The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20200484 Ver 1_401 Application_20200407Staff Review Does this application have all the attachments needed to accept it into the review process? r Yes r No ID#* 20200484 Version* 1 Is this project a public transportation project?* r Yes r No Reviewer List:* Sue Homewood:eads\slhomewood Select Reviewing Office:* Winston-Salem Regional Office - (336) 776-9800 Submittal Type:* 401 Application Does this project require a request for payment to be sent?* r Yes r No How much is r $240.00 owed?* r $570.00 Project Submittal Form Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all mandatory questions are answered. Project Type: r New Project r New Project w Existing ID r Pre -Application Submittal r More Information Response r Other Agency Comments r For the Record Only (Courtesy Copy) r Stream or Buffer Appeal New Project - Please check the new project type if you are trying to submit a new project that needs an official approval decision. Pre -Application Submittal - Please check the pre -application submittal if you just want feedback on your submittal and do not have the expectation that your submittal will be considered a complete application requiring a formal decision. More Information Response - Please check this type if you are responding to a request for information from staff and you have and ID# and version for this response. Other Agency Comments - Please check this if you are submitting comments on an existing project. Project Contact Information Name: Bradley Luckey VUio is submitting the inforrration? Email Address: Bluckey@pilotenviro.com Project Information Project Name: NC Highway 119 Is this a public transportation project? r Yes r No Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? r Yes r No r Unknown County (ies) Alamance Please upload all files that need to be submited. aick the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document 2927.1 NC Highway 119 PCN 3.13.20.pdf 4.02MB Only pdf or Iv17 files are accepted. Describe the attachments: NC Highway 119, Alamance County, NC PCN for 401 WQC. Sign and Submit V Bychecking the boxand signing box below, I certifythat: • I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form; • I agree that submission of this form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act") • I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act'); • I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND • I intend to electronically sign and submit the online form." Signature: rr1 Submittal Date: Is filled in &Ao ratically. Page 1 of 12 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. _____________ DWQ project no. _______________ Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008 Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: Section 404 Permit Section 10 Permit 1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NWP 39 or General Permit (GP) number: 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? Yes No 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): 401 Water Quality Certification – Regular Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit 401 Water Quality Certification – Express Riparian Buffer Authorization 1e. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401 Certification: Yes No For the record only for Corps Permit: Yes No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program. Yes No 1g. Is the project located in any of NC’s twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h below. Yes No 1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? Yes No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: NC Highway 119 2b. County: Alamance 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Mebane 2d. Subdivision name: 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Scott Mayo Properties II, LLC 3b. Deed Book and Page No. 2878/0611 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if applicable): Mr. Taylor Irwin 3d. Street address: 840 Plantation Drive 3e. City, state, zip: Burlington, NC 27215 3f. Telephone no.: 336-282-3550 3g. Fax no.: 3h. Email address: TIrwin@windsorcommercial.com Page 2 of 12 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: Agent Other, specify: 4b. Name: 4c. Business name (if applicable): 4d. Street address: 4e. City, state, zip: 4f. Telephone no.: 4g. Fax no.: 4h. Email address: 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: Bradley S. Luckey 5b. Business name (if applicable): Pilot Environmental Inc. 5c. Street address: PO Box 128 5d. City, state, zip: Kernersville, NC 27285 5e. Telephone no.: 336-708-4997 5f. Fax no.: 5g. Email address: bluckey@pilotenviro.com Page 3 of 12 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 9803172212 1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 36.04566 Longitude: - -79.33331 (DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD) 1c. Property size: 68 acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to proposed project: Back Creek 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: WS-V, NSW 2c. River basin: Cape Fear 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: The site contains undeveloped wooded land and fields. Structures are not located on the site. The site is located in Alamance County, North Carolina. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: ~0.56ac 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: Perennial Stream=~1,600LF. Intermittent Stream=~325LF. Open Waters=~0.80ac. 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: The purpose of the proposed project is to provide access for a proposed industrial facility 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The overall project consists of development of the site with an approximate 788,500 square foot industrial facility with circular tractor access, shipping/receiving docks, tractor court parking, vehicular parking and stormwater retentions devices. To provide circular access to the industrial facility, it is necessary to construct a road crossing that will impact an intermittent stream. To facilitate development of the site, clearing and grading the site is necessary. Graders, haulers, excavators and other heavy equipment will be used during site construction. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / project (including all prior phases) in the past? Comments: Agency Visit 10.5.17 Yes No Unknown 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? Preliminary Final 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Name (if known): Bradley Luckey/Michael Brame Agency/Consultant Company: Pilot Enviromental, Inc. Other: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. JD Not Issued. DWR, 10.9.17 (attached). 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? Yes No Unknown 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to “help file” instructions. Page 4 of 12 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? Yes No 6b. If yes, explain. Page 5 of 12 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): Wetlands Streams - tributaries Buffers Open Waters Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. Wetland impact number – Permanent (P) or Temporary (T) 2b. Type of impact 2c. Type of wetland (if known) 2d. Forested 2e. Type of jurisdiction (Corps - 404, 10 DWQ – non-404, other) 2f. Area of impact (acres) W1 P T Yes No Corps DWQ W2 P T Yes No Corps DWQ W3 P T Yes No Corps DWQ W4 P T Yes No Corps DWQ W5 P T Yes No Corps DWQ W6 P T Yes No Corps DWQ 2g. Total wetland impacts 2h. Comments: Wetland impacts are not proposed. 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. Stream impact number - Permanent (P) or Temporary (T) 3b. Type of impact 3c. Stream name 3d. Perennial (PER) or intermittent (INT)? 3e. Type of jurisdiction (Corps - 404, 10 DWQ – non-404, other) 3f. Average stream width (feet) 3g. Impact length (linear feet) S1 P T Fill Unnamed PER INT Corps DW Q 4 130 S2 P T PER INT Corps DWQ S3 P T PER INT Corps DWQ S4 P T PER INT Corps DWQ S5 P T PER INT Corps DWQ S6 P T PER INT Corps DWQ 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 130 3i. Comments: The proposed stream crossing will permanently impact 130 linear feet of intermittent stream channel associated with road crossing fill. A BMP will be installed at the most down-gradient portion of the impact area to prevent down-gradient sedimentation. Temporary impacts are not proposed. Page 6 of 12 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below. 4a. Open water impact number – Permanent (P) or Temporary (T) 4b. Name of waterbody (if applicable) 4c. Type of impact 4d. Waterbody type 4e. Area of impact (acres) O1 P T O2 P T O3 P T O4 P T 4f. Total open water impacts 4g. Comments: Open water impacts are not proposed. 5. Pond or Lake Construction If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below. 5a. Pond ID number 5b. Proposed use or purpose of pond 5c. Wetland Impacts (acres) 5d. Stream Impacts (feet) 5e. Upland (acres) Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded P1 Stormwater Attached P2 5f. Total Attached 5g. Comments: Stormwater ponds will be constructed in high ground and excavated in uplands. See attached Overall Site Plan. 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? Yes No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): Attached. 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): Attached 5k. Method of construction: Excavated in uplands. Page 7 of 12 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. Project is in which protected basin? Neuse Tar-Pamlico Other: Jordan Catawba Randleman 6b. Buffer impact number – Permanent (P) or Temporary (T) 6c. Reason for impact 6d. Stream name 6e. Buffer mitigation required? 6f. Zone 1 impact (square feet) 6g. Zone 2 impact (square feet) B1 P T Perpendicular Road Crossing Unnamed Yes No 8,255/0 5,525/1,540 B2 P T Yes No B3 P T Yes No 6h. Total buffer impacts 8,255/0 5,525/1,540 6i. Comments: The proposed road crossing will permanently impact 8,255SF of Zone 1 buffer, 5,525SF of Zone 2 buffer and temporarily impact 1,540SF of Zone 2 buffer with clearing/grading. Areas of temporary impact will be planted with native herbaceous seed mix. Mitigation is not proposed for buffer impacts. D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. The applicant has designed the proposed project in efforts to avoid and minimize impacts to WoUS. Initial project designs included the construction of a larger industrial facility. This design would have required an individual 404/401 permit. The applicant reduced the size of the industrial facility to avoid significantly more impact to WoUS. The proposed road crossing has been designed to cross the upper-most portion of a weakly defined intermittent stream, in an area where the stream is relatively straight. The road crossing was designed as near to perpendicular as possible. Initial road crossing designs impacted greater than 150LF of intermittent stream channel and were located farther down-gradient than the impacts proposed within this application. However, the applicant further reduced the number of shipping/receiving docks/tractor court parking and re-aligned the road crossing as close to the proposed facility to the maximum extent possible, thus avoiding at least 20LF of intermittent stream impact. The applicant has designed the road crossing to have 3:1 sideslopes, which also further reduces stream impact amount. Approximately 1,600 linear feet of perennial stream channel, 0.56 acres of wetlands, 0.80 acres of open water ponds and the remaining 245 linear feet of intermittent stream channel are being avoided. 1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. The clearing limits will be staked and BMPs will be utilized to prevent down-gradient sedimentation. Temporary impacts to riparian buffers will be stabilized with native herbaceous seed mix and matted appropriately. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? Yes No 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): DWQ Corps 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? Mitigation bank Payment to in-lieu fee program Permittee Responsible Mitigation Page 8 of 12 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: warm cool cold 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Comments: 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. Mitigation is not proposed. 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) – required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? Yes No 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. Zone 6c. Reason for impact 6d. Total impact (square feet) Multiplier 6e. Required mitigation (square feet) Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: Buffer mitigation is not proposed. Page 9 of 12 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? Yes No 1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. Comments: A diffuse plan is being completed as part of the post-construction stormwater management plan. Based on preliminary design information, the applicant has designed the proposed project to allow areas of uplands to be utilized for stormwater retention devices to discharge via diffuse flow. Yes No 2. Stormwater Management Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 49 % 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? Yes No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: A stormwater management plan is being completed for the proposed project. The applicant has designed the proposed project such that stormwater will be treated within uplands areas and diffuse flow can be maintained. 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? Certified Local Government DWQ Stormwater Program DWQ 401 Unit 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local government’s jurisdiction is this project? 3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs apply (check all that apply): Phase II NSW USMP Water Supply Watershed Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? Yes No 4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review 4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply (check all that apply): Coastal counties HQW ORW Session Law 2006-246 Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? Yes No 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? Yes No 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? Yes No Page 10 of 12 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land? Yes No 1b. If you answered “yes” to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? Yes No 1c. If you answered “yes” to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) Comments: We are not aware of a NEPA or SEPA being required as part of this project. Yes No 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? Yes No 2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes No 2c. If you answered “yes” to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes No 3b. If you answered “yes” to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered “no,” provide a short narrative description. We are not aware of additional development that will impact nearby downstream water quality. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. The proposed project will connect to municipal sanitary sewer system. Page 11 of 12 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 5.Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat? Yes No 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts? Yes No 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. Raleigh Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? The USFWS identifies the Cape Fear Shiner as being endangered within certain watersheds within Alamance County. The site is located outside of the protected watershed. Other federally protected species are not idenfited by USFWS in Alamance County. Therefore, the proposed project will have no effect to federally protected species. 6.Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? Yes No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? Based on our knowledge of the site, the site is not located in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat. Best management practices and the use of temporary sediment and erosion control devices will prevent sediment from entering down-gradient waterbodies which may contain fish. 7.Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? Yes No 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? According to the NC SHPO Historic Properties website (attached), the site is located within a larger registered district (AM-0497 Henderson Scott Farm District). According to the 1987 Nomination Form, it appears that the site has contained wooded land and has not contained credible structure resources or provides unique cultural significance to the historic district through previous agricultural practices. Multiple listed structures associated with the listed district are identified on adjacent properties of the site. The proposed project will be developed to include a vegetative screen between site development activities, NC Highway 119, North Jim Minor Road and nearby listed structures within the larger registered district. AM-0375 Henderson Scott Store has been removed from the intersection of NC Highway 119 and North Jim Minor Road, which had been previously re-located twice prior. Based on the site containing predominantly wooded land since at least 1962, the lack of cultural significance of wooded land located on the site related to the overall district, the former and most recent re-location of the Henderson Scott Store from the intersection of NC Highway 119 and North Jim Minor Road and the use of vegetative screening from remaining listed structures, it is our opinion the proposed project will not adversely affect the listed historic district or the aesthetics of the listed resources contained within the district. Page 12 of 12 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? Yes No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM 37108893ooJ (Drawing 4, Verification Package Previously Provided) Bradley S. Luckey Applicant/Agent's Printed Name _______________________________ Applicant/Agent's Signature (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.) 3.13.20 Date Proposal for Environmental Services Pilot Proposal2972 July 31, 2017 AGENT AUTHORIZATION This form authorizes Pilot to act as our agent in stream/wetland matters including U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and North Carolina Division of Water Resources field verification and permitting. Property Address: Owner Information: Address: Telephone Number: Fax Number: E-mail Address: 2W4. (CI#parr 1 Rd. M Eijq,� E n! G SGOT7' IN�yo P�o��a� l ES 1�0 g yo �oA,�rAn�N ;j�u2�r�c�rp,J n!G Z72 �S 4063 i7 2Z t Z) JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION REQUEST D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on. site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property. Print Name Capacity: _Owner �CAuthorized Agent Date g�z2l2ol� Signature � e�" . 0 SCALE 1"=200' 400'200'NAD 83DRIVE IN DOOR DRIVE IN DOOR PROPOSED 788,550 SF WAREHOUSE PARKING LOT (427 SPACES) CRE E K ± S A 1,02 6 ± LI N E A R F T. C/L CREEK± I-SA 238± LINEAR FT C/L CREEK± SB 507± LINEAR FT. 563.25' 1400' TRUCK COURT TRUCK COURT TRUCK COURT190' 190' 130 LF IMPACT JOB NO. SHEET NO. SCALE DESIGNED BY CHECKED BYDATEDRAWN BY DATEREVISION DESCRIPTIONYOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.These plans and associated documents are the exclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP and may not be reproduced in whole or in part and shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever, inclusive, but notlimited to construction, bidding, and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.8642 W. Market Street Suite 136 | Greensboro, NC 27409TEL 336.662.0411 FAX 336.662.0420 www.timmons.comTHIS DRAWING PREPARED AT THEGREENSBORO OFFICES:\107\44902-NCCP_Site_B\DWG\Sheet\Exhibit\Overall Site Exhibit.dwg | Plotted on 2/25/2020 10:14 AM | by Jacob MooreC-100 OVERALL SITE PLANJ. MOORE J. MOORE A. CARROLL 02/24/2020 PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT - NC HWY 119ALAMANCE COUNTY - NORTH CAROLINA44902 1" = 200'NORTH CAROLINA LICENSE NO. C-1652STORMWATER CONTROL MEASURE DRAINAGE AREA = 17.69 AC SURFACE AREA = 22,275 SF STORMWATER CONTROL MEASURE DRAINAGE AREA = 19.02 AC SURFACE AREA = 31,650 SF STORMWATER CONTROL MEASURE DRAINAGE AREA = 6.82 AC SURFACE AREA = 7,200 SF IMPERVIOUS AREA = 33.83 AC TOTAL AREA 67.800 Ac.± 590 585 595590 5 8 5 605 600 595 590 585 580 593 592 591 589 588 587 586 595 596 59 7 598 599 600 594593592591591592593590 585 585 590 590 590 130 LF PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT DRIVE IN DOOR AT FFE = 600.00DOCKS AT ELEV 596.00 3:1 SLOPE (TYP) JOB NO. SHEET NO. SCALE DESIGNED BY CHECKED BYDATEDRAWN BY DATEREVISION DESCRIPTIONYOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.These plans and associated documents are the exclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP and may not be reproduced in whole or in part and shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever, inclusive, but notlimited to construction, bidding, and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.8642 W. Market Street Suite 136 | Greensboro, NC 27409TEL 336.662.0411 FAX 336.662.0420 www.timmons.comTHIS DRAWING PREPARED AT THEGREENSBORO OFFICES:\107\44902-NCCP_Site_B\DWG\Sheet\Exhibit\Stream Crossing Grading.dwg | Plotted on 2/25/2020 10:11 AM | by Jacob MooreC-101 STREAM CROSSING EXHIBITJ. MOORE J. MOORE A. CARROLL 02/24/2020 PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT - NC HWY 119ALAMANCE COUNTY - NORTH CAROLINA44902 1" = 40'NORTH CAROLINA LICENSE NO. C-1652ZONE 1 BUFFER : 8,255 SF IMPACTED ZONE 2 BUFFER: 5,525 SF IMPACTED ZONE 2 BUFFER (TEMP. IMPACTS TO BE RE-VEGETATED): 1,540 SF BUFFER IMPACTS LEGEND 0 SCALE 1"=40' 80'40'NAD 83 State of North Carolina | Environmental Quality 450 West Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300 | Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27105 336-776-9800 ROY COOPER Governor MICHAEL S. REGAN Secretary S. JAY ZIMMERMAN Director Water Resources Environmental Quality October 9, 2017 Mr. Michael T. Brame Pilot Environmental Inc. P.O. Box 128 Kernersville, NC 27285 Subject: On-Site Determination for Applicability to the Mitigation Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) Subject Property: NC Commerce Park – Kimrey Rd, Mebane, Alamance County Dear Mr. Brame: On October 5, 2017, at your request, Sue Homewood conducted an on-site determination to review features located on the subject project for stream determinations with regards to the above noted state regulations. David Bailey with the US Army Corps of Engineers was also present during the site visit. The Division acknowledges the areas and boundaries identified as jurisdictional wetlands by the USACE. The attached sketch map accurately depicts all stream determinations conducted during the site visit. Please note that at the time of this letter, all perennial stream channels and jurisdictional wetlands found on the property are subject to the mitigation rules cited above. These regulations are subject to change in the future. In addition, the Jordan Lake Buffer Rules may apply to some streams at this location, please be sure to contact the local government for further information regarding the Jordan Lake Buffer Rules. The owner (or future owners) should notify the Division (and other relevant agencies) of this decision in any future correspondences concerning this property. This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected parties that dispute a determination made by the Division or Delegated Local Authority that a surface water exists and that it is subject to the buffer rule may request a determination by the Director. A request for a determination by the Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c/o 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650. Individuals that dispute a determination by the Division or Delegated Local Authority that “exempts” surface water from the buffer rule may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. Applicants are hereby notified that the 60-day statutory appeal time does not start until the affected party (including downstream and adjacent landowners) is notified of this decision. The Division recommends that the applicant conduct this notification in order to be certain that third party appeals are made in a timely manner. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This determination is final and binding unless you ask for a hearing within 60 days. This letter only addresses the applicability to the mitigation rules and the buffer rules and does not approve any activity within Waters of the United States or Waters of the State or their associated buffers. If you have any additional questions or require additional information, please contact me at 336-776-9693 or sue.homewood@ncdenr.gov. Sincerely, Sue Homewood Winston-Salem Regional Office Enclosures: USGS Topo Map Pilot Environmental Stream Map Cc: Scott Mayo Properties II, LLC, 840 Plantation Dr, Burlington NC 27215 David Bailey, USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office (via email) Josh Johnson, AWCK (via email) DWR, Winston-Salem Regional Office h^'^dŽƉŽŐƌĂƉŚŝĐDĂƉ EŽŵŵĞƌĐĞWĂƌŬ <ŝŵĞƌǇ ZŽĂĚ 'ƌĂŚĂŵ͕ůĂŵĂŶĐĞŽƵŶƚǇ͕E WŝůŽƚWƌŽũĞĐƚϮϵϳϮ ƌĂǁŝŶŐϭ h^'^dŽƉŽŐƌĂƉŚŝĐDĂƉ ŽŶĐŽƌĚtĞƐƚ͕EYƵĂĚƌĂŶŐůĞ ^ĐĂůĞ͗ϭ͟сϮ͕ϬϬϬ͛ >'E ^ŝƚĞŽƵŶĚĂƌǇ SA Surveyor Locate WA 1‐2 THE LOCATIONS OF FEATURES SHOWN ON THIS MAP ARE PRELIMINARY AND APPROXIMATE. THEY WERE VERIFIED BY MR. DAVID BAILEY WITH THE USACE AND MS. SUE HOMEWOOD WITH THE NCDEQ‐DWR ON OCTOBER 5, 2017. THEY HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED OR GEOLOCATED. LEGEND Site Boundary Pond Intermittent Stream Perennial Stream Wetlands Flag Number Data Point Verification Results SA 1‐5 DP‐1 FLAG NUMBERS/INFO WETLAND FLAGS = STREAM FLAGS = Stream Flags = 12 Wetland Flags = 41 Total Flags = 53 Wetland Map NC Commerce Park Kimrey Road Graham, Alamance County, NC Pilot Project 2972 Drawing 5 2016 Aerial Imagery from Google Earth and Pilot Field Notes Scale: 1” = 300’ Date: 08.30.17 ISA Surveyor Locate SB Surveyor Locate PB Surveyor Locate PA Surveyor Locate WA 3‐11 WAA 1‐30 ISB 1‐6 DP‐1 DP‐2 Differentiate Wetlands From Pond