20170110 Ver 2_RS response to DWR Year 2 Review_20200414

ID#* 20170110 Version* 2
Select Reviewer:*
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 04/15/2020
Mitigation Project Submittal - 4/14/2020
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* r Yes r No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
r Stream r Wetlands W Buffer V Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Raymond Holz
Project Information
..................................................................................................................................................................
ID#:* 20170110
Existing IDY
Project Type: r DMS r Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Weaver Farm
County: Wayne
Document Information
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Version:
*2
Existing Version
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: Final_ Weaver_ Buffer and Nutrient _2019MY2_.pdf 30.43MB
Rease upload only one RDFcf the conplete file that needs to be subnitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Raymond Holz
Signature:*

Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes St. Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina
Ph: [phone]
Fx: [phone]
1101 Haynes St., Suite 211 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • www.restorationsystems.com • Ph 919.755.9490 • Fx 919.755.9492

April 14, 2020

Attn: Ms. Katie Merritt
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources - Wetland and Stormwater Branch
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650

Subject: Weaver Farm Yr. 2 (2019) Monitoring Report Comment Reponses – DWR 2017-0110 v2

Katie - Below are the responses from Restoration Systems to all comments received on the Draft Weaver
Farm buffer and nutrient offset monitoring report. DWR comments are in black, and RS responses are in
blue.

RS had an opportunity to take remedial action on the property and did so this winter/spring. This action
included soil amendment, plant bedding and replanting of the site. Work completed is described below in
the response to Comment 4, and within the Yr. 2 2019 Monitoring Report. RS is in the process of collecting
baseline data, which will be detailed in the Yr. 3 Monitoring report along with an end of the year typical
vegetation monitoring survey.

Please do not hesitate to reach out if you would like to discuss.

Sincerely,

Raymond Holz
Restoration Systems

Comments Received & Responses
1. No height data was provided with the report, but is required to be submitted with all monitoring
reports (see BPDP). RS needs to submit the Year 2 height data for the stems in the plots to DWR.
Dataforms for planted stems are included in Appendix C, and include data related to height and
vigor.

2. Stem mortality is still a growing concern. However, DWR does not encourage a replant at this
time. I recommend RS wait until Year 3 data is collected and reassess the situation at that time.
RS appreciates DWR’s recommendation to wait until Year 3 data collection to determine weather
additional corrective action is required. However, further site review (in field efforts to locate and
count trees) has reviled that that planted stems are not surviving expert for near plot 15. RS sees
no other option than to attempt additional remedial action and to replant the site in 2020.

3. RS did not describe the type of herbaceous vegetation that is growing on the site at this time. But,
the remediation plan from 2019 included 3 different zones where RS broadcasted annual and
perennial seeding. Please provide DWR with the status of that seeding effort in all 3 zones. What
Page 2 of 2
vegetation is present. Identify if the vegetation is annual, perennial, or invasive. Explain how the
herbaceous vegetation is effected by the poor soil conditions.
Seeding efforts have had mixed results on the site. The annual seed broadcast on the footprint of
the old poultry houses established well soon after planting and grew to maturity as expected. This
provided more organic material on the site, particularly where bare mineral soil had been before.
The perennial seeding proved less impactful. This permanent seed mix (which is has been highly
effective on nearby sites) failed to establish in most areas and sprouted marginally in others. This is
likely due to competition from established weedy species (prickly sida, dog fennel) as well as poor
soil conditions on site.

The current vegetation conditions onsite are trending positive as more native but weedy perennial
species such as dogfennel, broom-sedge, goldenrod, and ironweed become established. Many areas
are infested with common annual pasture weeds, and remnant pasture grasses are hanging on in a
few places. The higher end of the site (closer to the road) has more lush herbaceous vegetation,
more surviving tree stems, and generally seems to have better soil conditions. The lower section of
the site still demonstrates lower herbaceous plant diversity and generally low productivity,
indicative of poor soil conditions.

4. Toxic concentrations of Zn and Cu were noted in the soil. DWR recommends RS consider soil
improvements and develop an action plan focused on reducing Zn and Cu. The focus this year and
in future years, is to develop cost-effective improvements that are supported by literature and
research. RS needs to seek professional guidance on any efforts that may be proposed.
After additional soil testing was conducted in 2019 and based on recommendations from
NRCS/USDA soil specialists with Wayne County and additional private soil consultants, Restoration
Systems implemented a two-prong soil improvement plan. First, agricultural lime was ordered to
be applied sitewide at a rate of 2 tons/acre. Lime is generally applied to raise pH, which alone is
helpful on this site as the low pH is likely a chronic stressor for the target plant community, but it
also relates to Zn and Cu. Lee et al found that application of limestone (agricultural lime) reduced
the impacts of zinc in contaminated soils both to the microbial community and herbaceous plants.
The second prong of our plan was to bed (with a bottom plow) the site and complete a full re-plant
of diverse native tree species. The bedding process relieved compaction (mechanically) and
incorporated organic thatch back into the root zone which reduces the bulk density of the soil,
effectively allowing better moisture retention. The resulting planting beds give the newly planted
trees better conditions for root establishment, based on soil improvement techniques commonly
recommended by USDA.

5. DWR does not support a bond reduction at this time.
Understood

6. DWR will consider a partial credit release of the approval of the Year 2 monitoring report when
Items 1,3 and 4 above have been addressed. No partial credit release will exceed 5% at this time.
Understood

Weaver Farm Year 2 (2019) Monitoring Report Executive Summary i
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS Restoration Systems, LLC
YEAR 2 (2019) MONITORING REPORT

Weaver Farm Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel
DWR Project #: 2017-0110v2

Neuse River Basin

In Agreement with:
The Weaver Farm Mitigation Banking Instrument for
Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation Credits & Pursuant to the
Neuse Nutrient Management Strategy

PREPARED BY:

Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604

Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
And

April 2019
Weaver Farm Year 2 (2019) Monitoring Report Executive Summary i
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS Restoration Systems, LLC
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Restoration Systems (Sponsor) is pleased to provide the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NC
DWR) this Annual Monitoring Report for the Weaver Farm Bank Parcel (Parcel). As agreed upon in
the Weaver Farm Mitigation Banking Instrument, made and entered into on July 7th, 2017 by Restoration
Systems, LLC, acting as Bank Sponsor (Sponsor), and the North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality (NCDEQ), Division of Water Resources (DWR). This document details Year 2 (2019) annual
monitoring at the Parcel.

Measuring 22.36 acres, the Parcel is designed to provide riparian buffer mitigation and nutrient offset
credits for impacts due to development within the Neuse River Basin. Neuse River Riparian Buffer
mitigation credits provided by this Parcel are available in the Neuse River Basin, according to 15A NCAC
02B .0295 (Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule – CMB rule) (effective date– October 24th, 2014).
Mitigation credits for Nutrient Offset are made available within the Neuse River Basin USGS 8-digit HUC
03020201 excluding the Falls Lake Drainage Basin. Supporting figures and tables are located in Appendix
A & B.

NCDWR representatives Katie Merritt and Chris Pullinger conducted an onsite determination for parcel
applicability and suitability on February 21, 2017. A second visit was conducted with Chris Pullinger and
Anthony Scarbraugh on March 2, 2017.

Restoration Systems (RS) purchased the Parcel in fee simple and transferred a conservation easement to
the North Carolina Wildlife Habitat Foundation. The conservation easement was recorded at the Wayne
County Register of Deeds on June 27th, 2017; Book No. 3309, Page No. 279-290.

Restoration construction activities began in July of 2017 and concluded in December of the same year. The
Parcel was planted with native hardwoods on December 12th, 2017. On December 14th – 16, 2017, Axiom
Environmental installed twenty-two (22) Carolina Vegetation Survey (CVS) monitoring plots and collected
as-built data. Katie Merritt of DWR performed a restoration verification site visit on February 1st, 2018.

The primary goals associated with the restoration of riparian areas is focused on improving water quality,
enhancing flood attenuation, and restoring wildlife habitat through the creation of a forested riparian buffer
adjacent to stream channels and a forested riparian area along agricultural ditches. These goals will be
accomplished by the following;

1. Removing nonpoint sources of pollution associated with agricultural production, including a)
ceasing the broadcast application of fertilizer, pesticides, and other agricultural materials into and
adjacent to Site surface water conveyances, and b) providing a restored buffer to filter runoff from
adjacent lands.
2. Reducing sedimentation within onsite and downstream receiving waters by reducing bank erosion,
vegetation maintenance, and agricultural land disturbances.
3. Promoting floodwater attenuation by increasing frictional resistance of floodwaters crossing Site
floodplains.
4. Improving aquatic habitat by enhancing stream bed shading and natural detritus input.
5. Providing a terrestrial wildlife corridor and refuge in an area extensively developed for agricultural
production.
6. Restoring and re-establishing natural community structure, habitat diversity, and functional
continuity.
7. Protecting the Site’s riparian buffer functions and values in perpetuity

Success criteria was established to verify that the vegetation component supports community elements
necessary for forest development. Success criteria within the buffer and nutrient offset restoration areas
will be based on the survival of planted species at a density of 260 stems per acre after five years of
monitoring.
Weaver Farm Year 2 (2019) Monitoring Report Executive Summary ii
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS Restoration Systems, LLC

Year 2 (2019) vegetation monitoring occurred in October 2019 and included the measurement of twenty-
two (22) total vegetation plots. Stem densities across the Parcel averaged 200 planted stems per acre
(excluding livestakes) surviving. Seventeen of the twenty-two plots (Plots 1-5, 7- 14, and 16-18, 22) did
not meet success criteria. Overall, planted stem survival continued to decline as a result of existing site
conditions beyond the control of RS, specifically legacy contaminants within the project’s soils.

No signs of herbivory, easement encroachment, mowing, pruning, or mulching were observed.
Additionally, minimal invasive species were observed on the Parcel.

2018 Maintenance Summary;
Between the initial planting and Yr. 1 (2018) monitoring no active maintenance occurred on the site.
In September of 2018, approximately 20-25 inches of rain fell over a three to four-day period, resulting
in complete inundation of the Site for nearly a week. Based on site-specific indicators (high-water
marks and debris racks in trees), as much as 6-feet of water covered the project. The impact of Hurricane
Florence was assumed to be the main contributor to the poor survival of planted hardwood stems which
was determined during Year 1 (2018) monitoring efforts, completed in October of 2018. A remedial
action plan was developed as part of the Year 1 (2018) Monitoring Report and approved by DWR staff
via email (Appendix D). RS implemented the remedial action plan in 2019, detailed below.

2019 Maintenance Summary;
On February 24th, 2019, RS completed the remedial plant effort at the Site (Appendix D). Planting
8,500 additional bare-root stems within two different planting zones, the broad cast application of
permanent herbaceous seed mix (red top grass mix) for better weed control, herbicide treatment for
control of dense Sida rhombifolia and Eupatorium capillifolium, and in in the location of the former
poultry houses, RS disc to incorporate lime and to breakup soil compaction from the removed buildings,
seeded the areas with temporary and permeant herbaceous cover, and replanted this area at a rate of
600/trees per acre.

DWR and RS staff conducted a field verification of the replanting effort in April of 2019. RS along
with DWR staff were unable to locate an abundance of living, planted stems. The survey triggered RS
to begin a robust evaluation of the Site to determine how planted stems from the initial planting (Dec.
2017) and the remedial planting (Feb. 2019) were faring; further surveys indicated planted stems were
struggling to establish and visual mortality of planted stems was near 80%.

To further investigate the mortality issues, RS conducted multiple soil tests with the Site. The results
of these tests are included in Appendix D and indicate high levels of zinc and copper.

2020 Maintenance Summary;
The 2019 monitoring season at Weaver revealed declining tree numbers across the site , despite
the remedial actions taken earlier in the season to boost tree survival. Those actions included discing,
liming, seeding, and replanting ~5 acres at the poultry house footprint, as well as supplemental
planting sitewide followed by selective herbicide treatments across most of the site. The widespread
tree mortality affected seedlings in most monitoring plots and in all planted species.

2019 remedial action seeding efforts have had mixed results. The annual seed broadcast on the footprint
of the old poultry houses established well soon after planting and grew to maturity as expected. This
provided more organic material on the site, particularly where bare mineral soil had been before. The
perennial seeding proved less impactful. This permanent seed mix (which is has been highly effective
on nearby sites) failed to establish in most areas and sprouted marginally in others. This is likely due
to competition from established weedy species (prickly sida, dog fennel) as well as poor soil conditions
on site.

Weaver Farm Year 2 (2019) Monitoring Report Executive Summary iii
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS Restoration Systems, LLC
The current herbaceous vegetation condition onsite is trending positive as more native but weedy
perennial species such as dogfennel, broom-sedge, goldenrod, and ironweed become established. Many
areas are infested with common annual pasture weeds, and remnant pasture grasses are hanging on in
a few places. The higher end of the site (closer to the road) has more lush herbaceous vegetation, more
surviving tree stems, and generally seems to have better soil conditions. The lower section of the site
still demonstrates lower herbaceous plant diversity and generally low productivity, indicative of poor
soil conditions.

There was no obvious acute cause for the decline in tree survival (in contrast to the flooding related to
Hurricane Florence in 2018), and no observable sign of physical damage to the dead stems that were
inspected. Based on field observations throughout the 2019 growing season and into early 2020, it does
not appear that the mortality is related to damage by animals or above-ground insects, or poor weather.
The most likely issue is the existing soil condition of the site. RS submitted multiple soil samples for
analysis and followed up both with state extension agents, county staff, private soil experts, and the
previous landowner regarding the historic herbicide use and application of turkey litter (Appendix D).

These tests and conversations had, indicated the site has elevated levels of copper and zinc, as well as
a strongly acidic character. According to literature reviewed, this can be common on sites where high
levels of poultry litter have been applied. While the copper and zinc levels are not at an acutely toxic
level for the planted trees, they may have been a stressor. The low pH would tend to cause more stress.
Prior use of the site as a cow pasture additionally degraded soil through compaction and the
maintenance of a shallow-rooted turfgrass.

With poor soil health as a primary driver behind the poor tree survival numbers, the remedial options
for the site are somewhat limited. RS implement the following plan in early 2020:

A complete replant of the site with bare-root stock at a rate of 680 trees/acre will be conducted this
planting season. Before planting, a narrow set ripping/bedding plow will be used to prepare planting
rows sitewide. This plow will disturb about 24” wide every 8’ across the site. The bedding action will
release surface compaction and incorporate organic material into the soil. The ripping portion of the
plow will promote deeper root growth and release deeper compaction. A narrow plow will be used to
minimize the disturbance. In addition, lime will be applied sitewide. RS has secured and plans to plant
the following species.

2020 Weaver Replant
Species Number
Acer rubrum 1500
Celtis occidentalis 100
Celtis laevigata 500
Cornus amomum 300
Liriodendron tulipifera 3000
*Pinus taeda 2000
Platanus occidentalis 3000
Prunus laurocerasus 500

Species Number
Prunus serotina 500
Ptelea trifoliate 500
Quercus lyrata 800
Quercus phellos 2500
Quercus shumardii 700
Rhus glabra 500
Viburnum dentatum 500
Totals: 16,900
*RS recognizes that Pinus taeda would not count under the CMB rule, we’re simply trying to see if anything will
grow.

RS is in the process of collecting baseline data, which will be detailed in the Yr. 3 Monitoring report along
with an end of the year typical vegetation monitoring survey. Photos of the 2020 remedial work are included
in Appendix D.

Weaver Farm Year 2 (2019) Monitoring Report Table of Contents
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS Restoration Systems, LLC
TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 PROJECT GOALS, BACKGROUND, AND ATTRIBUTES ......................................................... 1
Location and Setting .............................................................................................................. 1
Project Goals and Objectives ................................................................................................. 1
2.0 MITIGATION POTENTIAL ............................................................................................................ 1
3.0 MONITORING AND SUCCESS CRITERIA ................................................................................. 2
Monitoring Protocol ............................................................................................................... 2
Success Criteria ...................................................................................................................... 3
4.0 MAINTENANCE ............................................................................................................................. 3
5.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................. 5

APPENDICES

Appendix A. Site Background Tables
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Baseline Information & Attributes
Table 5. Planted Bare Root Woody Vegetation

Appendix B. Figures
Figure 1. Site Location and Service Area
Figure 2. Current Conditions Plan View
Figure 3. Component and Asset

Appendix C. Vegetation Data
Table 5. Planted Bare Root Woody Vegetation
Table 6. Planted and Total Stems by Plot and Species
Table 7. 2019 Herbicide Application Log
Vegetation Plot Photographs
CVS Field Forms

Appendix D.
2019 Remedial Action Plan
Soil Test Reports (2018 & 2019)
2020 Remedial Action Plan

Weaver Farm Year 2 (2019) Monitoring Page 1
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS Restoration Systems, LLC

1.0 PROJECT GOALS, BACKGROUND, AND ATTRIBUTES
Restoration Systems (Sponsor) is pleased to provide the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NC
DWR) this Annual Monitoring Report for the Weaver Farm Bank Parcel (Parcel). As agreed upo n in the
Weaver Farm Mitigation Banking Instrument, made and entered into on July 7th, 2017 by Restoration
Systems, LLC, acting as Bank Sponsor (Sponsor), and the North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality (NCDEQ), Division of Water Resources (DWR).

Location and Setting
The Parcel is located approximately 2.1 miles north east of Grantham in Wayne County, NC. (Figure 1,
Appendix A). The Parcel is located within the Neuse River Basin in the 14-digit United States Geological
Survey (USGS) Cataloging Unit 03020201170010 of the South Atlantic/Gulf Region (North Carolina
Division of Water Quality [NCDWQ] Sub-basin Number 03-04-12) (Figure 1, Appendix A).

Latitude: 35°18'16.01"N, Longitude: 78° 7'44.27"W

Directions to Parcel:
- Take I-40 East out of Raleigh,
- Take Exit 341 for NC-50/NC-55 toward US-13/Newton Grove,
- At the traffic circle (1.3 miles), take the 4th exit onto US-13 N,
- 9.4 Miles Turn Left onto Weaver Rd.,
- 0.7 Miles Turn Right at Angie Drive,
- Parcel is located on the left.

Project Goals and Objectives
The primary goals associated with the restoration of riparian areas is focused on improving water quality,
enhancing flood attenuation, and restoring wildlife habitat. Goals will be achieved through the creation of
a forested riparian buffer adjacent to stream channels and a forested riparian area along agricultural ditches.
Goals will be accomplished by the following.

1. Removing nonpoint sources of pollution associated with agricultural production, including a)
ceasing the broadcast application of poultry litter, fertilizer, pesticides, and other agricultural
materials into and adjacent to Parcel surface water conveyances and b) providing a restored buffer
to filter runoff from adjacent lands.
2. Reducing sedimentation within onsite and downstream receiving waters by reducing bank erosion,
vegetation maintenance, and agricultural land disturbances.
3. Promoting floodwater attenuation by increasing frictional resistance of floodwaters crossing Parcel
floodplains.
4. Improving aquatic habitat by enhancing stream bed shading and natural detritus input.
5. Providing a terrestrial wildlife corridor and refuge in an area extensively developed for agricultural
production.
6. Restoring and re-establishing natural community structure, habitat diversity, and functional
continuity.
7. Protecting the Parcel’s riparian buffer functions and values in perpetuity.

2.0 MITIGATION POTENTIAL
The removal of livestock had immediate benefits to the Parcel’s drainage features, specifically Features 1-
3. Flushing flows established a new top of bank within these features. Planting of the new “benches”
occurred during reforestation efforts, and the revised top of bank was measured during as-built survey work
and used to generate as-built credit calculations. Additionally, the final easement boundary was slightly
Weaver Farm Year 2 (2019) Monitoring Page 2
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS Restoration Systems, LLC

adjusted along the southern boundary of Feature’s 1 and 2’s origin; approximately 20 feet was added to the
easement in the section above the proposed boundary detailed in the Bank Parcel Development Package
(BPDP). These two factors resulted in a slightly higher mitigation potential than original detailed in the
BPDP.

The DWR has determined the nitrogen nutrient abatement of restored riparian area to be 2,273.02 lbs. per
acre. Riparian buffer credits will be measured by the hundredth of an acre and converted into square feet.

Per the as-built survey, the conservation easement measures 22.81 acres, and includes 21.53 acres of restored
riparian area. Of the restored riparian area, 15.37 acres will generate nutrient offset credit, generating
34,936.31 lbs. of nitrogen offset credit. 6.16 acres of restored riparian area will generate 268,329.6 sq. ft. of
Neuse River riparian buffer credits. Riparian buffer mitigation generated via restoration, can be used for
either Neuse River riparian buffer credits or nutrient offset credits, but not both. RS must request and receive
approval from DWR to transfer any mitigation credits between riparian buffer and nutrient offset. All
mitigation credit assets shall be shown on the credit ledgers. The Parcel’s mitigation potential is detailed in
Table 1 (Appendix A).

3.0 MONITORING AND SUCCESS CRITERIA

Monitoring Protocol
Restoration monitoring procedures for riparian vegetation will include periodic visual inspection and annual
plant survival and species diversity survey reports. Quantitative sampling of vegetation will be performed
as outlined in the CVS Level 1-2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008). Photos
will be taken from all photo points each monitoring year and provided in the annual reports. All planted
stems in the plots will be marked with flagging tape and recorded. Detailed qualitative and quantitative
monitoring is proposed for vegetated riparian areas; marsh treatment areas will be visually inspected
periodically and reported qualitatively within the annual monitor report, which will include photographic
record of the Parcel’s assets.

Monitoring of the restoration efforts will be performed for five years or until success criteria are fulfilled.
Restoration Systems shall submit an annual monitoring report to DWR, no later than December 31st of each
year. Quantitative monitoring includes measurements of 20-10x10 meter, permanent vegetation plots (2.0%
of riparian buffer mitigation and nutrient offset credit areas). Plots were randomly placed throughout the
planted riparian areas and are representative of credit generating areas. Sampling of vegetation will be
performed in the Fall of each year; monitoring data can be found in Appendix C.

Vegetation will received a cursory, visual evaluation on a periodic basis to ascertain the degree of
overtopping of planted elements by nuisance species. A visual assessment of t he cattle exclusion fencing
will also be performed each year to confirm:
• Fencing is in good condition throughout the site;
• No cattle access within the conservation easement area;
• No encroachment has occurred;
• Diffuse flow is being maintained in the conservations easement area; and
• There has not been any cutting, clearing, filling, grading, or similar activities that would negatively
affect the functioning of the buffer.

No signs of herbivory, easement encroachment, mowing, pruning, or mulching were observed. Additionally,
minimal invasive species were observed on the Parcel.

Weaver Farm Year 2 (2019) Monitoring Page 3
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS Restoration Systems, LLC

Success Criteria
Success criteria within the riparian buffer and nutrient offset restoration areas will be based on the survival
of planted species at a density of 260 stems per acre after five years of monitoring. A minimum of four
native, hardwood tree and shrub species must be present, with no one species representing greater than 50%
of the stems. In addition, appropriate volunteer stems of native hardwood tree and shrub species may be
included to meet the final performance standard of 260 stems per acre upon DWR approval.

4.0 MAINTENANCE
2018 Maintenance Summary;
Between the initial planting and Yr. 1 (2018) monitoring no active main tenance occurred on the site. In
September of 2018, approximately 20-25 inches of rain fell over a three to four-day period, resulting in
complete inundation of the Site for nearly a week. Based on site-specific indicators (high-water marks and
debris racks in trees), as much as 6-feet of water covered the project. The impact of Hurricane Florence was
assumed to be the main contributor to the poor survival of planted hardwood stems which was determined
during Year 1 (2018) monitoring efforts, completed in October of 2018. A remedial action plan was
developed as part of the Year 1 (2018) Monitoring Report and approved by DWR staff via email (Appendix
D). RS implemented the remedial action plan in 2019, detailed below.

2019 Maintenance Summary;
On February 24th, 2019, RS completed the remedial plant effort at the Site (Appendix D). Planting 8,500
additional bare-root stems within two different planting zones, the broad cast application of permanent
herbaceous seed mix (red top grass mix) for better weed control, herbicide treatment for control of dense
Sida rhombifolia and Eupatorium capillifolium, and in in the location of the former poultry houses, RS disc
to incorporate lime and to breakup soil compaction from the removed buildings, seeded the areas with
temporary and permeant herbaceous cover, and replanted this area at a rate of 600/trees per acre.

DWR and RS staff conducted a field verification of the replanting effort in April of 2019. RS along with
DWR staff were unable to locate an abundance of living, planted stems. The survey triggered RS to begin a
robust evaluation of the Site to determine how planted stems from the initial planting (Dec. 2017) and the
remedial planting (Feb. 2019) were faring; further surveys indicated planted stems were struggling to
establish and visual mortality of planted stems was near 80%.

To further investigate the mortality issues, RS conducted multiple soil tests with the Site. The results of these
tests are included in Appendix D and indicate high levels of zinc and copper.

2020 Maintenance Summary;
The 2019 monitoring season at Weaver revealed declining tree numbers across the site, despite the remedial
actions taken earlier in the season to boost tree survival. Those actions included discing, liming, seeding,
and replanting ~5 acres at the poultry house footprint, as well as supplemental planting sitewide followed
by selective herbicide treatments across most of the site. The widespread tree mortality affected seedlings in
most monitoring plots and in all planted species.

2019 remedial action seeding efforts have had mixed results. The annual seed broadcast on the footprint of
the old poultry houses established well soon after planting and grew to maturity as expected. This provided
more organic material on the site, particularly where bare mineral soil had been before. The perennial seeding
proved less impactful. This permanent seed mix (which is has been highly effective on nearby sites) failed
to establish in most areas and sprouted marginally in others. This is likely due to competition from
established weedy species (prickly sida, dog fennel) as well as poor soil conditions on site.

Weaver Farm Year 2 (2019) Monitoring Page 4
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS Restoration Systems, LLC

The current herbaceous vegetation condition onsite is trending positive as more native but weedy perennial
species such as dogfennel, broom-sedge, goldenrod, and ironweed become established. Many areas are
infested with common annual pasture weeds, and remnant pasture grasses are hanging on in a few places.
The higher end of the site (closer to the road) has more lush herbaceous vegetation, more surviving tree
stems, and generally seems to have better soil conditions. The lower section of the site still demonstrates
lower herbaceous plant diversity and generally low productivity, indicative of poor soil conditions.

There was no obvious acute cause for the decline in tree survival (in contrast to the flooding related to
Hurricane Florence in 2018), and no observable sign of physical damage to the dead stems that were
inspected. Based on field observations throughout the 2019 growing season and into early 2020, it does not
appear that the mortality is related to damage by animals or above-ground insects, or poor weather. The
most likely issue is the existing soil condition of the site. RS submitted mu ltiple soil samples for analysis
and followed up both with state extension agents, county staff, private soil experts, and the previous
landowner regarding the historic herbicide use and application of turkey litter (Appendix D).

These tests and conversations had, indicated the site has elevated levels of copper and zinc, as well as a
strongly acidic character. According to literature reviewed, this can be common on sites where high levels
of poultry litter have been applied. While the copper and zinc levels are not at an acutely toxic level for the
planted trees, they may have been a stressor. The low pH would tend to cause more stress. Prior use of the
site as a cow pasture additionally degraded soil through compaction and the maintenance of a shallow-rooted
turfgrass.

With poor soil health as a primary driver behind the poor tree survival numbers, the remedial options for the
site are somewhat limited. RS implement the following plan in early 2020:

A complete replant of the site with bare-root stock at a rate of 680 trees/acre will be conducted this planting
season. Before planting, a narrow set ripping/bedding plow will be used to prepare planting rows sitewide.
This plow will disturb about 24” wide every 8’ across the site. The bedding action will rel ease surface
compaction and incorporate organic material into the soil. The ripping portion of the plow will promote
deeper root growth and release deeper compaction. A narrow plow will be used to minimize the disturbance.
In addition, lime will be applied sitewide. RS has secured and plans to plant the following species.

2020 Weaver Replant
Species Number
Acer rubrum 1500
Celtis occidentalis 100
Celtis laevigata 500
Cornus amomum 300
Liriodendron tulipifera 3000
*Pinus taeda 2000
Platanus occidentalis 3000
Prunus laurocerasus 500

Species Number
Prunus serotina 500
Ptelea trifoliate 500
Quercus lyrata 800
Quercus phellos 2500
Quercus shumardii 700
Rhus glabra 500
Viburnum dentatum 500
Totals: 16,900
*RS recognizes that Pinus taeda would not count under the CMB rule, we’re simply trying to see if anything
will grow.

RS is in the process of collecting baseline data, which will be detailed in the Yr. 3 Monitoring report along
with an end of the year typical vegetation monitoring survey. Photos of the 2020 remedial work are included
in Appendix D

Weaver Farm Year 2 (2019) Monitoring Page 5
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS Restoration Systems, LLC

5.0 REFERENCES

Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule - 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (Published November 17, 2014)

Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation. Version 4.2. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Ecosystem Enhancement Program. Raleigh, North Carolina.

Neuse River Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy 15A NCAC 2B .0233,
15A NCAC 02B .0240, and 15A NCAC 02B .0295

Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina: Third
Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation, N.C.
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources. Raleigh, North Carolina.

Weaver Farm Year 2 (2019) Monitoring Appendices
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS Restoration Systems, LLC

Appendix A.
Site Background Tables

Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Baseline Information & Attributes

Weaver Farm Year 2 (2019) Monitoring Appendices
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS Restoration Systems, LLC
Table 1: Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Buffer Zone Credit
Type
Mitigation
Type
Total
Acreage
Credit
Ratio
Credit per
Acre Total Credits
UT2 Zone A (TOB to
50')
Riparian
Buffer Restoration 3.16 1:1 43,560 sq.
ft./acre 137,649.6 sq. ft.
UT2 Zone B (51’ - 100') Riparian
Buffer Restoration 2.99 1:1 43,560 sq.
ft./acre 130,244.4 sq. ft.
Total Riparian
Buffer 6.15 267,894.0 sq. ft.

UT2 Zone C (101’ - 200) Nitrogen Restoration 5.26 n/a 2,273.02
lbs./acre 11,956.08 lbs.
Ditches (TOB - 200') Nitrogen Restoration 10.10 n/a 2,273.02
lbs./acre 22,957.50 lbs.
Total Nitrogen 14.64 34,913.58 lbs.

Table 2: Project Activity and Reporting History
Activity / Milestone BPDP Proposed Date Actual Date
BPDP Approved NA July 7th, 2017
Parcel purchased in Fee-Simple June 2017 June 22nd, 2017
Parcel Protection via conservation easement June 2017 June 27th, 2017
Cattle exclusion / fence construction June 2017 July – August 2017
Removal of poultry houses / impervious
surfaces June/July 2017 August – October 2017
Soil preparation July through November 2017 October – December 2017
Removal of Powerline/Pole NA December 2017
Planting December 2017 December 12th, 2017
As-Built Data Collection January 2018 December 14th – 16th, 2017
Construction Completion Walkthrough NA February 1st, 2018
As-Built Report Submittal January 2018 March 2018
Year 1 (2018) Monitoring October 2018 October 2018
Remedial Replant #1 NA February 2019
Year 2 (2019) Monitoring October 2019 October 2019
Remedial Replant #2 NA March 2020

Weaver Farm Year 2 (2019) Monitoring Appendices
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS Restoration Systems, LLC
Table 3: Project Contact Table
Firm POC & Address
Bank Sponsor Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
George Howard and John Preyer
919.755.9490
Designer: Axiom Environmental, Inc. Grant Lewis; 919.215.1693
218 Snow Ave. Raleigh, NC 27603
Construction Contractor: Strader Fencing Inc
Lloyd Glover; 919.422.3392
780 Landmark Road
Willow Spring, NC 27592-7756
Planting Contractor: Carolina Silvics
Mary-Margaret McKinney 252.482.8491
908 Indian Trail Road
Edenton, NC 27932
Seeding Contractor: Land Mechanics, Inc.
Lloyd Glover; 919.422.3392
780 Landmark Road
Willow Spring, NC 27592-7756
Nursery Stock Suppliers: ArborGen 1.888.888.7158
Baseline Data Collection &
Annual Monitoring Axiom Environmental, Inc. Grant Lewis; 919.215.1693
218 Snow Ave. Raleigh, NC 27603

Table 4: Project Baseline Information & Attributes Table
Project Information
Project Name Weaver Farm
County Wayne
Project Area (acres) 21.81
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude) Latitude: 35°18’16.01”N , Longitude: 78°7’44.27”W
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province Piedmont
River Basin Neuse
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit 03020201 USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-
digit 03020201170010
DWQ Sub-basin 03-04-12
Project Drainage Area, Total Outfall (miles) 0.07 mi²
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Imperviou s Area < 1%
CGIA Land Use Classification Cropland and Pasture

Weaver Farm Year 2 (2019) Monitoring Appendices
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS Restoration Systems, LLC

Appendix B
Figures

Figure 1. Site Location and Service Area
Figure 2. Current Conditions Plan View
Figure 3. Component and Asset

RESTORATION SYSTEMS, LLC1101 HAY NES S T, S UITE 211R ALEIGH, NC 27604P HONE : 919.755.9490FAX : [phone]
This map and all data contained within are supplied as is with no warranty. R estoration S ystems, LLC expressly disclaims responsibility for damages or liability from any claims that may arise out of the use or misuse of this map. It is the sole responsibility of the user to determine if the data on this map is compatible with the user’s needs. This map was not created as survey data, nor should it be used as such. It is the user’s responsibility to obt ain proper survey data, prepared by a licensed surveyor, where required by law.
S CALE:
DATE: 3-2018
1 in = 54,167 ft
Coordinate S ystem:NAD_ 1983_ S P _ NC_ FIP S _ 3200_ Ft.
Aerial Imagery: (c) ES R I
0 4.5 9 13.5 182.25
Miles
S ITE: W F01-000
W eaver FarmFigure 1 - P arcel Location / S ervice Area
W eaver Farm Bank P arcel35°18'16.01"N78° 7'44.27"W
Directions to P arcel;• Tak e I-40 East out of R aleigh,• Tak e Exit 341 for NC-50/NC-55 toward US -13/Newton Grove,• At the traffic circle (1.3 miles), tak e the 4th exit onto US -13 N,• 9.4 Miles Turn Left onto W eaver R d.,• 0.7 Miles Turn R ight at Angie Drive, • S ite is located on the left.
S ervice Layer Credits: S ources: Esri, HER E, DeLorme, Intermap, incrementP Corp., GEBCO, US GS , FAO, NP S , NR CAN, GeoBase, IGN, K adaster NL,Ordnance S urvey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong K ong), swisstopo,MapmyIndia, © OpenS treetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Legend
P roject P in P oint
US GS Neuse 03020201 R iver Basin Bdry
S ervice Area - R iparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset (Neuse 01 Minus Falls Lak e W atershed)
4
5
6
3
79
2
8
11
11
17
15
12
19
13
14
22
20
18
16 10
21
NC Center for Geographic Information & Analysis
FIGURE
Drawn by:
Date:
Scale:
Project No.:
AMR
OCT 2018
1:1750
17-021
Title:
Project:
Prepared for:
Wayne County, NC
WEAVER FARMRIPARIAN BUFFER &NUTRIENT OFFSETBANK PARCEL
CURRENTCONDITIONSPLAN VIEW
2
Notes:1. Background Imagery Source:Latest aerial photographyprovided by the NC OneMapprogram (online, provided bythe NC Geographic InformationCoordination Council)
0 500250Feet
Legend
Ditches and Stream
Vegetation Plots
Easement ¯
Fea ture 1
Fea ture 2
Fea ture 3
UT-2
N ew 24" p ip e inserted, Existing fenc e rep la c ed a s wa s.
Ap p rox. 20' of historic a lly p ip ed ditc h,now op en. Area to b e re-surveyedduring a s-b uilt effort.
Origin P oint for UT-2
RESTORATION SYSTEMS, LLC1101 HAY N ES ST, SUITE 211RALEIGH, N C 27604P HON E : 919.755.9490FAX : [phone]
This m a p a nd a ll da ta c onta ined within a re sup p lied a s is with no wa rra nty. Restora tion System s, LLC exp ressly disc la im s resp onsib ility for da m a ges or lia b ility from a ny c la im s tha t m a y a rise out of the use or m isuse of this m a p . It is the sole resp onsibility of the user to determ ine if the da ta on this m a p is c om p a tible with the user’s needs. This m a p wa s not c rea ted a s survey da ta , nor should it b e used a s suc h. It is the user’s resp onsibility to obt a in p rop er survey da ta , p rep a red b y a lic ensed surveyor, where required b y la w.
SCALE:
DATE: 3-2018
1 in = 250 ft
Coordina te System :N AD_1983_SP _N C_FIP S_3200_Ft.
Aeria l Im a gery: (c ) ESRI
0 120 240 360 48060
Feet
SITE: W F01-000
Figure 3Com p onent a nd Asset
Servic e La yer Credits:
Legend
Fina l Conserva tion Ea sem ent: 22.81 Ac res
Top of Ba nk (Fea tures + UT-2): 0.65 Ac res
TOB - 50ft
TOB - 100ft
TOB - 200ft
AsBuilt Credit Determination
Strea m (UT-2), Zone A (TOB to 50'), Rip a ria n Buffer: 3.16 Ac res
Strea m (UT-2), Zone B (51' - 100'), Rip a ria n Buffer: 2.99 Ac res
Strea m (UT-2), Zone C (101' - 200'), N utrient Offset: 5.26 Ac res
Surfa c e W a ter Conveya nc e, (TOB to 200'): 10.10 Ac res
Buffer Zone Credit Type Mitigation Type Total Acreage Credit Ratio Credit per Acre Total Credits
UT2 Zo n e A (TOB to 50')
Rip arian Bu ffer
Resto ratio n 3.16 1:1 43,560 sq. ft./ac re
137,649.6 sq. ft.
UT2 Zo n e B (51’ - 100')
Rip arian Bu ffer
Resto ratio n 2.99 1:1 43,560 sq. ft./ac re
130,244.4 sq. ft.
Total Riparian Buffer 6.15 267,894.0 sq. ft.
UT2 Zo n e C (101’ - 200) Nitro gen Resto ratio n 5.26 n /a
2,273.02 lbs./ac re
11,956.08 lbs.
Ditc hes (TOB - 200') Nitro gen Resto ratio n 10.10 n /a
2,273.02 lbs./ac re
22,957.50 lbs.
Total Nitrogen 14.64 34,913.58 lbs.

Weaver Farm Year 2 (2019) Monitoring Appendices
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS Restoration Systems, LLC

Appendix C.
Vegetation Data

Table 5. Planted Bare Root Woody Vegetation
Table 6. Planted and Total Stems by Plot and Species
Table 7. 2019 Herbicide Application Log
Vegetation Plot Photographs
CVS Field Forms

Weaver Farm Year 2 (2019) Monitoring Appendices
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS Restoration Systems, LLC
Table 5. Original Planting List
Vegetation Association: Basic Oak-Hickory
Forest
Coastal Plain
Bottomland Hardwoods
Acreage: 22.10 Acres 15.02 acres 7.08 acres
Species (bare root = BR) Spec-ed Planted Spec-ed Planted
White oak (Quercus alba) - BR 2,750 2,750
*Northern red oak (Quercus rubra) - BR 2,750 0
Shumard oak (Quercus shumardii) 0 1,375
Cherrybark oak (Quercus pagoda) 0 1,375
Tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera) - BR 2,750 2,750
Green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) - BR 2,750 2,750
Water oak (Quercus nigra) - BR 1,900 1,900
Willow oak (Quercus phellos) - BR 22 1,900 1,900
River birch (Betula nigra) - BR 1,900 1,900
Total (18,600) 11,000 11,000 5,700 5,700
* Due to availability issues, Northern red oak was removed from the proposed planting list. Shumard and Cherrybark
oak were used as substitute species.

Table 7: 2019 Herbicide Application Log
Date: Herbicide\
Surfactant: Rate/Amount: Total: Target
Species: Method: Applicator:
5/29 &
31/19
Roundup®
Custom
(glyphosate)

Agri-Dex®
.3%
10.8 fl oz
.5%
17.25 fl oz
30 Gallons
Multiple:
nuisance
herbaceous
species
Foliage
ATV-
Broadcast
Joshua G
Merritt (NC
026-33717)

PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all TAcer rubrumred mapleTree111Betula nigrariver birchTree111Celtis laevigatasugarberryTree111Fraxinus pennsylvanicagreen ashTree222111111Liquidambar styracifluasweetgumTreeLiriodendron tulipiferatuliptreeTreePlatanus occidentalisAmerican sycamore TreeQuercusoakTree222Quercus albawhite oakTree111111222111222111Quercus nigrawater oakTreeQuercus pagodacherrybark oak Tree111222111Quercus phelloswillow oakTree444111111444111Quercus rubranorthern red oak Tree111222Quercus shumardiiShumard's oak Tree1 1 1111111Quercus shumardii var. shumardii Shumard oak Tree333333777555555888000444333222333333444444666000111333121.4 121.4 121.4 121.4 121.4 121.4 283.3 283.3 283.3 202.3 202.3 202.3 202.3 202.3 202.3 323.7 323.7 323.7 0 0 0 161.9 161.9 161.9 121.4 121.4 121.4Color for DensityExceeds requirements by 10%Pnols = Planted excluding livestakesExceeds requirements, but by less than 10%P‐all = Planted including livestakesFails to meet requirements, by less than 10%T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakesFails to meet requirements by more than 10%T includes natural recruitesCurrent Plot Data MY2 2019 Scientific NameCommon Name Species Type17021‐AXE‐0001 17021‐AXE‐0002 17021‐AXE‐0003 17021‐AXE‐0004 17021‐AXE‐0005 17021‐AXE‐000617021‐AXE‐0009Stem countsize (ares)1111Species countStems per ACREsize (ACRES)17021‐AXE‐0007 17021‐AXE‐00080.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.0211111Table 6. Project Code 17‐021. Project Name: Weaver Nutrient
Table 6. Project Code 17‐021. Project Name: Weaver NutrientPnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all TAcer rubrumred mapleTreeBetula nigrariver birchTreeCeltis laevigatasugarberryTreeFraxinus pennsylvanicagreen ashTree2 2 2111111111222Liquidambar styracifluasweetgumTree2Liriodendron tulipiferatuliptreeTree333111Platanus occidentalisAmerican sycamore TreeQuercusoakTree1 1 1111Quercus albawhite oakTree111333Quercus nigrawater oakTree1 1 11 1 1Quercus pagodacherrybark oak Tree111222111111111Quercus phelloswillow oakTree444111Quercus rubranorthern red oak Tree1 1 1111Quercus shumardiiShumard's oak TreeQuercus shumardii var. shumardii Shumard oak Tree333111222222666161616557555111222111222222333333556222111121 121 121 40.5 40.5 40.5 80.9 80.9 80.9 80.9 80.9 80.9 243 243 243 647 647 647 202 202 202 202 202 202 40.5 40.5 40.5Color for DensityExceeds requirements by 10%Pnols = Planted excluding livestakesExceeds requirements, but by less than 10%P‐all = Planted including livestakesFails to meet requirements, by less than 10%T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakesFails to meet requirements by more than 10%T includes natural recruitesCurrent Plot Data MY2 2019 Scientific NameCommon Name Species Type17021‐AXE‐0010 17021‐AXE‐0011 17021‐AXE‐0012 17021‐AXE‐0013 17021‐AXE‐0014 17021‐AXE‐0015 17021‐AXE‐0016 17021‐AXE‐0017 17021‐AXE‐0018Stem countsize (ares)11111Stems per ACRE1111size (ACRES)0.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.02Species count
 Table 6.Project Code 17021. Project Name: Weaver NutrientPnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all TAcer rubrumred mapleTree11 1 2Betula nigrariver birchTree1 1 1222222323232Celtis laevigatasugarberryTree111Fraxinus pennsylvanicagreen ashTree444777777292929393939595959Liquidambar styracifluasweetgumTree2Liriodendron tulipiferatuliptreeTree444444373737Platanus occidentalisAmerican sycamore Tree111222QuercusoakTree1 1 1555666202020Quercus albawhite oakTree111111141414242424484848Quercus nigrawater oakTree222222222Quercus pagodacherrybark oak Tree222111222242424404040848484Quercus phelloswillow oakTree1 1 11 1 1 18 18 18 19 19 19 44 44 44Quercus rubranorthern red oakTree1 1 1666666101010Quercus shumardiiShumard's oak Tree333777101010Quercus shumardii var. shumardii Shumard oak Tree1111118889910111111222109109112151151151349349349444334444222121213121212121212324 324 324 364 364 405 445 445 445 80.9 80.9 80.9 201 201 206 278 278 278 642 642 642Color for DensityExceeds requirements by 10%Pnols = Planted excluding livestakesExceeds requirements, but by less than 10%P‐all = Planted including livestakesFails to meet requirements, by less than 10%T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakesFails to meet requirements by more than 10%T includes natural recruitesCurrent Plot Data MY2 2019 Annual MeansScientific NameCommon Name Species Type17021‐AXE‐0019 17021‐AXE‐0020 17021‐AXE‐0021 17021‐AXE‐0022 MY2 (2019)111122MY1 (2018) MY0 (2017)22220.540.540.020.020.020.020.54

Weaver Farm Year 2 (2019) Monitoring Appendices
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS Restoration Systems, LLC

Weaver Farm
Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Taken October 2019

Plot 5
Plot 1
Plot 4 Plot 3
Plot 2
Plot 6

Weaver Farm Year 2 (2019) Monitoring Appendices
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS Restoration Systems, LLC
Weaver Farm
Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Taken October 2019 (continued)

Plot 11 Plot 12
Plot 7
Plot 10 Plot 9
Plot 8
Plot 13

Weaver Farm Year 2 (2019) Monitoring Appendices
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS Restoration Systems, LLC
Weaver Farm
Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Taken October 2019 (continued)

Plot 18 Plot 19
Plot 14
Plot 17 Plot 16
Plot 15
Plot 20

Weaver Farm Year 2 (2019) Monitoring Appendices
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS Restoration Systems, LLC
Weaver Farm
Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Taken October 2019 (continued)

Plot 21 Plot 22
T-1 T-2
T-3
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 17021-AXE-0001
VMD Year (1-5): Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N:
35.304262 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg. or m)
UTM Zone:
Longitude or UTM-E:
_78.127533
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
1 X-Axis bearing (deg): 8
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y
'a rs.:
Date last planted:
New lanting date mlyy?
Check box if plot was not
Votes: sampled, specify reason below
10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Oct 2018 Data 1 Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m O.lm 1cm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
672
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
®
R
1.2
0.3
40.0
❑
677
Platanus occidentalis
®
R
6.7
0.6
Missing
❑
679
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
9.4
1.9
55.0
❑
680
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
@
R
9.6
4.4
Missing
❑
681
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
®
R
6.7
5.7
40.0
❑
682
Quercus pagoda
O
R
9.5
6.7
!0.0
❑
683
Quercus sp. 4\%tl
®
R
9.4
9.1
40.0
❑
684
Fraxinus pennsylvanica,
O
R
6.9
10.0
25.0
❑
685
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
6.7
7.5
Missing
❑
686
Quercus alba
O
k
4.1
6.1
Missing
❑
687
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Q
R
0.8
7.3
42.0
❑
688
Quercus alba
®
R
0.9
9.1
Missing
❑
689
Liriodendron tulipifera
O
R
1.0
5.3
Missing
❑
690
Quercus sp.
©
R
3.9
8.4
Missing
❑
_-"=_-
■
m
"E
mm
�'
:...:e_
# stems: 14 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name Source* X Y Height DBH
(m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE: Tt=Transglant, L=Live stake. B=Ball and burlap. P=Potted Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically= U=Unknown �1
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued): 17021-AXE-0001 Oct 2018 Data c THIS YEAR'S DA IA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsam In **:
ei htCut-Off(Allstemsshorterthanthisareignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
Lf
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm
137 cm
sub-
Sapl
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**Requiredifcit-off>l0cmorsubsample?100%. 01
102 1
N
■ 3
•�
*4
H5
•i
1,
•
s
}��
10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
*SOURCE: Tr -Transplant, L=Live stake. B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted. Tu=Tublin.-. R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 2
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 17021-AXE-0001 x-axis: s ° #Sleets: i4
0- map size:
N LARGE
Y:51
(0,0) x:5ni
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant. L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted. Tu=Tubling. R=bare Root. M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 3
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Plot 170 1-AXE-0002
VMD Year (1-5): r1l Date:
Taxonomic Standard: 1/ eN(
Taxonomic Standard DATE: ()c v
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.303918 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg. or m) C "
Longitude or UTM-E:-78.126882 UTM Zone: U
Coordinate Accuracy (m): 1 X-Axis bearing (deg): 311
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Kom:
Date last planted:
New lanting date m/yy? 0
Check box if plot was not
(Votes: sampled, specify reason below
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Oct 2018 Data z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH y Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m 1cm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
694
Quercus sp.
O
R
3.2
0.7
Missing
❑
695
Quercus alba
®
R
2.1
2.6
Missin g
❑
696
Quercus alba
®
R
1.0
4.8
Missing❑
697
Quercus rubra
@
R
4.4
3.9
Missing❑
698
Quercus rubra
O
R
5.6
1.5
Missing
❑
699
Liriodendron tulipifera
O
R
8.0
0.8
Missing
❑
700
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Q
R
9.8
3.1
41.0
701
Liriodendron tulipifera
Q
R
6.6
4.3
Missing
❑
702
Quercus shumardii
®
R
7.7
7.6
65.0
❑
703
Liriodendron tulipifera
Q
R
5.6
6.9
13.0
❑
705
Quercus shumardii
©
R
4.8
8.5
18.0
❑
706
Betula nigra
O
R
1.9
8.0
Missing
❑
707
Betula nigra
O
R
2.8
6.2
MissIA91
❑
708
Quercus alba
O
R
0.0
6.2
Missing
❑
709
Liriodendron tulipifera
(j)
R
7.4
2.6
Missing
❑
# stems: 15 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE: Tr -Transplant, LrLive stake, B=Ball and burlap. P=Potted. Tu=Tublinr, R=bare Root. M=Mechanically U=Unknown h 4
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ltinlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Toot ver. 2.33

Plot (continued):
ID Species
17021-AXE-0002
map source X Y
char (m) (m)
Oct 2018 Data
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
c
*
ddh
(mm)
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(cm) (cm) sprout
Explanafion of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species A suhsampline**:
lei htCut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name CJJ
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
1
5-
10
(write DBH)
"Required ifcitoff>10cmorsubsample?100%.
•
3
• •
t !4
i
wS
•■
jr �ii 7
8 T
�10 FomtWS2,ver9.1
*SOURCE: Tr —Transplant, L=Live stake. B=Ball and burlap. P=Potted. Tu=Tubling. R=bare Roots M=Mechanicallp U=Unknown p. 5
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 17021-AXE-0002
Y:
(0,0)
�Q
0
X:5m
—� X-axis: 31 ° # stems: 15
N map size:
LARGE
*SOURCE:_ Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap. P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Roots M=Mechanically, U=Unknown P
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Toot ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet Please till in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 17021-AXE-0003 Par i % : Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year (1-5): � Date: / /
Taxonomic Standard: 4
Taxonomic Standard DATE: e
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.304174 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.m) 7g 126072 UTM Zone:
Longitude or UTM-M-E: -
Coordinate Accuracy (m): 1 X-Axis bearing (deg): 29
New lanting date m/yy? 0
Check box if plot was not
reason below
I
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Oct 2018 Data z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH R Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * 1cm* 1 cm sprout g g
712
Quercus pagoda
®
R
2.8
0.7
60.0
❑
713
Quercus alba
®
R
1.8
2.7
40.0
❑
714
Quercus phellos
R
0.1
1.6
10.0
❑
715
Quercus phellos
O
R
4.7
1.7
49.0
❑
716
Betula nigra
O
R
3.5
4.0
Missing
❑
7
718
Betula nigra
(p-)
R
8.5
0.3
MissingEl
719
Quercus sp. AM 11 ddn' S
O
10.0
2.9
59.0
ElR
720
�BEfah-nig�-
Q •
®
R
7.6
2.5
Missing
❑
721
Quercus sp.
®
R
6.8
4.8
18.0
❑
722
Quercus phellos
O
R
9.3
5.3
8.0
❑
723
Quercus phellos
R
8.7
7.0
10.0
❑
724
Quercus phellos
Q
R
7.7
9.0
10.0
❑
725
Quercus phellos
0
R
5.3
9.0
69.0
❑
726
Quercus alba
Qj
R
6.5
6.0
Missing
❑
727
Liriodendron tulipifera
O
R
3.0
6.2
Missing
❑
728
Betula nigra
O
R
2.2
7.1
Missing
❑
729
Quercus rubra
®
R
0.6
7.0
Missing
❑
=MINI
1��
_-mm_-
==u©m�
m-
M
m_-
=-tlm_-
:AMnooa�
=nom�
�M"TA
o ,
mn©m�
Ir
"©_-
# stems: 18 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name Source* X Y Height DBH
(m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
Gce L, 5
*SOURCE: Tr =Transplant. L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted Tu=Tublin, R=bare Root. M=Mecbanically, U=Unknown l� 7
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CYS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued):
17021-AXE-0003
Oct N)18 Data
o
THIS YEAR'S IAA i-A
ID Species
map source X Y
ddh Height DBH
* ddh
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
cbar (m) (m)
(mm) (cm) (cm)
(mm)
(cm) (cm) sprout
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species .&subsamp�inga*:
lei htLut-Off(Allstemsshorterthanthisareignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm 050cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
Q
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-Fcm
Seed
m-
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm
137 cm
Sub-
Sapl
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
—10
(write DBH)
"Required ifcit-off>10cmorsubsample?100%. 01
*2
■
■3
N■
t*4
■■
HS
■■
-■h
+■
7
#i
8
10 Form W S2, ver 9.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap. P=Potted. Tu=Tublin�. R=bare Root: M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p, 8
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 17021-AXE-0003
I
(0,0)
ri
x:51n
"
X-axis: 29 ° # stems: 18
0--
N mapsize:
LARGE
I
a
*SOURCE: Tr —Transom , L=Live stake. B=Ball and burlap. P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=_Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 9
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 17021-AXE-0004
VMD Year (1-5): 2 Date: / / -
Taxonomic Standard: I f e 4
Taxonomic Standard DATE: D
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.304457 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg. orm) �g 126072 UTM Zone:01D
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m): 1 X-Axis bearing (deg): 63
xoie:
Date last planted:
New lanting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
[dotes: sampled, specify reason below
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y; 10 ❑ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 dqUees to the right of X
Oct 2018 Data I Z I THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH y Height DBH Re- Vi or* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
732
Quercus rubra
O
R
3.2
0.7
71.0
❑
733
Quercus rubra
®
R
1.3
3.3
41.0
❑
734
Quercus pagoda
0
R
2.8
4.0
20.0
❑
735
Quer^us rubra
®
R
5.2
1.9
Missing
g
❑
736
n
Quercusq�ft 1t`,�hrl,�
\
O
R
7.6
3.4
78.0
❑
739
Quercus phellos
O
R
7.6
10.0
Missin g
❑
740
Liriodendron tulipifera
®
R
5.7
8.9
Missing
❑
741
Quercus sp.
O
R
7.6
8.0
Missing
❑
742
Quercus rubra
R
6.0
6.0
60.0
❑
743
Quercus pagoda
O
R
4.4
5.2
Missing❑
744
Quercus shumardii var. shumardii
R
1.9
9.4
48.0
❑
745
Liriodendron tulipifera
O
R
0.3
5.5
40.0
❑
# stems: 12 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name Source* X Y Height DBH
(m) (in) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake. B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubhne. R=bare Root M=Mechanically U=Unknown
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LNESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, I AN1Mal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued)' 17021-AXE-0004 Oct 2018 Data o THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of art -off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsamrAine**:
lei htCut- Off(Allstemsshorterthanthisareignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name Q
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm
137 cm
Sub-
Sapi
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
1-
-
**Required ifcttoff>10cm or subsample? 100%. rl
r2
r
r 3
rr
r r4
■•
r-r5
rr
* /t+
r
gI:r
�10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake. B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted Tu=Tublin . R=bare Root. M=Mechanically. U=Unknown p. 11
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 17021-AXE-0004 x-axis: 63 ° N # stems: 12
�/ map size:
U LARGE
Y:5
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE: Ti=Transplant,_L=Live stake. B=Ball and burlap. P=Potted. Tu=Tublin4., R=bare Root, M=Mechanicay, U=Unknown p. 12
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 17021-AXE-0005
VMD Year (1-5): ❑2 Date:
Taxonomic Standard: Woe � ((+ j
Taxonomic Standard DATE: - j ( d
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.304957 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg. or m) Q
Longitude or UTM-E: 78.125511 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy (m): 1 X-Axis bearing (deg): 1 51
Date last planted:
New lanting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 10❑ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Oct 2018 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
747
Quercus pagoda
Q
H
0.4
0.4
72.0
❑
748
Quercus alba
Q
R
3.4
1.0
Missing
❑
749
Quercus pagoda
Q
It
3.6
2.6
.67.0
❑
750
Quercus sp.
®
R
1.7
2.9
Missing
❑
751
*e1L --sp, l� l �l
®
R
2.7
4.5
.25.0
❑
752
Quercus alba
O
R
4.9
5.1
53.0
❑
753
Quercus alba
O
R
8.1
1.5
26.0
❑
754
Quercus shumardii
®
R
9.4
6.6
42.0
❑
756
Quercus alba
O
f?
6.6
8.2
40.0
❑
757
Quercus rubra
O
R
5.8
6.5
Missin %
❑
758
Quercus alba
Q
R
5.5
9.3
43.0
❑
759
Quercus alba
®
R
4.7
7.4
Missin
❑
761
Quercus pagoda
O
R
2.0
9.1
Missing
❑
# stems: 13 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name Source* X Y Height DBH
(m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
_j -1
E
*SOURCErTr=Transpant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burhAt .P=Potted: Tu=Tubligg R=bare Rootr M=Mechanicall U=Unknown p. 13
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME; LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. I Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEY Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued): 17021-AXE-0005 Oct 2018 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsam'�ing**: ff
[kj Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>l0cm,exp lain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
a
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
suer
Sap]
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
"Required ifcttoff>10cmorsubsample?100%. wi ■2
•
* 3
e•
•4
0
Ns
so
#ir, 7
•
8
:
10 Form WS2,va9.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake. B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted. Tu=Tubline. R=bare Root, M=Mechanically: U=Unknown p. 14
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
I=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CYS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 17021-AXE-0005
Y
(0,0)
of
X:5m
n
X-axis: 51 °
I
# stems: 13
N map size:
J LARGE
gal
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tublin_=. R=bare Root. M=Mechanically .U=Unknown E' 15
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to lOcm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Plot 17021-AXE-0006
VMD Year (1-5): 2 Date:
/ /
Taxonomic Standard:
(-eq
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
-#- ff t c)
Latitude or UTM-N:
35.305349 Datum: NADj83131WW
(dec.m)
Longitude or UTM-M-E:
- 7g 125201 UTM Zone:
1 1
" 11
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
1 X-Axis bearing (deg): 52
Please till in any missing data and correct any errors.
Role: Date last planted:
=:::] New lanting date m/yy?
i Check box if plot was not
reason Detow
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 10 ❑ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Oct 2018 Data z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
764 Quercus alba
$) R 1.8 2.1
61.0
❑
766 Quemus nd Iiwrll
O R 4.0 3.7
Missing
❑
767 Quercus phellos
O R 0.7 0.5
Missing
❑
768 Quercus shumardii O R 6.6 2.3 30.0 ❑
769
Quercus pagoda
®
R 8.1
0.0
25.0
CK
770
Quercus pagoda
0
R 9.7
1.7
30.0
❑
771
Quercus shumardii
O
R 7.8
3.8
24.0
❑
772
Quercus alba
®
R 5.3
5.5
40.0
❑
773
Quercus phellos
O
R 9179.5
5.4
Missing
❑
774 Quercus sp.
# stems: 10
Species Name
u
® R 8.9 8.5 35.0 ❑
New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
(>��r (1% 4'04 I✓t 3, ?� 71 J3
i
EUlanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsamaline**:
4e1 'htCut-Off(Allstemsshorterthanthisareignored. If>10cm,explam why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
Q
c
SEEDLINGS
- HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
- DBH
TREES - DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
sap]
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**Requimdifctioff>locmorsubsample?100%.
•
103
*&
•4
a
I **I
�s
rfi
7
HH
8 :j ] 10 Form WS2,ver9.1
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant. L(--Live stake. B=Ball and burlap. P=Potted, Tu=Tubling. R=bare Root. M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 16
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Toot ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 17021-AXE-0006
Y:51
(0,0) X:5m
7) X-axis: 52 °
# stems: 10
N map size:
0 LARGE
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap. P=Potted, Tu=Tublint, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown P 17
*VIGOR: 4--excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 17021-AXE-0007
VMD Year (1-5): Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE: v
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.305286 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.-7g 124794 UTM Zone:LM
Longitude or UTM-M-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m): 1' X-Axis bearing (deg): 24
Date last planted:
New lanting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
reason below
L_
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Oct 2018 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH N Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m Icm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
778
Betula nigra
®
R
2.1
1.8
32.0
❑
781
Betula nigra
O
R
1.9
4.4
Missing
❑
782
Quercus alba
O
R
5.5
0.9
10.0
❑
784
Betula nigra
R
6.4
8.5
Missing
❑
785
Liriodendron tulipifera
®
R
9.8
10.0
Missing❑
786
Liriodendron tulipifera
O
R
2.4
8.0
Missing
❑
787
Betula nigra
®
R
4.3
6.1
Missing
❑
# stems: 7 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name Source* X Y Height DBH
(m) (m) I cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
planation of art -off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsamrAine**:
htCut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,exp lain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137em
Species Name
Q
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm
137 cm
Suh-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**Required ifcitoff>1Ocmorsubsample?100%. •I
a2
•
■ 3
■ •
• •4
�5
as
r6
8
}i10
Form WS2,ver9.1
*SOURCE: Tr—Transrlant L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap. P=Potted. Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root. M=Mechanically,.U=Unknown p. 18
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 17021-AXE-0007
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 24 ° #stems: 7
GN map size:
� LARGE
*SOURCE: Ti=Traus lalant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap. P=Potted. Tu--Tublin& R=bare Root, M=Mechanically. U=Unknown i7. 19
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the C4S-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Plot 17021-AXE-0008
VMD Year (1-5): [ 2] Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
/ / -
L✓# - fl' cpJ
15.305633 Datum: NAD831W
r'Vu }--�
78.125794 UTM Zone: 1 1
11 X-Axis bearing (deg): 97
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Role: Date last planted:
New lanting date m/yy? 0
Check box if plot was not
(Votes: sampled, specify reason below
Plot Dimensions: x* to y; to ❑ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Oct 2018 Data z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH y Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
789
Quercus phellos
Q
R
0.2
0.5
15.0
❑
791
Quercus phellos
Q
R
2.9
3.8
15.0
❑
792
Quercus phellos
®
1:
1.0
2.5
16.0
❑
793
Quercus phellos
Q
R
2.6
0.9
20.0
❑
794
Quercus phellos
®
R
6.3
1.7
Missing
795
Quercus phellos
Q
R
7.9
2.0
Missing
❑
796
Quercus phellos
R
10.0
2.4
Missing
❑
797
Platanus occidentalis
Q
R
5.5
4.2
34.0
❑
# stems: 8 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name Source* Y Height DBH (m) (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
Explanation of cut-o
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsampline***:
ei Pht Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name p
c
SEEDLINGS
- HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
- DBH
TREES - DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(writeDBl1)
1
-
ifcitoff>lOcm or subsample? 100%.
s
�*tequired
!
/
l0 Form WS2, va 9.1
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant. L=Live stake. B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=TublinR, R=bare Root: M=Mechanically, U=Unknown _ P. 20
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CAS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 17021-AXE-0008
Y:
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis
97 °
N itstems: 8
U map size:
LARGE
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant. L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Roots M=Mechanically..U=Unknown p. 21
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LPdESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 17021-AXE-0009
VMD Year (1-5): Fi� Date: / /
Taxonomic Standard: 4-1
Taxonomic Standard DATE:-6-010
Latitude or UTM-N: 135.305245 Datum: NAD83/W
(dem) -7g 125704 UTM Zone:
Longitude or UTM-TM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m): 11 X-Axis bearing (deg): 47
Date last planted:
New laming date m/yy? 0
Check box if plot was not
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: to Elth
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to e right of X f
Oct 2018 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
5
Map Source* X Y Height DBH 21 Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
803
Quercus pagoda
Q
R
0.1
0.5
35.0
810
Betuta nigra
O
R
8.5
2.0
Missing
❑
812
Quercus phellos
®
R
5.7
5.6
20.0
❑
815
Quercus phellos
®
R
0.2
5.3
25.0
❑
816
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Q
R
0.7
8.0
38.0
❑
# stems: 5 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted.
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm
If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Vigor* Damage* Notes
planation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsam1/1iLn **:
IleLl-1htCut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right): ❑ 10cm 1150cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name 0
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm
137 cm
Sub-
Sapi
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**Required ifcifoff>lOcmor subsample? 100%. 611
:2 03
•■
�
••
5
■•
•
'S
g 1
10 Form WS2,ver9.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap. P=Potted, Tu=Tublin . R=bare Root, M=Mechanicall% U=Unknown p. 22
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CPS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 17021-AXE-0009
:51
(0,0) X:5m
� X-axis: 47 °
# stems: 5
N map size:
j ' J LARGE
*SOURCE: Tr=Transillant. L=Live stake. B=Ball and burls P=Potted Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root. M=Mechanically.. U=Unknown p. 23
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet Please till in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 17021-AXE-0010 arty: Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year (1-5): ❑2 Date: / / _ / / New lanting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: J
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.304723 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg. or m) � C'o
Longitude or UTM-E: 78.126095 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy (m): 1 X-Axis bearing (deg): 65
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: l0l ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Oct 2018 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH Height DBH Re -
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * * Vigor Damage Notes
i lcm 1 cm sprout
818
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
0.0
0.7
74.0
❑
821
Quercus pagoda
$)
R
1.0
3.4
28.0
❑
822
Quercus shumardii
O
R
9.4
2.9
43.0
❑
824
Quercus alba
®
R
7.9
5.5
10.0
825
Quercus alba
O
R
5.4
4.8
Missing
❑
826
Liriodendron tulipifera
Q
R
9.8
5.1
Missing
827
Liriodendron tulipifera
Q
R
7.9
7.7
23.0
828
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Q
R
3.8
6.9
; 3.0
❑
830
Liriodendron tulipifera
®
R
2.1
8.5
Missing
❑
831
Quercus rubra
O
R
1.3
6.1
`40.0
❑
# stems: 10 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name Source* X Y Height DBH
(m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
Explanation of cut-o
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & sohsam in ":
ieiohtCut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS - HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS - DBH TREES - DBH
Species Name p Sub- 1 10 cm 50 cm 100 cm Sub- =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm I Sapl 1 0-1 cm 1-2.5 1 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
"Required if caoff >10cm or subsample ? 100%. ■i 02 10 3 10 04 045 t
■0 ■ 7 8J:T JZ:0 Form W 52, ver 9.1
■ ■■ ��
*SOURCE: Tr -Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burls P=Potted, Tu=Tubling. R=bare Root, M=Mechanically.. U=Unknown -P. 24
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CAS-EEPEntry Toot ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 17021-AXE-0010
Y
—� X-axis: 651 N # stems: 10
�/ map size:
LARGE
U
1
p
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE_ Tr—Trans»lant,_L=Live stake. B=Ball and burlap. P=Potted. Tu=Tublin„ R=bare Root. M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 25
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Toot ver. 2.33

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Plot 17021-AXE-0011
VMD Year (1-5): ❑2 Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE: (� d
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.304757 Datum: NAD83i V
(dec.deg. or m) �-78.126589 UTM Zone:J
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m): I X-Axis bearing (deg): 68
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
1CVic;
Date last planted:
New lanting date m/yy? 0
Check box if plot was not
reason below
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Oct 2018 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m O.lm lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
837
Quercus sp.
O
R
2.9
1.4
Missing
❑
838
Quercus pagoda
O
R
6.6
0.2
61.0
❑
839
Quercus shumardii
O
R
8.4
0.8
20.0
❑
840
Quercus phellos
®
R
6.6
2.9
Missing
❑
842
Quercus alba
O
R
8.7
6.3
Missing
❑
843
Quercus phellos
®
R
7.1
5.6
Missing
❑
844
Quercus pagoda
Q
R
6.3
7.9
Missing
❑
846
Quercus pagoda
®
R
4.5
6.7
73.0
❑
849
Quercus phellos
0
R
4.3
8.6
Missing
❑
850
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
®
R
3.0
6.3
Missing
# stems: 10 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name Source* (m) (m) Height DBmH Vigor* Damage* Notes
Explanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsampline**:
iei;;htCut-Off (All sterns shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
R1
c
SEEDLINGS
- HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
- DBH
TREES - DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
Sapl
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**Requimdifcitoff>10cmorsubsample?100%. ri
:2
*3
•04
so
H5
so
6
7 ::8
::
::10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
*SOURCE: Tr -Transplants L=Live stake. B=Ball and burlap. P=Potted. Tu=Tubling. R=bare Root. M=Mechanically. U=Unknown p. 26
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 17021-AXE-0011
!:
(010)
x:51-n
—� X-axis: 68 ° N # stems: 10
map size:
0 LARGE
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant. L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu7--Tublk& R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 27
*VIGOR: 4--excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 17021-AXE-0012
VMD Year (1-5): IT] Date: / / -
Taxonomic Standard: (Q
Taxonomic Standard DATE: ( e
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.304799 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E: -78.127462 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy (m)• 1 X-Axis bearing (deg): 34
Date last planted:
New laming date m/yy-
Check box if plot was not
i
Plot Dimensions: X: 10� Y: 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Oct 2018 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
5
Map Source* X Y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
851
Liriodendron tulipifera
Q
R
0.9
0.9
Missing
❑
853
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
®
R
3.0
4.0
29.0
❑
854
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
®
R
3.9
1.9
35.0
❑
855
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
®
R
6.0
2.1
28.0
❑
856
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
5.3
4.4
40.0
❑
857
R
Q
R
7.9
3.2
Missing
❑
860
Betula nigra
Q
R
6.7
7.4
Missing
❑
861
Betula nigra
O
R
5.9
9.5
Missing
❑
865
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
3.5
9.4
10.0
❑
# stems: 9 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name Source* (m) (m) Heeigght DBH Vigor* Damage* Notes
I cm
Explanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsampling!*:
Heigh Cut-Off(Allstemsshorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS
- HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
- DBH
TREES - DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm
137 cm
Sub
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
Species Name
0
c
"Required if citoff >10cm or subsample ? 100 %.
0
1 102 103 :04 1: Irb
Form W S2, ver 9.1
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant LT --Live stake. B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root,_M=Mechanically, U=Unknown P. 28
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 17021-AXE-0012 x-axis: 34 ° # stems: 9
N map size:
� LARGE
Y:51
(0,0) X:51n
*SOURCE: Tr —Transplant, L=Live stake. B=Ball and burlap. P=Potted, Tu=TublinZ,, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically. U=Unknown P. 29
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Plot 17021-AXE-0013
VMD Year (1-5): Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.304528 Datum:
(dec.deg. or m) -78127462 UTM Zone:
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m): I X-Axis bearing (deg): 4i
Please till in any missing data and correct any errors.
xole:
Date last planted:
New lanting date m/yy? 0
Check box if plot was not
reason below
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 10 ❑ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Oct 2018 Data z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char O.lm O.lm 1cm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
871
Quercus pagoda
O
R
0.0
4.8
30.0
11
872
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Q
R
6.5
2.3
53.0
❑
875
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Q
R
6.0
4.2
Missing
❑
880
Quercus alba
®
R
2.2
6.1
Missing
❑
881
Quercus alba
©
R
1.8
8.2
Missing
❑
883
Quercus alba
®
R
0.9
2.7
Missing
❑
# stems: 6 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
I
Explanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species A snbsjunu ing**:
itei,,htCut-Off(All stems shorterthanthis are ignored. If>l0cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm 050cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
0
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**Requiredifcttoff>10cmorsubsample?100%. it
N2
r%
. `4
!-C
!�#6
04
::10 Form WS2,ver9.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Trans lant L=Live stake B=Ball and burls , P=Potted,_ Tu=Tubinig, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically,. U=Unknown ]'. 30
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Toot ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 17021-AXE-0013
Y:
-axis: 4° #stems: 6
X
0- map size:
N LARGE
5n
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake. B=Ball and burlap, P=Potte( Tu=Tublim R=bare Root. M=Mechanically, U=Unknown 31
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUgbt, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntryToo! ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Plot 17021-AXE-0014
VMD Year (1-5): Fi� Date: / /
Taxonomic Standard: LXect 1 ( {
Taxonomic Standard DATE: �(J
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.304723 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg. or m) C ,
Longitude or UTM-E: 78.127462 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy (m)• 1 X-Axis bearing (deg): 45
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Role: Date last planted:
New l nting date m/yy?
A 1 LjCheck box if plot was not
Plot Dimensions: X: W Y: 10 ❑ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Oct 2018 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char O.lm O.lm lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
885
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
®
R
2.0
2.2
30.0
❑
888
Quercus pagoda
®
R
5.4
1.0
Missing
❑
889
Quercus phellos
®
R
8.1
1.2
Missing
❑
890
Quercus pagoda
O
R
9.8
1.3
Missing
❑
892
Quercus phellos
O
R
6.6
3.5
52.0
❑
893
Quercus phellos
®
R
7.1
5.6
Missing
❑
894
Quercus pagoda
Q
R
8.9
6.2
20.0
❑
895
@eaenrpkekea`�(OJOr_l
VVVVV
R
6.5
8.0
Missing
❑
897
Quercus alba
O
R
1.0
6.5
Missing
❑
900
Quercus pagoda
O
R
2.6
9.5
60.0 ❑
# stems: 10 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name Source* X Y Height DBH
(m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
L if 10 j r" Jai I,$ n-
Llrl,i : "Jv r
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & su bsam pling* *:
iei h Cut-Off(Allsterns shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
0
c
SEEDLINGS
- HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
- DBH
TREES - DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
ZZ-
**Requiredifcit-off>Iocmorsubsample?100%. rl
i2 3
r rr
164 "5
r ■r
rh
�8
M r�
10 Fom�WS2,ver9.1
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant L=Live stake B=Ball and burlaa P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root. M=Mechanically, U=Unknown �p.. 32
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10em if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 17021-AXE-0014
Y
(4,0)
I
X:5m
X-axis: 45 ° # stems: 10
011�
Nmap size:
LARGE
*SOURCETr—Transplant. L=Live stake. B=Ball and burlai P=Potted, Tu=Tublina, R=bare Root, M=Mechanicall U=Unknown p. 33
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Toot ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Plot 17021-AXE-0015
VMD Year (1-5): Fi� Date: I I- 1
Taxonomic Standard: 04 (r
Taxonomic Standard DATE: (%
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.305233 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:-78.129006 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy (m): 1 X-Axis bearing (deg): 16
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
1: Role: Date last planted:
New lanting date m/yy? 0
Check box if plot was not
reason below
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Oct 2018 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH y Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m O.lm lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout
902
Quercus pagoda
®
1{
1.8
1.9
71.0
El
903
Quercus pagoda
@
R
0.3
3.0
20.0
El
904
Quercus phellos
O
R
2.4
0.4
Missing
❑
905
Quercus phellos
®
R
3.8
2.9
Missing
❑
906
Quercus phellos
©
R
5.2
-t-4 (�
Missing
❑
908
Quercus pagoda
®
R
6.8
3.0
59.0
❑
909
Quercus pagoda
€t
9.8
2.8
52.0
❑
910
Quercus pagoda
®
R
8.3
4.7
40.0
❑
911
Quercus pagoda
©
K
5.6
4.4
90.0
❑
912
Quercus pagoda
O
R
6.8
6.7
24.0
❑
913
Quercus pagoda
@
R
9.6
7.7
20.0
❑
914
Quercus pagoda
Q
R
7.8
9.8
24.0
915
Quercus pagoda
O
R
5.1
8.4
21.0
❑
916
Quercus pagoda
Q
R
4.0
6.2
20.0
❑
917
Quercus pagoda
®
R
3.1
8.2
45.0
❑
918
Quercus phellos
®
R
0.4
7.6
38.0
❑
919
/
Quercus phellos s/
Q
R
1.1
6.2
47.0
❑
920
Quercus pagoda
Q
R
2.1
9.7
75.0
❑
==101M_-
m-10_-
_-�0M_-
m-mm_
m-mm_-
m-©m_-
--mm_-
rm-lmm_-.
M-mm_-
�-mm_-
# sterns: 18 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name Source* (m) (m) Il cm*eight I cm
DBH Vigor* Damage* Notes
�Z iUt All
�I 7
*SOURCE: Tr -Transplant, L=Live stake: B=Ball and burlap. P=Potted. Tu=Tublinf. R=bare Root. M=Mechanical U=Unknown p. 34
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 1 Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued): 17021-AXE-0015 Oct 2018 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH # ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Exulanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &subsamRing**:
WAPhtCut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name 0
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm
137 cm
Sub
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
IL
0 M�
**Required ifcitoff>10cmorsubsample?100%. 4"42
•
M 3
•w
0*4
•i
*45
oo
6
•
N
8
V
;i
�10 Form W S2, ver 9.1
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant. L=Live stake. B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tublinp.. R=bare Root. M=Mechanically. U=Unknown D. 35
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUgbt, STORM, HURRicane, DIScased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 17021-AXE-0015
Y:5
(0,0) X:51n
X-axis: 160 # stems: 18
0--
map size:
N LARGE
*SOURCE: Tr —Transplant, L=Live stake. B=Ball and burlap. P=Potted. Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown [).36.
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 17021-AXE-0016
VMD Year (1-5): Date:
Taxonomic Standard: Vle.1 Q 4
Taxonomic Standard DATE: V
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.304818 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg. or m) `°
Longitude or UTM-E: �78.129273 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy (m): 1 X-Axis bearing (deg): 18
CN
Kole:
Date last planted:
New janting date m/yy? 0
Check box if plot was not
reason Wow
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 10 ❑ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Oct 2018 Data z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* I cm sprout
924
Quercus pagoda
®
R 0.5
0.7
Missing
❑
925
Quercus phellos
O
R 5.3
2.4
Missing
❑
926
Quercus alba
®
R �9;rr
��//
1.4
Missing
El
927
Quercus phellos
Q
R 8.6
2.2
62.0
❑
928
Quercus rubra
®
R 6.8
3.7
32.0
929
Quercus pagoda
O
R 8.3
5.0
40.0
❑
931
Quercus pagoda
O
R 4.5
9.1
90.0
❑
932
Quercus pagoda
Q
R 2.2
8.3
10.0
❑
933
Betula nigra
®
R 3.5
5.2
30.0
❑
934
Betula nigra
O
R 0.1
3.7
Missing
❑
# stems: 10 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) :Form:
Species Name Source* X Y Height DBH
(m) (m) I cm* I cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
�t✓ta? aA.-dV ri, 3t I 7
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsampline**:
e'_htCut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ 1Ocm ❑ 5Ocm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name a
c
SEEDLINGS
- HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
- DBH
TREES - DBH
sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
6l 1 d ss+w rl6/
**Requiredifcttoff>10cmorsubsample?100%.
2
/
:3
•0
•164
it
"i
••
rt;
•�
�� �8 -'
i�
::10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted Tu=Tubling. R=bare Root. M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 37
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2-fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 17021-AXE-0016
Y:5r!
1�
(0,0)
0
X:5m
1.
3 X-axis: 18
# stems: 10
0 N
map size:
LARGE
I
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant. L -�=Ball and burlap. P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root. M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 38
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unk wn
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Plot 17021-AXE-0017
VMD Year (1-5): Fi� Date:
/ /
-
Taxonomic Standard:
Vekk4i
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
d (�
Latitude or UTM-N:
35.304561 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg. or m)
Zo
-78.129833 UTM Zone:
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
I X-Axis bearing (deg): L�3J
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Role: Date last planted:
1 ] New lanting date m/yy? 0
y New
box if plot was not
reason below
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Oct 2018 Data z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
II) Sneeiec Name . Uw n l - n l m 1 nm* 1 nm * l em* 1 ern snmut
936
939
940
941
942
946
947
948
949
950
# stems:
Quercus alba Q R 0.3 0.2 40.0
Fraxinuspennsylvanica O R 3.5 3.4 51.0
Quercus alba Q kt 5.5 0.5 30.0
Quercus alba Q R 7.6 1.0 70.0
Fraxinus pennsylvanica ® R 6.2 4.1 Missing
Liriodendron tulipifera R 6.4 5.8 10.0
Liriodendron tulipifera Q k, 8.0 6.6 Missing
Liriodendron tulipifera O R 4.3 5.3 Missing
Quercus alba O R 1.7 6.8 Missing
Quercus alba ® R 0.3 9.5 38.0
10 New Stems nest inelnded )act year_ but are obviously nlanted.
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
If more snace
d
tao
El
14'
110
❑
❑
01
❑
❑
needed. use
blank
PWS
(Planted
Woodv Stems)
Form:
X Y
Species Name Source* (m) (m)
Height DBH
1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
(�AL
Explanation of eut-o
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsamlAin ":
f ieioht Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ 10em ❑ 50em ❑ 100cm ❑ 137em
Species Name
p
c
SEEDLINGS
- HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
- DBH
TREES - DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm
137 cm
sub-
Sap)
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
"Required ifclt-off>Iocmorsubsample?100%. *I 102 11 3
• �•
64
!!
6 ��7
! �Ni
8
:/
10 FomnWS2,ver9.1
H
*SOURCE: Tr -Transplant L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap. P=Potted; Tu=Tubling R=bare Rooms M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 39
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 24air, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LNESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Ma of stems on lot 17021-AXE-0017 X-axis: 3a ° #stems: 10
P P �N map size:
0 LARGE
0
(0,0) Min
*SOURCE: Tr —Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubliu R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 40
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Plot 17021-AXE-0018
VMD Year (1-5): Date: / / -
Taxonomic Standard: �:� `�N k( e I
Taxonomic Standard DATE: oZD fp
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.303797 Datum: NAD83/W
Longitude or UTM-E: 78.130011 UTM Zone: M
Cnnrdinnre Accnrnev (m): 1; X-Axis bearing (deg): 31
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Date last planted: I
New lanting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
reason Detow
Plot Dimensions: X: 10� Y: 1 10 ❑ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Oct 2018 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
954
Quercus alba
Q
R
1.4
3.4
30.0
❑
957
Quercus pagoda
0
R
8.3
2.5
45.0
❑
958
Quercus alba
®
R
6.4
4.3
10.0
❑
960
Liriodendron tulipifera
Q
R
9.3
7.4
Missing
❑
966
Quercus alba
®
R
9.2
5.1
20.0
El
# stems: 5 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted.
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm
A �a a•7 �
If. more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Vigor* Damage* Notes
xo1anation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsamOhm*
i ht Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50em ❑ 100em ❑ 13 7cm
Species Name 0
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
Sap]
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
"Required ifcttoff>lOcmorsubsample?100%. 01
■2
■
3
■*
■ •4 MS6810
■ ■ •■ ■ H
Form WS2, ver 9.1
*SOURCE: Tr -Transplant, L=Live stake. B=Ball and burlap. P=Potted, Tu=Tublinl;, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown _ p. 41
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 17021-AXE-0018
1
(0,0)
X:5m
-- , X-axis: 31 ° # stems: 5
U
N map size:
LARGE
F
fi
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake,.B=Ball and burlap. P=Potted Tu=TubliuE, R=bare Root. M=Mechanically, U=Unknown P. 42
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Plot 17021-AXE-0019
VMD Year (1-5): FTI Date: / / -
Taxonomic Standard: (p�
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.303336 Datum: NAD83/W
(de-7g 128896 UTM Zone:pri
Longitude or UTM-TM-E: _.
1 X-Axis bearing de
Coordinate Accuracy (m): g (deg): 14
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Role: Date last planted:
fr New lanting date m/yy? L�
N r t .� Check box if plot was not
votes: sampled, specify reason below
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 10 ❑ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Oct 2018 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout
968 Fraxinus pennsylvanica O R 0.0 0.8 65.0 ❑ a
969 Fraxinus pennsylvanica ® R 2.4 1.0 50.0 ❑
970 Fraxinus pennsylvanica R 4.1 1.1 28.0 ❑
971 Fraxinus pennsylvanica ® R 4.2 3.7 40.0 ❑
972 Fraxinus pennsylvanica O R 1.9 3.2 65.0 ❑El Pi
973 Quercus phellos Q R 0.3 2.9 61.0 ❑
974 Q. s cr�.I � ® R I eT 4.9 j j 10.0 ❑ lYd aE]
975 @06eng"igm �/',,,>t. 0 R r d ', -3,& 3rjr- 20.0 If
976 Fraxinus pennsylvanica R 5.8 1.4 130.0 DBH? Li Itill
977 Quercus phellos O it 7.2 1.2 Missing ❑
978 Fraxinus pennsylvanica O R 9.4 1.5 30.0 ❑
979 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Q R J.� "2 -'5 7� Missing ❑
980 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Q R 7.2 8.5 130.0 DBH? ❑
982 Quercus pagoda Q r. 9.6 7.0 Missing ❑ r� tt
983 b"tria utsiff Q R , 0 6.0 9.7 $ .� Missing ❑ 3a `1
984 Quercus rubra I ® R fi,Q3 "46*6 20.0 ❑If
985 Quercus sp. Q R 2.9 5.5 Missing ❑ A
986 Quercus pagoda ® R 0.0 8.5 Missing ❑
987 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Q R 4.0 9.1 70.0 ❑
988 Fraxinus pennsylvanica O R 1.8 8.2 40.0 ❑ K
1412 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Oj R 4.2 5.5 70.0 ❑
1413 Fraxinus pennsylvanica ® R 5.1 2.1 65.0 ❑
# stems: 22 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
PftA
Id
a)
*SOURCE: Tc=Transplant: L=Live slake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted. Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically . U=Unknown _ p. 43
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive y+rar, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. i Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued)' 17021-AXE-0019 Oct ''018 Data z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
map source X Y ddh Height DBH y ddh Height DBH Re Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) * (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-o
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &bamone*:
ei htCut-Off(Allsternsshorterthanthisareignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right)m❑ ❑ 137cm
Species Name
0
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
Sapl
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
1
"Required ifcitoff>10cmorsubsample?100%. ■1
:2 s 3
• ••
64
■ ■
#*5
io
r6 ►i
R
:
10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
*SOURCE: Tr —Transplant, L=Live stake. B=Ball and burlar. P=Potted. Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown 11.44
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 17021-AXE-0019
Y:5nl
I
a)
I
I
01
7 X-axis: 14 c #stems: 22
map size:
0- N LARGE
Q �O
(0.0) X:51n
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burla P=Potted. Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown g. 45
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HVIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 17021-AXE-0020
VMD Year (1-5): 1-21 Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
VIAA kli i1N
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N:
35.303833 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
-79.129123 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
1 X-Axis bearing (deg): 1 34
Kom
Date last planted:
New lanting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
reason Mow
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 10 ❑ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Oct 2018 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH RA Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char O.lm O.lm lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout
991
QGmmpagede �r N 1
0
R
0.3
0.7
65.0
❑
992
�►a �r
Q
R
3.1
$ 4- 'l
54.0
�]
993
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
®
R
1.8
3.5
85.0
❑
994
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
®
R
4.2
4.0
MAP
❑
995
Betula nigra
Q
R
7.9
0.5
Missing
❑
996
Via+
®
K
5.4
.9-3- I *%
✓✓�
Missing
El
997
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
-d-7'j.`3.5
45.0
❑
998
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Q
R
8.9
3.7
Missing
❑
999
Quercus pagoda
Q
R
6.2
6.4
50.0
❑
1000
Betula nigra
R
9.8
0.6
Missing
❑
1001
Quercus alba
O
R
8.2
6.8
Missing
❑
1002
Quercus alba
®
R
8.0
8.6
60.0
❑
1003
Quercus phellos
Q
R
6.8
8.6
41.0
❑
1004
O
R
3.1
8.4
70.0
❑
1005
Qu-p"eda. � � P
®
R F6AI
8•8
Missing
❑
1006
Quercus pagoda
Q
R
1.1
6.1
Missing
❑
# stems:
16 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted.
If more space
Species Name Source* X Y Height DBH
(m) (in) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
�. 14- A
*SOURCE: Ti--Transplant; L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlaps P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically,�U=Unknown
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Winissing. i Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued):
ID Species
17021-AXE-0020
map source X Y
char (m) (m)
Oct 2018 Data
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
c
0 ddh Height
* (mm) (cm)
THIS YEAR'S DATA
DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(cm) sprout
4Fxnlanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species subsampba*F:
eightCut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
0
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub
Sap]
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**Required ifcut-off>10emorsubsample?100%. 01
• •2
•3
• ■
••3
••
�s
••
r6
• 7
S
i
10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap. P=PottedTu=Tublinp. R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown _ �, 47
*VIGOR: 4--excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. Z3.I

Map of stems on plot 17021-AXE-0020
Y
(0,0)
(11
X:5m
7 X-axis: 34 * # stems: 16
G�j map size:
0 LARGE
*SOURCE: Ti—Transplant. L=Live stake- B=Ball and burlap. P=Potted, Tu=Tubbz R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown r. 48
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, OthedUnknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUgbt, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 17021-AXE-0021
VMD Year (1-5): F21 Date:
Taxonomic Standard: Q '
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: '35.304523 Datum: NAD831W
(dec.deg. or m) ''e.n
Longitude or UTM-E:-78.128711 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy (m): -- IT X-Axis bearing (deg): 18
Date last planted.
New lanting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
reason below
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Oct 2018 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH I Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m Icm* 1 cm * Icm* 1 cm sprout
1008
Quercus alba
®
R
2.9
0.7
53.0
1009
Quercus alba
@
I;
0.7
0.9
25.0
❑
1010
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
2.0
3.5
70.0
❑
1011
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
®
R
4.1
3.5
Missing
❑
1012
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
®
R
0.2
3.2
Missing
❑
1013
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
0
R
6.1
3.5
55.0
❑
1014
Quercus pagoda
®
R
7.3
0.9
70.0
❑
1015
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
(p-)
R
S -0-4,
3.5
23.0
❑
1016
Quercus sp.
©
R
5.3
1.0
19.0
❑
1017
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
®
R
6.7
64T, 35.0
❑
1019
Quercus pagoda
R
9.5
8.9
50.0
❑
1020
Quercus pagoda
O
h
7.2
8.9
Missing
❑
1021
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
(D
R
4.5
6.1
60.0
❑
1022
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Q
R
2.7
5.9
50.0
❑
1023
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
®
R
0.4
5.6
70.0
❑
1024
Quercus pagoda
®
R
1.8
9.0
71.0
❑
1025
Betula nigra
O
R
4.5
9.0
Missing
❑
# stems:
17 New Stems,
not included last
year, but are obviously planted. If more space
X
Y
Height DBH
SiDecies Name
Source*
m
1 cm* 1 cm
Vigor*
7%
needed, use blank PWS
Damage* Notes
M M mlm�
MWIM
=low mm
Woody Stems) :Form:
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap. P=Potted. Tu=Tubling,. R=bare Root _M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 49
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Toot ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued):
ID Species
17021-AXE-0021
map source X Y
char (m) (m)
Oct 2418 Data
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
c
y ddh Height
* (mm) (cm)
THIS YEAR'S DATA
DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(cm) sprout
Natural Woody Stems -tallied by species & 5un� plFnf cut-0ff
ei htCut-Off(Allstemsshorterthanthisareignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
0
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub
Sapl
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**Required if cutoff>10cm or subsample ? 100%. *1
■2 ■ 3
• rr
* *4
r
* 45
■■
�
■
1!
8
t�4
��rr
Form
10 WS2,ver9.1
*SOURCE: Tr -Transplant, L=Live stake„B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted- Tu=Tublin-o. R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 50
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, i ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 17021-AXE-0021
Y:5
(0,0) X:51n
X-axis: 180 # stems: 17
0 N map size:
LARGE
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap. P=Potted. Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown _ _ ..p, 51
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet Please till in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 17021-AXE-0022
VMD Year (1-5): Fil Date:
Taxonomic Standard: K (e
Taxonomic Standard DATE: XV ( V
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.303885 'Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:-78.128097 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy (m): 1 X-Axis bearing (deg): 7
Date last planted:
New planting date m/yy? 0
Check box if plot was not
�. I I
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 101 El plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Oct 2018 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
5
Map Source* X Y Height DBH y Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout
1026 Quercus phellos R 0.4 0.7 61.0
1032 Quercus pagoda ® R 9.7 0.3 24.0
1033 Quercus alba ® R 9.1 2.6 36.0
1034 Fraxinus pennsylvanica R 8.6 5.0 30.0 El
1036 Quercus pagoda © it 7.8 6.4 45.0
1037 Quercus alba Q R 7.3 9.4 18.0 ❑
1038 Quercus nigra O R 4.6 8.8 29.0
1040 Quercus pagoda ® R 2.2 7.6 18.0
# stems: 8 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name �1 Source* (in) (in) 1 cm* 1 cm X Y Height DBH Vigor* Damage* Notes
e 1 l� 11 1
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsamolina**:
Heigh tCut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
Q
c
SEEDLINGS
- HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
- DBH
TREES - DBH
Sub
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
Sap,
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
i
**Required ifcitoff>10cmorsubsample?100%. !,
!2
!
i 3
00
!!4
!!
N5
■■
*-!6
j ■
�7 8
H
} 1
!!
10 Form W S2, ver 9.1
*SOURCE: Tr -Transplant, Lr-Live stake, B=Ball and burlap. P=Potted. Tu=Tublins--. R=bare Root M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p 52
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 17021-AXE-0022
M
JU
5n
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 7 ° # stems: 8
0- map size:
N LARGE
*SOURCE: Tr —Transplant. L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap. P=Potted. Tu=Tublin„ R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U Unknown p. 53
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CYS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Weaver Farm Year 2 (2019) Monitoring Appendices
Weaver Farm MBI Neuse River WS Restoration Systems, LLC

Appendix D.
Remedial Activities

2019 Remedial Action Plan
Soil Test Report
2020 Remedial Action Plan

Ray Holz
From:
Merritt, Katie <[e-mail]>
Sent:
Tuesday, January 15, 2019 4:25 PM
To:
Ray Holz
Cc:
Matthew Harrell
Subject:
RE: [External] RE: Weaver Farm Year 1 review -
Hey Raymond,
By copy of this correspondence, the Year 1 monitoring report is approved and the remediation plan with the
modifications noted below is also approved. Based on your performance bond #22BSBHT4261, the bond term ends with
the approval of the Year 1 Monitoring Report. Therefore, please provide DWR with a continuation certificate extending
the bond through next year's monitoring year. Once I receive confirmation of renewal, I will issue a credit release letter.
Thank you,
Katie
From: Ray Holz <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 2:09 PM
To: Merritt, Katie <[e-mail]>
Cc: Matthew Harrell <[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] RE: Weaver Farm Year 1 review-
• rnal email. L7a not click links or open attachinentS u111�55 y;a,u,.r r' i d. S.enrJ,all.suspic a ail as an attacle"elo
blj
Katie — thank you for the review and for catching the cypress - that was an oversight on our part. Although I would love
to pant cypress, because they will not count towards success, we will instead plant 1,000 Quercus appropriate to the
target natural community (300 Q. laurifolia, 300 Q. lyrata, 400 Q. michauxii).
As for the maple, we understand and agree with the general DWR policy of not planting red maple (Acer rubrum), given
its abundance and prolific nature. However, in this specific case, a portion of the site (Zone 1 on the Remedial Action &
Maintenance Map) demonstrates such impaired soil conditions that we believe including red maple is justified and
beneficial.
While we have completed intensive soil remediation in this —5-acre area (lime, disc, herbaceous seed), there is still some
question about how fertile the soil is where the turkey houses area once stood. In the 2018 monitoring season, this area
was notable for poor tree survival and sparse herbaceous cover.
Red maple is known to tolerate a wide variety of site conditions, even growing on poor sites such as mining spoils. We
consider its inclusion in the planting mix an important part of reclaiming this particular area in a timely fashion. We plan
to plant 200 red maple/acre in Zone 1. That will constitute 1/3rd of the stems/acre planted this year in that zone. The
additional 400 stems/acre will be a mix of the other species on our remedial planting list. The combination will allow
Zone 1 to meet success criteria moving forward by establishing an adequately dense and diverse native hardwood
community despite the difficult soil condition.
Please do not hesitate to give me a call if you would to discuss any part of this plan in greater detail.
Sincerely,
Raymond Holz.
Raymond J. Holz I Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes St. Suite 211 1 Raleigh, NC 27604
tel:[phone] cell:919.604.9314 1 fax:[phone]

email: [e-mail]
From: Merritt, Katie[mailto:[e-mail]�]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2019 2:58 PM
To: Ray Holz <r fiolz restorationsystems.com>
Subject: Weaver Farm Year 1 review -
Hey Raymond,
I have finalized my review of the Year 1 Monitoring Report for the Weaver Farm Mitigation Site. Thank you for providing
a remedial action plan in response to the impacts to the site associated with Hurricane Florence. I do have concerns
with the proposed planting plan, considering not all the trees are part of the original approved planting plan. It is
proposed in the report, to plant the following species: Acer rubrum, Liriodendron tulipifera, Quercus nigra, Ulmus
Americana and Taxodium distichum. Three of the five species chosen, are not part of the approved planting plan. Acer
rubrum is not usually accepted as a preferable species to plant on riparian buffer sites due to its ability to colonize
rapidly, potentially outcompete other planted stems and possibly produce a monoculture. Ulmus Americana is an
acceptable species to plant on this site and DWR approves the use of this tree in the remediation plan. Taxodium
distichum is not a hardwood tree and would not be allowed to use towards the performance standards, which require
"native hardwood tree species".
Due to the special nature of this site, DWR will allow alternative species of trees to be planted for the
remediation. However, RS is required to provide DWR with a specific reason as to why Acer rubrum should be planted
on this site. This must include site -specific characteristics that warrant the use of Acer rubrum over other species
approved in the planting plan in the BPDP. Nursery availability of stems will not be considered a reasonable explanation
to use Acer rubrum on the site. Additionally, RS must acknowledge in writing, they understand that Taxodium distichum
will be excluded from counting towards the performance standards on the site. Otherwise, RS must choose a different
species from the original planting plan in the BPDP.
Once I have received a response to this email, I will be able to issue a credit release.
Thank You,
Katie
""please note my phone number has changed"*
Katie Merritt
Nutrient Offset & Buffer Banking Coordinator
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Office: 919-707-3637
Work Cell: 919-500-0683
Website: http:llportal.ncdenr.ordweblwg/401bufferpermitting
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, NC 27620
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

Ray Holz
From: Ray Holz
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2019 12:23 PM
To: Katie Merritt - NC DENR - DWR ([e-mail])
Subject: Weaver Farm - Remedial Action Implementation Summary
Attachments: Weaver Farm —Remedial Action Plan_Implementation Summary.pdf
Katie —
RS completed the remedial action work at Weaver Farm on February 24t''. Please find attached a summary of the work
completed. I have also updated a copy to the DWR edocs website.
At your earliest convenience, I would like to schedule a site visit to both Weaver Farm and Pancho.
Thank you for the time,
RH
Raymond J. Holz I Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes St. Suite 211 1 Raleigh, NC 27604
tel:[phone] cell:919.604.9314 1 fax:[phone]
email: [e-mail]

Weaver Farm –Remedial Action Plan Implementation
1
Weaver Farm –Remedial Action Plan Implementation
Species List of replanting
2
Zone 1 # of Stem Date Completed
Red Maple 1,000 02/24/19
River Birch 500 02/24/19
Yellow Poplar 1,000 02/24/19
Overcup Oak 500 02/24/19
Water Oak 500 02/24/19
American Elm 500 02/24/19
Bald Cypress 300 02/24/19
White Oak 500 02/24/19
Zone 2
River Birch 500 02/24/19
Yellow Poplar 1,000 02/24/19
Overcup Oak 300 02/24/19
Water Oak 500 02/24/19
American Elm 400 02/24/19
Bald Cypress 1,000 02/24/19
Total 8,500
Weaver Farm –Remedial Action Plan Implementation Photo Date: 02/24/2019
Herbaceous establishment in footprint of old turkey houses
Herbaceous establishment in footprint of old turkey houses
3
Weaver Farm –Remedial Action Plan Implementation Photo Date: 02/24/2019
Herbaceous establishment & replanting in footprint of old turkey houses
Herbaceous establishment & replanting in footprint of old turkey houses
4
Weaver Farm –Remedial Action Plan Implementation Photo Date: 02/24/2019
Herbaceous establishment & replanting in footprint of old turkey houses
Replanting in Zone 2 outside of old turkey houses (near Vegetation Plot 7)
5
Weaver Farm –Remedial Action Plan Implementation Photo Date: 02/24/2019
Replanting in Zone 2 outside of old turkey houses (near Vegetation Plot 12)
Replanting in Zone 2 outside of old turkey houses (near Vegetation Plot 10 & 11)
6
NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/Report No. FY19-SL001200
Mehlich-3 ExtractionSoil Report
Client:
Links to Helpful Information
Advisor:Predictive Raymond Holz
1101 Haynes St
Raleigh, NC 27604
Josh Merritt
120 Singlton Street
Raleigh, NC 27606
Sampled County : Sampson
Client ID: 489322 Advisor ID: 489323
Sampled:
Received:
Completed:
07/21/2018
07/23/2018
07/27/2018Farm: Weaver Farm
Lime History:
Sample ID: More
Information
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm ; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm ; NO3-N in mg/dm ]: Soil Class:
Ca%NO3-NSS-IESPNaCu-IZn-AIZn-IMn-AI2Mn-AI1Mn-IS-IMg%K-IP-IpHAcBS%CECW/VHM%
2 -
1 -
Crop
Recommendations:Lime
BCuZnMnSMgK2OP2O5N
Mineral
Hardwood, E
Hardwood, M
0.3
0.0
WEAV1
80-120
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4772835.32.0757.91.310.76 616519272243
0
0
0
0
Note: 11
Note: 11
192
(tons/acre)
333
0
0
33 12
Nutrients (lb/acre)
0.5
Lime History:
Sample ID: More
Information
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm ; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm ; NO3-N in mg/dm ]: Soil Class:
Ca%NO3-NSS-IESPNaCu-IZn-AIZn-IMn-AI2Mn-AI1Mn-IS-IMg%K-IP-IpHAcBS%CECW/VHM%
2 -
1 -
Crop
Recommendations:Lime
BCuZnMnSMgK2OP2O5N
Mineral
Hardwood, E
Hardwood, M
0.4
0.0
WEAV2
80-120
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
876445.32.4728.41.220.76 193677011445
0
0
0
0
Note: 11
Note: 11
770
(tons/acre)
333
0
0
55 12
Nutrients (lb/acre)
0.1
Thank you for using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality.
- Steve Troxler, Commissioner of Agriculture
Reprogramming of the laboratory-information-management system that makes this report possible is
being funded through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/Report No. FY19-SL001200
Page 2 of 2Josh Merritt
Recommendations
Lime
If testing finds that soil pH is too low for the crop(s) indicated, a lime recommendation will be given in units of either
ton/acre or lb/1000 sq ft. For best results, mix the lime into the top 6 to 8 inches of soil several months before planting.
For no-till or established plantings where this is not possible, apply no more than 1 to 1.5 ton/acre (50 lb/1000 sq ft) at one
time, even if the report recommends more. You can apply the rest in similar increments every six months until the full rate
is applied. If MG is recommended and lime is needed, use dolomitric lime.
Fertilizer
Recommendations for field crops or other large areas are listed separately for each nutrient to be added (in units of
lb/acre unless otherwise specified). Recommendations for N (and sometimes for B) are based on research/field studies
for the crop being grown, not on soil test results. K-I and P-I values are based on test results and should be > 50. If they
are not, follow the fertilizer recommendations given. If Mg is needed and no lime is recommended, 0-0-22 (11.5% Mg) is
an excellent source; 175 to 250 lb per acre alone or in a fertilizer blend will usually satisfy crop needs, SS-I levels appear
only on reports for greenhouse soil or problem samples.
Farmers and other commercial producers should pay special attention to micronutrient levels. If $, pH$, $pH, C or Z
notations appear on the soil report, refer to . In general, homeowners do not
need to be concerned about micronutrients. Various crop notes also address lime fertilizer needs; visit
Recommendations for small areas, such as home lawns/gardens, are listed in units of lb/1000 sq ft . If you cannot find
the exact fertilizer grade recommended on the report, visit to find information that
may help you choose a comparable alternate. For more information, read
.
Test Results
The first seven values [soil class, HM%, W/V, CEC, BS%, Ac and pH] describe the soil and its degree of acidity. The
remaining 16 [P-I, K-I, Ca%, Mg%, Mn-I, Mn-AI1, Mn-AI2, Zn-I, Zn-AI, Cu-I, S-I, SS-I, Na, ESP, SS-I, NO 3-N (not routinely
available)] indicate levels of plant nutrients or other fertility measurement. Visit
Report Abbreviations
Ac exchangeable acidity
B boron
BS% % CEC occupied by basic cations
Ca%% CEC occupied by calcium
CEC cation exchange capacity
Cu-I copper index
ESP exchangeable sodium percent
HM%percent humic matter
K-I potassium index
K2O potash
Mg%% CEC occupied by magnesium
MIN mineral soil class
Mn manganese
Mn-Al1 Mn-availability index for crop 1
Mn-AI2 Mn-availability index for crop 2
Mn-I manganese index
M-O mineral-organic soil class
N nitrogen
Na sodium
NO3-N nitrate nitrogen
ORG organic soil class
pH current soil pH
P-I phosphorus index
P2O5 phosphate
S-I sulfur index
SS-I soluble salt index
W/V weight per volume
Zn-AI zinc availability index
Zn-I zinc index
Understanding the Soil Report: explanation of measurements, abbreviations and units
$Note: Secondary Nutrients and Micronutrients
www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/obpart4.htm#fs
A Homeowner's Guide to Fertilizer.
www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/uyrst.htm
ncagr.gov/agronomi/pubs.htm.
NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/ Report No.FY20-SL010766
Mehlich-3 Extraction
Completed: Received:Sampled:
Soil Report
Farm:
Client:
Links to Helpful Information
Advisor:
10/29/201910/21/2019
Predictive
Matthew Harrell
441 Weaver Rd
Goldsboro, NC 27530
Sampled County : Wayne
503761Client ID: Advisor ID:
2.00 tons/acre; 11/2018
Lime History:
Sample ID: More
Information
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm ; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm ; NO3-N in mg/dm ]: Soil Class:
Ca%NO3-NSS-IESPNaCu-IZn-AIZn-IMn-AI2Mn-AI1Mn-IS-IMg%K-IP-IpHAcBS%CECW/VHM%
2 -
1 -
Crop
Recommendations:Lime
BCuZnMnSMgK2OP2O5N
Mineral
Hardwood, E 0.0
0.0
BUILD
0 00 0
8644635.31.68914.71.240.41 7240305137269
0 0 Note: 11
305
(tons/acre)
333
0
38 22
Nutrients (lb/acre)
1.1
Lime History:
Sample ID: More
Information
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm ; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm ; NO3-N in mg/dm ]: Soil Class:
Ca%NO3-NSS-IESPNaCu-IZn-AIZn-IMn-AI2Mn-AI1Mn-IS-IMg%K-IP-IpHAcBS%CECW/VHM%
2 -
1 -
Crop
Recommendations:Lime
BCuZnMnSMgK2OP2O5N
Mineral
Hardwood, E 0.0
0.0
SIDA
0 00 0
874985.51.7788.01.160.46 185892720942
0 0 Note: 11
927
(tons/acre)
333
0
61 12
Nutrients (lb/acre)
0.1
Thank you for using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality.
through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
Reprogramming of the laboratory-information-management system that makes this report possible is being funded
- Steve Troxler, Commissioner of Agriculture
NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/ Report No.FY20-SL010766
Page 2 of 2Matthew Harrell
Recommendations
Lime
If testing finds that soil pH is too low for the crop(s) indicated, a lime recommendation will be given in units of either
ton/acre or lb/1000 sq ft. For best results, mix the lime into the top 6 to 8 inches of soil several months before planting.
For no-till or established plantings where this is not possible, apply no more than 1 to 1.5 ton/acre (50 lb/1000 sq ft) at one
time, even if the report recommends more. You can apply the rest in similar increments every six months until the full rate
is applied. If MG is recommended and lime is needed, use dolomitric lime.
Fertilizer
Recommendations for field crops or other large areas are listed separately for each nutrient to be added (in units of
lb/acre unless otherwise specified). Recommendations for N (and sometimes for B) are based on research/field studies
for the crop being grown, not on soil test results. K-I and P-I values are based on test results and should be > 50. If they
are not, follow the fertilizer recommendations given. If Mg is needed and no lime is recommended, 0-0-22 (11.5% Mg) is
an excellent source; 175 to 250 lb per acre alone or in a fertilizer blend will usually satisfy crop needs, SS-I levels appear
only on reports for greenhouse soil or problem samples.
Farmers and other commercial producers should pay special attention to micronutrient levels. If $, pH$, $pH, C or Z
notations appear on the soil report, refer to . In general, homeowners do not
need to be concerned about micronutrients. Various crop notes also address lime fertilizer needs; visit
Recommendations for small areas, such as home lawns/gardens, are listed in units of lb/1000 sq ft . If you cannot find
the exact fertilizer grade recommended on the report, visit to find information that
may help you choose a comparable alternate. For more information, read
.
Test Results
The first seven values [soil class, HM%, W/V, CEC, BS%, Ac and pH] describe the soil and its degree of acidity. The
remaining 16 [P-I, K-I, Ca%, Mg%, Mn-I, Mn-AI1, Mn-AI2, Zn-I, Zn-AI, Cu-I, S-I, SS-I, Na, ESP, SS-I, NO 3-N (not routinely
available)] indicate levels of plant nutrients or other fertility measurement. Visit
Report Abbreviations
Ac exchangeable acidity
B boron
BS% % CEC occupied by basic cations
Ca%% CEC occupied by calcium
CEC cation exchange capacity
Cu-I copper index
ESP exchangeable sodium percent
HM%percent humic matter
K-I potassium index
K2O potash
Mg%% CEC occupied by magnesium
MIN mineral soil class
Mn manganese
Mn-Al1 Mn-availability index for crop 1
Mn-AI2 Mn-availability index for crop 2
Mn-I manganese index
M-O mineral-organic soil class
N nitrogen
Na sodium
NO3-N nitrate nitrogen
ORG organic soil class
pH current soil pH
P-I phosphorus index
P2O5 phosphate
S-I sulfur index
SS-I soluble salt index
W/V weight per volume
Zn-AI zinc availability index
Zn-I zinc index
Understanding the Soil Report: explanation of measurements, abbreviations and units
$Note: Secondary Nutrients and Micronutrients
www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/obpart4.htm#fs
A Homeowner's Guide to Fertilizer.
www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/uyrst.htm
ncagr.gov/agronomi/pubs.htm.
Weaver Farm –Yr. 3 (2020) Remedial Action Plan Implementation
A complete replant of the site with bare-root stock at a rate of 680 trees/acre will be conducted this
planting season. Before planting, a narrow set ripping/bedding plow will be used to prepare planting
rows sitewide. This plow will disturb about 24” wide every 8’ across the site. The bedding action will
release surface compaction and incorporate organic material into the soil. The ripping portion of the
plow will promote deeper root growth and release deeper compaction. A narrow plow will be used to
minimize the disturbance. In addition, lime will be applied sitewide. RS has secured and plans to plant
the following species.
*RS recognizes that Pinus taeda would not count under the CMB rule, we’re simply trying to see if
anything will grow.
RS is in the process of collecting baseline data, which will be detailed in the Yr. 3 Monitoring report
along with an end of the year typical vegetation monitoring survey.
1
Species Number
Acer rubrum 1500
Celtis occidentalis 100
Celtis laevigata 500
Cornus amomum 300
Liriodendron tulipifera 3,000
Pinus taeda 2,000
Platanus occidentalis 3,000
Prunus laurocerasus 500
Prunus serotina 500
Ptelea trifoliate 500
Quercus lyrata 800
Quercus phellos 2,500
Quercus shumardii 700
Rhus glabra 500
Viburnum dentatum 500
Totals:16900
Remedial Work Date Completed
Ripping/bedding plow Week of March 16th , 2020
Planting March 24th, 2020
Soil Amendments Ongoing
Baseline Tree Counts By end of April 2020
Weaver Farm –Yr. 3 (2020) Remedial Action Plan Implementation Photo Date: 04/02/2020
First photo series is of ripping/bedding work done by plow
Page 2
Weaver Farm –Yr. 3 (2020) Remedial Action Plan Implementation Photo Date: 04/02/2020
Ripping/bedding work done by plow
Page 3
Observed area of higher tree survival,
less ripping occurred (Plot 15 –Yr. 2 MR
(2019) 647 stems per acre)
Weaver Farm –Yr. 3 (2020) Remedial Action Plan Implementation Photo Date: 04/02/2020
Ripping/bedding work done by plow
Page 4
Weaver Farm –Yr. 3 (2020) Remedial Action Plan Implementation Photo Date: 04/02/2020
Ripping/bedding work done by plow
Page 5
Weaver Farm –Yr. 3 (2020) Remedial Action Plan Implementation Photo Date: 04/02/2020
Ripping/bedding work done by plow & planting details
Page 6
White arrow on replanted stems
Surviving planted stem from 1st
remedial work
Weaver Farm –Yr. 3 (2020) Remedial Action Plan Implementation Photo Date: 04/02/2020
Planting details
Page 7
White arrow on replanted stems
Bare root planting, March 24th, 2020
Weaver Farm –Yr. 3 (2020) Remedial Action Plan Implementation Photo Date: 04/02/2020
Ripping/bedding work done by plow
Page 8
Bare root planting, March 24th, 2020
White arrow on replanted stems
Bare root planting, March 24th, 2020
White arrow on replanted stems