossing for public access. The frontage road is slated to become a service road for HWY 74 when C? u L it becomes a limited access highway. This portion of the road will not have to be constructed by the NCDOT. VIII. Mitigation DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial streams. USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include, but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar functions and values, preferable in the same watershed. If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at bgp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/newetlands/strmgide.htmL 1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet) of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancemem, creation, or preservation), a plan view, preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach a separate sheet if more space is needed. (See attached Cover Letter). Mideation for channels impacted by this activity is proposed through the NC Wetland Restoration Program at a 1:1 ratio because of the channels low guafity. On site and local channel mitigation is not a viable option due to cost per acre The current site plan will best utilize the land surface. Relocation within the property, with an adequate belt width would require extensive cuts and the relocation of some utilities. Reduction in size and configuration cannot be practically accomplished in a manner that would result in less adverse impacts. 2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at httt)://h2o.enr.state.nc.us//index.htrn. If use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the following information: ' Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 1 0 u H DC Environmental Documentation (DWO Only) Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local) land? Yes ? No If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA coordinator at (919) 733-5083 to review current thresholds for environmental documentation. Yes ? No ? If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ? X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWO Only) It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the applicant's discretion. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233 (Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify ? Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information: Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer multipliers. Zone Impact (square feet Multiplier Required Mitigation 1 3 2 1.5 Total * Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified within 15A NCAC 2B.0242 or.0260.: M. Stormwater (DWO Only) Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters property: Storm water detention pond. )GI. Sewage Disposal (DWO Only) total acreage on the site. Discuss and wetlands downstream from the Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility: Local municipality ' sewer system. XIII. Violations (DWO Only ' Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules? Yes ?No Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ' Yes ?No G n n XIV. Other Circumstances QptionalZ It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control): (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.) Office Use Only: Form Version April 2001 USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. ' If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than leaving the space blank.. n J I L r I, Processing 1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project: ® Section 404 Permit ? Section 10 Permit ® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules 2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested:39 3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification is not required, check here: ? 4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: H. Applicant Information 1. Owner/Applicant Information Name: Scott L. Clark Mailing Address: Scott Clark Toyota City 6801 E. Independence Blvd Charlotte NC 28227 Telephone Number: 1-704-535-1972 Fax Number: E-mail Address: 2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant) Name: Chris Huysman Company Affiliation: Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants, Inc. Mailing Address: P.O. Box 224 1 I South College Avenue, Suite 206 Newton, North Carolina 28658 Telephone Number: 828-312-9206 Fax Number: 828-465-3050 E-mail Address: wnrincna,aol.com III. Project Information Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings, impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion, so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than I 1 by 17- inch format, however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided. 1. Name of project: Scott Clark Toyota site 2. T.I.P. Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A 3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 19322109 4. Location County: Mecklenburg Nearest Town: Matthews Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): See attached USGS Toro quad map; 5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 035D 08' 16.4" N 080D 43' 01.3" W (Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.) Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application: Forested 6. Property size (acres): 39 7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Irvins Creek 8. River Basin: Catawba Describe the purpose of the proposed work: Culvert and fill for purpose of constructing attendant lots and building pads. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project: Bulldozers Dump trucks etc. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: Commercial. IV. Prior Project History If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits, certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project, list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with construction schedules. N/A V. Future Project Plans Are any additional permit requests anticipated for this project in the future? If so, describe the anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application: No tare impacts expected. VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All ro osed impacts, permanent and temporary, must be fisted herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site plan All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly ' for wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet. 1. Wetland Impacts Wetland Impact Site Number (indicate on ma Type of Impact* Area of acres) (acres) Located within 100-year Floodplain** (es/no) Distance to Nearest Stream (linear feet) Type of Wetland*** N/A List each unpact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding. ** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or online athq://www.fema.g . ***List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond, Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: N/A Total area of wetland impact proposed: N/A 2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams 0 0 Stream Impact Site Number (indicate on ma Type of Impact* Length of Impact (linear feet Stream Name** Average Width of Stream Before Impact perennial or Intermittent? (please specify) 1 pipe 260 3 p 2 pipe 165 3 p * List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap, dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain), stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included. ** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at www.usgs.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com, www.mapguest.com, etc.). Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any other Water of the U.S. Open Water Impact Site Number indicate on ma * Type of Impact Area of Impact (acres) Name of Waterbody (if applicable) Type of Waterbody (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, ocean, etc.) * List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc. 4. Pond Creation If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application. Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): NA Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond, local stormwater requirement, etc.): NA Size of watershed draining to pond: NA Expected pond surface area VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization) Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts were minimised once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. (See attached cover letter). To best utilize the property it will need to be filled Auto dealerships need to be highly visible. Doing this will maximize land utilization. After extensive study by a land broker, no other viable sites were found in the to et area. The current site plan was developed to avoid current local utilities and adiacent business and land owners. VIII. Mitigation DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial streams. USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include, but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar functions and values, preferable in the same watershed. If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at httn://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.htrnl. ' 1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet) of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view, preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach a separate sheet if more space is needed. (See attached cover letter). Mitigation for channels impacted by this activity is proposed through the NC Wetland Restoration Program at a 1:1 ratio because of the channels low quality. On site and local channel mitigation is not a viable option due to cost per acre The current site plan will best utilize the land surface. Relocation within the property, with an i adequate belt width would require extensive cuts and the relocation of some utilities Reduction in size and configuration cannot be practically accomplished in a manner that would result in less adverse impacts. 2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at hM://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the following information: I Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): t IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Onlvl Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local) land? Yes ? No If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA coordinator at (919) 733-5083 to review current thresholds for environmental documentation. Yes ? No ? If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ? X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWO Only) It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers.' Correspondence from the DWQ Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the applicant's discretion. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233 (Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify ? Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information: Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer multipliers. * Zone Impact (square feet Multiplier Required Miti gation 3 2 1.5 Total * Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or. 0260.: M. Stormwater (DWQ Only) Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from the property: Storm water detention pond. MI. Sewage Disposal DWO Only Clean detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge Clearly or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility: Local municipality sewer system. XIII. Violations (DWQ Only) ' Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules? Yes ?No Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ?No XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional): It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control): t t t 11 111Jt/11.+w.lV, rw-,J 1?1?,. l1GLLl{! 4 j-,aW (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.) t 1 Ncll s c ^+ Fin ,err- _ °_ •ie) F-urd :J r ° Glc?i!C r!p? ;n '_ ra'?t ShGwn? n f C o , ID END POINT 1 i o r.v. 35 =?-' in IMPACT2 C71) co IBM -I •?1 f : f? - i G? r• Y =CE D r 'I 1 / \• ?. Esm • \, -ee 89 5-i Z- 10 ;D r• _ r 5G O ?I Y _ ¢. J ?_ m m w w m m m s m w m m w w ww m w = m _ p ? a y t ? 99 2 owl V I;. I? I I ? I? I? / X .C A Map If t ' n ., h p l R\ J i ?o I e d I ? 5 t? ???? S ?`S I d oy. 1 ? I r 7t? I ? ? I b I? ? I I• a m Ia ? ? Y? a ? C I ? ? V i, t ' _ ..ol ? ? .,V I I _.ptA r r e, t , :r ? E i:A ° EPg V o I S ? ?a3 v? I ?oP?? I 0 a m fD D ¢ v., j aMats ?..,,M+ Sm a ? . g?ox W /MIYA/ ?? g ? 75 1 i U) Lo $ J C- O y Aa. s ul b?? a 1? d?j j1 a y "= ?g ?F ,c. I at M x 3 lC n W r V1 m ? r 8? 1 d .?Y s ° o x A LT1n Sr^°a a r c» ?b +?. e fad} a„ 8 ?oNppO co 5 ? -- ? tD. C ;u C-) n CD Z m 'b p S?Q aj ro -f 7C f t S. ? Z ° n [_] ?e r r ?r r? rr r r err r? rr rr ?r rr r? rr r? ?w r ? \ 6(.Cf 1 o I o?7 r gi 4J1 71 I , y-? '? ,' /? r -.~c^ S',•r \. ? `?..1C-?\'?• ;/ 1 1 - \ `. \1 :.?I1 -- ?? 4ii --? I 11 ? ? Ads ?" .2?'a' \\` ?. T\1\ 1 1 ,. \\\\ \\ /-?\ ?\ y?° y J1 I y r I Y ?[1 I S klfl r ` ?/ an" \r J Cam' _ , 4 ?? L I\ \ I I 1 t - / of I; r + t t, . l / rN I ILj .l!GYr v' l/' \ I I L y f ii I I r J , r /, I. t \ ' ??? f ?-„fr ? 1 -- +?'• Ile, I I J i - 1 ' ;`?. ?/ \,'r'i?\?\\ ?< \I', F I K I, \ \I 11 \ \\ 1 Io' 1!: ..64 ?• `.. t\ 1 I n Ilit Imo`\ / i/. / )JU/, 111.11 I I..r/ ?\ I I\\ t{ / '\ _fI ? I-?? _ 1'. m ? 'il jl Y I I I, 1 r ti?\\ \ \ ?? 1\ ? ,1' ," I ? ,. ?_= s I _ k I .e o \ /• 1 .', "?'l - ?r r/C 4 I I, I 1 I \\ \ 1 q ' I ,-?? ,'? 1 ?"l •. f 1 -- V1 O V? ix ?` \? ?__ / • L\/ I ?? ij ??//?l ?r? %r i? jar ,r-:ice > 1 _ - _ - , \\. I I =S /_ ?,? 1? --f I, •C'' I` 1 \?1\``\\\\\\\\\.1 qlr/c. ?n \ +•?`?\?`\??\?\\\, ? ?'??'l???j/, ?j rll ? I l' ?; / /f, ': ...?ft.?`_ '?.' t v ,'/p' ?? _?, r i; -- I )}?7 `e? `y! - \\ \\\\?\\a ,?'R'I\ IIfJJ r I, i , // .'. J ob /i - ,',?,,,??•""'.. F t: y \ \\ ?\\\\\\\\\\\?\\ /--. •--?-:• \ \\ \\\\\\\\\\ "i///ll,l I I I C I I \,, 7 a -. O -? f it Tr- C ?I .t 1\I \ \ •• ? Q\\\\ \\ \\Z. v, i l I l I 1 I I r r , D,/ ? ? C,, // ' II' • ?l J ? --r- I '- = I -r- ' - - \. 1 1 41 \. ('?1 1 1? t i I \ rt it 1 / . -rt. [[ ?"I C 1 r \ / \ I 14V ?F? ?il ?` \ ?\ \ \ J. / L r 1 ?fa 011 YII? \\} \ I S ?r l I.i???L \?'?? \?\ \? \\ o4~ I Ilr'.l' tj \\ ?,\ \ ?I y -l {• It i 1.?{ ,?-1 rl•wt?!. 1-,` ?.. \\ -? r ?f ?'_", (?'t- - _---1 10- 4, 1 14 " - 1 ----- - - - - - - - - - \\, - ?- I \ ? - - l? i? ? '- -, Y ;,•, fJ`., "--, ^, ??? nor°K -H;.r+`..A.. I 1 \\_- \ 1 er? 1 S a.p 11; y rx I 1 f .i ?? ?1 ;o i4 ifa. / I ;? i 1 r #p 7F 1 'O 1 ' ---- /I ° I fir. Q . 1Jf ? 2 ? `) -L C1 Of , n = ° = O n D 1r D m ? Z 00 C0 mo ED 6:11 --1 M nO0 Fn a 00.o _ al f m H ,- M e a -3 E z IT n I ;u 0 m7<u?c[/1za $? u7 "' {} V®QI I I 14 rn \ ZON w d- m I I c S w y' b (- I I i $ Aj OM ?i °? ?5 7 89919 j? 4p} N q f' e o 1 +? C) 0 0 ZID a w z i f $ t g i , 00 y ? Ci r Aa •y• I I O If r 3 m °I F-` PRI"'7D AUG 3 0 2002 t INTERMITTENT CHANNEL EVALUATION FORM Action ID: Applicant Name: Scott L Clark Date: 7/18/02 Proposed Work in Channel (i.e., culvert, relocation, etc): culvert Waterbody: UT Irvins Creek River Basin:Catawaba County / City: Mecklenburg/Matthews Recent Weather Conditions: der P_ SP NP Observation Comments or Description ® ? ? °?o ® ? ? El El ER ® ? ? fish / shellfish / crustaceans Crayfish Benthic macro invertibrates Amphibians present/breeding Algae and/or fungus (water quality functions) wildlife channel use (ie. Tracks, feces, shells) federal protected species present (discontinue) riffle / pool structure Stable streambanks Channel substrate (gravel, cobble, sand, etc.) Riparian canopy present (SP = +/- 50%) Undercut bankshnstream habitat structure Flow in channel Wetlands adjacent to/contiguous (discontinue) Persistent pools/saturated bottom (June-Sept) Seeps/groundwater discharge (June-Sept) Adjacent floodplain present Wrack material or drift lines Moderate Hydrophytic vegetation in/adjacent to channel P = Present SP = Strongly Present NP = Not Present Important to Domestic Water Supply? Yes ? No Does Channel Appear on a USGS Quad or Soils Map? Yes ? No Notes: Channel #1 Determination: Perennial Channel (stop) Important Channel: LF Intermittent Channel (proceed) Unimportant Channel: LF Ephemeral Channel (no juris.) (attach ma indicating location of important / unimportant channel) Ditch Through Upland (no 'uric.) Project Manager Initials: Evaluator's Signature: _ (if other than C.O.E. project manager) IN INTERMITTENT CHANNEL EVALUATION FORM Action ID: Applicant Name: Scott L Clark Date: 7/18/02 Proposed Work in Channel (i.e., culvert, relocation, etc): culvert Waterbody: UT Irvins Creek River Basin:Catawaba County / City: Mecklenburg/Matthews Recent Weather Conditions: d_yr P SP NP Observation Comments or Description fish / shellfish / crustaceans Crayfish Benthic macro invertibrates Amphibians present/breeding Algae and/or fungus (water quality functions) wildlife channel use (ie. Tracks, feces, shells) federal protected species present (discontinue) riffle / pool structure Stable streambanks Channel substrate (gravel, cobble, sand, etc.) Riparian canopy present (SP = +/- 50%) Undercut banks/instream habitat stricture Flow in channel Wetlands adjacent to/contiguous (discontinue) Persistent pools/saturated bottom (June-Sept) Seeps/groundwater discharge (June-Sept) Adjacent floodplain present Wrack material or drift lines minimal Hydrophytic vegetation in/adjacent to channel P = Present SP = Strongly Present NP = Not Present Important to Domestic Water Supply? Yes ? No Does Channel Appear on a USGS Quad or Soils Map? Yes ® No ? Notes: Channel #2 Flows under NAtional tire and battery. Determination: ® ? ? ? ? ® ? ? ? ? ® ? ? ? ? ® ? ? ? ? ® ? ? ? ® ? ? ? ® ? ? ? ? ® ? ? ? ? ? ? ® ? ? ® ? ? Perennial Channel (stop) IL rtant Channel: LF Intermittent Channel (proceed) Unimportant Channel: LF E hemeral Channel (no 'uris.) (attach ma indicating location of important / unimportant channel) Ditch Throw Upland (no juris.) Project Manager Initials: Evaluator's Signature: (if other than C.O.E. project manager) 0? W AT X9 ? 0 O G FIL Michael F. Easley Governor ? r E William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary Department of Environment and Natural Resources Alan Klimek, P.E. Director Division of Water Quality July 2, 2002 Mr. Chris Huysman Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants, Inc. Post Office Box 224 Newton, North Carolina 28658 Subject: 401 Water Quality Certification Channel on Martin Marietta Property US Hwy. 74, South of Charlotte Mecklenburg County Dear Mr. Huysman: Per your request, Mr. Michael Parker with this Office conducted a site investigation of the subject property on June 13, 2002 for the purpose of determining whether a 401 Water Quality Certification will be necessary for the disturbance of at least 150+ feet of a channel (see attached map). Martin-Marietta, the current property owner, has a prospective buyer who has indicated a need to fill (pipe) the channel to facilitate site development. Mr. Tamp Bandy with Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants accompanied Mr. Parker during the investigation. Based on observations made by Mr. Parker, the channel that is to be impacted does appear to have the characteristics of a stream under the current guidance used by the Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE). Furthermore, the channel also appears as an intermittent stream (dotted blue line) on the current USGS topographic quad map. It should be noted, however, that it is the ultimate responsibility of the ACOE to determine whether or not the channel to be impacted is indeed a stream for which they may claim jurisdiction. Please be advised that the Division of Water Quality (the Division) requires that approval be obtained prior to disturbing more than 150 linear feet of stream under Nationwide Permit No. 39 and General Certification No. 39. It should also be noted that compensatory mitigation is required to replace unavoidable lost or degraded aquatic life uses of these streams, either through in stream measures and/or riparian techniques - such as buffer establishment or vegetative planting for temperature control (typically referred to as stream bioengineering). In determining' whether stream mitigation will be necessary, the Division must ascertain whether or not aquatic life requiring continuous water is present. Based on observations by Mr. Parker and Mr. Bandy, crayfish were found in the channel. The location where aquatic life was observed began at a point where a large rock vein dissects the channel approximately 200 feet southeast of where the channel passes under Highway 74. Mr. Bandy also placed flagging at this location. Such being the case, mitigation will be required by the Division if the channel impacts below this point are to exceed 150 linear feet in length. M MR Customer Service 1 800 623-7748 Division of Water Quality 919 North Main Street Mooresville, NC 28115 Phone (704) 663-1699 Fax (704) 663-6040 C 1 Mr. Chris Huysman ' July 2, 2002 Page Two 1 In order to obtain Division approval for any proposed jurisdictional stream impact, seven 1 (7) copies of the Preconstruction Notification Application (PCN), along with supporting maps and documentation, should be completed and returned to the addresses listed in the application. Please make sure that all maps submitted with the application are of suitable scale (e.g. 1" = 100') and delineate all impacted streams, ponds, and/or wetlands on the project site. Copies of the General Certifications and downloadable versions of the PCN can be accessed at the Division's 1 web page: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/NDbranch/wetland/wetland.html 1 If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Mr. Michael L. Parker or me at (704) 663-1699. 1 Sincerely, ./A< ?-AQL D. Rex Gleason, P.E. 1 Water Quality Regional Supervisor Attachment 1 cc: Doug Miller, DLR John Dorney, DWQ 1 Steve Chapin, USACOE hA401 \stream\m marieta. stm 1 i i ?I ?I SEP 03 2002 2:4SPM SCOTT CLARK TOYOTA CITY 1-704-569-2033 SCU"TT C?" " ?PS TOYOTA CTY 6801 East lndependenca Blvd. - Charlotte, North Carolina 28227 704-535.1972.704.567.905,2 (FAX) @- (900) 849.1972 www.scottelarktoyata.cam Sept. 1, 2002 Chris Huysman Wetland resources i 1 South College Ave. Suite 203 Hickory, N.C. 28658 Dear Chris, I can't express how im; 1 really need 20 acres o you arc aware, semp4a, blvd.) at which tint I4 building anotherjor iir, dedicated parkin! I fe the 15-acre trac othm As you kntnv, ere is r S 13,000,000 an not hi Should you requ. • e Sincerely; Scott L. Clark Owner t. property movedl ;rising I need. As (Lidependmce cx` ear, Toyota is ??S ce and hat 1 need on Spending 1.4 - ?°`?.' fir` ?,!„?1a,dY .:•P?t.,.??? ?'!d'.7•r.a.?'?lt'" -? wyt ? °?k: '•'?.;1., rah^No-?' . ;Y.?"' ?•;?, ?? yd y:?y? ^YiM?:?y.Fi'us'fis?cf ,.? ?'s •y.T' +y1k' TOYOTA e ve?r j cJ a ? p.2 August 21, 2002 Mr. Chris Huysman Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants, Inc. PO Box 224 Newton, NC 28658 Re: Scott Clark's Toyota City Site (Proposed), in Matthews, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Dear Mr. Huysman: Land Company Professional Site Selection Services Greg Cox gregcox(a-,carolina.rr.com Cox Land Company Office (704) 243-2002 1621 Walden Pond Lane Cell (704) 577-1200 Waxhaw, North Carolina 28173 Fax (704) 243-2003 Enclosed, please find two maps of Independence Boulevard in Mecklenburg County, NC between Margaret Wallace Road and 1-485. One map shows the entire target market area on an April, 2002 aerial photo overlaid with Mecklenburg GIS tax parcels. The other map shows four views of the market area. Each consecutive view eliminates candidate sites as they fail to meet minimum criteria for Scott Clark's proposed automobile dealership. The minimum criteria illustrated are: 1. Frontage on Independence Boulevard between Margaret Wallace Road and 1-485; 2. 14 acres or greater in size. It is worth noting that the14 acre minimum size maybe misleading in the traditional sense. The actual requirement is approximately 14 acres of usable land. The subject site has 14 usable acres only under the assumption that Scott Clark can bring the entire site to grade. The idea is to facilitate such a grading plan by constructing storm water improvements within easements on the seller's (Martin Marietta's) adjoining land. Without those easements and adjoining improvements, the minimum acreage would have to increase to accommodate storm water facilities.; 3. Vacant or sufficiently under developed to justify demolition and redevelopment; and 4. Zoned to allow construction and operation of an automobile dealership. As the enclosed maps demonstrate, the proposed site is the only parcel of land that meets the minimum criteria required to construct the Scott Clark's proposed dealership within the required target market area. With apologies for my redundancy, there are no alternate sites. Sincerely, ox Gregg 4/ Cox Land Company Enclosures: Aerial photo map & candidate site elimination map. 0 1 2 3 4 5 Miles N Source: Meck. Co. GIS Data All parcels fronting Independence Boulevard in the target market between Margaret Wallace Road and 1-485... & 14 acres or greater... & vacant or under developed... & zoned for an auto dealership. The Target Market For Scott Clark's Toyota City Site (Proposed) is Independence Boulevard Frontage between Margaret Wallace Road and 1-485 in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina 0 - 0.5 1 Miles A pril,2002 Aerial Photo N Meck Co GIS Tax Parcel Layer DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS 151 PATTON AVENUE ROOM 208 ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28801-5006 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF: October 29, 2002 Regulatory Division Action ID No. 200330057 Mr. John Dorney NCDENR-DWQ-Wetlands Section 1621 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621 Dear Mr. Dorney: NO # ? r M1f Enclosed is the application of Mr. Scott Clark for Department of the Army authorization and a State Water Quality Certification to discharge fill material into unnamed tributaries to Irvins Creek in association with construction of an automobile dealership, in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. Your receipt of this letter verifies your acceptance of a valid request for certification in accordance with Section 325.2(b)(ii) of our administrative regulations. We are considering authorizing the proposed activity pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, and we have determined that a water quality certification is required under the provisions of Section 401 of the same law. A Department of the Army permit will not be granted until the certification has been obtained or waived. In accordance with our administrative regulations, in most cases, 60 days after receipt of a request for certification is a reasonable time for State action. Therefore, if you have not acted on the request, or asked for an extension of time, by December 27, 2002, the District Engineer will deem that waiver has occurred. Questions or comments may be addressed to Mr. Steve Chapin, Asheville Field Office, Regulatory Division, at (828) 271-7980, extension 5. Sincerely, A& C. Scott McLendon Chief, Asheville Regulatory Field Office Enclosure/as t ? Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants, Inc. October 14, 2002 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Asheville Field Office Attn: Mr. Steve Chapin 151 Patton Avenue, Room 208 Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006 Re: Scott Clark Toyoto, Individual Permit Request Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Mr. Chapin: RECE?V?p OCT I's , ZuRr? .Oftm- f -'w i? y - oThe purpose of this letter is to provide the additional information that has been requested to elevate the Scott Clark Toyota City Nationwide Permit Applications to an Individual Permit Application. The information presented herein takes precedence over information submitted in the Nationwide Permit Application. Specifically, we have re- adjusted impact areas and lengths to comply with Corp directives. These changes in enumeration do not change the amount of mitigation required or proposed. We hope that the attached package meets the submittal requirements and that it is appropriate for the Corps to issue their public notice for the project We regret that the previously supplied information was not in an easily decipherable format and hope that this application compensates for the earlier deficiencies. Our prior PCN has larger scale drawings of the enclosed attachments. Thank you for your time and understanding and we look forward to continuing our work with you. Thank you in advance for your commitment to process this permit in the most expedited fashion that you know possible. We have commenced our work on the Environmental Assessment and will continue to cooperate with you to the extent that our client allows. Respectfully submitted, C:;'? V6? Tamp Bandy Newton Office PO Box 224 Newton, NC 28658 828&465A-3035 828&465A.3050 Fax www.wnrinc.com Clyde Office 217 Paragon Parkway, # 142 Clyde, NC, 28721 828A-627&0051 828?627A- 0052 Fax www.wndnc.com ?OGGcf710-02 09:22 AM WMRC 8284653050 P.e2 APPILICA ioM FOR bFPARTMENr OF p r fs! *AN 3251 TItE ARMY PERMIT QMB AMovAL NO. 0710.0003'°' M& bur- Mfrs ora 1 ? Rrt o1 OVWW P 10 tow* ExPMrR Doo?n6.r a9. 20W _ R to drno for Pot scu anss. This a n? k+9?+i no 0?aoM nns br ar I0 D badan a +?+Q tl burd.ty to ( ytrmt M Dafs?s. w R a"60;@r aWw 9f dos eodROtlen or ?pR.ts. 1i16.lsftan Davla KwiwRiisrs Sorvioo mroetowto of womation Wit NO&M -On proms 0710-00"), W SWIM 1204„ Adb?gwn, VA 227024302; and to tho Oft e pRrra?t ahai be On ? Do 201103. Rawrldants ow" bo swans dot I*01 "T m r rw tm*v Mm"w" 00 Nor Ii URN to damply w" • eeY..tlon.r (ntornlM N N 4M not d4p1aY • VIM t1w ju? or th+ gbpR of thaRR somas q Il1WM moil b. subn>kad owm"Wgem tt+R atr1.t &MM10sr MWMss: FtlvM PiiNACY ACT STATEMENT H0 1161M Act, S..dnn 10, as WiC . dean W , ndewNaa Aet, 3$ use 1413, &.,*. tQa. Prtotp.t n Prvo+.y: dwAct,s.atlon404,33USC1144:M&*wPafs*m Raaaa mhand Mernntb" emit. Am ft UaaR: Thin Inhm.$[on -W b. -b - with d?. p ftd an this torn wA W Nod in Rv tt,* „ Ibr a . r"W"M kdor"'`"16n is voka tOv- how.wr, It Ifft",?twt vidsda"d *& pwra appgaebnm 4as et e: nnrns apnnoia.. ov&%Iftd • °f ' dnawtftpa at 9"d rapnedwq?y nor am is som "On WhIA ohm halt ??? s"d h'aN alto b.wbmMtRd m ? 01sAiot? ?Itbts? or ft ptoposRd aetlritY mwt be ot't.ah.d to *& ?t n thrt It t aem N Ok*W ? fait 10 bs tstur"ad. 0 +dada+t "w *a be.tlon a1 eho iropa..d APPLICATION NQ. 9. FlELD oRFICp CODE APPUCANTIR NAM9 Mr. Scott Clark APPI.iGA14rS ADDRESS 01 X40t Independence Blvd arlotte, NC 28227 A. ilasidG" - h. bainm 704-535-1972 -.. authwit., et tld j Won rli4uvat, supplemenw ANUCANT'0 &CMATURE GATE r7rWAUT NAME OR TITLE tiniYfteda,a, Scott Clark Toyoto site t NAME OF WATER900Y. tit KNOWN nt?mrwwrr t Unnamed Tributary to Zrvina Creek 1 LOCATION OF PROJECT Meelksnburg HC STA7'i 3. DATiI RECEIVED 4. DATE APPLJCAy*N CONpWo e. AUTHOAM90 AGENre NAME AND TITLE &NN N, 4 ea.= Mr. Chrio Huyoman 0. AGENT'S ADORES$ #0 Box 224 Newton, NC 98658 s. RatldRnCR b, 9usinRts 828.465-3435 14. FROJiCT START AbDRE86 xWfA,,&W Mecklenburg County Tax ID 19332109 --%," W%"'"WN DMAIPTIONS, IF KNOWN, hithownv ite iN located at the southwObt corner of independence Blvd and sam Novell Road IJMkECTMM Vn Toe rw- Highwy 74 (Independence alvd) west from Charlotte taw4rd Matthewa. site is located of Independence Alvd at the intersectrlon uad. with Sam Nowell Rd. Bee attached U6{3 to oat In t>,y behatf go my atam in thR Ixooassing of this apocigion and to support of this pmt aw"don, / ?/1 -00T-10-02 09:23 AM WNRC 18. festun of Aettvlty t4.nteraenar?,y,?*,? see attachment shoat: "B1ook ia" 6_?__ r attaachMat sheet "elcck 39" fWaofl(s) for Dbshrp• ! attachment sheet "Block Zo" •.••••» b+•un.asa rw ttw Afhoont Of EPA Tvo• in Cubla Yards attachment: sheet "8loak 21• dL-S-,WW attachment sheet "g10ck 22" IS MY Potdert of the Work Air#** Comaw e? Ya No ' fF YEB, Df9CRtBE THE COM.ft ETEQ wow -J-ww ~W2, r+aParty . taaRaee, Eta., YYhwa 9104154 attach a grPp?W Est, Prey AdJoln• the wotk(g, pf tnoia than am be snt•rad hers, attached irfeekltenburg County tax "St:ing attachMOAt •RIOCk ad" . t? .. ?.?.. •.•, ""` 1°°"a « rUeP?ovaislD•Nttt Reoelvsd from other Feller 31, gqN of teem Ap•nd" for Work DucAb•d in 71rs Apps MIW. AGENCY_.. TYPE APPMVat . lr%L,....-. ___ .."'°Y nww Tor • Pwwut or pormka to authotfi• yw work tk>falb•d in We appae4o6n Is aompwM and occur 1 furttyr oaniry that ! Aotaets uta i f c•ttffy that the b<f"Melm in this dull audlor4•d spent • PR artt. w Undarmk•"w«k daacrilw Itw•U or •m actj g as the /O CQ? ?NATl1Rp Op ApT a<+d+ait•d •pant it utw" in DATE StANATUftE T DATE "appilaadon mutt be 4Pbd by 1M Arson who 4ealns is undertake tier pro"" Wdyity 1•pplio•ttO or it t>?oc[t i 1 hM beeh filled out and Wow& Y by eynad by ¦ dy1Y 18 U.S.C. a atlf n 1001 prowdet thee: Who•wr, In Inv mWMW wyft dw krrlWadan of kna "May gf dw Unks S"Y and wi!<fulty fakdfies, cona•rls, Of M1' daP?IMt or OVOM up bpldWsnt etatar+tatsta «tWft4ftWtlont of Vany ast t?Idt, tchanl•, or Owilaft a menial fact or m any },dp, dour at ca ta4 +i TMnts rtwires Ntk•t Of Vast any fttla Wtl ar algy, shall be lined not more dnp a daf amen krwwfnp **Me t+o oon aln wry fnWe, [FOtitfow or, than 110,000 of bW'SmW not M&O thafi Ave Years ar bath. 8284653050 P. 03 . i? ?• 'Ql"I'i ? ? ? ( I'TQ°?, `??t?l T•I { ! I I YY`?I 'PY? Q•?"IW i I I I iO?Q°?f3? Oi.QOi wi i s i s OSO" LZ' L1fl•IN . Anno w?. n nn°.°. Zv- lY ' yJ( ?4 ! ?v Y ? _ r {s ` + I ? " 1 ` ? ? w { ! i 6r't/d? }? / ? ?_ ? ] ?? ? ?l? ? ? ?, ` ' '{, ?'?? / ` t ? ?? ??t'1,r \' ry ?+ ? ?1 ? ? ?y?,> 1??? ? F. ?C' } .?b?`t1 '?. L? y? J 'i '? I , ? -t ? / < y ?i L..,r'1 F f 1 { • Y ? ,t g ? ! yh ? k? y 'f '' ?jYy` 7 ! uy ??l? t? f ? r1Y ,,,? ,'?,• ? ? :: 4 t f..lt ` '?+e? ? ,• ?^ ? %\, l 7' W? 1{ ?4+.f (F / Js.., ``}ti y ? ? .mc, 1?'? ' 1 F ?? i ?y ~`? ? 1 f Y ? t ,?'e ?+ 7 1 ? ? ? 1y?1i '. 111 111 l ) h{. Y l 't. r t } +? 3lf / ? i '. ? • ?F ? r \t . ?' } ,'(??/h j,. ` k l ! .'Y S ??f??'4'?f j ! + + S.`h ? 1 1 ?, ?. ? l""? 111 i ? i ? ?'? ?yC?'^t I 4 • {{ ?'?, 5??? ? ? J3? ?1j ? ..-? ? ??? l I j llP } '?• ?? ??•• ?' 4 rij S,. rt ?'1? ? ? ysi I` ?? ':.`J`?? \ ? r r^ ?:.? r b:a ?? • ????. ? -i-??L ??it? Y 1 ? ? f 1 ?' f}? * 01) ' r ? . { ' j a? 1 ??v? ? ? k P?' ?bo t ? ? ?f ?.i? ? I 1 • 1 l i r 1< t ? iN J ? ? ? ? c r ?? v '" ? sIK i r '4 + f ?1, L ? i?_ F i L '? err ? •'. ` ? .?a ?.. - i r,!? ( ` `, ? ''? a t \ ,? ` { ' y? .,, ? , , .? + i , ` ? ? , r , ti i to • . h A'hYf'?`i ., •-rr'c?..4 ? ,`; a 1 ??..? r v ' ? # ? ,.+ ,r/{ c` ? 7?? ? ? ! ? z? ?SU - ? `r• t ? ! ??I( ?"f ~? - - : t ?? } • `?•? ' x ?w s v? ` Y . } ?? ? ? ' { ? ? ?i r / r lid 1 ? ? ?,,,..,? > t --... ?' • 1 • ; ?l ij ? ? `?: ?a • ( t 1. ? / `'? !J w .'??f! ??\?4 ?, ? ` y ? iy,s ? 4 ?? E ? ??? ? , ?i `,1 ? ` I ?• ttti w5` :has • w! ` •ta: • ? of s ? F ?? ?? # T ?g ri . --... Mf 6o W • :1 x r? S ?' Kp ? ?t .vv .° vvv ? -f wvv rr' vow. tJ V.vvvv %=-14S' V.W vv ' ' ' ' UW7 4T fso-W Vy s s s , 080°'42' 0'.00• w ' r Name: MINT HILL Location: 0350 08' 17.8" N 080° 43'08.6- W Date: 101141102 Caption: Scott Clark Toyoto Scale:! inch equals 2000 feet Hwy 74, Matthews Mecklenburg County, NC Scott Clark Toyota, Independence Blvd Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Block 18. Nature of Activity. The permitted discharges will facilitate the development of an automobile dealership that will support two brands of cars. The construction will involve the relocation of 465 linear feet of live channels into stormwater conveyances pipes ranging from 60 to 72 inches in diameter. The piped channels will be on new alignments. Once the stormwater facilities are in place, the existing limits of Waters of the US will be placed in French drains consisting of small clean rock and perforated pipe. The perforated pipe will discharge into the above mentioned conveyance system. All pipes will be underlain with rock in accordance with sound engineering practices. The discharges of pipe will support display facilities. No dredged material will be re-deposited within the Waters of the US. Site Development Plan. Scott Clark Toyota, Independence Blvd Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Block 19. Project Purpose Scott Clark Toyota City, the existing dealership, has exceeded their ability to fully serve their client base from the existing facilities. The proposed facilities will replace the existing 4.5 acre site with a new site containing 14 acres that will serve projected growth for the next 20 years. Construction is anticipated to begin in spring 2003 and be complete by summer 2003. The site will support the dealership building, maintenance facilities, display area and storm water management facilities. To be suitable for a dealership a property must be clearly visible from major travel corridors. Additionally, the property must be in close proximity to other dealerships. More than three quarters of all car purchases are impulse buys, meaning that the desired car must be available from the displayed stock. The dealership must be considered to be a "display window" and the parking areas need to be considered to be a "stock room". The loss of display area translates into significant economic losses. The applicant has addressed these issues in Attachment 1. Need Letter No other alternative dealership sites exist in the vicinity of the proposed project. To be viable the site must be located within 4 miles of existing dealerships and should contain 15 to 20 acres of land and needs to be zoned appropriately for a dealership. A land broker committed significant resources to locate alternative sites for the proposed auto dealership. His review of properties found no other suitable sites. The results of his findings are presented as Attachment 2. Alternate Sites During the extensive alternative site plan analysis, open relocation was assessed to be inappropriate because it would be contained by two fill slopes and would conflict with utility infrastructure, or because if relocated within the property it would result in significant loss of property. Relocation within the property, with an adequate belt width would require extensive cuts (up to 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide) and the relocation of some utilities. Relocation that would require up to a 50 foot riparian buffer on either side of the relocated channel which would equate to the loss of up to I acre of developable land. Reduction in size and configuration cannot be practically accomplished in a manner that would result in less adverse impacts and maintain a viable dealership development Keystone walls were considered as a tool to reduce fills but were abandoned when it was determined that to comply with development objectives the channel impacts would be reduced by only few linear feet. Additionally, any open area within the channel would essentially become a scour-pool and would likely not be stable. Ecologically and hydrologically this solution was determined to be not acceptable because it would result in a scour pool. Additionally, this island of channel would be constantly subject to non-point discharges contaminated with automotive fluids and other household and residential pollutants derived from the upstream drainage area. 0 Scott Clark Toyota, Independence Blvd Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Attachment 1. Need Letter SCOT 1 CLARKS TOYOTA CITY—' C"AkF-iLO-r-FEH, tv.G 6801 East Independence Blvd. • Charlotte, North Carolina 28227 702-535-1972.704-567-9052 (FAX) • (800) 849-1972 www.scottelarktoyota.com Sept. 1, 2002 Chris Huysn:an Wetland resources 11 South College Ave. Suit-, 303 flickorv, 28635 Dear Chris, i r can't express how impgrtankit iS 6.}Iavr 1t-..wc find po tion of ;he property moved! i ccally recd 20 accts of prripcn>" cfbuiiS:3he t cility aihi,?)c'dgwtc t'xdricing I Hea l. s you arc aware, semeciay.:in tEir, ricsr:Futut c; ire st2(c'Qf wrdtav-R vy. 74 (independcttce blvd.) at which tirus l..ikill3o?e approximatC1 2B(l uirkjnp.plai:i >'n11c-<h r, ea Tuy u4- is t building another Car line'I,? cipn).tha v~il! nor r i(rsI ZCytcd,gltovml,i' qr& pace and dedicated parking! i tee.'coniidcnt,.c`2ii retluirs and vxhat I need on .._?._ the 15-acre trac otherwise &'`cannet` usiiTTI tgvr to leis looatwn. . A6 you kttu:v, tJivre is cW.o[1t4r lucptiiitl''tiz,a pzto fr'tt Tie3,illc my i oncerns. Spending. S 13,000,01x1 and not haxVina gwugh iixr},*?n i nC? i>On.' = Should you rcxlutte aay?adciitii tzul info=ation; lEa "ir 1 1'..: 1. j. Sincerely; Scott L. Clark Owner . : ? ?. TOYOTA l e v d, Y' 1 J a? Scott Clark Toyota, Independence Blvd Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Attachment 2. Alternate Sites August 21, 2002 Mr. Chris Huysman Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants, Inc. PO Box 224 Newton, NC 28658 Re: Scott Clark's Toyota City Site (Proposed), in Matthews, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Dear Mr. Huysman: Cox L:i n d - Comp:zny Professional Site Selection Services Grq Cox g,.R-m70.=hn--M Cox Land C.mpany 018.. (704) 11•-.002 1621 :Walden Pond Lane Cr111704) i-1 7.1"00 Waxhaw. Nonh Ca .Im 23173 Fax (704) 217-_003 Enclosed, please find two maps of Independence Boulevard in Mecklenburg County, NC between Margaret Wallace Road and 1-485. One map shows the entire target market area on an April, 2002 aerial photo overlaid with Mecklenburg GIS tax parcels. The other map shows four views of the market area. Each consecutive view eliminates candidate sites as they fail to meet minimum criteria for Scott Clark's proposed automobile dealership. The minimum criteria illustrated are: 1. Frontage on Independence Boulevard between Margaret Wallace Road and 1-485; 2. 14 acres or greater in size. It is worth noting that the14 acre minimum size may be misleading in the traditional sense. The actual requirement is approximately 14 acres of usable land. The subject site has 14 usable acres only under the assumption that Scott Clark can bring the entire site to grade. The idea is to facilitate such a grading plan by constructing storm water improvements within easements on the seller's (Martin Marietta's) adjoining land. Without those easements and adjoining improvements, the minimum acreage would have to increase to accommodate storm water facilities.; 3. Vacant or sufficiently under developed to justify demolition and redevelopment; and 4. Zoned to allow construction and operation of an automobile dealership. As the enclosed maps demonstrate, the proposed site is the only parcel of land that meets the minimum criteria required to construct the Scott Clark's proposed dealership within the required target market area. With apologies for my redundancy, there are no alternate sites. Sincerely, Greg ox Cox Land Company Enclosures: Aerial photo map & candidate site elimination map. Scott Clark Toyota, Independence Blvd Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Attachment 2. Alternate Sites The Target Market 0 0.5 1 Miles For Scott Clark's Toyota City Site (Proposed) is Independence Boulevard Frontage between 4A April, 2002 Aerial Photo Margaret Wallace Road and 1-485 in Mecklenburg N Meck Co GIS Tax Parcel Layer County, North Carolina Scott Clark Toyota, Independence Blvd Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Block 20. Reason for Discharge The relocation of live channels into the stormwater facilities and the discharges relating to the French drains allow the property to be developed as an automobile dealership. The stone underlayment provides a foundation that will support the stormwater pipes and fill over the pipes. Clean stone underlayment is specked to be at least 6 inches and will follow sound engineering practices. The installation of the French drains will involve the only material being discharged below ordinary high water within the existing channels. The discharge of stone limits erosion during construction and the pipe will replace failing soil channel banks. Existing channels will be converted to French drains by placing approximately 6 inches of washed stone base under perforated pipe that is covered by another 12 to 18 inches of washed stone. The top of the washed stone will be covered by a geotextile prior to placing clean fill that will support proposed facilities. Impact Area 3.:;Y3W7 7V •il?lll??lll Ilr?l.illi?!?lllitlliil?I'll ,?1 ?,?,' wE???. I'F 117 l 11 I-? I I ?I I U I I kl? I I' 1111 ' •r a• d°- ' I Lt w ?: .. (^a ) I I Tm l0. I ?I _I 111 ?1 I tl I I I I I?\;1 wed o? ' ----- , _I I II I-! -1.411 11t fri?CliIII g I,y' ,, __ _ f V' \I ?1 I I Impact3 220 LF Unimportant/ Intermittent Channel - ?° ,++' r , '? f III I r, l l i f rl-i-I4 a 1"?'I I l i f--Z.1 , I I I I ; 1 I •i, , ?? t _ _L --'- '.,? 171 I I"I I,? I ? t i `.I I I .- ,?s3 -o• I I !III ?? } 1 t I _If :l_I j l uN 1 I { I V I;'li I Il Impact 2 - 165 LP Impact, Corpsi DWQ ' ?{ I 1 I_I 71,:1 I ! ?' =t?,l I '1 ! I I %r I;I t ,u Mitigation Required Importance Endpoint , - _ - - .' `\.?:? ?'6._--??? °?? t QSI _` •ly I , I ?\1\' ', 1 ,'.(,1..lfieb 1`11 ? / 1 1 i, l t/ 1 l i l 1 1 I I 1, 71 1 ? T I gut I ? ?? 1` +1dIB?t? ? I, 1 1 +\ t 1 \. 1 1 p rKw '' n Impact I -260 LF Impact, - \ r: ?.: ?•' t L - `???? ?1i' Mitigation Required - - - - - - - ' ?. E.ettrp 1 , \ t t Q s Scott Clark Toyota, Independence Blvd Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Block 22. Surface Areas of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled The proposed impacts are to 425 linear feet of perennial channel and 180 linear feet of intermittent channel. The surface area for the proposed activity is less khan 0.05 acres based on an average width of 3 feet. The on-site channel is assessed to be a low quality urban channel with high peaks in its hydrograph resulting from the 30 plus acre urban watershed impervious estimated at 60%. Severe down-cutting and bank failure are evident along the entire reach. Vertical banks and low sinuosity indicate that the stable natural morphology of the channel has been lost and that the channel is contributing excess bed-load (sediment) to down stream reaches. The floodplain, though present, does not appear to function on a regular basis; the channel is deeply entrenched and the floodplain contains no regulated wetlands. Trash, including household and automotive debris, is also present along the entire reach. Even considering all the items listed above, crayfish inhabit portions of the channel. Wetlands and Waters Delineation Now !It?iii I'F?I I? EII? 1-4-W H I U w? : Sx _ .J I t l i , gyn. tas. ! i I I I I I f I l ,e Iiliillfilll-I-F_?i1i1111tff?.r I mot,' C ca Impact 3 I _ ?90`LF Unimportant on J -• -> _ Intermittent Channel _.I - u4 kit L If1i?Ii`TV•l,i I I i•? lilt'II ?+; 1..??i'lil..xbif ?'b??) -- ` '_' I . t I , }? \?i.l. `I j - , I I (Z????; ?i ! I ! i I?-? ! 1 ?• ? ? 1 I ' I ? ?e.S ! •1 _ _ Muni ,7N a' E -`'"?•? I I I i. ?!"fit.! ?; ' ? ?? '_ - - I'i?t' t a? ? Impact 2- 165 LF Impact, Corps / DWQ . ti I I . ! I,I "Zi I I I I Mitigation R Importance Endpoint ?, ,;, A' sy.? I} V I I I I I ! i I I ?; g squired 77, 7 Impact 1 - 260 LF Impart, - - ?•.r ' ' 1, y'_'.` , ' Mitigation Required off, ?, - t 't e , Anntr ?? , ? -.\\ r? t Mecklenburg County, NC GIS: Online Real Estate System Page 3 of 3 Record 1?IaNId# Parcel- I& (hvner's Name 1 1 Mailu?g Address 1 1 Property Address 1 . Heed , I Bookli age/Date lAcreag?e ? JUSTICE 1637 SAM NEWELL 1637 SAM 0930/311 1 2101 19322101 JOHN ELLIS RD MATTHEWS NC NEWELL RD 11/111975) 1.047 B/WL 281057572 PO BOX 673 E 2 2102 19322102 BARBEE 1 HEWS NC D EPENDENCE ? i? 5) 31 E LIZABETH D 2 ATT B D l 4 . PO BOX 673 9140 E 3 2102 19322102 BARBEE LU E ABETH ELIZAB D MATTHEWS NC INDEPENDENCE 01704/309 4.31 S 28105 BV (1/1/1975) MARTIN 4 2103 19322103 MARIETTA PO BOX 30013 9? E INDEPENDENCE 07667/629 691 299 MATERIALS RALEIGH NC 27622 BV (2/1511994) . INC 3333 BEVERLY 5 2106 19322106 TIRE RDD/768TAXB2-116A HOFFMAN E INDEPENDENCE 083681086 155 1 AMERICA INC ESTATESIL BV (11/17/1995) . 601790001 MARTIN 6 2109 19322109 MARIETTA PO BOX 30013 N/A 07667/629 0 MATERIALS RALEIGH NC 27622 (2/15/1994) INC This site is powered by 0 MapObjects2 Internet Map Server 909,111, ESRI This site was developed by Mecklenburg County GIS and was last updated on 9/23/2002 3:34:50 PM ?- p 0" errs ? P J ? http://maps.co. mecklenburg.nc.uslscriptslesrimap.dll?name=Taxgis&Left=1481912.38125&B... 9/26/02 Scott Claris Toyota, Independence Blvd Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Attachment 2. Alternate Sites & zoned for an auto dealership. The Scott Clark's Toyota City (Proposed) Site is the only parcel of land that meets the minimum required criteria. There are no alternate sites. 0 1 2 3 4 5 Miles N Source: Meck. Co. GIS Data All parcels fronting Independence Boulevard in the target market between Margaret Wallace Road and 1-485... & 14 acres or greater... & vacant or under developed... The Target Market For Scott Clark's Toyota City Site (Proposed) is Independence Boulevard Frontage between Margaret Wallace Road and 1-485 in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina 0 0.5 1 Miles April, 2002 Aerial Photo N Meck Co GIS Tax Parcel Layer r N & zoned for an auto dealership. The Scott Clark's Toyota City (Proposed) Site is the only parcel of land that meets the minimum required criteria. There are no alternate sites. I All parcels fronting Independence Boulevard in the target market between Margaret Wallace Road and 1-485... & 14 acres or greater... & vacant or under developed... 00fr-16-02 11:04 AM WNRC 8284653050 P.02 retiand and Natural Resource onsultents, Inc. October 16, 2002 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Asheville Regonal Field Office Attn: Mr. Steve Chapin 131 Patton Avenue. Room 208 Asheville, North Carolina 28801.5006 Ike: Mitigation Proposal Request for Purchase Into NCWRP Scott Clark Toyoto Site, Matthews, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Mr. Chapin: As on-site and adiacmnt, off-skee mitigation in the form of stream restoration have been determined to be impractical. compensatory mitigation Is proposed by stormwater management and treatment facilities and purchase into the NC WRP for 46S linear feet of stream restoration credit (above 425 linear feet to meet antidpated NCDWQ requiremem), A copy of the latter to Mr. Jeff jurek of the WRP is sttached. Please call with quezions, Sincerely, yw -Soo4? Tamp Bandy won OtAce BOX 224 Mort, NC 28658 14,4654, 3060 Fm oftbe Ir465+b 3035 CTPa8721, #142 82+627,60051 8284,627 &0062 I= www.wwnc.com Or-rT-16-02 11:04 AM WNRC 8284653050 P.03 N;t Wand and Natural Resource neultents, Inc. .f October 16, 2001 Wetland Restowdtion Program Attn: Mr. Jeff Jurek 1619 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1619 Re: Request for Stream IRestoration Credit Purchase Scott Clark Toyoto, Hwy. 74 Proposed Dealership Site Matthews, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina DWQ## 02.1454 USACE Action IDa`# 200330057 Dear Mr. Jurek The purpose of this letter is to request 465 linear feet of stream mitigation through purchase into the NC WRP, This mitigation is requested for the proposed Scott Clark Toyoto Dealership in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. The channels to be impacted are unnamed tributaries to Irvins Creek and are classified as Chu C Waters, They are shown on the attached USGS TopoQuad, and see feasted on Property with Tax PIN 19322109 on the Mecklenburg County Online Real Estate GIS System, Please notify us at your earliest convenience of your ability or inability to accept or purchase, or if additional information is required to process our request. A letter of acceptance will be necemry for use by the Army Corps of Engineers, Asheville ReSfoml Field Office (Agent: Mr. Steve Chapin). Sincerely, zomoty 'Abe Tamp Bandy v;ar+ Office 0 -0 on872t?avayI #142 Qr0Q Box 224 yc O ca, NC, 6A-627 Ab 20051 V , 3035 82 1+46543050 poet 82$276ta052fCX ...._.,. ,....._, www,wnenc.=n ¦ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. ¦ Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. ¦ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed W; L'G (} c --' `t 1 5 M fc kl n bu?^J S co f Ctc'c i ?yc (rte N [ Tnd e Pcl-d c r,ce C1-.c?l_ CYt? f Kt C Ze ll? X ignature / ????? 13 Agent Re .,ived by (Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery Is delivery address different from item 1? ? Yes if YES, enter delivery address below: ? No 3. Service Type 12 Certified Mail ? Express Mail ? Registered Bletum Receipt for Merchandise ? Insured Mail ? C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ? Yes 2. Article Number 7002 2410 0003 0275 0591 (Transfer from service ! PS Form 3811, August 2001 Domestic Return Receipt 2ACPRI-03-Z-0985 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE • Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box • NC DENR Division of Water Quality Wetlands/401 Unit 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250 Raleigh, NC 27604 First-Class Mail Postage 8? Fees Paid USPS Permit No. G-10 10 IL , 111161nL CHARLOTTE SUPER DOUGNNI,'TS SERVICE, LLP Approx. location 8" IP ~ i CM D per M UD customer service maps `I A VNLLIAM J. f0 ~ PLEASANTS PEP 80YS PEP 80YS PO 74 ~0 COMMERCIAL ; w. ~J rox. I A~~y yP NET LEASE water water APP ocatlon 24" DIP per v w vault ~ ~ Q, CMUD customer service ma s oul- t..... c ~ P - - - - ter-- - - - r•.... - S n - _ _ - ce ou ~ - - e en en - _ v~r ~ 200 R/W (per tax map) w See D.B. 9356 P EXISTING ~ 2.5' g. 634 curb & gutter HYDRANT r _ _ i1 2 A~ x r ~ - _ ?1Z tll yeELOa out 24' A92.96 (New 2t' Nln h U rn a W I _ 4 Y h o qr Y 0 ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ _ - - _ _ (~~.9~-.- T - - - r .C_ _ _ - - N T ~ ~ Y I Y OU a - ( \ r ~ l ~ a Inr h ~ 1T of iS'ftCP ' ~ ~ I _ - 702.9 out ExlHhq EOP I j 1 ~ e 2.OX 9 p 9 IP11 1 II NN T L. _ ~ J Exist. Driv _ _ ~ ~ 3 ~ _ _ _ - x Ir, OP I I a~ Y a~a ee') e~e.~ tN.. ~ h T.B.M. I t""' 6 Nail in pavement _ ~ / 0: - 3>OTOf 1 / - - - - _ - _ - - - - - - - - 67e.t4 out W Er~~ln3 Qdr I/ ~ --0.4:EQ~ _ ~ - - - - - - - Sr - _ - _ _ _ Elev. 689;94 - `6sh~ ~ ' ' _ - _ 1 r - _ ~ a ~ ~ v. 24;x1 .P-d68~-i'~ 1 1 - ~ < - ~ 1`xistin Exist. Driv _ ~ c'" ~ Found _ ` I \ ~ ~ gg ~ ~ - Aspha ~ -ssA- - _ 5~ / 34 4 \ E 1140.05 / s\ / ~ 1\ ~ J - - - - - , ~ Cry opo R-35!36 m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ t \ ~ ~ ~ ~ A~ - ~ ~ - N34'25 3~ W . ~ - . _ _ ~ _ _ _ ~ _ I I I ~ ~ a.o 3 v ~ 1 ~ / I 1887 (tie / \ I I \ ~ A 11 r 1 ~ v~0 6a6 o i \ o e6 ~0 / ~ ~ / ~ v 1 ~ ~ 6 ~ ~ 1 ~ ! ~ t Boa' / / a \ 1 ~ s, ~ 4 \ ` 1 ~ r~ ~ / ~ Existin ?'~~D'RIiJ(~ ESTATE I / g ~ 1 ~ / I Parkin Lo (BOSTON MARKET) ~ _ , / Temporary 40 g ~ 1 WJB REALTY / \ I , LP. I Grod Eo~ement I ~ 1 l I ~ ~ . ~ I ~ •,o o' a i~ ~ . ~ ~ E 8" ci tk ,ir< I o ~~wn~ l ~ Real Estate Joint ure I z I \ ~ o' ~ e I ~ 1 0 ~ ~ 682 a I ~ ~ . ~ 195' of 1e' HOP.. / / m x I I 1 ~ 1 2 I r Deed Book 8782 P. 8 w I f ~ • 1.18 5 ~ ~ ~ \ cc I ~ ~ \ / I I ~ 1 I ~ ~ ~ / ~ I Lot 1 MB 26-89 \ , I ~ ~ ~ o I ~ I ~ 0 ~ I I Y ~ i ~ / I ~ - - ~ I ~ ~ Tax I.D. 193-221-0 / 1 I I ,1 ~ N i ~ / „ ~ ~ Tire America, inch I I Boston Market Restour ~ ~/l / I / / ~ ~ \ e03.E0 out / 7 ~ I I 1 I ~ u+ - _ i 880 Deed Baok 836 P I ~ i ` a o / ~ ~ s 1 o ~ s~ ~ 8 9J I ~ ~ i - s~ / ~ Mop Book 26 Pg• 8 I / - ~ , -~0~ ~ ~ l / V ~ ~ Y ~ I / / i / ~ - ~ ` ~ I ~ d, I ~ / ~ A ~ } 691.Ja ~ ~ >Q ~ 6. / 1 ~ ~ I ~ ~ Tox L0. 193-221- I I ~ / ~ ~ s. ~ I Q I ~ i ~ I I I ~ I aP I ~ k ~ I I eo ou >t ~ - - - GR~U~ _ / V A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ II I I 'gat, ~ s> ~ I I ~ n~Ellis Justice ~ ~ ~ s> I I r a ~ I MAR 0~ Zp C W \ \ ~ ~~J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - m o ~ ~ e IY ~ ~ ~ P ~ I is a ~ ~ ~ ~ 03 n ~ I ~ Oeed Book 930 ~P . ` . s7s I ~ ~ n I _ g-31t 6 (i I ~ v ~ 1~ OTT' se lae s ' e a„t ~ . ~ ~ RK ~ ~ ~ ,,,,,1, ~ i ~ 9~, ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ I, 0 1 I~ o I I ~ 'Lot MB 26-89 I N~ I~I I a ~ h ATER ' I 't ~ ~ Dr f ~ ~ - - .o t ~ ~ o~ ~ ~ 'F YOT ~ of d ~ ~ ~ Sl~awra - _ $ 67 ~ ~ ao 871. ~ , sss I SE T CTI ox I, - ~I~ s~ 873 ~ x ~ by h I I c D. V93 221-0~1 o ~I I o~~ ~ I ~ Z _ / ~ ~ v' cNV / h~ 'o ~ 99 ,C;, ~ ~ ~ ~ e6 w 6 ~ - ~ ~ ~ - ao I// ~aaZ \ ~ - - s ~ . ~ _ ~ 86e.oo au ~ I I ones R 20 , 1~ a~~ll I . ~ ~ - ~ ~ / I ~ ~ t ~ 14• t ~ \ YN 8 ~ ° I I I ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ eJ nv ~ ~ ~ ~ ° I \ ~ Y / ~ ~ ~ ~ S eJ n 1 1 ~I ~ ~ 4f / 1 ~ -el~.cK ~ 1 o AV may". ~ g . / _-eoo ~ 1 I ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ !F vm,Tl 1, _ 1 ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ A ~ , _ / ~ ~ 676 ~ ~ , / .a~ Temporary 20' ~ I , ~ u / ~ ~ ' ~ ,1 l / ~ y ~ Ap ~ / ~ ~ p~ ~ ` 1 / 0 - ~ e~ ~ ~ Ap \ G?odh Easement ' I ~otr , - - ~ ~ ~ I 1 ~ "O~ ~ ~ ~ to K9'' w r Ine thlp r o ~ ~ ~ _ v ~ Orr pfr m N ~ ~ A f ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ Q1~ ~ m ~ r iota to be mq wed ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ Wets / f " - ~ / co I J / • / ~ ~ v a" ~,~a~m I ~ ~ ~ ~ l I ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ .A - 6 1 see ~O ~ l 1 _ ~ Inv 6,..Bf~ nv~f7` RCf~" ~ hr `0 9 / ~ . ~ Q ~ _ yg6 ~ \ I i I ~ c i iu ~ -664- ` 1 656.7 / 1 ~ - 656. ~ I ` 1 1 f ~ I ~1 1 ~ C73 1 \ 1 1 I ° /a ~ ~ / ; ~ Z ~ ~ f ao A A ~ A ~ en 64S.J' S8 ~ I 6 7,5~ / lua3~, / ~ X674 / ~ j ~ ~ Z Z / ~ eB t ~ ~ "ck,~y ~ / ~h ~~cs~z• I • v '10 E 9 i0co ~ ~ ~0 Q Z ~ 1 \ I I / ~ I ~ 6 9 ,aQ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ rq \ d 9 / ~ ~ I I hs / 1 ~ / / ~ 1 ~ 5 48 ~ o •p / ~ ~Q I 1 v 1 ~ ~ ~ 6 0 ~ I I ~ ~ 1.~ \ - - ~ , ~ / I o \ ~ o Squires Realt Inc• ~ ~ 1 ) 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v9S i ~ x Y• \ 9S ~ _ ~ ~ e ~p I I ~ Deed Book 76 t 5 P / ~ t \ 698 ~ I I ~ of ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t Y out 1 ? \ hd su.,• I g. 228 66 ~ sss - get ; 1 Lat 5, MB 25 P .608 / / shY1. h I \ ~ ~ / ~ , eetso eut 4 0 ~ \ \ RC _ ~ , ~ I I • ~ g \ 54 o I ~ I ~o~ 1 ~ Tax LD. 193-2.31-29 \ \ ~ e - ~ ~ ~ JJJ 1 7 ~ J, \ \ ~ ~ ~ , ~ _ I ~ ~ I r \ \ b~' ~ ~ III I I ~o a v , ~p~ ~ qb,, ) I- s ~ ~ ~ \ ` ~ \ ~.Q` ` ~ 52.3' ArphJM ' U aI I ` I 1 ~ -m ~ ~ -ro - ~ ~ \ \ ~ ( J~ ,~y I I -tee \ N 4' ~ \ ~ i0 ` 869 i ; ~ ~ J ~ I ~ 1 1 I I ~ ii~~ ~ ~ v ~ v s - ! _ loseli s _ - 111 ~ e a \ - - ~ / ~ ~l ~ 6~ L, //i~_ o~ ~ A \ ~ 1 / / ~~T''' r~ - d - - \ ~ ~ 9~t - ~i. I J I ~ III \ ~g ~ ~ \ ~ _ i / ~ i i' / 1 I I I I 1 1 l //r ~ 1 a~ . \ ( °,0 1 ~ c~ o f k ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~•1 esa•~'~ 7 t g sss ',66 - ~ \ ~ ~ 6g3 ? ~ 9~ 9Q 6 s~B r W o~0 ro° m roN q~ gyn.. .r ~ ~ ` _ _ \ . • ~ > ~ ~ ~ 1 o n ~ n • r 1 ` ~ Q3 662 ~.-i 1\ \ 1 I i I~ ~ I ~v 1~A \ ~ ~ I I ~ I 1, v ~ ~ C 18 38" nv \ ° 1 \ ' ~ i / / 4 ~ o \ \ \ / \ \ ~ ~ I / fP ~ ut , f ~ \ ~ ~ / I C 6 i \ ~ ~ 1 i ~ ~ e ? ~ ~ e ~ I ~ . i ~ ~v ~ v ~ ~ 1 I I ~ / , / _ w ~ A .1 ~ I I~~ ~ ~ T i LEGEND ~ 1v ~ , ,v , 1 I I ~ ' ~ ~ , / sa r. 0. ~ 5' ti 0 ~ , 23•a. ~ (1 r M ~ ~ ~ \ I ~ o, ,e4o:e5 ~ ~ 11 , r ,81(1;86 p~y~t~ 850.8 kExleth0)lout / t'y~ 9 ~ & as r ~ - / / / '65 . w pe i . ~ EXISTING ~ ~ 1 1 PROPOSED , \ \ ~ 1 I ~ ~ ~ - i / ~ t , J ~ ' +l Exult 9 ~ m `a~' / i ~ ~ R - ~A\ 1 1 I ~ ~ ' ~ / i 1 E(aT) ON 'r Electric (or Telephone) Overheod LMe do Pde / / ~ ~ 1 \ ~ • / ~ ~ ~ i I l ~ ~ ~ ~ halt _ / / ~ - ~ ~1~ ~ _ ~ l U T-U.G. ~ 1 ( ~ \ \ ~ q1 I v ~ ~ / / ~ ~ / i ~ , ~ 1 ~ ~ o ~ \ r ~ ~vvgr...~ - drrvewoY 1 Z T Telephone Underground Coble I~ \ IG \ ' ~ ~ / ai _ ~ A ~ ~ 1 1 - ` - / / 640 . E Electric Under ound Cable ~ Manhole ~ ~ \ 1 ~ tr / 640 ~ 1 - ~ ~ M., \ ~ \ o • 865 . q I ~ ~ 1\ ~ - - J. _ 884/. a't- 1 ~ \ ~ ~ ~\'~V \ VA 1 \ 1 X646 - to t`o -----8"G Coe MaM r..~ • ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ F0~ ~ - 'St - r, ~ ~ L 2 c 1 I \ I . l~Bq l ~ l ~ ~ \ ~ ~ o - - i - 1 1 III 1 sss ~ 1 ~A A 1 11 1A I ? . , ,n 1 ~ ~ \ - - ~ ~ q \ \ f e'?o~ 7 ~ i / ~ ~ I\ 1 Ap rox. location 24 j \ ~ Inv. 642:6 ~ r' ~ / / I 1 I ` N --6"w--- ttbter main, Hydront ~C hate 4olve 'w-~- ~ I~ 1 11 I\ I f0~ - ~ ! ci ~ \ 11 I 1 I 14 ' ~ I ,1 I I I ~ I ~ 1 IP _ \ s \ \ / ~ D per CMUD custn» \ l~ ~ - \ \ r r A , ~ ~ \ \ / ) ~ rvice map, ~ ~8'S Sanitary Sewer do Manhde ~'~~8'S I ~ 11 I I ~ I 1 1 Q ~ . _6 tti ~ ~m ~ ~ ~ ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ < ~ ~ 3a ~ M 1 ~ S ~ , ~ 'h ~ ~ \ 1 X54 ~ „ ti ~ - Storm Sewer ~ Nanhde ~ ~ 1 I I I I 11 1 ~ t~ --12'St-- ~~12 St-~- ~ ~ ~ ~ I I I ~ I. I I 1~ ~ ~7 I ~ storm catch Baeln a - " ~ f/ / I I I I I I I " ~ ~ ~ . i I I I I ° o ~ t Storm Inlet ~ ~ , ~ / l I J ~ I ~ C!• It ~ 1 1 ~ _ ~ / ,/i / 1 llEAl l I I I ~ _ ~ ~ r ~ ® ~ / - ~ l / - / ~ I o i ~ ~ Storm Curb Typeinlet ~ ~ / ~ / ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ I 1 ~ v / / s_ • I ~ ~ A v \ ~ / / 1 ~ ~ ~ I a I ~ ,9 ~ ~ ~ / 0 h ~66ri / / / ~ ~ ~ . 1 I I ~ C'~ St ~ \ v i ~ ~ x 671.25 Pdnt Elevation (at x) 871.25 / / Q 1 Q i / ! / l 4i ~ ~ A S ~ d ` Sig \ I / / ~ / i NA I I ~ o \ MA / ~ i / ~ \ ~ ~ W 7 T of Curb Eiew / 1 r E NA 8 1.25 oD , i, % ~ ~ z ~ 89 n s ~ \ \ ~ ~ / 88 . 2~In / , 89 n Etch Exleth9 f+ Fi 1 `o \ / ,848:85 i l \ \ r r r r r r + ~ Propaed Curb Elevotione ~ 870.75 Gutter Elec. ~!~o / ~ / A / ~ ~ry ~ ~ ~ ~ / 4y A i, N / ~ Y W 1 Contour Une 44 / / p r ~ ~ / ~ v ~ ~ i / 1 \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ \ / i 18 EE / o Fence ~ ~ ar 200 ~ o. ~ ugnt ~ ~ 0 / p ~ . ~ \ \ ~ 0!' ~ ~ ~ % / Q -4- Sign T ~ ~ ~ _ _ % Forth Caroline ~ ' ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ 1409 East Boulevard Sdt Fenw ~ O ~ GRAPHIC SCALE Charlotte, N•C. 28203 Tree Pr t t B rri v; ~ a ~ ! % ~ / ~ O 0 eC 1011 a er ti. ~ / ~ eo o ~ ~ +so (704) 377-4349 - ~ Qb No. By Ck. Description Date EMAIL:.. Isom c ~ / .FpR --fi-- ~ / Re lone V ao 671.25. Ae 8ullt Qevotlon c~a, ~ A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ IN ITT ( ) 1 inch = 80 !t. 1608 EAST BOULEVARD ~ 1 I / CHARLOTTE N.C. 28203 704-374-1440 J i 1 ~ ~ ~ • _ ~ CAU110N!!! ~ /Y 1`9 ~ 11t~t/"'1 t tA1ft ? '~''It"y - The locations and elevations of existing CALL t~itiHl111~ ~t V 1 lLl 11L~ ~y underground utilities an shown on this EFORE YOU DI S drawing are only APPROXIMATE. No grantee SCOTT o Op, l i \ 0 o s 7, I 1 Is either Y expressed or Implied as to the 9300 EAST INDEPENDENCE BLVD SW -2 Concrete Spillway M o of accuracy thereof. The TOP contractor shall be exclusively responsible CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG CO. N.C. I See Detail on I I ~ 800-632-494 9y , f or determining the exact utility locations AVOID UTIU DES, C.W.P. SCALE 1N Sheet WET-2 I I = 60 JOB NO. I and elevations prior to the start of construction i~ i AMAGE 1 DN. C.P. CK. C.W.P. DATE 2/28/2003 01-001 DWG, N0. 0 / J ' ~ n ~ - ~ ~ o \ 'L I I~ I ~ Tax I.D. 19 - ' 3 231-~ - fi~~2 ~S' I i A ~ ~ a~ 74 ~ ~ ~ r, ono s 1 ~ ! ~ 1 I?~,. 0 1 ~ ~s ~ ~ ~o c~ s?~ e: I ~ k I \ 52 3 ~ ~ I ~ ~ of ~ V l J ~ ~ n a ~ ~ 6 ~ ~ ~ , r, ~4 1 ~ N~ - ~ 668 X668 " ~0 8 ~ - - ~ ~ ~ f 1 ~ ~ - - 1 '2 a~, a 1 \ ~9, ti 6 ~ ~ rn ~ . A ~ ~ ~ o ~ Fy ~ °F 0 65 ~ G \ J 0 66~' 66 ~ 66~ ~ 1 666 0~ y W OF 6 ~ ~ v 6 ~ ut ~ ` \ 4 . ~ z 09 6?~4 S , ~ ~ 6g9•ZZ \ o~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U ,664 ~ \ \ ~ ~ , \ ~ / ~ ~ 6 / / T. \ / .t ~8 ~ • ~ J 1s 1 ~ 662 / i ~ , ~ ~ I ~ ° ~ J ~ - To 66 . ~ \ \ ~ 1 ~ r •stin ~ \ A / Inv 657.14 „ ` ~ \ i / 4 ~ a / " 51 6.9 out 1 ~ ~ ~ " City opo R-35136 V 62 AV ~ ~ .i i ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ " 6 ~ ~ ~ ,6 s 0 1 5 2 .B. M ~ ~ ~ k~s ~ out ~ Sri ~ ~ c~ 'n I " ~ ~ / / Per ~ -s5 W / g ? e . d ~ ~ ~ P_ R DESIGN NARRATIVE: / The extended detention wetland basin shown was deal ned mi ~Ine g to tigate the ~ ~ - h x, 0 ~ ~ in r ~ - EXIT 9 ~ ~ / ~ ~ / W impacts of storm water quality and quantity that occur during the construction of J ~ k~s alt _ ~ ~ / ~ ~ this commercial site. This and em p t porarl y stores storm water runoff In shallow pools that create growing conditions suitable for emergent and riparian plants. _ _ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ s/ ew y The runoff store a cam lex micro to o ra hic and emer en I g. p p g p g t p ants in the storm 9 \ ,q~ \ 9 ` ' water pool form an ideal matrix for the removal of urban pollutants when ~ ~ v \ \ ~ 1 W desi a ETui n d and constructed to the uidelines fn Storm Water Best Mana ement NdS rl 9 9 9 GR OUI~ Practices, NCDENR, April 1999. The extended detention wetland will remove the ~ ~ - v _ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ required 85~ total suspended solid (TSS). MAR O ~ ~ o ~ ~ 665 - = : ~ 3 2003 _ Y_ - 66~--''.~ ~ Q r ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ iii l1 / >rat' ~ o ~ - / ` ~ s < - / ~ ~ ~ 656 ?NAT ER QUAII TYSE AT • CTIO ~ ~ „ ~9= ~ ~ \ - ~ Inv. 642:6,,. ~ s ~ ` \ J / ~ / / Approx, location 24 ~ I DRAINA A A• 14 DIP per CMUD customer GE RE . .35 Acres (909 IMPERVIOUS) ~ service maps , SURFACE AREA /DRAINAGE AREA RATIO . 3,74x (3 DEEP POOL) ~ ~ 4 ~O5 ~ K. Marten Water ~ \ / s, J r, 1 READ SURFAREA: 3.747G 14,35 Acres =0.537 Acres (23,400 Sq. Ft) \ ~ ~ ~ - A - / \ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ - - ' ~ / ~ ~ Doroth N. Waters 1 Y ~ SURFACE AREAS DESIGNED: \ i J 1 Deed Book 74 \ 2 7 P . FOREBAY ~i 3510 sf 15X ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ 1 ~ / / ( ) ~ Lot 6 MB 25 P MARSH AREA 0-9" 8200 sf 35X \ , ~ ( ) ( ) ~ ~ \ \ ~ ~ \ ~ I I ~ A ~ / / / 9 " 652 T - MARSH AREA (9-18) 8200 sf (35~) ~ ax I,D, 193 2 - ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ 1 c0 ~ .9 ~ / 1 d 31 1 NORMAL POOL 3510 sf (15~) ~ ~ \ ~ / ~ ~ n ~ ~ v ~ ~ / ~ ~ A 1 I / Iti ~ i 1 \ N I ~ ,9 ~ \ ~ ~ ~ / ~ 1 STORM VOLUME: ~ Rv = 0.05 + ,0091 I = 90~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ \ ~ IgFI To 651 A9 / 1 1 I~ ~ i I ~ , 1~ l 1 ~ 650 Rv = 0.05 +.009(90) = 0.86 In/fn - ~ ~ V ~ ~ ~ ~ \ \ c / 68 Irr4 42.32~~n / \ \ 1 I " 11 1 ~ - / v I / ~ ~ ~ ~ o / rfi40:65 q / \ \ Volume = 1" Rainfall * Rv * 1 12 * Draino a Areo ) 9 ~ , ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ 1 , \ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ A ~ _ A • * * ~ \ \ Volume - (1) (0.86) (1/12) (14.35) = 1.028 Ac-Ft I - 1 ~ ~ ~ 1 v / ~ ~ 1 ~ / ~ Volume = (1.028) * 43,560 Sq Ft /Acre = 44,800 Cu Ft I - - / \ v i 1 , l ~ A ~ ~ i ~ ~ \ \ ~ ~ \ \ M EC K LF DRAW DOWN PERIOD: 648 Storage depth 2.0~ / ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ / C~i Stara a Volume = 44,804 Cu Ft \ 9 i%: % I ' ~ t '1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ \ Maximum outflow rate (2 Days) =44,800 / 48 hours = 0.26 cfs \ ~ • ~ ~ ~ _ ~ \ ~ ~ Orifice Diameter 3 ~ ~ A a 'H' _ ' ver ge of storage above Onfice 1.0 / ~ ~ ~A v, ~ ~ ~ ~ (P ~ \ Avers s Orifice Flow =0.26f cfs `646 9 \ ~ / , , ~ ~ ~ ~ , 646 ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ \ 1 \ 1 ~ ~.v~ 1 ~ I l r , A \ ~ _ F _ -n - / ~ EB \ ~ \ ~ A 1 1 I ~ 1 \~1 \ ~ ~ ~ 1\ I \ WETLAND DETENTION CONSTRUCTIQN SEQUENCE: 1 \ 1 11 _ l 1 ~ _ v 1 \ ro- - 1 I l ~ ~ t ~ 4 ~ \ ~ 1. Stake the limits of the area designated for the extended detention wetland. 1 1 I t I l I , 1 I I 44 \ 6 ~ 2. Install slit fences, silt basins, diversion ditches, etc. necessary for erosion control. ~ 1 I I 1 0 ~ 1 1 11 1 s - I ~ 3 1 ~ ~ < 8 ~ I 1 v I I Iv \ ~ ~ n. ,i 1 1 ~ 3. Call Mecklenburg County Engineering Department for inspection. Do not start grading until erosion control devices have \ ~ been approved. ! I 1 1 1 1 1 l I I ~ I 1 1 i ~ ~ / / ~ / l I I o 4. Begin grading. All cut shall be stored on site as designated by owner. - 1 I v I I o 1 1 ~ l ~ 1 1 W . ~6 ~ I 42 I )I a i .6 i i l W 5. Upon full atabnitatlon of the site begin fine grading for the extended wetland. / I / l I/ W W I ~ ~ / ~ ~ / / W W W 1 / \ N N N N Q \ 6. Create Marsh areas (0 to 9) and (9 to 1B / V ~ , 6 W W I ? ~i h ~ ~ / i ~ / W 7. Construct micro pool and spillway. ~ ~ ~ ~ / cu I i i ~ A ~ ~ / / ti S i H ~ FES ~ NA r ~ W N i-' E f / ~ ~ W v In 640,0 M~tch Existfn / / / ? 69 ~ 9 ~ i 8. Seed with plant species provided by the Wetlands Consultant. :ch Existing d)' % J~ ~ ! / w v. / 0 P CANTING NOTE: ~ \ FlNAL PLANTING SELECTION WILL BE BASED ON ON SITE HYDROLOGICAL CONDI110NS. TABLE II-2 OF THE STORM WATER $ r ~ o W I / ~ W ~ / ~ ry / BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE WILL BE USED AS A GUIDE FOR SELECTING WETLAND PLANTS. WETLANDS C SU TANT / / ON L ; ; / / ~ b' W / i / / / / / ro ~ ~ ~ / /X ~ W v- 1 l \ v~ ` WILL SUBMIT DETAILED PLANTING SCHEDULE TO NC DWQ. M ~ a o 18 W ~ ~ / I N / WETLANDS SEEDING SCHEDULE: ~ / ~ / 0 E ~ I \ BASINS SIDE SLOPES OUTSIDE MARSH ZONES AND ABOVE THE PERMANENT POOL ELEVATION SHALL BE SEEDED AS FOLLOWS: W / r~ / ~ / / ~ ~ / W 20 ~ / ~ a ~ 0 U WETPOND CONTOUR NOTE; ~ ! / ~ / ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ W W C / K-31 FESCUE AT 300 LBS/ACRE . o ADD 30 LBS ACRE OF ANNUAL TYPE % ~ / / ~ ~ W W W ~ C NT R WN N THI DRAWING W RE FURNISHED BY AN / ' ~ ~ / ~ ~ / / ~ W ~ ~ 0 OU S SHO 0 S E O J / FERTILIZER: 10-10-10 AT 1000 LBS/ACRE ~ AERIAL TOPOGRAPHY DONE FOR MARTIN MARIETTA. THE EXACT / i / ~ / W _ - LIME AT 4000 LBS/ACRE ~ ~ / i ~ DATE OF THE TOPO IS NOT KNOWN AND CHANGES MAY HAVE ~62 ~ ~ / - / , ~ % ~ W STRAW MULCH AT 1/2 TON/ACRE ` ' ~ OCCURRED SINCE THE DATE OF THE SURVEY. CONTRACTORS - ~ , , 6 - i ~ ; / / / 0 ADD 540 LBS/ACRE OF 0-20-0 SUPERPHOSPHATE ~ FESS~ •PO y~ • - SHALL UERIFY THE EXISTING CONDITIONS AND ELEVATIONS - ! ~ tx / ~ / 6 ~ •Q r THE GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PERMANENT SEEDING FOR ALL DISTURBED AREAS P N = r U 0 COMPLETION OF - ~ ~ c PE F ~ h ~ R ~ / _ PRIOR TO STARTING ANY WORK IN THIS AREA. THE SHA 0 , h5 6~ o z 9 9 ~ CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, i 4 ~ THE PONDS MAY NEED TO BE CHANGED IN ORDER TO 5 ~ ~ _ . - . . U ACCOMMODATE THE EXISTING CONDITIONS. CONTACT P.E.A. OF 5~" / ~ ~ NORTH CAROLINA (704-377-4349) WITH ANY DESIGN CHANGES - ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ' , F ° THAT MAY BE NEEDED. ' " - - ~ ~ ~ ~ O Z ~ R ~ IK / Q _ / ~o ~ ~ ~S w _ F ab ~ I a ~ _ ~ ~ • • • F~ i h ~ ~ I Q. 01' o ~ ~ / ~ No C rth nroline d i / o o / 1409 East Boulevard ~ ~ GRAPHIC SCALE a ~ S ~ i I e ~ , ~ Charlotte, N.C. 28203 . d 1 o~ y 1 \ ~ ,o o zo b 1m uo (704) 377-4349 ~ ~ ~ No. By Ck. Description Date / is o, / a 7 1 ~ MAIL; ol. om Revfslone sy~ / Concr - ete S ill via _ M p t , Y J e~~ / IN !'61;"I' 0 See Detail r I on I ~ N r I ~ n / ~ / i i~h - ~ ~ 1608 EAST 60ULEVARD i Sheet WET- I ~ - N ~ I N - - ~ CHARLOTTE N.C. 28203 704-3741440 1 cAUTIONn l ~ The locations and elevations of exietMg CALL underground utMRia at shown on this tit ~ ~ I I EFORE YOU DI SCE 1 1 r~ drawin are on APP XIMA N ~ 1 . ~ RO TE o orontee A I I i t..I1Fur •w,r..y..A e. I~nv,11.~1 e. . ~ Tn n A'lAA CAQt IAIhC~[AIhCAInC L]I 111'1 rt~r~ m U _ ` .,.r- - - - V uvvv L-nv i i i w"r "i wcnvc UL. V v 1 1 completenea of occuracy thereof. The ) 1 11 CHARLOTTE o i 1 ~ contractor shall be exclusively responsible MECKLEN9URG CO. N.C. I 1 i ~ 1 for deterrninin the exact utility locations 00-632-494 f , I 9 y VOID U Ll DES. C.W.P. SCALE 1" = 40' JOB NO. and elevations prior, to the start of construction AMAGE a DN. C.P. CK. C.W.P. DATE 2/25/2003 01-001 DWG. N0. 0 _o N 3 TOP OF BERM 644.0 CONCRETE SPILLWAY :1 SLOPES 3;1 SLOPES ~ TMiS ALL AROUND :1 SLOPES ALL AROUND 845 I ZONE F AY A ONE 640 635 630 WET LAND S! 401 GRO UR MAR 0 3 2003 ?NATE R QUA IITY SE CTION Planting Plan - Usg of Existing Soil Soli from the proposed wetpond areas will be stripped and stored as feasible for utilization in linin stormwater wetpond site. Usin these existin soils should hasten the develo ment. of ve etated ~ ration in lining the extended 9 9 P 9 soil conditions. This is also an excellent use of an important natural resource. f vegetated cover and hydric " FILL CMU WITH 6 4~_O" 8 CONCRETE It is expected that herbaceous and scrub/shrub wetland species will rapidly volunteer in the area. 6~ 30' 6' in the area. Supplemental 3"4 Orif(ce plantings wilt be selected from Table 11,2 in the stormwater Best Management Practices, NCDENR, I ~s, NCDENR, November, 1995 ° based on actual field conditions. To of Woll c p I - _ - Elev. 64250 varies ~ ~ ~ ~ -1 I I =ITI_ ' ~ - - Emergent Zone Schedule 0 -III-III-I . ~ ~ - - _ _ - ~ I-I I ~-I I1- ~atonicol Name Common Name Size Notes 4"0 PVC with Cap ~ II I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -1 I=~T I I-~ Rushes edges* 4" Concrete with 4" CONCRETE SLAB IMTH 12' FOOTING 8x6 WL4 x W1.4 W.W.F. Juncus effusus Smooth Needle Rush 2 yr. peat pot 3' 0/C. sxs W1.4 x W1.4 w.w.F. Scirp. americanus Common Three Square 2 yr, peat pot 3' 0/C. SECTION A - A EMERGENCY OV ERFLOW Acoris calamus Sweet Flag 2 yr, peat pot 3' 0/C. WEIR DETAIL ( 25 to 100 year Flood Storm ) Shallow Water Plants Peltandra virginica Arrow Arum 2 yr. peat pot 3' 0/C. Sagitaria latifolia Duck Potato 2 yr. peat pot 3' 0/C. Screen Trash 3 Erev.844.00 Saururus cemus Lizard's Tail 2 yr. peat pot 3' 0/C. Rack 11- I:mer Nuphar luteum Spatterdock 2 yr, peat pot 3' 0/C. Elev. 642.50 " gency Sphlway - 3 4 Concrete with RIP RAP 1 Inch Storm Elev. 842.00- - - - - 1 Bx W1 4 ~ 6 x W1.4 Permanent Pool Elev. 640.00 A Welded Wire Fabric General Notes for Herbaceous Zones Oririce for draw ow t ' 18"m HDPE N ? d n of inch storm- - ~ ~ , Elev. 839.50 4" ~ PNC 30' - 4"a 2 HOPE 0 2.0% t 1. Roots may be substituted for pots or containers, however spacing shall be reduced to approxim~ - S.F or less, Changes shall be reviewed for approval with the USACE a;,d NCDWQ. to approximately 1 each per I ~ EL 637.0 ~ 2. Area shape, water depth, and drainage pattern of littoral plantings may vary due to actual site N 1~' r M ~ actual site conditions. Minor 8" CONCRETE COLLAR modifications are allowed in accordance with plan objectives. A INV, s38,oo COMPACTED EARTH INV. 637.4} 3. For littoral zones, depth of planting area should not exceed 3'. At least 50% of the area shoulc foot in depth. area should be less than 1 4" CONCRETE SLAB MATH EMERGENCY DRAIN PIPE MrTH VALVE 6x6 W1.4 x W1.4 W.W,F. 4"0 PVC VNTH SCREW-ON CAP 4. If a livable, the littoral area should have a minimum width of 10' feet. The maxi I PP mum s ape is 3000 PSI CONCRETE, um slope is 4:1. The preferred slope is 8:1 to 10:1. 5. Plants should be spaced 2' to 3' apart and grouped to decrease competition between species. yen species. Plantings to be placed in naturalized patterns and clumps. An equal proportion of each species shall be used. 6. The area should be planted when the soil is moist or saturated but not inundated. . 7. Soils shall be topsoil or silt/clay laden and are to have a minimum of 40~ or anic content. Da 9 content. Do not use soil from a wetland or bottomland if it is populated with cattail or other undesirable species. In that case, obt gat case, obtain soil from an upland source. 8. Plants below the water surface or in saturated soil will re uire hand- lantin , q P 9 9. Timin of emer ent lantin s ecies should be verified based on final selection and I 9 9 P 9 P pant type, plant type. ~ The contractor may make minor field modifications to not plant emergent species in deep water. S leap water. Species that can tolerate these deep water depths will colonize deeper water after bein lanted in shallower zones. 9P lower zones. , Fertilization -Herbaceous and Woody Plant Species 0 1) Use Osmacote fertilizer or approved equal. For spring planting, use 18-6-12, ei ht to nine moni ® M 0 ~ g Z For winter and fall planting, use 16-5-11, twelve to fourteen month release. to nine month release. ~ m CV a 2) If plantin is under water, use A riform 20-10-5 two ear release 10 ram lantin t I t 9 9 Y 9 P g ob ets. ,.n ~ ~ tablets. iii ii6,` W U 3) Fertilize at time of planting U i i~~~~~ C • ~ 0 ~0 ~ R f F 'I' f v H PI ' I ec~mmen e~ ~u~ntities ~ erti izer •r ~ri~us err~ceous ant Nateria arbi h) .Q~ y~~ , 0 ~L~AI e:e ~ Dormant propagule 15 grams Osmacote or 1 ea. 20-10-5 10g Agribrm tablet s rowin bareroot 15 rams Osmacote or 1 ea. 20-10-5 10 A riform t bl t ~ g g g g g a e z container/fiber pot 30 grams Osmacote or 3 ea. 20-10-5 10g Agriorm tablet a plug (seedling) 15 grams Osmacote or 1 ea. 20-10-5 10g Agrifom tablet Q plug (collection) 30 grams Osmacote or 3 ea, 20-t0-5 10g Agrifom tablet w a R fF I f v W I 0 • • • ~ 1 quart container 30 grams Osmacote or 20-10-5 10g Agriform/Nanufacturer rate 0 1 gallon container 90 grams Osmacote or 20-10-5 10g Agriform/,Aanufacturer rate a * 30 additional grams for each additional gallon ~'oi'th Ciro r~ ~ plu (seedlin 15 rams Osmacote or 1 ea. 20-10-5 10 A rifom tablet GRAPHIC SCALE 1409 Eost Boulevard a 9 9) 9 9 9 Charlotte, N.C. 28203 ~ ° so so 's0 x'0 704 377-4349 No. B Ck. Y Description Date N Revielom MAIL: L om M O cam) D 0 co s O N co co i lnab - so n, 160 8 EAST BOULEVARD N N CHARL0ITE N.C. 282 70~-374.1 03 440 CAUTIONI l l ' 3 the locations and elevatlona of exlatfng CALL c underground utNkla as shown on thla drawing ore only APPROXIMATE. Ne euernnteR EFORE YOU DI r!T,e~~ m('w'nm~ Is either expreeied or Implied as to the + + va.resa0al s v 1 v to U com lateness of accurac 9300 EAST INDEPENDENCE BLVD P y thereof. The 0 0 contractor shall be exclusively responsible T CHARLOTTE MECKLENB 00-632-494 URG CO, N.C. Er 2 for determining the exact utility locations AVOID U11U 0 and elevations prior to the start of construction DES. C.W.P. SCALE 1 = 60 J06 NO. AMACE 0 o DN. C.P. CK. C.W.P. DATE 2 5/2003 01-001 / DWG. N0. N 3 0 D non ~ ~/-U:~- ~ , ~riLJ LJ ry. 6. i ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ _ c~, ~ ~ N {j 0 ~ ~ ~ Tax I.D. 193- 1 231- L ~ 6.5L3 ~ ' - ~ d~ 0 74 ~ I ~ ~ r, SOP ~ Q~5 ~ ~ ~ ( ~ _ 0 . ~ I I - 1 6 1 1 h~, 0 1 ~ ~ 1 pR N 5 ~ ~A k' I 52 ~ ~ I i ~ 3 fi I I ~ ~ of S~ ~ ~ (n a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v ~1 ~ 1 69 ~ ' ~ ~ ~ i ~ 6 1 ~ ~ r ~ol i ~ 1 6i H~ _ .8~ ~ ~ 0 668 Q. - ~ I c~-- - ~L ' - ~ - - 9 I ~ - _ ~ 1 of f ~ ~ ~ s \ S v ~9. ti ~ ~ rn 1 ~ AF ~p rn , ~ ,n do ~ Fy ~ 6,l 0 r 65 ~ G ~ J \ 0 66~' 66 ~ 66~ ~0 666 ~ p ~ Z F a ~ ~ -Y ~ N 49• t 6 ~ ~ 6 ~ u I o ~ 'o \ - "o\ ~ ~ ',-664 r' ~ - \ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ / - J i- ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ \ ~ s / / 6 \ / 1 ~t ~R ~ J 1 , , ' ~ 662 ~ . - ~of ~ 6 ~ ~ / O rh"'~ CA To 66 . ~ ~ ~ A \ 1 ~ ~ n ~ v / ~ ~ ~sti V \ / Inv 657.14 1 ~ ~ \ , / 4 ~ n / .ice " 51 ~ " 6..9 out ` ~ ~ ~ \ • City opo R-35136 ~ ~ \ _ r i 3 _ , , 6 5 s ~ ~ 0 ~ sr, I •0 ~ ~ 3 W 1 2 ~ .g • - M ~ sfi \ ~ ~ I / / per . 5 ~ W / '6 R DESIGN NARRATIVE: 1) ~OUt ~ ~ or ~ 9 ~ e • d by . The extended detention wetland basin shown was desi ned to miti ai - ~I(12 9 9 e the I' ~ SSA ~ a"'9 ~ I h x• o ~ ~ ~ ~ in - W impacts of storm water quality and quantity that occur during the "onstruction of ki ~ J r - s halt o ~ / - ~ ~ this commercial site. This and tem orarn stores storm water run., ~ P P Y ff in shallow pools that create growing conditions suitable for emergent and riper: I ~ ~ v _ _ m n~ ~ 1S ~ Q an pants. The runoff storage, complex micro topographic and emer ent plants g in the storm 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ . rivew Y o ~ °h" d / \ ~ ~ 9 ~ ` \ ~ water pool form an ideol matrix for the removal of urban pollutants when ~ ~ ~ A \ ~ i designed and constructed to ,he guidelines in Storm Water Best Ma~.a ement ~ . ~ ~~i,' ~ A Practices, NCDENR, Aprli 195. The extended detention wetland will , g emove the required 85X total suspended solid (TSS). ~ ~ ~ 1 i • , o ~ ~ 665 ~ _ f f ~ ~ ~ 401 GROUP ~ LANDS 1 WET _ 6 I _ 1 ~ ~ ~ _ '-G ..r V - 1 / - ~ _ 1 ~ a l I I 1 ~ 11 J1 I ~ M 1 / ration ~ o 1 ~ ~ E.56 MAR 0 3 2003 _ ~ _ ~ s / ~ ~ ~ ~ _ - ~ _ A ~ 6~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / / 1 SITE DATA: \ ~ Approx, location 24 ~9-- ~ ~ \ V ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 i _ Inv ` J / ~ I \ ~ .642:6,.. s ~ \ ~ iii l ~ 1 I P A AREA: 1 D per CMUD customer ,DRAW. GE 4.35 Acres (90X IMPERWOUS) 2_- ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ iii ,1 \ i/ TE All E service ma on} ~ ~ ~ _ _ A SURFACE AREA /DRAINAGE AREA RATIO : 3.74X (3' DEEP POOL) •r~54 K, Mar • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ tin Water s, J r. , f , READ SURFAREA. 3.74X « 14,35 Acres =0.537 Acres (23,400 Sq. Ft I L - ~1 -T r ~ Doroth ) 1 N. Wa y ters ~ ~ ~ \ / / 1 1 v / ~O / Deed SURFACE AREAS DESIGNED• Book 74 2 7 P , ~ , 1 \ ~O ~ ~ I ~ 1 1 / / / g FOREBAY 1 N 3510 sf (15f) / Lot 6 M " I I ~ / I B 25 P 6 MARSH AREA 0-9 8 g ( ) 200 sf (35X) 652 MARSH AREA 9-18" \ ~ 1 ~ ~ / i I ~I ~ ~ Ta X ~ , D ( ) 8200 sf 35X . 193-2 - ( ) 31 ~ ~ ~ ~ / I ~ ~ ~ i 1\ 1 I ~ / ~ NORMAL POOL 3510 sf 1 (5X) 1 i / 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ,9 / \ ~ / ~ 1" STORM VOLLIh~;; 1 I i I O IAA To 6 1 ~ I ~~o ~ S-~ ~ ~ / Rv = 0.05 +,009(1) i = 9pX . ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ krv 42.3 . ~ ~ 0 68 2~n / I I \ 650 Rv - 0.05 +.009(90) = 0.86 In/in ~ ~ ~fi4(~:65 / ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 _ ~ . , ~ ~ \ " Vdume = t Rainfall + Rv « 1 12 « i ~ ~ ~ I ' ~ A ~ v / ~ ~ Drainage Area - / \ \ Vdum - « « e - (1) (0.88) (1/12 « 14,35 = i. - , / i ~ .A~ 1 I ~ ~ ~ 1 ( ) 028 Ac Ft \ ~ ~ Vdume = 1,028 « 43 56 ( ) 0 S Ft A = / q / cre 44,800 Cu Ft i ~ I / ~ ~ P / ~ i ~ 1 I . \ M ~ ~ ~ 4 ECK e LF r 1 / ~ ~ / i , \ I Storage depth = 2.0' CD ~ . \ ~ Storage Volume = 44 800 ~ 1 c ~ \ \ Cu Ft \ Maximum outflow rate 2 Da - I \ 1_ ~ 1 1, ~ m ~ ,r ~ 6 0 ~ ( Ys) - 44,800 48 = \ Owe / hours 0.26 cf Diameter 3 ~ s ~ ~ , , 1 ~ ~~A 1 6 46 ~ \ 4 Average 'H' of store e _ 1 ~ 1 1 / ; ~ ~ \ \ - F _ I -n / ~6 6 g above Orifice _ t,0 ~ \ Average Orifice flow =p, 28t cfs OR ~ 1 1 EB i I \1 ~ 1 ~ , ~ 1 I ~ ~ ~ \ ~ 1 1~1 ~ 1 / 1 I 1 i 1 rc- - l l 1 _ \ \ I ,1 ~ 1 1 I 4 ~ I ~ 1 II ~ c~ I ~ ~ N 1 I ~ 1 I 1 I I I o ~ 1 - - \ f• Stake the \ 644 limits of the area desi ~ gnated for the extended d . ~ I l l I < 6.;' . 1~ ~ I 1 / 8 I I ~ ~ etentfon 2 MetaA silt fences wetland. ~ l 1 I ,1 1 II ~ \ 1 1 ~ silt basins, diversion alt ches, etc. necessor f l I I 1 i I / I I 1 1 I ~ Y or ~ _ a CaN Mecklenburg Count En onion control, ~ I I I ~ ~ 1 ~ ~i l 1 1 \ o I been approved y gineering Department for i • nspection. D ,6 , ~ I 1 ~ o i I 2 l 1 I ~ / ~ W a 6 ~ 1 o "°t start gradin un 4 4• 9 til erosion control devices h l l I ~ ~ , ~ / I l 2 ~ 9radin .All ove 9 cut shall be stored on s \ ite as das(9nated b o / / / / / ti ~ ~ 6 , / ~ / ~ t 5, y wner. Upai gull stabilization 66 ~ 6 , Y / / / ~ 1 ~ \ of the site begin fine r O adin 9 g for the extended wetlan / ~ 1 ~ / / ~ ~ W ~ A ~ ~ 6• Create Marsh areas d. I (0 to 9) and 9 to " ~ / ~ S ~ I / ~ O ~ FES N ~ E ~ ( 18 ~truCt mkxo pool an / / / ~,W / / f / 69 ? 640. / ~ i ti 0 Mach ' ~ ~ ` d spillway. tch Existing g, S Q ~ ~ W e i l f S ~ ~7 p ~ ~ eed wRh Olant ~ R species provided by the Wetlan / , ~ ds Consultant. / \ ~N ~ ~ / / W a W / / ,d / / M ~ , / ~ / / / i ~ ~ / / / / ~ Q „ ti to / I FINAL P ~ / LANIINC ~CT10N NALL / / / ~ 18 W ~ ~ BEST MAN ~ BASED AGEMENT ~AC11CE WILL ON ON SITE HYDROI,OgCA ~ ~ wiu eE usED As L coNDrnoN / , / , / a ~ ~ E ~ ~ / 200 E ~ WETP /h / / / / w , ~6 ~ SUBMIT DETAILEp PUINIIN A GUIDE FoR SELECnN S• TABLE II-2 OF TH G SC G WE E STORM ~ ~n i HE9UlE TO NC D TLAND PLANTS, WE WATER OND CONTOUR NOTE: ~ ~ / / / ~o / / , ~ / / / / i ~ / t WQ TLANDS CONSULTAN ~ T coo ~ BASINS SIDE / 0 / / ~ LL 0 ~ ~ CONTO ~ ' i - / / ~ W O o URS SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING WERE FURNISHED BY AN / ~ / / / SLOPES OUTSIDE MARSH O ZONES AN ~ D ABOVE THE PERMANENT i / W l `m AERIAL TOPOGRAPHY DONE FOR MARTIN MARIETTA. THE EXACT - ~ ~ / ~ K-3t FE POOL ELEVan CV SCUE AT 300 LBS/ACRE ~ SHAII BE SEEDED A U DATE OF THE TOPO IS NOT KNOWN ANO CHANGES MAY HAVE / ~ / ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ W - ~ qpO ~ S FOLLOWS, aD - LBS/ACRE OF ANNUAL TYPE W ~ OCCURRED SINCE THE DATE OF THE SURVEY. CONTRACTORS 66 i~ ~ ~ FER1~iZER: 10-10-10 AT 1 I o0o LBS A / CRE LIME AT 4000 LBS/ACRE SHALL VERIFY THE EXISTING CONDITIONS AND ELEVATIONS - ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ p0 ~ ~ ~ - ~ - / f / S1RAiN MULCH AT 1 ~ PRIOR TO STARTING ANY WORK IN THIS AREA. THE SHAPE OF ~ 5h ~ ~ '`1 6 Ql o ~ 6 6`~ - ' THE PONDS MAY NEED TO BE CHANGED IN ORDER TO ~ 1. - /2 rON/ACME ADO S00 LBS/ACRE OF 0-20- U ACCOMMODATE THE EXISTING CONDITIONS. CONTACT P.E.A. OF - ~ ~ 9 l 0 SUPERPHOSPHATE ~ ~(J" / o b THE , ~ cRAol~c c , ONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE P EgS / ' CONSiRUCTiON ACTIVITIES ERMANENT SEEDING FO r OF ~4 o NORTH CAROLINA (704-377-4349) WITH ANY DESIGN CHANGES - - ~ ~ , ; - z THAT MAY BE NEEDED. / ~ _F' ~ a- r O R ALL DISTURBED AREAS ` ti R o ~ ~ ~ _ _ / ~ UPON COMPLETI • 4 ON OF a ~ d _ ~'h ~ / ~ / w _ 46 i ~ d a _ . 6 ~ ~ ~ / - I / ~ I a 'ti~ \ ~ ~ ~ r I n I ~ / - ~I,, ~ i ~ ~ ~ ! ~ ,I o d ~ ~ Q ~ a ~ S Io 1 • • • a ~ ~1`' .y l o ~ 0 / ~ GRAPHIC SCALE North o ~ \ 0 N ~ , M S~ / ~ ~ CeroliA / o , e ~ " r ~ Aso 1409 East Boulevard Con o , M Crete S it Iva o p e Y t10 Charlotte, N,C. N / ~ ~ Seed ' ~e etail on No. By Ck. 28203 D~ptlon, (704) 377-4 4 N e N ~ ~ ~ Date 3 9 ~ ~ R"+stone MAIL: Sheet c, WET-2 I ~ _ _ m - ~ n 1 inch = ~0 SJ ft, 3 ~ I f 160 f 8 EAST B OULEVARD / c~utial~n CHARLOTT I ~ U I wwwa ana lima of e3" 9 ~ vatX7 /4.1440 undlrWroand utwitlee a shown CALL I CD on thN DE I dro"q are onlY A M.VMA'M. No o - -r- 1 ie ~ expressed or knplied as t#arontee YOU DI to the IN Tim NtNNee SCOTT Of C c ooairacy thereof. The D onbaetor shall be aduehrolY reeoarible S 0 9300 EAST IN 0 o ~ N for dielMmini DEPENDENCE ng the acct utwit CHARLOTTE NCE BLVD arM Y locations 632-494 done prior to the start MECKL 3 Of construction ~ MI-1 ENBURG DES. C. CO. N, W.P. C. WET-i SCALE 1 = 40' JOB-- DN, C.P. B NO. i CK. C.W.P. DATE 2 25/2003 01-001 DWG. NO. TOP OF BERM 644.0 C4NCREIE SPIU.WAY :1 SLOPES :1 SLOPES 3:1 SLOPES ~ DETAIL THIS SHEET ALL AROUND ALL AROUND 845 MARSH ZO MARSN ZONE F AY il8 840 835 830 WET LANDS 1401 GR OUP MAR 0 3 2003 ~NATE R QUAIi TY SECTI ON Planting. Plan - Usg of Existin~Soil Soil from the proposed wetpond areas will be stripped and stored as feasible for utilization `or utilization in fining the extended stormwater wetpond site. Using these existing soils should hasten the development of veg~ ment of vegetated cover and hydric e» " FILL CMU WITH soil conditions. This is also an excellent use of an important natural resource. 4 -0 9 CONCRETE 6' 30' 6' It is expected that herbaceous and scrub/shrub wetland species will ra idl volunteer In the P Y unteer In the area. Supplemental 3'o Oriflce plontings will be selected from Table 11.2 in the stormwater Best Management Proctices, NC Practices, NCDENR, November, 1995 ° based on actual field conditions, Top of NbA ° - - Elev. 642.50 - - Emergent Zone Schedule Varies _ - :r ~~TI - _=III=111- - -~-11- , Botanical Name Common Name Size Notes Cop I ~-I I ~ l ~~~T I i_ R fishes/Sedges 4" Concrete with 6x6 W1.4 x W1.4 W.W.F. 4" CONCRETE SLAA WITH 12' FOOTING Juncus effusus Smooth Needle Rush 2 yr. peat pot 3' 0/C. 6x6 WL4 x Wt.4 W.W.F. Scirp, americanus Common Three Square 2 yr. peat pot 3' 0/C. SECTION A - A EMERG N Y E C OVERFLOW Acoris calamus Sweet Flag 2 yr. peat pot 3' 0/C. WEIR DETAIL Shallow Water Plants ( 25 to 100 year Flood Storm ) Peltondra virginica Arrow Arum 2 yr. peat pot 3' 0/C. Screen Sagitaria latifolia Duck Potato 2 yr. peat pot 3' 0/C. Trash 3 Elev. 844.00 Saururus cernus Lizard's Tail 2 yr. peat pot 3' 0/C. v 4 Rack t ~ Emergency Spniway Ete . B 2.50 Nuphar luteum Spatterdock 2 yr. peat pot 3' 0/C. = 3 4' Concrete with RIP AP - ~ 1 Inch Stem Etev. 842.00- - - - - ~ 1 8x8 WI.4 x WI.4 R A Welded Wire Fabrlc Permanent Pod Elev. 640.00 - - ; Orifice for drowdown of t inch storm- - t8"e HDPE ~ General Notes for Herbaceous Zones Elev, 639.50 _ 4" ~ PVC 30' - 24"~ HDPE 0 1. Roots may be substituted for pots or containers, however spacing shall be reduced to a educed to a roximatel 1 each er 2'0~ f ~ I , PP Y P ~ S.F or less. Changes shall be reviewed for approval with the USACE and NCDWQ. EL. 63 .0 A N wy „ 2. Area sha e, water de th and drains a attern of littoral lantin s ma var due to acts P P 9 P P 9 Y Y ~ due to actual site conditions. Minor ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ , , 8 CONCRETE COLLAR modifications are allowed in accordance with plan objectives. A INV. 638.00 COMPACTED EARTH INV, 637.41 3. For littoral zones, depth of planting area should not exceed 3'. At least 50~ of the area of the area should be less than 1 4" CONCRETE 5LA8 WITH EMERGENCY DRAT foot in depth. N PIPE WITH VALVE 8x6 W1.4 x WI.4 W.W.F. 4"d PVC WITH SCREW-ON CAP 3000 PSI CONCRETE. 4, If applicable, the littoral area should have a minimum width of 10' feet. The maximum s maximum slope is 4:1. The preferred slope is 8:1 to 10:1. Y 5. Plants should be spaced 2' to 3' apart and grouped to decrease competition between sl in naturalized patterns and clumps. An equal proportion of each species shall be used. ~n between species. Plantings to be placed be used. 6. The area should be planted when the soil is moist or saturated but not inundated. . ndated. . 7, Soils shall be topsoil or silt/clay laden and are to have a minimum of 40~ organic cons organic content. Do not use soil from a wetland or bottomiand if it is populated with cattail or other undesiroble species. In that c es. In that case, obtain soil from an upland source. 8, Plants below the water surface or in saturated soil will re uire hand- lantin . q P 9 9• 9. Timing of emergent planting species should be verified based on final selection and plan ion and plant t e. YP The contractor ma make minor field .modifications to not plant emer ent s ecies in dee ~ Y 9 P P :ies in deep water. Species that can tolerate these deep water depths will colonize deeper water after being planted in shallower r Fertilization -Herbaceous and Wood~Plant Species in shallower zones. ~ - 0 ~ 0 ~ 1) Use Osmacote fertilizer or approved equal. For spring planting, use 18-6-12, eight to nl eight to nine month release. ~ For winter and fall planting, use 18-5-11, twelve to fourteen month release. z u~ a~ N we, ~ 0 2) If planting is under water, use Agriform 20-10-5 two year release 10 gram planting tab t planting tablets. , ? ~ ~ ~ 4r ~ ~ ~ ,a ir~~~~ ~ 3) Fertilize at time of planting U • • 0 ~0 C QQ. ~ Recommended Quantities of Fertilizer for various Herbaceous Plant Materials (Garbischl c ~~1 s3 ! A L 0 ~ Dormant propagule 15 grams Osmacote or 1 ea. 20-10-5 10g Agriform tablet a~ e ~ growing bareroot 15 grams Osmacote or 1 ea. 20-10-5 10g Agriform tablet o container/fiber pot 30 grams Osmacote or 3 ea. 20-10-5 10 A riform tablet z g g w plug (seedling) 15 grams Osmacote or 1 ea. 20-10-5 10g Agriform tablet plu collection 30 rams Osmacote or 3 ea. 20-10-5 10 A riform tablet Q 9( ) 9 9 9 ui a Recommended Quantities of Fertilizer for various Woodv Sp.~cles,~Garblsch) 0 ~ 1 quart container 30 rams Osmacote or 20-10-5 10 A riform anufacturer rate a 9 9 9 ~ rate 1~orth Cero ~ ~r rate 0 1 gallon container 90 grams Osmacote or 20-10-5 tOg Agriform/Manufacturer rate a " 30 additional grams far each additional gallon GRAPHIC SC 1409 East Boulevard ~ plug (seedling) 15 rams Osmacote or 1 ea. 20-10-5 10g Agriform tablet ALE Charlotte, N.C. 28203 a g e0 ~ s, eo ,:a ~ (704) 377-4349 No. By Ck. Description Date R~ a MAIL: I. om N i~ M O } C c~~' DO S UC 0 CO. O N 1 inch m 80 R 1608 EAST BOULEVARD N CHARL0ITE N.C. 2820 104.374-1440 3 N CAU110NI11 3 The locations and elevations of existing CALL underground utNitia as shown on this r c m drawing ore only APPROXIMATE. No guarantee ORE YOU DI 7 of accuracy thereof. The UJUU tAZ5 I INULPLNUENGE BLVD LT " wA completeness U conlroctor ehdl be exdusiwl re oneble CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG CO. y -632-494 N.C. C) 0 for determining the exact utility locations VOW U11U DES. C.W.P. SCALE 1" _ ' and elevations prior to the start of construction 60 JOB NO. 0 AMAM DN. C. P. CK. C.W.P. DATE 2/25/2003 01-001 DWG. NO. 0 CD N 01 3 0 0 ~n,.rn~ DOUGHNUTS CHARLOTTE SUPER SERVICE, LLP Approx. locution 8" IP i CMU D per ~ w. i WI D customer service maps til ~ LLIAM J. ~ fD PLEASANTS PEP Bl I ~ PEP BOYS rp 74 ~0 COMMERCIAL I ~Q~S NET LEASE water ~ ~ Approx. locution 24" DIP er . water vault ~ ~ A„ CMUD customer servi p vault~_ D ~ ce maps yP - - - - - - - ~ water - - - - - -w- - - - w- - voult- _ _ r~~ ~r - - -j- w- - - n e - S en ence ~ ou var I 200 R W ' (per tax map) w See D.B. 9356 P , 63 EXISTING ~ 2.5' ~ 9 4 urb Bc gutter HYDRANT I m - tl ~ ~^y~ l' ^ .e - - - - - _ T et ~ , xbt s~• r~) ees~ (s«r s~• Nwl ~ ~ ~O 2 W I _ ~ _ - - - ~ ~ ee1.00 Out a Y b ~ 1 'r... - - - _ # _ e7e.eo at ~ x ~O II - - - ~ i r ~ v at ~ ~ i r° _ i~ 1 1 ~ I~ Q j-~_ 1nv~s tot r~ e9s.ea out 1T of 1S"RCP a °Y ERbtMp EOP I I ~ ~ ~ I ~ ez.oz ~ N \ T.B.M. ? ~ ~ Exist. Driv - - _ _ - _ - ~ N 1 1 YH t ~ - - - x' tin OP 2 Inv tthq ee') e7GJ4 (Nee - 67e 14 ~ - - - ~ - W °°•1 °7e'" i"° 6 Nail in v pa ement _ i c~ n~, - 3fOTof 1Q -1-4:8 - . - - - Elev, 6894' - _sah~ l - ~ - i -r ~ J ~ 0 ~ - ~ - - - - - - eodwail / - - _ ~ , ~ .cur . ~ - - - \ <J I ~ ~ `4~ Q.v~..~}i;~ i / _ / . ~ ~ I 1 ~ . - _ - - ~ 1`xistin ' i ^ ~ ~ - - - - ~ ~ Exist, Drive ~ _ ~ ran / / , , ~ ~ V / ~ ~ ~ Found 34 4 E t t ' ~ ~ ~ - Aspho r _ se4 - - - - ~ 5~ ity opo 35 3 40A5 ~ ` 1 ~ \ 9\ - I n t 1 ~ ~ ~ N 4• ~ 1 _ ~ ~ 253 W.)~ . ~ - - ~ ~ I 18~T~ tie / I ~ i A ~ ~ V' \ 1 r 1 ~ o I ~ / \ V 1 _ ~ e ° ~ 1 - ~ ~ ° 686 1 ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ I / ` ~ ~ / / ~ ~ Existin ESTATE I / / o \ 1 ~ t r \ 1 ~ 9 ` ~ ~ / I Parkin to (80STON MARKET) ~ / ~ r- Q / ~ ~ ~ / 1 _ / Timporory 40 9 tl I WJB REA / \ LTY, LP. I Ore Eo~nont I I 1 Z ~ ~ \ A 'iG Cr a' ~ ~ 6 .0 I ~ I z ~ ~ % of ~ o I I 1 0 \ 682 $J~1 ~ 8" of Ik c~+e J ~4 I I e~ Reol Eetote Joint ure I Q I I ~ ; ~ , , , ~0 1 I ~ v. ( ~ ~ tes' or te' ~ m m ~ I 1 ~ 1 682 ~ 1 =now~~ 1 ~ Deed Book e~e2 Pg, s \ / ~ ~ I I Lot 1 MB 2s-89 I \ - ~ I I ~ N Tax I.D. 193-221-0 / ~ / ~ ~ ~ ° t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ I / ~ ~ ~ \ r ~ / ~ / I ~ . - - ~ D I SI M Boston _ ~ / ~ ~ Tire Americo, Ind i I orlcet Reet / 1 / v ~ ~ aaeo e~ ~ ~ I I 1 I u+ ~ bo ~ l / ~ A ~ % ~ ~ 1 ~ I ~ d!)0 Deed I ~ ~ d \ ~ ~ Book e3ae PgJ I ~ ~ 1 6% o / ~ ~ l ~ s~ r:~o ~ / ~ / / ~ ~ \ ~ r I / ` s~ ~ M I R 0 3 . ~ ; ~ op Book 26 Pg. ~e / - 7a03 I!1 / ~ " ~ 1 ~ ~ a 9 f en.JO ~ ~ A ~ V \ ~ ~ / ~s .1~ I I ~ Tox hD. 193-221- I / ~ s~ ~ 1 Q I ~ ~ / ~ ~ / I 1 ~ ~ ~ - / ~ I ~ ~ i ~ ~ o ~ _ ~ / WA •.I r II ~ ~ / I j / ~ ~ , , ~ ~ o` ~ I ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ eo av - f I ~ i / A ~ .,~k ~ ~ I ~ v I l ~ V ~ ~ I i / / ~ s~- I{ I I ~ I Y+ ~ i v ,P o d ~ ~ _ v fl9 ~ i ~ ~ , ` ~ s~ Ji3hn.Ellis Juste s' _ ~ I I I ~i ~ ~ mo ~ ~ ~ e . ~ ~ P n I E I I Deed ~ I ~ I ~ Book 930~P . 11 87 I i o~ II ~ 9-~ t~ 0 i ~ ~v ~ OTT se ~ce a _ G RK ~ ~ ~ ~ , I~ ~r ~ O i l ;t ~ \ ~ - I = I 1 I ~ Q ~ I I ~ 'Lot ~ Me za-a9 I t ~ o° ~t ~ ~ ~ Y~T Drop Off ~j° : ~ ~ ~ r a N ~ B `I S~iowroo ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~I~I I ( s75 676 ~ I I I ~ Tox LD. V93-221-0 6~p I I x nv N I$ \ ~ ~ vo l z 6 ~ ~ - _ ~ ~ ~ ~ - I ~I / ~ \ r o 6D6,00 ou oo I I ~ ~ Zonep R-20 i . 111 aR~) I ~ / ~ ~ ; N r ~ / / F=~" \ 4 3 ens ~ ~ ~ - ~ 0 S . Ft ~ \ ` ~ ~ a I ~ ~ ` ~ MH e ~ ~ o I ( i ~ ~ ~ ~ , ea n~ o ~ l r \ 1 ~ 1 / - 1 1 ~ ' s7s \ N ' - ~ ~ ; I ~ ~ ~ qA 11 ~ 1 / l / ~ ~ ~ e1 AA ~ Gradin Ea«nent 1 I 0 _ 88 ~ / I / dergr v one lhis a e g e7L V A m I ~ ~ ~ I 1 I ~ ~ too eerv arr Der m N t ~ ~ _ n ) ~ ~ ~ 1 ' ~ ww~ ~ ~ - = _ ~ I J / I 1 ~ bed a qtr loco to be n ued 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ r • / l I ~ ~ ~ 1 9 a~ a"cavort ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ / A o ~ - 6 / r 1 ~O I 1 - 1 Inv 6'„gCR nu"T2" RCts- 66 Inv ( 1 -664- ~ 636. ' ~ - ~ \ 1 / ~ X656.2 I ~ I , 1 ~ e0.1.J' S9 I f 6 ~,5~ a ~ / T ~ 674 ~ ~ r ~ I ~ 1 ~ g i i ~ 1 I ! Mahe ~ I \ ~ 5 i o ! ~ ~-Q I ~ \ 1 I / 1 ~ ~ W~ / \ ~ s ~ ~ I / l w , 1 ~ ~ ~ s o ~ ` I I I e\ ` ,'o ~ I ~ \ - ~ . N I ~ / I n \ ~ o Squires Realty, Inc. / / ~ 1 1 ~ 1, ~ / < ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ II I ~ ~ \ ~ S~ e ~.eo e~ I I I ~ r~ Deed Book 7615 Pg, 228 ~ I i~ V ~ > > 1 ~ s ~ V ~ A ~ / ~ / 1 ~ s98 ~ I ~ ~ t7 I \ \ A ~o ~ t v ait l \ or• ~ ~ V ~ V ~ ~ ~ ~ bsa ~ a"'' 61~ A 1 ~ Lot 5, MB 25 P 6@ ~ a g. 608 ~ ( / / ~ Inv ~ ~ ti 5a- o I ~ I n ~ ~ Tax l.D. 193-231-29 ~ ~ I a' , t enso out 6 ~ e J \ \ VA I 12' t 18 H 1. , u t V ~ ~ ~ ~ v \ \ ~ , A V J I / \ 1 ~ ~ $ h III I I _ 10 \ ~ \ \ ~ ~ 32.7' CA~~ ' ^ 1 l ~ ~ r6 0 I ~ 1 .o ` '1 669 1 1 r I 1 1 ti ( I ~ ~ s - df - ~ - - ~ _ I ~ 109819' i 1 < ~ 668 ~ \ ~ \ - 1 Z\ \ I \ ~ sLl _ \ ~ ~ ~ \ \ \ ~ c,,~ _ _ _ - - - 1 ~'9 1 ~ ~ / ~ ~I I I 11//rii 1 a, 9. ~ J m~ - k i to o ~ \ 1 to") x' I ~ ' ~ ~ / I 1 I //iii - - - ~ _ ~ t 1 I ~ 1 ~ , es~~~t I g sss - ~ ~ ~ 1 661 ~ \ - ~ 1 -gyp ~ ~ _ \ ~ \ \ 8 \ '.66 J,--„ n ~ \ ~ ` \ ~ ` ~ _ 6g3 9? ~ s9~ 69~ S s~9 n ~ ~ r m ro ~ t 1` } ~ "r' ~ 1\ \ l ~ I ~ I ~ ~ n i \ 1 ~ I I ~ I 1 ~ ~`A ` v ~ ~ ~ . \ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ 1'1 to ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ A \ I I ~ e ~V A ~ / ~ f out , ~ ~ \ \ / / I ~ C ss \ \ ~ 1 m e ~ \ t , ~ 1 1 1 ~ ~ ~ s v \1 ~ :9 ~ - ~ ~ ~ / 1 ~ ~ 1A ~A ~ 1 I I ~~~o LEGEND ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v ~ ~ 1 I ~ ~ ~ ~ / .r ~ 2 D s n ~ ~ ` ~A 1 I I 1 ~ ~ a=~ -epee's ~ ~ ~A1 ~~,A \ 1 + ~ / ~ ~ ,~A~,\ I 1 ~ ~ ~~~v / sbo;e I(e,a~t~a)~aut / ,o ~tl ~ - , ' - - ~ i / ~ W Pe ~ . yy~ d ~ ? a,, R~ M EXISTING PROPOSED ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ` \ 1 I ~ ~ A~ ~ 1 ~ ~ - ~ _ . W E(or -DH Electric or Tel hone 0 M P / ~ " 1 \ \ 1 \ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ / ~ ( ep ) verheod L e k de U t ! \ \ - ~ / / Z T-U,G. T Telephone Underground Cable \ ~ ~I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v ~ ~ ~1 ~ A\ 1 ~ v ~ 6 ~ E peetric Undwground Cale ~ Manhde \ 'VGA ` ~ ~ ~ \ `646 ~ ~ 640 ~ \ ~ o sbs ~ - a 1 ~ to ----8"G---- Goa Moira ~ • ~ V`, ~ ~ -FQR ~ ~fl ~ ~ t 2 c ~ 1 I 1 I . EBq ~ \ ~ ~ \~~~i~~"'- 1 ~ `656 --6 W--- water main, Hyd?ant At Gate Vdve •w~..~. ~1 1 11 I\ 1 11T - ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ \ \ " ` , ~ - ~ \ ~ 6, ~ / ~ i I I\ ~ 1 Ap rox. locotion 24 1 \ ~ Inv. ti47:6~ ~ \ \ ~ , ~ , i I I 1 I \ ~ 11 I1 1 0 \ G~ _ _ \ s ~ \ \ / ~ i 1 DI per CMUD cust~^• ~ \ - \ 2 \ \ ~ \ ii" ( SqA, \ ti \ - \ ~ ~ \ ~ iii ~ ~ service m c ' . ~ 1 ~ II II I 1\ --a"s- Sa?1ltory Sewer !c Manhde ~~.e~g ~ 11 111 I I 1 ` o - ai „w I I ~ III 1 ~ ~ ' ~ 3a ~ M ~ ~ ~ ~i ~ ~ - \ ~t1 ; ii , ~ \ 1 Asa : r ~ Storm Sewer ~ Manhde ~ ~ ) ~I I I ~ I 1 1 v I .o t2 st tz st-•o- ~ ~ ~ I I l I 1 ~ 11 1 II I ~ ~ I storm Catch 8oeh h'' j, ~ I I 1 I I I o ~ I I I 1 v o 0 1 -2 I I I I I ® storm Inlet ~ ~ / I I 1 ti D ~ ~ ~ ~ \ / ~ , ~ i / ~ a I I I ~ ~ 1~ ~~I~4 , ~ ~ ~ I ~ I I V I ~ A \ ~ ~ ~ 6c 'r w o / ~ / I I / z , loll " ~ ~ Storm Curb ?yore Inlet ~ / y j / / / / ~ ~ 6h 6 / / I ~ (dS ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~h 1 ~ r x 871,25 Pdnt Elevotlan (at x) e71.2S hb / " r 4 ~ / / / ~ ~ I A S ~ \ \ , W g7i, Top of Curb Eler. ~ % ~ O 15 ~ / ~ / ~ I a p ~ f . ~ 89 ropoeed Curb Elevations 870.75 Gutter Elev: / ~ ~ o) ~ V ; s \ v v ~ ~ / be . ,tn ~ ~ , ~ 69 n btch ExiatMq~nd~ ~ i° ~ . A B40:e3 ~ / \ \ r ~ ~ ~ i , ~ ~ I 1~ ~ o e~ 7 , / ~ i%, / / r~ti ( I ~ - ~ ~ , E., ~ ri y Gantou L ne 4 ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ % ~ / / ' ~ ~ W / / ~ " t "V " o " -~-F-;.~--~- Fence / / / 8 EE ~ f" aD ~ ~ / / Boa / a ~ 0 ught ~ : ~ 0 / d SI n ~ ~ ~ ~ / / ti ~ _ _ ~ Forth C~uroliue ~ 140 st I v r 9 Eo Bou e a d ~ Sit Fence ~ ¦ 60 , , / ~ / a ~ / ~ ) GRAPHIC SCALE 1 Charlotte, N.C. 28203 o Tree- Protectkn Barrla - F ~ / i ~5- yea / / / ~ o ~ b ~xo sb (704) 377-4349 M DD ~ 6`'2/ / ~ / _ p Oiverolon Oltch ego / / Ob9 No. By Ck. Deecrfption Dote EMAIL oLcom N _ i ~ ~Q/ / ao [671.25] Aa Buet QeMOtlon ~ / / i .Fps - ,~Q~ / ~ Redelone N / ,y0 \ ~ / f P'te') ~ C 0 a / e ~t ~ ~ ~ ~ t~ ~ ~ ~ \ 1 inch = 90 tt. 1608 EAST BOULEVARD ~ ~ ~ G / , CHARLOTTE N.C. 28203 704-374-1440 ~ ~ / I I c ~ '4 1 ~ i ~ ? ~ ~ ~ CAU110N!! I n rr n ~ r~~r~t~r ~ rmtf t tin The locations and elevations of existing 11 01 CALL lyrl~HUll~ t t V LALM-111i 0 I underground utilities as shown on this EFORE YOU I drawing are only APPROXIMATE. No guarantee D SCOTT CIARK TOYOTA s / Concrete SPillwla M Is / either expressed or Implied as to the 9300 EAST INDEPENDENCE BLVD SW-2 completeness of accuracy thereof. The I STOP contrbctor shall be exclusively responsible 00-632-494 CHARLOTTE MECKLENEURG CO. N.C. aR 1 See Detail on I o / ~ I _ -0_ for determining the exact utility locations VOID U11U DES. C.W.P. SCALE 1" = 1 Sheet WET-2 I 1 and elevations prior to the start of construction 60 JOB NO. I I1 ~ ( AMAt,E DN. C.P. CK. C.W.P. DATE 2/28/2003 01-001 DWG. N0. 0 , 111161nL CHARLOTTE SUPER DOUGNNI,'TS SERVICE, LLP Approx. location 8" IP ~ i CM D per M UD customer service maps `I A VNLLIAM J. f0 ~ PLEASANTS PEP 80YS PEP 80YS PO 74 ~0 COMMERCIAL ; w. ~J rox. I A~~y yP NET LEASE water water APP ocatlon 24" DIP per v w vault ~ ~ Q, CMUD customer service ma s oul- t..... c ~ P - - - - ter-- - - - r•.... - S n - _ _ - ce ou ~ - - e en en - _ v~r ~ 200 R/W (per tax map) w See D.B. 9356 P EXISTING ~ 2.5' g. 634 curb & gutter HYDRANT r _ _ i1 2 A~ x r ~ - _ ?1Z tll yeELOa out 24' A92.96 (New 2t' Nln h U rn a W I _ 4 Y h o qr Y 0 ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ _ - - _ _ (~~.9~-.- T - - - r .C_ _ _ - - N T ~ ~ Y I Y OU a - ( \ r ~ l ~ a Inr h ~ 1T of iS'ftCP ' ~ ~ I _ - 702.9 out ExlHhq EOP I j 1 ~ e 2.OX 9 p 9 IP11 1 II NN T L. _ ~ J Exist. Driv _ _ ~ ~ 3 ~ _ _ _ - x Ir, OP I I a~ Y a~a ee') e~e.~ tN.. ~ h T.B.M. I t""' 6 Nail in pavement _ ~ / 0: - 3>OTOf 1 / - - - - _ - _ - - - - - - - - 67e.t4 out W Er~~ln3 Qdr I/ ~ --0.4:EQ~ _ ~ - - - - - - - Sr - _ - _ _ _ Elev. 689;94 - `6sh~ ~ ' ' _ - _ 1 r - _ ~ a ~ ~ v. 24;x1 .P-d68~-i'~ 1 1 - ~ < - ~ 1`xistin Exist. Driv _ ~ c'" ~ Found _ ` I \ ~ ~ gg ~ ~ - Aspha ~ -ssA- - _ 5~ / 34 4 \ E 1140.05 / s\ / ~ 1\ ~ J - - - - - , ~ Cry opo R-35!36 m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ t \ ~ ~ ~ ~ A~ - ~ ~ - N34'25 3~ W . ~ - . _ _ ~ _ _ _ ~ _ I I I ~ ~ a.o 3 v ~ 1 ~ / I 1887 (tie / \ I I \ ~ A 11 r 1 ~ v~0 6a6 o i \ o e6 ~0 / ~ ~ / ~ v 1 ~ ~ 6 ~ ~ 1 ~ ! ~ t Boa' / / a \ 1 ~ s, ~ 4 \ ` 1 ~ r~ ~ / ~ Existin ?'~~D'RIiJ(~ ESTATE I / g ~ 1 ~ / I Parkin Lo (BOSTON MARKET) ~ _ , / Temporary 40 g ~ 1 WJB REALTY / \ I , LP. I Grod Eo~ement I ~ 1 l I ~ ~ . ~ I ~ •,o o' a i~ ~ . ~ ~ E 8" ci tk ,ir< I o ~~wn~ l ~ Real Estate Joint ure I z I \ ~ o' ~ e I ~ 1 0 ~ ~ 682 a I ~ ~ . ~ 195' of 1e' HOP.. / / m x I I 1 ~ 1 2 I r Deed Book 8782 P. 8 w I f ~ • 1.18 5 ~ ~ ~ \ cc I ~ ~ \ / I I ~ 1 I ~ ~ ~ / ~ I Lot 1 MB 26-89 \ , I ~ ~ ~ o I ~ I ~ 0 ~ I I Y ~ i ~ / I ~ - - ~ I ~ ~ Tax I.D. 193-221-0 / 1 I I ,1 ~ N i ~ / „ ~ ~ Tire America, inch I I Boston Market Restour ~ ~/l / I / / ~ ~ \ e03.E0 out / 7 ~ I I 1 I ~ u+ - _ i 880 Deed Baok 836 P I ~ i ` a o / ~ ~ s 1 o ~ s~ ~ 8 9J I ~ ~ i - s~ / ~ Mop Book 26 Pg• 8 I / - ~ , -~0~ ~ ~ l / V ~ ~ Y ~ I / / i / ~ - ~ ` ~ I ~ d, I ~ / ~ A ~ } 691.Ja ~ ~ >Q ~ 6. / 1 ~ ~ I ~ ~ Tox L0. 193-221- I I ~ / ~ ~ s. ~ I Q I ~ i ~ I I I ~ I aP I ~ k ~ I I eo ou >t ~ - - - GR~U~ _ / V A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ II I I 'gat, ~ s> ~ I I ~ n~Ellis Justice ~ ~ ~ s> I I r a ~ I MAR 0~ Zp C W \ \ ~ ~~J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - m o ~ ~ e IY ~ ~ ~ P ~ I is a ~ ~ ~ ~ 03 n ~ I ~ Oeed Book 930 ~P . ` . s7s I ~ ~ n I _ g-31t 6 (i I ~ v ~ 1~ OTT' se lae s ' e a„t ~ . ~ ~ RK ~ ~ ~ ,,,,,1, ~ i ~ 9~, ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ I, 0 1 I~ o I I ~ 'Lot MB 26-89 I N~ I~I I a ~ h ATER ' I 't ~ ~ Dr f ~ ~ - - .o t ~ ~ o~ ~ ~ 'F YOT ~ of d ~ ~ ~ Sl~awra - _ $ 67 ~ ~ ao 871. ~ , sss I SE T CTI ox I, - ~I~ s~ 873 ~ x ~ by h I I c D. V93 221-0~1 o ~I I o~~ ~ I ~ Z _ / ~ ~ v' cNV / h~ 'o ~ 99 ,C;, ~ ~ ~ ~ e6 w 6 ~ - ~ ~ ~ - ao I// ~aaZ \ ~ - - s ~ . ~ _ ~ 86e.oo au ~ I I ones R 20 , 1~ a~~ll I . ~ ~ - ~ ~ / I ~ ~ t ~ 14• t ~ \ YN 8 ~ ° I I I ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ eJ nv ~ ~ ~ ~ ° I \ ~ Y / ~ ~ ~ ~ S eJ n 1 1 ~I ~ ~ 4f / 1 ~ -el~.cK ~ 1 o AV may". ~ g . / _-eoo ~ 1 I ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ !F vm,Tl 1, _ 1 ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ A ~ , _ / ~ ~ 676 ~ ~ , / .a~ Temporary 20' ~ I , ~ u / ~ ~ ' ~ ,1 l / ~ y ~ Ap ~ / ~ ~ p~ ~ ` 1 / 0 - ~ e~ ~ ~ Ap \ G?odh Easement ' I ~otr , - - ~ ~ ~ I 1 ~ "O~ ~ ~ ~ to K9'' w r Ine thlp r o ~ ~ ~ _ v ~ Orr pfr m N ~ ~ A f ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ Q1~ ~ m ~ r iota to be mq wed ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ Wets / f " - ~ / co I J / • / ~ ~ v a" ~,~a~m I ~ ~ ~ ~ l I ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ .A - 6 1 see ~O ~ l 1 _ ~ Inv 6,..Bf~ nv~f7` RCf~" ~ hr `0 9 / ~ . ~ Q ~ _ yg6 ~ \ I i I ~ c i iu ~ -664- ` 1 656.7 / 1 ~ - 656. ~ I ` 1 1 f ~ I ~1 1 ~ C73 1 \ 1 1 I ° /a ~ ~ / ; ~ Z ~ ~ f ao A A ~ A ~ en 64S.J' S8 ~ I 6 7,5~ / lua3~, / ~ X674 / ~ j ~ ~ Z Z / ~ eB t ~ ~ "ck,~y ~ / ~h ~~cs~z• I • v '10 E 9 i0co ~ ~ ~0 Q Z ~ 1 \ I I / ~ I ~ 6 9 ,aQ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ rq \ d 9 / ~ ~ I I hs / 1 ~ / / ~ 1 ~ 5 48 ~ o •p / ~ ~Q I 1 v 1 ~ ~ ~ 6 0 ~ I I ~ ~ 1.~ \ - - ~ , ~ / I o \ ~ o Squires Realt Inc• ~ ~ 1 ) 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v9S i ~ x Y• \ 9S ~ _ ~ ~ e ~p I I ~ Deed Book 76 t 5 P / ~ t \ 698 ~ I I ~ of ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t Y out 1 ? \ hd su.,• I g. 228 66 ~ sss - get ; 1 Lat 5, MB 25 P .608 / / shY1. h I \ ~ ~ / ~ , eetso eut 4 0 ~ \ \ RC _ ~ , ~ I I • ~ g \ 54 o I ~ I ~o~ 1 ~ Tax LD. 193-2.31-29 \ \ ~ e - ~ ~ ~ JJJ 1 7 ~ J, \ \ ~ ~ ~ , ~ _ I ~ ~ I r \ \ b~' ~ ~ III I I ~o a v , ~p~ ~ qb,, ) I- s ~ ~ ~ \ ` ~ \ ~.Q` ` ~ 52.3' ArphJM ' U aI I ` I 1 ~ -m ~ ~ -ro - ~ ~ \ \ ~ ( J~ ,~y I I -tee \ N 4' ~ \ ~ i0 ` 869 i ; ~ ~ J ~ I ~ 1 1 I I ~ ii~~ ~ ~ v ~ v s - ! _ loseli s _ - 111 ~ e a \ - - ~ / ~ ~l ~ 6~ L, //i~_ o~ ~ A \ ~ 1 / / ~~T''' r~ - d - - \ ~ ~ 9~t - ~i. I J I ~ III \ ~g ~ ~ \ ~ _ i / ~ i i' / 1 I I I I 1 1 l //r ~ 1 a~ . \ ( °,0 1 ~ c~ o f k ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~•1 esa•~'~ 7 t g sss ',66 - ~ \ ~ ~ 6g3 ? ~ 9~ 9Q 6 s~B r W o~0 ro° m roN q~ gyn.. .r ~ ~ ` _ _ \ . • ~ > ~ ~ ~ 1 o n ~ n • r 1 ` ~ Q3 662 ~.-i 1\ \ 1 I i I~ ~ I ~v 1~A \ ~ ~ I I ~ I 1, v ~ ~ C 18 38" nv \ ° 1 \ ' ~ i / / 4 ~ o \ \ \ / \ \ ~ ~ I / fP ~ ut , f ~ \ ~ ~ / I C 6 i \ ~ ~ 1 i ~ ~ e ? ~ ~ e ~ I ~ . i ~ ~v ~ v ~ ~ 1 I I ~ / , / _ w ~ A .1 ~ I I~~ ~ ~ T i LEGEND ~ 1v ~ , ,v , 1 I I ~ ' ~ ~ , / sa r. 0. ~ 5' ti 0 ~ , 23•a. ~ (1 r M ~ ~ ~ \ I ~ o, ,e4o:e5 ~ ~ 11 , r ,81(1;86 p~y~t~ 850.8 kExleth0)lout / t'y~ 9 ~ & as r ~ - / / / '65 . w pe i . ~ EXISTING ~ ~ 1 1 PROPOSED , \ \ ~ 1 I ~ ~ ~ - i / ~ t , J ~ ' +l Exult 9 ~ m `a~' / i ~ ~ R - ~A\ 1 1 I ~ ~ ' ~ / i 1 E(aT) ON 'r Electric (or Telephone) Overheod LMe do Pde / / ~ ~ 1 \ ~ • / ~ ~ ~ i I l ~ ~ ~ ~ halt _ / / ~ - ~ ~1~ ~ _ ~ l U T-U.G. ~ 1 ( ~ \ \ ~ q1 I v ~ ~ / / ~ ~ / i ~ , ~ 1 ~ ~ o ~ \ r ~ ~vvgr...~ - drrvewoY 1 Z T Telephone Underground Coble I~ \ IG \ ' ~ ~ / ai _ ~ A ~ ~ 1 1 - ` - / / 640 . E Electric Under ound Cable ~ Manhole ~ ~ \ 1 ~ tr / 640 ~ 1 - ~ ~ M., \ ~ \ o • 865 . q I ~ ~ 1\ ~ - - J. _ 884/. a't- 1 ~ \ ~ ~ ~\'~V \ VA 1 \ 1 X646 - to t`o -----8"G Coe MaM r..~ • ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ F0~ ~ - 'St - r, ~ ~ L 2 c 1 I \ I . l~Bq l ~ l ~ ~ \ ~ ~ o - - i - 1 1 III 1 sss ~ 1 ~A A 1 11 1A I ? . , ,n 1 ~ ~ \ - - ~ ~ q \ \ f e'?o~ 7 ~ i / ~ ~ I\ 1 Ap rox. location 24 j \ ~ Inv. 642:6 ~ r' ~ / / I 1 I ` N --6"w--- ttbter main, Hydront ~C hate 4olve 'w-~- ~ I~ 1 11 I\ I f0~ - ~ ! ci ~ \ 11 I 1 I 14 ' ~ I ,1 I I I ~ I ~ 1 IP _ \ s \ \ / ~ D per CMUD custn» \ l~ ~ - \ \ r r A , ~ ~ \ \ / ) ~ rvice map, ~ ~8'S Sanitary Sewer do Manhde ~'~~8'S I ~ 11 I I ~ I 1 1 Q ~ . _6 tti ~ ~m ~ ~ ~ ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ < ~ ~ 3a ~ M 1 ~ S ~ , ~ 'h ~ ~ \ 1 X54 ~ „ ti ~ - Storm Sewer ~ Nanhde ~ ~ 1 I I I I 11 1 ~ t~ --12'St-- ~~12 St-~- ~ ~ ~ ~ I I I ~ I. I I 1~ ~ ~7 I ~ storm catch Baeln a - " ~ f/ / I I I I I I I " ~ ~ ~ . i I I I I ° o ~ t Storm Inlet ~ ~ , ~ / l I J ~ I ~ C!• It ~ 1 1 ~ _ ~ / ,/i / 1 llEAl l I I I ~ _ ~ ~ r ~ ® ~ / - ~ l / - / ~ I o i ~ ~ Storm Curb Typeinlet ~ ~ / ~ / ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ I 1 ~ v / / s_ • I ~ ~ A v \ ~ / / 1 ~ ~ ~ I a I ~ ,9 ~ ~ ~ / 0 h ~66ri / / / ~ ~ ~ . 1 I I ~ C'~ St ~ \ v i ~ ~ x 671.25 Pdnt Elevation (at x) 871.25 / / Q 1 Q i / ! / l 4i ~ ~ A S ~ d ` Sig \ I / / ~ / i NA I I ~ o \ MA / ~ i / ~ \ ~ ~ W 7 T of Curb Eiew / 1 r E NA 8 1.25 oD , i, % ~ ~ z ~ 89 n s ~ \ \ ~ ~ / 88 . 2~In / , 89 n Etch Exleth9 f+ Fi 1 `o \ / ,848:85 i l \ \ r r r r r r + ~ Propaed Curb Elevotione ~ 870.75 Gutter Elec. ~!~o / ~ / A / ~ ~ry ~ ~ ~ ~ / 4y A i, N / ~ Y W 1 Contour Une 44 / / p r ~ ~ / ~ v ~ ~ i / 1 \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ \ / i 18 EE / o Fence ~ ~ ar 200 ~ o. ~ ugnt ~ ~ 0 / p ~ . ~ \ \ ~ 0!' ~ ~ ~ % / Q -4- Sign T ~ ~ ~ _ _ % Forth Caroline ~ ' ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ 1409 East Boulevard Sdt Fenw ~ O ~ GRAPHIC SCALE Charlotte, N•C. 28203 Tree Pr t t B rri v; ~ a ~ ! % ~ / ~ O 0 eC 1011 a er ti. ~ / ~ eo o ~ ~ +so (704) 377-4349 - ~ Qb No. By Ck. Description Date EMAIL:.. Isom c ~ / .FpR --fi-- ~ / Re lone V ao 671.25. Ae 8ullt Qevotlon c~a, ~ A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ IN ITT ( ) 1 inch = 80 !t. 1608 EAST BOULEVARD ~ 1 I / CHARLOTTE N.C. 28203 704-374-1440 J i 1 ~ ~ ~ • _ ~ CAU110N!!! ~ /Y 1`9 ~ 11t~t/"'1 t tA1ft ? '~''It"y - The locations and elevations of existing CALL t~itiHl111~ ~t V 1 lLl 11L~ ~y underground utilities an shown on this EFORE YOU DI S drawing are only APPROXIMATE. No grantee SCOTT o Op, l i \ 0 o s 7, I 1 Is either Y expressed or Implied as to the 9300 EAST INDEPENDENCE BLVD SW -2 Concrete Spillway M o of accuracy thereof. The TOP contractor shall be exclusively responsible CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG CO. N.C. I See Detail on I I ~ 800-632-494 9y , f or determining the exact utility locations AVOID UTIU DES, C.W.P. SCALE 1N Sheet WET-2 I I = 60 JOB NO. I and elevations prior to the start of construction i~ i AMAGE 1 DN. C.P. CK. C.W.P. DATE 2/28/2003 01-001 DWG, N0. 0