NCG030075_MONITORING INFO_20191231

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
NCG PERMITS
PERMIT NO.
/V C� L)317��
DOC TYPE,
❑ HISTORICAL FILE
C MONITORING REPORTS
DOC DATE
❑ a�%� a- 3 J
YYYYMMDD

I
December 6, 2019
Mr. Jack Martindale
Borg Warner Turbo Systems
Post Office Box 15075
Asheville, North Carolina 28813
wood.
Wood Environment& Infrastructure Solutions, Inc.
1308-C Patton Avenue
1 r Asheville NC28806
RECRVED USA
DEC 31 2019
CENTil:AL FILES
DWR SECTIOI�J
Subject: Report of October 2019 Stormwater Discharge Sampling
BorgWarner Turbo Systems
Arden, North Carolina
Wood Project 6252-16-0240.05
Dear Mr. Martindale:
T. 828-252-8130
www.woodplccom
Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions, Inc. (Wood) is pleased to submit this Report of
October 2019 Stormwater Discharge Sampling forthe Borg Warner Turbo Systems facility
located on Brevard Road in Arden, North Carolina. This sampling was performed to complywith
requirements contained in the General Permit for Stormwater Discharge (Permit NCG030000
effective November 1, 2018 issued by the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
(NCDEQ). Borg Warner's certificate of coverage under this permit is NCG030075.
Background Information
Seven stormwater outfalls are located at the site, as shown on the attached Figure 1. A Tier Two
response was implemented at outfalls OF-1, OF-2, OF-3, OF-4 and OF-7 due to initial detections
of zinc above the NCDEQ benchmark value for two consecutive semi-annual sampling events in
2013. Concentrations of copper have also been detected above the NCDEQ benchmark value in
a limited number of outfalls. In accordance with the Tier Two response, monthly sampling of the
five outfalls above was performed from January 2014 until April 2015.
North Carolina Corporate Engineering License No. F-1253; Geology No. C-247

Borg Warner Turbo Systems —October 2019 Stormwater Disdiarge Sampling December 6, 2019
Wood Project 6252-16-0240.05
On April 22, 2015, a letter was received from NCDEQwhich indicated that Borg Warner Turbo
i
Systems' Request for Regulatory Relief from Monthly Stormwater Sampling had been approved.
This regulatory relief, in general terms, granted Borg Warner an exemption from the monthly
sampling/Tier Two response as it appI ies to the historic concentrations/detections of zinc and
copper in the stormwatersamples and allows stormwater samples to be collected on the
'regular' permit -specified semi-annual basis. The regulatory relief letter also approved the
request for representative outfall status, whereby outfalls OF-1 and OF-3 are the only outfalls to
be sampled. This regulatory relief expired when the current General Permit was renewed in 2018.
The outfalls discharge directly and indirectly into Clayton Creek prior to Clayton Creek's
confluence with the French Broad River. According to NCDEQ's water quality classification of the
French Broad River basin, Clayton Creek and the adjacent portion of the French Broad River are
not currently classified as the following sensitive receiving waters: Outstanding Resource Waters,
High Quality Waters, Primary Nursery Areas and Trout Waters. Therefore, the more protective
benchmarkvalue listed in the General. Permit for total suspended solids (50mg/L) does not apply
to stormwater discharges at the site— the applicable benchmarkvalue fortotal suspended solids
is 100 mg/L. A rain gauge is present at the site approximately six feet above ground in an open
area at a distance of at least twice the height of surrounding structures.
October 2019 Stormwater Sampling Activities
Wood personnel were onsite to perform stormwater sampling during a measureable storm
event on October 30, 2019. The storm event occurred between approximately7:00 AM on
October 30, 2019, and 4:00 PM on October 31, 2,019. Wood personnel performed stormwater
sampling of the discharges starting at approximately8AS AM when constant measureable
discharge was produced. Total rainfall for this event was 2.8 inches as measured at the on -site
1
rain gauge the following day after the samples were collected. Rainfall sufficient to produce a
measureable discharge was not recorded during the 72 hours prior to this measurable storm
event.

Borg Warner Turbo Systems —October 2019 Stormwater Dis6orge Sampling December 6, 2019
Wood Project 6252-16-0240.05
Within about 30 minutes of constant measurable discharge, the pH of the stormwa ter was
measured with a calibrated pH meter, and stormwatersamples were collected from
representative outfalls OF-1 and OF-3. The samples were packed in an ice -chilled cooler and
delivered with chain -of -custody via overnight courierto Pace Analytical in Mt. Juliet, Tennessee
(a North Carolina -accredited laboratory) for analysis. The outfall samples were submitted for
i
analysis of total lead, total zinc, and total copper according to Standard Method 6020B, total
suspended solids (TSS) according to Standard Method 2540D, and non-polaroiI and grease
according to EPA Method 1664E (SGT-HEM).
In addition to analytical monitoring, Wood performed qualitative monitoring at each stormwater
discharge outfall associated with industrial activity. The qualitative monitoring included the
observation of the following discharge characteristics: color, odor, clarity, floating solids,
suspended solids, foam, oil sheen, erosion or deposition, and other obvious indicators of
stormwater pollution. The completed Stormwater Discharge outfall Qualitative Monitoring
Reports for outfalls OF-1, OF-2, and OF-3 are attached to this report.
Field analysis of the stormwater samples indicated pH readings were within the NCDEQ
benchmark range. Laboratory analytical results indicated the concentration of zinc exceeded the
NCDEQ benchmark value of 0.126 milligrams per liter (mg/L) in the sample collected from
outfall OF-3.The remaining monitored parameters were belowtheir respective NCDEQ
benchmark values. The analytical results forthe outfall samples are reported on the attached
NCDEQ Semi -Annual Stormwater Discharge Monitoring Report. The laboratory analytical report
and chain of custody records are attached to this report.
Based on previous sampling results indicating that industrial processes are not a significant
contributor to the zinc and copper concentrations, NCDEQ had granted a regulatory relief
exemption to the zinc and copper benchmarks; however, the regulatory relief expired with the
general permit in November 2018. The zinc data values for OF-1 and OF-3 indicated in this

Borg Warner Turbo Systems — October 2019 Stormwater Discharge Sampling December 6, 2019
Wood Project 6252-16-0240.05
report are within range of concentrations that have been previously detected and reported.
Based on the October2019 sampling results, a Tier Two response is warranted at outfall OF-3.
Wood recommends that the following list of requirements for a Tier Two response be performed
at the facility in relation to the detection of zinc above the benchmarkvaIue at OF-3:
II
1. Repeat the required actions included in a Tier One response, including conducting a
i
y stormwater management inspection of the facility within two weeks of receiving sampling
results.
;i 2. Immediately institute monthly monitoring for all parameters. The permittee shall conduct
monthly monitoring at every outfall where a sampling result exceeded the benchmark value
for two consecutive samples (i.e. OF-3). Monthly (analytical and qualitative) monitoring shall
continue until three consecutive sample results are below the benchmark values or within
benchmark range.
3. If no discharge occurs during the sampling period, the permittee is required to submit a
monthly monitoring report indicating "No Flow" to complywith reporting requirements.
4. Alternatively, in lieu of steps 2 and 3, the permittee may, aftertwo consecutive exceedances,
exercise the option of contacting the DEMLR Regional Engineer as described in Tier Three.
The Regional Engineer may direct the response actions on the part of the permittee as
provided in Tier Three, including reduced or additional sampling parameters orfrequency.
5. Benchmark exceeclances for a different parameter separately trigger a tiered response.
6. Maintain a record of the Tier Two response and monitoring results in the SPPP.
Wood recommends submitting this documentation of stormwater sampling, along with the
attached Stormwater Discharge outfall Monitoring Report, to NCDEQ for their files.
2

Borg Warner Turbo Systems — October 2019 Stormwater Disd7arge Sampling
Wood Project 6252-16-0240.05
December6 2019
We appreciate the opportunity to provide water resource services on this project. If you should
have any questions, or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact us at (828)
252-8130.
Sincerely,
Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions, Inc.
Gregory L. Hutchins. Matthew E. Wallace, P.E.
Technical Professional II Principal Engineer
GLH/MEW:glh
Attachments: Figure 1: Site Drainage Plan
NCDEQSemi-Annual Stormwater Discharge Monitoring Report
Qualitative Monitoring Reports
Laboratory Analytical Reportand Chain -of -Custody

3
Area I Impervious I Impervious
44
W 1
Y
`� �,'.i f
m
7
�d14-. �(P'• �s.. ` #. �� �e�T\Nt,,9� i"-?:c fw;'y--( r
Legend •� ,,
• . y
Catch Basin Drainage Area #1�' • #" 1 - _ - ��80
Q OutFall Drainage Area #2�'.'�
'n
—� Estimated Flow Direction tDrainage Area #3� soo AS.+D; r ✓'ln�y�rY
— Stormwater Conduit Drainage Area#4
rt--SIG.. tnr
Clayton Creek / DrainageArea #5 i•-•
d.— Drainage Area #6 1. Hoof drainage reponedfy discharges through Outlet 3.
w` 10' Surface Contour �2. OF-5 is identired as OF -SA prior to 2008
DrainageArea #7 3. OF-7 identified as OF-5 prior to 2008
Sub -Catchment 4. Site drains to Clayton Creek (Class C Waterway)
OF-7
OF-6
OF-5
OF-2
OF-3
OF<
OF-1
a x99 40o so9 .„
Wood Environment &
Infrastructure Solutions, Inc.
1308 Patton Ave Suite C
Asheville, NC, 28806
nTLE:
Site Drainage Plan
%Aj®®
CLIENT:
BorgWarner Turbo Systems
Figure
SITE; BorgWamer Turbo Systems
1849 Brevard Road
DAM; n;a2o
SCSCALE: 1�4os Paw.: s!Q-1 m59
1
Dz cut
CNK: MEW
[phone]
Arden, NC
LOCAnON:.+....-.m

_ --StormwaterDischarge Monitoring Report
for North Carolina Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources General Permit No. NCG030000
Date submitted December6, 2019
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCG03 0 0 7 5
FACILITYNAME BorgWamer Turbo Systems
COUNTY Buncombe
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES Gregory Hutchins, Wood E&IS
LABORATORY Pace Analytical Lab Cert. p
Comments on sample collection or analysis:
ENV 375
Part A: Stormwater Benchmarks and Monitoring Results
SAMPLE COLLECTION YEAR 2019
SAMPLE PERIOD ❑ Jan -June Q July -Dec
or ❑ Monthly' (month)
DISCHARGING TO CLASS ❑ORW ❑HQW ❑Trout ❑PNA
❑Zero -flow ❑Water Supply ❑SA
*J' ECOVED ❑o Other Class C (Clayton Creek)
DEC S 1 a019 PLEASE REMEMBER TO SIGN ON PAGES 2 AND/OR 3 4
,ANTRAL FILES
DWR SECTIOAI
❑ No discharge this periodj2
Outfall No.
Date Sample
Collected'
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches'
Total Suspended Solids
pH
Standard units
Total Copper
Total Lead
Total Zinc
Non -Polar O&G/
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons
Total Toxic
Organics5
Benchmarks
_
-
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L4
6.0 — 9.0
0.010 mg/L
0.075 mg/L
0.126 mg/L
15 mg/L
1 mg/L
Parameter Code
-
46529
C0530
00400
01119
01051
01094
00552
78141
OF-1
10/30/19
2.8
1 <2.500
7.08
1 <0.00500
0.00223
0.116
<5.260
NA
OF-3
10/30/19
2.8
3.400
7.46
0.00814
<0.00200
0.181
1 <5.210
NA
' Monthly sampling (instead of semi-annual) must begin with the second consecutive benchmark exceedance for the same parameter at the same outfall.
Z For sampling periods with no discharge at any single outfall, you must still submit this discharge monitoring report with a checkmark here.
3The total precipitation must be recorded using data from an on -site rain gauge. Unattended sites may be eligible for a waiver of the rain gauge requirement.
4 See General Permit, Section B, Table 1 to identify the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
s Total Toxic Organics sampling is applicable only for those facilities which perform metal finishing operations, manufacture semiconductors, manufacture
electronic crystals, or manufacture cathode ray tubes. For purposes of this permit the definition of Total Toxic Organics is that definition contained in the EPA
Effluent Guidelines for the facility subject to the requirement to sample (for metal finishing use the definition as found in 40 CFR 433.11; for semiconductor
manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.12; for electronic crystal manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.22; and for cathode ray
tube manufacture use the definition found in 40 CFR 469.31).
Permit Date: 11/1/2018-05/31/2021 SWU-245, last revised 11/1/2018
Page 1 of 3

-,Facilities that incorporate asolvent .management -plan into the Stormwate?'Pollution Prevention Plan may so certify, and the requirement for TTO monitoring
may be waived. The solvent management plan shall include a list of the total toxic organic compounds used and the other elements listed in the General
Permit. For those facilities electing to employ the TTO monitoring waiver, the discharger shall sign the following certification statement:
"Based upon my inquiry of the person or persons directly responsible for managing compliance with the permit monitoring requirement for total toxic organics
(TTO), I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, no dumping of concentrated toxic organics into the stormwater or areas which are exposed to rainfall or
stormwater runoff has occurred since filing the last discharge monitoring report. I further certify that this facility is implementing the all the provisions of the
solvent management plan included in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan."
Name (Print name)
Title (Print title)
Signature
Date
Note: Results must be reported in numerical format. Do not report Below Detection Limit, BDL, <PQL, Non -detect, ND, or other similar non -numerical
format. When results are below the applicable limits, they must be reported in the format, "<XX mg/L", where XX is the numerical value of the detection
limit, reporting limit, etc. in mg/L.
Note: If you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
Part B: Vehicle Maintenance Area Monitoring Results: only for facilities averaging > 55 gal of new oil per month.
n No discharge this period?z
Outfall No.
Date Sample Collected'
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall amount,
Inches'
New Motor Oil or
Hydraulic Oil Usage
Non -Polar O&G/ Total
Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Total Suspended
Solids
Benchmarks
-
-
-
15 mg/L
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L4
Parameter Code
-
46529
NCOIL
00552
CO530
Footnotes from Part A also apply to Part B
Note: If you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
Permit Date: 11/1/2018-05/31/2021 SWU-245, last revised 11/1/2018
Page 2 of 3

FOR PART A AND PART B MONITORING RESULTS:
• A BENCHMARK EXCEEDANCE TRIGGERS TIER 1 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
2 EXCEEDANCES IN A ROW FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT THE SAME OUTFALL TRIGGER TIER 2 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
TIER 3: HAS YOUR FACILITY HAD 4 OR MORE BENCHMARK EXCEEDENCES FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT ANYONE OUTFALL? YES ❑ NO 0
IF YES, HAVE YOU CONTACTED THE DEMLR REGIONAL OFFICE? YES ❑ NO Q
REGIONAL OFFICE CONTACT NAME: Asheville Regional Office/ Isaiah Reed
Mail an original copy of this DMR including all "No Discharge" reports within 30 days of receipt of the lab results (or at end of monitoring period in the
case of "No Discharge" reports) to:
Division of Water Quality
Attn: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
YOU MUST SIGN THIS CERTIFICATION FOR ANY INFORMATION REPORTED:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I
am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Signature of Permittee
Permit Date: 11/1/2018-05/31/2021
1 LL% le
Date
SWU-245, last revised 11/1/2018
Page 3 of 3

N-C-0
Environmental
Quality
Stormwater Discharge Outfall (SDO)
Qualitative Monitoring Report
For guidance on filling out this form, please visit https://deq.ne.gov/about/divisions/energy-mineral-land-
resources/ npdes-stormwater-gps
Permit No.: N/C/G/0/3/0/0/0/0
Facility Name: Bore Warner Turbo Systems
or Certificate of Coverage No.: N/C/G/0/3/0/0/7/5
County: Buncombe Phone No. [phone]
Inspector: Greeory Hutchins — Wood E&Is
Date of Inspection: 10/30/19
Time of Inspection: 8:55
Total Event Precipitation (inches):
All permits require qualitative monitoring to be performed during a "measurable storm event."
A "measurable storm event" is a storm event that results in an actual discharge from the permitted site
outfall. The previous measurable storm event must have been at least 72 hours prior. The 72-hour storm
interval does not apply if the permittee is able to document that a shorter interval is representative for
local storm events during the sampling period, and the permittee obtains approval from the local DEMLR
Regional Office.
By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
(Signature of Permittee or Designee)
1. Outfall Description:
Outfall No. OF- I
Receiving Stream:
Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.): Pipe
Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage area:
Manufacturing ofturbo parts, assembly of turbos, and shiopine and receiving of materials.
Page 1 of 2
S W U-242, Lust modified 06/01/2018

2. Color: Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint
(light, medium, dark) as descriptors:
3. Odor: Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e., smells strongly of oil, weak
chlorine odor, etc.):
4. Clarity: Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge, where I is clear
and 5 is very cloudy:
O 2 3 4 5
5. Floating Solids: Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the
ii stormwater discharge, where I is no solids and 5 is the surface covered with floating solids:
l
O 2 3 4 5
6. Suspended Solids: Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in
the stormwater discharge, where I is no solids and 5 is extremely muddy:
02
3 4 5
7. Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? o Yes
8. Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? OYes
9. Is there evidence of erosion or deposition at the outfall? o
10. Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Pollution:
List and describe
Note: Low clarity, high solids, and/or the presence of foam, oil sheen, or erosion/deposition may be
indicative of pollutant exposure. These conditions warrant further investigation.
Page 2 of 2
S W U-242, Lut modified 06/01/2018

K-r--V
Environmental
Quality
Stormwater Discharge Outfall (SDO)
Qualitative Monitoring Report
For guidance on filling out this form, please visit https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/energy-mineral-land-
resources/ npdes-stormwater-gps
i
Permit No.: N/C/G/0/3/0/0/0/0
Facility Name: BorgWarner Turbo Systems
or Certificate of Coverage No.: N/C/G/0/3/0/0/7/5
County: Buncombe Phone No. [phone]
Inspector: Greaory Hutchins — Wood E&Is
Date of Inspection: 10/30/19
Time of Inspection: 9:00
Total Event Precipitation (inches): 2.8
All permits require qualitative monitoring to be performed during a "measurable storm event.
A "measurable storm event" is a storm event that results in an actual discharge from the permitted site
outfall. The previous measurable storm event must have been at least 72 hours prior. The 72-hour storm
interval does not apply if the permittee is able to document that a shorter interval is representative for
local storm events during the sampling period, and the permittee obtains approval from the local DEMLR
Regional Office.
By this signature, 1 certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
=Y
(Signature of Permittee or Designee)
1. Outfall Description:
Outfall No. OF-2 Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.): Pipe
Receiving Stream:
Clavton Creek
Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainagearea:
Manufacturine of turbo ports. assembly of turbos. and shippine and receivine of materials
Page 1 of 2
SWU-242, Last modified 06/012018

2. Color: Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint
(light, medium, dark) as descriptors:
3. Odor: Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e., smells strongly of oil, weak
chlorine odor, etc.):
4. Clarity: Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge, where 1 is clear
and 5 is very cloudy:
O 2 3 4 5
5. Floating Solids: Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the
stormwater discharge, where I is no solids and 5 is the surface covered with floatingsolids:
O 2 3 4 5
6. Suspended Solids: Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in
the stormwater discharge, where I is no solids and 5 is extremely muddy:
O 2 3 4
7. Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? o Yes
8. Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? 0Yes
9. Is there evidence of erosion or deposition at the outfall? o
10. Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Pollution:
List and describe
5
Note: Low clarity, high solids, and/or the presence of foam, oil sheen, or erosion/deposition may be
i
indicative of pollutant exposure. These conditions warrant further investigation.
i�
Page 2 of 2
SWU-242, Last modified 06/01/2018
1'

K11r.-F
Environmental
Quality
Stormwater Discharge Outfall (SDO)
Qualitative Monitoring Report
For guidance on filling out this form, please visit https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/energy-mineral-land-
resources/ npdes-stonnwater-gps
Permit No.: N/C/G/0/3/0/0/0/0
Facility Name:_ Borg Warner Turbo Systems
or Certificate of Coverage No.: N/C/G/0/3/0/0/7/5
County: Buncombe Phone No. [phone]
Inspector: Gregory Hutchins — Wood Uls
Date of Inspection: 10/30/19
Time of Inspection: 9:05
Total Event Precipitation (inches): 2.8
All permits require qualitative monitoring to be performed during a "measurable storm event."
A "measurable storm event" is a storm event that results in an actual discharge from the permitted site
outfall. The previous measurable storm event must have been at least 72 hours prior. The 72-hour storm
interval does not apply if the permittee is able to document that a shorter interval is representative for
local storm events during the sampling period, and the permittee obtains approval from the local DEMLR
Office.
By this signature, 1 certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
��Y
(Signature of Permittee or Designee)
1. Outfall Description:
Outfall No. 017-3
Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.): Pipe
Receiving Stream:
Clayton Creek
Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage area:
Manufacturing of turbo parts, assembly of turbos. and shipping and receiving of materials
Page I of 2
SWU-242, Last modified 06/01/2018

2. Color: Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint
(light, medium, dark) as descriptors:
3. Odor: Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e., smells strongly of oil, weak
chlorine odor, etc.):
4. Clarity: Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge, where I is clear
and 5 is very cloudy:
O 2 3 4 5
5. Floating Solids: Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the
stormwater discharge, where 1 is no solids and 5 is the surface covered with floating solids:
O 1 2 3 4 5
6. Suspended Solids: Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in
the stormwater discharge, where I is no solids and 5 is extremely muddy:
O 2 3 4 5
7. Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? o Yes igNo. _Lipht foam observed on rip rap
8. Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? 0Yes O No.
9. Is there evidence of erosion or deposition at the outfall? O Yes No.
10. Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Pollution:
List and describe
i
Note: Low clarity, high solids, and/or the presence of foam, oil sheen, or erosion/deposition may be
indicative of pollutant exposure. These conditions warrant further investigation.
,I Page 2 of 2
I
�„ SWU-242, Last modified 06/01/2018

l
aceAnalytical ® ANALYTICAL REPORT
National Confer br Testing 8lnnoMoon November 07, 2019
I
FTC
I
l
,I
1
I,
11
I
1 i
Wood E&I Solutions Inc. - Asheville, NC
Sample Delivery Group:
L1155739
Samples Received:
10/31/2019
Project Number:
6252-16-0240.03
Description:
BorgWarner
Report To: Greg Hutchins
1308-C Patton Avenue
Asheville, NC 28806
Entire Report Reviewed By:
Heather J Wagner
Project Manager
Results relate only to the items tested or calibrated and are reported as rounded values. This test report shall not be
reproduced, except in full, without written approval of laboratory. Where applicable, sampling conducted by Pace.
Analytical National Is performed per guidance provided in laboratory standard operating procedures ENV.SOP-MTJL-0067 and
ENV.SOP-MTJL-0058. Where sampling conducted by the customer, results relate to the accuracy of the information provided.
and as the samples are vicerved.
it
d
11
ACCOUNT: PROJECT: SDG:
Wood E&I Solutions Inc. - Asheville, NC 6252-16-0240,03 L1155739
DATERIME:
111074917,31
PAGE:
I of 12

TABLE OF CONTENTS
ONE LAB. NATIONWIDE.
i�
Cp: Cover Page
1
,
CP
Tc: Table of Contents
2
I
Ss: Sample Summary
3
Cn: Case Narrative
4
I,
I
Sr: Sample Results
5
3
Ss
OF-1 L1155739-01
5
,
OF-3 L1155739-02
6
Cn
Qc: Quality Control Summary
7
SSr
Gravimetric Analysis by Method 2540 D-2011
7
Wet Chemistry by Method 1664E
8
6QC
Metals (ICPMS) by Method 6020E
9
7GI
Gl: Glossary of Terms
10
Al: Accreditations & Locations
11
aAl
Sc: Sample Chain of Custody
12
I
II
,I
1II,
a
SC
M
ACCOUNT:
PROJECT:
SDG:
DATEMME:
PAGE:
Wood E&I Solutions Inc. - Asheville, NC
6252-16-0240.03
L1155739
11/07/1917:31
2 o112

'1
I; SAMPLE SUMMARY ONE LAB, NATIONWIDE.
Collected by Collected date/time Received date/time
1 1-1155739-01 GW Gregory Hutchins 10/30/1908:55 10/31/1909:00 C
Method
It
Batch
Dilution Preparation
Analysis
Analyst
Location
date/time
date/time
Gravimetric Analysis by Method 2540 D-2011
WG1373701
1 11/01/1915:57
11/01/1918:43
TH
Mt. Juliet, TN
Wet Chemistry by Method 1664B
WG1376197
1 11/06/19 06:19
11/06/19 20:40
MBP
Mt. Juliet, TN
Metals (ICPMS) by Method 6020B
WGI373700
1 11/05/1913:47
11/0511916:32
LD
Mt. Juliet, TN
Collected by
Collected date/time
Received date/time
OF-3 L1155739-02 GW
Gregory Hutchins
10130/1909:05
10/31/1909.00
Method
Batch
Dilution Preparation
Analysis
Analyst
Location
1'
date/time
date/time
Gravimetric Analysis by Method 2540 D-2011
WG1373701
1 11/01/1915:57
11/01/1918:43
TH
Mt. Juliet, TN
Wet Chemistry by Method 1664B
WG1376197
1 11/06/19 06:19
11/06/19 20:40
MBP
Mt. Juliet, TN
Metals (ICPMS) by Method 6020B
WG1373700
1 11/05/1913:47
11/05/1916:50
LD
Mt. Juliet, TN
1
I
I
1
1
1
11
ACCOUNT: PROJECT: SDG:
Woad E&I Salutlons Inc. - Asheville. NC 6252-16-0240,03 L1155739
DATE/TIME: PAGE:
11/07/1917:31 3 o112

,I ONE LAB. NATIONWIDE
CASE NARRATIVE �
All sample aliquots were received at the correct temperature, in the proper containers, with the
appropriate preservatives, and within method specified holding times, unless qualified or notated within
the report. Where applicable, all MDL (LOD) and RDL (LOO) values reported for environmental samples
have been corrected for the dilution factor used in the analysis. All Method and Batch Ouality Control
are within established criteria except where addressed in this case narrative, a non-conformance form
or properly qualified within the sample results. By my digital signature below, I affirm to the best of my
knowledge, all problems/anomalies observed by the. laboratory as having the potential to affect the
quality of the data have been identified by the laboratory, and no information or data have been
knowingly withheld that would affect the quality of the data.
Heather J Wagner
Project Manager
1� ACCOUNT:
Wood E&I Solutions Inc. - Asheville, INC
PROJECT: SDG: DATETIME:
6252-16-0240.03 L1155739 11/07/1917:31
PAGE:
4 of 12

OF-1
SAMPLE RESULTS - 01
ONE LAB. NATIONWIDE.
Collected dateltime: 10/30/19 08:55
L1155739
Grevimetric Analysis by Method 2540 D-2011
1 Result Qualifier
RDL
Dilution Analysis
Batch
Cn
Analyte ug0
ug/I
date/time
z
Suspended Solids NO
{
2500
1 11/01/201918:43
WG1373701
TC
Wet Chemistry by Method 1664E
Ss
Result Qualifier
RDL
Dilution Analysis
Batch
Analyte ug/I
ug/I
date/time
Cn
TPH -OilB Grease NO
5260
1 11/06/201920:40
WG1376157
Metals (ICPMS) by Method 6020B
11 Result Qualifier
RDL
Dilution Analysis
Batch
Analyte ug/I
ug/I
date/time
e0e
Copper ND
5.00
1 11/05/201916:32
WG1373700
Lead 2.23
2.00
1 11/05/201916:32
WG1373700
761
_
Zinc 116
25.0
1 11/05/201916*32
WG1373700
-
aAl
SSc
ACCOUNT: PROJECT: SDG: DATE7TIME: PAGE:
wood E8l Solutions Inc -Asheville, NC 6252-16-0240.03 L1155739 11/07/1917:31 5 of 12
i

OF-3
SAMPLE RESULTS - 02
ONE LAB. NATIONWIDE.
Collected date/time: 10/30/19 09:05
L1155739
Gravimetric Analysis by Method 2540 D-2011
Result Qualifier
RDL
Dilution Analysis
Batch
CP
Analyte
ugll
ug/I
date/lime
z
TC
Suspended Solids 3400
2500
1 111011201918:43
WG1373701
I I
Wet Chemistry by Method 1664B
Ss
II Result Qualifier
RDL
Dilution Analysis
Batch
Analyte ug/I
ug/I
date/time
4Gf1
TPH -Oil&Grease ND
5210
1 11/06/201920:40
WGI376197
Metals (ICPMS) by Method 6O2OB
Result Qualifier
RDL
Dilution Analysis
Batch
An5yte ug/I
Ugll
date/time
QC
Capper 814
500
1 11/05/201916:50
WGI373700
Lead NO
2.00
1 11/05/201916:50
WG1373700
7Gl
Zinc 181
25.0
1 11/05/201916:50
WGI373700
aAl
'I
5Sc
II
I�
li
it
I ACCOUNT: PROJECT:
Wood E&I Solutions Inc. -Asheville, NC 5252-16-024003
SDG: DATE/TIME: PAGE:
L1155739 11/07A917:31 6 of 12

WG1373701 QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY _ _ _ -ONE LAB_ NATIONWIDE_.
_ _.Gra vimetrlc-Analysls_b y_Methotl:2540.D 2011-c-__.= -- -
Method Blank (MB) C
(MB) R3467696-1 11/01/19 18:43
MB Result MB Qualifier MB MOIL MB ROL
Analyte ug/I ugfl ug/I
Suspended Solids U 350 2500
L1155611-05 Original Sample (OS) • Duplicate (DUP)
(OS) L1155611-05 1V01/19 18:43 • (DUP) R3467696-3 11/01/19 18:43
Original Result DUP Result Dilution DUP RPD DUP Oualifer DUP RPD
Limits
Analyte ug/I ugfl % %
Suspended Solids 188000 181000 1 339 5
L1155738-04 Original Sample (OS) • Duplicate (DUP)
(OS) L1155738-04 11/01/19 18:43 • (DUP) R3467696-4 11/01/19 18:43
Original Result DUP Result Dilution DUP RPD DUP Qualifier DUP RPD
Limits
Analyte ug/I ug/I % %
Suspended Solids 85000 79000 1 7.32 P1 5
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
(LCS) R3467696-2 11/01/1918:43
Spike Amount
LCS Result
LCS Rec.
Rec. Limits LCS Qualifier
Analyte ugfl
ug/I
%
%
Suspended Solids 773000
748000
96.8
85.0-115
ACCOUNT: PROJECT: SDG: DATE/TIME: PAGE:
Wood E81 Solutions Inc. - Asheville. NC 6252-16-0240,03 L1155739 11/07/19 17,31 7 of 12

WG1376197 QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY _ _,--=__ONE LAB._ NATIONWIDE
wet Chemistry_by_M ethotl_16648.:-_.-
Method Blank (MB) C
(MB) R3469223-1 11/06/19 2040
MB Result MB Qualifier MB MDL MB ROL
Analyte ug/I ug/I ug/I
TPH -Oil&Grease U 725 5000
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) • Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate (LCSD)
(LCS) R3469223-2 11/06/19 20:40 • (LCSD) R3469223-3 11/06/19 20:40
Spike Amount LCS Result LCSD Result LCS Rec.
LCSD Rec.
Rec. Limits
LCS Qualifier LCSD Qualifier RPD
RPD Limits
Analyte ug4 - ug/I ug/1 %
%
%
%
%
TPH -Oil&Grease 20000 16000 13600 MO
68.0
64.0-132
16.2
34
ACCOUNT:
PROJECT:
SDG:
DATE/TIME:
PAGE:
Wood E&I Solutions Inc. -Asheville, NC
6252-16-0240.03
L1155739
11/07/1917:31
8 of 12

WG1_373700 QUALITY
SUMMARY
_ , _ _
ONE LAB. NATIONWIDE
_
_CONTROL
_ _
'- "'"M eta ls(ICPM S)'by"Method 6020B - - - L1155739.01.02
Method Blank (MB)
Cp
(MB) R3468712-1 11/05/1915:58
MB Result MB Qualifier MB MDL MB RDL
Analyte ug/I ugll ug/I
C:
Copper U 0.520 5.00
Lead U 0.240 2.00
s
SS
Zinc U 2.56 25.0
[Cn
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) • Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate (LCSD)
s
(LCS) R3468712-2 IY05/1916:02 - (LCSD) R3468712-3 IV05/19 16:05
Sf
Spike Amount LCS Result LCSD Result LCS Rec. LCSD Rec Rec Limits LCS
Qualifier LCSD Qualifier
RPD
RED Limits
Analyte ug/I ug/I ug/I % % %
%
%
Copper 50.0 474 48.3 948 96.6 80.0-120
1.89
20
Lead 50.0 497 50.7 99A 101 80.0-120
Zinc SOO 49.3 50.5 98.6 101 80.0-120
1.92
2.41
20
20
7
GI
Duplicate
3AI
L1155830-07 Original Sample (OS) • Matrix Spike (MS) • Matrix Spike (MSD)
(OS) L1155830-07 11/05/19 16:09 - (MS) R3468712-5 11/05/1916:17 - (MSD) R3468712-6 1V05/19 16:21
Spike Amount Original Result MS Result MSD Result MS Rec. MSD Rec. Dilution Rec. Limits MS Qualifier
MSD Qualifier RPD
RPD Limits
SC
Analyte ug/I ug/I ug/I ug/I % %
%
%
%
Copper 50.0 1.57 48.5 479 93.9 92.8 1
75.0-125
1.15
20
Lead 50.0 U 50.7 49.9 101 99.9 1
75.0-125
144
20
Zinc 50.0 4.98 51.9 53.1 93.8 96.3 1
75.0-125
2.35
20
ACCOUNT:
PROJECT:
SDG:
DATE/TIME:
PAGE:
Wood E81 Solutions Inc. -Asheville. NC
6252-16-0240.03
L1155739
11107/1917:31
9 of 12

GLOSSARY OF TERMS
ONE LAB. NATIONWIDE. J0
Guide to Reading and Understanding Your Laboratory Report
The information below is designed to better explain the various terms used in your report of analytical results from the Laboratory. This is not
intended as a comprehensive explanation, and if you have additional questions please contact your project representative.
Results Disclaimer - Information that may be provided by the customer, and contained within this report, include Permit Limits, Project Name,
Sample ID, Sample Matrix, Sample Preservation, Field Blanks, Field Spikes, Field Duplicates, On -Site Data, Sampling Collection DatesrTimes, and
Sampling Location. Results relate to the accuracy of this information provided, and as the samples are received.
Abbreviations and Definitions
MDL
Method Detection Limit.
ND
Not detected at the Reporting Limit (or MDL where applicable).
ROL
Reported Detection Limit.
II Red.
Recovery.
RPD
Relative Percent Difference.
SDG*
Sample Delivery Group.
d U
Not detected at the Reporting Limit (or MDL where applicable).
Analyte
The name of the particular compound or analysis performed. Some Analyses and Methods will have multiple analytes
reported.
1,
If the sample matrix contains an interfering material, the sample preparation volume or weight values differ from the
Dilution
standard, or if concentrations of analyzes in the sample are higher than the highest limit of concentration that the
laboratory can accurately report, the sample may be diluted for analysis. If a value different than 1 is used in this field, the
result reported has already been corrected for this factor.
These are the target % recovery ranges or % difference value that the laboratory has historically determined as normal
Limits
for the method and analyte being reported. Successful OC Sample analysis will target all analytes recovered or
I
duplicated within these ranges.
Original Sample
The non -spiked sample in the prep batch used to determine the Relative Percent Difference (RPD) from a quality control
sample. The Original Sample may not be included within the reported SDG.
This column provides a letter and/or number designation that corresponds to additional information concerning the result,
Qualifier
reported. If a Qualifier is present, a definition per Qualifier is provided within the Glossary and Definitions page and
potentially a discussion of possible implications of the Qualifier in the Case Narrative if applicable.
The actual analytical final result (corrected for any sample specific characteristics) reported for your sample. If there was
no measurable result returned for a specific analyze, the result in this column may state "ND" (Not Detected) or "BDL"
Result
(Below Detectable Levels). The information in the results column should always be accompanied by either an MDL
(Method Detection Limit) or RDL (Reporting Detection Limit) that defines the lowest value that the laboratory could detect
li
or report for this analyte.
'Uncertainty
'i (Radiochemistry)
Confidence level of 2 sigma.
A brief discussion about the included sample results, including a discussion of any non -conformances to protocol
Case Narrative (Cn)
observed either at sample receipt by the laboratory from the field or during the analytical process. If present, there will
be a section in the Case Narrative to discuss the meaning of any data qualifiers used in the report.
li Quality Control
This section of the report includes the results of the laboratory quality control analyses required by procedure or
Summary (Oc)
analytical methods to assist in evaluating the validity ofthe results reported for your samples. These analyses are not
being performed on your samples typically, but on laboratory generated material.
This is the document created in the field when your samples were initially collected. This is used to verify the time and
Sample Chain of
date of collection, the person collecting the samples, and the analyses that the laboratory is requested to perform. This
li Custody (Sc)
chain of custody also documents all persons (excluding commercial shippers) that have had control or possession of the
:I
samples from the time of collection until delivery to the laboratory for analysis.
This section of your report will provide the results of all testing performed on your samples. These results are provided
Sample Results (Sr)
by sample ID and are separated by the analyses performed on each sample. The header line of each analysis section for
each sample will provide the name and method number for the analysis reported.
Sample Summary (Ss)
This section of the Analytical Report defines the specific analyses performed for each sample ID, including the dazes and
times of preparation and/or analysis.
Qualifier
Description
J on
�l
I;
u
RPD value not applicable for sample concentrations less than 5 times the reporting limit.
i
--
i�
ACCOUNT:
PROJECT:
SDG
DATErrIME:
It
II
Wood E81 Solutions Inc. - Asheville, INC
6252-16-0240.03
L1155739
11/07A917:31
1CP
ITC
aS5
aCn
SSr
aQC
aAl
aSc
PAGE:
10 of 12

ACCREDITATIONS & LOCATIONS ONE LAD NATIONWIDE
Pace National is the only environmental laboratory accredited/certified to support your work nationwide from one location. One phone call, one point of contact, one laboratory. No other lab is as
accessible or prepared to handle your needs throughout the country. Our capacity and capability from our single location laboratory is comparable to the collective totals of the network
laboratories in our industry, The most significant benefit to our one location design Is the design of our laboratory campus. The model is conducive to accelerated productivity, decreasing
turnaround time, and preventing cross contamination, thus protecting sample integrity. Our focus on premium quality and prompt service allows us to be YOUR LAB OF CHOICE.
' Not all certifications held by the laboratory are applicable to the results reported in the attached report.
' Acuedltabon Is only applicable to the test methods specified on each scope of accreditation held by Pace National,
State Accreditations
Alabama
40660
Alaska
17-026
Arizona
AZO612
Arkansas
88-0469
California
2932
Colorado
TN00003
Connecticut
PH-0197
Florida
E87487
Georgia
NELAP
Georgia
923
Idaho
TN00003
Indiana
C-TN-01
Iowa
364
Kansas
E-10277
Kentucky1°
90010
Kentucky'
16
Louisiana
A130792
Louisiana'
IA180010
Maine
TN0002
Maryland
324
Massachusetts
M-TNO03
Michigan
9958
Minnesota
047-999-395
Mississippi
TN00003
Missouri
340
Montana
CERTOOB6
Third Party Federal Accreditations
A21A - ISO 17025
1461.01
A21A-ISO 17025'
1461.02
Canada
1461.01
EPA-Crypto
TN00003
Nebraska
NEOS-15-05
Nevada
TN-03-2002.34
New Hampshire
2975
New Jersey-NEIAP
TNO02
New Mexico'
Na
New York
11742
North Carolina
Env375
North Carolina'
DW21704
North Carolina
41
North Dakota
R-140
Ohio-VAP
CLOO69
Oklahoma
9915
Oregon
TN200002
Pennsylvania
68-02979
Rhode Island
LA000356
South Carolina
94004
South Dakota
Na
Tennessee "
2006
Texas
7104704245-18-15
Texas'
UB0152
Utah
TN00003
Vermont
VT2006
Virginia
460132
Washington
C847
West Virginia
233
Wisconsin
9980939910
Wyominq
A21-A
AIHA-LAP,LLC EMLAP 100789
DOD 1461.01
USDA P330-15-00234
'Drinking Water 'Underground Storage Tanks 'Aquatic Toxicity 3 ChemicaUMicrobiological ' Mold x Wanewater ma Accreditation not applicable
I'
Our Locations
Pace National has sixty-four client support centers that provide sample pickup and/or the delivery of sampling supplies. If you would like assistance from one of our support offices, please contact
our main office. Pace National performs all testing at our central laboratory.
T
WA
T�
MT
ND
b OR
MN
T ID
SO T
WI
NY
WY
MI
•
T
NE IA
T T RA T
T NV
on
1 ur
• T
T
IL Ir
VGA/
C
•
VAT
T
IfS MO
KY
_CA
T
T TLT
•
DK
N
•
T�
NM
AR
EC
T
•
•
MS AL
CA
T TX �,
•--sT
e
AK
T
T
\•l
\
\l
Y . o
(1
FL
BHt
It
__- -__--- _-- ACCOUNT: _-_ _ _—_
— ----
PROJECT: -- _-----
_SDG:
----DATERIM E:
I Wood E8l Solutions Inc. -Asheville, NC
i'
6252-16-0240.03
L11SS739
11/07A917:31
ME
PAGE:
11 of 12

.?AnaIjsJs/CBncaIner/
Preservative
Chain of Custody Page of
Wood E&I Solutions -Inc. --Asheville,
ndy Quinzi P.
1308-C Patton Avenue Chk
qaCeAnEitical'
as n.m
NC
Asheville, NC 28806
1308-C Patton Avenue
Alaura A&rL T. 37122 o
Report
Emil To: rodneY.ciark(g)3mec.ccnn
Rodney Clark 1
-.9
0
z
x
smK SIS-759-MM
K00-M. 45' Ill. -
faw:6==
Project
City/5tate I
/j, Je.,i
LN )JS75777J-
Description: BorgWarner
Collected:
- I
Client Project
Lab Project N
Phone: [phone]
6252-16-0240.03
LAWENGAN-BORG WARNER
M
ur, e
J125
J2
F,,: 828-251-9690
Tabled
T ble 4 a
'N
Collected by (print):
SitelFacility, 10 # P.O. N
w
LA ENGAN
Accurium: LAWENGAN
rAL
'c"
61
Jk
Template:TI14678
Tem"atX T " 67
Coile ted by (signature):
Rush? (Lab MUST Be Noti ie,) Quote #
7,1
0
4.0
0'
Z
Prelogin: P719525 -
P,c,.g,n P7� 9 '2'
Sam Day �'Fhaqnll
Noo DaySDJY(RdOnfY Date Results Needed 1
M
0
T
TSR: 873 - Heather I Wagner
T.. Day 10 Day(Bad Only) No.
'M
x
PS: 6? (V*'
Packed on ice
Three Day. - of
a
6
L9 0
Shipped Via: Fed EX Ground
Sample to
=p/Gr.b
M,1:7
D-Plh
Date 7[
Time
us
ft.
3.01.4(bbarm
pw
/V'/,q
3-'
X
.�.-X
x
OF-1
-GW
z� (2
x
X,
I
OF-3
Matrix: Remia rks:
PH Temp
le Perefe, Chorkli 't
coc Seal Present/Inte.t: —UP 'ZY N
S5�jogd AIR. Air F - Filter
CDC siqmod/Atcu-ate: '/Y N
GW.G ... rulviater B - BlaassaY f
Flow other
Bottles arrive :intact.
Correct bo-tl.a used: y N
ww - wastewater
DW - Drinking Water Samples returned via:
1—UPS
Sufficie.'i volume sent:
to Acolicabte
OT - Chher_ _fedEx --Courier Tracking 0
I -
VOA zero Heodspace; Y N
—
Relinquished by: (Signature) Date: Time: Wece,i,yed by; (Signature) Trip Blank Received: Yes I No/
CwMeoH
re.srv.rfOn Correct/Chocked: 7zly V
W SCREEN: <0.5 MWr
r r _ a , -1 TFR
,01 1011c-phn
Fell by: (Sign
Date:
Received by: (Signature)
Border R,c.lved:
Temp:
iI
If preservation required by Login: Date/Time
Relinquished by: (S�ignalwe)
Date:
Received for tab by: (Signature)
Date: Time:
Hold:
condition;
NCF / OK
I ligo,