NCG140269_COMPLETE FILE - HISTORICAL_20150727

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SKEET
NCG PERMITS
PER NO.
/v u&
DOC TYPE,
HISTORICAL FILE
❑ MONITORING REPORTS
DOC DATE
❑ jo
YYYYM M DD

Pat McCrory
Governor
NC®ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and
July 27, 2015
9i2,Y'lif
Natural Resources
JAMES WASHBURN, ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE MANAGER
S. T. WOOTEN CORPORATION
PO Box 2408
WILSON, NC 27894
Dear Permittee:
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Subject: Multimedia Compliance Inspection
S. T. Wooten Corporation/Apex
Plant #18
Chatham County
Department of Environment and Natural Resources staff from the Raleigh Regional Office'conducted a
multimedia compliance inspection of S. T. Wooten Corporation/Apex Plant #18 on June 29, 2015 for
permits and programs administered by the following Divisions:
Division of Air
Division of Energy,
Division of Water
Quality
Mineral, and Land
Resources
Resources
We appreciate your cooperation during the inspection and hope that you have enjoyed the benefit of our
initiative to provide a single inspector capable of handling multiple areas of environmental compliance at
your facility. The results of each applicable inspection and any associated response actions or necessary
corrective measures are detailed in the inspection letters/reports attached to this transmittal sheet. If a
Division report is not attached, you may assume compliance with that particular Division's rules and
regulations at the time of inspection.
If you have any questions regarding this multimedia inspection or the results of each program inspection,
please contact the Raleigh Regional Office at [phone] and ask to speak with the appropriate
Division staff. Thank you for your cooperation.
encl: Air Quality Inspection Report
Stormwater Inspection Report
cc: DAQ RRO Files
DWR RRO Files
DEMLR RRO Files
NCDENR Raleigh Regional Office
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Location: 3800 Barrett Drive, Raleigh North Carolina 27609
Phone: [phone] Fax:[phone]
An Equal Opportunity 1 Alfirmalive Action Employer- Made in pan with recycled paper

NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF
AIR QUALITY
Inspection Report
Date: 06/29/2015
Facility Data
S. T. Wooten Corporation/Apex Plant -Plant No. 18
12750 Highway 64 East
Apex, NC 27502
Lat: 35d 44.2788m Long: 78d 57.6923m
SIC: 3273 / Ready -Mixed Concrete
NAICS: 32732 / Ready -Mix Concrete Manufacturing
Contact
James Washburn
Environmental
Compliance Manager
Comments: y�
Inspector's Signature:
Date of Signature:
Total Actual emissions in
Contact Data
Authorized Cont
Raleigh Regional Office
S. T. Wooten Corporation/Apex Plant -Plant No. 18
NC Facility ID 1900099
County/FIPS: Chatham/037
Data
Permit 08704 / RO6
Issued 4/3/2013
Expires 3/31/2018
Classification Small
Permit Status Active
Current Permit Application(s) None
Technical Contact I SIP
Program Applicability
Hank Butts James Washburn
Vice President Environmental
[phone] Compliance Manager
[phone]
/� / Compliance Data
Inspection Date 06/29/2015
Inspector's Name Lori Ann Phillips
�? Operating Status Operating
Compliance Code Compliance - inspection
Action Code PCE
0 if On -Site Inspection Result Compliance
TSP
S02
NOX
VOC
CO
PM10
* HAP
2012
0.8300
---
---
---
0.3800
0.0480
2007
1.44
---
---
0.6600
0.0344
We Year Violation History: None
Date Letter Tvoe
Date Test Results
Rule Violated
None
Test Method(s)
* Hiehest HAP Emitted
Violation Resolution Date
Source(s) Tested
(1) DIRECTIONS: From Raleigh Regional Office, take I-440 heading south to Highway 64. Take the Highway 64/Tryon
Road exit number 98B towards Pittsboro. Once on Highway 64 West, travel approximately 9 miles to Builders First Source on
the left (south) side of Highway 64 in Apex. The concrete plant is locatedjust to the right (west) of Builders First Source.

(I1) FACILITY DESCRIPTION: The facility is a truck mix concrete batch plant with a maximum output of 120 cubic yards per
hour.
(III) INSPECTION SUMMARY: On June 29, 2015, I (Lori Ann Phillips) met with Jimmy Washburn, Environmental
Compliance Manager, and Michael Barefoot, Plant Manager, to conduct a multimedia compliance inspection at S. T. Wooten
Corporation/Apex Plant #18. We first reviewed the facility's air permit and then took a brief tour of the facility. There had been
heavy rains over the weekend which lead to cement order cancellations during the time of the inspection; therefore, I was unable to
witness a truck being loaded. However, Roy Doster of this office'observed a truck being loaded in February of this year and noted
no issues. From an air quality standpoint, the facility appeared to be well maintained.
A hard hat, safety vest, safety glasses, and safety shoes are required for this inspection.
(IV) PERMITTED EMISSION SOURCES:
Emission
Emission Source
Control
Control System
Source ID
Description
System ID
Description
Truck Mix Concrete
Batch Plant (120 cubic yards per hour
maximum throughput)
SIL 181,
two compartment cement / flyash silo (side
CD-RA200-18
bagfilter (2,148 square
SIL 182
"A" has a capacity of 109.4 tons and side
feet of filter area)
has a capacityof 36.5 tons)
N/A
N/A
BAT 181
cement weigh batcher
TLP 181
BAT-182
track loading point
aggregate weigh batcher
All equipment was viewed at the time of this inspection. The equipment was not operating at the time
of this inspection. No additional permitted sources were observed.
(V) SPECIFIC CONDITIONS AND LIMITATIONS:
Al. Any air emission sources or control devices authorized to construct and operate above must be
operated and maintained in accordance with the provisions contained herein. The Permittee shall
comply with applicable Environmental Management Commission Regulations, including Title
15A North Carolina Administrative Code (NCAC), Subchapter 2D .0202, 2D .0515, 2D .0521, 2D
.0535, 2D .0540, 2D .0611 and 2D .1806. In Compliance. This facility appears to be in
compliance with all applicable state and federal regulations. Further details follow below.
A2. PERMIT RENEWAL AND EMISSION INVENTORY REOUIREMENT - The Permittee, at least
90 days prior to the expiration date of this permit, shall request permit renewal by letter in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2Q .0304(d) and (f). Pursuant to 15A NCAC 2Q .0203(i). In
Compliance. The facility contacts were reminded of this requirement.
A3. PARTICULATE CONTROL REQUIREMENT - As required by 15A NCAC 2D .0515
"Particulates from Miscellaneous Industrial Processes," particulate matter emissions from the
emission sources shall not exceed allowable emission rates. In Compliance. The facility uses a
central baghouse to control particulate emissions. This system is an effective control for
particulate matter.

e . . i
A4. VISIBLE EMISSIONS CONTROL REQUIREMENT - As required by 15A NCAC 213.0521
"Control of Visible Emissions," visible emissions from the emission sources, manufactured after
July 1, 1971, shall not be more than 20 percent opacity when averaged over a six -minute period,
except that six -minute periods averaging not more than 87 percent opacity may occur not more than
once in any hour nor more than four times in any 24-hour period. However, sources which must
comply with 15A NCAC 2D .0524 "New Source Performance Standards" or .1110 "National
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants" must comply with applicable visible emissions
requirements contained therein. In Compliance. No VE was observed at the time of the
inspection. However, the facility was not operating (loading trucks) at the time of the
inspection. Future inspectors should coordinate with the facility contact to find a time to best
observe truck loading, keeping in mind that weather may dictate the schedule for the day.
A5. NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT - As required by 15A NCAC 2D .0535, the Permittee of a
source of excess emissions that last for more than four hours and that results from a malfunction, a
breakdown of process or control equipment or any other abnormal conditions. Notify the Director
by the next business day. In Compliance. The facility contacts stated that there have been no
such occurrences.
A6. FUGITIVE DUST CONTROL REQUIREMENT - As required by 15A NCAC 213.0540
"Particulates from Fugitive Dust Emission Sources," the Permittee shall not cause or allow fugitive
dust emissions to cause or contribute to substantive complaints or excess visible emissions beyond
the property boundary. In Compliance. No fugitive dust was observed outside property
boundaries and no complaints have been filed against this facility.
A7. FABRIC FILTER REQUIREMENTS including cartridge filters baghouses and other dry filter
particulate collection devices - As required by 15A NCAC 2D .0611, particulate matter emissions
shall be controlled as described in the permitted equipment list.
a. Inspection and Maintenance Requirements - To comply with the provisions of this permit
and ensure that emissions do not exceed the regulatory limits, the Permittee shall perform,
at a minimum, an annual (for each 12 month period following the initial inspection)
internal inspection of each bagfilter system. In addition, the Permittee shall perform
periodic inspections and maintenance as recommended by the equipment manufacturer. In
Compliance. The bagfilter system is checked daily and magnehetic gauge readings
are recorded in an onsite logbook. Mr. Barefoot indicated that the bags are shaken
approximately weekly.
b. Recordkeeping Requirements - The results. of all inspections and any variance from
manufacturer's recommendations or from those given in this permit (when applicable) shall
be investigated with corrections made and dates of actions recorded in a logbook. Records
of all maintenance activities shall be recorded in the logbook. The logbook (in written or
electronic format) shall be kept on -site and made available to DAQ personnel upon
request. In Compliance. All maintenance and daily checks are entered into the site
logbook. Multiple years of logbooks were available for review.
A8. CONTROL AND PROHIBITION OF ODOROUS EMISSIONS - As required by 15A NCAC 2D
.1806. "Control and Prohibition of Odorous Emissions" the Permittee shall not operate the facility
without implementing management practices or installing and operating odor control equipment
sufficient to prevent odorous emissions from the facility from causing or contributing to

objectionable odors beyond the facility's boundary. In Compliance. No objectionable odors
were detected either inside or outside property boundaries. No complaints are on file.
(VI) GENERAL PERMIT CONDITIONS:
B2. RECORDS RETENTION REQUIREMENT - Any records required by the conditions of this permit shall
be kept on site for at least 2 years and made available to DAQ personnel for inspection upon request.
In Compliance. All required records are kept.onsite and readily available. The facility has multiple
years of data available.
B5. REPORTING REQUIREMENT - Any of the following that would result in previously unpermitted, new,
or increased emissions must be reported to the Regional Supervisor, DAQ.
In Compliance. No new equipment has been added to the facility since the last permit renewal or
modification.
B14. PERMIT RETENTION REQUIREMENT - The Permittee shall retain a current copy of the air permit at the
site. The Permittee must make available to personnel of the DAQ, upon request, the current copy of the air
permit for the site.
In Compliance. The facility contact presented a copy of the current air permit, 087041106,
during the inspection.
B15. CLEAN AIR ACT SECTION 112(r) REQUIREMENTS - If the Permittee is required to develop and
register a risk management plan pursuant to Section 112(r) of the Federal Clean Air Act, then the Permittee
is required to register this plan in accordance with 40 CFR Part 68.
Not Applicable — This program does not apply to this facility.
(YII) EXEMPT EMISSIONS SOURCES: No exempt/insignificant sources were observed during the inspection.
(VIM) 112r APPLICABILITY: This regulation is not applicable to this facility.
(IX) STACK TEST REVIEW: There are no stack tests on record for this facility.
(X) EMISSIONS INVENTORY REVIEW: There are no notable data jumps to investigate from the facility's 2007 and
2012 air emissions inventories.
(XI) COMPLIANCE HISTORY: On 5/18/2005 a NOV/NRE was issued to this facility for operating with ineffective
control.
(XII) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: At the time of this inspection, S. T. Wooten Corporation/Apex
Plant #18 appeared to be in compliance with all permitting requirements. I recommend the facility be re- inspected within
two years.

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG140269 Effective: 07/01/11
Expiration: 06/30/16 Owner:
S T Wooten Corporation
SOC: Effective:
Expiration: Facility:
S T Wooten - Apex
County: Chatham
12816 Hwy 64 E
Region: Raleigh
Apex NC 27502
Contact Person: Richard Vick
Title: VP
Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Certification:
Phone:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
On -site representative
James Washburn
252-290-5912
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 06/29/2015 Time:
10:OOAM Exit Time:
11:30AM
/Entry
Primary Inspector: Lori Ann Phillips
Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type:, Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Ready Mix Concrete StormwaterMastewater Discharge CDC
Facility Status: ® Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
® Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCG140269 Owner- Facility: S T Wooten Corporation '
Inspection Date: 06/29/2015 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
On June 29, 2015, a multi -media pilot program inspection was conducted by Lori Ann Phillips (DAQ) to evaluate
compliance with the NPDES stormwater and Air Quality permits issued to the facility.
The stormwater pollution prevention plan (SPPP) was reviewed and found to contain all components necessary for
compliance. The facility was reminded to keep this document updated annually and note all changes and dates of these
changes within the records. Secondary containment at the site was viewed and found to be adequate. The facility was
reminded to document all stormwater releases from the containment area.
Analytical and qualitative monitoring have been performed at regular intervals; however, only a couple analytical monitoring
samples have been collected in recent years due to no flow at the outfall. At the time fo the inspection, flow at the outfall
was observed; therefore, the facilty was reminded of their quarterly analytical monitoring requirements.
The facility uses a sprinkler system to wet sand and aggregates. At the time of the inspection, some runoff from the
sprinkler spray was observed leaving the process area between a pump house and the sand pile. The facility added earthen
material and created a berm to prevent this runoff. This was completed prior to my departure from the facility.
Overall, the site was clean and well -kept and is managed in such a way to meet the overall intent of the stormwater permit.
Good use of structural BMPs was noted.
Air quality inspection results are included under separate report.
Page: 2

N
Permit: NCG140269 Owner • Facility: S T Woolen corporation
Inspection Date: 06/29/2015 Inspection Type: compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
®
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
®
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
®
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
®
❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
®
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
®
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
®
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
M
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
i
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented? M ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: There was a washed out area on the northeast side of the vard between the sand Dile and Dum
house when I first arrived on site. Prior to my departure, it was bermed up to prevent stormwater
and water used to wet down the sand and aggregate from leaving the site. The wash pond at the
facility is relocated from time to time as needed. In its current location, an overflow would travel
downhill to the sedimentation pond where the facility's only outfall (Outfall 01) is located. PH
correction was being implemented at the pond and the current reading was 7.2.
Qualitative Monitoring
- Yea No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: The last qualitative monitoring was conducted on January 5 2015. The facility was reminded to
conduct qualitative monitoring on a semi-annual basis.
Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
Comment: The last analytical monitoring for Outfall 01 was conducted on ADNI 4. 2014 and Darameters
were within_ permit limits. At the time of the inspection, the outfall had flow. The facility was
reminded to try to collect its analytical samples quarterly and keep record at the facility. There
were records indicating that no flow had occurred for many previous quarters.
Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it property documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ ® ❑
Page: 3

Permit: NCG140269 Owner- Facility: S T Wooten Corporation
Inspection Date: 06/29/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit Routine
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stonnwater) discharges? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: A rain gauge was located at the top of a Dole near the pond It was suggested that this rain gauge
be moved to a better location for rain collection.
Page: 4

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory Donald R. van der Vaart
Governor Secretary
July 27, 2015
JAMES WASHBURN, ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE MANAGER
S. T. WOOTEN CORPORATION
PO Box 2408
WILSON, NC 27894
Subject: Multimedia Compliance Inspection
S. T. Wooten Corporation/Apex
Plant #18
Chatham County
Dear Pemuttee:
Department of Environment and Natural Resources staff from the Raleigh Regional Office conducted a
multimedia compliance inspection of S. T. Wooten Corporation/Apex Plant #18 on June 29, 2015 for
permits and programs administered by the following Divisions:
Division of Air
Division of Energy,
Division of Water
Quality
Mineral, and Land
Resources
Resources
We appreciate your cooperation during the inspection and hope that you have enjoyed the benefit of our
initiative to provide a single inspector capable of handling multiple areas of environmental compliance at
your facility. The results of each applicable inspection and any associated response actions or necessary
corrective measures are detailed in the inspection letters/reports attached to this transmittal sheet. If a
Division report is not attached, you may assume compliance with that particular Division's rules and
regulations at the time of inspection.
If you have any questions regarding this multimedia inspection or the results of each program inspection,
please contact the Raleigh Regional Office at [phone] and ask to speak with the appropriate
Division staff. Thank you for your cooperation.
encl: Air Quality Inspection Report
Stormwater Inspection Report
cc: DAQ RRO Files
DWR RRO Files
DEMLR RRO Files
NCDENR Raleigh Regional Office
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Location: 3800 Barrett Drive, Raleigh North Carolina 27609
Phone: [phone] Fax:[phone]
An Enual Opportunity 1AKrmative Acron Emplcyer- Made in'part with recycled paper

/-2q
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF
AIR QUALITY
Inspection Report
Date: 06/29/2015
Facility Data
S. T. Wooten Corporation/Apex Plant -Plant No. 18
12750 Highway 64 East
Apex, NC 27502
Lat: 35d 44.2788m Long: 78d 57.6923m
SIC: 3273 / Ready -Mixed Concrete
NAICS: 32732 / Ready -Mix Concrete Manufacturing
Contact Data
Facility Contact
Authorized Contact
Technical Contact
James Washburn
Hank Butts
James Washburn
Environmental
Vice President
Environmental
Compliance Manager
(252) 291=5165
Compliance Manager
[phone]
[phone]
Raleigh Regional Office
S. T. Wooten Corporation/Apex Plant -Plant No. 18
NC Facility ID 1900099
County/FIPS: Chatham/037
Permit Data
Permit 08704 / R06
Issued 4/3/2013
Expires 3/31/2018
Classification Small
Permit Status Active
Current Permit Application(s) None
SH'
Program Applicability
Comments: Compliance Data
�r�Plianc.¢. — ��e-ihi�ec� i.�
Inspection Date 06/29/2015
Inspector's Name Lori Ann Phillips
Inspector's Signature: ,� /f Operating Status Operating
Compliance Code Compliance - inspection
Action Code I PCE .
Date of Signature: (9 - J-9 - & 0 if On -Site Inspection Result Compliance
Tnfal Artnal a n T(1NCNAAB•
TSP
S02
NOX
VOC
CO
PM10
*HAP
2012
0.8300
---
---
---
0.3800
0.0480
2007
1.44
---
---
---
---
0.6600
0.0344
ive Year Violation History: None
Date Letter Type
Date Test Results
Rule Violated
None
Test Method(s)
0
* Highest HAP Emitted
Violation Resolution Date
Source(s) Tested
(1) DIRECTIONS: From Raleigh Regional Office, take I-440 heading south to Highway 64. Take the Highway 64/Tryon
Road exit number 98B towards Pittsboro. Once on Highway 64 West, travel approximately 9 miles to Builders First Source on
the left (south) side of Highway 64 in Apex. The concrete plant is located just to the right (west) of Builders First Source.

(II) FACILITY DESCRIPTION: The facility is a truck mix concrete batch plant with a maximum output of 120 cubic yards per
hour.
(III) INSPECTION SUMMARY: On June 29, 2015, I (Lori Ann Phillips) met with Jimmy Washburn, Environmental
Compliance Manager, and Michael Barefoot, Plant Manager, to conduct a multimedia compliance inspection at S. T. Wooten
Corporation/Apex Plant #18. We first reviewed the facility's air permit and then took a brief tour of the facility. There had been
heavy rains over the weekend which lead to cement order cancellations during the time of the inspection; therefore, I was unable to
witness a truck being loaded. However, Roy Doster of this office observed a truck being loaded in February of this year and noted
no issues. From an air quality standpoint, the facility appeared to be well maintained.
A hard hat, safety vest, safety glasses, and safety shoes are required for this inspection.
(IV) PERMITTED EMISSION SOURCES:
Emission
Emission Source
Control
Control System
Source ID
Description
System ID
Description
Truck Mix Concrete Batch Plant (120 cubic yards per hour maximum throughput)
SIL 18� 1,
compartment cement / flyash silo (side
CD-RA200-18
bagfilter (2,148 square
SIL 182
rt�wo
" has a capacity of 109.4 tons and side
feet of filter area)
" has a capacity of 36.5 tons)
BAT-181
cement weigh batcher
TLP 181 truck loading point
BAT-182 aggregate weigh batcher
N/A
N/A
All equipment was viewed at the time of this inspection. The equipment was not operating at the time
of this inspection. No additional permitted sources were observed.
(V) SPECIFIC CONDITIONS AND LIMITATIONS:
Al. Any air emission sources or control devices authorized to construct and operate above must be
operated and maintained in accordance with the provisions contained herein. The Permittee shall
comply with applicable Environmental Management Commission Regulations, including Title
15A North Carolina Administrative Code (NCAC), Subchapter 2D .0202, 2D .0515, 2D .0521, 2D
.0535, 2D .0540, 2D .0611 and 2D .1806. In Compliance. This facility appears to be in
compliance with all applicable state and federal regulations. Further details follow below.
A2. PERMIT RENEWAL AND EMISSION INVENTORY REQUIREMENT - The Permittee, at least
90 days prior to the expiration date of this permit, shall request permit renewal by letter in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2Q .0304(d) and (f). Pursuant to 15A NCAC 2Q .0203(i). In
Compliance. The facility contacts were reminded of this requirement.
A3. PARTICULATE CONTROL REQUIREMENT - As required by 15A NCAC 2D .0515
"Particulates from Miscellaneous Industrial Processes," particulate matter emissions from the
emission sources shall not exceed allowable emission rates. In Compliance. The facility uses a
central baghouse to control particulate emissions. This system is an effective control for
particulate matter.

A4. VISIBLE EMISSIONS CONTROL REQUIREMENT - As required by 15A NCAC 2D .0521
"Control of Visible Emissions," visible emissions from the emission sources, manufactured after
July 1, 1971, shall not be more than 20 percent opacity when averaged over a six -minute period,
except that six -minute periods averaging not more than 87 percent opacity may occur not more than
once in any hour nor more than four times in any 24-hour period. However, sources which must
comply with 15A NCAC 2D .0524 "New Source Performance Standards" or. 1110 "National
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants" must comply with applicable visible emissions
requirements contained therein. In Compliance. No VE was observed at the time of the
inspection. However, the facility was not operating (loading trucks) at the time of the
inspection. Future inspectors should coordinate with the facility contact to find a time to best
observe truck loading, keeping in mind that weather may dictate the schedule for the day.
A5. NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT - As required by 15A NCAC 2D .0535, the Permittee of a
source of excess emissions that last for more than four hours and that results from a malfunction, a
breakdown of process or control equipment or any other abnormal conditions. Notify the Director
by the next business day. In Compliance. The facility contacts stated that there have been no
such occurrences.
A6. FUGITIVE DUST CONTROL REQUIREMENT -As required by 15A NCAC 2D .0540
"Particulates from Fugitive Dust Emission Sources," the Permittee shall not cause or allow fugitive
dust emissions to cause or contribute to substantive complaints or excess visible emissions beyond
the property boundary. In Compliance. No fugitive dust was observed outside property
boundaries and no complaints have been filed against this facility.
A7. FABRIC FILTER REQUIREMENTS including cartridge filters baehouses and other dry filter
particulate collection devices - As required by 15A NCAC 2D .0611, particulate matter emissions
shall be controlled as described in the permitted equipment list.
a. Inspection and Maintenance Requirements - To comply with the provisions of this permit
and ensure that emissions do not exceed the regulatory limits, the Permittee shall perform,
at a minimum, an annual (for each 12 month period following the initial inspection)
internal inspection of each bagfilter system. In addition, the Permittee shall perform
periodic inspections and maintenance as recommended by the equipment manufacturer. In
Compliance. The bagfilter system is checked daily and magnehelic gauge readings
are recorded in an onsite logbook Mr. Barefoot indicated that the bags are shaken
approximately weekly.
b. Recordkeeping Requirements - The results.of all inspections and any variance from
manufacturer's recommendations or from those given in this permit (when applicable) shall
be investigated with corrections made and dates of actions recorded in a logbook. Records
of all maintenance activities shall be recorded in the logbook. The logbook (in written or
electronic format) shall be kept on -site and made available to DAQ personnel upon
request. In Compliance. All maintenance and daily checks are entered into the site
logbook. Multiple years of logbooks were available for review.
A8. CONTROL AND PROHIBITION OF ODOROUS EMISSIONS - As required by 15A NCAC 2D
.1806 "Control and Prohibition of Odorous Emissions" the Permittee shall not operate the facility
without implementing management practices or installing and operating odor control equipment
sufficient to prevent odorous emissions from the facility from causing or contributing to

objectionable odors beyond the facility's boundary. In Compliance. No objectionable odors
were detected either inside or outside property boundaries. No complaints are on file.
(VI) GENERAL PERMIT CONDITIONS:
B2. RECORDS RETENTION REQUIREMENT - Any records required by the conditions of this permit shall
be kept on site for at least 2 years and made available to DAQ personnel for inspection upon request.
In Compliance. All required records are kept onsite and readily available. The facility has multiple
years of data available.
B5. REPORTING REQUIREMENT - Any of the following that would result in previously unpermitted, new,
or increased emissions must be reported to the Regional Supervisor, DAQ.
In Compliance. No new equipment has been added to the facility since the last permit renewal or
modification.
B14. PERMIT RETENTION REQUIREMENT - The Permittee shall retain a current copy of the air permit at the
site. The Permittee must make available to personnel of the DAQ, upon request, the current copy of the air
permit for the site.
In Compliance. The facility contact presented a copy of the current air permit, 08704R06,
during the inspection.
B15. CLEAN AIR ACT SECTION 112(r) REQUIREMENTS - If the Permittee is required to develop and
register a risk management plan pursuant to Section 112(r) of the Federal Clean Air Act, then the Permittee
is required to register this plan in accordance with 40 CFR Part 68.
Not Applicable — This program does not apply to this facility.
(VII) EXEMPT EMISSIONS SOURCES: No exempt/insignificant sources were observed during the inspection.
(VIII) 112r APPLICABILITY: This regulation is not applicable to this facility.
(II{) STACK TEST REVIEW: There are no stack tests on record for this facility.
(X) EMISSIONS INVENTORY REVIEW: There are no notable data jumps to investigate from the facility's 2007 and
2012 air emissions inventories.
(XI) COMPLIANCE HISTORY: On 5/18/2005 a NOV/NRE was issued to this facility for operating with ineffective
control.
(XH) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: At the time of this inspection, S. T. Wooten Corporation/Apex
Plant #18 appeared to be in compliance with all permitting requirements. I recommend the facility be re- inspected within
two years.

' Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG140269 Effective: 07/01/11 Expiration: 06/30/16 Owner: S T Wooten Corporation
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: STWooten-Apex
County: Chatham 12816 Hwy 64 E
Region: Raleigh
Apex NC 27502
Contact Person: Richard Vick Title: VP Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC: - Certification: Phone:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
On -site representative James Washburn 252-290-5912
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 06/29/2015 rn,tnryTime: 10:OOAM Exit Time: 11:30AM
Primary Inspector: Lori Ann Phillips �_U Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type:, Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Ready Mix Concrete Stonnwater/Wastewater Discharge COC
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
® Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Penult: NCG140269 Owner • Facility: S T Woolen Corporation
Inspection Date: 06/29/2015 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
On June 29, 2015, a multi -media pilot program inspection was conducted by Lori Ann Phillips (DAQ) to evaluate
compliance with the NPDES stormwater and Air Quality permits issued to the facility.
The stormwater pollution prevention plan (SPPP) was reviewed and found to contain all components necessary for
compliance. The facility was reminded to keep this document updated annually and note all changes and dates of these
changes within the records. Secondary containment at the site was viewed and found to be adequate. The facility was
reminded to document all stormwater releases from the containment area.
Analytical and qualitative monitoring have been performed at regular intervals; however, only a couple analytical monitoring
samples have been collected in recent years due to no flow at the outfall. At the time fo the inspection, flow at the outfall
was observed; therefore, the facilty was reminded of their quarterly analytical monitoring requirements.
The facility uses a sprinkler system to wet sand and aggregates. At the time of the inspection, some runoff from the
sprinkler spray was observed leaving the process area between a pump house and the sand pile. The facility added earthen
material and created a berm to prevent this runoff. This was completed prior to my departure from the facility.
Overall, the site was clean and well -kept and is managed in such a way to meet the overall intent of the stormwater permit.
Good use of structural BMPs was noted.
Air quality inspection results are included under separate report.
Page: 2

Permit: NCG140269 Owner- Facility: S T Wooten Corporation
Inspection Date: 06/29/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation _
Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
®❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
®.❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
®❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
M ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
® ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
M ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
® ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
® ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
M ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
®❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
M 0 ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
®❑ ❑ ❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
M ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
® ❑ ❑ ❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
® ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: There was a washed out area on the northeast side of the vard between the sand Dile and Dum
house when I first arrived on site Prior to my departure it was bermed up to prevent stormwater
and water used to wet down the sand and aggregate from leaving the site The wash pond at the
facility is relocated from time to time as needed In its current location an overflow, would travel
downhill to the sedimentation pond where the facility's only outfall (Outfall 01) is located PH
correction was being implemented at the pond and the current reading was 7.2.
Qualitative Monitoring
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
Yes No NA NE
M ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: The last qualitative monitoring was conducted on January 5, 2015. The facility, was reminded to
conduct qualitative monitoring on a semi-annual basis
Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? - M ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ❑ ❑ ® ❑
Comment: The last analytical monitoring for Outfall 01 was conducted on April 4 2014 and parameters
were within permit limits At the time of the inspection the outfall had flow. The facility was
reminded to try to collect its analytical samples quarterly and keep record at the facility. There
were records indicating that no flow had occurred for many previous quarters
Permit and Outfalls
Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? ®❑ ❑ ❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? M ❑ ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it property documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ M ❑
Page: 3

f
permit: NCG140269 Owner -Facility: S T Wooten Corporation
Inspection Date: 06/29/2016 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
i='.` i
Comment: A rain gauge was located at the top of a Dole near the pond It was suggested that this rain gauge
be moved to a better location for rain collection.
Page: 4

July 16, 2003
Mr. Myrl Nisely
Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Section
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27669-1628
Subject: Storm Water Sampling Data
Dear Mr. Nisely,
S.T. Wooten
Corporation
In response to your letter of July 8, 03, 1 will provide the Sampling Data that I have and
hopefully give an explanation as to why I do not have the others.
NCG 140248 This is a Builders Firstsource plant and is not a part of S.T. Wooten.
NCG 140120 This plant is in Henderson, we do not have any material at this location
(ie. Cement, Ash, Stone, Sand or Chemicals,) this plant was closed in
1994 or 1995, and has not had any activity to effect Storm Water. I will
send a letter by July 30, to DWQ, Central Files.
NCG 140233 This plant we feel is Sheet Flow, and all Storm Water that is on site is held
by our pit system. A letter will also be sent to DWQ on this as well.
NCG 140269, NCG 140294 Were Builders Firstsource plants and S.T. Wooten has
purchased them. The Sampling will be included in this letter.
NCG 140121 This plant and property did not have Storm Water run off in 2002, but a
letter was not sent to DWQ.
NCG140010, NCG140122, NCG140234, NCG14035, NCG140236, NCG140289,
NCG140317; the drought of 2002 made it impossible to take the samples
by July 30, 02, we just did not have enough rain. As time went on the tests
were overlooked due to illness of the employee that was in charge of
Storm Water.
s0 sox 2408
Wilson, NC 27894-2408
252.291.516.5
FAX [phone]

I hope this will help, and as you know we are making every effort to correct any
problems we have.
Sincerely,
James Washburn
Safety Associate
S.T. Wooten

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Mr. Richard Vick
S T Wooten
PO Box 2408
Wilson, North Carolina 27894-2408
Dear Mr. Vick:
AA
®
NCf?"ESOURC
NORTH CAENVIRONMENT AND N
` 1 "*-
Subject: NPDES Permit Modification — Name/Ownership Change
Permit NCG140269
S T Wooten - Apex
(Formerly Builders First Choice)
Chatham County
In accordance with your request received June 2, 2003, the Division is forwarding the subject permit
modification. This modification documents the change in name/ownership at the subject facility. All other terms
and conditions in the original permit remain unchanged and in full effect. This permit modification is issued
under the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement
between North Carolina and the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency dated December 6, 1983.
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit modification
are unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30)
days following receipt of this letter. This request must be a written petition conforming to Chapter 150E of the
North Carolina General Statutes, filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714. Unless such demand is made, this decision shall be final and binding.
This permit does not affect the legal requirement to obtain other permits which may be required by the
Division of Water Quality, the Division of Land Resources, Coastal Area Management Act, or any other Federal or
Local government permit that may be required. If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact
Valery Stephens at the telephone number or address listed below.
cc: Central Files
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
NPDES Unit
1617 Mail 8envice Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Sincerely,
l� I I t""r'.
an W. Klimek, P.E.
919 733-5083, extension 520 (fax) 919 733-0719
VISIT US ON THE INTERNET @ http://h2o.enr.state.m.usl [e-mail]

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG140000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG140269
STORMWATER AND PROCESS WASTEWATER DISCHARGES
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
S T Wooten
is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater from a facility located at
S T Wooten - Apex
12816 Highway 64 East
Apex
Chatham County
to receiving waters designated as an unnamed tributary to Beaver Creek, a class WS IV NSW CA water in the
Cape Fear River Basin
in accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I, II,
III, IV, V, and VI of General Permit No. NCG140000 as attached.
This certificate of coverage shall become effective June 4, 2003.
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit.
Signed this day June 4, 2003
N I 1 wW
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

W ATp
Mr. James Washburn
Operations Manager
Builder's First Source
P.O. Box 981
Apex, NC 27502
Dear Mr. Washburn:
m imaei r. casiey, uovernor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
March 18, 2003
Subject:Stormwater Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Builder's First Source
12816 Hwy 64E
Permit No. NCG140269
Chatham County
On March 11, 2003 Mr. Ken Schuster and Mr. Myrl Nisely of the Raleigh Regional Office of Division of
Water Quality met with you to inspect the above readymix concrete facility for stormwater permit
compliance. The checklist used is attached. Your assistance was greatly appreciated. The following
observations were made:
I. A USGS general location map is needed for the SP3 manual that shows the flow of rainwater from
the site to or toward a water of the State, latitude and longitude, and the name of the body of water it
reaches. Permit Part II(A)(1)(a).
2. Obtain a less cluttered local site map that shows flows with arrows, % impervious surface and other
details noted in Part II(A)(1)(c). Be sure to include all physical components such as the small pond.
3. Add a page to the SP3 manual that officially designates the person(s) authorized to sign reports
submitted to the State.
4. Begin documenting observations made before emptying secondary containment structures Part
II(A)(2)(b) and Housekeeping inspections Part II(A)(4).
5. Vehicle Washing travels to the detention pond. Samples for compliance were stated to have been
taken at a location near the culvert pipes and at a second location about 15 or 20 feet upstream, then
combined. The sampling event is to take place at only one location, at the culvert.
6. The small pond with bright green water has not been used for drum washings in recent times. You
indicated that modifications of that area are planned, now occasionally used for disposal of unused
concrete. The Division requests that in that work you include removal of concrete materials from the
creek behind the green pond. The creek has also had riprap added downstream of the cementous area.
We ask for this to be removed, as well, probably after the upper section has been cleared. Please
submit these flans to the Division for review. Waywl+w�p
Raleigh Regional Office 1628 Mail Service Center phone [phone] Customer Service
Water Quality Section Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 facsimile [phone] 1-877-623-6748
�A
NUIENR

tswioers rust source uct sit tnu
rage z otz
7. The rain data portion of the analytical data did not include a value for total flow. This is calculated
from inches of rainfall and duration of the rain event, factored for the area of the watershed. Please
obtain this calculation for both past and future sampling events.
8. Insert sampling Chain of Custody reports into the analytical data section of the SP3 manual.
This facility is being purchased by S.T. Wooten, Inc. Be sure to submit change of ownership
notification to the Stormwater Permitting Section at the address in the permit for your analytical data
submittal, a name change request for permit numbers NCG140269 and WQ0014391 (Drip wastewater
permit for which a renewal package is being prepared at this time).
The permit provides a 30 day period after an inspection to upgrade the documentation. Please provide a
report to Myrl Nisely by April 18 verifying that the deficiencies have been corrected.
If you have questions or comments, contact me at 919-571-4700.
Sincerely, `�
04 Myr A. Nisely
Environmental Specialist
xc: Chatham County Health Department
Central Files

Readymix Concrete Stormwater Inspection Checklist
Type of Visit OCompliance Inspection/Program Audit HTech Assistance or Recon
Location Builde^, r s Fib o�c�e! y 64W- CZ[ tli m County
Facility Number NCG146260.Date3/1 I/03 Time In1:15 Time Out 3A0
People Interviewed, and Titles: JJmes.Washbuum ,Operations -manager
SPPP Documentation (Site Plan Part ❑ (A)(1)
1. Copy of Certificate of Coverage ®Yes pNo Copy of Permit ®Yes pNo Requested but not required
2. General Location (USGS) Map shows plant pYes pNo, lines of discharge Part II(A)(1)(a)
to water of State Eyes ®moo, Stream labeled 'Yes pNo, Latitude and longitude pYes ®No
Comment s:Wl _;e discussed how to,zoom`and add the above ,detatls toss .o`au_map
3. Narrative Descnphon of Practices ❑Yes ❑No •'r� Part II(A)(1)(b)
4. Site map ®Yes pNo Shows flows & areas served with arrows and Part II(A)(1)(c)
% impervious surface pYes pNo, buildings ®Yes pNo, process areas ®Yes pNo,
disposal areas pYes''INo, drainage structures pYes ❑No, existing BMPs such as secondary containment
Eyes pNo, list of potential pollutants pYes pNo
F — x ,
Comments Elementaare missngi(ex small,pond), iiot clear how waterflows Discussedupgrades
k..�
KRIM
5. List of significant spills in last 3 years or certif. if none ®Yes pNo der-e—�nond Part II(A)(1)(d)
RRO called? pYes pNo
6. SW outfalls have been evaluated for Qrocess water ®_Yes pNo M Part II(A)(1)(e)
7. Feasibility of Changing Practices ®Yes pNo' Part II(A)(2)(a)
8. Secondary Containment ®Yes pNo Schedule needed? El ®`ro ? y Part II(A)(2)(b)
Records of Draining Containment, Observations Made pYes No Use:fo' -,,signature
rD �•s l^"�' €v wz-wp ar,{- •arz'.-+-'""i^- --"s rA' ^--�YtYiv s ""'"'.�.:.`"'••-•a: Part
9. BMP Summary ®Yes pNo Rdmrnder ,updatthese as changes aree V Part lI(A)(2)(c)
10. SPRP Plan Yes ❑�o, Responsible personnel still employed here? pYes 0No Up'dtePart II(A)(3)
11. PM and Housekeeping, Plan ®Yes pNo Record of Inspections? pYes ®No Part II(A)(4)
12. Employee training pYes pNo— for everybody ®Yeses❑No^R°r Part II(A)(5)
13. Responsible parties, chain of command page ®Yes ❑Noo Part II(A)(6)
14. Plan updated/reviewed annually ®Yes pNo Revlsron dates:on each page G od Part II(A)(7)
15. Stormwater Facility Inspection Program ®Yes pNo Grp makes to r,w/ Twiny' Part II(A)(8)
16. This Plan Has Been Implemented (documents in manual, Part II(A)(9)
employees show awareness ®Yes pNo Comments
Sampling and Analytical Data Part II(C)
All Stormwater and Process Water is Recycled (IIC(31) pYes pNo
Rain Gauge on site (not required) ®Yes UNo
If <I0 yr storm and overflows, sample. If>10 yr storm, sampling not required. How do they know if 10 yr storm or not?
Record of an overflow pYes pNo Details
If not all recycled, what is allowed to discharge? Vehicle Cleaning (IIC2) Recycle overflow (IIC3
above) Q Wetting of Aggregate (IIC4)H Mixing drum cleanout (IIC5)
Note: this checklist does not take the place of your permit. You are fully responsible for
following the permit.

For the topics checked in last question, Analytical data present ®Yes pNo, Compliant? ®Yes pNo
Detarls U�htcle cleaning runs to detenntionipond
Total premp ®Yes pNo, Storm duration ®Yes pNo, Total (]ow Est. pYes®NgField pH ®Yes pNo,
Chain of custody pYes pNo
Qualitative Monitoring performed semiannually ®Yes pNo Wet Ej DryPart II(F)
Stormwater not combined with process wastewater— general runoff PartII(C)(I)
Analytical data pYes pNo, Chain of Custody pYes''ANo, Qualitative Monitoring performed
semiannually (Section F) pYes ®No,
Wet Q Dry m
If using cutoff policy, how many sample rounds
Cutoff Concentrations met pYes pNo F Ever have a Bypass? pYes pNo (III (C)(4)a 1 &2)
Notification given? pYes pNo
Outdoor Inspection
I located all discharge points ®Yes pNo No. of areas served
Sample points appropriate Yes ®No S
fomw1 caMEa�nplelust:uiifront of culvert gape Do not•coin6�ne'sainTp"les' Location if different from discharge point
Housekeeping: Trash ®Yes pNo Dust pYes pNo Plant was well cared for.
Take pH pYes pNo Values)
Take photos pYes pNo
Containment Area satisfactory ®Yes pNo, Loose drums pYes pNo, Locked drain ®Yes pNo
Concrete disposal pile comments Snrall volern fron[� of grejen pound.
Inspection Summary Comments
S�te;is basically m good,'shape�, Some practices have been changed{ui the last>yeai to better comply:`A
few topics in tiie SP3 manual still'°need attention S T Wooten haspurchased Builder's There maybe
guidance avatlable from their officials on some of the questions/issues raised ui4his inspection
f..z;_s,,,a:xc.�Sa�s.:a._- on.
Recommendations:Work with Bdl Twitty and-Wnntenan`detern„nP a hect.rn„rsP:nfarr,nn.
Letter is to go to:

Name
Title
Address
Helpful Information at http7//h2o.enr.state.ne.US/$Li/Maiiva]s—Factsheets.htm
Note: this checklist does not take the place of your permit. You are fully responsible for
following the permit.

United States nvironmental Protection Agency
Washington, D.C.23460
Approved.
EPA
OMB
OMB No. 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Approval expires B-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
19 L�20I
1 u 2 w 31 NCG140269 111 12 � 03/03/11 117 18 � j L
LJ IJ LJ
Remarks
211111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111166
Inspection Work Days FacilAy Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating 81 GA -------------- ---------- ----- Reserved ---------- -------
67 1 1 69 70 LJ 71 liI 72 L7374 751 1 1 1 1 1 1
Section B: FacilityData
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
Entry Time/Date
Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
01:15 PM 03/03/11
99/08/01
Goldston's Building Supply
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
12816 Hwy 64 East
Apex NC 27502
03:00 PM 03/03/11
04/07/31
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
James iaashburn///
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
J D Goldston III,4900 Hwy 98 Hest Wake Forest NC 27587//919-848-9047/
No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit Records/Reports Storm Water
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Myrl Nisely RRO NQ//919-571-4700/919-571-4718
Signatur of Managemen O A eviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
EPA Form 356d(Rev 9-G Previous editions are obsolete.

F,n...,,, W,0 %a
April 8, 2003
Mr. Myrl Nisely
Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Section
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27669-1628
Subject: Stormwater Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Permit No. NCG140269
Dear Mr. Nisely,
S.T. Wooten
Corporation
With respect to the March 18ih letter from you in regard to the inspection of our Apex
facility, we have made or will make the following updates to our SP3 manual:
-A new USGS general location site map has been added. Richard Bowen, Staff Engineer
for S.T. Wooten will draw a new site map for Apex. 1 could not find in our permit the
section that states the requirement that a designee be named for reports, but I will also
add this to our SP3 manual.
-The documenting for the secondary containment structures has been found and put in it's
proper place. There is also a clear understanding of the location stormwater sample is to
be taken.
-I will be working with the staff engineer to come up with a plan for the pond. 1 do not
agree that there is a creek behind the containment pond. This is clearly a drainage ditch.
It begins behind the pond and does not have water flow, other than a drain. The ditch is
confined to our property and the riprap was added at the time of construction to help with
erosion. I do not think that this was improper.
-The total flow has been calculated and added to data. Chain of custody has been located
and added to the SP3 manual.
PO Box 2408
Wilson, NC 27894-2408
2.52.291.5165
FAX [phone]

Myrl, as you know, I now work for S.T. Wooten and they are dedicated to safety and
environment. I look forward to having the expert help that they can provide. I will keep
you informed of any plans for the pond area.
Sincerely,
James Washburn
cc: George Strickland

March 31, 2003
Point Source Branch
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Re: Notice of Change of Ownership
Storm Water Permit No. NCG140269
Builders FirstSource of Raleigh, Inc.
Apex, Chatham County, NC
Dear Sir:
.1.IS
DENR RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE'I
S.T. Wooten
Corporation
Storm Water Permit No. NCG140294
Builders FirstSource of Raleigh, Inc.
Benson, Johnston County, NC
I am writing to inform you that S. T. Wooten Corporation of Wilson, NC has
purchased two concrete mixing operations at the above referenced addresses from
Builders FirstSource of Raleigh, Inc. as of April 1, 2003. S. T. Wooten Corporation
hereby requests that you transfer the above referenced permits, to the extent that they
relate to those concrete operations.
Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
S. T. Wooten Corporation
Richard Bowen
Staff Engineer
RB/dsb
JQOR_myr---_RS°e'
I�t C`tRI2D B"'EtJ
a5a(a3o cogia -
3//�� 11�\ �e
PIN*�
-
`6t
6'l I ok
PO Box 2408 Wilson, NC 27894-2408
252.291.5165 Fax [phone]

S.T. Wooten
Corporation
PO Box 2408
Wilson, NC 27894-2408
Point Source Branch
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor NCDENR
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
') ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
CERTIFIED MAIL DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
January 31, 2002
MR. JIMMY WASHBURN
BUILDERS FIRST SOURCE, CONCRETE DIVISION
12816 HWY. 64 EAST
APEX, NC 27502
Subject: Notice of Violation
Permit NCG 1400269
Apex, NC
Chatham County
Dear Mr. Washburn:
On December 6, 2001 Mr. Joe Albiston of the Raleigh Regional office of Division of
Water Quality met with Jason Hackney to conduct a stormwater inspection of Builders First
Source Concrete's Plant in Apex.
Upon inspection of the storage area for chemicals it was observed that secondary
containment for this area was not in place. According to Certificate of Coverage NCG140269
Part II Section A 2(b) "A schedule to provide secondary containment for bulk storage of liquid
materials, storage of Section 313 of Title III of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization
Act (SARA) water priority chemicals, or storage of hazardous substances to prevent leaks and
spills from contaminating stormwater runoff." According to Certificate of Coverage NCG140269
Part III Section A 1 "The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan shall be developed and
implemented within 12 months of the effective date of the initial certificate of coverage issued.
pursuant to this general permit and updated thereafter on an annual basis."
1) Please submit above schedule and information on implementation.
Runoff from the washing of the concrete trucks was not running into the containment
pond but running off site. According to Certificate of Coverage NCG140269 the Daily
Maximum Limit for Total Suspended Solids is 30 mg/L, Settleable Solids is 5 mVL, and pH is a
range of 6 to 9.
Please respond in writing to Mr. Joe Albiston of this office within 10 working days of
receipt of this notification.
Sincerely,
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Central Files
Chatham County Health Dept.
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.1628 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer - 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
1, e: '011'
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
11/27/2000
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
J.D. GOLDSTON, III
GOLDSTON'S BUILDING SUPPLY
4900 HIGHWAY 98 WEST
WAKE FOREST NC 27587
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND REVOCATION FOR NON PAYMENT
PERMIT NUMBER NCG140269
GOLDSTON'S BUILDING SUPPLY
CHATHAM COUNTY
Dear Permittee:
Payment of the required annual administering and compliance monitoring fee of $80.00 for this year has not
been received for the subject permit. This fee is required by Title 15 North Carolina Administrative Code 2H.0105, under
the authority of North Carolina General Statutes 143-215.3(a)(1), (1a) and (1b). Because this fee was not fully paid within
30 days after being billed, this letter initiates action to revoke the subject permit, pursuant to 15 ncac 2H.0105(b) (2) (k)
(4), and G.S. 143-215.1 (b) (3).
Effective 60 days from receipt of this notice, subject permit is hereby revoked unless the required Annual
Administering and Compliance Monitoring Fee is received within that time. Discharges without a permit are subject to the
enforcement authority of the Division of Water Quality. Your payment should be sent to:
N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Budget Office
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
If you are dissatisfied with this decision, you have the right to request an administrative hearing within Thirty (30)
days following recipt of this notice, identifying the specific issues to be contended. This request must be in the form of a
written petition conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and fled with the Office of Administrative
Hearings, Post Office Drawer 27447, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27611-7447. Unless such request for hearing is made or
payments received, revocation shall be final and binding. If you have any questions, please contact:
Mr. Ken Schuster, Raleigh Water Quality Regional Supervisor, [phone].
Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Supevisor, Water Quality Permits and Engineering Unit
Raleigh Regional Office
County Health Department
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled / 10% post -consumer paper

=' State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
July 27, 1999
J.D. GOLDSTON, III
GOLDSTON'S BUILDING SUPPLY
4900 HIGHWAY 98 WEST
WAKE FOREST. NORTH CAROLINA 27587
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Reissue - NPDES Stormwater Permit
Goldston's Building Supply
COC Number NCG140269
Chatham County
Dear Permittee:
Your facility was recently granted coverage under stormwater general permit NCG 140000. This letter serves as
your notification that the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) has reissued the general permit and that your
facility's coverage will continue under the conditions of the reissued general permit. Please review the new
permit to familiarize yourself with the changes in the reissued permit. The permit is reissued pursuant to the
requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between the state
of North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, dated December 6, 1983.
Enclosed is a permit package which contains the following information:
* A copy of general Stormwater permit NCG140000
* Five copies of the Analytical Monitoring form and five copies of the Qualitative Monitoring form
* A copy of a Technical Bulletin for the general permit which outlines changes in the permit, key
requirements, and addresses frequently asked questions
* A Certificate of Coverage
Your coverage under this general permit is not transferable except after notice to DWQ. The Division may
require modification or revocation and reissuance of the Certificate of Coverage. This permit does not affect the
legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by DENR or relieve the permittee from
responsibility for compliance with any other applicable federal, state, or local law, rule, standard, ordinance,
order, judgment. or decree.
If you have any questions regarding this permit package please contact Darren England of the Central Office
Stormwater and General Permits Unit at [phone], ext. 545
Sincerely,
b/¢l`l y
for Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Central Files
Stormwater and General permits Unit Files
Raleigh Regional Office
i�•.rv�.,L>
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG140000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG140269
STORMWATER AND PROCESS WASTEWATER DISCHARGES
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
GOLDSTON'S BUILDING SUPPLY
is hereby authorized to operate a process wastewater treatment system, and is hereby authorized to discharge process
wastewater and stormwater from a facility located at
GOLDSTON'S BUILDING SUPPLY
12816 HIGHWAY 64 EAST
APEX
CHATHAM COUNTY
to receiving waters designated as UT Beaver Creek in the Cape Fear River Basin
in accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III.
IV, V. and VI of General Permit No. NCG140000 as attached.
This certificate of coverage shall become effective August 1, 1999.
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit.
Signed this day July 26, 1999.
for Kerr T. Stevens. Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
May 7, 1999
Mr. J.D. Goldston, III
Goldston's Building Supply
4900 Highway 98 West
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
NCDENR
Subject: General Permit No. NCG140000
Goldston's Building Supply
COC NCG140269
Chatham County
Dear Mr. Goldston:
In accordance with your application for discharge permit received on February 8, 1999 we are forwarding
herewith the subject certificate of coverage to discharge under the subject state - NPDES general permit. This
permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215 .1 and the Memorandum
of Agreement between North Carolina and the US Environmental Protection agency dated December 6, 1983.
The stormwater permit you are receiving, NCG140000, does not permit wasting concrete, dumping
excess concrete, directly into storm sewer outfalls or into waters of the state. Any facility which either dumps
excess concrete or washes excess concrete into storm sewers or waters of the state will be operating in direct
violation to both the terms of this permit and the North Carolina General Statutes. Such a discharge shall be
considered an illegal discharge and may subject the owner to enforcement actions in accordance with North
Carolina General Statutes 143-215.6A
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are unacceptable
to you, you have the right to request an individual permit by submitting an individual permit application. Unless
such demand is made, this certificate of coverage shall be final and binding.
Please take notice that this certificate of coverage is not transferable except after notice to the Division of
Water Quality. The Division of Water Quality may require modification or revocation and reissuance of the
certificate of coverage.
This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by the
Division of Water Quality or permits required by the Division of Land Resources, Coastal Area Management Act
or any other Federal or Local governmental permit that may be required.
If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Darren England at telephone number
919/733-5083 ext.545. — 2
Sincerely,
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY
I7. LLIAM C. MILLS NGY I
Kerr Stevens i
. Rit�r'U. �. Rc�IONAI Ic r
cc: CRalEigh.RegionalOffic�e —
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG140000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG14U269
STORMWATER DISCHARGES
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Goldston's Building Supply
is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater from a facility located at
Goldston's Building Supply
12916 Highway 64 East
Apex
Chatham County
to receiving waters designated as an unnamed tributary of Beaver Creek in the Cape Fear River Basin
in accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III,
and IV of General Permit No. NCG 140000 as attached.
This certificate of coverage shall become effective May 7, 1999.
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit.
Signed this day May 7, 1999.
ORIGINAL SIGN® BY
WILLIAM C. MILLS
for Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

Facility Location Map
USGS Topographic Map
7.5 Minute Series
Facility: �jOc,JS'Ta..��S �u"��•"Jc-�rra.�
Map ID
Latitude: qy'
Longitude: ��6 5 7 � _l Z "

NCDENR Stormwater and General Permits Unit
Parameter Submitt
COC Number NCG140269 Value
Facility Name Goldston's
County ®Mgf a9 UPPIY Total Flow Outfall Number 001 Total Suspended Solids (mg/1 96.6
Date Sample Collected 6/14/2001 ph (units) 8.79
Certified Laboratory # 1 mar01-13357
Certified Laboratory # 2
> 55 gall mo New Oil Usage
New Motor Oil Usage gal/month
Total Event Precipitation 1.75 inches
Event Duration 1.5 Hrs.
AiR?S."'S� 3r r"' �SIYQNI
"
SGj2'T;1-''`
v
R.1cor`
()14"
� IV
14+�4�IC'
4
A,y'ry>�utY>r'�y.
General
Permit
NCG140000
Stormwater
Discharge Outfall
Monitoring Report
Data Entry Date
9/26/2001
Parameter Submitt
Value
VMA Total Flow (MG)
VMA Oil & Grease (mgll)
VMA TSS (mg/1)
VMA MBAS (mg/1)
VMA Leadjotal (mg/1)
VMA pH (units)

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office Adiliftsmalf,.�MEMMMn�
Michael F. Easley, Governor NCDENR
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary NOTM CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL REsauRcE
CERTIFIED MAIL DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
January 31, 2002
MR. JIMMY WASHBURN
BUILDERS FIRST SOURCE, CONCRETE DIVISION
12816 HWY. 64 EAST
APEX, NC 27502
Subject: Notice of Violation
Permit NCG 1400269
Apex, NC
Chatham County
Dear Mr. Washburn:
On December 6, 2001 Mr. Joe Albiston of the Raleigh Regional office of Division of
Water Quality met with Jason Hackney to conduct a stormwater inspection of Builders First
Source Concrete's Plant in Apex.
Upon inspection of the storage area for chemicals it was observed that secondary
containment for this area was not in place. According to Certificate of Coverage NCG140269
Part II Section A 2(b) "A schedule to provide secondary containment for bulk storage of liquid
materials, storage of Section 313 of Title III of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization
Act (SARA) water priority chemicals, or storage of hazardous substances to prevent leaks and
spills from contaminating stormwater runoff" According to Certificate of Coverage NCG140269
Part III Section A 1 "The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan shall be developed and
implemented within 12 months of the effective date of the initial certificate of coverage issued
pursuant to this general permit and updated thereafter on an annual basis."
1) Please submit above schedule and information on implementation.
Runoff from the washing of the concrete trucks was not running into the containment
pond but running off site. According to Certificate of Coverage NCG140269 the Daily
Maximum Limit for Total Suspended Solids is 30 mg/L, Settleable Solids is 5 ml/L and pH is a
range of 6 to 9.
Please respond in writing to Mr. Joe Albiston of this office within 10 working days of
receipt of this notification.
Sincerely,
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Central Files
Chatham County Health Dept.
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

klBuilders
FirstSource
12816 US Hwy 64 West
Apex, NC 27502
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
NCDENR
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,NC 27699-1620
RE: Ref NoV of 12/06/01
Dear Mr. Schuster:
!, FEB 2 12UU2
February 14, 2002
A plan to conform to certificate of Coverage NCG 140269 Part 11 Section A 2(b)
as related tot the containment of chemical admixtures has been implemented. The
estimated date of completion of containment walls is March 31, 2002.
With regards to runoff from truck washing, we have implemented the following
procedures:
I. The clean out of the wash pit, thus containing washout on our own property
2. By using a retardant chemical, our trucks are no longer using the wash pit to
wash out into on a daily basis
3. Using pre -cast forms to capture returned concrete thus further minimizing the
use of the washout pit.
The most recent grab samples cf June IA, 2001 v, ere it-. t1.:eir maximum daily
Maximum Limits for Total Suspended Solids, Settable Solids and PH range.
Sincerely,
,Gt���
games Washburn
Operations Manager