20021488 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20020916

Environmental Consultants, PA
Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
()2,1488 September 16, 2002
NCDENR-DWQ
Attn: Mr. John Dorney
2321 Crabtree Blvd
Parkview Building
Raleigh, NC 27604
RE: Nationwide Permit 12
Charleston Street Sewer easement
Wilson, Wilson County, North Carolina
S&EC Project #: 02-7323
Dear Mr. Thomas and Mr. Dorney,
US Army Corps of Engineers
Attn: Mr. John Thomas
6508 Falls of the Neuse Rd., Ste. 120
Raleigh, NC 27615
D g W
&;5R:IrI?ITI:SEI"T'VI
On behalf of Zeke Cozart (property owner), we hereby request authorization from the US
Army Corps of Engineers to use Nationwide Permit 12 to cover impacts to stream
channels and wetlands. Because the applicant will comply with the 401 Water Quality
Certifications associated with Nationwide Permit 12, the clearing limits are less than 40
feet in width, the crossings are at a near perpendicular angle, and there are no parallel
clearing limits are within zones 1 and 2 of the buffer, this is solely a courtesy copy sent to
the NC-DWQ. A Pre-construction Notification Application (PCN) is attached, which
includes an agent authorization form.
The proposed project consists of impacts from the construction of a sewerline. The
project is located on the south side of Charleston Street (SR 1607). The proposed
easement extends approximately 3000 feet west of Highway 264 to where it ties into an
existing sewer easement. The area surrounding the proposed project consists primarily of
agricultural land use. Please refer to the attached USGS map, which displays the location
of the proposed project.
S&EC performed a detailed delineation on September 3, 2002. We believe that feature B
(depicted on the Wilson County Soil Survey) consists of wetlands, not channels subject to
the Neuse Buffer rules. Because the proposed sewerline will be a perpendicular crossing
that will disturb less than 40 linear feet of riparian buffer and has a maintenance corridor
of 10 feet at that location, the activity is listed as exempt from the Buffer Rules.
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office: Hickory Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive 710 Boston Road
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455 Taylorsville, NC 28681
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone] Phone [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Therefore, we did not conduct a site visit with the DWQ to confirm this feature in order
to save time and money. Please also see the attached wetland and upland data forms in
support of the wetland delineation.
The applicant requested a detailed wetland delineation and buffer evaluation within the
sewerline corridor in order to avoid jurisdictional wetlands and waters and riparian
buffers to the maximum extent practicable. The proposed sewerline will temporarily
impact approximately 0.042 acres of jurisdictional wetlands, and 38.8 linear feet of
perennial channel. These impacts are elaborated upon within the attached PCN form and
are shown on the attached inset impact maps. The proposed sewerline is needed to
provide sanitary sewer service to the future commercial development to be constructed
near the intersection of Highway 264 and Charleston Street. Wetland impacts were
minimized to the greatest extent practicable by aligning the sewerline as close to the road
as possible. Channel impacts were unavoidable because the channel bisects the proposed
corridor of the sewerline. However, the crossing will be at a near perpendicular angle
and all contours will be restored following construction.
The USACE's current policy requires applicants to avoid and minimize wetland and
stream channel impacts to the maximum extent practicable and compensatory mitigation
to offset unavoidable losses of waters of the US when impacts exceed the requirements
for notification (0.10 acre). The proposed sewerline is necessary in order to provide
sanitary sewer service to the proposed commercial development. Because the applicant
has minimized impacts to the maximum extent practicable, S&EC believes further
compensatory mitigation should not be required by the USACE.
NC-DWQ's current policy requires written concurrence for stream impacts of greater or
equal to 150 linear feet of stream length per project. We request written concurrence that
the project complies with the 401 Water Quality Certification associated with Nationwide
Permit 12. NC-DWQ's current policy does not require wetland or stream mitigation for
perennial stream channel impacts below 1 acre and 150 linear feet per project. Because
impacts to wetlands and channels are temporary, and are below the thresholds for
mitigation, we do not believe that wetland nor stream mitigation should be required by
NC-DWQ. Please also note that following construction the site will contain no
impervious surface. Because wetland impacts are below 0.1 acres and because
impervious surface will be less than 30%, we do not believe that this project requires a
pre-approved stormwater plan.
Please call if you require any additional information or have any questions.
Sincerely,
LetA'LWoI*P
Kevin Martin
President
Laura Gadd
Wetland Scientist
Attachments:
Pre-construction (PCN) notification form
USGS Site Vicinity Map
Wilson County Soil Survey Map
Impact reference map and 2 inset maps
Agent Authorization form
Wetland and Upland Data forms
Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
? 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 12
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here:
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Zeke Cozart
Mailing Address: Woodard Farm No. 1842 Partnership
218 S. Goldsboro Street
Wilson, NC 27893
Telephone Number: 252-291-3171 Fax Number: NA
E-mail Address: NA
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Kevin Martin
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Telephone Number: 919-846-5900 Fax Number: 919-846-9467
E-mail Address: kmartin(c-bsandec.com
Page 5 of 12
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Charleston Street Sewer alignment
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): NA
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):
4. Location
County: Wilson Nearest Town: Wilson
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): NA
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): The proposed sewer easement is
located on the south side of Charleston Street (SR 1607) and extends approximately 3000
feet west from Highway 264 to an existing sewer easement.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 35°41'54.95"N 77°53'6.54"W
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): NA-Linear project
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Unnamed tributary to Hominy
Swamp
8. River Basin: Neuse
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http:/lh2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps!.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The existing conditions within the sewer easement consist
primarily of agricultural fields and wooded land. The surrounding_ vicinity consists primarily
of agricultural land use and residential housing.
Page 6 of 12
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
overall project consists of the construction of a sewer easement adjacent to Charleston Street.
The proposed project will temporarily impact 0.042 acres of wetlands and 38.8 linear feet of
channel. Typical heavy equipment associated with sewer easement construction will be used.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the proposed work is to provide
sanitary sewer treatment to a new commercial development that is planned to be near the
intersection of Highway 264 and Charleston Street.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
New offices and other commercial development have been proposed near the intersection of
Hi way 264 and Charleston Street; however, plans have not been finalized.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The proposed sewer easement will
temporarily impact 0.042 acres of wetlands and 38.8 linear feet of perennial stream channel.
Page 7 of 12
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact Area of Located within Distance to
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact 100-year Floodplain** Nearest Stream Type of Wetland***
indicate on ma acres es/no linear feet
Impact 1 Temporary/
Excavation 0.001 No > 300' Ditch
Impact 2 Temporary/ 0.004 No >300' Ditch
Excavation
Impact 3 Temporary/ 0.028 No Adjacent Headwater forest
Excavation
Impact 4 Temporary/ 0.009 No Adjacent Headwater forest
Excavation
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
* * 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at htip://www.fema.ggv.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: NA-Linear project
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.042 acres
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact Length of Average Width Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent?
indicate on ma linear feet Before Impact leasespecify)
Stream impact 1 Temporary/ 38.8' UT to Hominy Swamp 23' Perennial
excavation
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.eov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.tgpozone.com,
www.mapguest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 38.8 linear feet
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact Area of Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact (if applicable) (lake, pond, estuary, sound,
indicate on ma acres bay, ocean, etc.
NA NA NA NA NA
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Page 8 of 12
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): NA
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): NA
Size of watershed draining to pond: NA Expected pond surface area: NA
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The applicant requested a detailed wetland delineation and buffer evaluation within the sewerline
corridor in order to avoid jurisdictional wetlands and waters and riparian buffers to the maximum
extent practicable The proposed sewerline is needed to provide sanitary sewer service to the
future commercial development to be constructed near the intersection of Highway 264 and
Charleston Street. Wetland impacts were minimized by aligning the sewerline as close to the
road as possible. Channel impacts were unavoidable because the creek bisects the proposed
corridor of the sewerline. However, the crossing will be at a near perpendicular angle and all
contours will be restored following construction.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
Page 9 of 12
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ametlands/strmgide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The USACE's current policy requires applicants to avoid and minimize wetland and stream
channel impacts to the maximum extent practicable and compensatory mitigation to offset
unavoidable losses of waters of the US when impacts exceed the requirements for
notification (0.10 acre). The proposed sewerline is necessary in order to provide sanitary
sewer service to the proposed commercial development Because the applicant has
minimized impacts to the maximum extent practicable S&EC believes further compensatory
mitigation should not be required by the USACE.
NC-DWQ's current policy requires written concurrence for stream impacts of greater or
equal to 150 linear feet of stream length per project We request written concurrence that the
project complies with the 401 Water Quality Certification associated with Nationwide Permit
12. NC-DWQ's current policy does not require wetland or stream mitigation for perennial
stream channel impacts below 1 acre and 150 linear feet per project. Because impacts to
wetlands and channels are temporary and below the thresholds for mitigation, we do not
believe that wetland or stream mitigation should be required by NC-DWQ.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): NA
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): NA
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Page 10 of 12
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWO
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ® No E] If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 1864 3 NA
2 1557 1.5 NA
Total 3421 NA
* Gone 1. extends out 3U teet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Gone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of zone 1.
Page 11 of 12
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Following construction of the sewerline there will be 0% impervious surface; therefore, we do
not believe a stormwater management plan should be required by the DWQ.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Sanitary sewer treatment
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes E] No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes E] No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
NA
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12

3
Y ??
San
0

1515

,?? V• l -

R en
UMrY
° -41
- -

00 ? rI / p? 11\ _?-
131

.- N - _-
1602 _

t
264
0 ??
// ?
= ?
11 i4 _
` o -_ - •• a
58 ///i -

i

•
' Location of propos ed sewer easem
t ? '22
en

/23 •1 ? -
0 -
WILSON, N. C.
NW/4 WILSON 15' QUADRANGLE
N3537.5-W7752.5/7.5
1978
AMS 5455 III NW-SERIES V842
ProjectM Scale:
027323 1. = 2000' ure 1 - USGS Quad
Fi
D g
Project
Mgr.: KM ate:
9/4102
Charleston Street utility
Herring & Sutton
Wilson, Wilson Co., NC
SARATOGA, N. C.
NW4 WILSON 15' QUADRANGLE
N3537.5-W7745/7.5
1978
AMS 5455 III NE-SERIES V842
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone]•[phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com
02-7323
Mgr.: KM
1"= 2000'
Date: Figure 2 - Soil Survey
914102 Charleston Street utility
Herring & Sutton
Wilson, Wilson Co., NC
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Rd. - Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] • [phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com

a
a
Z
U
S

w z
W ?
n, ? o

z o ?
O
n
cj? ? o

Q ? U

U
::D
errin Sutt
associates, p.a.
ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNER
2406 WEST RASH SMW-W S0tl. NC ZING
Ta [phone] FAX [phone]N11 i15624oZ0v166N.nN
PROJECT NUMBER 02-9782A
DATE 8-30-02
SURVEYED BY JS
DESIGNED BY RLS
DRAFTED BY SPP
CHECKED BY RLS
REVISION NOTES
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

r,
r/
r
/
r/
r
/
/
/O
a I I I
I I
1 I
I I 1
i I
I1
1 j I
?I
II
11
II
11
li
? 11 j?
0
0
U
s
W
b
a?
a
a
x
I'

F- I I

(f)
z II
1
II
'
E

iE

as
0
CA
w
O
O
QU
h-a
d'
N I
>1
7gb

INSET 1
WETLAND IMPACT 1
53.9 SQ. FT.
(0.001 AC.)
WETLAND IMPACT 2
117.6 SQ. FT.
(0.003 AC.)
4"0
SER
MH #
STA 3 6.10
35 Now
7) E P
..? Location of existing culvert
LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE
SEWER LINE V9 = 20'
Q
it • N FTI
O O O --A y
0
o 00
I 2 I ?
D
?; I D
D
?- N
N N C?1
00
z z _ o
r? m 00 cc
z
0
z F-
U-I 00 T? ?? 0 (-0 rTI
0-) 0
0-1 ct? n O N
Cf)
00
Zo n
00
CA _--,
0-) c?
D
C7 n
Sep 07 02 09:43a Jon Bowker 252-291-5900 p.2
SEP-06-2002 04:10 PM C02ART FARMS 2522913173 P.01
0tp 06 02 01113p Jon Bowl+ar 252-281-5800
W2662 axes tll WSassa. M p.2
09
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
1101olk- f66ia Row • F. kw Nat, MOet r7au • ftW p1e7Na•110/ • Puy 0?9) tw•PS17
. AGENTAMMM T20 M
AA 8lanka Te Be F?? By The Curnerlt iandawner
Thaw Woodard Farm No, 78u ?Ar.npraht?
Ate: 215 S. Goldsboro Street, Wilson, NC 27993
Phww [phone]
Pr"tNausgDw "arr Charleston street U Slit}` Imnrovemel a L`
Date; 9!06/02
The Dspnrl vm of ON Army
U.S. Army Carps of ftble a Womkgft Dtetrkt
P.D. Box 1990
WW Thor, NC Uft
A*
PlNdofllt? r, a 1?i
Re•. Wetlands Nord Consulting and pwWWng
To Whom 11 May Cauem:
4 tba eufwt p owl+er, horalty das*mte and eu*4cb t Soft k Snvltonmamd Coltlatgntr, PA to
ad fn my behtU w my agent w the praealsbig ofpwadt appwAunr, to AvMah upon m
su information in support of appiicAdw% etc from 8tf/ day forward, The 4? day of
Tbb ilotlikabon eupertxdes Iey previmtt rorraxpoewlencecaneemtng the agent far dda proJecc
NOTWE 71ds awholfaidon, for Usb ty sad plafalstoaal (am" rt"010, fy vadd vay for
g+rer11a1nt offtcitJa to earertlte paapelly when tccoa+paatca 67' gkEC Itaf`t Yon Ibootd aaU bA?l?
f? UMP ¦ site a tf11` pator to Viol* the tire..
Coz ?
rm Property Owuee's Nape operty a SI
cc Mr. Jot Domey cc )k Kevin MatNn
NCDDM-DWQ Soil 4IinwoaopsntalCAnitlltal PA
2121 CrabtM UW "Ard
Rafdgh, NC 2704
wu?.?e«,wkaw.b.
In LOMIP M Sam C ISimOLllSie
1!17.8 1 +rad1M DAw
cm"41c"M 0Nefi*M.wc"Q3 by KC
Ftrat: r7a POPrO 6 thin, am)!*t?)a h aarvla?) 04.311
14
t/tldll•l190
c (7eyr20Aa06 Fn: djOse- !! ? the: U) 83.3&A
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Charleston Street Utility Date: September 3, 2002
Applicant/Owner: Herring & Sutton Associates County: Wilson
Investigator: Laura Gadd State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID: Headwater forest
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes X No Plot ID: Wetland -flag 112
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Acer rubrum Tree FAC 9.
2. Lipuidambar styraciflua Tree FAC+ 10.
3. Ligustrum sinense Shrub FAC 11.
4. Acer rubrum Sapling FAC 12.
5. Arundinaria gigantea Shrub FACW 13.
6. Fraxinus pennsylyanica Sapling FACW 14.
7. Bohemeria cylindrica Herb FACW+ 15.
8. Campsis radicans Vine FAC 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-): 100%
Remarks: Hydrophytic vegetation present.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
_ Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
_ Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
X Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Sediment Deposits
X Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
X Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: NA (in.) X Water-Stained Leaves
_ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 10 (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 2 (in.)
Remarks: Wetland hydrology present.
1 11
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
Project/Site: Charleston Street Utility Plot ID: Wetland - flag 112
SOILS
Map Unit Name Drainage Class: Poorly drained
(Series and Phase): Bibb loam Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Fluvaquents Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-5 Al 10YR 4/2 NA NA Sand clay loam
0-10 A2 10YR 5/2 7.5Y 4/6 Few/distinct Sandy clay laom
10-13 B 10YR 5/2 7.5Y 4/6 Few/distinct Loam sand
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydric soils present.
IL-
11
WETLANDS DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes No Is this sampling point within a wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? X Yes _ No X Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? X Yes No
Remarks:
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Charleston Street Utility Date: September 3, 2002
Applicant/Owner: Herring & Sutton Associates County: Wilson
Investigator: Laura Gadd State: NC
Pine/hardwood forest-
near existing sewer
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID: easement
is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID:
Upland -approximately
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes X No Plot ID: 30' up from flag 112
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Acer rubrum Tree FAC 9. Vitis rotundifolia Vine FAC
2. Pinus taeda Tree FAC 10.
3. Liquidambar styraciflua Tree FAC+ 11.
4. Ligustrum sinense Shrub FAC 12.
5. Liquidambar styraciflua Sapling FAC+ 13.
6. Acer rubrum Sapling FAC 14.
7. Arundinaria gigantea Shrub FACW 15.
8. Toxicodendron radicans Vine FAC 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-): 100%
Remarks: Hydrophitic vegetation present.
HVnRALnGV
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs Inundated
Other _ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_
X No Recorded Data Available _ Sediment Deposits
_ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
_ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: NA (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
_ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >16 (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: >16 (in.)
Remarks: Wetland Hydrology absent.
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
Project/Site: Charleston Street Utility Plot ID: Upland- 30' from flag 112
SOILS
Map Unit Name Drainage Class: Moderately well drained
(Series and Phase): Gritney sandy loam Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Hapludults Confirm Mapped Type? - Yes No
Profile Description.
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-4 Al 10YR 5/4 10YR 5/2 Few/distinct Sandy loam
4-10 A2 10YR 5/3 7.5Y 5/8 Few/distinct Sandy loam
10-13 B1 10YR 4/3 7.5Y 5/6 Few/distinct Sand clay loam
13-16 B2 10YR 5/3 NA NA Sandy clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydric soils absent.
IL-
I
WETLANDS DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes No Is this sampling point within a wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Yes X No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Remarks: