20200493 Ver 1_PCN Form Submission_20200408

DWR
mrlslon of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
April 11, 2020 Ver 3.1
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
C Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned
20200493
Is a payment required for this project?*
r No payment required
r Fee received
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office *
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
BEAVER CREEK
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
BETTY BULLOCK
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
4/8/2020
Nearest Body of Water
BEAVERDAM BRANCH 27-43-15-13
Basin
Neuse
Water Classification
C,NSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.5209
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Johnston
Is this a NCDMS Project
r Yes r No
Longitude:
-78.5486
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
W Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Version#*
1
What amout is owed?*
IT $240.00
r $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Stephanie Goss:eads\szgoss
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?

W Nationwide Permit (NWP)
r Regional General Permit (RGP)
r Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r' Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
r Individual Permit
29 - Residential Developments
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
F- 401 Water Quality Certification - E)press
W Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes f No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
r Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
W Owner r Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
BEAVER CREEK INVESTORS, INC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
05024/0885
2c. Responsible party:
2d.Address
Street Address
405 JOHNSON BLVD
Address Line 2
city
JACKSONVILLE
Postal / Zip Code
28540
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
State / Rwince / Ifgion
NC
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
r- Yes r No
r Yes r No
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)

4a. Name:
ATHAN M. PARKER, PE
4b. Business Name:
AMP'D ENGINEERING, PLLC
4c.Address
Street Address
7401 ARCHERS CREEK CT
Address Line 2
City
EMERALD ISLE
Fbstal / Zip Code
28594
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
ATHAN. PARKER@AMPDENG INEERING.COM
Agent Authorization Letter*
2020.04.08.OwnerAuthorization Letter.pdf
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
262.87KB
C. Project Information and Prior Project History C^U
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
BEAVER CREEK
1c. Nearest municipality/ town:
PLEASANT GROVE
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
2c. Project Address
Street Address
PLEASANT RIDGE CT
Address Line 2
city
BENSON
Fbstal / Zip Code
27504
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
BEAVERDAM BRANCH 27-43-15-13
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
C,NSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Neuse
2b. Property size:
State / Province / Fegion
NC
Country
USA
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030202010903
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
Previously, the project site was used as farmland with wooded areas. The general area of the impact was wooded. The site is currently built with a road crossing (stormdrain, water, etc.)
already installed and in use.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)

4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
6.61
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
2,182
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The project is a 41 lot single family residential subdivision. The infrastructure includes a 20' wide asphalt road with roadside ditches, 6" PVC water main, and storm drain pipe at the
crossing.
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The project is a 41 lot single family residential subdivision. The equipment that ran be expected to be used to construct the infrastructure of the project includes dozers, excavators,
pans for grading, motorgraders, rollers, highway capable dump trucks, and other tractors.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r Yes r No
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
r Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r N/A
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): CARLOS BAGLEY
Agency/Consultant Company: PITTMAN SOIL
Other:
O Unknown
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made bythe Corps or DWR
DECEMBER 2018
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes f• No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
W Wetlands W Streams -tributaries W Buffers
r Open Waters r Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
!a. Site #* (?) 2at Reason M 2b. Impact type * (?) 2c. Type of W.* 2d. W. name * 2e. Forested* 2f. Type of 2g. Impact
Jurisdicition*(?) area*
f
:7] CULVERT JP Unknown W1 Yes Corps 0.016
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.016
2h. Comments:
The wetland impact is the culvert crossing.
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.016

3. Stream Impacts
F
3a. Reason for impact (?) 3b.lmpact type * 3c. Type of impact * ��name * 3e. Stream Type* 3f. Type of 3g. S. width * 3h. Impact
(?) Jurisdiction* length*
S1 ROAD CROSSING Permanent Culvert S1 -Iff::]
Corps 4Average (feet) 8(linearfcet)
31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
31. Total permanent stream impacts:
31. Total temporary stream impacts:
81
0
31. Total stream and ditch impacts:
81
3j. Comments:
The layout was planned to minimize impacts to the natural hydrology of the
area to the best e:dent practicable.
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)?
Check all that apply.
FJ Neuse
r Tar -Pamlico
r Catawba
r Randleman
r Goose Creek
r Jordan Lake
r Other
6b. Impact Type 6c. Per or Temp 6d. Stream name 6e. Buffer mitigation required? 6f. Zone 1 impact 6g. Zone 2 impact
ROAD CROSSING P UNNAMED No 4,954 3,295
6h. Total buffer impacts:
Zone 1
Zone 2
Total Temporary impacts: 0.00
0.00
Zone 1
Zone 2
Total Permanent impacts: 4,954.00
3,295.00
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total combined buffer impacts: 4,954.00 3,295.00
6i. Comments:
Supporting Documentation
2020.04.03.PCN.Combined.pdf 632.62KB
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation u
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Layout specifically designed to minimize impacts to the wetlands and the stream while meeting NCDOT design requirements. it was not feasible to
avoid impacts due to the amount of develop -able land beyond the crossing. Rip rap splash pads were installed on both sides of the crossing to
dissipate water velocities in the roadside ditches and to reduce the head cut already epstent in the stream. A head wall was also installed on the inlet
side to prevent additional impacts to the stream, wetlands and buffers.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
The erosion control design was compiled such that temporary sediment basins/traps be installed directly up -slope of the four roadside ditches that
discharge up -slope of the stream. Silt fence was also utilized to surround any/all disturbed areas. Strawwattles were utilized where needed to slow
velocities and reduce suspended solids prior to entering the Unnamed Tributary.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes r No

2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes r No
What type of SCM are you providing?
F Level Spreader
W Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
F Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
F Other SCM that removes minimum 30 % nitrogen
F Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
Diffuse Flow Documentation
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
(- Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15ANCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes ( No
Comments:
The percent imperviousness of this project is 14.99%.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r Yes r No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15ANCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
r Yes r No
2b Provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
(- Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This is an after -the -fact application. The project has been built and permanent groundcover established.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r Nor WA
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated
at a treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
This project will utilize individual septic systems permitted under the Engineering Option Permit (EOP) through Johnston County Health Department.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.

Raleigh
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
Se. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r Yes r No
5f. Will you cut anytrees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?`°
r Yes r No
51. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
Contacted John Ellis with the USFWS office in Raleigh, NC.
919-856-4520 ext28
[e-mail]
Consultation Documentation Upload
20200330_LTRSNT_FWS_ Bunn _ AMPdEngineering-BeaverCreekSubdivision.pdf 176.24KB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
Contacted Fritz Rohde with NOAA.
252-838-0828
[e-mail]
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/
The closest site is the JT0713 Stephenson -Coats Farm that is roughly 0.9 miles away on Raleigh Rd.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-yearfloodplain?*
r Yes r No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FEMA Firm maps - 3720163400K - 6/20/2018
Miscellaneous
Comments
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
C^)
Signature U
*
W By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Athan Parker

Signature
Date
4/8/2020

JOHN L. PIERCE & ASSOCIATES, P.A.
LAND SURVEYING • LAND PLANNING • MAPPING
P.O. Bm;l 1685
Jacksonville, NC 28541
April 8, 2020
Re: Beaver Creek Investors Inc.
To Whom It May Concern:
OFFICE: 910-346-9800
FAX: [phone]
E-MAIL: bettyb®jlpnc.com
or brianj @jlpnc.com
"t
405 Johnson Blvd.
Jacksonville, NC 28540
Please accept this as authorization for AMP'd Engineering, PLLC company to submit on Beaver
Creek Investors' behalf a PCN application.
Should you need any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Betty Bullock, President
BEAVER CREEK INVESTORS INC.
LOTS, FARMLAND AND WOODLAND SURVEYING • SITE PLANNING • SUBDIVISION LAYOUT • LAND DEVELOPMENT PLANNING
CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING • TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYING AND MAPPING
Phase I Environmental Audit / Risk Assessment

March 30, 2020

David Bunn
AMP’d Engineering PLLC
PO Box 4580
Emerald Isle, NC 28594

Re: Beaver Creek Subdivision– Johnston County

Dear Mr. Bunn:

This letter is to inform you that t he Service has established an on-line project planning and
consultation process which assists developers and consultants in determining whether a
federally-listed species or designated critical habitat may be affected by a proposed project. For
future projects, please visit the Raleigh Field Office’s project planning website at
https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/pp.html. If you are only searching for a list of species that may be
present in the project’s Action Area, then you may use the Service’s Information, Planning, and
Consultation System (IPaC) website to determine if any listed, proposed, or candidate species
may be present in the Action Area and generate a species list. The IPaC website may be viewed
at https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/. The IPaC web site contains a complete and frequently updated list
of all endangered and threatened species protected by the provisions of the Endangered Species
Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)(Act), a list of federal species of concern 1 that
are known to occur in each county in North Carolina, and other resources.

Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non -federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized ,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally-listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining wh ether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally -protected species list, information on the
species’ life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or

1 The term “federal species of concern” refers to those species which the Service believes might be in need of
concentrated conservation actions. Federal species of concern receive no legal protection and their designation
does not necessarily imply that th e species will eventually be proposed for listing as a federally endangered or
threatened species. However, we recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid or minimize adverse
impacts to federal species of concern.

evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes.

If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species known to be
present within the county where your p roject occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species’ presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.

If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally -protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other relat ed articles.

With regard to the above-referenced project, we offer the following remarks. Our comments are
submitted pursuant to, and in accordance with, provisions of the Endangered Species Act.

Based on the information provided and other informat ion available, it appears that the proposed
action is not likely to adversely affect any federally -listed endangered or threatened species, their
formally designated critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Act at
these sites. We believe that the requirements of section 7(a)(2) of the Act have been satisfied for
your project. Please remember that obligations under section 7 consultation must be
reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect
listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered; (2) this action is
subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review; or, (3) a new species
is listed or critical habitat determined that may be af fected by the identified action.

However, t he Service is concerned about the potential impacts the proposed action might have
on aquatic species. Aquatic resources are highly susceptible to sedimentation. Therefore, we
recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid adverse impacts to aquatic species,
including implementing directional boring methods and stringent sediment and erosion control
measures. An erosion and sedimentation control plan should be submitted to and a pproved by
the North Carolina Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section prior to construction.
Erosion and sedimentation controls should be installed and maintained between the construction
site and any nearby down-gradient surface waters. In addition, we recommend maintaining
natural, vegetated buffers on all streams and creeks adjacent to the project site.

The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission has developed a Guidance Memorandum (a
copy can be found on our website at (http://www.fws .gov/raleigh) to address and mitigate
secondary and cumulative impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources and water quality.
We recommend that you consider this document in the development of your projects and in
completing an initiation packag e for consultation (if necessary).

We hope you find our web page useful and informative and that following the process described
above will reduce the time required, and eliminate the need, for general correspondence for
species’ lists. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis of this office at
[phone] ext. 26.

Sincerely,

Pete Benjamin
Field Supervisor

LEGEND:
DEED BOOK D.B.
EXISTING EX
MAP BOOK M.B.
PAGE P.G.
ROW RIGHT OF WAY
TYPICAL TYP
WETLANDS
0 200 400
Feet
SCALE 1 "=200'
THIS PLAN IS THE PROPERTY OF AMP'D
ENGINEERING, PLLC, AND MAY NOT BE USED OR
REPRODUCED WITHOUT THEIR PERMISSION.
DESIGNER ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY HOME
CONSTRUCTED FROM THIS PLAN. CONTRACTOR
MUST VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO
PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. CAUTION
MUST BE EXCERISED IN MAKING ANY CHANGES
IN THIS PLAN. ONLY QUALIFIED DESIGNER,
ARCHITECT, CONTRACTOR OR STRUCTURAL
ENGINEER SHOULD ATTEMPT MODIFICATIONS, AS
EVEN MINOR CHANGES IN ONE AREA OF THE
HOUSE COULD LEAD TO MAJOR PROBLEMS IN
ANOTHER AREA.
NOTES:
1. THIS IS AN "AFTER THE FACT" IMPACT MAP FOR THE WETLANDS AND
STREAM CROSSING. WITH THE ORIGINAL STREAM CALL, THERE WERE NO
STREAM OR RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACTS. THE CALL HAS SINCE BEEN
REVISED. THIS PLAN SHOWS ALL IMPACTED AREAS ASSOCIATED WITH THE
REVISED STREAM AND WETLANDS CALL.
2. ALL GRADING INSIDE OF THE IMPACT AREAS HAS BEEN COMPLETED WITH
FINAL GROUNDCOVER ALREADY ESTABLISHED.
3. NO OTHER DISTURBANCE IS ANTICIPATED INSIDE OF THE IMPACT AREAS
WITH THE EXCEPTION OF FILLING THE SEDIMENT TRAP.
4. AN "AS -BUILT" OF THE WETLANDS AND STREAM CROSSING IS SHOWN ON
SHEET 3 OF 3.
PELT PLACE
IMPACTS:
STREAM IMPACTS —
81 LF
WETLAND IMPACTS —
710 SF
ZONE 1 —
4,954 SF
ZONE 2 —
3,295 SF
TOTAL —
8,249 SF
`, I1111I I I//,I,
%%%%jjA A RO
; =OQ Ftisso,�. V
_,I e
SITE CIVIL CONSULTANT
.STORMWATER DESIGN
& INSPECTIO
-LAND DEVELOPN
MENT
-SITE PLANS
919-795-9594
E
0
U
C
N
J M N
C
CL m
I c
c9 a "o
Z 0 U a
W Z N Q
Uj Z u) M o ®�
0ZMZY�
W U , O
X Z 0.0
dmN O
m oZ_--
QL,dY 00)
0
Z
N p
O Q
N wLo
000
a0D
-J CV
N
Zoo
U
- m Z
Z
J
ILL,
W O
c
cos
Uz5
p�w0
X
C9
0
LJ4>>
Sw Z0(n
YJmY
wa0001-0-
0
Ld
F,
W
0
O_NZ
N
—
5F-
/�
c /
0
m~Z
0
J 0
< o z
LL]/
Q
M
w
mZN
U) (n
Q
2
OfJO
W
cf)
a
m
DATE:4/03/2020
REV: I DATE:
OVERALL IMPACT
SITE PLAN
SHEET 1 OF 3

NOTES:
1. THIS IS AN "AFTER THE FACT" IMPACT MAP FOR THE WETLANDS AND
LEGEND:
STREAM CROSSING. WITH THE ORIGINAL STREAM CALL, THERE WERE NO
DEED BOOK
D.B.
STREAM OR RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACTS. THE CALL HAS SINCE BEEN
EXISTING
EX
REVISED. THIS PLAN SHOWS ALL IMPACTED AREAS ASSOCIATED WITH THE
REVISED STREAM AND WETLANDS CALL.
MAP BOOK
M.B.
2. ALL GRADING INSIDE OF THE IMPACT AREAS HAS BEEN COMPLETED WITH
PAGE
P.G.
FINAL GROUNDCOVER ALREADY ESTABLISHED.
ROW
RIGHT OF WAY
3. NO OTHER DISTURBANCE IS ANTICIPATED INSIDE OF THE IMPACT AREAS
WITH THE EXCEPTION OF FILLING THE SEDIMENT TRAP.
TYPICAL
TYP
4. AN "AS -BUILT" OF THE WETLANDS AND STREAM CROSSING IS SHOWN ON
WETLANDS
SHEET 3 OF 3.
0 30 60
Feet
IMPACT AREAS
SCALE 1 "=30'
THIS PLAN IS THE PROPERTY OF AMP'D
ENGINEERING, PLLC, AND MAY NOT BE USED OR
REPRODUCED WITHOUT THEIR PERMISSION.
DESIGNER ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY HOME
CONSTRUCTED FROM THIS PLAN. CONTRACTOR
MUST VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO
PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. CAUTION
MUST BE EXCERISED IN MAKING ANY CHANGES
IN THIS PLAN. ONLY QUALIFIED DESIGNER,
ARCHITECT, CONTRACTOR OR STRUCTURAL
ENGINEER SHOULD ATTEMPT MODIFICATIONS, AS
EVEN MINOR CHANGES IN ONE AREA OF THE
HOUSE COULD LEAD TO MAJOR PROBLEMS IN
ANOTHER AREA.
IMPACTS:
STREAM IMPACTS —
81 LF
WETLAND IMPACTS —
710 SF
ZONE 1 —
4,954 SF
ZONE 2 —
3,295 SF
TOTAL —
8,249 SF
•�'''IA )CARI���' ,
'�OQ�FSSrp��q.9
:'Q 9�
�o,o. 'T�A P SEAL. R
_o i
-SITE CIVIL CONSULTANT
-STORMWATER DESIGN
& INSPECTION
-LAND DEVELOPMENT
-SITE PLANS
919-795-9594
E
0
U
rn
c
JL 0N
C
D_ m
I c
c9 a to
z � a
O
W Z co QUJI -
ZU)MU®-IAA
C,ZMZY�
WU , OIA
X ZMop ao
dMmU) O
m w o Z
Q E(_Y -a 0)
0
Z
(n p
O Q
N w a0D
GOD
-J CV
N
Z O U
U
- In Z
Z
J
J
W O
C
Uzco
5
—5;
000X0
�0
4 l
O
� U) Z
LJ >> Y
U)
m Y
J
w0a000
0DD�7)ma_7)
wz
F,
W
0
O_NZ
N
—
5F
/�
c /
0
m~Z
0
J 0
QC9Z
Q
/
M
mZN
U)U)2
Q
OfJO
( �
D _
�yw
m
DATE:4/03/2020
REV: I DATE:
IMPACT SITE
PLAN
SHEET 2 OF 3

NOTES:
LEGEND:
1.
THIS IS AN "AFTER THE FACT" IMPACT MAP FOR THE WETLANDS AND
DEED BOOK
D.B.
STREAM CROSSING. WITH THE ORIGINAL STREAM CALL, THERE WERE NO
EXISTING
MAP BOOK
EX
M.B.
STREAM OR RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACTS. THE CALL HAS SINCE BEEN
REVISED. THIS PLAN SHOWS ALL IMPACTED AREAS ASSOCIATED WITH THE
REVISED STREAM AND WETLANDS CALL.
PAGE
P.G.
2.
ALL GRADING INSIDE OF THE IMPACT AREAS HAS BEEN COMPLETED WITH
ROW
TYPICAL
RIGHT OF WAY
TYP
3.
FINAL GROUNDCOVER ALREADY ESTABLISHED.
NO OTHER DISTURBANCE IS ANTICIPATED INSIDE OF THE IMPACT AREAS
WITH THE EXCEPTION OF FILLING THE SEDIMENT TRAP.
WETLANDS
4.
AN "AS -BUILT" OF THE WETLANDS AND STREAM CROSSING IS SHOWN ON
0 40 80
SHEET 3 OF 3.
Feet
SCALE 1"=40'
VERTICAL SCALE 1 "=10'
cs
RCD, TYP
AS —BUILT PLAN 30 RipgRi
qN e�FFeR
so,
0)
EDGE OF PAVEMENT, TYP
/ RIP RAP APRON
W /
\PLUNGE POOL
36" RCP
HEADWALL `
I
X
S
HEAD OF STREAM y 79•
RIP RAP SPLASH PAD
EDGE OF PAVEMENT, TYP
WETLANDS, TYP '
\ ROADSIDE DITCH
CL STREAM
ISEDIMENT TRAP
cn
ME
THIS PLAN IS THE PROPERTY OF AMP'D
ENGINEERING, PLLC, AND MAY NOT BE USED OR
REPRODUCED WITHOUT THEIR PERMISSION.
DESIGNER ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY HOME
CONSTRUCTED FROM THIS PLAN. CONTRACTOR
MUST VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO
PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. CAUTION
MUST BE EXCERISED IN MAKING ANY CHANGES
IN THIS PLAN. ONLY QUALIFIED DESIGNER,
ARCHITECT, CONTRACTOR OR STRUCTURAL
ENGINEER SHOULD ATTEMPT MODIFICATIONS, AS
EVEN MINOR CHANGES IN ONE AREA OF THE
HOUSE COULD LEAD TO MAJOR PROBLEMS IN
ANOTHER AREA.
AS —BUILT PROFILE
.oFtisS,o,�.%
:QP 9l••.9
._z Ao3 LM"o
rr�rrrrrrrr����At
CL ROAD
GRADE
EXISTING
'VC WATER
zo
Q
w
-
N
45, TYP
36" RCP
BELOW
BURIED
CL OF STREAM
1.5"
8+00 9+00 ELEVATION
ONE JOINT DUCTILE
IRON CENTERED UNDER STATION NUMBER
STORM DRAIN
224
222
220
218
216
214
212
210
208
?06
g AMP'D
ENGINEERING. PLLC
SITE CIVIL CONSULTANT
.STORMWATER DESIGN
& INSPECTION
-LAND DEVELOPMENT
-SITE PLANS
919-795-9594
E
0
U
c
J M N
c
CL m
I c
c9 a o
Zp a
W Z co Lo QUj '*
ZU)V)0®�110
Z3Z MZ 00)
W U O
x
dmmN 0
m w'OZ�0,
Q L�D_Y 0rn
U
Z
O Q o
N w 000 000
J CV 04
Z O U U
— m Z Z
W O J C J
UZs —5:
�xoodx0
LJ W ) U) Z o u)
>> Y J m Y
w0< <
pm��ma_7)
wz
W 0 NO_NZ
— 3
5p}
U c/) m�Z
J 0 O
0 F= 0
Lj mwzc~n
Mtn=
Q OfJO
a
DATE:4/03/2020
REV: I DATE:
AS —BUILT PLAN
AND PROFILE
SHEET 3 OF 3