20200474 Ver 1_PCN Form Submission_20200403

DWR
mrlslon of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
September 29, 2018 Ver 3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
G Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned
20200474
Is a payment required for this project?*
r No payment required
r Fee received
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office *
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
St. Alban's Mixed Use Development
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Walter Cole
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
4/3/2020
Nearest Body of Water
Big Branch
Basin
Neuse
Water Classification
C, NSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.83123
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Wake
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
Longitude:
-78.62442
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
W Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
* Nationwide Permit (NWP)
* Regional General Permit (RGP)
7 Standard (IP)
Version#*
1
What amout is owed?*
IT $240.00
r $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Stephanie Goss:eads\szgoss
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]

1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
r Individual Permit
12 - Utility Lines
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
r 401 Water Quality Certification - E)iress
V Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
r Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
W Owner r Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
St. Alban's Holdings, LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c. Responsible party:
James Whitacre
2d.Address
Street Address
51 Kilmayne Dr., Suite 105
Address tine 2
aty
Cary
Postal / Zip Cate
27511
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
us
2f. Fax Number:
r Yes r No
r Yes r No
4a. Name:
Walter Cole

4b. Business Name:
S&ME, Inc.
4c.Address
Street Address
3201 Spring Forest Road
Address Line 2
aty
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27616
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Agent Authorization Letter*
Signed Agent Authorization. pdf
State / Province / Region
NC
Oxrky
US
4e. Fax Number:
26.96KB
C. Project Information and Prior Project History C^)
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(d appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality/ town:
Raleigh
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
1715077778,1715176384,1715183089
2c. Project Address
Street Address
900 St Albans Drive
Address Line 2
city
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27609
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Big Branch
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
Q NSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Neuse
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030202010804
4. Project Description and History
2b. Property size:
42.7
State / Province / legion
NC
Country
US
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The site is currently primarily undeveloped, vdth the southeast portion of the site being a parking lot and adjacent commercial building. The site is primarily uplands but is bounded by a
perennial stream to the west. The surrounding area is primarily developed as mixed use, including urban residential and commercial development.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
USGS.pdf 954.56KB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
SOILS.pdf 1.33MB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:

0
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property
675
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The purpose of the project is to provide infrastructure and utilities to the 40-acre development site. The overall 40-acre mixed use development will include office, retail, apartments,
hotel, and senior living facilities.
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The project consists of public roads, stormwater management and utility infrastructure to support a 40 acre mixed use development. Some mass grading will be completed with the
roadway infrastructure. Stornrvvater management is achieved through a wet retention basin and a level spreader with grass filter strip. Two of the smaller parcels will be treated with sand
filters. The sanitary sewer mainline that serves the site must come from the property to the west and cross the Big Branch Creek. Upon completion of the roads and infrastructure the
site will be developed into a mix of office, retail, apartments, hotel and senior living.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
St Albans Street Plans- 12-19-2019.pdf 42.91 MB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the propertyor proposed impact areas?*
r Yes r No
Comments:
Impact area delineated March 2020 by S&ME staff
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?
r Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r N/A
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Walter Cole
Agency/Consultant Company: S&ME
Other:
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
St Albans Figures.pdf
Photo Log.pdf
DP1.pdf
Stream Form.pdf
6. Future Project Plans
7.05MB
1.2SMB
46.9KB
224.94KB
O Unknown
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r' Yes IT No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
No other permits are anticipated. Site plans depict the site being constructed in phases for construction purposes, but the project will be constructed concurrently.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
r Wetlands W Streams -tributaries W Buffers
r Open Waters r Pond Construction
3. Stream Impacts
3a. Reason for impact (?) 3b.lmpact type * 3c. Type of impact* 3d. S. name * 3e. Stream Type * 3f. Type of 3g. S. width * 3h. Impact
(?) Jurisdiction* length*
Utility crossing Temporary Dewetering Big Branch Perennial Both 30 31
Averalge(feet)1
(linearfeet)
31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts: 31. Total temporary stream impacts:
0 31
31. Total stream and ditch impacts:

31
3j. Comments:
Impacts to Big Branch are temporary. The proposed sewer line will be connected to the existing sewer main on the western side of Big Branch using
standard open cut methods and will impact 31 linear feet. After installation of the sewer line, the stream will be returned to original grade and contours.
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)?
Check all that apply.
F7 Neuse r Tar -Pamlico
r Catawba r Randleman
r Goose Creek r Jordan Lake
r Other
6b. Impact Type 6c. Per or Temp 6d. Stream name 6e. Buffer mitigation required? 6f. Zone 1 impact 6g. Zone 2 impact
Allowable
P
Big Branch
No
1,275
0
Allowable
T
Big Branch
No
742 1
1,058
6h. Total buffer impacts:
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Temporary impacts: 742.00 1,058.00
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Permanent impacts: 1,275.00 0.00
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total combined buffer impacts: 2,017.00 1,058.00
6i. Comments:
Buffer impacts are the result of the construction of a 30-foot wide City of Raleigh Sanitary Easement. On the proposed site (east of Big Branch), there
will be 1058 square feet of temporary impacts to Zone 2, which will be returned to original grade and contour after construction and seeded with
herbaceous vegetation. The 1,275 square feet of permanent Zone 1 impacts will result from the clearing and maintenance of the 30-foot sanitary
easement. The 742 square feet of temporary Zone 1 impacts are located within an existing City of Raleigh sanitary easement and are necessary to
connect the proposed sanitary sewer line to the existing main. All areas of the riparian buffer will be returned to original grade and contour and
seeded with an herbaceous seed mix after construction is complete.
Supporting Documentation
Impact Figures.pdf 1.33MB
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
With the exception of the sole stream crossing necessitated for the sanitary sewer crossing, all stream and buffer impacts have been avoided within
the site. Per the City of Raleigh, the crossing is necessary in order to provide sewer to the site. The site was selected to allow for a perpendicular
crossing with minimal impacts from paralleling the stream.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Tree Protection Fence will be installed to avoid any impacts into buffers or sensitive areas. Standard best management practices will be implemented
throughout construction including sediment basins, sediment fence, wheel wash areas and temporary storm water diversion if needed. Specific
attention will be paid to ensure grading is only performed to the extent needed for the proposed project and all grading not required will be avoided.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes r No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Impacts to stream are temporary in nature. Impacts to buffers for non -electric utility lines with perpendicular crossings disturbing less than 40 linear feet of buffer with a permanent
maintenance corridor greater than 10 feet in width are considered allowable.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?

r Yes r No
What type of SCM are you providing?
r Level Spreader
r Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
r Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
r Other SCM that removes minimum 30 % nitrogen
* Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
Diffuse Flow Documentation
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r No
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater
program?
r Yes r No
2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply:
W Local Government r State
Local Government Stormwater Programs
W Phase II W NSW r USMP r Water Supply
Please identifywhich local government stormwater programyou are using.
City of Raleigh
Comments:
Stormwater management is achieved through a wet retention basin and a level spreader with grass filter strip. Two of the smaller parcels will be treated with sand filters.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r Yes r No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? *
r Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project is designed to accomodate on site development but is not anticipated to result in future growth off -site.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r Nor NIA
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated
at a treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
The project purpose is to connect with an existing City of Raleigh sewer line. The wastewater resulting from this project will be treated by existing City
of Raleigh infrastructure.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*

r Yes r No f Unknown
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-87
r Yes r No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
r Yes r No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
The NC Natural Heritage Program online data explorer (https://wvm.ncnhp.org/), US Fish and Wildlife Service Information for Planning and
Consultation (IPaC) report. No critical habitat or element occurrences of protected species were identified within the site or within one -mile of the site.
Consultation Documentation Upload
IPaC List.pdf 221.38KB
NCNHP Report.pdf 1.37MB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
The USFWS IPaC Report and the National Marine Fisheries Essential Fish Habitat mapper (https://vmw.fisheries.noaa.gov/resource/maplessential-
fish-ha bitat-ma p per).
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
The NC State Historic Preservation Office web mapping tool (https://www.ncdcr.gov/about/history/division-historical-resources/nc-state-historic-
preservation-office)
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-yearfloodplain?*
r Yes r No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
No development will occur in the FEMA flood plain. The proposed sewer will be installed below the ground surface, which will then be returned to
original grade and contour.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FEMA floodmap(3720171500J and 3720170500J) and the project engineer.
Miscellaneous C^U
Comments
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
FEMA Firmette.pdf 417.7KB
Signature
W By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:

Walter Cole
Signature
-�Vl&A/0
Date
4/3/2020

AGENT AUTHORIZATION AND RIGHT -OF -ENTRY FORM
Date: Z 17 S' Z nZ ea
Project Information
S&ME Project Name: Mixed -Use Development at St. Albans
Type of Project: Commercial
Location: St. Albans Drive in Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina
Property OwnerAlepresentative Information
Business Name:
Mailing Address: 57
City, State, Zip Code: rwi
Telephone No.
Contact:
Agent Information
Business Name:
Street Address:
City, State, Zip Code:
Telephone No.
Contact:
✓4rieeel Cvd (Pe
C>
'/9 • f�L d - Za2 y
S&ME, Inc.
3201 Spring Forest Road
Raleigh, NC 27616
919-872-2660
Mr. Walter Cole
Authorization: I
Of
(Contact Signature)
wvc,oeod l: % z)< s. �
(Name of Landowner or Representative)
, on behalf
a duly authorized owner of record of the property..' properties identified herein, hereby authorize S&ME to act as
agent with the USCAE in connection with the above -mentioned project. By signing above, I also authorize
representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property
herein described for the purposes of conducting on -site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional
determination pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the River and Harbors Act of
1889. I, the above signed, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or acting
as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.

Project Site
SCALE:
DATE:
PROJECT NUMBER
FIGURE NO.
21 " = 500 '
2-6-20
TBD
MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT AT ST ALBANSST ALBANS ROADRALEIGH, WAK E COUNTY, N ORTH CARO LINADrawing Path: Q:\PROJECTS\2020\Proposals\StAlbans\USGS.mxd plotted by abentz 02-06-20200 500 1,000(FE ET)
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC EXHIBIT
³
REFERENCE:GIS BASE LAYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM THE USGS NATIONAL TOPO MAP VIEWER. THISMAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED AREAPPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATEDOTHERWISE.
Project Site
SCALE:
DATE:
PROJECT NUMBER
FIGURE NO.
11 " = 350 '
2-6-20
TBD
MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT AT ST ALBANSST ALBANS ROADRALEIGH, WAK E COUNTY, N ORTH CARO LINADrawing Path: Q:\PROJECTS\2020\Proposals\StAlbans\SOILS.mxd plotted by abentz 02-06-20200 350 700(FE ET)
USDA-SCS SOIL SURVEY EXHIBIT
³
REFERENCE:GIS BASE LAYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM THE 1970 USDA-SCS PUBLISHED SOIL SURVEY OFWAKE COUNTY, SHEET 39. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALLFEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON CIVILSURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
SOILS:CeB2: Cecil sandy loam, 2-6% slopes, erodedCeC2: Cecil sandy loam, 6-10% slopes, erodedCeD:Cecil sandy loam, 10-15% slopesWo: Wehadkee and Bibb soilsWwE: Wilkes soils, 10-20% slopes
Project Site
SCALE:
DATE:
PROJECT NUMBER
FIGURE NO.
11 " = 381 '
3-23-20
4305-20-043
MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT AT ST ALBANSST ALBANS ROADRALEIGH, WAK E COUNTY, N ORTH CARO LINADrawing Path: T:\Projects\2020\ENV\4305-20-043 Mixed Use Development at St. Albans\GIS\SOILS.mxd plotted by abentz 03-23-20200 350 700(FE ET)
USDA-SCS SOIL SURVEY EXHIBIT
³
REFERENCE:GIS BASE LAYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM THE 1970 USDA-SCS PUBLISHED SOIL SURVEY OFWAKE COUNTY, SHEET 39. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALLFEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON CIVILSURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
SOILS:CeB2: Cecil sandy loam, 2-6% slopes, erodedCeC2: Cecil sandy loam, 6-10% slopes, erodedCeD:Cecil sandy loam, 10-15% slopesWo: Wehadkee and Bibb soilsWwE: Wilkes soils, 10-20% slopes
Project Site
SCALE:
DATE:
PROJECT NUMBER
FIGURE NO.
21 " = 500 '
2-6-20
TBD
MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT AT ST ALBANSST ALBANS ROADRALEIGH, WAK E COUNTY, N ORTH CARO LINADrawing Path: T:\Projects\2020\ENV\4305-20-043 Mixed Use Development at St. Albans\GIS\USGS.mxd plotted by abentz 03-23-20200 500 1,000(FE ET)
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC EXHIBIT
³
REFERENCE:GIS BASE LAYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM THE USGS NATIONAL TOPO MAP VIEWER. THISMAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED AREAPPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATEDOTHERWISE.
S to c k d a le D rR u tg ers C tSt Albans Dr Winona RdI 440
W
B
Bankston
W
oods W
ay
Colgate Pl
Quail Hollow DrNavaho Dr Benson DrI 4
4
0 E
B
2-Foo t Contours
Project Site
SCALE:
DATE:
PROJECT NUMBER
FIGURE NO.
31 " = 300 '
2-6-20
TBD
MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT AT ST ALBANSST ALBANS ROADRALEIGH, WAK E COUNTY, N ORTH CARO LINADrawing Path: Q:\PROJECTS\2020\Proposals\StAlbans\TOPO.mxd plotted by abentz 02-06-20200 300 600(FE ET)
COLOR AERIAL AND TOPOGRAPHIC EXHIBIT
³
REFERENCE:GIS BASE LAYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM THE 2017 NCONEMAP AERIAL ORTHOIMAGERYLAYER AND THE 2013 WAKE COUNTY CONTOUR DATASET. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONALPURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOTBASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
Stream Impact Area
St Albans Dr
I 4
4
0 WB Quail Hollow DrNavaho Dr
I 4
4
0 E
B Benson DrSF1 DP1
USACE Data Point Location
NCDWR Stream Form Location
Stream - Approx. Located
Stream - Field Located
Project Site
SCALE:
DATE:
PROJECT NUMBER
FIGURE NO.4
1 " = 175 '
3-27-20
4305-20-043MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT AT ST ALBANSST ALBANS ROADRALEIGH, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINADrawing Path: C:\Users\abentz\Desktop\Remote GIS\StAlbans\GIS\FEATURE.mxd plotted by abentz 03-27-20200 175 350
(FEET)FEATURE EXHIBIT³
REFERENCE:GIS BASE LAYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM THE 2017 NCONEMAP AERIAL ORTHOIMAGERYLAYER. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONSDISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION,UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
Project/Site:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State:Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Lat:Long:
Soil Map Unit Name:
X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Yes X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
X No
No X X
No X
X
Yes X
Yes X
Yes X X
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
NoYes
No
No
Water Table Present?
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
HYDROLOGY
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Deposits (B5)
City/County:At. Albans Mixed Use Devleopment Raleigh/Wake
DP1
3/26/2020
St Alban's Holdings, LLC NC
No
Section, Township, Range:W. Cole
3-5nonehillslope
Datum: NAD83-78.6280235.83184LRR P, MLRA 136
N/ANWI classification:Wilkes soils
Slope (%):Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Yes NoAre climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?(If no, explain in Remarks.)
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
Are “Normal Circumstances” present?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Remarks:
Is the Sampled AreaYes
Yes
Yes
Hydric Soil Present?
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Nowithin a Wetland?Yes
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Remarks:
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
No
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
Surface Water Present?
Field Observations:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Sampling Point:
(Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.(A/B)
7.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 2 =
1.x 3 =
2.x 4 =
3.x 5 =
4.Column Totals:(B)
5.
6.
7.
8.X
9.
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:Yes X8
=Total Cover
5
15
Lonicera japonica
5 Yes
Yes
YesVitis rotundifolia
FAC
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
)10*10
=Total Cover
FAC
FACW
Yes
3
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
VEGETATION (Four Strata)– Use scientific names of plants.
45 18
Acer rubrum
20
10 No FAC
Yes
Yes
FACW
FACW
10
No
Multiply by:
Prevalence Index = B/A =
FACU
UPL
Yes FACU
Prevalence Index worksheet:
FACW
Total % Cover of:
(A)
(B)
(A)
No
7
1333
18
50*50
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Woody Vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
FACU
FAC
=Total Cover
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10*10 )
Smilax rotundifolia
35
No5
Ilex opaca 5
30
Ligustrum sinense
Juncus effusus
Ranunculus ficaria 30
65
Elaeagnus umbellata
Lindera benzoin
Tree Stratum
)
=Total Cover
Betula nigra
Celtis laevigata
Ulmus americana
Liquidambar styraciflua
50*50 )
90
Indicator
Status
30
20
Yes
Dominant
Species?
Yes
20
10
No
FAC
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
5
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Absolute
% Cover
77.8%
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
No
DP1
7
9
FACU species
UPL species
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
FAC
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Depth (inches):X
Sampling Point:
Yes
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present?
Type:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Loc2
100
Sandy
Loamy/Clayey
100
Color (moist)
Matrix
2.5YR 4/4
10YR 6/1
6-18
0-6
DP1SOIL
Type1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Redox FeaturesDepth
(inches)Color (moist)Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
%
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Redox (S5)
%Texture
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136)
Dark Surface (S7)unless disturbed or problematic.Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
No
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

St. Albans Mixed Use Development Project Site Photographs
St. Albans Drive, Raleigh, Wake Co., North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4305-20-043
Taken by: W. Cole Date Taken: 3/26/2020
1

1 A view of Big Branch from proposed sewer line crossing
location looking upstream where NCDWR Stream Form
was recorded.
2 A view of Big Branch from proposed sewer line crossing
location looking downstream where NCDWR Stream Form
was recorded.

3 A view of Big Branch looking toward City of Raleigh sewer
line manhole that proposed sewer line will tie into.

4 A view of sewer easement from Big Branch where USACE
Data Form was recorded.

St. Albans Mixed Use Development Project Site Photographs
St. Albans Drive, Raleigh, Wake Co., North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4305-20-043
Taken by: W. Cole Date Taken: 3/26/2020
2

5 A view of existing City of Raleigh sewer easement looking
north.
6 A view of existing City of Raleigh sewer easement and
manhole that proposed sewer line will tie into.

7 A close-up view of existing manhole that proposed sewer
line will tie into.
8 A close-up view of Big Branch where proposed sewer line
will be constructed via open cut trenching.

NC Division of Water Quality –Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11

41

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Project/Site: Latitude:
Evaluator: County: Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if ≥ 19 or perennial if ≥ 30*
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:

A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_________) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool,
ripple-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _________)
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = _________)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:

Sketch:

ST ALBA
N
S

D
R
BENSON DRQUAIL HOLLOW DRIVEST ALBAN
S

D
R
LOT 1
LOT 3
LOT 5
LOT 17
LOT 7
LOT 8
LOT 9
LOT 10
LOT 6
LOT 16
LOT 13
LOT 12
LOT 2
LOT 4
LOT 11QUAIL HOLLOW DRIVEQUAIL HOLLOW DRIVEA STREET
A STREET
B STREETC STREETLOT 14
LOT 15
PHASE 1PHASE 4PHASE 3PHASE 4PHASE 2PHASE 1PHASE 1
PHASE 3
PHASE 2
PHASE 3
NC GR
ID
NAD
83

(201
1
ADJUSTMENT
)
GRAPHIC SCALE
0
1 inch = feet
40 80 160
80
Drawing Number:
Project Number:
Drawn By:
Date:
Scale:
Checked By:MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT AT ST ALBANSCONCURRENT SUBDIVISION PLAN1 / 1 ADVANCEDCIVILDESIGNENGINEERSSURVYEORSOVERALL SITE PLANDEWITT CAROLINAS, INC.
LOT 17
Drawing Number:
Project Number:
Drawn By:
Date:
Scale:
Checked By:MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT AT ST ALBANSCONCURRENT SUBDIVISION PLAN1 / 1 ADVANCEDCIVILDESIGNENGINEERSSURVYEORSIMPACT MAPDEWITT CAROLINAS, INC.LEGEND
USGS The National Map: Orthoimagery. Data refreshed April, 2019.
National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000250Feet
Ü78°37'51.58"W 35°50'7.93"N 78°37'14.12"W 35°49'38.77"N
SEE FIS REPORT FOR DETAILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAP FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT
SPECIAL FLOODHAZARD AR EAS
Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE)Zone A, V, A99With BFE or Depth Zone AE, AO, AH, VE, AR
Regulator y Floodway
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areasof 1% annual chance flood with averagedepth less than one foot or with drainageareas of less than one square mile Zone X
Future Conditions 1% AnnualChance Flood Hazard Zone XArea with Reduced Flood Risk due toLevee. See Notes.Zone X
Area with Flood Risk due to Levee Zone D
NO SCREE N Area of Minimal Flood Hazard Zone X
Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard Zone D
Channel, Culver t, or Storm SewerLevee, Dike, or Floodwall
Cross Sections with 1% Annual Chance17.5 Water Surface ElevationCoastal Transect
Coastal Transect BaselineProfile BaselineHydrographic Feature
Base Flood Elevation Line (BFE)
Effective LOMRs
Limit of StudyJurisdiction Boundar y
Digital Data Available
No Digital Data Available
Unmapped
This map complies with FEMA's standards for the use of digital flood maps if it is not void as described below. The basemap shown complies with FEMA's basemap accuracy standards
The flood hazard information is derived directly from theauthoritative NFHL web ser vices provided by FEMA. This mapwas exported on 3/23/2020 at 2:23:16 PM and does notreflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date andtime. The NFHL and effective information may change orbecome superseded by new data over time.
This map image is void if the one or more of the following mapelements do not appear: basemap imagery, flood zone labels,legend, scale bar, map creation date, community identifiers,FIRM panel number, and FIRM effective date. Map images forunmapped and unmodernized areas cannot be used forregulatory purposes.
Legend
OTHER AREAS OFFLOOD HAZARD
OTHER AREAS
GENERALSTRUCTURES
OTHERFEATURES
MAP PANELS
8
1:6,000
B 20.2
The pin displayed on the map is an approximate point selected by the user and does not represent an authoritative proper ty location.
March 23, 2020
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2020-SLI-0912
Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-02062
Project Name: St Albans Mixed Use Development

Subject:List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The species list generated pursuant to the information you provided identifies threatened,
endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical
habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally-listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally-protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or
03/23/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-02062   2

evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally-listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally-protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require
development of an eagle conservation plan (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/
eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects should follow the wind energy
guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and
bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http://
www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm; http://
www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/
comtow.html.
Not all Threatened and Endangered Species that occur in North Carolina are subject to section 7
consultation with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon, sea
turtles,when in the water, and certain marine mammals are under purview of the National Marine
Fisheries Service. If your project occurs in marine, estuarine, or coastal river systems you should
also contact the National Marine Fisheries Service, http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis
of this office at [e-mail].
03/23/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-02062   3

▪
Attachment(s):
Official Species List
03/23/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-02062   1

Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]
03/23/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-02062   2

Project Summary
Consultation Code:04EN2000-2020-SLI-0912
Event Code:04EN2000-2020-E-02062
Project Name:St Albans Mixed Use Development
Project Type:DEVELOPMENT
Project Description:Mixed use development site with utility crossing
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www.google.com/maps/place/35.83108955950175N78.62403497225014W
Counties:Wake, NC
03/23/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-02062   3

1.
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 6 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheries , as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Birds
NAME STATUS
Red-cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Endangered
Amphibians
NAME STATUS
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
Proposed
Threatened
Fishes
NAME STATUS
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528
Proposed
Endangered
1
03/23/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-02062   4

Clams
NAME STATUS
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164
Proposed
Threatened
Dwarf Wedgemussel Alasmidonta heterodon
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/784
Endangered
Flowering Plants
NAME STATUS
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
Endangered
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.
NCNHDE-11687
March 23, 2020
Ashley Bentz
S&ME, Inc.
3201 Spring Forest Road
Raleigh, NC 27616
RE: St Albans Mixed Use Development
Dear Ashley Bentz:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached ‘Potential Occurrences’ table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one-mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one-mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally-listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one-mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Clean Water Management Trust Fund
easement, or Federally-listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at [e-mail] or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
St Albans Mixed Use Development
March 23, 2020
NCNHDE-11687
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic
Group
EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last
Observation
Date
Element
Occurrence
Rank
Accuracy Federal
Status
State
Status
Global
Rank
State
Rank
Dragonfly or
Damselfly
32043 Coryphaeschna ingens Regal Darner 2004-Pre H?5-Very
Low
---Significantly
Rare
G5 S2?
Mammal 9363 Condylura cristata
pop. 1
Star-nosed Mole -
Coastal Plain
population
1991 H?3-Medium ---Special
Concern
G5T2Q S2
Reptile 35528 Ophisaurus attenuatus Slender Glass Lizard 1984-05-07 H 4-Low ---Significantly
Rare
G5 S1
Reptile 39356 Ophisaurus attenuatus Slender Glass Lizard 1946-09-13 H 4-Low ---Significantly
Rare
G5 S1
Vascular Plant 38697 Cyperus virens Green Flatsedge 1897-07 H 5-Very
Low
---Significantly
Rare
Peripheral
G5 S1
Natural Areas Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Site Name Representational Rating Collective Rating
NEU/Crabtree Creek Aquatic Habitat R5 (General)C4 (Moderate)
Managed Areas Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type
City of Raleigh Open Space City of Raleigh Local Government
City of Raleigh Open Space - Drewry Hills Park City of Raleigh Local Government
City of Raleigh Open Space - Kiwanis Park City of Raleigh Local Government
City of Raleigh Open Space - Eastgate
Neighborhood Center
City of Raleigh Local Government
City of Raleigh Open Space - Fallon Park City of Raleigh Local Government
City of Raleigh Easement City of Raleigh Private
City of Raleigh Greenway - Middle Crabtree Creek
Trail
City of Raleigh Local Government
City of Raleigh Easement City of Raleigh Private
City of Raleigh Open Space - FEMA HMGP Phase 1-1 City of Raleigh Local Government
City of Raleigh Greenway - Middle Crabtree Creek
Trail
City of Raleigh Local Government
Page 2 of 4
Managed Areas Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type
City of Raleigh Greenway City of Raleigh Local Government
City of Raleigh Open Space City of Raleigh Local Government
City of Raleigh Open Space - FEMA HMGP Phase 1-2 City of Raleigh Local Government
City of Raleigh Open Space - FEMA HMGP Phase 3-1 City of Raleigh Local Government
City of Raleigh Greenway City of Raleigh Local Government
City of Raleigh Open Space - FEMA HMGP Phase 1-6 City of Raleigh Local Government
City of Raleigh Open Space City of Raleigh Local Government
City of Raleigh Open Space - FEMA HMGP Phase 1-9 City of Raleigh Local Government
City of Raleigh Open Space - FEMA HMGP Phase
3-2
City of Raleigh Local Government
City of Raleigh Open Space City of Raleigh Local Government
City of Raleigh Open Space City of Raleigh Local Government
City of Raleigh Open Space City of Raleigh Local Government
City of Raleigh Open Space City of Raleigh Local Government
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/content/help. Data query generated on March 23, 2020; source: NCNHP, Q1 Jan 2020.
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 3 of 4
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Page 4 of 4