NCG210179_COMPLETE FILE - HISTORICAL_20160310

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
NCG PERMITS
PERMIT NO.
�V �� b
DOCTYPE.
HISTORICAL FILE
❑ MONITORING REPORTS
DOC DATE
❑ �� V 3% D
YYYYMMDD

Environmental
Quality
March 10, 2016
Mr. Clay Van Culberson, President
Carolina Wood Enterprises Inc
902 S Chatham Ave
Siler City, NC 27344
PAT MCCRORY
Governor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secretary
Subject: Multimedia Compliance
Inspection
Carolina Wood Enterprises Inc
Chatham County
Dear Permittee:
Department of Environment Quality (DEQ) staff conducted a multimedia compliance inspection
of Carolina Wood Enterprises Inc on February 17. 2016 for permitted and/or other activities
administered by the following Divisions:
Division of Air
Division of Energy,
Division of Water
Division of Waste
Quality(DAQ)
Mineral, and Land
Resources (DWR)
Management (DWM)
Resources EMLR
We hope that you have enjoyed the benefit of our initiative to provide a single inspector capable of
handling multiple areas of environmental compliance at your facility. The results of each applicable
inspection area and any associated response actions or necessary corrective measures are detailed
in the Division specific areas of the attached report. If there are no notes or comments under each
Division header, you may assume compliance with that particular Division's rules and regulations
at the time of inspection. Should violations be noted in the attached report, you may receive separate
enforcement related correspondence in addition to this report.
If you have any questions regarding this multimedia inspection, please contact me at Cheng 7-hang
(chen(,,[e-mail]). Thank you for your cooperation.
cc:
DAQ RRO Files
DEMLR (DWR) RRO Stormwater Files
Department of Environmental Quality, Raleigh Regional Office
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
Location: 3800 Barrett Drive, Raleigh, NC 27609
http://deq.nc.gov/
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG210179 Effective: 08/01/13 Expiration: 07/31/18 Owner: Carolina Wood Enterprises Inc
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Carolina Wood Enterprises Inc
902 S Chatham Ave
County: Chatham
Region: Raleigh Slier City NC 27344
Contact Person: Clay Van Culberson Title: Phone: 91"63-2323
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC: Certification: Phone:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
On -site representative Clay Van Culberson 919-663-2323
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 02/17/2016 EntryTime: 10:00AM Exit Time: 12:30PM
Primary Inspector:. Chang Zhang Phone: [phone]
CnO Crn(' ��Ib�7A(�p
Secondary Inspactor(s): �S
Gary Perlmutter Phone:
Thaddeus W Valentine Phone:
Reason for inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Timber Products Slomwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant Not Compliant
Question Areas:
M Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

permit: NCG210179 Owner • Facility: Carolina Wood Enterprises Inc
Inspection Date: 02/17/20/6 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit Routine
Inspection Summary:
The facility has not developed and implemented a SPPP.
No qualitative and analytical monitoring has been conducted.
Boiler blowdown waterwater is discharged without a valid permit.
Erosion was observed at some of the stormwater outfalls.
Page: 2

permit: NCG210179 Owner - Facility: Carolina Wood Enterprises Inc
Inspection Date: 02/17/2016 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stomwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
❑
N ❑ ❑.
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
❑
E ❑ ❑
#-Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
❑
! ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible altematives to current practices?
❑
0 Cl ❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
❑ ❑ ❑
❑
0 ❑ Cl
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
❑
E ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
❑
E ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
❑
S ❑ ❑
❑
■ ❑ ❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
# Does the Plan Include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
❑
E ❑ ❑
Comment: The facility has not developed and implemented a SPPP Secondary containment for the
8000-gallon diesel tank was adequate.
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes
No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
❑
e ❑ Cl
Comment: No qualitative monitoring have been conducted.
Analytical Monitoring
Yea No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
❑
❑ E Cl
Comment: No qualitative monitoring have been conducted Vehicle maintenance is conducted on site by a
contractor, monthly usage of new motor oil is unknown.
Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? ❑ E ❑ ❑
# were all outfalls observed during the inspection? • ❑ ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? El ElEl
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 3

Permit: NCG210179 Owner -Facility: Carolina Wood Enterprises Inc
Inspection Date: 02/17/2016 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit Routine
Comment: A copy of the General Permit and the Certificate of Coverage was not available at the site. A
copy of the General Permit was printed from DEQ website with the help of the inspectors. Five
sformwater discharge outfalls (SDOs) were identified dudnq the inspection. Wastewater
generated'ftom daily boiler blowdown is discharged to the ground outside the boiler room and
eventually enters an unnamed tributary to Loves Creek via one of the SDOs. Discharge of boiler
blowdown water is not covered under General Permit NCG210000. The facility needs to apply for
a Certificate of Coverage under NPDES Wastewater General Permit NCG500000.
Page: 4

5Vo a�
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF.
Raleigh Regional Office
AIR QUALITY
Carolina Wood Enterprises, Inc.
NC Faciliy ID 1900091
Inspection Report
Couuty/FIPS: Chatham/037
Date: 02/17/2016.. •.
Facility Data
: s Permit Data
Carolina Wood Enterprises, Inc.
Permit 08714 Y R05
902 South'Chatham'Avenue
Issued 4/10/2,614:
Siler City, NC 27344
Expires 3/31/2022
Lat: 35d 42.8070m Long: 79d 27.5240m
Classification Synthetic Minor
SIC: 2421 / Sawmills & Planing Mills General
Permit Status Active
NAICS:'- 321999 / All Other Miscellaneous Wood Product Manufacturing
Current Permit Application(s) None
- Program Applicability
Contact Data ..` - '_\.�' ;° "
Facility Contact ; .
Authorized Contact
Technical Contact ,.
srp ,
Clay Van Culberson Jr.
Clay Van Culberson Jr.
Clay Van Culberson Jr.
SPS: Part 63: Subpart6J N
SPS: Subpart Do
President
President
President
(919) 66372323
[phone] ,
[phone]..
Compliance Data
Comments: r A 1R I J c d �1 1�1 t R e L
—
* I
Inspection Date 02/17/2016
/
Inspector's Signature: [] �/
Inspector's Name Gary Perlmutter '
Operating Status Operating
i
Compliance Code Compliance - inspection
Action Code FCE '... .. _
Date of Signature: L. 1 q_, t 6 I
On -Site Inspection Result ., Compliance
Total Actual emissions in TONS/YEAR:
-
TSP
S02
NOX
VOC
CO
PM10
* HAP
2012
186.37
0.5306
4.70
33.06
13.00
60.19
3182.00
2008 - .'
102.96
0.3700
3.23
18.60
8.80
10.90
1785.50
* Highest HAP Emitted (in ounds
Five Year Violation History: None
Date Letter Type Rule Violated Violation Resolution Date
Performed Stack Tests since last FCE: None
Date Test Results Test Method(s) Source(s) Tested
(n DIRECTIONS TO FACILITY: From RRO take I-440 W to US-64 West to Siler City. After crossing US421, turn left
onto E. Raleigh Street at the first stoplight. Go to the first stoplight and turn left onto N Second Ave. Go to the modified T-
intersection and bear to the left. The facility will be the second building and driveway on the right, beside Chandler Concrete.

1900091 Inspection Report Page 12
(ID
FACILITY DESCRIPTION: Carolina Wood Enterprises is a lumber mill that receives southern yellow pine trees and then
produces kiln dried lumber. The facility operates on a 40-hr workweek employing —37 people and producing—320,000 board
feet / week.
Safety notes: Standard PPE (hard hat, safety glasses, steel -toed shoes) are to be wom. Be watchful of heavy machinery and
stay close to your escort when touring the facility. ,
Feb�amry t`f,WIG.
INSPECTION SUMMARY: Ong, I (Gary Perlmutter, DAQ-RRO) along with Thad Valentine (DLR-RRO)
and Cheng Zhang (DWR-RRO) visited Carolina Wood Enterprises for a multimedia inspection. This report addresses the air
permit component of the inspection:..
We met with Mr. Clay Van Culberson, President and Facility Contact, and Mr. David Purvis, Kiln / Boiler Operator. We
reviewed the permit stipulations and required records, most of which were in order. Copies of boiler initial notification and
notification of compliance status could not be found. I told Mr. Van Culberson that I would check DAQ files for submitted
copies, as.they had responded to an NOD.addressing this issue and other Boiler_GACT_(6_J) requirements.
We then toured the facility to see it in full operation. The boiler was running at 100% capacity with 10-15% visible emissions
(VE) observed from its stack The kiln was currently drying a load of green wood with much steam escaping from the walls
and roof. No VE was observed from any of the cyclones:
Back at RRO, I checked the facility's response to the NOD addressing the Boiler GACT, and found no notifications in the
packet. I then sent Mr. Van Culberson an e-mail containing an Initial Notification form to complete and guidance for
submitting', , a;- Notification of Compliance Status from the USEPA website:
iritp:iiwww3:epa:gowaugaautyicun.ousuun,'comphaacaJinde;.:,`.tm1-
Overall the facility appeared to be well run and maintained from an air quality perspective, despite the notification
deficiencies found. Further details follow.
PERMITTED EMISSION SOURCES
Emission i
Emission Source
Control Control System
Source ID
Description y ;
System ID m . Description .
._. ..
ES B I (NSPS)
.._.
+
wood -feed boiler (28.7 million Btu I
-
MC 1 MC-2 primary multicyclone ((16) 9 mch
per hour maximum heat input) j
tubes) secondary multicyclone ((44)
tl
utilizing fly ash reinjection
-- _.._
6 inch tubes)"
_.. _ _ ._......
' ES-3 -
wood planing operation - j
C-3__ cyclone (96 niches in diameter)
I. ES-5 ^'Isteam
heated wood kiln
N/A f- N/A
ES 2
cfiipper
cyclone (48 inches in diameter)
ES4
sawdust transfer point
C 4 ;cyclone (48 inches in diameter)
All equipment was verified during the inspection; all but ES-2 were in operation.
(V) SPECIFIC CONDITIONS AND LIMITATIONS:
A.I. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS'— The Permittee shall comply with Title 15A NCAC, 2D .0202, 2D .0504, 2D .0512, 2D
.0516, 2D .0521, 2D .0524 (46 CFR 60, Subpart Dc), 2D .0535, 2D .0540, 2D .1111 (40 CFR 63, Subpart JJJJJJ), 2D .1806
and 2Q .0315: '
Appeared to be in compliance -see below.
A.2. PERMIT RENEWAL AND EMISSION INVENTORY REQUIREMENT - The Pemiittee, at least 90 days prior to the
expiration date of this permit, shall request permit renewal and submit the air pollution emission inventory report for the 2020
calendar year.:
Appeared to be in compliance — I reminded Mr. Van Culberson and Mr. Purvis of this condition.

190P091_Inspection _Report Page 13
A.3. PARTICULATE CONTROL REQUIREMENT — As required by 15A NCAC 2D .0503, particulate matter emissions from
the wood burning indirect heat exchanger (ID.No. ES-B I) shall not exceed 6.55 lbs%mmBtu
Appeared to be in compliance —, compliance was determined during permit review provided the facility is operated properly.
The boiler ES7131 appeared to be well run and maintained during the inspection, with 10-15% VE observed from its stack
AA. PARTICULATE CONTROL REQUIREMENT - As required by 15A NCAC 2D.0512, the Permittee shall not discharge
particulate matter caused by the working, sanding, or finishing of wood without providing, as a minimum for its collection,
'adequate duct work and properly designed collector
Appeared to be in compliance — as no VE. were observed from the cyclones or any ductwork, it appeared. that the dust
collection system was working properly. Mr. Purvis' informed me that the system is checked.weekly, and repairs are made
when needed, as.documented in the cyclone log. He added that a section of the ductwork had been recently replaced.
A.5. SULFUR DIOXIDE CONTROL REOUIREMEN T — As required by 15A NCAC 2D .0516 sulfur dioxide emissions from the
combustion sources `shall not exceed 2.3 pounds per million Btu heat input.
Appeared to be in compliance_— the facility only burns wood, which has a sulfur dioxide emission factor of 0.025 lbs/mmBtu.
A.6. VISIBLE EMISSIONS CONTROL REOUIREMENT — As required by 15A NCAC 2D .0521, VE from sources shall not be
> 20 % opacity when averaged over a six -minute penod
Appeared to be in compliance - VE was 0% opacity from the cyclones and 10-15% from the boiler stack
A:7. 15A NCAC 2D .0524 NEW SOURCE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS For the wood fired boiler (ID No. ES-B1), the
Permittee shall comply with NSPS as promulgated in 40 CFR 60, Subpart Dc, including Subpart A"General Provisions."
a. NSPS Recordkeeping Requrements - the Permittee is required to maintain records of
i. theamounts. of each fuel combusted during each month; and
shall - .
U. all records all be maintained for a period of two years.
Appeared to be in compliance - the facility keeps trick of the number of revolutions of the sawdust feed screw to ES-Bl and
converts it to tons using the formula of 3.42 lbs per screw.revolution. IVIr. Purvis showed me the notebook containing sheets of
daily revolution readings and total amount combusted per month. The most recent entries include monthly totals of 555.22
tons sawdust combusted in January 2016, 427.53 tons in December 2015 and 5424.73'tons for the year 2015.
A.8. NOTIFICATION. REQUIREMENT — As required by 15A NCAC 2D .0535 the Permittee of a source of excess emissions
lasting > 4 hr and results from a malfunction, a breakdown of process or control equipment or other. abnormal condition shall
notify DAQ-RRO by the next business day.
Appeared to be in compliance -Mr. Van Culberson and Mr. Purvis told us that no such incidents have occurred.
A.9. FUGITIVE DUST CONTROL REQUIREMENT — As required by 15A NCAC 2D .0540, the Permittee shall not cause /
allow fugitive, dust.to cause / contribute to substantive complaints or. excess VE beyond the property boundary.
Appeared twbe in compliance - no fugitive dust was observed leaving the property during the inspection. No complaints have
been received by DAQ.
A.10. GENERALLY AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY - For the wood -fired boiler (ID No. ES-B1), the Permittee shall
comply with 15A NCAC 2D . ill 1, as promulgated in 40 CFR 63, Subpart JJJJJJ (6J), " National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants for Area Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers", including Subpart A "General
Provisions." See permit for extensive details.
Appeared to be in compliance - subsections of this stipulation are addressed as follows:
a. Compliance Dates — an NOD was issued for not complying with the Boiler GACT by the March 21, 2014 deadline as
discovered during an inspection on April 16, 2014. The facility responded by submitting a copy of their boiler tune-up
record and energy assessment report
b. Boiler Tune-up Requirements the initial boiler tune-up was conducted on March 25, 2014, in response to the March
21 NOD. The boiler runs consistently, so it is subject to biennial tune-ups. I told Mr. Van Calberson and Mr. Purvis
that the next inspection is coming due this March, and Mr. Purvis told me that he will schedule a tune-up after our
inspection. The Energy Assessment was conducted on May 19, 2014.
c. Notification and Reporting Requirements — DAQ never received the Initial Notification or Notification of Compliance
Status from the facility, and when asked about these, Mr. Van Culberson appeared confused. After confirming that
these documents were not part of the NOD response package (the NOD did not address notification requirements), I
sent him an e-mail with an Initial Notification form and information about Notification of Compliance Status from the

1900091 Inspection Report
Pane 14
EPA website so that these can be completed. Mr. Purvis said he will prepare a Compliance Report by March 1, 2016
for the upcoming boiler tune-up.
d. Recordkeeping Requirements = Mr. Van Culberson showed me copies of the Energy Assessment and the initial boiler
tune-up record during the inspection. He had no notifications; he and Mr. Purvis said that no malfunctions have
occurred.
A.11. CONTROL AND PROHIBITION OF ODOROUS EMISSIONS -As required by 15A NCAC 2D .1806 the permittee shall
keep objectionable odors from advancing beyond the boundaries of the facility.
Appeared to be in compliance - only mild wood odors were detected during the inspection; no complaints have been Filed
against the facility.
A.12 LIMITATION TO AVOID 15A NCAC 20.0501 - Pursuant to 15A NCAC 2Q .0315 "Synthetic Minor Facilities," to avoid
the applicability of 15A NCAC 2Q .0501 "Purpose of Section and Requirement for a Permit," as requested by the Permittee,
facility -wide emissions shall be less than 100 tons PMio per 12-month period.
a. Operations Restrictions - sawdust combusted in ES-Bl shall not exceed 8,100 tons per 12-month period.
b. Inspection and Maintenance Requirements -
i. Cyclone Requirements - the Permittee shall perform an annual inspection and periodic I&M of the cyclone
system...
ii. Multi -Cyclone Requirements - the Pemnttee shall perform an annual inspection and periodic I&M of the
multi -cyclone system:
c. Recordkeenine Requirements
i. The Permittee shall record monthly and total annually the tons of sawdust combusted.
ii. A log book shall be kept on site for cyclones and multicyclones and made available to DAQ personnel
---- -
upon request.- The Pemuttee shall-recordd all inspection; maintenance and monitoring requirements listed
above in the log book Any variance from the manufacturer's recommendations shall be investigated with
corrections made and date of actions recorded in the log book
Appeared to be in compliance 71 reviewed the cyclone / multicyclone I&M log and the boiler fuel combustion records onsite,
and both appeared complete and up-to-date.
(VI) - GENERAL PERMIT CONDITIONS
B.5 REPORTING REQUIREMENT:. -'Any changes that would result in previously unpermitted, new, or increased emissions
must be reported to the Regional Supervisor, DAQ. .
Appeared to be in compliance - Mr. Van Culberson told me that no such changes have been made, nor are any planned.
B.14 PERMIT RETENTION REQUIREMENT - The Permittee shall retain a current copy of the air permit at the site. The
Permittee must make available to personnel of the DAQ, upon request, the current copy of the air permit for the site.
Appeared to be in compliance - Mr. Van Culberson presented copy of Air Permit No. 08714R05 during the inspection.
B.15CLEAN AIR ACT SECTION 112(r) REQUIREMENTS - Pursuant to 15A NCAC 213.2100 "Risk Management Program," if
the Permittee is required to develop and.register a risk management plan pursuant to Section 112(r) of the Federal Clean Air
Act, then the Permittee is required to register this plan with the USEPA in accordance with 40 CFR Part 68.
Not applicable;- Carolina Wood Enterprises is not subject to 112(r)..;..
I
(VII) INSIGNICANT / EXEMPT SOURCES: The facility does not have any listed insignificant sources in its permit. However,
one 8,000-gall6n diesel fuel talk was observed outside the office building. This should be added in the next permit revision.
(VIII) EMISSION INVENTORY Per the header on the first page of this report, emissions of all listed pollutants were higher in
2012 than in 2008. However, the DAQ internal comments in I-Beam's Emissions Data (ED) module note that comparing data
of the two inventory data is not feasible due to differences in calculating emissions, performed by different consultants who
used different control device efficiencies and different emission rates. For example, in 2008 the manufacturer source test data
was used and found to be incorrectly calculated, whereas in 2012 the default DAQ data was used.
(IX) SOURCE TEST REVIEW: Carolina Wood Enterprises has no history of source testing, and its current permit lacks a
source test requirement.

•1900091 Inspection Report Page 15
(X) COMPLIANCE HISTORY: A review of DAQ files revealed the following compliance actions triggered by the -facility:
• April 15, 2015 — a Notice of Deficiency (NOD) was issued for failure to submit the annual report by the due date;
March 28, 2014 — an NOD was issued for failure to comply with the Boiler GACT rule by the compliance due date;
• January 10, 2014 — an NOD was issued for failure to submit a permit renewal apphcation and emissions inventory
the due date by .
• March 27, 2009 — a Notice of Violation /Notice of Recommendation for Enforcement (NOV/NRE) was issued for
repeated failures to submit annual reports. A total of $1188.00 was assessed against the facility.
• March 22,'2007 - an NOWNRE was issued regarding the delinquent annual report for the, calendar year 2006. A
civil penalty of $500.00 plus $188.00 investigative costs was.assessed and paid in full.
• March 3, 2005 — an NOV was issued regarding the delinquent annual report for the calendar year'2004.
• June 7, 2004 — an NOV was issued regarding New Source Performance Standards (Subpart Dc) reporting
<requirements.
(XI) CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS: The facility appeared to be in compliance with its air permit. An issue was
found in the facility's lack of procuring copies of initial notification and notification of compliance status per the Boiler
GACT (0) rule; but this was addressed by my e-mailing the facility forms and guidance for their completion. DAQ should
anticipate receipt of GACT notifications within two weeks; if not, the facility should be contacted to inquire about these
notifications.,The diesel fuel tank observed should be added to the InsignificantlExempt list. Finally, the facility should be
___ - next inspected for air -permit compliance alone in about a year. -- -- —

North Carolina
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
MC®E INR
Department of Environment and
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
December 16, 2011
Neil Wrenn
Wrenn Brothers Inc - Wrenn Brothers Incorporated
902 South Chatham Ave.
Chatham, NC 27344
Dear Permee:
Natural Resources
D E C E ry
DEC 2 0 Z .,
NC DENR
Raleigh Regional Office
Subject: Rescission of NPDES Stormwater Permit
Certificate of Coverage NumbeFMCG27:0.1- --9
Wrenn Brothers Inc - Wrenn Brothers Incorporated
Chatham County
On 9/27/2011, the Division of Water Quality received your request to rescind your coverage under
Certificate of Coverage Number NCG210179. In accordance with your request, Certificate of Coverage
Number NCG210179 is rescinded effective immediately.
Operating a treatment facility, discharging wastewater or discharging specific types of stormwater to
waters of the State without valid coverage under an NPDES permit will subject the responsible party to a
civil penalty of up to $25,000 per day. It is the intention of DWQ that enforcement proceedings will
occur for persons that have voluntarily relinquished permit coverage when, in fact, continuing permit
coverage was necessary. If, in retrospect, you feel the site still requires permit coverage, you should
notify this office immediately. Furthermore, if in the future you wish to again discharge to the State's
surface waters, you must first apply for and receive a new NPDES permit.
If the facility is in the process of being sold, you will be performing a public service if you would inform
the new or prospective owners of their potential need for NPDES permit coverage.
If you have questions about this matter, please contact Brian Lowther at [phone], or the Water
Quality staff in our Raleigh Regional Office at NPDES SW.
Sincerely,
for Coleen H. Sullins, Director
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Stormwater Permitting Unit
DWQ Central Files - w/attachments
Fran McPherson, DWQ Budget Office - please waive applicable fees
Wetlands and Stormwater Branch
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, Noah Carolina 27699-1617
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.Ong
An Equal Opponunity 1 ARimative Action Employer
NorthCarolina
Naturally

Permit Number NCG210179
Program Category
NPDES SW
Permit Type
Timber Products Stormwater Discharge COC
Primary Reviewer
robert. patterson
Coastal SW Rule
Permitted Flow
Facility Name
Wrenn Brothers Incorporated
Location Address
902 S Chatham Ave
Siler City NC
Owner Name
Wrenn Brothers Inc
27344
Central Files: APS_ SWP_
09/20/11
Permit Tracking Slip
Status
Project Type
Active
Renewal
Version
Permit Classification
3.00
COC
Permit Contact Affiliation
Major/Minor Region
Minor Raleigh
County
Chatham
Facility Contact Affiliation
Owner Type
Non -Government
Owner Affiliation
Neil A. Wrenn
PO Box 546
Siler City
NC 27344
Scheduled
Orig Issue App Received Draft Initiated Issuance Public Notice Issue Effective Expiration
04/29/94 01/31/08 08/01/08 08/01/08 07/31/13
Regulated Activities Requested/Received Events
Chip mills RO staff report received
Timber products manufacture RO staff report requested
Vehicle maintenance
Outfal I 001
Waterbody Name Stream Index Number Current Class Subbasin
Loves Creek 17-43-10 C 03-06-12

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
September 22, 2011
Certified Mail 2008 1300 0000 5006
Return Receipt Requested
Clay V. Culberson
Carolina Wood Enterprises, Inc.
101 Pine Hill Drive
Siler City, NC 27344
Subject: Carolina Wood Enterprises, Inc.
Stormwater Permit Coverage (NCG210000)
Permit Name/Ownership change form
Dear Mr. Culberson:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
It is the understanding of the Raleigh Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality that your facility, Carolina
Wood Enterprises. Inc.. is conducting business at the site formerly owned by Wrenn's Bros. Incorporated. The
subject facility produces/process timber products and is thereby required to secure a stormwater permit
(NCG21000).
Accordingly, the stormwater permit issued to Wrenn's Bros. Incorporated needs to be transferred to your
organization. This must be accomplished with a change of ownership form completed by you within 30-days of
this notice. Attached for your convenience is a copy of the ownership change form that needs to filled -out and
returned address depicted on the form (bottom of second page).
If you have questions regarding the form or conditions set forth in the stormwater permit you can find a copy at
http://portai,ncdenr.org/web/wq/ws/su/npdessw (see the General permits, NCG21000 Timber Products, permit
text). If you have any questions or need assistance please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Thomas Ascenzo
Environmental Specialist
CC`.Raleign Regional Office
North Carolina Divisicn of Water Quality
Internet: vprn.ncsaterquality.org
One
North Qtrolina
AlatitwIlif
.Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection Phone [phone] Customer service
1528 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 FAX [phone]M748
An Equal Ooperucity/Alfirrnative Action Employer — 50 % Recycletln 0 % Post Consumer Paper

Postal
Ie ce
CERTIFIED RECEIPT
Ln ®FFMAL USE
a
rn POMP g
rq Certified Fee
iC3 Posbnadt
Retum Receipt Fee Here
p taMasement Required)
C3 Resekted DelNery Fee
(ErnlotsemeN ReQuire(l)
17 Total P
ITI CLAY V. CULBERSON _
CAROLINA WOOD ENTERPRISES, INC.
erd o 101 PINE HILL DRIVE
`a SILER CITY NC 27344
Slree" CAROLINA WOOD ENTERPRISES, INC.
O wPo8 NCG210000.OWNERSHIP CHANGE
f� C!0 Se
9/22/11.MAILED.9Y20/11.SWPASCENZO
■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
CLAY V. CULBERSON
CAROLINA WOOD ENTERPRISES, INC.
101 PINE HILL DRIVE
SILER CITY NC 27344
1 CAROLINA WOOD ENTERPRISES, INC.
NCG210000.OWNERSHIP CHANGE
9122/11.MAILED.9/26/1 tSWP.ASCENZO
A. Signature
I
❑ Agent
❑ Addressee
B. R e(!V A by (y�rimed Name) C. Date of Delivery
D. Is delivery address different from Item 1? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3. Service Type
18 Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail
❑ Registered F Retum Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) 13 yes
2. Article Number
(Iiansfer from service label) (_
PS Form 3811, February 2004
7008
300 0000 1131 5006
Domestic Return Receipt
102595-02-A41540 I
i

May 3, 2005
Mr. Neil A Wrenn
Wrenn Brothers, Incorporated
PO Box 546
Siler City, NC 27344
r
5-II -ate
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Subject: Notice of Violation NOV-2005-PC-0068
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Wrenn Brothers, Incorporated
NPDES General Permit No. NCG210179
Chatham County
Dear Mr. Wrenn:
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
On April 22, 2005 Mr. Shannon Langley and Mr. Christopher Wu of the Raleigh Regional Office
conducted a compliance evaluation inspection of Wrenn Brothers, Inc. with specific regards to
its stormwater permit. Mr. Neil Wrenn, president of the facility represented Wrenn Brothers,
Inc. during the compliance inspection.
The following observations were made:
1. There was neither a copy of the NPDES Stormwater permit map of the facility, nor were
the required Spill Prevention Counter Control Plan (SPCC) and Stormwater Pollution
Prevention Plan (SPPP) available for review.
2. Wrenn Brothers failed to complete the qualitative monitoring of its stormwater runoff as
required by its permit. Currently, Wrenn Brothers is unsure if it uses more than 50
gallons of new motor oil per month. If greater, the facility will also be required to
complete analytical analysis of its runoff. Neil Wrenn stated that he would look into the
company's monthly oil consumption.
3. While there is secondary containment for the 10,000 gallon diesel tank, there is no SPCC
plan. This spill plan is a necessity for diesel tanks of such magnitude and is required by
Federal Law 40 CFR part 112.
4. There are numerous hydraulic oil puddles throughout the facility resulting from
incidental spills and leaks. The contaminated sediment needs to be collected and
properly disposed.
5. .There was evidence of flowing water on -site that Neil Wrenn believes derives from a
potential water line leak. The runoff is, at times, chlorinated and, therefore, unlikely to
have originated from the facility. This water was observed flowing through the property
Nor` Carolina
,A Nra/!y
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection
Internet h2o.encstate.nc.us 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
An Equal OpportunryAffrmative Action Employer- 50% Reecycled110% Post Consumer Paper
Phone [phone] Customer Service
FAX [phone]

Mr. Wrenn
Page 2
and into the roadside ditch leading to Loves Creek. Please consult with Town staff with
respects to correcting this problem.
6. There was flowing water originating from beneath a tank of Biocide PQ80, a chemical
used to treat lumber. While there was no evidence of the chemical's presence in the
water, the origin of the water should be identified. Neil Wrenn believes the water stems
from the potential water line break.
A large area of bark and mulch was noted on the South side of the property directly
adjacent to Loves Creek. Water flow from this area has been channelized to a point
where it enters Loves Creek near the front of the property. A coating of bark dust was
noted in Loves Creek just below the facility. In addition, Dissolved Oxygen (DO) levels
decreased just downstream of the site. The locations of the bark piles must be addressed
as part of the SPPP developed for this facility.
Within 30 days of your receipt of this letter, please provide the following:
1. A copy of an updated SPPP plan detailing how you propose to limit continued impacts
from your site to Loves Creek.
2. A copy of the SPCC plan.
3. Verification that the hydraulic oil was cleaned up.
If you have any questions regarding any of our findings, please contact Christopher Wu at: (919)
571-4700, ext. 266 (or email: [e-mail]) or Shannon Langley at: [phone], ext.
268 (or email: [e-mail]).
Sincerely,
Ken Schuster, P.E.
Regional Surface Water Protection Supervisor

May 3, 2005
Mr. Neil A Wrenn
Wrenn Brothers, Incorporated
PO Box 546
Siler City, NC 27344
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Subject: Notice of Violation NOV-2005-PC-0068
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Wrenn Brothers, Incorporated
NPDES General Permit No. NCG210179
Chatham County
Dear Mr. Wrenn:
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
On April 22, 2005 Mr. Shannon Langley and Mr. Christopher Wu of the Raleigh Regional Office
conducted a compliance evaluation inspection of Wrenn Brothers, Inc. with specific regards to
its stormwater permit. Mr. Neil Wrenn, president of the facility represented Wrenn Brothers,
Inc. during the compliance inspection.
The following observations were made:
There was neither a copy of the NPDES Stormwater permit map of the facility, nor were
the required Spill Prevention Counter Control Plan (SPCC) and Stormwater Pollution
Prevention Plan (SPPP) available for review.
2. Wrenn Brothers failed to complete the qualitative monitoring of its stormwater runoff as
required by its permit. Currently, Wrenn Brothers is unsure if it uses more than 50
gallons of new motor oil per month. If greater, the facility will also be required to
complete analytical analysis of its runoff. Neil Wrenn stated that he would look into the
company's monthly oil consumption.
3. While there is secondary containment for the 10,000 gallon diesel tank, there is no SPCC
plan. This spill plan is a necessity for diesel tanks of such magnitude and is required by
Federal Law 40 CFR part 112.
4. There are numerous hydraulic oil puddles throughout the facility resulting from
incidental spills and leaks. The contaminated sediment needs to be collected and
properly disposed.
5. There was evidence of flowing water on -site that Neil Wrenn believes derives from a
potential water line leak. The runoff is, at times, chlorinated and, therefore, unlikely to
have originated from the facility. This water was observed flowing through the property
NoofhCarolina
,l Witrallll
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: h2o.encstate.ne.us 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affrtnative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

Mr. Wrenn
Page 2
and into the roadside ditch leading to Loves Creek. Please consult with Town staff with
respects to correcting this problem.
6. There was flowing water originating from beneath a tank of Biocide PQ80, a chemical
used to treat lumber. While there was no evidence of the chemical's presence in the
water, the origin of the water should be identified. Neil Wrenn believes the water stems
from the potential water line break.
7. A large area of bark and mulch was noted on the South side of the property directly
adjacent to Loves Creek. Water flow from this area has been channelized to a point
where it enters Loves Creek near the front of the property. A coating of bark dust was
noted in Loves Creek just below the facility. In addition, Dissolved Oxygen (DO) levels
decreased just downstream of the site. The locations of the bark piles must be addressed
as part of the SPPP developed for this facility.
Within 30 days of your receipt of this letter, please provide the following:
1. A copy of an updated SPPP plan detailing how you propose to limit continued impacts
from your site to Loves Creek.
2. A copy of the SPCC plan.
3. Verification that the hydraulic oil was cleaned up.
1f you have any questions regarding any of our findings, please contact Christopher Wu at: (919)
571-4700, ext. 266 (or email: [e-mail]) or Shannon Langley at: [phone], ext.
268 (or email: Shannon. [e-mail]).
Sincerely,
Ken Schuster, P.E.
Regional Surface Water Protection Supervisor

NfATE
Michael F. Easley, Governor
9pG
O
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
\HO
co r
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
O -�
April 28, 2003
Neil A Wrenn
Wrenn Brothers Incorporated
PO Box 546
Slier City, NC 27344
Subject: NPDES Stormwater Permit Renewal
Wrenn Brothers Incorporated
COC Number NCG210179
Chatham County
Dear Permittee:
In response to your renewal application for continued coverage under general permit NCG210000, the
Division of Water Quality (DWQ) is forwarding herewith the reissued stormwater general permit. This
permit is reissued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the
Memorandum of Agreement between the state of North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, dated December 6, 1983.
The following information is included with your permit package:
• A new Certificate of Coverage
• A copy of General Stormwater Permit NCG210000
• A copy of the Analytical Monitoring Form (DMR)
• A copy of the Qualitativel Monitoring Form
A copy of a Technical Bulletin for the general permit
Your coverage under this general permit is not transferable except after notice to DWQ. The Division
may require modification or revocation and reissuance of the Certificate of Coverage. This permit does
not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, or relieve the permittee from responsibility for compliance with any
other applicable federal, state, or local law, rule, standard, ordinance, order, judgment, or decree.
If you have any questions regarding this permit package please contact Bill Mills of the Central Office
Stormwater and General Permits Unit at [phone], ext. 548.
Sincerely,
Bradley Bennett, Supervisor
Stormwater and General Permits Unit
cc: Central Files
Stormwater & General Permits Unit Files
Raleigh Regional Office
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 [phone]
ACV
NCDENR
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG210000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG210179
STORMWATER DISCHARGES
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful
standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Wrenn Brothers Inc
is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater from a facility located at
Wrenn Brothers Incorporated
902 South Chatham Ave.
Siler City
Chatham County
to receiving waters designated as Loves Creek, a class C stream, in the Cape Fear River Basin
in accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set
forth in Parts I, II, III, IV, V, and VI of General Permit No. NCG210000 as attached.
This certificate of coverage shall become effective May 1, 2003.
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit.
Signed this day April 28, 2003.
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

W ATF9
q
� -3
NEILA WRENN
WRENN BROTHERS INCORPORATED
PO 13OX 546
SILFR CITY. NC 27344
Dear Perminec:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
September 4.2002
Subject: NPDES Stormwater Permit Coverage Renewal
Wrenn Brothers htcorporated
COC Number neg210179
Chatham County
Your facility is currently covered for stormwater discharge under General Permit NCG2100(A). This pennit expires
on March 31.2003. The Division staff is currently in the process of rewriting this permit and is schc(lulcd to have
the permit reissued by carly spring of 2003. Once the permit is reissued. your facility would be eligible for
continued coverage under the reissued permit.
In order to assure your continued Coverage under the general permit. you must apply to the Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) for renewal of your permit coverage. To make this renewal process easier. we are informing you in
advance that your pennit coverage will be expiring. Enclosed you will find a Permit Coverage Renewal
Application Form. The application must be completed and returned by October 2. 2002 in order to assure
continued coverage under the general permit. Due to stnlfand bud, constraints. letters confirming our receipt of
the completed application will not he sent.
Failure to request renewal within the time period specified, may result in a civil assessment of at Ieast $250.00_
Larger penalties play be assessed depending on the dClinqucncy of the request. Discharge of stormwater from your
facility without coverage antler a valid stormwater NPDHS permit would constitute a violation of NCGS I43-215. 1
:md could result in assessmCnts of civil pen:ties of up to $10.000 per day.
Please note that recent federal legislation has extended the "no exposure exclusion" to all operators of industrial
facilities in any of the I I categories of "storm water discharges associated with industrial activity." (except"
construction activities). ]I -you feel your facility can certify a condition of "no exposure". i.e. the facility imlusmial
materials and operations are not exposed to stormwater- you can apply for the no axposurc exclusion. For additional
information contact the Central Office Stormwater Staff member listed below or check the Stormwater & General
Permits Unit Web Site at htp://h2o.enr.st2to.ncus/su/stonnw;ucr.hunl
If the subject stormwater dischar,,c to waters of the state has been terminated. please complete file enclosed
Rescission Request Form. Mailing instructions are listed on the bottom of the form. You will be notified when the
rescission process has been completed.
If you have any questions regarding the pennit renewal procedures please contact Joe Albiston of the Raleigh
Reeinnal Office at 919-571-4700 or Bill Mills of the Central Office Slornwater Unit ai (919) 733-50U. ext. 548
Sincerely.
Bradley Bennett. Supervisor
Stormwater and Generd Permits Unit
cc: Central Files
Stornlwaler and General Permits Unit Files
Raleigh ReFional Office ®NA
NCDENR
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 [phone] Customer Service
1- 800-623-7748

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
10/24/2002
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
WRENN BROTHERS INCORPORATED
PO BOX 546
SILER CITY, NC 27344
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
FAILURE TO SUBMIT RENEWAL APPLICATION
WRENN BROTHERS INCORPORATED
NCG210000
COC NUMBER NCG210179
CHATHAM COUNTY
Dear Permittee:
This letter is to inform you that, as of the date of this letter, the Division of Water Quality has not received a
renewal request for the subject permit certificate of coverage. This is a violation of NCGS §143.215.1 (c)(l) which
states "All applications shall be filed with the commission at least 180 days in advance of the date on which it is
desired to commence the discharge of wastes or the date on which an existing permit expires, as the case may be".
Any permittee that has not requested renewal at least 180 days prior to expiration or permittee that does not have a
permit after the expiration and has not requested renewal at least 180 days prior to expiration, will be subjected to
enforcement procedures as provided in NCGS § 143-215.6 and 33 USC 1251 et. seq.
In order to prevent continued, escalated action, including the assessment of civil penalties you must submit a
completed permit coverage renewal application to the attention of the "Stormwater and General Permits Unit" at
the letterhead address within ten (10) days of your receipt of this letter (renewal application enclosed). If the
subject discharge has been terminated, please complete the enclosed rescission request form. A valid reason for
requesting rescission is required, incomplete forms will be returned and you will still be subject to possible
escalated action. Mailing instructions for submitting rescission request are listed on the bottom of the form. You
will be notified when the rescission process has been completed.
Thank you for your prompt attention to this situation. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please
contact Bill Mills of the central office Stormwater and General Permits Unit at 919-733-5083, ext. 548.
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Director, Division of Water Quality
cc: Stormwater and General Permits Unit Files
Central Files
Raleigh Regional Office
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
May 1, 1998
NEIL A. WRENN
WRENN BROTHERS, INC.
PO BOX 546
SILER CITY, NC 27344
Subject: Reissued Stormwater General Permit for
Certificate of Coverage No. NC9210179
Chatham County
Dear Permittee:
ID E N F=1
In response to your renewal application for continued coverage under the General Permit
NCGO40000, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) is forwarding herewith the General Permit
NCG210000 which is a new General Permit to cover most of the Timber Products Industry. You
have now been given coverage under NCG210000 and your coverage under NCGO40000 is hereby
terminated. This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute
143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the US Environmental
Protection Agency dated December 6, 1983.
The following information is included with your permit package:
■ A copy of the stormwater general permit NCG210000.
■ A new Certificate of Coverage under general permit NCG210000.
■ A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Certification Form. This form certifies that you have
developed and implemented the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP) required in your
permit (both NCGO40000 and NCG210000). This form must be completed and returned to the
Division within 30 days of receipt of this letter. DO NOT send the SPPP with the signed form.
■ Five copies of Analytical Monitoring forms.
■ Five copies of Qualitative Monitoring forms.
■ A copy of a Technical Bulletin on the stormwater program which outlines program components
and addresses frequently asked questions.
Your certificate of coverage is not transferable except after notice to DWQ. The Division of Water
Quality may require modification or revocation and reissuance of the certificate of coverage.
This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by
DWQ or permits required by the Division of Land Resources, Division of Air Quality, Coastal Area
Management Act or any other Federal or Local governmental permits that may be required.
If you have any questions concerning this permit or other attached documents, please contact the
Stormwater and General Permits Unit at telephone number [phone].
Sincerely,
for A. Preston Howard, Jr., P. E.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10%post-consumer paper

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY -
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG210000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCG210179
STORMWATER DISCHARGES
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and
the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
WRENN BROTHERS, INC.
is herby authorized to discharge stormwater from a facility located at:
902 SOUTH CHATHAM AVE.
SILER CITY, NC
CHATHAM COUNTY
to receiving waters designated as Loves Creek in the Cape Fear River Basin
in accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements and other conditions set forth in Parts I,
H, IU and IV of General Permit No. NCG210000 as attached.
This Certificate of Coverage shall become effective May 1, 1998.
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit.
Signed this day May 1,1998
for A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authorization of the Environmental Management Commission

3800 Barrett Dr, Raleigh, NC 27609 to 902 S Chatham Ave, Siler City... http://maps.google.com/maps?f�-dRsource=s_d&saddr=3800+Barrett+...
Goole Directions to 902 S Chatham Ave, Siler City, NC 27344
63.8 mi -about 1 hour 4 mins
Save trees. Go gre4-��
Download Google Maps on yo
phone at google.com/gmm
3800 Barrett Dr, Raleigh, NC 27609
1.
Head west on Barrett Dr toward Haworth Dr
go 0.1 mi
total 0.1 mi
2.
Turn right onto Six Forks Rd
go 0.7 mi
About 2 mins
total 0.8 mi
3.
Turn left to merge onto 1-440 W
go 7.6 mi
About 9 mins
total 8.4 mi
4.
Continue onto US-1 S
go 4.1 mi
About 4 mins
total 12.6 mi
64 5.
Take exit 98B to merge onto US-64 W toward Pitts bo ro/Ashebo ro
go 39.8 mi
About 45 mins
total 52.4 mi
6.
Turn left onto Greensboro Ave
go 0.3 mi
About 1 min
total 52.6 mi
7.
Continue onto N 2nd Ave
go 0.7 mi
About 2 mins
total 53.3 mi
8.
Continue onto Fayetteville Ave
go 0.5 mi
About 1 min
total 53.7 mi
9.
Continue onto S Chatham Ave
go 410 ft
Destination will be on the right
total 53.8 mi
Q 902 S Chatham Ave, Siler City, NC, 27344
These directions are for planning purposes only. You may find that construction projects, traffic, weather, or other events may cause
conditions to differ from the map results, and you should plan your route accordingly. You must obey all signs or notices regarding your
route.
Map data 02011 Google
Directors weren't right? Please find your route on maps.google.com and click "Report a problem" at the bottom left. I
I of 1 10/25/2011 4:50 PM

®F„rI D
r SE
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
April 29, 2010
Certified Mail 7009 0080 0000 9789 7879
Return Receipt Requested
Mr. Neil Wrenn
Wrenn Brothers Incorporated
P.O. Box 546
Siler City, NC 27344
Subject: Notice of Violation
Wrenn Brothers: NOV-2010-PC-0416
Stormwater Compliance Evaluation Inspection (CEI)
NPDES General Permit No. NCG210179
Chatham County
Dee Freeman
Secretary
On March 17, 2010, Vicki Webb of the Raleigh Regional Office conducted a stormwater CEI of Wrenn
Brothers with the assistance of Mr. Neil Wrenn, Mr. David Wrenn, and Van Culberson. Your help was
appreciated, as it eased the inspection process.
The following observations were made:
1. The Wrenn Brothers Incorporated is located at 902 South Chatham Ave., Siler City, NC. The
facility discharges into the receiving waters designated as Loves Creek, a class C stream, in the
Cape Fear River Basin. Loves Creek is on the 303(d) impaired list for aquatic life
(ecological/biological integrity benthos).
2. Wrenn Brothers is shut down and is no longer in operation (since December 1, 2009). This
facility has an active permit and is required to follow all the requirements therein. The general
permit for this facility is NCG210000 and can be found at:
http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document librarv/get file?uuid=089a3724-lb02-4c65-a989-
a224ef062b50&groupld=38364. Currently this facility is for sale. If this facility is sold, then a
change of ownership form is needed and can be found at:
http://portal.iicdenr.ory/e/document librarv/-,et file'?uuid=6f3fb836-931e-4475-b523-
0l 99235 fea69&group Id=38364
3. The facility has the necessary components of the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SP3).
The facility is lacking in the implementation of the SP3. The facility could not produce employee
training records. This is a violation of General Permit NCG210000 and these requirements can
be found in Part 11 Section A of the permit.
No ehCarolina
Amura!!y
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: w .ncwaterquality.org 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50 % Recycled/10 % Post Consumer Paper

Wrenn Brothers Incorporated, �a
NCG210179"
Chatham Codhty' "
4. Files on record showed the last time analytical or qualitative monitoring was preformed was in
2005. This is a violation of General Permit NCG210000 Part II Section B and C of the permit.
Silt fencing had been put up at Outfall #2 to prevent bark and other materials from entering into
Loves Creek. During the inspection it was noted that the silt fencing has not been maintained and
is lying on the ground in some areas. During a heavy rainfall the fencing will not prevent dirt,
mulch or bark from entering into the creek.
6. It was observed at Outfall 91 that bark debris was lining the railroad track all the way to Loves
Creek. Measures must be taken to keep this debris from entering Loves Creek.
7. There is a large pile of soil, chips, bark mixture, & some bricks that borders Loves Creek from
Outfall 41 to Outfall 92. Measures must be taken immediately to prevent further debris entering
the Creek. Part II Section B states the follow:
SECTION B: ANALYTICAL MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Analytical monitoring of stormwater discharges shall be performed as specified in Table 1. A facility that
does not retain exposed (either exposed to incident precipitation or exposed to stormwater run on) piles of
sawdust, wood chips, bark, mulch, or other similar material on site for more than seven (7) days before
removing the material is not required to monitor the parameters in Table 1. A facility that is exempt from
analytical monitoring on this basis of removing material in seven (7) days or less shall keep in its SPPP a
record of dates when the material is generated and removed, and how/by whom it was removed. If at any
time the material is not removed within this time frame, the facility must begin analytical monitoring
immediately.
Accordingly, analytical monitoring for outfalls #1 and 92 is to be conducted during the next rain
event (unless it has already been conducted since the date of the inspection).
It was observed during the inspection around the oil fueling shed that there was motor oil -
hydraulic oil staining the ground in three different locations. Immediately clean and remove all
of the areas where there is motor oil -hydraulic oil staining on the ground. Provide receipts where
the contaminated soil was properly disposed. This was discussed daring the inspection with Mr.
D. Wrenn.
Wrenn Brothers is reminded that violations of the permit and NC General Statute 143-215.6A
are subject to a civil penalty assessment not to exceed $25,000 per day, per violation.
Please respond to items 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 in writing to this office within 30 days of receipt of this letter.
The overall condition of Wrenn Brothers stormwater program is not compliant with Division standards.
If you have questions regarding the attached report or any of the findings, please contact Vicki We b at
919-791-4200 (or email: vicki.webb(Dricderingov).
Sine ly, �
S. Daniel Smith
Surface Water Protection Supervisor
Raleigh Regional Office
c: Central Files
RRO

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG210179 Effective: 08/01/08 Expiration: 07/31/13 Owner: Wrenn Brothers Inc
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Wrenn Brothers Incorporated
County: Chatham 902 S Chatham Ave
Region: Raleigh
Siler City NC 27344
Contact Person: Neil A Wrenn Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 03/17/2010
Primary Inspector: Vicki Webb
Secondary Inspector(s):
Certification: Phone:
Entry TTiimee:-1,1:3366 ABM Exit Time: 01:12 PM
19 4r fro Phone:
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Timber Products Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant 0 Not Compliant
Question Areas:
0 Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page:1

Permit: NCG210179 Owner - Facility: Wrenn Brothers Inc
Inspection Date: 03/17/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Page:2

Permit: NCG210179 Owner - Facility: Wrenn Brothers Inc
Inspection Date: 03/17/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes
No
NA
NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
❑
■
❑
❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
❑
■
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
❑
■
❑
❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
❑
■
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
❑
■
❑
❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implementpd?
❑
❑
❑
■
Comment: Please see inspection letter for details
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes
No
NA
NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
❑
■
❑
❑
Comment: See inspection letter for details.
Analytical Monitoring
Yes
No
NA
NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
❑
■
❑
❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
❑
❑
■
❑
Comment: See inspection letter for details.
Permit and Outfalls
Yes
No
NA
NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
■
❑
❑
❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
❑
❑
■
❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
❑
❑
❑
■
Comment
Page:3

FAX C®V`R SHEE'
NORTH CAROLIN
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
NC�ENR AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Raleigh Regional Office
w 1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
TO: b ,'� WTr-nv.
FROM: II" is u �L%6
SUBJECT: S; IV
MESSAGE:
q Pages, including cover sheet
FAX: 90
DATE:
z 11;4t
7u7- -17i7
q -iv-
If you do not receive all pages, call
919 791 4200 or fax back to a i 4 - 78a - 7155
THE FAX NUMBER REMAINS THE SAME

\o�OF W A'9
0 <
December 7, 2005
Mr. Neil A Wrenn
Wrenn Brothers, Incorporated
PO Box 546
Siler City, NC 27344
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Subject: Reconnaissance Inspection
Wrenn Brothers, Incorporated
NPDES General Permit No. NCG210179
Chatham County
Dear Mr. Wrenn:
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
On December 7, 2005 Mr. Christopher Wu of the Raleigh Regional Office conducted a reconnaissance
inspection of Wrenn Brothers, Inc. in response to a submitted stormwater pollution prevention plan
(SPPP). Mr. Neil Wrenn, president of the facility represented Wrenn Brothers, Inc. during the inspection.
A maintained stormwater program is essential for protecting the integrity of surface waters. Wrenn
Brothers, Inc., a lumber manufacturing plant, has the potential to contaminate the unnamed tributary (UT)
to Loves Creek. The facility processes lumber and stores dirt, mulch, and bark in large piles adjacent to
the UT. These piles are full of organic material which have the potential to fill the UT as well as consume
the dissolved oxygen levels in the water. Such degradation to the health of a stream can have adverse
effects on aquatic life.
The submitted SPPP included most of the necessary facets required under permit NCG210179 including:
detailed site maps with clearly labeled storm drains and a spill prevention counter control plan. Because
the facility does not use an average of 55 gallons of motor oil per month, it is only required to
qualitatively monitor the creek twice per year. The plan, however, does not address the large piles of
bark, mulch, and dirt. In a June 3, 2005 response to a NOV, Mr. Wrenn stated that there was little
evidence that the piles impacted the creek and, therefore, was not required to address the piles in the
SPPP. On December 7, 2005 Mr. Wu observed floating bark in the creek, and the water was visibly
turbid. After discussing the observations and processes by which organic material consumes oxygen, Mr.
Wrenn agreed to temporarily place silt fences around the piles that lay adjacent to the creek. Mr. Wrenn
also agreed to seek the aid of engineers to design a more permanent method of sediment control. In
addition, Mr. Wrenn was asked to keep Division staff updated as to the status of such projects.
If you have any questions regarding any of our findings, please contact Christopher Wu at: (919) 791-
4200 (or email: [e-mail]).
Sincerely,
Christopher Wu
Environmental Specialist
cc: Christopher We, RRO
Central Files
No `hCarolina
,Uturnlly
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection
Internet h2o.enr.state.nc.us 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Phone [phone] Customer Service
FAX [phone]

North Carolina Secretary of State
Page I of I
North Carolina
Elaine F. Marshall DEPARTMENT OF THE
Secretary SECRETARY OF STATE
PO Box 29622 Raleigh, NC 27626-0622 [phone]
Date: 9/21/2011
Click here to:
View Document Filings I Sign Up for E-Notifications
J Print apre-populated Annual Report Form I File an Annual Report
Corporation Names
Name
Name Type
NC CAROLINA WOOD
LEGAL
ENTERPRISES INC
Business Corporation Information
SOSID:
1140755
Status:
Current -Active
Effective Date:
3/16/2010
Dissolution Date:
Annual Report Due
Date:
Citizenship:
DOMESTIC
State of Inc.:
NC
Duration:
PERPETUAL
Annual Report Status:
CURRENT
Registered Agent
Agent Name:
CULBERSON, CLAY V
Office Address:
101 PINE HILL DRIVE
SILER CITY INC 27344
Mailing Address: 101 PINE HILL DRIVE
SILER CITY NC 27344
Principal Office
Office Address: 281 JONES ROAD
SILER CITY NC 27344
Mailing Address: 281 JONES ROAD
SILER CITY NC 27344
Officers
Stock
Class Shares No Par Value Par Value
COMMON 100000 YES N/A
This website is provided to the public as a part of the Secretary of State Knowledge Base (SOSKB) system. Version: 921
http://www.secretar ,.state.nc.us/corporations/Corp.aspx?Pitemld=9458829 9/21/201 1

Ascenzo, Tom
From: Smith, Danny
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 10:51 AM
To: Ascenzo, Tom
Cc: Patterson, Robert
Subject: FW: NCG210179
Hey,
Do you know status of this? Can you pull file and review it... lets discuss status later this afternoon. Thanks!
Danny
My email has changed to dannv.smitb@ncdenr. 2ov
—E--mail correspondence to and hom this address maybe subject to the North Carolina Public Records Lawand maybe disclosed to third
patties.
From: Patterson, Robert
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 1:57 PM
To: Smith, Danny
Cc: Webb, Vicki
Subject: NCG210179
Danny,
I just got a couple calls from the previous owner (Wrenn Brothers, Inc.) of this facility in Slier City. They received the
annual invoice, but said they sold the facility to Carolina Wood Enterprises back in April 2010. Mr. Wrenn thought that
the permit was transferred or rescinded, but I cannot find any record of it. Nor can I find that the new owners have their
own permit for it. Vicki Webb had done a site inspection/NOV back on 3/17/2010. Do you have any record of a transfer
or rescission request in your RRO files? If not, I'll call Mr. Wrenn back and tell him that he must send us a rescission
request. I guess someone from RRO will need to go visit the new owner to get them to submit for a permit also. The
facility is at 902 S. Chatham Ave, Siler City.
Thanks.
Robert D. Patterson, PE
Environmental Engineer
NCDENR i DWQ i Stormwater Permitting
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Mail 1 512 N. Salisbury St, Raleigh, NC 27604 1 9w Floor Location & Parcels
[phone] Phone [phone] FaY I Robert Patterson^d,ncclenr.eov Email I htto://portal ncclenr ore/web/wo/ws/su Website
,Ai Before printing this email, please consider ,your budget and the environment.
E-mail correspondence to and from this address maybe subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and maybe disclosed to third parties unless the content is
exempt by statute or other regulation.

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
April 14, 2010
Wrenn Brothers Incorporated
P.O. Box 546
Siler City, NC 27344
Subject: Silt Fence
NPDES General Permit No. NCG210179
Chatham County
On April 13. 2010, L Vicki Webb, of the Raleigh Regional Office spoke to Mr. David Wrenn of Wrenn
Brothers Incorporated. Per our phone conversation yesterday, Wrenn Brothers is required to install a silt
fence around the pile of debris (soil, chips, bark mixture, & some bricks) that borders the creek.
As I understand, Wrenn Brothers are in the process of selling this facility. Please note that after the sell
is complete, a change of ownership is needed to transfer the NPDES Permit into the new owners name
(a copy of the change of ownership form is included). The new owner will be required to maintain all
aspects of the permit.
The permit can be found here: http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document library/get file?uuid=089a3724-
1b02-4c65-a989-a224efO62b5O&groupld=38364.
If you have any questions, please contact Vicki Webb at: [phone] (or email:
ycki. webb2nedenn aov).
Sincerely,
Vicki Webb
Environmental Specialist
Non hCarolina
Naturally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection Phone [phone] Customer service
Internet: w .ncwatemuality.org 1628 Mail service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 FAX [phone]
An Equal OpportunitylAffirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10 % Post Consumer Paper

Wrenn Brothers Inc. f
Spill Prevention Counter Control Plan \, �
At Wrenn Brothers Inc. there is a 10,000 gallon diesel fuel tank.;TF,ie tanX-1
meets all requirements for above ground storage of diesel fuel. ThereAs d
secondary tank around the main tank for containment of fuel in case the in f
tank should ever leak. The secondary tank will hold in excess of 10,000 galldns.
therefore making a spill on the ground highly unlikely. At the filling pipe of the �"/
tank there is a check valve and a gate valve. The purpose of the check valve is
for one way flow of fuel into the tank and no flow out that could result in a spill.
The gate valve is extra spill protection. Our fuel vendor puts about 8000 gallons
of fuel in the tank twice a year as it is emptied. By putting that amount in, the
tank can never be overfilled resulting in a spill. It is our vendor's duty to inspect
the tank, valves, vents, and piping at each filling and to notify us of any potential
problems.
If all of the above saftey measures should ever fail resulting in a spill of such
magnitude as to possibly migrate to Loves Creek, several things can be done to
stop the fuel from ever reaching the creek. A study has been made of how the
fuel would flow. Starting at the tank, fuel would spill into a drainage ditch that
flows to the ditch along the side of Hwy Bus. 421. The highway ditch drains into
Loves Creek. We have a lower entrance driveway off of the highway with a 24"
pipe in the ditch. The place to stop the fuel flow would be at this pipe. Using one
of our loaders, dirt would be put in front of the pipe stopping it up. This would
turn our entrance drive into a dam that would be high enough to contain all of the
fuel in the 10,000 gallon tank and effectively protect the creek.
Notifying proper authorities would be the next step taken. The local fire
department, town officals, and Division of Water Quality would be informed of
the spill imediately. How to handle the spill and dispose of it would be
corordinated with these officals.
In the event of a lesser spill that would not threaten the creek proper
notification will be given to Division of Water Quality as how to clean up the spill.

I. !'
C7"
Wrenn Brothers Inc.
P. O. Box 546
Siler City, NC 27344
May 27, 2005 \ c'y 60
''
Raleigh Regional Office
Dept. of Enviroment and Natural Resources
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh NC, 27699-1628
Subject: Corrective action plan for waste oil spill
Dear Sirs:
Wrenn Bros. has determined the cause of the waste oil spill on our site to be
as follows. Used motor oil collected from the servicing of our equipment is
supposed to be put in empty 55 gallon barrels for future disposal. First of all this
procedure was done carelessly by some employees who tried to put too much oil
in the barrels resulting in an over flow of oil on to the ground. Secondly oil was
spilled because a funnel was not used to get the oil into the small openings of
the barrels. It is our best estimate that approximately five to ten gallons of used
motor oil got spilled. This spill migrated less than thiry feet from the original
release site. The soil type at the spill site is red clay and therefore it prevented
the oil from penetrating into the soil more that four to six inches.
The following preventitive actions have been taken. Employees have been
retrained to be more careful with the procedure of filling empty barrels and to use
a funnel so as to not spill any oil on the ground. If any oil spills should happen
again, then an imediate notification to a superviser of the spill will be made.
Supervisers will start a clean up right away and notify your department with all
the details of the spill and methods being used for the clean up.
All of the oil contaminated soil has been removed from the spill site. The soil
has been placed on 8 mil plastic. The edges of the plastic have been pulled up
over the soil to prevent any rain water from washing the oil out of the soil and
causing futher contamination. It is our intention to land farm this soil. Included
with this letter is the paper work for land farm application along with two maps
showing the location of the land farm.
A soil sample has been taken from under the removed soil. It has been sent a
lab for testing to make sure all comtaminated soils have been removed. We used
an enviromental engineering firm to make sure our soil sample was properly
collected and transported the the testing lab. Results of the test will be sent to
your office as soon as they are available from the lab.

tr� .

Wrenn Brothers Inc.
P. O. Box 546
Siler City, NC 27344
June 3, 2005
Division of Water Quality
Raleigh Regional Office
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
Dear Sirs:
On May 3, 2005 we received a letter from your office about a compliance inspection
made at our plant on April 22, 2005 concerning our stormwater permit. Listed in the letter
were several concerns and observations. The following actions have been taken and are
listed below.
1. There was no NPDES stormwater permit map nor SPCC and SPPP written plans
available for review. All three of these documents are enclosed with this letter.
2. We had not completed the qualitative monitoring of stormwater runoff and did not have
an answer to the amount of motor oil we were buying on an annual basis. We plan to start
qualitative monitoring of the stormwater runoff as soon as we have enough rain to create
runoff. In the year 2004 we purchased four 55 gallon drums of motor oil. This was 220
gallons.
3. We had no SPCC plan for our 10000 gallon tank of diesel fuel. A SPCC plan is
enclosed with this letter.
4. There were several oil leaks on the property. We had a visit from Mr. Jimmie Greer
about these leaks and have cleaned them up per his instructions. There are two letters
enclosed stating our actions in this matter.
5. There was evidence of flowing water from a water line leak. The leak has been fixed
and the flow of water has stopped.
6. There was flowing water from under the Biocide PQ80 tank The flow has stopped.
7. There was a bark pile on the property. Water flow from this pile enters Loves Creek.
Bark dust was observed on the water and DO levels decreased down stream. At this time
the bark pile is still there. Bark is continously being added to the pile and then being
removed as it is sold. This is a vital part of our operations and to move this pile would be
very expensive and time consuming. We have doubts as to any damage this bark pile is
doing to the creek for several good reasons. First we have never seen a coating of bark
dust on the water as your inspectors say they have. Second it is not very clear to us as to

what caused these decreased DO levels. We were told by your inspectors that Loves Creek
decreased DO levels were mainly due to the low flow rate of the water. Third no figures
were given to us showing the drop in DO levels just below the bark pile compared to those
figures above the pile. Why were these fgures never given to us? This brings us to the
question what should be done with the bark pile? It is going to take better evidence than we
have seen so far to make us even consider moving the bark pile. Your letter stated that the
bark pile should be adressed in our SPPP plan. Without clear evidence of damage to the
creek, the bark pile is not at present a part of our SPPP.
Sincerely,
;
Neil Wrenn
President

W R E N N 131ROTIIERS, INC.
MANUFACTURERS AIR AND KILN DRIED LUMBER
P. O. BOX 546, SILER CITY, NORTH CAROLINA 27344
August 8, 2008
Stephanie Brixley
Raleigh Regional Office
Department of Enviroment and Natural resources
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
TELEPHONE [phone]
p'E E U d ME
AUG 1 12008
DENR RALEIGI! 6L:: - FICE
In responce to your visit on July 10 2008, Wrenn Brothers has made the
following changes.
1. The silt fence on outfall #2 has been fixed.
2. A copy of the General Permit and Certificate of coverage are now on site.
3. Semiannual monitoring will be conducted start this fall. All monitoring will be
documented.
4. A general location map and site map are now on site. Copies of these maps
are included with this letter.
In your letter to us dated July 10 2008, it states that Wrenn Brothers has an
'4ncomplete SPPP and goes on to
list all the items needed to make it correct. After carefully reviewing our SPPP, it
appears to us that the issues of BMP summary, Preventative maintenance and
good housekeeping plan, employee training, and responsible party list are all
stated in the SPPP. We are in total agreement that the issues of no site map, no
semi annual stormwater inspection program, and no documentation of
employees training are things that need correcting. On the issue of employee
training, we have conducted training but never documented it. A copy of our
SPPP, SPCCP, and site maps are included with this letter.
Sincerely
Neil Wrenn

Wrenn Brothers Inc. fill
Spill Prevention Counter Control Plan ; AUG E3
At Wrenn Brothers Inc. there is a 10,000 gallon diesel fuel tank. The tanOGH F °'� :FICE
meets all requirements for above ground storage of diesel fuel. There is a
secondary tank around the main tank for containment of fuel in case the main
tank should ever leak. The secondary tank will hold in excess of 10,000 gallons
therefore making a spill on the ground highly unlikely. At the filling pipe of the
tank there is a check valve and a gate valve. The purpose of the check valve is
for one way flow of fuel into the tank and no flow out that could result in a spill.
The gate valve is extra spill protection. Our fuel vendor puts about 8000 gallons
of fuel in the tank twice a year as it is emptied. By putting that amount in, the
tank can never be overfilled resulting in a spill. It is our vendor's duty to inspect
the tank, valves, vents, and piping at each filling and to notify us of any potential
problems.
If all of the above saftey measures should ever fail resulting in a spill of such
magnitude as to possibly migrate to Loves Creek, several things can be done to
stop the fuel from ever reaching the creek. A study has been made of how the
fuel would flow. Starting at the tank, fuel would spill into a drainage ditch that
flows to the ditch along the side of Hwy Bus. 421. The highway ditch drains into
Loves Creek. We have a lower entrance driveway off of the highway with a 24"
pipe in the ditch. The place to stop the fuel flow would be at this pipe. Using one
of our loaders, dirt would be put in front of the pipe stopping it up. This would
turn our entrance drive into a dam that would be high enough to contain all of the
fuel in the 10,000 gallon tank and effectively protect the creek.
Notifying proper authorities would be the next step taken. The local fire
department, town officals, and Division of Water Quality would be informed of
the spill imediately. How to handle the spill and dispose of it would be
corordinated with these officals.
In the event of a lesser spill that would not threaten the creek proper
notification will be given to Division of Water Quality as how to clean up the spill.

Wrenn Brothers Inc.
Stormwater Pollution Prevention
Plan— : • FICE
..,; nALEIGH G.
Wrenn brothers, Inc. is a lumber maufacturing plant that buyes standing
timber, brings the timber to it's plant and saws it into lumber. Then stacks, dries,
and planes the lumber. The lumber is then stored in sheds until it is sold and
hauled away by trucks. The manufacturing of lumber uses no chemicals. The
only potential pollutant sources are diesel fuel, motor oil and hydraulic oil.
Wrenn Brothers Inc. is a located at 902 South Second Ave. in Siler City, NC.
South Second Ave also known as business 421 forms the eastern boundary of
the properety. The Norfork Southern railroad is the western boundary. Loves
creek is the southern boundary and Chatham Novelties company is the northern
boundary. There are maps with this plan to show the site location of the
business.
There is no waste material left over in manufacturing lumber. Every part of the
log is used. All manufactured products are stored in sheds or truck trailers and
eventually sold. There is a small amount of non hazardous trash generated such
as steel strapping, plastic wrapping,ect. It is placed in a dumpster that is picked
up by a waste management company when the dumpster is full. Used motor oil
is generated from the on site servicing of the forklifts and loaders. It is collected
in 55 gallon barrels and picked up by a oil recycling company.
A site map is included with this document showing all buildings and the
manufacturing processes going on in them. All drainages ditches are shown. The
only impervious surfaces are in the buildings. All drainage of storm water goes to
either oufall #1 or outfall #2. There locations are shown on the map. Diesel
fuel,motor oil, and hydraulic oil are the potential pollutants. Because of where
these products are stored in relation to runoff water, outfall #2 could possibly be
affected if a major spill occured. The products are stored approximately 700 feet
from outfall #2 and marked on the site map.
In the past three years one spill of used motor oil has occured. Approximately 5
to 10 gallons was spilled and was cleaned up by Division of Water Quality's
instructions. A corrective action plan written to prevent future spills.
A certifcation statement will be signed with every inspection of the outfalls in
accordance with the requirements found in Part III, Standard Conditions,
Section B, Paragraph 5. This statement will certify there was an evauation done
for the presence of non stormwater discharges.
Measures have been taken to prevent our hazardous products from getting into
the storm water. The diesel fuel tank has a secondary containment tank with a
cover and a check valve at the filling pipe to prevent outflow from the tank. The
hydraulic tank and all oil barrels are sitting in a secondary tank to prevent

spillage. This secondary tank is under a shelter to keep rain water out. It is our
opinion that we are following best management practices with our hazardous
substances to keep them out of the storm water runoff.
A Spill Prevention and Response Plan is in effect. Neil Wrenn and Robert
Wrenn are responsible for implimenting the plan. A SPCC plan has been written
for our 10000 gallon diesel fuel tank. It is our judgement that the SPCC plan is
sufficent for our SPRP. The motor oil is in 55 gallon drums and the hydraulic oil
is in a 150 gallon tank. Both are in a secondary containment tank and only small
quanties are stored and therfore do not imediately affect the storm water runoff
into Loves Creek and do not need a spill plan as does the diesel tank
A preventitive maintenance prgram is been put into effect. The program is
basiclly aimed at spill prevention of motor oil and hydraulic oil. All leaking
equipment is to be fixed. Care is to be taken with oil changes to prevent spills.
The diesel tank is inspected at each filling for leaks or potential malfuctions. All
employees involved with these hazardous products will be trained in spill
prevention. Neil Wrenn is the responsible party for the SPPP.
Stormwater runoff will be qualitatively monitored once in the spring and once in
the fall according to qualitative monitoring requirements in Table 1. Records of
inspections will be on file and kept with this SPPP.
There will be documentation of all maintenance to vehicles, training of
employees, monitoring of stormwater,ect. kept on file for at least five years.

519 �4�/`;Y03c
Oi 0-.�p �a08�
e: O 09 0� ti 10
�300 301
i 307 15-51T O n,
^ V

G
I
uo,
116;
p
0

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
. —i
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
July 10, 2008
Certified Mail
Return Receipt Requested
7006 0810 0002 6049 3538
Mr. Neil Wrenn
Wrenn Brothers Incorporated
P.O. Box 546
Siler City, NC 27344
Subject: Notice of Violation
Wrenn Brothers: NOV-2008-PC-0515
Stormwater Evaluation Inspection
NPDES General Permit No. NCG210179
Chatham County
On July 10, 2008, Ms. Stephanie Brixey of the Raleigh Regional Office conducted a stormwater evaluation
inspection of Wrenn Brothers with the assistance of Mr. Neil Wrenn. Your help was appreciated as it eased the
inspection process.
The following observations were made:
The facility has an incomplete Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan that does not meet the
requirements of General Permit NCG210000. The Plan does not include: USGS map, detailed site map,
feasible alternatives, BMP summary, Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan,
employee training, responsible party list and the Stormwater Facility Inspection Program. These
requirements can be found in Part II Section A of the permit.
The facility does not have a copy of the General Permit and Certificate of Coverage on -site. A copy of
the Certificate of Coverage is attached to this letter for your records. The General Permit can be found
at: htti)://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/su/Forms Documents htm
The semiannual qualitative monitoring has not been conducted as required by the permit. This
requirement is found in Part II Section B.
4. Silt fencing had been put up at Outfall #2 to prevent bark and other materials from entering into Loves
Creek. During the inspection it was noted that the silt fencing has not been maintained and is laying on
the ground in some areas. During a heavy rainfall the fencing will not prevent dirt, mulch or bark from
entering into the creek. It is pertinent that this be fixed immediately.
No;'UtCarolina
Aatura/!y
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: h2o.encstatercus 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

Wrenn Brothers Incorporated
NCG210179
Chatham County
Wrenn Brothers is reminded that violations of the permit and NC General Statute 143-215.6A, are
subject to a civil penalty assessment not to exceed $25,000 per day, per violation. Please provide a
response to this letter within 30 days of receiving it to include corrective action plans and
implementation schedules.
Please provide a copy of the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP) that includes all required
components within 90 days of your receipt of this letter. Please submit your response to the following:
Stephanie Brixey
Raleigh Regional Office
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
The overall condition of Wrenn Brothers stormwater program is not compliant with Division standards. If you
have questions regarding the attached report or any of the findings, please contact Stephanie Brixey at 919-791-
4200 (or email: stephanie.brixev(cncmail.net). /.
Sincerely, /
S. Daniel Smith
Surface Water Protection Supervisor
Raleigh Regional Office
Cc: Central Files
Stephanie Brixey -RRO

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Kllmek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
April 28, 2003
Neil A Wrenn
Wrenn Brothers Incorporated
PO Box 546
Siler City, NC 27344
Subject: NPDES Stormwater Permit Renewal
Wrenn Brothers Incorporated
COC Number NCG210179
Chatham County
Dear Permittee:
In response to your renewal application for continued coverage under general permit NCG210000, the
Division of Water Quality (DWQ) is forwarding herewith the reissued stormwater general permit. This
permit is reissued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the
Memorandum of Agreement between the state of North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, dated December 6, 1983.
The following information is included with your permit package:
A new Certificate of Coverage
• A copy of General Stormwater Permit NCG210000
• A copy of the Analytical Monitoring Form (DMR)
• A copy of the Qualitativel Monitoring Form
• A copy of a Technical Bulletin for the general permit
Your coverage under this general permit is not transferable except after notice to DWQ. The Division
may require modification or revocation and reissuance of the Certificate of Coverage. This permit does
not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, or relieve the permittee from responsibility for compliance with any
other applicable federal, state, or local law, rule, standard, ordinance, order, judgment, or decree.
If you have any questions regarding this permit package please contact Bill Mills of the Central Office
Stormwater and General Permits Unit at [phone], ext. 548.
Sincerely,
Bradley Bennett, Supervisor
Stormwater and General Permits Unit
cc: Central Files
Stormwater & General Permits Unit Files
Raleigh Regional Office
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 [phone]
WA
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG210000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG210179
STORMWATER DISCHARGES
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful
standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Wrenn Brothers Inc
is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater from a facility located at
Wrenn Brothers Incorporated
902 South Chatham Ave.
Siler City
Chatham County
to receiving waters designated as Loves Creek, a class C stream, in the Cape Fear River Basin
in accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set
forth in Parts I, II, III, IV, V, and VI of General Permit No. NCG210000 as attached.
This certificate of coverage shall become effective May 1, 2003.
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit.
Signed this day April 28, 2003.
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG210179 Effective: 05/01/03 Expiration: 04/30/08 Owner: Wrenn Brothers Inc
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Wrenn Brothers Incorporated
County: Chatham 902 S Chatham Ave
Region: Raleigh
Siler City NC 27344
Contact Person: Neil A Wrenn Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Certification: Phone:
Inspection Date: 07/10/2008 Entry Time: 11:00 AM Exit Time: 12:30 PM
Primary Inspector: Stephanie Brixey c]�, b" Phone:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Stormwater
Permit Inspection Type: Timber Products Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: O Compliant N Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Storm Water -
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCG210179 Owner • Facility: Wrenn Brothers Inc
Inspection Date: 07/10/2008 Inspection Type: Stonnwater Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Page: 2

Permit: NCG210179 Owner - Facility: Wrenn Brothers Inc
Inspection Date: 07/10/2008 Inspection Type: Stormwater
Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes
No
NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
❑
■
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
❑
■
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
❑
■
❑
❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
❑
■
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
❑
■
❑
❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
❑
■
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
❑
■
❑
❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
❑
❑
❑
■
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
❑
■
❑
❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
❑
■
❑
❑
Comment: The Plan is incomplete and has not been implemented.
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes
No
NA
NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
❑
■
❑
❑
Comment: Qualitative monitoring has not been conducted. No records on -site.
Analytical Monitoring
Yes
No
NA
NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
❑
❑
■
❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
❑
❑
■
❑
Comment: No analytical monitoring required.
Permit and Outfalls
Yes
No
NA
NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
❑
■
❑
❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
■
❑
❑
❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
❑
❑
■
❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
❑
■
❑
❑
Comment: 2 outfalls at Southern Boundary (Loves Creek)
Page: 3

Permit: NCG210179 Owner • Facility: Wrenn Brothers tnc
Inspection Date: 03/172010 Inspection Type: Compflance Evaluation / Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan 5 Crl Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan? ■ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a `Narrative Description of Practices'? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including oudall locations and drainage areas? ®❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years? ■ ❑ O 11 . j r7,.,21_.-,><
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices? �� �Q� j� ■ O ❑ O Gi,
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment? ._/ CA O (3❑ [�.ppz.C�,
# Does the Plan Include a BMP summary? ' �i / ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Y
# Does the Plan Include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
0 ■v(7 "6 L�
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training? ❑ ■ Cl ❑
(V C'. n),41. - e--s-il—
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
l/✓n �n✓/'""
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually? ❑ ■ O ❑
# Does the Plan include a Stommater Facility Inspection Program? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented? r•6!
Comment: Please see inspection letter for details. 04:110/1
7 )D❑❑■
Qualitative Monitorlin Yes N�o( NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Ouafitative Monitoring semi-annually? ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: See inspection letter for details.
Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? M ❑ ❑
-erhr/ i C�1
# Has the facility conducted Its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance (are ? ❑ ■ ❑
Comment: See inspection letter for details. r7 � fJ I do - (w N ¢y--40fr7 rs �1
Permit and Outfalls m 0" R p Yes No NA NE (� u
O a,f 0i(o"
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? ■ p,F ❑ ❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? ®,❑ ❑ ❑ ,,0��
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ ®❑
vL
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non slormwater) discharges? ❑ ❑ ❑ ® F;?�
Q�
Comment: c,4,jCcnL� 5 SP
2 �
r 0- f Page: 3

SDa i
S'Doz
�203
�P0/-
Soo 3-
5-pa 6
L p v
L u iN 6 P/b- r-O vL n o{
{' t'
pee. o/

NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF
AIR QUALITY
Inspection Report
Date: 05/04/2015
Data
Carolina Wood Enterprises, Inc.
902 South Chatham Avenue
Siler City, NC 27344
Lat: 35d 42.8070m Long: 79d 27.5240m
SIC: 2421 / Sawmills & Planing Mills General
NAICS: 321999 / All Other Miscellaneous Wood Product Manufacturing
Facility Contact
Clay Van Culberson Jr
President
[phone]
Comments:
Inspector's Signature:
Date of Signature:
Contact Data
Authorized Contact
lay Van Culberson Jr.
�President ,V
[phone] �j(
I Total Actual emissions in TONS/YEAR:
Contact
Clay Van Culberson Jr
President
[phone]
&70V St 6011
Raleigh Regional Office
Carolina Wood Enterprises, Inc.
NC Facility ID 1900091
County/FIPS: Chatham/037
Permit Data
Permit 08714 / R05
Issued 4/10/2014 r
Expires 3/31/2022
Classification Synthetic Minor
Permit Status Active
Current Permit Application(s) None
Program Applicability
SIP
MACT Part 63: Subpart 6J
NSPS: Subpart Dc
Compliance Data
Inspection Date 04/16/2014
Inspector's Name David Miller
Operating Status Operating
Compliance Code Compliance - inspection
Action Code PCE
On -Site Inspection Result Compliance
TSP
S02
NOX
VOC
CO
PNH0
*HAP
2012
186.37
0.5300
4.70
33.06
13.00
60.19
3182.00
2008
102.96
0.3700
3.23
18.60
8.80
10.90
1785.50
Five Year Violation History:
Date Letter Type
03/27/2009 NOV/NRE
03/27/2009 NOV/NRE
Date Test Results
Rule Violated
Permit Late Report (excluding ACC)
Permit Late Report (excluding ACC)
'rest Methods)
HAP Emitted
Violation Resolution Date
02/09/2009
04/ 16/2009
Source(s) Tested
(1) DIRECTIONS TO FACILITY: From RRO take Hwy 64 West to Siler City. After crossing Hwy 421, tum left
onto E. Raleigh Street at the first stoplight. Go to the first stoplight and turn left onto N Second Ave. Go to the
�Brl f� G4n�tiLr ^�v '[/ V Cf 't"r /oQ�rr''14-

modified T-intersection and bear to the
left. The facility will be the second
building and driveway on the right, beside
Chandler Concrete.
(IT) FACILITY DESCRIPTION: Carolina
Wood Enterprises is a lumber mill that
receives southern yellow pine trees and
then produces kiln dried lumber. The
facility operates on a 40 hr workweek
employing —37 people and producing
—320,000 board feet / week.
(III) SAFETY NOTES: Standard safety gear
(hard hat, safety glasses, steel -toed boots)
s I 'i o
t p
� ILL
a o la,eo„t Yl
are to be worn. Be watchful of heavy
machinery and stay close to your escort when touring the facility.
'Le 154
(IV) INSPECTION SUMMARY: On April 16, 26�, I, David Miller inspected Carolina wood enterprise, in
Siler City North Carolina.
I arrived at the facility at approximately 1 L00 AM and asked to speak to Mr. Culberson, the owner of the
facility. Mr. Culberson and I went over the permit then he tamed me over to his yard foreman. We
inspected the facility checking the: ductwork, the cyclones, wood drying kiln, and the boiler. All appeared
to be in good order. Once we had completed this we went back to the office and reviewed the paperwork
and all appeared to be in order.
I left the facility at approximately 12:15 PM, and at the time of the inspection the facility appeared to be
in compliance with their air permit.
(V) PERMITTED EMISSION SOURCES:
Emission
Emission Source
Control
Control System
Source ID
Description
System ID
Description
ES-B1 (NSPS)
wood -fired boiler (28.7 million
MC-L MC-2
primary multicyclone ((16) 9-
Btu per hour maximum heat
inch tubes), secondary
input) utilizing fly ash
multicyclone ((44) 6-inch tubes)
reinjection
ES-3
lwood planing operation
C-3
Icyclone (96 inches in diameter)
ES-5
Isteam heated wood kiln
N/A
N/A
ES-2
Ichipper
C-2
cyclone (48 inches in diameter)
ES-4
Isawdust transfer point
C-4
Icyclone (48 inches in diameter)
***The list appeared to be in compliance. At the time of the inspection the equipment list appeared to
reflect the equipment at the site that is required to be permitted . The equipment was in operation. ***
(VI) SPECIFIC CONDITIONS AND LIMITATIONS:
A.1. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS — The Permittee shall comply with Title 15A NCAC, 2D .0202,
2D .0504, 2D .0512, 2D .0516, 2D .0521, 2D .0524 (40 CFR 60, Subpart Dc), 2D .0535, 2D .0540, 2D
.1806 and 2Q .0315. ***Appeared to be in compliance. ***

A.2. PERMIT RENEWAL AND EMISSION INVENTORY REQUIREMENT - The Permittee, at
least 90 days prior to the expiration date of this permit, shall request permit renewal and submit the air
pollution emission inventory report for the 2020 calendar year. The Company was made aware that in
2021 they will need to supply a 2002_O0 emission inventory.***
A.3. PARTICULATE CONTROL REQUIREMENT - As required by 15A NCAC 21) .0503,
particulate matter emissions from the wood burning indirect heat exchanger shall not exceed 0.55 pounds
per million Btu for emission source ES-B1. ***Appeared to be in compliance, per permit review.***
A.4. PARTICULATE CONTROL REQUIREMENT - As required by 15A NCAC 2D.0512, the Permittee
shall not discharge particulate matter caused by the working, sanding, or finishing of wood without providing, as
a minimum for its collection, adequate duct work and properly designed collector. ***Appeared to be in
compliance - as no visible emissions were observed, it appeared that the dust collection system (ductwork and
cyclones) were working properly.*** ✓ ~
A.S. SULFUR DIOXIDE CONTROL REQUIREMENT - As required by 15A NCAC 2D .0516 sulfur
dioxide emissions from the combustion sources shall not exceed 2.3 pounds per million Btu heat input.
***Appeared to be in compliance. The facility only burn wood, which has an emission factor for
sulfur dioxide of 0.025 Ibs/mmBtu.*** sr"k�) dvt
A.6. VISIBLE EMISSIONS CONTROL REQUIREMENT - As required by 15A NCAC 2D .0521, visible
emissions froshall not be more than 20 percent opacity when averaged over a six -minute period. ***Appears to
be in compliance. VE was 0% opacity from all of the sources. *** a-"-
Qiv--
A.7. 15A NCAC 2D .0524 NEW SOURCE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS - For the wood -fired boiler
No. ES-B1), the Permittee shall comply with 'f 9"Va I 1,u f i y.1
a. NSPS Recordkeeping Requirements - the Permittee is required to maintain records of ("V_d�
/ i. the amounts of each fuel combusted during each month; and
ii. all records shall be maintained for a period of two years.
***Appeared to be in compliance, the Company keep track of the number of revolutions of the sawdustfeed
screw and converts that to tons. Copies of these records are kept in the boiler building and in the office.***
J
A.S. NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT - As required by 15A NCAC 2D .0535 the Permittee of as source.of �D
excess emissions that last > 4 hr and that results from a malfunction, a breakdown of process or control equipment ec)
or any other abnormal condition shall be required to give notification to the Director or his designee by the next
business day. 3 A Z No / ��/�/, r -t -
***Appeared to be in compliance. The facility stated that they had not operated in an upset state. ***
NO
A.9. FUGITIVE DUST CONTROL REQUIREMENT - As required by 15A NCAC 2D .0540, the Permittee
shall not cause or allow fugitive dust emissions to cause or contribute to substantive complaints or excess VE
beyond the property boundary.***Appeared to be in compliance. No complaints have been received. ***
A.10. 213.1111 "MAXIMUM ACHIEVABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY' -For the following
equipment, the Permittee shall comply with all applicable provisions, including the notification, testing,
and monitoring requirements contained in Environmental Management Commission Standard 15A
NCAC 2D .1111, "Maximum Achievable Control Technology" as promulgated in 40 CFR 63, Subpart(s)
/below, including Subpart A "General Provisions." f-d /(:fm-a-fc) )"7,s
rsJ .
airy air- )-&7i
-7\ Or9
ii;i�tGt/ nv ' i'LZf.t'1 �(CV///-//,G,
ot� j `F�>

Emission Source(s)
boiler (28.7 million Btu per hour maximum heat input) utilizing fly ash
Boiler
ES-11-2
Fuel
Wood(Bio Mass)
Initial Notification (c.i) h tZ Lo 3 1 / 2-0 (i
3-21-2014
Notification of Compliance
Status (c.ii)
Compliance Report (due every other year, starting March 1, the year
ME
Following thefirst tune u) (c.iii)
Tune-up date
8-4-2014
>Nev tune-up required by:
3 (/z o ( -
>CO concentration before
325ppm
tune -tip (H.I)
>CO concentration after
236 ppm
rune-u (H.I)
>Any corrective actions
Adjusted the fan.
taken (H.II)
>Amount offuel used in the
fuel used if a duel fuel
boiler (H.III)
>date o assessment :5-19-2014
>were the required
elements meet (b.iii.A-G : es
***Appeared to be in compliance. *** 'b0 i Q_ 4,P-S312-,ot `-f
A.11. CONTROL AND PROHIBITION OF ODOROUS EMISSIONS —As required by 15A NCAC
2D .1806 the permittee shall keep objectionable odors from advancing beyond the boundaries of the
facility. ***Appeared to be in compliance — only mild wood odors were detected during the inspection;
no complaints have been filed against the facility. ***
A.12 LIMITATION TO AVOID 15A NCAC 20 .0501 - Pursuant to 15A NCAC 2Q .0315 "Synthetic Minor
Facilities," to avoid the applicability of 15A NCAC 2Q .0501 "Purpose of Section and Requirement for a Permit,"
as requested by the Permittee, facility -wide emissions shall be less than the following:
I Emission Limit
Pollutant (Tons per consecutive 12-month _
period)
PM10 100
a. Operation Restrictions -Limited to burning 8,100 tons of sawdust per 12-month period. ✓ �hr
b. In_spection and Maintenance Requirements --7--
i. Cyclone Requirements - the Permittee shall perform an annual inspection and periodic I&M of
the cyclone system.
ii. Multi -Cyclone Requirements - the Permittee shall perform an annual inspection and periodic
I&M of the multi -cyclone system.
e-n 4 e n o, si ce-- 0 ( C t� Ul n e-S
C
i
rJ r
3 t< S ; n S-1 e
I.Jc2_�,—K t `a—
C�ti (2-CK

C. Recordkeepina Requirements - A log book shall be kept on site for cyclones and multicyclones and made
available to DAQ personnel upon request. The Permittee shall record all inspection, maintenance and
monitoring requirements listed above in the log book. Any variance from the manufacturer's
recommendations shall be investigated with corrections made and date of actions recorded in the log book
***Appeared to be in compliance. The company is keeping paper records. The boiler used 5809 tons of
sawdust.***
(VII) INSIGNICANT / EXEMPT SOURCES: 1
N/a. J
(VIII) EMISSION INVENTORY:
Comparing the 2012 with the 2008 inventory for filterable material is not feasible, because the inventories were
develop using different parameters.***.
(IX) 112 R:
The facility has not triggered this set of rules.
(X) COMPLIANCE HISTORY: A review of DAQ files revealed the following permit violations by the facility:
03/27/2009 NOV/NRE Permit Late Report (excluding ACC) 02/09/2009
03/27/2009 NOWNRE Permit Late Report (excluding ACC) 04/16/2009
03/28/2014 NOD Deficient in complying with NESHAP 6J 08/04/2014
04/15/2015 NOD Late annual reports Pending
(XI) PERFORMANCE TEST REVIEW:
No performance test has been performed in the last five years.
(XII) CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS: At the time of my visit the facility appeared to be in
compliance with the permits.

0
ol
�d1q

Imo• _
yt
Wrenn Brothers Inc.
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. ??�,
Wrenn brothers, Inc. is a lumber maufacturing plant that buyes standings`.,\
timber, brings the timber to it's plant and saws it into lumber. Then stacks, dries\, co
and planes the lumber. The lumber is then stored in sheds until it is sold and. '
hauled away by trucks. The manufacturing of lumber uses no chemicals. The, A/%
only potential pollutant sources are diesel fuel, motor oil and hydraulic oil.
Wrenn Brothers Inc. is a located at 902 South Second Ave. in Siler City, NC.
South Second Ave also known as business 421 forms the eastern boundary of
the properety. The Norfork Southern railroad is the western boundary. Loves
creek is the southern boundary and Chatham Novelties company is the northern
boundary. There are maps with this plan to show the site location of the
business.
There is no waste material left over in manufacturing lumber. Every part of the
log is used. All manufactured products are stored in sheds or truck�trailers and
eventually sold. There is a small amount of non hazardous trash generated such
as steel strapping, plastic wrapping,ect. It is placed in a dumpster that is picked
up by a waste management company when the dumpster is full. Used motor oil
is generated from the on site servicing of the forklifts and loaders. It is collected
in 55 gallon barrels and picked up by a oil recycling company.
A site map is included with this document showing all buildings and the
manufacturing processes going on in them. All drainages ditches are shown. The
only impervious surfaces are in the buildings. All drainage of storm water goes to
either oufall #1 or outfall #2. There locations are shown on the map. Diesel
fuel,motor oil, and hydraulic oil are the potential pollutants. Because of where
these products are stored in relation to runoff water, outfall #2 could possibly be
affected if a major spill occured. The products are stored approximately 700 feet
from outfall #2 and marked on the site map.
In the past three years one spill of used motor oil has occured. Approximately 5
to 10 gallons was spilled and was cleaned up by Division of Water Quality's
instructions. A corrective action plan written to prevent future spills.
A certifcation statement will be signed with every inspection of the outfalls in
accordance with the requirements found in Part III, Standard Conditions,
Section B, Paragraph 5. This statement will certify there was an evauation done
for the.presence of non stormwater discharges.
Measures have been taken to prevent our hazardous products from getting into
the storm water. The diesel fuel tank has a secondary containment tank with a
cover and a check valve at the filling pipe to prevent outflow from the tank. The
hydraulic tank and all oil barrels are sitting in a secondary tank to prevent

1 �;
_ ,�
��; .. �
,.
:r
_•_
:,.
r.
... ..
�.. :�'
- .
r
r _ r �;��f ..
...
..
....
.• .
. ,,. - .. r . t
� � . r ..
...
,
.. '
. „_ .: it
,...... r �
�.
,..
,
.-
..... _ ...
. ±:� . 1
•. .......... _
� .•r. _ .ic
� ..
..
..
- . .., , ..,: r ..
r
...,
:, .. .,
,. .-
_
r ...1' I.
r. . 1,� . r � 'i �
..
1 •. ..
... ! !— .
.. r
fir.
�
i.
_ _i. r ..
� ..
r..r ... 1'.. is
�
r. .. �..
.. ...
r �.
�
�'
1
r

spillage. This secondary tank is under a shelter to keep rain water out. It is our
opinion that we are following best management practices with our hazardous
substances to keep them out of the storm water runoff.
A Spill Prevention and Response Plan is in effect. Neil Wrenn and Robert
Wrenn are responsible for implimenting the plan. A SPCC plan has been written
for our 10000 gallon diesel fuel tank. It is our judgement that the SPCC plan is
sufficent for our SPRP. The motor oil is in 55 gallon drums and the hydraulic oil
is in a 150 gallon tank. Both are in a secondary containment tank and only small
quanties are stored and therfore do not imediately affect the storm water runoff
into Loves Creek and do not need a spill plan as does the diesel tank
A preventitive maintenance prgram is been put into effect. The program is
basiclly aimed at spill prevention of motor oil and hydraulic oil. All leaking
equipment is to be fixed. Care is to be taken with oil changes to prevent spills.
The diesel tank is inspected at each filling for leaks or potential malfuctions. All
employees involved with these hazardous products will be trained in spill
prevention. Neil Wrenn is the responsible party for the SPPP.
Stormwater runoff will be qualitatively monitored once in the spring and once in
the fall according to qualitative monitoring requirements in Table 1. Records of
inspections will be on file and kept with this SPPP.
There will be documentation of all maintenance to vehicles, training of
employees, monitoring of stormwater,ect. kept on file for at least five years.

✓4MES KEITR BOUNG,✓R. 0 SEC BURL J. BROWN 1
C ANO ECM IG-/35 I
1
457-227 4960 K 357-I/5
/ pl EDWgRD N L/LFS i
TR4 CT fi BACK l LL
CJ" I / P! PI Lomas CreeX pl PI I EDW4RD N. 1.ILES
� g _ PI
331-441
InI �v�l �l P f P \ m • 71 � W fl.,�f1 O//��, PB-/6, P.
h
vEN�E 11 � 2 E
,0
421 SECOND P PI �IF I I C 53 0��
C� ✓Z-565-� ✓ PI
gFRrq� LOT ! -� - <%•,!(`p�
8 10.94 ACRE`
CONyEYOR 13 1_
2�1 369- 720
��e`�1 I0 I V
A p / LINE
'v
\l
_i Ell P it POWER_ ��}—�� ✓Z-565 6
F
AERIAL-
nj 1^ A a �1
A pi
i 7 ✓✓_84 PI Op0 P 6 E?
q. 6 RAILk Q.:
4M NVEL TIES CO.
pf
24 2 8 1
PB-7, P-66 EIp
t u ;?j � RE
Fr p g r, t 7 ,ACRES

Search results
Page I of 3
MSN Home I My MSN I Hotmail i Shopping I Money i People & Chat
L;�
.Expedia.come
Welcome - Already a member? Sign in
Web Search:
, vacation cruitivitideals &
sesaces
packages destinations
Q
Getting Started Search results
Find a Map > 902 S Chatham Ave, Siler City, NC, 27344
Get Driving Directions Print —this —map Save this_map E-mail this map
My Maps 8 Routes f , --"- j; p —F
LOW FARES
from Greensboro
$214 to Atlanta
$290 to_La_s Vegas
$183 to Orlando
$20.0 to Chicago
$3_tQ to San
Francisco
HOTELS
in Siler City
Choose a different
city,
CAR RENTALS
in Greensboro
GUIDE
Travel Information
O See_a_list_of hotels in S_iler City
Other options
Chatham Ave,
:itv: NC. 27344
http://www.expedia.com/pub/agent.dll 5/31 /2005

0

Search results
Page 1 of 3 E
MSN Home I My MSN I Hotmail I Shopping I Money I People & Chat
Web Search:
OaExpedia.coma MOMm
Welcome - Already a member? Sign in My Itineraries l My Account l Q Customer Support
Getting Started Search results
Find_a Map ► 902 S Chatham Ave, Siler City, NC, 27344
Get Driving Directions print this map Save_this_map E-mail-this-map
My Maps &_Routes �� 'f
. Summerfield>-/
Travel Resources
Igli LOW FARES
from Greensboro
$214 to Atlanta
$29.0 to-La-sVegas
$183 to_Odando
$2.00_to_Chicago
$310 to —San
Francisco
HOTELS
in Siler City
Choose a different
City
CAR RENTALS
in Greensboro
® GUIDE
Travel Information
�6 l
a
Ports Pleasant Garden
V
4By .... .. :......Chapel H 1
87 •.
N O R ' H�1902 i
o ibert O r
rndleman-.......... �.. �,D�t PS����
tham Atre;
A R 07L Siler City, NC, 27344
�,eoar grove°
Denton o oleridge C H A T H M !
R A N O L P H tb 5
Healing tm
,: Springs i 1
...... GtJlt'7... 421 .
.• t
\.` Tfwheriie llafional Forest E
Broa
Robbins Parkwood` Sanfor
Badir� Uvvharrie S[ar °
24
Albemarle Troy. B� io�e° -. M O O "RtE7 H
5'r MONTGOMERY Carthage // °
STAN '2a Candor° Bar
52 211 Seven Lakes
Johnsonville'°
� �� 24
®loos microzo`cory ®zooanevtEp,aoa7ercor; mc. + Pines 1
O See _a list of hotels in Siler City
Other options
http://www.expedia.com/pub/agent.dll
5/31/2005

NC®ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
April 15, 2015
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Clay Van Culberson Jr., President
Carolina Wood Enterprises, Inc.
902 South Chatham Avenue
Siler City, NC 27344
SUBJECT: Notice of Deficiency — Annual Reporting Requirements
Carolina Wood Enterprises, Inc.
Siler City, Chatham County, North Carolina
Air Permit No. 08714RO5
Facility ID No. 1900091
Dear Mr. Van Culberson:
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
The Raleigh Regional Office has not received an annual report for calendar year 2014 from your
facility in Siler City, North Carolina. Carolina Wood Enterprises, Inc. is required by Air Permit No.
08714R05 to submit a report by January 301h of each calendar year. The intent of this letter is to remind
you of the specific reporting requirements outlined in your air permit. Stipulation A.12.d. of your air quality
permit reads as follows:
Reporting Requirements - Within 30 days after each calendar year, regardless of the actual
emissions, the Permittee shall submit the following:
i. emissions and/or operational data listed below. The data should include monthly and
12 month totals for the previous 12 month period.
A. Tons of sawdust combusted.
Please submit your 2014 annual report to this office by May 15, 2015, along with a written
response describing actions taken by your company to ensure future compliance with your air permit
reporting requirements. This office also recommends that you or a designated company representative
review your air permit to ensure that you understand all of the specific and general permit conditions. Please
note the monitoring, record keeping, and reporting requirements, and make the necessary provisions to
ensure that these requirements are met within the specified time frames.
Any future late submittal of a permit -required report by the subject facility may be considered a
violation of your air permit. Any violation of air quality regulations is subject to the assessment of civil
penalties as per North Carolina General Statute 143-215.114A.
Raleigh Regional Office
3800 Barrett Drive, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] \ Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Oppommity1 Affirmafive kiion Employer —Made in part by recycled paper

Carolina Wood Enterprises; Inc.
April 15, 2015
Page 2
Your cooperation is this matter is appreciated. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call
Matthew Mahler, Environmental Engineer, or Steve Hall, Compliance Supervisor, at [phone].
Sincerely,
Patrick Butler, P.E., Regional Supervisor
Division of Air Quality, NCDENR
cc: RRO Files