20200445 Ver 1_BR0035_JDpackage_20200403

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: NCDOT; ATTN: Jason Dilday, 1598 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Moore City: Whispering Pine
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 35.252292 Long.:-79.411868
Universal Transverse Mercator: 17
Name of nearest waterbody: Nicks Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
Latitude
Longitude
Estimated amount
Type of aquatic
Geographic authority
number
(decimal
(decimal
of aquatic resource
resource (i.e., wetland
to which the aquatic
degrees)
degrees)
in review area
vs. non -wetland
resource "may be"
(acreage and linear
waters)
subject (i.e., Section
feet, if applicable)
404 or Section 10/404)
Nicks Creek
35.253347
-79.412724
261 linear feet
non -wetland
Section 404
SA
35.252176
-79.412252
45 linear feet
non -wetland
Section 404
WA
35.252389
-79.411781
0.05 acre
wetland
Section 404
W B
35.253303
-79.412417
0.01 acre
wetland
Section 404
WC
35.254670
-79.412786
0.03 acre
wetland
Section 404
W D
35253917
-794M
0.02 acre
wetland
Section 404
WE
35.253126
-79.412344
0.05 acre
wetland
Section 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
❑■ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:
❑■ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
USGS NHD data.
USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:24k (Carthage Quad)
❑ Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
State/local wetland inventory map(s):
FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑■ Photographs: ❑■ Aerial (Name & Date): NC OneMap
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
Digitally signed by Jason
Dilday
Jason DildayDate: 2019.12.0513:35:42
-05,00,
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
' Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

r4,
Cop right:© 2013 ataonal Ge•graphic Society, i-cubed NC�, jOne'Ma
Center for Geog aph c Information and Analysis, NC 911 Bo Ord:

low
- z- NS-97058
Pi s 1
Gravel
pit
C �•w``s'-� w �
r
S�,1a3a
Legend
Project Study Area
I 1 R
NS-97210
2 �
N � NS-98200 SR-1915
CO
7950 9
1 � -
s
NS-97987 z � �' � � SR-1911
SR-1941
97040
M s GR-1936 NS-99230
a
��y, } !N O
CO
00
27
Miles#rim , `` 4
Copyright*:© 2013 National Geographic Society, -cured
WONIf
r�rtt�rl,.�ga♦�j�f+F,AMoore
County
opog.p.•

N '
1
WA
A
ti SA
D 0 L.I� a@, l Amoco ft EUlY11R ky f 9,3!�!phor,% Cles`i ill-w7
DS
- D Acw@MD, oco ad ft 0% �J.3ar C•1tatTonTFm

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: � 1� ✓ 0035 City/County: MDi7(P_ Sampling Dater
Applicant/Owner: CJ State: A) C Sampling Point:�-
Investigator(s): i a . M/I rcSav , I>Ir� �� �� Section, Township, Range: �7�
Lan0/ dform (hillslo e, terrace, etc.): Lit r55('C"? (S.WPr 1"",JLocal relief (concave, convex, none): C01C_4VC'- Slope C/- ; �
Subregion R r MLRA): I Let: �' ZSLZ-C1 x' Long: "7,11 �6 g uu�Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: a�C NGn ( f Z % S NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes V No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes L--" No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes —� No
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
El
Surface Water (Al) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
High Water Table (A2)
❑ Mari Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (131)
0 Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
I❑ -I
1�
Sediment Deposits (132)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑
Drift Deposits (133)
tL-JT
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
�LqI
lJ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑
Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑,
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
❑,
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
"
Surface Water Present? Yes
L Dlo Depth (inches): 2
Water Table Present? Yes
N/ o Depth (Inches): L
,•
t/No
I/
Saturation Present? Yes
Depth (inches): to
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Semolina Point: W t7 to -
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
50% of total cover: _
(Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
°o Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
T J That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species 9/
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: /UV / (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
otal Cover OBL species x 1 =
_ 20% of total ver: FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydro hytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01
= Tot I Cover
Problematic Hydrophytc Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: a )
1. nC�t� P _ K S
20% of total cover:
�3c> ,_r l
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2. Sri r ct 1 _
3. r ,
4. Ch ru
(� j,�
FA
0 b 40
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree- Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5.
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
6•
7.
8.
9,
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
11.
12.
f(_5 = Total Cover �y
50% of total cover: yZ, 5 5c.20% of total cover: V 7 / o
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot'siZe: )
2.
3.
4.
= Tot over Vegetation
5• Hydrophytic
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: W P -. f I -
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth
the Indicator or confirm the absence of
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color moist % Type Loc Texture Remarks
io le 5 L 56; S G Z_ 5 16,
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Gleyed Matrix
r-I
u
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
,Loamy (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 15313)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions
r❑1 Red Parent Material (TF2)
u Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
(F8)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A,153C, 153D)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes tl No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Q- —67v3 S City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: AIC. DO r State: � Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): �� �'�� i �"M��sn�,,�' �i,Section, Township, Range:
D
Landform (Z�,"r
Woope, terrace, etc.): i /�6�b� Local relief (concave, convex, none): I d'7V — Slope (%): Z- %
Subregion MLRA): T Lat: Jr-. ZSZ�7 Long: -7% • Datym:
Soil Map Unit Name: Na o 11d,201k. Z- S'` 8/NWI classification: N
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain In Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
sUM[WIA T Ur riiVUINUO — Htzacn site map
ng point locations, transects, important teatures, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
HYDROLOGY
Wetland
Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (66)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Primary
Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
❑
Surface Water (Al) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Q
High Water Table (A2)
0 Mari Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
LJ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (61)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
IL—_1I
�t
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑_
Drift Deposits (133)
tQf
u Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
0
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑
Iron Deposits (135)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
❑
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth
(Inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No = epth (inches):
/
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes No "
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: 14
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dom inanceTest worksheet:
Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: V (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
7
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
8
tal C
- over
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover:
20% of total er.
FACW species x 2 =
Sa lin /Sh b Stratum (Plot size: )
FAC species x 3 =
1
FACU species x 4 =
UPL specles x 5 =
2
3.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
4.
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
= Total Cover
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
�
A
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1. f :
6`(S
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
�iDs
2. An dio'ogo��
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. J1 Ijcps Q.r� 4cSUc S Al,. Of3L
_
Tree- Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4•
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5.
height,
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
6•
7.
than 3 In. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) y) plants, regardless
9,
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 It in
11,
height.
12.
= Total Cover
�� 50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
a
Woody Vine Strlot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover: _
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations
Hydrophytic
= To ver Vegetation
20% of total cover: Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: l
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color moist %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc
Texture Remarks
U �_
1
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letton, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains,
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solls3:
0
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
HHistic
0
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
r—I Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
'7E—I Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
u Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
.❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Q
(A8) (LRR
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Q Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
D
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Q Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
HCoast
Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA
149A,153C, 153D)
D
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No —Z
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
c%
Project/Site: �- ���� City/County: /' 0(-4e— Sampling Date: 491WE::
Applicant/Owner: O I State: � Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): �� Ak � i� 47 �►+ Section, Township, Range;
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): 4W1V55iy,7 IF Local relief (concave, convex, none): C44c4uC Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): I Let: _?1 �J • Z S3Z7 2- Long: ' 7Q y 12-5*6C1 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: BI J dgM''1 Z %v S/OegS NWI classification:
proly—
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes `--- No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes --� o
Hydric Soil Present? Yes Is the Sampled Area /
within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
EDpersely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
❑
Surface Water (Al) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
C1
High Water Table (A2)
❑ Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
9
Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (131)
Oxid(zed Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
10
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
g Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ S turation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Q
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
®
Iron Deposits (B5)
Other (Explain In Remarks)
❑ Sh Ilow Aquitard (D3)
a
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
AC -Neutral Test (D5)
❑,
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
Water Table Present? Yes
No epth (inches):
No Depth (inches):
Yes �No Depth
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes No
Saturation Present?
(inches):
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

wD/WE
VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: I,c7 8 �� LA_Z__�
r
3
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Testworksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. Li r l a /b� c 1 0 �C�l
% L 14
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAG:_ (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
7
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
8
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover: f 20% of total cover: 1,q
FACW species x 2 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 3 C)
)
FAC species x 3 =
1. IBC rS; y`6 p ti 4
�� (�
FACU species x 4 =
2
---t—
UPI.species x 5 =
3
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4'
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6'
11 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7'
✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8'
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
L = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
S• S 20% of total cover: 2 Z--
_
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10, )
'Indicators
1. Al-w d7o 4 i' i i
ZU F
of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2. G d "n r 174
7-0 _ ��6L
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree- Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
3'
4•
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
5.
6•
SaplinglShrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7,
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
8'
9.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
10.
11.
height.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: Z-0 20% of total cover: _
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
Hydrophytic
2.
3.
4.
5•
= Total Cover
Vegetation
ZNo
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL
WD/WE
Sampling Point: w kti Ive
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color moist % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks
U -Z /60 add/o4PP1
L&e �s okQ S
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sa
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
U Histosol(All)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
D 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
D Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
F] Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
�] Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
HSandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
)Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
D�t—I
Reduced Vedic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
u
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbdc Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A,153C, 153D)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

�WrETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
!-'t`" Project/Site: — 00,35 City/County: ( Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: I. Sampling Point:-
Investigator(s): i i 4 ,4Section, Township, Range: D/WE
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): k. 's- f{ C,, T2 Local ref f (concave, convex, none): CUh V �X Slope
Subregion (LRR orMLRA): t Let: ✓7, Z✓����g Long: �� • Z_ �. Datum -
Soil Map Unit Name: id S i� r/- NWI classiflcation:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
—
Are Vegetation , Sol[ or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map
„showing sampling point locations, transacts, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yesy No Is the Sampled Area /
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No V
within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (86)
ElSparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑
Surface Water (Al) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑r
High Water Table (A2)
Marl Deposits (615) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (610)
LJ
Saturation (A3)
r0
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
1L--1i
u Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
I❑ -I
L�t
Sediment Deposits (82)
❑i Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑
Drift Deposits (133)
u Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
a
Algal Mat or Crust (64)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑
Iron Deposits (65)
lJ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑,
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
❑
Water -Stained Leaves (89)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No �epth (Inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No th (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
WD WE
Sampling Point: w W L
/ Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Testworksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 3v ) % Cover S ecies Status Number of Dominant Species
�►' C..� � FAQ That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Total Cover
50% of total cover: �J 20% of total cover: _3
Sa lin /Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
2.
3.
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 13
(A)
(B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:_ (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
= Total Cover
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb Strat m (Plot size: )
1. it I �z7 027 12•-) U, Cam, i i Ltu-5
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2. j_,,jWS --_4_5 S
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
3.
4•
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5.
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 In. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
6•
7.
8.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
9.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft. tall.
10.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11,
height.
12.
�SD = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 7-5- 20% of total cover: b
Woody Vine Stratum . (Plot size: )
2.
3.
4.
5 Hydrophytic
�Total ver Vegetation ' /
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:.__ _
Present? Yes V No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers . Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

WD WE
(O W� �
SOIL
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color moist %
Color (moist) °o ape Loc
Texture Remarks
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
ZLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
0 Histosol (Al)
E] Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (Ag) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (Al 0) (LRR S)
a
Black Histic (A3)
0 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
1�3-I Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
H
D Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 cm Muck (Ag) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
D Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA
149A,153C, 153D)
D Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
2
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

Wetland Site Name
Wetland Type
NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 4.1
Rating Calculator Version 4.1
WA
Basin Wetland
Date 1/11/18
Assessor Name/Organization J Dilday NCDOT
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
YES
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N)
NO
Sub -function Ratina Summa
Function Sub -function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
NA
Sub -Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
NA
Water Quality Pathogen Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NA
Particulate Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NA
Soluble Change Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NA
Physical Change Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NA
Pollution Change Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NO
Habitat Physical Structure Condition LOW
Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW
Vegetation Composition Condition LOW
Function Ratina Summa
Function
Metrics/Notes
Rating
Hydrology
Condition
MEDIUM
Water Quality
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NO
Habitat
Conditon
LOW
Overall Wetland Rating MEDIUM

Wetland Site Name
Wetland Type
NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 4.1
Rating Calculator Version 4.1
WB/WC/WD/WE
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Date 1/11/18
Assessor Name/Organization J Dilday NCDOT
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
YES
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N)
NO
Sub -function Ratina Summa
Function
Sub -function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
LOW
Sub -Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
MEDIUM
Water Quality
Pathogen Change
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NO
Particulate Change
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NO
Soluble Change
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NO
Physical Change
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NO
Pollution Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NA
Habitat
Physical Structure
Condition
LOW
Landscape Patch Structure
Condition
LOW
Vegetation Composition
Condition
LOW
Function Ratina Summa
Function
Metrics/Notes
Rating
Hydrology
Condition
LOW
Water Quality
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NO
Habitat
Conditon
LOW
Overall Wetland Rating LOW