20171527 Ver 2_ECS_2016_2015 Wetland Delineation Reports_20200407

Appendix S:
September 2016 Report of Wetland Delineation
for Project Trace

September 26, 2016

Mr. Blake Hall
Vice President, PLA, PE, LEED BD+C
Timmons Group
5410 Trinity Road, Suite 112
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607

Reference: Report of Wetland Delineation
Project Trace
Edwin Robertson Road and Country Club Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
ECS Project No: 49: 2245

Dear Mr. Hall,

ECS Carolinas, LLP (ECS) is pleased to submit this report of the jurisdictional waters/wetland
delineation for the above-referenced site. This report summarizes our findings and
recommendations for the site.

Background

Site A:
The site is located south of the intersection of Country Club Road and Edwin Robertson Road in
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina (Figure 1). The site consists of an approximate 718
acre portion of two parent parcels totaling an approximate 1,351 acres. According to the Person
County Online GIS Database website, the Parcel Identification Numbers (PINs) for the parent
parcels are: 0909-00-26-0057 (875.43 acres) and 0909-00-40-4723 (474.55). The site consists
of wooded land and agricultural fields. Single-family residences are located along Country Club
Road and Edwin Robertson Road. Agricultural structures are located on the southeastern
portion of the site. Based on the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Topographic Map,
unnamed tributaries to Marlowe Creek and Storys Creek are depicted on site, and Marlowe
Creek and Storys Creek are depicted along the eastern and western site boundaries,
respectively. Several ponds are also depicted on-site.

ECS previously conducted environmental services on a 310 acre portion of Site A (ECS Project
No.: 21626-F). The site was expanded to include environmental services for an additional area
of 408 acres. During the initial site reconnaissance, ECS identified waters of the U.S. within the
original site boundary. Figures 1 through 5 outline the entire site boundary.

Site B:
The site is located west of Site A and Storys Creek. The site is an approximate 200 acre portion
of an approximate 875 acre parent parcel. According to the Person County Online GIS
Database website, the PIN for the parent parcel is 0909-00-26-0057 (875.43 acres). The site
consists mostly of wooded land and fields. A powerline easement transects the northern portion
of the site. Based on the USGS Topographic Map, Storys Creek is located along the eastern
portion of the site. Two unnamed tributaries to Storys Creek are depicted on the northwestern
and central portions of the site.
Report of Wetland Delineation
Project Trace
Country Club Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
ECS Project No: 06:21626-F

2
Site C:
The site is located north of Edwin Robertson Road. The site is an approximate 420 acre portion
of an approximate 875 acre parent parcel. According to the Person County Online GIS
Database website, the PIN for the parent parcel is 0909-00-26-0057 (875.43 acres). The site
consists mostly of wooded land and fields. Based on the USGS Topographic Map, Storys Creek
transects the western and northwestern portions of the site. Unnamed tributaries to Storys
Creek and Marlowe Creek are depicted on the central and eastern portions of the site. One
pond is depicted on the central portion of the site.

ECS was contracted to delineate jurisdictional waters including ponds, streams, and wetlands.
ECS personnel conducted the field reconnaissance for all three sites starting on June 6, 2016
through June 28, 2016.

Wetlands are defined by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the United States
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as “those areas that are inundated or saturated by
surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and under normal
circumstances, do support a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil
conditions.” In order for an area to be classified as wetland, hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils,
and wetland hydrology indicators must be present described in the 1987 “Corps of Engineers
Wetlands Delineation Manual” and the appropriate Regional Supplement.

Literature Review

ECS reviewed the USGS Topographic Map, the United States Department of Agriculture
(USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Soil Survey for Person County, the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) Map, the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), and the Geologic
Map of North Carolina to obtain information regarding the site.

 The USGS Topographic Map, Roxboro, Olive Hill, Cluster Springs, and Alton, NC
Quadrangles (Figure 1), depicts several ponds, unnamed tributaries to Storys Creek and
Marlowe Creek, and Storys Creek and Marlowe Creek on the three sites.

 The USDA-NRCS Soil Survey for Person County (Figure 2) depicts streams on site. Soils on
the site have been mapped as Chewacla and Wehadkee loams (Cw), Enon fine sandy loam
(EnB & EnC), Georgeville loam (GeB & GeC), Georgeville clay loam (GfB2), Helena sandy
loam (HeB), Herndon loam (HrB), Lignum loam (LgB), Mecklenburg loam (MeB), Orange
gravelly loam (OrB), Tatum loam (TaD & TaE), Vance sandy loam (VaB & VaC), Wedowee
sandy loam (WeE), and Wilkes loam (WkB, WkD, & WkF). Chewacla and Wehadkee loams
are somewhat poorly drained and poorly drained and occur on floodplains. Enon fine sandy
loam is well drained and occurs on Ridges and knolls. Georgeville loam is well drained and
occurs on smooth upland ridges. Helena sandy loam is somewhat poorly drained and
occurs on dissected ridges. Herndon loam is well drained and occurs on smooth upland
ridges. Lignum loam is moderately well drained and somewhat poorly drained and occurs
on smooth upland ridges, toe slopes, and low areas at the head of drainageways.
Mecklenburg loam is well drained and occurs on smooth ridges and knolls. Orange gravelly
loam is moderately well drained and somewhat poorly drained and occurs on smooth upland
ridges and knolls. Tatum loam is well drained and occurs on upland side slopes adjacent to
Report of Wetland Delineation
Project Trace
Country Club Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
ECS Project No: 06:21626-F

3
natural drainageways. Vance sandy loam is well drained and occurs on smooth upland
ridges and knolls. Wedowee sandy loam is well drained and occurs on smooth upland
ridges and knolls. Wilkes loam is well drained and occurs on upland ridges and side slopes.
Chewacla and Wehadkee, Helena, and Lignum soils appear on the North Carolina hydric
soils list for Person County.

 ECS reviewed the USFWS NWI Map of the site (Figure 3). The map depicts freshwater
forested/shrub wetlands (PFO1/4A, PFO1A, PFO1Ah, PFO1C, and PSS1F), Riverine
wetlands (R2UBH, R4SBC, and R5UBH), and freshwater ponds (PUBHh) on site.

 ECS reviewed the FEMA FIRM Service Center website. The site is depicted on FIRM
panels 3720090800J, 3710999900J, and 3710999800J, dated June 4, 2007, respectively
(Figure 4). Zone AE, subject to the 1% annual chance flood event, is depicted along the
eastern and western site boundaries. The remainder of the site is located in an area that has
been classified as Zone X, an area outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain.

 The Geologic Map of North Carolina indicates that the site is located in the Piedmont
Physiographic Province. The soils encountered in this area are the residual product of in-
place chemical weathering of rock presently underlying the site. In general, shallow
unconfined groundwater movement within the overlying soils is controlled largely by
topographic gradients. Recharge occurs primarily by infiltration along higher elevations and
typically discharges into streams or other surface water bodies. The elevation of the shallow
water table is transient and can vary greatly with seasonal fluctuations in precipitation.
Movement in this water table is generally from higher to lower elevations. As such, shallow
groundwater would be expected to flow beneath towards Marlowe Creek and Storys Creek.

Site Reconnaissance

Mr. Paul Stephens, Mr. Cory Darnell, Ms. Shannon Zirpolo, Mr. Ken Vilagos, and Mr. Kevin
Ferguson of ECS conducted the site reconnaissance starting on June 6, 2016 through June 28,
2016. During the reconnaissance, the site was observed for evidence of ponds, streams, and
wetlands. Ponds, streams, and wetlands were observed on the site.

Ponds are located on the Sites A and C. Intermittent and perennial streams are located
throughout all three sites. The streams varied from approximately one to twenty five feet in
width and one to twelve feet in depth. The streams had strong sinuosity, assorted substrate,
well defined bed and banks, and little to heavy baseflow during the site reconnaissance.
Wetland hydrology indicators, hydrophytic vegetation, and hydric soils were observed on site.
The wetland areas are located adjacent abutting the stream features located on three sites.

Figures 5-7, 12, and 17-20 show the approximate GPS flagging locations of the wetlands,
streams, ponds, culverts, and data points. Figures 5-7, 12, and 17-20 are based on our field
notes and should be used for preliminary planning purposes. ECS did observe jurisdictional
waters of the U.S. on the site.

Report of Wetland Delineation
Project Trace
Country Club Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
ECS Project No: 06:21626-F

4
USACE and North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR)
Field Verification and Jurisdictional Determination

On July 28, 2016, ECS received an email response from Mr. William Miller with the NCDWR
stating that due to recent legislation passed by the State and the sites location within the
Roanoke River Basin, there is no need for the DWR staff to be present for the Project Trace
site. A copy of this email correspondence is attached.

On August 4 and 5, 2016, Mr. Eric Alsmeyer with the USACE accompanied ECS to verify the
stream and wetland delineation for the three sites. During the site visit, Mr. Alsmeyer removed
flagging on Wetland W4 and WH on Site A. Otherwise, Mr. Alsmeyer concurred with the
remainder of ECS’ delineation as depicted on Figures 5-7, 12, and 17-20.

General Discussion

Section 404 of the Clean Water Act regulates the discharge of dredge and fill materials into
waters of the United States (lakes, rivers, ponds, streams, etc.), including wetlands. Waters of
the United States include the territorial seas, navigable coastal and inland lakes, rivers and
streams, intermittent streams, and wetlands. Activities which are normally regulated under
Section 404 include the placement of fill for construction of roadways; residential, commercial or
industrial structures; and the construction of water retention ponds along tributaries. The EPA
and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers jointly administer the Section 404 program. Section 401
of the Clean Water Act grants each state the authority to approve, condition, or deny any
Federal permits that could result in a discharge to State waters.

Streams, ponds, and wetlands are regulated by the USACE and the NCDWR. Permits are
required prior to impacting wetlands or open waters, including ponds, lakes, and perennial or
intermittent streams. Mitigation and stormwater management plans will be a condition of
permits issued for the site. Buffers may be required adjacent to streams and water bodies.

For impacts to one-half acre or more of wetlands/waters or to 300 linear feet or more of
perennial stream channel, an individual permit (IP) may be required. According to the FIRM,
there are floodplains located on the site. An IP may be required to authorize impacts if wetlands
are located in a floodplain.

An IP requires a habitat analysis, alternative site analysis, project justification, plans to avoid
and minimize impacts, and a proposed mitigation plan. Depending on the habitat analysis and
the extent of impacts, and Environmental Impact Statement may be required by the USACE. An
IP allows for a public comment period and may require 4 to 18 months to obtain depending on
conditions arising during the USACE review and public comment period.

Watershed Classification/Buffer Requirements

State Riparian Buffer Requirements

According to the NCDWR the site is located in the Roanoke River Basin. The Roanoke River
Basin is not subject to mandatory state riparian buffers.

Report of Wetland Delineation
Project Trace
Country Club Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
ECS Project No: 06:21626-F

5
Local Buffer Requirements

ECS reviewed the Person County Zoning Office to determine if the county has vegetative buffer
requirements for surface waters. According to zoning personnel, the county requires a thirty
foot mandated vegetative buffer.

Stormwater Requirements

Surface waters located on site flow toward Marlowe Creek and Storys Creek which are
classified as Class C. ECS reviewed the NCDWR online stormwater permitting map to
determine jurisdiction of NCDWR stormwater regulations. According to the online permitting
map, it appears the site is located in an area designated as “No Program – Verify Locally.” ECS
recommends consultation with a civil engineer to determine if mandatory vegetative buffers
and/or regulated development (impervious surfaces) setbacks are required for the site in
addition to those mentioned above.

Closure

ECS appreciates the opportunity to provide wetland services for your project. Please contact us
at [phone] if you have any questions concerning this report.

Sincerely,

ECS CAROLINAS, LLP

Paul M. Stephens IV, E.I. W. Brandon Fulton, LSS, PSC, PWS
Environmental Staff Project Manager Environmental Principal
[e-mail] [e-mail]

Attachments: Figures 1, 8, & 13 – Site Location Map
Figures 2, 9, & 14 – USDA - NRCS Soil Map
Figures 3, 10, & 15 – National Wetlands Inventory Map
Figures 4, 11, & 16 – FEMA FIRM MAP
Figure 5-7, 12, & 17-20 – Flagging Location
NCDWR Email Correspondence
Photographs
FIGURE 1
SITE LOCATION MAP

SOURCE:
United States Geological Survey
7.5 - Minute Series Topographic Map:
Roxboro, Dated: 1982;
Olive Hill, Dated: 1968, Revised: 1994
NC Quadrangles
Contour Interval = 10 feet
Scale: 1” ≈ 1,200’
Project Trace – Site A
Country Club Road & Edwin Robertson Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina

ECS Project No.: 49: 2245
Country
Club Road
Edwin Robertson Road
LEGEND
Approximate Site Boundary
Approximate Original Site Boundary
FIGURE 2
SOIL MAP

SOURCE:
USDA Soil Survey of
Person County
Issued: 1995
Map Sheet Numbers: 6 & 7

Scale: 1” ≈ 1,000’
Project Trace – Site A
Country Club Road & Edwin Robertson Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina

ECS Project No.: 49: 2245
LEGEND
Approximate Site Boundary
Approximate Original Site Boundary
FIGURE 3
NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY MAP
SOURCE:

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
National Wetlands Inventory
Mapping Program

Scale: 1” ≈ 1,250’
Project Trace – Site A
Country Club Road & Edwin Robertson Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina

ECS Project No.: 49: 2245
LEGEND
Approximate Original
Site Boundary

Approximate Site Boundary

SOURCE:
FEMA FIRM
North Carolina Floodplain Mapping
Program Website
Panels: 3720090800J
Dated: 6/4/2007

Scale: 1” ≈ 1,400’
FIGURE 4
FEMA FIRM MAP
Project Trace – Site A
Country Club Road & Edwin Robertson Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina

ECS Project No.: 49: 2245
LEGEND
Approximate Original
Site Boundary

Approximate Site
Boundary

SOURCE:

Person County
2013 Aerial Photograph and
ECS Field Notes

Scale: 1” ≈ 1,100’
FIGURE 5
FLAGGING LOCATION MAP
THE SITE WAS DELINEATED BY ECS ON 6/8/16 – 6/14/16. OUR FINDINGS HAVE BEEN VERIFIED BY
THE USACE (8-4-16 & 8-5-16). THIS IS NOT A SURVEY. THIS MAP IS FOR PRELIMINARY PLANNING
PURPOSES. STATE MANDATED RIPARIAN BUFFERS ARE NOT REQUIRED FOR THE SITE.
HOWEVER, A 30 FOOT LOCAL BUFFER IS REQUIRED FOR STREAMS IN PERSON COUNTY.
Project Trace – Site A
Country Club Road & Edwin Robertson Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina

ECS Project No.: 49: 2245
Area Previously
Delineated/
Verified
Area Previously
Delineated/Verified
Figure 7
Figure 6
FLAG NUMBERS/INFO

WETLAND/JURISDICTIONAL
TRIBUTARY FLAGS =

STREAM/POND FLAGS =

Previous Stream Flags = 527 Recent Stream Flags = 782
Previous Pond Flags = 30 Recent Wetland Flags = 403
Previous Wetland Flags = 30
Previous Total Flags = 557 Recent Flags = 1,137

Total Flags = 1,694

Wetland Boundary
State Buffer Requirements: None
Nearest Water Body = Storys Creek
(Western Portion)
Watershed Classification = Class C
Nearest Water Body = Marlowe Creek
(Eastern Portion)
Watershed Classification = Class C
Watershed = Roanoke River Basin
Local Buffer Requirements: 30-0’
SOURCE:

Person County
2013 Aerial Photograph and
ECS Field Notes

Scale: 1” ≈ 550’
FIGURE 6
FLAGGING LOCATION MAP
Project Trace – Site A
Eastern Portion
Country Club Road & Edwin Robertson Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina

ECS Project No.: 49: 2245
S30 1-98
(Marlowe
Creek)
S39 1-14
S37 1-81
S31 1-6
W5 1-3
S32 1-61
S33 1-60
S36 1-48
S38 1-7
W4 1-30
W8 1-28 W7 1-90
W6 1-36
S34 1
S35 1-4
LEGEND
Approximate Location of Site Boundary Approximate Location of Stream
Approximate Location of Data Point Approximate Location of Culvert
Approximate Location of Wetland Area Approximate Location of Pond

DP-1
SOURCE:

Person County
2013 Aerial Photograph and
ECS Field Notes

Scale: 1” ≈ 700’
FIGURE 7
FLAGGING LOCATION MAP
Project Trace – Site A
Western Portion
Country Club Road & Edwin Robertson Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina

ECS Project No.: 49: 2245
SM 1-136
SR 1-45
SN 1-4
SO 1-40
SL 1-52 SP 1-6
SF 1-7
WA 1-2
SG 1-42
SC 1-22
SI 1-39
WC 1-11
WCA 1-14
SS 1-7
ST 1-5
SU 1-2
WG 1-10
WE 1-3
WF 1-4
WD 1-25
WDA 1-7
LEGEND
Approximate Location of Site Boundary Approximate Location of Stream
Approximate Location of Data Point Approximate Location of Culvert
Approximate Location of Wetland Area Approximate Location of Pond

DP-1
FIGURE 8
SITE LOCATION MAP

SOURCE:
United States Geological Survey 7.5 –
Minute Series Topographic Map:
Olive Hill, Created: 1968; Revised: 1994
Roxboro, Created: 1982; NC Quadrangles
Contour Interval = 10 feet

Scale: 1” ≈ 1,000’
LEGEND
Approximate Site Boundary
Project Trace – Site B
Edwin Robertson Road & Country Club Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina

ECS Project No.: 49: 2245
FIGURE 9
SOIL MAP

SOURCE:
USDA Soil Survey of
Person County
Issued: 1995
Map Sheet Numbers: 6 & 7

Scale: 1” ≈ 850’
LEGEND
Approximate Site Boundary

Project Trace – Site B
Edwin Robertson Road & Country Club Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina

ECS Project No.: 49: 2245
FIGURE 10
NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY MAP SOURCE:

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
National Wetlands Inventory
Mapping Program

Scale: 1” ≈ 750’
LEGEND
Approximate
Site Boundary

Project Trace – Site B
Edwin Robertson Road & Country Club Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina

ECS Project No.: 49: 2245
SOURCE:
FEMA FIRM
North Carolina Floodplain Mapping
Program Website
Panels: 3710999900J, 3720090800J &
3710999800J, Dated: 6/4/2007

Scale: 1” ≈ 850’
FIGURE 11
FEMA FIRM MAP
LEGEND
Approximate Site
Boundary
Project Trace – Site B
Edwin Robertson Road & Country Club Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina

ECS Project No.: 49: 2245
SOURCE:

Person County
2013 Aerial Photograph and
ECS Field Notes

Scale: 1” ≈ 850’
FIGURE 12
FLAGGING LOCATION MAP
LEGEND
Approximate Location of Site Boundary
Approximate Location of Stream
Approximate Location of Culvert
Approximate Location of Data Point
Approximate Location of Wetland Area
DP-1
State Buffer Requirements: None
Watershed Classification = Class C
Watershed = Roanoke River Basin
Nearest Water Body = Storys Creek
Local Buffer Requirements: 30-0’
FLAG NUMBERS/INFO

WETLAND/JURISDICTIONAL
TRIBUTARY FLAGS =

STREAM/POND FLAGS =

Stream Flags = 236
Pond Flags = 0
Wetland Flags = 81

Total Flags = 317
Wetland Boundary
THE SITE WAS DELINEATED BY ECS ON 6/14/16 & 6/15/16. OUR FINDINGS HAVE BEEN VERIFIED BY THE
USACE (8-4 & 8-5-16). THIS IS NOT A SURVEY. THIS MAP IS FOR PRELIMINARY PLANNING PURPOSES.
STATE MANDATED RIPARIAN BUFFERS ARE NOT REQUIRED FOR THE SITE. HOWEVER, A 30 FOOT LOCAL
BUFFER IS REQUIRED FOR STREAMS IN PERSON COUNTY.
Project Trace – Site B
Edwin Robertson Road & Country Club Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina

ECS Project No.: 49: 2245
W3 1-52
SI 1-39
S6 1-7
S7 1-4
S8 1-4
W1 1-5
W4 1-6
W5 1-8
S1 1-105
S9 1-50 S10 1-9
W2 1-10
S3 1-18
S5 1-21
100-105
S4 1-12 S2 1-4
LEGEND
Approximate Site Boundary
FIGURE 13
SITE LOCATION MAP

SOURCE:
United States Geological Survey
7.5 - Minute Series Topographic Map:
Roxboro, Dated: 1982; Cluster Springs,
Dated: 1968, Revised: 1987; Olive Hill,
Dated: 1968, Revised: 1994; Alton,
Created: 1968, Revised: 1990; NC
Quadrangles; Contour Interval = 10 feet
Scale: 1” ≈ 1,000’
Project Trace – Site C
Country Club Road & Edwin Robertson Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina

ECS Project No.: 49: 2245
FIGURE 14
SOIL MAP

SOURCE:
USDA Soil Survey of
Person County
Issued: 1995
Map Sheet Numbers: 6 & 7

Scale: 1” ≈ 1,200’
LEGEND
Approximate Site Boundary

Project Trace – Site C
Country Club Road & Edwin Robertson Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina

ECS Project No.: 49: 2245
FIGURE 15
NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY MAP
SOURCE:

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
National Wetlands Inventory
Mapping Program

Scale: 1” ≈ 1,250’
LEGEND
Approximate
Site Boundary

Project Trace – Site C
Country Club Road & Edwin Robertson Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina

ECS Project No.: 49: 2245
SOURCE:
FEMA FIRM
North Carolina Floodplain Mapping
Program Website
Panels: 3720090800J & 3710999900J
Dated: 6/4/2007

Scale: 1” ≈ 1,100’
FIGURE 16
FEMA FIRM MAP
LEGEND
Approximate Site
Boundary
Project Trace – Site C
Country Club Road & Edwin Robertson Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina

ECS Project No.: 49: 2245
SOURCE:

Person County
2013 Aerial Photograph and
ECS Field Notes

Scale: 1” ≈ 1,250’
FIGURE 17
FLAGGING LOCATION MAP
Project Trace – Site C
Country Club Road & Edwin Robertson Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina

ECS Project No.: 49: 2245
THE SITE WAS DELINEATED BY ECS ON 6/20/16 – 6/22/16, 6/24/16, & 6/28/16. OUR FINDINGS HAVE
BEEN VERIFIED BY THE USACE (8-4 & 8-5-16). THIS IS NOT A SURVEY. THIS MAP IS FOR
PRELIMINARY PLANNING PURPOSES. STATE MANDATED RIPARIAN BUFFERS ARE NOT REQUIRED
FOR THE SITE. HOWEVER, A 30 FOOT LOCAL BUFFER IS REQUIRED FOR STREAMS IN PERSON
COUNTY.
Figure 6
Figure 7
State Buffer Requirements: None
Nearest Water Body = Storys Creek
Watershed Classification = Class C
Watershed Classification = Class C
Watershed = Roanoke River Basin
Local Buffer Requirements: 30-0’
Figure 8
FLAG NUMBERS/INFO

WETLAND/JURISDICTIONAL
TRIBUTARY FLAGS =

STREAM/POND FLAGS =

Stream Flags = 868
Wetland Flags = 482
Total Flags = 1,350

Wetland Boundary
LEGEND
Approximate Location of Site Boundary Approximate Location of Stream
Approximate Location of Data Point Approximate Location of Culvert
Approximate Location of Wetland Area Approximate Location of Pond

DP-1
SOURCE:

Person County
2013 Aerial Photograph and
ECS Field Notes

Scale: 1” ≈ 600’
FIGURE 18
FLAGGING LOCATION MAP
Project Trace – Site C
Country Club Road & Edwin Robertson Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina

ECS Project No.: 49: 2245
W1 1-20
S1 1-92
W10 1-208
P1 1-9
P2 1-15
P3 1-13
P4 1-16
S3 1-78
(Storys Creek)
W4 2-17
S2 1-37
W2 1-7
S6 1-46
S4 1-39
W5 1-10
S5 1-7
S9 1-9
S8 1-56
W7 1-20
S25 1-26
S26 1-18
W3 1-5
SOURCE:

Person County
2013 Aerial Photograph and
ECS Field Notes

Scale: 1” ≈ 600’
FIGURE 19
FLAGGING LOCATION MAP
Project Trace – Site C
Country Club Road & Edwin Robertson Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina

ECS Project No.: 49: 2245
W16 1-10
S10 1-46
S21-12
W11 1-2
W12 1-5 S15 1-68 S19 1-11
S11 1-66
S17 1-27
S12 1-7 W8 1-23
W15 1-17
S13 1-5
W6 1-5
LEGEND
Approximate Location of Site Boundary Approximate Location of Stream
Approximate Location of Data Point Approximate Location of Culvert
Approximate Location of Wetland Area Approximate Location of Pond

DP-1
SOURCE:

Person County
2013 Aerial Photograph and
ECS Field Notes

Scale: 1” ≈ 600’
FIGURE 20
FLAGGING LOCATION MAP
Project Trace – Site C
Country Club Road & Edwin Robertson Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina

ECS Project No.: 49: 2245
W10 1-208 (East)
W14 1-128 (West)
S23 1-30 S16 1-15
S14 1-73
S18 1-3
S24 1-54
S27 1-16
S28 1-15
S22 1-8
LEGEND
Approximate Location of Site Boundary Approximate Location of Stream
Approximate Location of Data Point Approximate Location of Culvert
Approximate Location of Wetland Area Approximate Location of Pond

DP-1
1
PStephens
From:Miller, William J <[e-mail]>
Sent:Thursday, July 28, 2016 12:09 PM
To:PStephens; Robinson, Jason
Cc:Deck, Erin M; Zhang, Cheng
Subject:RE: Project Trace sites A, B, C
TargetType:project
Good afternoon all. I have just received clarification from our 401 permitting specialist. Legislation passed by the state
no longer allows us to seek mitigation for intermittent stream reaches. We still require mitigation for perennial stream
reaches, but our requirements are always less than what the Army Corps requires, as of today, so it is included in 401
permitting for academic purposes. Intermittent/Perennial determinations are only required in the select few areas
where local ordinances have additional setbacks above what the state requires, and even that is likely to be abolished by
legislation that goes into effect January 2017.

As such there is no need for DWR staff to be on-site for the Project Trace. Sorry about all the confusion and email traffic,
but hopefully we have all learned something in the process. If there are any questions please feel free to contact me, or
more likely Cherri Smith our 401 permitting specialist, and either one of us will be glad to help.
-William

From: PStephens [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 4:03 PM
To: Miller, William J <[e-mail]>; Robinson, Jason <[e-mail]>
Cc: Deck, Erin M <[e-mail]>; Zhang, Cheng <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Project Trace sites A, B, C

William,

This is understandable as rules and regulations do change. Thanks for being informative regarding this
information. Please let me know what you find out. Once I hear, I will be sure to forward this on to the other ECS NC
offices.

Hope that y’all are staying cool.

Thanks,

PAUL M. STEPHENS IV, E.I.
Environmental Staff Project Manager
ECS Carolinas, LLP 9001 Glenwood Avenue, Raleigh, NC 27617
T: 919-861-9910 D: 919-861-9828 C: 919-669-8639 F: 919-861-9911 www.ecslimited.com
Confidential/proprietary message/attachments. Delete message/attachments if not intended recipient.

From: Miller, William J [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 8:31 AM
2
To: Robinson, Jason; PStephens
Cc: Deck, Erin M; Zhang, Cheng
Subject: RE: Project Trace sites A, B, C

Good morning all. Paul, I copied all the staff that were assigned Project Trace in my absence. From what I understand,
and talking with Danny, it might not be necessary for any DWR staff to visit the project.

The entirety of the project lies within the Roanoke River Basin, which does not require a buffer determination request.
DWR staff can still identify waters of the state for the purposes of 404/401/water quality standards, but if the Army
Corps is going to be on-site and identifying tributaries for these purposes we would be replicating their efforts, and as
such, a site visit is not necessary.

The only issue I have to clear up is whether the state still has differing mitigation impacts based on whether a stream is
identified as intermittent or perennial. I had thought that had been changed and Danny was unsure. Unfortunately the
person who holds all the knowledge, Cherri, will not be in until tomorrow. I will clarify with her the situation, and
respond to all parties.

I am sorry for the confusion Paul, but some of our rules and processes have been evolving over the past few months
which has made some of our mandates unclear. I will have this issues resolved tomorrow, and hope that it does not
cause undue burden on anybody involved.
-William
Project Trace
Edwin Robertson Road and Country Club Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
ECS Project No: 49: 2245
ECS Carolinas, LLP Page 1
Photo 1: View of the central portion of Site C, facing south.
Photo 2: Typical view of the streams on site, facing north.
Project Trace
Edwin Robertson Road and Country Club Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
ECS Project No: 49: 2245
ECS Carolinas, LLP Page 2
Photo 3: View of a typical pond on Site C, facing east.
Photo 4: Typical view of the wetlands located on site C, facing west.
Project Trace
Edwin Robertson Road and Country Club Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
ECS Project No: 49: 2245
ECS Carolinas, LLP Page 3
Photo 5: Typical view of the wooded land located on sites B and C.
Photo 6: View of Storys Creek, facing south.
Project Trace
Edwin Robertson Road and Country Club Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
ECS Project No: 49: 2245
ECS Carolinas, LLP Page 4
Photo 7: Typical view of an unnamed tributary of Storys Creek and abutting wetlands,
facing east.
Photo 8: Typical view of the wooded land on Site B, facing east.
Appendix T:
December 2015 Report of Wetland Delineation
for Project Trace
December 15, 2015
Mr. Stuart C. Gilbert, MPA, MURP, CEcD, NC BIC
Director
Person County & City of Roxboro Economic Development
304 South Morgan Street, Room 221
Roxboro, North Carolina 27573
Reference: Report of Wetland Delineation
Project Trace
Country Club Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
ECS Project No: 06:21626-F
Dear Mr. Gilbert:
ECS Carolinas, LLP (ECS) is pleased to submit this report of the jurisdictional waters/wetland
delineation for the above-referenced site. This report summarizes our findings and
recommendations for the site.
Background
Project Trace is located at Country Club Road in Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina. The
site consists of an approximate 310-acre portion of two larger parent parcels totaling 1,350.98
acres. According to the Person County Online GIS Database website, the Parcel Identification
Numbers (PINs) are 0909-00-26-0057 (875.43 acres) and 0909-00-40-4723 (475.55 acres).
The site consists of wooded land and agricultural fields. Single-family residences are located
along Country Club Road. Agricultural structures are located on the southeastern portion of the
site. Surrounding properties consist of agricultural fields, wooded land, and single-family
residences. Based on the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Topographic Map,
unnamed tributaries to Marlowe Creek and Storys Creek are located on the eastern and
western portions of the site, respectively. Two ponds are also depicted on the southern and
western portions of the site. ECS was contracted to delineate jurisdictional waters including
ponds, streams, and wetlands.
Wetlands are defined by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the United States
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as “those areas that are inundated or saturated by
surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and under normal
circumstances, do support a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil
conditions.” In order for an area to be classified as wetland, hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils,
and wetland hydrology indicators must be present described in the 1987 “Corps of Engineers
Wetlands Delineation Manual” and the appropriate Regional Supplement.
Literature Review
ECS reviewed the USGS Topographic Map, the United States Department of Agriculture
(USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Soil Survey for Person County, the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) Map, the Federal
Report of Wetland Delineation
Project Trace
Country Club Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
ECS Project No: 06:21626-F
2
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), and the Geologic
Map of North Carolina to obtain information regarding the site.
• The USGS Topographic Map, Roxboro and Olive Hill, NC Quadrangles (Figure 1), depict
two ponds and unnamed tributaries to Storys Creek and Marlowe Creek on site.
• The USDA-NRCS Soil Survey for Person County (Figure 2) depicts streams on site. Soils on
the site have been mapped as Chewacla and Wehadkee loams (Cw), Enon fine sandy loam
(EnB & EnC), Georgeville loam (GeB & GeC), Georgeville clay loam (GfB2), Herndon loam
(HrB), Lignum loam (LgB), Orange gravelly loam (OrB), Tatum loam (TaD & TaE), and
Wilkes loam (WkB, WkD, & WkF). Chewacla and Wehadkee loams are somewhat poorly
drained and poorly drained and occur on floodplains. Enon fine sandy loam is well drained
and occurs on Ridges and knolls. Georgeville loam is well drained and occurs on smooth
upland ridges. Herndon loam is well drained and occurs on smooth upland ridges. Lignum
loam is moderately well drained and somewhat poorly drained and occurs on smooth upland
ridges, toe slopes, and low areas at the head of drainageways. Orange gravelly loam is
moderately well drained and somewhat poorly drained and occurs on smooth upland ridges
and knolls. Tatum loam is well drained and occurs on upland side slopes adjacent to natural
drainageways. Wilkes loam is well drained and occurs on upland ridges and side slopes.
Chewacla and Wehadkee and Lignum soils appear on the North Carolina hydric soils list for
Person County.
• ECS reviewed the USFWS NWI Map of the site (Figure 3). The map depicts a freshwater
forested wetland (PFO1/4A) and a freshwater pond (PUBHh) on the eastern and western
portions of the site, respectively.
• ECS reviewed the FEMA FIRM Service Center website. The site is depicted on FIRM
panels 3720090800J, dated June 4, 2007, respectively (Figure 4). Zone AE, subject to the
1% annual chance flood event, is depicted along the eastern and western site boundaries.
The remainder of the site is located in an area that has been classified as Zone X, an area
outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain.
• The Geologic Map of North Carolina indicates that the site is located in the Piedmont
Physiographic Province. The soils encountered in this area are the residual product of in-
place chemical weathering of rock presently underlying the site. In general, shallow
unconfined groundwater movement within the overlying soils is controlled largely by
topographic gradients. Recharge occurs primarily by infiltration along higher elevations and
typically discharges into streams or other surface water bodies. The elevation of the shallow
water table is transient and can vary greatly with seasonal fluctuations in precipitation.
Movement in this water table is generally from higher to lower elevations. As such, shallow
groundwater would be expected to flow beneath the site to the east and west towards
Marlowe Creek and Storys Creek.
Site Reconnaissance
Mr. Paul Stephens and Mr. Cory Darnell of ECS conducted the site reconnaissance on
September 22 and September 23, 2015. During the reconnaissance, the site was observed for
Report of Wetland Delineation
Project Trace
Country Club Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
ECS Project No: 06:21626-F
3
evidence of ponds, streams, and wetlands. Ponds, streams, and wetlands were observed on
the site.
Two ponds are located on the southern and western portions of the site. Intermittent and
perennial streams are located throughout the site. The streams varied from approximately one
to fifteen feet in width and one to ten feet in depth. The streams had strong sinuosity, assorted
substrate, well defined bed and banks, and little to heavy baseflow during the site
reconnaissance.
Wetland hydrology indicators, hydrophytic vegetation, and hydric soils were observed on site.
The wetland areas are located on the eastern (W1:1-19) and southern (W2:1-11) portions of the
site. The attached Wetland Determination Data Forms (DP-1 through DP-4) and Stream
Identification Data Forms (SDP-1 through SDP-30) document the conditions observed on the
site. A copy of the Wetland Determination Data Forms and Stream Identification Data Forms
are included as attachments.
Figures 5 and 6 show the approximate locations of the wetlands, streams, ponds, and data
points. Figures 5 and 6 are based on our field notes and should be used for preliminary planning
purposes. ECS did observe jurisdictional waters of the U.S. on the site.
USACE and North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR)
Field Verification and Jurisdictional Determination
On November 4, 2015, Mr. Eric Alsmeyer with the USACE accompanied ECS to verify the
stream and wetland delineation. During the site visit, Mr. Alsmeyer completely removed stream
flagging from streams S7, S9, S17, S18, S20, S21, S22, S24, S25, S26, S27, and S28. Mr.
Alsmeyer also removed flagging and made S8-10, S10-5, S16-48, S19-5, S23-19, and S29-5
the new stream starting locations. Mr. Alsmeyer concurred with the remainder of ECS’
delineation as depicted on Figure 5.
On November 5, 2015, Mr. James Graham, Environmental Specialist, accompanied ECS to
identify intermittent and perennial stream start/stop points. On December 1, 2015, Mr. Danny
Smith, Supervisor, with the NCDWR sent ECS a Stream Buffer Determination Letter. The letter
states that streams SA, SB, SC, SE, S15, S14, S13, S11, S10, S1, S4, S5, S8, S23, and S25
are classified as intermittent and streams S3 and S6 are classified as perennial. The letter also
states that SD, S19, and S16 are intermittent but become perennial at flagging locations SD-10,
S19-23, and S16-38. A copy of this correspondence is attached.
ECS recommends that the flagging be surveyed to accurately identify the locations and extent
of the jurisdictional areas and other features located on site. ECS will provide the surveyor with
guidance for producing the final survey plat required by the USACE. ECS will review the plat of
the surveyed jurisdictional areas and forward it to the USACE for final written verification in the
form of a Jurisdictional Determination (JD). The JD will be valid for a period of five years from
the date of issuance. ECS recommends consultation with a civil engineer to determine if buffers
or setbacks are required for the site.
Report of Wetland Delineation
Project Trace
Country Club Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
ECS Project No: 06:21626-F
4
General Discussion
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act regulates the discharge of dredge and fill materials into
waters of the United States (lakes, rivers, ponds, streams, etc.), including wetlands. Waters of
the United States include the territorial seas, navigable coastal and inland lakes, rivers and
streams, intermittent streams, and wetlands. Activities which are normally regulated under
Section 404 include the placement of fill for construction of roadways; residential, commercial or
industrial structures; and the construction of water retention ponds along tributaries. The EPA
and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers jointly administer the Section 404 program. Section 401
of the Clean Water Act grants each state the authority to approve, condition, or deny any
Federal permits that could result in a discharge to State waters.
Streams, ponds, and wetlands are regulated by the USACE and the NCDWR. Permits are
required prior to impacting wetlands or open waters, including ponds, lakes, and perennial or
intermittent streams. Mitigation and stormwater management plans will be a condition of
permits issued for the site. Buffers may be required adjacent to streams and water bodies.
For impacts to one-half acre or more of wetlands/waters or to 300 linear feet or more of
perennial stream channel, an individual permit (IP) may be required. According to the FIRM,
there are floodplains located on the eastern and western portions of the site. An IP may be
required to authorize impacts if wetlands are located in a floodplain.
An IP requires a habitat analysis, alternative site analysis, project justification, plans to avoid
and minimize impacts, and a proposed mitigation plan. Depending on the habitat analysis and
the extent of impacts, and Environmental Impact Statement may be required by the USACE. An
IP allows for a public comment period and may require 4 to 18 months to obtain depending on
conditions arising during the USACE review and public comment period.
Watershed Classification/Buffer Requirements
State Riparian Buffer Requirements
According to the NCDWR the site is located in the Roanoke River Basin. The Roanoke River
Basin is not subject to mandatory state riparian buffers.
Local Buffer Requirements
ECS reviewed the Person County Zoning Ordinance to determine if the county has vegetative
buffer requirements for surface waters. According to Ordinance, the county does not have
mandated vegetative buffer requirements.
Stormwater Requirements
Surface waters located on site flow toward Marlowe Creek and Storys Creek which is classified
as Class C. ECS reviewed the NCDWR online stormwater permitting map to determine
jurisdiction of NCDWR stormwater regulations. According to the online permitting map, it
appears the site is located in an area designated as “No Program – Verify Locally.” ECS
recommends consultation with a civil engineer to determine if mandatory vegetative buffers
Report of Wetland Delineation
Project Trace
Country Club Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
ECS Project No: 06:21626-F
5
and/or regulated development (impervious surfaces) setbacks are required for the site in
addition to those mentioned above.
Closure
ECS appreciates the opportunity to provide wetland services for your project. Please contact us
at [phone] if you have any questions concerning this report.
Sincerely,
ECS CAROLINAS, LLP
Paul M. Stephens IV, E.I. W. Brandon Fulton, LSS, PSC, PWS
Environmental Staff Project Manager Environmental Principal
Attachments: Figure 1 – Site Location Map
Figure 2 – USDA - NRCS Soil Map
Figure 3 – National Wetlands Inventory Map
Figure 4 – FEMA FIRM MAP
Figure 5 – Flagging Location Map Western Portion
Figure 6 – Flagging Location Map Eastern Portion
Wetland Determination Data Forms
Stream Identification Data Forms
NCDWR Stream Determination Letter
Photographs
FIGURE 1
SITE LOCATION MAP
SOURCE:
United States Geological Survey
7.5 - Minute Series Topographic Map:
Roxboro, Dated: 1982;
Olive Hill, Dated: 1968, Revised: 1994
NC Quadrangles
Contour Interval = 5 feet
Scale: 1” § 1,200’
LEGEND
Approximate Site Boundary
Project Trace
Country Club Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
ECS Project No.: 06: 21626-F
Country Club Road
Edwin Robertson Road
FIGURE 2
SOIL MAP
SOURCE:
USDA Soil Survey of Person County
Issued: 1995
Map Sheet Numbers: 6 & 7
Scale: 1” § 1,000’
LEGEND
Approximate Site Boundary
Project Trace
Country Club Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
ECS Project No.: 06: 21626-F
FIGURE 3
NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY MAPSOURCE:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
National Wetlands Inventory
Mapping Program
Scale: 1” § 900’
LEGEND
Approximate
Site Boundary
Project Trace
Country Club Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
ECS Project No.: 06: 21626-F
SOURCE:
FEMA FIRM
North Carolina Floodplain Mapping
Program Website
Panels: 3720090800J
Dated: 06/04/2007
Scale: 1” § 1,200’
FIGURE 4
FEMA FIRM MAP
LEGEND
Approximate Site
Boundary
Project Trace
Country Club Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
ECS Project No.: 06: 21626-F
SOURCE:
Person County GIS
2013 Aerial Photograph and
ECS Field Notes
Scale: 1” § 650’
FIGURE 5
FLAGGING LOCATION MAP
WESTERN PORTION
LEGEND
Approximate Location of Site Boundary
Approximate Location of Perennial Stream
Approximate Location of Intermittent Stream
Approximate Location of Culvert
Approximate Location of Data Point
Approximate Location of Pond
DP-1
State Buffer Requirements: None
Watershed Classification = Class C
Watershed = Roanoke River Basin
Nearest Water Body = Storys Creek
Local Buffer Requirements: None
PA 1-14SA 1-34
SB 1-23
SC 1-15
SD 1-20
SE 1-10
SDP-5
SDP-4
SDP-3
SDP-2
SDP-1
DP-4
Project Trace
Country Club Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
ECS Project No.: 06: 21626-F
THE WATERS OF THE U.S. SHOWN ON THIS MAP ARE APPROXIMATE. THEY HAVE BEEN DELINEATED AND GPS’D BY ECS ON (9/22/15 AND
9/23/15). THEY HAVE BEEN FIELD VERIFIED BY THE USACE (11/4/15) AND NCDWR (11/5/15). THEY HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED. THIS MAP IS
FOR PRELIMINARY PLANNING PURPOSES. STATE AND LOCAL BUFFERS ARE NOT REQUIRED FOR THE SITE.
FLAG NUMBERS/INFO
WETLAND/JURISDICTIONAL
TRIBUTARY FLAGS =
STREAM/POND FLAGS =
Stream Flags = 102
Pond Flags = 14
Wetland Flags = 0
Total Flags = 116
Wetland Boundary
FIGURE 6
FLAGGING LOCATION MAP
EASTERN PORTION
State Buffer Requirements: None
Watershed Classification = Class C
Watershed = Roanoke River Basin
Nearest Water Body = Marlowe Creek
Local Buffer Requirements: None
FLAG NUMBERS/INFO
WETLAND/JURISDICTIONAL
TRIBUTARY FLAGS =
STREAM/POND FLAGS =
Stream Flags = 538
Pond Flags = 12
Wetland Flags = 30
Total Flags = 580
Wetland Boundary
SOURCE:
Person County GIS
2013 Aerial Photograph and
ECS Field Notes
Scale: 1” § 1,000’
LEGEND
Approximate Location of Site Boundary
Approximate Location of Perennial Stream
Approximate Location of Intermittent Stream
Approximate Location of Culvert
Approximate Location of Data Point
Approximate Location of Pond
Approximate Location of Wetland
DP-1
S1 1-40 S3 1-36
S4 1-5
S6 1-100
S5 1-8
W1 1-19
Wetland area
with pockets of
uplands present
W2 1-11
P1 1-12
S13 1-16
S15 1-7
S10 5-14
S11 1-7
S8 10-14
S16 1-48
S29 1-5 S23 1-19
S19 5-60
S14 1-2
THE WATERS OF THE U.S. SHOWN ON THIS MAP ARE APPROXIMATE. THEY HAVE BEEN DELINEATED AND GPS’D BY ECS ON (9/22/15 AND
9/23/15). THEY HAVE BEEN FIELD VERIFIED BY THE USACE (11/4/15) AND NCDWR (11/5/15). THEY HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED. THIS MAP IS
FOR PRELIMINARY PLANNING PURPOSES. STATE AND LOCAL BUFFERS ARE NOT REQUIRED FOR THE SITE.
Project Trace
Country Club Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
ECS Project No.: 06: 21626-F
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Pr*ctlSite: nct CltylCounty: GA-1— Sampling Date:
AppllcantlOwner._ FL 97C�-± .r- _ State: AIL., Sampling Point: �� L
Invesilgalor(s): Section, Township, Range: —
Landform (hlllsiope, terra e, etc.: Local relief (concave, convex, none): C-wer, Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): p Lal: T CA 703-p . AJ Long: _ � g-�iSLz(d ' cry Datum: Y`�fafa f
$oli Map Unit Name: W NWI classfficatton: _=
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site Wal for this lime of year? Yes No (If no, explain In Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are -Normal Circumstances, present? Yes V/ No
Are Vegetation, Soil _ or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers In Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophylic Vegetation Present? Yes No is the Sampled Area
Hydrlc Soil Present? Yes V No within a Wetland? Yes Na
Weiland Hydrology Present? Yes � No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology indicators:
SecQndary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary dUtors (minimum of one is reguir
k all that a I
_ Surface Soil Cracks (86)
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
parseiy Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
ESaturalion
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Drainage Patterns (810)
(A3)
V- Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ WalerMarks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced fron (C4)
,flry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_/Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposts (133)
` Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saluratlon Visibie on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (84)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
iron Deposits (B5)
` Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
` Shallow Aquilard (03)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microlopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC-Neuiral Test (05)
Field Obse"atlons:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth
(Inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth [Inches): T L �_
Saturation Present? Yes Na
Depth (inches): -�-�
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes... t No
includes ca illa fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial pholos, previous inspections), If available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Easlern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: Of -1
Absolute Dominant indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1. � g �pgr Status
2. ' ..' �� 1. 3� Fft
,
��¢ = Total Cover
50% of total cover. 20% of total cover:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
4, r 70 EAL
S.
60% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: .76 }
6.
L6 = Total Cover
60 2096 of total cover: 9_44 RapidTest for Hydrophwic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
Dominance Test worksheets
Number of Dominant Species
That Are aBL, FACW, or FAG: �� (A)
Total Number of Dominant 1
Species Across All Strata: _ _ 1 Li T (B)
Percent of Dominant Species , o p 1
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: f (AlB)
Prevalence Index worksheat:
jotal % Cover of: MuItioIV bV:
CBL species x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC spades
x 3 =�
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B1A =
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 6 „ )
2. f 9 el, R C 3. 'ur
n, 2 zo
4.
5,
6.
7.
8.
9.
I F == Total Cover
50% of total cover. 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine (Plot size. _ _ 30% _ ]
1. t�3 +J J Zz>
2.
b " = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 3 a 20% of total cover: l 7-
photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 it (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 In. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 It (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes Na
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Verslon 2 0

$OIL
Safnpiina Point: IV- i
Proflie Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.]
Depth _ Matnx
Redox Features
[inches) Color
_
—Color (mo° st] L�`Loe Texture a rks
o ~ �I (a� �_ I a o
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De lotion RM=Reduced Matrix MS=Masked Sand Grains. Location: PL=Pare Lini M=Matrix,
Hydric fail Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
^ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
` Polyvalue felow Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (Al6)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ TNn Dark Surface (SS) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147,148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_JCoamy Gieyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (Fig)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136,147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Darts Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below park Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (FT)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147,148)
MLRA 936)
_ Sandy Gieyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136,122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5).
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (Fig) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (SB)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hyddc Sall Present? Yes Z No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: ' P -+ Zf Z1; ' CllylCounly: K CIAW'6 Pirle� Sampling Date.
Appiicanl/Owner: 9 Tc t1ic. Stater Sampling Point:
Investigators) 414- 1 Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hlllslope, terrace, tc.): r 414pa.,6 '. Local relief (concave, convex, none):. Cw^C4g Slope {96i:1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat. Long:: 49, 1`'119 Ll (a ° V-j Datum: O(Z�;�q�
Sail Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are 'Normal Circumstances, present? Yes —L/— No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic vegetation Present? Yes No is the Sampled Area
Hydrlc Soil Present? Yes Na within a Wetland? Yes No
Welland Hydrology Present? Yes Na
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology indicators:
Socandary Indicators Minimum of two require)
Prlma In(minimum of one ia r fired- check all that aRplyl_
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (A1)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BB)
Igh Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulnde Odor (C1)
Drainage Patterns (810)
k/ aluration (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (433)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ ater Marks (81)
Sediment
` Presence of Reduced Iran (C4)
ry-Season Water Table (C2)
]/Crayfish
Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilted Soils (C6)
Burrows (C8)
_ Drin Deposits (B3)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (64)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants 01)
Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (132)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aqultard (D3)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (89)
_ Microtopographlc Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (813)
_ FAC-Neutrai Test (05)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (Inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
4
Depth (Inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes No
Includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring wel, aerial photos, previous inspections), If available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:`
b z
Tree Stratum (Plot size: }
numnuie
% Cover
uvrmnam inoicator
Status
uomtnance I e M wonesrreM.,
AceyJ-'�
AC �
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW. or FAG:
3• `"
�
_C
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
5
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are 013L, FACW, or FAC:
1 = Total Cover
50°% of total cover: 6a 20% of total cover:_Z9
t
Sapling 5i_ra�m {plot size: 201
3. a --
4. �
_ 17� = Total Cover
(1 , (A)
l s (B)
z (A!B)
Total °% Cover of-,
Multiply by:
C+BL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAG species
x 3 -
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B!A =
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Rapid Test For Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum {Plot size: o t ] Z 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1. S X rt 20 — 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
— 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophypo Vegetation' (Explain)
5.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Z'a = Total Cover Definitions of Five V egetativn Strata:
50% of total cover. �_ 20% of total cover:__
t Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
HeM Stratum {Plot size: �D _ } approximately 20 ft {6 m) or more in freight and 3 in.
`% } (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2. Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines.
3• approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
4 than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5. Shrub —Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
6. approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7.
8.
9.
10.
it.
Total Cover
50% of total cover: �` 20% of total cover
Woody in (Plot size: t )
i. Vi W u�d lr� O
a = Total Cover
50% of total cover. t S' 20% of total cover: C
photo numbers here or on a separate
Herb — All herbaceous {non -woody} plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (i m) in heighL
Woody vine —All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point. 0 " 2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or cor fimn the absence of indicators.)
Depth Mjtrix Redox Featum
(inches) Color [moN ° Tvoe Lo Texture Remarks
RM=Reduced Matrix. MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (57)
^ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147,148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
amy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
` Piedmont Floodpfain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
` epleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136,147)
_ 2 cm. Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (K)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (SI) (LRR N,
` Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147,148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbdc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136,122)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (Fig) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Sail Present? Yes V/ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Pro)ectfsite: eL24 ec4- T,-c•+.— _L?1624-P City/County. K15?" Z&rraC. Sampling Date: �-Z3 I S
Appiicantiowner: _ • State: -. A/ C-. Sampling Point: _
Investigaier(s). , gnl•iewf Vavot 11 Section, Township, Range -
La ndform (hlllslope, terrace, etc.): as ( ,o e. � Local relief (concave, convex, none): o Slope (W.
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lal: • �i �`� tad 3 ° A/ Long: f ljg. W-9cf o w Datum: W. (g �{
Soil Map Unil Name: a NWi classification: —e206*e,
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain In Remarks.) /
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are 'Normal Cfrcumsiances• present? Yes ✓ Na
Are Vegelatton . Sop or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers In Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes Na within a Welland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology indicators:
Secondary
Indlcalors_ (minimum of Iwo rgr3. uired}
Primary IndfcglQrs [minimum of one is required:
check all thal apply}
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CT)
_ Drainage Paltems (1310)
Saluration (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (816)
_ Water Marks (B1)
` Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (83)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visibie on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain In Remarks)
_ Stunted or stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposils (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery
(B7)
_ Shallow Aquiiard (D3)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (159)
_ Microlopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
` FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
f
No i/ Depth
(inches):_
Water Table Present? Yes
No, Depth (inches): -i-1 H
Saturation Present? Yes
No 2 Depth (inches): }2rf
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ,� _ No yZ
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections). If available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION Give Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: fJ ".3
Absolute
Dominant indicator
m (Plot size: at j
r
Status
3. �r-Pr �ufays.�•. ,.., .�
2�
��
4. ti 1 -#
Z�
17ock
_-
1ld
J. �l ba M'9 Y ^L •
�
�F�.�
O(
4 t} = Total Corer
50% of total cover: 20% of
total cover Z
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: of
�s
2,
�r. 2
4. i M�^l �c
`Lo
A
5._ Jilr,f4u
T
PAG
6. C46C4
`Zm
_ = Total Cover
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL. FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species rr
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: `► (AIB)
0BL Species x 1 =,
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 = b
FACU species
2
x 4 = g
UPL species
x S =
Column Totals:
(A) 1 bU (B)
Prevalence Index - B/A a
U % of total cover: 20°% of total cover: — 1 - Raft Tast for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 13 `'t ] _ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1.
!_wt, v; �, ,o iZACu _ 3 -Prevalence Index is 53.0'
2. �.�_g t[ _ 04stc S '�o Cam] _ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
3.
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
6.
t' = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 3 6 k ^ )
3.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
».
= Total Cover
50°% of total cover. 20% of total cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size; Y_I 3l]S ]
i. _ V-ti+u,d.A) rs
3. o f a�Perd�a ,rzr/�'c�� `Z" �i4L
5.
�d = Total Cower
50%of total cover _30 20°% of total cover: —
Remarks: (include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Detinitlons of Five Vegetation 8tratac
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7-6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling- Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (i to 6 m) In height.
Herb - AN herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point* 3
Depth Matrix Redox Featgres
In _ W. [moist] �° _ Color (moist) _ % Tyne
6— _ Ip �K
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A I)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depteted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) (LRR N.
MLRA 147,148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox ($5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
or
Texture Remarks
c (4-"
d !z oar —
educed Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Location:. PL=Pore Lining, M=MaMx.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric So
Dark Suifaae (87)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Polyvalus Below Surface (58) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148)
(MLRA 147. i48)
_ Loamy Gieyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodpiain Soils (F19)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136.147)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (712)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Redox Depressions (FS)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127,147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
ProjecYSlte: fyl Ft+ vccc. / Z i ~ City/County, h °��°ram �Q,�f _ Sampling Date:
ApplcanWwner: F( Stale: 1� Sampling Point:`
invesllgator(s): i1whi"i Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.. �-cr c _ Local relief (concave, convex, none): caa,r'�ue� Slope (%):-
Subregion (LRR orMLRA): Q _ Lal: 4, Long: - q4 .114G)1 Datum: V-ICrSkLI
Soil Map Unit Name: G L NWI classification; NOK& _
Are climatic 1 hydroiogic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Sail or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes No
Are Vegetation _ _ Soil or Hydrology naturaNy problematic? (If needed, explain any answers In Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophyllc Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampied Area
Hydrlc Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
o a Indicators n reguirecil
Prim In Igators (minimum of one is re ulr
k all that a I
_ Surface Soil Cracks (86)
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Drainage Patterns M10)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhlzospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Mass Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (Bt)
` Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sedlmenl Deposits (B2)
_ Receni Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (CS)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat of Crust (1134)
_ Other (Explain In Remarks)
_ Slunled or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (02)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aqultard (03)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (09)
_ Microlopographic Relief (04)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC-Neuiral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Deplh {inches):
4,Deplh
Water Table Present? Yes Na
(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
Deplh (Inches):
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes No v
includes cal3illary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: Y r 4 µ
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheets
Tree Stratum (Plot size: _ _ � -� }
% Cover Soedes.2 Sta
Number of Dominant Species
�
1. B V
D F�4C
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC; C> (A)
2. �'�,��. ��v �.�: �, �,
3 F�c�
3. L,a w �Rw r rwc
_ L
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (9)
4. ,,01 44d,
50
S.
Percent of Dominant Species
� �.
D
That Are OBI_, FACW, or FAC: D (A1B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheets
Total Cover
50% of tale! cover:
yt
2096 of total cover: 2 1
Total % Cover of: MwtioN by:
3°
�� species x 1 =
Saalino stratum (Plot size: I
1. LV4^
Acewy-
r uT�
FAcw species x 2 =
2. t�• oc� E^4v,e 4, ,�,1„ ..rv�.,...
� o FI4t�''
FAC spades x 3 = -
L
FACU species x 4 =
3.��/�
fKV�
1I F
UPL species x 5 =
4'—
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
6.
Prevalence Index = B1A =
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indkators:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover: 2�
Rapid Test for Hydrophybc Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plat size: _1
,_]C 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
2.
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
3.
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4
5.
'Indicators of hydric soil and watiand hydrology must
5
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
= Total Cover
—9 L'h— ►l--- & .ss— �._......
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
°
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) f
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1. ;L ���; �,,,,� �;,.,; �,��,ti ,} � _
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2.
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3.
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
4.
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5.
Shrub —Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
6
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7•
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
g
9
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines. regardless of height.
11.
D = Total Cover
50% of total cover 2 1-120% of tote! cover
Woodv Vine $"Ium (Plot size: G t }
h
2. .l kl,; t-K
3. �p�C'++C•�4L�rrti 1'xv(itna� � b ��G
4.
y Vegetation Hydrophytic
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 3 20% of total cover Z pnesent7 Yes �!/ hto
Ns here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL.
or
Sampling Paint: Or_ q
Depth MMX Redox Features
_{Inches] Color fmoiaP % cow [moist] — °� Texture _. _ Remarks „!
(0 "q1L 2.
U iL 13 Lou
-
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (All)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147,148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (65)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Tvoe:
Depth {inches):
educed Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. location: PL=Pore Linina. M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sol
Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148)
(MLRA 147,148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Mabix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(ML12A 136, 147)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Redox Depressions (178)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N.
MLRA 136)
ilmbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless dlsWrbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 -fo - i
Date: - 22 - I ProjeetlSite: Prj er4 Zrce- Latitude:36.if'}j ii7 Z * A
Evaluator: ajk4lf County: Qr�rnv Longitude:
Total Points: r� gram Dee crce one
stream is at least entemwient �, `� tilj Other
ifa ig orperenniallfa 30` Epherrrera ntermlt#e t Perennial e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 1 L3
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Stroi
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thabAeg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure. ex, riffle-)ool, step -pod,
ri od sequence
q
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
2
3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
1
3
B. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
3
B. Headcuts
0
1CD
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
�2
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
15
11. Second or greater order channel
No
= 0
Yes
= 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal =
12. Presence of Saseftow 0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 1 2 3
14. Leaf lifter 1.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 C2=2 1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? No = 4 es = 3
C.C. B1�(Subtotal
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
[p7
t
2
3
22. Fish
0.55
1
1.5
23. Crayflsh
0
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in strearbed
AG W = 0.75; OBI_
= 1,5 Other = 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manu
Notes: tcqAAr SA
Sketch: r. jar

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
SAP- z.
Dater 2 r l
ProjeWSite: fw$oc} Tcce
Latitude: 36.119-0 q Lqo .'0J
Evaluator.
County: County: Qw
Longitude: -�,
Total Polyds:
S6 earn IS at least intermittent '�-�
cle one)
Stream DeteEn5erennial
Other
.
if z 19 or erennlaf if z 30"
Ephemeral
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geoma hd (Subtotal = i
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. rif "ool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
2
3
5. Activelrelict f7oodplain
0
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
C. >
1 g
11. Second or greater order channel
A0 = OD
Yes = 3
arnnciar ancnes are not fated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 4' 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14. Leaf lifter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1
1.5
17, Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
L:. twlow (subtotal = (111 Ls ) 11 ------
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
[]
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
ab2
3
22. Fish
0 i
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0
1
1.5
25. Algae
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACV1f = 0.7�; QBL = 1.5
Other 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of nranuai.
Notes: ci S
Sketch:
SDP - 2

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Vernon 4.11 fop-3
Date: -2 2 -t
ProjectlSitie: P . ,�. 7-,_4Ce
Latitude: 3 C . L j 6 j ! t L ,Aj
Evaluator: / D
County: Fevfoh
Longitude: -q6. q'f'+aS-S
Total Paints:
S&eam at yeast
Screl mufterrt ��
Stream De (cirde one)
nbe
Ephemeral rmitte t Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
;f a i9 or rennial it a 30•
A. Geomorphology Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
I" Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
3
Z Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pod, step -pool,
q le- ool sequence
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
2
3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
1
3
B. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1,5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
Co =
Yes = 3
`arIM081 ditches are not rated: see discussions in manual Ll
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 4 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
zn1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
CDP
1
1.5
Q anic debris lines or piles
0
1
1.5
E17.Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es = 3
U. tJ!0100V (Subtotal = 41•'+3 ]
18. Fibrous roots In streambed
3
2
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundanoe)
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
se1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
F W = 0.?5;
BL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p, 35 of manual
Notes:
Sketch:
C;
s�P-3

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
S`b P-'4
Date: q - 2 2 - `r
ProjectfSite: r p q- ��Qc�
Latitude: �(. t{ b 3 3 21 I'J
Evaluator: _r � e*1 Ogv-k 8 11
County: Pe vfo �,
Longitude:
Total Paints:
5b'eam is of least interrrs 9enf 2 r
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
of L. 19 or perwWal if L� 30"
I
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
I" Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
0>
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thaWag
0
1
C::�D
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
0>
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
CD
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
m
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
a = 0
Yes = 3
aruncaa vluawb are no[ raieu, see visa sions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = l
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
M5
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16.Organic debris lines or piles
0
1
1.5
1 T. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es =
C. Biology (Subtotal = Ll /4-T )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0>
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
404
1
1.5
25. Algae
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
4P90W = 0.75' 461- = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identifed using other methods. See
p. 35 of manual.
Notes: (9 cs( a1
Sketch:
SO f' --

NC DWQ Stream Identiflcation Form Version 4.11
Date: l — Z 2 —ir Project/Site: Pr�
Evaluator: S kfw county: Perfp�,
Total Points: Stream pets
Sham at ieasr r retr►rrr2 Ephemeral ntermitten
if 19 arAerannfaf if
a 34* p
•....,w... a..w..va wiv 1-1 immu, .lOa +.nawaSlVI1S 111 IIItl11Utl1
B. Hydrology Subtotal =
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
13. iron oxidizing bacteria
0
14. Leaf litter
1.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
M Organic debris lines or plies
0
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
C. Biology Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
19. hooted upland plants in streambed
3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
22. Fish
23. Crayfish
0
24. Amphibians
0
25. Algae
26. Wedand plants in streambed
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of
Notes: Flc4 a�pj As 6
Sketch:
No=0
Ap S
'rVe - 5-
--r4c0 latitude:
Longitude:
Imle one) Other
Perennial 1 e.g. quad Name:
N = Q.4; 08L = 1.5 Other = 0

NC DWQ Stream IdentiIIcation Form Version 4.11
J,p f- 6
Date: R - 2 2 - l S
Projectlslte: fr �- et Y��
Latitude:
Evaluator: "Qr �GtI MG [ l
County: f ey-rc.%,
Longitude:
Total Points:
Skeem is at feast Intermittent r� +
Stream Deter circle one]
Other
if? 19 or emnniaf it a 30•
Ephemeral term Itte Perennial
e.g. Quou Name:
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = y
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thatweg
0
1
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ri le- ❑❑I sequence
0
1
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
$
7. Recent alluvial deposits
8. Headcuts
0
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0,5
4ft>
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
CID
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
❑ =
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discu ions in rnanual
B. Hydrology {Subtotal = C )
12. Presence of Basefiow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
M1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16.Organic debris lines or piles
0
0
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
= 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = S `73 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
CZ--)
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
F
-
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. Seep. 35 of manual.
Notes: ElAg c -t t 4
Sketch:
o /

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 sop -
Date:
Projectlsite: ,�` Tice
Latitude: , y�s903-
Evaluator: R hchg P" V%'C f I
County: vd o(,A
Longitude: lfsq Iq Z
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent q '�-
tf z 19 or erenidat if a 30'
Stream Determination (ci
Ephemeral Intermittent
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomar hold (Subtotal =
Absent Weak
Moderate Strong
I" Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ri le- ool sequence
0
'
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Activelrelict floodplaIn
0
1
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
Op
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
9. Grade control
10. Natural valley
0
0
0.5
0.5
1
1
1,
11. Second or greater order channel
a
No = 0
Yes = 3
arrnnpai ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
6. Hydrology [Subtotal = `-1 ]
12. Presence of Baseftow
0
1
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Sail -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Y s =
C. Isiollogy {Subtotal = -1. -0 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
p
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
zf551
2
3
22. Fish
g
0.5 1
CID
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
CID
1.5
25. Algae
26. Wetland plants in streambed
0
rl�
ACW = 0.75D OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
1.5
.perennial streams may also be identifed using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: l4
Sketch:
V'i

NC DW Stream Identifleadon Farm Version 4.11 -if DP-- $
Gate: _Z 2 - Projectl3#te: __6 ec+ Lre[ Lati#ude: , ti 1574 Lf4
Evaluator: k,n„-V County: PersP4, Longitude:
Total points: Stream Det circle one] Other '
Stream Is at least intemi tterrt
ifa 19ornerenrdal ifz 30, 2 -� Ephemer intermitten Perennial e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomo hold {Subtotal = 1=�_j
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1s, Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pod, step -pod,
0
2
ripple -pool sequence
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
2
3
5. Activelrelict ftoodplain
0
1
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
3
8. Headcuts
0
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
0 0.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
W uuua WW"vW are nvr raceu. sea uwuss4ons in manual
B, Hydrolon [Subtotal = '4- 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
Q3
1.5
16.Organic debris lines or plies
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0 0.5
No = 0oyeis
1.5
3
.41W:7Ia][111#Ut&-Ynelrelisi1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in strearnbed
3
2
1
0
20, Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
nb
1
2
3
22. Fish
D
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
25. Algae
26. Wetland plants in streambed
0
D 1
1
CW = 0,75 06L - 1.5 Other - 0
1.5
1.5
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: i�SH
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 SSA- 47
Date: _ZZ_� 3
Project/site. ^�� "��
Latitude:
Evaluator: 3X-Le
1,r p A
County: r= Vjf'k
Longitude:
Total Points:
Sfream is at least intermittent ��� -�
Stream Date n {circle one]
Ephemeral tennitte Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
if 1- 19 or eemWal if a 30,
r
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18- Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
a3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thahn►eg
0
1
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
2
3
5. Active/relict fioodplain
0
i
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
3
9. Grade control
0
0.53
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated. see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal =
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
=
Yes = 3
U. urology (Subtotal = (,. '}s )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
C2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1,5
23. Crayfish
0
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
25. Wetland plants in streambed
AC
= 0.75-, ❑BL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manua .
Notes: F -�-A a, f
Sketch:
J

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: �_ZZ _ t Project/Site:
Evaluator: -14 VAIJ Dqv v e tt County: I _er faL�'
Total Points: Stream Determination ti
stream is at Wsr intermittent qr, 9--r Ephemeral Intermittent
Ya 19 or»erennrat i{k 30* P
S`vp- Io
'roc Latitude:
Longitude: -
Lnnal Other
ennlai e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = r
Absent
Weak
1 Moderate
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
0
ri le- sequence
1
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
5. Activelrelict floodplaln
0
1
2
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
<fy:)
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
es
artifiicial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal =
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
13. iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
15. sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
e
C. Biala Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
21. Aquatic Mollusks
®
1
2
22. Fish
0
0.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.6
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
25. Algae
<551
26. Wetland plants in streambed
A W = 0.75;
BL = 1.5 Other = 0
'Perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual
Sketch:
YQP- (b
3
3
3
3
0
1.5
1.5
0
0
3
3
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Versian 4_11 J-0E--1 l
Cate: y Z
ProjectfSite: oru -Tjr,,Ct_
Latitude:
Evaluator f �4aJ �u�
County:
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is of least lntermiffenf ez 1. '�-�"
Stream bete (circle one)
other
if a 19 or rennlaf ii a 30'
Ephemeral emnitte Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomo hot Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
I" Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ri I sequence
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
2
3
5. Activefrelict Floodplain
0
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
L.
6fo = 0
Yes = 3
arunciai ditches are not rated; we discussions in manual �---- -
B. Hvdroloav [Subtotal = 7
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16.Organic debris lines or plies
0
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidenoe of high water table?
-
Yes : 3
C. t5mogy t'umotat = a_j I
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
'[ I3
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
t!S>
1
2
3
22. Fish
rdl>
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
1
1 5
25. Algae
5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
A =
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See
p. 35 of manual.
Notes: - G err
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: G+ _ 7 2 `, Project/Ske:
Evaluator. JgTA 0G�,, + County:
Total Polyds: ' Stream Deter
Sftam is at least Intermittent r� . r Ephemeral t r
if k 19 or Perennial if a 30' G
Latitude: owl C
�Jo Longitude:
circle one) Other
I emyerennial e.g. Quad Name:
dl L111% M UHU11=4 We not F-MM see utscussrons in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal =
12_ Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
r
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16.Organic debris lines or piles
0
1
1.5
17. W-based evidence of high water table?
o = 0
Yes = 3
C. BiologySubtotal = - 2-
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1 2
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
0
20. Macrobenthos (note dKerslty and abundance)
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Moliusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
OF12
1.5
25. Algae
c5p
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FA W =
DBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 Of manual
Notes: I4c..e A a f o_
Sketch:
J'vp- (Z

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 SAP-- t3
Date: - r }
Project/Site:
Latitude:
Evaluator: r l,S D,,AvN 1►
County: rz rd o u,
Longitude:
Total Po(nts:
Stream is at least intarmiftent 2 (,
Stream Dete (circle one)
Other
Lift 19 or ronniai if 2 30'
E hemera nteimitt: Perennial
P
•. Quad Nam.:
A. Geoma hvl Subtotal = 1
)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a, Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
05
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thai
0
1
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ri le- ool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
0
2
2
3
3
5. Activelreiict floodplain
0
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
[]
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
3
9. Grade control 1
0
0.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
artmciai ditenes are not rates; see dtscussions in manual B. Hydrolocy (Subtotal = 3 ]
12. Presence of Baseflow
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
d::)
1
2
2
3
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0
t
1
1 5
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
N❑ = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biolo Subtotal = . }-S
18. Fibrous roofs In streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21, Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
❑
M
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
ACW = 0.7 OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: ju
Sketch:
SDP - 13
nid

NC DW Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 So r I LI
Hate: _ ProjectlSite: rn' ec mac Latitude: 7 c Llo q$ y -�/
Evaluator: ' 4'(/Wr County: � rl�� Longitude: -- �)1110 i?
Total Points: Stream i n cirde one
Stream is at feast intermitfent j Other
if a 19 or perennialif� 30• 2 - `}� Bphenne Mtermitte Perennial e.g Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = N )
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, stop -pool,
d IS- Isequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate
5. Active/relict floodplain
B. Depositional bars or benches
7. Recent alluvial deposits
8. Headcuts
9. Grade control
10. Natural valley
11. Second or greater order channel
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
Bea {Subtotal =
12. Presence of Baseflow
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
14. Leaf litter
15. Sediment on plants or debris
16. Organic debris lines or piles
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
C. Biology Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
22. Fish
23. Crayfish
24. Amphibians
25. Algae
26. Welland plants in streambed
Absent
1 Weak
Moderate
Stroi
0
1
4M3
0
1
3
0
1
(1:)
3
0
2
3
0
CL>2
3
0
1
C
3
0
1
3
0
(111>
2
3
0
1
-
1.5
0
f
1.5
a=0
yes=3
0
1
2
3
1
2
3
1•v
0.5
0
0
1
1.5
0
1
1.5
a=
Yes
3
2
0
3
2
0
0
2
3
1
2
3
0.5
1
1.5
0
1
1.5
0
1
1.5
0.5
1
1.5
r'TACW = 07N
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
Perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See n_ 35 of
Sketch:
-6P -14

NC DWQ Stream identification Farm Version 4.11 SO r - I s-
ate: �_ is
ProjectfSite: j9ir-b-e( V M
Latitude: 3 ` . � �°�� N
[Evaluator.��ak
County:
Longitude: g �� �4lotal
Paints:
►eam fs at feast Intermittent
z 19 or nnW fi z 30,
Steam Dot (circle one)Other
Ephemer rrtermitte Perennial
e.�. quad Name:
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 19
1" Continuity of channel bed and bank
Absent
0
Weak
1
Moderate
Strong
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
1
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
3
5. Activefrelict floodplain
0
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1QD
3
9. Grade control
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
- artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = . ]
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
C�D
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
fJ2
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or plies
0
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
=
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = _ S_ ZS )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20_ Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0,5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.7 06E = 1.5
Other = 0
.perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manua .
Notes: G z:� 1
Sketch:
Jbp_ t.-

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 '! Pp_ [6
Date: -2 2 - I S
ProjectfSite:�v ' eC} S+r�a?
Latitude: , y� `23S qj
Evaluator: L1 Tt►rl'%s pgrl.t ill
County:P• v-'ro'
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
�-�
Stream DeUredpadaujcircle one)
Other
.
if z 19 or gerennial If z 30`
Ephemeral ntermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad ►name:
A. Geoma hal Subtotal =
1"' Continuity of channel bed and bank
Absent
0
Weak
1
Moderate
Strong
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thaiweg
0
1
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
6. Depositional bars or benches
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
0
0
1
1
Z>
2
3
3
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channelZ
e
14-0 = 0
Yes = 3
artificial dUches are not rated; see disco ons in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 7 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
16. Organic debris lines or piles
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
0
No = 0
1 1.5
1 1.5
es = 3
c... B!9! Subtotal = S IA
18. Fibrous rcots in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
C[
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
24. Amphibians
25. Afgae
0
0
0
.5
5
1
1
1
1.5
1 5
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW - 0.75;
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p_ 35 of manual.
BL = 1.5 Other = 0
Notes I_ q AVj
Sketch:
W
soP- k �

NC DWQ Stream Identiifilcation Form Version 4.11 -CD IF, I /I -
Date: 1-2,2- .-� r
Pro]ectfsIte: f -rt+ -r,,zV_-
ol
Latitude: 36 LICC qL2
Evaluator Ff -e � k.
County: f eeSak
Longitude: -
Total Points: FF 2 i9 or ererarrlal If ?
Stream is at least intermittent `1
2 30" T�
Stream Det irde ones
Ephemer intermitt Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = i )
1", Continuity of channel bed and bank
Absent
0
Weak
1
Moderate
Strong
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. rif !"ool, step -pool,
rI le ool sequence
0
1
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
2
3
5. ActKWrelict floodplain
0
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
3
9. grade control
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
a _
No =
Yes = 3
arrirrpai dicnes are not rated; see dlscu$sions in manual
B. Hydrology [Subtotal = 6�7 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
.5
1
1.5
1 S. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence -of high water table?
No = 0
es = 3
%0. rsiolauv c%�iuo[otal = "t .'+3 1 -
1 S. FRbrous roots in streambed
3
2
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos [note diversity and abundance]
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
1
1.5
25. Algae
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
AC = D.75; BL = 1.5 Other = 0
`perennial streams may also be idenHAed using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
N otes: t G 5-
Sketch:
SOP- tr+ -��>

NC DWO Stream Identification Farm Version 4-11 Soo - t R
Bate: _ 7�_ �S
ProjectlSilte: fr ~ ec+ "'%ce'
Latitude: 3G , qqo 4 3a ° N
Evaluator: ' j ey,J ir+M1G I
County: ?e,so"
Longitude: - -+3,11oS2.1
Total Points:
stream is ar►ftsrfntem,rrrerr
Stream determination (c'
other
if z 19 or rem9af ff r 34• s
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology ( Subtotal = 2
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1"' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thaiweg
0
1
2
3. In -channel structure: ex. rEfile-pool, step -pool,
r' of sequence
0
1
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
1
2
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
M3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
CD
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
9. Grade control
0
0.5
2T5
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
as
=
aranciar mcnes are not rates; see dissions in manual
B. Hvdrologv (Subtotal = � s]
12. Presence of Basefiow
p
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0 i
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
p
0.5
1.5
17. Sail -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
ryes =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0>
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23_ Crayfish
p
0.5
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1,5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
ACW = 0.75
Bl_ = 1.5 Other = 0
.perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
(Votes:
Sketch:
Joe- ►�

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
S-op- 19
Date: �_ 3 - r
Pro ectlSita:r
Tie.
Latitude: 7.LIoc+
�
Evaluator* � vHe f
County: `rerf
Longitude: o
Total Points:
Sfraam is at least intermittent
Stream bete ;icirde one)
Mantermitt
Other
if z 19 or Perennial ff a 30•
Ephemeral9.
Perennial
e. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =
)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1g Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pod, step -pool,
h I ool sequence
0
1
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
3
5. Activelrelict floodpWn
0
1
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
B. Headcuts
0
1
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
a =
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. H drd Subtotal =
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
<IUD
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
e =
7! Blology [Subtotal = s )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
[]
0.5
23. Crayfish
6
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
1
1.5
25. Algae
5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 OBL
1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See P. 3535 of manuman
Notes: k. , 4 " r St ea -
Sketch: svD - 1,

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Sipe-7-0
Date:
ProjectlSite: �Ir�C
Latitude: 36.14�-i� �
Evaluator: k etj 04vt-1 i
County: Qevs.�-
Longitude: -fig, n)&
Total Points:
Stream is at least interment -s
Stream DeterqxIxuAkmqcIrde one]
Ephemeral tertnittent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
ifa 19 or rennial if a 30*
A. Geomorphology Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1" Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
C'D
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
2
3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
1
3
B. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
112>
3
8. Headcuts
0
1<110
3
9. Grade control
0
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
C 0-0
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Ulu 01 until IC. ore IIV1 I09WJ. WIV UMLM55""5 1" flM"U'- l
B. Hvdroioav (Subtotal = '? t
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
<2>
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
C-:T>
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
1 B. organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soll-based evidence of high water table?
o =
Yes = 3
G. Biolociv (Subtotal = S-- . 4-S 1
18. Fibrous roots In streambed
3
2
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
a
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23.Crayfish
0
4=5�
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
1
1.5
25. Algae02
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
ACW = 0.7 ❑BL = 1.5 Other = 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: F Ire.A1 S' Z 1
Sketch:
SPf_'a
Ili

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: -Z 3 - f ProjectlSite: ��o �{ Try Lat�t"�e: Xt-q I i s3 P
Evaluator. ewf PvtCounty: P-evro i Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent '� s
Stream D#rcle one)
[:or
if a 19 or renn+al if a 3Q'
E hemen lntermitte
p
Perennial
Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology Subtotal =
Absent
Strong
Weak
Moderate
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
0
rip le -pool sequence
1
2
3
4. Particle size of steam substrate
0
2
3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
1
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
3
8. I-leadcuts
0
1
*>
3
9. Grade control
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
D.
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o = 0
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = .3
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16., Organic debris lines or piles
0
0
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
o = 0
Yes = 3
C. BiOlO Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots In streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
CD
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
1
1.5
25. Algae
1
1.5
26. Welland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.7 OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual
Notes: P l r „a u.r
Sketch:
Jo p- 2I

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 d( -'Z2
Date: _-� I� Proiect/Site: Qr-n"ec+ -TLatitude-
Evaluator 5't � onf Vo,�� t I County: cvlLongitude: - ' Qf
Total Points: Stream Det clrale one) Other
Stramisatleastk9ermiuenf 7- �� Ephemeral Intermitter Perennial e. CWaditms:
if ;z 19 or renMat if a 30' p 9•
A. Geomor hol Subtotal = i Absent I Weak I Moderate Strona
18. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ri of sequence
0
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
S. Active/relict ffoodplain
0
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
7. Recent aliuvlal deposits
0
8. Headcuts
0
9. Grade control
0
10. Natural valley
0
11. Second or greater order channel
artiRcial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. H drdo Subtotal = ?
12. Presence of Baseffow
0
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
14. Leaf litter
1.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
16. Organic debris lines or plies
0
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
C. Biology (Subtotal = -'
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
19_ Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
20. Macrobenthos (note dWersity and abundance)
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
22_ Fish
23. Crayfish
0
24. Amphibians
0
25. Algae
26. Wetland plants in streambed
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See
P. 35 of man
Sketch: S,Df-7- L
1
1
1
1
41
2 ('
2
1 2
0.5 1
1
5 1
1
N = 0. ; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1.5
1.5
3
3
0
1.5
1.5
0
0
3
3
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 S _ -13
Date, ProjectiSrte: fr - "[,,d'e, Latitude:
Evaluator: &��, 4t"014 fj County. oL 9 `I �I
Lon itude: _
Total Points:
Stream is at Feast uttermittent r '�- Stream DotemtknoptRv4pircle one) Other
if z 19 orFeranniat if a 30' Ephemera( IntermitteW Perennial e.g. Oved Name:
o.wua.wvu— — Iwl IC14OUl *WW YISGU5ZWV"3 In manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 3
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
(T>
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or plies
0
1
1.5
17. SoN-based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes
= 3
C. Biology Subtotal = r
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
r25
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
0
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
(M>
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
ACW = O.M 08L = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See P. 35 of manual
Notes: .1'7 ?
Stretch:
sD F- 23

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 rP- 2 9
Data: — 3 r l r ProjectlSite: �rs• t a4Latitude: 7 G. Liq 2sal,
Evaluator: S�� �Z%.s C
c. ounty: Longitude: r
roc[ P�v-s�►., � � $-`�ByiL I
Tote! Points:
Stream is e feast rnterrrlftterlt 2� Ephemera! Stream petsion (circle one) Other
rmi Perennial e.
if � 19 orprepnraf if 2! 30* 9'• L?uad Name:
w "Itual uiwnera apc nvr ramu; see alscu oars on manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal' = )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1
1.5
17. Sail -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes
=
L. DIVIVYY lauplotaf = j .
18. Fibrous roots in strearnbed
3
Cz1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
0
20. Macmbenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
(M>
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.
1
1.5
25. Algae
5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants In strearnbed
OFACW = . 5; OBL
= 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual
Notes: ,;t qr _f7_ cj
Sketch:
•1pP- 2 �l

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 -�I) P - 'Z r
Gate: c( „'z 9 - l.r Projectlsite: ft `ec� Tr4elt Latitude: 3 6 -
Evaluator r4 "C' cxv j t County: [ ��Cfph Longitude: -
W
Total Points: Stream �rminationnPereq@ Other
rPa rs or rerinra►rrz 30'
Stream rs at least lnte►rru7tent d!� T� Ephemeral Intwmitte nn e.g. Quad Name:
I 'T
A. Geomorphology {Subtotal = 2 } Absent Weak Moderate Strong
ia' Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 2
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool. 0 1 2
rl I coi s uence
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
3
7, Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Seoond or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; we discussions in manual
B. H drol Subtotal
12. Presence of Basetlow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or plies
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es = 3
C. Biology Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
CD
1.5
25. Algae
5
!
1.5
2fi. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.
DBI = 1,5 Other 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual
Notes: � f aV
Sketch: i ___ sop- ��

NC VWQ Stream IdentiHca
Date; 1-z 3 _ l�-
Evaluator: C�e V,
Total Points;
susam is at feast inteirwnent
if k 19 ornerenwantk 3o' � �
Form Version 4.11 --0 P 26
Projeevske: f .o ec+ Tv ,;e- Latitude:
County; PLongitude:
Stream Date rp� le one) Other
Ephemeral (intermittent . rennial e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology Subtotal =
I"' Continuity of channel bed and bank
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate
5. Acbvelreiict ft000dptain
6. Depositional bars or benches
7. Recent alluvial deposits
8. Headcuts
9. Grade control
10. Natural valley
11. Second or greater order channel
°artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal =
12. Presence of Baseflow
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
14. Leaf litter
15. Sediment on plants or debris
16. Organic debris lines or piles
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
C. Biology Subtotal
18. Fibrous roots In streambed
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
22. Fish
23. Crayfish
24. Amphibians
25. Algae
26. Wedand plants in streambed
4
Absent
0
0
0
0
0
0 -
0
0
0
0
1.5
0
0
Weak
1
1
1
1
1
0.5
1
2
2
2
1
2
2
0.5
1
1
Yes = 3
Yes = 3
3 1
3 1
0 2
1 2
0.5 1
0 Coft>1
0 CS 1
0.5 1
= 0.7 OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Sketch:
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1.5
1.5
3
3
0
1.5
1.5
0
0
3
3
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5

NC DKQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 ftoo SOP -
p� r}
Date: I -- Z 7 ` (5- ProjSCUS te: rrt ,.C4_ -�Latitude: 7 6 y 3
Evaluator: , , Vke County: Longitude:
Tots! Points: Stream De t o ircle one Other
Sire 9 orp is at least bile, 3 fferit 2 � �'� l=phemer Intermitten Perennial e. Quad Name:
Ff z 99 orperennial if a 31" �.
A. Geomor holo {Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
1 a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
3. In -channel structure: ex. rifite-pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
5. Active/relict Iloodplain
0
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
8. Headcuts
0
8. Grade control
0
0.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
11. Second or greater order channel
NO = 0
artificial ditches are not rated: see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal =
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
14. Leaf litter
1.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1 B. Organic debris lines or piles
0
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
N =
C. BIOI Subtotal = gS
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
AE>
1
22. Fish
V
0 5
23. Crayfish
0.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
26. Wedand plants in streambed
COY =
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See P. 35 of manual
Notes: Ai ?
Sketch:
2
2
2
2
2
2
0.5
1
1
Yes =3
es=3
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
ftong
3
3
3
_3
3
3
3
3
1.5
1.5
3
3
0
1.5
1.5
0
0
3
3
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.6

NC DWO 14tream lidentifiratinn Farm Varcian A 17
r s� TISIM,
Date: - Z I
_1
ProjecUSite: Qc } -mac
latitude:79,33"
Evaluator: �Vav ell
County: ��
Longitude: _'4F.JFLi2�1
Testa! Points:
stream is at least infentwefd �� , ��
if 2: 19 orperennial If z 30'
Stream pet role one
Ephemeral tertnittent erennial
other
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomo hob Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
12, Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
0
ri le -pool sequence
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
C2>
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
Q]
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1U
3
8. Headcuts
0
C
2
3
8. Grade control
0 0.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
0 0.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
a = 0
Yes = 3
1X1LL14K11 UILL41Qb AJU IIVI IdICU. bU& UISGUbrWOM In manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = .3
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 1 1.5
16.Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? ❑ = Yes = 3
C. Bioiioov (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21_ Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
A = 0. ) OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: __..
i Sketch:
S�o p-2 B
7

NC DW Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 so F-`LA
Date: -Z3 Projectl5ite: Pao �rGC Latitude:
Evaluator. �,�n„t �arti�U County:er��i, Longitude:
Tote! Points: Stream D�circle one
if? 19SMWr e east frrf 2! 3o* t �7 n t Ephemeral rm Perennial e.g. er
ouad Name:
rf z i9 or uerenrrFal if a 3t?• 2 'T . 't'.J p
B. Hydrology Subtotal' =
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
C. Biofo Subtotal =
e _
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22.1= ish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
1
1.5
25. Algae
dD0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
ellFA W = 0.
; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'Perennial VMS may also be idendlied using other methods. See p. 35 of manna
Notes' .; t S '7
Sketch: fP P ^ z I

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Project/Site., �id VC �yIc latitude: 34 9q,4iS'}A
Evaluator: le"J ►� cl County., ears. longitude: 1 - 4 �20d
Tv#al Points: Stream Me r�
Stream is at lease inteftwttent Other
rf a is orpensnniat if z 30' p em I In#erm t�Perennis�l a uad Hama:
-1-- _.........,.--- ..va III 11 7111u�1
B. Hydrology Subtotal =
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
4:9:>
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Y = 3
C. Biol Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots In streambed
3
2
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
3
22. Fish
�Bj
0.5
1
1.5
23. Cra sh
0
dF-15,
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
1
1.5
25. Algae
Cp
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
C = 0.7
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See
p. 35 of manual.
Sketch: Sof Y 70

r
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Pat McCrory Donald R. van der Vaart
Governor Secretary
December 1, 2015
Lindsay T and John H Wagstaff
31 Reams Ave
Roxboro, NC 27513
Determination Type:
Subject: Buffer Determination
NBRRG# 15-472
Person County
Burfer Call I Isolated or UP Call
❑ Neuse (15A NCAC 2B .02'M
❑ Tar -Pamlico (15A NCAC 2B ® Ephemeral/Intermittent/Perennial Determination
.0259) ❑ Isolated Wetland Determination
❑ Jordan 05A NCAC 2B .0267)
Project Name: Project Trace
Location/Directions Property is located at Country Club and Edwin Robertson
Rd. in Person County, NC
Subject Stream: Marlowe Creek Sto 's Creek (Roanoke River Basin)
Determination Date: November 12, 2015 Staff.- James Graham
Division olVater Resources. Raleigh Regional Office. Water Qualit_■ Operations Svction hup:1 portal.ncdenr.org %keb % 4 aps
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh. NC 27699-1628 Phone: [phone]
Location: 3800 Barrett Drive. Raleigh. NC 27609 Fax: [phone]
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer - Made in pan by recycled paper

Project Trace
Person County
December 1, 2015
Feature
E/i1P*
Start@
Stop(a7
Soil
Sorvey
USGS
Topo
SA 1-34
I
X
X
SS 1-23
I
X
SC 1-15
I
X
SD 1-20
UP
Perennial
a)SD 10
X
SE 1-10
I
X
S15 1-7
I
S14 1-2
I
S13 1-16
I
S11 1-7
I
S10 5-14
I
S 1 1-40
I
S31-36
P
X
X
S4 1-5
I
X
S61-100
F
X
X
SS 1-8
I
X
SS 10-14
I
S 19 5-60
IIP
Perennial
S 19-23
X
S23 1-19
I
S29 1-5
I
X
S 16 1-48
IIP
Perennial
516-38
X
'1 A/P- EphemeTMAntermittenRerennial
Explanation: The appropriate column is checked above if the feature(s) listed above has
or have been located on the Soil Survey of Person County, North Carolina or the most
recent copy of the USGS Topographic map at a ] :24,000 scale. The approximate start
Point for Each feature that is checked"[" (Intermittent) or "P" (Perennial) or both is
approximately drawn in on the attached maps. There may be other streams located on
your property that do not show up on the maps referenced above but, stil l may be
considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers and/or to the
Division of Water Resources (DWR).
This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or
affected parties that dispute a determination made by the DWR or Delegated Local Authority may

Project Trace
Person County
December 1, 2015
request a determination by the Director. An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) days
of date of this letter or from the date the affected party (including downstream and/or adjacent
owners) is notified of this letter. A request for a determination by the Director shall be referred to
the Director in writing c/o Karen Higgins, DWR We$SCaPe Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center.
Raleigh, NC 27699.
This determination is frnal and binding unless, as detailed above, you ask for a hearing or appeal
within sixty (60) days.
The owner/future owners should notify the Division of Water Resources (including any
other Local, State, and Federal Agencies) of this decision concerning any future
correspondences regarding the subject property (stated above). This project may require a
Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries should be directed to the
Division of Water Resources (Central Office) at (919)-807-6300, and the US Army Corp of
Engineers (Raleigh Regulatory Field Office) at (919)-554-4884.
If you have questions regarding this determination, please feel free to contact
James Graham at [phone].
Respect ily,
/9/ )t
Danny Sm' It, Supervisor
Water Quality Section
Raleigh Regional Office
cc: RRa'SWP File Copy
Paul Stephens
ECS
9001 GIenwood Ave.
Raleigh, NC 27617

S16 1-48; 1 S29 1-5; 1 S23 1-19
Perennial @
S 16-38
•. rS'' �T� �i :�'�,_ti�v-�,� ! �I !gig r "tyr
SA 1-34; I r":_ _ :1._ _l • =_ 1
Perennial @ S19-23;
Intermittent above
S10 5-14; If ., y
ili ti_ d S8 10-14; 1
;J SB 1-23: I `:;- ` f- f S5 1-8; 1
.�'
so 1 -1 r'; I
SD 1-20; I
Perennial
f, M1 S6 1-100; P
@ SD-10
y ,•. S15 1-7; I
x�SE 1-10; I
• S wY `� ' ',� � � r � 'r
` ram- �• � �!' ,ram r !
S31-36; P
S13 1-16_1 ' - + S11 1-7; I
1
w 4 S1 1-40;
l
LEGEND
Approximate Site Boundary
SOURCE: FIGURE 1
United States Geological Survey - SITE LOCATION MAP
7.5 - Minute Series Topographic Map: ; r
Roxboro, Dated: 1982; Project Trace
Olive Hill, Created: 1968, Revised: 1994; Gauntry Club Road and Edwin Robertson Road
NC Quadrangles Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
Contour Interval = 5 feet ,
Scale: 1" = 1,200' EC5 Project No.: 06:21625 F

c MO
SA 1-34; 1
SC 1-15;1
SD 1-20;
Perennial
@ SD-10
SE 1-10; 1
S15 1-7; 1
S14 1-2; 1
S13 1-16; 1
S16 1-48;
Perennial
@ S16-38
S10 5-14; 1
SB 1-23; 1
S11 1-7;1
S29 1-5; 1
�S-k1Z
S23 1-19; 1
S19 5-60;
Perennial @ S19-23;
Intermittent above
S8 10-14; 1
S5 1-8; 1
S6 1-100; P
S4 1-5; 1
S31-36; P
P1 1-12
L-C'END
Approximate Site Boundary
SOURCE: ! FIGURE 2
USDA Soil Survey of Person County SOIL MAP
.ssued: 1995 Project Trace
Map Sreet Numbers; 6 & 7 ', Country Club Road and Edwin Robertson Roadil
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
Sea a 1" - 1,000' �
- ECS Project No.: 06: 21626-F

Project Trace
Country Club Road, Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
ECS Project No: 06:21626-F
ECS Carolinas, LLP Page 1
Photo 1: View of the fields located on the western portion of the site, facing north.
Photo 2: View of a stream located on the western portion of the site, facing west.
Project Trace
Country Club Road, Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
ECS Project No: 06:21626-F
ECS Carolinas, LLP Page 2
Photo 3: View of another stream located on the western portion of the site, facing
east.
Photo 4: View of a pond located on the southern portion of the site, facing east.
Project Trace
Country Club Road, Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
ECS Project No: 06:21626-F
ECS Carolinas, LLP Page 3
Photo 5: View of the access road and fields located on the eastern portion of the site,
facing east.
Photo 6: View of a stream located on the eastern portion of the site, facing west.
Project Trace
Country Club Road, Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
ECS Project No: 06:21626-F
ECS Carolinas, LLP Page 4
Photo 7: View of another stream located on the eastern portion of the site, facing
south.
Photo 8: View of the wetland area located on the eastern portion of the site, facing
north.
Project Trace
Country Club Road, Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
ECS Project No: 06:21626-F
ECS Carolinas, LLP Page 5
Photo 9: View of a stream located on the northeastern portion of the site, facing south.
Photo 10: View of the access road located on the eastern portion of the site, facing
west.