Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNCG050364_COMPLETE FILE - HISTORICAL_20110209I h t, (,L d 19 W,I) STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET RESCISSIONS PERMIT NO. DOC TYPE Ci COMPLETE FILE - HISTORICAL DATE OF RESCISSION ❑ � 01 1 0 a 60 ° YYYYMMDD Nomaco Inc. / Spongex LLC 3006 & 3002 Anaconda Rd. Tarboro, NC, 27886 Permit # NCG050364 Dear Mr. Smith, This is in regard to the NOV Case No. NOV-2011-PC-0022 where Nomaco Inc. and Spongex LLC proved to be in violation of the Storm Water Permit issued on December 8", 2008, by not having the required Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan established and in force at the time of inspection. Per the requirements set for the in the NOV letter we received on January 10'h, 2011, we submit the following timeline: Item Target Date 1) Re -produce a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Completed 2/8/11 2) Implement the monitoring requirements of your permit as soon as the First representative storm SDO have been identified. Provide documentation of the monitoring event. results to this office as soon as they are completed. 3) Provide a map identifying the SDO Completed 2/8/11—see site map in storm water plan submitted to DWQ on 2/9/11 We hope this suffices in establishing our intent to fully comply with the requirements established by the Stormwater permit. Regards, Peyton tamper 4 - Plant Engineer, Nomaco Inc. P: 252-563-1763 C: 919-302-3495 pstamper@nomaco.com �U►e EI , FEB -92011 .XE&F NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natura Resources Division of Water Quality Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman Governor Director Secretary January 7, 2011 CERTIFIED MAIL 7008 01300 0000 1109 4963 RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Mr. Robert W. Palz Nomalco/Spongex LLC 501 Nomalco Drive Zebulon, NC 27597 Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION Case No. NOV-2011-PC-0022 Compliance Evaluation Inspection Stormwater Permit NCG050164 Nomalco, Inc. Edgecombe County Dear Mr. Palz: On December 21, 2010, Dave Parnell of the Raleigh Regional Office carried out a stormwater compliance evaluation inspection (CEI) for the above permit. Mr. Peyton Stamper was available to assist Mr. Parnell. A file review indicates that this was the first time DWQ had inspected this facility. See the enclosed inspection checklist. A number of issues emerged and are discussed below: This permit was issued December 8, 2008 and it expires May 31, 2013. The permit was produced during the CEI. 2. Mr. Stamper was unable to locate the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SP3) during the inspection. After checking with former employees of the company in the days following the CEI, Mr. Stamper called to inform Mr. Parnell that due to high tumover of employees at the company, he was unable to locate the SP3. Mr. Parnell concluded that there had not been a continuity of staff ensuring compliance with the permit. Also, Mr. Stamper was unsure of the location of the Stormwater Discharge Outfalls (SDO) and could not produce any monitoring results. As discussed during the CEI, the permit requires qualitative monitoring be conducted at each (all) designated SDO, in a frequency directed by tables within your permit. Please prepare a timeline addressing the following: A) Re -produce a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. No YhCarolina Naturally North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection Phone (919) 7914200 Customer Service Internet: w .ncwaterquality.org 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 FAX (919) 788-7159 877-623-6748 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10 % Post Consumer Paper Nomaco, Inc. Compliance Evaluation Inspecition V1 Page 2 of 2 B) Implement the monitoring requirements of your permit as soon as the SDO have been identified. Provide documentation of the monitoring results to this office as soon as they are completed. C) Provide a map identifying the SDO. Please provide a written response to this letter, within 30 days of the receipt of this letter, detailing Nomaco/Spongex LLC's compliance efforts with respect to the bold items found above in #2A, 92B, and #2C. If there are any questions or comments about this inspection, please contact Dave Parnell at 919-791-4200 or david.parnellancdenr yov. Please note that a violation of Stormwater Permit conditions, monitoring and record -keeping, are subject to civil penalties of up toy-5,000.00 per day S' cer ly, a12 fi Danny Smitly� Water Quali y Regional Supervisor Raleigh Regional Office cc: RRO/SWP Files Central Office Files Enclosure: Inspection checklist for Nomaco, Inc. dated December 21, 2010 4 Compliance Inspection Report Permit: NCG050364 Effective: 12/08/08 Expiration: 05/31/13 Owner: Nomaco Inc SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Nomaco Inc / Spongex, LLC County: Edgecombe 3006 Anaconda Dr Region: Raleigh Tarboro NC 27886 Contact Person: Robert W Paltz Title: Phone: 919-269-6500 Directions to Facility: System Classifications: Primary ORC: Secondary ORC(s): On -Site Representative(s): Related Permits: Certification: Phone: Inspection Date: 12/21/2010 Entry Time: 11:30 AM Exit Time: 12:30 AM Primary Inspector: David R Parnell Phone: 919-791-4260 Secondary Inspector(s): Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Permit Inspection Type: Apparel/Printing/Paper/Leather/Rubber Stormwater Discharge COC Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ■ Not Compliant Question Areas: 0 Storm Water (See attachment summary) Page: 1 r Permit: NCG050364 Owner- Facility: Nomaco Inc Inspection Date: 12121/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation - Reason for Visit: Routine Inspection Summary: Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Yes • No NA NE Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ Al Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ # Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ # Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a BMP summary? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ Al Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ # Does the facility provide and document Employee Training? Cl ■ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ # Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ At Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program? ❑ ■ ❑ Cl Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ Comment: Peyton Stamper was unable to locate the plan and there was no indication that a plan had been implemented. Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? ONOO Comment: No monitoring results available at time of inspection. Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE # Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ # If the facility has representative outfall status, is it documented by the ❑ Cl ❑ properly Division? ■ # Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ Comment: Permit was found during inspection. Outfalls were not observed as Mr. Stamper has not been the compliance official in the past and did not know the location of the outfalls. Page: 2 STORMWATER-POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN NOMACO, Inc. 3006 Anaconda Road Tarboro, North Carolina 27886 Spongex, LLC 3002 Anaconda Road Tarboro, North Carolina 27886 Prepared: November 30, 2008 Revision: Revision 4 ffa NOACO. 2[pnr � ' k* J� � � �� LLC Revision Record Revision Date Corrections By Changes Made Reasons For Changes 11/30/08 Tracy Armstrong, New Document Stormwater Pollution Prevention EHS Manager Noel Plan created to comply with site Group stormwater permit (NCG050364) requirements. Tracy Armstrong, Additional site Stormwater Pollution Prevention 6/l/09 EHS Manager Noel specific details added Plan was not complete, still Group to draft SP3 Plan partially in template format. 1/7/11 Hellman & Change in document Existing Stormwater Pollution Associates, Inc. organizational Prevention Plan did not meet all structure. Revision to of the plan conditions identified existing site -specific in the site stormwater permit. information and the addition of required information. 2/6/11 Peyton Stamper, Revised document to Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plant Engineer reflect current Plan did not meet all of the plan Nomaco Insulation company structure conditions indentified in the site and provided missing stormwater permit. information. FFR-92011 NOI)SC f...:.:_IRegion^_1O C"a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan GENERAL COMPANY POLICY The purpose of this program is to inform employees and other interested persons about policies, controls, and procedures that have been implemented at Nomaco, Incorporated (Nomaco) and Spongex, LLC (Spongex) to comply with EPA requirements for preparing and maintaining a Stormwater Written Pollution Prevention Plan under the stormwater regulations (Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 122). Since the stormwater permit covers both NOMACO and Spongex, this stormwater pollution prevention plan covers operations at both facilities. Our written pollution prevention plan consists of: (1) An evaluation of the sources of pollution at our facilities, and (2) A description of the practices and program elements to reduce pollutants in areas identified as being potential pollutant sources for stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity. We encourage any suggestions that our employees have for improving our Stormwater Written Pollution Plan, as we are committed to developing and maintaining an effective plan. We strive for clear understanding, safe behavior and involvement in the plan from every level of the company. ADMINISTRATIVE DUTIES The Plant Managers are responsible for our written stormwater pollution prevention plan. Copies of our written plan may be obtained from the shared drive on the intranet or the office of the site Environmental contact. It is a company policy to make our plan available to our employees. Employees can obtain access to the plan by requesting a copy of the plan from either the site Environmental Contact. The plan is also available on the Company intranet to those who have access. The Plant Manager, Operations Manager, Plant Engineer, Maintenance Supervisors, and Warehouse Supervisors make up our company's stormwater pollution prevention committee. This committee is responsible for developing the stormwater pollution prevention plan and assisting the Plant Manager in its implementation, maintenance and revision. In addition, the pollution prevention team is also responsible for: A. Implementing all general permit and pollution prevention plan requirements. B. Defining and agreeing upon an appropriate set of goals for the facilities' stormwater management program. C. Maintaining a clear line of communication with plant management to ensure a cooperative partnership. The pollution prevention team also must evaluate existing environmental management plans for consistency and determine which, if any, provisions can be incorporated into the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. Other related plans may include the Preparedness, Prevention and Contingency Plan (40 CFR Parts 264 and 265), the Spill Control and Countermeasures requirements (40 CFR Part 112), the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Toxic Organic Management Plan (40 CFR Parts 413, 433 and 469), and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Emergency Action Plan (29 CFR Part 1910). STORMWATER PERMIT HISTORY Prior to the start-up of Spongex (Spongex, LLC began operations in November of 2007), NOMACO operations had applied for a Conditional No Exposure Certification (NEC) provided for in 40 CFR 126.22. An extended period of time lapsed and the Spongcx project began prior to a response from the Department of Water Quality. Given the potential for stonmwater exposure and the contiguous property which encompasses both facilities, it was decided to submit a new request for NEC which included both facilities. This time the DEQ responded with an inspection and denied the request for NEC. It was at this time that a Notice of Intent was submitted and subsequently coverage under the general permit was granted. Based on this sequence of events, material exposure to precipitation and storm water runoff during the period of three years before the permit was issued was limited to NOMACO operations only. Other than outside storage of general trash, NOMACO operations were not exposed to precipitation or stormwater runoff. Good housekeeping practices were employed to minimize material contact with stormwater. SITE PLAN Location Description and General Location Map The Nomaco and Spongex facilities are located at 3006 and 3002 Anaconda Rd. respectively in the township of Tarboro in Edgecombe county North Carolina. NCGO5036 County: Edgecombe Receiving Stream: Unamed Tributary to Raccoon Branch Noamco Inc. ! Spogex LLC Stream Class: WS-IV, NSW Outfall #1 : Latitude: 35°54'45.66" N, Longitude Outfall #2: Latitude: 35°54'50.37" N, Longitude Outfall 93: Latitude: 35°54'55.3" N, Longitude: Storage Practices Sub -basin: TAR03(03-03-03) (Tar -Pamlico RB) : 77°35'7.82" W :77°35'12.25" W 77035'19.1" W Some final product is stored uncovered at the Spongex facility during overflow storage conditions. The final product is an article of closed cell foam in various shapes and sizes. There is no leaching of raw material due to stonnwater exposure. Loading and Unloading Activities At the Spongex facility unloading of a flammable solvent is accomplished via tanker truck delivery into one of two bulk storage tanks. Unloading of solvent raw material into bulk storage tanks is located on the East side of the Spongex facility. Under normal conditions significant amounts of the solvent are not exposed to storm water. In the case of a catastrophic failure during unloading, there would potentially be exposure to storm water; however, the area does have secondary containment. At the Nomaco facility unloading of plastic resin pellets is accomplished via tanker truck delivery into one or five bulk storage silos. This area is located on the Northeast side of the facility. Under normal operating conditions no amount of plastic resin is exposed to stone water. In the event of a catastrophic failure during unloading there would be potentially be exposure to storm water. Nomaco facility receives Isobutane to its storage tanks via tanker truck. This area is located on the Northeast side of the facility. Under normal operating conditions no amount of isobutane is exposed to storm water. In the event of a catastrophic failure during unloading there would be potentially be exposure to storm water but due to the nature of this gas it will vaporize rather than being carried away by stormwater. Final product at both facilities is loaded from dock doors. All loading of final product occurs under roof and is not exposed to precipitation. Unloading of raw materials is done via closed conveyance systems and is not exposed to precipitation during normal operations. Outdoor Process Areas Nomaco: lsobutane storage and pumping systems located 75 feet from Northeast side of the facility containing one 8,500 gal tank and one 5,500 gal tank. There is a fill manifold for both tanks for the unloading of transport tankers. Nomaco: Plastic resin storage systems located adjacent to the facility on the Northeast Spongex: Two 10,000 gal solvent storage tanks and pumping systems within an enclosed dike located 35 feet from the northeast side of the facility. There is a fill manifold for both tanks for the unloading of transport tankers. Location for transport tanker is within a larger spill containment area. Dust or Particulate Generating or Control Processes Nomaco: The operation for regrinding, densification and repelletizing of polyethylene plastic generates dust which is captured by filtration systems within the process. The air for these systems is discharged inside the facility. Spongex: The operation for particle size reduction in the mixing area has five sources for generating dust which is captured by filtration systems within the process. The air for these systems is discharged to the exterior of the facility. Waste Disposal Practices Spongex also has scrap foam that is accumulated in covered roll -offs. The scrap foam itself will not leach due to exposure to stormwater. Since disposal is not done during rainy conditions it is assumed that any exposure to stormwater is minimal and would represent an exception or occur due to unforeseen circumstances. Roll -offs of general trash and some final product slated for land fill disposal is also accumulated on site. The final product would be consistent with the final product storage described above. Nomaco operations include roll -offs of general trash that is accumulated on -site. Site Map See Appendix A — Site map Significant Spills or Leaks No significant spills or leaks of toxic or hazardous materials have occurred at the facilities since the stormwater permit was received. No significant materials as identified in Section E. Part V1.27 of the General Stornwater Permit (NCG050364) have been exposed to storm water between the time of three years prior to the date of the issuance of the facilities permit and the present. Stornwater Discharge Outfall Certification See Appendix C STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN The Nomaco facility handles raw materials for production of polyethylene foam. In addition the plant handles a small inventory of machine oils and other miscellaneous maintenance chemicals such as adhesives, cleaners, lubricants, etc. The Spongex facility handles raw materials used to produce closed cell foam. There are both liquid and solid raw materials. Both facilities handle scrap foam and miscellaneous maintenance chemicals. Material management activities at both Spongex and Nomaco include: 1) Good housekeeping, 2) Monitoring of unloading activities to minimize potential for uncontrolled spill, 3) Storage of equipment and materials under roof to the extent possible, 4) Frequent pick-ups of trash hoppers; 5) Consumption of all product before disposal; 5) Frequent inspections, and 6) proper disposal of all hazardous materials generated on site. Neither Spongex nor Nomaco is subject to SARA Title III, Section 313 reporting requirements. Precautions have been taken at both facilities to ensure that the materials of construction for containers handling hazardous substances or toxic pollutants are compatible with the container's contents and surrounding environment. Feasibility Study At our facilities, there are certain activities that have a high potential for contaminating stormwater. These activities are: waste disposal, storage of final product and raw material unloading activities are exposed to stormwater at both the Nomaco and Spongex facility. However, secondary containment, good housekeeping practices, and spill control procedures minimize greatly reduce the potential for any contamination of stormwater. In addition, there are pollutants of concern that may be associated with these activities. These pollutants are: particulate, plastic pellets, and a flammable solvent. Both bulk storage and unloading activities have secondary containment. Certain types of pollutants have the potential to be exposed to stonnwater. These pollutants are Scrap material collected in roll -offs located at the Northeast corner of the Spongex facility represents the area of the facilities with reasonable potential for containing significant amounts of pollutants. No chemical constituents are released due to exposure to stormwater. Given this, the greatest risk is for solid scrap remnants or Total solids to be exposed to stonnwater in this area of the facility. The scrap containers are covered except when material is being added. Material is not added during storm events. In addition, spills are cleaned up in a timely fashion. Although the potential for significant amounts of pollutants to be exposed to stormwater is not great, this represents the greatest potential at this facility. The potential for runoff from both the Spongex and Nomaco facility is low. The Spongex facility has a concrete wall that prevents any contaminated runoff from the site. The Nomaco site has a recessed loading dock and a holding pond on the West side of the facility that prevents any contaminated runoff from this side of the facility. See Appendix A & B — Site map and area topography map respectively. Secondary Containment Schedule The storage tanks at the Spongex facility have secondary containment. Two 10,000 gallon bulk storage tanks are located inside a containment area with enough capacity for one tank plus sufficient freeboard to allow for the 25-year, 24-hour storm event. In addition to the secondary containment the loading area is sloped so that a catastrophic failure would be contained by a containment wall which prevents any spill from entering into a nearby creek. The unloading area is paved with asphalt. The Nomaco facility has a loading dock on the West side of the facility which serves as secondary containment. It is drained by a sump pump which discharges through a 4" PVC pipe to stormwater holding pond which also serves as secondary containment. BMP Summary At Spongex the structural controls include secondary controls for outside storage of bulk storage tanks. The secondary containment is a block wall that is large enough to contain the largest tank plus enough freeboard for a 100 year stormwater event. There is a discharge pipe that is controlled via a normally closed ball valve which is kept under lock and key. Tertiary control is provided by a block containment wall which ensures that any spillage during unloading will be contained. Non-structural controls include procedures, stormwater pollution prevention training and inspections conducted by associates knowledgeable in the both regulatory requirements and the requirements of this plan. Procedures include housekeeping, spill control and response and inspection of accumulated stormwater prior to release from containment areas. Non-structural controls also include frequent disposal of trash containers to prevent overflow. Given the absence of outside material storage and processes and exposed raw material unloading at Nomaco, there is no need for structural controls. However, there is a recessed loading dock located at the South West corner of the facility and a stonnwater holding pond adjacent to the west side of the facility. The loading dock containment area is drained via a discharge pipe that is controlled via a normally closed ball valve which is kept under lock and key. Grassy areas have been planted to reduce erosion at both sites. Non-structural controls are in place at both facilities. Stormwater is untreated at both Nomaco and Spongex. SPILL PREVENTION AND RESPONSE PLAN Spill Response Equipment is located in areas where spill potential exists. With regard to storm water pollution the most significant spill likely to be encountered would be associated with the solvent storage tanks on the East side of the Spongex facility. Other spills that might be encountered at both facilities of less likely hood or significance would be: • Vehicle fuel • Vehicle oil • Equipment oil • Plastic pellets Our Maintenance associates are trained in HAZWOPER procedures and respond to major spills. See Table 1 — Spill Kit Inventory See Table 2 — Material Handling & Spill Prevention / Clean-up Procedures PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE AND GOOD HOUSEKEEPING PLAN Preventative Maintenance We maintain an ongoing preventive maintenance program. The current preventative maintenance program includes frequent inspections for valves and equipment, maintenance of equipment according to manufacturer's recommendations. Any oil handling equipment is included in the preventative maintenance program. See Table 3 — Preventative Maintenance / Routine House Keeping Inspections See Form l — Preventative Maintenance / Housekeeping Inspection Form Good Housekeeping It is our policy to maintain clean and orderly facilities to minimize potential for industrial runoff as well as to ensure the safety of our employees. Our good housekeeping program emphasizes reducing the possibility of mishandling chemicals or equipment and training of employees in housekeeping techniques. Good housekeeping practices have been implemented to ensure that spills are cleaned up in a timely manner preventing foam or any other solid material runoff into stone drains and surface runoff. In addition, good housekeeping and spill response procedures have been implemented to minimize risk of exposure due to spills that could potentially occur during connection or disconnection of loading/unloading equipment. See Table 3 — Preventative Maintenance / Routine House Keeping Inspections See Form I — Preventative Maintenance / Housekeeping Inspection Form EMPLOYEE TRAINING All associates receive hazard communication training initially and on a periodic basis. Associates are trained when new chemicals are introduced at the site. Employees at both facilities are trained in the following elements: Training Topic Covered Personnel Frequency Preventative Maintenance Procedures Maintenance Annually Good House Keeping Practices Maintenance / Receiving Annually Qualitative Monitoring Procedures Maintenance Annually Spill Response & Reporting Maintenance Annually Good Material Handling Practices Maintenance / Receiving Annually In addition, employees are trained not to dispose of any chemical without the approval of the site Plant Engineer or supervisor. We maintain annual employee training in stormwater pollution prevention to inform personnel at all levels of responsibility of the components and goals of the stormwater pollution prevention plan. The Site Plant Engineer is responsible for conducting employee training. See Form 2 — Employee Training form RESPONSIBLE PARTY The Nomaco and Spongex facilities have collectively formed a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Committee. Each individual on the stormwater pollution prevention committee has a set of responsibilities. m The plant managers at each facility are responsible for the overall quality of this plan as well as overall compliance with regulatory and plan requirements. The Spongex Plant Manager and the Nomaco Plant Engineer shall be responsible for coordinating the design, implementation, and maintenance of the plan as it relates to each facility. The Nomaco Plant Engineer shall have overall responsibility for maintenance of the plan and any regulatory reporting requirements. A site -wide stormwater pollution prevention team shall be assembled. Representative members from each of the following areas at each plant shall make up the team: Environmental, Engineering, Maintenance, Warehouse. This team shall be responsible for conducting semi- annual inspections and annual review of this plan against regulatory requirements. The Plant Manager/Plant Engineer or their designee shall ensure that containment areas are inspected and approved prior to any release of stormwater from containment areas. The Plant Manager/Plant Engineer shall also ensure the qualitative monitoring is completed in accordance with the permit requirements listed in Table 1 of Section B. The Plant Manager is responsible for spill prevention at each facility. These responsibilities include ensuring associates are assigned responsibility for training and spill response including inventory control and management, maintenance of supplies and good housekeeping. The Site Plan Engineer is responsible for 1) conducting periodic site investigations, 2) keeping records of all inspections and reports, and updating the plan as needed. PLAN AMMENDMENT This Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan shall be amended whenever there is a change in design, construction, operation, or maintenance which has a significant effect on the potential for the discharge of pollutants to surface waters. In addition, the Plan shall be reviewed and updated on an annual basis. See Form 3 — Annual SWPPP Review Form FACILITY INSPECTION PROGRAM Inspections of the facility and all stormwater systems shall occur on a semi-annual schedule - during the first half of the year (January to June) and during the second half (July to December), with at least 60-days separating inspection dates. The inspection and any subsequent maintenance activities performed shall be documented, recording date and time of inspection, individual(s) making the inspection and a narrative description of the facility's stormwater control systems, plant equipment and systems. See Form 4 — Comprehensive Site Inspection Form QUALITITATIVE MONITORING PROGRAM Qualitative monitoring in the form of visual inspections of each stormwater outfall is performed as specified below in Fig 1. For this type of monitoring, no analytical tests are required. However, qualitative monitoring of stormwater outfalls must be performed during a representative stone event. A representative storm event is defined as a storm event that measures greater than 0.1 inches of rainfall and that is preceded by at least 72 hours in which no storm event measuring greater than 0.1 inches has occurred. A single storm event may contain up to 10 consecutive hours of no precipitation. For example, if it rains for 2 hours without producing any collectable discharge, and then stops, a sample may be collected if a rain producing a discharge begins again within the next 10 hours. Fig 1. Qualitative Monitoring Requirements Discharge Characteristics Frequency Monitoring Location' Color Semi -Annual SDO Odor Semi -Annual SDO Clarity Semi -Annual SDO Floating Solids Semi -Annual SDO Suspended Solids Semi -Annual SDO Foam Semi -Annual SDO Oil Sheen Semi -Annual SDO Other obvious indicators of stormwater pollution Semi -Annual SDO Footnotes: 3 Monitoring Locations: Qualitative monitoring shall be performed at each stormwater discharge outfall (SDO) regardless of representative outfall status. A guidance document for conducting qualitative stormwater monitoring is found online at httl::Hportal.ncdenr.org/c/document library/get file?uuid=2b010736-9c8b-4f2O-bc80- 8efc3dfed6f4&groupld=3 8364 Onsite vehicle maintenance is not performed at the Nomaco/ Spongex facilities thus the monitoring requirements identified in Section C of the general permit do not apply to these facilities. 12 APPENDIX A - si'm MAP — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -- Saondsn'caeummrnl rwrm xam MI&I, Wod 1 1 l 1 1 � REP SOD W3 • • • • r • • • • t t • �� NORTH : � ro l ,l l J - _ a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O ® SECONDARY CONTAINMENT 1 pp ®LOADING /UNLOADING AREA 1. t t A ® TRASH I WASTE STORAGE O ASPHALT/CONCRETE • p m DRAINAGE MELD I ' Expmud Polluwu'. VcM1ick ails. E:yvipm<m oils p omq iuO ngdcbns Tol.l aar. 3m.J ,8,9B3 ro ro ro Imp, f:wz« mao75% • ® DRAINAGE MELD O ExpmrM eollmmis: V.hickolls,B..w,d<Aris,• pminors imcnu Toul ama: sw., . , p a 4 Impervious ewx<vea: 39,rA p m I LD3 E,psPolluuVNik oils, (Ionung dcLria.• P p l AP-C-W..m nl dike noondsangc unAa i .mNu Tolalmca:l,.a r1 �, O Impcn,ous 31N % rvfaracc m<a. � 00 O roc SDO2 ' BMP- Saaodan mnminmrnl •mll xiW bcW Mmag<.al.c. Appendix B Nomaco / Spongex LLC Topo Map NCG05036 Nomaco Inc.: Spongex LLC APPENDIX 13 -TOPO MAP Nomaco / Spongex LLC Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Appendix C Representative Storm Water Outfall Certification for Nomaco / Spongex LLC 3006 & 3002 Anaconda Rd. Tarboro, NC, 27886 Permit # NCGO50364 This is to certify that the stormwater outfalls located at: SDO# 1: Latitude: 35°54'57.34" N, Longitude: 77°35'18.84" W SDO# 2: Latitude: 35°54'53.74" N, Longitude: 77°35'6.65" W are associated with similar industrial activities such that the characteristics of storm water runoff are essentially the same. Therefore, Nomaco / Spongex LLC requests that it be allowed to sample the outfalls located at: SDO # 001: Latitude: 35°54'45.66" N, Longitude: 77°35'7.82" W SDO # 002: Latitude: 35°54'50.37" N, Longitude: 77°35'12.25" W SDO # 003: Latitude: 35°54'55.3" N, Longitude: 77°35'19.1" W as the representative outfalls. The above outfalls have been evaluated for the presence of non-stormwater discharges and that there are no other significant discharges. Certification: I certify that I have chosen points that are most likely to contain pollutants from the area. I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment. Doug Stolpe, Operatio s Mana er, Nomaco Insulation: Signature: / Date: James Welch, Plant Manager, Spongex LLC Signature: -0-, Date: Zl411/ Table 1- Spill Kit Inventory Location Absorbents Tools PPE Other Supplies (Spongex) Maintenance Shop Pads, absorbent clay, pigs Shovels, brooms, squeegees, Rubber gloves, face shield, dust Warning tape, traffic cones, tarp masks labels, markers, MSDS (Spongex) Mixing Room Pads, absorbent clay, pigs Shovels, brooms, squeegees, Rubber gloves, face shield, dust Warning tape, traffic cones, tarp masks labels, markers, MSDS (Nomaco) Maintenance Shop Pads, absorbent clay, pigs Shovels, brooms, squeegees, Rubber gloves, face shield, dust Warning tape, traffic cones, tarp masks labels, markers, MSDS Responsible Parties: Nomaco: Peyton Stamper, Bryan Rooker Spongex: Jack Smith Spill Response Contractor: Eastern Environmental Management 24 hr. Phone #: 252-443-2224 NCDWQ Spill Reporting Emergency Hotline: 1-800-858-0368 Table 2 — Material Handling & Spill Prevention / Clean-up Procedures Potential Spill Area Material Handling & Storage Procedures Spill Response Procedures & Equipment Spongex - Two 10,000 gal. Solvent storage tanks • Solvents are transferred to the 10,000 gal. • Minor spills that occur due to the coupling and storage tanks from tankers via hose and quick uncoupling of fill lines is treated by connect couplings by the tanker driver. maintenance personnel using absorbent clay • Receiving personnel unsecure the tank fill lines from spill kit located in the mixing room by means of locking devices on the ball fill line adjacent to the solvent storage area. The clay is ball valves prior to unloading. then disposed of according to the companies • Receiving personnel must confirm that the waste disposal program. primary and secondary drain valves are closed • In the event of a large spill the maintenance and secured. response personnel will secure the area and • Receiving personnel must supervise the contact the Spill Response Contractor. unloading process. • Receiving personnel secure the tank fill lines by means of locking devices on the ball fill line ball valves after unloading. Nomaco / Spongex property —General spills • If possible, liquid or hazardous materials should • Clean up minor spills immediately. be handled, used, stored, re -package and • Block any down gradient storm drains with transferred indoors or under cover berms, covers, absorbent socks or "pigs". • Deliveries of bulk liquids should be supervised. • Never hose down spills or leaks. Down gradient storm drain inlets should be • Always use "Dry Cleanup Methods" for cleanup covered during deliveries. of fuel spills (gas, diesel, motor oil or kerosene). • Cover and contain containers, materials and waste. 1. Spread absorbents ("kitty litter" or loose • Keep all containers closed unless adding or removing absorbents, sheets, pillows, pigs, or socks) mater on the spill. 2. Sweep up or pick up the absorbed materials. 3. Dispose of wastes properly. • If fluids are leaking or have spilled on an impermeable surface, such as a roadway, locate nearest down gradient storm drain and dike or berm the drain to prevent fluids from entering it. • Put down absorbent on the spill area. • After clean up, be sure to sweep up the contaminated absorbent and remove the berm or dike at storm drain. • If Fluids are leaking or have spilled on a permeable surface, such as gravel, soil or grass, mark the area and report the spill to the spill response contactor. Table 2 — Material Handling & Spill Prevention / Clean-up Procedures Continued Responsible Parties: Nomaco: Peyton Stamper, Bryan Rooker, James Mann Spongex: Jack Smith, Ronnie House Spill Response Contractor: Eastern Environmental Management 24 hr. Phone #: 252-443-2224 NCDWQ Spill Reporting Emergency Hotline: 1-800-858-0368 Table 3 — Preventative Maintenance / Routine Housekeeping Inspections Description of Area or Equipment Tasks Frequency Spongex— Solvent storage tanks 1. Inspect containment dike structure for cracks or damage. Monthly 2. Inspect integrity of interior coating. 3. Inspect drain valve for leaks and proper operation. R&R as needed. 4. Inspect structural integrity of tanks. 5. Check tanks for leaks. 6. Check pumps for leaks. R&R as needed. 7. Check piping for leaks. R&R as needed. Spongex— Secondary containment wall 1. Inspect containment wall structure for cracks or damage. Monthly 2. Inspect drain valve for leaks and proper operation. R&R as needed. Spongex — Outfall #1 1. Inspect outfall and remove collected debris is needed. Weekly Nomaco / Spongex—Facility exterior 1. Check for vehicular oil spills. Clean up accordingly. Weekly 2. Check for unsecured trash. Clean up accordingly. 3. Check for signs of structural corrosion to building and exterior equipment (Iron oxide, flaking paint, etc) that might potentially be carried away by storm water. Clean up accordingly. 4. Check for improperly stored materials. 5. Check storm water drains for debris and remove as needed. 6. Check trash storage bins for leaks or physical damage. 7. Inspect pallet storage area for cleanliness. 8. Inspect all exterior equipment for oil leaks. Nomaco —Outfall #2 1. Inspect outfall and remove collected debris is needed. Weekly Nomaco —Outfall #3 1. Inspect outfall and remove collected debris is needed. Weekly Nomaco— Secondary containment— West dock 1. Verify proper operation of sump pump. Monthly 2. Inspect drain valve for leaks and proper operation. R&R as needed. 3. Inspect piping for leaks. R&R as needed. Nomaco— Secondary containment— Holding pond 1. Inspect pond for debris. Monthly 2. Inspect integrity of pond for erosion of banks and discharge area. Form 1— Preventative Maintenance / Housekeeping Inspection Form Date: Time: Inspector Print: Signature: Areas inspected Observation Corrective Actions Taken Form 2 — Employee Training form Date: Trainer Print: Signature: Topics Covered: Form 3 — Annual SWPPP Review Form Date of Review: Reviewer Print: Signature: Annual SWPPP Review Checklist 1. Facility general information and SWPPP team information is current and accurate YES NO 2. Site map is current and accurate YES NO 3. Significant material inventory is current and accurate YES NO 4. New exposures, processes and related controls have been documented YES NO N/A 5. Spills have been recorded and reported as appropriate YES NO N/A 6. Records of routine preventative maintenance, housekeeping and employee training are available in the SWPPP file YES NO 7. Comprehensive site inspections have been completed, certified and filed in the SWPPP file YES NO 8. Corrective actions noted in the inspection reports have been completed YES NO 9. Annual fees have been paid YES NO 10. Permit renewal request has been processed YES NO N/A 11. SWPPP has been reviewed by the designated representatives YES NO Additional Comments: Form 4 — Comprehensive Site Inspection Form Date: Time: Inspector: Print: Signature: is the taciiity in commiance witn the tienerai rerma ana the �wrvr Areas inspected I Observation I Corrective Actions Taken Stormwater Discharge Outfall (SDO) Qualitative Monitoring Report Permit No.: N/C/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ or Certificate of Coverage No.: N/C/G/_/_/_/_/_/_/ Facility Name: County: Phone No. Inspector: Date of Inspection: By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge: (Signature of Pennittee or Designee) 1. Outfall Description Outfall No. Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.) Receiving Stream: Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outf ll drainage area: 2. Color Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and fin (light, medium, dark), as descriptors: 3. Odor Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e., smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor, etc.) 4. Clarity Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where I is clear and 10 is very cloudy: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Page 1 S W U-242-020705 5. Floating Solids Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the stonmvater discharge where I is no solids and 10 is the surface covered with floating solids: l 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6. Suspended Solids Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the stormwater discharge where I is no solids and 10 is extremely muddy: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7. Foam Is there any foam in the stormwatcr discharge? Yes No 8. Oil Sheen Is there an oil sheen in the stormwatcr discharge? Yes No 9. Deposition at Outfall Is there deposition of material (sediment, etc.) at or immediately below the outfall? Yes No 10. Erosion at Outfall Is there erosion at or immediately below the outfall? Yes No 11. Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Pollution List and describe Note: Low clarity, high solids, and/or the presence of foam, oil sheen, deposition or erosion may be indicative of conditions that warrant further investigation and corrective action. Page 2 S W U-242-020705 Stormwater Discharge Outfall (SDO) Qualitative Monitoring Report Supplement SWU-242A: Guidance for Rating Stormwater Discharge This supplement is intended only as a guide for rating visually observed parameters on a scale of 1-5. The inspector should use best professional judgment when characterizing the quality of stormwater discharge. Also, the pictures included here do not necessarily show stormwater discharges but serve to illustrate the characteristics described. Clarity (1 is clear, and 5 is very opaque or cloudy) 1 3 Floating Solids (1 is no solids, and 5 is the surface covered with floating solids or significant trash/debris) 1 3 5 5 SWU-242A- I808 Suspended Solids (1 is no solids, and 5 is extremely muddy or clouded with other k1 Tannic Water 5 Water naturally high in tannins in the eastern part of North Carolina may still have low amounts of suspended solids and high clarity but not appear "clear" because of coloration. The examples below will help rate discharges that must be observed in tannic waters. Clear tannic water may look like tea or coffee, but waters that look more "milky" or like "chocolate milk" have less clarity and higher suspended solids. Suspended Solids / Clarity in waterbodies naturally high in tannins 1/1 3/3 Page 2 of 10 5/5 SWU-242A-061808 Example 1 1. Outfall Description: Outfall No. Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.) Receiving Stream: Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage area: 2. Color: Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium, dark) as descriptors: 3. Odor: Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e., smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor, etc.): 4. Clarity: Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge, where 1 is clear and 5 is very cloudy: 1 O 3 4 5 5. Floating Solids: Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the stormwater discharge, where I is no solids and 5 is the surface covered with floating solids: 2 3 O 5 6. Suspended Solids: Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the stormwater discharge, where 1 is no solids and 5 is extremely muddy: I 2 O 4 5 Page 3 of 10 SWU-242A4161808 Example 3 1. Outfall Description: Outfall No. Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.) Receiving Stream: _ Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage area: 2. Color: Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium, dark) as descriptors: _ 3. Odor: Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e., smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor, etc.): 4. Clarity: Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge, where 1 is clear and 5 is very cloudy: 1 2 3 O 5 5. Floating Solids: Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the stormwater discharge, where 1 is no solids and 5 is the surface covered with floating solids: 1 2 3 O 5 6. Suspended Solids: Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the stormwater discharge, where 1 is no solids and 5 is extremely muddy: 1 2 O 4 5 Page 7 of 10 SWU-242A-061808 7. Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? Yes No 8. Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? Yes No 9. Is there evidence of erosion or deposition at the outfall? Yes No 10. Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Pollution: List and describe Page 8 of 10 SWU-242A-061808 E_.volnplc 4 1. Outfall Description: Outfall No. Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.) Receiving Stream: Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage area: 2. Color: Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium, dark) as descriptors: 3. Odor: Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e., smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor, etc.): _ 4. Clarity: Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge, where 1 is clear and 5 is very cloudy: O 2 3 4 5 5. Floating Solids: Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the stormwater discharge, where I is no solids and 5 is the surface covered with floating solids: O 2 3 4 5 6. Suspended Solids: Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the stormwater discharge, where 1 is no solids and 5 is extremely muddy: O 2 3 4 5 Page 9 of 10 SWU.242A-061808 1.It, ? of d. cunt. 7. Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? Yes No S. Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? Yes No 9. Is there evidence of erosion or deposition at the outfall? Yes No 10. Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwafer Pollution: List and describe \l a Pace 10 of 10 S W U-242A-061808 ^I: i of J, runt. 7. Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? Yes No 8. Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? Yes No 9. Is there evidence of erosion or deposition at the outfall? Yes No 10. Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Pollution: List and describe V \ Page 4 of 10 SNVU-242A-O61808 Example 2 1. Outfall Description: Outfall No. Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.) Receiving Stream: Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage area: 2. Color: Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium, dark) as descriptors: _ 3. Odor: Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e., smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor, etc.): 4. Clarity: Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge, where I is clear and 5 is very cloudy: 1 O 3 4 5 5. Floating Solids: Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the stormwater discharge, where I is no solids and 5 is the surface covered with Floating solids: 1 O 3 4 5 6. Suspended Solids: Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the stormwater discharge, where 1 is no solids and 5 is extremely muddy: 1 O2 3 4 5 Page 5 of 10 6y"AM.M.WW 7t:?118 of 4. cunt. 7. Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? Yes No 8. Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? Yes No 9. Is there evidence of erosion or deposition at the outfall? Yes No I11. Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Pollution: List and describe Sonic di,plaecment of 2ratel and .edroc,it ubset\ed..n the owlall. kko, 14.& 't tie \\atcr hccnme, more turbidicloudN hcpmd the uutfall 1i.e.. clm it „1 ; \Le„1\e .olid, heim, carried into recei� m2'\:uCr. This example illustrates how additional information in number 10. can be important to characterizing stormwater discharge impacts. Page 6 of 10 swU-242A-061808