NCG160159_COMPLETE FILE - HISTORICAL_20160810

Egn,redl X/� .
STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET RESCISSIONS.
PERMIT NO.
DOC TYPE
O, COMPLETE FILE - HISTORICAL
DATE OF
RESCISSION
0 a o l 4 I D
YYYYMMDD

PAT MCCRORY
Govemor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secretary
August 10, 2016
Mr. Jule Smith, President
Fred Smith Company
P.O. Box 31768
6105 Chapel Hill Road
Raleigh, NC 27607 ,
Subject: Multimedia Compliance Inspection
Fred Smith Company — Knightdale
Asphalt Plant
Wake County
Dear Mr. Smith:
Department of $nvironmental Quality staff conducted a multimedia compliance inspection of Fred Smith
Company — Knightdale Asphalt Plant on July 27, 2016 for permitted and/or other activities administered
by the following Divisions:
Division of Air
Division of Mineral
Divisions
Division of Waste
Quality(DAQ)
and Land Resources
Resources DWRWater
()
Management
(DMLR)
(DWM)
We hope that you have enjoyed the benefit of our initiative to provide a single inspector capable of ,.
handling multiple areas of environmental compliance at your facility. The results of each applicable
inspection area and any associated response actions or necessary corrective measures are detailed in the
Division specific areas of the attached report. If there are no notes or comments under a specific Division
header, you may assume compliance with that particular Division's rules and regulations at the time of
inspection. Should violations be noted in the attached report, you may receive separate enforcement related
correspondence in addition to this report.
If you have any questions regarding this multimedia inspection, please, contact Gary Perlmutter at 919-
791-4200 or [e-mail]. Thank you for your cooperation.
cc:
DAQ RRO Files
DEMLR (DWR) RRO Stormwater Files
Department of Environmental Qual iry. Raleigh Regional Office Website: http://deq.nc.gov/
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Phone: [phone]
Location: 3800 Barrett Drive. Raleigh, NC 27609 Fax: [phone]

r,
tx '�'i��' �j.� Y•''
Environmental
Quality
Mr. Jule Smith, President
Fred Smith Company
P.O. Box 31768
6105 Chapel Hill Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
PAT MCCRORY
r. ' Covemor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
.. .. , Secretary
Subject: NPDES Stormwater Compliance Evaluation Inspection'
Certificate of Coverage No. NCG160159 `''
n:
Fred Smith Company — Knightdale'Asphai lt'Plant
Wake County
Dear Mr. Smith'
Staff from the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) conducted a stormwater inspection on July
27, 2016, as part of a multimedia inspection of your facility. The assistance provided by Mr. J. Bailey
Watkins during the inspection was greatly appreciated. The inspection report is attached. Findings
during the inspection were as follows:
1. Certificate of Coverage (COC) No. NCG160159 under NPDES General Permit NCG160000
was issued to Fred Smith Company — Knightdale Asphalt Plant to discharge stormwater
runoff to Milbume Creek, a Class C; NSW stream, in the Neuse River Basin.
2. The facility has developed and implemented a stormwater pollution prevention plan (SPPP).
A review of the plan indicated that it included most components required by the general
permit. Missing documented elements include: 1) a three-year spill history, 2) an
analysis of feasible alternatives to current practices, and 3) annual review / update of
the SPPP. These elements should be inserted into the plan to document their
implementation.
3. Semi-annual qualitative and analytical monitoring has been conducted atone stormwater
discharge outfall (SDO), as required by the General Permit. Qualitative and analytical
monitoring reports appeared complete and up-to-date, with no benchmark exceedences.
Raleigh Regional Office1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1628
Phone: [phone] / FAX:` 919-5714718 / Internet: http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/Ir/
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled \ 10% Post Consumer Paper

:. P6ge.2 of 2.1 •"
4. The one permitted SDO was observed and found accessible. However, the discharge`pipe
was found cracked with a large hole approximately four feet from the openegd, whic
could affect sample results by dilution or contamination. The pipe should be repaired'
or replaced to ensure sample quality.
Please respond in writing to DEQ Raleigh Regional Office regarding Items 2 and 4 within 60 days
of receipt of this letter. If you have any questions regarding the attached report or any of the findings,
please contact Gary Perlmutter at 919-791-4200 (or email: gary.nerlmutterRncdenngov).
Sin er�
Gary Perlmutter, M.S.
Environmental Specialist .
Division of Air Quality,
Department of Environmental Quality,

Y 1
Compliance
Inspection Report
5
,
Permit: NCG160159--' Effective:
I.0/02/14-
Expiration:" 09/30/19.' Owner:`
Fscil LLC DBA Fred,Smilh Co ' •-• -
SOC: Effective:
Expiration: Facility:
Knightdale Asphalt Plant
County: Wake
605 Old Montague Ln
Region: Raleigh
''
,
.r 1..:._ k. `:°:,
•-s:` t
„ ;. ;.. ,. ,•,
Raleigh NC 27607'
Contact Person:" Donald J Schell,
'^ .-
Title:
Phone: :[phone]"
Directions to Facility:-;,,..._
,:,1`
•,,._
System Classifications:.,,
,,,, -,
.,
,..,
....•
:..,
,; Y ;,-, :
,, ,
Primary ORC: - :...: .: •.;
',.. , . .,-- ,::
'. •. Certification;''. r, : ,.: , i
`• ; Phone: ...; .., ... „, . ..
Secondary ORC(s)
0nSIto Re presentative(s) �
24 hour contact name
J Bailey Watkins
910582-3580"
On -site representative
Stanley Taybron
919-673-2592
Related Permits:Y
Inspection Date: 07/25/2016
EntryTime:
10:00AM Exit Time: 12:OOPM
Primary Inspector: Gary Perlmutter
Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Asphalt Paving Mixture Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
® Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

pevnlC NCG160159 Owner. Facility: Fscii LLC DBA Fred Smith C0 -
Inspection Date: 07/2512016 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
tY
Inspection Summary:
On July 25, 2016, 1 (Gary Perlmutter, DAQ-RRO) visited the Fred Smith Knightdale Asphalt Plant for a multimedia.
inspection. This summary addresses the stormwater component of that inspection. In the Control Building I met with Mr"
Stanley Tayborn, Plant Operator, and Mr. J. Bailey Watkins, Asphalt Plant Manager. We reviewed the facility's stormwater
pollution prevention,plan (SP3)-and other permit -required documents, most of which appeared in order. Missing elements
include documents of feasible alternatives to current practices, spills in the past three years, and the SP3's annual
review/update. Analytical Monitoring reports and Oualitative Monitoring reports were found complete and up-to-date with the,: ...
most recent dating April 12, 2016; no benchmark exceedences or other issues were reported.
After document review we toured the facility. We walked much of the perimeter, as the topography allowed sheetFlow toward
a single outfall to the southwest corner of the property. Along the.west edge of the property a system of drains was _
observed just east of a vegetated berm, which Mr. Watkins told me was a condition of their special use permit with the Town of Knightdale. Sheetflow drains via underground pipe to a holding pond near the SW corner of the property, which_ then'
via a riser pipe is discharged to the receiving water: Milburne Creek, a Class C; NSW water in the Neuse River Basin. We
then walked to observe the sampling point, which is PVC pipe that empties directly into the receiving creek. This pipe
was cracked with a large hole approximately four feet from the open end. The condition of the pipe could affect the sample" "
results, if collected during a;rain event.
.. .-fi.1J:m! ..
Overall, the Fred Smith Co. Knighdale Asphalt Plant appeared to be in compliance with its stormwater permit, however
some issues need to be addressed. I recommend the following: draft and implement annual review forms, spill forms, and
insert a section addressing that feasible alternatives to current practices were explored. I also recommend repairing or
replacing the outfall pipe to better ensure sample quality.
A,
... „
A A
4...
-. ..,
Page: 2

Permit: NCG160159 Owner- Facility: Fscii LLC DBA Fred Smith Co
Inspection Date:. 07/25/2016 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation „ Reason for Visit Routine
Analytical Monitorng ' " "`
YesNo NA' NE`
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? ' ®' ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? "` - ® ❑' ❑ ❑"
Comment. --'Analytical reports were reviewed and found complete and up-to-date wtlh 6ap6rts'dated April 12"
2016, August 1, 2015, June 19, 2015, November 17, 2014, March 7. 2014, October 13, 2013 as
well as older reports documented in the previous inspection report. All results were below the
benchmark - _ .. .. ,
.. ".. I
Permit and Outfalls _ 1;,ill. ta., Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? ®❑. ❑ ❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? ®❑ ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, Is it property documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ ® ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? ®❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: I reviewed the site's Certificate of Coverage, which documents the receiving water as Milburnie
Creek. a Class C: NSW water in the Neuse River Basin. I observed the facility's single outfall
which drains into a creek from a holding pond via a PVC pipe. This pipe was observed to be
cracked with a large hole upstream of the sampling point, which may result in diluted or
contaminated samples. I recommend repairing or replacing this pipe to better ensu el sample
quality.
Qualitative Monitoring. Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? ®❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Semi-annual qualitative monitoring reports are attached to their corresponding Analytical reports
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
®❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
®❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
®❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map Including outfall locations and drainage areas?
®❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
❑ ®❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
❑ ®❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
®❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
ID El E1.0
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
®❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
®❑ ❑ ❑
Page: 3

Permit:
NCG160159
Owner • Facility: Fscil LLC'DBA Fred Smith Co-
. Inspection Date:
07/25/2016 '-
Inspection Typo: Compliance Evaluation". ,..'
Reason for Visit
' Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan -Yes No NA NE
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training? ,. M ❑. ❑ ❑ .
# Does the Plan Include a list of Responsible Pany(s)? ®, ❑, ❑ ❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?� ; ., , ., _ r ❑ ®, ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?,;, 0. ❑ ❑ ❑
Has the Stormwater Polluton Prevention Plan been implemented?' ' " - - - - ®❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: The SP3 was dated May 2014, with only the responsible Party contact sheet recently updated.. I
recommend that an annual review / update sheet be drafted to document plan reviews and
updates. Mr. Watkins said that no spills have occurred in the last 3 yrs but not documented I
recommend that an annual spill log be drafted for annual spill / no spill recording.
Page: 4

7
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF
AIR QUALITY
Inspection Report
Date: 67/26/2016
Facility Data
.r' .
Fred Smith Company - Knightdale Asphalt Plant
6631 US Hwy. 64 East .
Knightdal'e NC' ; 27545"' '
Lai: 35d 48.1360m' Long:•78d 30.3610" '.
SICi 2951 /Paving Miztuies And Blocks in
NAICS: 324121 / Asphalt Paving Mixtuie' and Block Manufacturing
Contact Data
Facility Contact .'
r Authorized Contact i
Stanley Taybrgn
Jule Smith
Plant Operator
President p : a -
[phone]
[phone]
tcaletgn xegional Uttice
Fred Smith Company,- Kmghtdale Asphalt Plant
NC Facility ID 9200752
County/FIPS: Wake/183
Permit Data
Permit 09310 / R05
Issued 9/30/2015_
Expires' 8/31/2617'
Classification Synthetic Minot,
Peindt'Status Active '
Current Permit Application(s) None
Program'Applicability
, , , . , ,. I'. .:
,Technical Contact sip-
J. Bailey Watkins NSPS: Subpart I
Asphalt Plant Manager.. Y ,
[phone]
Compliance Data -
Comments:
A P P FA
Inspection Date 07/2612016
Inspector's Name Gary Perlmutter
Inspector's Signature: Operating Status Operating'
/�'wf7X Compliance Code Compliance - inspection
Action Code FCE"' .
Date of Signature; 'T ..L6„ qP I6 On -Site Inspection, Result Compliance
Total Actual emissions in TONS/YEAR: -
TSP' .,
S02
NOX
VOC
CO
PM10
* HAP
2011
7.66
4.94
3.82 .
4.52, ;.,
12.75 :.
4.51
597.00
2006
4.86
8.45
5.78
6.34
17.94 .
3.55 ,;,, .
8.35.00
* Highest HAP'Emiited inpounds)
Five Year Violation Historv: . ' " ' • ' - -
Date Letter Type Rule Violated, Violation Resolution Date
07/20/2015' NOV NC Genial Statutes NCGS 143-215.108 Control of 07/18/2015
sources of air pollution; permits required.
Date. _ Test Results , - . Test Method(s)
Sources) Tested
(I) DIRECTIONS: From the Raleigh Regional Office turn right onto Six Forks Rd and drive to the junction with I-440. Take
the inner beltline (I-440 N/E) •-4.5 mi to the New Bern Ave/NC-64 exit (Exit 13B). Drive E on NC-64 for 4.5 miles to the
"u-tum" that lies in the median; specifically, the turn is just beyond the Lowe's Foods Shopping Center. Tom around and

9200752 Inspection Report
J
r'
P a a c 12
(In
am
(M
i
drive west, toward Raleigh. Immediate.lyget into the right lane and turn right onto Old Montague Lane.. This.service road
(behind Home Depot) is.the -entrance to the facility.
FACILITY DESCRIPTION: Fred Smith Company - Knightdale Asphalt Plant operates a 400 tonsihour (tph) capacity drum
mixed asphalt plant with hot mix asphalt storage silos and a truck loadout operation.
Safety notes: Standard PPE (hard hat, steel -toed shoes, safety glasses and ear plugs) plus a reflective safety vest are to be
wom at this site.
INSPECTION SUMMARY: On'i 26, 2016, I (Gary Perlmutter) conducted a multimedia compliance inspection of the
Knightdale Asphalt Plant. This report only addresses the air permit component. Upon arrival I observed the plant in operation
with trucks"being loaded. No visible emissions other than steam was observed from the plant equipment. Fugitive dust was
being kicked up by vehicle traffic onsite; but none appeared to leave the property, which adjoined. a quarry.
I metwith Mr. StanleyTaybron, Plant Foremanand we were soon joined by Mr., J. Bailey Watkins, Asphalt Plant Manager.
Mr. Tayliron informed me that the plant was. running on natural gas at a rate, of 170 tph. We reviewed the permit.conditions
and required records, all of which seemed in order. We their toured the facility, .whereirrall equipment was verified and
observed in operation. Again, no VE was observed other than steam and fugitive dust from vehicle traffic.
Overall, the facility appeared to be well run and maintained from an air quality standpoint. Further details follow. ;
PERMITTED EMISSION SOURCES:
Emission ... Emission Source I Control Control System
Source ID Description System tD j Description
Drum type hot mix
-
asphalt plant (400 tons per hour maximum production
rate)
consisting of
ES 3 1 (NSPS) i
ES 3 2 (NSPS) ,
three hot mixas halt storage silos 220 tons
P g (
N/A
N/A
ES-3 3 (NSPS)
storage capacityeach)
I_,..-_.___.
.....................__...._........ .........
natural gas % No.2 fuel oil / recycled No.2 fuel I
....__._......._.._............ __.
bagfil[er (12,399+ftz of filter I
-1 NSPS j
(, )
F
oil -fired rotary drum aggregate dryer/mixer .. I
CD-2; CD-1
area),(CD-1) installed in series
(400 tph maximum production rate, 100 million;
with a horizontal cyclone (9 ft
_ j
Btu per hour maximum heat input rate) I
diam.) (CD-2) .. ,
ES-F 1 (NSPS) truck loadout operation
N/AJ
N/A
All equipment was verified and observed in operation during the inspection.
(V) SPECIFIC PERMIT CONDITIONS:
A.1 The Pemrittee shall comply with Title 15A NCAC, Subchapter 2D .0202; 2D .0506, 2D .0516, 2D .0521, 2D .0524 (40 CFR
60, Subpart 1), 2D .0535, 2D .0540, 2D .0605, 2D .0611, 2D .1100, 2D .1806, 2Q .0315, 2Q .0317 and 2Q .0711.
Appeared to be in compliance -see below:
A.2 PERMIT RENEWAL''AND EMISSION INVENTORY REOUIREMENT The Pemrittee,` at least 90 days prior to the
expiration date of this permit, shall request permit renewal and submit an air pollution emission inventory report for the 2016
calendar year. ` " '
Appeared to be in compliance — I reminded the facility representatives of this condition.
A.3 PARTICULATE "CONTROL REQUIREMENT - As required by 15A NCAC 2D .0506 "Particulates froin Hot Mix Asphalt
Plants,"
a. Particulate matter emissions resulting from the operation of a hot mix asphalt plant shall not exceed allowable
emission rates.
b. Visible emissions from stacks or vents at a hot mix asphalt plant shall be < 20% opacity when averaged over a six -
minute period! - ,
c. Fugitive dust emissions shall be controlled as required by 15A NCAC 2D .0540 "Particulates From Fugitive Dust
Emission Sources." '

200752 [nspectioa Report
Pape 13
d: Fugitive emissions, for sources at a hot mix asphalt plant not covered elsewhere under Iles Rule shall not exceed 20
percent opacity averaged -over six minutes.
e.. All; hot mix,asphalt,batch plants shall, be equipped, with; a scavenger process dust control system for the drying,
conveying, classifying, and mixing equipment. The_scavenger process dust,control system shalCexhaust through a
stack or, vent; and, shall be. operated, and maintained in such a,manner"as to comply with the allowable particulate
emission rate and opacity limit of this Rule.,
Appeared to be in.comphance-;This stipulation was.addressed during the permit review and found to be incompliance if the
plant is operated and maintained properly. My observations during the inspection indicate that the plant is run and
maintained properly. The facility is a drum mix plant, so item e. should be removed from the permit.
A.4 SULFUR DIOXIDE CONTROL REQUIREMENT - As required by 15A NCAC 2D .0516 sulfur dioxide emissions) from the
,combustion sources shall not exceed 2,3 pounds per million Btu heat input:
Appeared to be in compliance — The facility uses natural gas exclusively, whfch'is a low sulfur fuel...; ,
A.5 VISIBLE EMISSIONS CONTROL REQUIREMENT As required by,:15ANCAC 2D ,0521,.visible emissions from the
emission sources, in after July 1,.1971, shall not be_> 26%opacity when averaged over a six -minute period.., ..
Appeared to be in compliance - At the time of the inspection, no visible emissions other than steam were observed.
A.6 .;. , ,15A NCAC 2D .0524 "NEW..SOURCE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS INSPS)' - For hot mix asphalt plant (ID No. ES-
1), including silos (ID No. ES-3.1, ES-3.2), and truck loadopt operation (ID, No. ES-F1), the Permittee shall comply with all
applicable provisions, contained inNSPS, as promulgated in 40 CFR 60, Subpart 1, including SubpartA,!'General Provisions."
a. NSPS. Emissions"Limitations.- As required by; 15A NCAC 2D .0524, the Permittee shall not discharge or cause the
discharge into the atmosphere from any affected source any gases which: • • 4
i. Contain particulate matter in excess of 90 mg/dscm (0.04 gr/dscf); or
. ii,, • Exhibit 20 percent opacity,, or greater ! % -
Appeared to be in compliance;—, At the time of the inspection, no,visible emissions other, than steam were observed..The asphalt
plant was tested in 2005 and found to be in compliance. It was tested again on July 19, 2016 and, the testingappeared to be
conducted properly with no issues, and,0%q, VE:seen as observed by DAQ staff., Results of the,2016. test are pending.
A.7 NOTIFICATION'REOUBtEMENT - As required b 15A,NCAC 2D .0535 the P q y ernnttee of a source of excess emissions
that last > 4 hr and results from a malfunction, a breakdown of process or.xontrol equipment or any other abnormal
,,..,. conditions, shall notify DAQ by,the next business day. „ •..,�
Appeared .to be, in compliance,- facllityrepresent.atives indicated that no such events have occurred.
A.8 FUGITIVE DUST CONTROL REQUIREMENT!- As required by 15A,NCAC-2D .0540,•the Perinrttee shall not cause or
allow fugitive dust emissions to cause or, contribute to substantive complaints or excess visible emissions beyond the property
boundary
Appeared to be in compliance -fugitive dust was observed kicked up by onsite vehicles, but it did.not appear to drift offsite.
No dust complaints against,the facility have been riled.,
A.9, . TESTING REQUIREMENT Under the provisions of North Carolina General Statute 1437215.108 and in accordance with
15A NCAC 2D .0605, the Pertruttee shall demonstrate compliance with 2D..0506 and 2D .0524 by;testing ES-1 for PM
(TSP),using.a DAQ approved method.,
,. a: .The Permittee shall arrange for avemission testing protocols to be provided to DAQ prior, to,testing.,Testing
protocols are not required to be pre -approved by the DAQ prior to testing. The DAQ. shall review testing protocols
". for pre -approval prior to testing if requested by the Permittee least 45 days before conducting the test. ,
b. To afford the Regional Supervisor, DAQ, the opportunity to have'an observer present, the Permittee shall PROVIDE
the Regional Office, in WRITING, at least 15 days notice of any required performance test(s).
c.. Two,copies of the test results must be submitted to the Regional Supervisor, DAQ, in accordance with the approved
procedures of the.Environmental Management Commission by March 28, 2016 .
Appeared to be in compliance — testing protocol was received by DAQ on March 21, Milo, and approved.on May 8, 2016. A
deadline extension was requested by the facility.on June 20 and granted by,DAQ on June 22, 2016,with a new test deadline for
July 29, 2016 and report deadline of August 28, 2016. The test was conducted on July 21, 2016 and observed by.Matt Mahler
of DAQ-RRO. According to Mr. Mahler, the plant was running at 360 tph, 90% of the maximum rate, fueled by natural gas.
The testing appeared to be run properly, and minimal VE (0-10% opacity) was observed. Results are pending.

J
9200752 Inspection Report I ' Page 14
A.10FABRIC FILTER REQUIREMENTS -As required by 15A NCAC 2D .0611, particulate matter emissions shall be controlled
as described in the permitted equipment list. '' "
a. "Irispection'and Maintenance (I&M) Requirements - the Permittee shall'perforni'at least an annual internal inspection
" as'well'as periodic I&Mbf each bagfilter system. "
b.'' Recordkeeoine'Reouirements- The"results of all I&M activities shall be recorded in'the logbook, shall be kept on -
site and made available to DAQ personnel upon request) "
Ap'peared'to:be in compliance ' I reviewed the facility's monthly baghouse records and they appeared complete and up-to-
date. r. . 1 . ,.. ,. ! e
A.11 CYCLONE REQUIREMENTS - As required by 15A NCAC 2D .0611, particulate matter emissions shall be controlled as
,
' described inthe'pernutted'equipm,ent list."'� � r ' '' '. • _ '' . ' � _.' ! . ' '_ ' ' • 1 ,` s
a. Inspection and Maintenance (I&M) Requirements Attie Permittee shall perforin`at least an annual'internal inspection
as well as periodic I&M of e'aclf cyclone system.' ''
b. Recordkeepine Requirements - The results of all I&M activities shall be recorded in the logbook, shall be kept on-
' "^ site'and ma$e"available4o DAQ personnel upon- request.
-'�''> - ` �' - :: ' " • ' ' -
t..; ,
Appeared to be m compliance' I reviewed ttie facility's monthly cyclone records and they appeared complete and up-to-date.
A.12 TOXIC AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS LIMITATION AND REPORTING REOUIREMENT - Pursuant to 15A NCAC 2D
1100 "Contr& of-Tokic Air Pollutants' and° in'accordance' with'the approved application for an air, toxic. compliance
demonstration the pemut-listed limits shall' hotbI6cxceeded ' " ` >
a. - 'Restrictions'- To eiisure compliance witfi'the above limits; the following restrictions shall apply::' . .
° is " ' theasph'alt produced shall be less than 1,200,000 tons per consecutive 12-month period`.' .
Appeared to be in compliance —see Stipulation A:14 below:" •
;.
A.13 CONTROL AND PROHIBITION OF ODOROUS EMISSIONS - As required by 15A NCAC 21):1806; " the Pernuttee shall
"i prevent"odorous emissions-froni"the facilityfrom'causing"'or contributing to"objectionable' odors'beyond the facility's
boundary: n.
Appeared to be in compliance'=mild asplialt odors were detectedonsite; but none were'detected'offsite., One smoke"and odor
complaint was received on November 9, 2011. Steve Carr of DAQ-RRO responded by conducting a permit inspection, finding
the facility to be in compliance. The complaint was'unsubsiantiated:
A.14 LIMITATION TO AVOID 15A NCAC 20 0501 - Pursuant,to 15A NCAC' 2Q .0315 "Synthetic Minor Facilities," to avoid
the applicability of 15A'NCAC'2Q %0501 "Purpose of Section and Requirement fora Permit,"`as requested by the Perinittee,
facility -wide emissions shall be less than the following: 100 tons/year S02 and CO each.
a: Operations Restrictions the following restrictions shall apply:
r '=Tlie asphalt production shall be less d(an 1,200,006 tons per consecutive12=month period;'
ii. The sulfur content of the No. 2 and recycled No. 2 fuel oil shall be limited to 0.5% sulfur by weight.
' b. RccbrdkeeninRReguirCin6ms+ +' •"' • , - - 7-+ - "� - :-
i. The Permittee shall record tons of asphalt produced.monthly and 'IotaII annually'
ii. Fuel supplier certification shall be kept on -site and made available to DAQ personnel upon request.
c: Reporting Requirements - Within 30 days after each calendar year, the Perinittee 'shall submit monthly and 12-
month totals of tons of asphalt produced;'and sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide emissions.
Appeared to be in compliance,— Mr. Taybron provided these records that are kept in"a notebook'on-site. The facility uses
natural gas exclusively for about three years per. Mr; Watkins: I reviewed' these'i'ecords; which include both copies of
submitted reports -and current logs: 2016'productionto date is 156,122'tons asphalt; 2015'total production is 242,432 tons
asphalt. DAQ received the facility's annual report on January 29; 2016; In it the facility reports to have entitled 6.1 tons of
S02 and 17.8 tons of CO in 2015:
A.15'' VENDOR SUPPLIED RECYCLED No(s)'2 FUEL OIL REQUIREMENTS'- I6'accordance "with Rule 2Q .0317, the
Permittee is avoiding the applicability of Rule 2Q .0700 by using recycled fuels which' are equivalent to their virgin
counterparts: The Permhtee is allowed to use the recycled fuel oil(s) as 'specified in the permit. i , ". .
Appeared to be in compliance - facility representatives told me that the plant has not used any recycled fuel'oil in its history
(i.e., since 2002).`.,. .

9200752 Inspection Report Page 15
A.16 TOXIC AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS LIMITATION REOUIREMENT - The facility shall be operated and maintained in
such a manner that emissions of any listed TAPS from the facility, including fugitive emissions, will not exceed TPERs listed
in 15A NCAC 2Q .0711(a).
Appeared to be in compliance — pollutants were reviewed based on potential operation of this plant. If there are no
modifications to this plant, then compliance is expected. No changes were made nor are any planned per facility
representatives. The facility appeared to be well run and maintained from an air quality standpoint.
(VI) GENERAL PERMIT CONDITIONS:
B.14 PERMIT RETENTION REOUMEMENT - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2Q .0110, the Permittee shall retain a current
copy of the air permit at the site. The Permittee must make available to personnel of the DAQ, upon request, the current copy
of the air permit for the site.
Appeared to be in compliance'— Mr. Taybron showed me the facility's copy of Air Permit No. 09310R05, which is kept in the
air permit binder in the control house onsite. .
B.15 CLEAN AIR ACT SECTION 112(r) REQUIREMENTS - Pursuant to 15A NCAC 2D .2100 "Risk Management Program," if
the Permittee is required to develop and register a risk management plan pursuant to Section I I2(r) of the Federal Clean Air
Act, then the Permittee is required to register this plan with the USEPA in accordance with 40 CFR Part 68.
Not applicable — the facility is not subject to the 112(r) rule.
(VH) EXEMPT EMISSION SOURCES:
Source t Exemption Regulation l
i IES_FSTI No.2 fuel oil storage tank (20,000 gallon storage capacity)
2Q .0102 (c)(1)(D)(i)
IES-ACS fl, asphalt cement storage tank (20,000-gallon storage capacity)
2Q 0102 (c)(1)(D)(i) I
IES-ACST2 - asphalt cement storage tank (35,000-gallon storage capacity)J1
2Q 0102 (c)(1)(D)(i)
IES-ACH1 - No.2 fuel oil -fired asphalt cement heater (1.2 mmBtu/hr maximum heat
input)
2Q`.0102 (c)(2)(E)(i)
All sources were verified during the inspection. No additional sources were observed.
(VHI) EMISSIONS INVENTORY REVIEW: Emissions of all criteria pollutants and HAPs decreased from inventory years 2006
and 2011, except for PM (TSP), which increased by 57.6%. Changes are due to "increase in business + change in the
amount of different type offuel burn" (David Miller, DAQ permit engineer).
(IX) SOURCE TEST REVIEW: the facility has performed two source tests to date. See Stipulation A.9 above for details..
(X) COMPLIANCE HISTORY: The Knightdale Asphalt plant has triggered the following compliance actions:
• July 20, 2015 — an NOV was issued for installing and operating an unpermitted silo.
• April 19, 2010 — an information letter was issued for general recordkeeping issues.
• December 22, 2005 — an NOV was issued for failure to conduct a required source test in 2003 as discovered during a
2005 source test.
(XI) CONCLUSIONS / RECOMMENDATIONS: At the time of this inspection, Fred Smith Company - Knightdale Asphalt
Plant appeared to be in compliance with all permitting requirements. Stipulation A.3.e should be removed from the next
permit revision as the asphalt plant is a drum type, not a batch type. I also recommend the facility be re -inspected in one year.

Wi
NCDENR t3
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat Mc Crory
Governor
Jule Smith, President
FSC II, LLC dba Fred Smith Company
6105 Chapel Hill Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
Dear Mr. Smith:
Division of Water Quality
Charles Wakild, P.E.
Director
May 16, 2013
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Magnum Asphalt Plant-Knightdale 43
Old Montague Road, Knightdale, NC 27545
(Former Magnum Group)
Certificate of Coverage No. NCG160159
Wake County
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
On May 16, 2013, Thomas Ascenzo of the Raleigh Regional Office (RRO) conducted a compliance
inspection (CEI) of Magnum Asphalt plant's stormwater pollution program. The assistance of Don
Schell—Superintendam was appreciated as it facilitated the inspection process.
The Magnum Asphalt Plant#3 facility discharges stormwater to receiving waters designated as UT of
Milburnie Creek (Milburme Lake) in the Neuse River Basin.
The following observations were made:
The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SP3) was reviewed and revealed the
following :
• The plan contained the required general location map that included outfall
location and drainage areas.
• Employee training documents were included in the SP3. The last training was
conducted on February 22, 2013.
• List of responsible parties for emergency spill response notification was available
for review.
• The plan included stormwater facility inspection reports, best management
summary, current certificate of coverage, narrative description of practices and a
spill prevention and response plan.
• The SP3 is being updated annually (or more frequently if needed) as required by
the permit.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1628 Mail service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Phone [phone]
Internet: wvvw. ncwaterquality.org Location: 3800 Parrett Drive Raleigh, NC 27609 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycledl10% Post Consumer Paper
e XhCarolina
turally
Customer service
1-877-623-6748

Magnum Asphalt Plant #3-Knightdale NCG160159 Of
2. Qualitative monitoring was conducted on February 9, 2012, May 15, 2012, December
17, 2012 and March 25, 2013.
3. Analytical Monitoring was conducted on February 9, 2012, May 15,2012, December 17,
2012 and March 25, 2013.
4. Outfall #1 was observed to contain slight turbidity due to recent rainfall.
5. The Spill Prevention Response Plan was reviewed and found to be complete.
6. Ownership name change from Magnum Group LLC. to Fred Smith Company
needs to be completed. A change of ownership form is attached to the report.
Complete the form and mail it to the address on the letter head.
The Magnum Asphalt plant's Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SP3) is considered compliant.
Please continue your diligence in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. Should you or your staff
have any questions regarding this inspection or this correspondence, please do not hesitate to contact me
at 919-791-4256 or you can e-mail me at tom.ascenzoQncdenngov.
Sincerely,
Thomas Ascenzo
Environmental Specialist
Surface Water Protection
Attachment: Compliance Inspection Reports
CC: RRO File NCG160159
Mr. Don Schell -Asphalt Plant Manager
6105 Chapel Hill Road, Raleigh, NC 27607

V 10
Permit:
NCG160159
SOC:
County:
Wake
Region:
Raleigh
Compliance Inspection Report
Effective: 10/01/09 Expiration: 09/30/14 Owner: CC Mangum Company, LLC
Effective: Expiration: Facility: Mangum Company -Asphalt Plant #3
6643 US Hwy 64
Contact Person: Donald Schell
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 05/1612013
Primary Inspector: tom ascenzo
Secondary Inspector(s):
Title:
Entry Time: 09:45 AM
Knightdale NC 27545
Phone: [phone]
Certification:
Exit Time: 10:20 AM
Phone:
Phone: [phone]
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Asphalt Paving Mixture Stormwater Discharge CDC
Facility Status: IN Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
■ Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page:1

Permit: NCG160159 Owner - Facility: CC Mangum Company, LLC
Inspection Date: 05116/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
Comment: Last employee training was conducted on 2/22/2013. No spills reported in
the three year period documented on a page in the SP3.
Qualitative Monitoring
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
Comment: 2/9/2012, 5/15/2013, 12/17/2012, 3/25/2013
Analytical Monitoring
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
Comment: 2/9/2013, 5/15/2013, 12/7/2012, 3/25/2013
Permit and Outfalls
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it property documented by the Division?
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
Comment: , Outfall #1 appeared to have slight turbidity, no signs of pollutant or solids,
Yes
No
NA
NE
■
❑
❑
❑
Yes
No
NA
NE
■
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
Yes
No
NA
NE
Page: 3

\6 OF W A -r, Oq
O t
Mr. Michael D. Mangum
CC Mangum Company, LLC
PO Box 31768
Raleigh, NC 27622
Dear Mr. Mangum:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W.
July 15, 2005 j
l �'es
Q/
Subject: NPDES General Permit NCG 160��JX
Certificate of Coverage NCG16 1-5
CC Mangum Company, LLC-PIani #3
Formerly The Mangum Group
Wake County
Division personnel have reviewed and approved your request to change your name under the General Permit,
received on July 1, 2005.
Please find enclosed the revised Certificate of Coverage. The terms and conditions contained in the General
Permit remain unchanged and in full effect. This revised Certificate of Coverage is issued under the requirements of
North Carolina General Statutes 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency.
If you have any questions, please contact the Stormwater Permitting Unit at [phone], extension 502.
Sincerely,
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY
BRADLEY BENNETT
Alan W. Klimek P. E.
cc: DWQ Central Files
,Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Stormwater Permitting Unit
N"o�,Ci rolina
V�r UM111
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: h2o.encstate.nc.us 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27604 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer —50% Recycledl10% Post Consumer Paper

r
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG160000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG160159
STORMWATER DISCHARGES
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
CC Mangum Company, LLC
is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater from a facility located at
CC Mangum Company -Asphalt Plant #3
6643 US HWY 64
RALEIGH
WAKE COUNTY
to receiving waters designated as an unnamed tributary to Milburnie Creek (Milburnie Lake) in the Neuse River
Basin in accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I,
II, III, IV, V, and VI of General Permit No. NCG 160000 as attached.
This certificate of coverage shall become effective July 15, 2005.
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect focthe duration of the General Permit.
Signed this day July 15, 2005. 4ORIGINAL SIGNED 8Y
i BRADLEY BENNETT l
Alan W. Klimek'Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

WArF9
Michael F. Easley
Governor
December 2, 2002
Mr. Kevin Hicks, President
The Mangum Group
3141 John Humphries Wynd
PO Box 31768
Raleigh, NC 27622
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Subject: General Permit No. NCG160000
Mangum Asphalt Plant-Knightdale
COC NCG160159
Wake County
Dear Mr. Hicks:
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
t, I•y� I I I
-
V
I
In accordance with your application for discharge permit received on September 3, 2002, we are forwarding
herewith the subject certificate of coverage to discharge under the subject state - NPDES general permit. This pen -nit is
issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215 .1 and the Memorandum of Agreement
between North Carolina and the US Environmental Protection agency dated December 6, 1983.
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are unacceptable to you,
you have the right to request an individual permit by submitting an individual permit application. Unless such demand is
made, this certificate of coverage shall be final and binding.
Please take notice that this certificate of coverage is not transferable except after notice to the Division of Water
Quality. The Division of Water Quality may require modification or revocation and reissuance of the certificate of
coverage.
This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by the Division
of Water Quality or permits required by the Division of Land Resources, Coastal Area Management Act or any other
Federal or Local governmental permit that may be required.
If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Mack Wiggins at telephone number 919/733-
5083 ext. 542.
Sincerely,
P�.�
_...,,.., ,uucka�AlanyVP�KM ekrl1Pt.E.
cc: CRaleigh Regional Office
Central Files
Stormwater and General Permits Unit Files
w ,A
NCDE.R
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748
Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 [phone]

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG160000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG160159
STORMWATER DISCHARGES
NATIONAL POLLUTAN'I' DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
The Mangum Group, Mangum Asphalt Plant
is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater from a facility located at
Mangum Asphalt Plant-Knighldale
1.5 mile east of Neuse River off US 64 west
Wake County
to receiving waters designated as an unnamed tributary to Milburnie Creek (Milburnie Lake) in the Neuse River
Basin in accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts 1,
11, III, IV, V, and VI of General Permit No. NCG160000 as attached.
This certificate of coverage shall become effective December 2, 2002
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit
J
Signed this day December 2, 2002 r�q`{'�i1�
C ",�--
ULL1AM^.1+�:1 i
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

t F-
co.'se
r '54
1�
91 w

±��'�
NC®ENR
rwywoe.o.r..o a�v,n rasa m
Division of Water Quality / Water Quality Section
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
NCG160000 ��
4 Q
FOR AGENCY USE ONLY
Date Received
Year Month Da
Certificate
or Coverage
Chec •
Amount
Q .
Permit kssigned to
'ZJ
NOTICE OF INTENT O i r IT, � 0 1J L l "I `I
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System application for coverage under General Permit
NCG160000: ; u OCT _ 42002 2 I
STORMWATER DISCHARGES associated with activities classified as: A-�\ _.
P g v�i /n7 _tIi ,-11_wl',-,L JFFirE
SIC 2951 Asphalt Paving Mixtures and Blocks _
' Standard I class) — itoge-
Note: Portable hot mix asphalt fadlities may begin operation upon submi of a otiltg Intent QQ '
implementation of a stormwater pollution prevention plan. Portable pl is ar defined as a-tegtporary
installation for the purpose of dedicating at least 75% of all matey' to � � c job orJJa ft"
continuously occupies a site for a period of six months or less. New pens s are recluth
submit a NOI 90 days prior to beginning industrial activities.
(Please print or type) qcF@q l ✓ y
1) Mailing address of owner/operator:
Name The Mangum Group
Street Address 3141 John Humphries Wynd, P.O. Box 31768
City Raleigh State NC ZIPCode 27622
Telephone No. [phone] Fax: -19191 510-6240
Address to which all permit correspondence will be mailed
2) Location of facility producing discharge:
Facility Name Mangum Asphalt Plant - Knightdale
Facility Contact Kevin Hicks
Street Address None at this time
City Knightdale State NC ZIP Code 27545
County Wake
Telephone No. (91 9) _ 783-53-00 Fax:
3) Physical Location Information:
Please provide a narrative description of how to get to the facility (use street names, state road numbers, and
distance and direction from a roadway intersection). Take I-440 to US64 East; past
the Neuse River bridge; on the left next to Wake Stone
(A copy of a county map or USGS quad sheet with facility clearly located w the map is required to be submitted with this application)
4) This NPDES Permit Application applies to which of the following:
® New or Proposed Facility
❑ Existing
5) Standard Industrial Classification:
Date operation is to begin March 1 ,_2003
Provide the 4 digit Standard Industrial Classification Code (SIC Code) that describes the primary industrial
activity at this facility
SIC Code: 2 9 5 1
Page 1 of 3
SWU-231-101701

NCG160000 N.O.I.
6) Provide a brief narrative description of the types of industrial activities and products manufactured at
thisfacility: _Asphalt-pa_ying._plant,__-_produces asphalt
7) Discharge points I Receiving waters:
How many discharge points (ditches, pipes, channels, etc.) convey stormwater from the property? _nne
What is the name of the body or bodies of water (creek, stream, river, lake, etc.) that the facility stormwater
discharges end up in? Unnamed trihutarlc_to_Mt ] hlrrn; p Taka-t-hpn Ne :_ Sf R; car _
If the site stormwater discharges to a separate storm sewer system, name the operator of the separate storm
sewer system (e.g. City of Raleigh municipal storm sewer). N/A - rural discharge _
8) Does this facility have any other NPDES permits?
IN No
❑ Yes
If yes, list the permit numbers for all current NPDES permits for this facility:
9) Does this facility have any Non -Discharge permits (ex: recycle permits)?
®:No
❑ Yes New plant has a
If yes, list the permit numbers for all current Non -Discharge permits for this facility: well & s tEtL C permit
pending w/Wake County
10) Does this facility employ any best management practices for stormwater control?
❑ No
® Yes
If yes, please briefly describe: Wet Dond: aQgianeS1_tQ_attenuate_t0-yr_stnrm
to pre-develoDmen levels and pass he 100-yr storm
11) Does this facility have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
ba:No
❑ Yes
If yes, when was it implemented? New faci 1 i
not constructed at this time
12) Does this facility employ wet scrubbers for air particulate removal?
X No ❑ Yes
13) Are vehicle maintenance activities occurring at this facility?
e9 No ❑ Yes
14) Hazardous Waste:
a) Is this facility a Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, or Disposal Facility?
Ed. No ❑ Yes
b) Is this facility a Small Quantity Generator (less than 1000 kg. of hazardous waste generated per month) of
hazardous waste?
®:No ❑ Yes
c) Is this facility a Large Quantity Generator (1000 kg. or more of hazardous waste generated per month) of
hazardous waste?
R. No ❑ Yes
Page 2 of 3
SWU-231-101701

NCG160000 N.O.I.
d) If you answered yes to questions b. or c., please provide the following information:
Type(s) of waste:
How is material stored:
Where is material stored: --
How many disposal shipments per year:
Name of transport / disposal vendor:_
Vendor address:
15) Certification:
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6 b (i) provides that:
Any person who knowingly makes any false statement, representation, or certification in any
application, record, report, plan or other document filed or required to be maintained under Article 21 or
regulations of the Environmental Management Commission implementing that Article, or who falsifies,
tampers with or knowingly renders inaccurate any recording or monitoring device or method required to
be operated or maintained under Article 21 or regulations of the Environmental Management
Commission implementing that Article, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to
exceed $10,000, or by imprisonment not to exceed six months, or by both. (18 U.S.C. Section 1001
provides a punishment by a fine of not more than $10,000 or imprisonment not more than 5 years, or
both, for a similar offense.)
I hereby request coverage under the referenced General Permit. I understand that coverage under this permit
will constitute the permit requirements for the discharge(s) and is enforceable in the same manner as an
individual permit.
I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in this application and that to the best of my knowledge
and belief such information is true, complete, and accurate.
Printed Name of Person Signing: _Kevin Hicks
Title: President, Mangum Asphalt Services
Signature of Applicant) (Date Signed)
Notice of Intent must be accompanied by a check or money order for $80.00 made payable to:
NCDENR
Final Checklist
This application will be returned as incomplete unless all of the following items have been included:
d Check for $80 made payable to NCDENR
ET' This completed application and all supporting documents
Ca' Copy of county map or USGS quad sheet with location of facility clearly marked on map
Mail the entire package to:
Stormwater and General Permits Unit
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Note
The submission of this document does not guarantee the issuance of an NPDES permit.
Page 3 of 3
SWU-231-101701

d
I
••�1
.� ! . T •o
-41
p '
IN
,Vt •1

Semi-annual Stormwater Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR)
for North Carolina DEMLR General Permit No. NCG160000 - Asphalt
Date submitted y/I-//I
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCG16 0 1 5 9
FACILITY NAME Fred Smith company- Knightdale Asphalt Plant
COUNTY Wake
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES Austin Pole
LABORATORY ESC Lab Sciences Lab Cert. # ENy375
Comments on sample collection or analysis:
None
Part A: Stormwater Benchmarks and Monitoring Results
SAMPLE COLLECTION YEAR Year 5 Period 2
SAMPLE PERIOD ■❑ Jan -June ❑ July -Dec
or ❑ Monthly' (month)
DISCHARGING TO CLASS ❑ORW ❑HQW ❑Trout ❑PNA
❑Zero -flow ❑Water supply ❑SA
[Mother class c: NSW
PLEASE REMEMBER TO SIGN ON THE REVERSE 4
Outfall No.
Date Sample
Collected
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches'
Total Suspended Solids C
Benchmarks =__>
-
-
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L
001
02/21/2019
0.73
45
Tli ,
ischd-rge-thrs period?'
PR 11 2p19
NTi'tA GT(p; l
;b IR S�
' Monthly sampling (instead of semi-annual) must begin with the second consecutive benchmark exceedance for the same parameter at the same outfall.
'For sampling periods with no discharge at any single outfall, you must still submit this discharge monitoring report with a checkmark here.
3The total precipitation must be recorded using data from an on -site rain gauge. Unattended sites may be eligible for a waiver of the rain gauge requirement.
" see General Permit text, Table 3, identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
Note: Results must be reported in numerical format. For example, do not report Below Detection Limit, BDL, <PQL, Non -detect, ND, or other similar non -
numerical format. When results are below the applicable limits, they must be reported in the format, "<XX mg/L", where XX is the numerical value of the
detection limit, reporting limit, quantitation limit, etc. in mg/L.
Note: If you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
Permit Date: 10/1/2014-9/31/2019 SWU-252, last revised 9/17/2014
Page 1 of 2

.,` Part B: Vehicle Maintenance Area Monitoring Results: only for facilities averaging > 55 gal of new oil per month.
❑ No discharge this period?'
Outfall No.
Date Sample
Collected'
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches'
Non -polar O&G by EPA
1664 (SGT-HEM)
Total Suspended Solids
Benchmarks ===>
_
15 mg/L
100 mg/L or 50 mg/0
Footnotes from Part A also apply to this Part B
Note: If you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. see General Permit text.
FOR PART AND PART B MONITORING RESULTS:
• A SINGLE BENCHMARK EXCEEDANCE TRIGGERS TIER 1 REQUIREMENTS.
2 EXCEEDANCES IN A ROW FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT THE SAME OUTFALL TRIGGER TIER 2 REQUIREMENTS.
TIER 3: HAS YOUR FACILITY HAD 4 OR MORE BENCHMARK EXCEEDANCES FOR THE SAME PARAMETER ATANY ONE OUTFALL? YES ❑ NO ❑C
IF YES, HAVE YOU CONTACTED THE DEMLR REGIONAL OFFICE AS REQUIRED BY THE PERMIT? YES ❑ NO Q
REGIONAL OFFICE CONTACT NAME:
Mail an original and one copy of this DMR including all "No Discharge" reports, within 30 days of receipt of the lab results for at end of monitoring period
.in the case of "No Discharge" reports) to:
Division of Water Resources
Attn: DWR Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
YOU MUST SIGN THIS CERTIFICATION FOR ANY INFORMATION REPORTED:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I
am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
y/s i
(Date)
Permit Date:10/1/2014-9/31/2019
SWU-252, last revised 9/17/2014
Page 2 of 2

STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO)
ANNUAL SUMMARY DATA MONITORING REPORT (DMR)
Calendar Year 2018
Revised 911712014 RECEIVE®
General Permit No. NCG160000
Certificate of Coverage No. NCG 16 0❑ 1❑ 19❑❑
CENTRAL FILES
DWR SECTION
This monitoring report summary is due to the DEMLR Regional Office no later than November 1 of
each year.
Facility Name: Fred Smith Company Knightdale Plant
County: Wake
Phone Number: (919 ) 783-5700
Total no. of SDOs monitored
Part A. Outfall No. 001 (use multiple sheets for multiple outfalls)
Is this outfall currently in Tier 2 (monitored monthly)? Yes No[Z]
Was this outfall ever in Tier 2 (monitored monthly) during the past year? Yes ❑ No ✓❑
If this outfall was in Tier 2 last year, why was monthly monitoring discontinued?
Enough consecutive samples below benchmarks to decrease frequency ❑
Received approval from DEMLR to reduce monitoring frequency ❑
Other ❑
Outfall 001
Total Rainfall
inches
00530
TSS, mg/L
Benchmark
N/A
501100
Date Sample Collected,
molddlyr
�
M
01/29/2018
1.89
31.6
10/26/2018
0.67
14.6
Pagel

Part B. On -Site Vehicle Maintenance Outfall No.
Is this,outfall currently in Tier 2 (monitored monthly)?
Was this outfall ever in Tier 2 (monitored monthly) during the past year?
If this,outfall was in Tier 2 last year, why was monthly monitoring discontinued?
Enough consecutive samples below benchmarks to decrease frequency ❑
Received approval from DEMLR to reduce monitoring frequency ❑
Other
Outfall
Total Rainfall
inches
00530
00556
TSS, mglL
Non-polar Oil &
Grease, mg/L
Benchmark
N/A
501100
15
Date Sample Collected,
molddlyr
Yes ❑ No[:]
Yes ❑ No[:]
Page 12

Semi-annual Stormwater Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR)
for North Carolina DEMLR General Per it o. NCG160000 -Asphalt
Date submitted i I /3
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCG16 0 1 5 9
FACILITY NAME Fred Smith Company - Knightdale Asphalt Plant
COUNTY Wake
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES Austin Pate
LABORATORY ESC Lab Sciences
Lab Cert. # ENV375
Comments on sample collection or analysis:
None
Part A: Stormwater Benchmarks and Monitoring Results
SAMPLE COLLECTION YEAR Year 5 Period 1
SAMPLE PERIOD ❑ Jan -June ®❑ July -Dec
or ❑ Monthly' (month)
DISCHARGING TO CLASS ❑ORW ❑HQW ❑Trout ❑PNA
❑Zero -flow ❑Water Supply ❑SA
Mother class C; NSW
PLEASE REMEMBER TO SIGN ON THE REVERSE -;N
outfall No.
Date Sample
Collected
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches'
Total Suspended Solids
Benchmarks =__>
-
-
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L
001
10/26/2018
0.67
14.6
No discharge this period?Z
RECEIVED
JAN 18 2019
CENTRAL FILEZ
DWR SECTIOi'd
' Monthly sampling (instead of semi-annual) must begin with the second consecutive benchmark exceedance for the same parameter at the same outfall.
' For sampling periods with no discharge at any single outfall, you must still submit this discharge monitoring report with a checkmark here.
'The total precipitation must be recorded using data from an on -site rain gauge. Unattended sites may be eligible for a waiver of the rain gauge requirement.
4 See General Permit text, Table 3, identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
Note: Results must be reported in numerical format. For example, do not report Below Detection Limit, BDL, <PQL, Non -detect, ND, or other similar non -
numerical format. When results are below the applicable limits, they must be reported in the format, "<XX mg/L", where XX is the numerical value of the
detection limit, reporting limit, quantitation limit, etc. in mg/L.
Note: if you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier Z or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
Permit Date: 10/1/2014-9/31/2019 SWU-252, last revised 9/17/2014
Page 1 of 2

Part 13: Vehicle Maintenance Area Monitoring Results: only for facilities averaging > 55 gal of new oil per month.
n No discharge this period?Z
Outfall No.
Date Sample
r
Collected
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches
Non -polar O&G by EPA
1664 (SGT-HEM)
Total Suspended Solids
Benchmarks ===>
15 mg/L
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L
Footnotes from Part A also apply to this Part B
Note: if you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
FOR PART A AND PART B MONITORING RESULTS:
• A SINGLE BENCHMARK EXCEEDANCE TRIGGERS TIER 1 REQUIREMENTS.
• 2 EXCEEDANCES IN A ROW FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT THE SAME OUTFALL TRIGGER TIER 2 REQUIREMENTS.
• TIER 3: HAS YOUR FACILITY HAD 4 OR MORE BENCHMARK EXCEEDANCES FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT ANY ONE OUTFALL? YES ❑ NO Q■
IF YES, HAVE YOU CONTACTED THE DEMLR REGIONAL OFFICE AS REQUIRED BY THE PERMIT? YES ❑ NO ❑■
REGIONAL OFFICE CONTACT NAME:
Mail an original and one copy of this DMR including all "No Discharge" reports within 30 days of receipt of the lab results for at end of monitoring period
in the case of "No Discharge" reports/ to:
Division of Water Resources
Attn: DWR Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
YOU MUST SIGN THIS CERTIFICATION FOR ANY INFORMATION REPORTED:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I
am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
twgnasure or rerm¢reel
(Date)
Permit Date:10/1/2014-9/31/2019 SWU-252, last revised 9/17/2014
Page 2 of 2

Ij
Semi-annual Stormwater Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR)
for North Carolina DEMLR General Permit No. NCG160000 - Asphalt
Date submitted 12/17/14
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCG16 0159 _ _
FACILITY NAME Fred Smith Company - I<nicthtdale Plant
COUNTY Wake
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES Matthew James
LABORATORY ESC Lab Sciences Lab Cert. a ENV375
Comments on sample collection or analysis:
None
Part A: Stormwater Benchmarks and Monitoring Results
SAMPLE COLLECTION YEAR Year 1 Period 1
SAMPLE PERIOD ❑ Jan -June [X] July -Dec
or ❑ Monthly' (month)
DISCHARGING TO CLASS ❑ORW ❑HQW ❑Trout ❑PNA
❑Zero -flow ❑Water Supply ❑SA
[x]Other C; NSW
PLEASE REMEMBER TO SIGN ON THE REVERSE 4
❑ No discharge this period:
Outfall No.
Date Sample
Collected,
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches
Total Suspended Solids
Benchmarks ===>
-
-
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L
001
11-17-14
0.22
38
RECjE1V1E0
p�G 1 � 2p14
DTRP� TION
N1R gEC
' Monthly sampling (instead of semi-annual) must begin with the second consecutive benchmark exceedance for the same parameter at the same outfall.
Z For sampling periods with no discharge at any single outfall, you must still submit this discharge monitoring report with a checkmark here.
'The total precipitation must be recorded using data from an on -site rain gauge. Unattended sites may be eligible for a waiver of the rain gauge requirement.
' See General Permit text, Table 3, identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
Note: Results must be reported in numerical format. For example, do not report Below Detection Limit, BDL, <PQL, Non -detect, ND, or other similar non -
numerical format. When results are below the applicable limits, they must be reported in the format, "<XX me/L", where XX is the numerical value of the
detection limit, reporting limit, quantitation limit, etc. in mg/L.
Note: If you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 1, or Tier 3 responses. see General Permit text.
Permit Date: 10/1/2014-9/31/2019 SWU-252, last revised 9/17/2014
.. Page 1 of 2

Part B: Vehicle Maintenance Area Monitoring Results: only for facilities averaging > 55 gal of new oil per month.
No discharge this period?Z
Outfall No.
Date Sample
Collected'
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches;
Non -polar O&G by EPA
1664 (SGT-HEM)
Total Suspended Solids
Benchmarks =__>
_
-
15 mg/L
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L
Footnotes from Part A also apply to this Part B
Note: If you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
FOR PART A AND PART B MONITORING RESULTS:
• A SINGLE BENCHMARK EXCEEDANCE TRIGGERS TIER 1 REQUIREMENTS.
• 2 EXCEEDANCES IN A ROW FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT THE SAME OUTFALL TRIGGER TIER 2 REQUIREMENTS.
• TIER 3: HAS YOUR FACILITY HAD 4 OR MORE BENCHMARK EXCEEDANCES FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT ANYONE OUTFALL? YES ❑ NO [X]
IF YES, HAVE YOU CONTACTED THE DEMUR REGIONAL OFFICE AS REQUIRED BY THE PERMIT? YES ❑ NO ❑
REGIONAL OFFICE CONTACT NAME:
Mail an original and one copy of this DMR, including all "No Discharge" reports, within 30 days of receipt of the lab results for at end of monitoring period
in the case of "No Discharge" reports) to:
Division of Water Resources
Attn: DWR Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
YOU MUST SIGN THIS CERTIFICATION FOR ANY INFORMATION REPORTED:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly. responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I
am awapq that there are.significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
(bate)
Permit Date: 10/1/2014-9/31/2019 SWU-252, last revised 9/17/2014
Page 2 of 2

Semi-annual Stormwater Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR)
for North Carolina DEMLR General Permit No. NCG160000 - Asphalt
Date submitted 12/17/14
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCG16 0159 SAMPLE COLLECTION YEAR Year 1 Period 1
FACILITY NAME Fred Smith Company - Knightdale Plant SAMPLE PERIOD ❑ Jan -June [X]July-Dec
COUNTY Wake or ❑ Monthly' (month)
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES Matthew James DISCHARGING TO CLASS ❑ORW ❑HQW ❑Trout ❑PNA
LABORATORY ESC Lab Sciences Lab Cert. q ENV375 ❑Zero -flow ❑Water Supply ❑SA
Comments on sample collection or analysis: [X]Other C; NSW
None
PLEASE REMEMBER TO SIGN ON THE REVERSE 4
Part A: Stormwater Benchmarks and Monitoring Results
No discharge this period:
Outfall No.
Date Sample
,
Collected
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches
Total Suspended Solids
Benchmarks ===>
-
-
100 mg/L or 50 mg/0
001
11-17-14
0.22
38
Monthly sampling (instead of semi-annual) must begin with the second consecutive benchmark exceedance for the same parameter at the same outfall.
For sampling periods with no discharge at any single outfall, you must still submit this discharge monitoring report with a checkmark here.
'The total precipitation must be recorded using data from an on -site rain gauge. Unattended sites may be eligible for a waiver of the rain gauge requirement.
"See General Permit text, Table 3, identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
Note: Results must be reported in numerical format. For example, do not report Below Detection Limit, BDL, <PQL, Non -detect, ND, or other similar non -
numerical format. When results are below the applicable limits, they must be reported in the format, "<XX ma/L", where XX is the numerical value of the
detection limit, reporting limit, quantitation limit, etc. in mg/L.
Note: If you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
Permit Date: 10/1/2014-9/31/2019 SWU-252, last revised 9/17/2014
Page 1 of 2

Part B: Vehicle Maintenance Area Monitoring Results: only for facilities averaging > 55 gal of new oil per month.
No discharge this period?z
Outfall No.
Date Sample
Collected,
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches;
Non -polar O&G by EPA
1664 (SGT-HEM)
Total Suspended Solids
Benchmarks =__>
_
-
15 mg/L
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L
Footnotes from Part A also apply to this Part B
Note: If you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
FOR PART A AND PART B MONITORING RESULTS:
• A SINGLE BENCHMARK EXCEEDANCE TRIGGERS TIER 1 REQUIREMENTS.
• 2 EXCEEDANCES IN A ROW FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT THE SAME OUTFALL TRIGGER TIER 2 REQUIREMENTS.
• TIER 3: HAS YOUR FACILITY HAD 4 OR MORE BENCHMARK EXCEEDANCES FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT ANY ONE OUTFALL? YES ❑ NO [X]
IF YES, HAVE YOU CONTACTED THE DEMUR REGIONAL OFFICE AS REQUIRED BY THE PERMIT? YES ❑ NO ❑
REGIONAL OFFICE CONTACT NAME:
Mail an original and one copy of this DMR including all "No Discharge" reports within 30 days of receipt of the lab results for at end of monitoring period
in the case of "No Discharge" reports) to:
Division of Water Resources
Attn: DWR Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
YOU MUST SIGN THIS CERTIFICATION FOR ANY INFORMATION REPORTED:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I
am aware at there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
(Si nat o r rmittee) (( ate
Permit Date: 10/1/2014-9/31/2019 SWU-252, last revised 9/17/2014
Page 2 of 2

STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO)
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCGI60000
DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT (DMR)
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCG160159 SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING CALENDAR YEAR: 2014 —Year 5
Period 2
(This monitoring report is due at the Division no later than 30 days from the date
the facility receives the sampling results from the laboratory.)
FACILITY NAME: Knightdale Plant: Plant # 3 - Fred Smith Company COUNTY: Wake
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES: Matthew James - Withers & Ravenel Inc. PHONE NO. (919) — 783-5700
CERTIFIED LABORATORY: ESC Lab Sciences
Lab # ENV375
Monitoring Requirements
Outfall
No.
Date
Sample Collected,
mo/dd/vr
Total Rainfall,
inches
00530
00400
00556
Total Suspended Solids, mg/I
pH,
Standard units
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons, mg/l
EPA Method 1664 SGT-HEM
Benchmark
-
-
100
Within 6.0 — 9.0
15
001
03/07/14
1.72
44
6.7
<5.6
If a value is in excess of the benchmark, or outside the benchmark range (for pH), you must implement the Tier 1 or Tier 2 responses in the General Permit.
Mail original and one copy to:
Division of Water Quality
Attn: Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
YOU MUST SIGN THIS CERTIFICATION FOR ANY INFORMATION REPORTED:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete.
I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
(Signature of Permittee)
03/28/14
(Date)
S W U-252-051409
Page l of 1