20021776 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20020114

OF WATFq Michael F. Easley
O? QG Governor
Uj William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
711
Alan W. Klimek, PE, Director
Division of Water Quality
January 9, 2003
Jim Adams
909 South Main Street
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Subject Property: Lots 23, 24, 27 & 28, Stonegate SD Phase 1 (St. Andrew's SD, Phase 5A)
Studbury Hall Ct., Wake Forest, NC 27587
S&EC, Inc. Project No. 2805
UT to Tom's Creek [03-04-02,27-24, C NSW]
DWQ # 02-1776
Wake County
Pagel of 2
APPROVAL of Neuse River Riparian Buffer Protection Rules MINOR VARIANCE [15A NCAC 2B.0233(9)(b)] with
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Dear Mr. Adams:
You have our approval, in accordance with the conditions listed below, to impact approximately 2,294 ft2 of Zone 2 of the
protected buffers to construct homes on Lots 23, 24, 27 & 28 located at the subject property as described within your
variance request dated October 21, 2002. This letter shall act as your Minor Variance approval as described within 15A
NCAC 2B .0233(9)(b). In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with any other required federal, state or local
regulations before you proceed with your project including (but not limited to) local building permits.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your Minor Variance Request. If you change
your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new request for approval. If the property is sold,
the new owner must be given a copy of this approval and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. For this
approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed below.
Conditions:
1. No impacts (except for "exempt" uses as identified within 15A NCAC 26 .0233) shall occur to Zone 1 of
the protected riparian buffers unless otherwise approved by the DWQ.
2. Protective Fencing
The outside Zone 1 buffer boundary approved under this authorization shall be clearly marked by orange
fabric fencing for the areas that have been approved to infringe within the buffer prior to any land
disturbing activities to ensure compliance with 15A NCAC 213 .0233.
3. Diffuse Flow
Stormwater shall be directed as diffuse flow at non-erosive velocities through the protected stream buffers
as identified within 15A NCAC 26 .0233(5). Roof drainage from the new addition shall be directed to
vegetated areas at non-erosive velocities prior to entering the protected riparian buffers. No new direct
discharges of stormwater (i.e., piping, ditching, etc.) through the buffers is allowed.
4. Deed Notifications
Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all retained jurisdictional wetlands, waters
and protective buffers in order to assure compliance for future wetland, water and buffer impact. These
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/
Page 2 of 2
mechanisms shall be put in place prior to impacting any wetlands, waters and/or buffers approved for
impact under this Certification Approval and Authorization Certificate.
Requests for appeals of this decision shall be made to the Office of Administrative Hearings. If you do not accept any of
the conditions of this approval, you may ask for and adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that
you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition which conforms to Chapter 1508 of the North Carolina
General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-6714. This
approval and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Protection Rules
[15A NCAC 2B.0233(9)(b)]. Please call Mr. Bob Zarzecki at [phone] if you have any questions or require copies
of our rules or procedural materials.
Sincerely,
x/
Alan W. Klimek, PE,
Director, DWQ
Cc: Kevin Martin, S&EC, Inc., 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, NC 27614
Steve Mitchell, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
DWQ 02-1776
January 9, 2003
bz
o`'?F
r
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
L-4 11? N Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
June 2, 2003
DWQ Project No. 02-1776
County: Wake
Page 1 of 2
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Attn: Mr. Jim Cooper
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Subject Property: Phase 5A, Stonegate Subdivision, Stream and Buffer Restoration Plan,
Studbury Hall Court, Wake Forest, NC
S&EC, Inc. Project No. 2805.01
UT to Tom's Creek [03-04-02, 27-24, C NSW (nutrient sensitive)]
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATE per the Neuse River Buffer
Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0233)
Dear Mr. Cooper:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions, to restore 110 feet of intermittent stream and the
impacted areas of Zone 1 of protected riparian buffers as described within your Stonegate Phase 5A Stream and Neuse
River Buffer Restoration Plan dated May 2003 and received by this office on May 27, 2003. After reviewing your
application, we have decided that the impacts are covered by the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) General Water
Quality Certification Number(s) 3399 (GC3399). The Certification(s) allows you to use Nationwide Permit(s) 27 or 13
when issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). This letter shall also act as your approved Authorization
Certificate for impacts to the protected riparian buffers per 15A NCAC 2B .0233. In addition, you should obtain or
otherwise comply with any other required federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including
(but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control and Non-discharge regulations. Also, this approval will expire when
the accompanying 404 permit expires unless otherwise specified in the General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your project,
you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold, the new owner must
be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. For
this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may result in criminal and/or
civil penalties. This Certification shall become null and void unless the above conditions are made conditions of the
Federal 404 and/or coastal Area Management Act Permit. This Certification shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or
CAMA permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved wetland or stream impacts),
you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for
a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office
of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its conditions are final
and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
Any disputes over determinations regarding this Authorization Certificate (associated with the approved buffer impacts)
shall be referred in writing to the Director for a decision. The Director's decision is subject to review as provided in
Articles 3 and 4 of G.S. 150B.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, WETLANDS / 401 UNIT
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
rage ;? of
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act and the
Neuse riparian buffer protection rule as described within 15A NCAC 26 .0233. If you have any questions, please
telephone John Dorney at 919-733-9646 or Bob Zarzecki at 919-733-9726.
Sincerely,,
Alan W. Klimek, P. E.,
NC DWQ, Director
Attachments: GC 3399
Cc: USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy _
Central Files
DWQ # 02-1776
Date: June 2, 2003
bz
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
Transmittal
To: '- wo
Project U I Date: S Lz 7 lo- A44,,-
Project Name: S- WIWA ? PCf1S4J1^12321 G,? A,S-? 2'51 _ Ofts/40MMAlln
tic 23L _ File: M
r ?
We Transmit to you Herewith: !frrT Under Separate Cover:
? Drawings ? For your information a"
l ? By mail
? B
i
? Specifications For continent or approva er
y cour
? Brochures or photos ? Returned for correction, resubmit ? By express
? Correspondence ? Approved as noted
? As per your request
No. Copies Document No. Date Description
Remarks:

?1N96
I/l Y/? r• ?1f- 02-- 1716) 1911.. vt Gn A /lne ri / 4";Owr IZIA-?-Ja- 14 V10
If enclosures are not as listed as above, kindly notify us at once.
By: t M
Charlotte Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C
Concord, NC 28025
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Greensboro Office:
3817-E Lawndale Drive
Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Hickory Office:
622 Coon Mountain Lane
Taylorsville, NC 28681
Phone [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
Stonegate Phase 5A Stream and Neuse
River Buffer Restoration Plan
Soil & Environmental Consultants
May 2003
S&EC project no.: 2805.01
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office: Hickory Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive 622 Coon Mountain Lane
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455 Taylorsville, C 28681
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone] Phone [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Introduction
While constructing a cul-de-sac at the Stonegate subdivision (phase 5A), 410 linear ft. of
a first-order, intermittent stream channel subject to the Neuse River Buffer Rules were
impacted (reference DWQ project number 02-1776) by the placement of a culvert and its
associated inlet/outlet and rip rap dissipater. As stated in the 401-Water Quality
Certification application submitted to NC-DWQ by S&EC dated October 14th, 2002 for
the project, 110 linear ft. of impacted channel will be restored when portions of the
culvert are removed. Additionally, the impacted areas of Zone 1 of the Neuse River
Buffers as a result of the project will be restored per NC-DWQ standards. All impacted
buffer areas in Zone 2 as a result of the road construction, aside from impacts granted in a
variance (DWQ project number 02-1776) for the construction of houses on lots 23, 24, 27
and 28, will be revegetated.
In order to restore the proposed sections of the impacted channel, the channel will be
reshaped to the appropriate bankfull dimensions for its watershed size. Banks will be
blanketed with CF-7 (or other similar material) matting and live-staked to reduce erosion
and provide channel shading. Given the field-measured morphological characteristics of
the channel coupled with the small drainage area, no grade control measures are initially
recommended. However, should channel bed stability be compromised by the removal of
portions of the culvert, the installation of grade control structures may be warranted.
Existing Conditions
Stream Channel
The impacted channel, an unnamed tributary to Toms Creek, is located in the St.
Andrews/Stonegate subdivision, which is approximately 3/ mile southeast of the
intersection of Ligon Mill Road (SR 2044) and Burlington Road (SR 2045). The
channel's headwaters form immediately south of Burlington Road, and its drainage area
is approximately 0.11 mi.2 (see attached USGS site map). Please see site photos in
Appendix A.
A longitudinal profile of the channel was developed upstream and downstream of the
culvert. In the upstream reach, there is a moderate headcut approximately 55 ft. upstream
of the culvert inlet, which does not appear to have been caused by the construction
activities. Local channel slope upstream of the headcut is 4.3%, and 3.3% downstream of
the headcut near the culvert. Downstream of the culvert, local channel slope is 1.1 %
above a small headcut approximately 45 ft. downstream of the culvert, and 1.0%
downstream of the headcut. Pebble counts were not performed, but coarse sands with
fine gravels (to a lesser extent) dominate the channel substrate material. Please refer to
channel survey data in Appendix B.
Two representative riffle cross-sections were also surveyed, one upstream and one
downstream of the culvert. From field measurements, bankfull cross-sectional area was
estimated at 4.3 ft.2 (upstream riffle) and 5.7 ft.2 (downstream riffle), both of which
accord well with the North Carolina Stream Restoration Institute Piedmont Regional
Curve bankfull cross-sectional area values for stream with similar drainage areas. This
curve reflects a range of bankfull cross-sectional areas from approximately 2 to 9 ft.2
Please refer to channel survey data in Appendix B.
The channel appears to have been straightened downstream of the project (historically,
and not as a result of recent land development); however, it remains in a generally stable
condition. There is a road crossing approximately 300 ft. downstream of the project, and
the channel appears to have incised immediately upstream of the crossing, though the
incision does not appear to have compromised channel stability substantially.
Riparian Buffer
Upstream of the culvert, in undisturbed areas, the vegetated community resembles a
mixed pine-hardwood forest. Canopy species within the Neuse River Buffer areas, which
are generally 10-12" diameter at breast height (dbh), include loblolly pine (Pinus taeda),
white oak (Quercus alba), sourwood (Oxydendrum arboreum), and sweetgum
(Liquidambar styraciflua). The shrub stratum is composed of saplings of the canopy
species and American holly (Ilex opaca), red maple (Ater rubrum), and eastern red cedar
(Juniperus virginiana). Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica) was the only
dominate vine observed. At the time of fieldwork, no plants in the herbaceous stratum
were emergent.
In disturbed areas beside the culverts, Neuse River buffer areas have been cleared and
seeded with erosion control grasses.
The undisturbed Neuse River Buffer areas downstream of the culverts are occupied by
subdivision lots. Loblolly pine is essentially the only dominate canopy species in these
areas, and the shrub and herbaceous strata are occupied by common species used in
landscaping, such as wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera).
Neuse River Riparian Buffer/Stream Bank Restoration Plan
Stream Channel Restoration and Bank Stabilization
In accordance with the engineering plan prepared by the John R. McAdams Company,
Inc., the culverts currently in place will be shortened on both the upstream and
downstream ends (see attached figure from John R. McAdams). Subsequently, the rip
rap dissipater and outlets will be shortened. The linear footage of re-exposed channel on
the combined upstream and downstream ends of the culverts currently in place will total
110 linear ft. per S&EC's 401-Water Quality Certification application dated October 141",
2002. Stormwater outfalls that previously connected inside the culverts will be
withdrawn and shortened. Scour holes will be constructed at the mouth of each outfall
(one upstream and one downstream).
The upstream and downstream channel reaches exposed by shortening the culverts will
be reshaped to the appropriate bankfull channel dimensions, except where additional
channel areas may be needed at the inlet and outlet of the culverts to adhere to
appropriate engineering specifications. The channel will be realigned to its pre-
disturbance pattern (based on the site's wetland delineation submitted to the USACE)
where reshaped. The reshaped channel bed will be set at the same grade as the culvert
inlet and outlet on both the upstream and downstream end in order to minimize the
chance of bed instability.
Restored stream banks will be covered with CF7 (or other similar material) fiber matting.
In addition to staples, live-stakes will be used to secure the matting in place, providing
both shading and habitat as well as greatly enhancing stream bank stability.
Neuse River Buffer Restoration
Areas in Zone 1 of the Neuse River Buffers impacted by the placement of the culvert and
associated fill material will be restored per NCDENR/WRP standards in accordance with
the conditions stated with the 401-Water Quality Certification. Buffered areas will be
revegetated in order to best reconstruct the mixed pine/hardwood forest community
naturally present in buffered areas.
Site Preparation
After the proposed upstream and downstream culvert sections are removed and the
stormwater scour pools are constructed, the stream channel will be realigned and
restored. Stream banks will be stabilized with fiber matting (CF7 or other similar
matting) and live-staked with silky dogwood (Corpus amomum) and black willow (Salix
nigra).
The impacted Zone 1 areas of the Neuse River Buffers will be stabilized, and care will be
taken to minimize soil compaction as a result of channel restoration work. Residual soils
are adjacent to the banks (Worsham formed from weathered rock, is the predominate soil
series mapped along the channel in the vicinity of the project), and thus, fertilization may
be required to ensure planting success. Bare soil exposed immediately after the culvert
removal and channel restoration will be stabilized with an appropriate grass species in
order to minimize erosion, such as brown top millet or rye grain, prior to buffer
revegetation.
Planting Plan
Species indigenous to the piedmont ecoregion will be used to revegetate impacted Zone 1
areas of the buffers. Table 1 displays a list of species that will be selected from to
incorporate into the planting plan.
Bare root seedlings will be used primarily to reestablish zone 1 of the Neuse River Buffer
areas. Tree species individuals will be planted randomly at an 8 ft. by 8 ft. spacing in
order to ensure a survivability density of at least 320 stems per acre. Shrub species will
be planted at a higher density and closer spacing (4 ft. by 4 ft.) to achieve a desired
survivability density of 1,200 shrubs per acre.
Loblolly pine, sweetgum, and red maple individuals will not be incorporated into the
planting plan, owing to the relatively high abundance of these species in areas nearby the
impacted portions of the Neuse River Buffers. These species will likely be recruited
naturally restored areas after planting.
Table 1: Tree and Shrub Species for Planting Plan Selection
Trees
Common Name Scientific Name
Sycamore Platanus occidentalis
River Birch Betula nigra
White oak Quercus alba
Willow oak Quercus phellos
Green ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Silver maple Acer saccharinum
Shrubs
Buttonbush Cephalanthus occidentalis
Winterberry flex verticillata
Deciduous holly flex decidua
Spicebush Lindera benzoin
Rusty Blackhaw Viburnum rufidulum
Downy arrowwood Viburnum rafinesquianum
Possumhaw Viburnum nudum
Elderberry Sambucus canadensis
A variance was granted by NC-DWQ for the project to permanently impact areas of Zone
2 of the Neuse River Buffers to site houses on lots 23, 24, 27, and 28 (see Figure 1).
Aside from areas granted in the variance, all other Zone 2 areas impacted by the stream
restoration and culvert removal will be revegetated.
Please call me if you have any questions regarding this submittal, or if you require any
additional infonnnation.
Sincerely,
o6,'-
Jim Cooper
Environmental Scientist

Halle A
t r , ,t r - ?S'a
1 t 4
?
9b5
C t `:.
?v ?v t ;

?. t ?}' ?? K ?I1 l - ?w • / / ilJ l I /'rya \\, `? V'\V !,,
s^ _ ?? ??_ 1 \ \? .? ` •`\?// ?; \ / ! I ?,?"---'ice ' / ._ r ? \ ? -z\.a,?`?-? ' ? i
?\
S
/ R
?
r
q ,?
y r

JU'il /0
4?/
J
4.1
t i L1? vL! ??J t • O'3., ? /r/ / /t .? t ', Q,. '/?.. '? ?\ ? ,r G# ;._ ;
1 ,?.ai 1/ \v i V 1
-
`, ?. I ,+. ?' \, I ? I 't\ ~` \„t \.
,? \. ?. i• .. jam'; f? ? t ` t ,, r- ..,

IMPACTED ??'ll ? r
CHANNEL VICINITY
j? W,
Ik 029 x 1",
/
iV1 77-
II

1. \.._ •, \ 1 \, ? r;_ Y .1 . ?,I r \ ?` ?..,? ??---? 11 .?,
01

Project #: Scale:
"
'
2805.01 =2000
1 USGS Site Vicinity Map
Project Date: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Mgr.: JC May 2003 Stonegate Restoration NC 27614
? Raleigh
11010 Raven Ridge Rd
,
.
Millridge Companies [phone] ?[phone]
Wake Forest, NC Web Page: www.SandEC.com

k
Project #: Scale:
2805.01 1" =1250' Wake County Soil Survey
Project
Mgr.:JC Date:
May 2003
Vicinity Map
Stonegate Restoration
Millridge Companies
Wake Forest, NC
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Rd.? Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] ? [phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com
1 11 \\\; ?'in \ _ LOT 20 ?% LOT 14
l 1 ? I \ \\ Yn \ / ? ? \ \ F.H.
11 ` I \\ \\\ ??? \ \ ` \ REMOVE EXI?NG-ST0M DRAIN
I '
L \ Z \ \ / PIPE9'AND JUNCTION BOXES. d
I I 1 \` \ 30' ZONE 1 \? r RESTORE STREAM/BUFFER TO O
I 1 \ \ NEUSE RI \ 1 PRE-CONSTRUCTION ALIGNMENT U i
RIP \ k REVECETATE °z°i'
\ I ` 9.74' LOT 3 x0 l
I SHITTiE REMOVE EXISTING STORM DRAIN V, U1H ?CHANNEL NEL AREA TO PIPES AND JUNC110N BOXES BE RESTORED RESTORE SIREAM/BUFFER TO O / PUBSTOR a ,\ \ PRE-CONSTRUCTION ALIGNMENT E U o
DRAINA IEASEMT & REVEGETATE LOT 15 / n
' ? 1 Cam, ? \\- ?? \ ? LOT 19
I N h ? o` ? v
\ 1 / 11 /11 EXILE ° ----'oo oo° . ---- '? i'-`?--------'/ / ri
I / ?)WN,A/
y\ \1• C ?\ ES ?/
\ 20' ZO 2 LOT \ i
\ NEUSE
RIPE IV R 17 LF 15' RCP 0 500X`\
I \ U / / ! \ \\ /-1? Ila \ + LOT 16
2- FES 1
I
I N S 235.55 5 11 1 INV. = 238.00 \ \ ??
N . = \I +
I \ 11 Il ? LOT t8
I \ CONSTRUCT 12' X if
I I \ SCOUR HOLE 1
/ LOT 25 ) r 11 EXIST. 238 LF 2-42' \ ?-
i= 1 RCP TO REMAIN 01.85% + I I
- _ ?? / I vl 1 11\ EXIST. 40 LF 18' RCP
\ IMPACT ON ZO?? Iw 1 TO REMAIN 0 0.84%/ I I
BUFFER WITH SCREENED '
r \ ED D If LOT 17
\ PORCH T. S0. F!? \ 111 S DBU I I \ \ \ z
771 S0. F FT. WED
111 ` / /, /' 1111 s A? C I /
EXIST. 2V
\\ /'' r? / ? 1111 p ? ?U_• ? ? DRAINAGE ESMT.\
LOT 26 / 2 1 / h a w Sswy(TYP:)--------
__- ,? ?, IIIIIv _ ? ? a
' LdT 1111 -? FES I LOT 3
\ ( \ 2 ' ZO E 2 V ,'j+ R 4V.I= 233.41 1
\ \ NEUSS?? I S1 20's]
\ RIPARIAN I W 1 1 I I ESLIT.
\\\ \ \ \ BUFFER-? sR NCT 15 r /
\ \ \ ?f7 EXIST. 2Q LOT q8 I 1
DRAINAGE T. F.H. ?--------
F, r
?__ \ I IJ i/?? 1 NEUSOI 1I 1 Nd ?, IN
RIPARIAN L?T 29 f I
' \ \ I I l 00000oot BUR
o o \
2 / 6 Vf?
1 \ \ N 5 Z 1 oa ?° c 0 EXISTING STORM DRAIN d
I I ? 6gb + \ P ES Of FES. REST E / LOT 2 o w
lg• o o° \ S FFER TO I 1
1 \ I W ?? °°? P TRUCTTON ALIMENT 24 I / / 0 0 0 0
\ \ ?? N co 62 ATE \ t QENTERLINE OF / o n
1 1 I v ESMT. r IMPACT ON ZONF!$ /t)OSTING STREAM ? o 9 a
I i BUFFER W1 SCREENED IN
F7. f
1 ` J PORCH M ALLOWED
516 S FT. ALLOWED
_ / 1 \I I \ \ I II I EXTEND EXISTING
?? I \ \ \ CHANNEL AREA TD r N 68'59'50' W
\ ?? I \ 111 f \ \ \ \ r / BE RESTORED i I I 1 60.49' / ?YcdDAYS

Looking across channel from right bank to left immediately upstream of culvert
inlet
Looking upstream at culvert outlet

op
I
Longitudinal Profile-Upstream of Culvert Inlet
104

102
+

100

c 98 1 • --. ?- + - ?" -
p X ...
96 -
-
--- ----- - -----

94

92

90

0 20 40 60 80 100 120
-+-bed water srf X BKF + TOB • WS - - p x-section - -Linear (BKF) - - Linear (TOB}
f :Elevation BM
cross BS HI FS FS depth FS FS FS FS AZ ELEV ELEV ELEV ELEV ELEV ELEV
notes section station 6.24 106.24 TP bed IR water azimuth bed water srf WS BKF TOB - -
pool 0
106.24 7.77 0.77 7 6 4.95
98.47
99.24
99.24
100.24
101.29
pool 12 106.24 7.93 0.93 6.02 5.22
98.31
99.24
99.24
100.22
101.02
log da m 106.24 0.25 7.07
98,92
99.17
99.17
run 24 106.24 8.06 0.41 7.65 98.18 98.59 98.59
pool 106,24 97.8 98.59 98.59 99.35 101,65
log • 106.24 98.05 98.59 98.59
pool 106,24 97.4 98.22 98.22
glide 44
106.24 8.34 0.28 8.06 7.1 6.32
97.9
98.18
98.18
99.14
100.92
riffle 46 46
106.24 8.33 0.14 8.19 7.09 5.25
97.91
98.05
98.05
99.15
100.99
p of headcurt 51
106.24 9.18 0.22 8.96
97.06
97.28
97.28
scour pool 54
106.24 11.55 1.2 10.35
94.69
95.89
95.89
.
glide 69
106.24 10.69 0.33 10.36 9.16 7.92
95,55
95.88
95.88
97.08
98.32
riffle 77
106.24 10.91 0.52 10.39 7.26
95.33
95.85
95.85
98.98
end riff le 103 91M 11.71 0.46 11.25
94.53
94.99
94.99
rdyert i nlet 08 106.24 0.04 11.67
94.53
94.57
94.57
0+46 riffle cross-section upstream of culvert Riffle -
103
102.5
102
101.5
101
o 100.51
100
w 99.5
99
98.5
98
97.5
0
dimensions
4.3 x-section area 0.5 d mean
8.9 width 9.7 wet P
1.3 d max 0.4 h yd radi
0.0 bank ht 18.3 w/d ratio
0.0 W flood rone area 0.0 ent ratio
11
0 33.4 8.25 97.99 0.00 shear stress Ibs/ft s
• r : 98.16 0.00 shear velocity ft/sec)
0 34.8 7.78 98.46 0.000 unit stream power (lbs/fUsec

99.05
35.4 7.19
0.00
Froude number
M 37.1 5.64 100.6 0.0 friction factor u/u*
101.08 04 threshold rain size mm
101.14
anne materia
m c
101.43 roo,
102.01 measured D84 mm
102.33 relative rou hness
10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Width from River Left to Right (ft)
44,41; riffla ..
II

Longitudinal Profile-Downstream of Culvert Outlet
93
i
5
92
. +
92

91
5
.

91
c ••.... .
90
5 •..
. -- • .. ..
W -- •
90

89
5
.
•y ------- ---
89-

88
5
.
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
t bed water srf X BKF + TOB • WS - - x-section - -Linear (BKF) - - Linear (TOB)
? :Elevation BM
cross B
S
HI F-S---J
FS depth FS FS FS FS AZ
ELEV
ELEV
ELEV
ELEV
ELEV
ELEV

notes section
station
4.61
104.61 TP ?j
BKF
tad water azimuth
• :
bed
water srf
WS
BKF
TO8
uIvert
outlet 104.61 90.52 90.79 90.79

riffle
5 104.61
14.16 0.32 13.84 12.36 90.45 90.77 90.71 92.25
run 15
104.61 14.37 0.44 13.93
90.24
90.68
90.68
riffle 26 104.61 14.45 a 90.16 90.54 90.54 92.01
minor headcut 46 104.61 14.73 0.28 14.45 12.94
89.88
90.16
90.16
91.67
1 1 disturbance) 104.61 88.99 89.54 89.54 91.19 91.19
pool 104.61 0.61 88.91 89.52 89.52
nstrearn 1 foot 104.61 88.86 89.29 89.29 90.89 90.89
riffle 90 80
104.61 15.82 0.47 15.35 13.92 M92
88.79
89.26
89.26
90,69
90.69
1
0+80 riffle cross-section downstream of culvert Riffle -
92.5
92
91.5
91
C
90.5
a?
M 90
89.5
89
88.5
5
description:
height of instrument ft):
omit distance FS FS FS W fpa channel Manning's
notes pt. (ft1 (ft) elevation bankfull top of ban (ft) slope (%) "n"
90.46
89.81
89.22
88.82
dimensions
5.7 x-section area 0.6 d mean
9.4 width 10.7 wet P
1.7 d max 0.5 h yd radi
0.0 bank ht 15.5 wld ratio
0.0 W flood rone area 0.0 ent ratio
91.39 0.0
91.52 0.0
91.54 0.00
O?O? Vy A ' AFRQG
r
=f
June 2, 2003
DWQ Project No. 02-1776
County: Wake
Page 1 of 2
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Attn: Mr. Jim Cooper
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Subject Property: Phase 5A, Stonegate Subdivision, Stream and Buffer Restoration Plan,
Studbury Hall Court, Wake Forest, NC
S&EC, Inc. Project No. 2805.01
UT to Tom's Creek [03-04-02, 27-24, C NSW (nutrient sensitive)]
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATE per the Neuse River Buffer
Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0233)
Dear Mr. Cooper:
,e
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions, to restore 110 feet of intermittent stream and the
impacted areas of Zone 1 of protected riparian buffers as described within your Stonegate Phase 5A Stream and Neuse
River Buffer Restoration Plan dated May 2003 and received by this office on May 27, 2003. After reviewing your
application, we have decided that the impacts are covered by the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) General Water
Quality Certification Number(s) 3399 (GC3399). The Certification(s) allows you to use Nationwide Permit(s) 27 or 13
when issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). This letter shall also act as your approved Authorization
Certificate for impacts to the protected riparian buffers per 15A NCAC 213.0233. In addition, you should obtain or
otherwise comply with any other required federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including
(but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control and Non-discharge regulations. Also, this approval will expire when
the accompanying 404 permit expires unless otherwise specified in the General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your project,
you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold, the new owner must
be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. For
this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may result in criminal and/or
civil penalties. This Certification shall become null and void unless the above conditions are made conditions of the
Federal 404 and/or coastal Area Management Act Permit. This Certification shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or
CAMA permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved wetland or stream impacts),
you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for
a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office
of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its conditions are final
and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
Any disputes over determinations regarding this Authorization Certificate (associated with the approved buffer impacts)
shall be referred in writing to the Director for a decision. The Director's decision is subject to review as provided in
Articles 3 and 4 of G.S. 150B.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, WETLANDS / 401 UNIT
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney
Non-Discharge Branch
Regional Contact: Steve Mitchell _
WQ Supervisor:
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Jim Adams
Project Number 02 1776
Recvd From APP
Received Date 11/4/02
Project Type
Recvd By Region
County WAKE
County2
Region Raleigh
Certificates Stream Stream Impacts (ft.)
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req. BE
7-BR PT O N 27 24 NSW 30,402. F F_ .F
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
TJ ? 2Q y 1r•>ti?- S
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? O Y ON Did you request more info? O y ON
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? O Y O N
Is Mitigation required? O Y O N Recommendation: Q Issue O Issue/fond O Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss)
Longitude (ddmmss)
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
Comments:
We got lots of mitigation on this screw up, If y;Du have questions, talk to Dorney or call mt. Four
In1wr yarlancas fbr houses near a stream that was piped.
Date: It. 8.07-
To:
DWQ#: oz. • t+4c,,
County: (,Jake.
From:
Bob
? ARO
? FRO
? MRO
RRO
Triage Check List
HL E
Cop
nm Naa.'.nS
Project Name: 6ypneco.le SIo Pvnac L / S+. Anaoews
Mike Parker ? Wa.RO Deborah Sawyer
Ken Averitte ? WiRO Joanne Steenhuis
Mike Pxker ? WSRO Jennifer Frye
teve Mitc
Telephone : (919) -4 33.9 4 Z.U
The file attached is being forwarded to your for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
? Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
Minimization/avoidance issues
® Buffer Rule eus Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
? Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
® Cumulative impact concern
Comments: M; kch\em : z w jie s?k o.. ??• o Z.

?S ulreael?{ uM?ruclerl '"fie pope i? ???eccl u ??s?i\e.c? - t-he \o?? cu-e S1; \t

w woo er _ ?.c n; e w +?ng ySACC 1-4?c?? l-?ne 51r?? ??s ?,;e?Mt \ 4ey.? ?,
un ?'?Porkn? S ?'hc ,?c the ?? D .w Bes p lG 14c? e?b ler ?^e r?,et ve dGl-? o? Nne bar
-?
rvketl. S ??,.? he?i}z •tik FO C o?te c ?? yo( aAuffs Cx uSe o 1 M1? Cor. `?c C?wbMe
10? z2f Z3 i Z.y?tS ? LG/Z} i Z?s-?t-9 Eo a?cv? ? ??.?c.??? Wh?.F aboJ?
d '?G bto-) of S?uM?wcle? kres,.ti fro c?S 1? h???e? 2
Environmental Consultants, PA
Road - Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 - Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone]
NCDENR-DWQ US Army Corps of Engineers
Attn: Mr. John Dorney Attn: Ms. Amanda Jones
2321 Crabtree Blvd 6508 Falls of the Neuse Rd., Ste. 120
Parkview Building Raleigh, NC 27615
Raleigh, NC 27604
RE: After-the-fact Nationwide Permit 39/401 Water Quality Certification Request and
Buffer Approval
Stonegate Subdivision (St. Andrews Plantation)
Wake Forest, Wake County, North Carolina
(UTM Coordinates: Zone 17, 724300, 3977000)
S&EC Project #: 2805
Dear Mr. Dorney and Ms. Jones:
The purpose of this letter is to request an after-the-fact Nationwide permit for
unauthorized impacts to a stream channel and buffers at Stonegate Subdivision Phase 5A.
We also request an after-the-fact 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer approval for
the project from the NC-DWQ. A Pre-construction Notification Application (PCN) is
attached, as well as an agent authorization form.
The subject project is located approximately 3/4 mile southeast of the intersection of Ligon
Mill Road (SR 2044 and Burlington Road (SR 2045). The site is bounded to the west by
Ligon Mill Road and is adjacent to Toms Creek. Please refer to the USGS topographic
map attached for the location of the project.
Stonegate Subdivision is a proposed residential subdivision and is considered part of the
St. Andrews Plantation project by the USACE and NC-DWQ. On December 20, 2001,
the USACE notified the applicant that an after-the-fact permit would be required as
remedial action for unauthorized impacts to an unnamed tributary of Toms Creek located
on-site. Approximately 410 linear feet of channel has been impacted for the purpose of
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office: Hickory Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive 710 Boston Road
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455 Taylorsville, NC 28681
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone] Phone [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
FILE COPS October 14, 2002
October 14, 2002
S&EC Project #: 2805
Page 2 of 4
preparing the site for residential development, 110 feet of the impact will be restored
leaving 300' of channel impact. Per a 2/20/02 conversation with Ms. Amanda Jones, the
USACE considers the impacted channel to be "unimportant". A site meeting was
conducted on 4/30/02 with Mr. Steve Mitchell to review the site and develop a strategy
for resolving the impact issues. A previous consultant handled the confirmation of the
Wetlands and Neuse Buffers on-site. According to the Buffer plat provided by the
previous consultant, signed by Mr. Steve Mitchell of NC-DWQ, the impacted channel
feature on the southwestern corner of Stonegate was determined to be an ephemeral
channel and therefore not subject to the Neuse River Buffer Rules. However, Mr.
Mitchell's records are not consistent with those supplied to the project engineer and
developer by the previous consultant. Therefore, DWQ has chosen to attempt to resolve
the matter in a fashion that complies with the rules but does not unfairly punish the
developer. Especially considering the fact that the road is already constructed.
Wetlands within the proposed Stonegate Subdivision were originally delineated by
another consultant. Mr. Todd Tugwell, of the USACE, approved the previous
consultant's wetland delineation on August 3`d, 2001 (Action ID 200021063). The
previous consultant advised the applicant and project engineer that the wetland
delineation approved by the USACE included the area of unauthorized impact and that no
jurisdictional wetlands or waters were present in the subject area. Based on this
information, the applicant and engineer designed the subdivision and placed a culvert in
the subject area to prepare the site for residential development. However, contrary to the
information provided to the applicant by the previous consultant, USACE records
indicate that the consultant never obtained a jurisdictional determination for the subject
area. S&EC flagged the remaining unimpacted jurisdictional channel on-site and
determined that no additional wetlands or waters were present within Phase I of
Stonegate. Our flags were surveyed by the John R. McAdams Company and are shown
on the attached plan.
The USACE's current policy requires applicants to avoid and minimize wetland and
stream channel impacts to the maximum extent practicable and may require
compensatory mitigation to offset unavoidable losses of waters of the US when impacts
exceed the requirements for notification (0.10 acre) or if a discharge to a special aquatic
site such as wetlands is proposed. The applicant is complying with the USACE's request
to submit for an after-the-fact permit. The applicant requested that S&EC delineate the
remaining undisturbed channel on-site in order to avoid any additional channel impact.
The applicant plans to avoid any further impacts to the channel feature and does not plan
to impact any other wetlands or waters within Phase 5A of Stonegate Subdivision (see
attached plan). Also 110' of the impacted channel will be restored. The Corps has
indicated that no additional mitigation would be required for the project.
NC-DWQ's current policy requires stream mitigation for impacts greater than 150 linear
feet per project to stream channels containing significant aquatic function. An office
October 14, 2002
S&EC Project #: 2805
Page 3 of 4
meeting with Mr. Steve Mitchell, Mr. John Dorney, and myself occurred on 8/01/02 to
determine acceptable mitigation for DWQ. At the meeting it was agreed that providing
Stormwater treatment that would not otherwise be required for the more densely
developed areas of Phase 6 would be acceptable to offset stream impacts. In addition
preservation at a 5:1 ratio of existing buffers 50'-100' from a buffered stream and at a
10:1 ratio 100'-200' from a stream was determined to be acceptable for buffer mitigation.
A detailed description of mitigation requirements is in the attached 9/12/02 John R.
McAdams letter site plans and stormwater plans for Phase 6 are also attached. Plans
were revised in Phase 5A so that no Zone 1 impacts are required for lot development (see
attached lot plan). Stormwater from the Phase 5A project will be required to meet the
diffuse flow requirements also. Attached is a plan from John R. McAdams detailing how
Stormwater is being handled in Phase 5A. We believe that the attached package contains
all the mitigation requirements required to satisfy DWQ and put this matter to rest. Since
impacts to Zone 2 are necessary for four of the lots a minor variance form is also
attached.
Please call if you have questions. The client would greatly appreciate anything you could
do to expedite the resolution of this matter since the recordation of the project is on hold
until it is resolved.
Sincerely,
Brad Suther
Kevin C. Martin
Environmental Scientist
Attachments:
Pre-construction (PCN) notification form
Site Location Map (Figure 1)
Stonegate Over-all (Figure 3)
Impact Map Inset (Figure 4)
Upland Data -roan
Agent Authorization
President
r 1 r «1?? //? lb X50

u
goo 0 - o

o O ?
o ?a. n 8.

Q) a \
o r CS?foNE??
A
M ? -
e,
• _ o
p X50 p.
r

r' b N '

ao Qe

x 0 0
roy
_
-
-
-- '
1
300
1-4 JU 01
IOH CO BD ?? p 50
//.?N ? ; • r? O I •n

aiw? ?a Ul

10 O N
N
J --7

O ) x q `,a I ,00

WAKE FOREST, NC
1993

w as NIMA 5255 1 NE-SERIES V842
o ?
.x250\
'78
55'
M
'76
'75
'74-
FROM : Panasonic FAX SYSTEM PHONE NO. : 919556 Oct. 21 2002 04:57PM P3
• .• "' ""`'? 5&tl; ! ?
co
py PAGE 02

OFFICE USE ONLY_ Date Received Request #
State of North Carolina
De
a
t
t
i
f E
i G U L5 ?J
o
p
r
men
nv
ronment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality 0 2 1 7 7 6
I t,,i; 11V/ 42002
2.
Variance Request Form - for Minor V ri tYtOUP
n
Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Areas Rules ECT N
NOTE This form maybe pafiotooopled for use as an orr,final
.
Please identify which Riparian Area Protection Rule applies.
Neuse River Basin: Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy
Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Areas Rule (15A NCAC.0233)
c, Tar-Pamlico River Basin: Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management
Strategy Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Areas Rule (15A
NCAC.0259)
Part 1; General Information
(Please include attachments if the room provided is insufficient.)
1, Applicant's name (the corporation, individual, etc. who owns the property)-
& dams
Print Owner/Signing official (person legally responsible for the property and its compliance)
Name: ?1cm l
Title:
Street address:
City, state, zip: Al E _-2?9 7'
Telephone:
Fax:
3. Contact person who can answer questions about the proposed project:
Name: Kevin C. Martin
Telephone: (919 ) 848-5940
Fax: (919 ) 8"-9487
Email: k, malt n2mridec.com
4. project Name (Subdivision, facility, or establishment name - consistent with project name on
plans, specifications, letters, operation and maintenance agreements, etc.);
St. Andrew's phase 5A/5oAcate Phase I
5. Project Location:
Street address-
City, State, Zip:
County:
Version 1, February 2000
Studbury Hall Court
Wake Forest. NC 27587
Wake
Latitude/longitude: Zone 17, 724190ni 3977310M
6. Directions to site from nearest major intersection (Also, attach an 8'h x 11 copy of the USGS
topographic map indicating the location of the site):
See cover letter from S7EC and attached PCN form
7. Stream to be impacted by the proposed activity:
Stream name (for unnamed streams label as "UT" to the nearest named stream):
UT of Toms Creek
Stream classification [as identified within the Schedule of Classifications 15A NCAC 2B .0315
(Neuse) or.0316 (Tar-Pamlico)]:
8. Which of the following permits/approvals will be required or have been received already for
this project?
Required: Received:
X
Date received
Permit Type:
CAMA Major
CAMA Minor
401 Certification/404 Permit
On-site Wastewater Permit
NPDES Permit (including stormwater)
Non-discharge Permit
Water Supply Watershed Variance
Others (specify)
Part 2: Proposed Activity
(Please include attachments if the room provided is insufficient)
1. Description of proposed activity [Also, please attach a map of sufficient detail (such as a plat
map or site plan) to accurately delineate the boundaries of the land to be utilized in carrying
out the activity, the location and dimension of any disturbance in the riparian buffers
associated with the activity, and the extent of riparian buffers on the land. Include the area
of buffer impact in ft2.]:
Development of 4 residential lots 2294ft2 of Zone 2 impact (see attached John R McAdams
site plans.
2. State reasons why this plan for the proposed activity cannot be practically accomplished,
reduced or reconfigured to better minimize or eliminate disturbance to the riparian buffers:
See cover letter from S&EC, PA and attached PCN form
3. Description of any best management practices to be used to control impacts associated with
the proposed activity (i.e., control of runoff from impervious surfaces to provide diffuse flow,
re-planting vegetation or enhancement of existing vegetation, etc.):
See attached Stormwater plans for project site as well as Phase 6 Village Care plans
Variance Request Form, page 2
Version 1 February 2000
FROM : Panasonic FAX SYSTEM PHONE NO. : 9195566672 Oct. 21 2002 04:59PM P5
JBre_l.,
PAGE 04
4. Please provide an explanation of the following:
(1) The practical difficulties or hardships that would result from the strict application of this
Rule.
Sea attar-had S&EC coyor letter
(2) How these difficulties or hardships result from conditions that are unique to the property
involved.
-See 8 ed S C cover letter
(3) lfeconomic hardship Is the major consideration, then include a specific explanation of the
economic hardships and the proportion of the hardship to the entire value of the project.
Part 3: Deed Restrictions
By your signature in Part 5 of this application, you certify that all structural stormwater best
management practices required by this variance shall be located in recorded stormwater
easements, that the easements will nun with the land, that the easements cannot be changed or
deleted without concurrence from the State, and that the easements will be recorded prior to the
sale of any lot.
Part 4: Anent Authorization
if you wish to designate submittal authority to another individual or firm so that they may provide
information on your behalf, please complete this section:
Designated agent (individual or firm): Soil Environmental Consultants PA
Mailing address: 11.010 Raven Ridge Road
City, State, Zip: Raleigtt, NC 27814
Telephone: e{ 191 .-5900
Fax; 14L19) 8419_467
Email: icmartinsandec.aam
Part f : Applicant's Certification
(print or type name of person listed'
In Part I, Item 2), certify that the information included on this permit application form is correct,
that the project will be constructed in conformance with the approved plans and that the deed
restrictions in accordance with Pert 5 of this form will be recorded with all required permit
conditions-
Signature:
Date:
Variance Request'Form, page 3
Version 1; February 2000
FROM : Panasonic FAX SYSTEM PHONE NO. : 9195566672 Oct. 21 2002 04:56PM P6
5&`l: PAGE 05
Title:

Variance Request Form, page 4
Version 1: February 2000
~ N NF DEER LAKE TRAIL
JANICE ROSE DILLARD MARTHA E. RICHARUSON r (50 PUBLIC R/W)
D.B. 7781, PG. 290 DEER CHASE PHASE 2 D.B. 4679, PG. 7.34 \ B.O.M. 1987 PG. 1113 PORTION RESERVED BY OWNER g,O.M. 1987 PG. 1113 ~i B.O.M. 1987, PG. 1113
PIN: 1748380727 B.O.M. 1987, PG. 1113 pIN: 174838276', ~ f . Q
r, - - - -
U .
- - ~ ~
~ o . x o
' ~
O S p;~-+ W zl N TE ~ ~ ~ ~ x
o ~ o ~ x
a LOT 13 '1'r 1. THE PURPOSE OF THIS EXHIBIT IS TO ILLUSTRATE THE PROPOSED LOCATION t` .a ) ~ d ~ G OF NEW AND REVISED LOT LINES AND DRAINAGE PATHWAY LOCATIONS ~ L4
LOT 21 Q h`O : ~ O ay ~ ALONG WITH THE EFFECT OF THE BUFFERS ON THE PROPOSED BUILDING ~ w0.,
~c~~•h ~ a FOOTPRINTS. ~ N n 2. ALL LOTS SUBJECT TO A 5 UTILITY EASEMENT ENVELO E ~ ~ z U
~ 3. MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC DRAINAGE EASEMENTS TERMINATES AT z z ~ o
2 ~`~'n•~~ LOT 22 ~ ~ ~ ~ THE END OF PIPE STRUCTURE. REMAINDER OF EASEMENT IS PRIVATE. ~ ~ W a h-+ O O
Q ~ ~ ~ 4.) ALL BUILDING FOOTPRINTS SHOWN ARE BASED ON A 40'X40 DWELLING G. ~ o ~ ~ ~ WITH A 20'X20' GARAGE. 0 ~
JQ ~ 2 4 BUILDING 5.) REFERENCES: BOOK OF MAPS 2002, PAGE 1165 v1 I ~ rrl~ x
~u ENVELOPE A TY I TRY ~ ~ a rp W KE COUN REG S w U O~
~e ~ LOT 20 LOT 14 )T 14 Yf' v w a p~
V PROPOSED ~ ~ ~ c~ w o
S BUILDING 6 FOOTPRINT 8 4?' TYP. •rn ~ z xad. / ~ w
v 7 44 ~ ) Q S9 3 £
~ 3 _ 4 V d
~ ` ~ O \ ~ 4 ~ ` {k
n' ~ ~ ` ~ ~ O ~
i h 14 \ ~ ~i ~ ~ I ~ ~
I N ExisTING v°' , ~ti. LOT 15 / I LOT 15
TOP `l OF ` ~
BANK ~ ~ i
^ ~ ~ N LOT 23 ~ % LOT 19 6 z I
30' ZONE 1 ~ 8 2' ~ ^ 4 c~ ~ o ~ m
STREAM BUFFER :ti \~G 4
o v ~ W. ~ ~f
PROPERTY ^ \ ZO \
LINE ^ \ \ LOT 24 20' ZONE 2 \ / c~,
U \ STREAM BUFFER \ LOT 16 ~~F ~ ~ F ~
\ ~ LEGEND
~ \ ~ O ~'l?~A-t~~ ~ ~
~ h/ ~ EXISTING IRON PIPE ~ \ ~ _
~ \ ~ _ . ~ NEW Syr 7j • L1 Lv { 18 \ ~ u T ~ ~ l.r,Li,V Lr:TLU PVIIV I y
24 / ~ PROPERTY 1¢ 43 G6 \ ~v w Q," ~ CONCRETE MONUMENT
LINES ~ 02, bV J g t~ J Q
40.0' $ Q V ~ ~ q ~ \ ~ 0 30' O SURVEY BY:
o L o o ~ LOT 17 \ h h ~ JOSEPH N. GRADY, JR.
~ o - ~ L g 40.0' L L-4163
~ o , ° C~ LOT AREA TABLE
o C 0 0 20.0 9 2 'q LOT SO. FT. AC. ZONE 'L SOFT. ~ 18,591 .4 95 ~
LOT 25 ~ 2S. ~ c11 c 1 ? ~ r~~, c z z O J rr~~ 25 16,442 0.46 N A ~
• Q 20' ZONE 2 "1 LOT 27 ~ ~1 O
5~ ~ C STREAM BUFFER S 19• ~ \ 2 26 20125 0.46 N A ~ ~ 27 19122 0.44 516 U Q
ry ~ ~ 28 17 444 0.40 712 U
v ro o ~ ~ CI A W = r
LOT 26 a~~ I 4 LINE TABLE A ~
~ a a ao 12.75 b ~ I LOT 28 LINE LENGTH BEARING w H ~ O
z~~~n L1 21.87 N 69'59'30" E ~ ~ Z L2 21.87 N 69'59'30" E W
W z, o w . ~ z 3 9 • ~ ~ PROPOSED L3 15.91' N 69'01'16" W
w m _ w 4 OLD ~ ^ ~ o o a ~ f PROPERTY A ° ~ BUILDING ~ _ „ ~ A L4 49.53' N 68'52 59 W Z ~ . _ p~ ~ Z I
00 w rn ~ LINE d' h. ~ ~ W FOOTPRINT Cr• U,
z cNV NEW O~ ~ N O r z ~ CURVE TABLE W O Y CU
w •o ~3~ o ~ O C~ B o a a00o PROPERTY m Z N~ ~ t,. u a N LINES J 9~ ~ ~ rh -Q CURVE DELTA RADIUS LENGTH CHORD BEARING TANGENT E,,,, Q J
z o cv ~ .r se S6 9 m o G l r Ct 12'33 39" 50.00' 10.96 10.94' S 20'3717" E 5.50 d ~ J ~ ~ z
o ~ ^ o h 36, ~ N LOT 29 ~ C2 48'11 23" 25.00' 21.03 20.41' N 02'48 25" w 11.18 TT
z m ^ (T r ~h N ~ N Q .~z N~~ rq \ ~ C3 05'50'33" 185.00' 18.86' 18.86' S 18'22'00" W 9.44' ~.J ~ ~ N 4 ~ ~ ~ (n Z ~ C 14'31'44" 185,00 46.91 46.79 S 08'10 51 W 23.58 W O w w U
~ o o ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 2g 8 HATCHED AREA ~ d C5 69'04'31" 25.00' 30.14' 28.35' N 35'27'14" E 17.21' U ~ ~ ~
~ m 2 4N N 6 9 REPRESENTS POR110N \ ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ u PROPOSED 9 OF PROPOSED BUILDING W ~ w Z C6 31'11'15" 50.00 27.22' 26.88 S 54'23'52" W 13.95' ~y O ~
2 ~ u PATH OF ~6" ~ ~ ~ Q o,^ Q FOOTPRINT"WITHIN THE ~ ~ C7 25'00'01" 50.00' 21.82' 21.64' S 26'18'15" W 11.08' ~ ~ ~ w
~ S STREAM "ZONE 2 BUFFER •~2 h C8 44'35'03" 50.00' 38.91' 37.93' S 08'29'18" E 20.50' ~ Z W > Z W " ~ p wQ~
20'OQ ~h^~ ~ d C9 38'14'26" 50.00' 33.37 32.76 S 49'54 02 E 17.33 ~ ~ p ~ O C10 04'40'40" 50.00' 4.08' 4.08' S 71'21'35" E 2.04' ~ ~ ~ . ~
Q m Qry ~ , W r •c,•0' •34 C11 36'18'35" 50.00' 31.69' 31.16' N 88'08'47" E 16.40' 7 ~ ~ ~ w
= W . ~ ~ CHAD R. AND MICHELE M. SCHWARTZ C12 69'04'31" 25.00' 30.14' 28.35' N 75'28'15" W 17.21' ~ A W o o Q
a~rn~ C ~ ~ D.B. 8451, PG. 2252 C13 14'39'24" 185.00' 47.32' 47.20' S 48'15'41" E 23.79' ~ Y Q rn 3 ~ Q a
m B.O.M. 1998, PG. 1215 PIN: 1748371942 ~m ~2 C14 13'1735" 185.00 42.92 42.83 S 62'1411" E 21.56' ~ U7 ~ z
2000 C15 01'45'57" 185.00' 5.70' 5.70' S 69'45'57" E 2.85' o 0
Q m ~ a a; -~N \ ~ PROJECT N0. ~ MRG-01015
O S'„ q FILENAME: MRG01015-Q1.()WG .
W ~ . ~ ~
QUa ~J , GRAPHIC SCALE DRANK BY: CDR
W m~ 60 0 30 60 120 240 SCALE: „ ,
~Jrn m4~ 1 =60
~O W co ~ DATE: 08 20 2~~2
~ `.'O ( IN FEET )
m 1 inch = 60 ft. McADAMS

N/F N/F DEER '~~AKE TRAIL
\ JAMCE ROSE DILLARD MARTHA E. RICHARDSON D.B. 7781, PG. 290 DEER CHASE PHASE 2 D.B. 4679, PG. 734 ~ (50' ~JBLIC RAW)
B.O.M. 1987 PG. 1113 PORTION RESERVED BY OWNER B.O.M. 1987, PG. 1113 B.O M. 1987, PG. 1113 a B.O.M. ~87, PG. 1113
PIN: 1748380727 PIN: 1748382767
i - - - - -
I x
o ' NOTES ~ zi'
~ ~ ~ ~
o~ Q LOT 13 o C~ ° o x x~ ~ ~
~ ~ LOT 21 ~ 1.) THE PURPOSE OF THIS EXHIBIT IS TO ILLUSTRATE THE PROPOSED LOCATION ~ ~ t` ~ OF NEW AND REVISED LOT LINES AND DRAINAGE PATHWAY LOCATIONS ~
z ~ o ALONG WITH THE EFFECT OF THE BUFFERS ON THE PROPOSED BUILDING U1 Q,
FOOTPRINTS. ~ ~ ~ r N ~ n ~ 2.) ALL LOTS SUBJECT TO A 5' UTILITY EASEMENT ENVELOPE. ~ ~
z\ , , a ~ ~ ~ LOT 22 ~ ~ 3 MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC DRAINA A ~ Z i i ~ ) GE E SEMENTS TERMINATES AT Z Z
Q ~ ~ ~ T ~ ifJ O ~ HE END OF PIPE~STRUCTURE. REMAINDER OF EASEMENT IS PRIVATE. 7~ d' ~ O O ~ 4.) ALL BUILDING FOOTPRINTS SHOWN ARE BASED ON A 40'X40' DWELLING ''a ~ O O
Ja ~z WITH A 20'X20' GARAGE. Q" E- d~ ~
~ Q BUILDING ENVELOPE \ ~ 5.) REFERENCES: BOOK OF MAPS 2002, PAGE 1165 ~ ~
sQ (TYP.) ~ LOT 14 WAKE COUNTY REGISTRY ~ ~ 'Y ~ w ~ ~ ~ LOT 14 ~ w ~ O ~
~ PROPOSED LOT 20 i < ~
S BUILDING 6 ~ FOOTPRINT z ~ ~ C7 V O
8 ~ ,S' 2 (TYP.) ~ 1 44" z ~ W
Q sg. , ~ ~ 33 E
U O
~ ~ \ C L
~ ~ ® ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~
C~ ~ N. LEGEND
EXISTING ~ ~ ~ TOP LOT 1 i DoT ~ 5
\ ~ ~ I OF ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i EXISTING IRON PIPE
BANK ~ ® CALCULATED POINT ~
~ ~ N SOT 23 ~ LoT 1g 68 a 30' ZONE 1 ~ 42 U~
STREAM BUFFER ,~V , ~~6 44 ~ \ w ~ CONCRETE MONUMENT Z O ~
I o ~ \ N o ~ - \
OLD = O' ~0 ~ W
PROP RTY ~ \ E \ LINE \
SOT 24 v 20 ZONE 2 \
~ U STREAM BUFFER \ LOT 16 ~6 ~
~ \ ~ ~ , ~0
~ ~ \ LOT 18 ~ ~
C~ ~
New 2 ' ~ HATCHED AREA \ PROPERTY ~ ~ ~ ~ l
LINES ~ 3 w ~ REPRESENTS IMPACT \ ' \ ON WETLANDS CHANNEL CULVERT BUFFER ~ IMPACT AREA TABLE
40.0' v STREAM BUFFER ZONE 2 \ Q STREAM BUFFER ZONE 1 18,849 SQ. FT.
~ 0 30' BY STORM CULVERT \ ~ ~ STREAM BUFFER ZONE 2 12,566 SQ. FT. \ ~ SURVEY BY:
° o ~ LOT 17 \ ~ o ~ ,.v ~ ~ JOSEPH N. GRA~~ JR.
40.0 °j N N SHADED AREA PROPOSED DWELLING BUFFER L-4163
~ ° ° \ REPRESENTS IMPACT IMPACT AREA TA BLE
0 20.0' o C'g ON WETLANDS CHANNEL \ \ T 2 5 ~ ~ LOT SQ. FT. AC. ZONE 2 S .FT / ~ O 23 18 1 Q ,59 0.43 295 z
~S \ 2 ~ STREAM BUFFER ZONE 1 V~ ~ BY STORM CULVERT ~ \a j ~ ~ 24 22,995 0.51 771 Z / O J
25 16,442 0.46 N A ~ O 26 20,125 0.46 N A F" ~
S 2~ \ 27 19,122 0.44 516 ~ Q
- / - ~ / o 28 17,444 0.40 712 ~
o / ~ o ~ - ~4 C15 =d W Q I
AT 26 ~ ~~d~ X12.75' ~ ~ N ~ 28 LINE TABLE ~
z~m~~ o ~ LINE LENGTH BEARING W F., L1 21.87 N 69°5 ' ~ ~
2 \ 9 30 E ~ z L2 21.87 N 69°59'30" E ~ W
z 73 9 ~ P w ro ~ _ ~ 4' OLD ROPOSED L3 15.91' N 69°01'16" W p~ ~
~ o ~ w v BUILDING o ~ PROPERT, ~ < m w w ~ 4 FOOTPRINT ~ - - t~ Q _ _ _ L4 49.53' N 68°52'59" W Z ~
~ ~ ~ LINE ry ~ o N N (TYP.) ~ Z U
z o NEW ~ ~ 6~ ,,~q w ~ ~ ~ PROPERTY ~ ~ ~ O W CllRVE TABLE z W
~ ~ ~ J a a~ LINES ~ g N" ~-HATCHED AREA CURVE DELTA RADIU N ~ ~ ~ v S LE GTH CHORD BEARING TANGENT ~ Q J
z ~ ~ Q > >9' ~ o REPRES NT ~ ~ N m a S o ~ a E S PORTION C C1 12°33'39" 50.00' 10.96' 10.94' S 20 37'17" E ~ 5. ~ ~ 50 Q ~ J ~
01'~ ,o ~ 62.3 ~ ~ ~ N OF PROPOSED BUILDING (JJ o~~~ 6 G~ z ~ N (T ~ ~ FOOTPRINT WfTHIN THE r C2 48°11'23" 25.00' 21.03' 20.41' N 02'48'25" W 11.18' ~ Z _ ~n C3 05°50'33" 185.00' 18.86' 18.86' S 18°22'00" W 9.44' ~ ~ U ~
Q .~z ~T ~ - w m Q ~ ~ ~ ~ "ZONE 2" BUFFER n ~ ~ ~ cv C4 14°31'44" 185.00' 46.91' 46,79' S 08'10'51" W 23.58' z
~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~ a o, 2g. g 30' 7J ~ m a ~ N 9. LOT 29 ~ O (n W C5 69°04'31" 25.00' 30.14' 28.35' N 35°27'14" E 17.21' ~y ~ ~ ~ rJ
~ _ , ~ PROPOSED 69 Q 2 \ a~~o~ ~ 1~ „ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ^ ~ PATH OF 6 20' ZONE 2 ~ ~ C6 ~ ~ W I- ~ . z ~ ~1 11 15 50.00' 27.22' 26.88' S 5423'52" W 13.95' ~ C
ro S STREAM U/ STREAM BUFFER GT 25°00'01" 50.00' 21.82' 21.64' S 2618'15" W 11.08' ® ~ ~
~ °N C8 44°35'03" 50.00' 38.91' 37.93' S 08°29'18" E 20.50' ~ ~ w z ~ C9 3814'26' 50.00 ~ 33.37 32.76' S 49°54'02" E 17.33' ~ O ~ o ~ ~
ZOOQ N^~o J m ~ . 21. ,3 , C1O 04°40'40" 50.00' 4.08' 4,08' S 71°21'35" E 2.04' U] O ~
o ~~\rn ~ \V a" N/F ~I C11 36°18'35" 50.00' 31.69' 31,16' N 88°08'47" E 16.40' ~ ~ ~ ,
~a,~,~"~ CHAD R. AND MICHELE M. SCHWARTZ Boa C12 69°04'31" 25.00' 30.14' 28,35' N 7 '1 " W m ~ W Q T ~ 5 28 5 17.21 q
Q ~ n D.B. 8451, PG. 2252 ~ B.O.M. 1998, PG. 1215 C13 14°39'24" 185.00' 47.32' 47.20' S 48°15'41" E 23.79' ~ ~ Q ~ ~ Q
~m ~z PIN: 1748371942 C14 13°1735" 185.00' ! 42.92' 42.83' S 62°14'11" E 21.56' ~ ~ ~ w C15 01°45'57" 185.00' I 5,70' 5,70' S 69°45'57" E 2.85' ~
zOOa m ~ ~ o ~
a N O ~ ~ PROJECT N0. MRG-01 G`~ 5
ro q FILENAME:
~ ~ C7 OUP MRGO1O15-C'.DWG
GRAPHIC SCALE DRAWN BY:
m~ CDR 60 0 30 60 120 240 SCALE: „
~ J~ Ql ~ 1 =60'
~O Y~~ DATE: 08~20~200
O ( IN FEET )
m 1 inch = 60 ft. ~~-,~Tl R ~~C~