20021650 Ver 1_Complete File_20021014

o?0F W a rFRPG
r
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
July 15, 2003
DWQ# 02-1650
Camden County
Mr. Brian Strong
NC Division of Parks and Recreation
Dismal Swamp State Natural Area
1615 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC, 27699-1615
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Condition
Dear Mr. Strong:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions, to dredge 0.07 acre of Public Trust Waters Shallow Water
Habitat in order to excavate between Bents 3 and 4 and change the fixed structure to a two span continuous structure at the US 17
Visitors Center in Camden County, as described in your revised application received by the Division of Water Quality on June 6, 2003.
After reviewing your application, we have determined that this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Number 3400, which
can be downloaded from our web site at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/nowetiands . This Certification allows you to use your CAMA Permit
when issued by the NC Division of Coastal Management. In addition, you should get any other federal, state or local permits before you
go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge, Water Supply Watershed and U.S.
Coast Guard regulations. Also this approval will expire when the accompanying CAMA Permit expires unless otherwise specified in the
General Certification. This Certification is in addition to the Certification issued to you on January 21, 2003.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your project, you
must notify us in writing and you may be required to send us a new application for a new certification. If the property is sold, the new
owner must be given a copy of the Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total
wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC
2H .0506 (h). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification and the additional
conditions listed below:
1. You are required to return the attached Certification of Completion form to notify DWQ when all work included in the 401
Certification has been completed;
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days
of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina
General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its
conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you have any
questions, please telephone Tom Steffens in our Washington Regional Office at [phone] or Cyndi Karoly in our Central Office in
Raleigh at [phone].
Sincerely,
(? 1 "
AW K/cbk
Attachments
cc: Corps of Engineers Washington Field Office
Washington DWQ Regional Office
Central Files
File Copy
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
021650
N=NR
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (htto://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands)
Customer Service #: 1-877-623-6748
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Michael F. Easley, Govemor . Donna D. Moffitt, Director William G. Ross Jr,, Secretary
June 4, 2003
MEMORANDUM:
.)
TO: Mr. John R. Dorney
Environmental Biological Supervisor ° .!
Division of Water Quality
FROM: Doug Huggett
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
SUBJECT: CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
Applicant: NC Division of Parks and Recreation
Project Location: West of US 17 South in Camden County adjacent to the Dismal Swamp
Canal
Proposed Project: To excavate 320 cubic yards of matefial from a triangular area located
between Bent 3 and Bent 4 and change the fixed structure from a three span
simple to two span continuous structure.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this
form by June 24, 2003. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact
M. Edward Harrell at [phone]. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting
data is requested.
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes are
incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached
comments.
SIGNED DATE
1367 U.S. 17 South, Elizabeth City, North Carolina 27909
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: http://dcm2,enr.state.nc.us
An Equal opportunity1 Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
Major Modification
APPLICANT'S NAME: NC Division of Parks and Recreation - Visitors Center US 17 - Camden
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: West of US 17 in Camden County adjacent to the Dismal Swamp
Canal
Photo Index - 2000: N/A 1995: N/A 1989: N/A 1984: N/A 1978: N/A
State Plane Coordinates - X: 2629600 Y: 1017500
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA B100922A
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - 06/03/03
Was Applicant Present - Yes
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received - 06/02/03
Office - Elizabeth City
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan - Camden
Land Classification From LUP - Conservation
(B) AEC(s) Involved: PTW
(C) Water Dependent: Yes
(D) Intended Use: Public
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing - None
Planned - On-site septic system
(F) Type of Structures: Existing - None
Planned - Change fixed structure to Two-Span
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: N/A
Source - N/A
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION: [AREA]
ll«o.l r.nA
,P; I I arl
(1tlhPr
(A) Public Trust Waters Shallow
Water Habitat 2,938 Sq. Ft.
(B) Public rut Shoreline
C i h round
(D) Total Area Disturbed: 2,938 sq. ft. (0.07 acre)
(E) Primary Nursery Area: No
(F) Water Classification: WS-IVSW Open: N/A
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant proposes to excavate 320 cubic yards of material from a
triangular area located between Bent 3 and Bent 4 and change the fixed structure from a three span simple to
two span continuous structure.
NC Division of Parks & Recreation - Camden County
Field Investigation Report
Page Two
Project Setting
The State of North Carolina owns the 14,400-acre Dismal Swamp Natural Area located
west of US Highway 17 in Camden County. The area is bordered on the east by the Dismal
Swamp Canal, on the north by Virginia and the National Wildlife Refuge, and on the west and
south by farmland. On March 5, 2003, NCDPR was authorized to construct a Visitors Center
on the west bank of the canal in accordance with CAMA Major Permit No. 27-03. Visitors
would park in a new lot proposed south of NCDOT's existing Welcome Center and access the
west bank visitor center via a floating swing bridge authorized within the canal. To access the
site turn west off US Highway 17 into the NCDOT Welcome Center located one mile north of
the US Highway 17/Culpepper Road (SR 1233) intersection.
The waters of the Dismal Swamp Canal in the vicinity of the project are classified as
WS-IV Sw by the NC Environmental Management Commission. These waters are classified as
Inland Waters by the NC Marine Fisheries Commission and NC Wildlife Resources
Commission and as Public Trust Waters by the NC Coastal Resources Commission. Water
depths in the project area (in the center of the canal) measure 9.5' below normal water level.
The presence of submerged aquatic vegetation was not noted in the vicinity of the project. A
review of available information suggests that there are no known archeological sites or
geological formations associated with the site.
NCDPR has not started the project as of this date and has applied for a modification to
CAMA Major Permit No. 27-03 to allow additional dredging within the canal. The dredging
within the canal at its western edge would provide a minimum water depth of 3.5' and allow
for the transit of small craft with a deck, bridge or mast height of 5.75 feet or less at times
when the bridge would rest upon its low water bents. The modification also includes a proposal
to reduce the number of bents by changing the fixed approach structure from a three-span
simple structure to a two-span continuous structure.
As a follow-up to the span modification and the request for additional dredging, which
will provide 5.75 feet of vertical clearance, the permittee is requesting a modification of
condition #14 of CAMA Major Permit No. 27-03. Condition #14 reads as follows:
"The swing bridge shall be left in the open position, paralleling the canal bank when not
in use by vehicular or pedestrian traffic. "
The permittee is requesting that the condition be modified to read:
"The swing bridge shall be left in the open position, paralleling the canal bank when not
in use by vehicular or pedestrian traffic, except during times when the US Army Corps of
Engineers has closed the canal to locking operations due to low water conditions,
provided that the bridge shall be opened upon the request of any vessels transiting
NC Division of Parks & Recreation - Camden County
Field Investigation Report
Page Three
between the closed locks when such vessels cannot be accommodated by transiting
beneath the bridge between bents 3 and 4, unless the bridge cannot be opened because of
extreme low water requiring that it be positioned above its low water bents. "
The permittee proposes to:
• Change the fixed approach structure from a three-span simple structure to a two-span
continuous structure. This will provide a minimum horizontal clearance of 15.5'.
• Excavate 320 cubic yards of canal bottom from a triangular 165.5' x 35.5' area located
between bent 3 and bent 4 of the continuous structure at the western edge of the canal.
This will provide a minimum water depth of 3.5'.
The dredging of 320 cubic yards of material from a 2,938 square-foot area will disturb
2,938 square-feet of Public Trust Water and Shallow Water Habitat.
The fixed structure modification and the proposed dredging between bents 3 and 4 will
allow 15.5' of horizontal clearance and a minimum water depth of 3.5'. Small craft
with a deck, bridge, or mast height of 5.75' or less will be allowed to transit at times
when the bridge would rest upon its low water bents.
Submitted by: M. Edward Harrell
Date: June 3, 2003
,PECEIVE
Form DC-M-NT-1
JUN U 2 20(
ION ,:,c.,ASTAL MANAGE
IFLIZIFLIZABETH C11
APPLICAT (To be completed by all applicants)
b. City, town, community or landmark
Dismal Swam Canal H 1 W
1. APPLICANT
C. Street address or secondary road number
Hwy. 17
a. Landowner:
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
Name N C Division of P-rkS ;nc RPrrPation jurisdiction? Yes X No
(Dismal Swamp State Natural Area)
Address e. Name of body of water
ismal eSwamp project. (e. river,
creels, sound, bay) D
Raleieh State ,Tr -
Ciry
Zip 77699-1 h 1 5 Day Phone (9 i 4? --71 s-27,
Fax [phone]
b. Authorized Agent:
Name Br'
,4ddress see above
City . State
Zip Day Phone
Fax
C. Project name (if any) Dismal Swamp Visitor
Center
!40TE: Perndr will be iruud iA nano of landow+er(.), amd/or
project name.
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED
3. DESCRIPTION AND PLAN TED USE
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
a. List all development activities you propose (e.g
building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier, an(
excavation and/or filling activities.
Parking lot, visitor center, canoe la
f I o tina bridae fender Gvsrem. 1;
crossing, septic system maintenanP
boardwalk with 1 oo nut an?-
control houses.
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance or an exist'.n
project, new work, or both? new
c. Will the project be for public, private or commercic
use? public
d. Give a brief description of purpose, use, methods c
construction and daily operatic:is of propose
project. If more space is needed, please a=c
additional pages. The purpose of this prc
to provide visitor access to the stat
natural area, provide a park presence
reduce problems associated wirh s
sing,and provide a point nP ;.,*=rn-?
for the state natural area
PROJECT
a. County -- Camden
P E '4::i/ 187; ? t+1'J C4J 1 W/Y
JUN 0 ? 2003
Form DC'i-NO-1
4. LAND AND WATER
CHARACTERISTICS
a. Size of entire tract 14,433 acres
b. Size of individual lot(s) 3 acres-project area
c. ADpprrox 8 at ?Gelevation of tract above MHW or
T
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
peat and muck with ann;1- Areas
e. Vegetation on tract vegitation includes shrubs
ana thickets-sapplings and vines.
f. Man-made features now on tract Dismal Swamp
Canal and spoil area ?,-^T+, rl,o canal
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land
classification of the site? (Consult the local land we plan.)
Conservation Transitional
Developed Community
Rural Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
NA
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable -NA
zoning? Yes No
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
j. Has a professional archaeological assessment been
done for the tract? Yes X No
If yes, ;)y whom?
k. Is the project located in a National Registered
Historic District or does it involve a- National
Register listed or eligible property?
X Yes No
Are there wetlands on the site? x Yes No
Coastal (marsh) Other
If ves, has a delineation been conducted? no
(,?twd? doau++entanan, if available)
O'QASTAL MANAGENU7NT
FU7A51-_1'H CAT`!
m. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
None
n. Describe location and type of discharges to waters
of the state. (For example, surface runoff, sanitary
wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent, "wash
down' and residential discharges.) 'NA
o. Describe existuig drinking water supply source.
None
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In addition to the completed application form, the
following items must be submitted:
A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims title
to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then
forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims title, plus written permission
from the owner to carry out the project.
An aetxtrate, dated work plat (including plan view
and cross-sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
ink on an 8 1/2" by 11" white paper. (Refer to
Coastal Resources Commission Rule 7J.0203 for a
detailed description.)
Pk2sse note that original drawings are r referred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue-line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an
adequate number of quality copies are provided by
applicant. (Contact the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers regarding that agency's use of larger
drawings.) A site or location map is a part of plat
requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed to
guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the
G1,4wt1L?T?C4 ?'.ti laG?
JUH 0 2003
Form DCM-MP-1
site. Include highway or secondary road (SR)
numbers, landmarks, and the like.
• A Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary
• A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and
signed return receipts as proof that such owners
have received a copy or the application and plats
by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised
that they have 30 days in which to submit comments
on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant
further certifies that such notice has been provided.
Name Penny Leary-Smith
Highway 17 N South Mills , NC
2-356
Address
Phone 27976
Name Marshall Powell
Address 121 Horsesb e Rd- South NC
Phone [phone]
Name Jennifer Pitts-DOT
Address P- 0. Box 25201 Ralei h 611
Phone (9 19 ) 7 33-29 20
• A list of previous state or federal permits issued for
work on the project tract. Include permit numbers,
permittee, and issuing dates.
Environmental Assessment-#01-E-4300-0360
• A check for $250 made payable to the Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing the
application.
• A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and inlet areas.
• A statement of compliance with the N.C.
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A - 1 to
10) If the project involves the expenditure of public
funds or use of public land's, attach a statement
documenting compliance with the North Carolina
Envirorunental Policy Act.
r? lF.;r? ?: l1 CIT,14
6. CERTIFICATION AND PERMISSION
TO ENTER ON LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to this
application will allow only the development described in
the application. The project will be subject to conditions
and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact,
grant permission to representatives of state and federal
review agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in
connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application and follow-up monitoring of the
project.
I further certify that the information provided in this
application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
This is the 27 day of May , `19"x.2-003
Print Name Brian L. Strong
Signature W
Landowner or Authorized igeru
Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
project.
x DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information
x DCM MP-3 Upland DevelopmenL
x DCM MP-4 Structures Information
x DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
DCM MP-6 Marina Development
NOTE. Please sign and date each attachment in the
space provided as the bottom of each form.

a
ANDFILL
(Except bridges and culvwu)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MRi, Be sure to complete all other
sections of the Joint Application that relate to this proposed
project.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation or all
aotlvlties, All values to be given In feet.
Access cha=4
(MLW) or (NM
Canal
Boat
basin
Boat
ramp
Rock
groin
Rock
breakwater
Floating Bridge
West-upland
West-Canal
East-upland
East-Canal

JUN p ?i / ;, •.
COAS'T'AL MANAGEMENT
ELIZABETH CITY

1. EXCAVATION
a. Amount of material to be excavated from below
MHW or NWL in cubic yards 142n
(includoa both ease nd West sJ
b. Type of material to be excavated muck/paa_ t
c. Does the area to be excavated include coastal
wetlands (marsh), submerged aquatic vegetation
(SAVs) or other wetlands? Yes X No
d, HiAVOUnd excavation in cubic yards 200
(includes both east and west sides
Z» DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED
MATERIAL
A. Location of disposal area Offsite approved
landfill die o al its,
b. Dimensions of disposal area NA
c, Do you claim title to disposal area?
Yes K No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from the
owner.
Yd3
180 d. Will a disposal area be available for future
320 maIntenaaca•? _2L_ Yes No
If yes, where?
20
100 C. Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs orock?er wetlands?
Yes x No
f. Does the disposal include any area in the water?
Yes x No
lurb d 031"
troth wwm zzhft r

JUN 0 2 2003
Form DCNI-N P-2
e. Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
Yes X._ No
f. Does the disposal include any area in the water':
Yes " No
3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION -NA
a. Type of shoreline stabilization
Bulkhead Riprap
b. Length
c. Average distance waterward of MHW or NWL
d. Maximum distance waterward of MHW or NWL
e. Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months
(Source of information)
f. Type of bulkhead or riprap material
g. Amount of fill in cubic yards to be placed below
water level
(1) Riprap
(2) Bulkhead backfill
h. Type of till material
i. Source of fill material
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES-NA
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
a. will fill material be brought to site?
Yes No
COASTAL, MANAGU,47NI
ELIZABETH UR'
If Yes,
(1) Amount of material to be placed in the
water
(2) Dimensions of fill area
(3) Purpose of fill
b. Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Dimensions of fill area
(2) Purpose of fill -
5. GENERAL
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled? material will be
imediately trucked offsite
b. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
dredge)? backhoe
c. Will wetlands be cr: ssed in transporting equipment
to project site? Yes X No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
Dismal Swamp Visitor Center
Applicant ie"ame
Sikgnat?n s- 2-?
Date
? ED
Form DCM-MEP-3
AN 0 % 2003
r'OAJTIAL MAN!AGEM,7 i_..
:JPLAND
DEVELOPMENT
(Construction and/or land disturbing activities)
Nttach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major h.
?ermit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all
ether sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
a. Type and number of buildings, facilities, units or
structures proposed 6 buildings--visitor center,
maintenance shed, elevated walkway, control i.
house (2), boardwalk
b. Number of lots or parcels 1
c. Density (give the number of residential units and the
units per acre) NA
d. Size of area to be graded, filled or disturbed
including roads, ditches, etc. 3 acres
e. If the proposed project will disturb more than one
acre of land, the Division of Land Resources must
receive an erosion and sedimentation control plan at
least 30 days before land disturbing activity begins.
If applicable, has a sedimentation and erosion
control plan been submitted to the Division of Land
Resources? Yes X No
If yes, date submitted
f. List the materials (such as marl, paver stone,
asphalt, or concrete) to be used for paved surfaces.
crushed stone, concrete, asphalt, and
treated wood
g. Give the percentage of the tract within 75 feet of
MHW or NWL, or within 575 feet in the case of an
outstanding Resource Water, to be covered by
impervious and/or built-upon surfaces, such as
pavement, buildings, rooftops, or to be used for
vehicular driveways or parking. 20
Projects that require a CAMA Major Development
Permit may also require a Stormwater Certification.
Has a site development plan been submitted to the
Division of Environmental Management for review?
Yes x No
If yes, date submitted
Describe proposed method of sewage disposal.
drain field
j. Have the facilities described in Item i. above
received state or local approval? no
(Attach appropriate documentation)
k. Describe location and type of proposed discharges to
waters of the state (for example, surface runoff,
sanitary wastewater, industrial /commercial effluent,
"wash down" and residential discharges).
NA
1. Describe proposed drinking water supply sourc-'
(e.g. well, community, public system, etc.)
well (from DOT Welcome Center) _
m. Will water be impounded? Yes _ x Nc-
If yes, how many acres?
n. If the project is a oceanfront development, when
was the lot(s) platted and recorded? NA
Dismal
??Swamp Visitor C en r
J Name,
Project
Appli t
signatw-e
r -- Z:?_ o,
Date
• 1 ? . Li l'fi^.'i ",. ? ?.;':`?.a i? tit L? r f,?,.?)
Form DCM-MP-•4 JUN 0 ? 2003
STRUCTURES
(Construction within Public Trust Areas)

Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major e. av a tonal Structure
co
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all xpublic (1) Commercial -Community _ Private
other sections of the Joint Application which relate to (2) Number 3
this proposed project. (3) Description of buoy
(Color, inscription, size, anchor, etc.)
a. Dock(s) and/or Pier(s) -NA 7-pile cluster with navigational
(1) -. Commercial -Community - Private light
(2) Number
(3) Length (4) Width of water body 90'
(4) Width (5) Distance buoy(s) to be placed beyond
(5) Finger Piers Yes No shoreline 9' to 23'
(i) Number Fender System
(ii) Length f. =Meering-struttm-e (boatlift, mooring pilings, etc.)
(iii) Width x public (1) _ Commercial -Community _ Private
(6) Platform(s) Yes No Z2) Number 1
(i) Number (3) Length 100'
(ii) Length (4) Width 2'
(iii) Width
(7) Number of slips proposed g. Other (Give complete description)
(8) Proximity of structure to adjacent riparian
property lines
(9) Width of water body
(10) Water depth at waterward end of pier at
MLW or NWL
b. Boathouse (including covered lifts) -NA
(1) Commercial Private
(2) Lenorth
(3) Width
c. Groin (e.g. wood, sheetpile, etc.) -NA
(1) Number
(2) Length(s)
Dismal Swmmn ViGitur Center
AppU or P o'ect
Sinature
O?
Date
ulkhead (for bridge protection)
d. eskewater (e.g. wood, sh°ztpile, etc.)
(1) Length 150'
(2; Average distance from MHW, NWL or
wetlands NA
(3) Maximum distance beyond MHW, N``VL or
wetlands NA
"?7 771N
Form DCM-NIP-5
BRIDGES AND
CULVERTS
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-I. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
1. BRIDGES
a. Public X Private
JUN D 2; 2003
9.17fv '-z.77 a C,0'y
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain)
g. Lengt'i of proposed bridge 75'
h. Width of proposed bridge 16'
i. Height of proposed bridge above wetlands
none-floating bridge
b. Type of bridge (construction material) j. Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow?
sub-structure--timber piles Yes X No
bridge structure--steel floating barge If yes, explain
c. Water body to be crossed by bridge
Dismal Swamo Canal
d Water depth at the proposed crossing at l?W or k. Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge
. NWL 1'-6 none-floating bridge
e. Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge? 1. Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by
Yes X No reducing or increasing the existing navigable
If yes, opening? x Yes No
(1) Length of existing bridge If ves_ explain Bridge will be operated to give
(2) Width of existing bridge peiority to navigation within the canal.
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing During periods of low water when the locks
bridge are closed the bridge will remain open to
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be pedestrian traffic.
removed? (Explain) m. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing
no nx igable waters? Yes X No
If yes, explain
f. Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert(s)?
YE-s X No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert _
n. Have you contacted the U.S. Coast Guard
(2) Width of existing culvert concerning their approval?
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above X Yes No
the MHW or NWL If yes, please provide record of their action.
Coast Guard is waiting on Ck,L? approval.

JUN (i „'
Form 001-YIP-5
COASTAL. .? ;,? ;r.o'
FLIZFIBE P i ;._q p_Y
). Will the proposed culvert alien existing navigad
2. CULVERTS -NA Potential? Yea - Na
If yes, explain
a, Water body in which culvert is to be placed
b. Number of culverts proposed
c. Type of culvert (construcdoa Mawrial, style)
d. Will proposed culvert rcplact as existing bridge?
Yes , No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing bridge _
(2) Width of existing bridge
(3) Navir.=au clearance underneath existing
bridge
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain)
?riwlww
e. Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert?
_? Yes -No
if yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above
the MHW or NWL
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain) -
f. Length of proposed Calvert
3. EXCAVA71ON AND FILL
a. Wal the placement of the proposed bridge or ealy
require any excavation below this MEW or NWI
xx Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated 2899
(2) Width of area to bs excavated 59 t.
(3) Depth of area to be- excavated ? 81
(4) Amount of material to be excavated in cu
yards 1420
(includes both east and vast sides
NA b. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or cult'
rewire any excavation within:
_. Coastal Wetdaads - SAYS .-._ Other Wedal
If yes,.
(1) Length of area to be excavated
(2) Width of area to be excavated .?...?,
(3) Amount of material to be excavate"! In cu
yards
c. , Will the placement of the proposed bridge or rule
require any highground excavatioa?
_.I,_ Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated 90'!.
(2) Width of area to be txcavated 671
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in
yards zoo
Width of proposed cvJvert
h.' Height of the top of the proposed advert above the
NI WcrNWL
Will rho proposed culvert affect existing water flow?
_ Yes No
if yes, explain
d. If the placement of the bridge or advert invol
any excavation, please complete the followiag.
(1) Location of the spoil disposal area
ofgeite aoyxove?.land*z'_1/rl;?en
(2) Dimensions of Spoil disposal area Sit
vA
(3) Do you claim title to the disposal area?
Yea :t No
If ao, =26 a lest gr=ting permission ii
the owner.
!`!1/1/?l`T IrT/'. Vtl I 6InT I LJ1\1^11\I 1l Cl\]\]U I
Form DCM-M7-5
(4) Will the disposal area be available for future
maintenance? X Yes No
(5) Does the disposal area include any coastal
wetlands (marsh), SAVs, or other wetlands?
_ Y :s X No
if yes, give dimensions if different from (2)
above.
(6) Does the disposal area include any area below
the MHW or NWL? Yes X No
if yes,. give dimension if different from No. 2
above.
e. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed below
MHW or NWL? Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill
f. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
1A described in Item d. above) to be placed within:
_ Coastal Wetlands _. SAVs _ Other Wetlands
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in item d. above) to be placed on
highground? Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill
A. GEN-ER AL
a. Will the proposed project involve any mitigation?
Yes X No
if yes, explain in detail
the relocation of
Yes X No
b.
Will the proposed project require
any existing utility lines?
If yes, explain in detail
c. Will the proposed project require the construction of
any temporary detour structures?
Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
d. Will the proposed project require any work
channels? Yes X No
If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2
e. How will excavated or fill material be kept oa site
and erosion controlled? material will be
imediately loaded for offsite disposal.
f. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe or -hydraulic
dredge)*7 backhoe and other traditional
construction equipment
g. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment
to project site? Yes X No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
h. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any shoreline stabilization?
Yes X NO
If yes, explain in detail
Dismal Swamp Visitor Center
Appagpt or Project Name
Segnacure
_ > - 2-
Date
o-
w?
u? -
O'
a'
o?
?i
...... VIRGINIA _ _
y NORTH CAROLINA
71
z
Lu
w.
ou
<x
zE
cc
J <C
0

PURPOSE:
PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICLE
ACCESS ACROSS CANAL
Q -APPROX. 320 CU. YDS.
OF DREDGED MATERIAL
(D-APPROX. 1100 CU. YDS.
OF DREDGED MATERIAL
OVERALL CIVIL PLAN PROPOSED VEHICULAR & PED.
GRAPHIC SCALE: 1° = 80' BRIDGE & SCENIC OVERLOOK
IN: DISMAL SWAMP CANAL
DATUM: MSL 80 40 0 80 AT: DISMAL SWAMP
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: COUNTY OF: CAMDEN STATE: NC
1. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTH CAROLINA DIV. APPLICATION BY: NC DIV OF PARKS & REC.
2. U.S. GOVERNMENT SHEET 1 OF 12 DATE: 4-16-02
3. LEASED BY STATE OF NC OF PARKS AND RECREATION REV.: 5-6-03
UPLAND FILL AT
EASTERN APPROACH
= 100 CU. YDS,

LLu
?D z
U)
? Q
MATCHLINE A-A
? ?? o ( !? '15 R i I
I N ? I
i
I 'Il I 1 '.I -
i ?
i I
i
N
I
_ I
3
I
I
X\ \ \:
.\\ o
?? \ o
00
A A
1
I .,
i F• - I
I' 161.8 S 67'32'20 V! \ \ \ \ \I b 50I f
N
I 1 3: ? ?\\.? \ j I ; I
j K ! I \ \ \`\I I t o
I
Ili \ I
I,
I
'I
1-
i
1
i
\ r i I ,
y
1 I
IL6
I? i ? ;y I \ III ?ra?,
i Iin
I
of
1 I. ?
i r3
I \' Ki I ? J
1 9.5' I I "I' I N
h'
0
w ,
I J 29.9' 1 1 61.25 37.0
I i I
C EAR CANAL
FLOOD' OPENING II
1 ZONE C 246.67' N 67'29.29" E o
TIE LINE I FLOOD
I I 3? -APPROX. 320 CU. YDS. D -APPROX. 11100 CU. YDS. ZONE A
OF DREDGED MATERIAL OF DREDGED MATERIAL
PURPOSE: PLAN - NORTH PROPOSED VEHICULAR & PED.
PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICLE
ACCESS ACROSS CANAL GRAPHIC SCALE: 1" = 50' BRIDGE & SCENIC OVERLOOK
IN: DISMAL SWAMP CANAL
DATUM: MSL 50 25 0 50 AT: DISMAL SWAMP
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: COUNTY OF: CAMDEN STATE: NC
1. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTH CAROLINA DIV. APPLICATION BY: NC DIV. OF PARKS &. REC.
2. U.S. GOVERNMENT SHEET 2 OF 12 DATE: 4-16--02
3. LEASED BY STATE OF NC OF PARKS AND RECREATION REV.: 5-6-03

W' I I i
N . ?
N I ?' I
i
I I, II i
8?.1
--UE--U
a II i ? ? ?, ! ,a/
? I
246.67'
S Fr7'29'29" W I ?I Ii j
I
UT
I,!
I?
j
I,
e ? I
I' , I
'l l ? I
MATCHLINE A-A
Al
TIE LINE
200.0'±
158.57'±
JUN 0 2, 2003
>7,«AUAL 1,nAIVAGEN -NT

i it I
I

I i
i l l I II I
i

I
(
I
I
I
PURPOSE: PLAN - SOUTH PROPOSED VEHICULAR & PED.
PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICLE
ACCESS ACROSS CANAL
GRAPHIC
SCALE: 1" = 50'
BRIDGE & SCENIC OVERLOOK
IN: DISMAL SWAMP CANAL
DATUM: MSL 50 25 0 50 AT: DISMAL SWAMP
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: COUNTY OF: CAMDEN STATE: NC
1. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTH CAROLINA DIV. APPLICATION BY: NC DIV. OF PARKS & REC.
2. U.S. GOVERNMENT
3. LEASED BY STATE OF NC
OF PARKS
AND RECREATION SHEET 3 OF 12 DATE: 4-16-02
REV.: 5-6-03
r)
0
O
N
G`J
Lu
4u
?s
z
J
h
-H
M
co CL
P1---
FJ---
Q---I
rr -
1
1
-H
0
N
29' DREDGING
TO EL. =1.00
(TYP.)
PURPOSE:
PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICLE
ACCESS ACROSS CANAL
DATUM: MSL
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS:
1. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
2. LIS. GOVERNMENT
3. LEASED BY STATE OF NC

DREDGING LIMITS LINE
(TYP.)
I RLJI IAPED
EMBANKMENT
(TYP)

EXISTING ABANDONED
TIMBER BULKHEAD
TO BE REMOVED
1 (TYP)

I i{? I I ?

'I

I
I
I
I
I
I
?. I
PLAN OF DREDGING LIMITS
DREDGING LIMITS
GRAPHIC SCALE: 1" = 50'
mommmNIIIIIIIIII
50 25 0 50
NORTH CAROLINA DIV.
OF PARKS AND RECREATION
- TOE OF DREDGED
SLOPE (TYP.)
TOP OF DREDGED
SLOPE (TYP.)
PROPOSED VEHICULAR & PED.
BRIDGE & SCENIC OVERLOOK
IN: DISMAL SWAMP CANAL
AT: DISMAL SWAMP
COUNTY OF: CAMDEN STATE: NC
APPLICATION BY: NC DIV. OF PARKS & REC.
SHEET 4 OF 12 DATE: 4-16-02
REV.: 5-6-03
I
? I
M
O
0
c'V
G?

?U
L-J
1

W N
Z

N
w
W
W Ln O
Z
N
J
3 °
J
J J w
+
pp
O O¢ p J
Oww a
x
^
z ?
w
N Z
x W
a o

o ?'
a
Q
L
OJ J
W Q ?w p T z
p LWi W J
Onf p
I
J
N
Z Z
W W.-. a
p a
m CL m
OU Ln
n ?

L'i

BENT 4
.<

------- --. ------- -- ---
\
? \ \ \ \ \ - 1 \ ?'kENT\3\ \^ \

2
?
LL
L?- . L\ \ ?- ?
\
.
?

? (w?
J
W p
m z 7 O

2 I
2 r-
`

x ?
G ?
"+

15'

6"
W
o W
V
(BR GE
Q
?
J
---DISMAL SWAMP CMAL-_ wl rr1)

a a ? ?

9 I 3
a

=z .Y
N
?

/ ca c
o
O V
m J / J
w
I 4Z 1 7
-? I

- - - - - - - - - - - - -

I - I
---- -- --- --

I I
I
I
I I
..I I ,
x
I 1 3'-
Z
o 6' p. 6' 0„ m Y
I rvi I
I I 12' D" a Z 1O

7.5' 9 SPACES 0 10.0' CTS. cr W °
_
z a
o ?-
u d
- CONCRETE ANCHOR
-
W `
n
PURPOSE:
PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICLE
ACCESS ACROSS CANAL
DATUM: MSL
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS:
1. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
2. U.S. GOVERNMENT
3. LEASED BY STATE OF NC
STRUCTURAL PLAN
GRAPHIC SCALE: 1" = 30'
30 15 0 30
NORTH CAROLINA DIV.
OF PARKS AND RECREATION
_ _DISMAL SWAMP CANAL
- - - BOUNDARY -
--- ------------ -------
.
SHEET_P1L1=xtBlJ3?G NT 1

PROPOSED VEHICULAR & PED.
BRIDGE & SCENIC OVERLOOK
IN: DISMAL SWAMP CANAL
AT: DISMAL SWAMP
COUNTY OF: CAMDEN STATE: NC
APPLICATION BY: NC DIV. OF PARKS & REC.
SHEET 5 OF 12 DATE: 4-16-02
REV.: 5-6-03
c")
CD
C-n
N
Z
G.
U1
e3
ui
U C:'
ou
{n??
r,?
MATCHLINE 8-8 z
O
oQ
i
o a o v
?w am
O °
Q ° z w J
Z #o'l

13
?
m N Z
pm P ?O O
Q
? O O U ? ?
J
l mY- I ? Q °
d
Q
U ? O O
?J
OW

?, J w m
?
fit) b? 13
o w Q
}
w `t
o?
y °
i ? a
a a

°za ° ~ + 0
? 0
=
z
m Z N
^ Lo
3 a 4?i
l
'
I u?oo? ?`n
w
O

h r- ;
?a
ll?l
?
- /
r w L'i o
!- W W V
W CO CO O
}

Lc;
c? fu'
:{a
if w

Z O O w
CL
W
(n
O
O
O
w
UO

'
w
W
J
z In
?
Z(n Q-
N O

100
?
rtr _
CL
?awgz
??
7
A
j /
3 w
Q
¢ O w v ¢ ~
LLJ
o ?
?l ? O o¢ O? w ? w O?
CD M Lu Ce O ? K
^ ¢
N
w }
?
Z ¢
O' ¢ 7 F- O W
3
? w
2
? O
m i
° "
"w
rz 9
.
w_
z¢ m ?
F ?
C
n
or oh CD o ° 3
cnmm¢wwZm¢ ?O
z O. ??
`? wQ wcp.? w
N w wm0 Q L
w
?
+ ° ado vZ?
° w Zw ?W Z dmY - a
5
?o

QU ?O O°
° o0
222 m JCON Z °NU Nm
r-- O
Jin v°
?O?°
m
w W
a° Q O J
JNJCn?ma2wzZ
w
o
? a w F 0 w

J
= ?
CL
W

V) V7 O
z
- ?z
N rx
w3 _
J
w
007
cn60 W
O
X w ^ °
w3wW Lr) u 07aw
co o o ? w

o w --j -j w W ?
J-i F Q? 2 O
00
Q
O Q
r
w Z.-NM V Lf lbI-
o z
U O! Q
W
U
m
p UU
X
- .-.-._.-'-'-' - - - - p
? p W
w N Q

Of Z
o
?o a=
w
CL
a o ¢
o
i
0
PURPOSE:
PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICLE STRUCTURAL ELEVATION PROPOSED VEHICULAR & PED.
ACCESS ACROSS CANAL GRAPHIC SCALE: 1" = 15' BRIDGE & SCENIC OVERLOOK
IN: DISMAL SWAMP CANAL
DATUM: MSL 15 7.5 0 15 AT: DIS MAL SWAMP
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: COUNTY OF CAMDEN STATE: NC
:
1. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTH CARO LINA DIV. APPLICATION BY: NC DIV. OF PARKS & REC.
2. U.S. GOVERNMENT
T
T
F
OF PARKS AND
RECREA
TION SHEET 6 OF 12 DATE: 4-16-02
A
NC
3. LEASED BY S
E O REV.: 5-6-03
M
N
7
.es
c.?.a1
Gr.?
n.r
P?JI
?Y
in wo
Z 4
N
O
~ O C7
ry L7 J w
co
r z?
z
g
x
w
N
w
J d
_J
w (n ?
Y
m?
ni CL
z
o?
0
z
N co
x O
"> w r
} z r
p: w I
a m
zz
m +
d
o N
N a
QQQ21311
? M I
N
? 1-- N
2 T
w ?
m a,
+
._ N I
? N
z Y
v~-i co
O
06
+
N

z
0
z_
o?
N U
O K
z
Z 0
m 2
? ^OQi
CL
w
m
O
w O
m o0
0 0
z
?7- +
o
W
(=,j L17
PURPOSE:
PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICLE
ACCESS ACROSS CANAL
DATUM: MSL
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS:
1. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
2. U.S. GOVERNMENT
3. LEASED BY STATE OF NC
I CO o
W ? ? N
4a?u0
02v?iz w
n O co
h- ?
Q J W O
3 w w w z
N
Z r?
W
m N
a Z v
W
w
- - - _ o
0
O
of

- Z (V
EL.=8.0± m
1

M
? N

-Fpg;.73 N
m
W
O

?p p,,13 4 Z L
W r =
ri(
m `i
-72
U
;o
73 C.4
_ F-
z
W

U
$p
Z
w
o r 7
3
im
li a

w ? u
3 z
O
=
f
J N
w
cl?

z

N

r r
000 Q W
W 3 I w II
?¢ V U U
W Fw- .
J,n W
v w W
N
N
O
mm Xg XS
o Ir
of
a= ?
° a
$p 1, 73 Qo Qp
I
I O O
MATCHLINE B-B
STRUCTURAL ELEVATION
GRAPHIC SCALE: 1" = 15'
15 7.5 0 15
NORTH CAROLINA DIV.
OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PROPOSED VEHICULAR & PED.
BRIDGE & SCENIC OVERLOOK
IN: DISMAL SWAMP CANAL
AT: DISMAL SWAMP
COUNTY OF: CAMDEN STATE: NC
APPLICATION BY: NC DIV. OF PARKS & REC.
SHEET 7 OF 12 DATE: 4-16-02
REV.: 5-6-03
O
N
;j
J I
a
(W?
G
MATCHLINE C-C
N w
I I
o I I
I I
uj -t7
I
? I 1
•ct = ? ? rz c?
,.
F- I w m ~S C]
32 om
? `F I
?
I boc
W
u.? I 1
Qq 1
I
( 1
i
w 1
? z
1 w Q
1
mc b 2'-791 \ m?°?
Fo w
uj -
W
= o T- %4"
m
i ?
- I
I
cx
w
J En
?I J
t, u
l
?a
o?
PURPOSE: FENDER SYSTEM PLAN PROPOSED VEHICULAR & PED.
PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICLE
ACCESS ACROSS CANAL GRAPHIC, SCALE: 1" = 10' BRIDGE & SCENIC OVERLOOK
INNIIIIII!l IN: DISMAL SWAMP CANAL
DATUM: MSL 10 5 0 10 AT: DISMAL SWAMP
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: COUNTY OF: CAMDEN STATE: NC
1. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTH CAROLINA DIV. APPLICATION BY: NC DIV. OF PARKS & REC.
2. LI S. 3. LEASED BY GOVERNMENT
OF NC OF PARKS AND RECREATION SHEET 8 OF 12 DATE: 4-16-02
REV.: 5-E-03
M
O
C>
Cpl
71.1
eR
ti ?:
"lip
LJ
L
a?
J
M1U
ell
KW?
W co
4i.1 !n ?O3 `
W
d'
2? \? I
6 a
O
I K
W
S
q o
I0
J
n
4 I
.n
> 5'i
I -
oz .r
4 ?G
~ w
- ^J
a
4
_Z z
a
N ?
q
I
W I
f
0o
Till
IN I
MATCHLINE C-C
PURPOSE: FENDER SYSTEM PLAN PROPOSED VEHICULAR (Sc PED.
PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICLE
ACCESS ACROSS CANAL GRAPHIC SCALE: 'I° = 10' BRIDGE & SCENIC OVERLOOK
IN: DISMAL SWAMP CANAL
DATUM: MSL 10 5 0 10 AT: DISMAL SWAMP
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: COUNTY OF: CAMDEN STATE: NC
1. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTH CAROLINA DIV. APPLICATION BY: NC DIV. OF PARK, & REC.
2. U.S. GOVERNMENT SHEET 9 OF 12 DATE: 4-16-02
3. LEASED BY STATE OF NC OF PARKS AND RECREATION REV.: 5-6-03
c
VJ
C.J
.r:
z
c^'7
0
N
.l
r"
1
UI
(:J
,c
'C(
n

PURPOSE:
PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICLE
ACCESS ACROSS CANAL
DATUM: MSL
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS:
1. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
2. U.S. GOVERNMENT
3. LEASED BY STATE OF NC
FENDER SYSTEM ELEV. PROPOSED VEHICULAR & PED.
GRAPHIC SCALE: 1" = 10' BRIDGE & SCENIC OVERLOOK
IN: DISMAL SWAMP CANAL
10 5 0 10 AT: DISMAL SWAMP
COUNTY OF: CAMDEN STATE: NC
NORTH CAROLINA DIV. APPLICATION BY: NC DIV. OF PARKS & REC.
OF PARKS AND RECREATION SHEET 10 OF 12 DATE: 4-16-02
REV.: 5-6-03
6
L, 11
C' 7 r
C"J LLI
C)
j cn
? d1
c
gj?? I
u
`15e? fa38
IV If111.11LIIYL V-V
PURPOSE: FENDER SYSTEM ELEV. PROPOSED VEHICULAR & PED.
PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICLE
ACCESS ACROSS CANAL
GRAPHIC SCALE: 1" =
10'
BRIDGE & SCENIC OVERLOOK
Moool
IN: DISMAL SWAMP CANAL
DATUM: MSL 10 5 0 10 AT: DISMAL SWAMP
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: COUNTY OF: CAMDEN STATE: NC
1. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTH CAROLINA DIV APPLICATION BY: NC DIV. OF PARKS & REC.
2. U.S. GOVERNMENT
3. LEASED BY STATE OF NC
OF PARKS .
AND RECREATION SHEET 11 OF 12 DATE: 4-16-02
REV.: 5-6-03

a
EL. = 15.38

S.'.r
C7 l:1
G) it
r.?, ate..

TURNS 1 "0 GALV.
RE ROPE EACH TURN
APLED TO EACH PILE.
OPOSED DREDGED
;ANAL LINE
EL. = 15.38
TURNS 1"o GALV.
RE ROPE EACH TURN
APLED TO EACH PILE.
3-PILE CLUSTER
PROPOSED DREDGED
CANAL LINE
ISOLATED 7-PILE CLUSTER
PURPOSE: FENDER SYSTEM ELEV. PROPOSED VEHICULAR & PED.
PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICLE
ACCESS ACROSS CANAL
GRAPHIC SCALE: 1" =• 5'
BRIDGE & SCENIC OVERLOOK
IN: DISMAL SWAMP CANAL
DATUM: MSL 5 2.5 0 5 AT: DISMAL SWAMP
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: COUNTY OF: CAMDEN STATE: NC
I, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTH CAROLINA DIV APPLICATION BY: NC DIV. OF PARKS & REC.
2, U.S. GOVERNMENT 3 LEASED BY STATE OF NC OF PARKS .
AND RECREATION SHEET 12 OF 12 DATE: -16-02
REV.: 5-6-03
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney
Non-Discharge Branch
Regional Contact: tom steffens
WQ Supervisor: Roger Thorpe
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name NC Parks & Rec US 17 Visitors Center
Project Number 02 1650
Recvd From DCM
Received Date 10/14/02 Recvd By Region
Project Type visitors center
County Camden
County2
Region Washington
Certificates Stream Stream Impacts (ft.)
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req. ME
LAMA Waters O YO N ? 30-3-2 WSIV 5w 30,150. 3.29
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? 0 Y 0 N Did you request more Info? 0 Y 0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? 0 Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? 0 Y O N Recommendation: 0 Issue 0 Issue/Coed 0 Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) Longitude (ddmmss)
Comments:
Hold-Incomplete LAMA Maj application. Applicant does not have right-of-way agreements, or own
property on which activity is applied for.
Issue n/c for mods to bents 3/4
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
o0? \ NA
r?9pc
0) r
> -f
January 21, 2003
DWQ# 02-1650
Camden County
Mr. Brian Strong
NC Division of Parks and Recreation
Dismal Swamp State Natural Area
1615 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC, 27699-1615
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Condition
Dear Mr. Strong:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions, to dredge, fill, shade and/or cover 0.28 acre of Public Trust
Waters and Public Trust Shoreline in order to construct a visitor's center on US 17 in Camden County, as described in your application
received complete by the Division of Water Quality on November 26, 2002. After reviewing your application, we have determined that this
fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Number 3371, which can be downloaded from our web site at
htto://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands . This Certification allows you to use your CAMA Permit when issued by the INC Division of Coastal
Management. In addition, you should get any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not
limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge, Water Supply Watershed and U.S. Coast Guard regulations. Also this approval
will expire when the accompanying CAMA Permit expires unless otherwise specified in the General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your project, you
must notify us in writing and you may be required to send us a new application for a new certification. If the property is sold, the new
owner must be given a copy of the Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total
wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC
2H .0506 (h). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification and the additional conditions
listed below:
1. You are required to return the attached Certification of Completion form to notify DWQ when all work included in the 401
Certification has been completed;
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60
days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition conforming to Chapter 150B of the North
Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This
certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you have any
questions, please telephone Tom Steffens in our Washington Regional Office at [phone] or Cyndi Karoly in our Central Office in
Raleigh at [phone].
AW K/cbk
Attachments
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Sincerely,
Pn Klimek, P.E.
cc: Corps of Engineers Washington Field Office
Washington DWQ Regional Office
Central Files
File Copy
021650
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 [phone]
. #a
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748

Y.]
IN REPLY REFER TO
Regulatory Division
March 18, 2003
Action ID No. 200310032 and State Permit No. 27-03
'011039 AJ17bnb831bM
Ndb
4089 1 oL
Mr. Brian L. Strong
North Carolina Division of Parks
and Recreation
1615 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1615
Dear Mr. Strong:
Reference your application for a Department of the Army (DA) permit to construct a floating
bridge across the Dismal Swamp Canal to provide access to a proposed 5,000 square foot visitor
center and associated facilities, on property located off the west side of U.S. Highway 17, south
of the Virginia State Line, in Camden County, North Carolina.
Your proposal has been reviewed and found to be consistent with the provisions and
objectives of General Permit No. 198000291. Therefore, you may commence construction
activity in strict accordance with applicable State authorization and the approved plan. Failure
to comply with the State authorization or conditions of the general permit could result in civil
and/or administrative penalties.
If any change in your work is required because of unforeseen or altered conditions or for any
other reason, plans revised to show the change must be sent promptly to this office and the North
Carolina Division of Coastal Management prior to performing any such change or alteration.
Such action is necessary as revised plans must be reviewed and the authorization modified.
Questions or comments may be addressed to Mr. Raleigh Bland, Washington Field Office,
Regulatory Division, telephone [phone], extension 23.
Sincerely,
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Washington Regulatory Field Office
F.O. Box 1000
Washington, North Carolina 27889-1000
? "'Q t4
Raleigh Bland, P.W.S.
Regulatory Project Manager

-2-
Copies Furnished:
Mr. John Dorney
D' ision of Environmental Management
?th Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Mr. Ronald J. Mikulak, Chief
Wetlands Regulatory Section
Water Management Division
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
61 Forsyth Street, SW
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
Mr. Doug Huggett
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
1638 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638
Mr. Garland B. Pardue
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Fish and Wildlife Enhancement
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
Mr. Ron Sechler
National Marine Fisheries Service
Pivers Island
Beaufort, North Carolina 28516
-3-
Mr. David Rackley
NMFS, Habitat Conservation Division
219 Fort Johnson Road
Charleston, South Carolina 29412-9110
Mr. Ted Sampson, District Manager
Elizabeth City Regional Office
North Carolina Division of Coastal Management
1367 US 17 South
Elizabeth City, North Carolina 27909
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: NC Division of Parks and Recreation,- Visitors Center US 17 - Camden
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: West of US 17 in Camden County adjacent to the Dismal Swamp
Canal
Photo Index - 2000: N/A 1995: N/A 1989: N/A 1984: N/A 1978: N/A
State Plane Coordinates - X: 2629600 Y: 1017500
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - 06/27/02
Was Applicant Present - Yes
5 PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received - 09/30/02 Incomplete pending
easement/encroachment agreements
Office - Elizabeth City
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan - Camden
Land Classification From LUP - Conservation
(B) AEC(s) Involved: PTS, PTW
(C) Water Dependent: Yes
(D) Intended Use: Public
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing - None
Planned - On-site septic system
(F) Type of Structures: Existing - None
Planned - Floating bridge, bulkhead, visitors center, parking lot,
storage building, canoe launch, septic system
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: N/A
Source - N/A
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION: [AREA]
T-IrPH aerl Fi 11 Prl Otlh Pr
(A)Public Trust Waters Shaded 1,600 sq.ft.
Shallow Water Habitat 8,125 1,440
(B) Public Trust Shoreline
1 Impervious coverage
1.269 aft.
(C) Highground Disturbed
130,680
(D) Total Area Disturbed: 143,114 sq. ft. (3.29 acres)
(E) Primary Nursery Area: No
(F) Water Classification: WS-IVSW Open: N/A
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant proposes to construct a floating bridge within the Dismal
Swamp Canal, a 5,000 square-foot visitors center, storage building, parking lot for 40 cars, bulkhead,
canoe launch, 400' long asphalt drive and 3,000 gallon septic system.
NC Division of Parks & Recreation - Camden County
Field Investigation Report
Page Two
Prplect Setting
The State of North Carolina owns the 14,400 acre Dismal Swamp State Natural Area
located west of US Highway 17 in Camden County. The area is bordered on the east by the
Dismal Swamp Canal, on the north by Virginia and the National Wildlife Refuge, and on the
west and south by farmland. Development potential in most of the natural area is severely
limited by the presence of peat/muck soils. The NCDPR proposes to construct a visitors
center within a highly disturbed treed berm located along the west bank of the canal. Visitors
would park in a new lot proposed south of NCDOT's existing welcome center and access the
west bank visitor center via a floating swing bridge proposed within the canal. To access the
site turn west off US Highway 17 into the NCDOT Welcome Center located one mile north of
the US Highway 17/Culpepper Road (SR 1233) intersection.
The size of the site located east of the canal is approximately 1 Y4 acres with an elevation
ranging 13' - 18' above mean sea level. A 20' wide x 660' long section of pavement (old
abandoned US 17) lies approximately 80' from the eastern side of the canal. The portion of
the site located west of the canal is approximately 3 acres in area with an elevation ranging 17'
- 28' above mean sea level. A berm located 30' - 100' from the western bank of the canal
ranges 20' - 26' above MSL. A 15' wide path parallels the canal and lies 80' from the canal.
No wetlands are located within the site.
Approximately 2/3 of the area proposed for development is owned either by the NC
Department of Transportation or the US Army Corps of Engineers. Although the Division of
Parks and Recreation has been negotiating an encroachment agreement with NCDOT and a
lease agreement with the USACOE, the agreements have not been finalized as of this date.
The abutting property to the north and east has been developed by NCDOT with a 1500
square-foot Welcome Center, restrooms, 30 parking spaces, picnic tables, and a 10' x 150'
shore parallel dock. No development has been carried out on the abutting property to the
south.
The waters of the Dismal Swamp Canal in the vicinity of the project are classified as
WS-IV Sw by the NC Environmental Management Commission. These waters are classified as
Inland Waters by the NC Marine Fisheries Commission and NC Wildlife Resources
Commission and as Public Trust Waters by the NC Coastal Resources Commission. Water
depths in the project area (in the center of the canal) measure 9.5' below Normal Water Level.
The presence of submerged aquatic vegetation was not noted in the vicinity of the project.
Review of available information suggests that there are no known archeological sites or
geological formations associated with the site. However, the canal itself has been placed in the
National Register of Historic Places and has been designated as a National Civil Engineering
Landmark, being surveyed by George Washington in the 1700s and dug completely by hand,
mostly with slave labor, between the years of 1793 to 1805. The potential for discovery of
1
NC Division of Parks & Recreation - Camden County
Field Investigation Report
Page Three
historic and archeological artifacts during any land disturbing activity is significant. The canal
has served continuously since that time as an important commercial and recreational interstate
waterway linking the Chesapeake Bay with the Albemarle and Pamlico Sounds, connecting the
states of Virginia and North Carolina.
Within the canal the applicant proposes the following development:
. A 151/2' x 771/2' steel floating swing bridge which will allow 531/2' of horizontal
clearance when the bridge is open to boat traffic.
• Dredge 1,100 cubic yards of material from an 8,125 square-foot area where the bridge is
proposed and truck the material off-site.
• A 110' long fender system with 12" diameter wooden pilings and 10" x 10" walers 3'
from the waterward end of the open swing bridge.
• A 12' x 28' pier with 3 bents such that the waterward end would lie 3' from the west
side of the fender system.
• At the waterward end of the pier an 11' hydraulic bascule ramp to overlap the fender
system and connect the pier and floating bridge.
• Approximately 103 linear feet of steel sheet pile bulkhead with concrete cap a maximum
distance of 5' waterward of NWL and average distance of 1' waterward. Twenty (20)
cubic yards of material would be placed landward of the bulkhead.
• Telephone, electric, and water service lines a minimum of 5.5' below the canal bottom
via a 200' long directional bore.
On the east side of the canal the applicant proposes to:
. Construct a 15' x 550' paved lot to accommodate 40 cars and 2 buses.
• Construct a 12' x 50' canoe launch immediately north of the proposed bridge.
• Provide access to the new bridge by constructing a 12' x 50' asphalt drive from the new
lot to the bridge. The eastern approach would be leveled using the 100 cubic yards of
material removed from the launch area.
NC Division of Parks & Recreation - Camden County
Field Investigation Report
Page Four
. Repave 600 linear feet of the old 20' wide roadway which was abandoned when US 17
was relocated to the east.
. Construct a 5' x 330' long concrete sidewalk.
• Place eleven 2' x 5' concrete anchors and tie-back rods three feet below grade and 32'
landward of the 103' long sheet pile bulkhead.
On the west side of the canal the applicant proposes to construct the following:
. A 5,000 square-foot visitors center.
• An 800 square-foot storage building.
. A 3,000 gallon septic tank and 4,000 square-foot drainfield.
. A 12' x 400' long asphalt drive and 700 square-foot turnaround.
. An 8' x 310' long boardwalk and 12' x 12' observation deck.
. A 10' x 50' gravel drive.
• A 6' x 400' long sidewalk surfaced with screenings.
• The construction of the floating bridge will restrict horizontal clearance to 531/2' feet
(1/2 the width of the canal) when it opens to vessel traffic.
A major impact of this project is on navigation within this canal. The proposed
development would reduce the navigable width of the canal by approximately 50%, a
significant alteration. This would result in an additional bottleneck in a lock and dam
canal system, and brings with it concerns for safe passage of meeting vessels at this
point. All future possible use of this canal for vessel transit between Chesapeake Bay
and the Albemarle Sound would be subject to the limiting features of this proposed
development. A further navigation-related impact involves the potential for closing of
the canal in its entirety to vessel transit if the floating bridge design fails in the closed
position due to low water, lack of maintenance, or vessel collision.
NC Division of Parks & Recreation - Camden County
Field Investigation Report
Page Five
. The dredging of 1,100 cubic yards of material from an 8,125 square-foot area will
disturb 8,125 square-feet of Public Trust Water and Shallow Water Habitat.
. When open to vessels the bridge, pier and ramp will shade 1,600 square-feet of public
trust waters.
. In the closed position the floating bridge will occupy 1,440 square feet of public trust
waters.
. The construction of a paved bridge approach, off ramp and the construction of a canoe
access, 12' x 12' gazebo, and 6' wide trail will result in a total impervious surface
coverage of 1,269 square-feet within the 40,200 square-foot public trust shoreline
AEC. Resultant coverage equals 3 %. The gazebo and trail are not water dependent.
• The disturbance of 130,680 square-feet of highground will occur as a result of this
project.
Submitted by: M. Edward Harrell
Date: October 4, 2002
?lphA ? vmeyn ?rorrp,l?C
Consulting Engineers
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT NARRATIVE
NCDENR - DIVISION OF PARKS RECREATION y
Dismal Swamp Visitor Center
Code: 49816 Item# 4862 ID# 4398164862A
February 16, 2001
Site Design Considerations
The site design consists of the earthwork, site utilities and pavements. The existing natural grade
has been cut down to an elevation of approximately 22.5 immediately beneath and around the
visitor center providing a finished floor elevation of 26.5. The four (4) feet of vertical clearance
provides enough room under the structure to allow the necessary framing to occur and to allow
for the workmen to install the sheathing to the framing. The vertical clearance also provides for
the aesthetics of a building located in a swamp. The soil material that is cut on the western side of
the canal can be used on the eastern side as fill pending the outcome of the geotechnical
investigation. The earthwork is currently balanced thus not requiring any borrow or wasting on
the project site. Approximately 3.3 acres are disturbed on the project site. Erosion control
measures will be designed in accordance with the state regulations and with special attention to
the Public Trust Shoreline on each side of the canal.
The drive entering the project site on the western shore gently rises at a 4 percent grade up to
natural grade and then continues around to the rear of the visitor center. This drive provides
vehicular access to the visitor center for staff and a place has been indicated for the staff to park.
The paved drive joins the existing soil road and the soil road will be used for access to the
maintenance building.
The site utilities are continuing to be a challenge to find an economical solution to provide service
to the visitor center. The sanitary system consists of a four (4) inch PVC outfall line from the
building to a below ground septic tank. The effluent will continue on to the dosing tank and then
be pumped with a single phase, t/2 horsepower pump to the pressure manifold to be distributed to
the nitrification field. Mr. Tim Peoples, Camden County Sanitarian, has been notified of the
tentative site location and is conducting his field investigation at the time of this narrative. The
septic system has been designed for 1500 gpd flow rate. We assumed an acceptance rate of 0.4
gpd/sf as provided by Tim Peoples. These assumptions may be revised once the sanitarian
completes his investigation.
pA99000\99060\docs\report\dd overall narr2-15.doc
3100 Spring Forest Road ? Suite 120 ? Raleigh, NC 27616
Phone: [phone] ? Fax:[phone]
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT NARRATIVE
Dismal Swamp Visitor Center
The water service, electrical power, and the telephone service will be advanced across the canal
by means of a single directional bore. The water service will be carried in a polyethylene plastic
pipe under the canal with sufficient cover to prevent any vessel anchor or dredging equipment
from snagging the waterline. The electrical power and the telephone will be together in a single
polyethylene plastic pipe and there will be one spare polyethylene plastic pipe installed for future
use. The remaining sections of the waterline will be PVC Pipe and connected to the polyethylene
pipe with ductile iron pipe sleeves. This material change is an effort to keep project costs more
economical.
The available water pressure in the existing four (4) inch main that supplies the NCDOT Welcome.
Center is only 44 psi as reported by the Camden County Utility Department. Given this low
available pressure, a booster pump and pressure storage tank are needed to provide the necessary
pressure at the visitor center to operate the flush valve fixtures. This apparatus has been indicated
on the design development plans, located inside the maintenance area.
The telephone service will be extended from the existing telephone hub located on the NCDOT
Welcome Center property.
The electrical power service will be taken underground from an existing service pole to a pad-
mounted transformer located on the west side of the canal.
Building Design Considerations - Architectural
The design concept of the Visitor's Center was generated from several considerations.
1. The first relates to the function of the center - what will be the major purpose - especially as
it relates to the public? We see the Center's primary purpose being that of a catalyst to inspire
people to explore and learn more about the Great Dismal Swamp. We also see it as a "service
center" for users of the swamp.
The progression that a visitor takes is important. We designed the path from the parking area
to the center to take advantage of the water feature provided by the Dismal Swamp Canal -
first by crossing the bridge and then by providing vistas of the waterway from the overlook
structure and the elevated walkway. The decks and the glass areas help to "bring the outside
in" and remind the visitor of where he is.
The arrangement of spaces within the center give the staff visual control of entrances,
exhibition, and auditorium spaces as well as the restroom areas which can be opened to the
outside without opening the entire center. The superintendent's office allows that person to
always be aware of approaching visitors. The location of the classroom allows for activities to
"spill over" onto an outside deck. The classroom area can also be opened separate from the
main center.
Page 2 of 9
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT NARRATIVE
Dismal Swamp Visitor Center
2. The second design consideration relates to imagery. Our original scheme borrowed from the
forms found in the "coastal architecture" found in the region. After further thought we have
modified the forms to reflect more of the buildings one would find further inland along the
rivers and swamps. The building has various wings that retain the image of a "group" of
buildings. This configuration also keeps the massing at a smaller scale and allows for every
area to have a connection to the outside. The pilings, wood siding, metal roof, and decks give
the building an appearance and feeling, which are appropriate to the area.
3. Environmental concerns were a factor in the selection in some of the major construction
material. Wood framing and siding have obvious environmental advantages as well as being
important to the area's history. Metal roofing is one of the most environmentally sound
materials available. The decking is made of a combination of recycled materials, which not
only provided dimensional stability, important for walking surfaces, but also is maintenance
free.
Building Design Considerations - Structural
The Visitor Center will be traditional platform construction consisting of a wood frame building
with pre-manufactured roof trusses on a timber post pile foundation. The pile foundation was
selected based on the limited access to the site during the construction phase of the project. The
travel distance and time for chute delivered concrete are considered excessive and pumping of
foundation concrete would be costly. The timber pile and wood frame construction used on this
project are common for the area and the resources are local to the project.
The foundation posts will be 12" x 12" piles driven to an anticipated depth of 25 to 35 feet. The
finish floor will be a minimum of 4 feet above the surrounding ground to allow access to the
underside of the floor system for construction and maintenance needs. The floor framing system
consists of 2x12 joists and engineered wood girders. The girders will be treated with wood
preservative since they will be exposed to the weather. The underside of the framing will be
sheathed with exterior grade plywood to protect the floor system and insulation from weather and
insect/animal infestation. Wood species used for the floor framing will be Southern Yellow Pine
(Grade 1) for the joists and dimensional lumber and Douglas Fir/Southern Yellow Pine for the
engineered wood products. Galvanized steel plates at the pile/girder connections and metal joist
hangers at the joists/girder connections will resist up-lift forces applied to the floor system. The
sub-floor will be 1-1/4" plywood or 1x6 dimensional lumber.
The wall system will be constructed from dimensional lumber. The exterior walls and interior
load bearing walls will use 2x6 wood studs and other interior walls will use 2x4 wood studs.
Headers and lintels in the walls will be constructed of plywood flitch beams or laminated veneer
lumber. Lateral loads from wind and seismic loads will be resisted by the exterior walls. Exterior
walls will be sheathed with 5/8-inch structural plywood. Additional lateral resistance will be
Page 3 of 9
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT NARRATIVE
Dismal Swamp Visitor Center
provided by the gypsum sheathed interior walls where required. All dimensional lumber used for
wall framing will be Spruce-Pine-Fir (Grade 2). Steel straps will be used to resist up-lift forces
between the walls and floor system.
The roof system will consist of a mix of pre-manufactured wood trusses, exposed site-built timber
trusses and dimensional lumber rafters. Exposed timber trusses will be used in the lobby area with
3x6 tongue and groove decking. Insulation and a 5/8-inch plywood surface will be attached to
the decking for attaching the metal roofing. The pre-manufactured trusses and dimensional
lumber will be sheathed with a span-rated wood product and metal roofing. Steel straps will be
used to attach the roof system to the walls and resist up-lift forces.
Boardwalk and Decks
Exterior decks and boardwalks will be constructed of an engineered material that is a combination
of recycled wood and plastic and dimensional lumber. The engineered material will be used for
the decking only. The engineered decking provides an almost zero maintenance feature. The
product will not split, splinter, warp or decay like conventional wood. The engineered product is
highly resistant to marine borers and wood boring insects. The product will fade to a light
driftwood gray color over a short period of time in moist environments and a light brown in hot,
dry climates. The product can also be painted or stained if preferred. As with most wood
products this engineered product can be cleaned with typical deck cleaning products. The
product meets or exceeds all A.D.A. standards for non-slip walking surfaces. The product carries
a ten (10) year warranty.
Deck framing adjacent to the building will be supported on 12x12 timber posts similar to the
building foundation. Smaller areas will be supported on 6x6 wood posts with concrete footings.
Girders for the deck frame will be engineered wood and 12x12 timber. Joists will be 2x12
lumber. The boardwalk adjacent to the canal will be supported on a single 12x12 timber post
with a 12x12 timber cap. Joists will also be 2x12 lumber. Deck railing will be galvanized steel
pipe and wire grid. The boardwalk will also include lighting fixtures mounted to 6x6 wood posts
along its length.
Bridge
In order to provide easy and timely access to the new Visitor Center, a bridge will be constructed
to allow pedestrians to cross the Dismal Swamp Canal. Four alternatives have been considered as
alternatives for this structure: a floatation bridge, a lift-span bridge, a bascule bridge and a swing-
span bridge. The floatation and swing-span bridges have previously received formal review and
the swing-span bridge was chosen for the crossing.
Page 4 of 9
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT NARRATIVE
Dismal Swamp Visitor Center
Consideration was given for feasibility, initial cost, maintenance cost, appearance and safety for
each of the four alternatives. The floatation bridge provides good initial and maintenance cost
while providing a pleasing appearance that works well with the surroundings; however, the
floatation bridge was not chosen because of its lack of functionality during periods of drought. A
lift-span bridge was considered for the crossing and has a comparable initial cost to the swing-
span option. The vertical clearance requirement for the crossing is 65 feet and would require two
70-foot tall towers to be built to lift the bridge to the required clearance. This bridge type would
require twice the equipment and a more sophisticated control system to operate. The resulting
bridge would have higher maintenance cost. Also, the two towers and elevated bridge deck
would provide an undesirable appearance and safety concerns due to their bulky size and the
weight of the bridge while in the open (to boat traffic) position. The bascule bridge is a similar
type of bridge currently used elsewhere over the canal. An estimate of probable costs shows the
bascule bridge to be 12% higher in initial cost than the swing-span bridge. The bascule bridge
would require heavier, more sophisticated equipment to address the higher load of the draw span
and the safety concerns associated with the inclined span.
A swing-span bridge should provide the best compromise between initial cost, maintenance cost,
appearance and safety. The bridge will consist of a long forward span with a counterweighted
back span. The girders will be supported along their length by steel stays that are supported by a
center tower. The tower and both spans will rotate from the open position (to boat traffic) to the
closed position and return on a sealed ball bearing with a gear driven slew ring. The structure will
be supported by a 6-foot diameter drilled pier and protected by a timber pile fender system. The
bridge will bear on two concrete abutments on each bank while in the closed position and will
bear on two concrete caps while in the open position. Both abutments and caps will be supported
by a timber pile foundation. The movement of the bridge structure will be accomplished by
electric motors. Hydraulic motors and actuators have been considered; however, the
contamination that would result from a leak in the system or inundation due to flooding. precludes
their use. Consideration should also be made for bridge operation during a primary,power failure.
Some type of backup system will be employed to ensure the operation of the bridge for several
cycles to allow for evacuation of the Visitor Center and opening the bridge after evacuation to
clear the canal. The use of AC motors would require the installation of a generator station for
backup power to operate the bridge mechanism. The generator may also offset the current lack of
three-phase power at the site. If three-phase electric service is required for the bridge motors, the
system could run solely on the generator instead of bringing it to the site. Another option is the
use of a DC power system. The bridge motors could be DC type and run off of a series of
batteries that could be charged by the single-phase power existing at the site. This system would
also provide the required additional run time required for evacuation in the event of a power
failure.
The bridge superstructure will be constructed of weathering steel which can be left unpainted and
exposed to the weather; however, the steel could be painted or powder coated to improve its
appearance and provide a more integrated finish with the adjacent Visitor Center. The primary
girders will be constructed of tubular steel with bolted field splices. Transverse beams and
Page 5 of 9
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT NARRATIVE
Dismal Swamp Visitor Center
stringers will be wide flange steel sections with a timber deck. The center tower will stand 25 feet
above the bridge deck surface and will be constructed from tubular steel and steel rods. The stays
will be steel rods. Detailing of the bridge structure will include extensive fatigue evaluation and
consideration for the non-redundant nature of this structure type. Connections and fabrication
procedures will be chosen based on their resistance to fatigue failure and ductility. A timber curb
will be used to constrain vehicular traffic on the bridge. The rail used will be the same rail used at
the Visitor Center with a 12-inch vertical extension required for bicycle traffic. This rail will be
adequate due to the low speeds of the vehicular traffic.
The bridge opening cycle is anticipated to be approximately one (1) minute. Gates and signaling
lights will be provided at each approach. Bollards could be provided to limit vehicle access to the
bridge and could be manually or mechanically actuated. Signage will be provided for the bridge
providing information on the vertical and horizontal clearances, one lane bridge warning, and any
load posting that might be required. Current design data is for HS20-44 loading that will not
require posting and will allow passage of all vehicles at legal road weight.
Page 6 of 9
PLUMBING
The General Contractor will extend water service from the 6" main located at the intersection of
HWY 17 and S.R. 1231, and provide a booster station upstream of the NCDoT facility. The booster
station will provide approximately 65 psi at the Dismal Swamp Visitor's Center. The General
Contractor will extend the water service to within 5 feet of the building.
The Plumbing Contractor will extend domestic water into the building at the housekeeping service
closet in the vicinity of the public toilet rooms. A double check or reduced pressure zone type
backflow preventer will be located at the service entry along with the main water shutoff valve for
the building. Domestic water shall be Type K below grade, and shall be Type L above grade.
Water piping will be insulated with preformed fiberglass insulation with an all service jacket.
Where exposed in mechanical rooms, the insulation will be covered with 8-oz canvas jacketing with
a pasted finish. Water piping outside the building's thermal envelope and subject to freezing, if any
(such as that possibly occurring between the public toilets and the main building) will be protected
with electric heat tracing. If possible, routing water piping outside the thermal envelope will be
avoided.
DWV piping shall be cast iron. Sewer will be routed to a point approximately 5 feet outside the
building, from which point it will be extended to a pumping station and septic field provided in the
General Contract. Drains from the water heater T&P valves will be Type L copper.
Plumbing fixtures will include urinals and floor mounted water closets with flush valves, vitrous
china countertop lavatories, electric water coolers, and an upright service sink. Flushing fixtures
shall be water saving type, 1.6 gallon per flush for water closets and 1.0 gallon per flush for urinals.
Lavatory fittings will be of the metering type, limited to 0.25 gallons/cycle. NCDENR should
indicate whether there is a preference for the use of motion sensor type actuators for the water closet
and urinal flush valves and lavatory fittings. At this time, standard flushing fixtures and metering
faucets are specified. Fixtures will be set at heights suitable to meet NC State Building
(Accessibility) Code and ADA. An electric water heater (storage type) will be placed in the vicinity
of the public toilet rooms. Use of a propane gas fired water was ruled out as too expensive to
operate and to install, Consideration was given to circulating hot water from a central water heater,
however, a small electric storage water heater has been selected. The water heater, will be located
on a wall stand in the storage room behind the staff toilet, and will require minimal maintenance.
This eliminates the need for a circulation pump and associated piping. One freeze resistant wall
hydrant will be provided on each exterior exposure (main building). Wall hydrants with removable
keys will be used in the toilet rooms in lieu of trap primers for floor drains. Typically, toilet room
wall hydrants (hose bibs) will be located in the ADA water closet stall to provide easy access. They
are rather inaccessible and difficult to use if tucked under a lavatory.
MECHANICAL
Public toilet rooms will be mechanically ventilated at a rate of 2 cfin per square foot.
Split system heat pumps have been selected to provide zoning of the various areas, including the
auditorium, classroom, exhibition, main lobby and staff work areas. Units serving spaces that
require outside air for good indoor air quality will be equipped with humidistats and electric reheat
Design Development Narrative: NCDENR-Division of Parks 6 Recreation Dismal Swamp Visitor's Center r? /ES Engineers
February 15, 2001 Page 7 of 9
coils to control humidity. The humidistat will bring on the electric heat to provide a "false" load,
thereby ensuring the cooling cycle runs sufficiently long to remove the excess moisture from the
space.
Air handlers are located in the main mechanical room and in the storage room behind the staff
toilet. This allows ductwork to be concealed everywhere, with the exception of the run serving the
main lobby. The exposed duct will be spiral duct with linear diffusers, all painted to blend in with
the natural wooden structure.
ELECTRICAL
Electric service is available south of the proposed sites along HWY 17 through Albemarle Electric
Membership Corporation. A 7200v, 1-phase overhead service to the DOT Welcome Center
presently crosses the parking area planned for this facility.
It is recommended the overhead service be replaced with an underground service beginning at a
point south of the parking area to the DOT Welcome Center. Albemarle Electric has indicated the
overhead service can be placed underground, however, they will pass along the installation and
overhead service removal cost to NCDENR. Albemarle Electric has indicated this work will cost in
the range of $8,000.
An underwater crossing will extend utility service from the service feeding the DOT Welcome
Center, and a pad mounted transformer set on the west side of the canal adjacent to the Visitor's
Center. The crossing will be subject to review and approval by the Corp of Engineers. Albemarle
Electric Membership Corporation has indicated the swamp crossing would be subcontracted, and
the cost passed along to NCDENR. This cost cannot be accurately determined until subcontractors
proposals are received by Albemarle Electric. However, in preliminary discussions, Albemarle
Electric has indicated the crossing could be in the range of $20,000.
Though the primary side of the utility work is presently the responsibility of NCDENR, we can
assist with coordinating utilities with Albemarle Electric,
The Electrical Contractor's scope of work presently includes extending the secondary electrical
service into the building for distribution. A 208Y/120v, 1-phase service will extend into the
building to feed receptacles, lights, HVAC and plumbing equipment. Lighting will be T-8
fluorescent lamps and electronic ballasts in office areas and the multipurpose area. Dimmable
fluorescents are specified in the auditorium. Directional down lights are shown in the Exhibition
area, in addition to T-8 fluorescents. Self-contained emergency lighting fixtures will be located
throughout the facility.
The theater will be equipped with a stationary screen and projector provided by the Owner.
A zone-type fire system will be provided. Smoke detectors will provided in all areas. Pull stations
will be provided at all exits. ADA compliant audible/visual devices will be located throughout the
facility.
Design Development Narrative: NCDENR-Divislon of Parks & Recreation Dismal Swamp Visitor's Center r? IES Engineers
February 15, 2001 Page 8 of 9
Telephone outlet boxes will be located throughout the visitor's center. From each box a conduit
will be stubbed up to an accessible point above the ceiling. Telephone service will be provided by
the Owner.
At the time of this writing, the proposed swing bridge is anticipated to require a small horsepower
motor for its operation. In the event a larger motor is required, options to provide three phase
power are limited by existing utilities, and the project's budget.
As the bridge element is finalized, consideration should be given to the need for auxiliary services
such as CCTV or telephone service for communication and as a means for observing the crossing.
These elements are not presently incorporated. Other electrical components necessary for the
bridge may include horns to warn of bridge operation, and perhaps lighting at the landings.
Design Development Narrative: NCDENR-Division of Parks 8 Recreation Dismal Swamp Visitor's Center r? lES Engineers
February 15, 2001 Page 9 of 9
Form DCM-M?,l
APPLICATION
(To be completed by all applicants)
6. City, town, community or landmark
Dismal Swamp Canal/Hwy. 17 Welcome Genter
1. APPLICANT
a. Landowner:
Name N. C. Division of Park Q and Recreation
(Dismal Swamp State Natural Area)
Address 1615 MSC
City Raleigh State =%c
ZipZ7699-1b15 Day Ph0he (919) 7,u, Q?l3
Fax [phone]
b. Authorized Agent:
Name Brian Strom
Address see above
City State
Zip _ Day Phone
c. ' Street address or secondary road number
Hwy. 17
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? Yes x No
Name of body of water nearest project (e.g. river,
creek, sound, bay) Dismal Swamp Canal
3. DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
a. List all development activities you propose (e.g.
building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier, and
excavation and/or filling activities.
Parking lot, visitor center, canoe launch,
floating bridge, fender sya m, utilities
crossing, septic system, maintenance area,
boardwalk-with i ookolit (R tyl l n'), and
control houses.
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an existing
project, new work, or both? 'new
Fax
C, Project name (if any) Dismal Swami) Visitor
Center
yOTE. pcmit wilt be issued in name ofLWdewner(s), and/or
project Mane.
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT
County Camden
r. Will the project be for public, private or commercial
use? public - -.)-
d. Give a brief description of purpose, use, methods of
construction and daily operatiow of proposed
project. If more space is needed, please attach
additional pages. The purpose of this project is
to provide visitor access to the state
natural area, provide a park presence to
reduce problems associated with tresspas-
sing, and provide a voini- of intcrzratation
for the state natural area
Revised 03/95
Form DCM-MP-1
4. LAND AND WATER
CHARACTERISTICS
a. Size of entire tract 14,433 acres
b. Size of individual lot(s) 3 acres-project area
c. Aoprox S at ?Gelevation of tract. above MHW or
iVWL
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
peat and m c *°i*b apnil areas
e, Vegetation on tract vegitation includes shrubs
and thickets-sapplings and vines.
f. Man-made features now on tract Dismal Swamp
Canal and spoil area ?r^M
m. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
None
n. Describe location and type of discharges to waters
of the state. (For example, surface runoff, sanitary
wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent, "wash
down" and residential discharges.) NA
o. Describe exist;.,ig drinking water supply source.
one
S. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
g, What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land In addition to the completed application form, the
classification of the site? (Consult im local land ute plm.) following items must be submitted:
_X Conservation Transitional
_ Developed Community
Rural Other
h. How is the ract zoned by local government?
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable -NA
zoning? Yes No 0
(Attach Zoning compliance certificate, If oppliwble)
Has a professional archaeological assessment been
done for the tract? Yes , No
If yes, by.whom?
k. Is the project located in a National Registered
Historic District or does it involve a National
Register listed or eligible property?
X Yes No
Are there wetlands on the site? z-_. Yes _ No
Coastal (marsh) . Other _ x
If yes, has a delineation been conducted? no
(xaach daaunentation, if available)
A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims tide
to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then
forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims title, plus written permission
from the owner to carry out the project.
An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view
and cross-sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
ink on an 8 1/2" by. 11" white paper. (Refer to
Coastal Resources Commission Rule 71.0203 for a
detailed description.)
Please note that original drawings are (referred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue-line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an
adequate number of quality copies are provided by
applicant. (Contact the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers regarding that agency's use of larger
drawings.) A site or location map is a part of plat
requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed to
guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the
Form DCM-MT-1
site. Include highway or secondary road (SR)
numbers, landmarks, and the like.
• A Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary.
• A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and
signed return receipts as proof that such owners
have received a copy of the application and plats
by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised
that they have 30 days in which to submit comments
on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant
further certifies that such notice has been provided.
Name Penny Leary-Smith
Address 2-356 Highway 17 N South Mills, NC
Phone 27976
Name Marshall Powell
Address 121 Horse 2797 NC
Phone [phone]
Name Jennifer Pitts-DOT
Address P- 0. Box 25201 Raleigh, 611
Phone
• A list of previous state or federal permits issued for
work on the project tract. Include permit numbers,
permittee, and issuing dates..
Environmental Assessment-#01-E-4300-0360
• A check for $250 made payable to the Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing the
application.
• A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and inlet areas.
• A statement of compliance with the N.C.
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A - 1 to
10) If the project involves the expenditure of public
funds or use of public land's, attach a statement
documenting compliance with the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act.
6. CERTIFICATION AND PERMISSION
TO ENTER ON LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to this
application will allow only the development described in
the application. The project will be subject to conditions
and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact,
grant permission to representatives of state and federal
review agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in
connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application and follow-up monitoring of the
project.
I further certify that the information provided in this
application i -tr-uthfu,l-to-tlte-bat,gf my knowledge.
is is the 'l 0 day of f\p r
nt Name {arc q -, L .
1 IL
Az?
In e 6 -L
Or
Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
project.
x DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill information
x DCM MP-3 Upland Developmem
x DCM M7-4 Structures Information
x DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
DCM MP-6 Marina Development
NOTE: Please sign and date each attachment in the
space provided at the bottom of each form.
V-' -A Al104
Form DCM-MF-2
EXCAVATION
AND.-FILL.
(F,xr,ept bridges and culverts)
Attach this forin to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-I. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation or
fill activities. All values to be given in feet.
Access
channel
(MLW) or (N`vL)
Canal
Boat
basin
Boat
ramp
Rock
groin
Rock
breakwater
Other
(Excluding
shoreline
uabillzaiion)
floating
bridge
1. EXCAVATION
a. Amount of material to be excavated from below
MHW or NWL in cubic yards
b. Type of material to be excavated rguck /p a_
c. Does the area to be excavated include coastal
wetlands (marsh), submerged aquatic vegetation
(SAVs) or other wetlands? Yes
d. Highground excavation In cubic yards 20
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED
MATERIAL
a. Location of disposal area Offsite approved
landfill/disposal site
NA
b. Dimensions of disposal area
c. Do you claim title to disposal area?
Yes x No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from the
owner.
d. Will a disposal area be available for future
maintenance? x Yes No
if yes, where?> _
Revised 03195
Aversge FUW
Existing Pmlect
Form DCM-NIP-2
e. Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
Yes X No
f. Does the disposal include any area in the water;
Yes X No
3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION NA
a. Type of shoreline stabilization
Bulkhead Rpprap
b. Length
c. Average distance waterward of MHW or NWL
d. Maximum distance waterward of MHW or NWL
e. Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months
(Source of information)
f. Type of bulkhead or riprap material
g. Amount of fill in cubic yards to be placed below
water level
(1) Rpprap
(2) Bulkhead backfill
h. Type of fill material
i. Source of fill material
4, OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES-NA
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
a. Will fill material be brought to site?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Amount of material to be placed in the
water
(2) Dimensions of fill area
(3) Purpose of fill
b. Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Dimensions of fill area
(2) Purpose of fill
5. GENERAL
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled? material will be
imediately trucked offaite
b. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
dredge)?
backhoe
c. Will wetlands be cr: ssed in transporting equipment
to project site? Yes X No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
Dismal Swamp Visitor Center
Applkant !ett Name
Stgaature
c1- 3v oL
Date
RevLsed 03/95
Form DCM-W-3
1JPLAND
DEVELOPMENT
(Construction and/or land disturbing activities)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
h
Projects that require a CAMA Major Development
Permit may also require a Stormwater Certification.
Has a site development plan been submitted to the
Division of Environmental Management for review?
Yes .r x - -No
If yes, date submitted
a. Type and number of u ldgdingsfacilities, units ocenter,
structures proposed 6 i control i.
maintenance shed, elevated walkway,
house (2), boardwalk
b. Number of lots or parcels 1
c, Density (give the number of residential units and the
units per acre) NA
d. Size of area to be graded, filled or disturbed
including roads, ditches, etc. 3 acres
if the proposed project will disturb more than one
acre of land, the Division of Land Resources must
receive an erosion and sedimentation control plan at
least 30 days before land disturbing activity begins.
If applicable, has a sedimentation and erosion
control plan been submitted to the Divisiun of Land
Resources? - -Yes x No
If yes, date submitted
f. List the materials (such as marl, paver stone,
asphalt, or concrete) to be used for paved surfaces.
crushed stone, concrete, asphalt, and
treated wood _
g, Give the percentage of the tract within 75 feet of
MHW or NWL, or within 575 feet in the case of an
Outstanding Resource Water, to be covered by
impervious and/or built-upon surfaces, such as
pavement, buildings, rooftops, or to be used for
vehicular driveways or parking. 20
Describe proposed method of sewage disposal.
drain field
j. Have the facilities described in Item L above
received state or local approval? no
(Attach appropriate documentation)
k. Describe location and type of proposed discharges to
waters of the state (for example, surface runoff,
sanitary wastewater, industrial /commercial effluent,
"wash down" and residential discharges).
Describe proposed drinking water supply sourc,-
(e.g. well, community, public system, etc.)
well (from DOT Welcome Center) _
m. Will water be impounded? Yes _ x No
If yes, how many acres?
n. If the project is a oceanfront development, when
was the lot(s) platted and recorded? NA
Dismal S m V -
Applicant or Project Name
/-
Signature
t?- _3 o
Date
'orm DC.M-M?-4
STRUCTURES
Construction within Public Trust Areas)
attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major e.
'ermit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete ajl xpublic
ther sections of the Joint Application which relate to
his proposed project.
Dock(s) and/or Pier(s) -NA
(1) Commercial --Community =. Private
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
Number
Length
Width
Finger Piers Yes No
(i) Number
(ii) Length f.
(iii) Width x public
Platform(s) Yes No
(i) Number
(ii) Length
(iii) Width
Number of slips proposed g
Proximity of structure to adjacent riparian
property lines
Width of water body
Water depth at water-ward end of pier at
MLW or NWL
Boathouse (including covered lifts) -NA
(1) Commercial Private
(2) Length _
(3) Width
c. Groin (e.g. wood, sheetpile, etc.) -NA
(1) Number
(2) Length(s)
d. ulkhegadtr ?for e wood, shepert'cpilecetc) )
(1) Length 150'
(2) Average distance from MHW, NWL or
wetlands NA
(3) Maximum distance beyond MHW, NWL or
wetlands NA
CTIVED
JUL 3 0 2002.
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
ELIZABETH CITY
_Dlg ional Structure
00
(1) Commercial -Community _ Private
(2) Number 3
(3) Description of buoy
(Color, inscription, size, anchor, etc.)
7-pile cluster with navigational
light
(4) Width of water body 90
(5) Distance buoy(s) to be placed beyond
shoreline 9' to 23'
Fender System
=Meerir?gIenretmme (boatlift, mooring pilings, etc.)
(1) Commercial -Community _ Private
(`2) Number 1
(3) Length 100'
(4) Width 2'
Other (Give complete description)
Appli r Project
Signature
Date
Form DCM-MP-5
BRIDGES AND
CULVERTS
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all
other sectigns of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project..
1. BRIDGES'
a. Public X Private
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain)

g. Length of proposed bridge 75
h. Width of proposed bridge
16'
i. Height of proposed bridge above wetlands
none-floating bridge
b. Type of bridge (construction material) j. Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow?
sub-structure--timber piles Yes X No
bridge structure--steel floating barge If yes, explain
c. Water body to be crossed by bridge
Dismal Swamp Canal
d Water depth at the proposed crossing at NEW or k. Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge
. NWL 1'-6 none-floating bridge
e Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge? I. Will the proposed bridge affect navigation. by
. Yes X No reducing or increasing the existing navigable
if yes,
(1) Length of existing bridge opening? X Yes No
If yes, explain Bridge will restrict navicatio
(2) Width of existing bridge due to the nature o the bridge
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing (floating bridge). Bridge will be attend
bridge to ensure boats can pass.
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain) m. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing
no nay: igable waters? Yes X No
If yts, explain _
f. Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert(s)?
YFs x No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert n. Have you contacted the U.S. Coast Guard
(2) Width of existing culvert concerning their approval?
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above x Yes No
the MHW or NWL If yes, please provide record of their action.
Coast Guard is waiting on CAMA approval.
- . ..
Form VCM-MP-5
Z. CULVERTS -NA
a. Water body in which culvert is to be placed
b. Number of culverts proposed
c. Type of culvert (construction material, style)
Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge?
Yes No
If Yes,
(1) Length of existing bridge
(2) Width of existing bridge
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing
bridge
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain)
e. Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert?
_ yes No
If Yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above
the MSW or NWL
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain)
f. Length of proposed culvert
g. Width of proposed culvert
h.' Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the
MHW cr NWL
i. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow?
Yes No
if yes, explain
j. Will the proposed culvert affect existing navigation
potential? Yes No
If yes, explain
3. EXCAVATION AND FILL
a. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation below the MHW or NWL?
X 'Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated 325'
(2) Width of area to be excavated 251
(3) Depth of area to be excavated 11-6'
(4) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards 1,100
b. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation within:
Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs .,_ Other Wetlands
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
(2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Amount of material to be excavate4 in cubic
yards
c. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any highground excavation?
X Yes _ No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated 16'
(2) Width of area to be excavated 5'
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards 20
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves
any excavation, please complete the following:
(1) Location of the spoil disposal area
offsite approved landfill/disposal
(2) Dimensions of spoil disposal area site
NA
(3) Do you claim title to the disposal area?
Yes = No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from
the owner.
Form DCM-W-5
(4) Will the disposal area be available for future b. Will the proposed project require the relocation of
X
maintenance? x `i'ce No No
any existing utility lines? Yes
(5) Does the disposal area include any coastal If yes, explain in detail
wetlands (marsh), SAVs, or other wetlands?
y .S X No
_
If yes, give dimensions if different from (2)
c.
Will the proposed project require the construction of
above
(6) Does the disposal area include any area below any temporary detour structures7
X
the MHW or NWL? Yes X No
if yes, give dimension if different from No. 2 No
Yes
If yes, explain in detail
above.
e. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
fill (other than excavated material
i
d.
Will the proposed project, require, any work
n any
result
described in Item d. above) to be placed below
X N channels? Yes X No
complete Form' DCM-MP-2
If yes
o
MHW or NWL? Yes ,
If yes'
(I) Length of area to be filled - e. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
material will be
(2) Width of area to be filled and erosion controlled?
imediately loaded for offsite disposal.
(3) purpose of fill
lacement of the proposed bridge or culvert
Will the
f f. What type of construction equipment will be used
li
p
.
result in any fill (other than excavated material
i c
(for example, bactherkhoe or -hydrau
backho
dredge)?
n:
described in Item d. above) to be placed with
_ Coastal Wetlands SAVs _. Other Wetlands _
construction equipment
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled .

Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment
(2) Width of area to be filled - g. to project site? - Yes X No
(3) Purpose of fill
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
g
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed on
h
Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
highground?. _ Yes X No . require any shoreline stabilization?
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled Yes X No
explain in detail
If yes
(2) Width of area to be filled ,
(3) Purpose of fill
Dismal Swamp Visitor Center
A. GENERAL
a. Will the proposed project involve any mitigation?
Yes x No
if yes, explain in detail
Ap t or Project N
suture
c,/ _ 3 v U 2-
Date
ALT ! A
y
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Parks and Recreation
Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary Philip K. McKnelty, Director
September 12, 2002
Mr Dillard Horton
US Army Corps of Engineers
Norfolk District
803 Front Street
Norfolk, Virginia 23510-1096
F-I'VED
SEP 2 5 2002
'-%OASTAL MANAGEMENT
ELIZABETH CITY
Dear Mr. Horton:
The North Carolina Division of Parks and Recreation is completing the design for the park visitor
center for Dismal Swamp State Natural Area in Camden County North Carolina. The public parking
for this project is planned for the east side of the Dismal Swamp Canal south of the NC Department
of Transportation Welcome Center on US 17. The building will be on the west side of the canal on
the state property with the utilities for the building to be put under the canal via directional boring.
We are working to gain access for construction and management on the west side of the canal so
construction and park management traffic will not be crossing the canal.
We would like to lease part of the Disrhal Swamp Canal for this public project. We are looking to
have the construction phase of this project funded this fall with a planned bid date of early 2003.
We would a lease term of at least five (5) years with the ability to renew.
Enclosed, please find the general site and utility plan page and the topographic survey from the
visitor center complex design plans. The general site and utility plan page shows the property lines
and topography for the site as well as the plans for parking, utilities and public access to the west
side of the canal. The top o graphic. survey page shows the property boundary lines and the existing
conditions, and I have highlighted the area we would like to lease from the Army Corps of Engineers
for this project. The project area that overlaps with the lease to the NC Department of
Transportation will be covered in the encroachment agreement we are developing. Let me know if
you need a legal description drawn up by the surveyor for the proposed lease area.
Also enclosed, please find a copy of the environmental document prepared for this project for state
clearinghouse review and copies of the responses to that document for your information. All the
comments relate to what permits are needed for the project. No comments were received in
opposition to this project. The canal crossing in this document calls for a turning bridge. This has
been changed to a floating bridge. The foot print for the project has not changed.
.. - . . - r, . -- n -1 -: -L NT--*" 0.,..,.1:. 17400 1 4 1 f
Mr Horton
September 12, 2002
Page 2
We are currently working with the NC Division of Coastal Management on the CAMA permit for
this project. They have held review until we have confirmation that we will have use of the project
area via lease or other documents. We are also working with the Army Corps of Engineers offices
for permits relating to this project. To facilitate our review of this project by the Division of Coastal
Management, please provide confirmation of this request and the likelihood of approvals by your
office. We have been in contact with the Coast Guard in regards to navigation on the canal. I have
requested documentation on these contacts and will send them under separate cover when I receive
them.
Alton Phillips with the State Property office will be handling the state's approvals for the lease and
the signatures for the state. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Please let me know if you
need additional information or clarification. I can be reached at 919-715-8694. Alton Phillips can
be reached at-919--733-4346.
Sincerely,
Gam-- `
Sue Regier, Head
Resource Management Program
Enclosures
cc: Alton Phillips, State Property Office (w% map enclosures)
Brian Strong, Resource Management Specialist (w/out enclosures)
DISMAL SWAMP VISITOR CENTER
STUDY REPORT
COPY
PREPARED FOR:
DIVISION OF PARKS AND RECREATION
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
PREPARED BY:
ALPHA & OMEGA GROUP, PC
3100 SPRING FOREST RD, SUITE 120
RALEIGH, NC 27616
FEBRUARY 21, 2000
?lp/,rA OAVOya 4proap, )VC Consulting Engineers
Dismal Swamp Study Report
History/ Background
The Dismal Swamp became part of the State Parks system in 1974 when approximately 14,400
acres of land was purchased from The Nature Conservancy. The land is bordered by the Dismal
Swamp Canal along the east, Virginia and the National Wildlife Refuge along the north and rural
countryside and farmlands along the west and south boundaries. A master plan was completed in
June of 1995 that identifies the overall purpose and use of the park. Part of the master plan is to
develop a visitor's center for the park in order to utilize this natural refuge for informative and
educational use and for primitive camping, hiking, canoeing, and biking. The Executive Summary
of the Master Plan and General Management Plan are included in appendix A for reference.
Dismal Swamp Visitor Center
Building Design Considerations
The design concept of the Visitor's Center was generated from two considerations.
1. The first relates to the function of the center - what will be the major purpose - especially as
it relates to the public? We see the Center's primary purpose being that of a catalyst to inspire
people to explore and learn more about the Great Dismal Swamp. The progression that a visi-
tor takes becomes important. We want the natural path of travel to take a visitor from his
automobile to the center and then to the Park areas. The center must relate to the outdoors.
The exhibit areas open to the outdoors and the inclusion of connecting decks that lead to the
canal areas and yet remain a part of the building provide this link. The tower structure serves
two purposes. The first obviously is to give visitors an overview of the canal and Swamp - a
preview of what is to come. The second is to provide an attraction for children (as does the
swing bridge). It serves as a focal point and relates to the imagery discussed in point two be-
low. The public restrooms are separated from the major portion of the center as a convenience
to visitors and staff (they can be made accessible without the entire center being open). They
also encourage interaction with the outside.
2. The second design consideration relates to imagery. The Dismal Swamp is a part of the
"coastal region" so we thought it was appropriate to draw from forms found in some of the
architecture original to the area. Such historical structures as the Chicamacomico Life Saving
Station feature gable roofs, hipped roof dormers, connected out buildings, and towers. These
forms combined with decks and pier like boardwalks invoke feelings that we think are appro-
priate to this region and will give the Center a sense of belonging. The buildings will be clad in
wood native to the area.
Evaluation of Site Alternates
p:\project files\99000\99060\docs\report\99060 study reportdoc
3100 Spring Forest Road ? Suite 120 * Raleigh, NC 27616
Phone: [phone] ? Fax: [phone]
Option I
Option I locates the visitor center entrance on US 17 south of the existing NCDOT welcome cen-
ter entrance approximately 3,600 feet. There is an existing median cut in US 17 that NCDOT has
indicated is acceptable for an entrance location to the visitor center. Locating the entrance south
of the NCDOT welcome center allows the welcome center and the proposed visitor center to be
separated and operate independently. It is our opinion that the separation of the welcome center
and the visitor center will bring more visitations to the visitor, center. Traffic traveling north will
tend to turn into the visitor center before reaching the welcome center and overflow traffic from
the welcome center traveling south will likely stop at the visitor center. The land between the two
centers will provide a visual barrier between the two facilities. A new 24 foot wide paved en-
trance will need to be constructed to adjoin the old US 17 paved roadway. A section of old US
17 will need to be resurfaced and debris removed from the west side of the roadway. The existing
waterline that serves the welcome center from SR 1231 will need to be extended along US 17 to
the south approximately 3,000 feet. The existing overhead power will be placed underground and
will provide power to the visitor center and to the proposed swing bridge.
Pros:
• Separation from the Welcome Center helps to define the Visitor Center as a separate
entity (although people traveling from the south may mistake the Visitor's Center for a
Welcome Center).
• It does not require crossing the canal for access thus making it accessible at all times.
• It allows for the progression of the visitor to go from parking to center to bridge to
swamp.
Cons:
• Requires building a new access from the highway.
• Visitors from the Welcome Center may miss the attraction of the Visitor's Center (if
they stop at the Welcome Center they may not want to make another stop in such a
short distance).
Option II
Option II is similar to option I and keeps the visitor center in the same location as option I. Op-
tion II eliminates the separate entrance to the south and utilizes old US 17 from the welcome cen-
ter to the proposed visitor center.
Pros:
• Access from the Welcome Center defines the area as separate (because of the distance
between the two) and gives people the option of using the "services" of the Welcome
center first.
• It does not require crossing the canal for access thus making it accessible at all times.
• It allows for the progression of the visitor to go from parking to center to bridge to
swamp.
• Does not require a new access from the highway.
Page 2 of 25
Cons:
• It may not get the "coincidental visitor" because of the perceived remoteness from the
Welcome center.
Ontion III
Option III utilizes the entrance to the welcome center and provides additional parking along old
US 17. The visitor center is located across the canal and will be accessed via the swing bridge.
The septic system will be located on the west side of the canal where soils are more suitable for
on-site disposal of septic waste. Water, power, and telephone utilities will need to be directionally
bored beneath the canal.
Pros:
• Access from the Welcome Center defines the area as separate (because of the canal)
and gives people the option of using the "services" of the Welcome center first.
• By being in the "swamp" it defines further the role of the Visitor Center as a part of
the swamp.
• Does not require a new access from the highway.
Cons:
• Since the bridge is now required for access this may present a scheduling/ staffing is-
sue. A casual visitor will not want to wait for the next scheduled "opening of the
bridge".
• Expense of running utilities across the canal.
Option IV
Option IV locates the visitor center and approximately 7,200 linear feet of roadway access on the
west side of the canal. No bridge is proposed for this option. This option requires getting access
form property owners south of the Dismal Swamp and tying to SR 1221. At present time the
property owners appear unwilling to sell property for a roadway access. There is a possibility that
the Army Corps of Engineers may have a 60' right-of-way that could be used for roadway access.
Pros:
• It allows for the progression of the visitor to go from parking to center to canal.
• By being in the "swamp" it defines further the role of the Visitor Center as a part of
the swamp.
Cons:
• Providing access will be expensive.
• Although it is visible from the Welcome Center it is not accessible from there which
may be frustrating especially to "first time visitors".
Page 3 of 25
STRUCTURAL
The structural system will be conventional timber construction with timber trusses and stick fram-
ing. A timber pile foundation system will be considered to minimize impacts to wetlands and re-
duce the cost of fill required to bring to the site to raise the building two feet above the 100-year
flood elevation. The amounts of fill and finish floor elevation for the building will be determined
when a topographic survey is completed for the site when an option is decided on. Recycled plas-
tic sheet pile will be utilized for all bulkhead work due to reduced cost and non-corrosive proper-
ties. The bridge options are discussed later in this study.
PLUMBING
The General Contractor will extend water service from the 6" water main presently serving the
NCDOT welcome center to a point 5 feet outside the visitor center building. The main is located
at the intersection of HWY 17 and S.R. 1231.
The Plumbing Contractor will extend domestic water into the building in the vicinity of the public
toilet rooms. A double check backflow preventer will be located at the service entry along with
the main water shutoff valve for the building. Domestic water shall be Type K below grade, and
shall be Type L above grade. Water piping will be insulated with preformed fiberglass insulation
with an all service jacket. Where exposed in mechanical rooms, the insulation will be covered
with 8-oz canvas jacketing with a pasted finish. Water piping outside the building's thermal enve-
lope and subject to freezing, if any (such as that possibly occurring between the public toilets and
the main building) will be protected with electric heat tracing. If possible, routing water piping
outside the thermal envelope will be avoided.
DWV piping shall be cast iron. Sewer will be routed to a point approximately 5 feet outside the
building, from which point it will be extended to a pumping station and septic field provided in the
General Contract. Drains from the water heater T&P valves will be Type L copper.
Plumbing fixtures will include water closets and urinals with flush valves, enameled cast iron wall
hung or countertop lavatories, electric water coolers, and a mop sink. Flushing fixtures shall be
water saving type, 1.6 gallon per flush for water closets and 1.0 gallon per flush for urinals. Lava-
tory fittings will be of the metering type, limited to 0.25 gallons/cycle if the Theater is determined
to fall into the "assembly" classification (based on occupancy), and 0.5 gallons/cycle otherwise.
Consideration will be given to the use of motion sensor type actuators for the water closet and
urinal flush valves and lavatory fittings. Fixtures will be set at heights suitable to meet NC State
Building (Accessibility) Code and ADA. An electric water heater (storage type) will be placed in
the vicinity of the public toilet rooms. Use of a propane gas fired water heater will be considered,
but it is anticipated the cost of venting will make the electric type more cost effective. Considera-
tion will be given to circulating hot water to the staff toilet to reduce water waste, or an instanta-
neous water heater may be used. One freeze resistant wall hydrant will be provided on each exte-
rior exposure (main building). Wall hydrants with removable keys will be used in the toilet rooms
in lieu of trap primers for floor drains.
Page 4 of 25
The swinging bridge depends on a source of compressed air, which will be provided by the Gen-
eral Contractor.
MECHANICAL
Public toilet rooms will be mechanically ventilated at a rate of 2 cfin per square foot. The toilet
rooms will be heated with either electric resistance cabinet heaters, electric radiant heaters or pro-
pane gas fired infrared heaters. The public toilet rooms will not be cooled, unless directed other-
wise by the Division of Parks and Recreation.
Portions of the main building, particularly the Theater, Exhibit and Multipurpose areas, may see
large swings in occupancy, and thus thermal load. The office areas, too, will see swings in occu-
pancy but not on the order of magnitude as the others. The swings in occupancy suggest the use
of a variable volume system, either VAV or VVT. However, split system heat pumps or pack-
aged combination air conditioning/gas fired heating (Gaspacks) better suit the facility given its
remote location (due to the lack of local organizations capable of maintaining more complex sys-
tems). Multiple heat pumps or gaspacks, if used, will allow zoning of the various areas. These
alternatives will be considered, and the best solution presented in the design development submis-
sion.
Air handlers will be located either in the attic or main floor mechanical rooms if split systems are
used. Gaspacks, if used, would be mounted on concrete pads adjacent to the building. If the attic
is used for equipment, it will be made accessible via a permanent ladder and hatch, and the attic
will be floored to the extent required by code for control side maintenance accessibility.
ELECTRICAL
Electric service is available south of the proposed sites along HWY 17 through Albemarle Electric
Membership Corporation. A 7,200v single phase overhead service to the NCDOT welcome cen-
ter presently crosses the sites proposed in Options 1 and 2.
In Options 1 and 2, this overhead service will be replaced with an underground service beginning
at a point south of the proposed Dismal Swamp visitor's center to the NCDOT welcome center,
This line will be tapped and a pad-mounted transformer will be provided for the Dismal Swamp
visitor's center. Albemarle Electric has agreed to place the overhead service underground, but
will transfer the installation and overhead service removal cost to NCDENR. Once a site has been
chosen, a firm cost will be established. Albemarle Electric has indicated this work will cost in the
range of $8,000.
In Options 3 and 4, the visitor's center site will be located on the west side of the canal. An un-
derwater crossing will extend utility service from the existing utility service feeding the NCDOT
welcome center. A pad-mounted transformer will be set on the west side of the canal adjacent to
the visitor's center. The crossing will be subject to review and approval by the Army Corp of En-
gineers. Albemarle Electric has indicated that the canal crossing would be subcontracted, and the
Page 5 of 25
cost transferred to NCDENR. This cost cannot be determined until a site has been chosen. How-
ever, Albemarle Electric has indicated that the crossing will cost in the Range of $20,000.
A 120v/240v, 1-phase service will extend into the building to feed receptacles, lights, HVAC and
plumbing equipment. Lighting will be T-8 fluorescent lamps and electronic ballasts in office areas
and the multipurpose area. Directional down lights may be employed in the Exhibit area. Dim-
ming fluorescent fixtures will be used in the Theater. Self-contained emergency lighting fixtures
will be located throughout the facility. The theater will be equipped with a stationary screen and
projector provided by the Owner.
A zone-type fire system will be provided. Smoke detectors will be provided in all areas. Pull sta-
tions will be provided at all exits. ADA compliant audible/visual devices will be located through-
out the facility.
The proposed swing bridge rides on an air cushion bearing, requiring only a fractional horsepower
motor to set it in motion. Power will be extended from the visitor's center to the motor control-
ler. Other electrical components necessary for the bridge may include horns to warn of bridge
operation, and perhaps lighting at the landings. Telephone service and CCTV may be required to
provide communications across the canal and to provide a means for observing the crossing
should the bridge not be visible from the visitor's center. The bridge is intended to only operate
during daylight hours, and navigation warning lights will likely not be required by the Army Corp
of Engineers.
Telephone outlet boxes will be located throughout the visitor's center. From each box a conduit
will be stubbed up to an accessible point above the ceiling. Telephone service will be provided by
the Owner.
BRIDGE OPTIONS
The bridge will be one of the key elements and attractions to the area and will be the gateway to
the Dismal Swamp. A bridge option has been considered in lieu of a ferry system due to the abil-
ity to transport staff equipment and vehicles and to minimize the operational aspects of crossing
the canal. Several options were investigated for a moveable bridge across the canal. Typical
types of movable bridges are bascule bridges, cantilevered swing bridges, and floating bridges.
Due to high maintenance and cost, the bascule bridge was eliminated and, therefore, the swing
bridge and the floating bridge were investigated as options A and B in this study.
Option A - Swing Bridge
The proposed swing bridge will be a 12-foot wide structural steel bridge set on one side of the
canal and will swing across the canal by the use of a pivot table with air bearings or fixed bear-
ings. The bridge will be cantilevered approximately 58 feet to span the 50-foot canal and will
have a 24-foot counterbalance end so that the bridge will be balanced on the pivot table. The
bridge will require a double mast with stays to reduce the size and weight of the structural steel.
Page 6 of 25
A park staff operator will operate the bridge from the visitor center via a switch to engage the
motor to turn the bridge to a closed position. Once the bridge is in the closed position, the public
will be allowed to cross the bridge. Pedestrian traffic only will be allowed to cross except for
park staff equipment and vehicles. The bridge will be designed to accommodate light emergency
vehicles such as ambulances. An electric or pneumatic motor will turn the bridge. Several issues
surround the bridge in regards to safety, operation, and maintenance of the bridge. The bridge
would remain in an open position giving boat traffic the right of way.
Safety will be handled by fencing off the moving areas of the bridge, providing adequate signage
about the bridge operation, and providing an audible horn and warning light when bridge is in op-
eration. We propose that the bridge be operated from the visitor center and that the visitor center
have a clear view of the bridge landing areas to maintain safe operation. If clear visibility to the
bridge were not possible with the location of the visitor center, then a video monitoring system
would be proposed to ensure safe operation. The bridge would be placed on the same side of the
canal that the visitor center is placed on.
Option B - Floating Swing Bridge
The proposed floating swing bridge will be a 10-foot wide floating steel structure with a timber
deck and railing. The bridge will be recessed into the bank in order to maintain the 50-foot unob-
structed width of the canal. An electric boat motor will propel the bridge to a closed or open po-
sition. The motor will be placed within the bridge in a compartment with an access for routine
maintenance and a bilge pump will also be located in the same access area. A ramp will be lo-
cated at each end that will be lowered into place once the bridge is in a closed position.
The floating bridge will need to accommodate fluctuations in the water surface elevations, how-
ever, the Army Corps of Engineers tries to maintain a fluctuation in water surface elevations of
less than one foot because of the boat traffic.. Severe fluctuations occasionally occur from severe
weather conditions. During hurricane Floyd the water surface elevations rose over 2 feet at the
South Mills Locks. During severe droughts since 1976 the water surface elevations have dropped
to levels where the canal has been closed to boat traffic (please refer to Appendix Q. The Army
Corps of Engineers may allow the bridge to remain closed during periods when the canal is closed
to boat traffic. The bridge could become inoperable if the water dropped below 3 to 4 feet that
creates steep ramps at each end of the bridge. Records show that the canal can remain closed for
several months.
SEPTIC SYSTEM
One of the primary concerns with the development of the Dismal Swamp Visitor Center has been
the lack of suitable soil for disposal of septic waste. The NCDOT welcome center has had diffi-
culty with the existing nitrification field. The initial field installed has failed and the current repair
field is having difficulty. The welcome center has high use during the summer from high traffic
along US 17. The system was designed for 4,000 GPD and utilizes a low-pressure pipe system.
Page 7 of 25
Discussions with the park staff identified an existing system that they consider similar in size and
use as the proposed visitor center. Umstead Park has a picnic/trail area that is adjacent to I-40
and has facilities designed for 1,500 GPD. Therefore, the proposed visitor center will be designed
for 1,500 GPD.
Preliminary soil investigations were made on the east side of the canal with Mr. Tim Peoples, the
Camden County sanitarian. Random soil samples were taken south of the existing Welcome Cen-
ter. The majority of the land south of the welcome center is low with a high water table and un-
suitable soil conditions. However, the area south of the existing cross canal approximately 3,000
feet south of the welcome center has higher ground with soils that are provisionally suitable. It is
anticipated that there is adequate area to install a nitrification system and repair area for the Visi-
tor Center. A preliminary application rate of 0.4 gpd/sf was estimated for the soil within this area.
If this area is to be developed further, additional soil tests will need to be taken and/or test pits
will need to be taken by the sanitarian or soil scientist to adequately design the septic system. It is
uncertain whether additional repair area could be allocated for the Welcome Center in this area at
this time.
Preliminary soil investigations were also made along the west side of the canal with Mr. Tim Peo-
ples. The soils along the west side are significantly higher in elevation than on the east side of the
canal. The west side of the canal was apparently the side where the spoils of canal excavation and
dredging were disposed. There is approximately 200' to 250' wide ridge where the spoils were
disposed. The spoils have been in place for many decades as indicated by the large trees growing
on the banks of the canal and the history of the canal. Random soil samples were taken with the
250' wide area and north and south along the canal. The soil on the higher part of the ridge is
suitable for septic use to a depth of over 3 feet. The thickness of suitable soil gradually decreases
and soil wetness comes to the surface at the west side of the 250' ridge as it transitions into the
Dismal Swamp. Available area for a septic field and repair is plentiful along the west side of the
canal and should be able to be installed utilizing a conventional system. Limiting factors along the
west side are keeping the septic system a minimum of 50 feet separation from the canal; soil wet-
ness along the west side of the ridge; conflict with proposed roadway location; and the land
owned by the Army Corp of Engineers. The soil on the west side is the preferred soil to install a
septic system.
RESTRICTIONS WITH THE CANAL
The canal is owned and operated by the Army Corps of Engineers and serves as part of the in-
tercoastal waterway. The Army Corps of Engineers requires that the 50-foot canal remain unob-
structed. A movable bridge is acceptable, however boat traffic has the right-of-way and the
bridge would need to remain in an open condition. Any fill placed in the canal would require a
CAMA permit. Any structure of utility crossing over the canal would require a 65-foot vertical
clearance. Any utility placed under the canal will be required to have a minimum depth of 9-foot
draft plus 6 feet of cover or 15 feet below water surface elevation. This restriction will place any
utility at approximately 20 feet below existing ground. Due to the difficulty of excavating, shor-
ing, and dewatering at that depth, any utilities placed beneath the canal will be accomplished
utilizing directional bore technology as the least expensive alternative. The right-of-way owned
by the Army Corps of Engineers appears to be 150 feet wide at the location of the proposed
Page 8 of 25
the Army Corps of Engineers appears to be 150 feet wide at the location of the proposed visitor
center or 75 feet on either side of the centerline of the canal. Exact boundaries of the canal will
be determined during the design development stage of this project. Easements or property acqui-
sition will likely be required to enable construction of the project.
ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS
The project site is located in Camden County which is one of twenty counties that are subject to
the rules and policies of the Coastal Resources Commission (CRC). The CRC administers the
Coastal Area management Act (CAMA-N. C.G.S. 113A-118) of North Carolina. The U. S. Army
Corps of Engineers approve all construction, excavation, filling or other work located within
navigable waters and/or wetlands. The necessary permits identified at this time are the Section
404 of the Clean Water Act, the Section 401, CAMA and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors
Act of 1899.
Given the size of this project in terms of disturbed land, in excess of 10,000 square feet, an Envi-
ronmental Assessment (EA) document is likely to be required. The EA will assess every facet of
the proposed site location with regard to the surrounding environment for both man and animal.
Once the EA is complete a wetland mitigation plan will be required along with the necessary wet-
land permits. The EA document may take 6 months to prepare. The reviewing agencies may take
from 3 to 6 months to complete reviews and comment. Once all review comments are satisfied
for each state agency the permitting process may begin. The permitting process will likely take up
to 6 months to complete. An Environmental Assessment Guideline is attached as Appendix B for
a general overview of the information required and the review process.
OPINIONS OF COST
Page 9 of 25
ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE
CONSTRUCTION COST - OPTION I
Project # 99060 Date: 2122/00
Client: Dismal Swamp Visitors Center Prepared By: SAR
RE: Cost Esitmate - Option #1 Checked By: TLB
Item No. Item Description Units Cost/Unit Cost
SITE ESTIMATE
1 MOBILIZATION (Usually 5% of Constr. Cost) LS LS $72,000
2 CLEANING AND GRUBBING 2 AC 2500.00 /AC $5,000
3 BORROW EXCAVATION 5500 CY $15.00 ICY $82,500
2 DISPOSAL OF CONCRETE RUBBLE & DEBRIS 2000 CY $25.00 ICY $50,000
3 RESURFACING (1 1/2" NCDOT 1-2) 15 TN $30.00 ITN $450
4 ROADWAY (8" ABC) 2610 TN $25.50 ITN $66,555
5 ROADWAY (2"- NCDOT 1-2) 650 TN $30.00 /TN $19,500
6 TRAILWAY (6" SRCEENING) 150 SY 20 /SY $3,000
7 CANOE LAUNCH 100 SF $35 /SF $3,500
8 BOAT DOCK 300 SF $35 /SF $10,500
9 SEPTIC SYSTEM LS LS $30,000
10 6" WATER LINE (PVC) 3500 LF $25 /LF $87,500
11 REPLACE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LS LS $8,000
12 MISC (SIGNAGE, GATE, ETC.) LS LS $3,000
13 BRIDGE ESTIMATE LS LS $260,000
SUB TOTAL $701,505 .
BUILDING ESTIMAT E
1 MAIN BUILDING (EXHIBITION AREA) 1250 SF $165 /SF $206,250
2 MAIN BUILDING (OTHER AREAS) 2610 SF $75 /SF $195,750
3 TOILET BUILDING 800 SF $100 /SF $80,600
4 DECKS 3595 SF $35 /SF $125,825
5 TOWER 200 SF $60 /SF $12,000
6 PLUMBING 14 FIX $2500 /FIX $35,000
7 HVAC 4500 SF $10 /SF $45,000
8 ELECTRICAL 4500 SF $9 /SF $40,500
SUB TOTAL $619,825

CONTINGENCY 10% $132,133

TOTAL $1,453,463
Page 10 of 25
ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE
CONSTRUCTION COST - OPTION II
Project # 99060
Client: Dismal Swamp Visitors Center
RE: Cost Esltmate - Option #2
Date: 2/22/00
Prepared By, SAR
Checked By: TLB
Item No. Item Description Units Cost/Unit Cost
SITE ESTIMATE
1 MOBILIZATION (Usually 5% of Constr. Cost) LS LS $68,000
2 CLEANING AND GRUBBING 1 AC 2500.00 /AC $2,500
3 BORROW EXCAVATION 3270 CY $15.00 /CY $49,050
2 DISPOSAL OF CONCRETE RUBBLE 8- DEBRIS 1920 CY $25.00 /CY $48,000
3 RESURFACING (11/2" NCDOT 1-2) 240 TN $30.00 /TN $7,200
4 ROADWAY (8" ABC) 1500 TN $25.50 /TN $38,250
5 ROADWAY (2"- NCDOT 1-2) 370 TN $30.00 /TN $11,100
6 TRAILWAY (6-1 SCREENING) 150 SY 20 /SY $3,000
7 CANOE LAUNCH 100 SF $35 /SF $3,500
8 BOAT DOCK 300 SF $35 ISF $10,500
9 SEPTIC SYSTEM LS LS $30,000
10 6" WATER LINE (PVC) 3500 LF $25 /LF $87,500
11 REPLACE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LS LS $8,000
12 MISC (SIGNAGE, GATE, ETC.) LS LS $3,000
13 BRIDGE ESTIMATE LS LS $260,000
SUB TOTAL $629,600
BUILDING ESTIMAT E
1 MAIN BUILDING (EXHIBITION AREA) 1250 SF $1651$F' $206,250
2 MAIN BUILDING (OTHER AREAS) 2610 SF $75 /SF $195,750
3 TOILET BUILDING 800 SF $100 /SF $80,000
4 DECKS 3595 SF $35 /SF $125,825
5 TOWER 200 SF $60 /SF $12,000
6 PLUMBING 14 FIX $2500 /FIX $35,000
7 HVAC 4500 SF $10 /SF $45,000
8 ELECTRICAL 4500 SF $9 /SF $40,500
SUB TOTAL $619,825

CONTINGENCY 10% $124,943
--
7 TOTAL $1,374,368
Page 11 of 25
ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE
CONSTRUCTION COST - OPTION III
Project # 99060
Client: Dismal Swamp Visitors Center
RE: Cost Esitmate - Option #3
Date: 2/22/00
Prepared By: SAR
Checked By: TLB
Item No. Item Description Units Cost/Unit Cost
SITE ESTIMATE
1 MOBILIZATION (Usually 5% of Constr. Cost) LS LS $75,000
2 CLEANING AND GRUBBING 1.0 AC 2500.00 /AC $2,500
3 BORROW EXCAVATION 1750 CY $15.00 ICY $26,250
2 DISPOSAL OF CONCRETE RUBBLE & DEBRIS 80 CY $25.00 ICY $2,000
3 RESURFACING (1 1/2" NCDOT 1-2) 110 TN $30.00 RN $3,300
4 ROADWAY (8" ABC) 240 TN $25.50 /TN $6,120
5 ROADWAY (2"- NCDOT 1-2) 60 TN $30.00 /TN $1,800
6 TRAILWAY (6" SCREENING) 150 SY 20 /SY $3,000
7 CANOE LAUNCH 100 SF $35 ISF $3,500
8 SIDEWALK 390 SY 30.00 /SY $11,700
9 DIRECTION BORING UNDER CANAL (W&E) 600 LF $75 /LF $45,000
10 SEPTIC SYSTEM LS LS $30,000
11 6" WATER LINE (PVC) 1400 LF $25 /LF $35,000
12 REPLACE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LS LS $8,000
13 MISC (SIGNAGE, GATE, ETC.) LS LS $3,000
14 BRIDGE ESTIMATE LS LS $260,000
SUB TOTAL $516,170
BUILDING ESTIMATE
1 MAIN BUILDING (EXHIBITION AREA) 1250 SF $165 ISF $206,250
2 MAIN BUILDING (OTHER AREAS) 2610 SF $75 /SF $195,750
3 TOILET BUILDING 800 SF $100 ISF $80,000
4 DECKS 3595 SF $35 /SF $125,825
5 TOWER 200 SF $60 ISF $12,000
6 PLUMBING 14 FIX $2500 /FIX $35,000
7 HVAC 4500 SF $10 ISF $45,000
8 ELECTRICAL 4500 SF $9 /SF $40,500
9 ACCESS DIFFICULTY (15%) $111,049
SUB TOTAL $851,374
CONTINGENCY (10%) $136,754
TOTAL $1,504,298
Page 12 of 25
ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE
CONSTRUCTION COST - OPTION IV
Project # 99060
Client: Dismal Swamp Visitors Center
RE: Cost Esitmate - Option #4
Date: 2/22/00
Prepared By: SAR
Checked By: TLB
Item No. Item Description Units Cost/Unit Cost
SITE ESTIMATE
1 MOBILIZATION LS LS $100,000
2 CLEANING AND GRUBBING 1.0 AC 2500.00 /AC $2,500
3 BORROW EXCAVATION 16000 CY $15.00 /CY $240,000
4 DISPOSAL OF CONCRETE RUBBLE & DEBRIS 10 CY $25.00 /CY $250
5 ROADWAY (8" ABC) 7500 TN $25.5 /TN $191,250
6 ROADWAY (2"- NCDOT 1-2) 1900 TN $30 /TN $57,000
7 CANOE LAUNCH 100 SF $35 /SF $3,500
8 DIRECTION BORING UNDER CANAL (W&E) 600 LF $75 /LF $45,000
9 SEPTIC SYSTEM LS LS $30,000
10 6" WATER LINE (PVC) 1400 LF $25 /LF $35,000
11 REPLACE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LS LS $8,000
12 MISC (SIGNAGE, GATE, ETC.) LS LS $3,000
13 BRIDGE ESTIMATE LS LS $260,000
SUB TOTAL $975,500
BUILDING ESTIMATE
1 MAIN BUILDING (EXHIBITION AREA) 1250 SF $165 /SF $206,250
2 MAIN BUILDING (OTHER AREAS) 2610 SF $75 /SF $195,750
3 TOILET BUILDING 800 SF $100 /SF $80,000
4 DECKS 3595 SF $35 /SF $125,825
5 TOWER 200 SF $60 /SF $12,000
6 PLUMBING 14 FIX $2500 /FIX $35,000
7 HVAC 4500 SF $10 /SF $45,000
8 ELECTRICAL 4500 SF $9 /SF $40,500
9 ACCESS DIFFICULTY (15%) $111,049
SUB TOTAL $851,374

CONTINGENCY (10%) $182,687
1 1 TOTAL $2,009,561
Page 13 of 25
ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE
CONSTRUCTION COST
Project # 99060
Client: Dismal Swamp Visitors Center
RE: Bridge Cost Esitmate
Date: 2/22/00
Prepared By: SAR
Checked By: TLB
Item No. Item Description Units Cost/Unit Cost
BRIDGE OPTION #1
1 ABUTMENTS 3 EA $15000 /EA $45,000
2 PILING 3 EA $5000 /EA $15,000
3 RACEWAY 60 LF $400 /LF $24,000
4 TURNTABLE W/ EQUIPMENT 200 SF $500 /SF $100,000
5 COUNTERWEIGHT + LIFT 1 EA $12000 /EA $12,000
6 BRIDGE STEEL 17 TN $4000 /TN $68,000
7 BRIDGE STRINGERS 360 LF $8 /LF $2,880
8 BRIDGE DECK 1080 SF $8 /SF $8,640
9 RAIL 230 LF $35 /LF $8,050
10 35% Misc $99,250
1 TOTAL $382,000
BRIDGE OPTION #2
1 ALL BRIDGE STEEL 28 TN $4000 RN $112,000
2 RAIL 160 LF $35/LF $5,600
3 GRIT SURFACING 800 SF $15 /SF $12,000
4 BULKHEAD 2600 SF $15 /SF $39,000
5 ABUTMENTS 1 EA 15000 /EA $15,000
6 PILING 1 EA 5000 $5,000
7 BILGE PUMP + DRIVE UNIT 1 EA 3000 $3,000
8 35% Misc $67,060
TOTAL $258,000

Page 13a of 25
APPENDIX A
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
ESTABLISHMENT OF THE DISMAL SWAMP STATE NATURAL AREA
The Dismal Swamp is the largest remaining swamp in the eastern United States.
About 106,000 acres are protected by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) in the National Wildlife Refuge System. In 1974, the state of North
Carolina purchased 14,344 acres from The Nature Conservancy for $2,2 million to
establish Dismal Swamp State Park. In the late 1980's, the Division of Parks and
Recreation (DPR) changed the area's classification to a state natural area because
of its natural significance, limited potential for public use, and lack of funds to de-
velop educational and recreational resources.
NATURAL RESOURCES
The Dismal Swamp State Natural Area is a vast, forested wetland containing four
noteworthy natural communities: Nonriverine Swamp Forest, Pond Pine Wood-
land, Peatland Atlantic White Cedar Forest, and High Pocosin. The plant commu-
nities historically present in the Dismal Swamp were changed over 200 years ago
when the area was drained and timbered. The ditches and roads that were con-
structed have altered the natural hydrology and, as a result, made conditions less
favorable to cypress and cedar forests. The natural fire regime has also been af-
fected by the ditches, roads, and fire suppression. As a result, hardwoods have in-
vaded the pocosins and cedar forests. The swamp supports a large variety of mi-
gratory neotropical birds, mammals (including the Dismal Swamp southeastern
shrew, black bear, and bobcat), reptiles, and amphibians. It also supports a signifi-
cant butterfly fauna.
Peatland Atlantic White Cedar Forest
This forest is one of three well-defined natural communities at Dismal Swamp
State Natural Area, covering approximately 6 percent of the site (about 890 acres).
This natural community consists solely of Atlantic white cedar (Chamaecypatis
thyoides) in the canopy, although red maples are invading some stands and reach-
ing the canopy in places.
PARK PURPOSES
Dismal Swamp was authorized as a state natural area so that its valuable biologi-
cal, geological, scenic, and recreational values could be protected. The Division of
Parks and Recreation is charged with preserving these values and providing park
Page 14 of 25

experiences that promote pride in and understanding of North Carolina's natural
heritage.
In addition to protecting the natural resources described above, the park provides
an excellent opportunity for visitors to experience an extensive east coast swamp
and pocosin complex. Activities that promote the park's interpretation and educa-
tion goals should be emphasized. The extensive road system can support long-
distance hiking and bicycling. Because of the soil types present, only limited visi-
tor facilities are feasible. The most significant scenic resources are the Atlantic
white cedar stands and the extensive swamp and forested areas. Although present
trails are located exclusively on straight roadbeds, they provide opportunities to
view wildlife.
RELEVANT LAWS AND AGREEMENTS
Land and Water Conservation Fund Stipulations
The area was purchased with a federal Land and Water Conservation Fund grant
from the Secretary of Interior's contingency reserve. The land acquisition project
was approved because it sought to preserve a unique natural resource (a portion of
the Great Dismal Swamp) and it was of broad significance (the swamp is the larg-
est swamp on the Atlantic coast). The grant states that the area is to "... be re-
tained as a natural preserve with only minima uture development to promote the
preservation and interpretive theme. " Actions that would convert the area to
other uses must be approved by the National Park Service. Land converted to
other uses, such as logging, must be replaced with land of equal value and useful-
ness.
Current Park Management
The USFWS manages the state's land from the Great Dismal Swamp National
Wildlife Refuge according to a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) that is in
effect until September 30, 1997. The stipulations include:
- The USFWS manages forest, wildlife, and water resources.
The Dismal Swamp State Natural Area continues to be a unit of the state
parks system.
The land is subject to all state park rules and statutes.
Public access can be limited (only hiking and bicycling are currently al-
lowed).
The state must approve any construction.
The state parks system is responsible for fire detection and suppression,
under a MOU with the N.C. Division of Forest Resources. In the event of a fire
on state park property, the Division of Forest Resources will assume direction for
the control of any wildfire either in or threatening state parks as quickly as possible
after discovery.
Page 15 of 25
MANAGEMENT ISSUES
Natural Resource Issues
Hydrology - Before canals were dug into the Great Dismal Swamp, drainage of
the swamp was very poorly defined, with no obvious river or creeks. Many canals
are now located throughout the Dismal Swamp. The extensive canal system has
contributed to a loss of wet-soil species because the soils are considerably drier
than they were 200 years ago. These drier soils favor trees such as red maple, tu-
liptree, and sweetgum at the expense of bald-cypress and the tupelos. The
USFWS staff are attempting to determine the swamp's historic hydroperiod - the
time that the wet soils occurred each year without the canals - and more closely
min-dc those conditions today.
Prescribed Burns - In areas dominated by white cedar, wildfires burned the vege-
tation, killing the cedar trees; these fires also burned the upper layer of peat, how-
ever, allowing cedar seeds stored in the ground to germinate, often producing pure
stands. Additional research and experience will be needed before instituting a
widespread bum program within the state natural area.
Park Management Issues
Which Agency Should Manage the Site? The state of North Carolina should
continue the MOU with the USFWS until sufficient state park system staffing,
equipment, and administrative/visitor facilities are available. The Division should
provide adequate staff, equipment, and funds so that Dismal Swamp can be oper-
ated as a state natural area in a manner consistent with the mission of North Caro-
lina State Parks System. When sufficient state resources are available, Dismal
Swamp State Natural Area should be managed as a state parks system unit.
Maintaining Fire Lines for Fire Suppression: The USFWS has the heavy
equipment and trained operators needed to maintain the roads on both state and
federal property. These dirt roads serve as fire breaks as well as vehicle routes
through the park. For transportation purposes, the roads should be maintained in
proportion to their purpose and use. Because private vehicles are not allowed, the
existing mowing regime provides sufficient passage for federal and state staff pa-
trols. The USFWS mows the following roads each spring to keep them accessible:
Corapeake (from the western park boundary to Laurel), Forest Line, and Kim
Saunders.
Fire suppression efforts are not hindered by the current mowing schedule, Fires in
swamp areas tend to bum slowly and provide greater reaction time. Fire fighters
using road maintenance equipment can clear the vegetation from dirt roads when a
fire occurs. Maintaining fire breaks by regular mowing is only one factor affecting
fire suppression. Because the USFWS has sophisticated weather tracking capabili-
Page 16 of 25
ties at the National Wildlife Refuge (including the ability to detect lightning
strikes), early detection of fires in the Dismal Swamp is expected.
The Division should maintain the existing mowing schedule in cooperation with the
USFWS. This schedule should be reexamined when the Division receives suffi-
cient funding to establish the Dismal Swamp State Natural Area as a unit of the
state parks system.
PUBLIC HEARING RESULTS
The Division of Parks and Recreation conducted a public hearing on September
19, 1994 in Elizabeth City to obtain comments concerning the Dismal Swamp
State Natural Area. After Division staff presented an introduction and explained
the meeting's purpose, attendees were asked to respond to the question, "What are
your suggestions for the future of Dismal Swamp State Park? "
Public Hearing Suggestions
1. Bring education and interpretation/stewardship/conservation together. (18
votes)
2. Need cooperative effort with N.C. Division of Forest Resources: Educa-
tion/management/use. (13 votes)
3. Update development plans with US Fish & Wildlife Service to avoid duplica-
tion of facilities, programs, personnel, etc. (10 votes)
4. Establish some facilities to encourage eco-tourism, especially near US 17 wel-
come/visitor center. (5 votes)
5. Restore natural hydrology. (4 votes)
6. State pay back federal government and turn over to N.C. Forest Service. (4
votes)
7. Allow more public access from the south. (3 votes)
8. Determine LWCF requirements for conservation purposes and compare to cur-
rent management. (3 votes)
9. State- should manage park (Forest Resources if not Parks & Recreation). (3
votes)
10. Use park resources to generate some funding for the park in cooperation with
Forest Resources. (3 votes)
11. Need boating access along canal for small boats. (2 votes)
12. Coordinate signs/information with park development. (1 vote)
13. Develop environmental education materials, programs, etc. (1 vote)
SITE LIMITATIONS
Soils - The soils at the Dismal Swamp State Natural Area are peat and muck,
which severely limit any type of construction or road building. Federal regulations
prohibit filling in wetlands. These soil conditions make it nearly impossible to lo-
cate buildings or new roads within the current park boundaries.
Page 17 of 25
Access - The state of North Carolina does not own road access to the Dismal
Swamp State Natural Area. Although Division staff members are permitted to en-
ter the park through the federal refuge, this route is closed to public vehicular traf-
fic. To the east, the site is separated from U.S. 17 by the Dismal Swamp Canal
and, according to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regulations, no structure may be
constructed across the canal that will impede boat traffic. Private land abuts the
southernmost boundary.
MASTER PLAN
The master plan identifies land acquisition boundaries needed to protect the site's
natural resources, describes the physical plant needed to accommodate public use,
and describes the major interpretive themes. The original master plan for Dismal
Swamp, written in 1974, has been reviewed to determine if changes are needed.
Factors considered include: the park purpose statement, relevant laws and policies,
natural heritage inventory, park management considerations, public opinion ex-
pressed through public involvement efforts, and park visitor safety. The review re-
sulted in this revised master plan, which replaces the 1974 plan. The master plan's
primary objectives are to obtain legal access to the state's property, to provide in
terpretation and education programs and facilities, and to manage the area's natural
resources according to the DPR natural resource policy.
The master plan construction includes a visitor center on the east bank of the Dis-
mal Swamp Canal as well as trails, group campsites, and maintenance facilities on
the west bank (Figure 1). The visitor center is a multi-use building containing the
reception area, exhibit area, auditorium, office space, access road, parking lot,
storage space, exhibits, furniture, and equipment. It will be located on U.S. 17,
just south of the Dismal Swamp Canal Visitor Center and Welcome Center. Ferry
service will take visitors across the Dismal Swamp Canal to the swamp. Ferry ser-
vice will comply with the federal regulation prohibiting structures that impede boat
traffic on the canal or infringe on the width of the canal.
The facilities on the west bank include a maintenance area, ranger residence, primi-
tive camps, trail improvements, and an interpretive trail boardwalk with an over-
look area. Primitive group camps will be provided for groups who wish to spend
several days in the park. Groups interested in the Atlantic white cedar stands will
find these campsites particularly useful because the travel time between the visitor
center and cedar stands invites overnight stays. Specific sites should be located
where impacts to the park's natural resources will be minimized.
The maintenance area will require land acquisition on the southeast comer of the
park where the soils will support building construction. An access road will be
needed to connect S.R. 1221 which parallels the Dismal Swamp Canal and the
Page 18 of 25
southeast comer of the state's property. This option is the best way to reach the
eastern edge of the park, where most of the visitor use will occur.
All the facilities described in the master plan should be completed at one time. The
park should not open to the public until sufficient staffing, equipment, and adminis-
trative/visitor facilities are available. Minimal staffing and equipment will result in
inadequate stewardship of the natural resources and will hamper essential, visitor
services.
The master plan does not recommend converting the Dismal Swamp State Natural
Area to state forest for multiple-use management that would include logging. The
federal LWCF grant to purchase the property states that the area is to "... be re-
tained as a natural preserve with only minimal future development to promote the
preservation and interpretive theme. " Actions that would convert the area to
other uses must be approved by the National Park Service. Land converted to
other uses, such as timber production, must be replaced with land of equal value
and usefulness.
LAND ACQUISITION NEEDS
The state parks system's highest land acquisition priority at Dismal Swamp is to
obtain legal access to the state natural area. Acquiring approximately 49 acres be-
tween S.R. 1219 to Bull Boulevard along the southern border will provide access
to the western side of the state's land. If this land cannot be acquired, another way
to gain access to the western side of the state natural area is to acquire access
rights along Insurance Ditch Road to Bull Boulevard.
The maintenance and operations center will require about 120 acres adjacent to the
southeast comer of the state natural area. The maintenance center will located
about 7,000 feet north of the end of S.R. 1221 and, therefore, approximately 25
acres will be needed for a 150-foot-wide right-of-way. Finally, approximately, 201
acres may be sold to the USFWS so that hunters on the National Wildlife Refuge
lands to the north of the state natural area will not need to cross state natural area
land to access refuge lands. Land purchases and sales will result in a net decrease
of two acres for the Dismal Swamp State Natural Area.
Page 19 of 25

March 1999
(replaces 5124193 guidelines)
APPENDIX B
N. C. Department of Administration
State Intergovernmental Review Clearinghouse
Environmental Assessment
Guidelines
These standardized guidelines are for use when preparing an Environmental Assessment (EA) to
comply with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and its rules in the North Carolina
Administrative Code.` The purpose of the EA is to provide a state agency with enough informa-
tion to determine if a planned project has a level of impact on the environment requiring the
preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) or if a Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI) is the appropriate conclusion.
1. Prepare a cover letter including the following:
• Title/name of proposed activity
• Responsible state agency
• Name, address and phone number of state agency contact person
• Preparer of the document (if not a state agency, include address, phone number)
• List of other cooperating agencies, if applicable
Prior to completing an EA, be sure that the proposed project meets the state project agency's"
minimum criteria for requiring compliance with SEPA and that you are following the lead
state project agency's procedures and required forms. This information can be obtained from
the state project agency.
2. Complete all sections (A-I).
A. Proposed Project Description
Describe the entire project. Explain how it fits into any larger project or master plan. If this is a
phased project, identify future and previous planned phases and their timing Details should. in-
clude, but are not limited to, the following, as applicable:
• number of acres of land to be disturbed
• square footage and height in stories of new buildings
• square footage or acreage of footprint of entire project
• number of parking spaces in parking lot(s) or deck
• proposed use(s) of any building(s)
• location of project (county/municipality) and reference to location map(s) in Section H"
• site improvements to be made, such as grading, filling, landscaping, etc.
• connections to existing utility and sewer lines and/or new utility installation
Page 20 of 25
• amount of paved and otherwise impermeable surface
• construction of any stormwater control devices
B. Purpose and Need for Proposed Project
Discuss why this project is necessary and how it fits into the project sponsor's mission. Include
any unique aspects of the project. For example, is the project needed to bring together functions
that are scattered, to alleviate crowded facilities, to expand, upgrade or replace unsafe or in-
adequate facilities, or to create a new needed facility/service?
C. Alternatives Analysis
Discuss all reasonable alternatives to the proposed project, including the alternative of no action.
If more than one site was considered, discuss the site selection process and the factors considered
in selecting the proposed site. Factors considered could include real estate considerations, space,
utilities, transportation, environmental consequences, etc. Conclude with why the proposed site
or project is the preferred alternative.
D. Existing Environmental Characteristics of Project Area
The existing or affected environment should be discussed in terms of what currently exists on the
site and in the surrounding area.
If no site resource information exists for a given topic, make a statement to that effect and pro-
vide a reference to a study or document which supports your statement. For example, if
there are no wetlands on the site, reference a wetlands delineation that was done in the past or,
at a minimum, afield survey that was conducted..
For some topics, such as land use, wetlands, water supplies, shellfish or fish and their habitats, and
wildlife and their habitats, discussion should also include the surrounding area if there is any pos-
sibility that the proposed project could have any impact on it. For example, if the site itself does
not contain any wetlands, but there are wetlands downstream that could be affected by the in-
creased surface water runoff from the site, they should be identified.
(1) Topography
Briefly describe the topography of the project area including landforms, slopes, and elevations.
A brief description of the geology of the site can be added if available. Is the site within the
100-year flood plain? National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) maps should be used to de-
termine whether the project will encroach on the base (100-year) flood plain.
(2) Soils
Describe the dominant soil(s) in the project area as well as any soil types that might prove to
be a constraint to the proposed project. This would include any fill, wetland soil types, etc.
(3) Land Use
Describe the current use of the land at the site and the surrounding acreage. Additionally, dis-
cuss how the current land use fits into the land use of the entire area in terms of conservation,
development, and ecological function. If applicable, identify the current zoning classification
of the project site and surrounding area.
Page 21 of 25
(4) Wetlands
Describe the existence of any wetlands on-site or near the site. Indicate any wetlands on the
map in Section H. Include a list of the type, quality, and delineation. Describe the primary
function of the wetland (e.g., flood control, wildlife habitat, groundwater recharge), and
other factors that indicate the relative importance of the function to the total wetland re-
sources of the area.
(5) Prime or Unique Agricultural Lands
Is any of the proposed site classified as prime or unique agricultural land? Reference some au-
thority. Local soil and water conservation districts can be of assistance in classification of
these areas.
(6) Public Lands and Scenic, Recreational, and State Natural Areas
Discuss the existence of any formally designated park land, scenic or recreational areas, or
state natural areas on or adjacent to the site.
(7) Areas of Archaeological or Historical Value
Reference any studies that have been done on this site. If no studies are available discuss if and
how the site has been previously disturbed. List any buildings on the site and their approxi-
mate age.
(8) Air Quality
Identify the area's air quality classification, acknowledging if it is in transition and why. Dis-
cuss the current sources of emissions for the site. Discuss any previous odor problems or
complaints due to any existing facilities.
(9) Noise Levels
Discuss the current noise levels on the site with a measurable benchmark, if possible.
(10) Water Resources (Surface Water and Groundwater)
Note: Since these topics tend to overlap and are interrelated, discuss them together under a
single heading.
Identify surface waters and groundwater (aquifers) in the project area. For surface waters,
identify the name, location (include on the enclosed map in Section H), classification, and use
support ratings. Identify the river basin where the project is located. If there are unnamed
streams, estimate the average flow. Discuss groundwater in terms of use, quality, quantity,
depth, and recharge.
(11) Forest Resources
List type (for example, hardwoods/pines) at or near the site.
(12) Shellfish or Fish and Their Habitats
Are there categories of shellfish beds/fish habitats at or near the site? Are these closed beds,
highly productive areas, or spawning areas?
(13) Wildlife and Natural Vegetation
Identify any wildlife habitat that exists on or near the project area. List specific species of
dominant plants and animals that are indicative of the kind of habitat that exists, as well as any
threatened or endangered species.
E. Predicted Environmental Effects of Projects
In this section the discussion should center on the direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts the
project will have on the same topics covered in the previous section with the addition of "(14) In-
Page 22 of 25
troduction of Toxic Substances." Identify both the construction and operational impacts. If there
will be no impact in any specific topic area (#1-13 above), that should be stated. If the impact is
small and deemed to be insignificant, describe the impact and then make a statement to that effect
at the end of the discussion for each topic. In all categories, quantify impacts where feasible (i. e.,
in terms of acres, linear feet, etc.).
If, in Section D, "Existing Environmental Characteristics of Project Area," it was shown that a
resource did not exist on or near the site, then indicate "Not Applicable (N/A)" in the appropriate
section. For example, if there are no wetlands on the site or near the site that could be impacted
by the project, then there cannot be any environmental consequences to wetlands from the pro-
ject and there need not be any mitigative measures. Therefore, the topic of wetlands does not
need to be addressed in this or the next section and "N/A"should be indicated under #4 of this
section.
(1) Topography
Will this project change the existing topography? Identify and evaluate any encroachments of
the project on flood plains.
(2) Soils
Will this project cause any soil disturbance or contamination? If soil is to be moved, how
many square yards/feet will be moved and to what location? If soil is expected to be contami-
nated, discuss the contaminant.
(3) Land Use
How will the land use change due to the project and how will the new use(s) fit into the in-
tended land use of the entire area in terms of conservation, development, ecological function,
and quality of life? Will local zoning or land use plans need to be changed?
(4) Wetlands
Will there be any direct or indirect impacts on wetlands from the project? If wetland is to be
filled, how many acres are involved and what kind of authorization (permit) is required? Will
the diversion/addition/withdrawal of surface water impact existing wetlands? Construction ac-
tivity as well as long-term operational activity should be considered.
(5) Prime or Unique Agricultural Lands
How will the project affect the identified prime or unique agricultural land? How much acre-
age will be lost and how much retained in that use? What will be the impact of the loss?
(6) Public Lands, Scenic and Recreational Areas
How will the project impact any formally designated park land, scenic, recreational or state
natural areas on or adjacent to the site? Again, quantify the amount of loss. Also, discuss the
loss of any informal scenic or recreational site functions.
(7) Areas of Archaeological or Historical Value
How will the project affect any areas of archaeological or historical value? Will any building
be demolished or renovated? If yes, include photographs of buildings on the site.
(8) Air Quality
How will the ambient air quality be affected by the project? Remember to discuss both the
construction and the operation of the project. Consider cumulative impacts as this project is
added to the existing development. Will there be any open burning? If parking is involved and
there will be more than 750 spaces, a Complex Air Source permit will be required. Confirm if
the project will increase odor levels or increase the possibility for odor complaints.
Page 23 of 25
(9) Noise Levels
Will the project increase noise levels? If so, when (days of the week and hours of day)? At
what distance will increased noise levels be heard? Will surrounding properties be affected by
noise level?
(10) Water Resources
How will the project impact the following during construction and operation: surface water
quality and quantity, and groundwatq, quality and quantity? Address any changes in the
amount of impervious surface at the project site and stormwater runoff (i. e., nonpoint source
pollution). When discussing these impacts, include impacts on erosion rates at the site and
downstream, sedimentation changes, changes in downstream water quality (e.g., eutrophica-
tion impacts), etc.
(11) Forest Resources
If any forests are destroyed by this activity, describe forestry practices to be used.
(12) Shellfish or Fish and Their Habitats
What kinds of impacts on shellfish, fish, or their habitats will the project have either during
construction or operation? Again, consider on-site and nearby aquatic habitats.
(13 ) Wildlife and Natural Vegetation
How much of the existing natural vegetation will be destroyed or altered by the project? If the
wildlife will be displaced, are there surrounding areas that provide similar types of habitat or
does the project encompass any possible relocation areas nearby? What is the long-term effect
if more development is planned for the area?
(14) Introduction of Toxic Substances
Will any toxic substances be introduced during construction or operation of the project? If so,
name them and identify how they will be used. Discuss any measures that will be taken to en-
sure that toxic substances will be treated in accordance with all appropriate regulations so that
there will be no significant environmental impact.
F. Mitigative Measures
The only topics that need to be covered in this section are those which were deemed to be signifi-
cantly affected by the proposed project in Section E, "Predicted Environmental Effects of Pro-
jects." List all of those topics in the same order as above and discuss for each one what measures
are going to be taken to mitigate the effects of the project. For example, wetlands created to off-
set wetland loss, or if habitat of any kind is going to be created, it should go in this section. If
the project will cause an increase in emissions, what steps are being planned to minimize or reduce
future emission increases? If stormwater control practices are going to be implemented, what
kinds and what level of rainfall events will they accommodate? Provide quantitative data.
G. References
List in alphabetical order any documents referenced in the EA.
H. Exhibits
Include a reproducible 8 1/2" x 11" site location map or maps showing the site of the proposed
project and any significant features such as wetlands, parks, historic sites, etc. Also include a most
recent USGS topographical map (7.5 minute quadrangle) with project and boundaries shown.
Page 24 of 25

I. State and Federal Permits Required
List any permits that are to be obtained for this project.
FOR LEAD STATE AGENCY USE ONLY
Conclusion Statement (Must be completed and signed by responsible state agency and submitted with the
EA document to the State Clearinghouse.)
Select the appropriate statement below:
After preparation/review of this EA, the responsible state agency has concluded there is a Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI) and will not be preparing an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). (Attach any addi-
tional information regarding this conclusion that you deem important to this finding.)
The agency has completed this EA and is hereby submitting it for review and comment. After a consid-
eration of the comments received.. the agency will proceed with a FONSI or prepare an EIS.
Signed
Agency
Submission Instructions
Note to non-state agency document preparer:
Documents completed for state agencies must first be sent to the appropriate agency for
approval and completion of the Conclusion Statement prior to State Clearinghouse submis-
sion. Contact the appropriate agency for its submission procedures. Documents prepared
for the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources will be subject to depart-
mental review prior to submission to the State Clearinghouse.
An EA should not exceed 40 pages in length, excluding exhibit materials. Sixteen (16) copies of
this document with the cover letter and Conclusion Statement should be submitted to the State
Clearinghouse, N.C. Department of Administration, Room 5106c, 116 West Jones Street, Ra-
leigh, North Carolina 27603. For the review schedule and submission deadline dates, call the State
Clearinghouse at [phone].
Page 25 of 25
f--j f G'-.+ L" 1 J? %---
Cn O G'?
LN, U
Z N
J
Lf')
q Cn
1^?
M""I
Q
Z
U
J
cn
O I
ul?
U-1
O
r O r
CD r 00
O O
N ?
r

W V 0)
T M
N r-
Ch Iq O
m 00 e- C) cD
: I- co

r r

Ch p r
M
cn W

-j r M ?I r- ? I

r

l O

r-
(M
07 I 1 I I e- 1?

C) N N ?- O Cf) V' CA r- L ' r
?
-
N ch C') (n Cf) N In LO r W ?

O
r
J
-
I I i ? i I I I ! •
CD M 0I
W M:
1
1 O: C. NI
- co U? N CO: C7 M
CO
? C
4 cc O ;
v ; CO ! N CO) , N
V) l co I Chi , N
OI I !
I r to

W
LIJ v co

N N

O N Q

r 1- CA

I- LO CO

ti co O

O
r

(-4

CYI)

CO

to
V)
r,
C7
C') r
r
r Q
N
O co

C)
L) U
I I
I
i ?
l
CA . et : N ' 0. cc LO O
N : to N t,- c+) W W W

- Co N
r
M

I U U U

W W
Cn ' VJ
' f? VJ
, V - Vl' r
' M' O , (TJ
r Cg
C) m
C)
tf (/) r- N N r r N Cf) r
o'
CA J i
T ,
O 0 r ' CD Q ' CO C? r , h U') C cl
r' . N r Il- LO O N O r W W
M r CO CO r ! N r CA C7
M O O'
T
U U
r? O v co L w CO U-). to U•) 0 0
. N O M r Cn lC)
O
cf'
r-
N
N Cl) CO r r N 4T ?-
M
C71
T
U W 1'-' O Cn O Cn co 1` v C
O Cn O m CO' m t-- CJ C7
T CO C/) : N N r r: r. C7 r
0
0 I i I
1

CV) e- !
LIJ! Cp Lo to J O ! to v O O
O N ~ r N O W
M a
- f
) r ?
O O O

Q-' J
U
n3 ?
T O! Ch O tr O . N r .-
C31 I r, N Cl) N: e-j ", Q r
00
Q1
T
(f) r
0) O
r" C)
r
J(::) - m

r LO
Cq N
ui
O M
00
CD
r m
h I t`
r r
a 2 z
m
U y
= C J Cn Z J

<
c.0 - , ? >1
,ma° > U H Q Z

C9 .? co
o a >
c> 3 W-
°
O
N O O ? O

M
w

W
a
z

B O
j
a
a ?
cn W
? Q
J
v ?

L
J ?
rn

Ea
Q
?1 N
?
N w
? QQ
^ ? C
O
H
2 41
r ? =

4n vi
O O ?

Q O C N
1
Q
V O y E_ C
EoE°3
N
T =
O
O
N Y
Y
?x OJ ?p e
? •C cC y C m ?
ti C°lA
U LU N- d Y :: N V

°
v Z

¢
`
ion 3P o
g
`f
CL Z
" ? J •?JN(0
N J. J (M ti 0)

d QCA
.,
I WOE ? ?
O ?'1 h co
T
, cm cm a) a) m
r ?-
m W
v W
L

0
O
[Fwd: [Fwd: [Fwd: NC Parks and Recreatio... on US 17, Camden County, DWQ#02-1650]11
Subject: [Fwd: [Fwd: [Fwd: NC Parks and Recreation Visitor's Center on US 17, Camden
County, DWQ#02-1650]]]
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 15:28:42 -0500 ??? C4G? V(1
From: Jeff Schaffer <[e-mail]> <d\"n
Organization: NC DENR DCM
To: Tom Steffens <[e-mail]> ? J D C ?
CC: Cyndi Karoly <[e-mail]>
Tom,

Another follow up to check on the status of your comments on the NC
Parks & Rec - Dismal Swamp Visitors Center Project (DWQ Project
#021650). I really need your comments on this ASAP. Anything you can
do to move this along would be greatly appreciated.
Jeff Schaffer
Jeff Schaffer
Major Permits & Consistency Coordinator
Division of Coastal Management
1638 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1638
Phone: [phone], ext. 240
Fax: [phone]
1
Subject: [Fwd: [Fwd: NC Parks and Recreation Visitor's Center on US 17, Camden Co/uhty,
DWQ#02-1650]]
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 09:58:47 -0500 I
From: Jeff Schaffer <[e-mail]>
Organization: NC DENR DCM
To: Tom Steffens <[e-mail]>
CC: Cyndi Karoly <[e-mail]>
1
Tom,
I just wanted to follow up on the status of your comments for the
subject project. Please let me know whatever you can.
Thanks, /
Jeff
e
Jeff Schaffer
Major Permits & Consistency Coordinator ll
Division of Coastal Management
1638 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1638
Phone: [phone], ext. 240
Fax: [phone]
I o1'3 1/21/03 1:32 PM
[Fwd: [Fwd: [Fwd: NC Parks and Recreatio... on US 17, Camden County, DWQ#02-1650)1]
Subject: Re: [Fwd: NC Parks and Recreation Visitor's Center on US 17, Camden County,
DWQ#02-16501
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 10:33:03 -0500
From: Cyndi Karoly <[e-mail]>
To: Jeff Schaffer <Jeff. Sch affer @ncmai 1. net>
CC: Doug Huggett <[e-mail]>, "Tom. Steffens" <Torn.Steffens (q) nemail.net>
Tom - please read Jeff's note below. Our clock is now ticking, so please advise on your decision on this
project when you can. Thanks.
Jeff Schaffer wrote:
Cyndi,
Based on correspondence from the USACE Real Estate Division out of Norfolk, they can not issue the
federal lease to the Division of Parks & Rec for the Dismal Swamp Visitor's Center until all regulatory
permits required by NC are issued. Also, the encroachment agreement/easement from NC DOT is in for
signature by both Parks and DOT so that should be in hand in fairly short order. Based on this, DCM has
agreed to move forward with the processing of the permit application and will condition the CAMA
Major permit requiring that Parks & Rec provide a copy of the federal lease before commencement of
any work at the site.
Because of the above referenced information and in accordance with your 11/19/02 email , DCM is now
considering the application to be "complete" and I am asking that the 401 review begin again.
If you have any questions, or if I can help you in any way, please let me know.
Jeff
Cyndi Karoly wrote:
Thanks Jeff, that's the info we needed. I'll see that it's noted as on hold on this end as well. Please
advise when this file is "complete" according to DCM, then we'll proceed with the 401 business.
Jeff Schaffer wrote:
Cyndi,
That is correct that the applicant does not have any documented ownership or easement from NCDOT
and the federal government for the proposed project site. Because of that, DCM placed this project
on hold when we initially received the application pending receipt of the appropriate documentation,
but sent the application out for review by the state and federal agencies in an effort to obtain
comments and minimize the time it would take to get the final decision out once the
ownership/easment documentation is obtained.
I hope this answers your question, and provides the information you were looking for. If you have
any questions, please let me know. You can reach me by phone at 733-2293, ext. 240 or email at
[e-mail].
Jeff
2 o1'3 1/21/03 1:32 PM
Re: [Fwd: NC Parks and Recreation Visito...er on IIS 17, Camden County, DWQ#02-1650]
Subject: Re: [Fwd: NC Parks and Recreation Visitor's Center on US 17, Camden County,
DWQ#02-16501
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 09:21:37 -0500
From: Jeff Schaffer <[e-mail]>
Organization: NC DENR DCM
To: Cyndi Karoly <[e-mail]>
CC: Doug Huggett <[e-mail]>,
"Tom.Steffens" <[e-mail]>
Cyndi,
Based on correspondence from the USACE Real Estate Division out of Norfolk, they can not issue the
federal lease to the Division of Parks & Rec for the Dismal Swamp Visitor's Center until all regulatory
permits required by NC are issued. Also, the encroachment agreement/easement from NC DOT is in for
signature by both Parks and DOT so that should be in hand in fairly short order. Based on this, DCM has
agreed to move forward with the processing of the permit application and will condition the CAMA Major
permit requiring that Parks & Rec provide a copy of the federal lease before commencement of any work at
the site.
Because of the above referenced information and in accordance with your 11/19/02 email , DCM is now
considering the application to be "complete" and I am asking that the 401 review begin again.
If you have any questions, or if I can help you in any way, please let me know.
Jeff
Cyndi Karoly wrote:
Thanks Jeff, that's the info we needed. I'll see that it's noted as on hold on this end as well. Please advise
when this file is "complete" according to DCM, then we'll proceed with the 401 business.
Jeff Schaffer wrote:
Cyndi,
That is correct that the applicant does not have any documented ownership or easement from NCDOT
and the federal government for the proposed project site. Because of that, DCM placed this project
on hold when we initially received the application pending receipt of the appropriate documentation,
but sent the application out for review by the state and federal agencies in an effort to obtain comments
and minimize the time it would take to get the final decision out once the ownership/easment
documentation is obtained.
I hope this answers your question, and provides the information you were looking for. If you have any
questions, please let me know. You can reach me by phone at 733-2293, ext. 240 or email at
[e-mail].
Jeff
Doug Huggett wrote:
1 of*2 11/26/02 10:33 AM
Rc: Fwd: NC Parks and Recreation Visito...cr on US 17, Camden County, DWQ#02-16501
Jeff, can you handle the repsonse back to Cyndi on this'?
Thanks
Doug
Subject: NC Parks and Recreation Visitor's Center on US 17, Camden County,
DWQ#02-1650
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 13:44:39 -0500
From: Cyndi Karoly <[e-mail]>
To: "Tom. Steffens" <[e-mail]>,
"doug.huggett" <[e-mail]>,
[e-mail]
Jeff and Doug - Tom Steffens in our Washington RO has informed me that
the applicant does not have a right-of-way agreement or own the property
on which they propose to build. Had you guys heard about this yet?
Please advise as to the status of the CAMA application.
Thanks.
Jeff Schaffer
Major Permits & Consistency Coordinator
Division of Coastal Management
1638 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1638
Phone: [phone], ext. 240
Fax: [phone]
Jeff Schaffer
Major Permits & Consistency Coordinator
Division of Coastal Management
1638 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1638
Phone: [phone], ext. 240
Fax: [phone]
2 of 2 11/26/02 10:33 AM
Re: [Fwd: NC Parks and Recreation Visito...er on US 17, Carnden County, DWQ#02-16501
Subject: Re: [Fwd: NC Parks and Recreation Visitor's Center on US 17, Camden County,
DWQ#02-16501
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 14:59:53 -0500
From: Jeff Schaffer <Jeff.Schaffer a ncmail.net>
Organization: NC DENR DCM (rte
To: Cyndi Karoly <Cyndi.Karoly@NCMaiLNet> D t ??
CC: Doug Huggett <[e-mail]>
Cyndi, !?''R
VL,() Y?6?-Y' i
That is correct that the applicant does not have any documented ownership or easement from NCDOT and(,
the federal government for the proposed project site. Because of that, DCM placed this project on hold
when we initially received the application pending receipt of the appropriate documentation, but sent the
application out for review by the state and federal agencies in an effort to obtain comments and minimize
the time it would take to get the final decision out once the ownership/easment documentation is obtained.
I hope this answers your question, and provides the information you were looking for. If you have any
questions, please let me know. You can reach me by phone at 733-2293, ext. 240 or email at
Jeff. Schaffer@ncmaiLnet.
Jeff'
Doug Haggett wrote:
Jeff, can you handle the repsonse back to Cyndi on this?
Thanks
Doug
Subject: NC Parks and Recreation Visitor's Center on US 17, Camden County,
DWQ#02-1650
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 13:44:39 -0500
From: Cyndi Karoly <[e-mail]>
To: "Tom. Steffens" <[e-mail]>,
"doug.huggett" <[e-mail]>,
[e-mail]
Jeff and Doug - Tom Steffens in our Washington RO has informed me that
the applicant does not have a right-of-way agreement or own the property
on which they propose to build. Had you guys heard about this yet?
Please advise as to the status of the CAMA application.
Thanks.
Jeff Schaffer
Major Permits & Consistency Coordinator
Division of Coastal Management
I of 2 11/19/02 12:50 PM
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact: tom steffens
Non-Discharge Branch WQ Supervisor: Roger Thorpe
Date: _
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name NC Parks & Rec US 17 Visitors Center
Project Number 02 1650
Recvd From DCM
Received Date 10/14/02 Recvd By Region
Project Type visitors center
County Camden
County2
Region Washington
Certificates
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream
Type Type Impact Score Index
Stream
Class Acres Feet
Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
Stream Impacts (ft.)
®o
CAMA Waters O YO N F_ 30-3-2 WSIV Sw 30,150. 3.29 F_ ?-F_
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? 0 Y 0 N Did you request more info? 0 Y 0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? 0 Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? 0 Y 0 N Recommendation: 0 Issue 0 Issue/fond 0 Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) Longitude (ddmmss)
Comments:
Hold-Incomplete CAMA Mai application. Applicant does not have riahte of-wayagreements, or own
propeEty on which activity is applied for.
11 i 1 f - .,.,1 A,, 1' vtN tw 4 A I `?A,. eW e- - ' --, , .?_ 0 C (- AM A n _-) r --?, _fl f
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
Facility Name NC Parks & Rec US 17 Visitors Center
County Camden
Project Number 02 1650
Comments (continued from page 1):
Regional Contact: tom steffens
Date:
cc: Regional Office Page Number 2
Central Office
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Michael F. Easley, Governor Donna D. Moffitt, Director William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
October 11, 2002
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney
Division of Water Quality, Wetlands/401 Unit
FROM: Doug Huggett 0216,5o
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
i '
s
OCT 1 4!
N. _ .1
SUBJECT: CAMA PERMIT APPLICATION REVIEW
Applicant: NC DIVISION OF PARKS & RECREATION - VISTIORS
CENTER US 17 - CAMDEN
Project Location: WEST OF US 17 IN CAMDEN CO. ADJACENT TO THE DISMAL
SWAMP CANAL.
Proposed Project: CONSTRUCT A FLOATING BRIDGE, 5,000 SQ.-FT. VISITORS
CENTER, STORAGE BLDG., PARKING LOT, BULKHEAD
CANOE LAUNCH, 400' LONG ASPHALT DR., & 3,000 GAL.
SEPTIC SYSTEM.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return
this form by October 31, 2002. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project,
please contact Doug Huggett at [phone], ext. 244. When appropriate, in-depth
comments with supporting data is requested.
REPLY
This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project, only if the recommended changes are
incorporated.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached comments.
SIGNED
DATE
1638 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] Internet: http://dcm2.enr.state.nc.us
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer -50% Recycled \ 10% Post Consumer Paper
D
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Michael F. Easley, Governor Donna D. Moffitt, Director William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
October 11, 2002
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney
Division of Water Quality, Wetlands/401 Unit
FROM: Doug Huggett
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
SUB.IECT: CAMA PERMIT APPLICATION REVIEW
Applicant: NC DIVISION OF PARKS & RECREATION - VISTIORS
CENTER US 17 - CAMDEN
Project Location: WEST OF US 17 IN CAMDEN CO. ADJACENT TO THE DISMAL
SWAMP CANAL.
Proposed Project: CONSTRUCT A FLOATING BRIDGE, 5,000 SQ.-FT. VISITORS
CENTER, STORAGE BLDG., PARKING LOT, BULKHEAD
CANOE LAUNCH, 400' LONG ASPHALT DR., & 3,000 GAL.
SEPTIC SYSTEM.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return
this form by October 31, 2002. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project,
please contact Doug Huggett at [phone], ext. 244. When appropriate, in-depth
comments with supporting data is requested.
REPLY
This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project, only if the recommended changes are
incorporated.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached comments.
SIGNED
DATE
1638 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: http://dcm2.enr.state.nc.us
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer -50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper

DCM % DWQ %
Development Type Feb (14300 1601,435100093 1625 6253 (743001602 435100095 2341
1, private, non-commercial
development that does not Involve
5250
100%(S250) 0°!° (SO)
the filling or excavation of any
wetlands or open water areas:
Public or commercial development
II
.
that does not Involve the filling or
S400
100%($400) 0% (SO)
excavation of any wetlands or open
water areas:
Ill. For development that Involves the
oiling and/or excavation of up to 1
acre of wetlands and/or open water
areas, determine if A, 8, C, or D
below applies:

III(A). For private. non-commercial
development, If General water Quality 5250 100%(S250) 0% (SO)
Certification No.3301 (see attached)
can be appiiad:
MMMMMMMMM?
111(8): For public or commercial
development, if General water Quality $400 100%(S400) 0% (SO)
Certification No.3301 (see attached)
an be applied:
III(C). If General Water Quality
Certification No. 3301 (sae attached)
could be applied, but DCM staff
determined that additional review and
$400 60%(S240) 40%($160)
written DWQ concurrence is needed
because of concerns related to water
quality or aquatic life: `-
III(D). If General Water Quality
Certification No. 3301 (see attached) 5400 60%(S240) 40% (5160)
can not be applied:
IV. For development that involves
the tilling and/or excavation of more 5475 60°x: (5285) 40% (5190)
than one acre of wetlands and/or
open water areas:
P.Int.d: 11:23 0m Dale: SEP 21, 2002 U...: mah000,
File Path: P:\99000\99000\Dwp\OSelpn De loamenl\FWtil q B.Idoe\ 990e0_56-100Ae9 Odle: SEP ZA. 2007 Time: 1123 am User. 101,0003
A
{C
125't

7/1
I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I
I _; 103'-?' I ;_ I I I d lS
I I I I I I I I I ??
I I I I I I I I I
1 1 I I 1 I I I I I w
I I I f I I
I i ??$ I I ; I I ; I
?I Q I I I I 1

_??
o1 -._7-.
P
X .
n'
C
000
m?
v Revisions:
C `o ' * No. De,
•? '? N ? y R t0 ?
Cl
Sheet title:
BRIDGE PLAN
do SECTIONS
4
DISMAL SWAMP CANAL ea,

>D
ID_1,?J
Nil
pag
EPs
m
Q
o •.
z
PI
z 92!
c
I <
f
N c P L P P•
9 Nag y Ph
to
?i
Oil
e
rProject title:
DISMAL SWAMP VISITORS CENTER
N.C. DIVISION OF PARKS AND RECREATION
CAMDEN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
ID# 4398164862A
?N a
I

1 N
t
0
I
I
C
b

slit ?

U !
I
zg

z
m

ALPHA & OMEGA GROUP
I?1 1 91?a1,13en3
`?-> IAA.,. u,+el aua P.,rl....,.....f ..".,...............
./! O.r., N../ 3'.31. 1aI R.l.. A, NC )fell
? / f e9l .e Jl
8
a
I
I
I
s
If., r,. .I. / of rP I...1.++ r1
df102?JIVJIWO'9 VHd1V

Y
?m

VZ9999196£9 101
VNIlOM HISON 'AMOO Uaviv0
NOlIV38338 ONV SAM JO NOISIAIO 'O'N
831N30 SMISIA dMYMS lvriSla
:01111 p0lad
I
i i
fal
I?
I I
?Id

I
,ISszr rA .er.ar.)vs ?
I rJ ' ? v

I ? I?
? 1 j ' 1
3
1 ,

1
Dt l(.l9 6
T ?? a
2
0
I-) O O v
$ v cal ? ? O
a cr M
"o r I
Im z $X $U?
S1D0 a oa CE r1?
•? ?a ? a
d0
.00
1jq a o
r

1
t. I I I \

6
? I.
I
I
i
.l.
r+r,u II? ' z9s I 1 II I
.ez.eae„ n
! I i ;I I
j ?I I
I I I
I W g ! it I
I Fs i i I I
? ?I I
?I I
ii
I iL J
I u
I
I
I
I Lq
i
i
i
I
+i
Y• a
i
i
I
NVId Milan
ONV
311S lVM3N30
:01111 Ps9S 1

i I
b
i
1
I
b
a
LEI,
C.cc
Lu.
z
LU
c. w
c: 0 U
d2
O ? W
c.m
(1. Q
w N
?W
cn Q
Q
U
ea? ls? ?i
g., j
l l? l
Ila
yO p
w 'p 9.9 av
gi
e
lie, IV x If x
3 c?5 14 H. A Id v " .e d a ? 1? :t _ N
iq
10W4Ow :--n w0 92:01 :-u 2002 •rZ d35 :.190 D..P001-0-09066 \11u.wn>„0 I)u.D\6.0\D9066\00066\:d Mod .„J
.9904„w 211 ZOOZ '1Z 119 :0100 -0 90:01 :P•lOVd
ra If p Ib I / blf 11 Ib• Y/
//bIl '1N Yl11 •) M [61 IS / b ••!1 /l61
df10bJ VJ9W0-19 VIAM
w9m is6£ti #al
VNI1OM HAON lAMOD N3aPIVO
NOlIV3833H aNV SAM 30 NOISIAIa 'O'N
831N30 8011SIA dWVMS lVwSla
01111 1o01ad
NVId
1081NOO NOIS083
aNY Main
01111 1004S
z
0 O v
U N O
l' C W- M N
z800 gV
01od NDtd?; 'oN U . O
d
??.'r :wei!wa f5
j
,IS'SZf M ..6Z,61.L9 S
1 ,19 9OF 3N11 l11 ; fB 8L
I I k
wl ? j
U a d
;n I -.- b i I I V]
Iryi? I ?? i ? ?. I 1? u iq
1U,
o ?
r ?? i ?. I I
1
G I a
Iffi? I d I
I
I I I R
8 I• I /
? I
I I IL
I ?
d J I Ir
I ?l I I ? ?
It I I y °CLA
o?? I WAN
I ? `? I N
g I
a L/) L-
j l\\\ I
pvvvy I
1 1 98.1 oz.?cc9 s V` ` i
---------- -..__. ........ .\. \\ ?.._.. i
r$
I ?? ' I I I\ + i ?
0"1 I
I J ? I
I ?
I?
I? 9. I ?
i ?.. i L
I
I ?% ? i I I
"0.
I ?-
g? w ? . , 1, ICI
I I ? i ; ?I
?p I I
1A I ,S99tZ 3NI1 311 70 98
I.I
9 Off 3 „6Z,6L[9 N I ''I
? I / ` I Ili
N
J Nes W; d
a
15
Ell
bt
1A rv n r u n d a fn
N
rl Y
R -.9 54 ^ &?s
Z? 3 2 ? ? 3? 3 17{ Y F?FS?
1

W?W
J

@e
?iEEfllll9
B `1? IIII
IIII
8
o
b? ? IBC Q 8? ? ??5 gR
gig
is 4t7,4191
r rf d n 14 d of d
lid I.
14 11 + A d r d e1 d 14
woouwl :NIn - 10:11 :-q ZOOZ 'I7 d3S :Wa D..p.001-J OB066 \Il".w .0 1".O\6M0\06066\00066\:d Mod 0111
19WVbw n.n ZOOZ 'It d36 :6100 -- 0:11 P-1-11d

Pr Nted. 1129 an Dote, SCP 21, 2002 User, nslwbba
fee Poth, P-X990001990601 Dw01 De s lon_ Davfi opnent gloplino Brldoe\ 99060-SB-104.da0 Dote- SCP La. 2002 ]Ine- 1129 on Ufer- nalrobbs
9 e
R
5
r_ FE
li• ? j
O
C7 2' -2-
1- D t ---- __ m
o ?
fTt
6
6
f
O
N
u' z
b
2-6•

I
rr I I
___
I
l ?
y
?
1 I
t
«J_ _ _aI
I
I

m
I I

I I 1
?? I I I
I pl P ?
i-
I I r
I 9 I
I I o
I
rnl
I I N
L L? I I
I I
I
I
I I
I ? I I
r ?1- A-1
7w•
I
I I -
L
1
;'--
r p-1`4
D I
I I I
I I
I
r
, m
l,
I I I I ?.
I I I
-- -?-
S CUR 2'-0• 3' CLR

1 n I
f 9 • I
r r7 I
L ?. P
IIa I
I I
CLA I 2'-0• _ L 3 CU
A
.dA
O
top
voo
-AN
9
T Re
v 3 '?' No
V)? m NgN
CD
.. z o -
v
N
Sheet lille:
BRIDGE do
HYDRUALIC
DETAILS
2
G7
z
E3
z
0
p?
G7
m^
0
^z
\ /
.'a
b
Il

DISMAL SWAMP VISITORS CENTER
N.C. DIVISION OF PARKS AND RECREATION
CAMDEN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
ID# 4398164862A
z ?
\ ?
\ A & OMEGA GROUP
?,
\
>
\
v ALPH
full G91rf1 fReel Sala l:s] vrrri a. NC ]lela
Isnnr IJ e1 Je Ie flf 911 OffJ
Rwrl] iaJa®s•/rael.r.+ r.f.Irn af.re
e
P.Inted: 11:24 em Dot.: SEP 21. 2002 U.e:.n.bobbs
File Path: P:\99000\990e0\De9\Deelgn_omlePmaet\PWetl.1 8.W9e\ 99000_58-103.da9 Dale: SEP 24. 2002 1M *: 11:21 om Use, .9h,bbs

n
c
u
?w
W
r
m
n
c
y
r m
o X
Gil

O
0
Q-p
o
0-0
2n
OF 7 Rey
-oa No.
3 D
N? 8 ?Q1 N S N R 1p ?
N v g' -
W
-
Sheet Title:
FENDER SYSTEM
PLAN, ELEVATION do
DETAILS
M '
jl?
ell!
N
O
?i

I
I
o
3'-111f• R
4
l'-lli'
I'
I
v;
a?
m
z 9
v
m -
ye
Its
0

_t

a
6
ypQ
Z
K
Q
O
I?
i

"'Project Title:
DISMAL SWAMP VISITORS CENTER
N.C. DIVISION OF PARKS AND RECREATION
CAMDEN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
IDI 4398164862A
II
1
10
<00
ALPHA & OMEGA GROUP
na...R- ro-I"r..a918 YOl ffn etas
d f? ? T $ O a
9IF?-
,? >
$
-39 AAA E Ell i
pU
T m
K
L.,
f'
1
i
s
1
3
l
(?yV'
0
n
n
CrJ
a
0
O t
\Jl '•
I
m 9p
I
a: •?1
b

Z
1 4
a
l
If,
Lp,
.;i
:I lip)
I
I?
rw,

A
••I ,i '? r? 3? ?_
kl
6 Q, •`
1 1. ?;x L
:r; Ifl
t it
.,.I/:\•,.:q?A-11• ..'_?°i/
T fir. I ? . } •.

I
I l
I
1
111
.uasri ??? I
I
i
M I',
II "j
r
i?
i
i
• q
i
i?
I
I
I

I I?
II
I
•
of ei7e7f
t

1
i
1? C I L

?
r' f ? n-I a
?-
t
+
t
I
.fi
, ;
;
l I
1
^
I ? i ? I ? ? •
S
f
;

x
4r A
?I
1 `I

R9 ;

4pppv ?

r- '

r
7 m
> y
Fy

• I I?
I
1 Ib
1 •:'?y •
I I ' ?FJ i
?? I'{ I lj 1 ? ?1ti
?I
I ?? $rh
iff?i?.,fl I I t
Ii?II?II. lit Y ?i
2
! I Ilya . `?._:'
-S ill( 1 t i
I I ` 111 `- y
fEil; I. ;` I ? • ?.
Ir ,t . I ,
?.rVt i ll' II
70'.'7 ! •' 1 !iI it N I s
:?I III ' .T I I!II ? „ I
i
l I ?lf?.{,? ! ll.fli tti
I'I •1.1 i I ` I
III I 417'4 • :1b1EI I?'+',
I -j ' -
.rte .I I A ,
II!:
Alle { ' I 111- _?
k I. I ; s ? ? iii , ?1I+1 p.j,1/ •I ?'
! I / s eiow w 37s.51' 4 Ii la
i i; Iy? S I i 1 eNa
I ? 'sel? ? Y j u
? ?I'v Y i f N

r o - - v garl7lons; Shes) Title: Project Title:
O IS
a. 1`eeNo. Description Dale
GENERAL SITE DISMAL SWAMP VISITOR CE
? o CD o -- - ---
°w <' CD AND N.C. DIVISION OF PARKS AND REC
n, o --------- --- - - UTILITY PLAN CAMDEN COUNTY, NORTH CARO
N ° - --- --- --- IDJ 4398164862A
1 I ,
1 t
I I 1
I I I
?` I I
I I 1
?-J 1
I I
I
I
I
f I I +
I I
I
I I
I
1 I I
• I II
I

+ . .? •1 1.. L y ? C ? i ill
I'T
1 ?•`• • ??I jll
N .77370_ [ ? _ 1.x.]7•---' "? ' I a
a
r ?
? n
D
? v
n
D 4
2
D
r
NTER
REATION? ALPHA & OMEGA
LINA : CIVIL A STRUCTURAL CI
``Ifl l G...• R../ Jrlre 117 A./r J,
MMwe1•?\ lA.•, f/ffe/ M.•f/f /Il
. i ew•.•/ 1. /. •...
r•r... •• w:rr.
v
N