HomeMy WebLinkAbout20200501 Ver 1_Line 125 PJD Application FINAL 4.13.20_202004138933 Western Way, Suite 12, Jacksonville, FL 32256 p | 904.538.9171 f | 904.538.9172
April 6, 2020
Ms. Samantha Dailey
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
RE: Piedmont Natural Gas Line 125 Project –Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination and Nationwide
#12 for Utility Line Activities (NWP #12) Pre-Construction Notification (PCN)
KLF# 20202880.01A
Ms. Dailey,
On behalf of Piedmont Natural Gas, Kleinfelder is requesting issuance of a Preliminary Jurisdictional
Determination for the Line 125 Project located in Edgecombe County, North Carolina.As part of this
request, we have also included a Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) and applicable support documents
for a NWP #12 for Utility Line Activities.
Please find enclosed the Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Application items as well as the PCN for
the NWP #12 and supporting documents.
Thank you in advance for your time and consideration of this request. Please contact me at my office 904-
538-9171 or at ckul@kleinfelder.com.
Regards,
Christopher Kul
Project Manager
Attachments:
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Application
Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A.REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B.NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD:
C.DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D.PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: County/parish/borough: City:
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: Long.:
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody:
E.REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH “MAY BE” SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non-wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource “may be”
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2)In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring “pre-
construction notification” (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant’s acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there “may be” waters of the U.S. and/or that there “may be” navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: ___________________________________________________.
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale: ___________________.
Data sheets prepared by the Corps: _______________________________________________.
Corps navigable waters’ study: ____________________________________________________.
U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: ___________________________________________.
USGS NHD data.
USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: _______________________________.
Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: ___________________________.
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: ______________________________________.
State/local wetland inventory map(s): _______________________________________________.
FEMA/FIRM maps: ____________________________________________________________.
100-year Floodplain Elevation is: ________________.(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: Aerial (Name & Date): ___________________________________________.
or Other (Name & Date): ____________________________________________.
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: __________________________.
Other information (please specify): _________________________________________________.
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member person requesting PJD
completing PJD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)1
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.
4/6/2020
Agent Authorization Form
Project: Piedmont Natural Gas, Line 125, Kingsboro Road
Property Legal Description:
Street Address:
Easement Holder (please print): Piedmont Natural Gas
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
Chris Kul of Kleinfelder
And
To act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of this
permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Easement Holder's Address (if different than property above): See enclosed mans
Telephone #:
Email Address:
IIYA/dl/VL/V
Signana ure (Contactor/Agent)
Wym1 au- V),(S d cam_
Print 74ame / Title
GPS Equipment Description
Wetland flags were field located utilizing a Trimble GEO 7X equipped with Floodlight and GPS-Correct
technologies to ensure sub-meter accuracy.
PROJECT NO.
DRAWN:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
FILE NAME:www.kleinfelder.com
Location & Vicinity Map
Piedmont Natural Gas
Line 125 - Kingsboro Road
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
1
20202880.01A
3/30/2020
LP
CK
Figure
£
0 500 1,000250
FeetThe information included on this graphic representation has been compiled from avariety of sources and is subject to change without notice. Kleinfelder makes norepresentations or warranties, expressed or implied, as to accuracy, completeness,timeliness, or rights to the use of such information. This document is not intendedfor use as a land survey product nor is it designed or intended as a constructiondesign document. The use or misuse of the information contained on this graphicrepresentation is at the sole risk of the party using or misusing the information.Legend
Project Boundary (±5.52 ac.)
Source: Imagery was obtained from ESRI Basemap. Image origin: Microsoft. Date: 2/06/2020.
See File Path
Document Path: G:\Piedmont_NG\Kingsboro Road\MXD\Location Map.mxd^
Project Location
PROJECT NO.
DRAWN:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
FILE NAME:www.kleinfelder.com
Aerial Ma p
Piedmont Natural Gas
Line 125 - Kingsboro Road
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
2
20202880.01A
3/30/2020
LP
CK
Figure
£
0 500 1,000250
FeetThe information included on this graphic representation has been compiled from avariety of sources and is subject to change without notice. Kleinfelder makes norepresentations or warranties, expressed or implied, as to accuracy, completeness,timeliness, or rights to the use of such information. This document is not intendedfor use as a land survey product nor is it designed or intended as a constructiondesign document. The use or misuse of the information contained on this graphicrepresentation is at the sole risk of the party using or misusing the information.Legend
Project Boundary (±5.52 ac.)
Source: Imagery was obtained from ESRI Basemap. Image origin: Microsoft. Date: 2/06/2020.
See File Path
Document Path: G:\Piedmont_NG\Kingsboro Road\MXD\Aeriall Map Fig. 2.mxd
PROJECT NO.
DRAWN:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
FILE NAME:www.kleinfelder.com
Topog raphic Ma p
Piedmont natural gas
Line 125 - Kingsboro Road
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
3
20202880.01A
3/30/2020
LP
CK
Figure
£
0 500 1,000250
FeetThe information included on this graphic representation has been compiled from avariety of sources and is subject to change without notice. Kleinfelder makes norepresentations or warranties, expressed or implied, as to accuracy, completeness,timeliness, or rights to the use of such information. This document is not intendedfor use as a land survey product nor is it designed or intended as a constructiondesign document. The use or misuse of the information contained on this graphicrepresentation is at the sole risk of the party using or misusing the information.Legend
Project Boundary (±5.52 ac.)
Source: Imagery was obtained from ESRI Basemap. Image origin: Microsoft. Date: 3/13/2011.
See File Path
Document Path: G:\Piedmont_NG\Kingsboro Road\MXD\Topo Map Fig. 2.mxd
PROJECT NO.
DRAWN:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
FILE NAME:www.kleinfelder.com
Soil Map
Piedmont Natural Gas
Line 125 - Kingsboro Road
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
4
20202880.01A
3/30/2020
LP
CK
Figure
£
0 250 500125
FeetThe information included on this graphic representation has been compiled from avariety of sources and is subject to change without notice. Kleinfelder makes norepresentations or warranties, expressed or implied, as to accuracy, completeness,timeliness, or rights to the use of such information. This document is not intendedfor use as a land survey product nor is it designed or intended as a constructiondesign document. The use or misuse of the information contained on this graphicrepresentation is at the sole risk of the party using or misusing the information.Legend
Project Boundary (±5.52 ac.)USDA NRCS Soils
NoB - Norfolk loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes
RaA - Rains fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, Southern Coastal Plain *
WaB - Wagram loamy sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes *
* Hydric Soil
Source: Imagery was obtained from ESRI Basemap. Image origin: Microsoft. Date: 2/06/2020.
See File Path
Document Path: G:\Piedmont_NG\Kingsboro Road\MXD\Soil Map Fig. 4.mxd
PROJECT NO.
DRAWN:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
FILE NAME:www.kleinfelder.com
Flood Ma p
Piedmont Natural Gas
Line 125 - Kingsboro Road
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
5
20202880.01A
3/30/2020
LP
CK
Figure
£
0 500 1,000250
FeetThe information included on this graphic representation has been compiled from avariety of sources and is subject to change without notice. Kleinfelder makes norepresentations or warranties, expressed or implied, as to accuracy, completeness,timeliness, or rights to the use of such information. This document is not intendedfor use as a land survey product nor is it designed or intended as a constructiondesign document. The use or misuse of the information contained on this graphicrepresentation is at the sole risk of the party using or misusing the information.Legend
Project Boundary (±5.52 ac.)
100-Year Foodplain
1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard
Floodway
Source: Imagery was obtained from ESRI Basemap. Image origin: Microsoft. Date: 2/06/2020.
See File Path
Document Path: G:\Piedmont_NG\Kingsboro Road\MXD\Flood Map Fig. 5.mxd
PROJECT NO.
DRAWN:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
FILE NAME:www.kleinfelder.com
National WetlandsInventory Map
Piedmont Natural Gas
Line 125 - Kingsboro Road
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
6
20202880.01A
3/30/2020
LP
CK
Figure
£
0 500 1,000250
FeetThe information included on this graphic representation has been compiled from avariety of sources and is subject to change without notice. Kleinfelder makes norepresentations or warranties, expressed or implied, as to accuracy, completeness,timeliness, or rights to the use of such information. This document is not intendedfor use as a land survey product nor is it designed or intended as a constructiondesign document. The use or misuse of the information contained on this graphicrepresentation is at the sole risk of the party using or misusing the information.Legend
Project Boundary (±5.52 ac.)
NWI Wetlands
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
Freshwater Pond
Riverine
Source: Imagery was obtained from ESRI Basemap. Image origin: Microsoft. Date: 2/18/2020.
See File Path
Document Path: G:\Piedmont_NG\Kingsboro Road\MXD\NWI Map Fig. 6.mxd
Wetland & Stream M ap
Piedmont Natural Gas
Line 125 - Kingsboro Road
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
7
20202880.01A
3/30/2020
LP
CK
See File Pathwww.kleinfelder.com
Stream 1
(40 lf.)
Wetland 1
(0.0 4 ac.)
WD-W1
UD-U1
PROJECT NO.
DRAWN:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
FILE NAME:
FIGUREThe information included on this graphic representation has beencompiled from a variety of sources and is subject to change withoutnotice. Kleinfelder makes no representations or warranties, expressedor im plied, as to accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to theuse of such information. This document is not intended for use as aland survey product nor is it designed or intended as a constructiondesign document. The use or misuse of the information containedon this graphic representation is at the sole risk of the party using ormisusing the information.
£
250 0 250125
Feet
Legend
Project Boundary (±5.52 ac.)
Wetlan ds (0.04 ac.)
Streams (4 0 lf.)
Ad jacent Streams (±197 lf.)
Ad jacent Wetlands (±0.42 ac.)
USAC E Wetland Data Points
USAC E Upland Data Points
Source: Imagery was obtained from ESRI Basemap. Image origin: Microsoft. Date: 2/06/2020.Document Path: G:\Piedmont_NG\Kingsboro Road\MXD\Wetlands & Streams.mxd
Project/Site:
Applicant/Owner:State:Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Lat:Long:
Soil Map Unit Name:
X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
X No
X No X
X No
X
X
X X
Yes X
Yes X
Yes X X NoWetland Hydrology Present?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
No
0-4Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Yes
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Drift Deposits (B3)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Are “Normal Circumstances” present?
Remarks:
Saturation Present?Yes
Remarks:
Not available
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Field Observations:
Water Table Present?No
No
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
No
(includes capillary fringe)
Surface Water Present?
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
1/09/2020
-77.676465
No
Rocky Mount
HYDROLOGY
N_A_1983
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?Yes
(If no, explain in Remarks.)
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
Hillslope
Yes
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.):
Section, Township, Range:Liz Penrod
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
LRR P, MLRA 133A Datum: 35.931399
NWI classification:RaA, WaB, NoB
Sampling Date:Edgecombe
NCPiedmont Natural Gas
Line 125 - Kingsboro Road City/County:
Slope (%):
PEM, PSS
WD-W1
none
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Iron Deposits (B5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?Yes
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T,U)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0
Sampling Point:
(Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.(A/B)
7.
8.
x 1 =
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:x 2 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 3 =
1.x 4 =
2.x 5 =
3.Column Totals:(B)
4.
5.
6.
7.X
8.X
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:X
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Woody Vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
25
=Total Cover
30
30x30
615
=Total Cover
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?Yes No
30x30
5
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Yes
FACU
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
=Total Cover
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
No
Yes
Absolute
% Cover
)30x30
10
Solidago canadensis
15
Juncus effusus
WD-W1
2
2
FACU species
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(B)
Indicator
Status
VEGETATION (Four Strata)– Use scientific names of plants.
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
100.0%
(A)
0
45
0
30
25
0
(A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Multiply by:
0
1.50
UPL species
)
=Total Cover
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
OBL
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Total % Cover of:
Prevalence Index worksheet:
0
5
0
Dominant
Species?
20
)Tree Stratum
Dichanthelium scabriusculum OBL
30x30 )
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0
X
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Depth (inches):X
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
Hard Clay
10YR 4/2 20%, 10YR 5/6 5%
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
(outside MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Hydric Soil Present?12
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
(MLRA 153B)
Red Parent Material (F21)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
205510YR 2/2
Histosol (A1)
Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
%
Matrix
10YR 3/6
Color (moist)Type1
Redox FeaturesDepth
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Loc2 Texture Remarks%(inches)Color (moist)
1-12
SOIL Sampling Point:
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Reduced Vertic (F18)
NoYes
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR, P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
WD-W1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
(LRR S, T, U)
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
(outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(outside MLRA 150A)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)Black Histic (A3)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Remarks:
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0
Project/Site:
Applicant/Owner:State:Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Lat:Long:
Soil Map Unit Name:
X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
No X
No X X
No X
Yes X
Yes X
Yes X No XWetland Hydrology Present?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
No
0Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Yes
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Drift Deposits (B3)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Are “Normal Circumstances” present?
Remarks:
Saturation Present?Yes
Remarks:
Not available
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Field Observations:
Water Table Present?No
No
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
No
(includes capillary fringe)
Surface Water Present?
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
1/09/2020
-77.676362
No
Rocky Mount
HYDROLOGY
N_A_1983
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?Yes
(If no, explain in Remarks.)
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
easment
Yes
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.):
Section, Township, Range:Liz Penrod
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
LRR P, MLRA 133A Datum:35.931373
NWI classification:NoB - Norfolk loamy sand, 2-6% slopes
Sampling Date:Edgecombe
NCPiedmont Natural Gas
Line 125 - Kingsboro Road City/County:
Slope (%):
none
UD-U1
none
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Iron Deposits (B5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?Yes
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T,U)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0
Sampling Point:
(Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.(A/B)
7.
8.
x 1 =
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:x 2 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 3 =
1.x 4 =
2.x 5 =
3.Column Totals:(B)
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:X
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Woody Vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
=Total Cover
30x30
=Total Cover
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?Yes No
30x30
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
=Total Cover
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Absolute
% Cover
)30x30
DoT mix grasses
UD-U1
FACU species
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(B)
Indicator
Status
VEGETATION (Four Strata)– Use scientific names of plants.
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
(A)
(A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Multiply by:
UPL species
)
=Total Cover
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Total % Cover of:
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Dominant
Species?)Tree Stratum
30x30 )
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Depth (inches):X
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
Gravel
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
(outside MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Hydric Soil Present?1
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
(MLRA 153B)
Red Parent Material (F21)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Histosol (A1)
Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
%
Matrix
Color (moist)Type1
Redox FeaturesDepth
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Loc2 Texture Remarks%(inches)Color (moist)
SOIL Sampling Point:
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Reduced Vertic (F18)
NoYes
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR, P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
UD-U1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Compact gravel made it unable to collect a soil sample.
(LRR S, T, U)
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
(outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(outside MLRA 150A)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)Black Histic (A3)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Remarks:
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date:Project/Site: Latitude:
Evaluator: County: Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if ≥ 19 or perennial if ≥ 30*
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_________) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool,
ripple-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _________)
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = _________)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
Soil View - WD-W1
Wetland View - WD-W1
PROJECT NO. 20202880
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS PLATE
DRAWN BY: LP
CHECKED BY: CK Piedmont Natural Gas
Line 125 - Kingsboro Road
Edgecombe County, North Carolina 1 DATE: 1/14/2020
REVISED:
Soil View - UD-U1
Upland View - UD-U1
PROJECT NO. 20202880
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS PLATE
DRAWN BY: LP
CHECKED BY: CK Piedmont Natural Gas
Line 125 - Kingsboro Road
Edgecombe County, North Carolina 2 DATE: 1/14/2020
REVISED:
Stream 1 - View West
Stream 1 - View East
PROJECT NO. 20202880
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS PLATE
DRAWN BY: LP
CHECKED BY: CK Piedmont Natural Gas
Line 125 - Kingsboro Road
Edgecombe County, North Carolina 3 DATE: 1/14/2020
REVISED:
Stream 1 - View East
Stream 1 - View Southwest
PROJECT NO. 20202880
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS PLATE
DRAWN BY: LP
CHECKED BY: CK Piedmont Natural Gas
Line 125 - Kingsboro Road
Edgecombe County, North Carolina 4 DATE: 1/14/2020
REVISED: